WEBVTT - Week 13: Elementary, Watson

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from i Heart Radio,

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>advice Leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul. Welcome to

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Putball Weekly on Paul charge In. My co host

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>today as they have been the last couple of weeks,

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. Hello, gentlemen. The a team

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's so, that's what we're gonna call it while Matt's

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not here, which is probably the best way to handle that.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got plenty to get to. This is for some

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people formally the playoffs. For other people, this is the

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>week you have to win to get into the playoffs,

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>which really makes it a playoff game for you, remember

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or not, even if you're not in the playoffs, what else?

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>What better things do you have to do other than

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to this show and it's enjoy Yes, well, we hope.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So we will get to all the usual stuff that

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>we do, including take a chance on me. We will

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do the three tough questions. No premature speculation at this

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>late stage of the season, we're retiring that as we

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have more games to get to in our allotted time. Um,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but we will also break down all of the matchups,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>including the New Orleans Saints taking on the Atlanta Falcons. Brian,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>I've got to Taysom Hill take for you, which is

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he ain't finishing the game if he plays as badly

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this week as he did last week, specifically as a passer.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they bring in Jamis Winston and they platoon

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Hill like they did with Drew Brees. Fantasy footballers would

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like to see that unless you have Taysom Hill on roster.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise he's the most hated man in the the game. Basically. Uh,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>these teams actually played two weeks ago in Week eleven,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>so we'll certainly reference that game. That was Taysom Hill's

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>first started quarterback. He did alright, passing two three yards

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen of twenty three. That was just icing on the

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>though he had two rushing touchdowns. He's basically got to

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>do that again to remain relevant. And like you said,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>if he's not running the ball, and he's not can

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get it done with his arms. So I'll give him

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a CEE with there's a upside and then there's bench downside.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm kind of here there, So you know I

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>picked your poison with Haysom Hill. He probably is poison,

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but just a CEE for him. Over to his pastcast

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>pass catchers, Michael Thomas, Gonna give him a B. He

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>had nine catches for a hundred and four in the

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, yet a fifty two target share in that game.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely insane. Has now topped a hundred yards and

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>five of his last eight games against the Falcons. But again,

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>tough to trust Taysom Hill. His passing was just so

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>bad last week. But Atlanta's secondary allowing two yards per

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>game to wide receivers, that second most in the league.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're definitely starting Thomas with a B. And you

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm I think you give Emmanuel Sanders a

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see here. This is more of a gut feeling. It's

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to see her at bench. He had four for sixty

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>six and that first meeting double digit PPR points. Just

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the heavy yardage surrender to wide receivers if Winston comes,

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and that certainly bill as well. For Sanders, I'm gonna

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of standards the sea, but he's certainly not a must start. Uh.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camara might not be a must start either. I

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think he is. I'm going to give him a

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>B real quick, I should say. Jared Cook on the bench.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>One catch in the first meeting, one of the three

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>catches he's had over his last four games. He he's

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dust at this point. But back to Kamara B. But

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's borderline C territory with Hill at quarterback. We're gonna

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>get into the brutal splits with Kamara and Hill later

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the show. I'm sure. The first meeting again was

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Hill's first start. Kamar had thirteen carries for forty five

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown, did not catch a pass, had

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>just one target, and the Falcons are tough against the run.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed just four rushing touchdowns to the running backs

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this here. No back has topped ninety rushing yards and

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>since Week six, opposing backs are action just two point

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>five catches and seventeen and a half receiving yards against

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta with no receiving about that, that's Morris, that's when

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he took over. Since then, their run defense has been

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on top of it. Ye, it's a it's a different

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>team right now. And lastly, for New Orleans, Octavius Murray

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on the bench to have big numbers against Denver. But

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't ask for a more positive game script than

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>when the opposing team doesn't have a quarterbacks run the

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ball over and over Murray on the bench, over to

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta side. Todd Gurley will start with him, should play,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 1>but it does not matter. I'm benching any starting running

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>back for Atlanta. The Saints allowing only three point five

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per carried to opposing back, so they've only allowed

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>five total touchdowns to the position. Atlanta backs total fifty

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>two scoreless combo yards on fourteen touches in that week

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven matchup, just one catch total to the position for Atlanta,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so they're all on the bench. Calvin Ridley never on

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the bench, just to be though. He had five catches

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for ninety yards in that first meeting, which is basically

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a floor game for him. Before facing the quarterbackless Broncos,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Saints were allowing one seven yards per game to

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, so safe b for Ridley with a upside,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and Julio Jones supposedly felt great in Friday's practice, so

0:04:54.880 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna towards him playing. He suffered the hamstring injury

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>he's suffering through right now. When these teams first met

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in Week leven, he only had two catches for thirty

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>nine yards. Understandably, but more shockingly, Julio hasn't scored on

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the Saints since the playoffs. Just three touchdowns in seventeen

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>career games against New Orleans and awful against the past

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, a long long time until recently.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, the Julio thing is going to

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>win and lose games if you guess right on whether

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>or not Julio is going to finish the game. And

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Julio can't tell you right now Julio is going to

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>finish the game. You have to use your best judgment

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have him on roster and the Guillotine League,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>no danger. Yeah he's out, but in in seasonally it's

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>up to you but to see if he suits up.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But he might not finish the game. I'm not gonna

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>start hating her. Has had no catches in the first meeting,

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's on the bench for me and Matt Ryan.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a see if Julio plays, but I

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think I might bench him if Julio sits two thirty

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>two yards, zero touchdowns, two interceptions in the first game.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The Saints have only had one passing touchdown over the

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>last four games, including that Falcons game. So soft bench

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Julio Matt Ryan's not the same guy this year. I

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if we're gonna get done with the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>season and they're gonna say, oh, by the way, we

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't really mention it, but he's had

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this injury all year long or something that he is

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>not the same guy. Rams take on the Cardinals, Scott,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the Rams, trying to guess which running

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.799
<v Speaker 1>back may have a good game is usually a fool's

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>erond do you have an angle on any of these

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>three guys. Nope. I think that Acres is gonna start

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to get more and more work of this this season

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>progresses here at the end of the season anyway. But

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I have Momll on the bench, only one runner his

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>top seventy five yards rushing on the Arizona Cardinals since

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Week one and the best receiving day thirty one yards

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>on these Cardinals run defense since week one. I have

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>them all on the bench. The passing game, I hate

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Jared goff Man. I can't. I can never tell when

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be good or when he's gonna be bad,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>very hard to know. You look home road, You're like,

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>you don't even know when it is. It's just random.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, Uh, Golf drop three hundred plus in three

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>straight before his dot against San Francisco last week. He

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was also averaging nearly fifty attempts per game in those three.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I like that in this one with the Vegas highest

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>over under here, and these are the two fastest paced

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>offenses in the NFL, so I think that he could

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of attempts here. So I am giving

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade. I wouldn't be surprised if it's

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Uh. Woods and Cup, I'm giving both

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>B grades too as well. If you had to bet

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on a start here, it's probably woulds the guy with

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven targets in just the last two games. Uh.

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>He also has twenty carries for a hundred and fifteen

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and two scores of the season, so he can

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>get it done there too. But he has eighty plus

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in three the last four, cast five, cast five

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or more catches in each of the last four. He's

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the safe B grade. Cup is the boomer bust B grade.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Only one game under forty yards and almost always has

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>five catches. You have a safe four, but every once

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in a while, once or twice a year, and once

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or twice this year, he's gone over a hundred plus

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the score. So that's that's I'm going to look

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>forward to Beasley and Crowded both went over a hundred

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and a score on the same Cardinals team, and they've

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>given up a lot of slot yards this year. So

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a cup to b Reynolds. He's gonna CE

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>grade two. As I said, it's gonna be high temple.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think the run game is gonna be

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>all split up at the passing game. Reynolds forty plus

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>yards and six of his last seven. That's C grade worthy.

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>When you're getting three to four catches for d yards,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you can hope for more, but that's that's C grade

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>right there. On the other side, Murray has not really

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>been the same since his shoulder injury. Last week was

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>really really rough, and this week the Rams their number

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the number one d against fantasy quarterbacks. This is a

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>very tough matchup for Kyler Murray. Yes, they've allowed the

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>sixth fewest yards and the fewest passing touchdowns six out

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the eleven teams they faced, so over half the

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>teams they faced failed to even record a passing touchdown

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams. It's a tough spot, but it's Murray

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and he does run, and I think that rushing gives

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more. He can get two hundred

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>plus yards. I'm still giving him the C grade, but

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>know that it's a really rough matchup. So if you

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have a nice spot start, it might it might be

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hoover you to go with someone over Murray. And you know,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for Murray, the schedule doesn't get a lot easier. So

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they've get a surprisingly robust Giants defense on the road.

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>After this, they gotta go across coast. Then they go Philadelphia.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We just saw Philadelphia put Russell Wilson on a tough game.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Then they go San Francisco. That defense is rounding into shape.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And for the horrible leagues that play Week seventeen, he

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the Rams again. So it is a

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>tough stretch for Kyler Murray, who powered teams into the playoffs. Yeah,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he gets you through the playoffs. Yeah,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's yeah, that's a really rough stretch. He might

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be getting a lot of sea grades and just mostly

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>off his rushing end name. Yeah, Uh, DeAndre Hopkins. I'm

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade too. He has been a little

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>rough lately, Yes, he has. Outside of that Hail Mary,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and he's got a day with Jalen Ramsey perhaps so

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is the number one d against wide receivers fewest yards

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and fewest touchdowns to wide receivers. They go back Ramsey

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hopkins from Yeah, if it wasn't if it was

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone but Hopkins, he might get a C here. But

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he gets a B grade because fifty five catches and

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards is like his floor. Those are those are

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the bad games. We're talking about five or fifty, So

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>anything better than that's probably B range. I have Kirk

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>put back on the bench. Uh, it's We've already mentioned.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a really, really tough matchup and uh he's been

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a missing act lately, having only top fifty yards once

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>in the last five games. He hasn't scored in the

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>last four games either. Kenyan Drake C grade here. The

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Rams are fifth best against fantasy running backs. They've allowed

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a running back to rush for more than fifty yards, uh,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just once since Week six, and that was sixty five yards.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Not not a great game. No, uh, they've allowed a

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>few twenty five yard receiving days. Can catch the ball.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get that fifteen to seventeen touch volume. He's

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what I like to call on this show, the volume.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>See that's what that's that's what he gets. He gets

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the volume. See here. The final game of this matchup

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>is the Detroit Lions and the Chicago Bears. I want

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to start with the complicated situation of DeAndre Swift, who

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>cleared the concussion protocol but is now dealing with some

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of illness I had at full health. If we

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>get to feel really much better about his illness status

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by Sunday, I've got a B grade on him. Chicago

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is seeing the fourth most rushing attempts and they've allowed

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the ninth most rushing yards per game. The way you

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>beat Chicago is on the ground, not through the air.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And these teams met in Week one. As you may remember,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Swift had a bad game and then dropped the game

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>winning touchdown on a pass in the end. And Daryl

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Bevil did say on Friday that DeAndre Swift, if he plays,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>might have a smaller package of place to scary for

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy start. It is because the reason I was

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>hoping to give him the B greatest because prior to

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the concussion had worked his way up to a twenty

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one touch game, which was the first time he had

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>really had a big share of the workload. So I

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was excited for that. But I just don't know that

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes altogether here. Plus add in Adrian Peterson saying

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that he looked you know, he looked funny and he

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't thinking clearly midweek that that worries me a little

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bit too. So we'll watch Swift. If Swift doesn't go,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>or you need a dart throw, you could certainly try

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson here, who performed well with Swift out entirely

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.239
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. Well, I guess one week ago, but Thanksgiving.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Then let's go to the passing game. T J. Hockenson

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gets a B grade. He's scored against Chicago in the

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, and all season long, the Bears have been

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tormented by tight ends, allowing the fifth most receptions, the

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sixth most yards, and the second most touchdowns to tight ends.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson is a very good start. And I've got one

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>other starting grade with Kenny Golladay ruled out, and that's

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Danny Amendola. Why he runs from the slot. He's going

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to return from his hip injury in time to face

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the busted screen door, Yes, buster screen. He's been awful.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He's allowed four touchdowns in the last five games. There's

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity for Danny Amondola. Slow receivers get it

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>done more than the outside receivers against the Bears, and

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then the whole rest of the Detroit's passing game, including

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford around the bench. Yes, the Bears were dissected

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>by Aaron Rodgers last week, but on the whole they've

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>been very good. No quarterback is at three yards or

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns other than Rogers. Marvin Jones does nothing with

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>without Goliday. It's in Matthew Stafford. By Matthew Staffords thumb still,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he's still questionable the thumb injury because he's playing through it.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>The thumb still isn't right. He's trying to play there.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a scenario where Stafford doesn't even finish this game.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Chicago side. We've got

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of plays here of most note to fantasy

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>owners Allen Robinson got the rare Friday down grade and

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>injury status to questionable with a knee injury. That's a concern.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Guys who get downgraded on ride A ten two more

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>often be ruled out. So watch this one closely now.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>If he goes, Robinson is a boom or bust play

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>in true bisk true brisk too true, brisky, Mitch to brick.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Why can't I see it? Mit Tbsky? Can I just

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>do this? I thought you were tried for a joke,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Troubinsky. I've said Sad Trombowsky so many times now

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know his real name in Mitch Trobinsky

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>starts good heavens, Allen Robinson has average ten targets, even

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if it has resulted in just sixty yards per game.

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are allowing one hundred nine four yards per

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>game to oceiver? Is that sound effect? Isn't it the

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>worst trombone solo ever? Ah? Anyway, um, what was I saying?

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are allowing yard per game to opposing receivers,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and its opponent's top receivers top one hundred yards and

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>back to back games, so there's plenty of upside for

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson if true Whisky does what he normally doesn't,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just keep throwing the bald Robinson, which is what I

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>would do if I were Mitr Whisky and I wanted

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to try to save my job. Agreed. Next, I've got

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a nice sleeper play for you in Darnell Mooney. The

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Lions are expected to be without starting cornerback Jeff Okuda,

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and that means Desmond true Font is going to see

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>extended time and Mooney predominantly plays on Desmond trud front

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. Pro Football Focus ranks true Font

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as cornerback one twenty one. There's only thirty two teams

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, so if you're cornerback one one, you're

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>not very good. Get this. Every single pass that's been

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>thrown in true fronts coverage since Week eight has been

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a completion. So I like Darnell Mooney in this game.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>He's questionable too with the knee, but they said they

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>expect him to go, so continue with the passing game.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham's on the bench. He's losing too much time

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to Cole Kemmet Commet, and he is a touchdown dependent

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>player who has scored one time in his last seven games.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The only other player you care about is David Montgomery,

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who's got a B grade in this game. The Lions

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>allow the fourth most rushing yards, the third most receiving

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>yards to running backs, a total of one sixty six

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, and Montgomery should get most of that

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one sixty six. There's nobody else to get a catch

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a pass or run the ball there mcnaate Matteneggie didn't

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>use Montgomery nearly enough last week, despite a good game

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and a long run against the Bears, or sorry against

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Packers because the Bears are down by a grillion

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>points all time garbage time by David Montgomery last week.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Just that long run was not garbage time. And you

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>think I was stuck with him, but he didn't. But

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's not gonna get way out in front in this game.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So Montgomery is a very safe play and he gets

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Garbage time by Mark keys Brown on

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Thursday to Yeah, how about that? It was? Oh yeah,

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it changed a lot of outcomes, didn't it? On Wednesday? Absolutely? Wednesday? Sorry, yeah,

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>no problem. How do we come back nine players not

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>normally in your starting lineup? We call it take a

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. We'll tell you who those players are

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can start this week for a variety of reasons.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Also will continue breaking down all of the matchups. If

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for all my player rankings, go to Guillotine

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. More fantasy football coming up in just

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly Ball Arch and

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you just hate the song?

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I love it so I want more of it, every

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and louder every stag. I would rather hear the trombone

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>solo again, turning up the voltage on the cold they

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>go together? Could they co exist? The trombone solo makes

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the song better. Uh, this is nine players not normally

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and you're starting wind up beginning at the quarterback position. Scott,

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I have Baker Mayfield, the Titans of the fifth worst

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>team against fantasy quarterbacks. Mayfield's top two d fifty yards

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just twice this year, but he's had a bunch of

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>bad weather games, and in the four of the five

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>games of twenty seven attempts or more he had multiple scores.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The Titans have allowed twenty seven attempts or more to

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>every single quarterback they face. It's it's it's just a

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>game where he's gonna get to pass a lot more

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>than he's been able to lately. Yeah, the volume is there.

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Titans are seeing forty passes per game, which is would

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be a huge uptick for Mayfield. And that's how he

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>gets fed in this game. Bryan, you're take a chance

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the quarterback the artist formerly known as Stu Beard,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he's now Stu Stubbs. Ryan Fitzpatrick at home against the Bengals,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>assumed starter. He should be the starter. We'll talk about

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this game a little later. We're gonna assume he's starting

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>right now for the segment. Fitzpatrick has eight passing touchdowns

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in his last three games against the Bengals. Has a dolphin,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a buck, and a jet and that all came in

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the same year. That's a joke, but very recently so

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he carves up Cincinnati on the regular. The Bengals have

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one passing touchdown over their last two games.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That was Alex Smith and then the Giants last week.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones was carving them up, throwing bombs to the

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>one yard line, but he got hurt. But before that game, uh,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>since he had surrendered well over three plus passing yards

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>per game over their last four and fourteen passing touchdowns

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>during that four game span. I've got Philip Rivers assuming

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>he goes, he's trying to work through a toe injury.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't, Jacoby Brisette might even be a plausible

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>answer here. Now Prost's already stealing goal line work from

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, but it's actually impacting the runners because he's

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>running in touchdowns and Philip Rivers is actually scored multiple

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four of the past six games, So very

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>favorable matchup with Houston. They've given, they get. They've recently

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>given up three hundred four passing yards to Jake Lewton

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and Cam Newton doubled his per game average, ballooning up

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred sixty five passing yards against Houston Philip Rivers,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>assuming he goes, let's go to the running back position, Scott. So.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>On the west coast, we have this beast blowing up

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the league by the name of de Kalin Metcalf. On

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the East coast, we have a guy that's about to

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>start blowing up the league by the name of Jackalin

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins JK. Dobbins. Okay, he's coming for you. He had

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen touches out of the twenty two running back touches

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>last the last healthy game he played. He didn't play

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this last Wednesday, of course. Uh, he had six the snaps.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>He's had two games where he's at sixty plus percent

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of snaps six team one and seventeen for eighty five

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in a score. Kenyan Drake hundred sixty four yards, daven

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Cook a hundred and sixty yards, Gibson had a hundred

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>eight against Dallas. Uh and they those three combined for

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdowns. And that was just in the last six weeks.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I I got J. K. Dobbins blowing up Dallas. We're

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk more about Tim a little bit later in

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the show as well. Uh, let's lose your take a

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>chance of me running back Billy's Boston Scott at Green

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Bay over the each in each of the last six games,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott has been Phillies leading receiving running back for the Eagles. Yes,

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders was injured for some of that stint, but

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>when since Sanders has returned, his touches have gone from

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven to seventy to fifty percent. Scott Scott's have

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>gone up during that span, from eight percent to thirty percent,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Packers have surrendered the second most receiving touchdowns

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and the most receiving yards to opposing running backs. It

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>should be no surprise Green Bay has yielded the third

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>most red zone targets and touches in Golden Ghost scenarios

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. I hate the wide receivers for Philly.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>In this game, it's gonna be all tight ends and

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>running acts catching the ball. So Boston Scott playing from behind.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got Miles Gaskin returning to the starting lineup, and

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I know sevon A Commen may come back as well.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Umubtful now, and I think Gaskin is gonna get the

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of the work against the Cincinnati defense that's

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>given up the third most rushing yards, two backs and touchdowns.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>In four of the last five Gaskin has gotten at

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>least twenty one touches and five is six starts. If

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets anywhere near twenty one touches in this game,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he is sitting on a potentially goldmine game. Let's go

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to the receivers. Scott, who is your take a chance

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of me receiver? Gave Davis Gabriel Davis for the Buffalo Bills.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a starting grade last week, and I

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>will do it here again this week. With Brown out,

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>he had three for seventy nine and the score last week.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>If he's still out there, go get him because he's

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been good when Brown has been out. That all

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>my buttons got moved and I could not find the

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>peacock right away. But that's that is a delayed earned

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>peacock right there. Brian, you take a chance of me, receiver,

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>help me, but I'm going t Y Hilton at Houston now,

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you against the Texans. You might remember t Y Hilton

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from such box scores as one yards and three receiving

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns two three yards and a touchdown, one hundred and

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards and two touchdowns in a hundred ninety

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>nine yards just two years ago. But yes, those are

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>in the past. But the Texans allowed more than one

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty five yards per game to wide receivers, and

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>if you take out they're bad weather game in Cleveland.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>We've mentioned the Raiders a game a bunch of times.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Houston has surrendered thirteen touchdowns to wide receivers over their

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>last eight games, so one time. T Y Hilton more

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of a double d Daily Dart, Daily Dart. I've got

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Keelan Cole against the Vikings because he runs out of

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the slot, which puts him up against Jeff Gladney. Jeff Gladen,

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>he has allowed the most passing touchdowns and the second

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>most yards in the league. That is a very favorable matchup.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Cole has been active in this offense, more active since

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew was benched, averaging a healthy six targets per game.

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Since then, other slot receivers have posted Fantasy relevant games

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings like Curtis Samuel, Ceedee Lamb, Danny am

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and Dola Marquez, Velda Scantling, Russell Gauge, Corey Davis, and

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Zach Pascal. If those guys can do it, why not

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Keelan Cole. Let's go to our next matchup, which is

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts taking on the Houston Texans. We've already

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about some of these Colts. I like the quarterback,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>presumably Philip Rivers. You liked receiver t Y Hilton. Let's

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stay with the passing game. What about the best receiver

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on the team. Yeah, Michael Pittman really quickly. I want

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to mention these teams haven't played yet. This will be

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting. They're gonna play again in week fourteen.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh next week camp. But yes, Michael Pittman, hold on,

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I get a chance to use there is that is

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>our crow crow eating right there? Wow, nicely done. Not

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>still nine targets for Pittman though, and he is the

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>lead receiver on this team now, it is not t

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton. And again the Texans I just said allow

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>more than hundred sixty five yards per game to wide receivers.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Take out the bad weather game in Cleveland and thirteen

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the position over the last eight is what

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Houston has surrenders would be for Michael Pittman. T Y

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Hiltons might take a chance on the wide receiver and

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burton going to give him a c. Over the

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, he has more targets than Jack Doyle

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and mo Ali Cox combined, and he gets a nice

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>match up here with Houston. Again, if you take out

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that bad weather game in Cleveland, Houston has allowed seventy

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>two yards per game to tight ends over their last

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>three So a C for Burton and to the running

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>game for the Colts. Jonathan Taylor should make his return

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>from the COVID list. Uh. The Texans have allowed these

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>second most fantasy points and the most rushing yards who

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>running backs, and going back to last year, they have

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>let a running back score in seventeen of their last

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>eighteen games. So yeah, I'm giving Taylor a b here,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>assuming he gets the bulk of the work. And that's

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>why I'm gonna bench nihem Hines. Yes, the matchup is

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>good on paper, but uh, Indie's line is a little

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>banged up. Costanzo is out there their top guard, and

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I do expect Taylor to see the majority of touches

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and Houston has only surrendered one receiving touchdown to running back,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so I got highs on the bench. Over to the

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Houston side, David Johnson hasn't officially been activated, but it

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he will get expected to the Texans. I'll

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a see. Before he was concussed, Johnson had

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>scored or topped one hundred Comboy yards in three straights,

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so he was certainly serviceable. The Colts are a tough

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>matchup as no back as top seventy two rushing yards

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>against them, but it will be a big boon for

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson if DeForest Buckner misses his second straight game,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is no Derrick Henry, but without DeForest Buckner, Derrick

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Henry just had his way with that Colts defense last week,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So if he's out, Johnson might be a b um.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks is a b The new lead receiver for

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the Texans has at least eighty yards and or a

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in five of his last seven games, averaging eight

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.719
<v Speaker 1>targets during that span. There are now seven extra targets

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>per game up for grabs. With Will full Fuller suspended,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>India's a solid corner duo and Xavier Rose and Rocky

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Sin is it? Rock your sin is it? But the

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Colts have allowed a ninety eight yard and one d

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and six yard wide receiver outing over the last two games.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give the B to Brandon Cooks and that

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>leaves Kiki Cutie and Isaiah Coulter out of Rhode Island,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>where I went there my freshman year. I had forgotten

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that I had done that until I saw that. Yeah,

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh yeah, I went to you are

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I I gotta like you know who that? Of course

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he does he's University of Rhode Island tape over here.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Knowes what what high school he went to? Probably, but

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I got them both on the bench. Uh. Someone needs

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to step up in Fuller's absence. We gotta let this,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>see this, let this play out in a tough matchup

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts. Nonetheless, so they're both on the bench,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as are Darren Fells and Jordan Nakins. Uh. The Colt

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>steps surrender just one tight end touchdown all season, and

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson, though not on the bench, of course, he

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>gets to be. The loss of Will Fuller is massive uh.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And the Colts have well the fourth views passing yards

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and touchdowns to quarterbacks, so it's not a good matchup.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>What Lamar Jackson did have thirteen carries for fifty eight

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown against the Colts, the only true

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile quarterback they've faced, and Watson is certainly in that ballpark.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders take on the Jets Scott uh and for

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this one, Josh Jacobs is out. Dante Booker, they presumed

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>starter and workhorse back in this one he is he is. Uh.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Since Week five, the Jets have allowed just one touchdown

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and running backs that's pretty good sneaky good run. Yeah,

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in that street, in that stretch, teams just don't need

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to run because passing is so easy though too so.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>No back in the last five weeks has more than

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen carries against them. They're not running the ball a lot.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh right now, DeVante Booker, we don't have a lot

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to go on this season for good When he's gotten

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, he's averaging five and a half yards per

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>came where I was gonna go, well, not with the

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, but he's had eight plus touches twice.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>He had sixty plus yards in both of those games,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>hit three touchdowns in those games. I have a B

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>grade on Booker because I think he's just gonna get

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just gonna get the workload of fifteen touch workload. It

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>could be it could be a C. But I'm gonna

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>go with a B on the Derek Carr. I have

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to give him a C grade because of the last

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>five games, he's averaging a hundred eighty four yards, which

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is very, very bad for a starting quarterback in the NFL.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He started so well too at the beginning of the year.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The Jets, though they have allowed the fourth most yards

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to quarterbacks and only one quarterback failed to score multiple touchdowns,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think this might be a little bit of

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a get right game. He hopes to have Aglar back

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or playing in this game. He's been missing practice all

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>week with the angle injury. Limited practice on Friday. We

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think he should be back. If he's back, I give

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a the C grade because the Jets just as bad

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>against the wide receivers as the Arthur quarterbacks. Fourth most

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed wide receivers. Nelson Aglar seventeen plus yards per reception.

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>He's top fifty yards in five the last seven. He's

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>averaging over five targets a game. He's the safe guy.

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I have Rugs and Renfro on the bench. I want

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to I want to put this though. If all does

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not go, I'm giving C grades to both Rugs and

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Renfroll because I think those targets, you know they're they're

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some targets anyway. Those targets have to spread out.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they try to hit Rugs deep. I think

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Renfroll becomes the underneath safety valve. I think they might

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>get enough work with targets moving from ail R to

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>those two to make them both seaworthy. But as for now,

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just with the sea. I love Seaworthy, Yeah, seaworthy.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>What was the Melvin Gordon line you had before? Let's

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not go back now. If you're playing the Bucks, then

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you could really be you can be double ec worthy right.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, yes, our uh Darren Waller A grade. The

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets are fourth worst against tight ends. Raiders consistently look

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for their tight ends for scores. David David. Derek Carr

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has nineteen touchdowns this year, eight of them to tight ends.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of tight end touchdowns from Derek From

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr. The Jets have given up huge days to

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and tight ends. Uh. Ten ends who get

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>seven or more targets. Uh, we're talking about nine of

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>those wide receivers are tight ends with seven or more

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>targets score scored. Eight of them had a hundred plus

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 1>yard days. Wellard has seven or more targets in eight

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>games this year. He's gonna get there, so he should

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have a really good day. On the other side, Sam

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald has three passing touchdowns in the last seven weeks.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>In his seven weeks and his best game is two

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and thirty yards. The question is are the Raiders defense

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>bad enough for Donald to do much. I don't think

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they're that bad. I'm gonna give crowded. Yeah, they're not

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>prop up darnal bad. I've given crowd of the C

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>grade though, because the Raiders are one of the worst,

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the two worst in the league against slot receivers.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Um Nim has had a nice game last week, but

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Crowder is the guy I would look to hear. Nine

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>different slot receivers have top fifty plus yards against the Radars.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of them, So C grade for Crowder Gore,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C grade to uh, no worry

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about his top seventy yards against the Raiders since we three, however,

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed fifteen touchdowns and given Gore's twenty one touch

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>usage last week and really no one to take Cary's

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from him. He's also getting the volume. See yeah, I

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's good for that seventy plus yards if he

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gets similar volume again when we come back. Jaguars take

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings James Robinson coming off a big game.

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>He's been uber consistent this year, but the Vikings run

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>defense has rounded into form over the past month and

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a half, making this a tricky matchup. We'll tell you

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>if you can start James Robinson when we come back

0:32:39.840 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Jarchi in Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you. A

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>block of matchups coming up, beginning with the Jacksonville Jaguars

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>traveling to the Minnesota Vikings. Let's start with the running

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>game and James Robinson. Over the last eight Vikings games,

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>only Zeke has top seventy five yards on the ground.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>They've given up just one rushing score and one receiving

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>score to Runners in their last six games right now,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, But I don't know he's better than the Runners.

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings are faced in six, seven or eight of

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the last games, and this is a sneaky, tough matchup

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>um Robinson, though it seems a match up proof. I

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mean just he basically performs well, not usually explosively against

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>just about everybody. He's provided at least nineteen touches and

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety four combo yards in his last five games. That's

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>good enough to give him a B grade in this one.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the passing game, where Mike Glennon gets

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. I thought he looked decent last week

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Browns, and each of his receivers have got

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>plus matchups over their cornerback counterparts. The Vikings secondary looks

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>slightly improved lately, but remains highly suspect. Minnesota is just

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one game removed from giving up three touchdowns to Andy Dalton.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in a pinch, you could start Glennon,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but you probably care more about his receivers. Already told

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you Keelan cole Was might take a chance on the

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and he gets a B grade in this game.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>D J Chark with a B grade. He's trying to

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>play through a rib injury. I think he'll do it here.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Chark has commanded at least seven targets and four of

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the last five games he's been getting more use with

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew out and he's got a He has a

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>score and a one hundred forty six yard performance over

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those last five games. Chark will face on the outside

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Chris Boyd and sometimes undrafted free agent Chris Jones on

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the outside, both of whom yield passer ratings north of

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred twenty in their coverage. So B grade for

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>d J Chark as well. Let's go over to the

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Viking side. This one's really interesting. Everybody feels and I

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>do too, that they have to give Dalvin Cook less usage.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Since his midseason injury, the Vikings have used him to

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the tune of twenty nine touches a game. He is

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>visibly wearing down, and over the last three weeks his

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry have dropped from six down to three

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And that's because of the I believe

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>because of the extra usage. So I think they dial

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>in back some here. But the Jaguars allowed the six

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>most rushing yards and the eighth most receiving yards to

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs, coughing up one d fifty total yards

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>per game. That is the fourth most. So Cook remains

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>an a start here. But don't expect another twenty nine

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>touch game. I think it's closer to eighteen to twenty.

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Alexander Madison is a dart throw C

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>grade here. If you believe like I do, that Cook's

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna see fewer touches, let's go to the passing game.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins is a B grade. Again. If Cook's gonna

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>get less usage, that puts an emphasis on Cousins, and

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>he throws a few more passes in this game. Volume

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is usually what keeps his numbers non fantasy relevant. In

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>many cases, when he gets volume, he does very well.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars have allowed exactly two touchdowns in four straight games.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Cousins is sitting out approximately two touchdowns in

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this swar and and he's thrown multiple touchdowns in four

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>straight So a B grade for Kirk Cousins. A grades

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>for Adam Theland and Justin Jefferson. Jaguars secondary starting undrafted

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>free agents Trey Herndon, Luke bark Who and fourth round

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>rookie Josiah Scott. This is a secondary right for Pilfering,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and I like both Feeling and Justin Jefferson with A grades.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars allowing two hundred eight yards per game just to

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position. Both Feeling and Jefferson can get

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>paid in this game. Lastly, Cal Rudolph is a C

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>grade with IRV Smith out. Jaguars are a defense that's

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most tight end touchdowns nine So if you

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 1>need to pivot a tight end, Kyle Rudolph's the guy

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you can use. We just mentioned in passing, Uh, well,

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>actually we didn't. Cincinnati Bengals taking on the Miami Dolphins.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I take that part back, Brian. Let's start on the

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Bengals side of the ball. Giovanni Bernard disappointed last week.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't love his chances against a surprisingly decent Miami

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>run defense. What do you think the Bengal is just

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be mentioned in passing at the end of the show. Basically,

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I got the Geo on the bench. He didn't lead

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the way quote unquote lead the way with the leaven

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of the fourteen running back opportunities. Those are carries and

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>targets for since he last week fourteen opportunities. That is

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>not when you've when you've got Brandon Allen's quarterback quarterback.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can't like Geo's prospects against the Dolphins. No

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>opposing back as top to ninety yards rushing and only

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>one back as top thirty five receiving yards all year,

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and that was the aforementioned James Robinson in Week three.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So Geo safely on the bench here. Tyler Boyd is

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>almost there. I'm gonna give him a see though Miami

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has surrendered just eight wide receiver touchdowns all season. That's

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not a lot, fourth fewest, but the Dolphins have allowed

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>back to back one hundred yard games to the position.

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind Brandon Allen had a hundred thirty

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>six passing yards total last week, so it's gonna be

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>tough to get to a hundred yards for Boyd. But

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he will face slot corner Nick need Um most often.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't allowed to score all seasons, So very soft

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>sea for Tyler Boyd and T Higgins. I got him

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. You can cover a J Green with

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a parking cone at this point. That means Higgins will

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>draw Xavian Howard. Pro Football focuses number one rated cornerback

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and just overall in general. So Higgins is

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, and so it was Brandon Allen. Of course,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>over to the Miami side, Miles Gaskin was your to

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me? Running back chart I love

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>him a lot in this matchup. You have to Davante

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Parker love him too. Can give him an A. And

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>again this is under the presumption Fitzer Ryan Fitzpatrick is

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback. I'm gonna give Parker in a B

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to but in A for Parker since he has surrendered

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most wide receiver touchdowns per game one point three,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and over their last four games alone, the Bengals have

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>surrendered seven wide receiver touchdowns and to one yard games

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to the position. Parker will face outside corner Tony Brown

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>most who allowed seventy eight yards and a touchdown in

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>his coverage last week wide receiver too. I'm tempted here,

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but Parker got all of the targets last week. Mac

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Collins saw three and jachiem Grant, a friend of the show,

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>had too. It's a great matchup, but I'm putting them

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench here. I feared the negative game

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>script for the wide receiver to for Miami, so they're

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench. But Mike Asiki is not gonna

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>give him a b. The Bengals have allowed the seventh

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>most receptions, the most yards, and eighth most touchdowns to

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends. They just got scorched by Evan and

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Gram last week for a hundred nine yards, and Gram

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>had in top of the hundred yards since earlyen So

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you love Gaseki here, and I love Ryan Fitzpatrick of course,

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as do you charge might take a chance on the quarterback.

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it all right. Let's go to our final

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>matchup of this segment, which is the Cincinnati Sorry, I

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know why I got these two teams backwards. Uh,

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns taking on the Tennessee Titans. We already

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about Baker Mayfield take a chance, I mean quarterback.

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the rest of the matchup. Yeah. Since

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I like Mayfield here, I like Landry here. Last week

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was his first good weather game without O b J.

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And he had eight catches for a hundred forty three

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown. He's getting He's getting a giant

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest target shares of his team's targets

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL right now. Uh. He also had his

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>first touchdown of the year, which was nice. Titans ninth

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>worst against wide receivers. So Landry's got to be Higgins

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and Hodge. They have combined for one game with three

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>or more catches this year. For more than three catches, yeah,

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I can I can't trust them. Hodge had a goose

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>egg two weeks ago, but he was better than Higgins

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>last week. You don't know where it's coming from. They're

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench. Austin Hooper. Titans are ninth worst

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends. They're they're just a bottom ten in

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of defensive categories here, allowing three touchdowns in

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. In that span, they've averaged a

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 1>five point five catches and sixty four yards two tight

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ends allowed. That's that is a lot for those that

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>are not used to the average tight end of those

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are healthy numbers. Yeah, if you get sixty, if you're

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>getting sixty yards out of the tight end, that's a

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>really good day, especially in especially in twenty. It's a

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>great matchup, so I'm giving, but the Browns and the

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Browns have a propensity to look for their tight ends

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone, so I'm giving. I'm given Hooper

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here, and it's just because of Hooper.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He has so many low yardage total games this year

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's tough to trust him despite the great matchup.

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb gets an A. He's just really darned good.

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Titans are seventh worth against running backs. Every running back

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with seventeen and more touches top two hundred yards and

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>our scores scored Nick Chubb nineteen plus touches in all

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>three games since returning top two fourteen in all three

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of those. Hunt also very startable B grade here has

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at least ten touches in every single game he's played

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Chubb this week. When you're getting ten touches,

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you're getting decent volume, especially in a good matchup against

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, the Titans seventh worst against running backs.

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed three receiving touchdowns in the last five weeks,

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's a good matchup for Hunt. Here. On the

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>other side, Derrick Henry is an A grade. I don't

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>even think we need to talk. We don't even talked

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>about him anymore in the past. I'll mention the Browns

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are a pretty good run defense, but it doesn't matter.

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Did James Robinson just have a hundred fifty nine yards

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>against them last week? And Derrick Henry is better than

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>James right doesn't have always worked that way. He was

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>out last week. Onto the passing game, Ryan Tannehill. Browns

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are eighth worst against quarterbacks. That should help maybe Tannehill's

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>really really bad streak going on, But look at the

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the schedule they've played so the last several weeks.

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Indie, Baltimore Indie. That's a brutal run for for Tannehill.

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's like a Deshaun Watson schedule. I'll talk more about

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that in just a minute. Ryan Tannehill Mike Glennon through

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for two thirty five yards and two touchdowns. Uh and

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz through for also two d thirty five yards

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>had two touchdowns against this Cleveland Brown Brown's team. I

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>think Tannehill is a little better than both of them. Uh.

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>He has sixth straight under two hundred six yards. But

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the upside is there. I'm thinking little mid two hundreds,

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of touchdowns for Tannehill. You here, I think

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's be worthy. I think that's a solid

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>safe outing A J. Brown. He was over analyzed last

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>week by me. I admit it, Brown, I gotta B

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>grade two or an eight grade to here this week.

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>He's just too much of a stud. And Corey Davis.

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade to Brown's eleventh worst against

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Davis has at least three catches and at

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>least sixty five yards in all but one game. That's

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>surprising is surprising, isn't Yeah? I think Tannehill is sitting

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>on a nice rebound to his season beginning here. A J.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown could be somebody who becomes the highest scoring wide

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver the rest of the way. That's I'll stay. I'll

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:07.879
<v Speaker 1>plant my flag on that. Like when we come back.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Three tough questions for a panel of experts. You can

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>play along. See if you can go three and oh

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>when Fantasy Football Weekly returns, you don't know, don't don't

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't don't don't, No, no, don't, don't don't know,

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>don't don't you don't Fantasy Football Weekly returns. This is

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a game we call three tough questions, formerly five tough questions,

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have as much time as we used

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to years past, formerly hot questions for a year or two.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It was briefly hot questions. Spots it top,

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And we didn't get it out of that pizza.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But the way I agree, by the way, I didn't

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>know I was biting into a pickle pizza today. It

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>was so bad. Don't do it. For the love of God.

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Anybody tries to give you a so called cheese burger pizza,

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure they get the pickles up. The hot pickle.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you. It was in general, and I like

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 1>pickles that you don't want any part of them. Do

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have some flaws. Three tough questions, beginning with tough question

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Number one, it is sabotage drop season. Should fantasy managers

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:45.240
<v Speaker 1>drop Deshaun Watson? What what Scott alluded to the last

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the last segment here, they have Indie Chicago Indians since

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he coming up, since he's not much Indie Chicago and

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Indie coming up on the schedule. It's a really really

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>rough schedule coming up, and he's lost Will Fuller. I

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>still don't think you could do it though Watson and

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Watson has run for two over thirty five yards last

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>few games. Chicago's allowed four touchdowns passing in the first

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, but since then they've allowed multiple touchdowns in

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>five straight both of both of those Indians Indians Chicago

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the early season is what got them in some really

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>weak matchups on the schedule, games against like Minshew and

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald and Falls and Mayfield and Tannehill for Indie. I

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>still think he's gonna be a borderline top twelve guy,

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and I just I just don't want to give an

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.280
<v Speaker 1>opponent a top you know, a guy that could perform

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at a top twelve level, even if you have better

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>replacement options. Keep him on your bench and don't give

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>him to anyone else, all Right, Brian, should fantasy managers drop,

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop DeShawn Watson. Yeah, like Scott said, Colts Bears

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Colts over his next three But he gets the Bengals

0:46:57.160 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>at home in week sixteen. Like Scott said, And even

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm streaming quarterbacks the next three weeks, I'm finding

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a bench spot to stash Watson for that week's six

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>team matchup in the event I'm still alive. But he

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>could have a good game against the Colts. Who knows,

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's the first meeting. And even if he has a

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bad game, you can essentially sabotage drop Watson after this

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>game because his name value still brings a lot to

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the table, and the Bears matchup is bad. Yes, but

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I looked back at all the quarterbacks they face. They

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have not faced a quarterback comparable to Deshaun Watson over

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons. Really like a truly mobile quarterback.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>He could be the skeleton key that gets to that defense.

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.839
<v Speaker 1>So don't drop Deshaun Watson, and h please don't cue

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the Beastie boys right now. Charge, don't do it. He's

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. I can't find it alright there they

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are the whole boy of the sabotage drop. He is

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to put a good player who's gonna struggle on an

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>opponent's roster. That's the whole point. This fits all of

0:47:55.840 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the criteria of the sabotage drop right year, right now.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>With the Shawn Watson here, let me let me phrase

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the question differently. Can Brandon Cooks carry a passing offense? Answer? No,

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he never has. He has always been a robin to

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:20.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's batman, and defensives are going to play to

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>take Brandon Cooks away. And then who is Deshaun Watson

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna pass to? Who's gonna carry him to fantasy glory?

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Coulter from the University of Rhode Island. The point

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is nobody, and if he maybe he squeaks out one

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>good game against this tough run. By the way, Indie

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ranks number four and passing yards allowed, number five in

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns allowed, their number three and fantasy points allowed

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to quarterbacks. The Chicago ranks sixth and fantasy points allowed

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to quarterbacks eighth and fantasy touch in passing touchdowns allowed,

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and they have an allowed of quarterback rushing touchdown all year.

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a brutal series of matchups. Ken, Watson have

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a good game against one of these teams, maybe he'll

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>find a way. Maybe, but more than likely he's going

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to dud in one of these games, and he will

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>knock out one of your opponents from the playoffs when

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:14.919
<v Speaker 1>he does. Now you might say, well, he's gonna rush

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>me to victory. You're own Watson, apparently, because Watson has

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>one rushing touchdown since the opener one. He has top

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty rushing yards zero times this year. He's not the

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>same rushing quarterback that you think he is. He didn't

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>need to add. Will Faller out there full fuller advantage drop.

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Who are you replacing him with? Who are we replacing him?

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find help by listening to this show and

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Tough question number two, what

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is the appropriate level of concern for Alvin Kamara? None?

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Some or a bowl loosening level of existential dread? Bryan,

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>My bowels are loosened, bricks are falling out right now, Rostering.

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm passing bricks, but I'll go with bow loosening level

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of existential dread. Just three targets over the last week,

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks for one catch for negative two yards.

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>For Kamara, he was on pace to break Christian McCaffrey's

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>record for receptions by running back set just last year.

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>He was gonna like shatter it. And that's all going

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>down the tubes. Taysom Hill is taking all the goal

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>line work, the Tavia's Murray's arguably healthier and fresher right now.

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not a better running back. But until Drew Brees

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>comes back, we're not going to see the Alvin Kamara

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we were used to for the majority of the season.

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So I am you know, you know the poopy pants

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>scared right now? All right, Scott, what's the appropriate level

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of concern for Alvin Kamara? None? Some or the bowle

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>loosening level of existential dread? See. Uh. When I start

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this question, my stomach starts to turn a little,

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then I think my balls are gonna loosen, And

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>then I think it is Taysom going to stay the starter?

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Is Jamis Winston gonna come in? And I think how

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>far away are we from Breese really coming back? Because

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna want to end this season on a high

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>note if this is his last year. I say just

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 1>some because I think this might just be a short

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>term thing and we'll be okay in the playoffs. The

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>correct answer is a bowl loosening level of existential dread.

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you why. It's not even just Taysom Hill,

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a massive concern. The no targets to Alvin

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Kamara at the negative receiving yards and the siphoning off

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns because as I said earlier in the show,

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Taysom Hill is gonna get benched sooner or

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>later because he can't pass. The foot injury really worries me.

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>This is this is no small deal. Remember last year

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>when Alvin Kamara famously played through all those injuries and

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>scored in two games all year. I think we might

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be back to that. He doesn't pass the eye test

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and the only way Lottavius Murray is getting equal playing time.

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That should never happen. If Alvin Kamara is healthy. He's

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not healthy. And I don't know that you get over

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a foot injury while you're playing on it. My bowels

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>are loosened. Tough question number three. Last week, I asked

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you about dropping all the Rams and Bucks runners in

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this segment. This week, I'm asking about the Baltimore Runners.

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Now that everybody's healthy. Should Ravens running back managers drop

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>them outright? Scott? First off, I think I might want

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to leave it. Both of your bowls and this this

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.279
<v Speaker 1>very small, very small studio. Yes, it's not that small

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of it anyway. You know how I feel about J. K. Dobbins.

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's taking over the load. I already said

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:40.879
<v Speaker 1>it earlier. I think he's going to be the lead

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>back going forward. I think he's led the lead in

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 1>touch in snaps four straight games, and two of those

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>games everyone was healthy. I think he starts to be

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixty plus percent of snaps fifteen to twenty touch

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>guy for the rest of the season. I say no,

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I say keep Dobbins, right, Brian should Should fantasy owners

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>drop all Ravens? Yeah, I'm with fish. Fifteen rush attempts

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>for Dobbins in week eleven, then he got the VID

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as we all know this week twelve, but they were

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ready to give him an extended look. So I'm holding

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:11.800
<v Speaker 1>onto Dobbins, but I'll drop the rest of them. But

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so the answer is now, yeah, that is correct answer.

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Gus is too touchdown dependent, he's out Ingram's uses, too scattered,

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he's out we just have this one game sample size,

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's all it is on Dobbins, just the one game,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the glimmer of hope. That's that game before his COVID

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>designation was going to be legitimate. We got to really though.

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>The other game that Markingham was out, he got sixty percentsion.

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Justice Hill looks pretty good, look pretty good.

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Could be four way rotation if we're not careful. I'm

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for at least one more week. I'm watching Dobbins. But

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if they go back to being another rotational team, even

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rotation between those runners, he's out. He's got a one

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>game leash and that is it. Let's work in one

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>final matchup into this segment, and that is the Dallas

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys taking on the Baltimore Ravens. Not a lot to

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:06.399
<v Speaker 1>talk about on the Dallas side. Yes, I was gonna

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>says Bryant revenge game. It is Bryant revenge. There was

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ever a revenge game. It might be this one. I know.

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's too bad it's not in Dallas, so we can't

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>go out to the Star. Uh, let's go. I have

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 1>one starting grade on a Cowboy and it's a Marie

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and it's only a C grade. In Andy Dalton's

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>three full games, Cooper is averaging yards and has scored twice.

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is a top five defense and yardage allowed to receivers,

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and they've allowed among the fewest passing touchdowns. Cooper will

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>get a healthy dose of Marcus Peters and Peters is

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably the easiest of the matchups in that secondary,

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:44.359
<v Speaker 1>depending on whether or not Jimmy Smith plays in this one,

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but either way it doesn't matter. It's a brutal matchup

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper is the only guy can start. Staying with

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Andy Dalton's on the bench. I think

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that goes without saying. Against Baltimore. Ceedee Lamb also on

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Out of the slot. He has a very

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup with Marlon Humphrey and staying again with the

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:01.399
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Dalton Shaw, it's the tight end. No tight

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:04.319
<v Speaker 1>end is top fifty yards against Baltimore over their last

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>eight games. He's on the bench too, and that leaves

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 1>us with Zeke. It's come to this a straight up

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 1>bench designation. Going back to weeks six, Elliott has topped

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>three point eight yards per carry, which is not good.

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 1>One time vikings. He has scored one time Vikings. He

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>has topped sixty three yards one time Vikings, so he's

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not playing the Vikings. So it's just a bench grade

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for Ezekiel Elliott. Let's go over to the Baltimore side

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>where things get a lot more interesting. Lamar Jackson expected

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 1>back and man does he need to get right game

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and this might be it? Please please. Jackson has scored

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just one or two touchdowns in eight of the past

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>nine games. He's been held under two hundred eight passing

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>yards in the past eight of the nine games. Only

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jets throw for le yardage than the Ravens. Fortunately,

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas can give up gigantic games to anybody. The Cowboys

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have allowed multiple passing touchdowns in eight of ten games.

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Jackson is going to find his way to

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:17.359
<v Speaker 1>two or even three touchdowns air and ground this week

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and to B grade for Lamar Jackson. Marcus Brown had

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the the nifty touchdown late in Wednesday Night's game Wednesday

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 1>afternoon's game. When he doesn't score those long touchdowns, though,

0:56:27.000 --> 0:56:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you usually get you know nothing from Brown, so you

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know the risk here, high degree of variability, but the

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>matchup very strong. Dallas allows the second most fantasy points

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to receivers. Brown runs from all over the field, but

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:41.239
<v Speaker 1>most often he'll see him he'll match up against back

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>up cornerback Anthony Brown, who has allowed three scores in

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the past two games. So I like, I like Marquise

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown here, and he's got to be grade for me.

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews another guy where we hope and expect to

0:56:54.320 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>get through the COVID protocol by this time time for

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the game. If he plays, he faces a super rising

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the solid tight end defense giving up just four receptions

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.360
<v Speaker 1>per game to the position, but they give up touchdowns.

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we're starting Andrews anyway. Andrews always a

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>threat in the red zone. He's seeing thirty of the

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.879
<v Speaker 1>team's target inside the twenty. That's fifth most across all

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL teams. So we'll start Andrews here with a B grade.

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And the aforementioned JK. Dobbins we just talked about him.

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We hope that he's going to go back to getting

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the high usage that he had, and I've got a

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 1>C grade on him here. In the two games where

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins saw at least fifteen touches, he averaged one hundred

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>three total yards and he played of the snaps. Let's

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:39.959
<v Speaker 1>just keep our fingers crossed that that's gonna happen here again.

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys have allowed four of the past six starting

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs they face to put up a hundred fifteen

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:48.919
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. They're vulnerable to bell cows. Please make JK.

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins the bell cow. Greg Roman, we're begging Ingram and

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Edwards are on the bench. As previously discussed, when we

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, a big block of

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>matchups for you, including the New York Giants and the

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. I think Chris Carson is one of the

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 1>trickiest guys to figure out across the entire slate of games.

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>This week, Brian Johnson will tell you whether or not

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you can start Chris Carson when we come back to

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly returns, We've got three

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>matchups for you in this segment, beginning with the Giants

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Seattle Seahawks. Brian, for the Giants, it's

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Colt McCoy at the helm, and I think

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much means we're not starting any part of

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that passing offense. Would the possible exception of van van Ingram,

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you think. Yeah, I will say Daniel Jones

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>put in a limited practice on Friday, he's doubtful. But

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>even if he plays, you're not wanting to play Daniel Jones,

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>nor Colton McCoy if he's the starter against the Seahawks,

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>who have just been giving it up in masses through

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the air, but not so much a lot better. Yeah,

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's coincided with the return of strong safety Jamal Adams,

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>who is all the world. So for that reason, Darius Slayton,

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd, Golden Tate, I'm gonna give them all a sea.

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not all going to get I'm not touching those

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 1>guys with Colton McCoy, it's really it's Sterling Shepherd's only

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>when I would give a soft seat. Two, I will

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 1>bench Slaton Tate, even though Tate led the team in

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>targets with nine last week, a lot of them coming

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when cold McCoy entered the game. And don't forget this

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is a revenge game for Golden Tate going back to Seattle.

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But all right, you talking about that, they're all on

0:59:52.880 --> 0:59:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Seattle. They used to give up like through

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't now. Jamal Adams has returned that to everybody

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>who started. Travis Folgum or we'll talk about the Eagles

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers later in the show. How bad they are,

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'll put them all on the bench. They are.

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>They all are double ds though in my mind daily

1:00:13.880 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>darts for the Giants wide receivers and a matchup that

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>has gotten tougher. But so Evan Ingram, though we'll give

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him the start, can give him a B. Jamal Adams

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't shadowing tight ends. He's plugging like all the other

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>holes in the secondary Right now, Ingram has at least

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>nine targets, and four of his last five games the

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks allowed the most yards per catch to the position.

1:00:31.520 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard just had a great game against Seattle. So

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>love Ingram here with it be even with Colt McCoy

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback and Wayne Gallman lastly for the Giants. Just

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to see here, he has scored in five straight games

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for the longest current streak among running backs. But two

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>major red flags here. One is Colt McCoy of course,

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in that whole offense, and no one runs against Seattle.

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Opponents are only running the ball thirty three percent of

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the time against the Seas So Gallman's carries have increased

1:00:56.720 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>week over a week, but again not a great matchup.

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But the volume will still be there, but it won't

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be as much as we're used to. So just to

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>see for Gallman over to the Seahawks side, Chris Carson

1:01:06.040 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a be despite only seeing of

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the snaps last week. But he did look good when

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he was on the field. You have to think they

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>might have been easing him back into action a little bit.

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll see more work against the Giants, but

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great matchup. Only one running back has

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>topped hundred yards against New York and against New York,

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and only two loan backs have gotten more than fourteen carries.

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That speaks to no one going over a hundred yards.

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's just not a lot of volume for featuring

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>runners against New York. But the Giants have surrendered the

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sixth most receptions and second most receiving arts to running backs.

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So be for Chris Carson. I got Carlos Hide on

1:01:37.880 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the bench though less Carson, I'm just I'm so nervous

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's gonna be another I mean, hid got like

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the work last week. I'm worried it's

1:01:45.520 --> 1:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be closer to Carson owner like everywhere. I'm so

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>nervous that it's gonna be like fifty fifty between the

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>two of them, and they both just sort of dud well.

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Hide's got a toe issue that popped up late and

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>last week's game too, he's supposedly gonna play about. I

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>am concerned for Carson as you are, but I'm still

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>starting Carson bention Hyde uh DK Matt Metcalf. Of course

1:02:06.600 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we're starting him, but just gonna give him a be

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>here because he's gonna get shadowed by James Bradberry and

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a fun matchup to watch. Since

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>week to brad Berry has allowed less than fifty yards

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in coverage in every game and just one touchdown during

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that span. And Bradberry is a big dude six one

1:02:22.400 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>two ten, but he's a guard in DK. Metcalf is

1:02:25.720 --> 1:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a power forward in basketball. So I still like Metcalf

1:02:28.920 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot here, but temporaryr expectations a little bit. They

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>met each other last year when Bradbury was with and

1:02:36.200 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Bradberry held him to two catches thirty one yards. Now

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>did get a score in the two catches, but still,

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, different teams, and you know Metcalf is

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>better this year, but still, that was a one on

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one matchup that Bradbury did pretty well. And Tyler Lockett

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is way better when he plays the Arizona Cardinals. His

1:02:53.400 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>last non cardinal games, last six non cardinal opponents, Locket

1:02:58.000 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>has cleared fifty yards just once and has not scored

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>during that span against non cardinal opponents. I gotta thank

1:03:03.960 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Pete Harrington from guillotine leagues for that one. The Giant

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary has played well lately, only allowing two receivers to

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>reach seventy five yards over the past six games, but

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>lock It will mostly see rookie slot corner Darnay Holmes,

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>who was allowing a seventy six percent completion rate in

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>his coverage. I think, uh, it feels like a Lockett

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>having a better game than Metcalf kind of day, But

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you never know. But I'm still starting Locket with some confidence,

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll start Russell Wilson of course with more confidence

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>than lock It. A strong be here over the last

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, Seattle's bottom ten in passing play percentage after

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball like pent At the time and Wilson's

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>number have. Wilson's numbers have definitely suffered during that span,

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and nobody has topped two touchdowns against New York since

1:03:44.640 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the opener, and only Tom Brady and Carson Wentz up

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>top two yards against them since Week three, But to

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty and two still feels like a safe floor for

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson in this one. Newly takes on the charger Scott

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sitting on a Damien Harris vibe in this game.

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm I kind of like them both and White sure

1:04:03.040 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and Rex Burkhad being out his simplified matters White it

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is and my concern, and they've been talking about how

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>worried they are about botha In that pass stich, I

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can see Cam Newton dropping back, dumping it off to

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Harrison White quite a bit in this game. Harris rarely catches,

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but yes, I agree. Yeah, so I've i've C grades

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on both Harris and White. Harris is gonna get more volume,

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe some goal line work if Cam doesn't take it,

1:04:26.760 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>White's gonna get the catches. Um, I've I have Harris

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with fifteen plus touches, uh and C grade there. Yeah,

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so C grades on both of them. Cam Newton, I'm

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>giving him a C grade two. He's had a seaworthy

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>grade on rushing alone, not just kind of his passing game,

1:04:42.440 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>passing yard, just his rushing a seaworthy grade in six

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of his nine fall games. So then you have the

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>passing on to that. That's basically all it is. Charges

1:04:50.880 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have allowed four different quarterbacks to rush one in. Uh, so,

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I still got to give Cam the sea,

1:04:56.920 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't love it. Wide receivers I don't even care.

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even care about they keep handling non functional

1:05:03.880 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>passer in today's NFL. How do you get to Week

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen with all the advantages that a quarterback has with

1:05:12.280 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>four touchdown passes. Yeah, it's mind boggling. It's staggering ineptitude

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>as a passer. These these target catching yards leaders flip weekly,

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and since Week five, no wide receiver has topped eighty

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>two yards on the Chargers. It's not a good spot

1:05:27.480 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for them. On the other side, Herbert once again, he

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>has had three yards and or multiple scores in let

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>me check my notes again every single game this year.

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't you can't ever mention he's an A grade.

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen's inn A grade even though he's gonna get

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Gilmore, who does shadow. And I just

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>saw this this week and I didn't realize it. Stephan

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Gilmore was the number six ranked PF slot corner last

1:05:51.000 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>year and he doesn't He's not stot doesn't pay. That's

1:05:54.400 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>how good he is when he's in this lot. I

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Ellen plays from the slot a lot. Yeah,

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how much Gilmore he sees in

1:06:01.120 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this game. If Gilmore shadows him, I don't care. Still,

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get ten plus targets because he gets ten

1:06:06.440 --> 1:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>plus targets every game. A grade there, Mike Williams, I'm

1:06:09.960 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>giving a C grade to two dods in the last

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>three isn't great. But if Gilmore, when Gilmore does get

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>on Allen, or even if he is on Williams, Gilmore

1:06:20.040 --> 1:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is allowed a hundred and eighty or so yards around

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just under a hundred eight yards in the last three games.

1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Williams is a great contested catch wide receiver.

1:06:28.040 --> 1:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he can get his Uh. Williams will get

1:06:31.760 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>five to seven targets. He's top seventy yards and three

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last five. That's sea level right there. Uh,

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry last three games are really encouraging. It was

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bad early in the season, but recently thirty in a touch,

1:06:46.760 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>forty in a touch, seven for sixty seven last week.

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>His usage is going up. He's played of the snaps

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last five games. Although Arizona and tight ends

1:06:56.320 --> 1:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>did minimal last week, Houston and Baltimore lit up the

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots the two prior weeks. Uh. Just to be grade here,

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>though New England's only surrendered one tight end touchdown and

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler I'm back to an A grade with played

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>sent of snaps, twenty five touches in his return. Every

1:07:14.360 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>running back who's top thirteen touches on the Patriots had

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:21.439
<v Speaker 1>eighty plus yards had eleven catches last week. He looked great.

1:07:21.600 --> 1:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>He e You would never have known he had. He's

1:07:24.000 --> 1:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a first game back off a massive hamstring.

1:07:26.640 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna double that. He's gonna double that thirteen touches.

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm I'm on board. Broncos taking on the

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs in a rematch from earlier this year. Only a

1:07:36.200 --> 1:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of starters on the Denver side in the passing game. UM,

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with Drew Lock, who was on the bench.

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He's expected to return from the COVID list. He's been

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a wreck, completing just fifty five percent of his passes

1:07:47.560 --> 1:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and averaging just one touchdown per game. He's only playable

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the easiest of matchups. And this is not it.

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy was just a C grade, not counting last

1:07:55.960 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>week's offensive debacle for Denver. Judy average sixty yards per

1:07:59.840 --> 1:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>game with two scores in his previous six games, which

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is okay, sixty yards and less than a coin flips

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>chance at a touchdown. He'll aim to keep that consistency

1:08:07.600 --> 1:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>going against Kansas City, a secondary that held him to

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>just twenty scoreless yards in the first game. Judy will

1:08:13.520 --> 1:08:18.639
<v Speaker 1>face most often utility defensive back Tyrone Matthew in the slot,

1:08:18.720 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>who's allowed one score in his last six games. So

1:08:21.439 --> 1:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just the C grade on Judy a C grade on

1:08:23.800 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Noah Fant. He has not scored since Week two, which

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>is bad, and he did very little in the first matchup.

1:08:28.760 --> 1:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's bad too. Fortunately, Chiefs are getting hammered by tight

1:08:31.800 --> 1:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>ends lately, giving up monster games to Rob Gronkowski and

1:08:35.120 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller over the past two weeks. Fan's been playing

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>gamely through an ankle injury. Is expected to start here,

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that ankles fully healed yet either,

1:08:43.400 --> 1:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So a C grade for Noah Fanse. Let's talk about

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the running game. We think Philip Lindsay is gonna play,

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know for sure. You're gonna need to

1:08:52.080 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>watch this one down to game time decision level. If um,

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:59.799
<v Speaker 1>if Lindsay doesn't end up going, you could start Gordon.

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>He's been a complete dud in four of the past

1:09:02.439 --> 1:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>five games. I think to my eyes he looks pretty slow,

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty powerless. He hasn't caught a passing in three games,

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs have not let a back top seventy

1:09:11.680 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>seven rushing yards in seven games. If Lindsay's out, then

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll give a C grade to Gordon, and otherwise he's out.

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Is the one game that Lindsay was inactive for earlier.

1:09:22.120 --> 1:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Gordon posted season highs and carry's yards and touchdowns, and

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really what he needs to be fantasy relevant. And

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>for Lindsay, he's going to be out either way if

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he if he tries to play or not, we will

1:09:31.800 --> 1:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not start him. So let's go over to Kansas City

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and this won't take long. Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Hill, and

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey. They are all ranked number one at their

1:09:41.760 --> 1:09:45.479
<v Speaker 1>positions by me at Guillotine leagues dot com. Kelsey's wide

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver for right now, I believe unbelievable. Biggest positional differentiator

1:09:50.200 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in football is Travis Kelsey. And it's not close. We

1:09:53.160 --> 1:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>say it every year and that nobody wants, nobody's willing

1:09:55.120 --> 1:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to draft him in the first half of the first round.

1:09:57.600 --> 1:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>What Tyree Hill is going to do to slot cornerback

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>he saying bassie should be illegal even in Colorado. M

1:10:05.640 --> 1:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Staying with the passing games, Sammy Watkins gets a C grade.

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>He's always a dark throw. He did little in the

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>first game back, did little in his first game back

1:10:12.760 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>last week. The Broncos only good quarnerback Bryce Callahan is

1:10:15.880 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss this game. So you want to try Sammy Watkins? Fine,

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think so. It's gonna be so easy

1:10:21.200 --> 1:10:23.519
<v Speaker 1>to find Hill and Kelsey, they won't need Watkins. But

1:10:23.720 --> 1:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>then again, maybe his turn does really well historically in

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Week thirteen matches Week one, uh. And then lastly, this

1:10:32.640 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>could be a Clyde Edwards a layer game as well. Now,

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>volume is always a concern for Clyde, but I can

1:10:37.840 --> 1:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>live with his recent usage, which is twelve touches and

1:10:40.240 --> 1:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touches. That's enough to get him to viability. I

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:46.479
<v Speaker 1>also like his three touchdowns in the last three games

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for Clyde. The Broncos run defense was overrun over the

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>last few games by both Las Vegas and New Orleans,

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've allowed nine scores to running backs in the

1:10:56.720 --> 1:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>last six games. So I kind of like Clyde Edwards

1:10:59.320 --> 1:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a layer here more than I have. The last several games.

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>He has been sick. They they've been talking about being

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>worried how much he's going to be able to play

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:09.639
<v Speaker 1>correct and we'll monitor that up to kick off, assuming

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>he's ready for maintain the workload he normally he has

1:11:13.320 --> 1:11:15.479
<v Speaker 1>been getting. I like him. Now do you like Levian Bell,

1:11:15.600 --> 1:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who apparently he's the next guy who's gonna fight this

1:11:18.200 --> 1:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>logan Paul YouTuber guy coming up? I like him more

1:11:23.800 --> 1:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in that matchup than I do in this one. Man,

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if you would have sold on LEVI on Bell at

1:11:29.439 --> 1:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the moment the Chiefs picked him out, you could almost

1:11:32.280 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>named your price on Bell. And he has done nothing nothing.

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It's all about striking at the right moment. You'll be

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>striking at the right moment. We come back from the

1:11:43.200 --> 1:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, as we covered the

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>final three matchups, including the Eagles taking on the Packers.

1:11:50.560 --> 1:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>What to expect from Miles Sanders when we return to

1:11:54.280 --> 1:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul

1:12:17.800 --> 1:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Charchi in, Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you. Thank

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us. If you are listening to this

1:12:24.520 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>show over the air, know that you can hear the

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>whole thing back by a podcast, Fantasy Football Weekly and

1:12:30.960 --> 1:12:35.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever your preferred podcasting medium is. We've got three matchups

1:12:35.680 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up the show. No premature speculation, which normally

1:12:39.479 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>during the season goes into this spot until about this

1:12:42.040 --> 1:12:44.519
<v Speaker 1>stage of the season when we have more games to

1:12:44.600 --> 1:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about and the it's no longer really picking up

1:12:48.800 --> 1:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>guys for the rest of the year as much because

1:12:50.400 --> 1:12:53.479
<v Speaker 1>there's just not that much time left. Our next matchup

1:12:53.560 --> 1:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is the Philadelphia Eagles against the Green Bay Packers. The

1:12:56.439 --> 1:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>way to beat the Packers is to run the ball?

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this a Mile Sanders game? Brian, I wish I

1:13:01.640 --> 1:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>had the answer for you. We're gonna assume it is,

1:13:04.000 --> 1:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>even though his touches since returning from injury have gone

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>down from seventy seven to seventy to just fifty percent

1:13:10.600 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>last week's all the while Boston Scotts have gone up

1:13:13.400 --> 1:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent to thirty percent to percent. But like you said,

1:13:16.720 --> 1:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a good spot and the only way to really

1:13:18.080 --> 1:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>beat Green Bay is running the ball. The Packers allow

1:13:20.280 --> 1:13:23.519
<v Speaker 1>one fifty seven combo yards per game to running back slot,

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the third most, the third most, and three straight opposing

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>starting running backs up top two hundred combo yards. But

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be wary of Boston Scott. He was might take a

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>chance of me running back. I think he's heavily evolved

1:13:33.920 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the receiving game in this one, as Philly plays

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>from behind. Uh Dallas got Sanders can catch, by the way, Yeah,

1:13:40.320 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, you know you can pass to him.

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's been out targeted by Boston Scott and basically

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>every game they played recently. So there we go. Uh

1:13:49.040 --> 1:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard might get out targeted by zach Ertz, who

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is making his return. I'm not gonna starts in this one.

1:13:56.439 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see something from him first. They might ease

1:13:59.240 --> 1:14:01.879
<v Speaker 1>him back in. I will give Goddar to see despite

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay allowing the fourth fewest receptions, seventh fewest yards,

1:14:06.400 --> 1:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and the eighth fewest touchdowns to tight ends just three

1:14:09.600 --> 1:14:12.479
<v Speaker 1>on the year, but the competition hasn't been great at

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the tight end level. The Colts tight ends did combine

1:14:15.160 --> 1:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for forty seven yards and two touchdowns against the Packers

1:14:18.360 --> 1:14:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, so I'll give Goddard to see here.

1:14:20.640 --> 1:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But again, I'm worried about the Earth's factor here. Uh,

1:14:23.920 --> 1:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna blow up like he did last week.

1:14:25.720 --> 1:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Got her that is, And the Eagles wide receivers did

1:14:28.400 --> 1:14:31.639
<v Speaker 1>not blow up last week, totaling forty six yards against

1:14:31.720 --> 1:14:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, who were allowing forty six yards per catch

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:40.519
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the season. I'm not sure Jayer Alexander is

1:14:40.520 --> 1:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna shadow any of these scrubs, but he'll essentially cut

1:14:44.240 --> 1:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the field and half. So they're all on the bench.

1:14:47.080 --> 1:14:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Long story short Jalen Rieker, Alejan Jeffrey, Travis Fulgham, Greg Ward,

1:14:50.960 --> 1:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>even Marky Mark he's on the bench. Carson bench, he

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench. No guarantee even finishes this game,

1:14:57.320 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So an easy bench for Carson here over the Green

1:14:59.439 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay side Aaron Jones and to give him a B.

1:15:01.960 --> 1:15:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Philly has been tough against the run for the most

1:15:04.520 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 1>part half, but they've been vulnerable as of late, as

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the last last three starting running backs they face have

1:15:10.040 --> 1:15:13.559
<v Speaker 1>either topped one yards or scored a touchdown. Last week

1:15:13.600 --> 1:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones. Jones saw the most rushing attempts and rushing

1:15:16.200 --> 1:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>yards since Week two. But Jamal Williams will continue to

1:15:19.600 --> 1:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>steal couches touches because you know why, Fish, He's pretty

1:15:22.960 --> 1:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>good football player. Jamal love him. We all love Davante Adams.

1:15:28.320 --> 1:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He gets an a. Adams has nine scores over his

1:15:31.320 --> 1:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>last six games, finding paydirt at least one once in everyone.

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:37.519
<v Speaker 1>He's also averaging a hundred nine yards over that span.

1:15:37.600 --> 1:15:40.599
<v Speaker 1>He's essentially matchup proof at this point. But whatever, here's

1:15:40.600 --> 1:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some analysis anyways. Philly has allowed only two receivers to

1:15:44.040 --> 1:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>reach seventy five yards over the last six games and

1:15:46.040 --> 1:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have only allowed one receiver to score over their last four.

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We can expect Adams to see shadow coverage from Darius Slay,

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but he just got flamed by DK mattcalf And again,

1:15:54.200 --> 1:15:56.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what the opposition does against receivers. You're

1:15:56.560 --> 1:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna start Davante Adams with confidence. I'm starting album's art

1:15:59.240 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with confidence to at least a sea level. Confidence. Last

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:05.439
<v Speaker 1>week was confidence, there you go. Last week it was

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>ardrew six targets and found the end zone on just

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a forty six percent snap. Sherry should see more work

1:16:11.320 --> 1:16:13.519
<v Speaker 1>in this one, and he draws a favorable matchup with

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Avante Maddox, who is allowing seventy of his passes to

1:16:16.960 --> 1:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>be completed in his coverage in a passer rating of

1:16:18.920 --> 1:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>one oh seven. Lastly, for the past catchers, Robert Tonyan

1:16:22.600 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>can give him a B. Philly hasn't allowed a tight

1:16:25.200 --> 1:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>end touchdown and its last five games, but they have

1:16:28.040 --> 1:16:31.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed the seventh most receptions to the position on the season,

1:16:32.040 --> 1:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tonyan is just a mountain has a catch rate

1:16:35.520 --> 1:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which will play nicely against former slot corner Jalen Mills,

1:16:38.960 --> 1:16:42.559
<v Speaker 1>who concedes five inches and fifty pounds to Tonyons, Mike

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and Tonian in this matchup, and Aaron Rodgers. A. Philly

1:16:45.960 --> 1:16:48.599
<v Speaker 1>has allowed only one passing touchdown over the last four

1:16:48.680 --> 1:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>games that went to Russell Wilson, but the other three

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks they faced where Benda Nuci, Daniel Jones and Baker

1:16:53.960 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield in the infamous Monsoon. So we like a a

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Ron here next match, I'll give him the art work

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>just for Matt Fantasy yard Park. There we go, the

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy hard Park. How did I miss this? I was

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I sleep walking through through the air assumed

1:17:12.680 --> 1:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>he was hybridating. I was gonna say, must have been rid.

1:17:15.360 --> 1:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>You know the weather is getting colder. Now we're in December.

1:17:18.680 --> 1:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't let me forget the up Bill's taken. The

1:17:24.760 --> 1:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>forty nine defense, got Richard Sherman back and immediately looked

1:17:28.080 --> 1:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>dramatically better last week. What do you think about his

1:17:31.040 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity the opportunities for the past. I want to start

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with the passing game and Josh Allen in particular, as

1:17:37.160 --> 1:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>he's got to try to beat Sherman. So Josh Allen

1:17:40.560 --> 1:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>has just one game where he didn't have multiple touchdowns

1:17:44.040 --> 1:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on a one way or the other. And in that

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:50.519
<v Speaker 1>one game seven yards passing in sixty one rushing. So

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the one game he didn't throw multiple touchdowns, He's still

1:17:54.680 --> 1:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>had a good game. Uh. That said, Ellen's five worst

1:17:59.040 --> 1:18:01.559
<v Speaker 1>games in the Fantasy in this year. We're with John

1:18:01.600 --> 1:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Brown out like all the one through five, the worst

1:18:05.439 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>games he's played this year. We're with they're still good games,

1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:10.799
<v Speaker 1>but they were with John Brown out, so you're ceiling

1:18:10.840 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>has to come down a little bit. I'm giving Allen

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a B here. Is the tenth best against fantasy quarterbacks

1:18:17.000 --> 1:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have held seven teams under two yards passing, but the

1:18:22.000 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing floor helps uh. San Francisco allows the most rushing

1:18:26.160 --> 1:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>yards two quarterbacks and the most rushing attempts, so be

1:18:30.160 --> 1:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>great for Alan. I'm giving Digs the B grade. He

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:36.599
<v Speaker 1>has six or more catches uh in every single game

1:18:36.640 --> 1:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>since Week three. He has a tough match up here

1:18:39.240 --> 1:18:42.799
<v Speaker 1>with Sherman, but Sherman wasn't able to clamp down super

1:18:42.880 --> 1:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>great last week, even though overall they kept him down.

1:18:46.760 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh. Last last week was the yardage dud for Digs.

1:18:53.080 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But he gets the volumes and he gets the catches.

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>As I said, six plus catches you're getting you're getting

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>points out of him. Segret for Gabriel Davis, who's gonna

1:19:02.000 --> 1:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me? Player Cole Beasley I have

1:19:05.000 --> 1:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Is the best game for a slot

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>guy against San Francisco this entire year? Forty one yards

1:19:11.000 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and none of them scored, not one so bench grade

1:19:14.880 --> 1:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for Beasley. I'm sorry, charge, I have Mosson Singletary on

1:19:19.120 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the bench after they've nervous tough matchup. They flipped again

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in touches. Moss led once again in snaps, but they

1:19:26.960 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>flipped again in touches. Only two running backs of top

1:19:30.880 --> 1:19:35.559
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yards rushing against Santranc, So, uh, they're both

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. On the other side, Nick Mullins A great, No,

1:19:42.160 --> 1:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>just see if you're awake. I mean the whole air

1:19:44.439 --> 1:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>bear thing. I just don't know if you're awake over

1:19:46.479 --> 1:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>there right now. So alright, As mentioned last week, the

1:19:50.520 --> 1:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Bills are bottom ten against fantasy quarterbacks as they've given

1:19:55.080 --> 1:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>up the most rushing touchdowns and tenth most rushing yards. Uh.

1:19:58.880 --> 1:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Two quarterbacks it through the air. They're actually pretty decent.

1:20:02.920 --> 1:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why Mullins is getting the bench. I don't

1:20:05.000 --> 1:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>expect him to run all over the field. Curtis Samuel

1:20:08.080 --> 1:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and Brandon Au however, I do have sea grades on

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>now that they're both going to play. They're both just

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>too good of playmakers. Samuel, Yeah, Samuel erupted getting thirteen

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>targets with ayuk out and I with Samuel got fourteen

1:20:23.960 --> 1:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>targets that I think even if they now they split

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>him seven seven, yeah, seven eight targets for each this

1:20:30.800 --> 1:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>week with them both in that's that's good enough volume

1:20:34.000 --> 1:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to probably see a ce I figured with one of

1:20:36.439 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>those touches, and they both run the ball too. With

1:20:39.320 --> 1:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those touches. Somewhere, they're gonna break something to

1:20:42.479 --> 1:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>get see where they good? Did Deebo Samuel look last

1:20:45.439 --> 1:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>He's finally healthy, right off the foot injury from the

1:20:48.040 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>preseason and you know the various other things he's had.

1:20:50.479 --> 1:20:52.719
<v Speaker 1>He came out. I thought he looked fantastic. He looked

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like one of the least fun guys to tackle receivers.

1:20:57.040 --> 1:21:00.120
<v Speaker 1>He did last year too. Yeah, he looked just like

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the guy that was just steamrolling opponents in the in

1:21:03.600 --> 1:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs in the second half of last year. Reminds

1:21:06.120 --> 1:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>me of an Kuan Bold in a little bits I

1:21:08.920 --> 1:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say next year, I wouldn't be shocked if

1:21:10.720 --> 1:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about him in the likes of the A. J.

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Browns and the McLarens and stuff like that. I wouldn't. Yes, Uh,

1:21:19.880 --> 1:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reed, I got a B grade on a couple

1:21:21.960 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. I said he's a prespect get him

1:21:24.240 --> 1:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>for this last couple of games. Stretch run and it

1:21:26.760 --> 1:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>starts here. Uh six targets and back to back games.

1:21:30.200 --> 1:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bills are third worst against tight ends, allowing the

1:21:32.800 --> 1:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>second most yards. Two of the last three starters top

1:21:36.000 --> 1:21:39.519
<v Speaker 1>six yards, and they've had seven tight ends top sixty

1:21:39.560 --> 1:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>yards and or score against them. We mentioned earlier. Sixty

1:21:42.280 --> 1:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>yards for a tight end is a pretty dang good game.

1:21:45.240 --> 1:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a B grade there where he mostard, I'm giving

1:21:48.160 --> 1:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a B grade too. He only played twenty nine snaps,

1:21:51.320 --> 1:21:53.479
<v Speaker 1>but he got eighteen touches. When she means when he

1:21:53.560 --> 1:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was on the field, they were getting him the touches.

1:21:55.680 --> 1:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It was his first game back. I think he'll get

1:21:57.400 --> 1:22:01.559
<v Speaker 1>more work this time somehow, uh fled uh San Francisco

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>running backs and snaps and usage. In the last five games,

1:22:05.200 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>four running backs had fifteen plus torches against the Buffalo Bills.

1:22:09.439 --> 1:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>All of them had a hundred plus yards. Most of

1:22:11.840 --> 1:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's getting that fifteen plus, yeah, most of it's gonna

1:22:14.840 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be A guy who's gonna sneaky power teams through the

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>playoffs is traded. I like it. Our final matchup is

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team and the Pittsburgh Steelers. Let's start

1:22:27.160 --> 1:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Washington side. Alex Smith is on the bench.

1:22:29.920 --> 1:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>He is a game manager. He throws short passes with

1:22:32.880 --> 1:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a few touchdowns, and he has a bad matchup. Is

1:22:36.960 --> 1:22:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the only receiver of his that you want to start

1:22:38.560 --> 1:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver Terry McLaurin. Of course, he's got an ankle injury,

1:22:40.960 --> 1:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but expected to play through it, averaging nine seven yards

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>over the past four games catching those slow motion wobblers

1:22:47.439 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from Alex Smith. He's also had at least seven catches

1:22:51.200 --> 1:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or eighty four yards in six straight games. I mean

1:22:53.520 --> 1:22:56.479
<v Speaker 1>he just, regardless of opponent, Terry McLaren finds a way

1:22:56.520 --> 1:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to get it done. Steelers have a good past defense,

1:22:59.320 --> 1:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>but opposing number one receivers have had some success, including

1:23:03.120 --> 1:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Marks Brown last Wednesday and Tee Higgins a couple of

1:23:05.479 --> 1:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks before that. So we'll we'll keep the B grade

1:23:08.280 --> 1:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>on Terry McLaurin in this one. The only other quasi

1:23:11.800 --> 1:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver we've got his tight end Logan Thomas. It's a

1:23:14.360 --> 1:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a brutal matchup. I don't like it at all

1:23:16.040 --> 1:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that From that respect, Pittsburgh's allowing the second fewest receptions

1:23:19.000 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and the third fewest yards to opposing tight ends and

1:23:21.400 --> 1:23:24.519
<v Speaker 1>just one score all year. But this year's tight end

1:23:24.600 --> 1:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>landscape is so bad you probably need to start a

1:23:27.000 --> 1:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>guy who has at least sixty yards or a score

1:23:29.760 --> 1:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and four of his last six games, So in a pinch,

1:23:32.560 --> 1:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you probably need to start Logan Thomas, and I'm giving

1:23:34.720 --> 1:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade only because it's such a dry

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:41.519
<v Speaker 1>year at the position. And then Antonio Gibson. He's been

1:23:41.600 --> 1:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>much better lately, but he's been dominating bad teams. The

1:23:46.840 --> 1:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Steelers allow the seventh fewest rushing yards per game to

1:23:49.479 --> 1:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs, and in Pittsburgh's last month of games,

1:23:53.560 --> 1:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>no back has stop seventy three yards. Guess Gus Edwards

1:23:56.920 --> 1:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>got a goal line plunge last Wednesday afternoon. That's the

1:23:59.800 --> 1:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>only score in the last month against them. Gibson's a

1:24:03.560 --> 1:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very good talent, but I'm not I'm nervous about this

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>game still. I think he gets enough usage here and

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>especially on the ground, that he should be playable. Pittsburgh's

1:24:13.240 --> 1:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>great against receiving running backs, and I've got a bench

1:24:16.040 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>grade on j. D. Mckissic, who has done very little

1:24:18.439 --> 1:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for two straight games. Let's go to the Pittsburgh side.

1:24:22.520 --> 1:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger gets a B grade. Pittsburgh is the perfect

1:24:26.920 --> 1:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>team to neutralize what Washington does best Defensively. Washington, they've

1:24:33.880 --> 1:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>got the four first round picks on their defensive line.

1:24:36.960 --> 1:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>They create a ton of pressure, but Ben gets rid

1:24:40.000 --> 1:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the ball quickly. He has the league's fastest throwing

1:24:43.080 --> 1:24:46.839
<v Speaker 1>time at two point to nine seconds per next Jen Stats.

1:24:47.760 --> 1:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>What's more, Pittsburgh ranks number two in pass blocking. The

1:24:52.360 --> 1:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Washington secondary is going to have is gonna need to

1:24:55.479 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>hold their coverage for longer than their used to, and

1:24:58.360 --> 1:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna open up some avenues for Ben Roethlisberger.

1:25:01.520 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So who's he gonna throw to? Well, Deonte Johnson is

1:25:04.160 --> 1:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>coming up this horrible game where he dropped more balls

1:25:06.960 --> 1:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>than a Hernia specialist. He had three drops in two

1:25:10.840 --> 1:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>potential fumbles in that game. But on the balance of

1:25:14.640 --> 1:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the year, Johnson has been uber reliable. He'll face both

1:25:18.760 --> 1:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Kendall Fuller and Ronald Darby on the outside. Darby has

1:25:21.479 --> 1:25:23.519
<v Speaker 1>allowed just one score in the past seven games, but

1:25:23.640 --> 1:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Fuller has been tagged for three scores in three weeks.

1:25:26.040 --> 1:25:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a B grade in Deonte Johnson and

1:25:28.560 --> 1:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he bounces back. I do worry that, like what

1:25:30.880 --> 1:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>happens if he drops his first pass at at him?

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Does Ben even look his way again? That worries me

1:25:36.320 --> 1:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>about Johnson. In fairness, everyone was dropping passes Sitsburgh and West,

1:25:40.840 --> 1:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Team Ebron, Claypool, they all Chase somebody said tweeted seven

1:25:46.240 --> 1:25:50.559
<v Speaker 1>drop passes in one game. Chase Claypool be great here.

1:25:50.640 --> 1:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You start him because he scores touchdowns. Washington's only allowed

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seven scores opposing wide receivers, which is third fewest. On

1:25:57.200 --> 1:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>top of that, they've given up just one yard receiver

1:26:00.280 --> 1:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a Marie Cooper just one week ago. So

1:26:02.560 --> 1:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Claypool here, but he's just been so

1:26:04.960 --> 1:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>consistent with scoring. I've gotta be grade on him. Uh.

1:26:07.760 --> 1:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And then Juju Smith Schuster a C grade. He has

1:26:09.840 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>been very consistent. He's been the least consistent of the

1:26:12.280 --> 1:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Steelers receivers. And Juju will face Jimmy Morland in the slot.

1:26:16.160 --> 1:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't given up a touchdown all year. So just

1:26:19.240 --> 1:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the C grade on Juju Smith Schuster. And then there's

1:26:22.080 --> 1:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron, who you touched on tight ends are responsible

1:26:25.040 --> 1:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for two of the receiving yards that Washington has allowed.

1:26:28.280 --> 1:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>That is the fifth highest ratio. Washington has allowed averages

1:26:33.479 --> 1:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of five catches, fifty yards and half a touchdown to

1:26:35.960 --> 1:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the position. That gives Eric Ebron a C grade. Let's

1:26:40.040 --> 1:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the running backs, Connor and Snell. So Connor

1:26:45.000 --> 1:26:47.599
<v Speaker 1>is in the COVID protocol um and since this game

1:26:47.760 --> 1:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is Monday night, you may not know whether or not

1:26:50.479 --> 1:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the starter. So whether it's Snell

1:26:54.160 --> 1:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>or Connor, it's a tough matchup against the Washington run

1:26:56.560 --> 1:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>defense that allows the sixth fewest fantasy points to running backs.

1:27:00.040 --> 1:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Only Nick Chubb is top eighty six rushing yards against

1:27:02.960 --> 1:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington in their last eleven their eleven games this year,

1:27:06.280 --> 1:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and they've been especially tough lately. Washington's only given up

1:27:10.160 --> 1:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>two scores to backs in their last six games. So

1:27:13.240 --> 1:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade on Connor if he goes,

1:27:16.080 --> 1:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you bench Snell if Connor doesn't go. A

1:27:18.479 --> 1:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Snell makes sense. I don't like you

1:27:22.640 --> 1:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the one much and you're not gonna again Monday night.

1:27:24.800 --> 1:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You may not know what Connor status is when you

1:27:27.000 --> 1:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need to set your lineup. I wanted more Anthony McFarland too,

1:27:30.280 --> 1:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in that Ravens like that. I thought it looked okay

1:27:33.400 --> 1:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to whatever. Um, We've got just a moment here at

1:27:36.640 --> 1:27:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the end of the show, give me a player Dynasty

1:27:41.000 --> 1:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and Empire league owners could pick up now that's widely

1:27:44.120 --> 1:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>available that you will be glad you have on your

1:27:46.479 --> 1:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>roster next summer. See, I was thinking more if it's

1:27:50.040 --> 1:27:53.479
<v Speaker 1>if it's a Shower or if it's a Empire or something.

1:27:54.280 --> 1:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think at the end of the season

1:27:57.040 --> 1:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>here A J. Dillon needs to get on rosters. He's

1:28:00.080 --> 1:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the only Packer under contract, packer running

1:28:03.000 --> 1:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>back under contract next year because contracts are up on

1:28:06.360 --> 1:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Williams and they need that money to sign

1:28:08.840 --> 1:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster. Right, they might go signed Juju Smith Schuster.

1:28:12.920 --> 1:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That might be, but I mean I think they keep

1:28:15.960 --> 1:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Williams because he'll be cheaper. Packers keep Williams. They let

1:28:18.960 --> 1:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones go because Aaron Jones thinks he should get

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a Dalvin Cook style contract, and I don't think it's

1:28:23.240 --> 1:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. We'll find out if that plays out. But

1:28:25.479 --> 1:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I like that A J. Dillon. That makes some sense.

1:28:28.479 --> 1:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. If you

1:28:31.400 --> 1:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are listening over the air. As a reminder, we are

1:28:34.200 --> 1:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>also a podcast. You can check us out on your

1:28:37.080 --> 1:28:41.439
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcasting platform and here the entire show via podcast

1:28:41.520 --> 1:28:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Thank you for subscribing, rating, and reviewing

1:28:44.880 --> 1:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the show as well, and we'll be back next week

1:28:47.240 --> 1:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to get you ready for the fantasy football playoffs on

1:28:49.920 --> 1:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy foot Ball Weekly is a production

1:29:01.320 --> 1:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

1:29:04.200 --> 1:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:29:07.400 --> 1:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.