WEBVTT - #579 Jason Flom with Daniel Holtzclaw

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Connor Hall, senior producer for Wrongful Conviction with

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>some more case updates and behind the scenes insights. And

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a case that began back in twenty fourteen. This

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is the summer after Trayvon Martin's killer was acquitted. And

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>then you had Michael Brown and Ferguson Missouri, and simultaneously

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you had revelations about powerful men using their positions of

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>power for sex. And in the midst of that June eighteenth,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzklaw pulled over

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a swerving automobile and found some empty pill bottles. Now

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>following that interaction came accusations of sexual assault, importantly that

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>were not corroborated by a rape kit. Additionally, the accuser

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>described a different officer, and rather than reviewing the surveillance

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>footage of the stop that occurred not in a quiet

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>cul de sac but rather at a busy intersection, investigators

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>took this opportunity to go fishing for other allegations against

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Holt's claw from specifically African American women with pending

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>criminal charges, and they found twenty one others with similar

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>complaints but were they about Daniel. One thing was for certain.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>This slew of stories looked like evidence of a serial

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>rapist in blue. But right off the bat, eight of

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>those stories were disregarded. Then thirteen went to trial and

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>only eight led to convictions. Perhaps this was an instance

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>where so much smoke must have meant fire, because even

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in these cases we see victims describing officers who were

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely not Daniel, as well as scenarios where Daniel could

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not have been present or there was some other dubious detail.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Now we believe many of these allegations are credible, but

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that Daniel Holt's Claw just became a patsy for a

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction that appears to be plagued by sexual violence at

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the hands of police, while the accusers received leniency in

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>their pending charges for going along with the narrative. Since

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>our coverage in twenty nineteen, all thirteen of those that

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>went to trial brought a civil suit against the city,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the detectives, and Daniel, which all came to interesting conclusions,

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>including depositions that exonerated Daniel, as well as a paltry

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>settlement from the city for the accusers. While the suit

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>against Daniel got dropped, and perhaps after you hear this

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>new edit, as well as some of that deposition audio,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it might become more clear as to why.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 2>At two am on June eighteenth, twenty fourteen, Oklahoma City

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>police officer Daniel Holsclaw finished up his shift. On his

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 2>way home in his police cruiser, he pulled over fifty

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>seven year old Jannyliggins for a traffic violation at a

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>busy intersection where surveillance footage shows a normal traffic stop.

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Around three hours later, Mims Liggans filed the complaint, claiming

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>that an officer forced her into oralsodomy. Her mouth swab

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 2>came up empty for Daniel's DNA, as did his uniform

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>for hers, but this allegation inexplicably launched an investigation focused

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>on at risk African American women that Daniel had made

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>contact with, bringing forth twenty one alleged victims, including one man.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Daniel became a rallying cry for everyone who doesn't want

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to see any cop abusing their power or sexually assaulting women.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It all seemed to fit a grim and growing narrative,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and a media circus ensued. In this amazing and alarming episode,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>we will speak with Daniel's sister, Jennifer Holsklaw, biologist Erika Feusch,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and will also take a phone call from an undisclosed

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>correctional facility from former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holsklaw,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>who is currently serving a two hundred and sixty three

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>year prison sentence in a maximum security prison under assumed

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>name for crimes he did not commit. This is wrongful conviction.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to wrongful Conviction. Today we're going to be

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about the case of Daniel Holsklaw, a former police

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>officer from Oklahoma City, wrongfully convicted. He's on the phone.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 2>So Daniel, I'm sorry you're here, but I'm glad you're

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>on the phone.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate having.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 4>Me on and my loved one. Letn't be able to

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>have the opportunity and definitely big one about.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>It, express my indet Well, we hope to be part

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>of the solution. And with us in the studio, we

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>have two extraordinary women. One is a biologist, Erica Fusch.

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the show, Thank you, Jason, and with her

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most persistent and brave women I've

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>come across, the sister of Daniel. Jennifer's here and without you,

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I can honestly say this wouldn't be happening.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for giving us the time.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>And this whole thing happened in twenty fourteen, which was

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a very fraught time, shall we say, a lot of

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 2>traversy around Ferguson and other which you know continues to

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>this day. Of course, the person to.

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>What happened then, the Baltimore deal was going on there,

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 4>so it was literally eye of the storm.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>It was rough, and this was a national news story, international,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.119
<v Speaker 2>I guess right. And at the time, and I'm really

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>sorry to say this, Daniel, but at the time that

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I saw had come across my screen, I was like, oh, well,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, okay, they got this guy, you know, like

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>because the narrative was always the same and me, of

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>all people should not have bought into it. But it

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>was an inexorable barrage of information that was all one sided.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And Daniel, your sister, your amazing sister, you know, wouldn't

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>leave me alone. And at first I was like, can

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you leave me alone? And she was like, no, I can't.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 5>The reason why I'm so passionate about it is because

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 5>when this first happened, it was definitely shocking to hear

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 5>these allegations, especially the first one, and I wanted to

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 5>know everything. I wanted to read all the transcript anything

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 5>that I can get my hand on to see my

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 5>brother have really done this, And everything that I've looked into,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 5>everything that I've read, not just because he's my brother,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 5>but just because the facts of everything that I put

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 5>my hands on, nothing pointed to Daniel's guilt. If there

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 5>was anything that proved or showed anything, I would back

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 5>out and see, Daniel, you deserve every second being in

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 5>prison forever doing this to a woman. And I haven't

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 5>found one single thing that pointed me to say that

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Dale did any of the crimes that he has been

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 5>convicted of.

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 6>Daniel's case is a tragedy because our society's noblest desires

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 6>to end racism and sexism and police brutality ended up

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 6>convicting an innocent man and send into prison.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 5>And I will fight till the day I die to

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 5>get my brother out.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Nor Your courage is inspiring, and Daniel's saying for you.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>So this started when Janny Liggins. She was a woman

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that Daniel pulled over right, and Jenny, you've obviously been

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>so deep in this ever since it happened. You want

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to walk us through this because it's really weird. Right.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>The video evidence doesn't matter. The descriptions don't match like

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>what happened.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 5>So Danielle got off of work about two am, that

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 5>was his normal shift. On his way home, not too

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 5>far from the police department, he saw a car swerving,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 5>tenant windows limoed tint at two am. You can't see

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 5>through those tenant windows. So it's not like Daniel targeted

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 5>a woman driving. So he pulled over, questioned her. He

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 5>had asked her if he could search her car. He

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 5>brought her to his police vehicle and then he searched

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 5>the car. He did say that he saw hydro codon

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 5>bottles and then he did a whole search. Is there

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 5>anything underneath your bra the class and shake and she

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 5>did that looking for drugs, looking for drugs and any weapons.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 5>And everything that Daniel claimed had happened matched up to

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 5>what Jannie Liggan said. Besides the sexual assault, Jennie Liggans

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 5>claimed that when she was in the back of Daniel's

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>vehicle that Dale made her perform oral sex right where

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 5>he had pulled her over, and it was right on

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 5>a busy intersection off of fiftieth in Lincoln in Oklahoma City.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 5>So it's not like Daniel pulled this person over on

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 5>a side street. It was a busy intersection. There's a

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 5>security video on YouTube right now that you can see

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 5>the traffic stop, and you can't see everything. You can

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to see a police officer pulling her over. He had

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 5>his lights on, he never turned his lights off. And

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Daniel let her go. And the following morning is when

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 5>she made the claims about the sexual assault.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 6>A little later that morning, actually, I think, yeah, few hours,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 6>which is.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>A significant point, right because we have with us in

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the room, as I introduced you before, a respected biologist

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>whose works in this field.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 6>What was important for me to see is that Jannie

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 6>Liggins made claims that were not supported by the forensic evidence.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 6>She had a same kit done that morning and was

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 6>interviewed by a female sex crimes detective and the same

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 6>kit ultimately came back negative. There was no DNA from

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Daniel found around Janie's mouth and the swabs there. During

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 6>the trial, the forensic analyst actually said unfortunately there was

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 6>no DNA from Daniel, which showed her bias. Janie Wiggins

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 6>had said that Daniel had placed his hands on the

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 6>car and she had placed her hands on the patrol car,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 6>but fingerprint analysis and DNA was not found matching either

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 6>of them on the car, so her descriptions did not

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 6>match what was found with the forensic evidence. There was

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 6>no forensic evidence supporting what she said happened. And later

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 6>it was discovered after this stop that Daniel did. When

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 6>Janie talked with the sex crimes detective Detective Davis, Janney

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 6>disclosed that she had been smoking pot earlier that day,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 6>and she described the police officer as having blonde hair

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 6>and being shorter. It just didn't match.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, so Daniel, I mean, she must have been high

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>as a kite, because if Daniel's blonde, then you know,

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Prime Minister of Egypt, you know what I mean? Like,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 2>he has dark hair obviously, and Shorty's six to two.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So none of this stuff makes any sense. How could

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 2>you get that wrong? You get a lot of things wrong,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>you can't get blonde to black hair wrong.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 6>And ultimately the detectives used Daniel's own police records, specifically

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 6>looking for African American women he had stopped. He had

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 6>criminal histories, and the detectives went and questioned over forty

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 6>women fitting this profile and then got allegations from them

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 6>to add to this initial allegation they had.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>So then they went fishing.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 7>Hello, this is detective days.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I work in sex frunts and I've been working in

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 3>some cases and I received a tip that you may

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 3>have been sexually assaulted by a police officer.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't think I've been clear on the phone.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 8>When we talked.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 9>Yea quite clear, But like I said, that's the only

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 9>time that I had that happened to me. He exposed

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 9>his stuff to me.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 5>That was a black officer.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had to go to a.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Lot of women.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 6>They didn't come forward.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I've had to go find them.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.599
<v Speaker 6>And Yeah, it's disturbing because the lieutenant who was in

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 6>charge of the investigation specifically looked back through six months

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 6>of Daniel's police records and created a list of the

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 6>specifically African American women quote who had a drug history,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 6>prostitution history, or a significant criminal history whom Daniel had stopped.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Why did they only question one race if they were

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 5>really wanting to figure out if he's a serial rapist,

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 5>why didn't the other races matter?

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 6>So people presumed Daniel was guilty of racism, when in fact,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 6>it was the detectives who were targeting African American women

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 6>at risk African American women, encouraging them to make allegations

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 6>against Daniel as they were railroading Daniel right, and.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>They brought these women in and the videos are as

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>troubling as the audience who's listening now probably thinks they

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 2>are right. There's one who came in and said the

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>seven times she was asked, did anything happen, and seven

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 2>times she said no, And then eventually they got her

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to change her story.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 6>She then said that the only officer who'd been inappropriate

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 6>was a black police officer several years ago who exposed

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 6>himself to her, And then the detective kept on questioning,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 6>and ultimately this woman then claimed that Daniel had wanted

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 6>her to lift up her bra. He didn't say anything,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 6>but she just did it, and that was the whole allegation.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 6>So I don't think that the detective reported that she

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 6>actually accused a black police officer just jumped instead right

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 6>ahead to saying that Daniel had done something right.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And the number were just summarily dismissed because they were

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>so ridiculous that they couldn't even take him to trial.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there were eight people who made allegations against Daniel,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 6>and those allegations were weeded out right away that never

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 6>went to trial. And then the trial, there were thirteen allegations.

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Five of them led to acquittals, and the eight that

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 6>ended up causing convictions had numerous problems in them, like

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 6>one of the women saying that it was a shorter

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 6>police officer who was black, a shade darker than her

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 6>own skin color, and thee got the most number, yes,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 6>two years for her allegations.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, so you were mistaken for a short black guy.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And anyone who hasn't already seen pictures of Daniel take

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a look. I mean he as a linebacker and he's

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the six to two, very bulky guy who's Asian. I mean,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 2>this is not confusing, right, this is nuts. This is

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>absolutely nuts. But with the sheer number of allegations seeming

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>so overwhelming, it's kind of understandable how that could have

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>continued to cast doubt on Daniel's innocence. After all, just

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>because one allegation is doubtful does not disprove another, which

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>is why we need to take a look at each

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>allegation individually. I also want to be clear that we're

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>not here to point at the alleged victim's life choices

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>as evidence of credibility or lack thereof. Now, Initially twenty

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 2>one accusers came forward, but eight were eliminated immediately as

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>false allegations against Daniel. For example, one of them alleged

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 2>that Daniel had used his position as a police officer

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>to sexually assault her after he had been put on

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>administrative leave. Others later admitted to lying, including Shenise Barksdale.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 6>He never touched you.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 9>Why as just felt bad for her and I just

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 9>wanted to know right she wasn't.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 8>Only you feel bad for who?

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 3>And you found out about her from one the Facebook.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Five of the remaining thirteen accusations resulted in acquittal. For

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>privacy protection, we will refer to each of these accusers

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>as quote acquittal and a corresponding number acquittal. One told

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>investigators about an alleged assault made by an officer in

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 2>an area that Daniel had never patrolled. When investigators fed

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 2>her details and a timeline to match Daniel's beat, she

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>denied that story until getting arrested for unrelated drug charges,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>at which time she decided to agree to change her

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>story to match the different location. Acquittal two claimed to

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>have flashed officer holes law her breasts, thinking that was

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>what he wanted, even though he had not requested it.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>She denied any inappropriate contact. Then she told investigators about

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>an alleged in decent exposure by a black police officer.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Acquittal three claimed that Daniel had raped her for twenty

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to thirty minutes and orally sodomized her through the unzipped

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>fly of his pants. This alleged incident would have happened

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>just hours before the Jennie Liggans traffic stop. However, there

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 2>was no match to her DNA either, as well as

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>no evidence of body fluid on Daniel's fly. She also

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>said that her attacker had ticketed her one year prior.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Daniel had never ticketed this woman. Acquittal four claimed that

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Daniel groped her breast, but described the alleged groper as

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>quote part Hispanic and having quote slightly gray hair. She

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>also testified in court that lying and giving false social

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>security numbers to the police is appropriate behavior. Lastly, Daniel

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>friended a message with Acquittal five on Facebook after an

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>incident involving an overdose on PCP in which acquittal five

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>disposed of the substance by eating a glass vial full

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of it. In fact, Daniel escorted her life saving ambulance

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>ride to the hospital. In her police interview, she claimed

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that while she was recovering from that incident, Daniel allegedly

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>forced her into oralsodomy while she was handcuffed to her

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>bed in a busy hospital. This is what she said

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>on her way out of that interview. So this is

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 2>good evidence, Well you tell me, I.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 9>Think so, because I mean, even if he didn't like

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 9>even right now about it, Letton, he filled in.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>And so all five of these allegations ended in acquittal

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of the original twenty one accusers. Eight allegations resulted in convictions,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and we are going to now one by one examine

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the facts of each case. Again, for protection of privacy,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>we refer to all as conviction and a corresponding number.

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>You're already aware of. Conviction one. Jenny Leggins, whom we

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>covered earlier. Conviction two, alleged that Daniel had orally sodomized

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>her near a public park, then transported her inside the

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 2>public park by a closed school, and proceeded to rape

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>her for five to ten minutes. This is how she

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 2>described her attacker.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:04.959
<v Speaker 4>Tell me your description him black man, muscular, muscular, So

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 4>you think he's shorter than you.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, okay, I'll tell you five eleven.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 4>What kind of car did he have?

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 5>A black and white, black and white Corps, Oklahoma City

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Police Corps.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Daniel also had made contact with her at some point

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>near that old school in the public park, but when

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>he did, his automatic vehicle locator or AVL, a GPS

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 2>device attracts the movements of police cars, says that his

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>car stopped for less than four minutes, not five to ten.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 2>He's also six two and half white, half Japanese, definitely

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>not shorter than five to eleven, and definitely not black.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Conviction three claimed that Daniel allowed her to drive under

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the influence while he followed her to her relative's house,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 2>at which point she alleged that he drove her to

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 2>the end of the street and raped her. However, his

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>AVL tells us that he never drove on that street. Further,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 2>the duration of the alleged rape changed from quote a

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>long time to quote five to ten minutes, and then

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 2>a trial to quote maybe about three minutes or so.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>But when she and Daniel did have an interaction, his

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>AVL still would only allow for a window of less

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>than three minutes for a possible attack. Conviction four alleged

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 2>that when Daniel raped and orally sodomized her in her

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 2>room in a house, that she wiped phlegm from that

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>oral sodomy on a chair. The swab from the chair, however,

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 2>revealed the DNA profile of a male that was not Daniel.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Conviction five claimed that her alleged attacker drove the older

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>model Oklahoma City PD Black and White. However, Daniel drove

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the newer all black Cruiser. Conviction six testified that her

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>attacker was a tan color like someone from India, not dark,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 2>but not pale. She also claimed that he made her

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>expose herself. However, a witness claimed that she was handcuffed

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>at the start of their encounter. For Conviction seven, there's

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 2>no DNA evans to speak of, but she did change

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>her story several times. At first, an officer allegedly fondled

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>her breast over her clothing, Then at a preliminary hearing,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>she claimed that the groping was skinned to skin contact.

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>It was back to her over the clothing. Allegation Finally,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the crux of the prosecution's case Conviction eight, a seventeen

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>year old girl who claimed that Daniel pat searched her,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>inserted a finger in her vagina, and proceeded to rape

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>her through the unzipped fly of his buckled pants on

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 2>her mother's porch. This is what she had told her

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>mother about their encounter.

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 4>She said, I met this really hot cop.

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 10>He told me I had a couple of.

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Want but he said, don't worry about it. She really

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 4>nicely affect them.

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>No body fluid was detected or observed on the fly

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of his pants. However, a microscopic trace amount of her

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 2>DNA was found on his fly, along with DNA from

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 2>at least two other individuals, including at least one unknown male,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>which goes to support the defense's theory that the presence

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>of her DNA on his fly can be explained by

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 2>secondary transfer transfer of DNA to objects or people through

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>an intermediary.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 6>The main evidence in the case was DNA found on

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 6>the fly of Daniel's pants, but the DNA evidence on

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 6>the fly of the pants included no evidence of body fluid,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 6>and ultimately Daniel was accused of raping one woman through

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 6>the unzipped fly of those buckled pants and there's no stains,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 6>no deposits on them at all, So that would make

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 6>it very unlikely that there had been any kind of

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 6>sexual assault to be able to give evidence. That's just

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 6>a low quantity of DNA that matches most closely with

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 6>indirect transfer of DNA.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible for Daniel to have done these crimes

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and not left any trace of biological evidence anywhere?

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 6>I would say very unlikely.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>This is so troubling because the idea that Daniel or

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>anyone could be convicted of eight different crimes with the

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>absence of any real biological evidence. And it takes you,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>coming from Iowa, an outsider, to come in and do

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the work that the forensic people should have and could

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 2>have very easily done in the first place. The mistakes,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 2>there's so many mistakes that we don't have time to

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>cover it on this show. I mean, I have a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>list of ninety five of them, right, and there's no

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>way we could talk for hours that we wouldn't cover

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>all of the mistakes that were made, both deliberate and

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>sloppy mistakes. Right, But back to you.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 6>When I looked at the news about the case, which

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 6>is how I found out about it. It was mentioning

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 6>how the prosecutors were so proud to have gotten convictions

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 6>on eight women's allegations based on a little bit of DNA.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 6>The more I looked, I saw there's no evidence of

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 6>body fluids. And it turns out the forensic analysts just

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 6>looked at the pants with the bright light and magnifying

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 6>glass and saw there was no evidence of vaginal fluid

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 6>or body fluid, and then went right to testing just

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 6>the fly of the pants. She did not do any

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 6>control tests on other places on Daniel's uniform pants and belts.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 6>The main problem I think at the Oklahoma City Police

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 6>Department is the detectives and then the prosecutors above them.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 6>They just did not understand that DNA can transfer innocently.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 6>So as soon as they found a mixture of DNA

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 6>on the fly of Daniel's pants, the police thought that

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 6>meant he was guilty of sexual conduct and therefore guilty

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 6>of sexual crimes. They wanted to then go out and

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 6>find the female who matched the major contributor to that

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 6>DNA mixture, assuming she was a victim. So they had

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 6>that mindset, that bias that developed into tunnel vision on

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Daniel right from the beginning of the investigation, and then

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 6>went out and solicited allegations from women whom Daniel had stopped.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 6>And it's no surprise that some of the women did remember, yes,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 6>they were stopped by Daniel, because they had been contacted,

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 6>because the police knew Daniel stopped them. Daniel's case would

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 6>be like someone meeting with you in your office and

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 6>then later they find a woman's DNA on the fly

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 6>of her pants and the woman said, yes, I was

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 6>at his office, and they conclude that you're guilty just

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 6>because you had an interaction with someone.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So if you shook hands this morning with somebody who

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>you met on the street, and then you went into

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 2>a friend whatever, and then they went and went to

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the bathroom afterwards, a little bit of your DNA, a

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 2>touch DNA would be on somewhere on the wherever they

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>unzipped or on buttons, it would be there.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 6>It could very well be there, right because.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 2>We're always transferring to DNA, always shedding. It's like we'd

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>leave it on every day, We leave it on the

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 2>coffee cup, we leave it everywhere we go. When you

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 2>were first taken in for questioning, did you request a lawyer.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I didn't request a.

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 8>Lawyer at the time. I just wanted to a professional.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to clear my name. Any in an any.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Department in law enforcement, your repiga where you.

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 8>Go on with and you want to go to their promotion.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 8>You want to go to any in special unit. You're

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 8>remigi when's on the line and when people hear about you.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 8>And so I'm talking about my name. I don't know

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 8>what you going to allegate you guys before me. I'm

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 8>talking to my name.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 4>I trug co operate and get out of there.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 2>But we see so many times when we see young

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>kids picked up by a police for questioning and they

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 2>don't even know they're supposed to ask for a lawyer.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Right they're in high school, or they're from they're from

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 2>a background where they had no knowledge of how these

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>things work. You were in law enforcement, right, college graduate,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 2>You've got a degree in criminal justice. I mean that's

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>where I go. Well, wait a minute, if there was

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>anything on your mind, the first thing you would have

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>said is okay, I want to lawyer. I'm not stocking

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 2>you guys now. And actually you went in the complete

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>opposite direction from what I understand, correct me if I'm wrong.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>You turned over your passwords, you turned over the keys

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to your apartment.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 4>I basically cooperated the pools. Anything asked, I answered Again.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to be professional. I didn't rage. Now I

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 4>didn't phrase my police they asked, I answered. And that's

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of how in the sense that you were training

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 4>the academy, you know, you're broken down and then you're

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 4>raised up, and so if you're asked the question you're addressed,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 4>you're going to reply anything that they asked. Yeah, go ahead,

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 4>please please do that. Go ahead and go with DNA test,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 4>and go ahead and go to my apartment, whatever you

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 4>need to do to clear my name so I could

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 4>get back and continue my job. I thought I did

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 4>really good at please.

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Do after this had become this insane media circus that

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 2>reached people all over the world. Now you go to trial,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure it was a crazy scene there.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Trial was a long period of time that this has

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 4>happened during the Thanksgiving break. So the biggest thing I

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 4>want to try to address to the audience is help media

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 4>affects people's perception in their opinions. So when they used

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 4>that national media into the aid of the d eighth Office.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm already presumed guilty before I stepped in that courtroom.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 4>So when Judge Henderson, after the jury members are everyone

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 4>in the courtroom, praise your right hand if you have

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 4>seen this man or ever heard of the name day.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I looked at the whole courtroom raised their hand.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 2>My friend Josh Dubin conducted a study with a help

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 2>from a lot of other people that showed that jury

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 2>members have a presumption of guilt that teeters on eighty

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>percent just because they see somebody in the defendant's box.

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>In your case, it was probably one hundred percent of

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>them assumed you must be guilty of something. Because it

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>was impossible to find a jury that hadn't heard about

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 2>the case. You couldn't have found one anywhere in America

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 2>at that point in time, but least of all in Oklahoma.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Again, media has such as a fact on the outcome

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 4>of the cases. Because all I showed is highlights. They

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 4>don't show the fact. They could edit and they could

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 4>crop whatever they want to say what they want, and

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 4>the mature of the cases is the Roman narrative. It's

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 4>all not the right fact.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, when the jury is sitting there. You know,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 2>they're not dumb people. So they're sitting the to going well,

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't make sense, and that wasn't true, and this

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't up. And he's not a black guy, and he's

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>not short, and he's not blonde. And but on the

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>other hand, I saw this thing on TV.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 4>It was a huge burden overcome. So it's you guilty,

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 4>then you got to prove yourself innocent. And then, like

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 4>I said, going back to the Thanksgiving break, you have

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Jess Henderson's quarterors is don't talk to your significant others

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 4>when you go back home. Will come on listen. In reality,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that's not going to happen. You know, honey, what do

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 4>you do today? Well, I was at the whole small trial,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 4>the biggest thing going on in Oklahoma. Of course you're

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 4>going to talk about it. So the people that are

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 4>not in even the court room that the husband and

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 4>wife is reinforcing the presumption of guilt. And then only

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 4>that you have before my lawyers. You know, we hire

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 4>a DNA expert, and yet you're going to.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Fail me on that the forensic analyst misrepresented the DNA

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 6>evidence on the fly of Daniel's pants. There was a

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 6>mixture of DNA from at least three people. There are

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 6>four different stretches of fabrics, two on the outside and

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 6>two on the inside of the fly that were swabbed,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 6>and it turns out all of them had male DNA.

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 6>And the reason this is significant is the prosecution ended

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 6>up arguing that they claimed Daniel's DNA was not there,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 6>and so if he had just innocently transferred DNA matching

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 6>the teenager accuser, you would supposedly expect to find Daniel's

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 6>DNA there. The forensic analysts ended up telling the jury

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 6>there was no male DNA on the inside of the fly,

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 6>and the prosecutor again and again would have her say

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 6>that there's no DNA, so Daniels DNA is not there,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 6>and then argued to the jury that this meant it

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 6>was very unlikely that you could have DNA transferring innocently,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 6>So the jury was misled into believing there was no

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 6>male DNA.

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 4>We have to wait till Eric to comes along to

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>find that that's not right.

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Anytime you have DNA misrepresented in a trial, it's bad

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 6>because DNA weighs so heavily in the minds of jurors.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 6>Daniel's attorney never even challenged these claims by the States

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 6>forensic analysts that there was no male DNA or that

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 6>Daniels DNA wasn't there.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Hearts were in the trial. I felt like, you know,

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 4>my work could have set up an objecte or said something.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 6>What's really important is how the DNA evidence contributed heavily

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 6>to Daniel's conviction, because the prosecutor actually said in his

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 6>closing argument quote, the most important thing about the teenager

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 6>whose DNA profile was found on the fly of Daniels

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 6>pants is the fact, said the prosecutor, that DNA from

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 6>the walls of her vagina was transferred to vaginal fluids

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 6>on the outside and the inside, not of his pockets,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 6>not of his cuff, not where he sits, but at

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the exact location she says his penis came in contact.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 6>So the prosecutor lied to the jury telling them there

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 6>was vaginal fluid that was there was not. And we

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 6>know from a juror's interview after the trial that the jury,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 6>at least this one juror thought there was vaginal fluid

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 6>because he was interviewed on Crimewatch Daily and he said, well,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I'm not a DNA expert. They told us

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 6>the DNA was from the vaginal fluid of a seventeen

0:29:59.520 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 6>year old.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I'm not a d NA expert.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 9>I told us it was the DNA from the vaginal

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 9>fluid from a seventeen year old.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 6>So we know at least Wonder was misled by the

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 6>prosecutor to believe there's vaginal fluid, and so of course

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 6>they're going to end up convicting, not just for the

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 6>teenager's allegations. That jurors explained afterwards that this impacted their

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 6>deliberations for all these allegations.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this was during closing arguments. Could you later

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>have objected in the closing argument? He still can. Yeah,

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and he should have. In fact, it should be a mistrial.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 5>And he didn't.

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they didn't object to that. That's crazy to a

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>gross misstatement.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 4>There was times when I was that and I remember

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 4>one time I'm just like Scott, what do you injecting?

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Like what are you doing? And we kind of got

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 4>into bigger many like calm down and calm down. Well,

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 4>it's hard for me to calm down when you see

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 4>the quote unquote victims that go on the stands and

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 4>not even addressing the questions, and in addition to that,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 4>you have lead detective Davis and Greg Ray that are

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 4>coaching them along and nodding everything they want to say. Okay, yuh,

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 4>that's where I continue on and they're looking at datements

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'm looking at the jury members. Are you serious?

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Are you not seeing this?

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is actually the perfect storm for a wrongful conviction. Right,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you have the media frenzy reporting inaccuracies left and right,

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>making up a narrative that sells advertising time or newspapers.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>You have a jury pool that then is hopelessly tainted.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>You have bumbling and competent and biased investigators throughout this process.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>You have a defense attorney who is I don't want

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to say incompetent, but was not up to the task.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Because this is as serious as a case could be.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about life in prison. I mean, I just

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 2>did the math Daniel's sentence. If you were to serve

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>a sentence, he'd be in prison until the year twenty

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and seventy seven. Then you have a prosecutor

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>who lied, forensic people who lied or were misstated or inaccurate,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever the word you want to choose. Right, with all

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of that the outcome was preordained. Did you have any

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>hope that you would still be vindicated?

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I always leading the judicial system, That's why with

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 4>the cop and so it was really frustrating. Obviously I

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 4>was in toul shock when the murdy came down.

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember vividly there was a DURM member that she

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 3>was a female that I would look and you know,

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge every time they came in the courtroom, I left

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the courtroom, she would look at me, she would smile.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And when the verdict.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Was coming in and.

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 4>They walked into the courtroom, I saw even males, the.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 7>Male GERM members, and cheery eyed. And then I saw

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 7>her crying hysterically. And this is when I'm really freaking

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 7>out and I'm shaking.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Up there, you know, what's going on? And on adord to.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 4>My lawyers and I'm like, well, what's going on? You know,

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 4>and she's crying hysterically, everyone's crying, the GERM members. That

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 4>does make sense because if he thought it was a

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 4>guilty villain white crying, you know.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 7>And then when they ran dogs American you know, y me.

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I was an old No, I don't even

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 7>remember what I and I even remember I think I

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 7>just drop.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 4>My head and you know, like God, why it was

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 4>something about it every.

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 8>Thought possible would happen.

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 2>We're here because we want to educate the public as

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to how these things could happen, and how it could

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>happen to someone you love, and to educate people who

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>are going to be serving on juries at some point

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 2>in their life that you know, whoever's listening, it could

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 2>have been you in that jury box, and how would

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>you have done? And I'm sure people are saying, well,

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I would never have convicted him, but twelve people did.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And how could they get it so wrong? How could

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 2>they look at at at things that are so clearly

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 2>black and white and go, yeah, I know it's false,

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but you know, and they had a complicated task. They're

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 2>looking at things that they know are false, right, They're

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at testimony that they know is false from a

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 2>number of different people. At the same time, they're being

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>presented with quote unquote evidence by people who they respect,

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors and forensic people, and so they're stuck in a conflict.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 2>But as citizens and as everyone again potential jury remembers,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>your duty is to if there's doubt, to acquit you know,

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt. That's something

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 2>we all learn in high school, right, beyond a reasonable doubt?

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Not maybe it could be. I don't know. It's a conflict.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, you know. And then there's that quote

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 2>that I can never say enough times better that one

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred guilty men should go free than that one instance

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 2>should suffer. And that's sort of been turned on its head.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 2>But Daniel, here you are. You're stuck in a situation

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that would break I think most people, how do you

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>do it? Day by day? How? I mean, how are

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 2>you getting along on the inside.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 4>I used to hate here and that and think's happened

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 4>for a reason, And I used to hate that, But

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a greater purpose from God, and I

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 4>think God has a plan for me. You know, be

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 4>down in my heart, I know I'm going to be free.

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>But that said, I can be here without any all

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 4>my loved ones and supporters, so everyone that had come

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 4>along the way, it's a blessing. It's just an act

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 4>of God right there, and finding never gave up, never

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 4>had a thought of giving up. And that day when

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm free, you better bet your blood and I'm going

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 4>to fight for all the wrongful convicted people out there.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's going to be an honor to work with you.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 2>So what happens next and how can people help?

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 5>I suggest people if they want to learn more, go

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 5>to free d Holds claw dot com, my Facebook, Jenny

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 5>holtzklaw is public. I post all the facts and information

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 5>and give daily updates of what's going on his case.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Another thing I want to point on too is we

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 5>have a petition going. We have over thirty five thousand

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 5>signatures right now and you can find that on my

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Facebook or freading Holds dot com for the link to

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 5>actually sign the petition.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>We will have Jennifer's Facebook as well as the petition

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>linked in the episode description. Now, all thirteen accusers that

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>had taken Daniel to trial went on to sue the city,

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the detectives, and Daniel, and then the lead up to

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a potential civil trial against the city. There were depositions

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>conviction one that's Jenny Liggins. There was the grainy traffic video.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>She also described a blonde officer in her initial statement

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no DNA from Daniel in a rape kit.

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And then this is what happened when asked about Daniel

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in her deposition, do you recall.

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 9>Listening to audio recording interviews of Daniel Holtz call who I'm.

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, No, I couldn't. I can't remember.

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't remember the man who allegedly assaulted her and whom

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>she sent to prison because she did experience a very

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>real assault, but it was never Daniel. That conviction accounts

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for twenty one years of his sentence. Conviction two originally

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>described her attacker as shorter than five to eleven and black,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>which obviously is not Daniel, who was six' two and

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ethnically Half, european Half, japanese and she confirmed That daniel

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was not her attacker during her. Deposition how do you

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize that person from?

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 7>Court do you recognize that person from any other time

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 7>in your?

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 8>Life?

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>NO i have never seen him before.

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Trial that's What i'll bally see who accused of riping?

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Meat that conviction accounts for sixty two years Of daniel.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Sentence conviction three was the one that was dispelled by

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the squad car's. Geolocator he'd never driven on that block

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>where she alleged the attack took. Place that's thirty more

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>years For. Daniel conviction four had this to, say about

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the first time she made a statement To Detective. Davis

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>she was coming down off crack in.

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Jail she hasn't be, quitness like send to, that get

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 2>stopped or. Whatever at, FIRST i.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Was kind of. Angry i'm angry like that When i'm

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>coming down so and you're in jail somewhere you don't

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>want to.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 9>Be, yeah Then i'm looking for a ticket out SO

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 9>i can get high.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Again Sel so she traded a story to get high

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>again another twenty. Years For daniel conviction, five her story

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>changed over, time including what kind of car her attacker.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Drove it also appears that she decided to cooperate following

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>other pending. Charges that conviction meant another forty six. Years

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>For Daniel conviction, six described her attacker as ten like

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe From, india so once again not Describing, daniel and

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the charges stemmed from an allegation that he had made

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>her expose herself and fondled her bare. Breasts during her,

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>deposition she confirmed That daniel never touched.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Her how many times Did Hultz claw touch you? Inappropriately

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 2>she didn't touch. Me he never touched.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 10>You no next to the or the third of the last,

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 10>line says Hol squaud didn't Ask Plaintiff barnes if there

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 10>was anything under her, breast and Final Planeiff barnes is naked.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 8>Breast do you see?

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 9>That is?

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Ready, YES i see, it.

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 10>Sir isn't that different than what you testified?

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 2>Today what do you mean is that?

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 10>Different didn't you say Hols claud didn't touch.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 2>You he didn't touch, Me so this is a. Mistake

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>he did not touch, me.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 10>Okay and if you go back To defend's exhibit number,

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 10>eleven count, one five lines from the bottom of count

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 10>one DIRECTING tb to expose her breast and then touching

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 10>her bare breast with his hand without her, consent that's

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 10>also a.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Mistake he didn't touch, me.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 10>Okay and you understand that Mister holsclaud was convicted of

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 10>sexual battery on that count as a result of your.

0:39:54.200 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Testimony, yes eighteen more years For. Daniel conviction seven onces

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>again had a differing description of her, attacker who was

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>taller Than, daniel not the same, haircut and then there

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>were inconsistencies between her story and. Reality another sixteen years For,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>daniel and finally conviction, eight probably the most consequential of

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>all the. Convictions the victim WHOSE dna was found On

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>daniel's fly with a mix of several other, profiles including

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>an unknown male, profile and during her, deposition she recalled

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>when the Prosecutor Galen geiger made the same misrepresentation about

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>THE dna evidence to her that he eventually made in

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>his closing.

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 9>Argument, WELL i was and the witness room or whatever

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 9>that room is, called before they have the witnesses waiting

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 9>to go testifile is there And Galen geiger came to

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 9>me and he told, ME i believe. You out of

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.479
<v Speaker 9>all the other, WOMEN i believe. You AND i said,

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 9>Why and he, said because we were looking for a

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 9>match OF dna that we found inside his police pants

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 9>and it was. You we found your vaginal fluid on

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 9>inside and outside his belief.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 8>Pants and what did you. SAY i don't THINK i.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 9>Said anything anything.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Else he.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 9>Said he encouraged me to testify because it would help

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 9>the other women IF i, testified BECAUSE i was the

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 9>only one with physical.

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Evidence so not only does this recollection reveal that the

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor may have really only believed In conviction eight's, allegation

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but that belief may have stemmed from a misunderstanding of

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>THE dna, evidence and then the eventual misrepresentation of that

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence to the jury granted credence to all the other.

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Accusations despite the inconsistencies and sometimes wholly unbelievable, statements the

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>final conviction meant another fifty years For. Daniel, interestingly after these,

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>depositions the states settled with the accusers for what we

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>understand to be very small sums under like ten grand.

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Piece why would they have accepted so little if they

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>had strong, cases strong enough for the state to, settle

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>yet weak enough to accept so. Little perhaps both the

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>accusers and the state know what this, was and maybe

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the state chose to settle as to not put these

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 1>witnesses back on the. Record if they intended on, winning

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>they destroy their own witnesses Against, daniel Giving daniel's team

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more ammo for post. Conviction they'd expose how the sausage was,

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>made how these people were, lying maybe not about their,

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>experiences but about who was. Guilty. Now soon after this

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 1>settlement was, reached civil proceedings began Against, daniel but soon

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>came to a halt When daniel's team shared their briefs

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the accusers dropped the suit Against. Daniel altogether looks

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't have a prayer Against. Daniel so now

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>post conviction litigation. Continues if anyone has information about this,

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>case please reach out to any Holtz. Claw Her facebook

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is linked in the episode description along with the. Petition

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and with that we'll go To daniel's closing thoughts as

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they were originally.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Recorded all, Right i'll just try to be quick out.

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Versus thank you for having letting us come on board

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 4>and be able to speak my side And manu SENSE

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 4>i appreciate. It jason just to, add you, know real.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Fast and someone asked, me, well why do you think

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 4>you're roughly Convicted, Daniels i'd probably say the.

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 8>MEDIA i think the media plays.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 4>A huge factor in people's. Reception LIKE i said earlier

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 4>in the, show people WATCH tv shows where it's law

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 4>and order in THE. Ipss you, know THAT'S tv. Show

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 4>that's not the reality of what, happens and that's support.

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Rooms people believe that this, defendant this high profile on national.

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Television oh, man he must be. Guilty the defense, warrier oh,

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 4>man he's grew up in bed War he's trying to

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 4>get paint. Here he's going to try to get them

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 4>off on a, Technicality well that's not the. Case please

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 4>just don't believe in to the, media don't believe in

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 4>that mass medium and nihilation where they get edit and

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 4>crop and wherever they want to. Do and the majority

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 4>of them are just aiding the prosecutions, side and people

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 4>believe the prosecutions are the good guys with all they

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 4>care about is the. Fictionary SO i just ask that you,

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 4>guys please just don't jump to the assumption that this

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 4>person is. Guilty looking in the facts of the case and,

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.399
<v Speaker 4>actually you, know do your, homework come out with your own,

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 4>opinion and don't don't believe with the, MEDIA i always

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 4>trying to. Portray SO i know it's fun to hang

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 4>up right. Now but, again thank you everyone and all

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 4>the loved with all the floers that came along as a.

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Spiracle that Where i'm at right now is thanks to.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 4>You i'm a continia to, fight never give, up AND

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 4>i know one want to be. Free so thank you

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 4>everyone out there that's.

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 6>LISTENING i love, Guys thank, you love, You Daniel Hie, daniel.

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening To Wrongful. Conviction you can listen

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to this and all The lava for good podcasts one

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 2>week early and ad free by subscribing To lava For

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 2>good plus On Apple. PODCASTS i want to thank our production,

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Team Connor hall And Kathleen, fink as well as my

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 2>fellow executive Producers Jeff, Kempler Kevin, wartis And Jeff. Cleiber

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the music in this production was supplied by three TIME

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>oscar nominated Composer Jay. Rouse be sure to follow us

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 2>across all social media platforms At lava For good and

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 2>At Wrongful. Conviction you can also follow me On instagram

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 2>At It's Jason. Flamm Wrongful conviction is a production Of

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 2>lava For Good podcasts in association With Signal Company Number.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>One we have worked hard to ensure that all facts

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>reported in this show are. Accurate the views and opinions

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>expressed by the individuals featured in this show are their

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>own and do not necessarily reflect those Of lava For

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>good