Speaker 1: So now former Vice President Mike Penns has admitted to
Speaker 1: mishandling classified documents. That didn't stop him from previously criticizing
Speaker 1: former President Trump. Listen, and clearly possessing classified documents in
Speaker 1: an unprotected area is not proper. I guess Mike Penns
Speaker 1: thinks it's fine when he does it. I want to
Speaker 1: get to the bottom of all of this with Mike Davis.
Speaker 1: He joined the show after the FBI rated President Trump
Speaker 1: a little while back. He's the former Chief counsel for
Speaker 1: Nominations to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley. He's also the
Speaker 1: founder and the president of the Article three Project. I
Speaker 1: want to have him on to break down what do
Speaker 1: you need to know about all of this? We had
Speaker 1: the raid on former President Trump, We've got Joe Biden
Speaker 1: admitting to misshandling classified information, including when he was in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Now you've got Mike Penns. What do you
Speaker 1: need to know about all this? Why does it matter?
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter. We're gonna break it all down with Mike Davis.
Speaker 1: We're also going to talk about this new select subcommittee
Speaker 1: on the weaponization of the federal government. What they need
Speaker 1: to uncover where they should focus all of that with
Speaker 1: Mike Davis. So, Mike, now we've got the former Vice
Speaker 1: president Mike Penns who has mishandled classified documents. It seems
Speaker 1: to be in vogue these days. What are your thoughts
Speaker 1: upon hearing this news? Well, thank you for having on LEASEA.
Speaker 1: I would say this that former presidents presidents of the
Speaker 1: United States have the absolute constitutional power as commander in
Speaker 1: chief to classify or to classify anything they want, and
Speaker 1: they have the absolute statutory power under the Presidential Records
Speaker 1: Act to take personal copies of their presidential records when
Speaker 1: they leave office, classified or not. So President Trump had
Speaker 1: his presidential records in the office of the former president
Speaker 1: in mar Laco, and Attorney General Merrick Garlands UH got
Speaker 1: this unprecedented, unnecessary, unball full home raid warrant from a
Speaker 1: bias judge Bruce Rinehardt and did this political circus going
Speaker 1: after President Trump for documents President Trump was lawfully allowed
Speaker 1: to have in his heavily secured office of the former president.
Speaker 1: That's why Congress gives former presidents uh secure office space
Speaker 1: called skiffs, federally funded office space, federally funded staff, staff
Speaker 1: gets security clearances, lifetime secret Service protection. Contrast that with
Speaker 1: former vice presidents like Biden and Pets, they get none
Speaker 1: of those things. They get Secret Service protection for up
Speaker 1: to six months after they leave office and that's it.
Speaker 1: So with Biden, there was a two and a half
Speaker 1: year gap where he did not have Secret Service protection.
Speaker 1: And we have clear evidence that the Biden family was
Speaker 1: on Ukrainian and Chinese payrolls, and there's evidence with Moranda
Speaker 1: divine she as she pointed out this twenty two point
Speaker 1: Now we're Hunter. Biden clearly used classified intelligence on Ukraine
Speaker 1: to write a twenty two points geopolitical analysis of Ukraine
Speaker 1: back in two thousand fourteen. So the Bidens can enrich themselves,
Speaker 1: so Hunter can get on the Breezema board in Ukraine
Speaker 1: and enriched themselves with this illegal scheme that they were in.
Speaker 1: So it's amazing how Attorney General Merrick Garlands uh sent
Speaker 1: in the FBI rad to go after Trump, including going
Speaker 1: through Millennia's lingerie and their son teenage son Baron's room.
Speaker 1: Yet Attorney General Merrick Garland colluded with Biden, the Biden
Speaker 1: White House attorneys, and the and the Biden personal attorneys
Speaker 1: for over two months to cover up the Biden stolen
Speaker 1: classified doctor. Well, and I think that's what's really sketchy
Speaker 1: is the fact that one in the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: sat on this information. And then secondly, as you pointed out,
Speaker 1: you've got documents pertaining to Ukraine that were allegedly found
Speaker 1: at the Biden Penn Center. And then the Biden pen
Speaker 1: Center is a Chinese backed think tank, and we know
Speaker 1: that these are two areas where the Biden family has
Speaker 1: had business dealings, both with Ukraine and then China as well.
Speaker 1: There's a lot going on there with the Biden family
Speaker 1: and the fact, remember we're in the divine also pointed
Speaker 1: this out that remember Hunter had a team made to
Speaker 1: these to one of his Biden's offices when he left
Speaker 1: the Vice presidency for their Chinese agents. Right, So we
Speaker 1: have Chinese funded's university University of Pennsylvania fake professorship for
Speaker 1: former Vice President Biden, this unsecured office that he was using.
Speaker 1: We have keys made for Chinese agents that the Bidens
Speaker 1: on these Uh, Chinese and Ukrainian oligarch's payrolls. And there's
Speaker 1: clear evidence that Hunter Biden is using Ukrainian intel for
Speaker 1: their business dealings. Uh, it's if this doesn't scream for
Speaker 1: an FBI rate. I don't know what does the FBI actually.
Speaker 1: So people say that that Vice are President Biden cooperated
Speaker 1: with with the probe. He immediately turned over this information
Speaker 1: to the Biden Justice Department. That's actually not true. When
Speaker 1: they found these documents on November two, they turned them
Speaker 1: over to the political head of the National Archives, and
Speaker 1: it was the Inspector General of the National Archives that
Speaker 1: got wind of this and turned it over to the
Speaker 1: Justice Department. If that Inspector General did not get wind
Speaker 1: of this, they probably would have just swept us under
Speaker 1: the road. There probably would have been a just a
Speaker 1: political cover up between the Biden team and had their
Speaker 1: political appointee at the National Archives. So when the Biden
Speaker 1: Justice Department, when Attorney General Merrick Garlands uh found out
Speaker 1: about this from the Inspector General of the Archives, they
Speaker 1: knew that they couldn't just bury it completely because the
Speaker 1: Inspector General has reporting requirements to Congress. But what did
Speaker 1: they do. They had they let the Biden lawyers, the
Speaker 1: Biden personal lawyers and Biden Biden White House lawyers do
Speaker 1: their own searches of the crime scenes. They let Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and Joe Biden and who whatever other Biden go
Speaker 1: to these crime scenes, taint these crime scenes, and then
Speaker 1: they let Biden's lawyers go to the searches they tainted
Speaker 1: the crime scenes, they did not send in the FBI,
Speaker 1: And when they finally sent in the FBI on the
Speaker 1: fifth search, they let the Biden attorneys go along with
Speaker 1: the FBI during the search. And contrast thought to what
Speaker 1: they did with Trump, where they made they made the
Speaker 1: Trump attorneys stands stand outside of Moral Lago in like
Speaker 1: nine degree heat, ninety five percent humidity in August for many,
Speaker 1: many hours, while they let Biden in his attorneys taint
Speaker 1: their crime scenes for months. How do you think the
Speaker 1: discovery of classified documents with both Biden and Vice President Pence,
Speaker 1: how does that impact this ongoing case against President Trump.
Speaker 1: I mean, you already clarified that presidents of the oldim
Speaker 1: authority vice presidents do not. But how do you think
Speaker 1: this impacts the case they're trying to make against the
Speaker 1: former president? The Train to America Land appointed special counsels
Speaker 1: for both Trump and a separate special counsel for Biden.
Speaker 1: I think that these are handpicked allies of the Unit
Speaker 1: Party in both cases but at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: it's going to be Merrick Barlan's decision whether to prosecute
Speaker 1: or not to not prosecute, whether to prosecute Trump or
Speaker 1: not prosecute Biden. It is politically very difficult to move
Speaker 1: forward on any prosecution of Trump when when he had
Speaker 1: an absolute constitutional in statutory rate to have his presidential records,
Speaker 1: including classified presidential records, in the office of former President
Speaker 1: moral Ugal, while at the same time not prosecuting Biden.
Speaker 1: This was no accident that Biden had these records. Remember,
Speaker 1: they found five sets of classified records in at least
Speaker 1: three different locations. Right They found him in his garage
Speaker 1: next to his corvette. He admitted of Peter Doocy on
Speaker 1: from Fox News that Biden knew that he had those documents,
Speaker 1: then it was no big deal because they were in
Speaker 1: his secure garage next to his corvette. He had documents
Speaker 1: in his personal files and his personal office in his
Speaker 1: Wilmington's home, and he had these documents in his personal
Speaker 1: files and his penn Biden home to China funded University
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania fake professorship in Washington, d C. So he
Speaker 1: had five sets of documents at least three different locations.
Speaker 1: That shows that it was clearly not an accident that
Speaker 1: he had these records, and it was clearly not an
Speaker 1: accident when Hunter is using intel about Ukraine to make
Speaker 1: millions for the Biden family. So you contrast that with Pence.
Speaker 1: We don't know a lot about what's going over with Pence.
Speaker 1: We don't know if it were you know, if if
Speaker 1: he had his records boxed up and sent to his
Speaker 1: house after he left the vice presidency, and he's such
Speaker 1: a boy scout when he heard about Biden having these records,
Speaker 1: he had his lawyers search and found him. I don't
Speaker 1: know what the circumstances are. Regardless, under the Espionage Act,
Speaker 1: it is an Espionage Act violation to have these records.
Speaker 1: Whether you use them for to enrich your family or
Speaker 1: you just recklessly have them in your papers at home,
Speaker 1: it's still an Espionage Act violation. But there are there
Speaker 1: are there are other crimes that you can look after
Speaker 1: the Bidens if they actually did in fact use this
Speaker 1: classified material on Ukraine to enrich the Biden family. But
Speaker 1: it just shows you that we have two systems of
Speaker 1: justice in America that we've known for a long time.
Speaker 1: Leads one one for the Democrats and the ruling elite,
Speaker 1: and one for the rest of us. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: Edwards Snowden tweeted about this, and I want to get
Speaker 1: your thoughts on that. He tweeted, how is it possible
Speaker 1: that I fear classified documents in my house than the
Speaker 1: last few White House admins? The Espionage Act is a
Speaker 1: strict liability crime, good intentions or no defense under the
Speaker 1: quote unquote or parentheses dumb law. These guys are all
Speaker 1: unindicted criminals. Uh well, what do you what do you
Speaker 1: make of that? We eat from Edward Snowden? You know,
Speaker 1: someone who fled the United States to escape espionage charges. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean you have to look at what the intentive
Speaker 1: is when they do what they're doing. If you're a
Speaker 1: president of the United States, the Espionage Act never applies
Speaker 1: to the ESPIONAGA Acts applies to everyone else on the
Speaker 1: planet except for the President of the United States because
Speaker 1: he is the classifier or declassifier as commander in chief
Speaker 1: under the Constitution. So that's why I've argued since August
Speaker 1: that it is legally impossible for President Trump to have
Speaker 1: violated the Espionage Act in the way he handles classified information.
Speaker 1: He could he can declassify anything he wants, just like
Speaker 1: President Clinton did when he had eight years of highly
Speaker 1: classified audio recordings of his presidency and his soctore, just
Speaker 1: like President Obama did when he leaned over on the
Speaker 1: hot mic and told the Russian puppet president that Obama
Speaker 1: would have war negotiating room after the two thousand and
Speaker 1: twelve presidential re election. Clearly classified information, But clearly the
Speaker 1: president has the constitutional power to do what do with
Speaker 1: whatever he wants with classified information. That is not the
Speaker 1: case with vice presidents or anyone else. And so unless
Speaker 1: President Obama told Vice President Biden that he can take
Speaker 1: those classified records with him when he left office, president
Speaker 1: Biden faces uh, serious Espionage Acts violations for what he did.
Speaker 1: Now only thing happened to him. I seriously got it,
Speaker 1: because we know that there are two systems of justice
Speaker 1: in America. But he clearly violated the Espionage Acts, and
Speaker 1: snowdon's correct that it's not you don't have to have
Speaker 1: specific intent to do it. The mere fact that you
Speaker 1: have these records, uh is oftentimes all you need for
Speaker 1: an Espionage Act violation. So now, of course the left
Speaker 1: wing fact checkers are trying to come to Biden's defense.
Speaker 1: You've got PolitiFact, Snopes, so these left wing organizations and publications,
Speaker 1: and they say that farmer pres in Obama had issued
Speaker 1: an executive order in two thousand nine, Executive Order twenties six,
Speaker 1: title the Classified National Security Information. Uh. And what they
Speaker 1: allege is that this order gives both the president and
Speaker 1: the vice president original classification authority and that it's not
Speaker 1: been changed since by or wasn't changed under Trump, so
Speaker 1: it still bears uh, you know, fruit, it is still
Speaker 1: in existence. What do you what do you make of that?
Speaker 1: Is that the case is Biden covered under this. So
Speaker 1: if you read that executive order, Biden may have the
Speaker 1: ability to declassify records that he classified in the office
Speaker 1: of vice president, but he doesn't have the ability to
Speaker 1: declassify records across the government or the president has that authority.
Speaker 1: So that's just a nonsence. And where were these same
Speaker 1: people with that executive order with with Trump who was
Speaker 1: the president? Right? What they're arguing that Trump could not declassify,
Speaker 1: that he was an espionage by accilation for Trump to
Speaker 1: declassify as the president of the United States, But this
Speaker 1: executive order from from Obama gives the vice president more
Speaker 1: power than Trump had as president. That's just complete quick
Speaker 1: commercial break more with Mike Davis. Well, I think what
Speaker 1: bothers me is the hypocrisy, as you just pointed out.
Speaker 1: And I guess it's not really hypocrisy because it's not
Speaker 1: apples to apples, But you know, even pens like, let's
Speaker 1: play this clip from Mike Penns who recently criticized Trump
Speaker 1: in his handling of classified information. Let's play this clip,
Speaker 1: and clearly possessing classified documents in an unprotected area is
Speaker 1: not proper quick to condemn Trump when in reality he
Speaker 1: is mishandled classified information. And to your point, you know,
Speaker 1: didn't have that same authority as Trump. So do these
Speaker 1: people know that they're mishandling classified information? Like how easy
Speaker 1: is it to accidentally handle it? You know what kind
Speaker 1: of what's the what's the situation with that? I think
Speaker 1: it really depends on the factual circumstances. It is amazing
Speaker 1: how sanctimonious both Biden and Pence were about Trump because
Speaker 1: they both want to run against Trump as president, right,
Speaker 1: so that of course they want to politicize this against Trump.
Speaker 1: That it came back and smaxim in the face. Right,
Speaker 1: because they both got caught with classified records as the
Speaker 1: vice president, which is clearly a favor vice president, which
Speaker 1: is clearly an Espionage Act violation unless their president Obama
Speaker 1: or Trump gave them permission to take those classified records.
Speaker 1: And there's no evidence that either president allowed their vice
Speaker 1: presidents to do that, right. So, but I mean, it's
Speaker 1: I will say this, the Obama Justice Department just excuse me,
Speaker 1: the Biden Justice Department just put in prison a woman
Speaker 1: who worked for the Pentagon who moved uh secret documents,
Speaker 1: not even top secret secret documents from her government office
Speaker 1: in Hawaii to a ten periory duty office and did
Speaker 1: not send the documents through a secure courier so or
Speaker 1: a secure case that you you say, classified documents through.
Speaker 1: So they take this very seriously. I know that I
Speaker 1: had top secret clearance in the government. I had above
Speaker 1: top top secret clearance in the government. And everyone knows
Speaker 1: that when you have those security classes, especially when you're
Speaker 1: dealing with s c I Secure compartment and information above
Speaker 1: top secret information, that you have to have that information
Speaker 1: in skills, right, And uh, you know, it's it's just
Speaker 1: not it's Biden had to have known that having classified documents,
Speaker 1: including SEI documents, codenamed documents, and his personal residence and
Speaker 1: in his an abandoned office. He had to have known
Speaker 1: that he could not have done that, right, and so
Speaker 1: why did he do it? Well, it looks like he
Speaker 1: was doing it because he was trying to let Hunter
Speaker 1: use that intel to run his corrupt family business, including
Speaker 1: at Parisma. Well, and what's strange too, is you know
Speaker 1: documents from his time and the Senate. And Ted Cruz
Speaker 1: raised at this point on Twitter not too long ago,
Speaker 1: and he said, how on earth did he do that?
Speaker 1: I've served in the Senate for ten years. Every single
Speaker 1: classified document I've read a hundred percent have been at
Speaker 1: a secure skiff in the basement of the capital. What
Speaker 1: the hell? He asks? So how would Joe Biden even
Speaker 1: get those documents out of the skiff had out of
Speaker 1: the basement of the Capitol? As Ted Cruz pointed out, Well,
Speaker 1: I mean that's a that's a very good question. Um,
Speaker 1: he could have you know, if it's it depends on
Speaker 1: the classification, If it's top secret, he can read those
Speaker 1: in his office, right, So you could have had when
Speaker 1: he was the Senate Foreign Relations to the Sherman, he
Speaker 1: could have had someone from the State Department bring documents
Speaker 1: to him when he was the Foreign Relations Community showman
Speaker 1: and just forget to take him back or if they're
Speaker 1: if they're if they're sci documents or SAP documents. Uh,
Speaker 1: those are codenamed documents that would had to have had
Speaker 1: to have been in a skiff. So who knows how
Speaker 1: he got Hi out of the skiff. I know that
Speaker 1: in the Senate skiff. I don't know how it was
Speaker 1: back then, but I know that in the Senate stiff
Speaker 1: from what I worked there in two thousand seventeen to
Speaker 1: two thousand nineteen. It's a big room and it's heavily guarded, right,
Speaker 1: so um it's it would be it would be difficult
Speaker 1: for some for a senator to walk out of the
Speaker 1: skiff with a codenamed document. But it sounds like Biden
Speaker 1: found away. Quick break more on all this classified documents stuff.
Speaker 1: This sort of seems similar in the way that they've
Speaker 1: gone after former President Trump with the way that they
Speaker 1: have enacted or or executed on the Foreign Agents Registration Act,
Speaker 1: because it's one of those things that like everyone in
Speaker 1: d C does, but then they only selectively applied justice
Speaker 1: to Trump people with vera uh. And it seems like
Speaker 1: this where you know, you've got all these violations of
Speaker 1: classified documents, and then they went after Trump when he
Speaker 1: didn't even do it, but just to stick it to him.
Speaker 1: Like I just I really dislike forget to have laws,
Speaker 1: make them known and execute on an even basis, you know,
Speaker 1: don't just selectively apply them or you know, when you
Speaker 1: know you can punish your political opponent. Well, and that's
Speaker 1: that's the problem with a lot of this Spionage Act
Speaker 1: stuff is it's used by the intel community, it choosed
Speaker 1: by the FBI, and choosed by the deep state to
Speaker 1: punish people, right it's to so you can you can
Speaker 1: you can cover this up. You can bury it when
Speaker 1: it's Joe Biden, when it's Obama, when it's Clinton. Sandy
Speaker 1: Berger stuffed classified documents down his pants. Hillary Clinton had
Speaker 1: an illegal home server of our nation's most classified secrets
Speaker 1: that was hacked by hostile foreign governments. She destroyed the server,
Speaker 1: she destroyed of the hard drives, she destroyed the phones.
Speaker 1: Nothing happens to her. But they want to do a
Speaker 1: home raid on form President Trump, who had the absolute
Speaker 1: lawful right to have this presidential records, including classified presidential
Speaker 1: records in the office of former President Marl So that's
Speaker 1: the problem is is that if we need to I
Speaker 1: mean we have to. You have to follow you have
Speaker 1: to follow these laws and apply them evenly. And that's
Speaker 1: the problem. When you don't, is we have this reaponization
Speaker 1: of the federal governments. And I really do hope I
Speaker 1: I really do hope that House Republicans start to get
Speaker 1: serious about this. I know that they set up that
Speaker 1: Select committee. Um, they need to get moving on this,
Speaker 1: because you know, if if you have laws but they're
Speaker 1: not applied evenly, then what's the point of those laws?
Speaker 1: You know, I wanted to ask you. So the National
Speaker 1: Archives had flagged the documents that they wanted Trump to
Speaker 1: turn over, the former president Trump to turn over. How
Speaker 1: do they not flag earlier that these Biden documents were
Speaker 1: missing and they've been missing for years. That's a very
Speaker 1: good question. That's a very good question for oversight. Like
Speaker 1: James Khmer on the Government Affairs Committee oversight of the
Speaker 1: National Archives, I think the National Archives has been completely politicized,
Speaker 1: just like the d o J, including the FBI. Just
Speaker 1: like many other government agencies, these agencies are run by Democrats, right,
Speaker 1: and and they're run by Democrat operatives throughout many layers
Speaker 1: of these agencies. And you have to ask this, um,
Speaker 1: you know what, what was the timeline we have? They
Speaker 1: found these documents with Biden around November second, supposedly. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's very fishy how they found these documents because President
Speaker 1: Biden was paying his private attorneys fifteen hundred bucks an
Speaker 1: hour or whatever. He was paying his private attorneys to
Speaker 1: go close down his his abandoned Penn Biden office at
Speaker 1: the University of Pennsylvania. I'm a I'm a lawyer. I've
Speaker 1: never heard of a client paying me to go close
Speaker 1: down an office. You would have a junior aid go
Speaker 1: do that, not a high priced attorney. They come across
Speaker 1: these class of five documents. The lawyers think about it
Speaker 1: overnight and come up with the plan. They call the
Speaker 1: National Archives. Had the political head the next day and
Speaker 1: they were going to cover this up. That's November two,
Speaker 1: six days before the mid term election. The Biden Justice
Speaker 1: Department finds out about this because the Inspector General blew
Speaker 1: the whistle on them, and then what happens. Attorney to
Speaker 1: America Island covers this up for two months when he
Speaker 1: should have immediately appointed a special council on November two.
Speaker 1: He should not have been investigating his own boss for
Speaker 1: clear Espionage Act violations. And he does appoint a special
Speaker 1: council on November eighteen, sixteen days later, but as a
Speaker 1: special counsel to investigate Trump. And during this time, there
Speaker 1: was no mention whatsoever for two months that Biden got
Speaker 1: caught with the stolen classified records. And so you have
Speaker 1: to wonder if a lot of what they were doing
Speaker 1: with Trump was do they know about these Biden records
Speaker 1: a lot sooner than this? Was this all a deflection
Speaker 1: or is it? And these part of it was the flection.
Speaker 1: And when they appointed a special council for Trump on
Speaker 1: November eighteen, sixteen days after they found the Biden records.
Speaker 1: So the House Republicans, James Klemer, he's sitting off, sending
Speaker 1: off letters. I hope he issues a slokana because they
Speaker 1: need to get to the bottom of what's going on here.
Speaker 1: The National Archives is supposed to be non partisan bureaucrats
Speaker 1: and librarians who keep government records and they should not
Speaker 1: be politicized and recognized like they have that. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: they withheld that information before the election before the midterms,
Speaker 1: that Biden was in possession of these documents made it
Speaker 1: all seem that, you know, Trump Republicans were unethical, all
Speaker 1: these different things, when you know, meanwhile they're sitting on
Speaker 1: this bombshell about Biden. You know you you mentioned, uh
Speaker 1: this the Select Subcommittee. Uh. Speaker Kevin McCarthy has now
Speaker 1: announced the individuals who are going to be on this subcommittee. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: he's been falling through his promises, so fingers crossed on him.
Speaker 1: You know, he took Adam Schiff and Eric swell of
Speaker 1: off the Intelligence Committee. Good moves. But so this Select
Speaker 1: Subcommittee on the weaposition of the federal government has been announced.
Speaker 1: What do you hope they accomplished? What do you want
Speaker 1: them to look at? You know, sort of what areas
Speaker 1: of interest do you think would serve them best? I
Speaker 1: hope they get moving, first of all, because we I
Speaker 1: was I've not I've been a pretty vocal critic of
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan's but I they were elected,
Speaker 1: and I really do hope they succeed because there's so
Speaker 1: much at stake for our country. We could not have
Speaker 1: two systems of justice in America, one for the ruling
Speaker 1: elite one for the rest of us. We cannot have
Speaker 1: a politicized and weaponized federal government, including Justice Department, including FBI,
Speaker 1: including National Archives. We can't have a politicized and weaponized
Speaker 1: uh Intel community. And that's the problem is is we've
Speaker 1: we have all of those things. One thing that President
Speaker 1: Obama was able to do very successfully was weaponize the
Speaker 1: career bureaucracy, the sub cabinet, within the FBI, and the
Speaker 1: Intel community. And they have turned that against They turn
Speaker 1: that against President Trump. When he was a presidential candidate,
Speaker 1: they spied on him. They spied on him when he
Speaker 1: was the President of the United States. Was his shocking
Speaker 1: really that the intel agencies are spying on a sitting
Speaker 1: president of the United States. They used it to push
Speaker 1: the Russian collusion hoax, the impeachment hoaxes, hoax after hoax
Speaker 1: after hoax, another pushing this document hoax down in moral lago.
Speaker 1: What I what I what needs to happen is this
Speaker 1: select Committee has to has to root out this weaponization
Speaker 1: of the federal government. Hold these people accountable, get them fired,
Speaker 1: make them famous, get them fired from their jobs, make
Speaker 1: their lives living hell until they leave. Cut off their
Speaker 1: appropriations we have, we cannot. This is not sustainable to
Speaker 1: have this Fazzi style governments where you can you can
Speaker 1: ignore crimes from Biden, Biden's family, Biden supporters, and then
Speaker 1: weaponize the Justice Department in the intelligencies against Trump, Trump's
Speaker 1: top topies and Trump Trump supporters. Just can't continue. And
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that they're worried because you know, you look
Speaker 1: at the FBI finally made some arrests on the attacks
Speaker 1: on pro life pregnant centers. It's been forever and they've
Speaker 1: just not done anything about it. So do you think
Speaker 1: that's because you know, they're a little bit worried about
Speaker 1: this select subcommittee and a Republican Leadhouse coming for them. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean and they yes, and they should be. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think Chris Ray was President Trump's biggest mistakes of
Speaker 1: his presidence. He was appointing Chris Ray as the FBI director.
Speaker 1: He was he was kind of quartered and forced to
Speaker 1: do it because they used Chris Ray as a way
Speaker 1: to say that Trump was going to have some distance
Speaker 1: from the Russian pollution probe. And it's just Chris Ray
Speaker 1: is he's he is so weak and incompetent of a
Speaker 1: director that he lets the FBI run him and he
Speaker 1: does not run the FBI. He's used the perfect FBI
Speaker 1: director for the deep statement as they can just control him.
Speaker 1: And they can't continue to let this happen. You can't
Speaker 1: have out. Uh, these abortion activists threatening, intimidating, harassing, illegally
Speaker 1: obstructing justice by by threatening harassing Supreme Court justices and
Speaker 1: their families outside of their homes. Uh. They are correct
Speaker 1: terrorizing pro life pligancy centers, vandalizing Catholic churches. Not a
Speaker 1: damn thing happens because the abortion industry has such a
Speaker 1: grip on the Democrat Party. Yet they're going to send
Speaker 1: the FBI after every grandma and goofball who trust passed
Speaker 1: it took selfies on January six. Then you're gonna send
Speaker 1: the FBI against people who are praying the rosiary outside
Speaker 1: of abortion clinics. We can't continue as a we cannot
Speaker 1: continue as a country when you have this complete politics,
Speaker 1: this this weaponization of the Justice Department to go after
Speaker 1: your enemies and protect your friends. I mean, it's one
Speaker 1: of the biggest issues we face as a country. And
Speaker 1: I'm praying that you know there's some brave warriors on
Speaker 1: the subcommittee, uh, like Thomas Massey, Dan Bishop, so I
Speaker 1: pray that they uncover a lot. Mike Davis, always helpful,
Speaker 1: always so informative. You're a smart man. I appreciate you
Speaker 1: taking the time to to come on the show and
Speaker 1: break the cell down for us. Thank you for having
Speaker 1: me out again, Lisa so Is. Mike Davis breaking down
Speaker 1: all of that for us, very informative, super helpful. I
Speaker 1: appreciate you guys listening. I want to thank John Cassu
Speaker 1: and my producer for putting together the show every Monday
Speaker 1: and Thursday, but you can listen throughout the week. I
Speaker 1: hope you will drop us a review, leave us a
Speaker 1: rating on Apple Podcast, and as always, I appreciate you're listening.