WEBVTT - The 2024 All-Sleeper Team (EP. 770)

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. It is me Joey p joe.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Pisapia, and today we've got another all star team for

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you today it's the All Sleeper Team for twenty twenty four.

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Get excited, everybody, It's me, it's the Welsh, it's you,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and everybody has a different definition of sleeper. And to me, Welsh,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>when I think about sleepers, I just think about guys who.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Are being undervalued.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes it's young players, but sometimes it's also veterans

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>who continue to produce and yet still nobody wants them

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>because they're another year older. But sometimes these veterans can

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>continue to be steady productive players in your fantasy lineup.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a definition of sleeper before we kick

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>things off with our All Sleeper Team of twenty twenty four.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's kind of like, uh, because there's breakouts

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>and there's sleepers and rebounds and blah blah blah. They're

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they're all in the same family. So sleepers, in my

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>mind are players that are being taught about less than

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Because we just did the Breakouts episode and that episode

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>is designed these players are ready to take this next step,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and they're usially not like in the higher level, I

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>do think sleepers can still be Like there could be

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy that's ranked like fifty if I think he

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>can be the first overall player. Michael Harris. Michael Harris

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>isn't a sleeper technically.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>No, but in the depth be a sleeper of the

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>first No.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>No, but in my definition of like, if that's a

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>guy that's like a third rounder, that I can be

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>a first rounder, Like, that's kind of that undervat. So

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>it comes back to your undervalued conversation. My definition in

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>this episode is players that get talked about less because

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 3>the community is so much bigger, there's so many more

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 3>people in voices, it's hard to find sleepers and deeper.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>So I'm playing these deeper names because I do believe

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>there's handfuls of players that are still in the top

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>one hundred that are sleepers by being undervalued. But these

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>are much further down. These are further down guys we're

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>sleeping on that in some cases aren't really being drafted,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>could then end up jumping in and being valuable starters

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>across the board. So I will kind of join you

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in all all that stupid crap. I just said in

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's like it's undervalued. These are undervalued players discussed.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Sleep is the key for you.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I like it when you said under discussed because I

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>think you know, there's certain guys we've talked about so much.

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've talked about the Reagans and the Michael

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Kings and the Kaminaro, like, we've.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Talked about those guys, and we love those guys.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's important to start to give some

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>love to some players that nobody's talking about, or maybe

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>people are tired of talking about, or even worse. Take

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>for granted, and I'm looking at just so happens. All

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of mine are ADP's outside of the top two hundred

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 2>save one who's at one ninety nine currently, So I'm

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about guys that are buried. I'm talking about this

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is towards the end of your drafts. So again for sleepers,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a mixture. For me, and I'm gonna start here

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>with our catcher, and for me, it's Mitch Garver, who

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think people are paying enough attention to now

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 2>when you look at fangrafts, he is slated to hit

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 2>four in this lineup. He qualifies at catcher, but he's

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>also going to DA so you're gonna get more at

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>bats out of Mitch Garver. Mitch Garver last year had

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a pretty solid season. He's still going to give you power,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>which I think that's something that is forgotten too much.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 2>If you're in deeper leagues and you're looking for somebody

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>with RBI potential, somebody with power potential, or in the

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>two catcher league, Mitch.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Garver becomes really intriguing.

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>He is right now currently the fifteenth catcher going off

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the board and Welsh I don't think we're taking enough

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>into account his position in the batting order, which means

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 2>so much. He's got Horidy Polanco and Julio Rodriguez hitting

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>in front of him. Those guys are going to be

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 2>on base. He's gonna have RBI opportunities. I think Mitch

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Garver is one of these guys that you could take

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>as a deeper league utility guy. I think he's a

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>great bench bat. I think he's a great deeper league

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>catcher or in a two catcher league. Mitch Garver is

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>somebody you should pay attention to because, like I said,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>he is going to qualify there and He's going to

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>get at bats in the middle of that Seattle order,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think Seattle is going to be challenging for

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that West this year.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They're my pick to win it.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I know that's not always the popular pick, but I

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>think from the board right now on the betting side,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a really intriguing one. Who is your catcher that

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you think is in your all sleeper team this year?

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want to point out I probably would have

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>picked Garver here of all the position I was also say,

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>all the positions that we're gonna talk about. I do

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>think the line between breakout and sleeper and like favorite

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>player to draft, they're really close in this because, as

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I've said to a lot of people, I like late catchers.

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't want any of the guys on the top end.

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 3>So could I have picked Gabby Moreno here, Yeah, I

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>put him in the all breakout team because I think

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>he's going to take a next step one of your

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>guys Logan, Ohoppy, I could have put him here as well. Garb.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I'd breakout because I think he showed you

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>enough last year where you're like, Okay, you give this

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 2>guy one hundred and you know twenty five games, he's

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 2>gonna hit thirty home runs, like that's a breakout.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>But he's also a sleeper at catcher.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen he can be You're right at sleeper at catcher.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 2>He's still technically a sleeper as well. But you got

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>another name.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>On this, yeah, yeah, yeah. So I was just kind

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of lining all those up because I think the line

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>is very thin. The guy that I picked is the

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>ninth adyp catcher, so it's not too too far down there.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 3>It's Wilson Catreras. And one of the reasons behind putting

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Wilson Contreras there is constant twenty three straight seasons now,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>he has put up at least twenty homers, gets a

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 3>handful of stolen bases. Batting average is actually ticked up

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>over the last three years. I think that Cardinal team

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>is gonna kind of rock back out this year this

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.239
<v Speaker 3>coming year. His XBA was the highest of his career

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>this past year, two seventy nine versus his two sixty

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>four batting average. Hard hit numbers are pretty solid, almost

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>forty seven percent hard hit Baseball Savant. You go and

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 3>look outside of his chase rate, you're kind of top

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty percentile and ex wOBA X slugging in a really

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>good offensive lineup that I think, like I said, Aeronaudo

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Goldie are going to have a bounce back and at

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 3>catcher nine. Really the sleeper aspect of this is I

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think anybody talks about him. People talk more about

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>his brother. People focus on the top end. I think

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Catres can easily be a top five closer or catcher,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think he definitely defines the high end offensive

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>upside that I want from catcher. So Gabby Marino breaks out,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Ohapi breaks out, Garver is killer, but Contreris can be

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 3>a top five catcher easy with those offensive stats, and

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>that is why we are sleeping on him and he's

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>my all catcher sleeper.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break in the action and tell

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you about underdog fantasy. MLB draft season is here, and

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the easiest.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Place to play fantasy baseball is it underdog Fantasy. We've

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>already been active in their best ball FORMATT fantasy drafts,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>where you draft your team over twenty rounds at the

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>best score from your team that you drafted becomes your

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>score for each week in the MLB season. Drafts are

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 2>constantly filling each and every day, So go to Underdog

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy right now and draft in the Dinger for your

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>share for seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in prizes,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>with first place being a cool one hundred k. It's

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 2>only ten dollars a draft, and the tournament closes on

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>opening Day, March twenty eighth, So jump in now, sign

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 2>up for Underdog and use that promo code f p

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>MLB that's FP MLB to get your first deposit match

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>up to one hundred dollars. That's ten free Dinger drafts,

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>and that promo code is fp MLB. And join the

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Underdog today and get drafting in the upcoming MLB season.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And now back to the action. All right, who is

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>sleeping on at first base?

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Welsh?

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Because your name is somebody that I just took in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>our Underdog draft. I think with all the new rookies,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>were kind of leaving him out of a lot of discussions.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about your selection.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you were saying like all your sleepers are

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 3>outside the top two hundred. Contrast is technically because of

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the NFPC, I have two other players that are inside

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the top two hundred that I'm designing as sleepers. This

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>is one of them Christian incarnacion strand huge hard hit

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>numbers this past year average one to eleven almost essentially

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>one to twelve ev, which is killer. Over ten percent

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>barrel rate, which is great, almost a fifty percent hard

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 3>hit rate which is phenomenal, forty eight point four percent.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>And let's go back to the batting average stuff. His

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>expected batting average XBA it was the same as his

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>batting average which was two seventy. So their strikeout issues.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>But what does he do in my book, hits the

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 3>ball really hard. He also barrels the ball, he gets

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>it in the air. And now he's got more opportunity

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>with the Nuelvie Marte situation in the best hitting ballpark

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>in baseball, best ballpark factors, So now we're less worried

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>about any weird playing time stuff. He's going to be

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 3>handed this first base job. So why is he a sleeper?

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Because he is being massively undervalued, which could have been

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>a big piece because of this weird situation with too

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>many players, and this might start to change. But at

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 3>one fifty seven and ADP the nineteenth first baseman on

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the Fantasy pros, ADP, he's a sleeper he's the top

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 3>one hundred bat Christian and Carnelcion Strand. I love Tristan Kassis.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>He's my all breakout team. I all whatever, I want,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 3>every share of him. Strand could put up top ten

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 3>catcher numbers this year and he's almost going into the

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 3>first base numbers.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You mean first base?

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, first base. I'm catcher closer.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>You tried to have a catcher close and now you're

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like catcher.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 3>Closer is as an enunciation thing between it. I screwed

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>up all the time. I don't know how I turned

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>him into a catcher. The good thing is he's got

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 3>a position. It's first base. Those power numbers are real

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>and there's a thirty home run potential, uh with Cincinnati

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 3>with all of that playing time. So I think Strand

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 3>we have been sleeping on him, and we might not

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>be so sleepy anymore because of the Nouelvie Marte situation.

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>But he's my pick for the all sleeper first baseman.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got one from Cincinnati.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And also, you know, if you watch the show last week,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 2>we did the breakout Team and I was talking about

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Michael Garcia Thurbe. I was also talking about Nuevee Marte.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>That was my main guy.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 2>And of course the pd suspension came like hours later

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>after we finished that show, of course, but because of

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that same suspension, I've got another guy in Cincinnati who

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna get more playing time for sure. Now it's

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>johnmer Candelario of the Cincinnati Rights. Last year, coming off

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a season where he had twenty two homers the RBI

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 2>seventy runs, he say, okay, well, that's not really exciting,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>but you know what, it's exciting enough when you're hitting

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of his order in a good offensive ballpark,

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>on a good offensive team, and in those mixed leagues,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>those deeper leagues where you're looking for help in your

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>corner spots. He qualifies at first, he qualifies a third.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 2>The dual eligibility is great. I'm putting him here at

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 2>first base on this team because, again, middle of the order.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I keep coming back to how important lineup placement is

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>in fantasy and right now, Strand is looking like he

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>could be hitting eighth according to Fangrafts. That's where he's projected.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>Candelario hitting cleanup right now. Now, that could flip flop

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>by May. But at the same time. I think you

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>have to pay attention to Candelaria. He is a player

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think gets enough credit. Another guy too,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>He qualifies at second base. He qualifies a couple of

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>places as a Brandon Drury of the Los Angeles Angels.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>He is the twenty second second baseman going off the

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>board two twenty and ADP currently and this is another

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>one Welsh. I just don't get it. I keep looking

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>around and I keep saying to myself, why does no

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>one want Brandon Drury qualifies at first qualifies a second

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>two straight of twenty six or more homers, twenty eight

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>homers in twenty twenty two, twenty six last year. Again,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I understand the runs and RBI fell short a little bit,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 2>maybe have expectations, especially the runs last year, down from

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven to sixty seven, but he's still at two

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty in both of those. I'm looking at just the

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>profile of this player, and I think, because people are

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>so sour on the Angels, and rightfully so, that his

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>ADP has been suppressed further than it should be, because

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 2>if you're just talking about a projectability of a twenty

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 2>eighty eighty player, and that's what he is with a

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>two to sixty batting average. I think that's better than

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>two twenty at eightp I just think that's far more valuable.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>You know who the player is. I understand that first year,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe you weren't buying all the power, you weren't buying everything.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 2>But when he basically repeated it year over year, what

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>do you have to lose with this player?

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Nothing.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we've done one show where we talked

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>about him. I've started drafting him. I drafted him in

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 2>the raz Slam. I drafted him in a couple other

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>best ball situations. We just did the Underdog Draft. I

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 2>drafted him there too. He's going late, he's got pop,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 2>he's got at bats. To me, this is another player

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to lock in terms of batting order. Also,

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 2>that's another thing where okay, where's he gonna hit in

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the order. We know Trout's gonna be, you know, towards

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the top of the order, but right now he is

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 2>slated to hit sixth in this batting order.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good situation there.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Rendome is never healthy, so he could easily flip

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>into that four or five spot without a doubt.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's my guy's second. Okay, so Drury is the

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>guy for me.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 2>Welsh, You've got another guy at second base on your list,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>also on the same Angel squad.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna stay with it. It was funny. I actually had

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 3>a Bill smile when you when you put dry on

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>here and you said Drury because I'm going on that

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>other side with Luis Ringifo as a super super deep

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 3>sleeper here two sixty six ADP right now, as far

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 3>as second base goes, he's ranked twenty eighth on the

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy pros ADP when you look at it now, numbers

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 3>last year pretty solid. He's he increased his barrel percentage

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 3>career high barrel percentage into the sevens. His hard hit

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>rate continues to tick up. It was actually a career

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 3>high thirty six point nine percent. But the guy at

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>LEAs sits around that two fifty batting average marker does

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 3>not strike out a whole bunch. We've seen some power

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>seventeen and sixteen homers respectively. He's also hit the same

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 3>batting average two straight years. But the talking about him

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 3>leading off, and that's something that I really know pun

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>intended to our show. That's something that I really like

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>if he's going to be able to lead off, even

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>if it's in a split situation, if it's like him

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>and then Shan, well, if they're going to go back

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>between that, it's going to create run opportunities. Everything that

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>you just said about Brandon Drury lives with Rin Gifo

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>as well. He's probably going to score more runs than

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 3>he is RBI batting average anywhere from the two fifty

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 3>to two seventy range. He's going to steal some bases,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 3>we might get into double digits with more opportunities, and

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 3>he qualifies at a lot of different spots. So he's

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of one of those super utility markers. So Luis

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 3>ring Guifo is going to be my sleeper second baseman.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Now I mentioned this name on the Breakout Show, and

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>you've carried him over to the sleeper list because I

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>think it's a great spot. So with third base, as

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>a guy in Kansas City who who might be flying

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to the top of the batting order because he's having

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>such a good spring. We talked about him last week,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Michael Garcia, So Walsha, I want you to talk about

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>him some more because this is a player that I

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of, you know, was alluding to maybe there's a

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>breakout there.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Not the biggest slugger.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 2>You look at the minor league numbers, you know, not

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of power there, but maybe there's a little

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>bit more pop. Maybe again the run score, the stolen bases,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe all that is enough here if he makes enough

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 2>contact to go from the nine hole to the one hole,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and that would be huge for his fantasy value coming

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the gate and opening day.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I want to point out too that one

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent was putting Candelari on this list. You got Candelario,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 3>this was my third base guy. You already talked about him,

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>but he is a one thousand percent all sleeper team guy.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But the other guy that was floating around, like you said,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>was Michael Garcia. It's not a big power play and

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 3>sometimes playing like out of traditional stats. Bagman and I

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>did this episode on ITL about a month or month

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half ago where it was like what do

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>you need out of your positions, Like what are the

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 3>average stats of the starters you need? And third base,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Harry's a lot of big power. So if you're gonna

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>take perceivably if he was gonna be like your starter,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>you're missing a lot of power and you're gonna have

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>to make up in other spots. That marker goes down

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 3>when you start to look at a player that you

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 3>can put for your middle or corneringfield. And that's a

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 3>cool thing about Michael Garcia is he could qualify at

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 3>third and short in some places. ADP's around two point

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty big hard hit number last year fifty point six percent,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and he had over four hundred and sixty at bats,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's nothing to just scoff at. Problem is he

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 3>hasn't gotten the ball in the air. It was around

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 3>a four percent barrel percentage. But he doesn't strike out.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 3>He walks some and he steals tons of bases. He's

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 3>stole twenty three this past year. I've seen him a

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 3>bunch in camp. Looks like he's gotten bigger over at

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Royals camp. If he is leading off, there's run arby

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 3>run opportunities. There are tons of stolen base opportunities that

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>you're getting out of position. If that power can come up,

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>kel Garcia could be a low key CJ. Abrams this year.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 3>If he can get to twelve to fifteen homers, Yeah,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 3>and he could push thirty stolen bases and you could

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>have that at third. Michael Garcia is one of my

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 3>big sleepers, and we're putting him here at third base.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>He's projected already on fangrafts to lead off. Now that

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>was not the case last week when we talked about him.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So there's you look at some of the spring training lineups,

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>keep looking at where Garcia is hitting when you get

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>into the next week or so spring training, as Welsh

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>alluded to, as a player who's making a step up.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>And he is so cheap right now, I mean two

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 2>forty seven, Welsh, that's just absurd.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>And it's it's late stolen bases, and it's late stolen

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>bases just to throw out. So it's like you, you know,

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 3>he qualifies in a couple of different spots.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He's cheap.

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 4>You're trying to chase your stolen bases. This is the

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 4>guy to chase. My guy is somebody that's been around forever. Literally,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 4>he's one hundred and forty two years old. He's being

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 4>drafted outside the top two hundred. He's at two to two.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 4>He's a twenty first third baseman being selected. And I

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 4>get it, you're not excited about drafting Justin Turner.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Okay, last year, what did he do?

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>He at two seventy six, eighty six runs, ninety six

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty three homers. He played one hundred and forty six games,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 2>which is great. I know in twenty two he only

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 2>played one hundred and twenty eight, but he did play

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty one and twenty twenty one. So

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>when you're drafting Justin Turner, you have to realize you're

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>probably at best getting some around one hundred and thirty games,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>like that's kind of what your peak is. But he

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>continues to show you that he's still gonna probably drop

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty bombs and there he's gonna drive in runs.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And guess what.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Guess where he's hitting Welsh in the order for the

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays this year. He's slated to hit cleanup. Now,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I've just given you four straight guys being drafted outside

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the top two hundred who are hitting clean up for

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>their respective teams. Mitch Garver, Candelario, Drury and Turner. Are

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>they the most exciting guys on the planet? No? Are

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>they going to be productive if they stay in that

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 2>cleanup spot? Yeah, they are outside the top two hundred.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 2>To me, Welsh, it's a win. People are just bored.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>They're concerned with the age, and I get it, but

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>he is still a live bat. You look at the

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 2>second half of the year, the stats are still there.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 2>All he does is hit the baseball. That's basically all

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>he's done his entire career. After being a utility player

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 2>for the Mets, and of course only the Mets. Could

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>I get a guy so wrong, like Justin Turner, and

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>then he goes on to have a great career and

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>hits twenty home runs and hits two eighty five every year,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 2>only the Mets. Let's switch gears to shortstop. Here Welsh

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and my guy shortstop. I'm excited about. He's turning just

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. His exit velo this spring has been unbelievable.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>He's had a couple balls over one hundred. Ezekiel Tovar,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>who had some great numbers in the minor leagues, very

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>young players. Still, he got exposed last year at the

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>major league level too much swing and miss. He has

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 2>worked his butt off. You could see also physically a

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>little different this year, a little bigger in the lower

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>half in terms of the leg size, so you see

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 2>like he's getting more drive on the baseball.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So far, he looks really good. He is crushed minor

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>league pitching.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>He got exposed a little bit, and that happens sometimes

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>with young players. But as excited as I was about

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Tovar last year, I'm still excited about him this year.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like the bloom is off the rows.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's moved on to the next thing and the next thing,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and I have not. I'm gonna give this guy a

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit more time. Why because he also plays in Colorado. Folks,

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>At any point, you know, Colorado is a great place

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to play. So if he can get right trim down

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the strikeouts a little bit. So far the spring things

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 2>have gone really well for him. I had an eighth

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 2>keeper in my home league. He was the last guy

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 2>I kept because it was a good price, and I

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know what, let me see what age

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty two season brings for a guy who's playing shortstop

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>for the Rockies. And again, you look back at the

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 2>minor league track record, this was a player that showed

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you some elite offensive potential. So to me, this is

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a player that we've forgotten about and we shouldn't have.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 2>And til Var should be a guy on your radar

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 2>going at two oh five, the twenty first shortstop Welsh,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>where are you going for shortstop for your all sleeper team?

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love yours. I think like if you were

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 3>literally drafting, if we were like drafting the all sleepers,

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 3>like he would be the quintessential sleeper shortstop. This year,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm going deeper and I don't remember. Let me take

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a look at it. This might be one of the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>deepest guys here.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is outside of three hundred baby.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Three seventeen shortstop thirty really one of my favorite guys,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 3>especially in deeper leagues. To take zach Netto, we're going

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 3>back to the Angels. You're just looking for opportunities. Now.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Where he's hitting in the lineup might be a problem.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>There was a time where they even talked about maybe

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>hitting him higher in and leading off. Currently he's setting

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>at nine, So those are going to kind of backtrack

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. But let me read off this ATC

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>projections on zach Netto. So remember this is the number

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 3>nine hitter outside of the three hundreds ATC two forty

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 3>eight eighteen homers, nine stolen bases in five hundred and

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>thirty four played appearances. It's one hundred and thirty games.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to push that up to one

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty games in a full season, that's a

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten guy probably into the seventies and runs bat

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>x has. I'm hitting two point fifty one, eighteen homers,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 3>seven stolen bases. Playing time is still down. Neto's one

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of those guys forty percent hard hit rate, barrel percentage

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 3>almost into the double digits at eight point eight. That's

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a great thing to see for like a young shortstop,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen this power grow. I think Nedo is

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the most undervalued shortstops, especially for the counting stats.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Twenty ten isn't just something we throw away. We're talking

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 3>about that earlier twenty ten out of that middle infield.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>He's more of a traditional middle infielder. You're not gonna

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>draft him as a shortstop, but at the end of

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the day, he might be able to put up top

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>fifteen shortstop numbers, maybe even a little bit higher, especially

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 3>if he moves higher in that lineup. But the power

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 3>is becoming real. It's all about contact. He's kind of

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>like an Anthony Volpi. He just doesn't steal as much.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Netto's trending up. He's one of my sleepers, trying to

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>draft him wherever I can.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, these are two guys in Neto and Tovar

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that we were all excited about last year, young players

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>coming up, and just because it didn't hit the ground

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 2>running right away does not mean that you throw them away,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>not at this age, not the opportunity, and not the

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>fact that they're both gonna be starters and really no

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>ways good well.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Especially you know, it's a weird thing too, and I

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 3>know this, like we always do this thing, but like

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 3>there's guys at Carlos Korea that are sitting out there.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 3>We know exactly what we're getting from Carlos Kre and

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to down talk it.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Seventy five games, Yeah, well you're.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Gonna get twenty homers, you know, seventy five, seventy five

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah. But it's like there's no stolen base upside.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Neto can outperform Carlos Korea just by playing throughout the year.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there's many games.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, there's a toll.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Faver opportunity that Tovar can do the same thing.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jeremy Payannia, other ones these are guy Jeremy Paynea

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Carlos career. Going ahead of both of these guys, I

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 3>think Nedo can easily overpass them statistically. Tovar is already

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of like designed to be there.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>These shortstops I think were the big easy ones for

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>us to pick.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, My outfielders might have been a little easy here.

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>In fact, my guy was at one ninety nine. The

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>first one gonna talk about is Jared Durant, who I

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>know Welsh has talked about him a lot.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I would have talked about him today.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Outside of but he was already a your breakouts. Yeah,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>so like you can't be the breakout in the sleeper

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>like I mean that maybe it can be.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I'm with you. I'm I'm holding

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hands with you.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 2>On the Jared Duran thing because over one hundred and

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>two games last year, Duran showed you that if he

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 2>plays a full season, he is a potential fifteen thirty guy.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>And he hit for two to ninety five batting average,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>So the batting average is going to be there. So

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 2>this is potentially a five category player that you're getting

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>around pick two hundred in the outfield and outfield is tough.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>It is not great. It's funny Welsh. As I'm looking

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 2>at this, we just did our underdog draft right If

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 2>you want to see that, go check it out.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>We're doing a best Ball draft on Underdog on one

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the shows.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>We just record him, Tovar Drury, and Jared Durant all

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 2>on that roster, all being undervalued and best Ball undervalued

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 2>in regular drafts too.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>If you tell me, this is.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 2>A player that's gonna score one hundred runs and is

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>going to hit at the top of the order for

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox and is going to be a potential

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 2>player that's gonna give you a fifteen thirty and a

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>high batting average. Why the hell is he being drafted

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>so late? I just don't understand it. So for me,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this is another player that I'm all in on, and

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 2>another guy too, especially in points leagues, Jung Hulee of

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the San Francisco Giants at two twelve. To me, this

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 2>is a guy who could challenge for the batting title again,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>just like Duran hitting at the top of the order.

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So this is a player that you want pieces of,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you want to be in on Lee.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be hitting at the very top of

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco order.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna have run potential, batting average potential, he's got

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>some pop.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that the greatest home ballpark?

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 2>But I think it offsets a little bit. At the

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 2>same time, I think the unknown factor with Lee is

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 2>scaring some people off, and I don't think it should.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 2>When you watch this guy play and you watch him

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in spring, he's flashing some power in the spring so far.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 2>This is one of these guys where spring training matters

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>as well as we always say this, like spring training

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter except for the guys that it matters for,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and Lee's one of these guys. For me, I wanted

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>to see how he's hitting some major league pitching. What

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 2>does he look like here?

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he overmatched? And the answer is no, He's not

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>overmatched at all.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 2>So Lee and Duran are two guys that are going

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 2>late in the outfield that I love. Now you've picked

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 2>two guys that are going even later, which I love,

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>one of which I need you to sell me on

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>because I'm almost there with the first one. And the

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>second one I think is one that's gonna blow a

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of people's minds. So let's talk about your two

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>sleeper outfielders for twenty four.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there have been two late outfielders. I'm targeting

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 3>every drought. There's lots of outfielders I like this year.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 3>We've talked to of done videos like Riley Green and stuff.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>When we go later. There's two guys, Jared Durant, who

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, and Jared Kelnick. So double Jay's Double j

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 3>not Jeff Jared, but Jared Durant.

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And joy Le bad country music.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 3>But Jared Kelnick. Jared Kelnick is the guy. So last season,

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Kelnick was kind of off to a you know, we

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 3>had this whole big thing. Eleven homers, threw three hundred

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.719
<v Speaker 3>at bats, hit around two point fifty. He was stealing

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a bunch eleven stolen bases in that first run. Then

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>he gets hurt, comes back power Zapp stops stealing. He

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 3>was hitting for contact. He had two eighty eight posts

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>all Star break in around sixty at bats, which I

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>think then he got hurt after that. Actually maybe because

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe I mix that up, but either way, that power

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of zapped. Batting average went away. We saw who

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Jared Kelnick was, and you're now going into a ballpark

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>where left handed hitters thrive way more. I mean he

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 3>was in Seattle, one of the worst ballpark factors out there.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a top ten ballpark factor for left

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 3>handed hitters. For Jared Klnick, who has been bareling the

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 3>ball better, he's been stealing bases. The strikeouts are a problem.

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>That's always something that we've got to consider. But a

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>two sixty four expected batting average overall is great, one

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 3>twelve MAXIV solid, double digit barrel percentage. Good, he's getting

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the ball in the air. It was in the tens.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 3>These are things that you can build off of into

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a huge, big offensive lineup in Atlanta that is going

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to support him overall. Hitting six or seven in Atlanta

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>is like that Dodger situation.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that point?

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like you drop him into the Braves offense, like

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>you gotta be real, JABRONI not to be good in

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 2>the Braves offense, like you're gonna produce something, Just just

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>make some contact for goodness sake. But this is a

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>really interesting move. Keep talking about Kelnick.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also, I mean he destroyed fastballs last year

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>ninety two. EV hit two ninety two with a two

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>eighty two expected batting average. Though the batting average wasn't

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 3>great against breaking an off speed. The expected batting average

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty nine and two sixty seven was good. He's becoming

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 3>a better hitter. I think he's going twenty twenty this year.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 3>That's where I think Kelnick is gonna go. You're gonna

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 3>get more offensive opportunities, even hitting six, seven or eight

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 3>in Atlanta because that offense turns over even more and

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 3>you're out of the platoon stuff. So I love Jared Kelnick.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 3>He's one of my main targets sole and bases power.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 3>The other guy is a guy that might get some

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 3>leadoff opportunity or hitting high in the in the lineup

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. One of the deepest guys in here, well

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>out outside the top three hundred. And it's not Riley

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Green with the Tigers, it's Parker Meadows. This is another

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty guy. I say a lot of some of

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the same stats. Sometimes that could be annoying to people,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's things you're looking for, big breakouts, nine percent

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 3>barrel percentage, you're closing into the double digit percentage gets

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the ball in the air. Last year he had an

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 3>eighteen degree launch angle. It's one of the highest, probably

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>for any outfielder but one of the highers in the

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 3>league expected batting average two point fifty part hit percentage

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>moving up a little bit. This is a solid bat

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 3>and he is a power speed threat. I actually think

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 3>he could steal more bases than hit homers. But if

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>you get fifteen to twenty five out of a full season,

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that is in the cards. I think if

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 3>he plays a full season, he's gonna put up twenty

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases. And I'm going to take a look here

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 3>over on We'll do ATC or do our buddy Ario

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 3>Cohen where we've got a great episode here if you

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 3>guys want to check out. And for Parker Meadows in

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty three games, they have fifteen stolen

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>bases and thirteen homers with a low batting average of

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 3>two thirty. So you can start to project out if

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 3>he plays one hundred and fifty, you're gonna close in

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>on a twenty twenty. So both of the guys I

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 3>picked here are twenty twenty potential players, and that's what

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking out of a lot of my depth in

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>the outfield. I'm trying to get big power bats early

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>on as much as i can, and then Jared and Durant,

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Jared Kelnick, Parker, Meadows. These are some of my favorite

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>outfielders in those five outfielder formats to target.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Things starting to turn around for the Tigers a little

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>bit Welsh after all these years, we'll see, all right,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the starting pitcher as Welsh. Who are the two names

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>that you're targeting as sleepers in twenty four.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 3>So number one, I've got Nick Pavetta, who I think

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 3>I've talked a little bit about. Thirty one. Yeah, thirty

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>one point two percent K percentage from July first on

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Paveta had I think it was the number one K

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 3>percentage and he had the highest on the season, highest

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 3>on the season with increase of a starting pitcher overall.

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 3>With increase and Paveta has had a good spring, we're

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing vlo upticks bodies there making that team even better.

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 3>He went a full mile per hour up on the fastball.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I think what they're going to be doing with pitchers

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>overall has been phenomenal. Paveta could hurt us, I suppose

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>in the long term, but the K percentage was like

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 3>elite without any crazy walk issues, and it might have

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>actually even been the K minus walk percentage. Which was

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 3>really high from July first on. He was an elite

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 3>strikeout option and now he's going to get the full

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>throes of it. Hopefully he stays healthy. I think he's

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a big sleeper pick, and his ADP at one seventy

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 3>five has actually been moving up. But he's pitcher fifty one.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>It's top thirty SP upside with the strikeouts. My other

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>one we've talked, we've talked to actually a decent amount.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I think in the underdog draft was TOADJ. Bradley and

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Taj Bradley. With that confidence back, some uptick in spring

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 3>with the cutter working again, I think Taj Bradley is

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 3>in line for all the innings that he can have

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 3>this year, and I think he's he might be the

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>best pitcher, like overall pitcher, especially from a stuff perspective,

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in that rotation and given the full confidence and without

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>many restrictions, I think Taj Bradley is going to have

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.239
<v Speaker 3>a big breakout this year. So Taj and Paveta are

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 3>my two sp sleepers, two.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Really good ones definitely there. And Bradley that's another one too.

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying back in. You know, he was an elite

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>prospect last year we're all excited about. We were telling

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>everybody run to the waiver wire. Spengers need to get him.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>It didn't work out. Okay, that doesn't mean he's a

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 2>bad pitcher. It means he's a young pitcher that still

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>has to learn. And it seems like he's been humbled

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Seems like he's put the work in

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the off season so far the spring showing you some

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 2>much better versions of himself. The velocity, but I don't

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 2>know if you saw this Welsh he was sitting at

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety six ninety six point four.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>And he was ninety six point one last year, so

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 3>he's upticking a little bit. I mean, he got hit

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 3>hard last year, but I think that's something that decreased.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Like every single pitch he threw had a ninety or

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 3>higher exit velocity against. But that's rookie. That's rookie pitching.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I think with the tutelage, I'll be very curious to

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 3>see what changes happened. The cutter was the big, like

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 3>weird thing. I'll be curious to see if the split

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 3>finger comes up, because last year had the highest fifth

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 3>percentage over forty percent. If we see the split finger trend,

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that's going on. If we see maybe that overtake the

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>cutter a little bit more. I think the Rays are

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 3>going to turn him into a bigger strikeout pitcher this season,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and that's going to be the focus, and I think

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 3>that's what's going to make him exceptionally better.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I do too. I'm excited about TODs.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm also excited about my two pictures on the list

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>at two three and two twenty two. The first one

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>is Brian Wu of the Seattle Mariners, a picture with

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 2>a live arm who had a spotty record I think

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 2>at times in some of the college baseball, but you've

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 2>seen what Seattle's been able to do out of him,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>and in eighteen games last year, eighty seven innings, ninety

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>three strikeouts for him, he's got to trim the walk

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>rate just a little bit.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If he can do that, that's great.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>A four to two to one era, Okay, you know

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it's again rookie stuff, as we were alluding to before,

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>but a one two one whip.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Wu is.

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 2>One of these pictures you start to see what kind

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>of competitor he is. He's in the back end of

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>this rotation. It's a deep rotation. There's no pressure on

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the kid. All he's got to do is just go

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>out the every fifth day. Give the Seattle Mariners a

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>chance to win. And I told you already in the

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the show. I like the Mariners, So I

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 2>like the Mariners. I'm in on the Mariners. I want

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the Mariners to, you know, continue to use this rotation

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to get not even into the playoffs, but I think

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>they can go all the world, all the way to

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.239
<v Speaker 2>the World Series and maybe even win it this year.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I really do.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And Aaron Savaldi's the other guy in Tampa going at

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>two twenty two. If you look at Aaron Savally, it's

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>eerily similar of some of the earmarks of what we've

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 2>seen time and time again in Tampa, where they take

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a guy who's kind of feels like a middling pitcher

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>who at time shows you better versions of himself. He

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>comes to Tampa and all of a sudden you get

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the best version of him. If you look at Savally's

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 2>recent seasons, you see a guy who is, you know,

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of under nine k per nine, somewhe around that

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half range eight range nothing blown away

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>era floating round four. Go back and look at Zach

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Eflin before last year. It's pretty much the same guy.

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Statistically speaking, Can the.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Rays be the team that gets the most out of

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Savali? I think the answer is one hundred percent yes.

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Every year we've started to get smarter and smarter to

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>this Welsh where we say, oh, who are the Rays

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>signing this offseason?

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That guy?

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me put him on the sleeper list, because

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Zach Efflin was on this list last year, I believe,

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>or one of these lists we talked about, Hey sleeper pitchers.

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Take a shot on Effln? Why because Tampa signed him?

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna go back down to this well again

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>with Savally.

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>What's kind of funny about it is like these three

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>pit elementthropep there too, Pepio, Savally and Bradley. They're all

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 3>just cheap. I don't hate the idea of like taking

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 3>them all and figuring out because it is kind of

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>weird that you can't just throw all the raised pitchers

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>in and be like, hey, they're going to do this

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 3>in this But the Rays have a system of picking,

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 3>like Pepio had some big stuff plus numbers, fastball you have.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 3>You've seen Savally and what he can do with some

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 3>of his off speed stuff. And then it's like you

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 3>get one of the best organizations that manipulate some of

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>these players and has their hand into pitching development, and

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 3>they've taken these pieces in. All of these guys could

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 3>be great in different ways. Savally from a command perspective,

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Pepio looks like a big strikeout guy. Bradley might be

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 3>the best combination between them. It's just not bad to

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 3>bet on the same thing you did with the Mariners

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 3>as well. You can't get a Mariner's pitcher really for cheap,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>except for Wu and Bryce Miller, and I wouldn't hate

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 3>you for taking both of them Rays Mariners. The cheap

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 3>options that are going to be out there, I think

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 3>those are great just bets. Now, it's tough if you're

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 3>going to do a big capital on drafting a bunch

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of them. But let's just arguably say, somehow you were

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 3>able to get two of these Race pitchers and two

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 3>of those Mariner pitchers, you're probably giving yourself at least

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 3>a fifty percent chance for a player that is going

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to blow past the cost of what you put into them.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>It's it's you know again, it's like buying more tickets

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to the fifty to fifty raffle. You know he's just

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>like it's going to be there.

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm not sure that's the Have you ever known a.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>More than ones now happened? I've got proof.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I got that at a minor No, you'd at a

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 3>minor league game you did not win at like a.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know who's winning in life, Welsh.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Anybody who watches our Fantasy Fest, which is coming up,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 2>our third annual Fantasy pros MLB Fantasy Fest is happening

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 2>right here on the channel on Wednesday the thirteenth, from

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 2>four to eight pm Eastern four hour live stream me

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh. You got Ino Sarris, You've got Scott Pianowski,

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you got Steve Gardner, you got an amazing group of

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>guests who are going to be joining us and more

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to break down the twenty twenty four fantasy Baseball landscape.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 2>We've also got a mock draft at the end. And

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 2>if you can't join us live, that's okay. It's all

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be up on the YouTube channel. But regardless, subscribe

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to the YouTube channel. That's what you gotta do. Ring

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>that belt to lit go ding for notifications. And by

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the way, if you're going back and watching it on demand,

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>as the kids like to say, or if you're gonna

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>watch it live. You can ask your questions hopefully get

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 2>some of them answered here on the show. But if

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 2>you are a subscriber of Fantasy Pros, if you are

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>dropping your comments like a good boy and girl, we're

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>giving away something very cool, the Ultimate Fantasy Baseball Championship

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Belt from Trophy Smack. Somebody's gonna win this, bad boy,

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing. All you gotta do again, subscribe to Fantasy

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Bros MLB, the greatest baseball YouTube channel on the planet,

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and comment on a video.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 2>That's all you gotta do, and don't forget to ring

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the beltill it goes ding and you could win the

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Trophy Smack ultimate symbol a Fantasy Baseball supremacy. And remember

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 2>leading off live is gonna be right around the corner.

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So subscribe to Fantasy Bros MLB, hang out with us

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 2>at fest live or watch it back or both, and

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that's all you gotta do to win some free stuff.

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 2>The Ultimate Fantasy BA Baseball Championship Belt, courtesy of our

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>good friends.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>At Trophy Smack. Welsh.

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to our relief pitchers. That's all that's left

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>here on our list. So for me, this one's easy sometimes,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 2>you know me, I don't like to pay for saves.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So if SAMs just get away from me, Jose Leclerk

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is the guy in Texas that got the boat on

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>them last year, Texas is still gonna be a very

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 2>competitive team.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And if Leaclerk isn't the guy.

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And as the manager said, well, we haven't put names

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 2>and we don't want to put labels on guys right now,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Label anybody anything.

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, fine, Well Robertson's there too, so it's gonna be

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 2>one of these guys. So you think Robertson, well your

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 2>very last pick, and you take Laclerk late, and you've

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>got all the saves in Texas, Welsh, I think it's

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a very easy equation.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Where are you going here for your saves?

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Because the name on your list is the one I

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 2>was gonna put on mine.

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But this one you nab before me.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, like I agree with it you said about

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 3>closers in general, I like the cheap save guys. Laclerk

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 3>would be a player. But you know, if we're talking

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 3>like sleepers, and we're talking upside. Matt Brash would have

0:37:57.840 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 3>been a player I would have picked if he didn't

0:37:59.239 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 3>have this arm.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 4>INNG.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>The other obvious one is a guy that's qualifying as

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 3>a starting pitcher right now, and it's Mason Miller. So

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 3>that's who you were alluding to because of this insanely

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 3>big fastball and the team said they want to commit

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 3>to him being like a reliever this year. They don't

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 3>want to hand him the job to be the closer

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 3>from day one. I think they want him to kind

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 3>of prove and work it. But this is a guy

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 3>they kind of keep telling us these things with Mason Miller,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and then it just bam, it explodes. I mean, we're

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about a triple digits fastball pitcher who really I mean,

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 3>he throws a cutter, cutter and sliders can kind of

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:34.959
<v Speaker 3>be the same. It's kind of a slider fastball guy,

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 3>quintessential classic closer that they've already said they want to

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 3>put him in. Here's the only problem. How many opportunities

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 3>are the a's actually going to have to say that's

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 3>a bigger question. But when given those opportunities, Mason Miller

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to thrive with it. He's going to strike

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 3>out guys. He might have a couple of blow ups.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 3>He is the closer of closers, and if the opportunity

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 3>happens early, Mason Miller might save twenty five to thirty

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 3>games and he would be a top ten closer. So

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 3>you want to talk about a closer sleeper. I think

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 3>he is the number one quintessential player. But there is

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 3>risk in this pick because he could just be a

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 3>middle relief.

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>You know what, I don't think he's going to be

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a middle relief. I think to keep him healthy, the

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 2>best thing to do is give him that clean ninth inning.

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 2>And if the A's were a competitive team, might be

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>more concerned because I don't want Mason Miller working three

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 2>or four days in a row closing out games. And

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the A's are three or four games in a row,

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 2>that's not gonna be a problem. So in a lot

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>of ways, it's kind of the best case scenario. Make

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 2>him the closer. He's not a bad team. One or

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 2>two appearances a week, Okay, great, it's a great opportunity

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 2>for Mason Miller to be healthy, be productive. I think

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 2>it's the best case scenario for him. So just to

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>recap here. Here's our all sleeper teams. Welsh has Wilson

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>contraresat catcher, Christian and Carnascio Strand at first, Luis Rangifo

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 2>at second, Michael Garcia at third base, Zach Netto at third,

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 2>excuse me at shortstop. The outfielders Jared Kellennick Parker Meadows

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 2>then Paveta and Bradley the pitchers, and Mason Miller at

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>c I've got Mitch Garver clean up catcher. I'm Rick

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Candelario clean up at first base, Brandon Jury clean up

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>at second base, Justin Turner clean up hitter at third base.

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>See I love a theme, Ezekiel Tavard's short.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Jaron Duran and the outfit along with Jung hu Lee,

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Brian Wu, Aaron Savali, jose Leclerk aka anybody in Texas.

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So take David Roberts at the last pick and again

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you get all the.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Saves and you don't have to worry about spending any

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 2>free agent budget as long as your bench is big enough.

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 2>But we want to hear from you who are your

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 2>sleepers in twenty twenty four. Drop your comments below and

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 2>you just might win yourself an incredible trophy smack Ultimate

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Baseball Championship Belt, which.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Looks pretty cool.

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget to join us for Fantasy Fest Wednesday

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the thirteenth right here on Fantasy Bros MLB. Subscribe like

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 2>the video and have a great day. Everybody that'll do

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>it for us, But the story of the game goes

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 2>on for the Welsh.

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time, kids. Peace,