WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Yergin, Altman, Summers

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall st Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate government? So the deficit is a real issue. The

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>US economy continues to send mixed signals, the financial stories

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data the five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, Start CEO,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. An uncertain economy meets

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the promise of a vaccine, and markets pretty much take

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the over on that bet. Welcome to Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. Twelve years ago, President Obama came to

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>office with a struggling economy and fought to get a

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package despite the political hurdles. Austin Gouldsby was a

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>key Obama economic advisor and saw from the inside what

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it took to get that done. He's now a professor

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of economics at Chicago's Booth School. There are some parallels

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in what we're seeing right now with a struggling economy,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the need for stimulus. Every seems to agree on some

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>political difficulty in getting it done. How can what advice

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>would you give to the incoming administration about how to

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>do that and how to do it effectively? Well, I

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>do think there are some parallels. If only Mitch McConnell

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was a thorn in the side of both of those uh,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the the thought in two thousand nine,

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, was let's do some and if things

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>remain bad, we'll just do more. But Mitch McConnell saw

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to it that that there would not be more. So

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the incoming Biden administration,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they're probably gonna put some significant focus on try to

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>get as much direct relief as you can, as early

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as you can, because the economy needs it now. One

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>difference is in two thousand nine, that was traditional stimulus

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the U the U. S. Government's gonna spend money try

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to get growth jump started. This is different. I mean,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a temporary wave that's spread over US and

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we basically need to figure out a way to hold

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>our breath for six or eight months until the vaccine

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can be widely available and we can go back to

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doing what we were doing before. So we're trying. Our

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>goal is to try to prevent permanent damage, which is

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a little different from stimulus. So I hope that they

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can agree to do something. I mean, we need the

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>money right now. Well, and that goes to the question

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that's been pending, frankly since July thirty one. When we

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>when the supplementary unemployment benefits, what a way? The question

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is do you hold on for the full loaf or

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>take half a loaf? Thus, farther speak of the House,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, she's come down off over three point three trillion,

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but still she's insistent on a lot. Would you advise

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>the incoming president say take what you can get during

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this lame duck session. I guess I disagree a little

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>bit with the premise of that question. We need as

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>much as we can get, as soon as we can

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. My perception of what's happening is not that

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are holding out. It's that, once again, like

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, Mitch McConnell has decided that a

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>deal is not favorable to him before these Georgia runoff elections,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not primarily a dispute about the size

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of the rescue. It's about one side not wanting there

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to be a bill at all. So I think if

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Minuan and Pelosi, we're the only two deciders, they would

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have been able to reach an agreement. I mean, they

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>were close on on numbers and how long it would last.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think the politics of this whole thing is

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is quite complicated in the lame Dock. Well, that that's

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>sobering because, as you suggest, if it's a question of

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>not giving the those side credit for something before those

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>runoff elections, that suggest we're not gonna get anything until

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>into the new year. And I've and I'm quite afraid

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of that because as you say, look, the unemployment money

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ran out, the cares agg money through the p p

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>P program that was gonna help give a lifeline to

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>small business, that money's run out, and the Treasury you

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saw last week said they're gonna withdraw the money for

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed Main Street lending facility, so that money is

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be there. So I think this issue

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that we are we are inches away from having permanent

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>damage that we did not have to have. Um that

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that that I think everybody should find sobering. So Austin,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about that permanent damage as you as you put it,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's a great deal of hope that a vaccine

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is coming. It's not here yet, it'll probably be at

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>least into the middle of next year before it really

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>is widely disseminated. And so we need a bridge to

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>get there. What kind of damage can happen in the meantime,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because some people might say, well, let's just wait, we'll

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccine, will be okay in the long run. Yeah,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but we need the bridge, like said, and the alternative

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is falling down in the water. And and there are

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>literally millions of businesses around the country that I would

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 1>say they're gonna go bankrupt, but as you know, something

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like nine of business closures never even they can't afford

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to go through bankruptcy. They just shut the doors and

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they're never heard from again. And that's a space that

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely don't want to have to go down. But

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>right now we're on path to two. In all the

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>states and pretty much all the major cities of the country.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>They're having revenue shortages like they've never seen, with expenses

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that are up dramatically because of the pandemic, and they're

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start laying off policemen, firefighters, teachers,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and a whole bunch of state services that we kind

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of need at a moment like this. So I think

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>those are the two big speed bumps, uh that I fear.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And and then the third is underlying this whole thing.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The virus is the boss. And if you cannot get

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>control of the spread of this virus until the middle

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of next year when the vaccine comes, there's gonna be thousands.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>There will be thousands of people who die unnecessarily. There

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>will be tens of thousands of people who are hospitalized

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>or suffer permanent health damage permanently unnecessarily. So I really

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that Congress does as big a package of relief

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>as they can, as rapidly as possible, so we don't

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>get people evicted from their homes. I mean, millions of

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna get evicted. That was Austin gouls Be,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a professor of economics at Chicago's Booth School. Coming up. Oh,

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>PEC plus decides to ease off the brakes, but very

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>gradually we talked with Daniel Jurgin about what difference it

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>will really make. That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We think that energy prices are at equilibrium

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the high team's low twenties. I also think

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a hedge. We have seen

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a very short production in energy prices. By the way,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that is stimulative to the economy, So thank you for that.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That was Abby Joseph Cohen of Goldman Sachs on Wall

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Street Week back in two thousand two. Eighteen years later,

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil is double what it was back then,

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and we don't look at low oil prices so much

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for how they can stimulate the economy as for what

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they may say about the strength of global demand, particularly

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the time of the pandemic. Daniel Jurgen of I

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>H S Market wrote the book on oil, and we

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>asked him whether this week's latest opeque plus agreement to

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>gradually ease production curves is what the market needs. What

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it does is basically says that the deal is not

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>going to break up. When you have twenty three nations

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that come together and looking at an abyss a negative

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>oil prices, they make a deal. Everybody sticks together. Other

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>as prices start going up, people start looking at their

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>own interests. Saudi Arabia has one view, Russia another view, UH,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the UAE another view. But I think that they could

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not afford to not have a deal, and there are

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of digital bilaterals that had to happen to

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>make this happen. But this kind of is a is

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a gradual one that does ultimately get to what they'd

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>agreed to in terms of bringing production back. But it

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just shows you, David, how hard it is to bring

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half million barrels of oil over a

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>year back into the market exactly, particularly given this market

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>just one part of forgive the expression criminal knowledge here.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing some people say it was important that Russia

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>was presiding they were chairing the meeting around the Saudi Arabia.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you put any stock in that. I think so.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Minister Novak was one of the architects of

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole deal, the Russian and UM, the Saudi coach share, UH,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the petroleum minister Ulzi spend Salomon decided he didn't want

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in the chair, and so the your of

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stability was somebody who's not part of OPEC. But part

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of the non OPEC group, So it sends a message

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Russians focus on stability. So they had to

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>delay the meeting because there was enough contention they couldn't

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>really get to an agreement quite And the contention, as

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand it, came from a quarter that I didn't appreciate,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which is Saudi Arabia and U a E. Usually I

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's Saudi Arabia and Russia. What was the bone

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of contention between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Yeah,

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they actually Saudi Arabia and Russia has been the basis

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of this whole agreement from the beginning. Uh. The U

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a E has said that they want to increase production.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>They didn't like the fact that other countries were cheating. Uh,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they seemed to want to They've raised questions about what's

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the framework here. I think they want to monetize their oils.

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So there was a degree of tension between those two

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>countries in terms of their point of view, which normally

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty much in locksteps. So that's the example of

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the divergence of interest that exists, particularly as prices start

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>going up again in anticipation of vaccine. Well that and

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that's key. It seems to be as you say, the

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>prices started going up again because I took a look

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>at oil over a period of time of the course

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and it has been moving its way

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>back up. Is that really triggering the dispute right now

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about whether it increased production? Yes, I could. I think

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>when prices start going up the divergence of interests. I mean,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the oil price has basically been stuck on what I

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>call the virus alley, and like a lot of other

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>parts of the economy, and in terms of getting out,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been torn between the one hand, now vaccine optimism

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the other hand virus pessimism. But as it's now

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>basically looking towards the springtime, when it's possible that a

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in countries where you have had economic

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>shutdown like the United States or Europe, will be back

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in motor cars and demand will be going up again.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Then we spent almost every day looking at the equity markets,

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>at least here in the United States and how they've

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>been going up, and it's generally thought that's because we

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are anticipating a vaccine sometimes at least towards the middle

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of next year, does the all market work that way?

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean all this is being affected already by the

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>prospect of a wider distributive vaccine by the middle of

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely it's signaling it, and that that, uh, that's when

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll start to see demand going up. Of course, there's

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>some things hanging out there. For instance, that the Biden

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>administration starts to move to try and reopen the door

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with Iran, that could mean a lot of Iranian oil

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back into the market. So there's a whole geopolitical

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>drama that's happening at the same time. But it's certainly

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>expectations of a vaccine and kind of confidence and hope

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond what looks like a very difficult twelve weeks that

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a head from a health point of view.

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we see China coming back faster.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say in the United States

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and Europe, is that helping drive the price of oil

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself right now? It gives a sense

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of what the China resurgence is doing. Yeah, it's uh

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sent a message that was not expected because people thought,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, demand would be weak. Chinese oil demand now

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is higher than it was at this time last year.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think that is figuring in that people see

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that you get recovery, and with recovery comes increased demand.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, this is a market that has

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>been very hard hit by the reduction in demand because

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of the free snymp of activity, and there seems to

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>be indication that demand is is really back in India

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, and that's another signal that the market's looking at.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Moving over to the supply side, you mentioned the possibility

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of Iran coming back online if in fact a Biden

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>administration comes to terms of them. Libby already, as I understand,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it is producing again more than it was before. How

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>much oil is sitting out there that could come back

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in on the production side, Well, if you add what

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has been out because of the OPAQ plus deal at

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this point that's seven a half million barrels, then you

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have another that all won't come back at once. They're

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to have a structure for that, but you could

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have three million barrels a day of Iranian oil coming back,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and possibly something with Venezuela too. So that is hanging

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>out there, and it looks like the Trump administration is

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>doing everything you can to put together an anti stronger,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>anti Iranian coalition to make things more difficult for a

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. What is the effect at this point of

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the U S shale. I mean, it's been a huge effect.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You you have it in the new Map, your new

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>book about the effect of US shale. How is that

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>affecting the oil market right now? Well, shale has come

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>down a lot. We reached an incredible high point of

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen million barrels a day in February, ahead of Saudi Arabia,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead Russia. We're still out of Saudi Arabia in Russia

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>because of their cutbacks, but it's down about two million

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day, and I don't think we'll see a

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>recovery until the middle of next year, until you start

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to see a demand going up and prices getting really

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>getting out of virus Alley Dan, As you suggest, the

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>big issue I think it's for the world, but certainly

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for the oil industry, is what happens with the vaccine

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and the vaccine coming back on. We also have a

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>change in administrations coming up here in the United States,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and we have what looks to be quite a different

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>approach to energy coming in from a President Leiden when

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he takes office January twenty. How big a factor is

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that likely to be? Well, well, I think in a way.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the way obviously listening to your previous interview

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and thinking that really the presidential election really isn't over

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>until January five, and we know the outcome of Georgia,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>because that will affect what the Biden administration can and

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can't do it on climate. But it is said that

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>climate is one of its four priorities. John Kerry has

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>been appointed as Climate Envoy. Every Cabinet secretary will have

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a climate objective so and the United States will re

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>engage with the Global Climate Paris Consensus. So it will

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty big change, I think. But he's also

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>made clear that there's no ban on fracking, that there'll

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be more regulation. That was Daniel Jurgen, author of the

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>New Map Energy, Climate and the Clash of Nations. Coming up,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We're down to the wire on Brexit. Bloomberg Senior executivetor

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for Economics Stephanie Flanders on what's at stake that's next

0:14:54.800 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio Less than

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a month ago until the United Kingdom leaves the European

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Union with or without a deal. After years of back

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and forth, it's hard to see how the parties have

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>truly narrowed their differences over harmonizing regulations over the Irish

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>border or over those fish. As Wall Street Week contributor

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Senior executive editor for Economic Stephanie Flanders says,

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time to make some decisions. Well, and of course

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's those kind of phrases that have been used over

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks as we've had increasingly felt that

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we were just on the edge of an agreement, and

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that was true last week, and we know that it

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>was delayed. Any any final furlough was was delayed by

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that one of the negotiators actually was exposed

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to COVID and everyone had to go into quarantine for

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>some period of time. But every day now we've all

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to our reporters and the world on the street, we

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are hearing that it's about to come a deal. I

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>have to say, the move music the last few days

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has actually been less positive, and I think that's partly

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that hang on a minute, we thought we

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>knew what needed to happen. You mentioned those three deals.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know the general perception is, but on those three

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>sticking points, it's Britain, probably Boris Johnson himself, who will

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>need to give a little bit on this language around

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a level playing field where Britain sort of promises that

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to try and use its new freedom

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to get an enormous competitive advantage against Europe in return

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Europeans then asking for what the British would

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>say was a more reasonable amount of access to British waters.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing how important this not point one percent of

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy, the fishing has become in this negotiation, and

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of course many in the financial sector. The city is

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>so important. I would say, hang on a minute. We

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>were sold down the river years ago and you're still

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the fish fishermen are still in their battling away for

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>their rights. It does seem like a very topsy turvy negotiations.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>As we would say, them's politics, it's a practical matter.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>But we have the British on the one side, and

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty to say the British position is

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not always been perfectly consistent. But on the other hand,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are we having dissension over the European side because now

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there are reports that maybe they don't think Michelle Barnier

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is really including them in and what the terms are.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>There was even a Bloomberg report saying that in fact,

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>France might be threatened to vita whatever Mr Barnier negotiate.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Friends have always had a very have

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>been the sort of the muscular side of the negotiations

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and certainly have had more muscular rhetoric feisty rhetoric throughout

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this process. We know they've quite actively talked about taking

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>advantages for paris Is financial sector for this for sure,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but also about Britain being you know, being absolutely sure

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that Britain doesn't get a deal that any other country

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>might look at and say, oh, I'd like I want

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>one like that. Whether that's sort of classic, not to

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>play to too many stereotypes, but is it the sort

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, gallic desire to sound to sound matcho

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>or whether there's something more fundamental They're a real disagreement.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure. And what has been really striking

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout you pointed to the inconsistency on the British side

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in general the Europeans. This is a lot of countries

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of different interests in this negotiation have

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>been remarkably of one voice throughout, and I suspect that

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>will continue even if you get a little muttering around

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the edges. What is the real deadline? I mean, there

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>are so many deadlines now I'm hearing like December eighteen,

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>because they do have to get ratification right after they

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>get a deal done. Yeah, And it's been interesting because

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that the British said the deadline of October, middle of

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>October a while ago, so that was the sort of

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>drop dead date. Um the Europeans were always a bit

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of po pooed that. Then it went through November.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed the Irish Prime Minister a few weeks ago

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Bloomberg New Economy Forum. He thought the deadline

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>could slip into the middle of December. Now they are

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about a bit later. I think the idea is,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>once you get into that un of territory, everything would

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be provisional. You wouldn't be able to get ratification in

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the European Parliament, and in the sense you would be

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>prolonging the agony because you would you would still be

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>having to go back and finalize this deal that you

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>did already in the final hour. So I think people

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are hoping that we won't be pushing those further deadlines,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>not least because that the new vaccine that Britain has

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>just confirmed has to we haven't got it from but

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Belgium yet, and we certainly don't want to get shipments

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>to be interfered with come January. So we're all going

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.239
<v Speaker 1>to need to be watching this very very closely over

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the coming days and weeks. By the way, if they

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.239
<v Speaker 1>don't get a deal done by by December thirty one,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>can they just keep negotiating into new year? I understand

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>w t R restrictions will come into effect, but why

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't they deal want to do a deal on January

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or January You know, we've we found that before

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that these things can be can be more flexible. I

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the problem is that the potential of extending

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the transition period was absolutely ruled out after the summer.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a deadline. I think it was in August

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>where the British to apply for an extension and they said,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>despite COVID, despite everything else, the government was adamant it

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have an extension. So legally, you're right that the

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>change has to happen on January one. Whether you'd have

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>enough goodwill, enough desire to negotiate with the same kind

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of pace and energy when you've already crashed through that

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>crucial legal deadline, I'm not so sure. But yet technically

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they could carry on talking. That was Stephanie Flanders, Bloomberg

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Senior Executive editor for Economics. Coming up, we wrap up

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the week with our special contributor Larry Summers of Harvard.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Every week we ran things up with our special contribute

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers, Harvard. So Larry, welcome. I must say this

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>week instructs me. It strikes me that the big developments

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>were on the fiscal side rather than the monetary side.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We did hear from j Pale said there are some

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>uncertain about the economy, but it was really apparent progress

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to a compromise on some fiscal stimus were on that

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred eight billion dollar proposal from some Democrats and

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans in the Senate. Is it possible that in fact,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have been right all around long, and then

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have done the three point three trillion last spring,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was right to wait, because nine eight billion

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe enough. I think the three point three trade was

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>always a negotiating position. We certainly should have done stimulus

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the summer. We would have come into this difficult

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>period with a stronger economy. We would have had even

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more rapid growth. We would have helped a lot of

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.239
<v Speaker 1>children who are going hungry. We would have prevented a

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of layoffs from state and local governments. But look, David,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what's important now is to look forward, not backward. And

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you saw it employment figures. You see it in what's

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>happening with COVID. This economy needs relief, and it needs

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it now. It needs it for hungry children, needs it

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for people who are unemployed. Needs it to compensate those

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>who are going to need to stay home if we're

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all going to state safe. It needs it to pay

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>for much more testing than UH we're having. It needs

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it to pay for more contract tracing than we're now doing.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It needs it to pay for the monitoring and assuring

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that people are wearing UH masks and it needs it

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we deliver those vaccines every bit

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as rapidly as we conceivably can. This cannot possibly be

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a moment for UH sitting still. It would be the

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>highest irresponsibility if Washington was not able to find a compromise.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That means cutting out peripheral issues that may be very

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>important economic issues but are not central to the stimulus challenge,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and it means getting with the program and recognizing that

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>America needs help. I hope it will happen in the

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>next several weeks. It looks more likely than it did,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are no certain and teach and it is

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a real test of goodwill and the capacity of Washington's function. Larry,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we like to do here in

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is look at the week, but also look

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond the week too. Larger patterns here, and when anybody

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>mentions a paradigm shift for me, it certainly gets my attention.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I read that book a long time ago about Paradigi

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and their suggestion there may have been a paradigm ship

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to physical cities. It comes from Olivia

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Well and Shard referring to you, saying that there there

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>might be a paradigm shift. The large agreement between Larry Summers,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Jason Firman, Ben bernanke Ken Rogoff, and him tell us

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about that paradigm shift. I think the paradigm shift is

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what I've talked about on your show before, Uh, David Uh.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>For forty years, since the inflation of the seventies, the

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>preoccupation of macro economic policy has been with monetary discipline

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to avoid inflation and fiscal discipline to prevent crowding out. Now,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>when we've got zero interest rates and zero interest rates

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>projected for a very long, very low interest rates for

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>acted for ver long time, we're in a different paradigm

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>where in a paradigm where the challenge is absorbing all

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the savings that an unequal and uncertain private sector generates,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and that means we're gonna have to think about fiscal

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>policy not just as a countercyclical tool, but as a

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>chronic instrument that we're gonna need to use to maintain demand.

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>If we don't have fiscal policy, we're gonna have pathologically

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates. We're gonna have with those pathologically interest rates,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>savers who don't have a chance to make it for

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>their retirement exploding asset prices and potential financial instability, rising

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>uh inequality, and economies that aren't going to reach their

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>full potential. So the right way is to provide more

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>stimulus to the economy, and we probably can't provide it

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with monetary policy, and even if we could, the side

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>effects would be catastrophic in terms of financial instability. So

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to think about fiscal policy as a permanent

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>tool of maintaining demand management. That is a very different

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>view than the one we've had. It may not it

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>may well not be the right view forever, but it's

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the right view for coming decades. So so apply that

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>approach the fiscal policy, which it would be a paradigm shift,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as you say, to what we're facing right now, what

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Roger All referred to as a split screen economy, where

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at three or four months of really tough times,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with a snap back if a vaccine is why

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they distributed towards the middle to the end of next year.

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Can we have one fiscal policy that handles both of

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>those very different conditions. I think so, because even with

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the snap back, even with a very good period of growth,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we're still going to be short in terms of total

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>number of jobs where we thought we were. We're going

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to be short in terms of output of where we

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>thought uh we would uh be, and we are going

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to need to run deficits of a kind larger than

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>people used to think we're appropriate. Um. And the truth

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is it's gonna be okay, because we're gonna be able

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to run uh those deficits given how much savings there

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is to absorb them, and given how little pressure there

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is uh coming from credit markets. So I don't think

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this is an alarming prospect. In many ways, low costs

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>to borrow for public investments are a boon, are a

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>good thing, just like businesses regard low borrowing costs is

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, and all of us as homeowners regard

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the ability to refinance our mortgages, the ability to get

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a larger home or a second home at a lower

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>carrying costs because of low interest rates. We regard those

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>as positive things, and the same thing is operative in

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.239
<v Speaker 1>terms of public investment. So I don't think that this

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily a bad uh thing. Low interest rates are

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to do all kinds of things we probably

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>should have done a long time ago, whether it's green investments,

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or investing in our children, or fixing our infrastructure. I've

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>used this example before. When I started flying from Harvard

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to Washington to give advice, it took an hour and

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarter. Now it takes over an hour and a half.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And it hasn't gotten any further. And airplane technology hasn't

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten worse. What's gotten worse is our air traffic control

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>systems ability to manage all the traffic that's got to

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not make any sense. That is one of many, many

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>examples of where we need to strengthen our country's infrastructure.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Another example is our kids who are uh not able

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to school and in so many cases don't

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>really have decent access to education because they lack the

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>broadband access that is kind of part of being part

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, in the same way that electrification was

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a necessity to be part of the economy a century ago. Okay,

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>so Larry, just a little over a minute left here.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to do a couple of quick Summer says

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 1>is that we love to do. Number One, when are

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we going to have a defects of vaccine which is

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>so widely distribute it affects American population? When will that

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>happen June one. That's that's pretty But is that the

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>second inoculation or just the first, second and second inoculations

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for enough of the population that COVID will be down

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>from current levels by June one, is my prediction. I mean,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are saying we're gonna get a

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>third of the way by February, and if we come

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>close to that, we'll get the rest of the way

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>for sure by June. Well, I for one, would take

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that deal without question. I'm an optimist. Well, I like

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your optimism. That's terrific. Clary, you've been warnings about COVID nineteen.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It's good if there's a way out of this second

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>one when we're gonna were gonna see the ten year

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>yield up about one. We really saw it move up

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>significany this week. I think that's gonna be until next year.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the fans gonna want to see that happen.

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be a lot of pressure to

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:28.719
<v Speaker 1>keep rates, uh, keep rates low to maintain financial stability

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that we're getting all the stimulus to

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>investment that we can February one, by next year one, yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but does that mean that the reflation trade maybe over

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>oversold as a possibility. Uh No, there's a lot more

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>room above one per cent than there is. That's parallel

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>where we are where we are now, But I don't

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good short run. Thank you so much

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to Special Wall Street. We contributor Larry Summers of Harvard,

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>always so great to have him with us. Finally, one

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more thought, the irresistible force of COVID meets the immovable

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>object of American football. All of our lives have been

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>upended in ways we could not have imagined just a

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>year ago. But it's one thing to work from home,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or miss graduations and family gatherings or forego vacations. It's

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>something else, altogether to do without our football. So the

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL came up with a plan to push ahead, to

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>test everyone daily where masks even in practices, limit all

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>outside activities, and punish anyone who doesn't comply. The only

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>problem is football is played by people, and people don't

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>always play by the rules. Even in football, they had

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a good protocol, good strategy in place. At the end

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day, they're working with people, and human beings

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>make errors. And so this week we had the Pittsburgh

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Steelers play the Baltimore Ravens on a Wednesday afternoon, the

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>third time the game had been rescheduled because a good

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the Ravens roster tested positive and the Denver

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Broncos lost all of their quarterbacks not to COVID, but

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to violating the rules on COVID, leaving a wide receiver

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to run the team, one who hadn't taken a snap

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>under center since his days in college at Wake Forest.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It would be easy to say just stopped playing, But

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as Hall of Fame cornerback Darryl Green put it, it's

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not just about a game. For many of us, it's

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about who we are. How can we keep moving certain

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>things that has to continue to move that makes us

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>who we are as an American society. So whether you

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>love football the way some of us do or not,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we all share the need not to let a virus

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's changed what we do change who we are. That

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>does it. For this episode of Wall Street Week, I'm

0:31:54.040 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>David Weston. This is Bloomberg. See you next week,