Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. It's been quite a
Speaker 1: week for the administration. We have so many people running
Speaker 1: around telling us that we should care so much about Russia.
Speaker 1: But here's a huge shock. The American people don't actually care.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about some things they do care about, like
Speaker 1: what's going to happen in the midterms, what's going on
Speaker 1: with immigration, how the left thinks that now low wages
Speaker 1: equals violence. That and more coming up on The Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a great
Speaker 1: American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins set. Can we
Speaker 1: still call President Trump the leader of the free world?
Speaker 1: Can we still call him the leader of the United States.
Speaker 1: It's just as serious to me as the Cuban missile
Speaker 1: crisis in terms of an attack or the nine eleven attack.
Speaker 1: His performance today will live in infamy as much as
Speaker 1: the Pearl Harbor attack or Crystal Knocked. When do we
Speaker 1: see almost a shadow government come out and say we
Speaker 1: cannot side with the government, whether it's the Cabinet or
Speaker 1: the Senate or Trump has been a problem, as I say,
Speaker 1: and now I feel it's it's a crisis of real urgency,
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure what we can do except to
Speaker 1: try to contain him in various ways. The definition it
Speaker 1: meets is the first word of the impeachment article in
Speaker 1: the Constitution, which is treason, bribery at high crimes of misdemeanors.
Speaker 1: You had a one word reaction to what you saw yesterday.
Speaker 1: Treason treason. Yeah, what is wrong with him? It's time
Speaker 1: for you to stage an intervention. This is urgent. We
Speaker 1: can't count on the President United States to do the
Speaker 1: right thing. Welcome to the Buck's Action Show. That that
Speaker 1: gave you a sense of how things have been this
Speaker 1: past week, which is, uh, just a whole a whole
Speaker 1: lot of insanity, a whole lot of people completely and
Speaker 1: utterly losing it because of Trump's meeting in Helsinki, for
Speaker 1: which we we don't even have the full details. Isn't
Speaker 1: that interesting? Right? It was terrible. It was such a miss.
Speaker 1: It was the worst thing you've ever seen, the worst
Speaker 1: thing I've ever heard. It was, oh my gosh, I mean,
Speaker 1: it was the equivalent of putting pineapple on pizza. Folks,
Speaker 1: who does that. What are we savages? You're probably are
Speaker 1: your pineapple on pizza guy, Yeah you are. John likes
Speaker 1: pineapple on pizza. Okay, fine, maybe it's not that bad.
Speaker 1: I know I eat gluten free pizza. Who am I
Speaker 1: to make? Yeah? Pineapple and ham. I know people do this.
Speaker 1: It's probably tastes delicious. By the way, I think you
Speaker 1: can put a lot of things, um, a lot of
Speaker 1: things on on pizza. That would be surprising, folks. But
Speaker 1: let's get into substance. Buck. Don't get distracted just because
Speaker 1: it's a Friday. Although see Ann is distracted you know
Speaker 1: what by here's a shock more stormy Daniels. Oh no,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, this is actually is this not? This is
Speaker 1: the other alleged mistress now that they're saying, is that?
Speaker 1: Is that? Okay? This is a McDougal one. Oh. You
Speaker 1: know these are the only two storylines they care about it.
Speaker 1: And this is the cable news network the situation room
Speaker 1: with Wolf Blitzer, you know who's whose main attribute seems
Speaker 1: to be that his face never registers any emotion or knowledge.
Speaker 1: It's amazing how he does that. It's like I am
Speaker 1: Wolf Blitzer and I are reading off a prompter. You
Speaker 1: cannot tell my political affiliation because you cannot tell anything.
Speaker 1: My face is mostly covered with this Burnanki esque beard. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's I've said that, I I give respect, We're due.
Speaker 1: It is Bernanky level, It is Berna level. But these
Speaker 1: are only stories they like to run over there. And
Speaker 1: because the Russia thing that, I think they exhausted themselves,
Speaker 1: like like a toddler that cries himself to sleep. I
Speaker 1: think the left has finally gone to the point with
Speaker 1: all the Russia stuff where it's like, Oh, you mean
Speaker 1: that this isn't really this isn't really going to be
Speaker 1: something we can continue to do. This isn't really going
Speaker 1: to work the way it's supposed to work. Oh wow, Um,
Speaker 1: I guess we have to move back to Michael Abanati
Speaker 1: and like that, after after a week of NonStop Russia
Speaker 1: RuSHA Russia. Sure enough, here I am in the Freedom
Speaker 1: hud in New York City, and I see, on the
Speaker 1: on the one hand, you've got Fox talking about trade deals,
Speaker 1: which matters to people, matters to the economy, matters to producers,
Speaker 1: matters to farmers, matters to people that are involved in
Speaker 1: America also known as Americans. And then on CNN you've
Speaker 1: got quote, I can't believe Michael would do this to
Speaker 1: me after learning Cohen recorded their discussion of playmate payoff.
Speaker 1: They think that they're gonna flip Michael Cohen on Trump
Speaker 1: for a campaign finance violation of some kind, that they're
Speaker 1: gonna just twist the law to try to make that
Speaker 1: a thing. They will have viole related attorney client privilege
Speaker 1: in the process, and and uh, they think that sure enough,
Speaker 1: this is justifiable under some bizarre rubric of whatever you
Speaker 1: have to do to get Trump is acceptable. Whatever you
Speaker 1: have to do to whatever you have to do to
Speaker 1: defeat this menace to America that is Donald Trump, is
Speaker 1: on its face justifiable. Even attorney client privilege doesn't matter anymore.
Speaker 1: Nothing matters as long as you can get Trump. So
Speaker 1: that's why we have Michael Avanati, Michael Cohen. It's it's
Speaker 1: almost like CNNs on some kind of a loop, like
Speaker 1: they just keep running the same story. Oh it's time
Speaker 1: time for some Avanati, time for some straw by annuals,
Speaker 1: time for some McDougall ah, all over what exactly, all
Speaker 1: over the notion that somehow, for some reason Trump, well,
Speaker 1: if there really was, if there were these affairs, and
Speaker 1: they had information to prove the affairs. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it's impossible that we wouldn't already know. It's possible they
Speaker 1: would have held it for some reasons I'm not aware of.
Speaker 1: It just seems to me not entirely likely. It's plausible,
Speaker 1: but unlikely that neither Stormy Daniels nor uh Karen is
Speaker 1: their name. I gotta get names right, and Karen McDougall's
Speaker 1: that right, yeah McDougald. By the way, last night, guys,
Speaker 1: I said, um, uh, I said Robert Spencer. I meant
Speaker 1: Richard Spencer. So me wrong? Well last night, yeah, there
Speaker 1: you go. Last night I was wrong. I just was
Speaker 1: a mental slip. But Richard Spencer is the white nationalist.
Speaker 1: There is no there is no known white nationalists named
Speaker 1: Robert Spencer on the national stage. So that all said,
Speaker 1: uh oh, my friend Ellison's on Fox News right now.
Speaker 1: I remember when Ellison I used to do real news
Speaker 1: on the Blaze with me way back in the day. Men,
Speaker 1: all of my all of my Blaze. P we're taking
Speaker 1: over the media now. You know. You've got people all
Speaker 1: over the place. We've got all the different networks. It's
Speaker 1: like Glenn has seeded the media with these conservative sleeper cells.
Speaker 1: We're all just waiting for the right time to strike
Speaker 1: for the for the constitution. Yeah, Alex Jones did say
Speaker 1: that I was actually a c I A sleeper in
Speaker 1: in talk radio, and I'm supposed to take over talk
Speaker 1: radio on behalf of the c I A. How do
Speaker 1: you know, Alex who told you? Um, Alex Jones might
Speaker 1: get booted off on Facebook? By the way, you guys
Speaker 1: know that there's there there's a push that he's so
Speaker 1: outside the He's actually got pretty big reach people. People
Speaker 1: listen for whatever reason, people listen to that show. They
Speaker 1: absolutely do. I don't know what to say about it
Speaker 1: other than that is the thing that they do. So
Speaker 1: Uh anyway, Um, where was I on this whole Russia thing.
Speaker 1: It's just the whole It's crazy, man, It's as though
Speaker 1: you were writing it out in a script. They've been
Speaker 1: talking about nothing but Russia all week and now they've
Speaker 1: switched gears and now you're in a place where, uh,
Speaker 1: they are switching to Avanati and switching to Stormy Daniels
Speaker 1: and this is just this is the playbook. And what's
Speaker 1: so funny is it got the gallop pole right here,
Speaker 1: thirty seven issues. This is just this is just from
Speaker 1: the most recent gallop pole. There are thirty seven issues
Speaker 1: and had tip Daily Wire for this that Americans care
Speaker 1: more about than Russia. We do not care, and why
Speaker 1: would we. It does not really matter. It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: to any of you. I don't come up here and
Speaker 1: say nothing matters, right, I'm up playing some game like
Speaker 1: whoa whatever the politicians do and say no, no, no, no.
Speaker 1: Immigration matters, trade policy matters, law enforcement matters, like there
Speaker 1: are things that we all need to care about, US
Speaker 1: citizens and people living in this country. What what? What
Speaker 1: the words that Trump uses and to describe putin all
Speaker 1: the time, It just doesn't really matter. I know the
Speaker 1: media wants it to matter. I know they want us
Speaker 1: to care so much, but that just frankly isn't going
Speaker 1: to be the case. They can't change Americans minds on this.
Speaker 1: There is a fixation, There is a near insanity from
Speaker 1: the left on this stuff that are maybe it's an
Speaker 1: all out insanity. I don't think it's a near insanity.
Speaker 1: And it just keeps getting They keep getting deeper and
Speaker 1: deeper into it. Now now they're talking about a Manhattan
Speaker 1: madam and they're they're just they think they're gonna find
Speaker 1: out something in Trump's background that's gonna finally make us
Speaker 1: all turn on him. I just don't see it, and
Speaker 1: they're grasping, you know, you can't. It doesn't see And
Speaker 1: then I have, like a Democrat, to to create some storybook,
Speaker 1: some false story narrative around to tell us it's gonna
Speaker 1: be the next Greade whatever for the Yeah, there's Ocasio Cortez,
Speaker 1: but she needs to do a little more studying. That
Speaker 1: was I said that nicely. That was a nice way
Speaker 1: of saying it. I think. So we're talking about immigration
Speaker 1: this hour, we're talking a bit more about the Mueller probe.
Speaker 1: Got some updates on that, also discussing the lady Ist
Speaker 1: and uh greatest from move on dot org. Oh you're
Speaker 1: gonna want to stick around team, we gotta freestyle Friday.
Speaker 1: In effect, many of my Democratic colleagues in the House
Speaker 1: voted present, which I think is unconscionable. These are dangerous
Speaker 1: jobs going after human smugglers, sex traffickers, drug smugglers, UH,
Speaker 1: and people who are illegally entering the United States or
Speaker 1: are in the interior of the United States. UH. And
Speaker 1: for a candidate uh for office in New York whose
Speaker 1: views can only be characterized as socialist, to call for
Speaker 1: abolishing ice and then to see so many leaders of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party jump in behind her and say, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: we should abolish ice. That was outrageous. So we said,
Speaker 1: you know what, you have legislation, we'll put it on
Speaker 1: the floor. And they turned around and said, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not going to vote for that. That's right, there
Speaker 1: are voting present on on abolishing ice. They talked a
Speaker 1: big game about it. What a surprize at Democrats when
Speaker 1: push comes to shove a bunch of whimps, bunch of
Speaker 1: whimps on this one. What a shock. But sure enough,
Speaker 1: that is the situation in which we find ourselves, my friends,
Speaker 1: after this week it was all for show, as we know, well,
Speaker 1: this this abolished ice thing. I've been thinking about it.
Speaker 1: I've been thinking about it, and you know what, what's
Speaker 1: one of the things that's really interesting me is that
Speaker 1: I thought that this was a Machiavellian based turnout plan.
Speaker 1: You know, like you often, I fall on this trap
Speaker 1: a lot. You You often are in a case where
Speaker 1: you often find yourself be in a situation where you
Speaker 1: think that the opposition. You think that your opponents are
Speaker 1: just really really smart, you know, they really know what
Speaker 1: they're doing. They're brilliant, and and that can kind of
Speaker 1: throw you off your game because your assumption automatically becomes, well,
Speaker 1: they must be thinking three steps ahead. And with this
Speaker 1: abolish abolish Ice, Abolish Ice, with that whole campaign, with
Speaker 1: all that stuff you were hearing, I was thinking to myself,
Speaker 1: they must have a they must have something in mind here,
Speaker 1: how this is going to help them, you know, get
Speaker 1: their get their base to come out or something. Right there,
Speaker 1: It's just too much to think that this was a blunder.
Speaker 1: But now I'm actually switching around on this one because
Speaker 1: I think that the abolished Ice chant was just they
Speaker 1: they had this moment where the media was all it
Speaker 1: was all on their side, uh and and they finally
Speaker 1: had a chant that could get them all excited. Right Boles,
Speaker 1: All right? I mean you hear the things that they chant,
Speaker 1: right who streets are streets, Occupy Wall Street. You know
Speaker 1: I've been at there. I've been at the rallies where
Speaker 1: the've chanted black Live Matter, Black Lives Matter, And you
Speaker 1: know that they chant is very central to the mobilization
Speaker 1: of leftists because they ideologically tend to be collectivists. They
Speaker 1: think in in terms of group, and they are particularly
Speaker 1: susceptible to a hive mind ideology as a result. Right,
Speaker 1: it's always about what's best for the group, for the
Speaker 1: the entity that they are a part of. That's also
Speaker 1: why identity politics is something that Democrats UH spend so
Speaker 1: much time focused on and and operating within. But you know,
Speaker 1: Trump said yes, so the Dems have quote a death
Speaker 1: wish in their push to abolish ICE. I think he's right.
Speaker 1: I think he's taking the wind out of their sales
Speaker 1: on this one. I really do. I think that, you know,
Speaker 1: he sees us for what it is, which is that
Speaker 1: they're just flannling. They're just flaying. What do you think, Mike,
Speaker 1: I think abolished ICE. I don't think that plays well
Speaker 1: as a chant anywhere outside of San Francisco, Los angele Us,
Speaker 1: New York, in d C. I really don't. I don't
Speaker 1: think anywhere else. So you're gonna get a lot of
Speaker 1: traction with that one. I agree. I think it just
Speaker 1: pushes more voters to Trump. It's like, this is what
Speaker 1: they offer up, this is what we're supposed to get
Speaker 1: all Uh, you know, energized about we're supposed to think
Speaker 1: that abolishing ICE. I also there's so much disingenuousness. They say, oh, book,
Speaker 1: you guys will talk about how you want to abolish
Speaker 1: the Department of Education. I'm like, yeah, we're not saying
Speaker 1: no one goes to school. If you abolish ICE, then
Speaker 1: you don't have anyone to do federal immigration enforcement. It's
Speaker 1: not like there's if you abolish the Department of education.
Speaker 1: What you're saying is the states will be in charge
Speaker 1: of education. Already there are state departments of education. It
Speaker 1: wouldn't be such a big deal. We we operated as
Speaker 1: a country for a long time without that. We have
Speaker 1: always had somebody. As long as we've had borders to enforce,
Speaker 1: we've always had somebody, whether it was you know, the
Speaker 1: customs houses. I mean, look, it's gotten a lot easier
Speaker 1: to get here, right, so we've had to change things.
Speaker 1: It used to be we had a couple of ports
Speaker 1: of entry. They were actually sports and to get here
Speaker 1: you had to come on a ship pretty much. And
Speaker 1: in some of the other places you could get here,
Speaker 1: but you had to go through uh native areas that
Speaker 1: were a bit dangerous. From what I understand sometimes sometimes
Speaker 1: I'm reading this book on the on the Aztecs and Quartez,
Speaker 1: the whole thing. Man, they don't teach kids. They don't
Speaker 1: teach kids what really was, what really went on, you know,
Speaker 1: It's just we're all taught like, Oh, the the Aztecs,
Speaker 1: they were basically, you know, they were reciting Shakespearean poetry
Speaker 1: to each other all day or they were literally ripping
Speaker 1: people's guts out for sport, to to appease gods and
Speaker 1: doing this by the thousands and thousands, depending on the
Speaker 1: particular ritual and holiday, you know. But but yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: sure they were practically a bunch of a bunch of
Speaker 1: regular Shakespeare's in the Tenochtitlan conversation for another time. Oh, any,
Speaker 1: this whole situation with abolishing I stuff, I do think
Speaker 1: it just shows that the Democrats have a have a
Speaker 1: particularly weak hand, uh when going into the mid terms.
Speaker 1: They have no economic message, They have no real immigration
Speaker 1: message other than amnesty and more legal immigration. That's a
Speaker 1: losing message for them. I do not think that they
Speaker 1: can win with that as their messaging. And I think
Speaker 1: that the more that the American people get a sense
Speaker 1: of where all this is going, the more the American
Speaker 1: people understand what's really happening here. You know, I'm telling
Speaker 1: you we're gonna have to have like a secret Freedom
Speaker 1: Hut session where we just obviously I'll do the show,
Speaker 1: but I'm saying we're all like, okay, everybody, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe keep the maga hats away for a day after
Speaker 1: because if the Republicans winning the mid terms, I don't
Speaker 1: know what the country looks like, but it's going to
Speaker 1: be it's gonna be like one of those scenes where
Speaker 1: Godzilla is like crushing the city and everyone's just running
Speaker 1: around the total panic and pandemonium, except Trump is going
Speaker 1: to be Godzilla in this analogy, like it's going they're
Speaker 1: all gonna be running away screaming in the streets from Trump.
Speaker 1: If the Republicans, even though Trump's not on the ballot,
Speaker 1: but they know it's Trump's party, they know that there's
Speaker 1: no way of getting around that He's he will have
Speaker 1: been president for two years, and all these elites and
Speaker 1: all these fancy fancy people that have been running around suggesting,
Speaker 1: and all that you need is just somebody in there
Speaker 1: who really understands the ins and outs of uh, you know,
Speaker 1: international policy and and the really you know, has a
Speaker 1: PhD in this or no, or it's been a lifelong bureaucrat,
Speaker 1: a lifelong politician. You've had a guy who for two
Speaker 1: years like, yeah, I think I can negotiate and know
Speaker 1: some things and do some stuff, you know, And the
Speaker 1: country has been You've been doing fantastically in that period.
Speaker 1: The country is so strong economically right now, and I
Speaker 1: just I have to say this. I know we've got
Speaker 1: other stuff to get into it, and I will, and
Speaker 1: I know it's a Friday. We're gonna have some fun too.
Speaker 1: We've got some other topics coming up. Apparently, Uh, we're
Speaker 1: at a point now we're getting if you're not paid enough,
Speaker 1: that's basically violence. What We'll get to that in a
Speaker 1: few minutes. That's right. Low wages equals violence according to Democrats. Now.
Speaker 1: But you know, we're really at a point where I
Speaker 1: gotta say, if Democrats had an economic message, we would
Speaker 1: have heard it. They don't because it's not possible for
Speaker 1: them because Trump is doing so well on the economy.
Speaker 1: There's nowhere for them to go. There's nowhere from north.
Speaker 1: That's why you don't hear about it, right. Could you
Speaker 1: imagine if unemployment started ticking up considerably. Could you imagine
Speaker 1: if we had a massive stock market rash. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we're here. Our Trump is the worst. Trump is the worst.
Speaker 1: But they got nothing. They got nothing right now. And
Speaker 1: that's what's so fascinating and in a sense also scary,
Speaker 1: because they're gonna lose it. We'll be right back. He's
Speaker 1: holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. You
Speaker 1: might give them the benefit of the doubt, But why
Speaker 1: does this always happen? Every time something happens on on
Speaker 1: one side where we find out a new revelation about
Speaker 1: what appears to be to be real problems in the
Speaker 1: FBI and d o J with this investigation, then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they drop an indict You know, people
Speaker 1: were telling me, people were telling me Buck the the
Speaker 1: twelve indictments or whatever it was, of the of the
Speaker 1: Russian trolls right before Helsinki. Trump. When I say people
Speaker 1: are telling this, I saw reports on this. This wasn't
Speaker 1: for my sources. So let me step back on that.
Speaker 1: What Trump Trump wanted this to happen. They say Trump invited,
Speaker 1: invited the notion of the indictments coming beforehand, and I go, guys,
Speaker 1: hold on, hold on, hold on a second, Okay, hold
Speaker 1: on a minute. Here, time out. If Roe sen Steen
Speaker 1: comes up to Trump and Rosenstein says, hey, I'm going
Speaker 1: to either renounce these indictments before you go to Helsinki
Speaker 1: or after you go to Helsinki. Who thinks that it
Speaker 1: would not leak to the press if Trump had said, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, hold off on that one until afterwards.
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, right, does anybody really believe that
Speaker 1: if in fact, there had been a situation where Trump
Speaker 1: had said, yes, please delay, please delay the situation of
Speaker 1: the indictments for the twelve rudder, I mean, guaranteed, guaranteed,
Speaker 1: it would have gone out of the press. And then
Speaker 1: they say, oh, Trump is stock in the deck and
Speaker 1: he's doing all this patch stuff. And you know, we
Speaker 1: we know that the air political actors, they can't help themselves.
Speaker 1: They can't help themselves from exposing to us what a
Speaker 1: a clearly politically motivated operation, this whole mother prob really is.
Speaker 1: I mean Rosen scene when he announced his indictments, whatever
Speaker 1: it was, earlier in the earlier or last week, he
Speaker 1: started giving some lecture about democracy, and he thinks he's
Speaker 1: like one of the founding Fathers reincarnated. You know, buddy,
Speaker 1: you're a prosecutor at the Department of Justice. We we
Speaker 1: we really don't need the lecture. You can just tell us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what we decided, in our infinite wisdom and
Speaker 1: and tremendous grace, we decided to indict a bunch of
Speaker 1: Russians nobody's ever heard of, in some kind of effort
Speaker 1: to uh make sure that the Russians won't set up
Speaker 1: more fake Facebook accounts going forward, because you know, that's
Speaker 1: a good that's something that we're gonna be really worried
Speaker 1: about going forward. You know, you want to talk about
Speaker 1: justice and what what the injustices that are being done
Speaker 1: by the Justice Department all the time, all you have
Speaker 1: to do is look at what what broke last night.
Speaker 1: And I honestly, I look, this is one of these
Speaker 1: stories you see these days, and you go, come on,
Speaker 1: come on, They're not that brazen, right, They're not that
Speaker 1: grotesque in their willingness to uh show that they are
Speaker 1: so favorable to one side and so opposed to the other.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's just no way that they would do that.
Speaker 1: It's so obvious. But nope, sure enough, I have not
Speaker 1: seen this retracted yet and producer Mike let me know
Speaker 1: if if if I'm missing a retraction on this or
Speaker 1: or additional updates. But Tucker Carlson last night broke on
Speaker 1: his show a story that Tony Podesta, the brother of
Speaker 1: John Podesta, whom I actually just sat and had a
Speaker 1: chat with on my show TV show a few weeks ago.
Speaker 1: But Tony podets to who is as connected a swamp
Speaker 1: creature as you could find anywhere. I mean, if there
Speaker 1: is such a thing as the swamp, Tony Podesta is it.
Speaker 1: He has been offered immunity by the Mueller pro by
Speaker 1: Special Counsel Mueller to testify against Manifort. Now, I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, folks, I don't think. I don't think since
Speaker 1: they went after al Capone, has the government had such
Speaker 1: an interest in somebody's tax vulnerabilities. Okay, I don't think
Speaker 1: this is any although they did go after my, my
Speaker 1: buddy Wesley Snipes real bad. You know, I was. I
Speaker 1: was kind of like a free Wesley guy, you know,
Speaker 1: I felt, Okay, granted, Wesley made I think it was
Speaker 1: forty million dollars and had a very novel theory that
Speaker 1: allowed him to pay zero federal income tax on that
Speaker 1: forty million. Now, I know the government can be sloppy,
Speaker 1: but if you have forty you don't pay any taxes
Speaker 1: at all based on the I don't have to theory,
Speaker 1: which was more or less what it was. I feel
Speaker 1: like you're gonna get in trouble. I think what I
Speaker 1: think Wes got three years for that. I think that's
Speaker 1: what it was. Something like that. Um. But so they were,
Speaker 1: you know, tax they go after people. Wesley's was quickly bad.
Speaker 1: But but since Camposa and they haven't been so fixated
Speaker 1: on getting somebody for taxes. I mean, they've turned Manifold
Speaker 1: into their version of public Enemy number one. The federal
Speaker 1: government really well, I mean they want to make an example.
Speaker 1: They're talking about life in prison, and so far all
Speaker 1: we've heard about is wire fraud, tax fraud. And these
Speaker 1: are all understand this, These are all related crimes, right.
Speaker 1: This is you're hiding money from the government. You're you know,
Speaker 1: signing something fraudulently to hide the money from the government.
Speaker 1: You're moving the money over the wire, you know, illegally,
Speaker 1: to hide it from These are all connected. So it's
Speaker 1: not like Manaford is doing all these you know, he's
Speaker 1: he's ordering hits on people here and he's selling drugs there.
Speaker 1: It's not like he's doing disc at bad crimes and
Speaker 1: you add them all together. No, No, what's going on
Speaker 1: here is they got mana for it on essentially tax evasion,
Speaker 1: Farah registration and Tucker talking about this last night, and
Speaker 1: I'm like, I'm glad I'm not the only body who's
Speaker 1: been just screaming about this. They've prosecuted seven people in
Speaker 1: fifty years for Farah violations, as they said last night
Speaker 1: on Fox. I've been saying, it's like the Logan Act.
Speaker 1: It's a law that's only a law when Democrats wanted
Speaker 1: to be a law. And that's what they think of
Speaker 1: the criminal justice system, that it is a a tool
Speaker 1: that just screams out for left wing abuse and misuse
Speaker 1: as long as it serves some kind of of political ends,
Speaker 1: as long as there are some means of taking this
Speaker 1: and and using it to their advantage. Um, I I
Speaker 1: just but here you have it. Podesta is is, from
Speaker 1: what we understand so far, the brother of Hillary Clinton's
Speaker 1: top advisor who had to shut down his firm and
Speaker 1: Hillary didn't win. Oh, it's almost like you mean he
Speaker 1: wasn't as valuable when Hillary wasn't gonna be president anymore. Oh,
Speaker 1: maybe the Podesta group was essentially selling access. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: what they were doing, because because why why did he
Speaker 1: why did Tony Podesta have to shut down just because
Speaker 1: Hillary didn't win. I thought he was offering just really
Speaker 1: sage advice, really good consulting. Oh you mean it was swampy,
Speaker 1: And it was, it was indeed swampy. But he is
Speaker 1: being offered, I meaning, just like Hillary for the production
Speaker 1: of her laptops for her and share A Cheryl Mills
Speaker 1: and whom abbot And they were offered immunity, right, they
Speaker 1: didn't have to testify under oath, they didn't have grand
Speaker 1: jury subpoenas of it. It always goes in favor of
Speaker 1: the left with this stuff, and I think it's because
Speaker 1: conservatives culturally and psychologically just don't. We don't think of
Speaker 1: the law as a weapon to be abused. We actually
Speaker 1: we are just we are disposed culturally to think of
Speaker 1: the law as something that is sacred and important and
Speaker 1: protects everyone. Liberals see the law as whatever I want.
Speaker 1: It's what they want when they want it, and it
Speaker 1: changes based on whatever needs they may have in the moment.
Speaker 1: I mean, but the fact that the fact that this
Speaker 1: is now an instance where we might have yet again
Speaker 1: even more favoritism, even more favoritism shown in the prosecutorial
Speaker 1: wing of the government, and how it's treating a Democrat
Speaker 1: versus Republican. Manafort tied to Trump crushed, I mean, prison
Speaker 1: for life, for life, folks, I mean Wes didn't pay.
Speaker 1: I mean, how much taxes can we be talking about here, Mike.
Speaker 1: If Wes didn't pay taxes on forty million, man for
Speaker 1: is not that rich. I mean, maybe, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: he's a hundo million kind of guy, but he's definitely not.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're they're talking about saying to prison for
Speaker 1: like thirty years. I'm looking around, I'm like, for what
Speaker 1: for what? Farr registration? I mean, that's just one of
Speaker 1: the many charges. But this is something that nobody gets
Speaker 1: charged because it's so vague. I'm not even sure. Here's
Speaker 1: the thing, I'm not even sure that the challenge of
Speaker 1: a fair registration, and some of these cases, whether it's
Speaker 1: man of Forod or others, would even stand constitutional scrutiny.
Speaker 1: You have to registers what really qualifies as being a
Speaker 1: foreign agent. You know, if you work for a foreign
Speaker 1: media company in the the United States, are you a foreign agent? Well,
Speaker 1: if you're British, orf you're Russian? I mean, how how
Speaker 1: do we start to draw these distinctions and these designations?
Speaker 1: You know, they don't think about this though, they don't care.
Speaker 1: They don't think about it. They just figure whatever, you know,
Speaker 1: whatever works for their side when it works for their side. Um,
Speaker 1: and oh, but I've been saying this all along. Man
Speaker 1: of the Week, folks, Man of the Week is my
Speaker 1: main home slice Ran Paul. He has been in fuego
Speaker 1: and he's not done. Not only is he saying that
Speaker 1: everyone's got a case of Trump's arrangement sending for the
Speaker 1: whole health thinky thing, he's also like, why the heck
Speaker 1: does John Brennan still have a top secret clearance? Now?
Speaker 1: This is alarming? And if John Brennan still has top
Speaker 1: secret clearance? Can he research Donald Trump? Can he research
Speaker 1: his family? Can he type my name into computer search engines?
Speaker 1: Can he look at all of my information? Uh? It's alarming.
Speaker 1: If he has top secret clearance as unhinged as he
Speaker 1: is now calling the president treason, treason is saying basically
Speaker 1: that he's for you know, the death penalty for the president. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's alarming if he has security clearance, it's absolutely alarming.
Speaker 1: Notice how he pointed out treason can care penalty of death.
Speaker 1: And so when you're calling it the president treason is
Speaker 1: you're just making a legal argument that could have some
Speaker 1: very very troubling ramifications. Right. I said that earlier than
Speaker 1: week too. There you have it, sitting U S senator
Speaker 1: saying this is all what's really going on here? And
Speaker 1: I mean John Brennan, he he is. He is a
Speaker 1: truly he's become somebody that I'm I am scared what
Speaker 1: he is capable of because I think he's a true believer.
Speaker 1: I don't think this is an act. You know, some
Speaker 1: of the people you see on CNN and by the way,
Speaker 1: they're all like, oh my gosh, Mike, can we get
Speaker 1: Michael Avenati on TV. Let's hear more Michael LAVNAUGHTI We've
Speaker 1: got this really compelling story to tell about Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 1: I mean, CNN, the reason you are losing two reruns
Speaker 1: of Naked Night in the middle of the day is
Speaker 1: because you do not care about what the American people
Speaker 1: care about. You just care about trying to think that
Speaker 1: somehow you're right in this whole mess and that you're
Speaker 1: gonna just you're just carrying on a feud with Trump.
Speaker 1: CNN is no longer a channel devoted to progressivism, although
Speaker 1: it's stealth they launder liberalism. It is a stealth progressivism.
Speaker 1: They pretend to be centrist. I've walked you through this before,
Speaker 1: but that's the whole CNN gimmick is we're just journalist man,
Speaker 1: and then everyone who watches who's liberal goes, yeah, all
Speaker 1: the things that I think can believe are somehow true
Speaker 1: according to the journalists. Right, MSNBC is like, all right,
Speaker 1: we're a bunch of lives talked to all the lips.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm much cooler with the MSNBC approach. But at CNN,
Speaker 1: I mean, they're they're essentially and just they're just now
Speaker 1: in an open feud with the President and they're letting
Speaker 1: that dictate their decisions about how they're gonna schedule programming
Speaker 1: and what they're gonna do. Right. That that's what's going
Speaker 1: on with CNA. That that's why they're ratings are so poor.
Speaker 1: And I don't know when as a brand it finally
Speaker 1: starts to affect them I mean, they really are kind
Speaker 1: of a legacy institution, so it takes a long time
Speaker 1: for this stuff to affect them. But anyway, speaking of
Speaker 1: a progressive ism, I do want to spend a moment
Speaker 1: to talk to you about a campaign that I just
Speaker 1: saw today. Here's the short version. Wages that people don't
Speaker 1: like are now violence, they say. Stay with me, I'll explain.
Speaker 1: So I've seen a lot of things. I've seen a lot.
Speaker 1: I've seen some stuff, my friends, but this is the
Speaker 1: craziest one that I've seen a little while when it
Speaker 1: comes to a left wing organization in the new direction.
Speaker 1: So this is from move on dot org, which is
Speaker 1: a left wing political activist group. I'm sure you're familiar
Speaker 1: with them. I should go back and research the origins
Speaker 1: of this group and where it comes from and all
Speaker 1: that stuff, because you know, I feel like maybe it
Speaker 1: saw us was writing checks. Yes, we need to move
Speaker 1: on move on dot org. That sounds like a good
Speaker 1: idea for the site. But sorrows aside. See, when I
Speaker 1: used to work for Glen Man, we used to talk
Speaker 1: about sorrows so much more. We we got a lot
Speaker 1: of o Lynsky and sorrows time in back at the
Speaker 1: back in my blaze days? Am I right? Is it Sorrows?
Speaker 1: I'm amazing, dude, I am. I am like a some
Speaker 1: kind of incredible. I'm a very stable genius stam exactly
Speaker 1: just like that. I didn't even know that. I knew that,
Speaker 1: and I knew it. I do when I don't and
Speaker 1: it did. Um yeah, so it is. It is move
Speaker 1: on dot org. I has have the many billions of
Speaker 1: dollars and they pay for they move on dot org
Speaker 1: and also talk about the international markets and crashing currency
Speaker 1: of poor people. But then I talk about how much
Speaker 1: I love progressive values and the Breton Woods system. Yessuh
Speaker 1: So this move on dot org courtesy of Sorrows campaign
Speaker 1: that they've got out here is low wages that I'm folks,
Speaker 1: I'm quoting. I'm not making this stuff up. I don't
Speaker 1: have to. They're so crazy, there's no need to make
Speaker 1: stuff up. Low wages are violence. Knowingly letting people suffer
Speaker 1: is violence. It must end. This is what this is
Speaker 1: now what they do because violence is bad, right, the
Speaker 1: same way that everything that they don't like is Hitler.
Speaker 1: Everything that they don't like is now violence, right, or
Speaker 1: every person they don't like as Hitler everything. The liberals
Speaker 1: don't like his violence. They've done this with speech already, right,
Speaker 1: they'll say speech that they don't like is basically the
Speaker 1: same thing as violence. Speech that you know that they
Speaker 1: get upset about might as well be considered violence, and
Speaker 1: it's practically the same thing. And then they have this
Speaker 1: in this ad. I mean, this is going all over
Speaker 1: the place right now. In the South, they have a
Speaker 1: guy who's got here's what's written. He was a young guy, um,
Speaker 1: and he's it's something written in Spanish. So I'm assuming
Speaker 1: he's a young his young Hispanic or Latino gentleman. Not
Speaker 1: that I'm jumping to any conclusions. I don't know his ethnicity.
Speaker 1: But it's written in Spanish on his sign. So here's
Speaker 1: what he writes. Oh, no, I do know, because his
Speaker 1: name is Miguel Cala Colosto. So I think Miguel is
Speaker 1: probably uh, he probably of Espanol, right, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: a fair and his sign is written in Spanish, Okay,
Speaker 1: he does. I'm doing the jobs of three people, cashier,
Speaker 1: baker and running the store. That's a lot of responsibility
Speaker 1: for just minimum wage. I deserve fifteen dollars and union rights.
Speaker 1: You know. I'm just gonna say this, like, if you're
Speaker 1: running if you're running the bakery, you may think that
Speaker 1: the guy who runs the bake shop is a fat cat.
Speaker 1: That is not a way joke, by the way I'm saying.
Speaker 1: You may think that the guy running the bakery has
Speaker 1: got a lot of excess cash reserves. But it's a
Speaker 1: very it's a razor thin margin business. And if he
Speaker 1: could pay more, and if he needed to pay more
Speaker 1: to be competitive, he would fifteen dollar minimum wage. All
Speaker 1: that's going to do is put some businesses out of business,
Speaker 1: cut back on people's hours. It's not as easy despite
Speaker 1: what liberals think. They think that's about prices. They think
Speaker 1: that's about wages. Just because you wish it were so,
Speaker 1: it does not make it so. And trying to force
Speaker 1: it once you realize that your wishes can't just become
Speaker 1: real qality leads to some very bad stuff. Venezuela is
Speaker 1: the one that we point to right now. But show
Speaker 1: me any place where the government determines what the prices
Speaker 1: of consumer goods and I'll show you an economic disaster.
Speaker 1: So anyway, move on. Courtesy of status. You gotta talking
Speaker 1: about China coming up here. I gotta get motivated every day.
Speaker 1: I got a lot of work to do. I know
Speaker 1: you have the same thing, right, And what do you need?
Speaker 1: No matter what you face? Energy? You need to get
Speaker 1: fired up. You need to have the energy to get
Speaker 1: through whatever it is that, whatever task you have before you.
Speaker 1: Strike Force Energy can do that for you, my friends.
Speaker 1: It is a veteran owned, American made energy product. Go
Speaker 1: check it out for yourself. Go to strike Force Energy
Speaker 1: dot com and or discount code buck at checkout. And
Speaker 1: this is so easy, right. You take this liquid Strife
Speaker 1: Force Energy Liquid, you mix it in with water, ta lemonade, yogurt,
Speaker 1: whatever it is you want, and it just gives you
Speaker 1: that boost. I mean, they've really worked on this formula,
Speaker 1: so it'll get you fired up. And also for every
Speaker 1: packet you buy right now, when you go to strike
Speaker 1: Force Energy dot com and use that discount code which
Speaker 1: is b U C K buck, for every packet you buy,
Speaker 1: they will donate a packet to military members around the globe.
Speaker 1: Strike Force Energy ease fuel for the fight. Check it
Speaker 1: out for yourself strike Force Energy dot Com discount code
Speaker 1: buck buck. Sexton Mission Decoding the news and disseminating information
Speaker 1: with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, Let rank You're
Speaker 1: a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Analysts set no Disremember with a bank with a bank,
Speaker 1: and everybody wants to steal from and plunder, and it
Speaker 1: can't be that way anymore. We lost five billion dollars
Speaker 1: last year with China. We are going to end the
Speaker 1: theft of American intellectual property, crackdown on China's trade abuses,
Speaker 1: and confront countries that cheap. I also had a very
Speaker 1: candid conversation with Presidency about the need to reduce our
Speaker 1: staggering trade deficit with China and for our trading relationship
Speaker 1: to be conducted on a truly fair and equitable basis.
Speaker 1: We can no longer tolerate unfair trading practices that steal
Speaker 1: American jobs, wealth, and intellectual property. China, from a counterintelligence perspective,
Speaker 1: in many ways, represents the broadest, most challenging, most significant
Speaker 1: threatnly face of the country. Uh and I say that
Speaker 1: because for them, it is a whole of state effort.
Speaker 1: It is economic espionage as well as traditional lesbianage. It
Speaker 1: is non traditional collectors as well as traditional intelligence operatives.
Speaker 1: It's human sources as well as cyber means. It's we
Speaker 1: have economic espionage investigations in every state, all fifty states,
Speaker 1: the trace back to China. Welcome back to the buck
Speaker 1: Sex and Show. You know I've been telling you this week.
Speaker 1: What did I say? I said you'd hear more about China. China.
Speaker 1: There you go. I said you'd hear more because I
Speaker 1: got I got people now in DC, I got people
Speaker 1: that know people that know some things about some stuff.
Speaker 1: And now that from Trump leading into this was a
Speaker 1: that was some historical soundbites we had there. But but
Speaker 1: Ray FBI director just from yesterday and who does he
Speaker 1: sound like? Folks, who's her remind you of? China is
Speaker 1: the biggest counterintelligence threat to the United States by far
Speaker 1: that the FBI director. I'm not making this stuff up
Speaker 1: when I come on and I tell you, I said,
Speaker 1: China is a much bigger threat. I brought this up
Speaker 1: on my show Rising on Hill dot TV. I bring
Speaker 1: it up here on radio. Right. China is the real
Speaker 1: problem because when China actually implements some of the technology
Speaker 1: that it is stealing from us, when China takes action
Speaker 1: based on all of this, we got a real problem
Speaker 1: on our hands because the Chinese economy is enormous. Right
Speaker 1: when you look at Chinese GDP and US GDP. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know the we're we're getting neck and neck here.
Speaker 1: We are closing the gap very rap or they're closing
Speaker 1: the gap very rapidly. And so for them to get
Speaker 1: access to our most sensitive economic, military, and other information
Speaker 1: is a real challenge. But you see, the focus is
Speaker 1: so on Russia because that benefits democrats here at home.
Speaker 1: And this is why it's important to talk about this.
Speaker 1: It's not a diversion, it's the truth. They spend all
Speaker 1: this time wrapping themselves and oh, we need to protect
Speaker 1: our democracy. All this pearl clutching snowflake is um over
Speaker 1: Russia from the left and and they act like it's
Speaker 1: their their patriotic duty. Now you have the former CI director,
Speaker 1: you have the former n s A director, you have
Speaker 1: the form all these big oh intel people who are
Speaker 1: coming out in an actively opposing President Trump and saying
Speaker 1: that Russia is this imminent threat and never even mind
Speaker 1: the stuff about oh it's like pearl harbor. Oh it's
Speaker 1: like you know what was the other one they were
Speaker 1: saying nine eleven or oh, it's like crystal knocked. I
Speaker 1: saw that somewhere too, the Russian intrusion into our election. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: on every observable front, China is more sophisticated in its
Speaker 1: efforts to undermine US, more sophisticated in its efforts to
Speaker 1: steal from US, more aggressive in its cyber intrusions, and
Speaker 1: unlike Russia, we may not have a massive military and
Speaker 1: economic edge over China all that much longer. You cannot
Speaker 1: make the case. And this is what and I would
Speaker 1: challenge anyone, anyone who thinks they are a national security
Speaker 1: expert or thinks they know something about anything, to come
Speaker 1: on and they are welcome to debby on this. You
Speaker 1: cannot make the case that Russia is a bigger threat
Speaker 1: than China. In fact, you can only make the case
Speaker 1: that China is realistically a bigger threat to our national
Speaker 1: security right now than Russia and has been for years.
Speaker 1: So since that is the truth, since that is the
Speaker 1: reality of our current national security situation, I would then
Speaker 1: ask you why is it that you hear not even
Speaker 1: ten times as much, fifty times as much in the
Speaker 1: media about Russia as you do about China. You see,
Speaker 1: it's not really about national security, it's not really about
Speaker 1: the sanctity of our democracy. And and I know you
Speaker 1: know this, but it's important that we get a chance
Speaker 1: to say this out loud. You get a chance to
Speaker 1: hear it, I get a chance to say it. We
Speaker 1: can share these thoughts. The fixation on Russia and Russia
Speaker 1: related actions, election and intrusions and everything else is purely
Speaker 1: a partisan spasm because they're so upset, because they're such
Speaker 1: sore losers. The Democrats are such whiny babies over Trump
Speaker 1: beating them in the election. Russia is not a real
Speaker 1: national security threat to the United States. Russian Facebook accounts
Speaker 1: are an irritation. They are aggressive, they're annoying, but they
Speaker 1: are not something to keep us up at night. And
Speaker 1: there's certainly not anything. Yeah, we should be threatening real
Speaker 1: military action over which I know some people are crazy
Speaker 1: enough that they're actually saying that. I had the congressman
Speaker 1: on my show earlier in the week saying we should
Speaker 1: shut down the Russian banking system. That's a really good
Speaker 1: way to get yourself into a you know, a thermonuclear war. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's a very bad idea, um, But this is the
Speaker 1: this is the truth of it. You see, the Democrats
Speaker 1: are willing just as they were. And this is this
Speaker 1: may sound a little harsh, but just as I saw Democrats,
Speaker 1: and this is from being inside the government, I saw
Speaker 1: people who were working for the intelligence community and people
Speaker 1: who were you know, in and around Capitol Hill, who
Speaker 1: were cheering for our greater difficulties and even eventual defeat
Speaker 1: in Iraq. And I know people it say, no, it's true.
Speaker 1: I saw it. Okay, I heard it. I heard the
Speaker 1: conversations because it would have meant the humiliation of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party of the Bush administration, and it would have
Speaker 1: meant that no longer would Republicans be considered the superior
Speaker 1: party on national security. That same at all costs mentality
Speaker 1: exists with Democrats today when it comes to their Russia
Speaker 1: collusion delusion, and it is that they are willing to
Speaker 1: pretend that this is all about securing the country, even
Speaker 1: if it means spending little to no time and energy
Speaker 1: preparing for the much more realistic, much more serious threat
Speaker 1: from China. They do not, I think about this. How
Speaker 1: can they take themselves seriously when they spend so much
Speaker 1: time talking about Russia and the cyber intrusions. I mean,
Speaker 1: you look at the things that we think China is behind.
Speaker 1: China is is stealing everything and then there taking it
Speaker 1: and using it for building their own advanced military technology.
Speaker 1: They're using it to build their own companies that are
Speaker 1: essentially rip offs of American intellectual property. They're establishing clear
Speaker 1: this is what they're pushing deeper into the Indian Ocean.
Speaker 1: They're setting up a really a mer cantiles. They're kind
Speaker 1: of replaying what the British Empire did that China is
Speaker 1: just setting up clear supply lines of raw materials wherever
Speaker 1: it can, however it can, so that it can feed
Speaker 1: this massive economic engine that only a billion people could
Speaker 1: possibly support. And they've got big plans, folks, What do
Speaker 1: we have ahead of them? We have our ingenuity, we
Speaker 1: have our creativity, we have the dynamism of American minds,
Speaker 1: we have the the courage and valor of our military.
Speaker 1: But our technological advantage, which is a big part of
Speaker 1: by the way, our economic and military advantage of the
Speaker 1: Chinese ease eroding with every day, and it's routing a
Speaker 1: whole lot faster than it would otherwise because they're stealing
Speaker 1: stuff from us and in ways that who knows, But
Speaker 1: do you do you really think and this is just
Speaker 1: now I'm just gonna get outside the box for a second.
Speaker 1: You think the Chinese aren't running different scams and the
Speaker 1: Chinese government isn't involved in trying to push US policy
Speaker 1: in one direction or another. You don't think that they're
Speaker 1: using shell companies and front companies and and cyber operations
Speaker 1: and you know, and seeding things into the media. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're not naive here in on the buck Section show.
Speaker 1: We get it all that and not just that, not
Speaker 1: just the Chinese, lots of countries are doing stuff like this.
Speaker 1: Keeps bringing me back to Obama knew this was going
Speaker 1: on and did not did not think it was a
Speaker 1: big deal until Hillary lost. And that you see when
Speaker 1: they say it's a nine eleven, they know that it's
Speaker 1: not an eleven in the security sense, but it's a
Speaker 1: political nine eleven for them. This was the last thing
Speaker 1: that they had. They've been losing state houses, losing governorships,
Speaker 1: and now they've lost the House, the Senate, and the presidency.
Speaker 1: They just could not handle it because and this is
Speaker 1: where it really gets scary. I know this is a
Speaker 1: bit of a diversion from the talk about what's going
Speaker 1: on with China, but Ultimately, liberalism has become a replacement religion,
Speaker 1: replacement for religion on the left. It is. It is
Speaker 1: a belief system that is inextricably linked to the sense
Speaker 1: of worth at people that tie themselves to it, the
Speaker 1: sense of worth that they have. They are good people,
Speaker 1: they believe because of their liberalism. They are smart people
Speaker 1: because of their liberalism. If that's all true, and that's
Speaker 1: the case, how could they be out of power? You know,
Speaker 1: it's somewhat similar to how I know you're gonna say, buck,
Speaker 1: You're going from on it to now liberalism to now
Speaker 1: Islamic fundamentalists, but it's Friday. It's a freestyle. Islamic fundamentalists.
Speaker 1: One of the things that comes up time and again
Speaker 1: in their literature and their propaganda is that they believe
Speaker 1: that they have the only truth. And how could it
Speaker 1: be possible that the people that have the only, the
Speaker 1: only truth in the world have been subjugated and humiliated
Speaker 1: for the last hundred years. How could it be possible
Speaker 1: that the Western world has so wildly outpaced and out
Speaker 1: skilled the Islamic world economically, militarily, and otherwise for the
Speaker 1: last hundred years. It has to be wrong, and therefore
Speaker 1: there has to be an evil hand behind all of this,
Speaker 1: and anything is justified to turn it around. That is
Speaker 1: a fundamentalist mentality. It is fundamentalist when it comes to Islam,
Speaker 1: and is fundamentalist when it comes to contemporary liberals. Whatever
Speaker 1: they have to do to get back in power, however,
Speaker 1: they have to turn this around. That's what they want
Speaker 1: to do, and that's how you can have this to
Speaker 1: spare between the situation with Russia and the situation the
Speaker 1: way that the liberals view Russia and the way liberals
Speaker 1: view China. They're they're kind of soft on the whole
Speaker 1: China situation. They're soft on China, but it comes to
Speaker 1: everything except occasionally they get a little noisy about human rights.
Speaker 1: But you know what, they don't want to get two
Speaker 1: noise by human rights because the worst thing that China
Speaker 1: has done on the human rights front is it's one
Speaker 1: child policy and force sterilizations and forced abortions, and you know,
Speaker 1: that's the one thing that liberals don't really want to
Speaker 1: talk about. That's what the one thing that they don't
Speaker 1: want to get into when it comes to China that
Speaker 1: they don't want to make that part of its human
Speaker 1: rights issue. So you know I've been telling you're gonna
Speaker 1: hear more about China, not just on the show, but
Speaker 1: from the government. You had that statement from Ray, and
Speaker 1: I think it is really important that we show that one.
Speaker 1: For national security reasons, that becomes a bigger part of
Speaker 1: our conversation, you know, for national security reasons, that becomes
Speaker 1: some thing that we're talking about a lot more. And
Speaker 1: also to it just shows you. It really holds the
Speaker 1: mirror up too. Liberals, as on this issue of oh,
Speaker 1: it's aboutter democracy and it's about protecting America, they're just
Speaker 1: huge phonies because the fixation on Russia is not about
Speaker 1: keeping us safe. It's about nullifying an election and we
Speaker 1: all know it. And China is a way of a
Speaker 1: way for us to understand that. All right, stay with me, team.
Speaker 1: You need the best to have your back when it
Speaker 1: comes to background investigations and vetting. That's why you need
Speaker 1: Global Verification Network. Global Verification is the only dual certified
Speaker 1: veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They're independently certified
Speaker 1: by the National Veteran Business Development Council. They are headquartered
Speaker 1: in Chicago. Look, other guys take your stuff, They send
Speaker 1: it overseas. They actually will outsource your background investigation work
Speaker 1: to other companies. Right, So, if you are a business owner,
Speaker 1: or if you're somebody that owns property and you want
Speaker 1: to rent that property out, you want to make sure
Speaker 1: you know what you're doing and you have the MA
Speaker 1: you need to make the best decisions. That's why I
Speaker 1: want you to call Global Verification. Go to my g
Speaker 1: VN dot com or call eight seven seven six nine.
Speaker 1: They will work with companies from startups all the way
Speaker 1: up to Fortune one hundreds. Global Verification Network leave no
Speaker 1: stone unturned. There are lots of things discussed. There remains
Speaker 1: a great deal of work to do. But the President
Speaker 1: accomplished one of his goals, which was to create a
Speaker 1: way where the two leaders of these important countries can
Speaker 1: have positive, constructive conversations that surround these incredibly important issues.
Speaker 1: So you got Pompeo there. I brother, I'm really a
Speaker 1: pro Pompeo guy. You know, I like them. It's kinda
Speaker 1: seems kind of gruff, no nonsense, gets right down to business.
Speaker 1: He was liked at the you know, they liked him
Speaker 1: at the agency. You know, the file on him from
Speaker 1: folks that I know were was that he was stand
Speaker 1: up guy. People liked him. I felt like, you know,
Speaker 1: he had the best interests of of the organization and
Speaker 1: the people that work there at heart, and was was
Speaker 1: doing a good job, so you know, but he said,
Speaker 1: we gotta see we don't know. I heard so many
Speaker 1: crazy theories about what was said between Trump and Trump
Speaker 1: and putin in that in that meeting, and I see
Speaker 1: it here and I say to myself, you know, at
Speaker 1: what point is it irresponsible? At what point to liberals
Speaker 1: find themselves thinking, you know what, we can't just we
Speaker 1: can't take it that far. We can't be that crazy,
Speaker 1: you know, just making stuff up as we go along.
Speaker 1: And it'swers. I don't know. It feels to me like
Speaker 1: there's a situation here where they just, well, we all
Speaker 1: know that there are no limits to this. If if
Speaker 1: they think it damages Trumpet, they think it makes Trump
Speaker 1: look bad, are all for it. They think that it's
Speaker 1: a great idea and a great thing. But Pompeio was like, look,
Speaker 1: there's there's more to come. We'll see what the results are.
Speaker 1: Speaking of results, they're also all over Trump for North Korea.
Speaker 1: And I keep saying this, guys, I'm like, we don't
Speaker 1: know what's Everybody, come up the coast, have a few laughs, relaxed.
Speaker 1: We gotta see what's going on in North Korea. We
Speaker 1: don't know. We just frankly do not know. And here's
Speaker 1: Nicky Haley. By the way, I am pro Nicky Haley.
Speaker 1: You know, I like Nicki Haley. Um. I also like, uh,
Speaker 1: what's the what's the democrat from Hawaii Gabby Tulsi Tulsi
Speaker 1: Gabbard or whatever. Yeah, they're doing good policy. They're doing Hey,
Speaker 1: they're doing good policy work, both of them, even though
Speaker 1: she's a Democrat. But here here's what Nicki Haley had
Speaker 1: to say about North Korea sanctions. Play eight. Please, we
Speaker 1: can't do one thing until we see North Korea respond
Speaker 1: to their promise to denuclearize. We have to see some
Speaker 1: sort of action, and so until that action happens, the
Speaker 1: Security Council is going to hold tight. The international community,
Speaker 1: we ask you to hold tight as we go forward.
Speaker 1: The problem that we are encountering is that some of
Speaker 1: our friends have decided that they want to go around
Speaker 1: the rules. Yep. What she means by that is that
Speaker 1: some of the countries that are supposed to be playing
Speaker 1: ball China, there you go, no drop, Come on, man,
Speaker 1: there we go. China is not helping us, folks. Oh
Speaker 1: look at that. You mean China comes up again as
Speaker 1: a major problem for another policy issue that really matters
Speaker 1: to us, and an initiative where we could see assistance
Speaker 1: from them, and instead we're getting a lot of nonsense.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, what a what a shock, What a total
Speaker 1: and complete shock that is to me. You know, maybe
Speaker 1: if we spend more time focusing on issues that matter,
Speaker 1: we would have quite a bit, quite a bit more
Speaker 1: knowledge in the media on things like what's really happened
Speaker 1: with more Korea. You gotta let that situation play out.
Speaker 1: People are trying to judge that too early. They're trying
Speaker 1: to judge the the outcome of the Helsinki summit. Look,
Speaker 1: I wish Trump hadn't, you know, some of the stuff
Speaker 1: he said, it's not what I would have It's not
Speaker 1: what I would have said, I'll put it that way.
Speaker 1: But it's all. They also laid a trap for him
Speaker 1: with all the ways they're pushing stuff. They know that
Speaker 1: if they if they go after Trump's ego, They're going
Speaker 1: to get a certain kind of response from him, and
Speaker 1: that's and that's what they did. But you know, I
Speaker 1: I do think that. Oh by the way, today, um
Speaker 1: you had uh, I think two million dollars released to
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian government, is that right, something like that of
Speaker 1: a direct military aid. So there's that, folks, Oh that's
Speaker 1: right here. So he's sow in the pocket of Putin.
Speaker 1: He's doing Putin's bidding. He's sow in the pocket of Putin.
Speaker 1: That Trump is sending missiles and sniper rifles to the
Speaker 1: Ukrainian government to use to take out Russians. You think
Speaker 1: that that might get them to calm down a little
Speaker 1: bit of the Asia in the pocket or the rushroan.
Speaker 1: But but now sure enough they they think that maybe
Speaker 1: maybe that's Putin playing playing four D chess. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: that's Putin doing some some crazy tricks that are supposed
Speaker 1: to be a shock to everybody. And I don't know.
Speaker 1: And it's just at some point the derangement syndrome becomes way,
Speaker 1: way too much for anyone to be able to handle.
Speaker 1: And we're getting close to it, folks. Well, speaking of
Speaker 1: deranging Center, we got Whoopi Goldberg later on speaking out
Speaker 1: about what what really went down with the judge, And
Speaker 1: we had a judge on the show this week, so
Speaker 1: I was like, whoa. We had a great interview though.
Speaker 1: Judge and I always have fun. I'm telling you something.
Speaker 1: Judge and I get along just great. I see her,
Speaker 1: she's like Buck, I'm like Judge. We hug it out.
Speaker 1: It's great. She's a lot of fun. She's she's fierce. Man.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't judge Yournine dark Alley, Dude, she'd go. She'd
Speaker 1: take that beer bottle, smash it in half and come
Speaker 1: at you. You You don't want to mess the judge knee.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, lady does not play games. All right,
Speaker 1: stay with me. He's back with you now, because when
Speaker 1: it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. Hey,
Speaker 1: welcome back, everybody. It's Friday. I got a special treat
Speaker 1: in store for you. We have the man himself with
Speaker 1: us now, Congressman Louie Gomert from the great state of Texas.
Speaker 1: He is just going to shed wisdom on all the
Speaker 1: things right now to send you off on your weekends. Gohmer,
Speaker 1: thanks for making the time for us. Man, you're blowing
Speaker 1: your credibility. You got terrific credibility, and then you say
Speaker 1: things like that about me. We gotta put you on
Speaker 1: the spot, man, the hot seat. It's been a crazy
Speaker 1: week in America. Just can you just tell me? Do
Speaker 1: you know? I need to know this? And I'm usually
Speaker 1: today I'm in I'm in New York City, but I'm
Speaker 1: usually down in the swamp where unfortunately you have to
Speaker 1: spend a fair amount of time too. I'm usually d
Speaker 1: C Base now and and I just have to wonder,
Speaker 1: you're Democratic colleagues in the Congress, when when they aren't
Speaker 1: near a camera and when they're not on the floor
Speaker 1: of the house, are they walking around like you know,
Speaker 1: this Russia stuff is crazy. We gott to tone it
Speaker 1: down a little bit because I hope that they're saying that. Well,
Speaker 1: I haven't heard any of them say that now. Some
Speaker 1: of them, when we get out from behind the hearings,
Speaker 1: there is nicest can be. That's that's true. But Buck,
Speaker 1: I haven't heard a single one say anything except how
Speaker 1: bad Trump is and how we got to get rid
Speaker 1: of him. And that is extremely disconcerting to me. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you one of the things that that made
Speaker 1: me feel good. I went to Texas a and M
Speaker 1: undergrad and I got I was sending a chain of
Speaker 1: emails my classmates were sending around and they were saying,
Speaker 1: you know the thing about Louis, if that were Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and the Justice Department, we're conspiring to get rid
Speaker 1: of her and use the Justice Department to do it.
Speaker 1: He would be yelling just as loudly at any Republican
Speaker 1: that acted that way. And I'm glad they realized that.
Speaker 1: And and Buck, I've said to my colleagues and open
Speaker 1: hearings before I brought this up a couple of times
Speaker 1: at least. Look, you know, when when George W. Bush
Speaker 1: was president and we found out that there were over
Speaker 1: three thousand abuses of the National Security Letter where FBI
Speaker 1: agists did fishing expeditions. I called the White House and
Speaker 1: said the A G I got to go and where?
Speaker 1: And I should have said Moeller had to go. I
Speaker 1: didn't know how bad he was at the time, but
Speaker 1: I go, where is the single Democrat. Where's one of
Speaker 1: you that will open up and say, I don't care
Speaker 1: Republican Democrat, this is wrong and it's got to stop.
Speaker 1: And nobody says anything. It is really an outrage that
Speaker 1: somebody doesn't stand up and say this is just wrong,
Speaker 1: this is wrong. You know, Congressman that's I try to
Speaker 1: talk about this in the show a fair amount. When
Speaker 1: we use the word principle, for example, we talk about,
Speaker 1: you know what it means to have principles. A good
Speaker 1: example of it is, even when it's not your team,
Speaker 1: so to speak, even when it's not your political party
Speaker 1: that would benefit from a certain action, you take that
Speaker 1: action or you try to enforce some accountability because you
Speaker 1: know there's something bigger at stake than just the short
Speaker 1: term when in the news cycle or short term political gain.
Speaker 1: And I have not seen any Democrats that are concerned
Speaker 1: in the least about prosecutorial misconduct. The Department of Justice clearly,
Speaker 1: by its own admission, messing up on a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of key points in the Hillary email investigation, the Russia
Speaker 1: collusion investigation, the leaks that have come out. Nothing Congressman,
Speaker 1: there is no sense of bipartisan checks and balances at all.
Speaker 1: That's that's right. The bipartisanship is nothing but partisan. And
Speaker 1: they say it's Republicans defending Trump. Actually we're defending the
Speaker 1: constitution and the abuses that have arisen out of justice
Speaker 1: and intel. And I know you've heard our friend New
Speaker 1: English say, and if Hillary had won, we would never
Speaker 1: have known how co optive and how weaponized the justice
Speaker 1: and intel had become under the Democrats. And and it's
Speaker 1: one of the things I asked Darnald Trump before I
Speaker 1: agreed to co sponsor the Trump for President in Texas.
Speaker 1: I said, you got to promise me that you're not
Speaker 1: gonna do what George W. Bush did when he took office.
Speaker 1: He was trying to be gracious, because he can really
Speaker 1: be a gracious, decent guy, but he took office after
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court and all that stuff weighted in, and
Speaker 1: he said, you know what, I understand, there may have
Speaker 1: been crimes or whatever committed in the administration, but everybody
Speaker 1: starting fresh today and everything in the past is bygones.
Speaker 1: And the problem with that word there were crimes committed,
Speaker 1: and when he didn't root that out, it just festered
Speaker 1: during his administration until it just bloomed big time under Obama.
Speaker 1: And you can't. We have got to get these people out.
Speaker 1: But the trouble is, as long as rosen Stein is there,
Speaker 1: and he is really good at Schmooz and Jeff's sessions
Speaker 1: and the president others make him think he's their buddy.
Speaker 1: And until he has fired and out of there, we're
Speaker 1: not gonna have any chance of cleaning things up. I
Speaker 1: was gonna ask Congressman, what do you think the next
Speaker 1: step should be from from the Republicans. You guys are
Speaker 1: the majority in the House. Hopefully that will continue. By
Speaker 1: the way, how confident are you that that will continue? Uh? Well,
Speaker 1: it's like my friend Devon has said, if the Democrats
Speaker 1: win the majority back, even if it's just the Senator,
Speaker 1: just the House, the investigations are gonna be uh just
Speaker 1: brought to an end. Do you think Democrats are trying
Speaker 1: to and do you think that some folks that I
Speaker 1: would call a part of the deep state cabal? Do
Speaker 1: you think that they're trying to run the clock out?
Speaker 1: And that's why we've seen so many delays. Buck, you're
Speaker 1: a smart guy. You've been on both sides of the government.
Speaker 1: You know what's going on deep down. You're part of
Speaker 1: the intelligence. Uh you understand. You bet they're trying to
Speaker 1: run out the clock and and why would they not
Speaker 1: if you're if you're engaged in criminal activity within the government,
Speaker 1: and you have seen that during the Clinton administration, they
Speaker 1: constantly ran out the clock and after they delayed anything
Speaker 1: being done for three or four years and they say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's old news, I get off it, and said, no,
Speaker 1: we still haven't gotten to the truth. And then you
Speaker 1: look at fast and Furious resulting in murder because of
Speaker 1: what the justice well a t F did and getting
Speaker 1: those guns in the hands of criminals, and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Terry's killed out there, and and all they do it
Speaker 1: was obfu skate and Eric Holder was one of the the
Speaker 1: worst in the world of covering things up. And he
Speaker 1: walks away Scott Free. Unbelievable. And so they have seen
Speaker 1: over and over being Ghazi. Basically they never allowed the
Speaker 1: full truth to come out. They delayed, they obfuscated, and
Speaker 1: so Democrats have seen that is the plan to take.
Speaker 1: That's the course of action. They have their template in place,
Speaker 1: and that's what they're doing right now. You bet it is.
Speaker 1: They're trying to run out the clock. And won't they
Speaker 1: be surprised when we hold the majority in both houses
Speaker 1: and President Trump ends up stronger. On the other side,
Speaker 1: Congressman Louis Gomer, everybody at Texas the first Congressional District
Speaker 1: Conston Gomer's number one. I have a great weekend, Louis.
Speaker 1: Good to have you on. Man Thank you for joining us, Buck,
Speaker 1: Thanks for all the routing out you do of the truth.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Man, do my best, sir, you keep
Speaker 1: it up. Alright, team, we got a big, big third
Speaker 1: hour coming up on the show, a follow up to
Speaker 1: the feud between Mean Whoopie and Judge Janine, a clash
Speaker 1: of the Titans, the Hulk versus the Thing you know, Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's like the biggest Isn't that the number one comic
Speaker 1: book crossover fight? Or Superman versus Batman? Maybe I don't
Speaker 1: know one of those things. We've got that indeed, the
Speaker 1: next hour and oh we have an epic string of rocal.
Speaker 1: We even have a new roll called Intro for you
Speaker 1: tonight that's gonna be like whoa coming up. My mother
Speaker 1: believed that my father believed that if I wanted to
Speaker 1: president United States, I could be I could be Vice
Speaker 1: presd MoMA lived in uh in Long Island for ten
Speaker 1: years or so. God rest her soul and uh um
Speaker 1: although she's wait, your mom's still your mom's still alive?
Speaker 1: Is your dad past? God bless her soul? Chuck Graham,
Speaker 1: State Senators here, it's not stand up shock that him,
Speaker 1: see it? Oh God love you? What am I talking
Speaker 1: about a man who will be the next president United States?
Speaker 1: Barack America, Delaware. The largest growth in population is Indian Americans.
Speaker 1: Movie from Indian You cannot go to a seven eleven
Speaker 1: or Duncan Doughnuts unless you have a slight Indian accident.
Speaker 1: What kind of a chance with a Northeastern liberal like
Speaker 1: Joe Biden stand uh in the South better than anybody else.
Speaker 1: And you don't know my state. My state was a
Speaker 1: slave state, My state is a border state. My state
Speaker 1: is the eighth largest black population in the country. They're
Speaker 1: gonna put you all back in change. That was just
Speaker 1: a compilation of the great hope of the Democrats so
Speaker 1: far for folks, the Joe Biden blue color Joe, it
Speaker 1: is amazing, isn't it? To watch? How when you think
Speaker 1: about it, what Trump said, and I mentioned this earlier
Speaker 1: in the week, is a correct by the way, which
Speaker 1: is that Biden was really a backbench It really really
Speaker 1: a second or third tier senator. I mean when I
Speaker 1: remember I went to a speech by Biden and it
Speaker 1: was like Biden and Kusinach. And this was when I
Speaker 1: was living in d C. Over a decade ago. Like
Speaker 1: Biden and Kusinach and a couple of other candidates. I
Speaker 1: can't remember who it was, but you know they're the
Speaker 1: Democratic candidate at the time who everybody's like, why is
Speaker 1: that guy running? I mean, Biden was not a serious candidate,
Speaker 1: and now they're saying because he served as vice president
Speaker 1: Barack Obama, they're just grasping at straws. So then you
Speaker 1: get and this is this is the big the big
Speaker 1: question of the week. You get your socialist of the
Speaker 1: month situation playing out right now. Um. And by the way,
Speaker 1: one of my one of my listeners wanted to draw
Speaker 1: my attention to the fact that when you look at
Speaker 1: at a country like Norway and talk about its social
Speaker 1: spending programs, keep in mind it has the largest sovereign
Speaker 1: wealth fund in the world because of its massive fossil
Speaker 1: fuel reserves. Norway people don't think of it this way.
Speaker 1: The Norwegians keep it kind of quiet. He's got a
Speaker 1: lot of gas money, lots and lots of it. But
Speaker 1: anyway you have this, there's hope that the energy for
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party is going to come from one of
Speaker 1: two kinds of socialists. You've got the Bernie Sanders socialist,
Speaker 1: the kind of aging boomer, left wing hippie type, come
Speaker 1: gonna be amazing. I'm gonna get everybody free, overything all
Speaker 1: the time. And the thing with Bernie Sanders is, you know,
Speaker 1: he remembers the Soviet Revolution like it was yesterday. And
Speaker 1: and then you've got or you know, the the other
Speaker 1: end of the spectrum, you know, the on the younger
Speaker 1: end of the spectrum, got Okazia Cortez and doesn't know
Speaker 1: what the Soviet Revolution was. But at least she's young, right,
Speaker 1: at least there's some possibility that she'll be able to
Speaker 1: energize young people. I have heard, I mean, folks, we
Speaker 1: are almost in August, we are casting ballots the first
Speaker 1: week of November, and I have heard basically nothing from
Speaker 1: the Democrats about what their messages about how they plan
Speaker 1: on winning people over. I mean, I really do think
Speaker 1: that it's just going to be a giant hate Trump
Speaker 1: fest and that's the plan. That's the plan. And I
Speaker 1: also think that the Democrats are more vulnerable on immigration
Speaker 1: then they realized. I was just this was making the
Speaker 1: rounds today and I just wanted to play this here, John,
Speaker 1: do me a favor. Play clip fifteen here on Almo
Speaker 1: Obama say about immigration. Oh, our message absolutely is don't
Speaker 1: send your children unaccompanied on trains or through through a
Speaker 1: bunch of smugglers. That is our direct message to the
Speaker 1: families in Central America. Do not send your children to
Speaker 1: the borders. If they do make it, they'll get sent back.
Speaker 1: More importantly, they may not make it. You know, why
Speaker 1: is it okay that Obama would say, Look, everything he
Speaker 1: said there is true and good. I like that. Of course,
Speaker 1: his policies did not match his rhetoric. And isn't that
Speaker 1: so fascinating with Obama when he would say things that
Speaker 1: the media wanted to hear and then do things that
Speaker 1: the left wanted him to do. No one ever talks
Speaker 1: about how this was not just incongruous but dishonest. And
Speaker 1: when they would say that, you know, the abministration, they
Speaker 1: would call him the deporter in chief. That was all
Speaker 1: a lie, that was all a scan. It wasn't the
Speaker 1: deporter in chief. He was just somebody who changed the
Speaker 1: way they were calculating deportations at the border. But you know,
Speaker 1: when Obama says, don't bring your kids here, he's not
Speaker 1: a monster, he's not racist, he's not any of those
Speaker 1: things that they say about Trump, and then they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: that's because look at the policies, look at data, look
Speaker 1: at these other things, and I say, yeah, you see,
Speaker 1: this is the it's the reverse of the of the
Speaker 1: problem that that people are trying to make of Trump. Right.
Speaker 1: Trump says stuff the media doesn't like, but does things
Speaker 1: that his base and that those who voted for him
Speaker 1: expect him to do. So we judge him based on
Speaker 1: the actions, and you know, they were judging Obama always
Speaker 1: based on the rhetoric. I prefer our way. I think
Speaker 1: that's a better way to go. And on immigration and
Speaker 1: how that's going to affect the midterms, they're hoping that
Speaker 1: their whole message is going to be, you know, that
Speaker 1: Republicans are so mean and bad. This is an issue
Speaker 1: that the Democrats haven't really figured this out. The country
Speaker 1: is with Republicans on immigration. They don't want more illegal immigration.
Speaker 1: They can come up with different ways to try and
Speaker 1: change the calculations around this, they can look at different
Speaker 1: ways to ask the polling questions. The bottom line is
Speaker 1: the country does not want more legal immigration. And when
Speaker 1: Democrats talk about the issue of immigration, that's the only
Speaker 1: thing they really focus on. You know, they won't discuss
Speaker 1: ways of uh. They're not even focused on like guests,
Speaker 1: worker programs or things that you think would be for
Speaker 1: those who are somewhat squishy and immigration sound like a
Speaker 1: good idea, but they won't even they don't even talking
Speaker 1: about that. They're getting as close to being an open
Speaker 1: borders party as possible without actually having to come out
Speaker 1: and and say it. And I think that's going to uh.
Speaker 1: I think that's going to haunt them going into the
Speaker 1: mid rooms because the American people are just simply not
Speaker 1: with them. And I look around and I try to think,
Speaker 1: who is the standard bearer right now? Who is the
Speaker 1: standard bearer who is in a position to rally the Democrats?
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe they can count on Obama to be a successful,
Speaker 1: you know, a successful rally rally the Democrat based effort.
Speaker 1: I don't know, um, but so far, I mean, they're there,
Speaker 1: bench is they got nothing, And I know that they're
Speaker 1: all excited about uh Kamala Harris, but I think that
Speaker 1: she's gonna be one of these politicians. He's gonna kind
Speaker 1: of remind me of Scott Walker. Everybody was really excited
Speaker 1: about Scott Walker until they realize, I don't know, he's
Speaker 1: a conservative. He's on the right. But so they realized,
Speaker 1: wait a second, he's got to actually answer a lot
Speaker 1: of questions and inspire people and do things. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: seems great, but I've never to the left. But I've
Speaker 1: never seen her I have to deal with any opposition,
Speaker 1: I've never seen. I've never seen her in a tough interview.
Speaker 1: I've never seen her have to do anything other than
Speaker 1: have people say, Wow, you're amazing. Thank you Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: for representing California. You're incredible. You are the best. Um
Speaker 1: So that's what I just don't see it. I don't
Speaker 1: see how they're gonna be able to do this. And
Speaker 1: Biden is not this. I know Biden is not the answer.
Speaker 1: If they're really counting on Biden to be the one
Speaker 1: who who comes through for them, I think that they
Speaker 1: are going to be a very, very disappointed to watch.
Speaker 1: That's at least my assessment of the situation right now. Um,
Speaker 1: he just he doesn't have it. How do you go
Speaker 1: from not being able to get one person out of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party's vote to being an actual contender for
Speaker 1: the president. Can you think think about the insult contest
Speaker 1: between trumpet by I'm actually gonna feel bad for Biden
Speaker 1: if it if it turns into that. So I'm I
Speaker 1: just keep I keep bringing our attention to this because
Speaker 1: I'm almost in disbelief at how days march on, days
Speaker 1: march on, and we don't get any more sense than
Speaker 1: the Democrats that they understand that they might not win
Speaker 1: this mid term, they might not win back power this
Speaker 1: midterm election, and then the world's gonna get or this
Speaker 1: country is gonna get real crazy. I mean, Trump arrangement
Speaker 1: syndrome is going to turn into a pandemic this fall.
Speaker 1: Stay would Buck Sexton remission, decoding the news and disseminating
Speaker 1: information with actionable intelligence, Make no mistakes, American, You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Activity analysts,
Speaker 1: remember of the Sexton Aleta were under a rock yesterday.
Speaker 1: You know all about Janine Pierro's appearance here on the show.
Speaker 1: That thing's got hot on the air, which you expect
Speaker 1: that happens a lot. But I want to clear up
Speaker 1: what happened afterwards, because she talked about it on Fox
Speaker 1: News last night and Fox and Friends whatever it is,
Speaker 1: but she seemed to leave out some key points because
Speaker 1: so well, she left a lot of pertinent stuff out,
Speaker 1: and there were a lot of people backstage, and I
Speaker 1: want to be very clear about what happened. So there's
Speaker 1: a lot of spin she's doing and I can't do
Speaker 1: anything about that, but I can tell you what went on.
Speaker 1: She was upset when she died here because Anna Navarro
Speaker 1: was here instead of Joy, which ended completely acceptable. By
Speaker 1: the way, Joy Behart is really annoying, and you know,
Speaker 1: she just talks like this all the time, and she
Speaker 1: says really stupid things or television and get paid all
Speaker 1: this month. But I will take Joey Behart over An
Speaker 1: Navarro any day of the week. I think you could
Speaker 1: say that when it comes to television and Main Factor,
Speaker 1: be the worst, the absolute worst. Continue John supposed it
Speaker 1: was not early, it was not late. It ended when
Speaker 1: it was supposed to. She then called everybody at the
Speaker 1: table a name I cannot repeat on TV and set
Speaker 1: it in front of the audience. When I came off stage,
Speaker 1: I went over the because I was a little hot, okay,
Speaker 1: so I went to calm down. She came off. She
Speaker 1: could have just passed me. She didn't need to stop,
Speaker 1: but she stopped and put a finger in my face
Speaker 1: and yelled, I've done more for victims than you ever
Speaker 1: will than I said to her some few choice words
Speaker 1: I cannot repeat. Yes, I did say it. I did
Speaker 1: say it, but I did not spit on her. I
Speaker 1: did not intimidate her. No one chased her out of here,
Speaker 1: but she did leave here cursing at the people who
Speaker 1: booked the show. She cursed at the guys who did
Speaker 1: the security for the show. So I did say to
Speaker 1: her in the middle of all this, you and I've
Speaker 1: never had a problem before, you know. And to finish
Speaker 1: the show, which should tell you, none of us were
Speaker 1: chasing her because we still had another segment to do. So.
Speaker 1: For twenty years, the show has always had people on
Speaker 1: with different views, all right, So so you know, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna say this, The view has actually had on people
Speaker 1: and a lot of your buck. Why are you talking
Speaker 1: about the view, guys? This Friday night and the mood
Speaker 1: is right, gonna have some fun, tell you how it's
Speaker 1: dying t G I f you guys, remember that it
Speaker 1: was amazing. It was amazing, dude, belly cousin Laddie, he
Speaker 1: was amazed. Dude, Belky. When you think about a borat
Speaker 1: is kind of a rip off of Belki like boor O.
Speaker 1: There's a lot. I mean, I know bell Ki is
Speaker 1: from Greece basically, and boas from Kazakhstam. But the whole
Speaker 1: like country bumpkin thing that you know speaks the truth
Speaker 1: even though he doesn't speak the language. Yeah, that's the thing, dude.
Speaker 1: I was a big Perfect Strangers fan full House obviously
Speaker 1: here by the way, you see the full house. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you were if you were on when
Speaker 1: I said this micro in the week four million dollar house.
Speaker 1: Now the full house house is four million dollars, so
Speaker 1: you know, cousin Jesse wasn't exactly roughing it. Okay, that's like, uh,
Speaker 1: this whole like, oh like their family just comes together
Speaker 1: because they're trying to raise these girls. I've lived in
Speaker 1: a four I live in the attic of a four
Speaker 1: million dollar house, nice one bedroom up there in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: You probably get about five g's a month for that. Anyway,
Speaker 1: So where was I? Oh, yeah, why are we talking about?
Speaker 1: Why are we talking about the the situation here with
Speaker 1: Judge Jennin and whoopee um, Well, one is that Mike
Speaker 1: is is that the hottest uh tempered. You've ever seen
Speaker 1: ms Goldberg, I have to say, I've actually never seen
Speaker 1: her blow up like that before. I've seen her get
Speaker 1: up in people's faces a little bit that show, but
Speaker 1: I've never seen a straight up she knutron bomb that segment.
Speaker 1: She was like, we're done segment break go to it,
Speaker 1: like she was done with it. Yeah, you very rarely
Speaker 1: see somebody loser cool like that on the air. She went,
Speaker 1: she went, she went right to we're done next, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: exactly she was. She was like, you know, cut the mics.
Speaker 1: Basically that was where she was on that. And I
Speaker 1: just bring it up because one, you know, Judge Janine,
Speaker 1: she's not gonna play with that. You know, she's just
Speaker 1: not She's not gonna sit there and get bamboozled by
Speaker 1: the other side. And two, uh, this is what Trump
Speaker 1: arrangement does to people. That's it's so funny because the
Speaker 1: whole segment was really about It started out because uh, whoopee,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm sorry, uh not whoopee the judge, judge, thank you. Judge.
Speaker 1: Janine kept wanting to say and A Navarro again because ah,
Speaker 1: like I said the worst, but the judge was like,
Speaker 1: you know, some people have Trump arrangement syndrome, and she
Speaker 1: kind of gestured to WHOOPI Goldberg. By the way, the
Speaker 1: reason this is all in the news today is because
Speaker 1: they said that would be spat at her and they
Speaker 1: were dropping F bombs and it was a total, a
Speaker 1: total melee over at ABC Studios here in New York
Speaker 1: at the View. And I've heard of things like this
Speaker 1: happening before. I've actually heard of it happening at seeing
Speaker 1: and a few years back between a couple of people
Speaker 1: that I knew. And you know, sometimes what you see
Speaker 1: on TV, I I I think people believe it's usually
Speaker 1: some kind of a like a hoax. It's a it's
Speaker 1: a ruse um. But it's you up there. And when
Speaker 1: people get up in your people get up in your grill,
Speaker 1: you sometimes react. This has happened with me before, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, people get get a little hot and bothered.
Speaker 1: I don't want to say so anyway, So they went
Speaker 1: into this thing. But it all started because she pointed
Speaker 1: at will be Instid that she had Trump derangement syndrome,
Speaker 1: and then she proceeded to get super super angry, incredibly angry,
Speaker 1: almost like a deranged person. Wow, look at that look
Speaker 1: at how that happened, she in fact proved her Trump
Speaker 1: arrangement syndrome on the spot. When the mere accusation of
Speaker 1: TDS sends you flying into a TDS tantrum, what further
Speaker 1: evidence could you possibly have if you were not, in
Speaker 1: fact deranged when it came to issues arounding, touching upon
Speaker 1: in the neighborhood of Donald Trump? How could it bother
Speaker 1: you in the least if somebody said that you were
Speaker 1: suffering from Trump derangement syndrome. You will also note that,
Speaker 1: and this is this just keeps coming off of my head.
Speaker 1: We hear all this stuff about civility from the left.
Speaker 1: We hear all this stuff about how Trump has coursened
Speaker 1: the discourse, Trump has made things. And then when you
Speaker 1: really think about it, who had which political party in
Speaker 1: the last twelve months has suffered an attempted mass assassination
Speaker 1: of congressmen? Oh, that's right, the Republican Party. Where do
Speaker 1: we see all the stories about people being turned away
Speaker 1: for service, being ejected from restaurants or other establishments because
Speaker 1: of their ties to the administration, or even for something
Speaker 1: as simple for a transgression as minor as wearing a
Speaker 1: maga hat. Where else do you see that? And the answer,
Speaker 1: sure enough, is that you only see it with Democrats.
Speaker 1: And it's always the victims that are Republicans. Somehow, we're
Speaker 1: the ones who are supposed to be nicer or or
Speaker 1: Trump has made everybody you know, has has made everything worse. Everything,
Speaker 1: and they always say that it's Trump's fault. But where
Speaker 1: are the Trump supporters that are doing these terrible things
Speaker 1: that we definitely see the Democrats doing. I I know
Speaker 1: this is somewhat anecdotal, and yeah, I'm sure there's some
Speaker 1: bozos somewhere wearing a maga hat who said something stupid
Speaker 1: or you know, let a comment fly, or you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it never happens, but I'm saying, if
Speaker 1: you're gonna really compare these things, the side that is
Speaker 1: constantly calling for uh well, calling out Trump and saying
Speaker 1: that he has made everything so much worse, he's course
Speaker 1: in the discourse, they're really like the guy who who
Speaker 1: do I don't know if you've ever had this, if
Speaker 1: any of you had older brothers, but the the the greatest,
Speaker 1: the greatest physical humiliation that you might suffer when you
Speaker 1: have it an older sibling is when they take your
Speaker 1: own hand, and they say stop hitting yourself with your hand,
Speaker 1: and stop hitting yourself because they grab your hand and
Speaker 1: they start slapping you with your own hand like it
Speaker 1: adds to it adds to the aggravation you feel because
Speaker 1: you are being forced to hit yourself with your hand.
Speaker 1: And that is what I feel like this this call
Speaker 1: for greater decency from the Democrats. They're running around punching us,
Speaker 1: kicking us out of establishments, in some cases engaged in
Speaker 1: very real political violence, attempted assassinations. That's a whole separate category,
Speaker 1: but I just mean in the day to day, right,
Speaker 1: it's Republicans who are being chased out of restaurants. It's
Speaker 1: Republicans who are being picketed at their homes by lunatics.
Speaker 1: It's Republicans who are being verbally accosted an assaulted in
Speaker 1: the street in front of their family members, as we've
Speaker 1: seen with Mitch McConnell and other members of the administration.
Speaker 1: You know, it's Republicans who have a hat on that
Speaker 1: can lead to somebody throwing a drink in their face,
Speaker 1: as we saw in that viral video a week ago.
Speaker 1: And yet the other side does all the complaining about oh,
Speaker 1: it's I feel so unsafe. Trump makes me feel so unsafe.
Speaker 1: I both so unsafe. I have to attack you. That's
Speaker 1: what they keep doing. They claim that it's a safety issue,
Speaker 1: and yet then they come out and physically attack us.
Speaker 1: They claim that they're the ones who think that they're
Speaker 1: under threat, and yet the actual acting upon threats always
Speaker 1: comes from their side. And I just have to wonder
Speaker 1: at what point there'll be some moment where they finally
Speaker 1: have to face up to this reality. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure it will ever really happen, because I've just
Speaker 1: laid out all these different cases, all these instances. They
Speaker 1: have nothing. They'll say, oh, Trump once said something about,
Speaker 1: you know, kick his butt or something at a campaign rally.
Speaker 1: You know, that's one time, and I don't think anybody
Speaker 1: actually got hurt, and Trump was a little caught up
Speaker 1: in the moment. But that doesn't compare to the stuff
Speaker 1: that we're seeing from the left on a daily basis,
Speaker 1: not like eighteen months ago, two years ago, yesterday, today,
Speaker 1: next week. We know which side the violence comes from.
Speaker 1: It comes from the more emotional and self righteous end
Speaker 1: of the political spectrum. That is Democrats today, that is leftist,
Speaker 1: that's just truth. It's a reality that they do not
Speaker 1: want to face up to. But as one that I
Speaker 1: will not let them skate around anymore. This is, in
Speaker 1: fact what is going on. So I just think it's,
Speaker 1: you know, the WHOOPI Goldberg situation. Yes, I know it's
Speaker 1: not really it's not really a big deal. Who really cares,
Speaker 1: But it's yet another instance of Whoopy started out saying
Speaker 1: that you know, she's feeling so upset and so threatened,
Speaker 1: and everything is so scary now basically, and then she
Speaker 1: proceeds a curse at somebody allegedly spitting her face. She
Speaker 1: says it didn't happen, and there's this huge few of
Speaker 1: this huge fight, and she invited someone into her home
Speaker 1: in a sense, right when you invite someone on your show.
Speaker 1: That's why I don't invite liberals on this show to
Speaker 1: just get ripped apart on air. I think that's just
Speaker 1: I think it's ghosh. I think it's ungallant, it's cheesy.
Speaker 1: I want to have a real discussion with one, sure,
Speaker 1: but I don't think you get very far, especially with
Speaker 1: cross talk on radio. Then you just it's just a jumble.
Speaker 1: You can't really tell what's being said. But I would
Speaker 1: never invite somebody on with the idea that they would
Speaker 1: be humiliated, they would be undermined, and they would leave
Speaker 1: feeling like they had been degraded in some way. And
Speaker 1: and libs do that all the time. They do it
Speaker 1: all the time, and then apparently they do it on
Speaker 1: the view now once in a while. Oh my my friends,
Speaker 1: we have a superb roll call session on the way shortly,
Speaker 1: so you will absolutely want to stick around for that.
Speaker 1: And don't forget speaking of you. Former co host Jedediabela
Speaker 1: joins me on the Freedom of podcast this week. Check
Speaker 1: it out. I'm trying to talk about a run. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to talk about Valiant run day out. You've told
Speaker 1: me this three hundred times? Do you know that that's
Speaker 1: what my tweet was about. I know you've explained this. Literally.
Speaker 1: I thought them she was why, dadad I thought them
Speaker 1: she was why. So that's Roseanne Barr, who is obviously
Speaker 1: still very much uh psychologically well fragile, but also psychologically
Speaker 1: attached to what happened with her tweet. It was not
Speaker 1: even a full on tweet. It was a response to
Speaker 1: a tweet. It was in It was in the replies
Speaker 1: about Valerie Jarrett. She made a very ill advised and
Speaker 1: racist remark. Um and and Mike, what was the content?
Speaker 1: She's this is on her YouTube channel, and she's just really,
Speaker 1: was that supposed to be this? Was that an outtake?
Speaker 1: Or was that supposed to be like that? She was
Speaker 1: aware the cameras were rolling, But yeah, I don't know
Speaker 1: the context of it, fully because they've just released this.
Speaker 1: This is all over the place, but it almost seems
Speaker 1: like an outtake. I I don't know if that's an
Speaker 1: intentional thing. I'm guessing it is. But but her whole
Speaker 1: contention now is that she did not realize that Valerie
Speaker 1: Jarrett was African American, so she's screaming about that. You know,
Speaker 1: here's my question, Mike, do you think Roseanne is Are
Speaker 1: they gonna let her make it come back? I think
Speaker 1: she's just done. I think she's she's too toxic, crossed
Speaker 1: too many lines too and and quite honestly, I think
Speaker 1: that she got really her career beforehand. I don't think
Speaker 1: she was amazing because everybody like I was never a
Speaker 1: fan of the show of Roseanne. That's the bottom line.
Speaker 1: So I just think she's done. But maybe maybe I'm
Speaker 1: missing something that's uh special about her career or her abilities.
Speaker 1: To me, she just seems kind of heinous and and
Speaker 1: unappealing in every sense. I agree. I was done with
Speaker 1: her after she sang the national anthem and spitting the
Speaker 1: ground stuff. And after that, you're done. In my book, exactly,
Speaker 1: it's like Roseanne, check yourself before you wreck yourself. But
Speaker 1: you know, this is the thing. There was another guy
Speaker 1: who wasn't somebody got somebody got jammed up with tweets
Speaker 1: the last twenty for another guy, old tweets. And I've
Speaker 1: said this so many I I it was a guy.
Speaker 1: He was tied to the guardians of the Galaxy franchise.
Speaker 1: I've said this, you know I'm talking about Yeah, he
Speaker 1: was a director. I think, right was he the director? Um?
Speaker 1: Because I've said that so many times. If I wasn't
Speaker 1: in the commentary business, meaning that I didn't have to
Speaker 1: share my thoughts about things that were happening as part
Speaker 1: of my job, I would either be a Twitter viewer,
Speaker 1: or I would have somebody professionally handling my social media
Speaker 1: just to put out, you know, appearances. Or now I'm
Speaker 1: thinking like, hey, I'm like a rock star, but I
Speaker 1: just it's just not worth the risk. I see these
Speaker 1: professional athletes that are getting with the guy at the
Speaker 1: MLB game recently. He got on all this trouble for
Speaker 1: for stuff, and it was stuff that he tweeted out
Speaker 1: years ago. I mean he was seventeen when he tweeted it,
Speaker 1: you know, So this is now we're in this world
Speaker 1: where I think this is the this is step one
Speaker 1: of oppo research on anyone now. And that should be
Speaker 1: kept in mind that they just they immediately dive into
Speaker 1: previous tweets and previous Facebook postings and and they'll, you know,
Speaker 1: anything that you there's no context for it, right, they
Speaker 1: just find it and they put it up there. So
Speaker 1: you can get in a lot of trouble even if
Speaker 1: don't say something stupid. But the reality is most people,
Speaker 1: especially people who don't you know, for some of these people,
Speaker 1: I feel like Mike, they didn't know that they were
Speaker 1: going to get famous, right, they didn't know. When you're seventeen,
Speaker 1: you don't know if you're gonna become a public person.
Speaker 1: So so maybe you write some stupid things thinking that
Speaker 1: no one's gonna see. It doesn't matter, it doesn't excuse it,
Speaker 1: but you do see how somebody could be so dumb, right,
Speaker 1: because if you're not a public figure at the time,
Speaker 1: and you probably don't understand at the time the reach
Speaker 1: that it's going to eventually, you know that people are Look,
Speaker 1: everyone has a digital archive of everything. Now. It's I'm
Speaker 1: so glad man. We are the last Mike, We're the
Speaker 1: last generation you meet, John, you know, we we think
Speaker 1: back to the Zach Morris giant cell phone and and
Speaker 1: how like if you had a beeper, you're either a
Speaker 1: drug dealer or a doctor, and like there was just
Speaker 1: not there was this whole realm of the privacy of
Speaker 1: life that existed that's just all gone now. Anyway, this
Speaker 1: is kind of a rant. I know, it's really not
Speaker 1: very much to do with the rose and thing other
Speaker 1: than you know, one one tweet, one late at one
Speaker 1: late at night tweet from Roseanne cost two people their jobs.
Speaker 1: They say they're bringing back the show though, which I
Speaker 1: feel like is not going to be successful. But I don't.
Speaker 1: I didn't think it was good in the first place. Yeah,
Speaker 1: did you see it? Yeah, I didn't think it was
Speaker 1: good at all. Yeah, it wasn't good. It wasn't good.
Speaker 1: I thought it was really the whole thing was really true.
Speaker 1: Oh um. By the way, I did watch What Who
Speaker 1: Is America? I watched the first episode because I was
Speaker 1: I talked about it and I didn't want to talk trash.
Speaker 1: It is horrible, it's not funny, it is not good.
Speaker 1: The the one Israeli martial arts gun guy is like,
Speaker 1: can I have some kind of funny moments his other characters?
Speaker 1: I am shocked. He does a whole Sasha Baron Cohen
Speaker 1: does a whole sketch, and he does kind of go
Speaker 1: he kind of goes after not liberals, but maybe there
Speaker 1: is one character a little bit. So I said, if
Speaker 1: it's bipartisan, at least that's a good start. But the
Speaker 1: problem is not even that it's liberal comedy stuff. The
Speaker 1: problem is that it's just terrible. It is really really bad.
Speaker 1: I'm it's disappointing, Like like when Dave Chappelle finally came
Speaker 1: back and we're all excited for his stand up and
Speaker 1: then we're like, Wow, you're just not funny anymore. That's
Speaker 1: that's a sad thing that happened. You can't just go
Speaker 1: away for ten years and not do this and come
Speaker 1: back and like still be relevant and funny. That was
Speaker 1: what happened. It's like that with Sasha Baron Cohen. Folks,
Speaker 1: It's sorry, we have a roll call coming up. Stay
Speaker 1: with me. He's holding the line for America. Buck sext
Speaker 1: in his back rock and roll. Fellow patriots, we made
Speaker 1: ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: All right. It's Friday, which means we get to do
Speaker 1: a double dose of roll call, which is a fun
Speaker 1: thing for me because I get to see what all
Speaker 1: of you think, what all you right and gives me
Speaker 1: something to work off of, which I very much appreciate
Speaker 1: before I get off into the weekend's craziness. By the way,
Speaker 1: I will be on the Greg Gutfeld program on Fox News,
Speaker 1: which airs Saturday, I believe eight Eastern, The Greg Gutfeld Show.
Speaker 1: We are going to have a fantastic show. Please do
Speaker 1: tune in set your DVRs for Fox for this Saturday.
Speaker 1: Really enjoy hanging out with Greg and the gang. Greg
Speaker 1: was the first person to ever put me on TV
Speaker 1: at Fox, something I will never forget and always appreciate.
Speaker 1: And we some great shows back in the red eyed days,
Speaker 1: and I think you're gonna see we have a great
Speaker 1: show here for your Saturday night enjoyment. Even if you
Speaker 1: go out Saturday night, folks, make sure your DVR it.
Speaker 1: It's fun to watch Sunday night when you're at home too.
Speaker 1: All right now, Official Team Buck at gmail dot com
Speaker 1: in the inbox, here's what we've got, and then we'll
Speaker 1: get to some Facebook in the next part of our
Speaker 1: roll call. All right, Kyle, He writes, it's basic human
Speaker 1: nature to unite people against a common enemy, resulting in
Speaker 1: strong and positive bonds within that society. Think World War two. Currently, though,
Speaker 1: we are lacking a common enemy, so the left is
Speaker 1: acting by pitting or actively pitting smaller and smaller groups
Speaker 1: against each other, thinking they will divide and conquer and
Speaker 1: then take power. Problem is, as we learned from the
Speaker 1: Roman Empire. For one, when there is no remaining common
Speaker 1: enemy unifying the citizens of a diverse country, the civilization
Speaker 1: was destroyed from within. It's not China or Russia that
Speaker 1: I'm worried about taking the US down militarily. I think
Speaker 1: it will be ourselves, and it will be attributable to
Speaker 1: the left, desperate and misguided ploy for power. I wish
Speaker 1: our politicians actually learned history in school instead of just
Speaker 1: memorizing important dates and people. Lack of historical perspective is
Speaker 1: the number one reason for most of our current societal problems.
Speaker 1: That's why we are doomed to repeat it. From Kyle H. Kyle,
Speaker 1: let me just say also, I agree with you and
Speaker 1: with regard to the teaching of history, history is stories,
Speaker 1: uh and needs to be taught as stories. Now you
Speaker 1: need dates and names to go with the stories. You
Speaker 1: can't tell a story without dates and names. You don't
Speaker 1: have characters, you don't have any sense of movement, you
Speaker 1: don't have any sense of progression. But it is a story.
Speaker 1: And I think a lot of the history that I
Speaker 1: was taught was it was almost like you were just
Speaker 1: supposed to memorize entire paragraphs and not understand what was
Speaker 1: really going on. And given all of the just the
Speaker 1: proliferation of different videos and audio and visual tools you
Speaker 1: can use now to learn history, to understand the stories,
Speaker 1: to get deeper and deeper into it. Man, it'd be
Speaker 1: amazing to be able to go back and do you
Speaker 1: know medieval Like I? I studied the history of the
Speaker 1: Crusades in college. Some of you are like, Buck, why
Speaker 1: do you like these things so much? I studied history
Speaker 1: the Crusades in college and to be able to even
Speaker 1: to go back now, there's just so much more information,
Speaker 1: And I could pull up videos, I could pull up
Speaker 1: photos of actual Crusade era weapons on my phone and
Speaker 1: study them, and and I could reach out and email
Speaker 1: the You know, maybe maybe this was possible when I
Speaker 1: was in college, but it was a little a little
Speaker 1: less rich, little less stuff online, but certainly wasn't possible
Speaker 1: when I was in high school and when I also
Speaker 1: did study of medieval Europe. So anyway, I'm I'm nerding
Speaker 1: out on the history. But yeah, politicians don't know our history,
Speaker 1: that is for sure. Paul writes book, I'm disinclined to
Speaker 1: believe that Robert Spencer is white nationalists scum. From around
Speaker 1: the first half hour of your July Thursday show. His
Speaker 1: name does sound pretty white nationalist, maybe blurrbal with some
Speaker 1: genuine white nationalist. He is the spokesman for g Hodwatch,
Speaker 1: which is affiliated with David Horowitz. Yes, Paul, you are correct,
Speaker 1: and this is a correction I've already issued. But just
Speaker 1: to clarify, I was referring to Richard Spencer, the white
Speaker 1: nationalists mentioned in the or I was I was intending
Speaker 1: to refer to Richard Spencer, the white nationalist, open white nationalists.
Speaker 1: Not that's not a a description of him that requires
Speaker 1: any editorializing. He is a white nationalist, uh not Robert Spencer,
Speaker 1: similar ish name, but Robert Spencer is an author of
Speaker 1: the g Hodwatch series tied to the David Horwitz Freedom Center.
Speaker 1: Not only is he not a white nationalist, but you
Speaker 1: know he's he's on our team, right, Robert Spencer, not
Speaker 1: Richard Spencer. Robert Spencer is on our team. So I
Speaker 1: got the names. Look, it's live radio. Sometimes it will happen.
Speaker 1: I got the names. Uh, I was not thinking of
Speaker 1: Robert Spencer when I said that. I just got the
Speaker 1: names wrong. So Robert Spencer, author g Hodwatch, David rich
Speaker 1: Freedom Center guy, has absolutely nothing to do with Richard Spencer,
Speaker 1: who is white nationalist scum. And uh, there you have it.
Speaker 1: So that that is the correction, official on air correction
Speaker 1: once again. But yes, Paul, anytime I get something wrong,
Speaker 1: let me know, all right, I want to know what's
Speaker 1: going on there? Uh do solutions? What the what? No?
Speaker 1: Sounds like something the wife unit hiatus from the hut? What?
Speaker 1: I don't know what's going on here? Do solutions, but
Speaker 1: thank you for the email. I don't even know. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't know what's going on with that one.
Speaker 1: Another communication request from a county jail. Um, I, I
Speaker 1: guess I'll have to accept. Uh what do you? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll accept, but I don't have anything to read here
Speaker 1: right now. So next up is Cynthia, who, right Steerbuck,
Speaker 1: love your show. I whole heartedly agree with your caller,
Speaker 1: who appreciates that you fill a void in the six
Speaker 1: pm to nine pm hour when I get home from work.
Speaker 1: It's so often hard to get that second win and
Speaker 1: do all the homework I need to UM, So when
Speaker 1: you started your show, I found more energy because I
Speaker 1: can listen to you while I'm getting all my mundane
Speaker 1: chore is done. So thank you for that. It was
Speaker 1: neat to hear the audio of Larry Couldlow on your
Speaker 1: show Wednesday night. He's one of my favorite persons. The
Speaker 1: only drawback with his new job at the White House
Speaker 1: is that we are no longer able to hear his
Speaker 1: radio show on Saturday. I love how he was is
Speaker 1: never afraid to debate an issue with his guests and
Speaker 1: always treated them kindly and foster that atmosphere on his
Speaker 1: show regarding plants, plants actually use oxygen to breathe. They
Speaker 1: have a process of respiration which, just like humans, takes
Speaker 1: into oxygen gives off carbon dioxide. It's the process of
Speaker 1: photosynthesis that uses carbon dioxide and gives off oxygen. Yes, correct, true, Um.
Speaker 1: And in fact, during times of high heat, photosynthesis rates
Speaker 1: are reduced more than respiration, so more C O two
Speaker 1: in the summer, and yet they survive. Wow, a lot
Speaker 1: of siance here, thanks Cindy. Cindy's dropping all kinds of
Speaker 1: science knowledge here. Uh. And she says that's the very
Speaker 1: small percentage of our atmosphere people are fussing over anyway. Yes, yes, true,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Cynthia. Um, here we go. Uh, we have
Speaker 1: j m A right buck. Love the show, and I
Speaker 1: think I've converted a number of my co workers into
Speaker 1: tuning in. Just a quick correction for you. On ly
Speaker 1: eight you comment. You commented on Obama winding about the
Speaker 1: economy and how it was unfair. You made a quick
Speaker 1: comment passing through the point some of the effects of Bush.
Speaker 1: Didn't see it coming. But whatever, Perhaps I misunderstanding you,
Speaker 1: but I never want to miss an opportunity to lay
Speaker 1: down clearly where most, if not all, others blame or
Speaker 1: the blame for that crisis belongs. Bush did see it
Speaker 1: coming early in his time at the White House and
Speaker 1: raised alarms for years, but was ignored by Congress and
Speaker 1: the media and largely seemed to refuse to relay the message. UM,
Speaker 1: here's a timeline. Thanks for bringing this quality information. I
Speaker 1: have two folks I listened to daily three of time. Allows. Uh.
Speaker 1: You're one of the two for many reasons. Made a scoop,
Speaker 1: live long, healthy and happy with shields high. Jared, well, Jared,
Speaker 1: thank you. Um. I have to go back and see
Speaker 1: if Bush was really raising the alarms on this one.
Speaker 1: I know he wasn't responsible for the financial crisis, but
Speaker 1: because he was president, it was laid at his feet,
Speaker 1: laid at his doorstep, and that's just the way politics works.
Speaker 1: But I'll check it out and see if he was
Speaker 1: trying to do more to stop it. But there was
Speaker 1: a lot of spending during the Bush years, a lot
Speaker 1: of spending. Andrew rites hi Buck you face you see
Speaker 1: in the new movies very well, and for that much respect,
Speaker 1: would you consider the Princess Bride an action movie? At
Speaker 1: first thought you'd say, no, idiot, that's a comedy of romance.
Speaker 1: But the more you think about it, it has sword fights, poisonings,
Speaker 1: setting a blanket on fire, torture, et cetera. P s.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to bulk up and dresses Jack Burton for Halloween.
Speaker 1: Nobody will understand it, but I will. And that's all
Speaker 1: that matters. And it's all in the reflexes from Andy
Speaker 1: well any. First of all, Jack Burton is a homeless character.
Speaker 1: Second of all, Uh no, I gotta throw a flag
Speaker 1: on this one. The Princess Bride is not It is not,
Speaker 1: I repeat, an action movie. It is a historical epic.
Speaker 1: It is in the fantasy and fiction genre. But I
Speaker 1: cannot give I cannot wave you through on action movie.
Speaker 1: Not enough violence. It's also a kids movie. I mean
Speaker 1: it's great, I still watch it to this day, but
Speaker 1: it's also kids movie. Uh. Chuck writes, I've been super busy,
Speaker 1: so I have not been able to write you a
Speaker 1: thank you compliment. I wanted to thank you for the
Speaker 1: riff reminding people that socialism is a top down control philosophy.
Speaker 1: I thought you did that in a way that went
Speaker 1: beyond the usual. The left wants control now let's keep
Speaker 1: that message and start reminding listeners of what real freedom
Speaker 1: looks like under Americanism. I know that as not as Yeah,
Speaker 1: there we go, Thanks again, Chuck. Well, thank you very much, Chuck.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the support and the kind note. Steve writes,
Speaker 1: exclamation point. Thanks Steve. I'm hoping it's a good exclamation
Speaker 1: so I'll take it. Uh. Daniel writes, my head hurts. Okay,
Speaker 1: I hope you got some adville for that, Daniel, take
Speaker 1: care of yourself. Larry writes, uh FBI circular evidence in
Speaker 1: the In the headline here, he writes, and also, hey,
Speaker 1: I like your Freedom Hut podcast to love your show
Speaker 1: shields high. Since I listened by podcasts sometimes I'm late
Speaker 1: to the topics, but why not. The f behind their
Speaker 1: circular evidence brought to mind an incident of my own
Speaker 1: from thirty years ago, and he goes into tremendous detail here. Um,
Speaker 1: let me just say, Larry, I will read your whole note,
Speaker 1: but I don't have time to read this all on
Speaker 1: air right now, but it will get read by me
Speaker 1: and I'll respond as soon as I can. That said,
Speaker 1: it is where we have to uh take a station
Speaker 1: break out to pay some Freedom Hunt bills, folks what
Speaker 1: we do, but we have more roll Call come it
Speaker 1: up and remember if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of this amazing party known as roll Call, Facebook, dot Com,
Speaker 1: slash buck Sexton, the best way to do it, which
Speaker 1: is coming up. Guys, don't forget about the Freedom Hunt podcast.
Speaker 1: I had a great chat with my friend Jedediah Biela
Speaker 1: about life in the media, what's going on in politics
Speaker 1: right now, also cell phones and how they are destroying
Speaker 1: and taking over our lives. At the same time. I've
Speaker 1: known jededia now for seven years, so we go back
Speaker 1: the ways and I think you'll really enjoy it. It's
Speaker 1: a It's a perfect thing to put on and just
Speaker 1: listen while you're doing the dishes this weekend, while you're
Speaker 1: grilling up some steaks or burgers, you know, while you're
Speaker 1: going to the store to pick up some beer. Whatever
Speaker 1: it is. It's it's a quick show, but please do
Speaker 1: check it out. Just go on iTunes or Stitcher and
Speaker 1: type in the Freedom Hunt and it will pop up.
Speaker 1: If you're already in a podcast of ascriber, it should
Speaker 1: be in your fee, but you might have to go
Speaker 1: into your iTunes and actually click listen on it, So
Speaker 1: please do that when you get a chance. And with that,
Speaker 1: we have a bit more role call to get through today,
Speaker 1: because you know, you know I love the roll call.
Speaker 1: You know I love the role call. Uh. It's the
Speaker 1: greatest part of anyone's day every day. Well that might
Speaker 1: be a little much, but it's still really good. I
Speaker 1: really do enjoy it. Um. And I'm also stalling because
Speaker 1: my Facebook page has as I am now live on
Speaker 1: air with you, decided to freeze because why why not technology?
Speaker 1: Why not fail me when I'm on a Nashally syndicated
Speaker 1: radio show with a mass of people listening. Okay, here
Speaker 1: we go, uh, Jen, right, thank you for helping me
Speaker 1: laugh every day at the Left and their nonsense. Ms
Speaker 1: Molly is a lucky lady, shields Hie. Well, thank you, Jen.
Speaker 1: Ms Molly will be probably quick to remind you that
Speaker 1: I'm actually a very lucky man, but I I appreciate
Speaker 1: you looking at it from my side of of things
Speaker 1: for a moment. And uh, I I try to make
Speaker 1: people laugh, try to inform, try to bring some insight. Uh.
Speaker 1: And this is the best part of my day. My
Speaker 1: favorite thing that I do in media is this radio show.
Speaker 1: No question, just the way it is. And talking to
Speaker 1: all of you, some of you have probably realized that
Speaker 1: because I do a show where I have to deal
Speaker 1: with liberalism and progressivism in the morning on TV, that
Speaker 1: when I get to just be myself and do my
Speaker 1: thing at night, there's a little extra fire in the belly.
Speaker 1: I think it's probably true these days, because I'm like, oh,
Speaker 1: let me just tell you guys the truth. Okay, this
Speaker 1: morning I had to be polite. I don't want to
Speaker 1: be polite anymore. Let me just go and that's what
Speaker 1: ends up happening. On the radio show, Adam writes on
Speaker 1: getting Jordan Peterson, I approved give him a lot of
Speaker 1: time to explain though. Okay, Adam, um, you know what
Speaker 1: a producer, Mike, let's reach out to Jordan Peterson ceviill
Speaker 1: come back on. We had him out a few months ago.
Speaker 1: I haven't. I'm kind of curious what your what's your
Speaker 1: thoughts are on this team. I haven't had that many
Speaker 1: guests on. It's not because I don't. You know, Look,
Speaker 1: I it's great to have on, uh, Guy Benson and
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro and Emily's Nadi, and there's some people that
Speaker 1: that have a specific area of expertise that I think
Speaker 1: we need for the news cycle, but just other people
Speaker 1: who are great media commentators, you know, I feel I look,
Speaker 1: I'm a little I'm a little jealous of your time,
Speaker 1: and I like to get to talk to all of
Speaker 1: you as much as I can. But if you think that,
Speaker 1: you know, we could get a couple more guests in
Speaker 1: the mixed day in and day out. Let me know
Speaker 1: if if you're happy with the vibe of the show
Speaker 1: right now, where it's just us talking and some roll
Speaker 1: call and some phone calls with the occasional guest, uh,
Speaker 1: then let me know that too. Joseph Rights, Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: not sure if you thought of this comparison before, but
Speaker 1: it came to me while watching TV referring to the
Speaker 1: awesome movie Caddyshack. Think of Donald Trump as Rodney Dangerfield's
Speaker 1: character and the swampy establishment democrat and Rhino as Ted
Speaker 1: Knights character Judge Smails. The Bushwood Country Club members, led
Speaker 1: by Smails, were applauded at the thought of the We're appalled,
Speaker 1: not applauded at the thought of the uncultured millionaire joining
Speaker 1: their club and did everything in their power to stop him.
Speaker 1: Sound familiar love your show, Broke keep hammering those lunatic
Speaker 1: leftists from Joseph. Well, thank you, Joseph, And yeah, I
Speaker 1: do get the comparison you're making their Caddyshack one great movie,
Speaker 1: timeless uh Cindelo story, timeless movie Kenny Shack two doesn't
Speaker 1: really hold up with Jackie Mason, not not nearly as good.
Speaker 1: But thank you for your kind note, Robert. Next up here,
Speaker 1: I cracked up during your Wednesday podcast about sanitary conditions
Speaker 1: in San Francisco when you responded to a caller with
Speaker 1: the defecation situation. That's a great euphemism for a blank show,
Speaker 1: or a blanky situation. Might make a good segment title
Speaker 1: for your show, the defecation situation, Robert, Well, thank you, Robert.
Speaker 1: I'm glad I I chuckled a little bit that one
Speaker 1: later on too. It just kind of came out, so yep, yep,
Speaker 1: and here we go. Brian. Brian writes Buck wondering when
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hut podcast that is going to be on
Speaker 1: Stitcher shield time. My friend, well, producer Mike. But I'm
Speaker 1: taking producer Mike out for drinks tonight, so I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get you. Guys are gonna lay it on Thick. Now
Speaker 1: tell me what I need to do. I need to
Speaker 1: give producer Micael code red. I was thinking I was
Speaker 1: going to get him some scotch, but we could also
Speaker 1: just give him a code red. Uh. But no, let
Speaker 1: me know if if if there's a platform that we're
Speaker 1: not on that we should be on. Um I've gotten.
Speaker 1: I'm reaching out to our digital team about what's going
Speaker 1: on with T shirts. You know, we we gotta stay
Speaker 1: on top of I gotta stay on top of all
Speaker 1: these things to make sure that those of you who
Speaker 1: are kind enough to spend your time with me, we're
Speaker 1: not just having an optimal experience in terms of the
Speaker 1: content of the show, that's number one, but also that
Speaker 1: we're you know, the sound quality is always good, and
Speaker 1: you know, any of those things I like to know
Speaker 1: about I dare I say I am an audio radio perfectionist,
Speaker 1: or at least I I aspire to be somebody that
Speaker 1: you call a perfectress on this stuff. All right, everybody's
Speaker 1: gonna be it for the Freedom Hunt for today, Please
Speaker 1: do check out the Freedom Hunt podcasts. Like I said,
Speaker 1: Jededi Abila is the guest this week. Excited to be
Speaker 1: with you every day next week. Until then, have a
Speaker 1: great weekend. Everyone shields high. Simply Safe is simply the
Speaker 1: best in the home security business. I have a simply
Speaker 1: Safe system at home, and it is so easy to use.
Speaker 1: You download an app. By the way, you can control everything,
Speaker 1: and you know everything that's going on in your home
Speaker 1: in your way. It gives you complete peace of mind.
Speaker 1: It runs off of your WiFi. It's so easy to
Speaker 1: set up, and Simply Safe is all about the details.
Speaker 1: They even set up their own class break test facility
Speaker 1: so they could run class break simulations to make sure
Speaker 1: that you didn't get or you won't get any false
Speaker 1: positives right. Simply Safe is all about those kinds of details,
Speaker 1: and that's what sets them apart from other security companies.
Speaker 1: It's designed so that you will never even notice it
Speaker 1: in your home, and there's no contracts. So simply Safe
Speaker 1: it's gonna work hard for your business because it simply
Speaker 1: safe dot Com slash buck. Now I've got it at home,
Speaker 1: I can't recommend it more highly for all of you.
Speaker 1: Simply Safe dot com slash Buck again, simply Safe dot
Speaker 1: Com slash Buck m