WEBVTT - Tech News: ICE ICE Surveillance

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and Welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. How the tech are you. We're gonna start

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>off today's news episode with a little story about digital surveillance.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Georgetown Laws Center on Privacy and Technology reports that the

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency or ICE, has been engaged

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>in widespread digital surveillance despite the fact that the agency

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't supposed to do that now. Essentially, ICE has been

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>using a loophole, so instead of conducting digital surveillance on

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>US residents itself, the agency has actually just been purchasing

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>massive amounts of data through various data brokers and other

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>private companies as well as public utilities. Now, according to

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the researchers, ICE has accumulated nearly three quarters of all

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>adult residents who have a driver's license in the US

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of photos. That is, of those driver's licenses.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>The agency purchases information from utility companies, and that gives

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 1>ICE the ability to detect when someone moves by seeing

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>when someone activates service at a new address. ICE is

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the Department of Homeland Security, and the researchers

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are arguing that the agency lacks proper congressional oversight. The

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>researchers have made a few recommendations to address this incredible

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of digital surveillance, ranging from more thorough oversight of

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the agency to reforming immigration law. Personally, I think this

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really points to a need to create comprehensive laws about

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>who can sell data to whom and under what circumstances,

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because as it stands right now, there's no need to

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of skullduggery oriented agency. You don't have

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, Mission impossible or anything in order

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to spy on people. These agencies just purchased the information

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they need from various sources, and through that they get

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly detailed dossier on anyone they like. I mean,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>our ability to analyze data has reached a point where

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if you just have the information, you can sift through

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it and put together a really comprehensive picture of who

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>someone is and where they've been. Big Brother has been

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>distributed and democratized. Yikes. In other news on how US

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>departments are using technology, the Pentagon recently held a demonstration

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>via its Joint Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office. I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>had to be really careful about reading that. It's kind

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of a mouthful, But in this demonstrate, Shan vendor teams

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>used high powered microwave transmitters to bring down drones. So

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the department has been assessing the possibility of using high

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>powered microwave beams to bring down hostile drones. We're talking

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>military grade drones here, not your average little quad copters.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And this was the third set of demonstrations, all intended

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>to give the agency the information needed to determine capability

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>gaps like where do they need to make improvements, and

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to focus on developing the next generation of anti drone weaponry.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>The vendors had to demonstrate their respective technologies effectiveness, which

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>included everything from threat detection to tracking too bringing down

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>targeted drones, sometimes two at a time. So this is

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>still very much in development, and while similar weapons may

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>already be deployed, what we're really looking at is the

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>refinement process intended to develop more effective anti drone defense systems.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>There have been a few people who have suggested that

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's quest to purchase Twitter has had at least

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>something to do with his own tendency to post things

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that the United States securities and Exchange Commission or SEC,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>has objected to not that buying Twitter is going to

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>change that at all, but whether that factored into his

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>decision to purchase the company or not. The SEC is

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:29.119
<v Speaker 1>once again investigating Musk with relation to Twitter. This time,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's because Musk was late in submitting a form indicating

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>his intent to purchase more than five percent of Twitter's shares.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>He ended up purchasing a little more than nine percent.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>That's something that investors are supposed to do when they

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>plan to make that substantial and investment in a company,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is to file that with the SEC. Musk apparently filed

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the form at least ten days after he was supposed to, and,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>according to the SEC, by not reporting the intended purchase

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in a timely manner, Musk was able to buy that

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>stock essentially at a discount, potentially amounting to as much

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as a hundred forty three million dollars. How Well, if

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk had followed the proper protocol and submitted the form properly,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that submission would be public information, which means investors would

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen that Musk was going to buy more than

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>nine of Twitter's stocks, and that in turn could have

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>been enough to drive up the share price, which would

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>have increased the wealth of current shareholders or encouraged more

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>people to buy into Twitter stock ahead of that actual purchase.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And one shareholder has now filed a lawsuit against Musk,

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially arguing that by filing late, Musk robbed shareholders of

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>potential wealth. The SEC could also seek its own lawsuit

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>against Musk, but neither the shareholder lawsuit or a potential

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>SEC lawsuit would likely have any real impact on the

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>planned acquisition, which still requires shareholder and regulatory approval before

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it can go through. Let's start talking about Meta. There

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of stories to to cover now. The

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>owner of Facebook, that being Meta, is looking to make

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>some cutbacks to its Reality Labs division, which is the

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>hardware centric part of Meta that develops mixed reality hardware. Apparently,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>at an internal meeting, leaders told employees to expect upcoming

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>changes to be announced within a week or so, with

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 1>those announcements being specific cutbacks. And this is a pretty

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>dramatic turnaround from where we were in the fall of back.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Then that's when Zuckerberg spoke at length about how the

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>company was putting an intense focus on developing all things metaverse.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's when they changed the company name from

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to Meta and the development includes making immersive hardware

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that will give people the chance to experience the metaverse.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But you see, this dedicated focus on the metaverse comes

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at a massive cost. And if you skip ahead a

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>few months to earlier this year, we learned that Facebook

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>had experienced a drop in active users. That news shocked investors,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>who I guess clutched their pearls whenever certain numbers go

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>down instead of up, and I might be getting increasingly

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>grouchy about how the stock market works. Anyway, there was

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a drop in confidence from the investor community, and Meta

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>reps said that the company would be cutting costs to

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce the negative impact on shareholders. Subsequently, news broke that

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the company was slowing down on hiring for mid to

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>senior level positions within the company in general. And now

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we hear that they're going to be cutbacks that will

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>put some of these reality labs projects on old at

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>least for a while. Some might end up being shelved permanently.

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We do not yet know which of those projects are

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be impacted. We had previously heard that the

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>division was working on four new headsets to aiming at

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a more premium space in the market, which really means

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, more features and more expensive, and too meant

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for a more of an entry level space in the market.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Still expensive, but you know less. So not sure if

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>any of those four are going to be impacted by

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>these cutbacks or if this is actually going to affect

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>projects that are further down the pipeline. Meta reps said

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there are no current plans for employee layoffs at this time,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's good. I mean, I don't like Meta, but

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I really hate seeing people lose their jobs. In an

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>earlier tech News episode, I talked about how Facebook relied

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on third party staffing services to hire content moderators in

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>places like Africa. Now, one former employee is bringing a

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against both Meta and one of those third party companies,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a tech outsourcing firm called Sama, which is based out

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco. This former employee argues that he was

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hired under false pretenses because he says he was never

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>told that he would be working for Facebook and that

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he would be doing content moderation when he interviewed for

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the position. He relocated from South Africa to Kenya in

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>order to take this job and then discovered what it

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was that he was meant to do. His lawsuit claims

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that this practice is a violation of Kenya's anti human

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>trafficking laws. So the headlines about this all naturally say

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook is being sued for engaging in human trafficking.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's why I clicked on the story to

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>read up on what was going on. Now, I don't

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>know the particulars of this law in question, However, I

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have to assume the fact at the former employee allegedly

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>had no idea who his employer was going to be

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or what his actual position was going to be while

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he relocated to another country has to factor into it.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>In addition, the former employee claims he was fired after

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he tried to organize other employees, so there are also

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>charges of union busting wrapped up in this too. Now,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>on top of all that, the man says that exposure

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 1>to truly horrifying material, which ranged from child abuse to

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>videos of executions, has left him traumatized and impacted his

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>physical and mental health. Now, y'all, I can tell you

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I could never be a content moderator on Facebook. Just

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my exposure to the normal news is enough to cause

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>me mental distress, and that's the same stuff that everybody

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>else is seeing all the time. Anyway, Meta reps have

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>claimed that the company takes employee welfare seriously and holds

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>their third party staffing service is accountable for providing fair pay,

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>benefits and support, something that the lawsuit UH argues with,

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and SAMA that third party staffing service, for its part,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>denies that it engaged in any anti union behavior. So

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to see where the story goes from here. Okay,

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got some more news stories coming up, but first

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. Last year, the state of

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas passed a law called HB twin Team, which would

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>give Texans the right to sue social media platforms that

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have fifty million or more active monthly users if those

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>users believe that they got a ban from those platforms

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>due to their political views. So, in other words, if

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they think that they've been banned from a service because

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of their political views, they can sue the company within

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the state of Texas, UH if they are residents of Texas.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>That is, the law also forbids social networks from cutting

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>off access to people in Texas in order to sidestep

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>this issue, which y'all that is absolutely wild. Uh. It's

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>left a lot of folks saying, where does Texas get

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>off litigating how a business in another state conducts itself,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Like if the business is incorporated, saying California, why gives

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Texas the authority to prevent that company from not providing

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>service to Texas? Anyway. A federal judge previously passed an

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>injunction against HB twenty, preventing it from going into effect

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>until further judgment determined whether or not the law is

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, legal, and the Fifth U. S. Circuit Court

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals has now overturned that injunction and HB twenty

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is now in effect in Texas. I suspect this is

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just another stop on the journey to bringing this law

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the Supreme Court. But then, considering the current

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>makeup of the U. S. Supreme Court, I can't confidently

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>say that they will find the law to be unconstitutional,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>even though it appears to be pretty unconstitutional. The federal

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>judge who passed the injunction had pointed out that passing

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the law infringed upon the freedom of speech for the

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>actual social media platforms that these platforms have the right

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>to establish codes of conduct and then they have the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>right to enforce those codes of conduct, and any state

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>coming in to say no, you can't do that is

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>akin to censorship, which you know is ironic because Texas

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>was positioning its law as being anti censorship, but in

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>fact Texas was engaging in censorship against the social platforms

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to do this. Anyway, HB twenty is just

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a terrible law, full stop. It's a terrible law. On

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>top of that, one of the judges in the the

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Circuit Court of Appeals referred to Twitter as an Internet provider,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>which is just playing wrong, Like you can't get more wrong.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter provides a service that's on the Internet, but it's

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not an Internet provider. It's not providing Internet service. I

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>swear Texas is like the upside down in Stranger Things.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And I say that as a resident of Georgia, a

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>state that has its own share of totally backwards legislation. Anyway,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to see where the story goes in

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the future, and my heart goes out to all the

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>folks in Texas who opposed this kind of stuff. I

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>understand how hard it can be to live in a

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>state where leaders make bad decisions that reflect poorly on you,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and you had nothing to do with it. Over in Europe,

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing another example of how leaders, in an effort

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to fight something that's truly hideous, in this case UH

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>images and video of child sexual abuse use, they are

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>pursuing rules that will have massive, unintended consequences and a

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>negative impact. So the EU has proposed founding a new

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>division to fight child abuse material online, as well as

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>required tech companies to quote, detect, report, block and remove

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>end quote such material from their platforms. On the surface,

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that all sounds fairly you know, reasonable right to detect, report, block,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and remove child abuse material. And obviously this material is

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly harmful and reporting it would be absolutely key in

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>order to track down the people responsible and to stop

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>them from abusing children. But it's the detect part that

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>could be particularly disruptive and dangerous for lots of reasons.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You see, for any platform that allows private messaging between

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>people on that platform, if that platform is ordered to

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>dete hecked this kind of material, well, to do that,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it would have to scan messages that were being sent

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>between individuals on the platform to see if any of

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that material was included in those messages. These could be

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>messages that people presumably come on as being private and secure.

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It would also mean that end to end encryption would

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>be pretty much impossible or rendered meaningless. A solid end

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to end encryption service would be created in such a

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>way that no one other than the parties communicating would

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to see the contents of that communication. That

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>includes the communications platform itself. So in other words, if

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>company A allows true end to end encryption, company A

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>has no way of knowing what is being sent over

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>those messages. It cannot access those messages, it cannot scan them.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So the only way to get around this is to

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do was called client side scanning. That means you would

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>actually have to scan the material on the end devices

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>once the material has been decrypted. So that would mean

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all users in the EU would have various companies scanning

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>their personal devices for signs of this kind of material.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Apple had actually proposed doing this and then put the

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>plans on hold after receiving some pushback from civil rights activists,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and those activists have argued that this kind of surveillance

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is really dangerous. It removes all privacy. Now, there is

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>no denying that child abuse is horrible and it needs

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to be stopped and prevented. But researchers are suggesting that

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it might be better to use other methodologies rather than

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>stripping away the possibility of true d end encryption, which

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>promotes human rights, and that those methodologies can be things

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>like analyzing metadata in order to detect criminal behavior and

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to stop it. Obviously, this is one of those really

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>emotionally charged topics. It is hard to tackle. There are

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>no easy solutions, and it is very clear that a

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>solution is desperately needed, so it is a difficult situation

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of suss out. A couple of weeks ago,

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about how Netflix had a very rough call

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with investors as the company reported its first net loss

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and subscribers ever, and once again, you know, if numbers

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>go the wrong way, the stock market goes bananas. Anyway,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>apart from this being another example of how reactionary things

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are in the investment world, it pushed Netflix to talk

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about the ways the company intends to drive up revenue

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and reduce costs in the future. Two of those ways

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>involved clamping down on the practice of password sharing, and

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the other was to introduce ads. Two create different tiers

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of subscriptions now. The company says we might see both

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of these practices begin by the end of this year,

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and we have an idea of how this is probably

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going to play out. For one thing, Netflix has been

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with a model in a few countries in which

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>households can pay a little bit extra in their monthly

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions and in return, they are authorized to share their

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>password with at least a person outside of their household.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So this this allows them for the case where someone

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who is not living under the same roof is able

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to access the service, so you pay a little bit

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more per month and you get a kind of adjunct

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>household member who just happens to live outside the house.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>As for advertisements, the general belief is that Netflix would

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>do something similar to what we've seen other platforms do

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past, which is that they offer a less

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 1>expensive subscription model for folks who opt to have ads

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>included in their service, and those who don't want ads

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>will just have to pay a little bit more per

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>month for a premium service. Whether this will address the

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>issue of subscriber loss remains to be seen. Okay, I've

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>got a couple more stories to go through before we

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>get to those, let's take another quick break. One service

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that did not have Netflix's problems was Disney Plus. The

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>mouse House reported that nearly eight million people joined as

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>new subscribers to Disney Plus over the first quarter of

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, which was better than anticipated. This makes Disney

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus a leading company when it comes to growth. Keep

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>in mind, like there are other services that are bigger,

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they're just not growing at the same rate as Disney

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Plus growth. Like again, this is why I think growth

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is a bad metric for success, because you could be

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>growing really fast, but the reason for that might be

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're pretty small. So if you have two people

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on your service and then six more people sign up,

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that if you if you convert that over

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to percentages, looks really impressive, but when you look at

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the actual numbers, maybe not so much. Anyway, despite the

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that Disney Plus is growing very fast, faster than

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>services like Hbo Max, the division is losing lots of money.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's losing money faster than it was before. This,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is again one of the things that

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>really puzzles me about business. It convinces me that all

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>money is fake and we're all just playing pretend until

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it all falls apart. But yeah, Disney Plus is growing

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>super fast and pulling in more money per subscriber on average,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's also losing money faster because the cost of

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>producing exclusive content for the platform is really high. We've

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>seen this with other services as well. Netflix, in particular

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>streaming platforms attracts subscribers primarily by securing exclusive content. Sometimes

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that is involved by signing deals with specific studios so

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that you have the exclusive right to stream that studio's content.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>In other cases, it involves funding productions directly, and this

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff is expensive you. Disney is reportedly considering introducing an

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>ad supported subscription tier to Disney Plus in the future,

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>similar to what Netflix is considering. Yesterday, Google kicked off

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>its annual Io event. That's the one in which the

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>company reveals new products and invites developers to become familiar

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with various platforms so that those developers can create stuff

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that can work on those platforms. Like this is where

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>developers learn about increased features and and upcoming operating system updates,

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Now, I've attended one io event

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that was the year that they brought in Flight of

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the con Chords to play the after party. But I

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know who Fly the Concords were at the time,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and now I kick myself because if I had known,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I would have been at the whole set instead of

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>just at the tail end of it. Anyway, none of

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that matters. Let's talk about some of the stuff that

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Google showed off this year. So it teased the Pixel seven.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be the next generation of the

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Pixel line of smartphones, the Android phones. The company plans

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to release a Pixel seven and a Pixel seven Pro,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which is in line with what it's done over the

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Both of those phones will sport

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Google Tensor chips, but that's about all the information that

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the company was willing to part with at this stage.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Google also announced the Pixel six A, which is meant

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a more budget friendly version of the Pixel

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>six smartphone. It'll be slightly smaller, might lack a few

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>other features. Uh, it will retail for four dollars, and

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing that the Pixel six A will not have

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>is a headphone jack. Google has gone back and forth

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to including a physical headphone jack, and

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>has even taken some potshots at Apple for having abandoned

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the headphone Jack in the past, but it looks like

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Google is doing the same thing, at least with the

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>six A. Maybe that's because of another announcement that the

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>company made, which is that the Pixel Buds Pro Earbuds,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a a two dollar set of earbuds with noise cancelation

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and advanced microphones to allow for calls with a minimum

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of interference, are coming out this year. At long last,

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Google also unveiled the Pixel Watch, which will incorporate fitbit technology.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That fitbit connection is critical because it means Google can

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rely upon tried and tested technology rather than developing everything

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>from scratch. The company said it would be available in

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the fall, and it would be sold at a premium price,

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>which probably means if you have to ask, you can't

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>afford it, So I guess no Pixel Uch for me. Then.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Google also showed off a prototype of some smart glasses

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that would be able to display translations in real time,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning if you had two people and each of them

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>had a pair of these glasses, they could have a

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation with one another even if neither of them spoke

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the other person's language, which is pretty cool. Uh, there's

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>no telling if this prototype will ever become an actual product,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is a nice demonstration of how augmented reality

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>technology could have some real world applications outside of gimmicky stuff.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The io event continues today, but usually we see all

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the big reveals on day one. But if anything huge

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>gets announced today, I'll be sure to cover it in

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an episode next week. Finally, Bethesda, the video game studio

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and publisher, tweeted that upcoming video game titles Redfall and

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Starfield will not be coming out this year. The company

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>has chosen to postpone the publication these games until the

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>first half of three, citing the need to quote ensure

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that you received the best, most polished versions end quote.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bethesda first announced Starfield at e three way back in

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>calling it a an all new i P, so not

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a continuation of any of the franchises Bethesda is known for,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff like Fallout and Skyrim or Elder Scrolls.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say, and that this game puts players in

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the role of space explorers. Uh, there's not a whole

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more detail available about Starfield. There's a bit, but

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's largely mysterious since it's a brand

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>new I P. Red Fall is actually an arcane Studios title.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Bethesda is the publisher, not the developer in this case,

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a first person shooter game similar to titles

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like Left for Dead, in which players can assume one

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of four playable characters and up to four people can

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>play cooperatively in a session x app. Instead of fighting

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>off zombie hordes like you do and Left for Dead,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>where you're you know you're fighting off endless waves of

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>zombies on your way to a safe zone, the Red

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Fall game is going to be about fighting off vampiric

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hordes as you presumably try to make your way to safety.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm told there's more to it than that, and I'm

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>being a bit snarky. It's my reaction is mostly based

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>off of a teaser video about Red Fall that I

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>saw a couple of years ago, where I thought, ah,

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Left for Dead, but with vampires. So I'm sure

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more complicated and sophisticated than that. So my apologies.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It was just my initial reaction. And that's it for

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the Tech News for today. That's Thursday May twelve, two

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty two. Hope all of you are well. If

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you have suggestions for topics I should cover in future

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, Please leave me a note on Twitter.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is text Stuff. Hs W

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely used the the tech show handle because I don't

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>check my own Twitter anymore. And I will talk to

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Y tech Stuff is an I

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.