WEBVTT - Worst. Episode. Ever

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>advice now dot Com. Here's your host. It is the

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>goofiest episode of Fantasy Football Weekly ever. I don't know

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>if I call it goofy. In our twenty seven year

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>history of this show, we have never had less concrete

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>information with which to base our analysis upon on one

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the more important weeks of it all. It is

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is the first week of the playoffs. Never there been

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a better week to have a first round by than

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's basically an if then episode of Fantasy

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly for your coders out there. If we will

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be you're gonna be hearing a lot of if this

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>guy plays, if this quarterback is in, then this, If

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 1>this defense isn't ravaged by COVID, then this. So brace

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of that. We're gonna try to get

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>through all the games, including the games that have now

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>moved to Monday and Tuesday night. Las Vegas and Cleveland

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is now Monday night, Washington, Philadelphia now Tuesday night, Seattle,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles now Tuesday night on Sunday. You're going to

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>need to make some tough calls about Monday and Tuesday

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>players whose status you don't know that you're hoping will

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>clear the COVID protocols, but you're not gonna know. And

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>mostly the answers I'm gonna be giving people are Start. Guys,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know we're gonna play. Start all your Chiefs and Chargers,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Go Start Travis Kelsey. Uh, we're gonna go through all

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the matchups. Of course, like always, no by weeks. This

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>week three tough questions like we usually do. Let's begin

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Texans taking on the Jaguars my coast. I

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>should mention Matt Harrison at Explosive out Put on Twitter,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson at bat t x J on Twitter as well. Hi, guys,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>well this one will be a quick one. Uh, I

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bet it with Ars, especially in the playoffs, where I've

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>asked you guys, don't bore our listeners with players who

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are not on any playoff rosters. I don't want to

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>hear about Rex Burkhead this week. Well, since there's a

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of COVID people in uh in the protocol this week,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you might need a few Texans and a few Jaguars.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the guys that you might need.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks is the obvious one. He gets a B

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>grade here with Davis Mills back under the helm, Cooks

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was targeted copiously last week eleven targets eight for one

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>oh one last week against Seattle. In his first meeting

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Jags, Cooks went for a hundred and thirty

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>two yards on five catches. Speaking of Davis Mills, hold

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on a minute, because the collective group that was here

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>last week hammered take a chance on me, including Brian Johnson,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>who went three for three with Davis Mills. Take a

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>chance on Penny Rashide Penny, which was a huge hit.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And your third guy, do you remember Jalen Guyton, Yeah, Jalen,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but that became too easy and I threw out Josh

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Palmer as a bonus. So I'll take three and a half.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You can have the three and a half. The Hooper

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Scooper was a big hit last week. All feel free

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue the Scott Fish. We gotta throw out the

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Craig Reynolds. It wasn't take on, but I was like,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of the guy before, but did not

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>actually technically use him is just take a chance, I

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>mean running back. Another guy that Scott Fish has mentioned

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a few times is Nico Collins, who just recorded his

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>career best day last week against Seattle. Uh. The intriguing

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thing was ten targets he saw from Davis Mills and

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Collins gets to draw the worst of the Jags corners.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's Tyson Campbell, who's allowing a passer rating of one

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>oh five in his coverage. No playoff team is starting

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. Both quarterbacks in this game, Davis Mills and

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence around the bench. So now onto the Jags

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you can start. Marvin Jones is the wide receiver you'd

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>want to play if you needed a Jaguar. He only

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>gets a seed. Bright side is the Texans have allowed

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the eighth most receiving yards to opposing wide receivers on

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. You're not dipping down to Lavisca Chenalta, Lakwan

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Treadwell territory here and James Robinson he gets a B plus.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good day here. That was not

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>even subtle that he is a B grade. Oh whatever,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you if you believe some of the reports, there was

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a schism between Robinson and urban Meyer,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and he was limited in Wednesday's practice, but suddenly he's

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>feeling a lot better on Thursday. The Texans are allowing

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the most rushing yards per game to opposing backs, the

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>third most rushing touchdowns, and four point nine yards per carry.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up a first down on basically every two runs.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So you can start James rob Robinson with some confidence.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's I I hope that they pound James Robinson and

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that the the guy that was limiting

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>his reps was not Darryl Bubble, because it could be

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>urban Meyer wasn't already pounding people with his foot, and

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why he's not there anymore. Nicely, that's it. That's it. Okay,

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to our next matchup, Cowboys taking on

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Brian for the Cowboys, this running game is erect.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't know for sure if Tony Pollard is going

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to play through the torn plant or fascia

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in his foot. Ezekiel Elliott has been bad and they

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>actually gave more touches to Corey Clement last week. What

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>do you do with this running game? Yeah, you pretty

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>much just just start Zeke and I'll mention quickly the

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Giants and Cowboys did play in Week five. Will reference

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that game a couple of times here, but I'm gonna

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>give Zeke a b. He had a hundred ten yards

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown rushing, caught two passes and a receiving

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the first meeting. Will likely be without left

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>tackle Tyron Smith in this game, though. That said, the

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Giants could be without Leonard Williams defensive end, which would

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be a big loss. But even when at full health,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>New York has allowed one plus rushing yards per game

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to the opposition. But like you said, you want to

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on Tony Pollard. That'll that'll dim Zeke's

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>prospects a little bit. But I'm still give as he

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>could be here in a game that should be a

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>positive game script for the running backs. For the Cowboys side,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb, I very positive outlook for him. He gets

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>an a. New York has been brutal against wide receivers lately,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>allowing the fourth most yards the position over the past

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>two games. Lamb had eighty four yards in a touchdown

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in the first meeting, and that's probably a solid floor

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>projection for him in this one. So in a for

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>cd uh, not an A for Mark Cooper, but I'm

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a B. He also did well in

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting. He had sixty yards in a touchdown

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Week five game. He has also scored in

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>his two previous games against the Giants, so he has

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>very good past performance against New York. So would be

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for Cooper and a CEE for Michael Gallup. He did

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not play in the Week five game. He was injured then.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's a good matchup and I'm just worried that

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the script could fall out of favor for the wide

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>receivers or Dallas, but they all have potential here. But

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just to see for Gallop, Gallops look good. By the

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>way he's gonna be. I think he's gonna get paid

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this office for sure. Where do we want him to

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>end up? Kansas City would be a nice spot. Yeah,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I haven't thought that far, but I don't

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>want him to be one of the other five guys

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in that rotation. Umari Cooper, just as a side note,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>looked as good as he's looked on the field since

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>before he had the COVID and before that when he

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>had the hamstring, so he had to go back almost

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>two months. He looked downright, spry, and I'm optimistic about

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a big game for Marie Cooper here. Yeah, it could

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be a big game for Dalton Schultz. He had six

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>catches for seventy nine yards in the first meeting between

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants and Cowboys. And it's a decent matchup for

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Uh. The Giants are alloting more than five

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>catches and fifty yards per game to the position, so

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a double digit PPR floor is in place for Schultz

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh Dak Prescott and obvious a when all three

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the in the tight end gets starting grades.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's worth mentioning he had three plus yards

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns in the first game of the season

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>between these two over to the Giant side. Not a

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot to talk about other than season ticket holders

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>supposedly getting a free medium soda at this game. I

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I read this on Twitter. It's fan appreciation days.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>If you spend you spent fifty grand on Worth Giants tickets,

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you get a free You don't even get a large Well, no,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're not allowed to sell large sodas in

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City. That makes sense, you know what I mean?

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's not. But over se Kwon Barkley, he

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gets to see Dallas has held the posing teams who

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>under sixty five rushing yards in four of the last

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>five games, and their defensive line. Dallas has has a

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>significant advantage over the Giants offensive line. And this one

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is a very soft to see for Barkley, who got

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>hurt in the first meeting only atune as. Yeah, just

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to see. Uh, just a bench, double bench for a

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sterling Shepherd and Kenny. That's just a bench, not a

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>double bench. Can't have you never said you can't give

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a bench plus No, I know you can't because that

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>gets you somewhere out of between bench and a C grade.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no bench plus. Well, the double bench is fine

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>because you can't extra bench. Somebody. I like how you're

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fine with the harpoon though what the don't even know

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what the harpoon means, So you're probably got the harpoon.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Pass me, we got some harpoon, he used later in

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the show. But benching Golladay and Shepherd, despite it being

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a positive matchup on paper, Uh, we'll get to the

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation in a second for the Giants. But Shephard

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and Gala Day combined for twelve Let's not get to

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback situation. It will only take a second when

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we do. But Shepherd Golliday combined for twelve targets last week,

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just four catches for forty two scoreless yards. So they're

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. So is whoever the quarterback is Mike Glennon,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be Daniel Jones. Maybe either way you're benching then,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But I will give Evan and Groom a see opposing

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>tight ends or averaging nearly five catches sixty yards per

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>game against Dallas. Ingram had four catches for fifty five

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>yards in the first meeting, so double digit PPR points

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is possible. Listen, this is the ninth straight positive matchup

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on paper for Evan Ingram and he never comes through

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. Waste Land, you take ten points. He's

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not giving you ten points because he never does. Alright,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Still giving a Patriots take on the Colts, and there's

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>only a couple of guys to talk about. Damien Harris

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>gets a b great exp acted to be recovered from

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring injury for this game. Colts are good run defense,

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>but Harris read it. Good run defense is this year,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>including Buffalo before last week's by Indians, allowing the ninth

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fewest rushing yards eighth fewest rushing touchdowns to opposing backs.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And Harris again uber hot before the injury, scoring eight

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>times in his last eight games, a span over which

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he was averaging a whopping five yards per carry. So

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>even in a tough matchup, Harris comes in with a

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>B grade. We're gonna keep reminder Stevenson on the bench.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He when Harris gets his the full workload that he gets,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough left for Stevenson. And this is a

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>trickier matchup than most. And the only other guy with

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the starting great is Mac Jones. He's top two hundred

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards once, just once in his last six games,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and over the last month, the Colts have allowed the

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>league's fewest passing yards just one seventy seven per game,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>despite facing far better quarterbacks Josh Allen and Tom Brady.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And he's one of the league's worst deep passers by

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, where yards and touchdowns come. You know what,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting him on the bench, forget it. I've just

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>talked to myself, Auto mac Jones, and all the receivers

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are on the bench too. If you've got the playoffs,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't need Jacobe Myers, Nelson, Aguilar, Kendrick Born against

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a team that's given up the fewest receptions yards and

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>second fewest touchdowns to opposing wide receivers, they're on the bench.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Indianapolis side. Jonathan Taylor's an obvious a

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and I should mention here, not that you need any

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>extrapolation on this, but the Patriots are actually shockingly easy

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to run upon, and they're brutally tough to pass on.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing one hundred fifty four total yards per game

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs, that's fourth most, and through the air,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>they're giving up the fourth most receiving yards. And Taylor

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>can catch a literally, you know, he chips in a

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of catches every game. Sure, uh Niahim Hines is

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not an option really in this game, and I don't

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna need him here. The only other player

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got with the starting grade is Michael Pittman, and

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he's the only Colts I think, the only other cold

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>outside of Taylor you'd ever consider starting in the playoffs,

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is a bad matchup. Nobody has shut down

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers more consistently than New England over the last

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>five weeks. Entire receiving positions are averaging seventy eight yards

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>per game over the last five against New England. So

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if all of the Indian receivers are gonna get seventy

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, Pittman gets half. His one on one matchup

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is brutally tough against emerging star cornerback J. C. Jackson.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>He has a passer rating against him in his coverage

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of thirty nine. That's not that's not good. Carson Wentz

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench for the reasons I think you've

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>already already heard as we talked about the wide receivers

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>here and you ken pick spots to start Wentz, this

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is definitely not one of them. Let's take a break

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, take a chance on me. Nine

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting lineup. It's a weird

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>week and there's gonna be a bunch of different angles

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to start guys you would not normally start. We're gonna

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do our best to give you players we think are

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go with positive matchups, but it really who knows.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I got a nice we're throwing darks. I got a

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>nice weird angle coming up. You do, all right, Willie

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>will stay tuned Fantasy Football Weekly to hear Brian's weird angle.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. A segment we like, he'll

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Nine players who may or

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>may not contract COVID between now and when you try

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to start them. True at the time of this, I

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>got one that's not gonna get it. I'm well, he

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just came off the list. He's quarantine in a box. Well, Dolf.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He just came off the list because he had it

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and recovered from it. Then, yes, probably saying now he

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just came up off the list because he was like

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a close contact and anyway, I don't know, we'll find

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>out soon. All right, Let's go to the quarterback position, Matt.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I got Jimmy G again. Third week in that's the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>third week probably for just for you. Yeah, Jimmy G

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Seahawks in week thirteen and two, that's when

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I used him. Fish used him last week against the

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Bengals to and two. We're going back to the well

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons, who have faced maybe the easiest slate

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks I've ever seen this year. The notable names

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they faced, like Heineke Dimes, Zack Wilson, Simeon, Trevor Lawrence,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Panthers awful trio of quarterbacks twice. Yeah. Still,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed the third most passing scores in the league

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>at two touchdowns per game, and have allowed the sixth

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>most completion So Jimmy g will get two scores in

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this one. All right, Brian, you take a chance at me, quarterback.

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to a toungo viola at home against the Jets.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami won't have Jalen Waddle in this game. That well,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>not officially outs, not literally enough in the week that

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a chance he comes back for this. I

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think the odds already won't play, but hopefully he does.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But even if he doesn't, I don't care. I like

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>too against the Jets, And how can you not when

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jets have allowed these sixth most passing yards per

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>game at two fifty four per and outside of Taysom

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Hill last week, New York has surrendered multiple passing touchdowns

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and eight straight games that includes the two touchdowns and

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two d seventy three yards they allowed to tah when

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>these teams were submitting week eleven, and the Jets are

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>already going to be without starting cornerback Justin Hardy. They

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>could be without the other starting cornerback, Michael Carter the

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>second so to a Tonga viola. Bear in mind, I'm

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>an emotionally damaged Vikings fan. I'm pretty I'm as as

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are all Viking fans this season, aren't we all? Uh?

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of what's driving me to recommend Justin

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Fields on what it's currently Monday night. Well, hopefully that

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>will hold. That will hold the all the Bears problems

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with COVID, Maybe they move that to Tuesday as well.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Rutching yards can mitigate a bad passing game and feel

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just finally being allowed to run the ball. Over his

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>last three full games, he's averaged seventy four rushing yards.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That puts him You're you're basically starting running backs rushing

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of Justin Fields, and the Vikings have faced

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly two mobile quarterbacks. Kyler Murray ran for a touchdown,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson ran for a hundred twenty yards. Fields will

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>also help through the air, because the Vikings cornerbacks are dreadful.

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>No Viking cornerback ranks higher than one in coverage by

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. Darnell Mooney can beat the Vikings deep.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson, if he's able to go, can win on

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>routes and hands. Jachim Grant has turned into a factor.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of ways. Justin Fields can get helped

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>through the air as well. I like him by ground,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sea and air. Let's go to the I'm looking forward

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to the sea part. Let's go to the running back position. Matt,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I got somebody who's from Seattle. Oh nice, Maybe we

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just need to uh let Rashad Penny cook in a

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>peacock to Brian against last Sound right there if you're

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>live from Pugech sound so. In the last three years,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny has had ten rushing attempts or more in

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>five total games. He scored a touchdown in four of

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>those five games, including two last week in a total

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of hundred and thirty seven yards. And Alex Collins was

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just put on the COVID list. Now this game is

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>now Tuesday, but right now it's just Penny and DJ

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Dallas left on the roster. He's facing a Rams team

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that is missing a lot of people. According to COVID,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams have allowed a touchdown to six running

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>backs who have led their team in touches over the

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>last seven weeks, so a touchdown is basically guaranteed for

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny here. All right, you know I mocked Penny

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>last week. I can't do it now, so you know

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys shut me up on that. Brian, you take

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a chance at me running back? All right, weird COVID

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>angle time. I'm going. I'm going back to the Dolphins.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And no, not Miles Gascon. That's too easy. I'm going

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Salven Akhmed, the backup running back. Both have been activated

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>as never easy, by the way, and more easier. That's

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the play here, like he just disappears at times.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>It gets benched or is this play is awful? So

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and and the speaking of awful, the Jets against running backs,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they're allowing a hundred nearly a hundred eighty combo yards

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns per game, which is stunning. They're actually

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst team against any position out of every defense

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>against any position, I believe, by a pretty large margin.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Astronomical numbers. So Salvin Akhmed, there's gonna be enough to

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>go around for him and this one again, and if

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Gascon disappears, you could have a top five running back

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>on your hands. And we know, well, even if Gaskin

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't disappear, just out of if you can get to

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>eight touches on Salvin Akhmed, maybe that's enough. He'll get

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>double digit touches. I just want to see Jared Doakes

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>activated from the practice squall that they I forgot that

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson to look, there's a long laundry list of

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but I went with Akamed, So let's go Salvin.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Donte Foreman is your leader among running backs for Tennessee,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's the latest to go up against the Steelers.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>This is another really struggling run defense. You saw Dalvin

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Cook roll up a monster game just in the first

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>half against the Steelers last week. They're allowing the fourth

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>most sushing yards and a league worse four point nine

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Two opposing backs and the starters over

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks have all crushed the Steelers. DeAndre Swift,

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Austin Neckler, Joe Mixon, Devanta Freeman, and Dalvin Cook. And granted,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Freeman is not nearly as good as those guys

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, but they averaged a hundred forties six total

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>yards and two touchdowns. So if even if he's half

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as good as those guys, Dot de Foreman sitting on

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially in eighty yard game, seventy five yard game and

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, Matt, let's go to the wide receiver slash

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>tight end position now as of this recording, I'm taking

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>David in Joeku because as of now the Browns would

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>be missing tight end Austin Hooper and Stephen Carlson on

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list, Harrison Bryant is questionable with an ankle injury.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus Jarvis Landry is on the COVID list, and Cream

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is out. The old line is a mess. And

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, no Baker Mayfield, no case Keenum, it's Nick

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Mullins starting. And a great stat from Kent wy Rock

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>in games which Nick Mullins had at least of the snaps,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so these are his days. In San Francisco, George Kittle's

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>averages were ten targets, six and a half receptions, nine yards,

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and half a score per game. All of those numbers

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are way better than Kittle's career averages, so Mullins likes

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to target the tight end and David and Joke Wu

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>has the talent. We saw him go for a hundred

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and forty nine and one in a game against the

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Chargers this year. We all know the opportunity is here

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and this now he gets the one of the worst

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end defenses in the league. The Raiders are bottom

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>five and receptions, yards and touchdowns allowed to the tight

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>end position, and they have allowed a touchdown to a

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>tight end nine times in their last nine games. Brian,

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you'na take a chance and we're running back white receiver. Sorry,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Buffalo's Gabriel Davis against the Panthers. Now, the

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Panthers's out Manny Sanders is out and the Panthers on

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup for why but Davis will not draw

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>step on Gilmore. That will probably go to Stefon Diggs.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see most of that coverage. But this is really

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>how good Gabriel Davis is when given an opportunity. He

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is second over the last six weeks and yards per

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>route run only behind George Kittle, in ahead of Justin Jefferson,

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and in this this season, he is number eight in

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points per target. He was eleventh last year. He

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>just needs opportunities and he's gonna get him on Sunday.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>So if Gabriel Davis is out there, especially in a

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>dynasty league, this guy is like top twenty wide receiver

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>potential moving forward this season and next years. Rolling forward

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to next year, I'm going a J. Green against Detroit.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.479
<v Speaker 1>It's Detroit, so maybe this is a little obvious. DeAndre

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is out. Green becomes the go to wide receiver

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for this passing offense and he's coming off his biggest

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>game of the year. He runs This is really weird.

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>A J. Green runs eight percent of his routes from

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>one side of the field. I've never seen that before.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He is pegged to the right side of the field,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which puts him up against journeyman cornerback Nickel Roby Coleman,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>who as of two weeks ago, was sitting on a

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>couch like the rest of us. He's only because he's

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>only playing for Detroit because of the loss of cornerback

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jacobs, who was only playing because of the loss

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of Jeff Okuda, and now they're to Nickel Roby Coleman.

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Coleman's only played one game this year, but last year

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Eagles awful, allowing a passer rating of one

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four in his coverage A J. Green's gonna eat

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>him alive. I like that when players don't have a team,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>they just sit on a couch. Are always on the

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>couch or on the street's street free agents, Yeah, sitting

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on the street. Pittsburgh is taking on the Titans. Will

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>start on the Titan side. I told you I love

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Foreman as might take a chance of me running back.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the passing game that is

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>languished for most of the last two months. Yeah, I'm

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>giving Ryan Tannehill a C grade. He hasn't really had

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>his full complement of weapons in a long time, which

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat excusing his average stat line of one yards

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and zero point eight touchdowns per game over the last

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>six weeks. He's only good for his rushing ability. Yeah, Still,

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>he's very accurate, and this matchup favors running over passing,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>So just to see, but you know, actually probably a bench.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Julio Jones a B grade, though Pro Football

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Focus has Julio's matchup against cornerback Cameron Sutton ranked at

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>point four out of a hundred this week, Sutton allowed

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns in his coverage last week in Minnesota, and

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Julio was a bit disappointing last week, but the Jaguars

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>game was never in doubt for the Titans and they

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to throw, and Julio still led the team

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with six targets. Over on the Steeler side, Big Ben

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gets a B grade. Looking inspired in the comeback attempt

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday, faces a very similar secondary in Tennessee. They've

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed either two yards or multiple touchdown passes in ten

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>out of thirteen games this season, and Roethlisberger is thrown

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for multiple scores and three of his last four. So

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you can fire up Big Ben. You're obviously firing up

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Johnson with an A and Chase Claypool gets to

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be if you're super desperate for a wide receiver, you

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>could throw a harpoon at James Washington. Uh. The Steelers

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>receivers torched a similarly bad Vikings secondary last week. Uh

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>They're those two secondaries are shockingly similar. The Titans have

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most yards and receptions to the wide receivers

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. Pat Friar muth He gets a C grade.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Titans linebacker Jayn Brown is asked to cover the tight

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>end most often, he allows a catch on eight eight

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>percent of his targets, and Friar muth Is scored in

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>six of his last seven. And then Naji Harris gets

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>He gets almost all the work and the hope that

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he can duplicate what the Patriots backs did. Two games ago.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots backfield trio combined for a hundred and fifty

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>two total yards and to score on twenty five touches. Now,

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Titans have held the Jaguars, the Texans, the Alvin

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Camaro less Saints to nearly nothing outside of uh in

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the running game. But the Pats game, which was two

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, they they they gave up some stuff, so

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they faced one of the softer running back schedules in

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the league this year. So I'm holding Nag at a B.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely one of the more positive B grades I'll give, though.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll just call that what we like to call it,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Nagi Harris and this one a real positive. No,

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it's just it. What about it? I like

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that better? At least it's witty. I feel positive about

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>killer Bees. When we come back, Panthers take on the Bills,

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you if there's anybody who contrust out of

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that Panther's offense, presumably led by Cam Newton. Maybe I

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know for half the game. Maybe Josh Allen comes

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>into this one hobbled. What are you gonna do with him?

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Lots of storylines Panthers Bills and many other games. When

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we come back for the final segment of our number

0:25:43.160 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>one Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgie and Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson with you if

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got questions about who to start, who to bench

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in this one of the most confounding weeks the history,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So do we I can't tell you how much I

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>agonized over my lineup decisions on Thursday internal slack. We're

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we're always just asking each other what should I do?

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've never been more flammixed. And really, and when

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're still live in a guillotine league at this point,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you have all star rosters. At this point, everybody's great,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you're just trying to swap good for great

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>between your players, and it's it's unbelievably tricky. Guillotine leagues

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com from my player rankings updated as much as

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I can possibly humanly update and keep up, keep everything going,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's just nuts. Right now, Let's go back to matchups,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>including Panthers taking on the Bills. Brian Panthers ended up

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks swapping. Some would say benching Cam Newton throughout the game.

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can start Cam new in this

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one because you can't. You don't know how long he's

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay in now. They're gonna like rotate he and

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>p J Walker in and out of this game. Most

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Bills are allowing passing yards and zero point

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>eight passing touchdowns per game. The only points you might

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>get some rushing from Cam, but you're not gonna bank

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on that, so you're benching the quarterbacks. As far as

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the receivers go, I'm gonna give d J. Mor as

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 1>c He's got a hamstring issue, keep your eye on that,

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but he is trending towards playing. I would probably bend

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>him if As White all pro cornerback for Buffalo, uh,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>if he was playing. But White is on I R

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so I will give more A cee who has back

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to back games with ten targets. Robby Anderson saw twelve

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>targets last week had his best game of the season,

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but he's on the bench. Going back to the quarterbacks,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't You're not playing Robby Anderson in fift Come on,

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not that nuts. And the last guy we can

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about for Carolina is Tuba Hubbard. I'm reluctant to

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>give him this see. I almost want to bench him

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's really just a nightmare for scenario for him

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>with Cam Newton at quarter act, well it is, and

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>then he's not even getting that many so many touches anymore.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't we're dually getting any I don't know, and

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Carolina could be without both of their starting guards. The

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>only reason I'm giving Hubbard to see is Buffalo has

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>been getting gashed on the ground lately, allowing rushing yards

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last three games. So there's some hope for

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Tuba here, but very little. But if you're desperate running

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>back in, we're pretty much desperate for anyone at this point,

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll give it. I'll give Hubbard to see. A lot

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>more to talk about on the Buffalo side, started with

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs. Gonna give him a B. He will likely

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get shadowed by Stefan Gilmour in this game. It's a

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup, and Carolina is allowing the seventh fewest receptions

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and the sixth few whisty yards too opposing wide outs

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last five weeks. But there's no way you're

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bending Stefon Diggs. But just just to be for him.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh see for Cole Beasley. Uh. Emmanuel Sanders was killing

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Beasley's production, but Sanders left the game last week early

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with an injury. Beasley saw levin targets, so he gets

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a sea. But I like Gabriel Davis might take a

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>chance on me wide receiver a little bit more. A J.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Bouyer probably was going to be covering Davis for the

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>most part, but he's gonna miss this game. So I

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>like Gabriel Davis a whole lot. That's why I used

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>my take a chance to me wide receiver. I do.

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Everyone loves Dawson Knox right Uh. This year, he's been

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best steal at tight end in all of

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football. He gets to be. Carolina has had a

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hard time handling tight ends recently, as Kyle Pitts uh

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>really a wide receiver and Hayden Hurst just combined for

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty plus yards and a touchdown against the Panthers. The

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Panthers are allowing nearly fifty yards per game to tight

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ends over the last four games. That's decent production. Knox

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 1>should have a good game here and uh not. Lastly,

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about Devin Singletary in a second, but

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we gotta talk about Josh Allen. Of course, no injury

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>designation going into the game, so not concerned about the

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>foot injury. It is a bad matchup though. Carolina owns

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the third lowest opponent passing play percentage at just so

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's no real surprise. They are allowing the fewest passing

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per game at seventy eight yards per game. Uh

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Carolina has allowed or zero passing touchdowns and six of

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>their last seven games as well, So not a good

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup on paper. But Josh Allen, he's a unicorn. And

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers have only faced one true mobile quarterback this

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>year and that was Jalen Hurts and he ran for

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, so that that rushing floor and ceiling always

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>makes Alan startable. And I just mentioned Devin Singletary saw

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a season high snapshare last week. I was the highest

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for him or any Bills running back all season, but

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still on the bench. You just can't trust what's

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going on in that backfield and not very productive with

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the runs. And Caroline has allowed the fourth few as

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing running back. So your bench and singletary,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>let's hope Zack Moss goes off. I got a lot

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of active I got a lot of best ball teams

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that would really appreciate that. Have that. All right, Cardinals

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>take on the Lions, and it's you know, because it's

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, there's gonna be some some good plays here.

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray is an A grade despite the fact that

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is not available for this game. Quarterbacks weirdly

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>putting up modest numbers against the Lions, though in part

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because the running game comes so easily. But here's the thing.

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's wrapped up fifty nine and sixty one rushing yards

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>over the past two weeks while scoring two rushing touchdowns

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks, So just between ground and air.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Murray with an A grade, and he's I

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>think you're not predicting a sea touchdown for no Sea

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown here because this game is taking off. Actually, Detroit

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is right on a large body of water. It's on

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a great lake, is itch is it here on? Let's go.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go here on for this um and so yeah,

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then maybe a little by sea here is possibility for

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray. I'm not ruling that out. Zach Ertz gets

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. He's played by the way he showed

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>up Friday, dinged up with something, but he's expected to go.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He's played in seven games since arriving in Arizona, and

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he's only gone under forty yards twice. The lines have

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed the eighth most receptions in seventh most yards two

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and despite effectively only playing half of the

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>season with his new team, he's second in red zone

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>targets on the team and most since he got there.

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think a touchdown feels like a pretty wrong

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>play for zach Ertz with his B grade. A J

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Green was might take a chance of a wide receiver

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>from earlier. Christian Kirk is a plausible pivots seat. You

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>guys think see darts to C minus. It's just a

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>dart throw C grade. He has a solid C grade.

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe he'll move outside and run Hopkins routes that

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>puts him up against a MARII are you are a

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a competent cornerback who's only a lout one score all

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>year and a modest passer rating of sixty seven C

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>grade on Christian Kirk. Rondel Moore is on the bench

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and run out of the slot, which will give him

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>some extra looks. But even when Hopkins was out earlier

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, rondel Moore was not at all consistent. So

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna leave him on the bench. Let's talk James Conner.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I told you Detroit's easy to run upon. Here's my

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>concern and Connor. It's not the Lions. It's it's a

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 1>great matchup and he will probably score a touchdown here.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Lions give up the fifth most rushing yards and the

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>second most touchdowns running back, so Connor feels like a given.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. He's suffered an ankle injury late

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>last week's game. Chase Edmonds is coming back, and I

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do worry about him potentially getting rested to make sure

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the ankles okay. He's been really good. He's a valuable

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff asset. Cardinals up by twenty one. Connors on the

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bench for the rest of the game. Now, the lines

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are rarely getting blown out of games, but that could

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>happen here. The Cardinals are so hot right now, so

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I've I've only put a B grade on James Conner

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>out of that concern that it plays out that way.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds a C grade. If I knew for sure

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he was going to get high volume, then I would

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>think that Edmonds could be a higher grade than this.

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna play it safe for the moment and

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>give him a C grade in a which should be

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>easy matchup, But I don't know how his workload is

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go in this game. Let's go over to

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit side. As you can imagine, there's not a

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lot to go on here. The only starting grade I've

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>got right now is I'm on ras St Brown, who

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>has seen twelve targets and back to back weeks and

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in his last two games is averaging eighty yards per

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>game over the last three weeks. The Zona allowing one

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seventies six yards per games to receivers, that is seventh

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>most have given up four scores in those three games

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to receivers. So there's a chance here if even if

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it's just garbage time for aman ros st Brown startable here.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>If DeAndre Swift returns from his shoulder injury, I'll give

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade, even though I don't know that

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>he would catch any passes with the shoulder injury. If

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams were to come back and everybody else is out,

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>then you could use him as a C grade. If

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they're both out and Craig Reynolds comes off the practice

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>squad again, then maybe you could use him if you

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>needed to. But all in all, I think we're just

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave those guys on the bench. T T. J.

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson underwent season ending thumb surgery earlier this week. Jared

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Goff is unstartable in non Viking games, and Calif Raymond

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Reynolds usage is way too scattered to trust

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>anything they may or may not do in this game.

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Brian no Matt, let's go to Falcons taking on the

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. This Falcon's offense has been wildly inconsistent. Cordell

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Patterson his usage has been fascinating. Through the first eight weeks,

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Matt He was averaging five catches, fifty seven yards and

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>half a touchdown per game. Then, over the last month,

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they've dialed back his route running and his receiving to

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the point that Cordell Patterson is only averaging two catches

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen yards and has not scored through the air,

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and that part of his usage worries me because he's

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>now turned into just a part time running back to that.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I say, Pshaw, Church Pshaw, I say, um. He was

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>averaging just over six targets per game in the beginning

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the season. The last two weeks, he's had five

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>targets in each game. I'm I'm not worried about targets receptions,

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but targets equal receptions. At some point, you have to

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>have a target to get a reception. That's the opportunity

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. Okay, Matt Ryan sounds like the coach

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of Hoosiers that said, you know, before

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Gene Hackman showed up, was like, you can't score if

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't shoot. I think that's you. I think that

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was Wayne Gretzky who said that, um uh. In the

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, the Falcons have faced three top ten

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>run defenses, so Patterson's still put them numbers, and the

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Niners aren't a top ten run defense. They have allowed

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>fourteen touchdowns are running backs on the season. That's the

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>sixth most. They're also bottom half of the league in

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>receptions and receiving yards to opposing runners. So he's still

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>in a grade for me. Uh, let's move over to

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the receivers and get Russell Gauge and Kyle Pitt's out

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the way. I'll give Gauge a CEE and I'm

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna give Pits a B in this one. Both spend

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>about half their time running from the slot, where they're

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to face five nine slot corner Kawan Williams. That's

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a rather large mismatch for the six sixty pound Pits,

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and if they flex outside, they either get Josh Norman

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>who's allowing a passer rating of one two in his coverage,

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or Ambree Thomas, who's Pro Football Focus is two hundred

0:36:54.920 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>ninth ranked corner out of two. D Matt Ryan, I'm

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>giving him a C grade. His average stat line in

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>games where the Falcons have not been involved in a

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>blowout in in in what I mean by that they

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have they have not one by more than seven and

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>they have not lost by more than two scores either. Yep. Uh,

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging two seventy two and two touchdowns per game.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>In those games, San Francisco is favored by nine and

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a half years, but that actually kind of works in

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan's favor because the two scores is where where

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.479
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a blowout. I think Ryan's gonna be just fine.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a C grade Deebo. Samuel's doing his best Cordarrel

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Patterson impression. He gets an A grade in this one.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons are a defense you circle on your calendar.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Plus Elijah Mitchell is trending towards out again, should mean

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>more touches for Debot. The Falcons have struggled with past

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>catching running backs all season, and with Samuel lining up

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield a lot, I imagine most of that

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>work goes his way. As I mentioned, Elijah Mitchell hasn't

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>practiced all week with a concussion, so Jeff Wilson is

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>your likely starter. Wilson was the only running back to

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>take a handoff last week, and since he with thirteen carries.

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta has been okay straight up against the run, allowing

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>three point nine yards per carry. That's actually ninth best

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the league, but they do allow a lot of

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ground touches, so for that, Wilson stays to see. Brandon

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>au gets an A grade over the last five weeks.

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Auk comes in at wide receiver sixteen in total PPR points,

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and he had his highest target total to date last

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>week with eleven. Atlanta's bottom eight in both receptions and

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns allowed to opposing wide receivers, not surprising. George Kittle

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>gets an A even though he did sit out Wednesday's

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>practice with a sore knee, but he was ramping up

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>his work Thursday and Friday. He's had over a hundred

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yards in each of his last two games. Uh.

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>And every good tight end to face the Falcons this

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>year has scored a touchdown every one of them. Uh.

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And Jimmy g finally he was might take a chance

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the quarterbacks. So I like the passing game in

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this one. Kittle is a little dinged up with the knee.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It's always he's always dinging up. It was a little

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>dinged up, but uh, he's probably a little dinged up

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks too. And how did that work

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for you? He has been so good and so dynamic,

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 1>so fast. Um, And I know Travis Kelsey is coming

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>off a Bonker's game. You're just you're just hurt because

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I am been y did in your guillotine. I did,

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and it might cost it might cost me my season.

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I need Kintle. They can both have great games. Sure,

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any reason why Kittle can't have a

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>forty two point I hope he does. I hope he

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>does too, Brian, I believe we have time to work

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>through the Jets taking on the Dolphins. The Jets side,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't imagine there's anybody you would start

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in a playoff roster. Yeah, there's gonna be no forty

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>two point games or anyone the Jets maybe not combined

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>along all among all players. I am going to give

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter a see. Though expected to come off, I

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>r the ankle injury, should operate in a Bell cow roll,

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but be warned that Tevin Coleman also likely to make

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>his return. But he sucks. But it's it's a bad

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Carter. Since Week six, my ammy is allowing

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>only seventy nine compoy yards per game. Uh, they haven't

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to touch down during that same span. Both their

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>league lows so very it's even that I worry they

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't give a full workload to Carter if he's not,

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have to bring it is he's a

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>warm body. Let's put it that away. If you're desperate

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>running back, We'll give him the sea for that, a

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>warm bodied sea. And it could. I don't know. How

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>do how do we have a sound bite for a

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>warm body? I don't know. I don't know either believe

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it or not. I do have another another starting grade.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 1>It's Jamison Crowder. Oh, come on, it gets a se

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>uh Elijah more On I R as his Corey Davis.

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>The Jets gotta throw somebody. It's not gonna be Key

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>d J. Montgomery, Braxon Burrios, Denzel Mims or Vincent Smith.

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It'd likely be Crowder. He did have six I should

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned these teams had play in week Levin Crowder

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>did have six catches forty four yards in a touchdown

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first meeting of a sea on Crowder, but

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>only only only in PPR leagues. Ryan Griffin obviously on

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the bench as Zack Wilson for the Jets. We are

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>done with them. Over to the Dolphins side. Miles Gaskin

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>gets an a grade. Um, I know I just like

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the way he delivered it gets an E grade. Like Gaskin,

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He's like he's an enigma. Really, this is an amazing

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup I mentioned earlier, and take a chance on me.

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The Jets allowing a hundred and seventy plus combo yards

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at one point eight total touchdowns per game two running backs,

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and that is why Salvin Achmed was might take a

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>chance of me running back. There should be enough meat

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>on the bone for Acamed in this game, so both

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>running backs startable for Miami. Jalen Waddle has officially been

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ruled out now, so bench him, that's for sure, but

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>start Davante Parker. Gonna give him a b uh. He

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>missed the first meeting between these two teams, but who

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he will be running as Miami's wide receiver one now.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>He played seventy one of the snaps in his Week

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen return, so he should be near full health following

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins rare Week fourteen By last week, the Jets

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>are so easy to run on the run on that

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little concerned about the volume for Parker, But again,

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the top wide receiver, so he gets

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a B or will he be no, he won't be.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I know who is going to be at the top

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wider Mike gisick there it is who really plays wide receiver,

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>although he's obviously tight end eligible. We'll we'll speak to

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. The Jets are top eight and most fantasy

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>points per game allowed to tight ends. Gausiki had five

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>catches for fifty yards in the first meeting, but Miami

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends as a whole top yards in that game.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>And I glossed over Isaiah Ford, who should be taking over. Well,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna take the Jalen Waddle, uh Jalen Waddle role,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give him a seen PPR. It is

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a soft matchup, So if you're desperate wide receiver, go

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for Isaiah Ford and uh to might take a chance

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback. He's probably more of a usually our

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take coms or seas, but two is like more of

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a like find number nine right quarterback this week. I

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>had him as an a but then when they lost,

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Waddle kind of teamed him take on wordy in my mind.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But he'll still do just fine. Speaking of Miles Gaskin,

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's my number two ranked running back this week based

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>on everything else that's changed this week. Just you know,

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you you get to annoy the fantasy fonsie. But what

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's he still scares me. It is

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>an odd numbered week, does scientific? I think so? It

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is week fifteen. We've got a couple of minutes before

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we break for the end of our number one fantasy

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>owners who are trying to deal with all of our

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID stuff and and generally in the playoffs, you want

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to be dropping your mid tier starters, your courtland Sutton's

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of the world who you will never play in any

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>normal scenario, to get backups to your stars who might

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get COVID. And see, am I going to play any

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of these guys in the next three weeks if the

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>matchups not awesome, drop drop them out right and go

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>get backups to your starters that would be starters, it

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would be stars potentially if the starter goes down. So

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just situational awareness that we need to

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>have as fantasy owners. When we come back, we will

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>continue through matchups including packers Ravens coming up shortly, plus

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions and there's some tricky ones that deal

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with COVID. Fantasy commissioners managers will help give you some

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>guidance on what you need to do in the trickiest

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>week we've ever seen in the history of fantasy football.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football has never been harder than it is this week.

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the game we love and there's no stable footing

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy managers to try to make the right decisions

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this week. You know, I feel one piece of luck

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>out of all of this. What's that half of the

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy managers are out of it? Yeah, that's that's true.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to deal with this headache. It's a

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>good time. It's a good season to have a loss.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Have not made the playoffs if you needed to. This

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>time of year, you hear people complaining who had to buy? Yeah,

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this was like like if you had Travis Kelsey and Ross, Like,

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>oh I kind of wanted those points. But you don't

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>hear that this year. Now people are happy, finally happy

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to have their buy. Um, Matt Harrison, what's happening in

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>shock fantasy? Uh? Super dash? Getting ready for the playoffs?

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Making all of your tough lineup decisions a little bit

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>easier from a statistical standpoint. I'm not sure I can

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>make it easier from the health standpoint. Everybody unfortunately. Yeah,

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>air Bear promo code gets you a nice little discount

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of shock air Bear, nice tidy little Thursday night. Yeah,

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I was wearing my air Bear T shirt that night.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, got mine too. This is a segment

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we call three tough questions. Tough question number one, should

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we sabboth hajj drop Lamar Jackson Matt So in a

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>redraft league, he's absolutely well obviously this is redraft only.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He's absolutely worth dropping. But should you drop him? No,

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Because in order to perform a sabotage drop, you would

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>need to have done it already this week on Monday,

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so people would be picking him up along the way

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and and wasting their fab And if you do it

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>next week, you are already advancing in your fantasy playoffs,

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>and then only three other teams would be left in

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>your playoffs to maybe have a crack at him. So,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're allowing playoff pickups, I assume others in your

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>league in the consolation bracket are picking up players too,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll grab him, and your sabotage drop is worthless.

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So don't sabotage drop him. Brian, should we sabotage drop

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. No, I wouldn't do it. I'm tempted to

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>say yes, but he's got the Packers this week. We

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>all know he's most likely not gonna play, but he

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>does have the Bengals next week. They played once already

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. Jack's seven passing yards, one passing touchdown, ran

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball for eighty eight yards. I think he's still

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he's almost It depends on your roster, but he's going

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to be startable next week, depending on him being healthy,

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think he will be. So I'm tempted to

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>say yes, but I'm saying no. Let's let's just take

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the name Lamar Jackson off of this player for a moment,

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just as just mystery player. Imagine the silhouette with a

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>question mark in it, and that's the player we're described from.

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 1>QB Ravens from Technoball cry exactly one touchdown in nine

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>games this year, nine of twelve games, scoring exactly one touchdown.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That appears to be average finish in full games this

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>year is quarterback four. Most leagues have ten or twelve teams,

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's not a He's not even a starting quarterback

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in an average week. He's sitting right next to Carson Wentz,

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who is largely un rostered in many leagues in terms

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of average finished per game. He has just three finishes

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:07.879
<v Speaker 1>this year as QB seven or better, three all year.

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Christmas and mystery quarterback has three finishes of quarterback

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seven or higher. That's it. So are you going to

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>start him the remainder of the way this week Green Bay,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati or the Rams? No? Probably not. He's got a

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>bench grade coming this week next week. I haven't said

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it yet, it's coming next week in Cincinnati. I think

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be sitting at roughly a C grade. But

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe if you take a chance on me a quarterback

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>next week, maybe Championship week against the Rams, likely a

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bench or a C grade, You've probably got another quarterback

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>who's better for you and more hazardous to an opponent.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Why not drop him? Maybe to Matt's points. So maybe

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>some not some consolation team's gonna pick him up. I

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.840
<v Speaker 1>don't care. It doesn't hurt me. What hurts me is

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.879
<v Speaker 1>me starting Lamar Jackson. You can totally drop him if

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a good player out there, but if not, he

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could do you more harm than good. If you're in

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, Lamar Jackson didn't get you there. Tough question

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>number two. In a league that locks rosters for the playoffs,

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what should the commissioner do if a team can't feel

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the starting lineup because of all the COVID problems. As

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>an example, Uh, you do not have a tight end.

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a valid tight end. Every one of

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your tight ends is out and your rosters are locked.

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.800
<v Speaker 1>What should the commissioner like if you have Austin Hooper

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Higbee is yes. As a perfect example, Brian Um, Well,

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this is speaking directly to private league's home leagues, whatever

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to call them. Um, the commissioner should make

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>an exception if a guy has been officially ruled out

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.919
<v Speaker 1>put on, I r the COVID list, whatever you wanna

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>call it. You get one chance per player. I'll reach

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out to you and say who do you want you get?

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I will, you know, add this player to your roster.

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:01.839
<v Speaker 1>You don't to change your mind, and if he goes

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on gets COVID, I don't care. You get one chance.

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll make an exception. That's it. But I would do

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a manual override. Only you can only really do this

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the private home leagues. Whatever. You can't do it

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in a public contest, operators, they can't do you can't ah.

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>This is strictly for friends and family home leagues, uh, Matt.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Same question in a league that locks rosters for the playoffs,

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:27.919
<v Speaker 1>what should a commissioner do if the team cannot feel

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a starting lineup at one position due to all the

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID problems. First off, don't lock your rosters for the playoffs.

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>And second, if you do, I think that you have

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to expand your bench for just this reason. For the

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>playoff teams. Then I think what you do is you

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>do a fun little exercise and you have a draft

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for the remaining bench players that you could do at

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the How would you establish the draft order? I think

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that you would go the the number one seed gets

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the first overall pick uh to to fill out their bench.

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're adding let's say five bench spots to your rosters,

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.399
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the playoffs, number one seed gets

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>first pick and then and then you you have a

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 1>nice little serpentine draft and uh and and finish out

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>your rosters in that way. This is a better answer

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>than my answer. A lot of work, though there's a

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>great answer. I'll tell you why the problem with the

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>solution that you offered, And I would take your solution, Brian,

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>which was I'm gonna give a one time exception to

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the guy who can't feeld a starting roster. You've got

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>lock rosters, right, and I don't have a tight end.

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>He get this, This person gets to pick from all

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the available tight ends. It could be a huge

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:37.359
<v Speaker 1>advantage to be able to go through all the tight

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ends and just take the one player you want when

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>nobody else has that option. What I love about yours, Matt,

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is everybody gets the same advantage. It's equitable to everyone,

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and because you're doing it by record, the team that's

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:52.839
<v Speaker 1>earned it gets the first pick. Man, I love that.

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Just one three tough questions, that's outstanding, brilliant question numbers

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>rendered You even gave your answer. No, I know that's

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really actually won my first time in nine years. Did

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:14.839
<v Speaker 1>you went? Uh? What was? He went four for six five? One?

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You're confusing, you're confusing. Take a chance of you a

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.720
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions? It was it was five tough questions

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and he went six for five, which is very just

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>very hard to do. Um, it's the what's the how

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 1>did captain Kirk break the simulation. Thing was that the

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Ashi maneuver or something. Do you know what no idea,

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking Google Captain Kirk breaking the simulation or whatever?

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that that he Yes, you'll you'll see what

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean. It's not kobe Ashi, but it's something. It's

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>something Maru koby Ashi, Maru something like that. Anyway, the

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>answer I had was that I would I would grant

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 1>you the roster exception, but I would give your opponent

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and the chance to go first. I

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like you wars even better, which gives it to all

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the remaining team play. And you could still do it

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to um this weekend, or you could

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>do it before the Saturday night game happens. Everybody's got

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>their their Thursday guys locked. But you could still do

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it before the Saturday night game happens. Or you can

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>say just the obvious next guy up, like you know,

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>like the next tight end on the depth chart on

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the same team. You get it, then you don't have

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to the other You do it that way.

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But that answer is the best. I think Matt's answer

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is the best. Tough question Number three should teams that

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are out of the playoffs continue to make roster moves

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>during the playoffs, Matt Chart, I know that you and

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I have the same exact answer, so I'm not going

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to I'm not I'm I. I heard you on another

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 1>radio show talking about this exact tough question, and I

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>agree with you completely, So I will just take the

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 1>already want to questions, Brian, What do you got Should

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>teams that are out of the playoffs continue to be

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to continue to make roster moves during the playoffs

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and redraft? No, unless there's some kind of consolation bracket

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>where there's money on the line or some kind of prize,

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but on a high level. No in redraft and dynasty, absolutely,

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>because you're always improving your team for the future. You

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.479
<v Speaker 1>can't restrict a non playoff team in a dynasty league

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>from making ads while the playoff teams that have their

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>essential free pick of all the available free agents. So no, redraft, yes,

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>dynasty in a nutshell, if your league has provided some

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of incentive for teams that aren't in the playoffs

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to compete, like, for example, weekly high score

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>h a consolation bracket or a toilet bowl or something

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 1>like that then yes, I mean, if you're asking those

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>teams to continue to be competitive, then they need to

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue to make moves. If the answer

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>is no, you don't just get to play spoiler and

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>play keep away with free agents. Sure, so the answers

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no in that case. So it's a two part answer, Brett,

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>It's something more ru hi. Um, so what is it?

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>The Captain and Kirk broke the simulation with So the

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>simulation itself was called the kobe Ashi Maru. Yes, that

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was the name of the simulation. Okay, he was yeah, um.

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He was the only cadet in the star Fleet to

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 1>ever beat it by reprogramming the simulation so that it

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>was possible to win. So that was the name of

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the simulation. A franchise. I've never I you know, I

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>only had two out of three questions, right, I'm giving

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.919
<v Speaker 1>myself a bonus point for that, So now I'm gonna

0:55:30.920 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 1>go three out of three. You've never gone this yet.

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>This was the first time I had not gone three

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>out of three, and I found a way to give

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>myself an extra bonus and it was the start trek question. Yes,

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it was all right, let's go to uh matchups including

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers taking on the Ravens. Rogers, Aaron Rodgers, Davante Adams

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are automatic a's obviously, especially in this matchup against a

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bad Raven secondary. But let's talk about Alan Lazard six

0:55:56.200 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and seven targets the last two games, and Baltimore is

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>without its two best corner acts. I think he is

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a COVID week dart throw. You guys like to call

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:07.279
<v Speaker 1>your darts see dartschis a c great I needs a

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>dart throne, so we're gonna give him the s dart.

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lazard, A J. Dillon, and Aaron Jones are just

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>se grades here. Each. Dylan got far more work last week,

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it looks like the Patricks are trying

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that Jones is fresh for the playoffs. Baltimore

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very good run defense. They're only giving up

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>three point eight yards per carry on the season. That's

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the third lowest rate, and since their Week eight by

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>more recently, Baltimore is only allowed a single run of

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen yards since Week eight, and they've kept

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.479
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs completely out of the end zone since

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Week eight. Week it was a long time ago nobody

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>even knew what a macrowd was in weekend. Let's go

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:51.319
<v Speaker 1>over to the Baltimore side. Mark Andrews didn't suffer at

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>all with Tyler Huntley at the Holme last week, so

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we can safely start him again here. Although I don't

0:56:56.640 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think Huntley is gonna end up going, we do expect

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson to go in this game. Green has limited

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end production, but when facing elite talents t J. Hockenson,

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle, Travis Kelsey, packers have been exposed. Each of

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>them saw eight or more targets in average seventy five

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>yards and two of the three scored touchdowns. Marcus Brown

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade here, we'll bump him up to a well

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get I'm gonna move them to a B

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>grade on on on the expectation that Jackson will go

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as expected here um mired in a sizeable scoring slump

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 1>after a hot start and a touchdown though possible here

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because Green Bay has allowed the most touchdowns per game

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers one point eight per game over the

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks, and they've done that while allowing the

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>twelfth fewest receptions, So maybe the touch on productions a

0:57:40.480 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit fluky here. If Gyr Alexander comes back, it

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't phase me that much because it will be his

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>first game back after two months, and I think he'll

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>probably hit the field a little rusty and on a

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>diminished snap count. So I'd still stick with the B

0:57:52.520 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>grade on Marquis Brown. I've got Lamar Jackson on the bench,

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and I really I've really been back and forth on this. Now.

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The presumption is that his mobility is going to be

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:06.880
<v Speaker 1>dramatically curtailed here um and if I got to rely

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on Jackson's arm topower me to fantasy points, that feels

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like that feels like trouble. As mentioned earlier, he's topped

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one passing touchdown in just two games. Average passing game

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is just two hundred sixty to six yards. Isn't bad,

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but the one point for a touchdowns is not good.

0:58:21.200 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Almost exactly Ben Roethlisberg. Around the season, Green Bay secondary

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:26.640
<v Speaker 1>has been inconsistent, but on the whole has been good.

0:58:27.040 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm keeping him on the bench. Shot Bateman came

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>off the bench last week. Well, we're all talking about

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>him like, this is the breakout game for Bateman. This

0:58:34.040 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is the breakout game for Bateman, never comes, never comes.

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>We all give up on him. He doesn't even start

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the game, but then Tyler Huntley throws to him like

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy and he ends up with a good game. Last week,

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not chasing that weird fluky outpush. I need more

0:58:46.480 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>consistency from marishat Bateman before we go there. Let's take

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a break when we come back, Matt, this Raiders in

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown's game is who knows which Browns are in? Which

0:58:57.560 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be out? This is not gonna be easy.

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what day we'll play it? Well, seemingly on Tuesday. Now.

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they can move it again. All I

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>know is all right, Monday, they could move it again.

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller has a better chance of playing maybe a

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Uh, this thing's gonna be ugly. Well here

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt try to muddle through Raiders Browns when we come

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It is the most grueling, difficult week in the history

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy football and this show, as exemplified by Matt

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Harrison trying to break down the Raiders taking on the

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Browns in a game that has been moved from Saturday

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to Monday. And Matt, there's so many shifting sands on

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this but I still got to believe that the Browns

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be without many key components to their

0:59:57.120 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to their offense in this one, and their defense, which

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very important part for the Reds, like their

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>entire secondary may miss this game. Yeah. So, as I

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was writing up this matchup, because I write up what

1:00:08.360 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, Uh, twenty three players on the

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Browns are on the COVID reserve list, fifteen of which

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are starters, including as of now, seven starting members of

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the defense and eight backups on the defense. And I

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like Raiders in this game. That's good for the Raiders, right,

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think Baker Mayfield tweeted something like Derek Carr

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna eat his alive or something like that. Yeah. Well,

1:00:31.080 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the easiest Raider to rate, and that's

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Renfrew, who gets an A grade. Uh. He's the

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>entire offense for them right now. Fourteen targets, thirteen catches,

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventeen yards and a score last week.

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Has also been targeted at least nine times in five

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last six games. He should see a fair

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of m J. Stewart in this game. Who hasn't

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>logged a snap this year. As both Troy Hill and

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg Knewsome looked like they're going to miss this game,

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Auster Moreau, I have him on the bench. Uh, Darren

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Waller looks like he's out with a knee injury. But

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>now that the game has been moved two days later,

1:01:09.240 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that Darren Waller could play. No tight end

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>except for Travis Kelsey has topped the fifty one yard

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>mark on the Browns all season, So I got the

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>both of the tight ends on the bench in this one.

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, I'm giving a B grade two. He's averaging

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>three yards per game in a score and a half,

1:01:27.760 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and with so many members of the Browns defense out,

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he can wiggle his way to at least

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five and two. That's B grade worthy in

1:01:35.040 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>my book. And Josh Jacobs, I'm giving a B grade

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>two as well. The Raiders had to abandon the run

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, Jacob still ended up with fourteen touches and

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>has been very active in the passing game as of

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>recent averaging just over five catches per game in his

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>last five. Only Leonard four Net has more running back

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>catches in that span. Every non Ravens runner to face

1:01:56.920 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Browns has had a good week since mid October,

1:01:59.840 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so Jacobs is fine. Here on the Cleveland side, Baker

1:02:03.840 --> 1:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield and case Keenum right now both out on the

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID list. Offensive tackle Jedrick Wills, offensive guard Wyatt Teller,

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper, Jarvis Landry, and Anthony Schwartz are all on

1:02:16.480 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list. Not to mention, they lost tackle Jack

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Conklin a few weeks ago, and Kareem Hunt is on

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the shelf with an injury. So Nick Mullins, and yeah,

1:02:26.200 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins is your starter. He started nine times for

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners last year career, and credit the Browns

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for having a Their third string quarterbacks got seventeen NFL

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>star Their third string quarterback is the best third string

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the league. It's gotta be. He averaged a

1:02:42.800 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>very respectable two hundred sixty three yards and one point

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns last year, but with three of his five

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen and three of his main five receivers missing

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the game, I don't think you can start Mullins with confidence.

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And I covered David and Joku and to take a

1:02:57.400 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chance on me segment because Mullins does target the end,

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a great spot for in Joku.

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Last week against Baltimore, Donovan People's Jones was the only

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver besides Jarvis Landry to receiver target just out

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of sheer volume. He gets a C grade here. Richard

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Higgins is the only active roster wide receiver right now

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>besides d p J. Finally, Nick Chubb, who really has

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>been flat out disappointing in his two consecutive games against

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens with that bye week in between. So I'm

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.479
<v Speaker 1>surprised CHARGE didn't have a Nick Chubb should we drop

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>him question, because you usually do that when a guy

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>has a bye week. I I do overreact sometimes, but

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not dropping Chubb. But I don't know starting I'm

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>giving him an A grade. He's still dominating. He's absolutely

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>dominating the workload twenty touches last week, and the Raiders

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely brutal against running backs. They are ranking in

1:03:49.200 --> 1:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the bottom ten in just about every statistical category. And

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I considered d Ernest Johnson as a C. Dart harpoon here,

1:03:57.000 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I could trust the workload of

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the fantasy placed on nothing in these opportunities

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to fill in for Cream Hunt. His one good game

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is when he got all the carrier, They're going to

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>hand the ball to Chubs, and I'm so nervous about

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they can't get anything else going that

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>all the Raiders will do is play to stop Nick Chubb.

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders have tried to stop the run all year

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't worked. Yeah, but then you have a

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>function you have still do account for a functional quarterback

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and passing game, and he might be missing to lineman,

1:04:24.200 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous. I'm way more nervous about Chubb than you are. Here.

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>There we go. I can't take credit for this, but

1:04:28.720 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw on Twitter someone said this game should be

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>impossible to be played because Baker Mayfield lives at the stadium.

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a great in fact that the entire stadium you

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can go to Bengals take on the Broncos. Brian, this

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>is the rare game that doesn't seem to have any

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really significant COVID related issues. So let's start on the

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Bengal side. Joe Mixon has been disappointing over the past

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know three or four games. What do you

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think here? Yeah, Mixing has cooled down in recent weeks,

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>partially because he's been banged up, but either way, his

1:04:56.760 --> 1:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>production has slowed, so just to be for him, He's

1:04:59.040 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>also losing a lot of his receiving work to Somaj

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:05.439
<v Speaker 1>p Ryans. P Ryan has out targeted Mixican Nixon six

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to two over the last two weeks. Uh. Not a

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>great matchup. Not a bad matchup for running backs. The

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Broncos have allowed the sixth highest yards per carry but

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the sixth fewest touchdowns to opposing running back. So just

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to be for Mixing, I'm gonna give T Higgins B Mr.

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>T Higgins. He has racked up three straight one plus

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>yard games. Uh. This is a somewhat tough match up

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on paper, though Patrick Surtan and Ronald Darby are very

1:05:30.680 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>formidable cornerback duo. Over the last five weeks, Denver has

1:05:34.200 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed the eighth fewest yards to wide receivers. Despite that,

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give Jamar Chase a B as well. Uh.

1:05:40.960 --> 1:05:44.439
<v Speaker 1>He always has a upside with his talent. Last week,

1:05:44.520 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Chase became the fifth wide receiver since the NFL a

1:05:48.640 --> 1:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>f L merger to record one thousand yards and ten

1:05:51.880 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his rookie season, joining Justin Jefferson, Randy Moss,

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham, and Mike Evans on a very prestigious list.

1:05:58.200 --> 1:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So a B for for Chase and Higgins, both wide receivers,

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but a bench grade for Tyler Boyd. He continues to

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be the odd man out in the wide receiver room.

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Not liking him this week. And lastly, just to see

1:06:09.640 --> 1:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Burrow. Last week, Burrow not most multiple passing

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns for the first time since Week eight, ending a

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>four game drought where he total just three scores through

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the air. Unfortunately for Burrow, be tough to stay hot

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Broncos, who are top ten in fewest passing

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed per game and only lowest opponent completion percentage

1:06:28.600 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at just fifty eight percent. And what's more, no opposing

1:06:32.160 --> 1:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback has managed to top two passing touchdowns against Denver

1:06:35.880 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all season long. So just to see for Joe Burrow

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>over to the Denver side, starting with the running backs

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in Melvin Gordon canna give him a see. He returned

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>last week to lead the Broncos backfield in carries with

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and snaps. Uh since he is a decent

1:06:50.200 --> 1:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>matchup for running backs. Are allowing five compo yards per

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>game to the position, and that's why Javonte Williams gets

1:06:56.760 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to see as well. He will be active for this game.

1:06:59.280 --> 1:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Basically back that fifty fifty split though, which sucks no offense.

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon is still a very good football player. He

1:07:05.120 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually running fine. He is, man, it was funny.

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I know what. I don't want him to but the

1:07:09.640 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>reality is Melvin Gordon's good. He's the most hated man

1:07:12.280 --> 1:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football for no Reasonay, we just want Bell

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Cou Javante. We're gonna have to wait till next year,

1:07:19.160 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but Javonte is the preferred past watch. Melvin Gordon's gonna

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>resign with the Broncos. Don't you put that evil on us.

1:07:26.560 --> 1:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll be so disappointed. The Bengals are allowing seven receptions

1:07:29.720 --> 1:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing running back, So I like Javonte

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>still this week he gets to see. I don't like

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy a whole lot, considering he has scored zero

1:07:37.400 --> 1:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this year. He has been hurt a little bit.

1:07:39.880 --> 1:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But just to see for Judy, the Bengals have allowed

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>five eighty yard receiving games over the last five weeks.

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>If Broncos wide receiver is gonna not eighty receiving yards

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably Jerry Judy is not gonna be Courtland Sutton.

1:07:52.320 --> 1:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench. Sutton is scoreless since Week six.

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been held under thirty yards in five straight games.

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just been absolutely brutal. Thirty million and don't pass

1:08:01.680 --> 1:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>them the ball. Teddy Bridgewater is the fantasy eraser. Yeah,

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Suton easily drop herble in redraft formats, but we still

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>got a hold in dynasty. Unfortunately I'm doing it. It's painful. Uh. Lastly,

1:08:12.760 --> 1:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for the past catchers, Noah Fant gets to see Albert

1:08:15.480 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>oh has really eaten eaten into fans production. But this

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>is a decent matchup. The Bengals are allowing five plus

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>catches in nearly sixty yards per game to opposing tight ends,

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and over the last six games since he has surrendered

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five scores to the tight end position. So a very

1:08:31.040 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 1>safe seat for fans and Teddy b The B stands

1:08:34.560 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for bench for no doubt about it. So the Washington

1:08:39.600 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>game against Philadelphia has been moved to Tuesday, and I'm

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna do my best with what the information we have

1:08:44.640 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>at this time, which is basically most of Washington's not playing,

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and their starting quarterback could very well be Kyle Shermer. Yes,

1:08:53.200 --> 1:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator Pat Shermer's kid, who I think was either

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.519
<v Speaker 1>corectdraft like a fifth or sixth th I have been

1:09:01.560 --> 1:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>drafted I think the Chiefs, and he got cut and

1:09:04.120 --> 1:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he bounced around a little bit, and Ryan Fitzpatrick willis

1:09:07.920 --> 1:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Reid moment. That's Ryan Fitzpatrick's music. I'd love that. So

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with Kyle Schermer at the helm, and even if Kyle

1:09:17.200 --> 1:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Allen defies expectation and comes back here, I only have

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>one starter for all of Washington injuries throughout the team,

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>including there down to their fifth string center, guy named

1:09:27.479 --> 1:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>John Toth, whose day job is as a plus sized

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>male model. I'm working at a starting center. I hear

1:09:37.120 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you an Tonio Gibson straight up on the bench. With

1:09:40.760 --> 1:09:43.479
<v Speaker 1>defense is really only having to stop Antonio Gibson and

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not worry about the passing game led by Kyle Schermer.

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh Gibson averaging just his averaging under four yards per

1:09:50.120 --> 1:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>carrying each of the last three games, and Charles Leno

1:09:53.520 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>may not start. That's their left tackle over the last

1:09:55.920 --> 1:09:58.799
<v Speaker 1>three games. Only one team has a loud fewer rushing

1:09:58.840 --> 1:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>yards than the Eagles have. They turned into an elite

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 1>run defense. It was a bad matchup any anyway, made worse.

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not starting Antonio Gibson in the whole passing game

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, including Terry McLaurin, wasn't playing all that

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>well anyway. He had to get this. Mclarina has reached

1:10:14.640 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards once in the last six games. That's terrible

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as one touchdown over that stretch too, and brutal matchup

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with Darius Slay. The sleigh ride is back. There is

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>no no, no, no, no, Hey, there we go. The

1:10:34.640 --> 1:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sleigh ride is back. He's profo ball focuses fourth ranked cornerback.

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't start Terry McLaren here, works to it kind of

1:10:42.960 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>does Uh, you're one starter if you believe like I

1:10:46.600 --> 1:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>do that Philadelphia is gonna stake a big lead j

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>D mckissic, assuming he clears the concussion protocol, he's expected

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to go here. The Eagles are gonna lead throughout and

1:10:58.520 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I can see Kyle Sherman just doing dump off short

1:11:01.479 --> 1:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>passes to j. D mckissic. In PPR leagues, he is

1:11:05.720 --> 1:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a c grade. Let's go over to Philadelphia. I've upgraded

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>basically all of my Eagles by a full letter grade

1:11:12.640 --> 1:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because of all of the injuries that the Washington defense has,

1:11:16.720 --> 1:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>including potentially all of its starting defensive line in this game.

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders has been great while healthy and playing. He's

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>averaged over five point five yards per carry over his

1:11:29.960 --> 1:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last three full games. The Washington run defense had been fantastic,

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:36.639
<v Speaker 1>but again, if these guys aren't starting, maybe it doesn't

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>even matter, and the Philadelphia is likely to get ahead

1:11:40.560 --> 1:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and just run out the clock in this game. So

1:11:42.960 --> 1:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I like Miles Sanders here. Um, Washington has only given

1:11:46.880 --> 1:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up one score since the week nine by but maybe

1:11:49.000 --> 1:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even matter. You could you could play a

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>desperation Boston Scott if you wanted to, But I don't

1:11:55.120 --> 1:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>think I'm gonna go quite that deeper. We're gonna stick

1:11:57.080 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with Miles Sanders has gotten the vast majority of the work.

1:11:59.520 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I orige only had Jalen Hurts on the bench, but

1:12:02.960 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he gets an extra two days to heal that ankle,

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he can run a bit here, and even

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:11.599
<v Speaker 1>if he can't, the passing could come easily if Washington

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have all the defensive players it's expected to have here.

1:12:14.760 --> 1:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the past six weeks, the average game against Washington

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>passing game is a modest two twenty one yards and

1:12:19.640 --> 1:12:22.639
<v Speaker 1>one point three touchdowns, and that includes holding far better

1:12:22.680 --> 1:12:25.599
<v Speaker 1>passers Derek Carr and Dak Prescott to a combined one

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>score of the past two weeks. But again, if there's

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>injury ravaged as we expect I think hurts and it

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>hurts his foot is back, then maybe he can between

1:12:33.360 --> 1:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>running and passing, he can get up to a C

1:12:35.120 --> 1:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>grade on this. Dallas Goddard is a solid B grade

1:12:39.200 --> 1:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with zach Ertz out. He's top sixty yards and four

1:12:42.040 --> 1:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the past seven games the football team has been

1:12:44.760 --> 1:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty stout against opposing tight ends, only two tight ends

1:12:47.800 --> 1:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of top sixty yards against them. But again due to injuries,

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you can start Dallas Goddard pretty safely. And lastly,

1:12:55.600 --> 1:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Smith. Over his last three games, Smith, averaging just

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:01.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty three yards, hasn't found the end zone. Um in

1:13:01.640 --> 1:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington's last six games, which includes matchups against Brady and Prescott,

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>only Tyler Lockett and Hunter Rent for we were able

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to reach sixty five yards, So we're gonna we're gonna

1:13:09.920 --> 1:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>throw out Davonta Smith here, well maybe even give him

1:13:14.640 --> 1:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>a secret. Well, I'm gonna go I'll well go ahead

1:13:16.600 --> 1:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>give him a because again, if watching his missing all

1:13:19.200 --> 1:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the players we expect them to be missing, Smith's the

1:13:22.160 --> 1:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>best chance for somebody other receivers have a big game.

1:13:25.439 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy who want to start. If you're going

1:13:26.960 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>up against someone who started, Travis Kelsey or something, I

1:13:31.080 --> 1:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>need something special to happen. Yeah, that's a great angle.

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>That is a great angle. When we come back our

1:13:36.640 --> 1:13:41.599
<v Speaker 1>final three matchups, including Seahawks taking on the Rams another Tuesday,

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>another Tuesday game with a bunch of injuries. What to

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>do a DK Metcalf will talk about that when we

1:13:47.680 --> 1:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>come back for the final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:14:04.840 --> 1:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Final segment Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchi in, Matt Harrison,

1:14:09.600 --> 1:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you in the craziest week in the

1:14:13.640 --> 1:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven year history of Fantasy Football Weekly. You're gonna

1:14:18.240 --> 1:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have to stay on your toes. We encourage you to

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>follow my rankings available for free at guilloteon leagues dot com.

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Will be keep trot doing our best to keep up

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:28.519
<v Speaker 1>with all the craziness and help you start your line

1:14:28.600 --> 1:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>up correctly. We do that on this show here, but

1:14:30.920 --> 1:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it continues to be updated all the way up to

1:14:32.840 --> 1:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>kickoffs on Monday, Tuesday, Sunday. So we have games Thursday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday.

1:14:41.720 --> 1:14:48.599
<v Speaker 1>This week crazy, poor Friday, Poor Friday. It's a bad deal.

1:14:48.640 --> 1:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And then it goes Saturday again. It's eight of the

1:14:50.960 --> 1:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>next ten days. There's gonna be pro football. Wow, that's

1:14:54.320 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not starting this weekend? Really eight of the next tent No,

1:14:57.720 --> 1:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>really no, no, No Friday this week and then and

1:15:02.120 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>then Thursday game this week. They're done with Thursdays. They're

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>done with Thursday games. I'm almost sure Seahawks take down

1:15:10.280 --> 1:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Matt And for the Seahawks, Tyler Lockett probably

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:17.919
<v Speaker 1>not available, may be available, maybe comes back by Tuesday.

1:15:18.160 --> 1:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's possible. It's possible. Alex Collins and Tyler Lockett are

1:15:22.080 --> 1:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the notable Seahawks on the COVID list. There's gonna be

1:15:25.640 --> 1:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>more in this game, but those are the only Seahawks.

1:15:28.439 --> 1:15:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny was might take a chance of me. Runner

1:15:31.040 --> 1:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson has never thrown for a three yard game

1:15:34.200 --> 1:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams and twelve career starts, and he has

1:15:37.680 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>thrown multiple touchdowns only once in his last five matchups

1:15:41.000 --> 1:15:44.759
<v Speaker 1>with l A. However, the Rams have twenty five players

1:15:44.760 --> 1:15:48.759
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list, including four starting defensive players, seven

1:15:48.800 --> 1:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>backup defensive players, and Aaron Donald was estimated as a

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>limited participant with a knee injury because the Rams can't

1:15:55.880 --> 1:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>meet in person, so it was an estimated limited participant

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for that. I'm gonna give Wilson a B grade because

1:16:03.960 --> 1:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of facing a preseason style defense. Um. Some

1:16:08.439 --> 1:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of the noteworthy guys who are out on the defensive side,

1:16:11.160 --> 1:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey, Von Miller, It's it's pretty big, so um.

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's move on to DK Metcalf, who did practice

1:16:18.280 --> 1:16:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in full on Friday and if lock It is out.

1:16:21.240 --> 1:16:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Both Freddie Swain and d s Gridge are both deal

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with injuries as well. So Metcalf. He's been working

1:16:27.280 --> 1:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>through foot and back stuff, but he looks like he's

1:16:30.000 --> 1:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. With Jalen Ramsey on the COVID list,

1:16:33.080 --> 1:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing for Metcalf. And it's worth noting

1:16:35.120 --> 1:16:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that Metcalf has scored twice against the Rams in each

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of his last two games against them. And that's with

1:16:40.120 --> 1:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey playing, so I think d K will play and

1:16:42.720 --> 1:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if he's active, he's a B grade as well. Gerald

1:16:45.920 --> 1:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Everett kind of becomes the de facto number two wide

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver with lock it Out. And it's also a revenge

1:16:52.320 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>game for Gerald Everett in l A and the first

1:16:55.200 --> 1:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>time they played this this year in weeks Week five,

1:16:58.760 --> 1:17:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Everett was out in that game. So the Rams are

1:17:01.520 --> 1:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>normally the middle of the pack against the tight end

1:17:04.200 --> 1:17:07.839
<v Speaker 1>position and a normal tight end coverage guy. Ernest Jones

1:17:08.240 --> 1:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is still active as of now, but he's not that

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>great at coverage, so he's actually allowed three touchdowns in

1:17:14.320 --> 1:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>his last six games. UH. Of the twenty five Rams

1:17:18.720 --> 1:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list, the most important on the offensive

1:17:22.479 --> 1:17:28.759
<v Speaker 1>side are right tackle Rob Havenstein, Darryl Henderson, Odell Beckham,

1:17:29.040 --> 1:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>although Beckham tweeted that he was negative on Friday, so

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going in this game. He could have

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:38.799
<v Speaker 1>been talking about, though you never know. And Tyler Higbee,

1:17:38.800 --> 1:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>who just tested positive on Friday, so he probably won't

1:17:41.520 --> 1:17:45.759
<v Speaker 1>go anyway. Matthew Stafford he still gets an A grade.

1:17:45.840 --> 1:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Wilson, Stafford has thrown for three yards against the Seahawks.

1:17:49.280 --> 1:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Every time he's faced them in a rams UNI and

1:17:52.080 --> 1:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he's yeah, that's right. He's thrown for three touchdown passes

1:17:56.240 --> 1:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in each of the last three games. Seattle is allowing

1:17:58.880 --> 1:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the most passing yards per game, but weirdly the sixth

1:18:02.320 --> 1:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fewest passing touchdowns, so that's kind of strange. Cooper Cup

1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is my fantasy art Vark of the week. I like it.

1:18:11.840 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>That's a solid A grade right there. Van Jefferson, I'm

1:18:14.600 --> 1:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B on the premise that O'Dell doesn't go.

1:18:18.040 --> 1:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>If O'Dell does go, If O'Dell does go, I think

1:18:21.840 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Van Jefferson still a C grade. Van will line up

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:29.759
<v Speaker 1>against DJ Read most often, where Jefferson has a five

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>inch advantage in the height department. And then the last

1:18:33.240 --> 1:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>guy is Sony Michelle, who gets an A grade because

1:18:36.120 --> 1:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Henderson is out for a third straight week.

1:18:38.880 --> 1:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He's on the COVID list and he's still dealing with

1:18:41.360 --> 1:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now that they've moved it. Maybe if Henderson does go,

1:18:46.000 --> 1:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Henderson gets the A grade. If Henderson doesn't go, Michelle

1:18:49.200 --> 1:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>gets the ego um because he would get to bell

1:18:52.280 --> 1:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Cow again and he's averaged twenty two carries for a

1:18:54.880 --> 1:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards over the last two weeks. Better if if

1:18:59.200 --> 1:19:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Henderson doesn't go, because you know what to get out

1:19:01.560 --> 1:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of Sony. If Henderson does go, I worry a little

1:19:04.920 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>bit about a possible harsh a little time share. We

1:19:08.080 --> 1:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>call him Sony Michelle Cow, Michelle Cow. I like it.

1:19:11.400 --> 1:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh Well, Michelle Cow would face his easiest matchup that

1:19:14.920 --> 1:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he's seen so far this year. Seattle is allowing the

1:19:17.640 --> 1:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>most touches per game to opposing runners at thirty four

1:19:20.800 --> 1:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>per game, and opposing bats have hit them up for

1:19:23.439 --> 1:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty eight combo yards per game this season.

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:29.519
<v Speaker 1>So even if Henderson does play, Sony, Michelle is still

1:19:29.520 --> 1:19:34.599
<v Speaker 1>a plausible c start here. If Henderson does go, alright,

1:19:34.960 --> 1:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gross. It's it's a Tuesday game. If you can

1:19:38.880 --> 1:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>start anybody ahead of these guys except for Cooper, Cup

1:19:42.240 --> 1:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think and Stafford, I'd start those guys. Saints take

1:19:45.840 --> 1:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Bucks, Brian and for the Saints, this is

1:19:49.960 --> 1:19:53.559
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup a lot of different ways. Alvin Kamara

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is traditionally been able to find ways to fantasy relevancy

1:19:58.680 --> 1:20:00.559
<v Speaker 1>against a very good run defense. What do you think

1:20:00.560 --> 1:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about this week? Yeah, Well, we'll start with the Camara.

1:20:02.800 --> 1:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a B by now. Everyone should

1:20:04.960 --> 1:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be aware that the Bucks are a brutal matchup for

1:20:07.040 --> 1:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>running backs, are allowing less than one combo yards per

1:20:10.479 --> 1:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>game to the position, just eight total touchdowns allowed to

1:20:13.120 --> 1:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs all year, but one of those touchdowns that

1:20:15.240 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>did go to Kimara. When these teams met in Week eight,

1:20:18.000 --> 1:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Camara also totaled seventy six combo yards of that touchdown.

1:20:22.080 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the floor and almost ceiling we're looking

1:20:24.439 --> 1:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at here. Temper your expectations with Camara, but certainly the

1:20:27.840 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>star and the ceiling. It's at the same time. It's

1:20:32.120 --> 1:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an uncomfortable spot to be in. It's a

1:20:34.000 --> 1:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>really weird room. Speaking of a weird room, the wide

1:20:37.280 --> 1:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver room is pretty weird for the Saints with tray

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith, Marquette Callaway, and Esop Winston, all who combined

1:20:44.400 --> 1:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for just six catches last week against the Jets. Love

1:20:47.000 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>his fables, by the way, but New Orleans didn't need

1:20:49.640 --> 1:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to throw much in that game. They will likely need

1:20:51.520 --> 1:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to throw more against the Bucks. I am gonna give

1:20:53.640 --> 1:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>tray Kwan Smith a CEE. He had a touchdown in

1:20:57.160 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the earlier meeting this year, and he swored two touchdowns

1:21:00.040 --> 1:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>one game against the Bucks last year and one in

1:21:02.479 --> 1:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the other, so four touchdowns across his last three games

1:21:05.840 --> 1:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>for tray Kuwan Smith against the Bucks, so see for

1:21:08.000 --> 1:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>him and his c for Nick Vannette. Saints tight end

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Vanette has seen the second most targets from Taysom Hill

1:21:13.640 --> 1:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks, and the Bucks are allowing

1:21:16.280 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>six plus catches and nearly sixty yards per game to

1:21:19.280 --> 1:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight end. So if you're desperated tight end, Nick

1:21:21.439 --> 1:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Vannette is worth a shot. And Taysom Hill, I'm not

1:21:24.640 --> 1:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him an a, but I'm gonna even be

1:21:26.920 --> 1:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>He has a one percent completion rate in three career

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>games against the Bucks. Now, granted his past attempts in

1:21:32.479 --> 1:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>those three games were to one and one. He'll probably

1:21:35.080 --> 1:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pass it more in this one. But of course, it's

1:21:37.240 --> 1:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>all about the rushing with Taysom Mill. In his last

1:21:39.720 --> 1:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>six starts, Hill was averaging sixty three rushing yards and

1:21:42.479 --> 1:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>one rushing touchdown per game. Josh Allen just ran for

1:21:45.320 --> 1:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred plus yards against the Bucks last week, also

1:21:48.040 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had three hundred plus passing yards, and I think we

1:21:49.840 --> 1:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can call Taysom Hill a very poor man's Josh Allen,

1:21:53.160 --> 1:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>so a B for Taysom Hill over to the Tampa

1:21:55.640 --> 1:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Bay side, starting with Leonard Fournette. He will play in

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:00.599
<v Speaker 1>this game. He's been nursing an injury, but he will play.

1:22:00.680 --> 1:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>He gets a c just forty three scoreless combo yards

1:22:03.800 --> 1:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on eleven touches in the first meeting. He'll likely get

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>more touches in this game, though, as his last three

1:22:08.320 --> 1:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>touch counts have been twenty and twenty four and an

1:22:11.280 --> 1:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>absolute bell cow as of late. But a tough matchup

1:22:14.600 --> 1:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for him as well. New Orleans is allowing just ninety

1:22:16.840 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>seven conboy yards per game to running backs. Another it's

1:22:19.520 --> 1:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a tough magic from Mike Evans, too likely to square

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>off with Marshawn Lattimore yet again. Evans did have two

1:22:25.240 --> 1:22:27.479
<v Speaker 1>catches for forty eight yards and a touchdown in the

1:22:27.520 --> 1:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>first meeting, but in his previous five games against the

1:22:30.840 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Saints he has total just ten catches for a hundred

1:22:33.400 --> 1:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and thirty six yards in one touchdown. Those averages have

1:22:36.080 --> 1:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>not come out to a very pretty number for Evans,

1:22:38.120 --> 1:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but Chris Godwin put up very pretty numbers in the

1:22:40.920 --> 1:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>first game against the Saints, he gets an A. He's

1:22:43.840 --> 1:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>had at least ten catches and over a hundred yards

1:22:45.880 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and back to back games. He could do it again

1:22:47.560 --> 1:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and this one. The Saints have allowed these six most

1:22:50.040 --> 1:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>yards to wide receivers um and Godwin lit him up

1:22:53.840 --> 1:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first meeting for eight catches, a hundred and

1:22:55.680 --> 1:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>forty yards and in touchdown. So love God when here

1:22:58.200 --> 1:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he gets an A, as does Rob Gronkowski. Uh, he

1:23:01.760 --> 1:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really didn't play in the first meeting. He was coming

1:23:03.720 --> 1:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>back from injury. Probably shouldn't even suited up. Only saw

1:23:06.720 --> 1:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>five snaps, no catches. The Saints are tough matchup on paper.

1:23:10.640 --> 1:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed an average of thirty nine yards per game

1:23:12.840 --> 1:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends over the last five weeks. That's not great,

1:23:15.439 --> 1:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>but when targeted seven or more times against the Saints,

1:23:18.720 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>tight ends have averaged the healthy fifty five yards per game.

1:23:21.840 --> 1:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>That's good news for Gronk, who has seen at least

1:23:23.880 --> 1:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>eight targets in four straight And lastly, Tom Brady, what

1:23:27.200 --> 1:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can you say about him other than he gets an

1:23:28.680 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>A seventy five yards for passing touchdowns on the first meeting.

1:23:31.600 --> 1:23:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Guy now probably gonna do it again, probably breaking news.

1:23:35.640 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He's been good the Monday Night game. Well, the one

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Monday Night games now is Vikings taking on

1:23:41.080 --> 1:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. Bears riddled with COVID and regular injuries as well.

1:23:45.760 --> 1:23:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Notable defenders who will be missing for the Bears are

1:23:48.560 --> 1:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>expected to be missing Eddie Jackson, Eddie Goldman, already, Burns

1:23:52.880 --> 1:23:56.479
<v Speaker 1>have all got COVID. Uh Ro Kwan Smith's got a hamstring.

1:23:56.600 --> 1:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He may not go in this game. They were already

1:23:59.200 --> 1:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>without Kali mac who was on I R and Danny

1:24:01.680 --> 1:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Trevathan who was on I R. This is a a

1:24:05.120 --> 1:24:08.759
<v Speaker 1>ravage defense and so there's great opportunities for the Vikings

1:24:08.800 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 1>offense in this one. Justin Jefferson's an absolute lock. And

1:24:12.680 --> 1:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not that you need to me to really even expand

1:24:14.760 --> 1:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on that, but let me mention the two full games

1:24:17.160 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>without Adam Feeling, he seemed twenty nine targets. So obviously

1:24:22.200 --> 1:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>they continue to throw to Justin Jefferson and they will

1:24:25.160 --> 1:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>do so here as well. He's gonna get shadowed by

1:24:27.800 --> 1:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Johnson for the whole game. But they did that

1:24:30.080 --> 1:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>against Davante Adams last week, and they Packers found ways

1:24:33.479 --> 1:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to get Adams on other players moving into the slot

1:24:35.680 --> 1:24:37.959
<v Speaker 1>and some other things. Vikings will do that with Jefferson

1:24:38.000 --> 1:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>here too, UM K j Osborne and obviously for Jefferson

1:24:41.479 --> 1:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kJ Osbourne, I've I've bumped up to a B on

1:24:43.640 --> 1:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>all of these defensive injuries. He would have gone up

1:24:46.240 --> 1:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>against already Burns, which was already a positive matchup, but

1:24:49.680 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this means they will probably have to go to our

1:24:52.160 --> 1:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite whipping boy kindle fil door that's right back on

1:24:56.920 --> 1:24:59.519
<v Speaker 1>the field and if it's not filled or might be

1:24:59.600 --> 1:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Profit although he may not go either, he's questionable

1:25:02.479 --> 1:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for this game. A K. J Osborne I've got as

1:25:05.160 --> 1:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a B grade right now. Kirk Cousins feels incredibly safe here.

1:25:09.000 --> 1:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Multiple touchdowns in six straight games. I've already told I

1:25:12.040 --> 1:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like Jefferson, I like Osborne, actually like Tyler Conklin too.

1:25:16.280 --> 1:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, I'm gonna give him a B only because

1:25:19.960 --> 1:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the running game is gonna be a big

1:25:21.680 --> 1:25:25.599
<v Speaker 1>factor here as well. Tyler Conklin startable. Bears have only

1:25:25.640 --> 1:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of four tight end touchdowns all season, but

1:25:27.720 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they were just picked apart by Green Bay's backup tight

1:25:30.360 --> 1:25:33.719
<v Speaker 1>ends for seven receptions and ninety yards, and they've actually

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>given up three tight end scores in their last four games.

1:25:36.720 --> 1:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Constlin probably gets a few extra looks here. With theelan

1:25:39.400 --> 1:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>remaining out of this game, I believe he'll be out

1:25:41.439 --> 1:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of this game. So we'll give Tyler Conklin a C

1:25:44.280 --> 1:25:46.759
<v Speaker 1>grade in this one. And again, all those missing parts

1:25:46.960 --> 1:25:50.559
<v Speaker 1>could be a huge part for the Vikings and Dalvin Cookson. Obviously,

1:25:51.439 --> 1:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this might have been a B grade in a trickier

1:25:54.160 --> 1:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>matchup without all of these starters gone. So Cook averages

1:25:58.120 --> 1:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>only eighty two combo yards and his only score or

1:26:00.160 --> 1:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>twice in five career meetings against the Bears, But who

1:26:02.680 --> 1:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>cares that all bets are off the only the only

1:26:05.680 --> 1:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>really knock on Dalvin cook wasn't able to catch while

1:26:09.080 --> 1:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he was wearing that harness for his shoulder last week.

1:26:12.400 --> 1:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>May not be able to catch much in this game.

1:26:14.640 --> 1:26:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Still a grade for Dalvin cook Let's go over to

1:26:17.840 --> 1:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side for Chicago. David Montgomery missed some practice

1:26:23.120 --> 1:26:26.519
<v Speaker 1>with regular non COVID illness, but came back on Friday.

1:26:26.520 --> 1:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>We expect him to be able to go in this one.

1:26:28.520 --> 1:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings defense finally healthy, but they were healthy last week,

1:26:31.360 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and Nagy Harris gouged him for five yards per carry

1:26:33.960 --> 1:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and two scores, So I still like Montgomery here. In

1:26:36.800 --> 1:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>three career games against the Vikings, he averages twenty five

1:26:41.280 --> 1:26:44.519
<v Speaker 1>rushes for one four yards and a score per game.

1:26:44.720 --> 1:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>If you tell me David mcgomery is gonna get twenty

1:26:46.720 --> 1:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>five carries, I'm definitely in. I only have a B

1:26:50.720 --> 1:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>grade on him here because of the prospects potentially of

1:26:53.439 --> 1:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the of the Vikings getting out ahead against this injury

1:26:56.400 --> 1:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>ravage defense, and maybe the running game gets phased out,

1:26:59.120 --> 1:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and I worry a little bit about Fields eating into

1:27:01.200 --> 1:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>some of his rushing output. Speaking of Justin Fields, he

1:27:04.920 --> 1:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me quarterback, So obviously

1:27:07.320 --> 1:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I like him. If Allen Robinson comes back in time

1:27:10.200 --> 1:27:12.479
<v Speaker 1>to play, I like him a lot in this matchup

1:27:12.479 --> 1:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings cornerbacks. As I also mentioned earlier in

1:27:15.920 --> 1:27:18.479
<v Speaker 1>this show, he's got positive matchups at every stop but

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>shod Brilan, Mackenzie, Alexander or even Patrick Peterson. No Vikings

1:27:22.760 --> 1:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback ranking higher than one coverage by Pro Football Focus.

1:27:26.520 --> 1:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>If Robinson's out, you could dart through at Chachem Grant,

1:27:29.600 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>what great would you get? Fields? I have a B

1:27:33.520 --> 1:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>grade at Justin Fields. Thank you for allowing me to

1:27:36.240 --> 1:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>clarify that I have a B grade on Allen Robinson

1:27:38.240 --> 1:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if he goes a C grade and Jachem Grant. If

1:27:40.240 --> 1:27:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Robinson doesn't go, Darnell Mooney gets a B grade. Vikings

1:27:43.600 --> 1:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the most yards to receivers two hundred three

1:27:46.040 --> 1:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>per game, and the last seven opponents have all had

1:27:48.680 --> 1:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at least one receiver hit eighties six yards. Mooney would

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be that guy. Minnesota has also allowed to receiver to

1:27:54.720 --> 1:27:57.479
<v Speaker 1>score in seven of their last I'm shocked that he's

1:27:57.479 --> 1:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a B. He's a B grade. You think you should

1:27:59.880 --> 1:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be a fine, A great. It's Christmas time. I'll give

1:28:04.400 --> 1:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you the getting and you get an A cold commit

1:28:09.400 --> 1:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>returned to practice on Friday. If Eric Kendricks does not

1:28:12.560 --> 1:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>go for the Vikings, give cold Commit a starting see

1:28:16.439 --> 1:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>grade for your team. If you miss any part of

1:28:20.000 --> 1:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. If you're listening over the air, this is

1:28:22.200 --> 1:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>also a podcast. You can go podcast back and listen

1:28:24.400 --> 1:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>to it. If it's a podcast, listen look for us

1:28:26.520 --> 1:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on your favorite sports talk radio station. We'll be back

1:28:30.080 --> 1:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>next week for a week that hopefully has a lot

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>more clarity than this one. A grueling week. Best of luck, everybody,

1:28:37.040 --> 1:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not easy stuff. We'll talk to you one

1:28:41.080 --> 1:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>week from today. Bye Bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

1:28:53.200 --> 1:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

1:28:55.960 --> 1:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:28:59.240 --> 1:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you live since your favorite shows.