1 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:22,480 Speaker 1: Bodybags with Joseph Scott Morgan. Sometimes you sit back as 2 00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: a crime scene investigator and you try to observe things 3 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:31,640 Speaker 1: from the perspective of a clinician, somebody that's kind of cold, 4 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:35,560 Speaker 1: that goes in and just wants the facts. But there 5 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 1: are those cases that I don't know, tease your humanity 6 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 1: out of you at the scene, those things that you 7 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:46,360 Speaker 1: look at them and you think, how in the world 8 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:53,480 Speaker 1: could this possibly have happened. Today, we're going to talk 9 00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 1: about a mother and a wife by the name of 10 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 1: on A wash We're going to talk about her disappearance, 11 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:10,399 Speaker 1: her possible homicide, and her dismemberment. I'm Joseph Scott Morgan 12 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: and this is Bodybacks. Joining me today is my friend 13 00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:24,959 Speaker 1: Jackie Howard, executive producer of Crime Stories. When Nancy Grace, Jackie, 14 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:27,520 Speaker 1: I know that you, like much of the country, has 15 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 1: been following this case or sometime. I think that we're 16 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 1: left again with a case where we've gotten more questions 17 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 1: and answers. What do you think about that? I think 18 00:01:38,080 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: you are absolutely right. The disappearance of on A Walsh 19 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 1: has so many more questions than answers, just like Jennifer 20 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: dulos Up North. This woman disappeared, I mean literally disappeared. 21 00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:57,080 Speaker 1: One day, she was here, next day, cannot find her. 22 00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:00,480 Speaker 1: There's a lot of similarities between these two case for that. 23 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:03,960 Speaker 1: But on a Walsh left her home. She was seen 24 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 1: leaving her house with her bags in hand. She worked 25 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:12,079 Speaker 1: at a different location. She was a real estate professional. 26 00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 1: She had taken on a new job in the Boston area, 27 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 1: and she actually traveled from her home in Massachusetts weekly 28 00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 1: to go for this position. So she was last seen 29 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,880 Speaker 1: leaving her home with bags in hand, according to her husband. 30 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:31,640 Speaker 1: And what happened to her after that is the question. 31 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 1: She has not been seen. She did not make the flight, 32 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: she did not make her new job, so they missed 33 00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 1: her in the office. That's when the questions began. That's 34 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:48,200 Speaker 1: where our investigation needs to begin. How do we start 35 00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:51,560 Speaker 1: that timeline, Joe, I don't know that it's necessarily starting 36 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 1: the timeline as much as it is location. Now I 37 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: know that those two things are kind of married together. 38 00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:59,680 Speaker 1: You've got a husband that's actually stating, and he was 39 00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:03,840 Speaker 1: very specific. He said she left the house in either 40 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,720 Speaker 1: an uber or left. Let's back up to that, because 41 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,919 Speaker 1: now you've got again here we go again. Jackie, we've 42 00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 1: got a digital footprint, because if you were alleging that 43 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 1: she left in an uber or a left and so 44 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 1: not only do you have a digital footprint, you're what 45 00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:22,960 Speaker 1: your alleging means that you would have a physical witness 46 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 1: to her getting into the vehicle with you to be 47 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 1: transported somewhere. So if that's what is being put forth, 48 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 1: then that would be solid information to go on. But 49 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:40,080 Speaker 1: there's no indication that she was seen by anybody getting 50 00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: into the vehicle to go somewhere. So where do we begin, Well, 51 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 1: we begin the home. We begin where an individual lives, 52 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 1: where they're domiciled. You know, you have to think that 53 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: that's the last place she was seen. So what could 54 00:03:54,800 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 1: have occurred within that home that would have essentially led 55 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:03,360 Speaker 1: to her total and complete disappearance, Like you mentioned just 56 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,040 Speaker 1: a second ago, it seemingly just vanishes off the face 57 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:09,320 Speaker 1: of the planet. Well, you peg that one pretty well, Joe, 58 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 1: because now we know that Anna Walsh's husband, Brian has 59 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:18,719 Speaker 1: been charged in her disappearance. The beginning of that suspicion 60 00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:23,720 Speaker 1: from police began in the basement of the home, it did, 61 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 1: and you begin to look for things like physical evidence 62 00:04:26,720 --> 00:04:30,200 Speaker 1: that can begin to turn up. One of the things 63 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 1: with death investigation, and I think that for many reasons, 64 00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 1: it goes back to this. Certainly, people in literature use 65 00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:40,880 Speaker 1: this a lot as a device. You look for blood, 66 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: don't you. Blood is always associated with either the loss 67 00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:48,479 Speaker 1: of life or at least the diminishment of life to 68 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 1: some degree, particularly if you wind up would say, for instance, 69 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,120 Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of blood that you fund at the scene. 70 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,479 Speaker 1: And there's a term that's used. We've talked about it 71 00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:00,920 Speaker 1: before on bodybacks, but it bears repeating, and that is 72 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:03,839 Speaker 1: the idea of the amount of blood that you have 73 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:07,599 Speaker 1: at a scene gives the appearance of an event being 74 00:05:07,680 --> 00:05:12,760 Speaker 1: incompatible with life. However, at least to this point, I 75 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: don't know that there is that much blood evidence. Although 76 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,680 Speaker 1: there was blood evidence found at the home that would 77 00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:23,599 Speaker 1: give an indication that something very troublesome happened there in 78 00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 1: a basement. I would think that a bloody knife found 79 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 1: in the basement would indeed give an indication that something 80 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:34,680 Speaker 1: bad happened. From a forensic standpoint, we hear about this 81 00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:37,160 Speaker 1: a lot in cases. There's a couple of cases out 82 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 1: there right now where I think that many times the 83 00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:43,720 Speaker 1: general public begins to think about, well, you have blood, 84 00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 1: so therefore you can get an arrest warrant and arrest somebody. 85 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:52,840 Speaker 1: That's not the way it works, not in forensics at least, 86 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:57,120 Speaker 1: if you find something that you believe is in fact blood, 87 00:05:57,400 --> 00:05:59,760 Speaker 1: you have to verify that, don't you. You have to 88 00:05:59,839 --> 00:06:02,920 Speaker 1: do what is referred to as presumptive testing on an 89 00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 1: item that might have blood on the surface, say for instance, 90 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 1: with a knife, or if you have a piece of 91 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:10,640 Speaker 1: cloth or even a droplet on the floor. You cannot 92 00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:13,919 Speaker 1: just simply assume that that is first off, that it 93 00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: is blood. So that's our first step. We have to 94 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:19,160 Speaker 1: go in and take a look at that sample and 95 00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:22,200 Speaker 1: see if it is in fact blood, and then from 96 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,400 Speaker 1: that point you can move on to the next level, 97 00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 1: which is where we're going to take a look at 98 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 1: it from the perspective of, well, we verified that it 99 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 1: is blood, but is it human blood, because you can 100 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:36,440 Speaker 1: have animal blood as well. If you have that's in 101 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 1: the home. There's a couple of cases out there where 102 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 1: people were deer hunters, they track blood into the house 103 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:44,680 Speaker 1: and it turned out not to be human it was 104 00:06:44,760 --> 00:06:47,479 Speaker 1: actually dear blood. So you have to be able to 105 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: whittle that down. Well, if you establish that it is 106 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:53,280 Speaker 1: in fact human blood, you go to the next level 107 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:56,400 Speaker 1: of testing, which of course begins to lead into well 108 00:06:56,760 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 1: typing the blood, what blood grouping does it fall into? 109 00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 1: And if you have a missing person, if you try 110 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 1: to say, okay, well what blood group would on a 111 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 1: fall into and hopefully you can establish that, and then 112 00:07:11,720 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 1: of course then you're going to have a DNA fingerprint 113 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 1: as well. Relative to that, What about the age of 114 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 1: the blood, Joe, I know you've probably told me this before. 115 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:25,560 Speaker 1: Can they tell did this happen last week, has happened 116 00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:28,800 Speaker 1: five years ago? What can they tell? Blood is a 117 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 1: curious substance because it's multilayered. It contains several elements to 118 00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: it that actually make it blood. And much of this 119 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:43,440 Speaker 1: relative to attempting to determine how old it is, it's 120 00:07:43,440 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: going to be heavily depended upon not so much time 121 00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:53,240 Speaker 1: as it is exposure. What this sample has been exposed 122 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 1: to over a period of time. You can go back 123 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 1: and take a look at samples from long long ago. 124 00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:00,280 Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, famously, we're able to take 125 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 1: a sample of President Lincoln's blood and actually do a 126 00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:06,880 Speaker 1: DNA profile on it. So, yeah, you can take historic 127 00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:10,720 Speaker 1: samples even and essentially profile them. So in a case 128 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 1: that is this fresh, Remember Anna has only been missing 129 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 1: since January the first, so it's not like we've got 130 00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 1: someone that has been missing for six months, a year, 131 00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 1: or two years. This sample would still be viable at 132 00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 1: this point in tom and I think that that's what 133 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:28,520 Speaker 1: they're dealing with. But when the officers came into the 134 00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 1: basement and they see a substance that they think is blood, 135 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:34,440 Speaker 1: and given the amount of time that Anna has been missing, 136 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:37,440 Speaker 1: it would have more than likely been dried. So when 137 00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:40,800 Speaker 1: they see that based on the color, can they look 138 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:42,960 Speaker 1: at that and go, oh, that happened yesterday, Oh that 139 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:46,200 Speaker 1: happened two weeks ago, Oh that happened six years ago. 140 00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 1: How does what they see? What clues does that give 141 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:55,000 Speaker 1: an officer. There's a certain level of dehydration that occurs 142 00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 1: with blood, depended upon how long it's been down And 143 00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:01,839 Speaker 1: again it's completely depended upon environment mental factors. And you 144 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:04,640 Speaker 1: can kind of eyeball it and get an idea that 145 00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:07,240 Speaker 1: if you've got a sample that has gotten to the 146 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:11,199 Speaker 1: point where it has gone from brilliant red to brown, 147 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:14,679 Speaker 1: and then there's another phase where it will essentially go 148 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 1: to this kind of brown cracked appearance where it and 149 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 1: this is why this is so difficult when you're eyeballing 150 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:24,480 Speaker 1: what you think is a blood sample, because it can 151 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:26,960 Speaker 1: actually look like chocolate, believe it or not, and it 152 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:30,319 Speaker 1: goes from this kind of brown cracked appearance to flaking. 153 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:34,720 Speaker 1: But here's the problem. There is no and I repeat, 154 00:09:34,840 --> 00:09:39,080 Speaker 1: there is no definitive time marker that you can place 155 00:09:39,160 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 1: on that where it is an absolute okay, you're going 156 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:45,200 Speaker 1: to have a lot of wiggle room. And one of 157 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,319 Speaker 1: the reasons is is that you cannot account for all 158 00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:52,640 Speaker 1: of the environmental influences that have taken place in surrounding 159 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 1: that environment. We're talking about Massachusetts. Yeah, it would be 160 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 1: called outside. But conversely, are you running the furnace in 161 00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 1: the house. You've got the sink cranked up so that 162 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 1: it's so hot in there that it's going to cause 163 00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,560 Speaker 1: changes in any kind of biological element that you have 164 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:09,680 Speaker 1: have around. If you've got a garbage that's got I 165 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 1: don't know, a piece of chicken in it, for instance, 166 00:10:11,880 --> 00:10:14,400 Speaker 1: and you've got the heat jacked up in the house, 167 00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:16,959 Speaker 1: it's going to promote the decomposition of that piece of chicken, 168 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:19,360 Speaker 1: whereas if it was cooler, it would preserve it longer. 169 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,840 Speaker 1: So it's it's going to be completely and totally environmentally dependent. 170 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:45,680 Speaker 1: You've got a missing wife. As an investigator, where do 171 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:49,680 Speaker 1: your eyes go first? I'm not talking about at the scene. 172 00:10:50,920 --> 00:10:55,520 Speaker 1: I'm talking about information. I'm talking about where are you 173 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: going to go? What's the well spring of data here 174 00:10:58,679 --> 00:11:02,200 Speaker 1: to find out what exactly happening in this case? Jackie, 175 00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 1: I think that those answers are going to rest with 176 00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:07,680 Speaker 1: a husband. They are, and police again have taken the 177 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:11,720 Speaker 1: husband into custody. And it's strange to me. If you 178 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 1: look at what friends, neighbor's family say about this man. 179 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:21,600 Speaker 1: They all received a strange vibe about him. He didn't 180 00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:25,880 Speaker 1: want his picture taken, he wasn't friendly the town there 181 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 1: where the Walshes lived. People in the shops there, shop 182 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:34,480 Speaker 1: owners like pizza parlor and another restaurant there say when 183 00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 1: they came in that Anna was extremely quiet, she didn't 184 00:11:37,880 --> 00:11:41,280 Speaker 1: speak a lot, and that he as well, just kind 185 00:11:41,320 --> 00:11:44,439 Speaker 1: of gave off a creepy vibe, is how they describe it. 186 00:11:44,960 --> 00:11:49,280 Speaker 1: So she goes missing. The police find blood in the 187 00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:56,439 Speaker 1: home that they now believe shows that he murdered and dismembered. Anna, 188 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: where do you go from here? Joe, her body is missing. 189 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 1: I mean you can get rid of a body a 190 00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:06,880 Speaker 1: thousand ways. How do you track what he did next? 191 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:10,600 Speaker 1: When you go to the scene and you begin to 192 00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 1: dig around as the scene and you suddenly realize that 193 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 1: you don't have what's referred to as a corpus delecti, 194 00:12:17,160 --> 00:12:19,559 Speaker 1: that is the body of the evidence, you're going to 195 00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 1: have to expand your search from there. If the police 196 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:24,920 Speaker 1: were to suspect that the husband was involved in any level, 197 00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 1: they have to begin to track his movements. You know, 198 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:31,280 Speaker 1: you had mentioned, and rightly so. Just a moment ago, 199 00:12:31,400 --> 00:12:35,240 Speaker 1: they found this knife in the basement. And one little 200 00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:39,560 Speaker 1: piece to this that we didn't mention is that this 201 00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:42,960 Speaker 1: knife was bent. You get a bent knife and it's 202 00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:48,400 Speaker 1: gotten blood on it. That means that probably you could 203 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 1: make an intellectual leap scientifically and say this knife was 204 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:56,280 Speaker 1: probably involved in some kind of vigorous behavior, that the 205 00:12:56,400 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 1: knife was not necessarily meant for this purpose. And when 206 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: you begin to think about taking a part of body, 207 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:05,960 Speaker 1: which is what the police are at least thinking has happened, 208 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 1: that goes to this idea of you're in a fever, 209 00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:13,360 Speaker 1: you're using the tools that you have at hand, and 210 00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:15,840 Speaker 1: the tool is not meant for the job, So therefore 211 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:19,319 Speaker 1: it's going to bend and it's going to potentially break. 212 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 1: In this case, it didn't. But what other elements are 213 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:25,840 Speaker 1: you looking for? Well, there's a rug that they've apparently 214 00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 1: found that had blood on it. And here's one more thing, 215 00:13:30,720 --> 00:13:38,160 Speaker 1: and this is key. There's evidence that the husband had 216 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:42,240 Speaker 1: gone to a store and it's purchased about Get this, 217 00:13:42,280 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 1: I don't know how much you spent on cleaning supplies, Jackie. 218 00:13:45,240 --> 00:13:49,920 Speaker 1: He spent four hundred dollars allegedly on cleaning supplies. You 219 00:13:49,960 --> 00:13:53,000 Speaker 1: know how much cleaning supplies do you need in order 220 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: to accomplish a task? That gives you an indication that maybe, 221 00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:00,600 Speaker 1: in this fevered state, he's just a ting to cover 222 00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:02,800 Speaker 1: all of his bases. He's going to use everything that 223 00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:05,680 Speaker 1: he possibly can in order to clean up this mess, 224 00:14:05,679 --> 00:14:08,480 Speaker 1: and it would have been a big, big mess. Well. 225 00:14:08,559 --> 00:14:14,760 Speaker 1: As police continued their investigation into things that Brian Walsh 226 00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:18,959 Speaker 1: had bought, we also find that he bought a hack saw. 227 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:22,240 Speaker 1: You know, we've talked about the use of hack saws 228 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:26,600 Speaker 1: in the past on bodybags. When you begin to look 229 00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:29,400 Speaker 1: at this in total, you think, well, what's the purpose, 230 00:14:29,480 --> 00:14:32,280 Speaker 1: Why would you choose this particular instrument, Why would you 231 00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:34,360 Speaker 1: bring it to bear as a post to say, for instance, 232 00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:38,440 Speaker 1: a carpenter saw or limb saw. With hack saws, they 233 00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 1: have different blades that can be applied to them. Now 234 00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: we don't necessarily know at this point in time the 235 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:50,000 Speaker 1: specifics about the type of blade that was on this 236 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: particular hack saw, but it is essentially something that you 237 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:58,560 Speaker 1: can work with in a very tight, fine space. It's 238 00:14:58,640 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 1: not going to leave as big I can mess. Say, 239 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:03,080 Speaker 1: for instance, if you really go over the top and 240 00:15:03,120 --> 00:15:06,520 Speaker 1: you're using some kind of electrical saw, a sawsaw or 241 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 1: maybe a circular saw and this sort of thing so 242 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 1: you can kind of keep it contained. You have to think, well, 243 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,480 Speaker 1: was he thinking about this? Was he thinking about using 244 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 1: a hack saw where you can kind of diminish the 245 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:20,920 Speaker 1: amount of evidence that you're going to leave behind or not. 246 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:24,080 Speaker 1: And that's kind of a fascinating point here. I'm going 247 00:15:24,160 --> 00:15:26,120 Speaker 1: to ask you something that's kind of morbid. But I 248 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:28,920 Speaker 1: think then again, what we talk about is kind of morbid. 249 00:15:29,480 --> 00:15:35,120 Speaker 1: If you were going to dismember a body, what is 250 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:39,560 Speaker 1: the end result going to be if you do it 251 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 1: when the body has only been deceased for a couple hours, 252 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:48,920 Speaker 1: as opposed to if the body has been deceased for days. Well, 253 00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 1: ask an excellent question. Here's what my thought is on this. 254 00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 1: First off, you've got two sides to think about here. 255 00:15:55,120 --> 00:16:00,320 Speaker 1: If it is immediately afterwards, the blood that remains in 256 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:04,520 Speaker 1: the body is not going to be See how can 257 00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:08,280 Speaker 1: I term this? Not as viscous or thick as it 258 00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:12,640 Speaker 1: would be after the body has been decomposing for a while, 259 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: and so therefore it's going to be in more of 260 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:18,200 Speaker 1: a liquid state, closer to life than it is to 261 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:22,520 Speaker 1: a decomposition, an advanced decompositional state. So that's going to 262 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 1: create a problem. You'll have more blood to clean up, 263 00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 1: if you will. All right now, we're not even talking 264 00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: about any kind of injuries that this individual would have 265 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:34,520 Speaker 1: sustained prior to death, because that if you're talking about 266 00:16:34,560 --> 00:16:36,560 Speaker 1: gunshot wounds or stab wounds and that sort of thing, 267 00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: that's a completely different set of problems that you have there. 268 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:44,640 Speaker 1: We're just merely talking about the dismemberment of human remains. 269 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:47,680 Speaker 1: So in the early state like this, you can still 270 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:50,600 Speaker 1: have quite a bit of blood seeping out, and so 271 00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:53,320 Speaker 1: that is going to pose problem for anybody that is 272 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:57,080 Speaker 1: doing a dismemberment like this. And so you'll have blood everywhere, 273 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:00,880 Speaker 1: You'll have contact blood obviously on the strument that you're using. 274 00:17:00,920 --> 00:17:04,680 Speaker 1: The individual cannot escape this event without having blood all 275 00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:07,479 Speaker 1: over them. Even if they're wearing gloves, you're still going 276 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:10,120 Speaker 1: to get blood on you. Because this is the thing 277 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,119 Speaker 1: about it, is that when perpetrator shows up to a 278 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 1: scene with let's say, for instance, a hack saw, all right, 279 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:21,199 Speaker 1: and a knife that you might use in your kitchen, 280 00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:25,200 Speaker 1: they got the tools to use, and my suspicion is 281 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,119 Speaker 1: is that they don't have the anatomical knowledge in order 282 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 1: to facilitate this. We have specific instruments that we use 283 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:34,879 Speaker 1: for these purposes. That's certainly something that you have to 284 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:37,879 Speaker 1: factor in. You're going to have quite a big mess 285 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: early on. Now, the further you move down range and say, 286 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:43,879 Speaker 1: you ask the question, Jackie, if you have a body 287 00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 1: that is in moderate to advanced state of decomposition, you're 288 00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:49,840 Speaker 1: going to have to deal with smell. You're going to 289 00:17:49,920 --> 00:17:52,360 Speaker 1: have to deal with the changes in the tissue itself. 290 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 1: But I guess I hate to use the term upside. 291 00:17:56,720 --> 00:18:00,520 Speaker 1: But if there is an upside with dismemberment of decomposing remain, 292 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:05,119 Speaker 1: the joints become much more malleable because of the breakdown 293 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:07,760 Speaker 1: of the tissues, all the connective tissues and everything that 294 00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:10,040 Speaker 1: are in there. So if you go into, say, for instance, 295 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:12,919 Speaker 1: a shoulder joint, or to the elbow or to the wrist, 296 00:18:13,640 --> 00:18:17,120 Speaker 1: those are going to be much easier to access and 297 00:18:17,400 --> 00:18:20,120 Speaker 1: kind of take apart if you will. It's just that 298 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:22,439 Speaker 1: you're going to have to deal with all of the 299 00:18:22,480 --> 00:18:44,360 Speaker 1: problems that come along in the messiness of the decomposing body. 300 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:50,560 Speaker 1: For investigators, it's certainly one thing when you have an 301 00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 1: intact human remain. I'm not going to say it's easy, 302 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:58,119 Speaker 1: because that's kind of a diminishment of what all is 303 00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:01,919 Speaker 1: involved in a death investigation. How Ever, I think that 304 00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 1: we can all agree on the fact that if you're 305 00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:08,880 Speaker 1: talking about a case that involves possible dismemberment, what's happened, 306 00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 1: What's happened to all of those various dismembered remains. Are 307 00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: they in one location or they spread out over a 308 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:20,479 Speaker 1: vast area, And that's certainly something that the police are 309 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:23,560 Speaker 1: faced with right now. Jackie, this case reminds me so 310 00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 1: much of the Jennifer Dulos case. Mom ghost, missing husband 311 00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:35,119 Speaker 1: is arrested. He is caught on videotape and with evidence, 312 00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:41,959 Speaker 1: putting evidence into dumpsters and trash cans around the city 313 00:19:42,040 --> 00:19:47,320 Speaker 1: and away from the home. So my question is, and 314 00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:50,840 Speaker 1: again in the Dulos case, the idea of dismemberment was 315 00:19:50,920 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 1: also brought into play. How do you start this kind 316 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:57,400 Speaker 1: of an investigation where you believe the body has been 317 00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 1: dismembered and taken to separate location. The dumpster at Brian 318 00:20:02,160 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 1: Walsh's mother's apartment was searched, so your area of search 319 00:20:09,040 --> 00:20:13,040 Speaker 1: has become massive, And at what point do you stop 320 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:16,320 Speaker 1: and say, Okay, sorry, we've gone out fifteen miles. We're 321 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:19,600 Speaker 1: not going out any farther. Very difficult. It's kind of 322 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 1: like stopping a battleship. You can't snap your fingers and 323 00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 1: have it stop. Right now. I'm thinking about what kind 324 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 1: of logistics are involved in is for the police, and 325 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:29,919 Speaker 1: I've been involved in cases where I've had to go 326 00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 1: to landfills and they are an absolute nightmare. I mean, 327 00:20:33,920 --> 00:20:35,879 Speaker 1: it is a nightmare. You remember when where kids we 328 00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:38,640 Speaker 1: used to play that game called red Light green light. 329 00:20:38,800 --> 00:20:41,239 Speaker 1: Everybody would be moving in the yard. You'd be all 330 00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:43,520 Speaker 1: together and somebody say green light, red light, and you'd 331 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:48,800 Speaker 1: have to stop. We're trying to stop the process of Okay, 332 00:20:48,840 --> 00:20:54,119 Speaker 1: I'll repeat it. The process of processing garbage is monumental. 333 00:20:54,359 --> 00:20:59,199 Speaker 1: Where are the receptacles? And then on what kind of 334 00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:02,840 Speaker 1: schedule are the trucks on they're going to pick this 335 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,520 Speaker 1: stuff up? And then once the trucks, if they're serviced 336 00:21:06,520 --> 00:21:09,760 Speaker 1: by specific service, what landfill are they going to go to? 337 00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:13,080 Speaker 1: Because various different locations and depended upon the region of 338 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:16,200 Speaker 1: the country you're in, they might be serviced by private companies, 339 00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:18,720 Speaker 1: might not necessarily the city of the county that's doing this, 340 00:21:18,800 --> 00:21:21,040 Speaker 1: and so they have different areas they're going to go to. 341 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:24,680 Speaker 1: And again that adds another layer to this. So from 342 00:21:24,720 --> 00:21:26,840 Speaker 1: that moment time we do have a starting place. We 343 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:30,880 Speaker 1: have obviously the washes trash. And then you were referring 344 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:34,800 Speaker 1: to the husband's mother's location. Where would her trash go? 345 00:21:35,480 --> 00:21:38,240 Speaker 1: How would you track that down? Oh, and by the way, 346 00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:44,240 Speaker 1: between his house, the washer's home, and his mother's home, 347 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:47,119 Speaker 1: where else is there that he could have gone to? 348 00:21:47,880 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 1: Or did he take some kind of detour in going 349 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 1: there is there some kind of other location where items 350 00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:56,719 Speaker 1: could be deposited along the way, and all of that 351 00:21:56,760 --> 00:21:59,680 Speaker 1: has to be factored in. And listen, you've got a 352 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:03,280 Speaker 1: very tight window to do this in because if this 353 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:07,000 Speaker 1: stuff makes it out to a landfill, Jackie, they put 354 00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 1: it out into grids, and those grids are subsequently covered up. 355 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 1: You've got this stratification that's going on with this very 356 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:19,359 Speaker 1: very fragile biological evidence that begins to break down very quickly. 357 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 1: I'm going to throw one more thing out that i 358 00:22:20,960 --> 00:22:24,919 Speaker 1: want our listeners to understand. When you are in a landfill, 359 00:22:25,440 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 1: this is a highly aerobic environment, which means that you've 360 00:22:30,359 --> 00:22:35,080 Speaker 1: got a lot of microscopic activity going on, and it's 361 00:22:35,240 --> 00:22:39,200 Speaker 1: made that way so that things break down, and that's 362 00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:41,920 Speaker 1: why they periodically turn the trash out there. They're always 363 00:22:42,040 --> 00:22:46,520 Speaker 1: running over it with these big trucks and equipment and stuff. 364 00:22:46,560 --> 00:22:49,520 Speaker 1: So time is of the essence. If you don't capture 365 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:52,359 Speaker 1: it at that moment time, your entire case could be 366 00:22:52,400 --> 00:22:54,640 Speaker 1: lost and all of the physical evidence can be lost 367 00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:57,640 Speaker 1: as well. You brought up a really good point talking 368 00:22:57,680 --> 00:23:03,040 Speaker 1: about this time factor in finding things in the trash 369 00:23:03,080 --> 00:23:05,840 Speaker 1: and how important it is we can see this in 370 00:23:05,920 --> 00:23:11,600 Speaker 1: the Idaho murders case with Ryan Coberger. He was caught 371 00:23:11,640 --> 00:23:16,960 Speaker 1: putting trash into his neighbor's ben at four o'clock in 372 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:20,560 Speaker 1: the morning, wearing gloves. It just so happened that the 373 00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:24,480 Speaker 1: police were staking him out and caught him saw him 374 00:23:24,520 --> 00:23:26,879 Speaker 1: doing that, so that they were able to retrieve that 375 00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 1: in case there was any evidence in there. The idea 376 00:23:31,200 --> 00:23:37,560 Speaker 1: that that's a possibility makes a forensic experts job a 377 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 1: thousand times more difficult. How do you say, okay, check 378 00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:44,320 Speaker 1: this neighbor, but don't check that neighbor, or do you 379 00:23:44,359 --> 00:23:46,560 Speaker 1: just check them all? Oh? Well, I think that a 380 00:23:46,600 --> 00:23:50,280 Speaker 1: lot of this goes back to the police having to 381 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:53,640 Speaker 1: look at who their primary suspect is and what kind 382 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:58,160 Speaker 1: of behaviors is this individual normally engaged in. Here's kind 383 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:02,159 Speaker 1: of a salient point I believe people have, as you 384 00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 1: well reported, Jackie, earlier, you talked about how people viewed 385 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:09,080 Speaker 1: him as kind of the standoffice figure. The question would 386 00:24:09,080 --> 00:24:11,639 Speaker 1: be for me is who did he talk to? Not 387 00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:14,040 Speaker 1: where didn't he go, but where did he go on 388 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:19,680 Speaker 1: a regular basis? And that's within a comfort zone for 389 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:23,200 Speaker 1: this individual. Most people that perpetrate a crime and they're 390 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:26,600 Speaker 1: not arch criminal out there, which most of those types 391 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:29,600 Speaker 1: of people don't truly exist. They do in comic books. 392 00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:33,399 Speaker 1: But when you find yourself in the midst of having 393 00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:38,840 Speaker 1: been involved, allegedly involved in something so horrific, you need 394 00:24:38,920 --> 00:24:41,360 Speaker 1: those things that are gonna you're gonna feel comfortable with, 395 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:45,080 Speaker 1: and you're gonna feel most comfortable going to locations that 396 00:24:45,160 --> 00:24:47,399 Speaker 1: you frequent, things that you pass by every day that 397 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:50,080 Speaker 1: you would see, Hey, look there's a dumpster behind that 398 00:24:50,119 --> 00:24:53,119 Speaker 1: convenience store, or hey look there's a trash can. This 399 00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:55,680 Speaker 1: person never takes in their trash can, just to leave 400 00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:58,239 Speaker 1: it out there all week long. It's always sits by 401 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:00,840 Speaker 1: the road, and well, arbitrarily throw this and my gosh, 402 00:25:00,880 --> 00:25:03,119 Speaker 1: all we have to do is think back, Jackie. This 403 00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:04,919 Speaker 1: is one of our earliest cases that we covered on 404 00:25:04,960 --> 00:25:08,160 Speaker 1: body backs, and that was infamous Ingrid and Lend case 405 00:25:08,160 --> 00:25:11,159 Speaker 1: out of Seattle, where she'd met this guy on a 406 00:25:11,240 --> 00:25:15,679 Speaker 1: dating app and he brought her home that evening and 407 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:18,960 Speaker 1: wound up killing her and actually dismembering her body in 408 00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:23,000 Speaker 1: a bathtub in that house. And he went to places 409 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:26,800 Speaker 1: that were convenient for him along his route, and he 410 00:25:27,119 --> 00:25:30,240 Speaker 1: actually deposited parts of her body all over the city 411 00:25:30,440 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 1: in recyclable trash cans. It just so happened. I think 412 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:37,000 Speaker 1: that they would have had a hard time with this case, 413 00:25:37,040 --> 00:25:39,440 Speaker 1: even more difficult than they wound up having if this 414 00:25:39,680 --> 00:25:42,679 Speaker 1: random citizen had not walked out to their trash can 415 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:45,280 Speaker 1: to retrieve it and notice it was heavy, looked down 416 00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:47,080 Speaker 1: in there and can you imagine this looks down in 417 00:25:47,119 --> 00:25:50,480 Speaker 1: there and discovers I think it was a footsticking out. 418 00:25:51,040 --> 00:25:54,520 Speaker 1: So you just never know about what a perpetrator is 419 00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:56,880 Speaker 1: going to do. They're going to do I think those 420 00:25:56,880 --> 00:25:59,280 Speaker 1: things that make them feel most comfortable, because this is 421 00:25:59,320 --> 00:26:02,760 Speaker 1: already comp located enough when you begin to think about 422 00:26:02,880 --> 00:26:05,640 Speaker 1: what kind of intellectual energy has to go into this 423 00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:08,320 Speaker 1: in order to facilitate this pull it off, and you've 424 00:26:08,359 --> 00:26:10,199 Speaker 1: always got it in the back of your mind. I 425 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:14,160 Speaker 1: would imagine, as somebody is always watching, that they're going 426 00:26:14,200 --> 00:26:17,120 Speaker 1: to get onto you, that you're going to leave a 427 00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:21,280 Speaker 1: trace behind, and of course they always do. But going 428 00:26:21,320 --> 00:26:23,840 Speaker 1: back to my question, I think I'm kind of hung 429 00:26:23,920 --> 00:26:27,480 Speaker 1: up on the fact that while you say most people 430 00:26:27,520 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 1: go where they're comfortable, what they know when you've got 431 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:34,680 Speaker 1: that one person Israel Keys, for example, travel the country, 432 00:26:35,440 --> 00:26:40,200 Speaker 1: setting up kill kits in strange locations. So you've always 433 00:26:40,240 --> 00:26:43,119 Speaker 1: got that one person that goes, I'm smarter than everybody else, 434 00:26:43,680 --> 00:26:45,960 Speaker 1: And then you have to worry is he really smarter 435 00:26:46,040 --> 00:26:48,680 Speaker 1: than anybody else? And does that mean he's going to 436 00:26:48,760 --> 00:26:52,159 Speaker 1: drive two hours away to dispose of a body. And 437 00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:56,680 Speaker 1: this ties back into my original question, how far out? 438 00:26:56,800 --> 00:27:00,560 Speaker 1: At what point in an investigation five miles, ten miles, 439 00:27:00,640 --> 00:27:04,080 Speaker 1: fifteen miles from home do you say, Okay, we've gone 440 00:27:04,359 --> 00:27:07,359 Speaker 1: out far enough. I'll plainly say that I don't know. 441 00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:09,240 Speaker 1: I don't know how you take the measure of that 442 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 1: as an investigator. As much as I hate to say 443 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:15,719 Speaker 1: this as a scientist, some of it just relies on intuition. 444 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:18,159 Speaker 1: I hate that term. I hated when it comes. I 445 00:27:18,240 --> 00:27:21,600 Speaker 1: hate things like intuition and gut feeling because I think 446 00:27:21,640 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 1: that they'll fail you most of the time. But in 447 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:28,560 Speaker 1: this particular case, the police will exhaust to every possibility 448 00:27:28,600 --> 00:27:30,960 Speaker 1: that they can, and at some point in time you 449 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:32,679 Speaker 1: just have to call it quits. But you know, you 450 00:27:32,720 --> 00:27:36,160 Speaker 1: want to talk about leaving a trail behind. When the 451 00:27:36,200 --> 00:27:38,639 Speaker 1: police actually got a hold of one of the I 452 00:27:38,880 --> 00:27:41,840 Speaker 1: think it was the iPad that was found in the 453 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:45,520 Speaker 1: home per search warrant. This is what was left behind 454 00:27:45,600 --> 00:27:49,240 Speaker 1: on the iPad. Just listen. This is kind of these 455 00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:53,600 Speaker 1: little bulleted points that I have here. Ten ways to 456 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:57,880 Speaker 1: dismember a body? Does baking soda make a body smell good? 457 00:27:58,880 --> 00:28:03,720 Speaker 1: How long is someone missing before you can inherit? Can 458 00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:07,800 Speaker 1: you throw away body parts? Can you be charged with 459 00:28:07,880 --> 00:28:12,160 Speaker 1: a murder without a body dismemberment? And the best ways 460 00:28:12,200 --> 00:28:17,480 Speaker 1: to dispose of a body? A little light Saturday afternoon reading. Huh? 461 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 1: You know who searches these things out? And when you 462 00:28:20,440 --> 00:28:23,960 Speaker 1: begin to couple that with her disappearance in well, and 463 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:26,720 Speaker 1: don't forget the fact, Joe, don't forget the fact that 464 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:30,800 Speaker 1: she had said before that her husband had threatened to 465 00:28:30,880 --> 00:28:33,320 Speaker 1: kill her. Yeah, and you know her mother, who I 466 00:28:33,359 --> 00:28:36,800 Speaker 1: think is from Eastern Europe maybe Serbia, was not even 467 00:28:36,840 --> 00:28:40,320 Speaker 1: aware of this, and that came out later that he 468 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:43,400 Speaker 1: had threatened her, I think, many many years ago, and 469 00:28:43,560 --> 00:28:47,200 Speaker 1: the mother was astounded to find this out. And who knows, 470 00:28:47,400 --> 00:28:49,760 Speaker 1: you know, what might be the motivation behind all of this. 471 00:28:50,400 --> 00:28:53,920 Speaker 1: And again, he's innocent until proven guilty. He's merely been 472 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:56,200 Speaker 1: charged at this point in time. But you have to 473 00:28:56,280 --> 00:28:59,800 Speaker 1: look at the totality of the circumstances and who would 474 00:28:59,800 --> 00:29:02,280 Speaker 1: have had the opportunity in order to perpetrate such a 475 00:29:02,320 --> 00:29:06,440 Speaker 1: heinous crime. I look at this and I begin to think, 476 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:09,720 Speaker 1: deep down in my heart of hearts, I've been married 477 00:29:09,720 --> 00:29:12,520 Speaker 1: for a long time, I've got kids. Many of us 478 00:29:12,520 --> 00:29:14,840 Speaker 1: can identify with this. At what point in time do 479 00:29:14,920 --> 00:29:21,320 Speaker 1: you get in a relationship where you say, Okay, I'm 480 00:29:21,320 --> 00:29:24,960 Speaker 1: going to kill the person that I've been married to 481 00:29:25,280 --> 00:29:27,560 Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, not only married to, but 482 00:29:27,680 --> 00:29:30,560 Speaker 1: created a life with and have attempted to build a 483 00:29:30,600 --> 00:29:32,920 Speaker 1: life with. At what point do you get to And 484 00:29:32,960 --> 00:29:35,840 Speaker 1: I think that that's currently what the police are trying 485 00:29:35,840 --> 00:29:39,120 Speaker 1: to explore. What would be the overall motivating factor for 486 00:29:39,240 --> 00:29:41,960 Speaker 1: somebody to have done this, To do this with a 487 00:29:42,040 --> 00:29:45,560 Speaker 1: person that you've built a life with and completely destroy it. 488 00:29:46,200 --> 00:29:50,440 Speaker 1: Brian Walsh has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder 489 00:29:50,480 --> 00:29:54,520 Speaker 1: and disinterring a body. He is being held without fail. 490 00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:02,960 Speaker 1: I'm Joseph got Morgan and this is body backs