WEBVTT - Inflation, Crypto, Commodities, And Credit (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news on the Bloomberg Markets Podcast,

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, the Inflation

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Reduction Act. Matt and I talked about it a lot,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to E s G, As it relates

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to taxes, as it relates to climate. But the title

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Inflation Reduction Act, as I read through it, I'm like

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>my hands around it. Is it reducing inflation? I don't know. Say.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday we talked with Sadequaba right from I Squared Capital

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Infrastructure at Morgan Stanley. This guy is super plugged in

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and way smarter than me, like exponentially smarter, and he

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>said it is longer term going to have a serious

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>impact inflation. All right, Good for him. Carol Murphy's CEO

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of Kestro Holdings, joins us today. Carol, what do you

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what's your read of this Inflation Reduction Act? How should

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we think about it? Here? Well, I have to say,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, guys, and I think the title is

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a very clever piece of marketing, so kudos to whoever

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>came up with the name. But I agree once you

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>dig in, I mean, this is really about climate change policy.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's about access to healthcare. It's not about inflation. The

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that I mean, I understand why they named it

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that right got to it. They're selling it, and I

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how smart it was, because when you

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the details, you start to think this has

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with inflation. But what gets me is

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they left in the carried interests tax loophole for you know,

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>rich pe guys. And good for those rich pe guys.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, you know, knocking them, but it just doesn't

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>sound like something that Democrats would do. Then they didn't

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>put the salt deduction in, which hurts middle class people

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like me, you know, and that seems like something the

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats would want to I understand how this is a

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Democratic bill. Frankly on the tax side of things. Yeah,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to agree, And it's a disappointment that those

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>two got you know, left on the cutting room floor.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think those those are those have been objectives of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Democrats and others for quite some time now.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>They did get in the corporate minimum tax, which has

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>been a goal and attack on share repurchases. So you know,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that gets a little bit more to turn the screws

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on some companies in a way that you know supports

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>democratic policy goals. UM. But I think you know, some

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of those other things that were left out were disappointed.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that? I mean, are they

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing a big giant blanket over all large corporations and saying,

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, these companies are all from now, I'm gonna

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pay minimum No. I mean when we look at the numbers,

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it's really just on the margin. I mean, it's a

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>handful of companies that are going to be very impacted

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by that corporate minimum tax UM. And I think politically

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it plays very well to write this idea that very large,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>very profitable companies are able to avoid paying any taxes

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>does not fit well with a lot of Americans. So

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps to kind of close the loophole,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but really isn't going to impact all that many company

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>me Karrot, we we've got somebody here at Bloomberg govin Signarelli.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>He's a strategist force here, and he spent his career

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street trading UH currencies and bonds and all

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. He kind of says, this focused

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>by the FED on inflation is misplaced. He kind of

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like inflation is kind of taking care of itself.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And I only look at you know, I look at

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>gasolene prices three dollar for regular a gallant? Thank you?

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Did I say bar a gallant? I do that all

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the time. Okay, So that's for a regular unletted. So

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>what's you're calling inflation here? So it's interesting because we've

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of been in that same camp, and that for

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>good prices at least, it's pretty easy to follow the

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>pig and the python and see how these inflationary pressures

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are working themselves out, and you know, things like container prices, subsiding,

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices easing. The harder part is on the services side.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are prices that tend to move around a lot

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>less and have still seen a lot of inflation. Um

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>those prices tend to be very closely aligned with the

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>labor market. So cooling the labor market is going to

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be really key to bringing that down. And we started

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to see some anecdotal evidence that the labor marketed cooling,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but that typically takes a lot longer, so I think

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that will be the more difficult objective. Well, and not

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>even um really anecdotal anymore. Yesterday I saw a survey

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from Price Waterhouse Coopers and they talked to more than

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>seven US executives and board members across a range of industries.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>They said are They found that half of respondents said

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they're reducing headcount or planned to, fifty two percent have

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>implemented hiring freezes. Um more than four and ten are

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ascending job offers. This is These are some real storm

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>clouds on the horizon, yeah, for sure, and those will

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>start to work their way into the actual numbers over

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. So I think this will be,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big headwind. And I've been warning folks

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>who are sort of newer to the job market that

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not a normal job market. This is so

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>much easier to get a job than we often see

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>during cycles. So I think folks who have only been

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the job market for a couple of years really

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>need to brace themselves. But Karen, can I ask you

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>about something completely different here? Looking through your resume Um,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing you fell in love with Prague at some

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>point and decided to stay there for a while. Do

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they not have the best beer in the world? I

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have never in all of my travels, and I drink

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>beer everywhere I go, have better beer, had better beer

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>than in the Czech Republic. It is so true. And

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the tech pride themselves on drinking the largest amount of

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>beer per capita. And there's a reason that's great. So alright, So, Karen,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's interesting in this economy here

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we focus on the consumer. The consumer seems like in

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent shape. It seems like the consumer has been

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so confounding because you're absolutely right, you know, job we

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the job market slowing, but right now

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's very very strong. Wages are up, consumer balance sheets

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are very strong, but consumer confidence continues to look really poor.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's among the lowest that we've had in

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a number of years. So consumers are spending money

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>like they feel good, but they're telling us that they

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>don't feel good. And I'm worried that's going to fall

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff here when this when this job news

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>comes home to roost and savings are down. I know

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that data is a little bit sketchy, but um credit

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>card uses going up at some point, I'm worried consumer. Right,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>all right, Karen, thank you so much for joining us.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Kara Murphy, c IO of Chestra Holdings here. She has

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a master's International Relationship University of Chicago and it be

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as an international politics from Georgetown. That's pretty darn good.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you go to Georgetown, you're thinking about public service,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, going into government, all that kind of good stuff.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And then she gets a masters in Chicago. Not bad.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Looking at bitcoin off eight point four seventy five four

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and we can talk bitcoin because Tom Keen is

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not here. It's generally during surveillance. It is a bitcoin

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>free studio. But Everett Millman East, chief markets analyst at

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Gainesville Coins. You look at precious metals at Gainesville Coins. Everett,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but we also like talking to you about bitcoin. Any

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here about what we're seeing? Is this just a

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>trading thing that isn't because of the FED? It's because

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Fed? Right? Yeah, I guess you're right. I

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>guess you're right. What do you what do you have

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for us effort? Well? Sure, I think basically across markets

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, pointing to the FED is going to be

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the correct answer more often than not. But really, what

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at with the cryptocurrency market as it stands

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's caught in a bit of a catch twenty two. UM.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>The lack of a regulatory one of my favorites. The

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of a regulatory framework UM is certainly hampering adoption

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin and other cryptos. But on the other hand,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>tight regulation really is antithetical to the core principles of

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and many other cryptos, which is to say that, um,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they're the entire animust behind bitcoin is to have completely

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>private and largely anonymous transactions through a decentralized network. So

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the more that regulation comes in, the less likely that

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is to be the case. But again, I think almost

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone involved in the crypto space wants to see some

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of regulation to kind of put some people's fears

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to rest. Well, it's exactly the people who are selling

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the picks and uh wheelbarrows that they want

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to see regulation because that's how they make their money

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on on the whole gold rush, not actually the gold

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The people who are into um bitcoin for real don't

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>want to see UM censorship, government censorship allowed on money right.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I talked to UM, the CEO of Cracking, a couple

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, and I thought it was really interesting

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>because he's kind of torn. Cracking is one of the

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>biggest crypto exchanges. Jesse Powell is the CEO, and he's you.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And what you talked to him, you can see he's

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly torn because on the one hand, he has this business,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he employs a ton of people, he wants to make money,

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and regulation and working with the government is he goes

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with that. On the other hand, he's

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly like an early stage bitcoiner who wants who has

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the kind of libertarian viewpoint, and you just can't reconcile

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>those two things. I tend to agree. I think the

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the idealism behind bitcoin, as he said, to have this

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of libertarian bent to being sound money and being

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>censorship resistant UM. Even on a personal level, that was

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the main reasons that I got interested in

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin early on. But as we see, there really does

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be some establishment backing UM, and you know,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some regulation would certainly spur that. We've seen that over

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the past year. A lot of major US corporations have

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>been rather enthusiastic investors in crypto startups, but it's still

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on the order of about a billion dollars over a

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve month period. UM. That's being held back because again,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>if they make those investments, they start businesses and then

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>here comes Washington with a hammer to crush all of

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>those businesses. Well, that's um, that's that's a reason to

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not invest. That's the reasons shy away. So we're still

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing that playoff. Well, I mean every I tend to

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>see it like this. There does need to be regulation,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and there has to be a framework for bitcoin to

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>work with governments around the world. If you wanted to

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>trade trade for twenty dollars, right, if you want a

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin to cost ten tho dollars, if you need it

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to cost five grand for bitcoin, then yes, but not

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't care about that, Not if you're someone

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who wants to use bitcoin just within the community of

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>people who all have the same principles, Because if you

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>open it up to regulation, as we've seen with um,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they're gonna censor it. They're

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going to tell exchanges you can't trade with anybody who

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>has a Russian residence, which I mean you can have

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>your own view on what Vladimir Putin does, but certainly

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>random dude you know in in the uh suburban or

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>urban areas or rural areas of Russia has little to

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do with that, correct. And and that is a constant

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>threat um, not just from censorship, but from the idea

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that uh, you know, governments and central banks would sort

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of co opt the idea with central bank digital currencies.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>That would because their government money, they would be very um,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they would have no resistance to to censorship. Um. And

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we're still obviously although bitcoin has been around about a decade,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we're still these early stages where the the pass forward

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is not entirely clear. And then we have to also

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>take into account that it is not like bitcoin against

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>one central enemy. Um. You have governments all over the

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>world with their own individual interests that are kind of

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>attacking this problem from their own angles. So I think

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that does create a although a very kind of wild

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>West dynamic. Um, it is still fertile ground for some

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>growth and experimentation with how how best to tackle is

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>from a regulatory standpoint, Where is Lutz, Florida, Ah, So

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it was just north of Tampa. It's in the Tampa

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay area. That's where uh you guys, that's for your base, right, Yes,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where Gainesville Coins headquarters. Of the name is a

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>holdover from where we were founded. Um, but we do

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>also have offices internationally, um in London and one in Singapore. Alright,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>So Gainesville is what's Gainesville? Isn't that the Gators? Is that?

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The University of Florida? Yeah, the University of Florida in

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the central part of the state. Alright, awesome, all right?

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And then Tallahassee's Florida State. I'm just getting my because

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you think about Florida, you know, you know, I just

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of think South Florida. But you gotta you gotta

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>go to tahas for Florida State. Well, personally, I love

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Panhandle the best, the best beaches, literally, folks listening

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world, you want to go to the best

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>beaches in the US destin Florida and that kind of panhandles. Awesome?

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Everett, thanks so much for joining us. We

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate talking to you. Everett Millman. He's a chief

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>market analyst at Gainesville Coins. Located and beautiful Lut's Florida,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just north of Tampa, Matt. I spend a lot of

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>time in the central California coast, and I tell you,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like around Selina's you look as far as

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the eye can see literally our farms, and it's like

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're most It just seems like most of our countries

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>fruits and veggies come from. I mean, they're just everywhere

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for Aunt, miles and miles and miles and miles and miles.

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And one of the big companies there in Watsonville, uh

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is Drift Calls Thinks Strawberries, fresh strawberries. Those are the

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>folks that bring you that kind of stuff so sore

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>and boring. He's a president of Drift Calls of the America's.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They are in fact based in Watsonville, California, near my

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>crib in Carmel. Uh sore and thanks so much for

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Talk to us about your business here.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>How's it from both a supply you know, in terms

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the farms, the the environment, all that type of stuff,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as the demand for your products. Yeah, and

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, I would say these things have

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good. Um. I think the reality is there's

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>more people work from home and had to get a

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>mid morning snack on afternoon snack. You know, they went

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to varies very frequently. And so the demand side in

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>officiness has been very strong the last couple of years,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and we actually don't really see that ending as we're

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming out on the other side. And so

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the demand side has been very good. Production

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is way more challenged. M We certainly had some pretty

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>significant weather events, and an inflation, of course, is hitting us.

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we are planning next year's crop right now,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and we are doing that with a cost structure that

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've never seen before. So what so inflation is

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be with us? I can think of a few

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ways in which inflation would hit you. One of the

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>stories we've been seeing a lot lately is the water

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>shortage in California. Is that an issue for you? I

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>mean a different issue in the long run. I think

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the reality is we have it off water today to

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>grow up the crops we have, but we are several

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>places where we're getting rationed down to sort of the

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>minimum level where that we need. And if we get

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rationed anymore, then then some of the crops will not

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be combiable. So if you get rationed anymore. You can't say,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, well we'll spend another ten There's there's little

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you can do, right, Yeah, I mean typically the way

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it it gets allocated out is like on a per

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>acre basis, and we need about two and a half

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a computer water to grow strawberry crop. And if our

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>allocation goes below that, you're just not going to have

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a product to crop. Right. So, and we are right

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there on the on the edge of that in a

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of districts in southern California. So and talk to

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>us about your labor situation. We hear about it, you know,

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>across almost every single industry, uh, you know, over the

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>less several years, a labor shortage, and of course your

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>labor uh you know market is a little bit unique.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of immigrants, legal and illegal. Talk to

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>us about your labor supply kind of what you're doing there. Yeah,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that what's happening in California now,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's we're finally seeing a significant increase in the agricultural

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>labor coming in under the age to a guest worker program.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Really not something that you saw very much in California.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Is much more common on the East Coast and that

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't needed to supplement the shortage that we have. Without that,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we we simply couldn't pick the crops. And we expect

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that to increase year after yearfter year going forward. So

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you're bringing in workers from other countries, I'm

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>assuming um wage costs are still going up. There must

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be some pressure there with the inflation that everyone's seeing. Yeah,

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think on top of that, you know, California

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>has passed, you know, a number of pieces of legislation

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that's made labor costs a lot more expensive. So even

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>before you know, the general economy start feeling inflation, we've

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>been feeling inflation for quite a long time. I would

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>say for almost ten years. Labor costs has been going

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>up twice the rate of inflation. And so we've been

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing this for a long time. And so efficiencies and

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>increasing productivity has been a major focus of ours for

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say the last six seven years.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So our consumers willing to pay um the boost in prices.

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, every time I go to the grocery store,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I throw a couple of boxes of strawberries and blueberries

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the cart without looking. But my wife says, wait

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a second, those are ten dollars a box. You know,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where we're shopping, but you get my

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you get my point. Yeah, absolutely, So yeah, I think

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the good nurses and it's that consumers are willing to

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>pay for really good fruits. Okay, that's you know, if

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>consumers are not going to trade down to cheaper, lower

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>quality strawberries. I think that the evidence of that is

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>very clear. Our company has historically done well and there's

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>been an economic downturn because consumers may trade down their

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>car or the vacation or not eat out as much,

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're not they're never trading down the quality of

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>their berries when they eat them at home. So so

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely we believe that that's here to stay. And

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how that makes sense. Right. This is a relatively

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>cheap indulgence and there's really no reason to go off

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to the three dollars strawberries when you can get better

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>for dollar strawberries. So dry schools again, I know the

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Brandon listeners. Go google it. You'll you'll recognize the brand immediately.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>When when when you see it, Um, who does the

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>average California strawberry? Who does that? Who? Does it compete

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with you know, I think we we like to think

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that we compete against you know, there's snacking alternatives, right,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we've seen throughout the pandemic. We're not

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really competing against the other fruits. We really mean competing

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for a share the consumer stomach. And so we are

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>really focused on going outside and looking to bring consumers

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>into coming in from other categories and and make them,

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, make a healthier choice and eat fresh berries instead.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering what the cheaper I guess the cheaper

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>alternative would just be old and yuckier, as my daughter

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>would say, strawberries. So you're obviously going to pick the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>best looking box that you can find at the store,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>right what what what you don't You don't compete with bananas,

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't compete with Kiwi's or blueberries. I mean, in

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the end, there's only so much fruit that ends up

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in the shopping basket. So of course there is some

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of that going on and um, but your strawberries is

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>by far the number one category in produce and is

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing category, has been so for ten years.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not twice the size, So the the second biggest

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>fruit category, which would be apples, and uh, you know,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>bananas is not growing that much and hasn't really grown

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And I think it's just it's

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the versatility of berries, is the health benefits of berries.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the indulgence of berries, right, I mean, not

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>too many categories to sort of check all the boxes.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>And we're very fortunate our stars so so. And just

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I spent a lot of time in the

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Central Valley. I see the folks picking the berries. So

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>my question is what the time between the barry getting

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>picked in Watsonville or Salinas and getting to a supermarket

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. That's not expensive. It's got an expensi

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>cificate against the truck across. I mean, well over ten

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars would be typical to get that truck across.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>We will have it there in three to four days, right,

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets to a distribution center in New

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and then out to the store, right, And so

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, New Jersey consumers probably realistically I can get

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>their hands on the berries in six to seven maybe

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>eight days, depending on you know, exective way it's at.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's pretty fast. Yeah, that's the kind

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of trucking I want to do. That's when I get

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>my CDL. That's what I want to Watsonville. I'm not

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>doing these little hundred mile John's. Yeah, I want to

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>go across country in three to four days. All right.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It's good stuff. I'm telling you, folks. You go to

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Central Valley, California, and it is amazing. And we're gonna

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to Central Valley. We're gonna go back to

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>California just a little bit. You know why Why because

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk to the CEO of Lamborghini. He's a

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>pebble beach. He's a pebble beach. All right, that's how

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>far away? How far away are you staring from pebble Beach.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm twenty miles away, okay. And I saw all the

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>cars yesterday. So there you got all right, good stuff.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So in boring the president of Driscoll's of the America's

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think strawberries, blueberries, all that kind of stuff. And I

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you, it's just all inspiring to see these huge,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>huge vegetable and fruit farms in the Central Valley of California,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>truly feeding the rest of the country. Truly cool stuff.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Carmendo Royal joins us. She's a credit reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>She's got an article out today showing the banks are retreating,

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>some banks like even Wells far especially Wells Fargo. That's

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the one because that's where I had my mortgage. When

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I had my mortgage for about fifteen minutes, I got

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>my mortgage from Wells Fargo. Carmen, How can a banks,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>how can the banking industry like like a Wells Fargo

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pulled back even slightly from the mortgage market. Isn't that

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're job is. Yes, of course that's that's what

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they do. But they do certain types of mortgages, especially

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>after early um, before I wait, they did all kinds

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of mortgages. They did, like the risk here ones, the

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ones that work that are now backed by the government.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But right now they've kind of retreated. They do only

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>more like Freddie and Sandy Mac mortgages, which has left

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of space from non bank lenders to

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of grow in this risk here parts of the

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>mortgage world. Um, and now that's becoming an issue with

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like basically no business coming in, rates really high and

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole change in the rate cycle. Yeah, so the

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>rate cycle is basically killing this business. Is regulation also

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a part of that? I mean, the rates is something

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Carmen that we can very easily see. You look at

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage rates and they're up over five some I've

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>seen as high as six UM, and so I understand

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going to be turned away by by that,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>having been used to very low rates for the last decade.

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>What about regulations is that a part of the problem

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>right now? Right like regulation was kind of part of

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem after early and a lot of banks retreated them.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the cost of class of that is at

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>right now basically um two thirds at the top twenty

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>lenders are non bank lenders, whereas before the crisis, it

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was about a third of the top top twenty lenders

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>were independent firms. And that's kind of the problem, the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that this non non bank lenders have much less

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>capital to kind of maneuver compared to banks, and they

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>also don't have a lot of factcess to emergency funding

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>or other lines of credit like that. So how bad

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be for these uh, non bank mortgage lenders?

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's again, as you mentioned, they don't have

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the capital, they don't have a lot of the support. Well,

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody's pulling out, wells Fargo is shrinking, and the non

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bank lenders can't participate. Who's going to be around to

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>give us mortgages? Someone will be there, but not everyone's

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going to disappear, but it's certainly going to consolidate a

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit. They were, especially in this prescure space, there

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>were which was basically only independent non banks UM there.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's where most of the pain is going to come

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>from UM because that they don't have that government backing,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so the loans drop in value. They can't really go

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to the g s c s to kind of get

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>funding from them, and that's why we've seen like some

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcies and they've been mostly focused on this space. So

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm looking at the uh the story here

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a couple of names sprout mortgage, first guarantee, mortgage.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not even tried go for a mortgage

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>with one of these people, but the rage right, you're

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it, I guess. But who goes to these

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>types of mortgage players? So there is usually more for

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>non qualified mortgages, which is, for instance, if you don't

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have like W two's or basically if you're not eligible

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>for mortgages that are backed by Fannie and Freddy or Jinny. Um.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So you that's the type of mortgages that are mostly

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>done by non bank lenders. Uh, and that banks kind

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of retreated from after eight because they were the riskiest ones,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were the ones that are kind of like

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit more regulated. First guarantees owned by Pimco. Yeah,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that got my I mean, what are they doing in

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that business? All right? Good stuff interesting here? I mean

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, you don't think about it as much, but

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, interest rates go up and maybe some challenges.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. You don't think about it so

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>much because you just sold your house and you never

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>had a mortgage to begin with note dumped it. I

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it because it took me months to get

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage. It was a painful, painful process. Why you're

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a good credit right right? Well, well I did

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>get a good rate, but I still had to, you know,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>show all of these documents. I had no idea where

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they are and with keep stuff. But you're a star

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on television that you just didn't say, Hey, go see

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>me on TV tomorrow, And that's good enough. I said,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you know what cable news fame, and they were like,

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>who are you again? All right, Carmen Royo, credit reporter

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, with that story out today and her

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>team looking at the kind of the the mortgage market,

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but not from some of the mortgage players you might

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think about. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you for her. I'm Matt Miller.

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller en seventy three. On

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio