WEBVTT - John Neffinger

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Today's quote is for Monica Hess from The Washington Post,

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>writing in November of twenty nineteen. It's about the general

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>reaction to Marie Ivanovitch testifying during the the Old impeachment trial.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>This quote is part of the inspiration for the final

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>segment of this podcast, when I asked my guests to

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in a voice they admire. Here's the quote. We're

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of building a listening library of

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>powerful female voices. We still can't ask. As Senator Klobascher

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>pointed out in a presidential debate quote, who is your

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite woman? President? End quote. During the height of Hillary

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's sixteen campaign, she was so besieged with charges of

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>shrillness that the Atlantic magazine interviewed experts to figure out

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>what made her voice so allegedly irritating. They found that

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>her so called shrill voice was actually quote average in

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>pitch and loudness for her age and gender end quote.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The issue wasn't how she sounded, It was how she

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>sounded to us, a listening public without the oral reference

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>library to assess female authority, trustworthiness, and power. Our voice

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is a reflection of our life experience, where we've been

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and who we've listened to, but we can also own

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>it and even change it if we want. This is

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that's all about the voice, but it's also

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>all about power, Who has it, how we get it,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and how we sound when we have it. I'm Samarve.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm a dialect coach for actors in Hollywood on projects

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like the upcoming Wonder Woman's sequel, and I'm also a

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>speech coach for entrepreneurs, politicians, creatives and women everywhere who

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>need to use their voice to get what they want.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to permission to speak. Let's do this. Today's guest

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is John Neffinger. He's a man. He talks about trigger warning, um,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the the guy who's our president, and nonetheless I wanted

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to have him on because he's a world class communication

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>coach whose book Compelling People is taught at top business

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>schools around the country because it synthesizes a massive amount

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent studies on how we're perceived and

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>makes it super clear. We can argue the fairness and

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>whether we have to follow the rules just because they're

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the rules, and I do, but we can't argue with

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the data. It's depressing and it's enlightening. He was also

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the calms director for the Democratic National Committee and coach

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton leading up to the election, which we talk

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about here, as well as his thoughts on Elizabeth Warren

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>suspending her campaign. We had a lovely chat geeking out

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about coaching people, since we both do so, and it's

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>full of practical advice that I hope is useful. This

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is John, So your book Compelling People or Compelling People. Yeah,

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a double um focuses largely on two

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>different metrics, strength and form. Yes, it is metrics. It

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is one framework. It is there. Yeah, that's right. Yeah,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a really nifty framework and it's one that comes

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in handy in a lot of the kinds of conversations

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that you have where you're thinking, you're you're trying to

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>make sense of all of this soft and smushy whether

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's vocal tone or posture, body language, or the stuff

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that makes us react to each other the way that

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we do. But it's very hard to see which parts

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are doing what thinks right. And so this is a

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>framework that helps organized redibly simplifying. It's really simplifying. We're

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about strength, we're talking about as you say in

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the book, the root of respect, and we're talking about warmth,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the root of affection. Correct, how much

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>someone likes And you can map these on top of

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>everything from you know, the sort of energy somebody walks

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>into a room with, and their look and their gender

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and their race and their age and their height. But

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you can also even map it on like sounds that

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we make that's on soft versus hard, And you can

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>map it on how we apologize. If you say you

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>realize you hurt someone, that's warmth. If you say you

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>commit to not doing it again, that strength, and it's

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>not a good apology if it doesn't have both. Actually,

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, you can and then obviously also on leadership,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's where correct correct, Yes, So where do you

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>want to start? Well, my first question is, just to

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>back up for a second, is how do you describe

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what you do because obviously can be so wildly learned.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you got have to. I just do

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of different stuff I do. I know, right, I

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>am very very fortunate because I do a lot of

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>things for a lot of folks. Over the course of

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the year, interesting things come up, and mostly it adds

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>up to enough money to pay my rent at the

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>at the or my mortgage at this point at the

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. So so I you said how

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you said that with a lot of strength, and then

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you warmed it up at the end. There it's the thing.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the thing. You gotta do the thing right. You

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>got to watch the talk. So so look on paper,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you are a speaking coach. That's right on paper. I

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>describe myself much the same way you do write um

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that I help politicians and others, be the organizational leaders

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or other folks in the media, or advocates or school kids.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I work like I'll work with anybody to express themselves effectively,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and so I like to work with people who agree

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with who I want people to hear um. But other

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>than that, it's people from all walks of life. And

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>then there's also a whole strategy side. There's a whole

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy side. And I do a lot of other comps,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I've been the COMPS director for the Democratic National

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Committee Party at some point. So there's a bunch of

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>other associated communication. How quote unquote we present ourselves and

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're presenting ourselves with. We don't just tell people

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to fill your voice to the edge of the room.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>There are more things than that. Yes, there is a

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>much I don't know if you've talked about this before

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in this but there is a much misquoted study from

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the early seventies Morabian. Do you know about Merabian? He's

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like a local boy, right, he was at u C.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>L A. And you don't know everybody in l A

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is not from l A. Okay, that's fair. He was

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>transplants fair enough, fair enough like DC. But he was

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doing these studies where he was trying to figure out

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you decode the emotion or what's the most

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>important channel through which we interpret the emotion of somebody

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who's talking to us. And so we got three We

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>got their words, and we've got what we're seeing, and

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 1>we've got what we're hearing. Obviously you're hearing their words,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but the music in the time of the tone in

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the voice. And so the punchline is that the way

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly told is the words are only seven percent

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of the communication and some vast majority like more body language,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and then between and is tone of voice. And that

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>leaves less than ten for us to very depressingly, uh

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>reflect the content of what we're trying to very nice,

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, But what he was actually asking is where

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>does the emotion come through? And what he was doing

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to come up with these suspiciously precise numbers was to

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hit them against one another. So we've all been in

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a room where somebody stands up at the front of

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the room to talk to us and says, I'm happy

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be here today because and you're like, really are

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you now? Clearly not? Or if the bodyline, which is yeah,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like he wants to our confidence that we're saying confidence

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sounding things that I don't belong here, then we we

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>believe our eyes and our ears over the right, over

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the content, over the words themselves. So it's a very

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>clever way to figure out what matters in terms of

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the emotion just by pitting the channels against you another.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But what it gets reduced to is seven percent of

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>your communication. Only seven percent of your communication is what

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you say, so what right? So like read from the

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>dictionary but just have really gleaming white teeth and stand

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>up straight and no no. But the emotional content is

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>why anybody is going to take time out of their

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>schedule to go and visit with somebody and be in

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the same room as opposed to sending an email. Like

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we have lots of ways to send words around these days,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but we take that time not just because of you know,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>conversation back and forth. We can do that electronically too,

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but we want to be in the same space because

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>there is an emotional thing that happens when two all

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>are together and seeing each other and being in each

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>other's presence, and that's an important thing. That's what's what means,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>what gives meaningful and important matter. And so just for listeners,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the sort of button of this misunderstanding of these three

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>different statistics is that it's not that what we're saying

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It's that if our body language and our

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>tone of voice were not in alignment with what we're saying,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we will not believe you. Yes, I use lots of

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>political examples because that's where I hail from. And you know,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Palin strode on the national stage and everyone went wow,

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who she And then she said down for an interview

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and couldn't string together enough thoughts and yeah, and it

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>blew up. So you gotta you gotta know your content.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But just knowing your content isn't enough to make it

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>matter to anybody necessarily well, and also for those of

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>us thinking about how to apply this in our lives

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to really trust that how we think about walking onto

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that stage and trusting ourselves and believe thing ourselves and

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the strength side of it maybe is actually going to

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have an impact. You know, we can't actually just know

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>our material. We have to also trust that our body

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to reveal whether or not we feel like

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we deserve to be up there. That's right. So what

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is that mental work that we can do ahead of time?

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Which actually leads me to my real question, which is,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you work with people? What? What is that?

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What is an hour long experience with me? Yeah, I mean, obviously,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>let's say a new client, Let's say maybe somebody running

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for office. Let's say maybe a woman. I am working

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of just overachieving people who have a

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart thoughts because that's their job, and they've

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>trained and you know, spent god knows how many years

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in school, and then I had all this experience, and

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of content rattling around in their

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>heads upstairs. But often times the reason I get called

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in is because it's not doesn't seem to be coming

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>out right, or doesn't seem to be having the intended

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>effects and the desired effective, which we might say, literally

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody needs that. Everybody, all these perspective things were rattling

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>around in our heads. Definitely, definitely, So when I get

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>called in for essentially, you know, kind of remedial stuff,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's not always remedial. Sometimes it's just like, look,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to step this up, and we need to

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>compete on a way bigger stage, and we've been used

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to and so let's let's talk about what's going on here. Um,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes I'm dealing with people who are very comfortable in

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an analytical space where they're thinking about stuff and there's

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>logic and stuff makes sense, and they're much less comfortable

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of touchy feely intuitive space. And part

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of what's tricky about this for them is they feel

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like they're being thrust into a space where the rules

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game are not clear to them and they

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have no way to take control back. And when the

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>game do you mean, like literally, when we're communicating with

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>people to try to get them to do something for us, right,

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to have people respond positively to them and their message, right,

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And so part of the reasons to take the time

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to write a book about this and to you know,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>work with all these academics and think about this theory

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and structure. Is that part of what I will often

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>do at the beginning of my session is to introduce

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that as a way for people to now have a

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>way to think about what's working and what's not, what

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, and what levers they could you know, pull

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to change the outcome, because before it was just like,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you need better energy or more confidence or

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all things which are totally true and worth saying and

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>worth identifying, but not super actionable for somebody who who

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is not comfortable operating in that space. I mean, you

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot more time on set than I have,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe on set that makes all this like oh yes,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of course more energy, right, But my people, a lot

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of my people that's like, you know, you might as well,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, grow another head perfect. I mean two things.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>One is, yes, when you're working with people who are

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>professional performers and who have spent their lives trying to

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out sort of the mind body connections that they

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>actually know how to sort of work the instrument that

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>is themselves that's instantly easier than anybody I've worked with

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>who's from the business or political sectors, because there is

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a disconnect. I mean, it just happens societally, like we

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>get put in boxes and we get our heads cut

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>off from our bodies, and you know, we forget how

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to like access joy and I'm really like, what was that? Seven?

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>What was that? What's in the box? Um? And the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>other part of it is there's such an immediacy when

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you're about to go on camera and your scene partners

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>right there and you're acting opposite them or on stage

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. But I imagine that sort of

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the further way the audience is, whether it's through a

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>lens or you're on a big stage and the lights

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are blinding you. Part of this is like, how do

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we bring the version of ourselves that we're that we like,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>that we're used to when we're talking one on one

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with somebody and scale that up to these really like

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>artificial feeling exactly exactly exactly. And for folks who are

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>communicating not in character most of the time, oh yeah,

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that most of the time, what we're going for is

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some version of how they are with their friends or

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever it is. That they're relaxed and comfortable expressing themselves.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Not always some people that's not ideal and we need

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to about that. But a place where they are communicating

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>authentically how they feel on the inside. That is what

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>makes us first of all, that's what makes us trust people.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump communicates authentically the stuff he's either fooled himself

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about or the stuff he's trying to will into being,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's definitely speaking from a place that he has

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some honest feeling around. It's the facts are all wrong,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's saying what he feels in a way that

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for poor Hillary Clinton, right, who knew if she said

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing that was a little bit tinily factually questionable,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>she would get triple checked and wrung up for it

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>by the media. So she when she's speaking, was constantly

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>editing and monitoring what she was saying in a way

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that you could see the gears grinding as she spoken,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so it looked calculated, even when it was her absolute

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>best effort to be honest when it comes to the facts.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's the speaking with feeling in politics. There's been

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting move and I think this is true in

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the business world too. I don't know if it's everywhere.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But basically we talked about going from oration to conversation.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So oration is this sort of formal thing which, if

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, just from a technological standpoint, right,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>go back a few hundreds of years when they used

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to teach rhetoric in schools like that was the main

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>topic of conversation. Is how you do this in locos

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and path ups and all this stuff. And if you

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it, you've got no mike. We don't have

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one of these things here. And so you are if

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you're standing in front of a crowd, you have to

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>project to the back of the room kind of thing

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for people to hear you. And if you want to

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be covered in the media, you have to write this

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>speech down so you can give it to the newspaperman,

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which means that if you're gonna tell them that you

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>gave the speech, then you have to give the speech.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to write the speech down first and then

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>stick to what's on the page. Right. And the amount

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways that this has changed. Right now, every one

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of us has a like enormous TV the size of

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a like seven year old in your living room, right,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and you and it's h D and you can see

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>every poor well no, there's people thankfully for that, but

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can see every twitch of every facial muscle,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and we want to because that's how we know that

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a straight dope from that person. Right, Very

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>different totally. It's that real authentic feeling. And if even

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.479
<v Speaker 1>feels like they're reciting lines, this is a thing that's

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you can bridge this, and you know more about how

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to bridge this than most people do. But forget the

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>act of reading, right. We all know we can see

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody looking at the page and they're looking down and

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>then they're looking up a US, Okay, fine, their reading.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The act of citing something that someone has memorized. Unless

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you're a pro at this, that is a different mental

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>activity than just what you and I are doing now talking, right,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is it has this different set

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of nonverbal behaviors around it. So when you and I

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are talking, we can see each other, we know that

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we're just speaking what we're thinking and feeling in the moment.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the real deal. If I'm reciting something, all my

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>non verbals are going to be different. My vocal tone

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>will probably be different, my my visual will definitely be

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>different unless I'm really really good at this, right, But

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>so so the other major factor when you're reciting is

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that you can't pivot. You're not listening. Yes, exactly exactly,

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to fit My answers aren't going to

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>fit what you're saying at all, right, yeah, and so

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing that, people know. And then in my world,

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in the political world, the question is immediately okay that

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not you. Yeah, you agreed to say it, but

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what team of you know, consultants

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and polsters and gods who else wrote that crap for you?

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And so I get that you've signed off on it,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but I still don't know who you are, except that

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you're someone who signs off on whatever somebody else tells

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>me to say. That's not where we're going. You gotta

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>bring it. You gotta be real for people to be like,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's who I want in charge. So it feels like

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a authentic equals good. But be what if your authentic

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>self isn't doesn't huge to what not even but doesn't

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he to what society says is what we're used to

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing a powerful person looking and sounding like and you know,

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>working with a type a straight white man where the

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>problem is like, let's bring out some warmth. Great, yeah,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we know about that. I mean, you know this sort

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of idea of where he used to being analytical but

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of we got to tell some stories in here because

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I hear stories or what what tick right? I mean?

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But inevitably there is some element of that. But I mean,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this great line from Rebecca Trayster's book Good and

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Mad where she's talking about your work and she says

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that for men, a little bit of warmth goes a

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>long way, and for women a little bit of strength

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>goes way too far. Yes, what do you do when

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's authentic self quote unquote isn't as palatable to like

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the old Guard of listeners? Yeah, So there are different

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>ways to think about this. So if I want to

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>explain this within the strength and warmth framework, the old

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Guard has the power, doesn't want to give it up

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>any more than anybody else with power does, and they're

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>looking for some things. There's some stuff that they're looking

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for that registers to them frosty as they are as

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>warmth from that audience's point of view, something that's familiar,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>something that validates how they are in the world, right,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and so how do you appeal to those people? Some

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of it is ask kissing. We all know that, right.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels like what we're also talking about is short

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>term versus long term, because in the short term, for

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody who say hires you, we're saying, how does that

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>person who hires you succeed in the narrowly defined success

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're going for in the next pitch or the

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>next cycle or the next whatever. And in that case,

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>success means playing by these rules and dialing up the

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're missing. And then there's the much longer

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>term idea of where we're going with all this and

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what responsibility or opportunity we each individually have in saying

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.479
<v Speaker 1>just because this is how it's been done. Absolutely, if

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at change or persuasion as something that we're

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to do in this communication space, right you almost always, yes,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you need somebody's attention, and that's a preliminary thing, and

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you may need to break some china to get there,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, you're meeting your audience where

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>they are at now. First. Then once you've established to

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>your audience that you are worth listening to, now you

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>can introduce new thoughts. Now you can introduce new ways

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of thinking and new approaches that might include having their

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ears more open to a different kind of approach the

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>next time within the system. To you gotta win the

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>game before you can change. All right, we're gonna take

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a break if you right back. Hi, We're back with John.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We were talking on the break about how important it

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is to remember that we have a body in all

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this work. And John, you mentioned that you do warm

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>ups with people sometimes if the environment seems to allow

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for it, kind of whenever it can be gotten away with,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>which is its own issue. But yeah, well when can

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it not be gotten away with? Because I'm interested in

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>corporate culture and culture, what sort of work culture? Uh,

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know how how it loosens over time? Well, it

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a little bit abrupt, and these things like

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot goes into that judgment, a lot like are

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you right after lunch and everybody's half comatose? Or first

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>thing the morning? Is actually sometimes these are actually good

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>excuses to do this. The move that I'm talking about

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is getting everybody up out of their seats, moving around

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for just a minute. And there's there's a whole scientific

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>piece about why that's a good thing, and it's an

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to explain that that why that matters. You have

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a relationship, a working relationship with Amy Cutty, do I

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like is known for allowing people to take up

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>more space with their bodies. This is the thing which

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has all the scientific basis and there's the Harvard hanging

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>over it all. I mean, these are sort of encourage

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people to loosen up around this stuff? Does that work?

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's people's reactions? Like, everybody get up right

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>if you move around and take up lots of space.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>And basically, in the early days when people were nervous

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>before speeches, the standard prescription was jumping Jack's twenty outside

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>right now out and they come back in and be like,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, this feels better. And it was that mechanical because,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, we have a body, and all of

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that stuff that's going on the experience of being nervous

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and all of that tightening and warbling and weirdness is

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>energy that's being directed by various glands and things going

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>on in there. And you can seize control of that

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit by moving around in certain ways. So basically,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>move around, take up space, shake it all out a

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>few minutes before you're doing whatever it is you're doing.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>In at the very minimum, it takes the edge off

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. But if you're really whoop and holler

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and get into it, you get yourself in a totally

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>euphoric but much more confident place to be able to

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stride into that situation and have people go, oh, oh, okay,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>what's what this? This is interesting? What's this going to be?

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So you seem like a real person, You seem like

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a real person who's not wanting to crawl into a

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>whole because you're terrified because this is a very and

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it is it's we get called upon when you're successful

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in life and you get asked to speak to groups

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of people at once. It is nerve racking. Right. All

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the studies show people would rather be, you know, in

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the coffin than doing the eulogy or eaten by a

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>shark than whatever, all the public speaking stuff, And there's

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a good reason for it that people totally just don't appreciate.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The good reason is this, So if you and I

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are now sitting across table from each other, that's great,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and as I'm talking, you're not checked out, You're not

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just like staring at me like you would a YouTube video.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You're nodding, and you're mum m m, and you're making

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>good eye contacted facial expressions and all of these good

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>things that tell me you're doing great, keep going right.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>If I weren't doing this, this is good, we could

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do a little experiment. No, please don't. If you were

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just staring at me blankly, I would start to get

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a not in my stomach after just a couple of minutes,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'd be like, oh, oh, this is bad. Oh

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this is going horribly wrong. And what happens when you

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do this in front of a whole group full of

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>people is to them, it's not a conversation. They are

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the audience and you are the television, and they are

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>off the hook for this interaction. And no matter how

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>much you love your favorite TV show, you do not

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>nod and and whatever at the screen as it's going.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're just send them encouragements, right. Oh, that would

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be like get the net right. So, so they're just

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>rocked back letting it wash over them, which means they're

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>staring blankly at you, not one blank face, but a

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>whole sea of blank faces. Now and so of course

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get not in your stomach and like

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>have all kinds of physiological changes that signal nervousness because

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's going horribly because why aren't these

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people talking to me? Right on a really basic level,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>if you look at someone saying we get you, that

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>means they don't get you, or at least it opens

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>up the question in your mind, and then you're spending

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>half your time up there thinking hate me. Right, And

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>because when people normally approve what you're saying to them,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you get this whole stream of feedback that's not there.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So how do you break that pattern? Right? Right? Picture

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>them that no, do not, picture them in their underwear.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the Brady bunch. I don't know

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>how that guy it's that that's not what you do.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, you can strengthen your own sort

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of confidence and take control of your own physiology, just

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the way we're talking about before. For sure, part of

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it knowing is part of the battle. Knowing that that

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>seal blank faces, that that's what's happening when you see that,

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and also knowing that when your lizard brained you know,

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sees that you are going to have some of that

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>physical reaction, even though you know why they're doing that,

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and that's okay to the problem. The real you know,

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of public speaking fantastic stories of the disaster and

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>when the wheels came off and all the rest of that.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>That stuff happens when people beat themselves up for it.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>When people get nervous in the moment it's still a moment,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they say, oh my god, I'm nervous. Oh

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>my god, I'm screwing this up. Oh my god, why

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>am I nervous? Like, and people will tell themselves, they'll

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>set themselves up for this. They'll say, I'm going to

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be great at my talk as long as I don't

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>get nervous. Well, guess right, recipe for disaster. You know

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm really asking, I think is probably how do

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>people change? How do you get people to change? You know,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do they get themselves? Because obviously it's

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>if they've paid you, they have a vested interest in

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>making that change. But also it's really high right, somebody

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who's right in the check thinks that this yeah, exactly exactly.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that's right. There's also the question of buying it,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just like exactly. Yeah, yeah, I know that as a coach.

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So your book is structured in two main parts, the

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>hand youre dealt and playing that hand, which I think

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>is a really handy way of thinking about, you know,

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what we have control over obviously certain aspects. And you

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about this at the beginning of the playing the

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>hand section, where we're sort of going from here's what

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you look like and you can't control it into here's

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what you can control, and you say, you know, sort

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of sort or you can't do much about the way

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that you look, etcetera. But that's exactly why these physical

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>attributes are far from the last word on how people

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>judge your character at the end of the day, character

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of who you choose to be, not

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the way you happen to be born. And then you know,

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk about there's unconscious stuff, and then you say

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>unconscious stuff meaning we're lost in thought or we're having

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>these moments like we're just describing. And then there's this

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>line that I wanted to read. But even if a

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of behavior is unconscious, nearly all of it can

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be subject to conscious choice. You can choose not only

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to behave differently, but to learn how to behave differently.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You can take steps that change the way you react

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>unconsciously in the future. Some of these changes require a

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of practice, but others just take a little imagination.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Will you tell me what that means? You know? Where

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I start thinking about this is back with our friend

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Arabian we talked about a little bit earlier. Because the

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>reason that we trust the visual more than we trust

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the vocal, and the vocal more than we trust the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>words is those are in reverse order of conscious control.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We have to consciously choose which words are coming out

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of our mouth by and large, and since we're choosing

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the words anyway, the vocal tone is sort of right there,

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so we can play with that a little bit consciously

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>more easily too. But when we're forming words, we're mostly

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not thinking about where our hands are or posture or

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff. And so as an interpreter of

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>human communication, I know that most of the time the

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm seeing are going to be controlled not

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>by somebody deciding what to show me, but just by

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>how that person feels right, and then next most for

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>vocal tone, and then lastly for the words themselves, which

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they're consciously choosing so the question is, how do you

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>take at some point conscious control of what's going on

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of that stuff, Not because we want

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to lie, but because we want to actually express ourselves

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>even more confidently, even more effectively. And part of that

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is muscle memory, the kinds of things that we might do.

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We put a lot of emphasis on the what we

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>call the warm up or team. I'll give you a

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>quick story. So first time I went on TV at

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>National TV was it was what's his name, Chris Matthews,

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I was doing like body language interpretation on

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>some debate thing, and I was excited, and I sat

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in a little booth in a little box, and it

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was a remote thing kind of like this, and I

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>had all my answers for everybody, Yeah we're not really,

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but but the like me and the mic right, And

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sitting there with Chriss, so he was in

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some some other city. And I was really enthusiastic and

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it was great, and let's just say the effect was

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not what I wanted. And what I mean by that

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was I was like waggling around and jumping all and

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>doing this thing with my neck that kind of looked

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like a bad Stevie Wonder impression so ironic that you

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>were talking about yes, right, And so the next time

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I went on this is the actional part when I'm

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the chair and I miked up and made

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>up and all of this stuff. What I did in

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that moment to kind of get my body language in

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>my muscle what we call short term muscle memory, the

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>short term muscle memory where I wanted it to be

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was I just did this little miniature movement like I

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was heading a soccer ball back of soccer practice. Boom boom, boom.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And what that did for me is then when we

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>were live, I didn't have to think about it that much.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Where my body went when I started to talk was

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>here instead of so forward and backwards, instead of side

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to side in a serpentine motion, which was not but

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the forward and backwards. If you're in the room with me,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd see is like, not, yeah, it's not No, it

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was not huge. I was not jumping out of my

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>chair and thrust in my forehead at the camera. But

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but it changed posture and it changed movement, and it

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was much more at least appropriate for that setting. Right,

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And you can change the stuff, and you can be

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>who you want to be. So how did you think

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>about the actual content of what you were saying while

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>also thinking about do this thing with my body? Well,

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the beauty of the warm up or team, right,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which is in the moment, I was thinking about my content,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but my muscles were doing the thing that i'd been

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>doing a couple of minutes ago, a couple of minutes before,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>which is for and backwards thing, And so it was

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>much easier for me to reproduce that in the moment.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have a limited amount of bandwidth, limited

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of conscious bandwidth in the moment, and the more

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>nervous you are, the more of that shrinks. Right, So

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't control everything all at once, even if you

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have very specific, fantastic plans for how you're gonna do

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your voice here and you're gonna do your other thing here,

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and no, no, no no, it's going to happen in the moment.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And so it's like Ron popeel yes said it and

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>forget it. No late night infomercials, so you're setting your

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>your that's right. So like early eighties introvercials, late night

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sleep deprived idiots buying things that don't work. So by

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>practicing that, I'm more confident that my body is going

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to do the thing at once. And this is something

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I imagine with clients you have to sort of just

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lightly convinced them of because there is that sense of like,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, how could I possibly keep track of

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>all these things at once? But no, actually like doing

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this little bit of practice ahead of time, and then

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't think to your body right, and then you

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have to keep track of it. The a number

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one question. I don't know if it's always people's first question,

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's the thing that they actually do need to

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>know and don't know when you're speaking in public unless

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have no cards or a clicker or a podium

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>or a mic. Is what do we do with my hands?

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like being the boy at the sixth grade dance

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and like do I snap? Do I point? What do

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I do? I don't know. For the women listening, I

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's a really funny, like revelations about what

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about. The boys had no idea. They knew

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you guys wiggled a little bit, it looked

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. And for us, it's like all of our

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>gestures that we've been rehearsing for the last few years

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>were from football, which does not look it on a

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>dance floor. It's a different thing, or baseball anyhow. So

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the question of what to do with your hands, mostly

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking this is not universal. Mostly when we're talking,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our hands move, and that's great. It gives some visual

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>interest and kinds energy. There's an old saying in this

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>business it's just the public speaking piece, that your audience

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is never going to be more interested in your material

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>than you are. So if your hands are dangling at

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your sides and just your mouth moving, and you're not

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even excited enough about it to move your hands, it's

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>going to convey that like this as dry as dust,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>why would they be interested in? Like you clearly want

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere else, Why should I want to be here?

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But mostly, if we can start feeling a little bit,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our hands are going to do a thing until you

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>reach the end of the sentence, the end of the paragraph,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to think about it that way, and

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly your hands have no idea where to be,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole catalog of things that they do

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>in that moment that are mostly awful. And awkward and

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>visually very distracting to your audience because we're visual creatures

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and those hands are speaking more what happens at the

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>end of their story, that's right, And usually it's some

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of clutching, nervousness or weirdness, and there's every different

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>variety of thing, and so there are a couple of

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>things that don't look bad. So one of the things

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that we do, again, the warmer routine, is a great

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>place to reinforce this is go through motions that show

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.919
<v Speaker 1>how do you come back to a resting position that's

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>usually your hands nested one inside the other around sort

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of belly button belt buckle. Yeah, you're you're doing it

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>sitting down. It's belly button belt buckle level. We can't

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>talk about this about becoming self conscious? Yes, oh god.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Back when I was single, oh my lord, Like it

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was the worst part when I had to explain what

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I did for a living, because as soon as people

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>figured out that I had something to do with body language,

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>suddenly they're shifting nervously in their chairs and just entirely

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>self conscious. And it was awful. Yes, I get this

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, Yes, but the voice I feel like thinking

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about my accent. I'm like, I'm thinking about the content

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of what you're saying and your body language and your

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly and think, so you know about this, you

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have to mention it. I want to say though,

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's a natural segue in here when you're talking

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>about people up on the podium and being interested in

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>their material. I would love to know what makes you tick,

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what makes you want to do this, How are you

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>contributing to sort of like how I mean a little bit,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know that, but also really like what

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 1>makes you excited? So okay, where to start? So me,

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about me? Is that's what you're saying.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk about me? So you are my

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>guest and I am your guest. Okay, So me, I

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>would like to take this moment to appreciate that you

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were the first straight white man we've had on and

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I value so that even you are having a moment

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, oh, God, surely no one wants my

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>boring suburban upera ship. No, I'm not to be fair.

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not asking about your boring suburban upbringing. I'm literally saying,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what makes you excited about this work? Because you know

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>how humans communicate? Is I have reason? You know, I

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>excited should be exciting? Right. Two thousand and four there

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was an election and the Draft Dodger beat the War Hero,

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I first of all didn't want that to happen um,

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't want it to happen again. And so

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I do this had a lot to

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do with politics, and politically, Democrats fancy the right person

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to win. Yes, I want the right person to win.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>And for the most part, there are some arguments about

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>policy or whatever, But for the most part, the people

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that I want to win are the ones who are

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to govern the country in

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes everybody the most people like some

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of maximal happiness. So you can argue about what

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the end state is. But then there's another party that

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>makes a very good thing taking money from people with

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.479
<v Speaker 1>power and money and keeping their power and money safe, right,

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's it was sort of always us, And that's fine.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But I want the good guys to win because I'm

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a Star Wars kid, and so their own biases that

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if we just explain to the people how good our

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas are, they will choose us to implement those ideas

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for their benefit. And if they're not choosing us, we

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just have to explain it more thoroughly. Yes, we got

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold them in their seats longer and make them exactly. Meanwhile,

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the party that's doing this as an investment basically for

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 1>their clients who are their donors, know how to put

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>on a show. They know how to put on a

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>show because they listen to best practices. And it's not

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so much the scientists. Even that they're looking to is

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Madison Avenue and like, so what works. But the point

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast truly is about best practices for those

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of us who don't necessarily look like the old guard

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>thinks power should look or sounds. Yes, you know, I

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>asked some friends if they had any questions for you,

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and all of them head questions. I mean, sure, yeah, okay,

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously that all of them ask the same question in

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>different ways, and it is the same question, which is,

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>how can we come across as knowledgeable, confident sort of

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>without coming off as threatening or aggressive or a bitch?

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that b word? Ye, it's my I am there. Yeah.

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I prefer not to, but everybody I don't have to.

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows what and truly the other questions were how

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>do you speak truth to power without fear of retribution?

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you maintain your heart health when you must

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>align with expectations of female communication in systems that often

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>do not allow for truth to be spoken? I mean,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. And the other one is about how do

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you get permission quote unquote to be justifiably angry without

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the perception of being a bit and being treated in

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a weird, placating, dismissive way. Right, And so the questions

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that I can answer more easily are what kinds of

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>communications are received well and allow you to be effective

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>within the context of the organization. The questions that are

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>trickier our heart health and where do I put all

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this anger right? The pretzeling of ourselves in order to

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do this right? So if I can execute this, do

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I have like a closet I can just go scream

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>into for five minutes and let it all out or

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is? And that is a bigger challenge for sure.

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.919
<v Speaker 1>There's also that makes me think of statistics. I've heard

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that like, the more women in leadership, the more parity

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 1>there isn't an organization, the less these issues actually come up.

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and so there is a long term strategic

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>plan if the strategy, yes, okay, which is to meet

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people where they're at now and succeed so that women

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are in charge and win the game. So you can

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>change it, right, So once you have women in positions authority,

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're all these expectations, and I guess, for good

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and for ill, right that like, once we put women

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in charge, everything will be wonderful and there will be

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>much more empathetic leadership and outcomes will be greater. And

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how to right. I've been schooled that

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>the answer to the patriarchy is not a matriarchy, right,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's feminism. Is that we're not actually saying hierarchical structures

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are fucking awesome. Let's just do there. That's right, That's right. Yeah, No,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole different way for like maybe like a

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit just to like, but now, I mean, obviously

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole lie of patriarchy. I think this is good

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for man. I mean it will actually be pretty great.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Will tell you it's good for everyone because everyone knows

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>their place. And let's look politically, there are a whole

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of women who voted that way because of much

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable lifelong indoctrination is the patriarch and fear of

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>change and all the rest of it and proximal power.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's white women that we're talking about, totally, totally.

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a really interesting one and or some

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting research done just politically to figure out who

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>are these women and how do we talk to them

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and what are their lives like? And it was like, yes,

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>there are two earners in the household, but my house

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 1>is a much happier place when the man in it

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can feel like the head of the household and feel

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>respected and feel like he's living the life his father lived.

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And having Hillary Clinton in charge of the country is

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to like mess with that and some deep band

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And I know that in the relationships in my own

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>life the men in my own life, as a you know,

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>completely out feminist who tries to live my values, I

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>know what it is in those tiny moments of disagreeing

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with a man to make sure that they still feel

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>great about themselves. Yeah all, And we don't like to

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about this much. And for many people it's not

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a practical consideration. And that's a wonderful thing. But for

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>many people. The threat of physical violence is a real thing,

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.720
<v Speaker 1>not from strangers, and that's part of life for way

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>too much of the population. Still, so you're such a

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>good straightway. Um, you worked with Hillary during the campaign,

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is that right? Can you tell us a little bit

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>about what you focused on. So we've focused on the

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>impression that she was making and how she was coming across.

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So I worked with her very specifically around each of

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the three general election debates against Donald Trump. And so

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>she was being pitted against this monstrous figure who was

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 1>super hostile and takes no prisoners in his own approach

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to communication, and she I was in the classic double

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>bind where she had to project authority, she had to

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>defend herself against this guy was by definition a competitive endeavor,

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and yet she had to be appealing to voters as

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody that they would potentially be seeing every day on

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.840
<v Speaker 1>their media and could not appear to abrasive, could not

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>appear off putting in that way, which, as we know,

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>is really hard for women to accomplish both of those

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>things at once. I mean, one thing that I do

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>remember clearly, because it was such a ridiculous thing to

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have happened, is that I was literally you know me,

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the hell am I was literally advising Hillary Clinton world

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>historical figure that it's a sexist country and not not

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like she didn't know that. Of course she knew that.

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to be in charge of a

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sexist country, then there are some things that you should

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>take into account that are different than then how you

0:44:54.160 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>might otherwise. I much less. I wro only in the like,

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>oh my god that then like that, Yeah, I fucking

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>know that. Right's much for like? Yeah, I mean thanks

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for exactly exactly well, and not just the female experience

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>but her unique Look. The reason I'm asking is now

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that Elizabeth Warren has dropped out, I can't help but

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there's any way the outcome would have been

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>any different, if the stuff that's within our purview had

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>been different if she had demeanor, No question. I mean,

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want me to analyze Elizabeth Warren what happened

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>with that? I can do, yeah, not think directly. And

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I love her and have a lot of thoughts about

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what she did effectively and less effectively. Look, there's a

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>narrative that I think is accurate that says, whether it

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>was a conscious decision or not, that she kind of

0:45:55.840 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>sacrificed herself to save democracy from the billionaire interloper, that

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>she used the occasion of Bloomberg's first appearance on the

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.959
<v Speaker 1>debate stage to lay waste to him in a way

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that crippled his surge in candidacy at that point, but

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>also painted her in not the most appealing light. She

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>came down hard on him, and that was not necessarily

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the most flattering image she could have projected for herself

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at that Do you think, though, that it was meant

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to suggest him as a proxy to how she would

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be with Trump in a debate. Yeah, and I think

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a strategy too. But if that was her strategy

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, here's how I would approach Donald Trump, and

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>here's how I would appear on America's television screens in

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:45.919
<v Speaker 1>October of asking to be their next president, I don't

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was a good answer. I think it was

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>way too harsh, frankly, And even though if a man

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>did exactly the same thing, it worked in terms of

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>blowing up the target, Yeah, for sure. But I fired

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a sacrif faced her own her own. There is something

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we call the quality of life voter theory, and that

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is that it is actually very rational to vote for

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody who you find pleasant, because the chances that their

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>policy prescriptions are the right ones could get past would

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have their intended effects are very remote and very hard

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to judge for your average voter. But your average voter

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good judge of whether, if this person

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were elected, that the experience of having them in their

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 1>lives and talking to their coworkers and their kids about

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this person and hearing them on their radio every morning,

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>whether that would be pleasant or not, and that affects

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>their quality of It is the implication that if she

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>had not eviscerated uh Bloomberg, that her campaign would have

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>done better on Super Tuesday. It depends what else she

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>had done instead. She can be very winning. She's a

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>fantastic communicator, not just because she's freaking brilliant, but she

0:47:56.000 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>has a tone that she achieves sometimes that is just

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>so lovely, that is both authoritative but so empathetic at

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time. She does the strength or balance really beautifully,

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>but she doesn't always stick to that. She often does

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>other things instead. Town halls energy is so different than

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>her debate energy. That's right, that's right, and the debate

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a competitive endeavor. And so it's understandable that she

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>goes there. I mean, look, I would have liked the

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.399
<v Speaker 1>narrative to have been that that way that she you know,

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 1>handled Bloomberg, which made you know, women around the country

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 1>cheer at somebody who wasn't just playing um, you know,

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the the nicest women, thank you. But but because of

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>our own experience being within the double body, seeing somebody

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, yeah love you know, sort of unfurl

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:45.959
<v Speaker 1>it in their way, unapologetically, it would have been great

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if the story had been and that worked, and she

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was rewarded and in some the way she was. There

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was some surge after that, obviously, probably from the people

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>who saw themselves in her, But then for the ultimate

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>narrative to have been you know, oops, that fucked her,

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that pretty hard to swallow. Look, I don't think it

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was just I think there was a moment there ahead

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of Super Tuesday for her to show us her most

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>compelling version of her that everybody would feel fantastic going

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at night and waking up in the morning

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:15.879
<v Speaker 1>knowing she was in the White House and in charge

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of everything, and she did not show us that. She

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>chose instead to cut this guy off at the knees.

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the example of Obama and how he never, ever,

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>somehow and in his entire public career, let himself be

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>seen showing I don't have any visual for it, except

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>possibly like the sort of like surge of strength when

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 1>he said bin Laden has been killed. But even that

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't anger. It was just like intensity. Yeah. Yeah, I

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>mean he looked annoyed a lot when he was president.

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>He was dealing with all this other stuff, but he

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't do the angry thing. That's a good point, because

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that the thing that you know,

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people like me bump up against when we're told that

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>women can't show anger in public is like, you know,

0:49:57.360 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>fucking we can. We just have to figure out how

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 1>to do it right. But maybe the answer really is,

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>if you take from you know, the Abamba lescon, the

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>answer really is try to channel it into something else

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that is just more palatable. And listen, I have a temper,

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and mostly I don't like that, but it's certainly part

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of who I am, and I don't like to tell

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people you cannot do that, but I think it is

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:23.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly instructive to see that our first African American president

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who had that whole aloha spirit going and

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>never ever, ever, once even gave us a visual that's infuriating.

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I need to take a break to U, simmer and

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>come back to find out whose voice you've picked. So

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we are back and we are going to talk about

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the person whose voice you brought in for us, John,

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who did you bring it? I brought in the former

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>governor of the great State of Texas and Richard. What

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a classic, classic, gorgeous archetype of dating yourself here, I think, well,

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and for all of us who were not necessarily conscious

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and certainly conscious of the political world in the eighties. Um,

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>she really burst onto the national stage in the eighty

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>four and then especially the eight Democratic National Convention where

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>she was the keynote speaker. And we're going to listen

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to a little of that. Why did you choose her? So?

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I chose her because to me, she's as good as

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody male female at projecting all of the things that

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you want in a leader all at once, and to

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 1>some degree that makes her sort of so wonderful that

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>she's inaccessible that the lessons from listening to her are

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>probably harder to implement to some degree. But I do

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot there to unpack, and I think

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's worth just admiring the fact that it can be done,

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and it can be done at such a high level

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in such a compelling way. And she's just marvelous to say, Okay,

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna listen to a little bit. Behind his calm,

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:05.959
<v Speaker 1>there's an impatience to unify this country and to get

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on with the future. His instincts are deeply American. They're tough,

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and they're generous, and personally, I have to tell you

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that I have never met a man who had a

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>more remarkable sense about what is really important in life.

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So she's talking about failed Democratic candidate for presidency and

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>nine eight Michael Ducacus and I chose that clip partly

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because actually of the content of it, because she actually

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 1>talks about what leadership means, you know, but also for

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the style. She was known for her one liners and

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>her humor, and so this was a bit where she's

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>not relying on that, and yet it's still, you know,

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>extremely strong when we look at her. If anybody wants

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to YouTube and check this out. Texas Treasurer

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and Richards gives the keynote address at the nine Democratic

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>National Convention, that's what it's called. You know, the look

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of it and the sound of it are somewhat surprising,

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>especially I think for modern audience, because she really looks

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like a I mean, she looks like Nancy Reagan, you know,

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>she looks like the eighties, and but she looks like

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a specific kind of grandma who should be like really tight,

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and yet she's got a looseness and a sparkle to her.

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And sound wise, I mean, she's got her accent. She

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talks about it in this speech and fact and references

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it and says, this is what a real Texas accent

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds like. If you've been listening to Georgie tell you

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Rich Bush too much, which is a beautiful way of

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.879
<v Speaker 1>owning your sound. Right. What you've got here is something

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that's authentic. So why would I hide behind you know,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>why would I discount it? Absolutely? And then what I

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>love is okay. Content wise, what she's saying about this

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>gentleman she's there to speak well of is that his

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 1>leadership style is all American, that he's tough and generous.

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, well, what a talk about strength and warmth? Right,

0:53:57.640 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And then she said he has a calm exterior and

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an im patient interior. She's actually defining a style of

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>leadership that you know, we should all emulate. And what

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I love that I really want to point out to

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>people is she has his line at the end where

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>she says he has a remarkable sense about what is

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>really important in life. And I love that phrase because

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you know her phrasing, rather because to say a sense

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>about what is important in life, I mean talk about

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an empty platitude. It could mean literally nothing. And if

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 1>it was written either by you or by someone else

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and delivered by you, you could it is physically possible

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for every one of us to deliver that like it's

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just words. But instead she takes this pause right after

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 1>really what is really important in life? And you see

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>her just actually go there so that those three words

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>mean like her lifetime of you know, God knows hardship

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and making her decisions and and you know, doing hard things,

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's all in that tiny little pause right before

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it and investing in I'm going to say something that

0:54:57.960 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>sounds trite, but I'm going to fill it with a

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>life is humanly possible, absolutely, and that if you want

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about practical stuff, if you want to deliver

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 1>something with strength that makes people sit up and take notice.

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The tone of how you deliver it is important, sure,

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.319
<v Speaker 1>but probably the most important thing is the pause that

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you take right before and right after what you say.

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The pause before gets people's attention because you were talking

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a second ago and now wait, the rhythm is different,

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, And so people perk up and they listen,

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and so that pauses Okay, you're ready here totally. I

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>think what's gorgeous about the pauses that sometimes we hear

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that advice and we just think, like literally stopped talking.

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But the secret fill it. It has to be you

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>know what makes a pause a pregnant pause? And the

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 1>answer is that there's a real sense of expectation in

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it and that comes from us literally breathing thinking and

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting thought. We can see interesting thoughts on your face

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>before you say them, and then you know, and the

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 1>anticipation of what is going to come out and then

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes out. And no matter how boring of a phrase,

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it is important in life quote unquote, it feels full

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>oh yes, because you're you're in that moment, in that

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>moment of that pause, you're making sure everybody's with you,

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 1>You're drawing them into you, and then you deliver it,

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and then you pause again to say you got that right, right, right,

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and that you can talk to you know, that confidence

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that I can take that pause and people will stay

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with me is they will, They almost always will. But

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to trust that you can take that pause is you know.

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 1>That's That's what she's a real master class in. I mean,

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>among other things, it is it's a gesture of strength.

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right to say that way that she feels like

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 1>she's in her back. Do you know what I mean

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 1>when you watch it, I mean it's it's a sound thing,

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's physical exactly. She feels like there's nothing about

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>her demeanor. Talking about what we talked about earlier with

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Morabian stuff, there's nothing in her demeanor

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that says I don't belong here. M She owns it. Yep,

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 1>she belongs right up there in charge of the room.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of thing that even though yes, she's

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a masterclass and on repeatable, it is that kind of

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think we can practice. I think that's true.

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the accent, as she said herself, is a

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>little tough to image and if we you know, took

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of fact the right yes, no, not a good idea.

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And and she is both recognizable from her voice, she's

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 1>recognizably female and older. There's a sense that she has

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>she's lived some things, and so she's speaking with some

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>experience and that comes through. It's always right there kind

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of in your face, that that's part of what you're

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing is somebody's lifetime of experience. There, that's you know,

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to be as applicable to all of us,

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but the pause and the way she executes that moment,

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right is directly useful to all. We can, i think,

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>translate that age component, which you're right, we can't literally translate,

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but we can sort of metaphorically translate it onto ourselves

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in that it feels like the way she's using her

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>age is she has earned the right or she has

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>told herself you know, enough that she believes it, that

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>she's earned the right to say, you know what I mean?

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean energy, It's like what a

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>genius and we can all do yes, even if we're

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:13.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, not cracking our thirties yet or whatever. If

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you're confident in it if you are sure that it

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is the right thing and you can speak from there. Yeah,

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not insistent in the sense of being agitated, right,

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not upset. It's totally calm. This is how it

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is because you just know, and it's a way of connecting.

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not just reflecting on her that she's

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>got an authority on this subject, but it's connecting to

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the audience. You know. What I mean is saying we're

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all in this together, right, right, Yeah, I love that.

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, Well, thank you, Yeah, thank you for bringing

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>her in. She's like such a yea, you might as well.

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You might as well hear the best. Love it. I

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>love it. I really appreciate that. Well, John, thank you

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. Of course it was a pleasure. Thank you

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to John for coming in. You can find out more

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:03.240
<v Speaker 1>about him in the show notes or on our website

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Permission to Speak pod dot com. Also you can go

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to permission to Speak pod dot com if you have

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 1>any awesome quotes you'd like me to read at the

0:59:11.240 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>top of the episodes, and if you have any questions,

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I will do and ask me anything episode from time

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to time. And I want to know what is getting

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the way of your voice. You can also send

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 1>d M s or voice messages to our Instagram at

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Permission to Speak Pod, where we're posting a bunch of

0:59:29.920 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>content and please join the community. Thanks as well to

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Lichterman and the team at I Heeart Radio, to

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Megan Read, to my family and cohort, and to all

0:59:40.320 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of you. We're recording this podcast in the I Heart

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Radio studios in Hollywood on land that used to belong

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Tongva Indigenous tribe, and you can visit U

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>S d A C dot us to learn more about

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>honoring native land. Permission to Speak is a production of

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and Double Vision Executive produced by Katherine

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Burke Canton and Mark Canton. For more podcasts from my

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, listen on the ihart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your favorite shows. H