WEBVTT - Henry Wang on China's Role in the New Emerging World Order

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of The Odd Laws podcast.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm joll Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, you know, we talk all the time about US

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>China relations, multiple times a month, games for obvious reasons

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>we need. We usually get it from something resembling a

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>US perspective, not always, but I think it's a bit skewed.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is a geographic bias at play, for sure,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>a linguistic one, yes, But you're right, there is always

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>a lot going on with US China relations, and especially recently.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Right So we're recording this on September sixteenth, and we

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>have Chinese and American officials gathering in I think it's

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Madrid to talk trade, try to hammer out some sort

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>of deal on the tear. By the time this episode

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>comes out, maybe US China relations will have changed completely.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>But somehow I doubt it.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>There's going to be some new era of peace. Everything

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 2>is going to be solved, There's going to be no

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>more anxiety about trade, A TikTok deal will have been

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>made with the perfect algorithm that satisfies everyone everything. No,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>probably unlikely. Probably we are going to be talking about

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>some version of this for a long time. I don't

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>want say, you know, it's not like our perspectives are

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>just strictly US. You know, we talked to Cameron Johnson

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>who works in China regularly, so it's not none. But

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>we obviously have to change the mix up.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 3>I admire your efforts at being on partisan.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Well cross border. You know, we have to still do

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it via zoom obviously. But isn't this a long historic

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to try like build build dialogue between multiple sides

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and get multiple perspectives in the hopes of achieving something.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.279
<v Speaker 3>All I'm gonna say is we need to go to Beijing,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>mostly for the food, but also for in her US

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>China dialogue.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>The dream is that in twenty twenty six US Alive.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>It's in Beijing. We're putting it out into the world

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>right now, and I hope that we can manifest it

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>into existence. Yes, all right, Well, I am really excited

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to say that in these efforts, we really do have

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest. We're going to be speaking with Henry Wong.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Here's the founder and president for the Center for China

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and Globalization. It's the largest independent think tank in China.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Someone perfectly placed to talk about all of these topics

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>from a Chinese perspective that we don't usually get. So Henry,

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on the.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Podcast, and thank you, yeah that plessure. What is the.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Center for China and Globalization? Why did you found it?

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>What is its goal? And what is this independent think

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 2>tank that exists?

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we actually founded since twenty two oh eight. Actually, yeah,

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 4>right after the Beijing Olympic. You know, at that time,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, when we watched the Beijing Olympic, the slogan

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 4>for the Olympics then was one word, one dream. So

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I thought that that's actually it's a globalization and Chinie

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 4>actually embarked on a globalization year because I think Olympic,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Beijing Olympics in two eight was something that China's started

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 4>to read about globally. And so that's where we start

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 4>to found this think tank. At first, I have to

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 4>take all of the savings. You know, I was doing

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 4>all the business before, but we really want to study.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 4>But I really have found this thing tank that can't

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>combine my experience in a government, business and academic and

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 4>also you know, since then, it's seventeen eighteen years now

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and we become one of the top one hundred think

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 4>tank in the world, actually ranked four times in the

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>top hundred by the University of Pennsylvania Think Tank and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the Service Society Program. So, so CCG, you know, abbreviation

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>for Santa Ma China is a bridge. Is a communication platform,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 4>dialogue platform, and also it's a research platform for big issues,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 4>policy issues regarding US and China, gobal governance, golobal economy,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 4>and of course goobal migration. So just to name a few.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 4>But since then we've been doing Okay, we had about

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>over sixty seventy people, and we've been based in Beijing

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 4>and Honju and Guangdo, a few places in China, and

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>we've been very active. We're doing one hundred event a year.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 4>We published a dozen books and multiple reports. So thank

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 4>you for asking that.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>So you described the center as something of a bridge,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 3>and I was reading an Economist article from a couple

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>of years ago where you yourself are described as something

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of a go between for technocratic government ministries, Chinese entrepreneurs,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and foreign embassies in Beijing. So my question is, how

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>busy have you been lately?

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>We are pretty busy. I just give you a few

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 4>examples for example, last week I was in sham and

0:04:54.440 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 4>attending September eight the twenty five annual China Investment and

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Business Forum and Export. There the Vice Premier Relifone, who

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>is now in Madrid talking with Scott Basin, was there

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 4>opening up that forum, and so I was speaking at

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the keynote speaker at one of the Bricks Summit conference there.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>But also just Friday Santava, China hold another conference at

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>China International Service Export, you know, held in Beijing, where

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 4>there's another one hundred some countries come as well. And

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 4>yesterday we had our seventeen's mostly VIP launching, and we

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>have attend ambassadors from European, from Japan, from Turkey, from

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 4>many other countries, quite a member from European countries, and

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>just yesterday with fifty people I'm represented in China. We

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of multinational global media. And also of

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>course last night I attend relevant riception the US members

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 4>a hold the reception were becoming the new Deputy Head

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Mission, mister Gregg, and he actually made an

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>action speech there. He said, the China and the US

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 4>relation now rather than in the past. I mean, you know,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 4>I know that in the past we had a lot

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 4>of a strategic rivalry, but the new head of a

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 4>new deputy head of the US mission here in China

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 4>and said, now we should put a strategic stability. He's

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 4>not talking about strategic arriving now, So it's the strategical

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>stability you maintained a US channel relation and Secretary of

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Rubio also said that in July. So it's very encouraging

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 4>to see the thing going on. But that's also shows

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 4>how busy we are meeting all the peoples and talking

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>to all the parties and the business too.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I get that various people might describe an ambition for stability,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>it does not typically feel like it when I read

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the headlines that this is a stable relationship for various reasons,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 2>particularly the headlines that come out of the Trump administration,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>which strike me as volatile. Setting aside what you hear

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>from officials, whether at the embassy or the State Department.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Does it feel like that is the trajectory, because it

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly feels, especially over the last ten years, that when

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I was younger, the relationship felt something more like stability,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and at these days it's much more about rivalry and

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>anxiety about potential conflict.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 4>That's right, I agree with you. I think that basically

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 4>because of this deterioration since the first Trump administration in

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty seventeen and now eight years later, the resion does

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>really go down quite a lot already. And because in

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>the twenty seventeen the National Security Committee of US has

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 4>put a strategic report and according China a strategic rivalry

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 4>number one, I mean before Russia. Actually, so we see that.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Since then we had a trade war and the tire war.

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>But this second term, somehow I felt well in China

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 4>a bit more, you know, getting used to this kind

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 4>of tariff trade war. And China is also better prepared

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 4>than the other countries because we already experienced in the

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 4>first trum administration. So now I think also china economy

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>is second only to the US. The two countries are

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 4>too much independence among each other. And so, you know,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 4>because geo politically, we are really looking very bad. And

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 4>then I think the consensus on post government is that

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 4>we need to look for some stability because we can't

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>change each other. We cannot wepe, you know, delete each other.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>We have to coexist and peacefully. And that's probably the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 4>conclusion that we're getting there. And so we have to

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 4>seek a common ground and the coexisting even we are

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 4>having a lot of different views and ideas.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned just then the idea of the world's

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 3>two biggest economies being more dependent on each other. Perhaps

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>less so nowadays, but over I guess the decades of

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the early two thousands, certainly they grew more dependent on

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 3>each other because of globalization. And this is something that

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask you, which is, what exactly is

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 3>China's definition or understanding of globalization. And I ask this

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>because I think in the West it's sort of generally

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>thought of as this process of more countries trading with

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 3>each other and again becoming more economically dependent on each other.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>But there's also this sort of social element that's also

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 3>in there, because I think the assumption was always that

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 3>as countries trade more with each other, they're going to

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 3>start sharing, you know, values, whether those are political or social.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm curious if globalization is thought of the same

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>way in China.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that in China because it was a

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 4>late commerce you know, for example, you see the globalization

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 4>in the nineteenth century, which is, you know, Britain invented

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the steam power that led the industrial revolution, in nineteenth

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 4>century and twentieth century. American invented the internet, computers and

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 4>digital and US has led in the twentieth century. I

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>think twenty first century Chinese is also you know coming

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 4>up now for example on green power, Chinese leading on evs,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 4>on the solar panels and also the wind power and

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>other sea But in the compalization concept in the Chinese

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>mind is really more referred to the economic coorgalization because

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 4>because that's the benefit they're getting substantially. For example, eight

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 4>hundred million people has been lifted out of property since

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 4>China embraced opening up, basically embraced the globalization. And then

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 4>you can see China now is the largest trading nation

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 4>or major trading nation with one fifty seven countries around

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>the world. And also furthermore, China is have since the

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 4>opening up in the last forty seven years, China's about

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 4>almost ten million student study the board, I mean almost

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 4>half of that in the United States. So that means cooplization.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Flow of people, flow of talent, flow of goods, you know,

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 5>in connect connectivities fast you know, stock marketing, exchange listed

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 5>with each other, and also business doing. You know, there

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>are seventy thousand US company operating in China generating seven

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion revenues here in China.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 4>And also you know Apple will make eighteen ninety percent

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 4>of his iPhone in China, and Tesla make fifty percent

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 4>of its evy cars in China, and one Apprecious about

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent. That's a surprise from China. So I think

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 4>that's probably the colation in China felt the substantial benefit

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 4>probably for both Chinese and as American consumers. They are

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 4>less ideological, but they're more probably on an economic sense

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 4>that globalizations really bring them a lot of a good

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 4>and benefits. Example, since China John A. W Two, twenty eleven,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Chinese GENIP has gone up thirteen fourteen times. So that

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 4>really I think in the minds of Chinese when they

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 4>talk about globalization, they're really talking about joining economic orbalization

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 4>rather than the global securitization. They don't want to see

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the Arcust, they don't want to see the Quad. They

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 4>don't want to see Camp David of Korea, Japan and

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 4>all those security or NATO move into Asia, that kind

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>of militarized globalization. They want to see more economic clublizations.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm a huge personal beneficiary of these students, of living

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>in the East Village, where there's been an absolute explosion

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>of amazing Chinese restaurants in my neighborhood of New York

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>City because there's so many students there. So I'm personally

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>very invested in this trend continuing. But let's talk a

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit more about the security angle. You've actually written

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>somewhat recently that China could play some role in the eventual,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 2>hopeful end of Russia's war with Ukraine. But we don't

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 2>tend to associate the Chinese government with playing an active

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>role in global conflicts not directly near the borders, including

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Israel and Gaza, which we should talk about too. But

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to something, you know, when it comes

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 2>to the Russia Ukraine war that tends to be focused

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>on the Europeans, the role that US will play. Is

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>there going to be a point in the near future

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>or is there something we're missing where China sees this

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>conflict that is far from its direct borders and wants

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to play a more activist role in bringing peace or

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 2>is this something that is only associated with the sort

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of American style, Western led style of globalization.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's probably now the world is. I

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>mean I was at Munich Security Conference kickoff meeting Berlin

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>earlier this year with the chairman of the Munich Secure Conference.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 4>The issue the report I was discussing. On that report

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they called multipolarity. So we're getting into multipolar war. I mean,

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 4>China suddenly become one part of of this multipolar war

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 4>and then you can see what happened in the Russian

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine War. There it's getting nowhere. We had Alaska sammit.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 4>That's why I published up the Foreign Policy two days

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 4>before the Alaska SAMI. Basically, I suggest that if you

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 4>as a defense secretary, I heard him saying at the

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Munich Security Conference that the one peace making troops coming

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 4>from European countries and non European countries. So what'll be

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 4>by now European countries? So I think that countries could

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>be these brick countries from China, India, Brazil, you know,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 4>South Africa or Turkey, whatever, bricks countries. But basically, again

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 4>you see that when Trump actually after the Alaska talking

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 4>to G seven at White House, put an actor talked

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 4>to President Ship before he's Alaska and talked to Lulah

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 4>talk to Moody and talk to the person of South

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Africa after the Alaska So I think that I recently

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 4>seen macomb proposing that let's have twenty six European countries

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 4>troops placed into Ukraine. But that get very strong reaction

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 4>from Russia that Putting is that okay? For that is

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the case that we regard it as a NATO violation

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 4>or something. So we see that the excuse for Putting

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 4>to start the war is because the Natal troops are

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 4>puaching Russian border. I mean, after three and a half years

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 4>fighted me, you have a NATO European troops there again,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean he will not probably ending that war easy.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think a more extra guarantee for this peace

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 4>making in addition to NATO, EU and and also US,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 4>let's get China, India, Brazil, those the largest buyers of

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Russian energy product and what else is really an extra

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>safe keeping for the for the border. And then by

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 4>having Chinese peace keeping force there, it will really you know,

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 4>make you know, make Russia difficult to violate that peace

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 4>border because you know, China has a lot of influence

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 4>on Russia. Same for India, same for Brazil. So so

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that we're in there is this, We're stuck

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 4>in this. You know, Trump says, you know, he started

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 4>to sanction again. You're not going anywhere. But I think

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 4>by adding the China bricks element, we probably see a

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 4>more security piece that's going to happen.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 3>M What does China actually think its role in the

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>world should be? And we talked about its role economically

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 3>and the idea of globalization, but setting aside economies when

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>it comes to geopolitical security, be what exactly does China

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>want to be?

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, thank you, I think. But basically China is

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 4>a large country, of course, but it's basically agriculture culture.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's basically you have a five thousand years history,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 4>I interrupt the civilization. It based on agriculture economy. The

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 4>farmers cultivated along the Yan's River and the Yellow River,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 4>and the confusion said, if your parents alive, don't travel

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 4>far away, and then you can only cultivate the land

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 4>for seasons that they can grow enough vegetables and wheat

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and grain to feed yourself. So it's really that kind

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 4>of a culture cultivated the culture of China, and they

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 4>are not really a nation on horses or like Mongolias.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>They're going to expeditions or going to have a connalize

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 4>any places. In the mid Dallas there's a Marshall called

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 4>had a big expedition trips beyond almost to Africa. Also,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 4>you know as young country socialization, they never they never

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 4>stayed anywhere, they never occupy any places. They all returned

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 4>seven times. It was even earlier than Columbia. So you see,

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 4>that is really the culture China has until now, for

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 4>the last forty years, China hasn't started any wars, stand

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 4>any soul journeywhere, or colonize any place, or invaded any

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 4>other country. So I think geopolitically, we had this big

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 4>parade on September third to commemorate in the Second World War.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 4>But I think China has produced enough deteriories so that

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, probably if they are in any hot conflict,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 4>they have enough defenses to deter in that. So if

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 4>we cannot have a nuclear or hot war to mutually

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 4>assure destruction, then the only thing remains is peaceful competition

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 4>on the economy, on the soft power, on the culture,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 4>on the people to people exchanges. So I think China

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 4>wants to really see, let's have a level print field

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 4>and let's really compete on the economic China now is

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 4>having seventy percent of Go Go speed, the railway, five

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 4>gen networks of the world, out of the ten largest

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 4>container ports, several of them in China. China also has

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>thirteen million college graduate every year, and you know, they

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of the things that they are doing

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 4>on their own and also on energy installation now They're

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 4>electricity consumption is two point five times of US, three

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 4>times of Europe now and in terms of green power,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 4>China has produced a fifteen to sixteen million EV cars

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 4>total number will be thirty million, and they have a

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 4>sixteen million charges stations in China everywhere, you know, very

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 4>convenient to charge your EV carnal. So I think, you know,

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 4>they want to public compete in those area rather than geopolitically.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 4>So I think maybe if China can play some maintains

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 4>on peace keeping would be great because China is the

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 4>largest the peace keeping budget contributed to the UN. China

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 4>is the largest peace keeping sending force amount the P

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 4>five countries, so China can do more peacekeeping and also economically,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, China larned the money initiative about the ROW initiative,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 4>China just did summit in Tangine where they is so Bank.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>They have a bricks Bank, New Development Bank, so they're

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 4>doing all this kind of economic stuff. I think that's

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 4>how they view the world should be intertwined the more

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 4>economically business wise, rather than we are really divided according

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 4>to the ideological divided according to democracy versus autocracy, and

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 4>divided by you know this this east or West. So

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 4>there's many things. I think China is thinking a little differently.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the United Nations, and there's sort of this

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>question about the relevant or the vitality of a lot

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of these Western developed multilateral organizations wto being among them,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 2>but you specifically in your vision, maybe China's vision, or

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's distinct Is it's important to breathe new life

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>into these organizations or is there a new set of organizations,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 2>including some of the ones that China has set up itself,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the be r I, whether we're talking about

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 2>the Bricks, whether it talk about some of these others.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Is the future more okay? If we're going to have

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>this sort of new style of globalization, we actually genuinely

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>need new organizations rather than the husks of the organizations

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that were sort of built out of the Western liberal order.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think that's that's quite true. I have written

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 4>to Listen to Me, wrote the book about my dialogue

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 4>with grand Allison, the funding thing of Havard Coundedy School,

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 4>which have become a very good seller in China now

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 4>also English wise. Basically, we find that in our dialogue

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>we talk about US China relations as con John tweens.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, we cannot separate each other. You know, if

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 4>we want to separate each other, we end up damage ourself.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 4>So that's a given. So we should avoid the so

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 4>he hit his trap that Grandma isn't famously defined. But

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 4>also on the other hand, we should also avoid the

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Kinderberger trap, which means that when new rising power starting

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 4>to catching up existing number one power, there's a vacuum

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 4>in the global public goods like when US was taking

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 4>place in UK, there's a lot of a missing linking points.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, we've got big recession in the in the thirties,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 4>nineteen thirties and things like that. So China actually is

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 4>US is now put a bit back on its policy.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 4>Now it's become a mega you know, make me first,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 4>make me great again, and rather than there's no country. Really,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 4>it's looking at the gob of public goods. So that's

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>what China is now. China has not backed on a

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 4>climate change agreement. China strongly support that and China has

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 4>developed a very clime friendly environment now and we reach

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 4>cobon neutral and combon peak ahead of time.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>But just to be clear, these legacy organizations, specifically like

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the U, China feel like these are their bets that

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 2>China is intended to make, that these are going to

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>be important institutions or are they fading like many legacy institutions,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>And that the sort of new more stable order that

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>you may envision doesn't have to be with a fresh

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>set of multilateral international organizations.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 4>No. I think China is a strong support of existing

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 4>UN system, and as president, she just recently proposed the

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Global Governance institu I mean on five point two or

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 4>three point he was emphasized the UN principal view and

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>chant of UN and also we can't help he has

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 4>improved and make it better, but we should not just restart.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 4>But on the other hand, we see you also getting

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>quite a marginalized and there's a be awakening and for example,

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 4>China become a second largest donor to the UN budget

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 4>now close to you has almost no difference now and

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 4>also when US putting out of who, China committed the

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 4>five hundred million US dollars who and when you know

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 4>W two is marginal, China is working with your Europeans

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 4>to do that. But furthermore, I think China is still

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the only public big country, one of the largest economies

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 4>still proposing economic corporations like a Belgium ROA initiative. For

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>the last twelve thirteen years, Chinese invest over one trillion

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 4>US dollars for three thousand projects. And also furthermore, China

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 4>has started the China Africa Economic Summit, China and Latin

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 4>American Economic SUMMI, China and US CEO Economic Summit, and

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 4>China Central Asia and China Arab Economic su So it's

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 4>all economy related. And furthermore, and while Persident Trump has

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 4>raised in one hundred some country tariff, China announced they're

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 4>they're going to reduce the tariff of fifty three least

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 4>development country tariff zero for coming to China. So you

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 4>can see the contrast there. So I think China is

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 4>really providing enough public goods to fill some to vacuum

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 4>US is backing off on development on the global sal

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>and on the on the US system. You know, Chinese

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 4>US are putting off the UNICO Chinese that was a

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 4>big support of UNISICO, UH and so and so forth.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 4>So so I think China is doing a lot of

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 4>that kind of activities now.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to US China relations. You know, you

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that your book was selling well in China. I'm

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>really curious what is the biggest misunderstanding or the biggest

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>concern that you hear from Chinese people on the ground

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to US policy. And I realized it's

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit unfair word treating you as a spokesman

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>for an entire country and China. We don't intend to

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 3>do that, but I'd be curious, like, what sort of

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>questions do you get on a daily basis from the

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 3>average Chinese person about America and what it's doing well.

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest throwing point basically that the bother

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 4>of the ordinary Chinese that we see the US you know,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>navies coming to Chinese Ivan Street or South Channel Sea

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 4>or quite often we see you know, airplan patrol in

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 4>this part of the world. We never see Chinese aircraft

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 4>or Navy go to Hawaii or go to Caribbean. You know,

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 4>we never see that, but we see the US military

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 4>persons very strong. We had the forty thousand US a

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 4>minitary personnality in South Korea. It's just just neighboring China

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 4>and another I don't know how many, you know, it's

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 4>quite thirty forty thousand public in Japan and we have

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 4>now in Philippine. And then they have also miss cells,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 4>mid range miss sells place there and also they're going

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 4>to place new missiles in Japan now and South Korea.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 4>So those of them actually bought because because China felt

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, Taiwan is part of China, and certainly the

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 4>people in the USA, oh, China's or democracy. We have

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the defender, but China has a Chinese style democracy. Maritocracy

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>also works perfect, you know, not perfect, but at least

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 4>to work well for this most populous country in the world.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 4>So I think, you know, we all have a different

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 4>governor style. But just because our governor style is with you,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 4>and then that's why you need to because Taiwan, because

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 4>the reason for the protecting Taiwan is Taiwan is the democracy.

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Say that we have to protect that but I think

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 4>you know, China can also absorbing that. And you know,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 4>China promised to Taiwan, you know, no tax to be

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 4>given to federal government, a lot of autonomy, and China

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 4>announced that Taiwan Taiwanese will be free to walk in

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 4>the mayland. You know, no visa needed, anything needed. We

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 4>already two million taiwan Is working to mainland, and there's

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 4>half a million husband wife married across the street. And

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 4>then before tai when you know formal person of Taiwan,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's six million mayland flooded the Taiwan with tourism.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Send me the money spending restaurant, hotels. You know, there

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 4>was almost integrated already if not for the four interference.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 4>So I think the Chinese said, okay, please maybe just

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 4>let us peacefully unified, like like Germany you had the

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 4>you know East Germany, West Germany unified, and let's also

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 4>hope in North Korea sALS Care unified. So basically they

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 4>were really looking for less interference on that. And so

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that would be greatly improve in the reason

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 4>because in the communicate that the established three Communicate China

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 4>US have it said very clear US will not maintained.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're just named the normal time, no official times.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 4>But then we see US officials, parliament managary Nazi policy

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 4>keep visiting Taiwan or Taiwanese leaders coming to the visiting US.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 4>So those in public about a bit of ordinary Chinese.

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 4>But of course again win then of course US was

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 4>a world place man for a long time. But now

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 4>we see many countries also the governt model is not

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 4>working perfectly. We have all the domestic issues, US has it,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 4>European has it, All the countries has that. But China

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 4>on the other and seems maintain a pretty good status.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 4>And that's also keep lifting people out of property. So

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I think they should give China some credit for doing

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 4>that rather than okay, is always shown in front of

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 4>the China's those steps, and you have a US parade

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 4>of military muscles all the time, So that's a bit

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 4>of bothered for the Chinese.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Basically, when you think about China's relationship with the other

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 2>bricks countries, with African countries, with the global South country

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, have you seen substantive changes in those relationships,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>specifically since the wake of October twenty twenty three and

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the start of the war on Gaza and countries sort

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of rethinking. You know, has this prompted a concrete rethinking

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 2>about you know, you said the US was the global

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>policeman and a lot of people have perceived that in

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the wake of this ongoing war. Has there been a

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>substantive change the way countries want to have a relationship

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 2>with China.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, absolutely, you can. You know, this show was for

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the first time you see China Asian Summit at the

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 4>g CC. You know, golf countries all came to CM.

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 4>So you had the first China Asian CC Summit. And

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 4>now you can see also the bricks countries expanding that.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 4>You had the you know, UAE was there, and there's

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of you know, Middle Eastern countries really coming

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>to China. You have you also have the s Shaha

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Corporation summit. Recently, you had the Turkey, you had the

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 4>Iranian president. You have a lot of people from that region.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 4>So I think China's road does play because China, for example,

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a few years ago, China clinched do between Saudis and

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Iranians rather than you know, we're seeing the current chaos

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 4>going on. China also causing the fourteen different fractions of

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Palestinian group had aging Palestinian decoration, and China could publicly

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>do more in making a peace promoting peace between and Palestinian.

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>China also maintained good religion in the past with issue.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think that sooner or later, probably those countries

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 4>we realize that we cannot really let just what happened

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 4>that gods are the humanitarian crisis that you know, deaths

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 4>of thousands and tens of thousands of people, what happened

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 4>you're living on a daily basis, I mean, where is

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 4>where is the where is the you know, children are

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 4>dying and all these things, so that kind of justice.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Where is the justice? Now? So of course there's there's

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 4>there's always problem to start with, but I think we

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 4>cannot because a two round doesn't make it right. I

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 4>really think that we should continue to have this international

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 4>moral power that the United Nations Security Council should really

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 4>exercise rather than you know, being vtled all the time.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 4>So I'm thinking, you know, China public could play more

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 4>role in the future. But that's that's let's solve this

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Quinn crisis. If the if the breaks country peace making

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.239
<v Speaker 4>can happen. Uh left by China and I'm sure that

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 4>model could be applied to other conflicts in other regions.

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 4>China also trying to You can see Prime Minister Moodie

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 4>and the Prime Minister of Pakistan was at the same

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 4>type a few months after fighting in China, and we

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 4>said Armenia and Azerbaijab president coming to sing in Tanging

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 4>as well. So probably China is its building up its

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 4>mediating power and peace keeping power as time goes on.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 3>M just going back to globalization for a second. I

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 3>think everyone agrees, and you've already talked about this, that

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 3>China has been a huge beneficiary from globalization over time,

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 3>but I get the sense that there is still of

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 3>feeling within China that some aspects of the global economic

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 3>order or trade agreements are unfair to China. How do

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 3>you sort of square that tension and where do you

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>think the concern or the worries over unfairness actually comes from.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, I could ask this question to

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>American officials as well, Like the US is a massive

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 3>beneficiary of the global economic order, and yet the Trump

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 3>administration clearly feels very aggrieved about America's place in the world.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>But when it comes to China, like where does the

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 3>sense of unfairness actually come from.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's quite a few actually. You see. One of

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 4>the things that US was treating the pure deficit. That's

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 4>the only reason they started tire for war. I was

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 4>giving a talk just the last April to a few

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 4>months ago at the UN Security Council where they called

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 4>a specially arena meeting in New York. Eighty countries representably

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 4>un participated. Where I gave a speech there. I was

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 4>saying that for example, US only looking at the goods deficit,

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, merchandise compasite, but all of that deficit was

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 4>maybe you know, thirty forty fifty percent was produced by

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 4>multinational thirty percent by US. For example, out of the

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 4>four hundred billion deficit, the Trump is a levy on

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 4>China's three hundred some billion deficit. He immediately waived one

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred billion because a lot of the companies are made

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 4>goods in China. Apple has to source their iPhone from India,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 4>but it's not enough, so they have to lift that

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 4>sanctions on those deficits. Anyway, and there's a lot of

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 4>inter time. But also US and joined one trillion dollar

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 4>trade surplus on the service tree. They're not counting that.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.439
<v Speaker 4>And also the calculation about China's export. For example, every

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 4>every phone we made in China, I've iPhone made here,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 4>China probably made the labor costs, you know, eighty percent

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 4>was made by multinationals, even cars the same. So why

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 4>is just purely looking at the trade deficit numbers. A

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 4>lot of money was not made in China, was made

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 4>by international multinational companies and they're not sending back to

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the country. So that's why I agree with the President

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Trump to have more investment back to US because multinational

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 4>made a lot of money in China and elsewhere, but

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 4>they should really investment back rather than putting the tax heavens.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 4>So that's why the Global minimum taps proposed by OECD

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 4>has a great by over one hundreds some countries, but

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not practiced yet on that now. So that's what aspect.

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 4>The other spect I could say is the for example,

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 4>US is starting these sanctions on China, for example, forbidden

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 4>the use selling the chips to China, so that is

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 4>really and also they called in the Trump administration, you know,

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 4>high fance, small yard and all those things. And there's

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 4>one thousand and five hundred Chinese companies on the US

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 4>anti the least. I mean, maybe China has a dozen

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 4>or or two dozen of US companies, but compared with

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 4>the magnitude of US, is too much. Too many over

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 4>the security, over use of the security raises to really

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 4>restrict all the Chinese companies on that. So that really

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 4>become a problem. And so that's why China started to say, okay,

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 4>if chips can be the do use goods, right, you

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 4>can say okay, can be used for security or military.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 4>The same is true for rare earths right, raiers can

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 4>be making for airplanes, tanks, everything. So when China started

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 4>a little bit on that, that US starting to relax

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 4>on the sale of the chips now quite a bit.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 4>So you can see, you know, morally, it's the same

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 4>reason if US doing things in the first term, China

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 4>didn't respond like that, but now China starting to respond

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 4>like that. So I think that's why we see quite

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 4>a few agreement made by between US and Chinese off issues,

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 4>because China is much resilient now, much stronger. And also

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 4>US has realized if they really sanctioned so hard on China,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 4>the Christmas shopping sees that we're coming up the shoves

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 4>will be empty, and we could you know, American consumer

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.959
<v Speaker 4>will suffer and then that going to hurt the Trump space.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 4>That's why we keep extending. They have these seems more

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 4>they talk to each other, more friendly than talk to

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Indian and Brazil and others. So I think they probably

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 4>realized that too. Lott is economy, they can really organize

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 4>each other. They have to fund the ready to collabor.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 3>The Christmas shopping season is my personal super Bowl.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, earlier this year, actually not that long ago, Bloomberg reported,

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 2>So therefore it's absolutely true. It says quote officials in

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Beijing verbally encouraged regulatory agencies and local governments to curb

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 2>technology transfers and equipment exports to India and Southeast Asia.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 2>And there were some stories about Fox con engineers, for example,

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 2>who may have been part of some sort of moving

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain of those Apple iPhones, the men part

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of the final assembly perhaps to India. And this report

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that Chinese officials may have been pushing back against it,

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I get like rhetorically, the existing system where American companies

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of manufacturing or in China has been

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 2>incredibly beneficial. Is China totally comfortable with the fact that

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 2>as part of this globalization, some of this manufacturing may

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 2>end up leaving or is you know, US seeks to

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>diversify its sources. Is China comfortable with this?

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 4>China, I think it's pretty comfortable now. And that's why

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 4>China is more confident. For example, in twenty nineteen one,

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 4>before covid Us is largest trading part of China, and

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 4>now US fall into the third place or the first

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 4>place now because URCI become the largest place trading part

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 4>of China since the Asset Regional Comprehensive Partnership Agreement. And

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 4>then that is actually happening because you know, Viennam become

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 4>China FAS's largest trading partner now and Indonesia, Malaysia and

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 4>now expanded to Latin American, you know, most a lot

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 4>of American countries. China is the largest trading partner. And

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 4>also with Africa. Now China lifted all the tariff from

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 4>African countries products to come to China. You will see

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 4>a flot of African products coming to China. So so

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 4>I think you know that probably China doesn't mine. There's

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 4>low maybe a little bit labor entires because the labor

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 4>average labor workerforce micro workers ages forty three years old.

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 4>It's getting old China. So there's a lot of shoemaking

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 4>or you know, low low income labor cost jobs went

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 4>to Vienna went to China. Really doesn't mine now. The

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 4>China now is focused on the high end now. For example,

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Chinese focus on the green power transition.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>No curves like there's no curves as far as like

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 2>from your perspective, there's no impulsive the government to curb

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 2>moving some of these more advanced things again talk about

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 2>iPhones and such to a country like India.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Not really. I think China still encourage the investment for

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 4>example Bui d or you know, c ATL and I

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 4>know quite a few companies still very bullished investing overseas.

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 4>There may be sensitive military or rare stuff that China

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 4>may be question a little bit, but on the general

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 4>I think things are still quite open.

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Is there an argument to be made that China should

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 3>perhaps open its own economy further if you know, it

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 3>actually desires more economic integration with the rest of the world,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 3>because we're talking about globalization still. But China still has

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 3>capital controls, still has currency controls, still has some restrictions

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>on investment and things like that. Should it be more.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Open, absolutely, I agree with you. I think China should

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 4>be more open, and that's why we've been that's our

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 4>think time role to promote that. For example, we proposed

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 4>people promoting the visa. Now China has you should beatly

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 4>laterally you should visa for forty some countries in our

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 4>European countries, Australia, Japan, South Korea. I urge also you

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 4>recommend China to policymakers to open visa for US citizens

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 4>for Canadia City this coming to Channel Free. But also

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 4>on the trade policy, I think there should be more

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 4>libilization continuously. I note that the government is located to

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 4>that and fifteen five years plan will probably be even

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 4>more open. Of course, there's always rooms to improve. I

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 4>totally agree. And they have opened a financial sector quite

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 4>a long time ago, and as you said, maybe in

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 4>currency they should be more convertible. And also on the

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 4>on the investment in the culture, in the in the

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 4>in the you know, other areas pharmaceutical and now Channa

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>also welcome for university come to China to open their

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 4>branches and do it. I'm on the board of a

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Duke Queensland University in China, which is John Vander between

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Duke University and Huhai University. You know, we have so

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 4>many international student there and Yu shang Hai is operating

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 4>very well, so we hope to have more goloble exchanges.

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you. You know, there's there's still more rooms.

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 4>That's why I think this kind of talk between China

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 4>and US. Now we see tiktoks almost maybe have a

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 4>deal there, and it's great, so we listen, is this

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 4>start we should continuously talk and engage and reach agreement

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 4>and open up further to acm to each other.

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 3>First comes diplomacy through dance videos, Joe, and then comes

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>an easing of currency restrictions.

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Well podcast recordings. Just to be clear, you know, obviously

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't expect you to be the representative of the

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 2>entire Chinese perspective, Tracy, and I need to establish that

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 2>we do not represent the entire United States and the

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 2>questions that we have. You mentioned the goods trade deficit,

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and of course one of the things is you know,

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>obviously China has gotten up much richer thanks to the

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 2>booming industrial sector. The US has benefited from a lot

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of less expensive, more sophisticated goods that AD buys. But

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 2>there is this source of concern, and I say this,

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, a couple of weeks after that military prade,

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 2>there is a source of concern that without a robust

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 2>American manufacturing capacity that we can no longer be a

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 2>powerful military country as well. And I know I do

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 2>not believe it is China's role to sort of helped

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:05.919
<v Speaker 2>the US figure out its industrial capacity questions. Nonetheless, from

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>the perspective, does the US concern make sense to you?

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps there are things that seem unfair, certain technology transfer restrictions,

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 2>seem counter to the spirit of globalization, et cetera. But

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 2>is the US fundamentally wrong to be concerned there is

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 2>more and more of the world's share, however you want

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 2>to measure it of manufacturing of advanced goods somehow become

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 2>centered around China, that that long term weakened the national

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>security position of the United States.

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we are now more intertwined. Warnow, there's

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 4>quite a bit of the competitive advantage, like Davi Kanto

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 4>mentioned in many years ago. So what I think US

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 4>is still leading. The US is very good at inventing innovation.

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 4>You see Silicon Valley. You CEI. You know, by the

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 4>way Jason Hulk said, the half of the AA talent's

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 4>coming from China. You know, US is a big harvest

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 4>of Chinese talent too, And that's why we're saying several

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 4>million Chinese student went to the United States. I mean

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 4>probably half of them return still have a remain that

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 4>greatly benefited the US economy. So what I think that

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 4>that is really US is good doing zero to one,

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and maybe China is good at one to one hundred.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 4>So of the world one hundred university top fifty is

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 4>doing the United States. The reason China did allders of

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing because as I mentioned, China is seventy percent of

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 4>the global speed railway sixty, golo go five, gen networks ten,

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 4>largest container broad seven. They have the infrastructure to so

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 4>this is a value change supply chain for the world,

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 4>not for China. So maybe in Chinese is made for

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 4>the world. I think US only worried about if they

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 4>can make you cannot make big ships or aircraft. Now

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 4>they go to South Korea to do that now, so

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 4>they still find a way to do that. But I

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 4>don't think that you have to depend totally on the manufacturer.

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 4>So if if if we're leaving the pre uh you know,

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the trade war era, you know where we buy so

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 4>much chips from US China China energy depends on the

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 4>import Channa to spend more money buying the chips than

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 4>China importing energy. So now US said they're not selling

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 4>to China, and then the US company losing a big

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 4>profit center and then they are really reduced their antibuddy,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and China is forced to do reinvent well, and there's

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of waste there. So we see this separation

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 4>is really no good all on security reasons. We should

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 4>not overseecurize and we should really display our own each

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 4>other's a compartit advantage.

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask one more question about security philosophy. Obviously,

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>when Russia invaded Ukraine, the US opposed all kinds of

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 2>sanctions on Russia and tried to constrain its ability to

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>trade it all or make any money. Going back to

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Israel's war in Gaza, and you express the horror that

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 2>you see from that and the sort of response to that.

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:06.800
<v Speaker 2>But China still trades with Israel as the US does

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in the future in a sort of different global world.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Order.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Would it ever be part of China's diplomatic arsenal to

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 2>take a more heavy hand in some of these conflicts

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh, we're not going to trade you, We're

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 2>not going to sell you advanced technology that you need

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to run your economy or run your military, et cetera.

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Because so far, despite the sort of concerns or the response,

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>there hasn't been any change in the trading relationship. Could

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 2>it ever get to that point where China views its

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of diplomatic commercial power that way in conflicts that

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 2>it's not directly involved in.

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think China certainly would like to do more,

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, like what do you happen on the WHL?

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese already fulfilled its objecations too. I think the key

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 4>is really we need to restore the U and authority

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 4>and principle, particularly US Security Council. Maybe we should also

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 4>reform that too. Maybe we should add twenty members are

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 4>the sixteen to twenty members as associated permanent member of UN.

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 4>And we should really not let the Union Lanto single

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 4>veto be abused. For example, since the founding of you

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and Russia abused use the veto one hundred sometimes twenty

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 4>forty times US, one hundred times China and twenty times.

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 4>We need to really control that. So I think we

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 4>reform you wan to reflect this multipolar world. And in

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the future, if there's any other there's any problem happened,

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 4>let's send the UN Peacekeeping Force to do that. And

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 4>so if the old Security member have a big majority

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 4>and general sample have a big majority, we should make

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 4>that happen. So I think reform this multipolar world. We

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 4>also need to reform you and to reflect that because

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 4>the war is no longer fits. The superstructure does not

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 4>fit the relative today.

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Now all right, Henry Wong, Founder and President for Center

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 2>for China and Globalization, So fantastic to have you on

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 2>the show. Can we do a live odd Lots in

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Beijing with you at some point?

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, Pea, welcome back. All right.

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>We are gonna as soon as as soon as we

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 2>get off this call, we are going to begin the

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 2>preparations to figure out how we're going to make this happen.

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 2>So great chatting you with you. Thank you for staying

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 2>up late in your time to talk with us, and

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:19.919
<v Speaker 2>I'll hope to talk to you against him.

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Thank you so much, both of you.

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Tracy. I really enjoyed that conversation.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 2>It was interesting thinking about, you know, this idea that

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.760
<v Speaker 2>rhetorically there are a lot of people on both sides

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of the aisle who say things like, oh, we need

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to get out of this sort of competition framework, et cetera.

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really feel like anything is actually happening on

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 2>that front.

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, one thing that struck me from the conversation was,

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess how economic oriented it feels like all of

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Chinese policy actually is. And I suppose maybe that gets

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 3>back to this idea. This is an old idea now,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 3>but that social contract idea about the CCP, so as

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 3>long as people feel that their lives are getting better

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 3>right than, the CCP has strong support. I think the

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 3>economic focus really came through in that conversation.

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, obviously from the US perspective, there

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.879
<v Speaker 2>is this view that you know, Henry is the word

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 2>global policeman. A lot of people would say yes, absolutely,

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and that a big role of the US Navy specifically

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:45.280
<v Speaker 2>is enforcing the fact or freeing the world for trade.

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Right that part of the reason that the world could

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:49.240
<v Speaker 2>trade freely, that.

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 3>That's like a public good provided Bible.

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And Opposer has talked about this, and others have talked

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 2>about this idea that these things go hand in hand.

0:49:57.080 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting because so Henry talked about impulse for

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>continuation of global trade, including with the US, et cetera.

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 2>They're clearly, to my mind, seems to be less of

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 2>an appetite from China to like, it's not obvious that

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 2>there is a to fill the gap, yeah, or that

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I guess there's a question like does

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the world need such muscle to trade?

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Right? Does it?

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Could you have a world of trade where there is

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 2>not one entity that has a truly global military footprint.

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I think these are really interesting questions. Henry of course

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.920
<v Speaker 2>talked about, especially in that last answer, restrengthening the UN,

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, restructure, restructuring the UN exactly. It's not entirely

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 2>obvious to me that these institutions as they're constructed can

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 2>really be revived, even with lots of Chinese money going

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 2>into them. I think that's still kind of TVD well.

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I think this is it right, even if you restructure

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the Security Council so that, you know, you wouldn't have

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 3>one powerful member vedoing stuff all the time. Even if

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 3>people agreed to do things, what is the UN actually

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 3>going to do? Right?

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 2>What is the UAD actually going to do? I don't

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 2>we didn't get into it that much, but like the

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.280
<v Speaker 2>idea of a sort of war, I don't know, bricks

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 2>composed peace keeping force. I bet there are a lot of

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 2>people in the US who would love that. They're like, yeah,

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 2>let's have peace, let's.

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 3>Have a sea, someone else take care, let's give a.

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Ceasefire in Russia and Ukraine. And also let's not have

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 2>it be particularly dominated by Western peacekeepers shouldering that burden.

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I bet a lot of people in the US would

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 2>love that. I would, you know, head more time. I

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:36.399
<v Speaker 2>would love to really explore, like what the constraints on

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that actually happening are there? But I thought that was

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a very useful sort of overview of some of these

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 2>questions from the Chinese perspective.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely don't explore the constraints, Joe, just take credit for

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 3>solving us China attentions on the podcast in less than

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 3>an hour.

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 6>Shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there.

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy.

0:51:58.520 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Alloway and I'm Joe.

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me at the Stalwart, follow our producers

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Krmen Rodriguez at Carman armand dash O Bennett at Dashbot

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 2>and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. For more odd Lots content, go

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots. Were have the

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 2>daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and you can

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 2>chat about all of these topics twenty four to seven

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>in our discord Discord dot gg slash od Lots.

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you want us

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 3>to go to Beijing and talk to more people on

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the ground, then please leave us a positive review on

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 3>your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 3>absolutely ad free. All you need to do is find

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:52:40.560 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening. In e