WEBVTT - Train Your Brain to Focus

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, it's already noon. I gotta get going on

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>my story. Hello, blank page, All right, I can do this.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Here we go typing a sentence. This is hard. I

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>wonder what's happening on Twitter. I'll just click over for

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a quick minute breaking news. Everything is horrible. No, your horror.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a distraction. Distraction gate stop. Here's a photo

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of a panda. Oh god, it's three thirty. Why do

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I ever read Twitter? I feel like garbage. I really

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>need to get to work. Okay, writing some words, this

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't so bad. Oh a chat message? I want a gossip.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You know you want to gossip. I don't know. I

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>heard the salacious thing about this person we talk about

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Let's dissect it together for the next

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minutes. It's gonna be juicy and fun. And

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll also talk about work a little bit, so you

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can justify spending your time chatting with me. Okay, that

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was fun. That comes is work? Right. While I'm here,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I might as well click over to my team's group chat.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>We're working on a big project. I bet there are

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>important updates for me in there, dancing. I feel like

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm forgetting something, something important. Oh god, my story and

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's almost four I just need to focus. I'm so

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>bad at concentrating on one task, even when I know

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it needs to get done as soon as possible. But

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get serious now. I'm gonna sit down and write.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder what's happening on Facebook. Welcome to Works

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for Me, the show where we try to fix our

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>workplace problems to find out what strategies will work for you.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Francesco Levi and I'm Rebecca Greenfield. This week, it's

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Beca's turn to take us on a productivity journey. Becca,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the problem you're trying to solve this week?

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>As you heard in that dramatic reenactment at the top

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show, I cannot focus on my work. I

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>get distracted by Twitter or the Internet or my email

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or chat very easily. And it feels like I can

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>never sit down and complete a task without an interruption.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>How is that possible? I know that you can. You're

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>capable of getting things done. You get things done all

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the time. In fact, I think you're like a particularly

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>productive person. Like I know people who can't focus, and

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you're nowhere on that list. Okay, yeah, that is, this

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is what people say to me. So when I told Danny,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>my boyfriend, that I wanted to work on my focus

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for our next experiment, he had the exact same reaction

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as you did. But as I explained to him, getting

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>things done is different than being focused on the things

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. I don't really understand why you think you

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>need to focus better, because you are way more efficient

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>than anyone I know. You'll be like, all I did

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was chat all day and then I wrote these four stories.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what, I've never written four stars in one day.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 1>And also, I don't think we can play this from

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>my employer because I'm not g chatting all day. You're not.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You are working while chatting me. Okay, well, I would

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like to not have that habit. I would like to

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>work really focused and then when I'm done, reward myself

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with a G chat and then be the best version

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of myself. Okay, So you're not liking the experience you're

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>having while you're getting stuff done. I do not like

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the experience, and this is a common problem that I

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>guess you have. Also, um, I'm far from the only

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>person who can't focus. British Telecom found that people check

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>their phones every twelve minutes, so yeah, this is something

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people can relate to. Yeah, I definitely.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my phone just flashed. There's like a new

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>feature where it shows you how much screen time, and

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>my just was like an unwelcome push notification about my

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>screen time. And I was shocked and horrified at just

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>like the amount of time staring at my phone, because

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm not most of the time, I'm not

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>working when I'm staring at my phone. So I've done

0:04:55.680 --> 0:05:00.039
<v Speaker 1>on a phone. Yeah, okay, so your focus is a

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>problem apparently, and you wanted to fix it. How so

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really know how. I looked some stuff up online,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and there are all of these brain training websites, but

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really get at what I wanted. Like, I

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to get better brain games. I wanted to

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get better at focusing on my work. So I went

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>out and found a super concentrator, the simone Biles of Concentrating.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>If you will, it's not unusual for me to do.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I can do a five six hour, seven hour day

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm just working on one thing. That's Cal Newport.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a computer scientist at Georgetown university. He also happens

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to be very good at concentrating. He even wrote a

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>book about it. It's called Deep Work Rules for Focused

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Success in a Distracted World. Cal got interested in concentrating

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>when he started looking into how people do their jobs.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>He quickly realized that the answer to that was not

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>very well. He found that the workplace is a very

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>distracting place, and people like us have convinced ourselves that

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>engaging in the distractions like answering emails and slack messages

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is part of our jobs. But he says, it's just not.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're properly valuing uh, concentration, because it's

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to say, you know what, I'm busy, I'm communicating,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of messages are moving, I'm on messenger, I'm

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>on my phone, I'm active a lot. So I must

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be productive. I must be doing something something right. I

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>must be producing value. But I think when you look

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer, you realize actually it's the undistracted,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>concentrated work that is more valuable to the bottom line

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in many different positions, in many different fields. Kel on

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, doesn't operate like this at all. In

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>his work life. He gets all of his work done

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>during the hours of nine to five. He doesn't use

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>social media, he ignores his inbox. He's disciplined, so he

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>realized that he had a lot to teach sad distracted

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sacks like me. The good news is that, according to

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cal most people don't even know how much they can

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>really focus because as they're not even trying well. I

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think physical fitness is a good analogy for thinking about this.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people incorrectly think about the ability to

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>focus as something like a habit, like flossing their teeth,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>something they know how to do. It's just a matter

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of doing it more often. That's not actually the case.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're not actually training your mind to be good

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at sustained concentration, you're actually not going to get nearly

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as much value out of your concentration sessions. So this

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is not about small tweaks around the edges. Really embracing

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>focus as a core skill in your job and something

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that you practice and protect can have massive changes to

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of things you're able to produce in the

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>quality level of those things. Cow says that you have

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to work out the concentration muscles in your brain, and

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>by working them out you'll get better at using them.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So everyone's trying to multitask because they feel obligated to.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But multitasking is the destruction of your work, and you

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really need to concentrate. And apparently concentrating is something that

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to use it or lose it, right, Yeah,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I find this very encouraging. Well, so what are you

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to do to improve your concentration? I Am going

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to work out my brain in an attempt to learn

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>how to concentrate better. Cal told me about this interval

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>training exercise where you sit down with a timer and

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>do twenty minutes of work focusing on a single difficult task.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If I can get through twenty minutes a few times

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>without distraction, I can increase the time by ten minutes.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And if I get through that, increase it another ten minutes,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Cal also talked about how it helps

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to have a ritual before you start doing focused work,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like he always takes a walk to get coffee before

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>getting down to work. So I'm going to walk around

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the news room and put on music without words to

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>get in the zone. I'll do all of this for

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a week. Like this, you have like a little workout

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>plan from your personal trainer, except it's for your brain,

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not your body muscles. But how will you know if

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you have succeeded. So I am not very confident in

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>my focus ability really at all. Like twenty minutes of

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>doing one thing uninterrupted sounds completely impossible to me. Like

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when I'm writing a story, I cannot not click over

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to something or some other tab, Like I'm writing one

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>sentence and I need to distract myself. So I think

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to suck at this. But that said, I

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to do thirty minutes of uninterrupted

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>focused time by the end of my experiment. I'm starting

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>off the experiment by doing the ritual, which is walking

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>around the newsroom once before I get started. So that's

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing. Look, I'm like a crazy person talking

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to this microphone. This was me on my first day,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>completing my first ritual lap around the office. Okay, back

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at my desk, going to find my playlist. I found.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I found this playlist called Concentrate at work on Spotify.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Going to set a timer or queue up a timer

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes and I have a story that I'm working on.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna work on that and ready set good the

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>playlist had a lot of technobis. I sat down to

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>work on my story and it wasn't as hard as

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would be. I was trying really hard

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to not look at distracting things, and it was working.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>But soon enough I realized that I wasn't exactly concentrating

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on my work either. I have five minutes left. I

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>think I'm basically sitting here staring at the page and

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not concentrating thinking about other things. I'm gonna call this

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I fail. Well, this gets into like a a tricky area, right,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>because you thought you'd have to just eliminate your distractions,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but then you find ways to distract yourself with your

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>own mind, even if you're not actually like looking at

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or doing whatever else would take you away from

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>being in your word document. Yeah, my brain was distracting

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>itself fine enough on its own. Did not need the

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>two meets. But I did decide to try it again

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that day. Okay, take two. Gotta in my ritual again.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So I did my ritual again and walked around the

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>news room. Then I sat down to do my work,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and again my brain was fighting the concentration. I was

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>reading a story and my eyes were jumping all over

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the page, just looking for something else to do. But

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>if that weren't bad enough, then something out of my

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>control happened. Becca if Ellen was a woman, yeah, is

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that the subjects lite? What if he was O? Great technicallymatically,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>but it's a subject time, so I think stuff. Okay. So,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>as you saw, I got interrupted by my boss asking

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>me a question. That's I can't X out her window.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>She just talked to me. Okay, that's over. Timer is up. Okay,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with this experiment right now. Too much to do. Well,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a wrench that got thrown into your plan. Yeah,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you we work in an open office, like not every

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>interruption is a self imposed interruption like the internet. It's

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm also, this was your boss talking to you, right,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>so it was hardly somebody you could ignore or just

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be like, excuse me, I'm concentrating right now doing an

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>experiment for a podcast to improve myself. Yeah. No, I

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do that. And cal had warned me about the

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff about my brain fighting it, but he didn't really

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>warn me about the realities of working in a modern

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>open office and how that could interfere with my experience.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So I tried one more time on that first day,

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and I failed yet again. Fifty seconds left and I

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>clicked away man. So that not a very successful first

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>day of focusing. Huh. No, my first day was a bust.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>It sucked. I failed like hard every single time, and

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I was really feeling bad, really bad about myself. But

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I had to keep going with the experiment. So on

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>day two I soldiered on and after the break, we'll

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>see how I did. After my day of failures, on

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>day two, I decided that the playlist was the reason

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for my failed first day. I really hated the music.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I am just really not into techno. It felt like

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>being inside and urban outfitters or a Burning Man themed

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>co working space. It was not for me. I don't

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>alienate our techno loving listeners. Sorry, it's just awesome for me.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But I found something I liked better called chill lo

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>fi steady beats. I don't have to play for you,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but I can if you want, I can imagine what

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like. I'll ever every one second. That's how

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a creepy Okay, well that's that sounds like haunted music

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>box in the haunted house. But whatever works for you,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>sleepy wow, right, well, to me, it's neither sleepy nor creepy.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I like it. And with this new playlist in hand,

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I did my walk around the newsroom ritual again. Can

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I just point out that, like, it's kind of funny

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that every single time you decide you're going to get

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ready to focus in a given day, you now have

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to get up and walk around. It's so much walk.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're getting your steps in, that's right. So

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I walked around the newsroom again, and then I settled

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>into another focus session. Need to close tab? Wasn't my email?

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Was that? Twitter? Minimized chat, setting my timer, and here

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we go. That day, I was working on preparing for

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a big interview I had coming up. I was researching

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the people I was interviewing and then writing a list

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of questions to ask them. It was feeling pretty good,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then before I knew it, time was up. I

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>did it. I successfully focus for twenty minutes straight, no interruptions. Wait,

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>already on your second day? Yeah that's awesome, considering you

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>felt like you could never achieve focusing for more than

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one sentence of writing at a time. Yeah, it was.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>If I dare say, I'm miraculous, I felt I felt great,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I thought maybe the playlist was the problem.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But then came my next try and I failed. So wait,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the playlist wasn't the problem. No, I mean I think

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it helped. I think you have to make your environment

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as optimal as you possibly can, Like I can't escape

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from our open office, but at least I don't have

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to torture my ears with techno music. But after control

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for that, I realized that the culprit the reason I

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was still struggling was the type of work I was doing.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So cal talked about two kinds of work. There's deep

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>work and there's shallow work. Shallow work has to happen

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in order for just an organization to function, but deep

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>work has to happen if you actually want to advance

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your organization or advance your career. Shallow work is necessary.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Deep work pays to bills. Shallow work is the stuff

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to do to function in the workplace, like

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>checking emails, attending meanings, making lists. And deep work is

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the meat of your job, which in my world is

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>reporting and writing. And the deeper the work, the harder

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it is to focus on. Yeah, deep and shallow is

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a really apt analogy for that because I look at

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like the shallow work, the stuff that you can take

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>off your list, and it's just basically easy, but it

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>makes you happy when you actually get around to getting

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it done, like that feels so good, But it's not.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not hard. So if you just set aside the

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>time for it and commit to doing it, you can

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>do it. But the deep work, it is like staring

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>into an abyss, Like you're just like, I have to

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>make something out of nothing. I have to write a story,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>or I have to write a script for a podcast.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I just got shells. It's it's so hard to just

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 1>stare into the abyss and it's just the ugly depths.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But I also think that there's the spectrum of work

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in between, stuff that contributes to deep work, but isn't

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>actually that deep. It's like deep adjacent. So for me,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's researching and writing up questions for an interview, right,

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to think about that, right, it's not

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like writing an email. But it's not like writing a

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>story either, And that's why I think I got through

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that focus session because it was this medium work adjacent

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right, So it's not as hard as writing a story.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I zoomed right through it. But so the deep work.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Does CAL have any suggestions for how to get through

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the deep work? Yes, but it's not a satisfying answer.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not just change your playlist, he said. I had

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to keep practicing. So I just kept trying and failing

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and trying and failing again. But then eventually, on day four,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sorry if you did it, I got through twenty minutes

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't a fluke. I'd broken through some wall

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and kept succeeding, and by day five I was comfortably

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>getting through twenty minutes. So I decided to go for

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the holy grail thirty minutes. I've been training for this

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>moment all week. I get up from my desk to

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>walk around the room to get in the optimal mindset.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>After a brisk clock I'm feeling good. I sit down,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>put in my earbuds and switch on chillow by study beats.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>My brain feels primed. I set my timer and then

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I get to work on a story. I'm in the zone,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>writing complete sentences about taking a break. I think about

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>checking Twitter, but I tell myself, no, stay strong, and

0:19:55.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>before I know it, okay, I didn't the thirty minutes.

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It was torture and they did it. There you're okay,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and I can procrastinate throw Wow, wow, thirty minutes the

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>holy grill, you hit your gold, I know. And it

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>really felt amazing. And I feel so freaking good, like

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just doing thirty minutes of writing where you just

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>get through it, you focus. I feel like a queen.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I know. I know this sounds like I'm over exaggerating,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but it really felt good. I mean, usually it's so

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to get stuff done, like three pm

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on any day, and wow, this is crazy. I feel

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>so good, Like my brain felt different, I swear, and

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>from then on I was untouchable. I did thirty minute

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>blocks of focus work for the rest of the week,

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>no problem. I was getting so good at thirty minutes

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>that on my last day, day seven, I decided to

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>try for forty minutes. WHOA, we didn't. Honestly, it was hard, um,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of what done. Finished one task, started another. Honestly,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>feel like I could do more time. Oh from zero

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a zero congratulations, Becca, thank you you really triumphed. Yeah,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it felt amazing, as not to restate the point, but

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>it felt amazing. It feels amazing. I had been worried

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that it would be harder for me to get through

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the time when I had hard work like writing to do,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't. I not only wrote my story, but

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I liked it. It got addictive. I wanted more and more.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Cal are focus afficionado predicted that that would happen if

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you do this pretty aggressively for a week. By the

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the week, you'll feel you know, this is

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not only a little bit easier, but my work feels

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. I feel like I'm achieving a

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>new level of concentration on producing sharper words or more

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>words per minute or whatever the metric is, but that

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm better at concentrating than I was. The other feeling

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you should be looking for is also the sort of

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>an emergent attraction to concentration is something that you start

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to crave more. So many parallels with exercise, right like you,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It takes discipline, you have to work out your muscles,

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and then when you do it, you feel really good,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and then you get kind of predicted to it. I'm curious,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>do you think your work were sharper like did the

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>writing you did during those concentrated times actually turn out better.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's very hard to measure this, but it was

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>during a time of intense productivity for me. It was

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like a crazy couple of weeks I had there. Also,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the story I wrote one of those times was a

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>story that this does not happen often. But my editor

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, this is really good, and so I

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, you can't really measure it, but yes,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Well, it definitely sounds like you succeeded at

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>your experiment, right, you sailed past that thirty minute goal. Yeah,

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I did. I did it. After my week long experiment.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I was an enthusiastic focus supporter. I am so into

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this and I hope I can keep doing it. It

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>feels so good to just sit down and do work.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And I also was really scared that when I got

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to writing stories, because writing it's so hard and torturous,

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and you want to just like write a sentence, look

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter, write a sentence, check your email. That that

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would be so hard. But when I was doing the

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>concentrating thing, it just wasn't it. Just I think you

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>psych yourself out, but you can sit down and write

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a story and yeah, it's not perfect, but you can

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>do it, So that was awesome. The downsides I think

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are when you come back, you feel like you can

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>just go crazy not focusing. Yeah, I wonder if if

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't keep this up, it goes back to being

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just as hard. If the exercise analogy holds, then it would, right. Yeah,

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I read somewhere about exercise like if you don't do

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it for two days, you're back to your base. So

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's the same for brain, Like I can't I

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>got to go back to twenty minutes and not being

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>able to do it. But you're addicted to it at

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, so it shouldn't be a problem. Let's just

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>keep doing these sessions focusing forever um. But yeah, I

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think there are a couple of caveats, Like I said

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you do, there's like still a lot of procrastination evolved,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like those does not have anything to be procrastinate, and

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like it took me a long time sometimes to get

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to the focus session. And I think you in a

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>way procrastinate more before and after because you are anticipating

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>all of your focus. You're like, I gotta get into

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>my internet time now like a crazy person. And then

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I also think like not everyone can do this if

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a type of job where you can't shut

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the world out for chunks of time at the day.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of people think their job

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is like that, but it's not. They think that they

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>can't shut the world up if they can, like I

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people can take twenty minutes and

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not answer emails. Yeah, and presumably if your job really

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of those jobs that you can't shut out

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, like like you're an air traffic controller, then

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. By not shutting out the world, you're

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>actually doing your job, So you would still feel accomplished

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you're just like listening to all the inputs

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, taking in lots of outside feedback, because

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>that's still good work. Like you never would need to

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>check Twitter. You might need to respond to an but

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you're right, probably not as quickly as you think. So

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I really strongly suggest people try this. UM. And the

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>big lesson that I'm taking from this is I thought

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of myself as somebody who thrived in the chaos, like

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd optimized working with distractions, and now I know that

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>they're I don't have to do that, Like there's a

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>better way, and it not only helps me get work done,

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but it really made me feel a lot better. It's like,

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say there's a simple trick that

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>will turn you into some superhuman worker, but sometimes you

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>just have to like try something different and you'll feel

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>less stuck. Um. Next time on Works for Me, Francesca

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>takes on the dreaded team meeting. Oh, did anyone have

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>any general announcements? Um ered. Thanks for listening to another

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>episode of Works for Me. If you like this show,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>please go over to Apple Podcasts and take a second

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to rate review, and of course subscribe to our show

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and tell your friends, Tell all your friends or your

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>best friend at least. You can also find all of

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>our shows and are very cool illustrations on Bloomberg dot

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>com slash quirks for Me. Are there any problems in

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>your work life that you're dying to fix? We would

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 1>love to hear about them. Call us and leave us

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail at two one to six one seven zero

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and we might use it on the air, Or you

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can tweet at us I'm at Francesca today and I'm

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at RZ Greenfield. This show was hosted and recorded by

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>me Becca Greenfield and me Francesca Leavie. This show was

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>produced by Tobrah Foreheads. Jordan's Spear did the illustrations on

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our show page, and we want to give us special

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>things to Ebban Noby Williams, Liz Smith and Erica Parpinello.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Leavy is Bloomberg's head of Hot. How see you

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>next week. Bye,