WEBVTT - 25 Players in 25 Years: Mina Kimes on Nos. 25-21

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to NFL Daily's Top twenty five players of the

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years. Yes, this is the first episode.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a six part series. I'm really

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>excited about And there is no one I would rather

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>start the series with than my friend Mina Kimes of ESPN.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a big responsibility, Mina taking the first episode.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Hello, I'm excited to do this. The players that are

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>in this bunch are great. This is a great group.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're all great, that's the general premise of

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>this entire thing, but they're really fun players to talk about.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm particularly excited to be twenty five through twenty one.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a couple things I noticed putting the list together

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's backloaded, like the current players are more towards

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the back. Don't blame Mina or any of the future

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>guests that are coming on the show. It is my list,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but that they're coming on to give their impressions. And

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of great guests. Kevin Harlan is

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the show coming up, your buddy,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Nate Tice, Brian Baldinger, Steve Weis. It's going to be

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>really great. Just a couple of little ground rules. Though,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners out there, if they're curious, it was

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>more about sustained greatness over like a three to five

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>year period. Was like where I started, like, you're not

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be on this list if you only had

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one or two great years. That's almost a prerequisite. But

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't about longevity to me. It was like who

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was the very best and maybe longevity is a little

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tiebreaker.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's like a fair way to do it? Yeah?

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean we're talking about especially when you're talking about

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>top twenty five, it's tough, man. Yeah, you're gonna have

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to make some really difficult cuts and you're gonna have

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>to set guidelines. I think around like, it's kind of

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>like when we do general debates that we're like who's

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the greatest of all time? You have to take longevity

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>into account. You can't just be like a guy at

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>his peak. I actually think the player you're starting with

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>is a great He really is. He really is perfect

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 2>fodder for this exact question is exact debate because there's

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>another player who he's constantly compared to, who I think

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>is probably also on your list, and you're by starting

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>with this player, you're making drawing a line in the sand,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 2>really and you're kind of it's a take.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, it absolutely is, which means we should just get

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. But yes, he's on one side of the equation.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, you're gonna find out. And a second

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, for instance, is maybe a guy

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like no Imdasamawa or something. And not that he was

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>close to making this list at all, but for a

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>three to four year period he was one of the

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>coldest cornerbacks of the last twenty five years. Like, obviously

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna make it because that's too short of

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>an absolute peak. But this list is full of guys

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who had crazy high peaks.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Larry Fitzgerald is not on this list, for instance.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to spoil too much, but he's a

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>guy when you look at it, not that he was

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a compiler, but a one first time All Pro or

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>first team All Pro, like two second teams, his highs

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't quite as high.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's just get the little list. Let's go to number

0:02:58.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty five.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Number twenty five, Travis Kelcey Maholmes gets the shotgun snap

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>pulps throws for the end.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Zone to Kelsey Asting makes the catch touchdown.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 4>Travis Kelcey put a touchdown in.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>The back right corner of the in zone.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Kansas City wins it forty two thirty six and over time.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 6>Patrick Mahomes back does get up the road middle Travis Kelcey,

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 6>this dude's taking over and been dominant in the playoffs.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>When Mahomes throws doing they have a.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 5>One forty quarterback writing, I mean, this is Montane wife territory.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what people call us.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 5>I know I'm back to back and I won three

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 5>in whatever year.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Y'all can call us the dynasty.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You can call us whatever you guys want.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>I know we got it.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 7>Something more special than really what you've seen in the

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 7>NFL is because the guys in his locker room, in

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 7>the headcoach.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It has been a wild dirty we have been on

0:03:59.040 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with Travis Kelcey.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:00.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember when he slips in the draft because of

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>tests and stuff and underrated and comes out. He was

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>older when he came out, twenty four years old. He

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have his first thousand yard season un till he

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was twenty seven years old. And yet he is one

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous certainly and one of the defining players.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you started this whole thing already saying I'm

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>making a take. What do you think that take is

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>putting him at twenty five?

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess that take depends I'm making an assumption,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 2>which is that Rob Gronkowski comes later.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're in this list.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that's the take, right, Because this is the debate,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's a debate, the debate between Gronkowski and Kelsey,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 2>and I think is a really good debate, and I

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's not one that's like there's an obviously glaring

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>right answer. I think you can argue either side. It's

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>about longevity, it's about dominance, it's about peaks, it's about

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>postseason accomplishments. It's also about the nature of this particular position.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the most important thing. Is when you're

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about who is better, who was greater, who was

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>more dominant, you were also talking about, well, what are

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>we expecting out of the tight end position?

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Aolute And yeah, his blocking obviously is not nearly what

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Rob Gronkowski's is. But I don't want I don't want

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to be comparing those two the whole time, because at

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>first he wasn't even on my list, and then I

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>started thinking about, yeah he was well because I'm thinking

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about absolute dominance.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Who are the best?

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>But it's crazy the Hall of famers that are not

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>making this list. I mean there are there are a

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of them. This is a it's a tough list.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But for first team All pros three seconds. He's on

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the All two thousand and tens team for the Hall

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of Fame that they put out. He has the numbers

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>like most yards, most playoff touchdowns now, like third in

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards among tight ends. So the numbers are all

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of counting stats, and I just think

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>his peak wasn't like as high as some of the

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>guys higher on this list. But it is ridiculous, meana,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>how many defining moments he's had. And it's because he's

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>been in the playoffs so long, but it's because he

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>finished those games that catch you.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 3>Heard to start.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It was the Divisional round, maybe the best game of

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this decade that he finishes in the overtime against Buffalo.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 1>He's had like so many walkoffs, including against the Chargers.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>We might hurt hear that one a little later, like

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>him beating Kyle Hamilton in the AFC Championship just a

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. The walk, Like, he's had so

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>many absolute big moments and he's just been incredibly consistent, and.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 3>He had to make this list.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I talked to our friend Nick right because I was

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Tony Gonzalez because his all pros and his

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>numbers are just outrageous. But I think at his peak,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey was ultimately better, and obviously he deserves to be here.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of thoughts on Traus Kelsey. First of all,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 2>I think because of the comparison to Gronk and because

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of who he is a disappointing career his career, we

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>forget he was an okay blocker. He wasn't like he

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>was never as dominant as Gronk, and that is a

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>huge part of the argument for Gronk if one wants

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to make that argument, but he wasn't bad, I just

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I want to throw that out there. He still isn't

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>actually that bad. He just gets used differently, And a

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of the way he gets used has to do

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>with the fact that he has not been surrounded by

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>world beaters outside of Tyreek Hill. I think that also

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>bears mentioning this offense has been run through, has run

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>through Travis Kelcey at so many points in so many

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>big games, and certainly since Tyreek Hill left since then,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's not something you see very often. A lot

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>of his usage is because of that. It's born out

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of necessity. I would also argue, and this is something

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I would say is a little bit is if you

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 2>weren't to make a case for him over Gronk, he

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to me, Greg is the single best zone coverage beater

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe of our lifetime. Maybe that's a little bit too rich.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>We think about some of the receivers, but certainly amongst tight.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Ends, no question amongst tight ends. And you're right, I

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 1>would have to think about that list. And that's why

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>he was a tough one for me of where to

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>put him, Like is he high enough? He's one of

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>only two tight ends on this list. I don't mind

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>spoiling like that is his trademark. And you saying how

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>his usage went up, like his best season was twenty twenty,

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that that cursed season with no crowds or anything, that

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he was just going crazy. He actually got a few

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Offensive Player of the Year votes that that was one metric,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Like was he ever at the super top where he's

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>winning those sorts of awards, not so much, but that year,

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, fourteen hundred yards, like over one hundred catches

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and just totally dominant. And to me, he's had a

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>better career than Antonio Gates.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 3>He's the key player other.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Than Patrick Mahomes in you know, the best dynasty that

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>we've seen other than the Patriots dynasty, not just the

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years, but one of them in the

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>history of the NFL. And the thing that's crazy that

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, Mina is he's actually gotten better as

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he's lost juice. One of the fun things I've gotten

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with this exercise. I just go back watch

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>some old tape or watch some old highlights, and you know,

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he's ripping off eighty yard screen passes in twenty seventeen,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. You're like, oh, yeah, Travis Kelcey used to

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have so much juice. And yet because he has a

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous mind meld, maybe the best since Montana to Jerry Rice,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as Mahomes to Kelsey, he's actually gotten better as he's

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten older.

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I do like that, Like, you can't really punish eitherism

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>for the quarterback because they both played with like the

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>two greatest quarterbacks, right, So yeah, it's not like, well,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelsey got to play with Patrick Mahobes. I swear

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to God, I'm not gonna only talk about Trales Kelsey

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>do the lens of Ropper Gronkowski, but Gronk got to

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>play with But I think right now he is in

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 2>that phase, the one last job phase of his career

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 2>where all they need is for him to be big

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>in huge moments in certain games, the same way that

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Gronk was in the infamous RAM super Bowl victory on

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>that one last drive. Yeah, I think with Kelsey, like,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely think he belongs on Listless. Yes, let's start there,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 2>because it's just like the TI, he really marries all

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.599
<v Speaker 2>of it, longevity, peaks, playoff, accomplishments, big.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Games, random reality shows.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the other thing is like watching those clip like

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 2>because he's played for so long at this point and

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>as his persona has evolved so much, it's kind of

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>like his girlfriend's eras, like we do have Travis Kelce's. Yeah,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 2>that's that, by the way, is all I know about Ty.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I've reached the limits of the slip jokes. That I

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>can make, but like, there have been points in his

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>career where he's been used in different plays where he's

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 2>where he's played different roles in that offense, where he

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 2>has sounded different he talks, and it's like he to me, like,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you really can't tell the story of the NFL over

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the last ten years without him. Yeah, I just spectacular

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>football player.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>That It was part of my reasoning. Not only that

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he was on a lot of these guys were going

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on. Who were the most painful to leave off?

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>When I had him off first, I was like, oh,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that's too painful and Chiefs fans are going to want

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear this, But there were there were a lot

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of like Chiefs that were right. I thought about Chris Jones,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought about Tony Gonzalez.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>They were among the first.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>People to be left offices that I was like, it

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>would be too painful to leave Kelsey, who, yes, not

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>only entertain millions, including the namesake of the studio, Chris

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Westling and Lakeisha Westling were hardcore fans of Catching Kelsey

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the only two people I know that

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>were watching every single episode. But yes, like authored so

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>many moments that I can remember, let's actually look back

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because one thing I found looking through like his greatest

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>plays in his greatest games, so many of them came

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Chargers. It's just outrageous that I just want

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>to play one of them.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 6>Get all number three on the all time Chiefs touchdown

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 6>catch list. Would one to night now just one catch

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 6>shay otis Taylor. Here is Kelsey, still going, still going, Kelsey,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 6>good night, touchdown Chiefs.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Winning the thing I remembered more, not that I should have,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>but he has so many good after the catch plays

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>where he just puts that foot in the dirt and

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>gets everyone to go one way, and you don't think

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of him like that.

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 3>And half of them are against the Chargers.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has two game winning touchdowns against the Chargers.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>He has one hundred and ninety yard game against the Chargers.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that that was part of that, Like he

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>so many of them was just like breaking the rest

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the AFC's hearts, especially the Charger.

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.599
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because I feel like Derwin James on the

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Chargers has been thought of as one of the dudes

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>you can count on to try to handle Travis Kelsey.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the other thing that's so unique about him.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Whenever we've talked about the Chiefs over the last few

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 2>years is certainly when during the Tyree Kill era, it

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>was a lot about how you handle that level of

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>speed and it was game tilting. But I know as

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>an analyst, every time I've talked about this team and

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 2>playing them and the defenses, it always starts with, Okay,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>who's on Kelsey? What is your game plan? What is

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>your approach to him? Are you comfortable playing zone coverage?

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 2>The question you ask always about the Chiefs, right like

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>do you have the capability to man up this team?

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you do, who's on Kelsey? Like I just

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a when I think about like great

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>players and whether or not they qualify for a list

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>like this. From my not to be solipsistic perspective, I

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>think through, Okay, when I'm thinking about this team and

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>their games, this is the first person I think of,

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 2>how do you stop them? And he could make that

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>same argument for Chris Jones, by the way, who I

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 2>do think was probably a tough cut.

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It was he was an extremely tough cut, And like

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's a lot of Hall of Famers not

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on this list, So It's tough to make those cuts,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad Kelsey is on. I'm also glad I

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>have our next guy.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Number twenty four, Terrell Owens.

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 5>Terrel Owens down the sideline, getting the first down and

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 5>continuing richeld move backing sow Owens Loo's a big run

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 5>all the.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Way under the XIL for the forty nine touchdown.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Another seventy five yard play, this time terror Owards.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Doing it after the catch, throw it and doing see

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 4>you off the play.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 5>Rolling right the touchdown, ter Olands.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 6>Theren's are going right to the center of the stadium.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 8>Rug to the Dallas Cowboys all going yah, see it

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 8>touchdowns again.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 4>Heading from midfield there he goes.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 6>He's there's gonna be a penalty on George t because

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 6>he's gonna clock them, so ow it's just gonna show

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 6>him up again.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 3>And Tik just said, the heck with it. This game's

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 3>over anyway. I'm just gonna take a cheap shot at him.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>We are wrapping.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that little celebration ofterrell Owens with him sleeping on

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the football. He could make this list just off the celebrations.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You kind of forget how many of them were so iconic. Uh,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you got the popcorn eating the popcorn. You have the

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Sharpie signing the ball, you have the Seahawks, you have

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the pomp Poms grabbing and doing the pomp Pom dance.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 3>You have him, of course doing.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Holding his arms up to the sky at the old

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas Stadium. It's it's just amazing and five first team

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>All pros kind of what you imagine Mina when you

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>think of at least back in the day, there's not

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as many of these guys of like, what would you

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>want your number one to look like? Six three, two

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five pounds and just fast as hell.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I went down a rabbit hole watching too highlights when

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I saw he was on your list, And one of

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the highlights was just every catch he made against the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Bears in the record breaking game that I think

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 2>was Brandon Brushall Brooke that if I remember, yeah catches, yeah,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's it's a great mix of just you know,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>slants and hitches, but then also some couple deep balls

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>as well, and you really get a full sense of

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>like his unbelievable skill set, which really was. I mean,

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>he was good a lot of things, but at that size,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>the speed the breakaway speed. First of all, he was

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>really physical, really strong, good contested catch guy. Some of

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>his most famous catches are like that. But then like

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>the breakaway speed and movement abilities he had at his

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 2>size were so rare, it's like you're like you put it.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's another. I'm sure Calvia Johnson's going to

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>come later, but but it does feel like he was

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>like built in a lob to be a true X.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little different, like better after the catch even

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than Calvin Johnson, and but still had like the mobility.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know he had some drops certainly along the

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>way and wasn't like as great a separator, say as

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, who was a tough cut from this list

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately because I just just on the field watching him.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>He was among the very best I ever saw.

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But he's a guy who, till the end of his

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>career was just a big play machine. He averaged fourteen

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>point eight yards per catch for his whole career that

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like never fell off. He's third all time in receiving yards.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>He was on the All Decade team. He was timed

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>very well for this list his breakout season, and that

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was part of it. I did not consider any nineteen

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>nineties seasons. So even if you started in the nineties,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like a Randy Moss for instance, that wasn't part of

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the equation. And his breakout season to was two thousand

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and five first team All Pros And man, he didn't

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>have like a ton of playoff moments. He had he

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>had to catch too, certainly with the forty nine ers

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was young in his career. But you remember

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that performance he had against the Eagles where Belichick has

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>said many times how he assumed to is not going

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to be in that game or not gonna look like

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to because he's coming off of a broken leg, and

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he goes nine for one twenty two and almost kind

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of carries them to a Super Bowl win all by

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>himself while he was a member of the Eagles.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>The was the finger game before that was after that,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>right when he had the plate in his finger and

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>he came back and played. And that's the other thing

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>we got to talk about with him. Yeah, this is

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the unbelievable toughness, which and it's the other thing about him,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 2>like just like the perfect I talk about him being

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 2>like the perfect wide receiver, lab built ride receiver. The

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 2>personality is like when people think about wide receivers better

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>or worse, and I say better for better or worse

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>because you know, was he always the best teammate? No,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>did he rebul the wrong way? Sure, but holy smokes,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 2>his dude was tough and was a competitor. I mean,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>like some of the injuries that he overcame to play,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, maybe more so than he has some

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of the most iconic coming off in injury games of

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 2>any player in NFL history. And it is funny to

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 2>me that like he contained multitudes in that way, right,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Like we think of this like diva personality, but then

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>he was tough as nails. I don't know, he was

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>just kind of an interesting mix of contradictions.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Yes, let's let's listen just to a little cut up

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we have of some t o trashtock.

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 5>I know you don't know me to sound put them

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 5>a sound in a way because I love me.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Tell me I.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Can hit me.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh, y'all won't do what you can stuff.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>He is an all time NFL Films sound effects guy,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like an all time NFL miked up guy. There's a

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>clip on YouTube from NFL Films with just thirteen minutes

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of him on miked up and it's so good. And

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing you do get from it is you're reminded,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like he was a team captain more than a few

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>times in his career, he was known as like one

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the if not the hardest workers on his team.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>He learned literally from Jerry Rice, and he talks about that,

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>not only about how to work, but how to look

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>good on the field. He talks about that a lot,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and you just kind of think about him running over

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>all these guys and running past him, and it's just like,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what you want on your team. And yes, it

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ended up sour at the end in a few places,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Dallas and San Francisco, like when it

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>went bad, it went bad. But the vast majority of

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>those years, especially the first couple of years in each spot,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>even into Cincinnati at the end of his career, when

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>he's with Ocho Sinkle, he's still putting up a thousand

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>yards like he gave you everything he had. And so

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that was why I didn't want to knock him too

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>badly for all that.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Well speaking, I mean, I mean, I have to bet

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 2>we run an NFL podcast, but I coverring this up.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 2>He's not in the NFL one hundred. Did you know that?

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I did not know that he was not, So then

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I fell did the one hundred greatest Players of all time?

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they did it a few years ago, five

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and uh uh, let's see why. Let me

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>find the headline. He called it despicable and he was

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 2>left off, and like, I'm on his side. I mean,

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 2>come on, dude, he's third old time and receiving yards,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 2>touchdown catches top ten and it's not just a long

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>He's not just a compiler, dominant seasons, one hundred yard games.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's insane that he wasn't on that list. I'm just

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna say, it's crazy.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Receivers the toughest position.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think making this list okay when you're just

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the last twenty five years in no particular order.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones like is he like his peak was just

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely outrageous. Antonio Brown, he used to get into an

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>argument that at his very peak, I don't know if

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone was any better. These are guys that are not

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on the list. Larry Fitzgerald, like I mentioned, who's just

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stacked up numbers like not on the list.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>It was very hard to separate wide receivers.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, yeah, the combination for me of just he

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit uncoverable because even though he had

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>those drops at times, he was such a good contested

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>catch guy that like, even if you could cover my

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Revis had some good battles with him later in his career,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even if you could cover him, like it didn't really

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>matter if he was playing his best.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>The Catch Tube being the perfect example of that. I

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>remember growing up when I first got access to like YouTube,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 2>just watching that over and over and trying to like

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>understand it. It haven't right because it just doesn't just

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>like what wait the ball, Like how is this getting through?

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 2>And how is he winning for it? And yeah, it

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>was just yeah, remarkable. I was asking just one quick aside.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 2>I was while I was watching Highlights, I was texting

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit with you. Mentioned Nate Tice and Danny

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 2>about who is the closest to him in this current generation,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 2>and the consensus was AJ Brown is the player who's

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 2>most similar to t O, which I think is accurate.

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right, especially this version of AJ Brown,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like where he is right now, where we just did

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a Receivers episode and we had him third overall because

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's such a complete receiver. I think Too

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>also warmed up to that spot too, as you mentioned,

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>like the catch Too, that was his big breakout in

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Like, it's funny hearing them talk about him

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>early in his career, like he didn't speak, he was

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>very afraid to talk to the media. It was like

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>this shy guy until he wasn't. But yeah, Marvin Harrison

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was another guy. Tyreek Kill was another guy that got

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>cut off this list. Marvin Harrison somewhat got cut off

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>from the ninety two thousand thing. But it's crazy how

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>hard it was to make it. So it just shows

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you what kind of career Too had. Let's take a

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>quick break and we will be back with the next

0:22:49.840 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>guy on the list. Back on NFL Daily Best twenty

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>five players of the last twenty five years. And yeah,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as we go through some of these players, I will

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be mentioning who didn't get off the list.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I almost feel bad not saying it.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase, they are building

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>up that resume, but they're getting cut off basically because

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been in the NFL long enough.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Unlike our next.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Guy, Number twenty three, TJ WAT.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Sixty yards of offense for the Falcons since halftime Man.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Cousins is sacked.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 6>Guess who TJ WAT put in an exclamation on this one.

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Big rush Hey kJ On has that suck.

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Unbelievable. TJ W comes around and.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Makes a sack.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Favorite pass rushler to watch. I mean, I have to say, TJ.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 4>What shoe string sick?

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 3>From the master himself.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 4>TJ continues to run rough shot woop, Newton gets hit,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 4>ball is out. That's it in trouble periods.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>TJ rock.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 6>He is now the Steelers franchise all time leader in

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 6>that category.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The single most surprising player to make this list for

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>me in terms of I did not expect to be

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>putting him on when I started the list. He was

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>not even that close until I really started thinking about

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the resume. Defensive Player of the Year Top four in

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the voting four straight years, the last four years, four

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>all pros. The most sacks since he's entered the league,

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the most forced fumbles by far since he's entered the league,

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the most tackles for loss since he's entered the league,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the most sacks in his first eight seasons. Other than

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Reggie White and DeMarcus where single season sack record led

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the league in sacks three times, and I just thought about, like,

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what are we talking about here? I'm talking about players

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at the very top of their game. Even though I

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>feel a little lower than consensus on TJ. Watt in general,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I realize, like, not only is he a first ballot

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer, but he deserves to make this list.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it kind of sneaks up on you how dominant

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are. And we know, oh well, whenever we

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 2>do like we're the best three pass rushers in the NFL,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>it's always TG Watt, Mouse Garrett and Blank Michael Parsons

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>right now, right, But I think you don't think of

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>him as like historically dominant until you look at what

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you just described, the idea of that he has led

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the NFL three times in sacks, twice enforced fumbles, that

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 2>he's reached such insane sack totals. It's kind of one

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>those things where you really have to take a step

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 2>back and realize how incredibly dominant he's been, which is

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I'll throw something out. Do you feel like

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe not he's that he's overlooked, But it seems so unbelievable.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>JJ Watt could have a brother just right, like the

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 2>JJ Watt who his peaks were so high that his

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>brother came in and you were and you were like, uh,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's JJ Wat's brother. That he became what

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>he came seems so unlikely. Greg, maybe that plays into

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>it a little bit.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I think so. I mean, you know, who agrees with

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you the entire NFL?

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>How did this guy go thirtieth in the draft, Because

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for so many years all anyone said about JJ Watt was.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Like, how did he fall so far in the draft?

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I know he was like he's a you know, walk

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on and he had a different sort of career. He's

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like a late bloomer at Wisconsin. But it's like he's

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>two ninety five and the biggest, freakiest athlete with like

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the best motor you've ever seen, and then had you know,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a first ballot Hall of Fame season. Obviously he is

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be on this list coming up. And then

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing happened mean with d J Watt.

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Just knowing like what happened with JJ and somehow that

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like in them they we used the phrase like

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they're built different. Like, so Watts apparently really are built different.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>How did TJ. Watt get to thirtieth and then be

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this big of a seal for the Steelers of all teams?

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I guess, you know, genetics and also

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>just work ethic and technique. I mean, that's the thing

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>about TJ. Watt similar to JJ. But to focus on

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.959
<v Speaker 2>TJ for a second, just such a complete player. I

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>think that's if you know, if I had to summarize

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 2>him in one word, it would be complete. He's so

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 2>good at everything. He's so good. Obviously, he is very

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 2>technically refined and fun to watch pass rusher, and that

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>is something he kind of has only gotten better at

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 2>over time as he's you know, added more to his repertoire.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 2>He wins with speed, he wins with power. He wins

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 2>with speed to power. He's got great inside moves, like

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>he's just really really really smart. He's seen it all

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 2>and then he finishes, which is how you get the

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>high sack totals. But he's also a fantastic run defender

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>that matters if we're talking about like who are the

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>greatest of their generation. He's good in coverage, he's a

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>good moments coverage, he's read the quarterback, and he's just

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>he's just really really complete Greg. And I think when

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 2>you if you were able to hit that level, some

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of it is nurture. Not to say that j Watt

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and TG Wat's mom is over this, but like, clearly

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.239
<v Speaker 2>these guys love ball and love studying ball, and that

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>has factored in.

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got that dog at him and they're always you're

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>always looking for intangibles, and it's tough to really evaluate that.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But I really do think like the fact that he

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was jj Watt's brothers should have gotten him drafted higher

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because because there is clearly something about how you can

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>improve at the NFL level that that they haven't helped

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to master.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, it is. It is the big plays.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the knack over and over and over to

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>have game winning plays like it. Once it happens like

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a few times, you're almost like, is this a little

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>fluky that he's getting all these force fumble Like, like

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, he leads the NFL and forced fumbles, Uh,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>since he entered the league. Is it a little fluky

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that like his best plays keep coming at the end

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of these games. It's like at a certain point you

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have to just accept like, no, that that is not fluky,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just just you know, thinking a few He had a

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>game against the Ravens where he called game on Lamar

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Jackson on a fourth down sack. He had the game

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>last year against the Falcons where he essentially called game

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>against then one. Right, Yeah, he essentially called game on

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>our boy Gino Smith in that Sunday night.

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I remember that.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has like a four sack game, you know,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he he's just had like when he goes big, he

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>goes so big and at the biggest moments, And I

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do think that's that's how you get defined as like

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest of the greats.

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel like anyone on this list has to

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 2>have taken over a game or taken a game games, right,

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>but bo, you know, both the all of the guys

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about thus far, you would put in that category.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And with a pass rusher, that's like a really high

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 2>bar because it doesn't happen that often. And there's probably

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 2>like three or four guys in the league right now

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>where you can say I can point to a few

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>times where that's happened, And yeah, certainly it's been TJ.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Wild.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>There's there's something cool too about that he is like

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the ed Rusher of the Pittsburgh Steelers, that he's continuing

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, tradition for that team.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 3>But he's the next and the greatest.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why he wasn't high on my list

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at first is I think I was a little biased

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>towards the players.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>That are in the middle of their prime.

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned before that like Justin Jefferson and Chase just

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like just sure, if they had one or two

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more years, like they really might make it. But seeing

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wat's been in the league by now eight years,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and so why I started comparing them and you compare

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>his resume and here's some other guys. I'm just curious

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts, like like a Kaleis Campbell, for instance, who

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was All Proof Football Reference All twenty tens team, who

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>had a second place at a Defensive Player of the Year.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Jared Allen who's in the Hall of Fame.

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason Taylor, who you know was a second team All

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousands is in the Hall of Fame. But I

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think, actually, when I looked at it, that his

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>highest of highs were as high as t J.

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:17.479
<v Speaker 3>Watt.

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Dwight Freeney was probably my toughest omission where his peak

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe wasn't quite as long, but he was such a

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>good player. But those guys, like, none of them had

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a defensive player of the year like top four type

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of run that that TJ.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Watt had.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you can probably. I mean TJ. Wat's

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 2>been like top one to three for.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Four years.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at least.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>In some other years as well, where he wasn't that. Yeah.

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, none of the guys you mentioned I would put

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 2>over him, So I think that's fair. I am curious

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>now to see how high that another guy who i'd talked, well, yeah,

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to. I don't want you to spoiler.

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's okay, it's good. It's a good tease for

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of us. Speaking of let's talk about

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a player that I know you will enjoy discussing number.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Twenty two, Walter Jones.

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's be anything on the way head with me. I

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 5>want you to come in, you know, and try to

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 5>attack him. It's an honor to join Steve Larger at

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 5>quarter as Kennedy, I'm going to hear to rush up.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 3>A feeling that tell me what w.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Christer Jones get the crown one at.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 5>The third player to represent the Sea.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Yak fronchise, He's steal the Bess.

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Walton is still to Bess and the twelfth man.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 6>What a great push by that left side of the

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 6>Sea Yawks offensive line.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Walter Jones, big Walt, he could be even higher

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on the list, Mina, but I wanted to hear you

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about your Seahawks. I mean, you were very young

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>when Walter Jones was at his speaking yeah, for our

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for our audio listeners.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 3>For instance.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're young, you heard that clip, h It was

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Ware asking tell me where Walter Jones is, so

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's like game recognized game, A Hall of Fame player,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely fearful.

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 3>And worried about what Walter Jones was gonna do.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I was drafted when I was in maybe

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>fifth or sixth grade, so it wasn't that young. Well,

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but then I would say he peaked for so long,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>so it was, you know, he My point is that

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I was in high school when he was great. I

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 2>was the beginning of college. He was still. I mean,

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>he hit something very rare. Although I guess while and Kelsey.

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Interesting continuity here, one player, one team that great, you're

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 2>certainly more likely to stay on one team to where

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 2>to even begin. I was waiting for the block. It

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a cool nickname, but the two thousand and

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 2>five NFC Championship game.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Talk about it. Play it, we got it, but you

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>could talk over it, So tell us about.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 3>It a little bit.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's against the Panthers NFC Championship two thousand and five.

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I would contend, Yeah, there we go. Oh my god,

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike Rucker rip. That man had a family one of

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the single most dominant run blocks by left tackle in

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the history of the sport right there, and he's taken him.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>For a ride and he said as much too. He

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw an interview with him that he did. And

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a play going to the weak side where yeah,

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the defense man is on his outside shoulder, so he

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>has to get to the inside and block a two

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety pounds man and he does it twenty

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>five yards down the field and it's part of one

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the best his feet. Sorry to no, please please

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>go on about what Big Waltz meant to you?

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that play, so again, like if you what what

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>was so remarkable about this and maybe this is if

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about Walter Jones and what made him great,

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>because he was really good at everything. He's a man

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 2>that size shouldn't have feet that moved that quick, and

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you can really see that on that play. Like sometimes

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, when a guy's like block, it's just like

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 2>he's it's just power and he's just nasty and he's

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like a snowplow, you know, moving the

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>guy along. That's not what Walter Jones looked like. Like

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 2>his feet looked like a tight end or something out there.

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 2>It makes no sense. And that was his calling card, Greg.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 2>It was he was so light on his feet and

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 2>so unbelievably athletic at his size. I think he ran

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 2>like a four six forty famously. I think he played

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a little tight end in college or maybe the beginning

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of college or something, so he had that background. But

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it was just very rare and very unusual, and it

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even I mean, he was an unbelievable past protector.

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 2>He just never seemed to get taken by surprise or

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 2>rattled again. A lot of that had to do with

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the lightness of his feet, you know, I'm sure you

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 2>guys have some stats on this. He gave up so

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>few sacks and so little pressure over the course of

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 2>so many years, it was unbelievable.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so's it's fifty seven hundred plays in his career,

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>only twenty three sacks in that entire time, and nine

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>holding penalties in that entire time. Four first team All Pros,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>two second teams. He is the only player that was

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Hall of Fames and Pro Football References first

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>team for the All two thousands, So I thought that

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. He's the only one from this era that

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>did make that NFL one hundred list, which which did

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>influence me. It was tough to pick him over Orlando Pace.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was the way that Jones's career worked out.

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned his longevity.

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Pace was incredible at the start of his career, like

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>right off the jump in like ninety seven through ninety nine,

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and Jones was still peeking late into his career. So

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all those All pros that I mentioned are actually in

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands. He actually made it all the way

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Mina to the PFF era and so these are like

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the last three years of his career, and he was

0:36:55.880 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the highest rated tackle in pass protection in those three

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>years for PFF, and those are the final three years

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of his career.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 3>That's his mid thirties. So I know, like, there's no

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 3>perfect way to mention here.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>To evaluate offensive line, especially twenty years later. But when

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you have like the numbers like that, and then you

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>have all of the people that were around at the

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>same time saying it, I found like a handful of

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>players that were like, that's not just the best tackle,

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the best football player alive right now, or that's

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the best football player I've ever seen. And enough of

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>those I was just like, well, he has to be

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on the list, and he could be higher if I wanted.

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Who knows with offensive linemen.

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Pace was the same draft, right he was.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 3>He was taken first and Jones yeah, went later.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 2>He was well no, But crazily enough, he was the Seahawks'

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 2>second pick in that draft because they took Sean Springs fourth. Yeah,

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 2>and then they traded up with the Bucks for Walter,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 2>which was just insane and a little Seahawks lowreer. A

0:37:58.640 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of that had to do with because that was

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>when all Alan took over the team. This was before

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the rookie contract era. And Paul Allen was rich enough

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 2>to afford to for his around rookies. Like a weird

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 2>quirk of NFL history where he gave the green light

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.439
<v Speaker 2>to do it, because that was what I think right

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 2>after the sale.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Or great, great call, because I was wondering, like I

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was looking at his contracts and stuff. It's just like

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>those first round contracts at the time. They were like

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>seven years long, but they were they were huge for

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 3>But you're absolutely right. They tried to trade up with

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the Jets.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>They thought they had to deal with the Jets at

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>six in the end, the Jets said no, like when

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>they were on the clock. But Bill Parcell's got a

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>small assist apparently said hey, we were talking trade with

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. I don't think they're going to want to

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>sit there. You should call the Bucks. They call the

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Bucks and they make history taking Walter Jones.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 2>The contracts too, are another funny part of Walter Jones's career.

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Who was the torreous for just not showing up to

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 2>camp again. This is all that you learn a lot

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.479
<v Speaker 2>about NFL contract and CBA history through just reading about

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Walter Jones. But every year he would just hold out

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 2>and he would train on his own, pushing like SUVs

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 2>up them and then just show up seth Wickershiam did

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 2>a great story about a USP in the magazine like

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty years ago. By the way, Uh anyways, he I

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 2>feel like Cortez Kennedy before him, maybe was the last

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 2>great Seahawks, but he really defined Seahawks football for an

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarily long amount of time.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I loved hearing some old clips I found at like

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>John Madden talking about him and to be as recognized

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as he was in like a pre internet era essentially

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>as just that dude, you have to just be that good.

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>And I did want to give a shout out to,

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, his line mate Steve Hutchinson, who wasn't always there,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but once they got him in the trade that is

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>almost unquestionably the best left side of an offensive line

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history. I started covering the NFL for Roadal

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>World in three and I would say that Seahawks offensive

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>line not that people talk about all time great offensive lines,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but maybe they get forgotten a little bit to me,

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because to me, they would be right near the top

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys of the mid twenty tens of the

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>best offensive lines you know that I've you know, had

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a privilege to cover and having Jones and Hutchinson next

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to each other for a chunk of their primes is

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy.

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>We've been punished for it with twenty years in battle

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>place since then.

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 3>That's so true.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, shout out to Steve Fudgets it did not

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>make the list, but had to get Jones on there.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Ravens fans, if you're curious, Jonathan Ogden, you know only

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>five years of his prime were in the two thousands,

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so he like we missed a lot of the very

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>best of his career some other really great tackles over

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the years. Lane Johnson did not make it for me.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Jason Peters did not make it for me. Tyron Smith,

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who man, it's close at his very very best is

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to like ar you against him. But we

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>can only have so many offensive linemen.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 3>We have a handful. We have a few more to go.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next guy and our last guy

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>will talk about with you.

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 8>Mina number twenty one, Lamar Jackson, it's a second down

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 8>and free Jackson takes it himself.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Look at him back and forth. Oh it broke his ankles.

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Now he's gotten that turage. Damn, he's got a touchdown.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 5>He is, who deny? Who want to play? Forty seven

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 5>yard touchdown run by the magical quarterback Lamar Jackson.

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 7>Wow, he's like Kobe Bryant. How you can't necessarily stop

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 7>Kobe Bryan. Kobe Bryant's gonna get his at some point

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 7>And that was a great analogy. Lamar's gonna get his

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 7>at some point. And we know that, and everybody knows that.

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Everybody knows that buyers to the anz up touchdown on.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 2>That tun Now I mingle with Vet, but he was

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Rema Eyes, so I'm right.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I'll say, all right, then I had to be twenty.

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson makes a list at twenty one, two MVPs

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and a first team All Pro in the year twenty

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, where he didn't win MVP but probably his

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>best season had led the yards per carry in terms

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of the entire NFL four different time, third all time

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're into quarterback rating, by the way, like if

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you're just one of those old school people that like

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rating and wins, I know wins are not a

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback stat mina, but he's third all time in like

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>winning percentage in quarterback fascorating Yeah, kdr, Yeah, it's funny, yes, passerating.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's funny to me that like he dominates those like

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>old school traditional stats too, so there's no way to

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>come at him.

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>The passerrating one is the one that blew my mind

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 2>this season because he came close to the Rogers passer

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 2>rating record, and passer rating, for those who don't know,

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 2>doesn't take into an account quarterback rushing, which is why

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a useless stat to be honest, because

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>quarterback rushing is such a big part of the modern

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>gamell QPR accounts for a point whatever we have to

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 2>get to it, but anyway, point is like the quarterback

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 2>who coming into this league. I don't want to overplay

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bill Poleon thing, but it was questioned by everybody

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 2>whether or not he could be a pocket passer now

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>whether they just switch positions. Just came close to breaking

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the Pesser rating record, Like I cannot stress enough. And

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>I was as much of a Lamar Jackson fan as

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 2>anyone in that draft Dominice, and I wrote long article

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 2>about him like staking our you know, planting our flag.

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I did not think he would be this good. It

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 2>is unbelievable what he has accomplished and he's only twenty eight.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's no way to say about really any prospect

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>coming in that year. He is going to be an

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>inner circle all time great and that's what he is.

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I had to think about with this exercise,

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I was like, has he played long enough in

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL?

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 3>It's been seven years?

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Has he done enough to get on this list over

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:02.399
<v Speaker 1>some really great quarterbacks? Because I didn't want to make

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this just like an all quarterbacks list. Initially I had

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>him on like a little higher than I had him

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>completely off. And I settled here and just decided, like,

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>especially of this generation. You know Mahomes is coming up

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert, but of this generation, he literally was the

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>best player in the league either three times or if

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to split it, this last year, like two

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half times. And he's the best running quarterback

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ever that like goes without saying not just that he

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>had the best season of all time in terms of

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, but leading all the NFL including the running

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 1>backs and yards per carry four times, Like to me,

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is so crazy, But what you realize pretty quickly, and

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think about that week one game actually in his

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>first full season starting, it was twenty eighteen, right or

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, sorry, against Miami, and that game where he

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is just throwing bombs down the field and he is

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so good throwing over the middle of the field, and

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that is the game where you kind of realize, oh,

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>his legs are going to set up so much with

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 1>this passing and he is such a good passer. And

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that season, you know, his first full season as a starter,

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he wins the MVP.

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I think he's also a guy where the stats, as

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably impressive as they are, and you know, we just

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>discussed all of them, still don't capture what he does

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to defenses and what he does on a football field

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and the way he I would say, more than any

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 2>other player I've watched, Clee Michael Vick. He has more

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 2>gravity as a dual threat, and I love watching the

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Ravens on tape for this reason. I love the way

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 2>he pulls defenses on a string still and the opportunities

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that creates for the run game and other players is

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 2>just unparalleled. He is also just the most electric like

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 2>dynamic runner, you know, I mean just his style, the

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 2>fact that he never appears to be moving at full speed.

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Is crazy. And then, oh, by the way, he also has,

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 2>by the way, become the most accurate passer in the NFL,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I was always a believer in his

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 2>passing ability and his football IQ and whatnot, but he

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 2>was not the passor he is now earlier in his career.

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's another thing I really have loved about watching

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 2>him and about his game. And this is the same

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 2>would apply to Josh Allen. He's gotten so much better, Greg,

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 2>and he's twenty eight, twenty eight. I mean he's both

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 2>him and Allen, by the way, not only have gotten better,

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 2>but mentally, I would put up there with anyone in

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the league right now.

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Right because when you think about that twenty eighteen season

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or twenty nineteen season, twenty eighteen, by the way, sort

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of underrated when he came in and immediately started winning

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>games for them and was like an immediate sensation and

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>helps get them to the playoffs and belonged right away.

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But he definitely needed to develop, and he did that

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>offseason in terms of his passing, You're right that twenty

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen season, his running was absolutely setting up his passing

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and his passing was better than everyone realized. Hey led

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the league in passing touchdowns and QBR ESPNSQBR that year.

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>But now the way he can manipulate defendant defenders, how

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he can anticipate, how he can throw over to the

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field. You have that part of it,

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of like everyone who ever watched a

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>running quarterback growing up, whether it was Randall Cunningham or

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Steve Young or even Dante Culpepper and just thought, like,

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's so cool. Like if one guy could put it

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>all together, like at the highest level, wouldn't that be

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the coolest football ever? And that is Lamar Jackson. He's

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>done it. He is that guy.

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>So you are taking into account playoff accomplishments putting this

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>list together. How much are you dinging him for the

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 2>fact that he's never been to a Super Bowl? So

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 2>he's never won a conference championship game? I imagine you know none,

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean like Mahome. You said Mahomes is on the list,

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 2>so it's not like there's anyone else in this regard.

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 6>But but.

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, does that do you think there are people screaming,

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 2>how can you put a guy this high? I'm just

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 2>playing Devil's advocate here. Do you think that there are

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 2>people at home saying, like, well, he's never even won

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a conference championship game, how can you put him this

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 2>high on a top twenty high list.

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think the best way to evaluate a quarterback

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 1>is over the course of a regular season, and he's

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>done that so many times that it tells me that

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he will have that playoff success at some point and

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not that worried about it, like we I

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>saw it with Peyton Manning, who is one of the

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>greatest individual success stories of all time, and it took

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a while for him to actually get it done in

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and it didn't change really who who I

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think about him and think of all the times just

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:40.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the order it happened that, like Aaron Rodgers

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>knocked on the door and didn't make it, you know,

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 1>or Drew Brees after winning that Super Bowl the one time,

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like it took that long. So I don't want to

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 1>have to wait till he's thirty one or thirty two

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to recognize Plus he's like he just he makes your

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>jaw drop.

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's actually look at one of my favorite Lamar Jackson place.

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 5>Justice Hill who's the best likely emotion, He buckles of

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 5>my God, performs groups of them, doctrooms at home, pretends

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Hubbard how from a look a word and.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Cots on touchdown, cots on touchdown then likely.

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely amazing.

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 5>How in the world did he keep it together and

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.240
<v Speaker 5>let him find the open receiver.

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I could just do an entire show on Kevin Harlan

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>calls of Lamar Jackson touchdowns. I've almost regretted not having

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Harlot on this episode just so I can hear him

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 1>react to that. But we'll have them on some calls.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 2>I love it. Next, not to really nerd out, but

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 2>next gen jet stats does the you know, completion percentage,

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 2>likelihood of throws and whether or not a quarterbacks he

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 2>seeded those he's got to have the most like just

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 2>preposterously low odds of completing passes, touchdowns, deep passes, and

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 2>just pulling the rabbit out of his hat. Of any quarterback,

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Mahomes, I guess would.

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Be above him.

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I don't know, though, I mean they're close. They

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 2>both have, you know, all the best quarterbacks in the

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 2>league right now, by the way, can lay us to that.

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But Lamar, it feels like he has to lead in

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 2>this guy moments like that.

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.919
<v Speaker 1>That's worth something like we're talking about best, we're talking

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about greatest to me, this freaking guy, this guy he

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>came to and Josh Allen. It took a little slightly

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>later developing obviously came out a little later.

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Like he ushered in this new generation.

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It was we were a while between like great truly

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like all time quarterbacks. It was really like Andrew Luck

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was this one guy in the middle of this desert

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that we thought was gonna get there and then obviously

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>retired early.

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 3>But it was.

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Between these guys and we thought maybe that like the

0:50:57.560 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>next great quarterback would would look like this, and he does.

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think his arm gets underrated. I mean you

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned like the crazy plays. One play I watched, like

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>watching this was a sixty two yard in the air

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like air yards opposite hash throw where.

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Like he's at the eight and he hits.

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Sean Jackson of all people

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in stride. Like he does have a hose, which you

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of forget about with everything else.

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he is a really strong arm and he has

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 2>a really unique arm talent. The game where him and

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Stafford just went toe to toe, not this year,

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 2>but the previous year where they were just launching nukes

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 2>all over the place. It was one of my favorit

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 2>football games the last few years. I remember watching that

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and being like, these guys have a lot of common

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 2>because they both not only have strong arms, and they're

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 2>not only preposterous and have like arm arrogance, but they

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:49.919
<v Speaker 2>also are doing like side army, Like Lamar side arms

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 2>it a lot. He's throwing off of like crazy platforms.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 2>He's doing really really special things just with his arm.

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I just had I just interviewed Darius lagh and now

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 2>these in the AFC North. I asked him, are you

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 2>more wary of playing Joe Burrow's Bengals or Lamar Jackson's Ravens.

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought he would say the Bengals because of Jamar

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Chasen t Higgins, right, but he was like, no, Lamar.

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.479
<v Speaker 2>And it wasn't a knock on Burrow, but he just said,

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 2>there's just nothing more frustrating than having to defend defend

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 2>two plays in one so often against the quarterback. And

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that's just what makes him special. It's like he gets

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 2>an extra play like it's crazy. I mean, what he's

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 2>able to do.

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>For the first handful of years, and it was kind

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of back last year too. I thought the most unstoppable

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>play in the league was when you know, they did

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a play action or RPO and he pulls

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball and he just takes eight yards to the side,

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Like for four years the defense was essentially giving him

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>seven to eight yards just running to the sidelines. There

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>are so many runs throughout his career where he never

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground. It's just him going out of bounds,

0:52:58.719 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>him just like gliding out a bound.

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>Crazy. Yeah, the ability to avoid contact is I mean,

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 2>knock I would is just the most unique runner that

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's crazy watching him run. It just

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 2>makes no sense.

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 3>You're the best guest ever.

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Because you even brought up like people yelling at me

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about the playoffs. That's I would have just like completely

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>ignored it, which I which.

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I know I shouldn't. I shouldn't because it was it take.

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm certainly used to the playoffs.

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 3>It's a great point.

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the first couple of years he played

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>tight and he was a young player then, but that's

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:40.760
<v Speaker 1>also like Mahomes came in and played his very best

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>like immediately in the playoffs. The last couple of years,

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he's had great games in the playoffs, whether it's the

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>divisional round or last year in the championship game, like

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>doing everything he could, needing the drive and making it

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>happen and playing well. So that that also really the

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 1>last two years especially, and there were there's a couple

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of year gap there. They weren't in the playoffs and

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he didn't play twenty one and twenty two. So the

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:06.919
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years also as part of the reason

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>why I feel like he's he's over that hurdle, and

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he has played well in the playoffs. But yes,

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this is more for the regular season. Sorry to the

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen fans out there, their guy is not going

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to be on this list. I mean, I think that's fair, right,

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It's fine.

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, then.

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Said you have such a bad spot.

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 2>You I know, I don't want to make a comment

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 2>on this. I think that after Lamar, well, I don't

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 2>know which how many.

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Quarterbacks, there's five more. There's five more quarterbacks. And that's

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing, like I was thinking about Lamar, let's say

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>versus a Drew Brees. Drew Brees is going to be

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on this list, of course. Yeah, and when I think

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>about lamar At is very very peak and what he's

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.839
<v Speaker 1>already accomplished, you could argue, I think that's as high

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or higher even than a great player like Drew Brees.

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So the highs are there. I had to not put

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 3>my our guy, Philip Rivers on.

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I thought about doing it just to help his Hall

0:54:57.760 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of Fame case, but I don't think I have that

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of way that it would really matter. Brett Favre

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting one, by the way, because he won

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>his three MVPs in the in the nineties and then

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you realize, like in the two thousands he made like

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>two first team All Pros and four second teams, Like

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he was an incredible player in that decade, even though

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like he was even better the one before.

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, you got your guy Russ.

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of great quarterbacks that could have made

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this list, Matt Ryan, like, but you can't make it

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>an all quarterbacks list. But I did want one of

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>these these current guys, at least at the back end.

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you chose the right one. Non Mahome's division.

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>We're biased though, I mean you wrote the article back

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Check out Mina Chimes. Thank you so much, Mina.

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's the Mina Chimes Show featuring Lenny and

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 1>then the Big Time New Podcast If you were a discretion.

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I like that she's tackling pop culture with her friend

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>David w Pod.

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Check it out if you Right now, we're doing Love Island,

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 2>so not everybody's watching Love Island, but subscribe. Keep your

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 2>eye on the space even if you aren't. We're going

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to do more shows. We're going to do Love is

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Blind again, of course, and we also take recommendations love it.

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, I don't need to tell everyone to check

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:09.720
<v Speaker 3>out Mina.

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Our next episode will be the second edition of NFL

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Daily's twenty five Players of the last twenty five years.

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We will be joined by NFL Networks National reporter Steve Weisch.

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Looking forward to that one.