WEBVTT - Bannon's Addition to NSC Raises Questions, Bloomfield Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, and at Bloomberg dot com. It has

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>been an eventful past week, and one of the bits

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of news that has come out in recent days is

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump elevated his chief strategist Steve Bannon to

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Council. Into Mooded, the Director of National Intelligence,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>off of that committee. I want to bring an Ambassador

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Bloomfield. He's the chairman of the Simpson Center and

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he was Assistant Secretary of State from two thousand and

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>one to two thousand five under George W. Bush, president

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the United States at the time. Uh, Ambassador Bloomfield,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. First, I just

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get a sense before we even start to

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about the implications, what does the National Security Council

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>really do well? That does vary from president to president,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was set up under a law in nine

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to coordinate military and non military activities better.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.919
<v Speaker 1>And so it's function traditionally has been a place where

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>each of the cabinet departments in the national security community

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>comes together, gives their recommendations, and usually the National Security

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Advisor is the one at the heading the meetings unless

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the President does it himself in major cases of emergencies,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>um and and to to hear their views and including

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>their different views, see if they can resolve them and

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if they can't, and then they take it to the

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>President for decision. Can you recall specific meetings which you

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>attended in which you learned something about out the operational

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe backstory of of the of the you know, small

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>circle of people who are included in these meetings. Well,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>I was on the Vice president's staff for one year

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>under Dan Quayle, and I would I would go to

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>those meetings and sit against the wall. So there are

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>people who can come in the room and and watch

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the meetings if they're White House staff. The question is

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>who has a formal seat at the table, And that's

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what this is about. So President George W. Bush,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, did not allow his political counselor Karl Rove,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to NFC meetings because he didn't I didn't

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>want to send a signal that there was any politics involved.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So if asked Bloomfield, what's your impression from Steve Bannon

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>being named to this, well, you know, uh, I testified

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>last fall at a hearing that the House Foreign Affairs

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Committee held about the issue of the National Security Council

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and the size and the role. And frankly, the bottom

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>line is that presidents get to decide who there eisors are.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the White House staff. So if the President

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants Steve Bannon to be at the table, uh,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>deliberating with the senior national security agency heads, that is

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>his call he can. I mean, I think he's sort

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>of deferred to the president whatever serves the president's purpose

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to to make the best decisions. So he has crossed

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a line that was not crossed by previous presidents. President

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Obama had David Axelrod come to some of these meetings,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but he sat out, you know, he didn't sit at

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the table and participate. But that's just a call that's

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>been made. And if President Trump is relying on Steve

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Bannon to be his advisor across the board on these issues,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then then I think that at the end of the day,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>people will defer to that how it works. But what

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>about the on the flip side, President Trump's to Mooting,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Joint Chiefs of Staff. Those I think are actually the

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>more interesting discussion. I mean, obviously people are fascinated by

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bannon, whom I don't know, and he's he's a

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>person who's getting a lot of attention. We will see

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>how how that plays out and what he what his

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>input is. But the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, by law,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>was given the principal role of military advisor to the

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>President under the Goldwater Nichols Law Reform Act of nineteen

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>six and so the notion and so what the directive

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>said was on those issues where they have business before

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the committee, they can come otherwise, not that I think

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that the impact there is whether you whether you get

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a really solid flow of the team around the president.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is usually run by the National Security Advisor.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So General Michael Flynn is the is the national Security Advisor.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>This is his operation. So the question is what will

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be the chemistry if the people at the table keep

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>changing Traditionally and I'm talking about decades. The first person

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that the National Security Advisor turned too is the intelligence person.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with an intelligence update, what's the latest, what

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>do we know? Then the Secretary of State has the

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of Uh, the protocol leads, so the Secretary of

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>State goes second or their deputies. And that's the way

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>this has worked for decades. Uh. If key players like

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the military representative is not there, I think you're going

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear and already are hearing from members of Congress

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>who say, wait a minute, um, the principal advisor of

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the military needs to be part of this team pretty

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>much at all times. It is national security. And you

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>will hear from senior military as well, who feels that

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the voice of the professional military is essential and that

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>whether the president agrees to it, agrees with the military

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>advice or not, it's not the point. It's whether the

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>president is hearing that advice. And as for d n

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I Congress created the Directorate of National Intelligence after nine eleven.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>They added a very what turned out to be two

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand people, a very big layer on top of the

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>other agencies. And know, if they aren't at the table,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>then you know, I'll just give a personal view. General

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Flynn regionally intelligence very closely, so I don't fear that

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump will be uninformed about intelligence, but but not

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>having the community's voice there at the table is going

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to raise some questions. So how many how much? So

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the question is how much friction do they want to

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>cause and how much? Thanks very much, Ambassador Lincoln Bloomfield,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of the Stimpson Center, speaking about changes in the

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration's National security team. I want to learn more

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about our southern border neighbor, Mexico and potential opportunities there.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Herrado Rodriguez, Managing director and portfolio manager at black Rock

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Financial Management, UM, thank you so much for joining us.

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You were quoted in an article all about a week

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>or so ago saying that you think that the Mexican

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>PATO could be one of the best bets of We've

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly had an eventful a couple of days on the

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>political front. Do you still believe that? Absolutely? At LISTA

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and good morning everyone. When you think about the Mexican economy,

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it is an economy that has been run relatively conservatively

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>from an economic policy perspective. It is an economy that

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>has the fiscal accounts in order, inflation has been uh,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming down. There is a big shock that

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican economy is facing because of a change in

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>policy from the US administration, But so far it is

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>an economy that has been adjusting very well. Using a

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>textbook example, tighten on the fisical, raising interest rates on

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the monitor, letting the currency go. And we're getting to

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a point in which Mexican assets actually look very very cheap.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The val do that they have accumulators quite significant, but

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they uncertainty surrounding the US Mexican relationship. It is something

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed before asset prices in Mexico

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>start to perform. But from evaluation perspective, clearly Mexican assets

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>are one of the most attractive trade for the months

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>remaining this year. So here Ado. You served for more

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>than a decade in the Mexican Ministry of Finance, last

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>serving as the under Secretary of Finance and Public Credit.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I imagine you've had a lot of contact with Mexican

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>officials and probably can get a better feel for just

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how elevated the tensions have become. Do you have a

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of how much what we're hearing is political rhetoric

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>uh and sort of chest beating and how much really

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>nearing a sort of tipping point into a very bad

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs between Mexico and the US. Well, there

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are there are two different dynamics here that we need

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to to understand better. One is just what the US

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>wants from Mexico. From a trade perspective. Mexico has been

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a good neighbor. It is a comparative neighbor. It is

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor that tends to sort of to engage and

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to compromise on different things. It has been a very

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fruitful relationship since NAFTA was signed. It was a very

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fruitful relationship with the Canadians and the US. So it

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would be important to understand exactly what is it that

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the US would like if an institutional table was set

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>up to basically modernize NAFTA, and there's a blueprint already

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for that, and it is basically the content in terms

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of um the sort of rules of origin for example

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that has been negotiated in the context of TPP intellectual

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>property and an addressing sort of dispute mechanisms. Now, on

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, you have a domestic political agenda, domestic

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>political dynamics that the president of Mexico has a twelve

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>percent approval rate all time load. There's a lot of

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>pressure and if anything, these contentious issue against the US,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it is something that is bringing the population together now

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because the two things are a bit uncertain. You're right

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that we could get two different equilibriums here. I think

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's still the central scenario is one in which

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of reason prevails. Everyone has been benefiting from NAFTA,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>there's potential to improve that, and then an institutional table

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is set up with the Canadians, the US and Mexico,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and that brings you to a more benign outcome for

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>asset prices in Mexico. But given what's been happening over

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the past few days, it is likely that we don't

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>get there, and then the tensions actually increase and the

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>positions radicalized. So again, it is a great value trade,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is one that you need to be careful

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Mr Rodriguez honoring the theme of focusing

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>on your purchase price of any investment, in other words,

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the purchase prices. The most important function for some investors

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is the purchase price not only of the pace so

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but of certain Mexican assets at a point where you

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that long term investors will be significantly rewarded. Absolutely,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But that is assuming that the reality of a Mexican

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to be in line of what it has

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>been over the past. It's not it's the eleventh largest

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>economy in the world exactly. But but but one needs

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand that if we go the route over, say,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>radicalization of positions between Mexico and the US, there's a

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of value that could be destroyed and actually Mexican

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>assets could go even weaker. So again, given the central

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario in which countries are able to channel these differences

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>and the potential to revamp NAFTA, all of that is

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>channel through institutional means. Absolutely, the answer to your question

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is that the value of Mexican assets is significantly attractive. Well,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so is it just the pace so that looks attractive

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>or are there other Mexican opportunities the past will look

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>even more so? Perhaps in the corporate sphere, the Mexican

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>past with certainly top of mind here, and I would

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>point to Mexican interest rates. There's been there's been an

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>increase of more than two hundred basis points across the

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>curve in Mexican bonds, and certainly when four point four

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>point one one for the Mexican tenure. Yeah, and and

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>local currency bonds. I mean you can get bonds for

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, say out to ten fifteen years in the

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>case of Mexico. You don't get that type of wheels

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in many places in the world, especially in economies that

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are wrong responsibly like Mexico. Is there anything that you

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would see to diffuse this situation rapidly or will it

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have to escalate before it's diffused? Give you back thirty seconds.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So what we're looking after the signpost is and has

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to be an announcement that the US, Canada and Mexico

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>agree on a set up out of framework to revamp NaSTA,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you get to the technical details and at

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that point it stops being an element of uncertainty. Thank

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Arado Rodriguez. He is Managing Director Portfolio

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>manager for the Emerging Markets Group at black Rock Financial Management.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to call upon Bloomberg Gadfly columnist Shira over

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Day to tell us a little bit about the technology

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>industry and its response to the details of the executive

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>orders that were signed over the weekend by President Trump

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>regarding immigration. Yeah, so obviously the some of the tech

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>industry executives and CEOs, and obviously those outside the tech

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>industry too, are responding to the calls to restrict UM

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>immigration from some of those predominantly Muslim countries. The interesting

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to me was Sergey Bryant, is one of the

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>co founders of Google and a billionaire, one of the

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>richest men in the world, was spotted at protests at

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Airport over the weekend, which I don't think

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you would see, you know, Lloyd blankfeind or Jeff m

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>melt at immigration protests. Although the week is young. We'll see,

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we shall see. We'll becoming the JFK ranks to see

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>whether we see Lloyd blank find But in the meantime,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>shira uh, there was there's an interesting concern that some

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>have that the worst for tech companies has yet to come,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that basically VISA programs for foreign workers UM should be

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>administered in a manner that protects the civil rights of

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>American workers. Is according to a draft proposal that we

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>may be getting from President Trump Trump imminently, with the

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>idea being that some of these tech companies couldn't rely

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>as much on some of their international recruiting programs they

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have in the past. Right, So basically there's a there's

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a kind of grab bag of skilled worker visa programs

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that are employed not only by tech companies but by

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>many US corporations. The most kind of prominent one of

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>these h one B visas, again, which are for skilled

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>foreign workers in fields like engineering, and there's about eight

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>five thousand of them issued every year. Uh, there is

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>far more demand than there is supply, and the biggest

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>users are the biggest companies. Granted those visas are outsourcing

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>companies like Tata Consultancy and Accenture who hire engineers that

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that then work at again, tech companies, but also big

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>banks and retailers and other American companies. What's the advantage

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for the tech companies that hire internationally other than just

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>having a bigger pool of talent. Is this a play

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to lower the cost of of employing people? I think

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the goal depends on who you ask. So these programs

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have been targeted before, both on the left by people

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like Bernie Sanders and on the right as basically away

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for American companies to hire workers from abroad. They can

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pay less. Now, those companies who employ those uh those

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>skilled worker visas say we can't find appropriate workers in

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States, that this is a global work force,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>or the the world is a global place and we

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to tap into the glow will

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>workforce not just the people who live inside of the

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>United States walls. Is there any hint that the president's

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>administration will in some way recognize the deficit that would

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>occur in the technology industry if it was more challenging

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the United States, let's say after your

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>term school or study. I think the most honest answer is,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea that. Um, everything seems to be

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of being done by the seat of the pants,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little bit hard to know what impossible.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>If you are looking to make the system better to

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>address the needs of technology companies, what would be one

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that you would suggest. I think that if you

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ask the tech executives, they would say, we want we

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to bring in more workers, and

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to be able to keep the large numbers

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of highly skilled, highly highly educated UM university graduates who

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>are graduated from Harvard and Stanford every year, and our

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>citizens of China, in India and other places. I think

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a big desire to keep those people in the

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>United States and starting companies and working for companies. So

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the number one fix or potential fix

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with this visa provision that is included in a draft

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of an order that President Trump was expected to sign. Correct,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Can can the President enact something like this without any

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>congressional sign off? Again, the honest answer is it's not

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>clear that. Obviously, UM Congress has been trying to work

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on various UM worker visa programs for a while, and

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're at least one kind of piece of

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>legislation working its way through Congress. UM. Obviously, we've seen

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this White House already issue sweeping executive orders without input

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from Congress or without waiting for Congress, So this may

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be the same, and it's unclear exactly how it would

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>work in practice. I believe it's worth noting that this

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>was at least described as a security measure. This is

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not aimed at the business community. We're looking at the

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>potential ramifications for the business community. Because the suspension of

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>immigration is from uh IS, because they describe it as

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>countries with ties to terror including Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Iran,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and Libya for a period of ninety days. It also

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>calls for the complete suspension of Syrian refugees for an

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>indefinite period. And I just wanted to make that clear

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because the issue that perhaps the technology industry or any

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>industry is focused on now is different, but maybe uh

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly come under the same heading. Correct, Is that? Yeah?

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I mean there's two issues one right,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>there's the executive order issue of the weekend affecting people

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>from those particular kind of Muslim dominated countries and Syrian refugees,

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and and there's this issue of this draft order that

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe coming down the pike that our colleagues wrote about

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>affecting worker visas. And those are obviously separate issues, but

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>both deal with immigrants to the United States. Do the

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of which technology companies executives are have to have

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest voice into the White House? I don't know yet.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been interesting to see, you know, Tim Cook, who's

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Apple, isn't making the rounds in Washington

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>in the last few days. The head of IBM is

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>also influential the right. The CEOs of Oracle are also

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very influential. Um, but it's a little bit hard to

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know at this point who has real influence. Because the

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>reason why I ask is because we've heard a lot

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about the auto companies and the Detroit CEOs that have

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>met extensively with President Trump, and you don't hear it

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as much with the technology companies. Yes, there was that

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>one meeting, but beyond that, we don't have a clear sense.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. All this is a pretty young administration.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Did not feel that way, but well it could be.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>You could say it's it's been Peter til Yes, good point.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I neglected to mention. Peter Tiald obviously has been a

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>close advisor and advisor to Trump, co founder of PayPal.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>He like an Australian citizen. When citizen yes, and he's

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>also an immigrant, distribute said the Teal's originally emigrated from Germany. Well, Sarah,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, Sirah Overday, who

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>covers the technology sector for it. Let's move forward though,

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>with Justin st Justin is our Bloomberg government reporter and

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he joins us. Now, Justin, let's get the sort of agenda.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>What is scheduled for today as far as the cabinet nominees. Yeah,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so we are inspecting, but but aren't positive that we're

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>going to see Rex tellers in the Secretary of State

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Um have his sort of final vote in in the Senate.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>That it's expected that he's going to fly through and

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>likely fly through today, especially after winning the sport of

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>some key Republicans, including Mark Rubio. But Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Um,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the top Democrat in the Senate, UH said Monday that

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he's hoping to ask for delay on the confirmation vote,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>citing the sort of chaos stemming from from the Muslim

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ban um or the extreme betting band, depending on who

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to. U that the unrolled over the weekend

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and obviously caused some chaos at airports and across the country.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that was a little bit played

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>down as a result of getting overshadowed by the Executive

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Order on Immigration that President Trump signed was the decision

0:22:55.119 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to elevate Steve Bannon to National Security Council and to

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>remove some other national security officials from that post. Do

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you have any color on what was behind that or

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what the implications are. Sure? Yeah, I mean, I think

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting to just show a bit of the

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>consolidation of power that Steve Bannon, who's the former chairman

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of Right bart Um now at a top aid both

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in the campaign and the White House to Donald Trump

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>some of his power. It does make sense in the

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>context that when Bannon was introduced he was UM sort

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of referred to with as a co chief of staff

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with with Ryn's previous that they'd have similar roles. The

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff typically serves on on the NFC, but

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it is UM somewhat unprecedented to have a purely political

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>figure on the staff. George W. Bush Passilly excluded people

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>under Obama. David X rod Will sit in on a

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of those meetings, but wasn't there regularly, and so

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>UM this is a change. The other sort of aspect

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of this is that UM one of the people who

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had their roles a little reduced was the Director National Intelligence,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Flynn, who's UM the National Security Advisor, has said

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that he wants d n I, which is the body

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of coordinates all the different intelligence agencies together,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a reduced role. And and that's interesting because

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Mike Flynn was actually fired by President Obama's Director of

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>National Intelligence a couple of years ago, and so he

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>has I think some residual animosity towards that body and

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is looking to reform um the way that intelligence works

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Trump administration so that people like him UH

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>can succeed in the way that they didn't or he

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't in the Obama administration. One other thing that we've

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>heard out of President Trump's camp this morning was that

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he intends to revamp Dodd Frank in a very big way.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Nathan Dean of Bloomberg Intelligence

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to give us more of a sense of what this

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>potential rollback might look like, especially in light of Treasury

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary nominee Steve Manusian's comments last week while he was

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>being UH when he while he was testifying in front

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of Senate saying that he did not intend to completely

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>eradicate the vocal rule. So I think what this means

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is that they're going to be studying the existing regulations. UH.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>They're going to spend a couple of months, three or

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>six months looking at the REGs UH and trying to

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>look at ways that they can increase liquidity. UH, they

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>can actually maybe make it cheaper to lend money. But

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see a targeted look at regulations.

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>SEC Chair nominee J. Clayton, for example, He's going to

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have carte blanche to look at this. But if you

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>look at regulations that are governed by the FED or

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Uh, those are still led

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>by Obama era appointees. And so Janet Janet Yellen at

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED, for example, you know she's going to remain

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in office still two thousand and eighteen. She may not abide.

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But what by what President Trump wants to do in

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of regulation or rolling back dot Frank, Hey and Nathan,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>can you just elaborate on on who Clayton is, what

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>his background indicates about what he's likely to be like

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as uh as the head yep. So, Jay Clayton uh

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>from Sullivan and Cromo has done a lot of work

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with Wall Street, Uh, not so much on financial regulation

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>more I P O M and A activity. Our take

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>on that is that he speaks the bank's language, but

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not a Dodd Frank Uh. Uh not a lot

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of experience in terms of Dodd Frank. So what we

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>expect from the nominee when he comes in and we

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>expect him to be confirmed. UH, is that they're going

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to spend some time three to six months not putting

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>any new regulations out that we expect the a sec

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to follow uh Donald Trump's executive order on that. So

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect any new rags, but we expect to

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.959
<v Speaker 1>see him talking to the industry, talking to a lot

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of bankers about what they see as ways that they

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can roll back legs uh, and then eventually pushing the

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>agency to um move forward on that. Yeah, Nathan Dean,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Bloomberg Intelligence government analyst there on

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank and Justin Sank before I say goodbye, just

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of seconds. It's the mood like right

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>now in Washington. I think it's a little chaotic. Everybody

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to figure out what the priorities of the

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration are and how they're implementing some of these

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>executive actions because obviously it's not being communicated extremely well

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. Thank you so much. Justin Sink, Bloomberg government

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>reporter in Washington, d C. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio