1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:09,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 2: And as you probably heard me say, we picked up 3 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:15,080 Speaker 2: since just the election three trillion dollars in you go 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:18,959 Speaker 2: it worth or value, but three trillion dollars was picked 5 00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:20,960 Speaker 2: up since November fifth, so that's pretty good. 6 00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:33,840 Speaker 3: I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg, 7 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 3: and this week we're asking does the bomb market have 8 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,840 Speaker 3: it in for Donald Trump? And if so, should he care? 9 00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:41,280 Speaker 4: With me? 10 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:45,440 Speaker 3: Anna Wong, Chief US Economists at Bloomberg Economics. She's worked 11 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:47,880 Speaker 3: at the FED and served in the Trump White House 12 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:51,080 Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty once a comment at 13 00:00:51,120 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 3: the Council of Economic Advisors. Hello, Anna, Hi, Stephanie, and 14 00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:01,360 Speaker 3: Kate Davidson, managing editor who covers you economic policy for 15 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:05,759 Speaker 3: Bloomberg News in Washington, d C. Thanks for joining us, Kate, Hi, Stephanie, 16 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 3: the rest of you listening. Maybe just getting settled into 17 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,399 Speaker 3: twenty twenty five, but the bond market investors of the 18 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,760 Speaker 3: world have been extremely busy since the start of the year. 19 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 3: The bond market story is front and center. Is this 20 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:22,679 Speaker 3: sell off just getting going? If yields continue to rise, 21 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 3: pushing up the cost of government borrowing, especially in the US, 22 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 3: but also around the world. 23 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:29,520 Speaker 5: The market is telling you you're at some level here 24 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 5: where you're really pushing your luck on. About what level 25 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 5: do tenure yield or to rate really begin to hit 26 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 5: the economy. 27 00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: I think that's the question. 28 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 3: The yield on a US ten year treasury bond roughly 29 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 3: what it costs Uncle Sam to borrow for ten years, 30 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 3: has risen more than one percentage point since September, and 31 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 3: could now with what's happened in the last few weeks, 32 00:01:48,040 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 3: be heading for five percent. Now, that may not sound 33 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:53,560 Speaker 3: like much, but we haven't seen long term rates that 34 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:56,760 Speaker 3: high in nearly twenty years. Of course, everyone on Planet 35 00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 3: Bloomberg cares a lot about all aspects of this, constantly 36 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,680 Speaker 3: writing about it in the last few days. But I 37 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 3: think the big question for this podcast is whether the 38 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:09,920 Speaker 3: incoming Trump administration should be worried about what's been happening 39 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:13,320 Speaker 3: in the bond markets, and specifically does it put at 40 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:17,240 Speaker 3: risk any of Donald Trump's grand plans, whether for immigration, 41 00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 3: trade wars, or tax cuts. Welcome to Trumpnomics, the Bloomberg 42 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,639 Speaker 3: podcast that looks at the economic world of Donald Trump 43 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 3: how he's already shaped the global economy and what on 44 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:35,079 Speaker 3: earth is going to happen next, Anna. I mean, we've 45 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 3: got quite a lot to cover, but I guess first 46 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 3: we should spend a little bit of time on why 47 00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:43,560 Speaker 3: you think bond yields the cost of borrowing has gone 48 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:46,440 Speaker 3: up so sharply in the last few weeks. Why are 49 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 3: they selling bonds? 50 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 4: Right? The answer to that question will crucially get to 51 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 4: the core of your original question, which is will it 52 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:59,360 Speaker 4: restrain the Trump administration? Right? So, I've heard at least 53 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:04,360 Speaker 4: five different explanations for why ped year yields have risen 54 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,000 Speaker 4: by one hundred basis point even though the FED has 55 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 4: cut by over one hundred basis point. These explanations range from, well, 56 00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:15,799 Speaker 4: it's because the FED has lost credibility that they should 57 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 4: not have cut by so much in the first place, 58 00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:21,840 Speaker 4: and market is signaling that they don't believe they have 59 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 4: attaped inflation. I've also heard maybe because investors have lost 60 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:32,079 Speaker 4: confidence over the fiscal sustainability. I've also heard maybe it's 61 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 4: Trump's policies potentially being inflationary, the tariffs and the deportation. Finally, 62 00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 4: another explanation I've heard is maybe it's because China or 63 00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 4: other foreign central banks have been dumping US treasuries as 64 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 4: they are defending their currencies. So out of all these explanation, personally, 65 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 4: what I've found most convincing is that it's a combination 66 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:05,080 Speaker 4: of a resetting of expectation of FED rate cuts due 67 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:10,720 Speaker 4: to better economic growth prospect as well as and increase 68 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:12,200 Speaker 4: in real rate. 69 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 3: Just to sort of spell that out a bit, I mean, 70 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 3: coming into this year, or at least maybe when everyone 71 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:21,159 Speaker 3: went on their holidays, we were thinking we get some 72 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:25,360 Speaker 3: interest rate cuts and maybe lower mortgages from the Fed. 73 00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 3: They're getting control of inflation, and for a mixture of reasons, 74 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:33,359 Speaker 3: people in the markets have reassessed that view in the 75 00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 3: last week or two. And if you're Donald Trump, you'd say, well, 76 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 3: because I won the election, everyone's super optimistic about the 77 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,480 Speaker 3: US economy, so maybe it doesn't need so many interest 78 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 3: rate cuts because it's not in trouble. In fact, it's 79 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:51,039 Speaker 3: doing well. I guess that would be the positive spin 80 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,479 Speaker 3: that he might have on it if he spent his 81 00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 3: time thinking about interest rate expectations. 82 00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 4: If he truly thinks that way, then he wouldn't be 83 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 4: trying to talk down the interest rates. They're so clearly 84 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:05,279 Speaker 4: worried and I do think he has some reasons to 85 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 4: worry because, as I said, the reprising of the ten 86 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:11,440 Speaker 4: year yields started in September, but a lot of that 87 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 4: action also happened after the December of RMC meeting, and 88 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:21,320 Speaker 4: in that meeting, the Fed sharply increased their inflation outlook 89 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:28,200 Speaker 4: in twenty twenty five on expectations of Trump policies, tariffs, policies, deportations, 90 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:32,800 Speaker 4: so the Minute suggest So if that's the case, then 91 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 4: from the Fed perspective, the reason why they are not 92 00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:39,880 Speaker 4: planning to cut as much in twenty twenty five partly 93 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 4: has to do with Trump policies policies that has not 94 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:47,280 Speaker 4: happened yet, and that is already all baked into ten 95 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 4: year yields and serving as a restraint to the economy. Right, 96 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 4: So it's all basically acting as a restrictive force to 97 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,920 Speaker 4: the economy before those policies come in place. 98 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,159 Speaker 3: Okay, do you have a team of people under you 99 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:04,159 Speaker 3: that's sort of looking at the real economy and also 100 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:07,920 Speaker 3: looking at the Fed. But just from your perspective sitting 101 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 3: in DC, is it kind of registering this change in 102 00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 3: bond yields sort of inside the Beltway with people thinking 103 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 3: politically about the incoming administration and how incoming members of 104 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 3: the administration, whether it's the new Treasury sector or others, 105 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: are thinking about the world. Do you think this kind 106 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,760 Speaker 3: of registers or is it not something they really care about. 107 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:34,479 Speaker 5: I think it's slowly starting to and I think where 108 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:37,039 Speaker 5: we will be looking for it and listening for it 109 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 5: first is among the members of Congress who tend to 110 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:44,120 Speaker 5: be more worried about deficit spending, the deficit and debt hawks. 111 00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:47,160 Speaker 5: There's not as many of them as there used to be, clearly, 112 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:50,479 Speaker 5: but there are still a few. And remember, Republicans will 113 00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:52,640 Speaker 5: be in control of the House, the Senate, and the 114 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 5: White House, and so they can do a lot, but 115 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:57,880 Speaker 5: their majorities are not very large, and so all it 116 00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 5: takes is for a few concerned people to sort of 117 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 5: throw a wrench into the process here, and if they 118 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:08,080 Speaker 5: are starting to be worried, if they're hearing from constituents, 119 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,400 Speaker 5: if they're hearing from builders, or if they're hearing from 120 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 5: regular voters, hearing about interest rates, hearing about people concerned 121 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 5: about inflation being stickier, and all of that kind of 122 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 5: being reflected to a certain extent and higher yield. I 123 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 5: think that that could raise some worries, and it's maybe 124 00:07:22,480 --> 00:07:26,440 Speaker 5: starting to a little bit about how much more deficit 125 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 5: spending they can do in the form of you know, 126 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:30,680 Speaker 5: def asit finance tax cuts or other things. 127 00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:32,880 Speaker 3: Yes, because to your point, I mean, the reason it 128 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 3: matters is if you've got this, this is about the 129 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 3: cost of borrowing for government sur If it's gone up, 130 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 3: it's potentially not just now but into the future the 131 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 3: cost of doing things, the cost of expanding a deficit 132 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:46,200 Speaker 3: gets that much higher. You're going to be spending that 133 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 3: much year upon year on the debts. Already, I think 134 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 3: the debt service costs are bigger than the defense budget, 135 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 3: which has raised some eyebrows of those who want to 136 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:59,760 Speaker 3: make sure that the US continues to be a great power. 137 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 3: But you don't get the sense that Donald Trump all 138 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:06,559 Speaker 3: the people close to him are focused on the bond 139 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 3: market as much as the stock market. Would it take 140 00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 3: a stock market decline to really change change the way 141 00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 3: he's thinking about the markets and the economy. 142 00:08:17,280 --> 00:08:19,600 Speaker 5: Perhaps for Donald Trump, right, we know he cares very 143 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:22,560 Speaker 5: much about the stock market, but certainly his Treasury Secretary 144 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:25,920 Speaker 5: Scott Bessett is very much aware of what's happening in 145 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:27,720 Speaker 5: the barn market. He's made some comments, you know, the 146 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 5: past few months about how Treasury Secretary Jennet Yellen has 147 00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:33,720 Speaker 5: been managing the debt, and I would certainly expect that 148 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 5: he will talk about this at his confirmation hearing in 149 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:38,880 Speaker 5: the Senate that's coming up soon. He'll be asked about it. 150 00:08:40,040 --> 00:08:43,480 Speaker 5: But right I would think that the you know, yields 151 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 5: tenure yields eclipsing that very you know significant, even if 152 00:08:46,760 --> 00:08:50,680 Speaker 5: it's just psychologically significant five percent threshold would get a 153 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:52,720 Speaker 5: lot more intention in Washington. 154 00:08:53,400 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 3: And it's worth saying the rally in the stock market 155 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:59,319 Speaker 3: that we've seen since Donald Trump was elected has been 156 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:03,359 Speaker 3: more or less pyped out by the stop market reacting 157 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:07,400 Speaker 3: in the last few days to the rising interest rates, 158 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:08,960 Speaker 3: because if you think about it, you know, if the 159 00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:11,200 Speaker 3: rising cost of borrowing also means you can earn more 160 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,160 Speaker 3: on a bond, which means that it's less attractive to 161 00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:16,520 Speaker 3: hold a stock, is you know, one way of thinking 162 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 3: about it. So we have already seen a response on 163 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 3: a stock market. What is interesting about this happening now, 164 00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:25,840 Speaker 3: right is that we haven't actually seen a lot of 165 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:30,360 Speaker 3: the incoming Trump's Administration's policies coming in and most of 166 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:34,040 Speaker 3: them will add to growth, and if anything put the 167 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:36,880 Speaker 3: Fed in a position of maybe having to raise interest rates. 168 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 3: Is that something that you think could happen in the 169 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:43,920 Speaker 3: next year? If you have tariffs potentially adding to inflation, 170 00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:47,760 Speaker 3: a big tax cut package or a package that makes 171 00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:51,839 Speaker 3: permanent the tax cuts from the previous Trump administration, surely 172 00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:53,720 Speaker 3: that could send yields even higher. 173 00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:58,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, so the tariffs, if the Trump was serious about 174 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 4: imposing a universe tariffs, a twenty percent universal tariffs for example, 175 00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:08,679 Speaker 4: could raise the core PC by one percentage point. Then 176 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:12,040 Speaker 4: it's possible that we will see a rake pike at 177 00:10:12,080 --> 00:10:15,200 Speaker 4: the end of twenty twenty five or early twenty twenty six. 178 00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 3: But do you think there would be any voices in 179 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:19,439 Speaker 3: the White House saying, you know what, we don't want 180 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 3: to bond market meltdown for people to start really questioning 181 00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 3: US debt or demanding you know, ever higher cost to borrow. 182 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 3: Do you think that there it could potentially be a 183 00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:36,480 Speaker 3: restraining force on any of the sort of big priorities 184 00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:39,480 Speaker 3: that Donald Trump has coming into this administration. 185 00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 4: So if there is two people who would be those voices, 186 00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:47,559 Speaker 4: it would be Scott Byssant and Kevin Hassett and. 187 00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 3: Just remind us what jobs they're going to have in 188 00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 3: the next administration. 189 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:54,800 Speaker 4: So Scott destined would be the US Treasury Secretary and 190 00:10:55,080 --> 00:11:00,440 Speaker 4: Kevin Hassett would be the NEC director. And in their 191 00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 4: influence on Trump to a large extent depends on their 192 00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 4: personal relationship with Trump, and both of them had been 193 00:11:09,559 --> 00:11:13,680 Speaker 4: known as not friendly to tear. I mean, they were 194 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:17,480 Speaker 4: basically in their core free traders if you look at 195 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 4: the stuff they wrote years before they joined the Trump administration, 196 00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:24,120 Speaker 4: and you know, we call it a couple of weeks ago. 197 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:26,960 Speaker 4: In fact it was I think it was just last week. 198 00:11:27,480 --> 00:11:32,079 Speaker 4: There was a leak in Washington posts suggesting that some 199 00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:37,439 Speaker 4: people in Trump orbit are proposing a more targeted tariff, 200 00:11:38,120 --> 00:11:42,760 Speaker 4: and to extent that those are leaked by people in 201 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 4: Scott Bessent's camp. And now this gets into palace intrigue ry, 202 00:11:47,760 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 4: then it could be hurting the relationship of Scott Bessent 203 00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:56,640 Speaker 4: and Trump because the folks around Trump, especially characters like 204 00:11:56,720 --> 00:12:01,440 Speaker 4: Peter Navarro, who's playing a pretty important role as a 205 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 4: shadowy person. Leak's actually flows distrust within the inner circle, 206 00:12:08,440 --> 00:12:10,760 Speaker 4: and they're not supposed to leak and the fact that 207 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 4: that story in Washington Post came out suggests that it's 208 00:12:14,880 --> 00:12:19,880 Speaker 4: hurting the internal trust and it could I think it 209 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 4: could take a toll on the personal relationship between people 210 00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:29,319 Speaker 4: like Howard Ludnick and start the center Trump if that continues. 211 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 3: Kate, we should probably spend a minute on that. Although 212 00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:33,320 Speaker 3: it's not directly on the bomb market thing, it does 213 00:12:33,360 --> 00:12:36,560 Speaker 3: go to the sort of expectations around economic policy and 214 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 3: the thing we've tended to focus a lot on, which 215 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:43,160 Speaker 3: was the desire to put the promise to put tariffs 216 00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,960 Speaker 3: on most imports coming into the US. You know, we 217 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,640 Speaker 3: did see last week a lot of back and forth 218 00:12:49,920 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 3: and the sort of outbreak of different views on where 219 00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:57,000 Speaker 3: the tariff policy is going. We had that Washington Post 220 00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:00,520 Speaker 3: story that Anna just mentioned, but then quite a lot 221 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:04,440 Speaker 3: of pushback from people closer to Trump on whether or 222 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:06,839 Speaker 3: not they would be targeted those tariffs or whether actually 223 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:09,680 Speaker 3: would be closer to what he said on the campaign trail. 224 00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 3: I mean, we thought it was going to be terribly disciplined, 225 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:14,920 Speaker 3: but it's already there's a lot of debates breaking out 226 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:15,600 Speaker 3: into the public. 227 00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:18,960 Speaker 5: I think we learned a lot in the first Trump 228 00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:22,720 Speaker 5: term about how the Trump White House operates, and for sure, 229 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 5: I think there are indications it will be different, won't 230 00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:27,240 Speaker 5: be exactly the same. And as you mentioned, Stephanie Wright, 231 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 5: in some sense that things are a bit more organized 232 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,040 Speaker 5: now you have different people running things. But at the 233 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:35,160 Speaker 5: core Trump, you know, he has people with a lot 234 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:37,640 Speaker 5: of different viewpoints, as you said, at different perspectives and 235 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,079 Speaker 5: different philosophies on these issues, on economic policy in particular, 236 00:13:41,320 --> 00:13:43,720 Speaker 5: And one thing we did see last time is there's 237 00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 5: competition among those voices. There was then and there certainly 238 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:48,839 Speaker 5: will be again. It's obvious based on the stories that 239 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:51,680 Speaker 5: we're seeing. So I think a lot of it oftentimes 240 00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:53,959 Speaker 5: depends on who's the last person in Trump's ear. When 241 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 5: he's making a decision, He changes his mind on things, 242 00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:01,000 Speaker 5: he changes his view. So that we are at the 243 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:04,240 Speaker 5: stage right now. We haven't gotten to the inauguration yet. 244 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:06,720 Speaker 5: We are about to start hearing from folks at their 245 00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 5: confirmation hearings, but we're trying to figure out who will 246 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:12,679 Speaker 5: have the most influence on these decisions, which view will 247 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:14,800 Speaker 5: went out with the president, and it is so hard 248 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:17,280 Speaker 5: to know at this point how these details are going 249 00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:17,839 Speaker 5: to shake out. 250 00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,320 Speaker 3: Just staying with you, Kate, because you oversee the FED coverage. 251 00:14:21,360 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 3: I mean, we did have quite a lot of voices 252 00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:25,880 Speaker 3: coming from the Fed in the last Fed policy makers 253 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 3: in the last couple of weeks, and those have fed 254 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,240 Speaker 3: into these changing expectations around what the Fed's going to do. 255 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:33,360 Speaker 3: Do you think there's is there a risk or a 256 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 3: sense that Trump administration officials or Donald Trump himself are 257 00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:39,520 Speaker 3: just going to blame the FED for all of this 258 00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:41,680 Speaker 3: and at some point we'll just say, oh, you know, 259 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:44,280 Speaker 3: this is the only reason the market's a week is 260 00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 3: because they're getting it wrong on interest rates and interest 261 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 3: rates are going to be too high. Do you think 262 00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:50,040 Speaker 3: there's a risk of that. Absolutely. 263 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,720 Speaker 5: I mean, I think we saw in his first term 264 00:14:52,760 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 5: Trump was not shy about saying what he thought about 265 00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 5: the FED and monetary policy and criticizing when he thought 266 00:14:57,920 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 5: they did something wrong. And to be fair, I think 267 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:01,680 Speaker 5: when I or something goes wrong, the FED could always 268 00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 5: take the blame. It's not exclusive to Donald Trump. But 269 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:06,760 Speaker 5: for sure, I think that there is a very big 270 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 5: political risk for the Central Bank, and I think that 271 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 5: they are probably bracing for a lot of incoming over 272 00:15:12,760 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 5: the next year and a lot of pressure to ease 273 00:15:15,160 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 5: up to help support the economy. I don't think that 274 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 5: Trump is particularly concerned about whether it's appropriate that the president. 275 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 5: There are these long standing norms that he shifted from 276 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:27,400 Speaker 5: that the White House shouldn't they shouldn't say anything. They 277 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:29,360 Speaker 5: shouldn't even say what they think interest rates should be. 278 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:31,480 Speaker 5: And Trump came out over the summer last summer and said, 279 00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:32,880 Speaker 5: well why not. I mean, I should be able to 280 00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:34,240 Speaker 5: have a say. I'm not telling them what to do, 281 00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:36,400 Speaker 5: but I should say what reach should be. So I 282 00:15:36,400 --> 00:15:38,280 Speaker 5: don't think he'll be shy about saying if he thinks 283 00:15:38,280 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 5: they're doing the wrong thing, nor about telling them what 284 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 5: they should be doing. 285 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:43,360 Speaker 3: Well, as you remember, our editor in chief, when he 286 00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:48,440 Speaker 3: sat down with Donald Trump at Chicago in September, he 287 00:15:48,440 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 3: he talked to him about the FED, and yeah, he 288 00:15:50,600 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 3: was quite clear not only that he thought he should 289 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:54,080 Speaker 3: be able to give his advice, but they had a 290 00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:56,200 Speaker 3: pretty easy job and they hadn't had to do very much. 291 00:15:56,440 --> 00:15:59,720 Speaker 6: I think it's the greatest job in government. You show 292 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 6: up to the office once a month and you say, 293 00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:07,120 Speaker 6: let's say flipp acle and everybody talks about you like 294 00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:07,640 Speaker 6: you're a god. 295 00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:08,640 Speaker 4: Oh what will we do? 296 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:10,440 Speaker 6: I mean, I think I have the right to say 297 00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:12,120 Speaker 6: I think you should go up or down a little bit. 298 00:16:12,680 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 6: I don't think I should be allowed to order it, 299 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:16,560 Speaker 6: but I think I have the right to put in 300 00:16:16,680 --> 00:16:19,920 Speaker 6: comments as to whether or not interest rates should go 301 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 6: up or down, which I saw. 302 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:23,960 Speaker 3: Christine Legard, at the head of the European Central Bank 303 00:16:24,040 --> 00:16:26,000 Speaker 3: came back saying, no, no, we actually do have quite 304 00:16:26,040 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 3: a hard job. 305 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:30,600 Speaker 1: You should come and visit us. And you know I have. 306 00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: I have thousands of hard working people, economist, jurists, a 307 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:41,840 Speaker 1: computer scientist, and I can assure you that they work 308 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 1: super hard every day, not just once a month. 309 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 3: We should sort of spare a thought for the rest 310 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:49,960 Speaker 3: of the world in this. And I'm speaking in London, 311 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 3: and I think London has particularly borne the brunt of 312 00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 3: this sort of change in market sentiment in the US, 313 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:00,520 Speaker 3: probably not entirely from anything that the UK done, but 314 00:17:00,560 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 3: we've seen as the cost of borrowing has gone up 315 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:05,960 Speaker 3: in the US, it's also gone up everywhere, and particularly 316 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:09,560 Speaker 3: in the UK. It's not entirely clear why the pound 317 00:17:09,600 --> 00:17:12,399 Speaker 3: has fallen. There's a sort of sense that whatever it 318 00:17:12,480 --> 00:17:16,199 Speaker 3: means for the US and the sort of strength of 319 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,879 Speaker 3: the US economy, it is already exporting quite a lot 320 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:22,560 Speaker 3: of pain and quite a lot of policy challenges to 321 00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:27,520 Speaker 3: other countries who are facing possibly you know, a tougher 322 00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:29,680 Speaker 3: time with their economy than the US, you know, slower 323 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:34,639 Speaker 3: growth and are quite stubborn inflation. Anna, I mean this 324 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,760 Speaker 3: is something that this is something that has an international impact. 325 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 4: And that's right. Indeed, I could see what you mean 326 00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:43,880 Speaker 4: that that in fact, the UK tenure bond yields has 327 00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 4: increased by almost one hundred basis points since August, particularly 328 00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:51,640 Speaker 4: sharply in December. 329 00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:54,480 Speaker 3: And it sort of heightens the challenge that the Trump 330 00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:58,000 Speaker 3: policies pose because you know, you have a strong US 331 00:17:58,040 --> 00:18:00,919 Speaker 3: economy that people are already having to deal with, and 332 00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 3: then if he is adding fuel to the fire with 333 00:18:04,160 --> 00:18:08,080 Speaker 3: these expansionary policies. Although it makes everyone feel very upbeat 334 00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 3: about the US, I guess the risk is it's also 335 00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 3: just sort of sucking money into the US and sharing 336 00:18:15,400 --> 00:18:18,400 Speaker 3: a lot of higher cost of borrowing with other countries. 337 00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:21,120 Speaker 3: But I'm fascinating when you were sort of briefing and 338 00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:24,760 Speaker 3: writing memos in the Council of Economic Advisors under Trump 339 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:28,200 Speaker 3: and how much focus was there on the markets day 340 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:29,920 Speaker 3: to day. I mean, I don't imagine. I know Donald 341 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 3: Trump probably wasn't sitting it looking at his Bloomberg terminal. 342 00:18:32,840 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 4: But. 343 00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 3: Do you think there will be an awareness day to 344 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:38,800 Speaker 3: day about what's going on in a concern? 345 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:42,520 Speaker 4: So, first of all, when I was there, Larry Kudlow 346 00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:46,399 Speaker 4: was the director of the NEC, so he talks to 347 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,080 Speaker 4: Trump all the time. He sits in the West wing, 348 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 4: in fact, in a little room in the West Wing. 349 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 4: And second, Trump also has Fox News on his television 350 00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:59,360 Speaker 4: set all day long, so he would be staring at 351 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:03,360 Speaker 4: whatever News is showing, so he would be very aware 352 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:04,639 Speaker 4: of the market movement. 353 00:19:05,280 --> 00:19:07,119 Speaker 3: And then ultimately, do you think it will still be 354 00:19:07,119 --> 00:19:09,360 Speaker 3: come down to the stock market what the stock market does, 355 00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:12,800 Speaker 3: rather than sort of what he might consider slightly more 356 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:16,800 Speaker 3: obscure changes in ten year yields and thirty year yields. 357 00:19:17,480 --> 00:19:21,119 Speaker 4: Absolutely. So, I was there in Cea during the de 358 00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:26,520 Speaker 4: escalatory phase of the trade war, and the factors that 359 00:19:26,720 --> 00:19:31,240 Speaker 4: drove this subtle change in attitude toward taking a deal 360 00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 4: with China at that time was because the stock market 361 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 4: has been falling and the manufacturing employment data was showing 362 00:19:40,119 --> 00:19:45,719 Speaker 4: that in fact, manufacturing payrolls have been plunging ever since 363 00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:50,000 Speaker 4: the tranch three of the tariffs of the massive tariffs 364 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 4: on the consumption bits from China. So that was like 365 00:19:52,920 --> 00:19:58,119 Speaker 4: the last two tranches of the US China tariff escalation, 366 00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 4: and so he could I think what he's doing is 367 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:04,560 Speaker 4: he will be trying to push the tariff hire to 368 00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:09,560 Speaker 4: a point where he sees the markets begins to have 369 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:13,800 Speaker 4: a negative attitude, and when those cracks are forming, he's 370 00:20:13,800 --> 00:20:14,960 Speaker 4: going to de escalate. 371 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:17,840 Speaker 3: Well, I think we're never going to have a full 372 00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:20,679 Speaker 3: answer to this, but we will see how it unfolds 373 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:22,480 Speaker 3: over the next few months. I've heard quite a few 374 00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:24,879 Speaker 3: economists over here anyways say to me they felt, at 375 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:27,560 Speaker 3: least for the US, that what had happened as a 376 00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 3: sort of healthy reset, and they even suggested that it 377 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 3: could be a wake up call or a sound of 378 00:20:34,880 --> 00:20:38,200 Speaker 3: warning sign for the incoming administration that they maybe don't 379 00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:42,439 Speaker 3: want to overheat things too much early on when it 380 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:46,720 Speaker 3: comes to things like tax cuts and big constraints on 381 00:20:47,280 --> 00:20:50,440 Speaker 3: immigration or trade wars. But it's certainly been a wake 382 00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:53,080 Speaker 3: up call already for countries like the UK, and in 383 00:20:53,119 --> 00:20:56,800 Speaker 3: the week's time, next time you hear this podcast, I 384 00:20:56,840 --> 00:20:58,600 Speaker 3: will be on the top of a mountain at the 385 00:20:58,640 --> 00:21:02,920 Speaker 3: World Economic Forum and Donald Trump will be president. Thank 386 00:21:03,000 --> 00:21:05,639 Speaker 3: you very much Kate and Anna for joining us this week. 387 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:07,600 Speaker 5: Sure, thank you for having me. 388 00:21:08,119 --> 00:21:09,439 Speaker 4: Thank you see you again. 389 00:21:16,680 --> 00:21:20,199 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the first formal episode of Trumpernomics 390 00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:22,879 Speaker 3: from Bloomberg. It was hosted by Me, Stephanie Flanders and 391 00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:27,119 Speaker 3: I was joined by Anna Wong and Kate Davidson. Trumponomics 392 00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 3: is produced by Summersadi and Moses and Dam, with sound 393 00:21:30,600 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 3: designed by Blake Maples. Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer. 394 00:21:36,600 --> 00:21:39,320 Speaker 3: Please help others find the show, rate and review it 395 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:40,560 Speaker 3: wherever you listened