WEBVTT - Surveillance: OPEC Is Doomed, Gartman Says

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>their trust and independent registered investment advisors to the two

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and four trillion dollars. Why learn more and find your

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>independent advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg He was trying to get

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the Tiffany's next to the Trump Tower and it was

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a little hard to get there through the security for

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the President elect, so Dennis Gartment decided to darken the door.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You guys will apparently let anybody on this show nowadays help, yes,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>help the liberals of America with the surprise of the election.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest a Virginia, North Carolina guy like you

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't all that surprised, assist the progressives Listening people

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>need to get in an airplane and fly over the

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>great fly over part of the United States and just

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>go there and go there. It actually is quite civilized.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You'd be surprised. They are very nice well, it's well

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>spoken area tite people living in Peoria who are reasonably

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>well read, who are cognizant of what goes on in

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the country and are different than the coasts.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's indeed what happened. So it was not

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>all that surprising. Maybe you wrote about this this morning.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Some of them want a thirty five percent tariff on

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bad elites like you sending jobs abroad and others, including

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership of the GOP and the How's go Maybe not?

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not? Where are the checks and balances to Mr

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump's rhetoric excesses. I think Mr Ryan is a check

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in a balance to Mr Trump's rhetorical excesses. If there

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is a problem with Mr Trump, it is that this

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>propensity on the part of of of he and others

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>around him too to put into effect or talk at

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>least about a thirty five percent tariff. What a what

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a silly notion that would be? How detrimental that would

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be to the economy in general. Yes, two small groups

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of people to to the labor unions, it makes sense.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But you have to remember you put a thirty five

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>percent tariff on a television and suddenly you are spending

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent more to buy that television, and that's the problem.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that shall not happen. Hopefully we do not take

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a chapter out of the middle of the nineteen thirties

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>when tariffs, the smooth Holliday tariff, took a medium term

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and rather substantive recession and turn it into a depression.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully there are wiser voices around. But on balance, I

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>got to tell you there's a greater sense of of

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of optimism out in the great flyover part of the

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>United States, and there had been a mere three weeks ago.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>It's demonstrable. How do you judge Donald Trump's willingness to

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be checked and balanced? In this week since the presidential election,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We've watched his Twitter feed with with great interest, But

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you wonder if he's that quick to

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>respond to what the media is saying, for instance, how

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>well he's going to be able to have a conversation

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>about smart trade policy that does the great fear, isn't it?

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And and actually I put that in my newslet this morning.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Won't somebody around him please stop this man from tweeting?

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, it doesn't appear that anybody's gonna have

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the power to stop him. Please Milannia, stop this man

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>from tweeting. I'll jokes aside, though, I mean here here,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know he has the potential to do some real damage.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you must have been watching what he was

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying about China, about Taiwan with us. I was

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not as dismayed about what he said about China as

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as other people were and are. I'm far more dismayed

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about the the intention last week, or the decision last

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>week to push Carrier to do what they did, to

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to push UTX to do what it had to do,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and then to talk two or three days later about

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>once again putting tariffs into effect. That that is bothersome.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>As long as we can avoid that, and I think

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we shall avoid that. As long as we can avoid that,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>things will be fine. I I talk up Dennis how

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the few people that actually put your

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>tick by tick TA track record out to the public.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a brutal year for people gaming uh the market.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Now you enjoy Fortres's diamond three point one standard deviation

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>moonshot on a monthly chart. The last time it did

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that was from the Quiet of two thousand five, which

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't even comparable. What does Dennis Gartman do if you

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold the banks and you've gotten this gift,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do you stay with him? I think you have to.

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something that is that is tectonic that

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>really has occurred to things the banks are going to

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do so much better over the course of the next five, six,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>seven years, and to something I've been arguing about. To

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>put it into simplistic terms, I I think that we're

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see the trumping for lack of a better term,

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Mahoning Valley, the place where Steele was born

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, compared to Silicon Valley. I think

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it means that if the Trump administration means anything, it

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>does in fact mean infrastructure rebuilding and simple things are

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>going in down. Okay, but you come on, you invented this.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump took the lesson from you. If it drops

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 1>on my foot, you own that fraend line. Yeah, what

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is taking so long for that to happen? He ain't

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>president yet. Okay, it's that simple. He's not president yet

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and it will probably be with the whole concept of

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>shovel ready is an utter misnomer. The shovels are ready,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>but it takes a long time. Given the fact that

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>all those products or projects have to be done at

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>state and local levels. Federal government can try to do something.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Federal government can set the standard. Federal government can fund

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of it, but that the mass funding has

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to come from the state and from the local, from localities,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and it takes a long time to get that that

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing passed through those various legislatures. It will

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>take time, but it is time to buy the things

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that if you drop them on the on your foot

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>shell hurt. And I have to admit I think that's

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an interesting and simple but a correct mnemonic device. Dennis

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Goverment with us. We thank all the hate mail for

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>coming in on guard. He is the pinata of the street.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's the hate mail, David Girl from one de

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Cass down in Florida. Don Cass says, I'm short in

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the banks. I don't agree with Dennis. Why how do

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you respond to a guy like Cass who, on a

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>trading basis has been short this great bull market and

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now he loads the boat and shorts the banks. Yeah,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's getting his golf games getting so much better.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He sent me a scorecard. They had three birdies in

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a row. Well done, Douggie, well done, and we said

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>good morning to Mr Cass. Seriously, folks, dot Cass very

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cautious to short on the banks after the huge service. David,

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm eager to talk to you about oil. Since we

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>last spoke, we had this OPEC production cut agreement. How

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>optimistic are you that that's going to be uphilm It

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>won't be upheld. I mean, if history shows anything, it

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>shows you that all OPEC decisions, all OPEC cuts in

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the past have always been overridden. They cheat, it's just

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a fact. Are they cheating right now? Well, the interesting

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is they began the cut from an already ramped

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>up September October in early November production, So the cut

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually going only going to take you back to

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>October levels of production. Two, they will cheat, that's just

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a matter of that. That's only a matter of time.

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>The the new agreement doesn't go into effect till January one.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I suspect it by March we will see a a

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rather substantive amount of cheating. And it doesn't even take cheating,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It takes us. We are going to continue to be

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>larger and ever greater producers of crude oil fifty two

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars w T I with a four dollar contango to

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the one year gives you fifty six dollars for one

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>year crude and they're going to sell We need more,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>jan can we get We need an additive jargon. What

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>did you just say to the contango? The contango is

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the carrying charge, it's the cost. It's the tangible of

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a tangible asset. And crude is indeed a tangible asset.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And and for the one year, it's the one year forward.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>The crude oils trades right now at about two dollars

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifty cents premium to spot. That gives you a

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 1>fairly comfortable hedge double arrangement. And I guarantee the banks

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are telling every E n P producer produce hedge, earned

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the carrying charge, and produce crude oil. What did the

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>way that that meeting went down tell you about the

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>future of this organization? The future of OPEC. I think

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the future of OPEC is doomed for for no other reason.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>The smartest guy in the room at OPEC is the

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Crown Prince, and he's made it clear he understands

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty years from now, crude oil prices will be zero.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>There it will be worthless. Something else will have supplanted

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>crude oil. He understands that, and he intends to sell

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>his crude before that. Joseph Knight, in another world from

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you of international relations, is adamant about American exceptionalism. Sure,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I want you to state for US, and it permeates

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>your newsletter the DEFEATUS of America. What do they get wrong?

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And particularly where do they get wrong? In capitalism? They

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get everything wrong. They get, for example, the one thing.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>There are certain things in this world that you can

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>count on, but you can count on the fact that

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>every year drought in rain out, America's farmers are going

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to produce more and better crops every single year than

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they did the year before. Our technology drives that fact.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We are now producing don't hold me to the number,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps four to five times more soybeans on the

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>same ancorage than we did a mere thirty years ago.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We will produce more ten years from now than we

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>produce now. We have learned through technology how to drill

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for crude oil so much more efficiently, so much at

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a at a much greater pace, with a greater success ratio.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They the defeatist miss what we do. We are the

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>greatest minds in the country when in the world, when

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to production. We enjoy the morning with Dennis

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Gartman of the Gartman Letter. No, we will not send

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>out his letter. We protect the copyright of all of

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>our guests and particularly the joy of Dennis Gartman's beliefs.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>In the back of his newsletter, one of his foundation

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>beliefs is gold, not in dollar terms, but in yen

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in euro terms. Uh, it's a really ugly chart. It's

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the classic pop bullmarket and then a trumpion rollover to

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven seventy two announce. Some gurus would tell me support

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is nine as possible. Are you long or short the

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Golden Beast? I am still long of gold in euro

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>terms and in end terms. I have no urge to

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>buy any in dollar terms because I'm a bull on

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar. I'd rather own something in terms of

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a currency that I think is going to devalue in

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship relationship to the buck. But do I wish I

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>owned any gold at all right now? I wish I

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>sold a goodly portion of what I had, which is

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in my retirement fund. Two or three weeks ago. Wait,

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we get inflation from Mr Trump, from the Republicans in Washington,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we get inflation, gold goes up, right, not necessarily there.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>There have been plenty of times when we've had inflationary

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>impulses and gold hasn't gone up. On the other hand,

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there have been periods of deflation in the past when

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>gold has gone up. Gold, I think is misunderstood. I

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's an inflationary harbor any longer. I think

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's simply a currency relative to other currencies. And having

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>started in the business in the early nineteen seventies at

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>dear Old n C and being now Bank of America,

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>when when when we traded one currency against another, I

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think of gold as simply being another currency, not not

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a harbor of of safety, not a a a place

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of value in an inflation to mentioned the Lira a

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>few minutes ago, and you've written about that in your newsletter.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The moves that we've seen there, what's driving it and

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you see is the outlook for that? You

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>mean the Turkish leer, Yes, exactly. Well, it's first of all,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't trust the Turkish government under air

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to one for as far as I can throw him.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and he's fighting a rear guard action. The

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that you had the president of a of a

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>country come out and say they need to lower rates

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Bank of the Central Bank has, in fact,

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>right within minutes raised rates tell you he's got a problem.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Where's the where's the Turkish leer going probably demonstrably lower,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>if for no other reason that the dollar itself is

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>demonstrably strong. Looking at euro dollar right now one of

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty seven, are you surprised is in light of

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in Italy that it is where it is? Oh? Yeah,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I am, I'm surprised. I thought when they it looked

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to me in the middle of the night after the

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>votes had been counted, and when I get up every

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>morning at one o'clock in the morning to write the letter,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and we were trading one oh five one oh five,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>oh five had been given, it looked like one oh five,

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the big figure was going to be given. And then

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>suddenly there was a defense at one oh five. Next

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thing you knew, everybody who's short, including myself, ran for cover,

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and the next thing, it's trading one oh seven. But

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>if you take a big look at the big picture

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last year, is that rally

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>from one oh five to one oh seven. I think

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got a one oh seven eighty bit if I'm

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken at one time yesterday. Is that is that

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>technically important? Now? The the lows are lower, the highs

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are lower, and it still looks to me like a

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>bear market when you look ahead here to the the

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>e c B meeting this week, what's what are your

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>expectations terms of what we'll hear from from Mario dragging?

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll hear very little. I think that I

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think they'll kick the football into the next year. It's

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Christmas time. Their propensity to take any action whatsoever is

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>extremely limited. That will be rhetoric, there will be verbal action,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>but will there be any real action? I think to

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But but again it goes to the back half of

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>your newsletter, which is essentially on the exogenous shocks. To

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>worry about what's your outside shock? You're worried about what

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>am I shot starting with European banking? But what's the

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>one that keeps that garment up at night at one am?

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>When he writes in granite and chisels out his newsletter,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the the one thing that keeps me up at night

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese and whatever they're up to in the

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in in the South China Sea, that keeps me up

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at night. I'm always worried about what the North Koreans

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are capable of doing at any one time. They are

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>more Trumpian than Mr Trump is, and he at least

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>only tweets they actually take action at times. I I

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stay awake worrying about that. Um I stay awake about

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I stay awake nowadays worrying about what Mr Trump is

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>going to tweet out. That that bothers me a great

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in far more than it probably should. One final question,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross talks about a decade of financial repression. Can

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you say the financial impression for conservative people, retirees, savers,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>can you say it's over? I think it's over. I

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see I think the honestly, I think

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the thirty five year bear market in the bond market,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>uh in in rates, the thirty five year bull market

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in bond prices has ended. I think it ended six

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and I think rates are going to be

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not dramatically higher, but certainly demonstrably higher. Can we get

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can we get the Fed funds, but right over the

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>course of the the next three or four years back to

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Can we get the ten year bond tenure

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>note back to a five percent? Eel sure, I think

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we can do that without doing any damage to the economy.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Independence bull, what's your forecast for the that will kick

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>off at noon? And I think that both teams will

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the words, in the words of

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>my high school phizzed teacher Bobby Knight, the team with

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the most points show win. There you go, a sound

0:14:53.680 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of forecasts anytime, the surveillance that all we're trying trying

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a hard. Kate Moore joins as chief equity strategist at

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock. As I said to morning, Kate, let's start

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with with this referendum and and the fallout from it,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so much as there is one here in US equity markets.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>How how we're market participants, our investors watching what was

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>going on in Italy. You know, I think we've been

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about how markets have been shrugging off

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>recent political changes and wondering, really if that's going to

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>extend itself into two thousand seventeen years we get further

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>into European elections, you know, there's a sense at one

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>level that there's a bit of a narrative change, that

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have more stimulus, that the people are talking,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that the government has to answer, And then there's a

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sense on the other side that, you know, this doesn't

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>actually change meaningfully the path of the economy, particularly I

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to the market reaction to Italy.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, is it fair to say the

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>markets have been schizophrenic? What one could? You know? You get,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you get this no vote at Renzy is staying on here,

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but you said there's there's a lot of work to

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be done here. How optimistic are you that in the

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>next twelve eighteen months something is going to is going

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen or the politics going to overshadow everything that

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you think. I'm pretty focused on the politics, to be fair,

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell you that I'm absolutely optimistic

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see a significant acceleration in growth,

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that all of these changes end up being, you know,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.239
<v Speaker 1>just sort of blips on a longer term positive trajectory.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the thing I keep coming back to

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is what this does to business confidence, what this does

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to investment sentiment, you know, and whether or not given

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>all of this uncertainty, we actually get an increase in

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>spend or let's say, if you're a consumer or household

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and you think about borrowing money. You know, when there's

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>so much political uncertainty in the future of Europe is

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in question, do you really look to you know, lever

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself up and um, you know, take advantage of this environment.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I was going to ask you to

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>answerr rhetorical question. There I go. I would say, waiting

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines and be a little bit more cautious

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is prudent at this point. Continue with business as usual,

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps not accelerate any of your spend or investment.

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>From here, I'm gonna ask you if this is all

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>part of a continuum. We had the news out of

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>friends yesterday another candidate for for president there from the

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>socialist center left side of things. Uh. And it strikes

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>me that the longer this continuum gets, the more events

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like this probably take upon to take less import than

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they would have in the past. That's right. I wonder

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if we all have a little bit of a political

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>news fatigue too, because um, it's been a NonStop array

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>of big events and you know, analysis of every politicians speech,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and we were already in that mode when it came

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to policymakers, particularly on the monetary side. Um and and

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>now here we are trying to really discern what every

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>politician is trying to try and do, and you know,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>their policy priorities. The one thing I would also note, though, is,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of these political changes have huge impacts

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on currencies and sustained impacts on currencies, and that ends

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>up helping someone's relative purchasing power or uh, the earnings

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of exporters. I think that may actually help the economy

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>in the near term, but it's really too soon to

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>say how sustainable that is. So you can hear me,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit of a skeptic. I'm a little

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of skepter, you go. I mentioned those two big

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a monetary policy events, one this week one next is

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that taking on less importance is monetary policy taking on

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>less importance, and light of all of the politics that

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, I was totally unaware that we had some

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy coming up. Of course that's not of course

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that's not true, But no, I think that actually, you know,

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were to ask me between now and kind

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of your end. You know what am I most focused on,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>if any sort of events, it's is actually gonna be

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>ECB on Thursday, UM less interested in the FED next

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>week unless there was a meaningful shift and all of

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden the decided to step away and not continue

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the path normalization. But I think you know what the

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ECB does in terms of talking about UM bond purchases

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen and onwards, whether or not they

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>would consider tapering or extending the program. I think that's

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a huge impact and will really move markets.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's a small meeting later this week. Small it'll

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be amazing why. I can't imagine what do you will say?

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It is always eagerly anticipated press conference. Good morning everyone,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>David Gerr and Tom King, Kate more with us Kate

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>within within the rotation, You've said the word rotation four

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>or five times in the morning here as well. I

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>think we needed to define that what is rotation and

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for our listeners investment? So what

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about rotation. You're right, Tom, totally fair

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to call me out on using that word a dozen

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>times this morning, but only one cup of tea in

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>what I would what I would say is this this

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this rotation within the equity market happened and started to

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>happen before the US election. It was away from some

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the bond proxy stocks you know, broadly will say

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that's utilities, tell a calm and consumer staples, and towards

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the more value and cyclical plays, particularly towards financials,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say, and energy. Uh, that accelerated after the election,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can actually really see a meaningful departure from

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>first half performance, second half performance, and then you know,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>super charged in the last month. That's what I'm talking

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about in terms of the rotation and really away from

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, investor darlings into sectors people had much lower

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>exposure to. So so help me. And maybe this goes

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with a Roper merger that was just announced. I believe

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Karen Moscow got that into a discussion. They're buying is

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it Dell Tech? Roper Technologies? Um getting it up here

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of Sarasota, Florida ten They manufactured, they distribute industrial equipment.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Those are the people Donald Trump wants to help. We

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned tariffs before. How do you fold the president elects

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric maybe policy and actually you're estimate of his real

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>policy into buying acquiring shares of industrials and then here's

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the hard part, and then holding them. How do you

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>do that, Tom, That's a great question, I would say,

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because industrials are the one sector where I think there's

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of uncertainty. The market did price in

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely optimistic scenario, both in terms of infrastructure spend

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and on shoring. But it's really not so straightforward. And

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I would just take us back a few

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks to how companies in that that sector guided not

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just for fourth quarter, the forward quarter, but also for

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve months. It was very very mixed, Tom,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what we need to recognize. We

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have to also look at the policy changes. But but

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but focus on the fundamentals, and um, you know, I'd

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>say I'm a cautious, a little bit cautious. You know,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>given the recent run in the sector, market priced and

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>pricedent very fast, too fast. Do you think I mean

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's overshooting their bent? You know that you look at

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>those for couple of days post the election, and and

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>some of these potential policies got priced in very very

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>quickly and then backed off. I would say the big

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>example there would be large capt pharma, and you know,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of broad the healthcare where there was a great

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of optimism, of a bit of a relief rally,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then sort of a well, we don't know what

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this means for affordable care, and we're still concerned about

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pricing when it comes to private insurers, so you know,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a bit bit of a back off. But then some

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff can has continue to run. And those

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are the sectors as I mentioned before, they were already

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>in favor and moving ahead of the election, help us

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the weight of the variable of trade policy. Here

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people saying, we heard what he had

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to say on the campaign trail, heard with Donald Trump

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>had to say on the campaign trail. He's going to

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>limit what he's said when he gets into opposit itself.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And then we see these tweets over the weekend as

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you're looking ahead to the to the health of the economy,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>how much is that weighing on on your outlook? I mean,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>trade policy is enormous people, people, we can't separate out

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what could happen to the US dollar um or what

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>could happen to the global supply chain or what could

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>happen to the average cost of goods purchased by the

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>average consumer who has not actually experienced significant wage gains

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or any wage gains UM. And I think stuff sounds

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>good when it comes out, perhaps on a tweet, it

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's protecting the American people. But there's a

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>far distance between some of that rhetoric and a positive

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>impact UM in terms of over someone's overall spending. Kip

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>more with us with black Rock. We've been talking up

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a storm here. On a break, Let's talk about technology

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and hydrocarbons. There's always a point where something gets stupid

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>within the SMP valuation, like it makes up twenty one

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or eight cent or whatever the sp index. I would

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>suggest hydrocarbons right now aren't stupid, and I'm guessing sort

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of big ugly technologies not stupid. But is technology a

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>value trap? What portion of the SMP is it? And

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is it a value trap? Look, without question, the importance

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of technology has increased, but I would say, you know,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for me to say it's a value trap.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The multiples didn't get crazy. There was actually so much

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth and sales growth in that sector for a

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>long time it's obviously slowed a little bit and estimates

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for two thousand seventeen or not as aggressive, But you know,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it is a sector I think that incorporates some real

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>high flying companies and some kind of older tech and

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>where it may pay to be a little bit more

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>specific and discerning. I would also say it's a sector

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge consensus overweight for some time. At

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a consensus overweight going into this rotation, I want to

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>use it for thirteen times now tom um in that

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that started in the beginning apart me the second half

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of of two thousand and sixteen. So it's a place

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>where I think people can continue to reduce their positions

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to fund um some of their buying into

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>energy or into cyclicals or something kind of a more

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>value place. I was mentioning in terms of US bank stocks.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>There was so much commentary after the election looking at

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>technology and specific which was down on the heels of

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the election results that it was directly attributable to what

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>happened on November eighth. Looking looking back at the election, now,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is there anything that we've seen since that you can

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>tie that to or is it just the uncertainty generally

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of rotation. It's not that you could argue

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>if it was just about the election, then people should

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really like a lot of these technology companies with huge

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>amounts of cash off shore and if that's coming back,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and it would be great to own the shares, especially

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>if some portion of that cash is used for buybacks

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or special dividends. But I think this is really about

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>people getting more constructive on the banks, which were the

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>consensus underweight and which we had become more constructive on

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of had been talking about throughout the fall,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>and that needing to fund um, you know, find some

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>place to actually, you know, to get cash to decrease

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that underweight. And I don't even think we're at neutral yet. Frankly, yes,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I think so um, not meaningfully underweight, but modesty underweight. Look,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I've had a number of conversations within Black Round, outside

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of Black Rock, where portfolio managers and investors have said,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they were overweight, the bank's going in

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there at least neutral. They felt pretty good about it.

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But the speed at which these these stocks moved has

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>made them cautious about doubling or trippling down. So I

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>think that people are still phasing into the sector. Mike,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a phase into the sector. JP Morgan

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>is basically a moonshot. I mean, if you look at

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it on a monthly basis, and you look at too stands.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, David, it's it's where's that chart again? There

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. It means way out past three standard deviations

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on a monthly chart. It's a moon shot. I'm quite

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the shape of the J. Yeah. I thought

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the bank was about ready to fall apart if you left.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I hardly think that's the case. It is, Uh, it is.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a very very solid institution. Uh probably didn't

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>even notice I was gone. Um, But the point of

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the matter, Jamie, Diamond were black for three weeks after

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you left. I were black every day. Seriously, you're telling

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>me the banks are availing to make it fails. I know.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the banks have so many things going for

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>them at this point. Outstanding balance sheets which we knew,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>better cash return to shareholders which we knew, which was

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like skeptically, um, you know, taken in by

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. We actually also we're seeing good green shoots.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I hate using green shoots, but it's green shoots in

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of economic excuse me, we're rotting. We're pretty constructive

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on the U. S economy and actually see see good

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe we're going to get an acceleration in growth,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not just because of this election, but just in terms

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of overall demand um in two thousand seventeen. In addition,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>if we have less regulatory pressure, I think that's a

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a real help. And of course we've got this

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>reflationary theme which is steepening the yield curve, and it's

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to help overall earnings. We think, especially

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of quarters. There are a lot

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of things that have aligned at the same time to

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>make the banks an interesting by. JP Morgan is out

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>three standard deviations for the first time since May of

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, and then it was from extremely quiet

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four, two thousand five. That's how rare the

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump surge is for Mr Diamond. Fortress Fortress Trump, maybe

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what we'll call JP Morgan. Kate Moore, thank you

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so much. She is with Black Rock giving us wisdom

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on the equity. Fortress Trump till there was yesterday. I

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't lie this time to go across one block the

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Place to be. He said, you're a bad influence. Yes,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Gucci will continue. This is Bloomberg, who

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you put your trust in matters. Investors have put their

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>trust in independent registered investment advisors to the two and

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of four trillion dollars. Why they see their roles to serve,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not sell. That's why Charles Schwab is committed to the

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>success over seven thousand independent financial advisors who passionately dedicate

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves to helping people achieve their financial goals. Learn more

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and find your independent advisor dot com. Well, let's a

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>real pleasure to have a legend on the line from

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Rye in New York. That's Mario Gabelly, founder of Gabelly Funds,

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>schooled by Dodd and Graham, joining us now by phone

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>from Rye. As I say, Mary, good morning, Great to

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have you with us, Delighted to be here talking about stocks.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Well, let me let me ask you,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, what these last few weeks have been like.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking with guests about how they processed what

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>happened on November going into the morning afterward. Give us

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>your sense of of what's happened here and how it's

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>changed your outlook hasn't changed anything other than the re

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>establishment of a basic fundamentals of allocation of capital towards

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>capitalism as opposed to socialism. Any event, the eboth, Hillary

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and Donald were basically going to push for a couple

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of areas that were fairly obvious, one of which was

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending. The other one was military spending. So you know,

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we were there and the you know, the change in

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>administration basically allows new changes that who is going to

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>run the regulatory agency like the Federal Communications Commission? What

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? And things like, uh, you know banks

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and consolidation in the banking industry. You bring up infrastructure,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start there. There was so much enthusiasm among investors

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>after Donald Trump was elected. A lot of people betting

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that there is going to be an

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending package. When you look at a sector by

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sector basis, when you look at utilities, say, is it

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>oversold at this point? Well, whoa, whoa, You're you're off

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the deep end. Let's talk about infrastructure. Cement, roads, bridges

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>inland waterway inland waterway, the the locks on the Mississippi

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>where our grain goes to export, like soybeans are big

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>export product that's got to be focused on. We've gotta

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>eliminate the bottlenecks and just drive around Manhattan independent of

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>all of that. What does infrastructure mean? It means airports

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and the equipment rental companies. You or I Ashtead in London,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Herrick Rentals and has three or four others they benefit.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a forty five billion industry that was hidden. But

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you go back a year ago, one year ago, December fifteen,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen, the US government past the five

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>year bill for highway fixer up called fast Fix America

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Surface Transportations. Fact, like company in Chattanooga doubled before this happened.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's called Aztec. Companies like Gento, which makes us to

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>get tons. Mario, how do you respond to somebody who says, Okay,

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's great, Mario, Red and barons from your listen to

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on surveillance and you are are United rentals talk about

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't make money in stocks, folks, fourteen point nine

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>percent per year over the last decade. How do you respond,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Mario to a person who says I didn't get in

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm too late. Well, that's the question mark. That's always good.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Buffett makes the case and I'll just echo

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>his comments about the next ten years, America is great,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>American investing will be terrific. And to the cree that

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you own a company and your buy hole. Look, if

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you bought Warren Buffett's company somewhere around seventy when I

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>started the firm, you probably compounded at any time over

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years. People would say it's of a price.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm think that a index fund will grow.

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom and the active management you better, I need you

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>get you wound up. This morning, Mario Gabelly on the

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people that say companies shouldn't do share buy backs, they

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>should stop financial engineering, they should go out and find

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>investment even if it doesn't work. That upsets you a

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, doesn't it? Not? Not really, I think it's

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.719
<v Speaker 1>not inappropriate to allocate capital to the way a CEO

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks to the degree that you were basically putting money

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty years ago and open heart furnaces because you

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>were in that business and you want to continue in

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that business, and now that was not smart. Just think

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of Cuba, Just think of China. They did the same thing.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the American capitalistic system. You know,

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to allow all of the errors and all

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of the mistakes, allow that capital be formulated. And I

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>put in, I have no problem if the company is

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>selling value to buy, it is a thirty seconds that

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to come back, Mario. Is Donald Trump good

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for Mario Gabelly? I think the notion of a lower

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>corporate taxes, global competitors for American industry, somewhat less regulation,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and the re establishment of the entrepreneurial innovation, creative innovation

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that made America great is not bad for any entrepreneur

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like myself and anyone else that wants to succeed. To

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>give you an idea of the pixie dust of Mario Gabelly,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and trust me, folks, there's years that he would rather forget. Rarely,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if ever, have I seen back to back years in

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the ninety four percentile that would be the Gabelly Equity

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>trust A closed and fund g A B is Well, Mario,

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>did banks have anything to do with your two thousand

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>twelve two thousand thirteen excellence. No. I think it was

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a combination of transactions and coming off the lackluster performance

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in the prior years. Talking about banks that we're looking

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at all of the banks in Virginia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and Florida that will be part of the consolidation effort.

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, anything on the two or three billion dollars,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they've got a new tail in

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>tom Well, how does it change, How does the bank

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>analysis dialogue change with the politics of Washington. Oh, I

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's fairly simple. The eliminate the the they raised

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling of fifty billion dollars before you have to

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>file a large number of extra forms and the list

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty simple. Anybody can just go out and get

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a Russell two thousand index of banks and identify those

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>areas rather than be identifying them for you. But that's easy,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just requires a little oval grease. On

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side. In the infrastructure area, one of my

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>favorites is case New Holland Farm Equipment Company, say construction

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>equipment company that trucks in Europe, which is improving, and

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the stocks around eight dollars and seventy five cents and

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>US and C n h I and it's controlled by

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Annelli family, and I think it's quite quite attractive.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>So there's a whole bunch, Tom, when you say about

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>entry points, what do I want to own, how do

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I make money over the next three or four years,

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and how do I pay lower capital gains taxes during

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that period? While I'm holy it, that's what the individual

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>investors think about, not the professional investors, the managing tax

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>free money. Though Tom mentioned your prowess for for media

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and our colleague David Weston sat down with

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Less Moonvest the president, chairman and CEO of CBS yesterday.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that you have been actively watching and engaged

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>with the conversations about the future Vicom, the future of

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>CBS are you are you looking forward to Do you

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>want to see here a merger, a deal with both

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies and do you want to see Moonvesz running

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in Basically, Less is terrific, one of the great executives

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in America. We have blessed this this country with so

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>many good CEOs. Basically, the decision is going to be made,

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously by National Amusements. National Amusements obviously is trying to

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>go through the fairness. Our clients own most of the

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>majority of the minority in terms of voting stock in

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Boat CBS and Viacom. So hopefully if there's an issue

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of fairness and extreme of fairness opinions or

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, we will have an important say in it.

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And we're not opposed to emerging. We've gone through this

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>before Viacom was off from CBS. It was they bought

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>CBS and a lot of going things going on within them.

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Within the dynamics. M is the basic idea of animal spirit.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we believe. I just did a chart of

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the monthly JP Morgan chart. It's a moonshot folks at

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>three point one standard deviations. I mean, it is a

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump moonshot on the equity markets. Would you suggest M

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and A. I mean, I was with you, Mario one

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>day and the next day Cadbury was taken out. Is

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that game going to continue? Well, you know, it's funny

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned Cadbury because one of the ones on

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Pretende A transaction list is one that you know, Irene

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Rosenfeldt went after cat Barrier and Mandale is certainly around forty.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, kind of an interesting consolidation play on its own.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Either they're gonna buy someone or someone will merge with

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>them to create scale on the global basis, Tom, how

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was the the environment for the the atmosphere four mergers

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and acquisitions right now? Well, it's not change. We go

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>through the last sixty years and we go through a

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>variety of cycles, and this one here, you know, may

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>have some tail when, particularly if you allow capital to

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>be flowed back to the United States and have a

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate tax that is not based on world taxation but

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>territorial taxation, so that companies in the United States, particularly

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>big farmer utilities, will merge. You know, you get a

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of companies that will consolidate. And the entertainment

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>business is just another example, and content and connectivity, so

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll see a lot of potential deals. Even this morning

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where we're talking to I just tweeted that X Y

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>companies being taken over the cash tender offer. Mario, let's

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do some job constructive job advice for our global Wall

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Street audience to the young turk who's level one, level two,

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>level three cf A. They're doing securities analysis, either full

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>time or they're certainly aware of it. What is the

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>new new for you in terms of analyzing the company's

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>performance and potential. Well, we just look at how management

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>allocates capital. Tom, that's but nothing has changed. I mean

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>basically as Graham Dodd Murray Greenwald that methodology. You know,

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be the CEO of a public company,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do deals in big private equity,

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>if you want to understand how to do merging acquisition work,

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the notion of doing fundamental research and sticking

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to the problem is getting paid for it. Ever since

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer put his rules out, it has become extraordinarily hard

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for the cell side, which is a great training ground

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to basically pay for analysts. And so where are the

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>analyst going where they do in their work? And it's

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's the quandry. Tell me about General Electric if

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>it's about the CEO and allocation of capital. Has mr

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>mL done a good job? Well, clearly this deal with

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Maker use and merging their uh you know, energy business

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>into that. And look at what they're doing in the

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>additive area with Joyce who runs their engine business making

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions in Europe because he wants to get into the

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional metal additive business. You know, they've got to

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>move capital around. They've been shrinking the cap. The stock

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good target for industrial activity on a

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>global basis. Clearly they're trying to figure out what they're

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do with their water business and obviously some other industries.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So the notion of capitalism is to allow you to

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>make managements, to make mistakes, and you know, make acquisitions

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and also sell the investments without the same time reposition

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the company for the dynamics of growth and that stay

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>frozen like Cuba did but fifty years I hear you're

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the need for tax reform, for regulatory reform,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted the degree to which you're working hard

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that that Donald Trump is hearing you out.

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Are are you somebody who wants your opinions known, which

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about him here, But are you satisfied this

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as a president elect who's listening to guys like you?

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I hope, I hope he's not listening to me. There's

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of part of people. There are a lot

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>smarter people out there that can give him advice. I'm

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>just basically an old fashioned stock picker that has done

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a fast you know, work hard for my clients, and

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's all We're gonna focus on. No politics, no sex,

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>no religion. But we will listen to Tom Keene and Bloomberg.

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it there after, you know, no, Mario,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Baragabilly greatly. I appreciate it. Thanks

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura is

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>David Gura before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio. Who you put your trust in? Matters?

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Investors have put their trust and independent registered investment advisors

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to the two and four trillion dollars. Why Learn more

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and find your independent advisor dot com