WEBVTT - Decentralizing the Music Industry

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg Views.

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heart podcast.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Thursday, July. Earlier this year, the pop music duo

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are known as The Chain Smokers released five thousand non

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>fungible tokens to fans for free. These n f t

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>s gave fans a one percent cut of the streaming

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>royalties from their latest album, as well as prior as

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the access to concert tickets and free merchandise. The Chain

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Smokers might not be the first musicians to experiments with

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto n f t s or the blockchain, and it's

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>unlikely they'll be the last. What are artists and musicians

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Chain Smokers hoping to achieve with these moves

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and how are fans responding? In this episode, you'll hear

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Reports A Hannah Miller and from Justin Blom,

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Royal, a decentralized music startup. What if

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the public could actually owns in their favorite artist music.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>My DJ name is Blow, which is also my last name.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Than Yeah, that's Justin Blow a K A three law

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a K. The CEO of Royal Royals the Stars up.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>That's trying to give fans more access and more investment

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in the bats they love. His company partnered with

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the chain Smokers to give their fans a stake in

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>their success, they say, by creating and offering up n

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>f T s that allow that share of streaming ownership.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin joins me now, Justin, thank you so much for

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us today. Awesome, thank you for having me. Can

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you tell me a little bit more about the history

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of Royal Yeah, absolutely so. I was really interested in

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of crypto music about for the past eight

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>years now, and I've been experimenting with lots of different things.

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Did some of my first early n f T experiments

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in and Royal is kind of just the amalgam of

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>different manifestations that I've that I've thought about over the

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>past call it eight years, um in ways to disintermediate

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>music and give artists more power, give fans financial upside

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in an artist success. Now, when you say this intermediate music,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what exactly do you mean. I think a lot of

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>people are stuck in the illusion that music doesn't make money.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You've seen that in the media, narrative quite often um

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when in reality music generates quite a bit of money,

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>especially on streaming, which makes about of all recorded music income.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just the people who are capturing that income are

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>our institutions and the institutions that have owned rights over

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>years and years and years and years of time, decades

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of time. So what we think about it, Royal is

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what what if the world was a bit different? What

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>if the public could actually own rights in their favorite

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>artist music, so that you have a combination of labels

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>art and fans co owning songs that they love. So

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>when I hear you say the folks who have been

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>benefiting are like the big institutions Spotify share crisis tanked

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. They're facing stiff competition from Apple

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Music is the world's most valuable company, pivots more aggressively

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>towards kind of the ecosystem of services. But look for Spotify,

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the most important asset is artists. So if we see

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>more complaints coming forward, that could be a major problem

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for the streaming service. But what about the musicians themselves, Like,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>how does Royal help the musicians or does Royal help

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the musicians in that kind of framework? Absolutely I think

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the most important way Royal helps musicians, and this is

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, leaning a little bit into my

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>background as a musician, is that with blockchains and immutable,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>transparent data, any artists can actually see who owns their

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>tokens and interact with those particular people. In the regular

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>world with Spotify and with you know ticket you know Ticketmaster,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>all these different services, artists don't actually participate in any

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of the data collection that they helped generate. So for

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>music specifically, I might have done over a billion streams,

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea who my top listeners are. For ticketing,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I might have sold over millions of tickets

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in my career, and I have no idea who those

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>people are. I don't have the data. So what's really

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting about block chains is for for tokens, artists can

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>actually identify their audiences and communicate with them in a

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>way more efficient way. I want to pick up on

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>something you said. They're about transparency. I don't know of

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>anyone who would ever describe the music industry is like

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a paragon of transparency or probably not, you know, clarity

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about how things work. What has been the reception of

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>this fairly radical idea. Um, you know, with folks that

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you've been working with and talking to, you know, we're

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lucky that it's been so insanely positive, both but both

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on the kind of artist side and the existing the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>existing industry player side. I think everybody's really excited about

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the technology and they're curious how it might benefit their

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>their incentives and their ends. Um. Realistically, right, having a

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>more transparent, immutable data structure for music is probably good

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for all parties, right, And so the world is just

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of beginning to explore how it might apply to

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their specific niche of music. And you know, while Royal

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>does focus specifically on artists, we believe in a future

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>world where people could co own all types of IP. Now,

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in this potential future world where you know, there's multiple

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>different models, Different people could be owners, people could be producers,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know that more traditional but of course also

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>forward looking sense of the term. This perhaps assumes that

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>n f t s as an element of crypto, like

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have legs, right, that people are going to continue to

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be interested in this. We are talking right now in

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a period when you know, n f t s have

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>had a bit of a challenging run, much like pretty

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>much every other asset class in crypto. Once read hot

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>n f T s are now cooling off a bit.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The secondary market for the majority of people's paintings today

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is down from the peak, as is most an f

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>T art. What is it about the model that you're

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>proposing that works despite other pressures in the market, or

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>does this work despite other propos in the market. That's great, Absolutely,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a wonderful question. I think at Royal

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we've we've never really considered ourselves an n f T platform.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We consider ourselves a platform that enables anyone to invest

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in music, and we just so happened to use crypto

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>rails to make that possible. We just so happened to

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>use the technology behind non lungerible tokens to make that possible,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because it actually becomes more efficient, um for payouts, for transparency,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for all the other kind of reasons that we've we've

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>briefly touched on in the past. I think that you

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>know the concept, no matter what you apply crypto too,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it has to solve the real world problem. UM. A

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people kind of leverage the technology and talk

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about it in the sense of, you know, whether it's

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>investable or not UM. Even even aboard ape right, which

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is arguably one of the most well known type of

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>n f T s UM, the image itself is not

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the n f T right, So there's this giant misconception.

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the n f T, What the n f

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>T is a certificate of authenticity? And why are certificates

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of authenticity valuable UM for tons of reasons, right, So

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the underlying technology isn't going anywhere. I think that we

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we've all established that. I think that some of the

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>brands and the most recognizable projects will ebb and flow

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>at the times UM. But the most powerful aspect of

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it is again the ability to you know, authenticate ownership

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of digital types of assets. And that's something that we

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>really haven't seen in the past that we're going to

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of development in the future, you know,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about authenticity, verification, validation. We've had episodes

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>where we interviewed Nicola Julia, who's the CEO of so

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>rare Are, which you know provides like this kind of

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>service but for fans of fantasy sports UM and sports

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>based on real teams. We have talked about, you know,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>situations in which n f T s give people access

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to real world experiences, and that's also something that in

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the chain Smoker's concept um you'll provide it right where

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like, the owners of these tokens, and there were

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>five thousand of them, didn't only get access to streaming revenue,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they got tangible other non financial benefits. Can you talk

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about those. Yeah, I think the

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>beauty of tokens is once they exist on a blockchain,

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the issuer, whether that's an artist or a team, can

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of provide whatever benefits they want to. UM. The

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>beauty of cryptos that it's composable, it's you know, the

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>architecture of it enables anyone to build on top of it.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So you could even be another artist and still engage

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the chain smokers fans by looking at all the wallet

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>addresses that have interacted with the actual chain smoker token

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>set right, so there's it's all transparent. You can see

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone who owns it. Um. The non anonymity of chowner

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is up to the owner, right, Like they can choose

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to you know, identify themselves on the Internet, or they

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can choose to remain anonymous. But the beauty of tokens

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in general is that Once they exist, they're not going

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere and anyone can interact with them. So the idea

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of you know, creating real world utility, whether that's tickets

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or other types of social engagement, extras, exclusive content, you know,

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we're really just seeing the beginning of that development as well. Um.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, fan clubs in the past haven't always been

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the most successful model for achieving you know, additional value

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for an artist, or for a team or for a musician.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And when you begin to wrap your head around when

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>when when the public begins to wrap it's head around

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>this concept of co ownership, the incentives are aligned in

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>such a stronger way. At the beginning, you said, you

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>know that there's this really popular misconception that there's no

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>money in music. What's another misconception that you're trying to

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>address with Royal Interesting, Yeah, I mean I think another

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>misconception is maybe more along the lines of like what

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the technology is capable of? Um at Royal were we

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>try to be realistic in that, you know, the tech

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>is still developing and there are a lot of challenges

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as we go. Um, so we we really attempt to

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>make it as easy as possible for a user to

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>get engaged. People have the misconception that crypto is really

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>hard and difficult, and you know, it's easy to get hacked,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>things could be a scam, etcetera. You know, we've heard

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>that over and over again in the media and at Royal.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>What we do is quite simple. We keep it very familiar,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so you can log in with an email and password,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can pay with a credit card, and we

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do that in order to show people how easy it

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is to get engaged in the crypto ecosystem without even

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing that it's crypto. So I would say those are

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the two big conceptions that we challenge. The last question,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>what's your DJ name? My DJ name is blow, which

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is also my last name. There's a three in in

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>my DJ name. I was in college and that was

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we all did that. It was the whole thing. Oh yeah, excellent. Well,

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate you

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>taking the time. Thank you. Next up, Bloomberg reporter Hannah

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller joins me for a look at how n f

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>T s are reshaping the relationship between artists and their fans. So,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>what exactly are artists like the Chain Smokers and platforms

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like Royal hoping to achieve by giving fans a piece

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of ownership in the band's success, and how are fans responding.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now for more on this is Bloomberg reporter

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Miller. Hannah, you are back. Welcome. Always great to

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>have you on the pod. Hi, thanks for having me today.

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about n f T s, which

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like we talked about n f

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>T s a lot, and specifically, what I want to

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>hear from you is about the story that you wrote

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Chain Smokers. Now, I confess I had not

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly listened to any of their music before I read

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>your story, so I had to go and study up

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>before we recorded this episode. But now that I have,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and clearly you have, what is it that the Chain

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Smokers have been up to in the block chain space? Yeah, well,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they released a new album called so Far, So Good,

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and basically this album was connected to an n f

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>T where if you own this n f T held

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this n f T, you would get a very small

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sliver of the audio streaming royalties from the album, which

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was pretty cool. And it was not really that surprising

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that it was the Chain Smokers doing this, because they

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are totally into crypto. They're totally into web three. They

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>actually have a venture fund called Mantis that has made

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>some pretty big investments in the space, you know, some

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>really notable names like Moon Pay, Magic, eden Um. So

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it kind of just fits overall that they would do

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>something like this with their new album fascinating. I mean,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested in the ways in which crypto when

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>venture capital and music and musicians and dj is, even

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if those musicians are cover bands emerging into what sounds

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like one conversation in the reporting of that story and

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>others that you've done, what do you think are some

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the trends that are causing all of these factors

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to converge. Yeah, I think people are constantly looking for

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of mainstream use cases for crypto, and when it

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to n f t s, like it's pretty easy

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, fun things that you can use

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>them for, whether it's art, collectibles, gaming, things like that,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and they really do fall into the category of music.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen multiple projects try to define what a

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>music n f T is. Like, there's some decentralized music

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>streaming platforms. There's platforms like Royal, which is the one

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that helped make the n f t tied to royalties

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Chain Smokers released. Um, you know, there are

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>all these different projects that are kind of trying to

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out how can we best use crypto, blockchain, n

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>f t S with music And is all of this

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>coming from the musicians, is it coming from venture capital

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is it coming from those platforms you mentioned? Like what's

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the direction of all this innovation? Yeah, it's a total mix. Um,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some pretty big names get really excited um

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about music, n f t S, music and blockchain. I'm

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking here like Snoop Dogg, Steve Aoki. Um, these are

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 1>people who have you know, created their own platforms or

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have argued for the importance of music n f t S.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you have venture capitalists jumping on board as well,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to pour a lot of money into

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>these projects. They're willing to, you know, really back something

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're kind of still figuring out what exactly the

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>best use for blockchain is in music. So a couple

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of last things before you go. When we think about blockchain,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>when we think about crypto, when we think about n

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>f t S, something we've also discussed is this this

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>tension between centralization and decentralization right where on the one hand,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got these theories that are about we're not going

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to have centralized control manifest in this space, but actually

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what you see instead is specific company specific platform, specific

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists that are very centralized and do have a

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of power. Are you seeing anything, especially in music

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and music and f t s that is looking more

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like something decentralized or are we still really dealing with

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>concentration here. Yeah, Well, part of why artists are seizing

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a pond blockchain in the music space is because they

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want to take back control of their art their music

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the music industry itself. The music industry takes

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge cut of artists streaming revenue, so something like

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized music platform would in theory allow an artist

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a more direct relationship with their fans. So

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's like a lot of the push here that they're

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of decentralizing in the sense that they're moving away

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>from the control of huge music companies and it's more

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>direct between artists and you know fan, Okay, I'm a

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fun or if I were a fun and I like

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the chain smokas the chains more cause has a decentralized platform. Maybe.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm also a fan of the Winklevy cover band. They

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have a decentralized platform. I want to listen to Snoop,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He's on a different decentralized platform. How is that not

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>annoying for me as a fan having to do all

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of these work to listen to them. Yeah, because we're

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>still trying to figure out which is going to be

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest decentralized music streaming platform. There are some names

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>out there like Audious is one. I think it's pretty interesting,

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's gonna be quite the battle to get

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>people to consolidate on one platform and also to actually

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>get artists on board with blockchain. While you have people

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like Snoop Dogg and Steve Aoki really cheering this on

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto and blockchain n f t S, there's still scary

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>concepts to a lot of people. Crypto is still a

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>very complex thing that a music artist might not even

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get into. So it's gonna be I think,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>an uphill battle to try and get people to come

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>over and really embrace this technology. Thank you, Hannah. You

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>can find more of Hannah's reporting on the Bloomberg terminal

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter. She's at h

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>G Miller nine. On the next episode of Bloomberg Crypto,

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear from two of our Crypto editors for our

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Editors Roundtable tomorrow. I'll be joined by Anna Errera in

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>London and Philip lager Kransa in Zurich. We'll talk through

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this week's highs lows, the biggest stories of the week,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and answer any questions folks have sent in. I'm Stacy

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Marie Ishmael and this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows from

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Email your questions, comments

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>net and you'll find us on Twitter at Crypto. The

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky very Galina. Our

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producer is Mohammed Peru.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Our producer is Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers of Zanam Sidehi,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Thaie Butler and Moses and um Desta wonder At is

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>our engineer original music by Leo Sidron. Special thanks to

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Justin Blow for his track Worst Case