WEBVTT - China's Tech, Tesla's Surge, and Bitcoin Stall

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio Newshard.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Where innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon Valley, n Beyond.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>We are live from New York. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, Apple CEO Tim Cook visit China and undines

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 4>its importance to.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>The tech company.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Will discuss the future US China relations and supply chains.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Plus we'll look at what's behind Tesla's post election stock surge.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it fundamentals, is it hype?

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 4>And Bitcoin's rally stools out after nearly reaching one hundred

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll discussed on Kristen Smith from Blockchain Association, but first.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's get a little bit more on today's market moves

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 4>when you fold in the geopolitical contentions here, we're still

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 4>on what happens between US and China, and we still

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 4>tried to digest what's happened in terms of earnings from

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.559
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese tech johnts Isabelle Lee joins us now and Isabelle,

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 4>you've really been going global for us, and I want

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>to take a moment to say how awful Chinese earnings

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 4>have been for the big tech companies, and we get

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a reprieven training today, but we

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 4>were entering a bear market at the end.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Of last week.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, it was definitely underwhelming for all of the Chinese

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 5>tech companies, and it's not a surprise to allude to

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the geopolitical and economic uncertainties and whether or not these

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 5>companies can win investors back large hinges on Beijing's stimulus

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 5>splits and that has really since fizzled out. Just over

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 5>the past week, we have the five biggest tech companies

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 5>erase forty one billion dollars in market cap. The MSCAI

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 5>China indexed slits its lowest in September, and call after call,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of these executives are really just saying how

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 5>uneven the economy is and how underwhelming their business is,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 5>and how most offered cautious optimism. But they also ask

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 5>investors for patients. We have PDD for example, they walk

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>around discussing their disappointing earnings. Ten Cent that it promised

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 5>new blockbusters, even Baidu, which is the front runner in

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 5>the AI development, failed to wow. And adding to this

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 5>is of course Donald Trump win and what that would

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 5>mean for China. And lastly we have Morgan Stanley cutting

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 5>Chinese equities too slight underweight and Golden sax lowing. It's

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 5>MSCA Chinese gauge ratings, so it's really underscores how cautious

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 5>and how shaky Chinese equities are on for.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, it's really with the roundup of concerns with China. Meanwhile,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I commit that economic concern or a number of top

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 4>executives of global firms traveling to China participating in discussions

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 4>with the country's premiere. Apple CEO, Tim Cook was one

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>of the most notable names. Just to take a listen

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>to what he's had to say.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thrilled to be here and I'm so proud

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that Apple has an exhibit here with our partners.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So how do you value your partners in China?

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I value them very highly. We could not do

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what we do without them.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Dan Willman's with us joining us for more on will

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 4>remind us why China is so integral to Apple.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 6>China is a huge, hugely important to Apple supply chain,

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 6>and according to our reporting, it is Apple's second largest

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 6>market behind the US, where it is currently struggling. According

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 6>to many of our reports over this past year against

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 6>domestic Chinese domestics smartphone makers. So on those two counts

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 6>extremely important to Apple.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, they've got to try and front run what other

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>tariffs look like, what the future and under a Trump

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>administration can look like. And actually, you've done great reporting

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>across the entire team that they have interesting relations across Asia.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 4>More broadly somewhere they have to invest more to earn

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>the right to sell their products in China, where they

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 4>have to earn the right to continue to build so much.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 6>The absolutely in a real study of contrast, today, Bloomberg

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 6>also had a report out that Indonesia is really pushing

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 6>back on lifting its iPhone sixteen sales ban, really demanding

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 6>more investment from Apple, saying, hey, you have invested so

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 6>much in manufacturing in Vietnam, which is a smaller market

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 6>for you in terms of iPhone sales, why not invest

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 6>more in Indonesia, which is the largest Southeast Southeast Asian economy.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 6>So the two stories today stood as a real contrast

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 6>for me, this push from Indonesian leaders versus just this

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 6>report out of China that really highlighted how vulnerable Apple's

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 6>business is in the region.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Dana we love the context Dane woman for all things Apple.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the other juggernaut that is in video.

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 4>A big exposure to China too, of course in terms

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 4>of selling into that market. The CEO, Jensen Wang, was

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 4>just in Hong Kong over the weekend, where he received

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>an honorary doctorate in engineering from the Hong Kong University

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 4>of Science and Technology. He emphasized in Vidia's ties to

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 4>the region and weighed in on the potential impact of

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 4>the incoming US administration.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Just take a listen.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 7>I don't know what's going to happen with the new administration,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 7>but whatever happens, we'll balance multaneously compliance with laws and policies,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 7>continue to advance our technology and support and serve customers

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 7>all over the world.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Will continue to do that, and we'll be able to

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>do that.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 7>Just fine.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's keep this conversation going from an investor perspective. Scott Ladin,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a CEI of Horizon Investments. Does it give you pause

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 4>as you try to understand what on earth US China

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 4>relations look like next year and how it impacts your

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 4>investments in tech?

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, it has to.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean you have to take account of what this

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 8>administration says they're going to do to China, especially on

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 8>the tech front, and and frankly, what China's retaliation might

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 8>look like. You know, we think actually the US is

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 8>probably a little bit of a stronger position than they

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 8>were in twenty eighteen, the last time these two powers

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 8>really confronted, because China is frankly in the throes of

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 8>a balance yout recession right now, so they probably don't

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 8>have quite as much maneuverability on the on the stimulus side.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 8>But at the end of the day, you know, like

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 8>taking account of how these two are going to interact

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 8>amongst each other, kind have a lot to do with

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 8>where we put our money in.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.799
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So would you ever, even at these pretty beaten

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 4>up levels, be thinking about the Chinese technology giant still

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 4>being an area to be a creative in the future.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 8>Look for once for me twice on the Chinese stimulus stuff,

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 8>it's not you know, you can't you can't predict what

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 8>the what the Chinese administration or the Chinese Communist Party

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 8>is going to do with respect to fiscal stimulus, which

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 8>is really what the doctor ordered for that economy. And

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 8>without that fiscal stimulus, it's really tough to get out

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 8>of these balance sheet recessions where demand is just lacking.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 8>And so you know, if we do get signs, not signs,

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 8>we get announcements that the China is going to engage

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 8>in large scale fiscal stimulus, then yes, you have to

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 8>get on board the Chinese tech stocks because you know

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 8>they because then the consumer can come back alive again

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 8>in China and we can really get get going. But

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 8>without that, it's you just you can't predict policy in China.

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 8>So you know, we just have to take a wait

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 8>and see approach.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 4>What about US names that have significant exposure to China

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 4>and perhaps haven't managed to show that they've got such

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>strong demand globally that it doesn't matter.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's gonna hurt them, you know, any but

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 8>this is not you know, there's not new news. I mean,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 8>everybody knows with the Trump win that China's is going

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 8>to be sort of enemy list number one. And so

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 8>you know that these these companies have been planning for

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 8>a while the potentiality of a Trump win.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>They're going to have answers to it.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 8>But you know, just just because you know, this is

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, like I said earlier, this is not new news, well, let's.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Think about what's not new news when it comes to

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>a player like in video. Currently, in Video is one

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the worst points contributor to the NASDAC. Today we're falling

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>significantly another three percent, which is a lot of market

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 4>cap erosion for Is this as big as this?

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that more.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 4>About just profit taking? Is that about exposure China? Is

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>it about exposure to too few clients like Microsoft, like

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Amazon and like Alphabet.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, look, it's probably a little bit of all those things, Caroline.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 8>It's it's you know, when you when you have one

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 8>of your largest clients, you know, a company like Amazon

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 8>coming out and saying, look, we might start competing with you,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 8>we might get in this game. Even though they've they've

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 8>been in the game for a while, but now they're

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 8>really ramping up efforts. You know, this is obviously a

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 8>very lucrative space. You know, margins of seventy five eighty

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 8>percent on businesses like this, So you know, it makes

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of sense for it for other large tech

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 8>companies to come in, to come in and try to

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 8>challenge in Video's place in the market. These things will

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 8>take some time, but but you know, those things will

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 8>have to weigh on the on the stock price at

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 8>some point.

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 3>So what do you do, Scott? Do you keep the

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>exposure you have to? It feels a fool Zerran to

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>have a bet. Again, it's big tech in some way.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh but let me be clear, I'm not I'm not

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 8>advocating it anyway to bet against they bet against big tech.

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, we are we are in the

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 8>in the mid to late nineties sort of cycle. AI

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 8>is him as my kids would say, you know that,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 8>you know so this this is this is definitely a

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 8>training guy to get on, but the train like that

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 8>they have to get on in a broadening sense. You know,

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 8>this is not just in VideA anymore. This is not

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 8>the twenty twenty three AI trade. Just so you know,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 8>the broadening out of this team into other users, like

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 8>how are companies going to use.

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>AI in the future, you know what?

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 8>Other what other you know, suppliers are going to come online,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 8>like like possibly Amazon in the chip space. So you know,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 8>playing that broadening out theme inside of AI is rankly

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 8>We're spending quite a lot of time trying to figure

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 8>that out here at Horizon, and it's something that I

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 8>think a lot of investors are going to have to,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 8>but it is you know, you know, you do not

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 8>want to be short tech. You do not want to

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 8>be short at these this AI theme this time. To

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 8>get on board, you have to understand how to play

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 8>it for twenty twenty five, not for twenty twenty three.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I know you don't want to share the secret source.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>But as you're.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Doing that work, where have been the rich pickings so far?

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 3>We've heard often.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 4>It's about the energy play, or it's about the applications

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 4>within healthcare, But where have you found some of the

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 4>outsized potential here?

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>You're you're picking on a couple of them. Look at mean,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, at some point you've got to get down

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 2>to the users. So you know, if you know, if you.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Think about how how the tech trade played out in

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 8>the middle late nineties, you know, first there's the people

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 8>that made the tech and made things possible. But really,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, the main gains where to we had by

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 8>people that use the technology, that use the internet, that

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 8>use PCs in order to enhance productivity in their businesses.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 8>So you know that, you know, getting onto that, getting

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 8>onto that type of play is we're spending quite a

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of time trying to figure out, like you know what.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>You know you mentioned healthcare, which.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Biotech companies are going to figure this out in order

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 8>to do advanced drug development? You know which which major

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 8>farmers are going to figure this out for the same

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 8>type type of reason. You know what kind of industrial

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 8>companies are going to figure out logistics improvements based on

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 8>some AI logical that they're building in their processes. And

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 8>so those types of questions are the things we're trying

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 8>to answer right now. You know, I do think we're

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 8>second or thirty any of this stuff. It's probably a

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 8>little early to get really on board with the users,

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 8>but it is.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have to start doing the work right now.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Keep going on when you've done the work, and as

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 4>you continue down at Scott Lander, his CIO of Horizon Investments,

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 4>we really appreciate your time today. Meanwhile, coming up, we've

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 4>got so much more on some of the stocks that

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 4>have outperformed. Tesla for example, absolutely mean like stock Search,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 4>is it needing Wall Street feeling a bit wary at

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 4>these levels.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 3>We'll bring you the details from the latest UBS.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Note, as we're up another four percent over the last

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 4>five days, let's just focus in in one of well

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 4>key driver in the market, today is Tesla.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>We want to look at it over the last month.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Shares as you see thirty one percent in the last

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 4>month because well, of course, all surrounding the new administration

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>that's likely to come in twenty twenty five. BBS analysts

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 4>are cautioning that this post election surge is more to

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 4>do with marketing xuberants and actual improvements in the fundamentals

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 4>of the business.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Who knows Cretridel.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Has more And we've been trying to understand crucially whether

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 4>this relationship personal one really between Elon Musk and Trump

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 4>and the future administration will bear dividends for the business

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 4>of Tesla, And you've been trying to measure it up,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 4>so has UBS.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 9>I think UBS's report is very interesting today because they

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 9>will sort of grant this idea that narrative wise, it

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 9>makes a lot of sense that you would see a

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 9>run up in the stock given how close Elon Musk

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 9>has placed himself to Donald Trump. But they really sort

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 9>of pick apart some of the reasons you know, commonly

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 9>cited for this run up in the last few weeks.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, you take a look at taking away ev

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 9>tax credits in the US, for example, maybe Tesla is

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 9>able to handle that better than some of its competitors

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 9>that aren't making money on EV's but it's still not

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 9>a positive for EV demand as a whole, and so

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 9>UBS is a bit bearish on that front. And when

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 9>you look at autonomous vehicle policy as well, you don't

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 9>have an actual robotaxi at Tesla, whereas you know, Weimo

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 9>is out with a robotaxi now, and you know that

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 9>was that company was just valued at about forty five billions.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 9>So does it really make sense to put, you know,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 9>potentially one hundreds of billions of dollars on a Tesla

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 9>autonomous vehicle valuation given its it's sort of closest comp

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 9>Weimo is valued it much less than that.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 3>The problem is.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>The price target for the next twelve months on average

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 4>from the analyst that rate it is well below where

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 4>we're currently trading two and forty four, whereas the last

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 4>price is currently three hundred and fifty four. We've seen

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 4>relative strength indexes of Tesla just show that we are

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 4>over bought territory, and yet we don't seem to be

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 4>able to actually against the stock.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 9>I think that's another point that UBS makes interestingly today.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 9>Is just that we've seen this before. We've seen that

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 9>this is sort of an ultimate momentum stock that when

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 9>it rises, it really rises.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>When it falls, it really falls.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 9>And I guess that's sort of befitting of Musk, right,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 9>he doesn't do anything halfway. But you really see in

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 9>terms of you know, equities that are are commonly you know,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 9>traded with with options that you know really sort of

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 9>lead to these outsized moves. I think Tesla is you know,

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 9>sort of exhibit A in terms of stocks that you know,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 9>because of the options activity, you tend to see you know,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 9>sustained and really dramatic moves in the stock one where

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 9>or the other when you have a a sort of

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 9>reason for the stock to you know, narrative wise, you know,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 9>go in one direction or the next.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 4>We'll see whether the meme trading can continue. We're currently

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 4>up on the day at least. Created Al always great

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 4>to check in with you.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's take.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 4>A look at Rocket Lab shares absolutely surging as well

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 4>after the satellite company said it successfully launched IS fifty

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 4>sixth electron missile LUMEGS. Bruce Einhorn joins US. Now we're

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>up three percent there's other narratives around the business today

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the chip sacked, but focus on this launch.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 4>We had one out of New Zealand very swiftly after

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>one out of the United States.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so there are two launches. The launch in the

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 10>United States is for a customer that the rocket Lab

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 10>has not yet disclosed. In the past, rocket Lab has

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 10>done launches from Virginia for US government customers. The launch

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 10>in New Zealand was for French startup. This was part

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 10>of a multiple launch contract that rocket Lab.

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Has with them.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 10>So altogether this makes fourteen launches that rocket Lab has

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 10>had this year, which beats their record which was ten

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 10>last year.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's put this in context.

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 10>Impressive for rocket Lab, but remember that SpaceX has had

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 10>more than one hundred launches this year.

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 4>They are very much still and also run at the moment,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 4>but they're clearly garnering some momentum here. What's interesting is

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 4>they're also getting money from the US government when it

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>comes to chips. Where else in the manufacturing area are

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 4>they and why are they getting such money from the

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Commerce Department.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 10>So this is the final signing of a contract from

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 10>the Department of Commerce related to the Chips Act. Twenty

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 10>three point nine million dollars. The company had announced a

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 10>preliminary deal for this before, so this is not a surprise.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>People knew this was coming.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 10>Rocket Lab has a subsidiary in New Mexico that makes

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 10>solar cells. It's one of the only companies I believe

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 10>they are only two in the United States that make

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 10>these components. And so rocket Lab has now gotten funding

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 10>from Commerce Department to promote that to build more of those.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 10>So just giving another lift to this stock. Interesting what

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 10>you were talking about with craigirl about optimism about post election.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 10>Rocket Lab is one company among several space companies also

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 10>benefiting from this bullishness after Trump's reelection that the new

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 10>administration will have policies that will be favorable to the sector.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Almost twelve billion dollars market capitalization not quite up to

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the two hundred and fifty billion dollar market evaluation we

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 4>understand for the privately held SpaceX At the moment, Bruce

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Einhorn will need to get the context.

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>The French government.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Suffering to buy the advanced computing assets.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>From ATOS for as much as six hundred and fifty.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Three million dollars after an earlier offer from the state expired.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Now the offer includes the company's AI business as well

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 4>as its supercomputers and Merg's Benoir Badillo is here with

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 4>more And what is better about this dale or is

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 4>it just different because this is all about trying to

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 4>bail out what is a company that's under a lot

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 4>of duress from a debt perspective.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's important for Athos at this stage to divest

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 11>it has these activities. The creditors who are taking over

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 11>the company will win liquidity out of it. And most importantly,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 11>the French state has wanted to ensure that these strategic

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 11>assets remain within French control and are sort of safe.

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 11>These are important assets because the supercomputers we're talking about

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 11>are used to do the dissimulations of nuclear activities for example,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 11>that are very key to friends and the French government.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>So this deal is sort of narrower.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 11>It's just on the supercomputers part of Athos, which called

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 11>build Essay, and this leaves on the sides other assets

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 11>that are in cyber security or what's called mission critical systems.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 11>So these are said are going to be sort of

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 11>up for auctions and other French companies again are going

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 11>to make bids for these activities.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's the kicker here.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 4>These all want to remain in local hands in some way.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Some deals have worked world.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Grade unit we sold to a French engineering company, but

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 4>others have unraveled, like the one with Talas. Is it

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 4>just trying to find the right price point here.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 11>Yes, there's a bit of that. The creditors want a

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 11>good price point for it. That the French defense companies

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 11>bidding for these assets will certainly want to have a

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 11>good price as well. We know that Talis, an important

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 11>French defense company, is interested by what's called mission critical

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 11>assets here. They said in the past they could be interested,

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 11>they have not made a bid yet. It was probably

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 11>complicated for these companies to do a deal with the

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 11>French states. So now the state has done the deal

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 11>in the supercomputers, and other deals could be done. But

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 11>you're right, what's at stake here is really used as

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 11>strategic assets and the sovereignty of French technology that's critical

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 11>for the civilian industry and also for a lot of

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 11>military use. So while this company has been unraveling, it's

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 11>really the stake of these really sovereign assets that's at

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 11>steak now.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, it's bonds trading at sense on the Euro. Significant

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 4>pressure there still Benman Bartolo on that key French asset.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>We thank you very much. Meanwhile, time for talking tech now.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 4>A first up online verification company, id dot me as

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 4>close to tender offer that value the business at one

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 4>point eight billion dollars, according to a source, REMIT Capital,

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>a new investor in the company, led the transaction with

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 4>existing investors Viking Global Investors and Capital G anticipating plus

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 4>insta three sixty. It's a Chinese rival to GoPro, with

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 4>backers including IDG. Capital is considering an IPO in Hong

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Kong after plans for a listing in mainland China stalled,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>according to sources who say the company could seek evaluation

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 4>of at least two point one million dollars in a

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 4>share sale. And Sony is in the early stages of

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 4>developing a portable console there all play its PlayStation five

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 4>games on the move. According to sources who paid say

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 4>that the product is meant to expand Sony's reach and

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>go head to head a Nintendo in the portable gaming market.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloemberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Yet more news around companies buying adding to the balance

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 4>sheet MicroStrategy one of them. Let's get to it with

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Kristin Smith, SEO of the Blockchain Association, who can really

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 4>discuss the future more broadly of how we're going to

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 4>be thinking about where we go in terms of overseeing

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 4>of bitcoin and crypto more generally, how we're going to

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 4>see more laws made.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course, we've had.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 4>The news that the SEC share Gary Gensler, is announced

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 4>that he's going to be stepping down from his seat

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 4>come January. So, Kristian, were you surprised by the news

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:00.120
<v Speaker 4>that he's front running in.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 12>No, I wasn't surprised by the news. It's very common

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 12>when there is a change of power for the chair

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 12>of the SEC to step down at the end of

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 12>the Congress and the end of the presidential term before

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 12>the inauguration, and so, you know, we're certainly very excited

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 12>to see him leave. It has been a really difficult

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 12>couple of years for the industry. We felt like we've

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 12>been boxed in the corner with his regulation by enforcement approach.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 12>But right now we're really focused on trying to figure out,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, how can we move forward as an industry

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 12>how can we reset our relationship with government. And we're

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 12>very excited to get new people into these key positions

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 12>and work with the newly elected Congress when they come

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 12>to power next year, because I think we have a

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 12>real opportunity to get a regulatory frameworkting place that will

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 12>that will be lasting and appropriate for the industry for

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 12>decades to come.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, can you talk to us about the names, for example,

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the sec acclony, pondering, folly, chump for example.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>These will the names that you think won't be regulation

0:21:59.560 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>bond form.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and I think that there are a couple of

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 12>great names that have been floating around for the chair

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 12>of the SEC. I think from the standpoint of the

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 12>Blockchain Association and the industry, what we want to see

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 12>is somebody in there who has experience and deep understanding

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 12>of crypto. I think there are going to be many

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 12>challenges of the SEC chair faces, but figuring out the

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 12>right regulatory environment for digital assets is going to be

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 12>one of those things. And so we don't care who

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 12>it is as long as it is somebody who has

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 12>a deep understanding and who's willing to have an open

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 12>dialogue with the industry.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 4>There's been a discussion about having the first of a

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>crypto post in the White House. Is that necessary at

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 4>this moment when you have a relatively pro Congress, more procrypto.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 3>Than we've ever seen before.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Add indeed, a new SEC check, I think it.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 12>Would certainly be a welcome position. I mean, make no mistake.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 12>What we needed was a strong Treasury Secretary pick, and

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 12>I think we got that with Scott Bessett. We also

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 12>need strong choices for the SEC and the CFTC because

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 12>without those three positions, a CRYPTOSR isn't going to be

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 12>able to get much done. But if you look at

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 12>the many different issues, and this is something that we

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 12>touched on our letter to President Trump on last week,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 12>they cross many different agencies.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 12>We need to deal with the debanking issues with the

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 12>prudential bank regulators. We need to deal with the market

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 12>regulatory issues with the SEC and the CFTC. We need

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 12>Congress to step in and pass a new law. And

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 12>I think having a CRYPTOSAR position at the White House

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 12>would help facilitate those conversations and make sure that we're getting.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>All the pieces done.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 12>Because there are a lot of different different parts that

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 12>need to be addressed. They occur across many different agencies,

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 12>and so yes, we would welcome someone in that role,

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 12>but not at the expense of getting somebody strong in

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 12>at the SEC and the CFTC.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So, if it's not a mutually exclusive thing, who

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>would you want to see as a ZAW level? How

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 4>deep within active duty do you want them to be

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 4>or do you want them to be perhaps a step

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 4>remove in terms of advisory.

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think there are really two qualifications you want

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 12>from that role. One is you want somebody who understands

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 12>the crypto industry.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 3>It is very nuanced.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 12>There are a lot of different pieces, and you need

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 12>somebody who can understand and navigate the people and the

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 12>personalities of the industry. I also think, though, you need

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 12>somebody that knows how to navigate government, because if you

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 12>have someone who shows up from industry but doesn't understand

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 12>the nuances in the history of their relationships, you know,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 12>it would be difficult. And so I think that's going

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 12>to be a very tough position to find. But I

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 12>think there are a lot of people in the industry

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 12>that are willing to step up and step in and

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 12>do that kind of role.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 4>For people who aren't day to day working in crypto.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Can you explain to them why they would want to

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 4>see an SEC chair so deeply in the weeds of

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 4>understanding crypto when the SEC also has to oversee the

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 4>trillions in passive investment, the understanding of implications of AI

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 4>on ETF investment, and ultimately when Crypto remains all about

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the same size as Nvidia's market cap.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, I.

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Think that this is something.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 12>You're going to be someone who can walk and choo

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 12>gum at the same time, right. I think if you

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 12>look at Crypto, yes, it's just approaching a three trillion

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 12>dollar market cap, but this is still the early days.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 12>This is going to be the foundation of financial services,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 12>of our Internet, of so many things going forward that

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 12>we really want to get the regulatory framework right now

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 12>for when this is a ten to twenty thirty trillion

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 12>dollar asset class. And so I think that it's really

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 12>important that we get the rules right so that consumers

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 12>feel protected, so that institutions feel comfort to come in,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 12>but also so that the developers, the builders of the

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 12>underlying blockchains and the applications on top of the blockchains,

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 12>they understand the rules of the roads. They can do

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 12>it right here in the US I think this is

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 12>going to be a big part of our economy in

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 12>the future, and if we don't get the rules right now,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 12>we're going to miss out on that here in the

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 12>United States.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Have you been asked, Kristin for bisar Ro pardon? Have

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you been off to told about Bizarro?

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 12>I've spoken to some people about it, not for me,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 12>but I've offered some ideas as to what kind of

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 12>qualifications would be goad.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Kristin Smith, thank you for the transparency. It's great to

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 4>have you on again. See the blockchain and Association. Meanwhile, let's

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 4>talk about other government versus tech. Google and the US

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 4>government really facing it off in federal court today as

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 4>each side and delivering its closing arguments in the case,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 4>and the tech joan's a legend monopoly of online advertising.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Adam Epstein's here with us. He's COSEO of the Search.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Advertising Company and Marketplace been advising the DOJ and Trust

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 4>team on the remedies in this case.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>And this is sprawling. At the moment.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's front of mind for Alphabet and Google is the

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 4>fact that they might have to sell off Chrome. Now

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 4>many would say, okay, it's about dominance and search. Many

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 4>people worry us about dominance and advertising, and that's something

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 4>that Europe's been looking at too. Just tell us what

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>role you've played for the US government.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 14>Sure, so you know, I've been in search for twenty years.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 14>I went to the closing arguments back in May, the

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 14>decision came out and August and I wrote a memo

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 14>talking about how there could be behavioral remedies that could

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 14>fix the search and the advertising search advertising markets. The

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 14>DOJ saw the memos, asked me to speak with them

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 14>a few times about what we're doing, and then you've

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 14>seen in their proposed final judgment in order. Some of

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 14>the ideas are in there, as well as some of

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 14>the ideas around Chrome divestiture, Android divestiture. Some of that's

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 14>around making sure that Google would comply with the behavioral remedies.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 14>And so this is a two hundred billion dollar market

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 14>and this minimum opolate's been running for a while, so

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 14>getting the remedy rate is difficult, and then making sure

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 14>that there's compliance will be the next step.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Your business is in the world of placing advertising, but

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 4>not having to depend just purely on a few key

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 4>dominant forces in search. Right, would some of the things

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 4>being discussed at the moment. Some of the remedies dramatic

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 4>as they are, help your benefit and benefit your business.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 14>Sure, you know, there's I think a lot of folks

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 14>that would be able to invest in this. In this industry,

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 14>it's been I think such an adelict. Microsoft called it

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 14>a no fly zone for investment for about twenty years.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 14>So we've been working where we can around the edges

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 14>to help browsers and large shopping apps create native search experiences,

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 14>and we think that is the future. And obviously we

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 14>have a little bit of a head start, but there

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 14>will be a lot of entrance in this space, both

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 14>from the advertising side and on the search results side,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 14>especially around AI next gen search agents.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 4>That's really the future, and that's that's kind of the

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>irony of the whole situation. Many feel Actually Google's never

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 4>been under such competitive threat than they are now, particularly

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to us perhaps dotting Google searched one

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and instead using chat gipt.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>You might also they be using AI overviews and a

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Gemini offering.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Just from your perspective setting off a chrome, can you

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 4>see anyone in the market actually.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Buying that, apart from an open AI for example.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 14>Sure, I think there's other folks that would be itento

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 14>in buying Chrome. It's the largest browser in the world.

0:28:55.480 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 14>I think with the DOJ's initial proposed to be really

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 14>set off was the first shot of browser war three

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 14>point zero. Okay, So I think you'll see other browsers,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 14>you know, the duc Duck goes the Firefox of the world,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 14>the Braves, those folks will be more to the front forefront.

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 14>There'll be new browsers coming out, perhaps really built around

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 14>gen Ai and the idea there is that you know,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 14>if we have a lot of entry points and we're

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 14>still able to have some Google modernization, some Google results

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 14>side by side, that's gonna be the best and most

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 14>innovative experience for users and searchers.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not that it's an all or nothing.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 14>Either you get Google and you've got to take Gemini,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 14>or you can use something else. It's a little bit

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 14>more innovative or trying something different. The idea that we

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 14>all go to the search engine result page of Google

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 14>and basically get a one size fits all solution. That's

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 14>I think what the real you know, detriment is to

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 14>consumers and to users of the search monopoly.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 2>We have Chrome in place, but the problem is.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 4>It's very expensive for the infrastructure build around an offering

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 4>such as search and Google Chrome as an access point

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 4>to search. Would anyone ever be able to offer such

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 4>a great product consumers without the huge deep pockets that

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 4>a Google has.

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 14>Exactly so half the clicks that Google sells out to

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 14>advertisers start on third party sites like Apple, like Samsung.

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 14>The question is can they get access to Google's results

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 14>into their ads and then curate their own experiences with

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 14>perhaps instead of Gemini, a chat GPT search agent, or

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 14>with other ads, or with other results, or ranking and

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 14>changing how the rankings work. That's really what we're talking

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 14>about is allowing for that innovation to take to take hold,

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 14>not forcing force funneling every user to search result page

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 14>of Google in order to take advantage of Google's assets.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 14>So the idea is, I think it's both. It's not

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 14>an either or situation, and that would be the remedy

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 14>that I think gets us into a more innovative space

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 14>and also brings competition to the market, which is at

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 14>the end of the day, what the goal is.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're going to be waiting for the final round

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 4>of what exactly is going to be offered, and indeed,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 4>then an appeal process. But in the meantime, Adam, it's

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 4>been great having here from a perspective of the ad marketplace.

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Is coca there, Adam Epstein. Meanwhile, coming up some major

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 4>fundrais news for cybersecurity firm Halcion.

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Company CEO John Miller joins us.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 13>Next, this is a bloom technology.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 3>In today's VC Spotlight.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about the explosive growth in ransomware, and we're

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 4>looking at.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 3>What a cybersecurity firm, Halcion is.

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Doing to stop those attacks and how it plans to

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 4>invest his newest round of funding. Here with more is

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Halsey and CEO John Miller, who's just announced announcing one

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 4>hundred million dollar raise.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>It's your Series C.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Congratulations John, and I want to understand when you yourself now

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 4>have a one billion dollar valuation, put that into context

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 4>of how much each year cut bad actors are making

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>from ransomware.

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 15>Oh, it's a small, small fraction.

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 15>We've seen the growth of ransomware year over year explode

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 15>in the last five years. You know, the losses that

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 15>corporations are seen are on the scale of tens to

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 15>hundreds of billions of dollars a year, Right, Now, the

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 15>scary thing is we're the only actual, or at least

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 15>the first any ransomware company to ever exist where we

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 15>took ransomware as the mission of our company to try

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 15>to figure out how to mitigate as much risk for

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 15>our customers as possible.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so that's fascinating for our viewers to try and understand.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 4>How you block suddenly your corporate being overtaken and everything

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 4>demanding that you give them some crypto payment immediately. What

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 4>is it that your technology is different?

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 15>So what we're all about is breaking that leverage that

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 15>they get to actually incent someone to pay them, right.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 15>So it normally goes down into kind of two forms

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 15>of extortion. One is they'll come in and encrypt everyone's data,

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 15>effectively breaking the computers, right, and then they'll demand extortion

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 15>to get the encryption keys back to bring all the

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 15>data back. And then the double ex as it's called,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 15>is when they steal data from outside of the enterprise

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 15>and then charge you to not release it. And so

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 15>what helsy on what we do is we've figured out

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 15>how they xfiltrate or steal that data, and we stop

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 15>it when it starts to get stolen, and we when

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 15>they go to encrypt the systems, we stop them, and

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 15>if they successfully encrypt something, we capture the encryption keys

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 15>and we have the ability to just decrypt everything.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Anyway you can explain the underlying of what it is

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 4>you're doing.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean it's all super technical, right. The best

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 15>way to think of it as like a new type

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 15>of focused anti virus. Instead of anti virus being wide

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 15>against all types of kind of malware and spyware and adwear,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 15>we're just focused on ransomware. And so because of that,

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 15>we every day we follow the different groups, We take

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 15>apart their tools, we take apart their samples. We're just

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 15>completely focused on this threat, and it's giving us increased

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 15>efficacy over everybody else that's trying to do like general

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 15>security for everything. It was our theory that ransomware had

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 15>becomes such a big problem that by actually focusing on

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 15>it alone would give you higher affocacy in the ability

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 15>to mitigate more risk than the more generalized solutions that exists.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 4>But at the moment we are We had Palo Alto

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Network see on last week, for example, and there's a

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 4>shift between towards what he says is platformization. People wanting

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 4>not just loads and loads of different vendors, but wanting

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 4>a one stop shop to protect them.

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Would you end up folding in.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Your offerings to other cyber players out there? What is

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 4>your end goal here when you've now raised a good

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 4>chunk of change from some key partners.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 15>So we integrate with all of those players, the Palo Alto's,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 15>the Cisco's, the Dells. Really we are kind of our

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 15>own platform, right, so we're building ourselves to not just

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 15>have a feature that gets integrated into something bigger, but

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 15>a platform specifically around mitigating the risk of these ransomware threats. Right,

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 15>as these attackers continue to get more money and be

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 15>more successful, it just gives them better access, they get

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 15>better tools, there's more of them. So we're starting to,

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 15>I mean, and I think it's obvious we're starting to

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 15>lose the war against these attackers. And by coming in,

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 15>we're going to use this money to just try to

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 15>bring as much value as we can to our customers

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 15>about stopping these ransomware attacks.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 4>John Miller und a million dollar Seriously, we thank you

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 4>from Houseion. Amazon getting ready to go toe to toe

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>with Nvidia in the AI hardware space, so that won't

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 4>happen anytime soon. The car coomputing giant is hoping to

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 4>reduce its reliance on the chip maker Remags.

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Matt Day is here for more.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 4>The toe to toe quote comes from a very key

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 4>executives within Amazon who's trying to take on in video

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 4>in the training and inference space.

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about it, that's right.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 16>That was from James Hamilton, the godfather of Amazon Web

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 16>Services hardware strategy.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 2>About a decade ago.

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 16>He suggested to Jeff Bezos that they get started making chips,

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 16>and we're seeing some of the fruits of that now.

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 16>You know, they weren't necessarily planning on the AI boom

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 16>to unfold as it is, but you know, it just

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 16>so happens. They're on their third generation of AI chip

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 16>and they think they've got a part as they'd call it,

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 16>that can compete within video.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 4>Why is the generation so important and why therefore they're

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 4>going all out and handing four billion dollars to Anthropic

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 4>again to be able to get them to use these chips.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 16>Ever Moore, Yeah, so the third generation is kind of

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 16>the prove it point in chips. You know, your first

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 16>is an experiment, your second starts to catch on in

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 16>the third. If you did it right, It's probably going

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 16>to be the one that gets you the volume and

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 16>the success that or else you go a different direction.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 16>This is definitely helps explain why Amazon is doing things

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 16>like spending all that money on anthropic as you said,

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 16>investing in them and investing in other partners who will

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 16>help them use their chips, help them improve Amazon's home

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 16>built chips and build a better mass trap to compete

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 16>more effectively within video.

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 4>In videos down a lot today, three percent. It's a

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 4>big move in terms of market cap because it's of

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 4>course got a massive market cap. But at what point

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 4>would we see less dependence on an Invidia from an Amazon.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 4>What is they end goal here that they no longer

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 4>have to buy them at all, or is it more

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that they just supplement and aren't quite so dependent.

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 16>I think it's definitely to supplement it. You know, Amazon's

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 16>a pretty sober about this. They're not trying to remove

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 16>all of the Invidia from their data centers, far from it,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 16>and that would be a miracle if they could pull

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 16>that off. And I think the goal, if they were

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 16>even optimistic, would be that they can create a credible

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 16>rival to in video. They can put a lot of

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 16>those in their own data centers, and then you know,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 16>for the customers of theirs who want to use in

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 16>video that's still around, but that they've got a competitive

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 16>offering as well.

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 4>And just remind us, I mean, Alphabet's been at this

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 4>a long time. Microsoft and just getting in the space.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, Amazon's got company, or as you said, Google's been

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 16>doing this for about a decade. Microsoft just now is

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 16>rolling out its first chips. But it seems that everyone

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 16>in the cloud has come to sort of the same

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 16>realization that they need to build the hardware too, and

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 16>they need to build the more sophisticated hardware, which are

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 16>the chips.

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 3>Matt Day.

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 4>It is a great piece Today's Bloomberg Big Take, go

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 4>read it, an excellent deep dive.

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, we've got.

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Plenty more news on Amazon because that came out on

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Friday that they're really trying to help their clients.

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Understand quantum computing.

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 4>It's the next iteration of artificial intelligence and machine learning,

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 4>and boy is it helping some quantum computing stocks.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Look at this. On the day, we're currently.

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Seeing Rerighetti up seventy one percent. We're up twenty eight

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 4>percent on quantum computing as They're saying, Amazon's offering advisory

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 4>help as well as, of course the future of where

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 4>hardware goes when it comes to using quantum computing for

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 4>its clients. Now that does it for this edition of

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology. You do not want to forget.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 3>To check out our podcast.

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 4>I find more on the terminal as well as online

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 4>on Apple, on Spotify, and iHeart this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>This healthy shay N Health over