WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Why Not Draft A Safety?

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com.

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Tuesday, May first, two, eighteen, Season fourteen,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>episode number seven. Welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>live from the SWBC Mortgage Studios at the Star, and

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you guys to take us some time to

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to some Cowboys football with us today. Post draft,

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys completed the NFL twenty eighteen NFL Draft picked up

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the total number, five, six, seven, eight, nine players? Um?

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Nine players they drafted. I should say, we're gonna talk

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about a few of those guys, talk about some of

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the moves they did and did not make, and give

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys our opinions on where this team goes from here.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>How's everybody doing today? Great? Wonderful? Good? All right, so

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right in. M As I said, the Cowboys

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>got nine nine draft picks. There were two players that

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they traded for Um. Let's talk first about just overall.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>What were your thoughts coming out of the draft based

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>upon I guess it's hard to do that without talking

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about whatever your expectations were for them and what they

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>were going to do. Based upon each of your expectations,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>how did you feel about what they were able to

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>accomplish in the draft. Let's start with you, Nick. I

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>thought they drafted for need. Um. I think that they

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll say all the time that they got

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>best available player, and maybe maybe they did in certain cases.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>But I thought they had a need going in and

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they drafted for need, especially with the first pick. In

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the second pick, I still think that was a need

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>pick because Connor Williams is going to play guard. So overall,

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that that they went in here with

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some glaring needs. They didn't address all of them. There's

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one still sitting out there, and I think it to

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that they'll get to it, and they will get to it.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But I thought overall they had some needs that they

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't address a free agency and they drafted that way. Amber.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What were your thoughts? I like it. I liked the

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>overall everything that they did. I was surprised though, to

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>see how many wide receivers they got. I really didn't

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>believe wide receiver was that big of a need, you know, so,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is, but as of right now, if

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you're wanting to get right wide receiver, I would have

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>expected someone way higher than the guys that got. And

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess that falls down to what Nick was saying,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting best player available, and that's kind of

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 1>what they said to along the draft when it goes

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to those rounds, you just go for the best one available.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that, I said that they got. I

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>think they got best available need, yeah, which is very well,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very way to put yeah. Yeah, and then they have

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of needs. I mean, I mean it's pretty broad.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So I just it still surprised me, and it surprised

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>me not to see the whole safety situation. I mean,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you get, you got very close to Derwin James and

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing happened there. But it just shows that they really

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>weren't interested in someone like him, and in fact, they

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just believe linebacker was a bigger need. That is. Yeah.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that last thing you said is right. And

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I've said this a million times in the last couple

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Like the biggest secret in the NFL is

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>that they all draft for need. That's my opinion. I mean,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you do the homework and you lay it all out

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the best that you can, but at the end of

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the day, you're going to opt for the guy that

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>addresses the needs on your team. I think there's maybe

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>five teams in the league that don't operate that way,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and their teams like New England, who have had enough

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>success that they're not worried about their jobs. So I

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a coincidence. You go down the line

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of their picks, with the exception of ignoring safety, almost

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>all their picks addressed a need. I mean, what are

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the odds that that would continually happen down the course

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of seven rounds in the draft? You know, But I

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think they got good value. I said this in our

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>draft coverage over the weekend. I think even if you

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>think that Layton Van was a bit of a reach,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if you factor that in with I think

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they got amazing value in Connor Williams. I think, you know,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they looked at Justin Reid in the second round. I

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think they decided Connor Williams was a better pick. I

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>agree with that they got great value with Michael Gallup,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy that they said they thought about drafting at fifty,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and then all down the line. I thought they got

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really good value with their picks, and most of them

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>addressed the need. It's interesting that they ignored safety, but

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand that that's the way the draft breaks. I

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think when you factor it all into one big picture,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what they did makes a lot of sense. We'll see

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>if the players are any good. We will talk about

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the safety position because I think there's a lot to

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>dive into there Before we do that, though, I do

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the first round pick Vander I'm sorry,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>um Um Layton Vanderesh at the time when he when

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys were on the on the clock, you had

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Rashaun Evans, who was a linebacker who was still available.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>You had Dj Moore and Calvin Ridley, both of the

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>two highest rated wide receivers that you guys on the

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>draft show. It talked quite a bit about heading into

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to the draft, as Amber said, a couple picks before

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Derwin James was there, which nobody expected him to get

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to that range. And I think we talked about even

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>last week that if he got to thirteen fourteen, we

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>would you know, be okay with the idea if the

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are willing to jump up to try to make

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a play for him. All that being said, do you

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys or would you have preferred the Cowboys

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>go a different direction than vander Esh in the first

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>round With all of those other options sitting there on

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the board, you got to go off of what they wanted,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and they they evaluated vander Esh higher than all of

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>those players. Every one of them was higher, So there's

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>no reason to trade up in their mind and get

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a player that's rated lower than vander Esh. And I

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>think Derwin James was right there. If someone takes Vanderesh,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>then you know they'll probably they'd probably take the safety.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I still think it's not all complete

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't addressed safety, and they will. They have to.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no way they're not going to get a safety.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what happened here, and then I think

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when you you know, lay it all out there, you're

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, well, probably worked out better to go

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this route than this route, because who's going to be

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the be the linebacker? If you would have taken trade

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it up and taken Derwin James. You probably don't have

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Gallop right right, do either? You guys wish that they

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would have done something different in the first round. I've

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I've said it from the very beginning, like I am

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>not in love with Layton vander Esh as a player

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I have zero qualms with what they did.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I loved Derwin James all through the

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>draft process. I love DJ Moore too, But again, you

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>look I look at it as a puzzle, like you

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>have to look at it all within context. If you

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't take a linebacker there, I feel

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 1>terrible about what you're gonna find later in the draft.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel especially terrible about what's going to happen if

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you trade up for Derwin James. Now you're probably not

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>picking Michael Gallup. Maybe you can't address tight end the

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>way you want to. And I hear people at home

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't pick for need, don't pick for need, but

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you can well not only that, but like you can

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do both. I legitimate I agree if Derwin James had

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>been there, I still think they would have picked Laton

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>vander Esh. And you can draft a linebacker who is

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>capable of starting at nineteen while still holding onto picks

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that help you address other things, and so um, you know,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I I had other guys that I liked more than him,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think that I think the pick makes perfect

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sense and I don't have a single problem with that.

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the free safety position. Obviously,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the big name that everybody was talking about was the

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>possibility that the Cowboys would trade for Earl Thomas. So

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you guys straight up, if there were

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a scenario in the draft where the Cowboys could have

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>given up their second round pick for Earl Thomas, would

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you have been willing to do that or would it

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>had to have been a third or lower pick for

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you to go for Earl Thomas? If you had if

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a scenario where where fifty would would be

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what had to be given up, would you have been

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to give that up? And again, you got to

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do it in the context of you're giving it up

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to taking Connor Williams. Can we just say

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that the right? Can we just say that because I

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm pretty sure that there was Okay, Seattle

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was ready to do it. I think the Cowboys looked

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at it and said, Connor Williams, is it fits our

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>need right now? And if we don't take him, then

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not addressing this need. And yes, we could. We

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>address the safety position for one year at least um

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and and then by not doing it, you draft the

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>guard or you draft Connor Williams, and it's still open

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to maybe get a veteran safety. If it's Earl Thomas

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else, you can still do it. So you

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>don't close the door there. So I understand what they

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what they did there. Yeah, I wanted to. I still

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>want that thing to happen, and I think it can

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I still think it will. But I understand what

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they did there. It Okay, tell me who the veteran is,

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's Exaca Woods is not that your safety started,

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be somebody. He's gonna be. Just you're

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>closing the door on that, yep. Okay, because he's because

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he's short, and he's fifth round and he's he's sixth round.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>They had a third round grade on him though, sorry,

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sixth round, sixth round pick. And I just don't think

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he's I mean, you don't think that this front office

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>has shown a willingness to bank on their hopes for

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a player rather than the reality of the situation. They

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do it all the time. They do it all the time.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying they will back it up with somebody else.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It'll be one of those three veterans or Earl Thomas.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>They'll be one of the three free agents out there. Oh.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree, they're going to add a safety this summer.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I would bet money on that they will add a safety,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like an accomplished safety. And they'll tell us they like

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Xavier and he can compete in Caven. Oh yeah, cave

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>On too and all that. I really, I mean, I

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it'll be anything worth getting excited about it.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I don't know anything. I don't I

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I think this is likely. I don't

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think they'll do anything to this position until the summer.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't be surprised if it's JJ Wilcox. Just

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he just got cut yesterday. I'm that serious. You can

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be as upset about it, but honestly, I'd already have

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that guy, right. They have like four of those guys.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think he gives you anything

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably I don't think JJ really gives you

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>anything based upon the other guys that are out there.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>At least maybe there's an upside within that you haven't seen.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He gives you a veteran who knows how to run

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the scheme and has shown that he can do it

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, as long as you limit his snap count, right, which,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but again, we've seen this team do stuff like that

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>before where they're just like, well, Heath can do it, yeah,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like they do. I mean, this team has a lot

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of faith in their coaching and their scheme. And I'm

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>not saying I agree with it, but I mean, this

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't a team that has done a ton of like

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>bold swing for the fences type stuff over the last

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>four years. And that's not to say that that's always

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been wrong, but they just they have a lot of

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence that their way can work. So I don't feel

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>super confident that they're going to do something drastic. I

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>do think they'll add to the position, but I don't

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>know to answer. If you'd told me Friday morning that

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pick fifty would get me Earl Thomas, I would have

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>been so all in, But knowing now that it was

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that it got you, Connor Williams. I'm a little more

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reluctant because I mean that that was a guy. He

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>probably would have been a top fifteen pick if he'd

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>come out after his junior year. And even still, I

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>mean Brian had him rated higher than Layton vander Esh.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was a guy we talked when we

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>went down to Austin for that pro day tour. We

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about him maybe being the first or second tackle

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>off the board and maybe you draft him at nineteen.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So again, you got insane value on that. So I'm

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to give that up for a thirty year old safety. Yeah.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know how real or true this is,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes I get to thinking and feeling that they

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>might be focusing too much on their strength. You know,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>let's reinforce the old line, let's take care of the offense.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, wide receiver lists, build this great offense. And

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it, that is your strong point and you

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>should do that. But at the end of the day,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>they I feel like they remember seeing what they can

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>do with Zeek and a great old line right now

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they're wanting to get that back. And it's like, once

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point in the season playoffs, we've

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>seen that if you don't have a good defense that

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can go out there and stop the offense, you don't

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily win games, right, So I just get afraid of

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>them focusing too much on that aspect and kind of

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>forgetting those little areas. As far as safety, when you

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about safety, they they've shown that it's not I mean,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>according to them, they're like, Okay, well, we're fine with

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what we got right now, Savior Woods. If we need

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to move back some guys back from a corner that

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they can play safety, you can do that. That's not

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm wanting to hear. You know, that's a big

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>need and it's disappointing to see that it was an address.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And as far as linebacker, that came down to an

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>obvious thing that they all know, shan Lee and we

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>saw what happened last year. You got Tyren Smith, al

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>shan Leel. You know what that causes. But at the

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>same time, you can't forget about those other areas. But

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's the key if you look

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at last season, and you guys may disagree, but I

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like last season when things went wrong, it was

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>when Sean Lee was out of the lineup. It was

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>when Tyren Smith was out of the lineup. And I think,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously you can talk about Zeke as well, but I

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>think those two players. I think we figured out very

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly that without those two players, they had bigger ramifications

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of other positions. And that's why I

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>look at this draft and say, when you talk about

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>them drafting for Need, I think was absolutely about Need.

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they looked at that too and said, even

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when you go back to free agency, the fact that

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they went and picked up Fleming, I think what they

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>said with Fleming and what they said with Connor Williams

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>is we are not going to be in a situation

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>this year where if our left tackle goes down, we're screwed.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to give ourselves a chance to still be

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>able to play. Because what we saw in that Atlanta

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>game specifically, was after that Atlanta game, I don't think

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Dak was the same beyond that. And I think what

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to see as a young quarterback that

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>gets ruined because an offensive line camp protect him, and

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened in Atlanta. So I think when you

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>look at vander Esh and you look at Connor Williams.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Those two picks were all about the fact that last

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>season those two positions held your hostage and they don't

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>want that to happen again. Now you have to make

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're not holding Dak's hand this whole season,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and by that, I mean overprotecting him and the whole

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>saying of making this offense Dak friendly. You're at the

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>point that you can't do that. We need to find

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>out who Dak really is and what he can really do.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's some and it's great obviously we know we've

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>seen the success they can have. But at the same time,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you gotta be careful how much help you give

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that guy. I don't know. I mean, you can't over

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>protect your quarterback on my opinion. That's I mean, I

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get it, but I guess where I'm trying to get at.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I don't want them to just fully rely

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on the running game. I need to see Dak throwing

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>those passes. I need to see him connecting with his receivers.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, That's my point. It's like, Okay, let's not

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>protecting that much, like and the fact like let's give

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>him those easy throws again, or let's go back to

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what he did in twenty and sixteen. No, now we

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>need to see some improvement there. Now we need to

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>see that they can throw the ball down the field.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Teams with NFL MVPs on their roster make picks to

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>help and protect their quarterbacks. I mean, I yeah, I

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can do enough for that. And I

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>get your point. You want to see some growth, You

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>want to know that he can do stuff beyond just

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>make the easy read. But I can't. I can't complain

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about making that running game as good as possible because

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the running game fueled their run deep. You know,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when they had a shot with Tony Romo, it was

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the run game. I mean, DeMarco ran for more yards

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>than Zeke did, So that's I mean, that's something every

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback should want. So I don't have a problem with that.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And again, I see your point that you want to

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>see Dak developed, But I think all of these picks

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>will help in his development. So don't you just never

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know what can happen, And of course you want to

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be sure that your guy is able to do other things.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Then hand off the ball and you have a great

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>running game. You want to make sure you have other

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>weapons and that you're able to succeed in that way

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>because you never know what can happen. Well, that's a

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>good point, and we're going to hold that right there.

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to take a break. When we come back,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about one of those other weapons

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see how he fits into this offense. But

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys got and get speech to Tavon Austin. Let's

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about that when we come back. This is Dallas

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com Radio. It can be hard to find

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the right resource for learning about important financial matters. You

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>search how to build savings, you end up reading about

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot Com,

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit Better Money Habits dot com. What

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan. It

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>means you've got the passion of the heart to do

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season law AT

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. I

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>am craving a Doctor Pepper. I got some soda. I

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>asked not for soda, I asked for ice cold, cravable

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper. Its flavor is more one of a kind,

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>been a foretold sloth with a thirst for speed. Stop

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>settling for soda and start demanding doctor Pepper. I love sloths.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>When you crave a doctor Pepper, nothing else will do.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Grab an ice cold twenty ounce of doctor Pepper today,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper, the one you crave. To work this big land.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You need equipment with values rooted as deep in Texas

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>soil as you are. Like John Dear compact tractors for

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the six year power train warranty. In big features that

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>help you work less so you have more time to

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do what you love. John Deer was first in the

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas Fields and we're proud to be on the field

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as the official agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Find Texas sized deals and my John Deer Dealer dot

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Com slash Flippall durms conditions, exclusions, who warranty limitations apply.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So can you love for details? Family? Back to the Break,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. We're in the second segment of the Break

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>live from the s WBC Mortgage studio that the Star

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were talking draft and we're talking a little bit of

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of trade action. Cowboys traded for a

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>couple players this last week, busy weekend, and one of

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>those players who I thought was a very interesting trade

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>was Tavon Austin. This is a guy that when he

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was drafted, was drafted I think number eight overall, is

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>that correct? It was first round, was high. It was

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>definitely a top ten pick. It feels like he's been

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in the league a lot longer than I mean, he

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was in six years of twenty thirteen, so he was

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Travis's year. It seems like he's been in the league

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>since like two thousand and seven. But it doesn't seem

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like and you guys can can have different opinion on this,

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't seem like he's had the kind of

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>impact that that you would probably expect from an eight

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>overall pick. But that being said, um, I do think

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that players sometimes go to other places and they're used

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in different ways, and you can utilize them and realize

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits of them in different ways. So talk to me

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>about what he does. What does he bring to the

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>table that the Cowboys didn't currently have when they decided

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to trade for him. He's experienced, the dynamic type player

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that can probably use the sideline to sideline better than

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they've had in the past. I think he's he's like

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted to get out of Lucky Whitehead, but

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more vertical and down the field. UM.

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I see this very similar to NBA players that are

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>drafted ninth tenth overall and they don't work out there

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the contract you're paying them in the expectations,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 1>but they go somewhere else and they're pretty good in

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that role, like a JJ Reddick type of player, where

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh my god, what a bad pick. You know,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not that good, but then he goes to another

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>place and makes more sense. I think this will make

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>more sense, not asking him to save the world, just

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>just make some plays and helping them in the punt return.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He mean, it's an upgrade from Ryan Switzer. So I

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's a great pick for the sixth

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>round when you you're just throwing picks. He gave up

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a sixth round pick. Yeah, I mean two years ago

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they took a good rebounder. So in the sixth round. Yeah,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you're just you get you get

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a first round talent and Tavon Austin with a different

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>with a fresh start. Yeah that's still young, by the way. Yeah,

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I uh oh no, I love this move. I hesitate

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to compare him to a Hall of Famer, but he

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of Devin hester By, like I mean, it's

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's to be nice. Well, and I'm not

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>saying he's gonna return twenty five kicks for touchdowns, but

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got or whatever that number was. But he's got

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>dynamic ability in the return game. He's better than the

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>guys they've had here in recent years. And he is

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not a He is not a dynamic receiver in the

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that like his route tree or his ability down

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the field is gonna wow you. I don't even you know,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think of him as Nick's like speed guy.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're going to be throwing this guy

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of nine routes, like let Deonte Thompson or

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody do that. But he can, you know, bubble screens,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>jet sweeps, anything near the line of scrimmage. I just

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>looked it up. I mean, he's never had more than

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>forty or fifty receptions in a season, never more than

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>four or five hundred yards, but he did when he

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>was healthy for the Rams, was getting you know, forty

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to fifty carries a year and averaging four or five

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>six seven eight yards per carry. I mean, we talked

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>about it on Twitter the other day, like it was

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so hilarious how the lucky jet sweep. Everybody knew it

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>was coming and it still worked for ten to fifteen

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>yards every time he did it. So I think you

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>got a guy who can do all of that stuff,

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully better. Right, That's exactly right. And I think

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing I want to clear up, and I want

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>your opinions on this. We heard a term web back

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>being used quite a bit as kind of the role

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that they see him playing, and I think it seems

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, at least that a lot of fans on

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter have taken that to mean that he is going

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to be their running back, their third running back, or

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>third down running back. Although I think he's going to

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>play some of those roles. I want to be clear,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like he's actually coming in here to be

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. He'll be working out with the wide receivers,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but he will be kind of that hybrid player that

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>will sometimes line up in the backfield, sometimes line up wide.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll do a little bit of everything, although he'll probably

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>be working with the wide receiver group. Is that how

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys? When they drafted Switzer, they said that Switzer

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to do some things that Lance Dunbar was

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>doing for them, So they've always kind of had this

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>role of a running back. I mean, remember Lance caught

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>up more passes I think than he had carry So

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll be that type of role there. I think for him,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna see him run the ball in third

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and one or two, and like you know, unless it's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe a jet SUITEP or something like that. I just

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think what it does is it just brings the game

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>more you know, horizontal. I guess if you will just

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just kind of use all all fifty three yards of

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the field and just kind of spread things out more so,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and that might be what you see if if you've

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>got a different tight end here, which I'm sure is

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on your list, it is on my list. And actually

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that tight end position, I did

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about some of the other wide receivers

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Cowboys picked up. They made two draft picks

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>of wide receivers, Michael Gallop and Cedric Cedric Wilson. I'm sorry,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about what their skills are, like, what

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of receivers did the Cowboys pick up and what

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can they deliver to this wide receiver group that they

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe didn't have before or is it just more of

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the same I think, I mean, you heard us talk

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about in the draft coverage. I mean, Gallop is like

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a third round version of DJ Moore. I think you're

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the same type of player. This isn't your health,

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this isn't your big body Dez guy. He's a he's

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>an accomplished route runner for what he is. Not to

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>say he doesn't need to work on it, but he's

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>got a good route tree, he's tough, he's physical, it's

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to bring down. And then Wilson. Wilson was at

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl. I know, like he can move inside

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and outside again like these you know, it's not that

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>classic receiver type or it's either like a big bodied

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>guy or a burner. They're just well rounded, you know,

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>average looking wide receivers, which I think that's you know,

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Jones keeps talking about it. They're not They're at

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>peace with the fact that they don't have a number one.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They're just trying to throw as many solid, well rounded

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers at it as possible. And I think it's gonna

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be really fun because I think there's probably only two

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on this receiver corps that have guaranteed jobs by the

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>end of training camp. So have fun figuring out who's

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna make the team, even with Switzer being gone. Now

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you think going two of them are guaranteed a spot

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point and go down the line. I mean,

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Alan Hearns is here. They gave him too much money

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for him not to be and he has a skill

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>set that not a lot of these other guys have.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And then Gallup is here because they just spent a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred pick on him, But who else, I mean, Terrence,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you might feel pretty confident Terrence is gonna be I mean,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it would surprise me, but that's not I mean, a

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>four million dollar cap hit is not so crazy that

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>if he just gets badly outperformed in training AMP that

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't do it. But you'd have to be something drastic,

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, probably for him and Cole

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>would probably have to be something pretty drastic for them

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not to be honest, I would expect them to make

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the team. But I mean, I can't sit here and

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>say that they have like this crazy job security, not

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with all these other guys that are going to be

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>fighting for roster spots. So with I think that they're

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to get cut, but I could see a

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>trade scenario, especially with maybe not with Terrence as much,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but with definitely with Cole. I mean, if you wanted

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to go that route. But I still think they're going

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to try to make that work with Beasley, and you know,

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a guy that works well with Dak, and you

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>know Dak is that's that's a throw that he can

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>make I mean, I'm not trying to be funny here,

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but that is that is one that he's good. But

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you when you go back to what

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>she said earlier, and I've said this as well, I

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think on the last show is that you know the

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>time is now for him. I mean he Dak needs

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to really take his game to another level. Um, this

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>whole Dak friendly stuff. I mean, these are guys that

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can get open, catch the ball and make place for

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>him and he needs that, but he needs to to

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of elevate their game as well. So I think

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a big time for him, especially if you

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have the tight end that you're that you've had

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the first two years. So let's talk about that. Jason Witten.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Last what was that Thursday, Friday, Friday, we hear word

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that there is at least some contemplation, some serious contemplation

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on Jason's part that he will hang them up and

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>instead opt for a position in the Monday night football

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>booth calling those games. There was also a report that

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>came out I think Saturday, that another network may have

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>stepped in and created an offer for him as well.

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So now he's at a point where he's trying to

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>make a decision on whether he continues to play or

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>whether he opts to step away from football and h

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and just focus on broadcasting. That being said, Um, do

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that? Um? What do you think of what

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have left at tight end? Let's assume now

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that what they have you remove Jason Witten from it.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Do the Cowboys have enough of the position to be

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>able to enter the season and feel good about what

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to do with the tight ends they have?

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You want to take that or Man, Yeah, that that's

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest curveball you've ever thrown. Um, how's that? That

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>was a good curve And it was like I started

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>hearing down because that's Jason Witten, and you're just like, Okay,

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what But the point is we don't

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I don't feel like we're putting words in

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>his mouth on what he's gonna do. I don't. I

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he knows right now what he's gonna do.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So now you, unless you have some insight, feel free

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to jump on in and get it. Did I did

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago, and then eight minutes ago it changed, and

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>then four minutes ago it changed, and now it's back

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to what it was. It's up in the air, right,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a This guy is a damn football player.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>That's what he is and that's what he's always will be.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And I Garret, hey, hey, hey, I don't have any information.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>You don't have anything answer that part about them. I don't.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not sitting here trying to tell you that, like, oh,

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they're fine, Everything's gonna be okay. Like this, the tight

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>end position certainly looks like a trouble spot if Jason

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Witten's not on the team. But I'm just I don't.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not losing a ton of sleepover It's fine. I mean,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's funny one of those things where like all

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>through the spring it was like Witten's holding this team hostage.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>He's not what he used to be. He's terrible, Like

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he's holding this offense back. And then he's like I

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>might retire, and everyone's like worse good. I think you

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>know there will be a drop off from a locker

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>room standpoint as well as an on field standpoint, obviously,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously, but just you look at the talent.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Jeff Swain and Blake jar how many times

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, did Stephen and Jerry Jones say Blake

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin by name, like this dude must be freaking Travis Kelsey,

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like they look Going back to my point, this team

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is not afraid to have faith in guys that they developed.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you talk about the safety spot, how but

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just like, now, this guy we signed undrafted last

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>year is pretty great. We're good. And then they get

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz in the fourth round. The other thing that

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in is if Jason Witten's not here to

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>play ninety seven percent of the snaps, maybe that frees

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you up to play different looking football. Maybe you see

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>more ten personnel no you know, four receivers, no tight ends,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you see more you know, even more eleven

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>than you're used to with one tight end. I don't know.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to see because I would imagine if

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the drop office as severe as people want to make

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it out to be, then I would adapt my personnel

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to make up for the fact that I don't have

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a great tight end. Yeah. Last year, I think eleven

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>personnel was probably the most was the predominant yeah thing

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that they did, and particularly when they were in two

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>minute they would typically have Witten on the field with

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>three wide receivers, and I always thought when they drafted

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Switzer, my thought was, if you could have that

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>ten personnel, where's Switzer and it's easily in the two slots,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it gives you some really great opportunities to do some

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.239
<v Speaker 1>cool stuff. I'm I'm fascinated by the thought of this

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>team playing ten personnel. I think that is suited to Dak.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's suited to Zeke. Give Dak more options

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to throw, put smaller defensive personnel on the field, so

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Zeke has a matchup advantage you've got. I mean, if

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Connor Williams is joining this line, then your line should

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be even more capable of handling it without a tight end.

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And then again smaller personnel, so you clear Dack up

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to maybe run if he wants to. I just I

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>love the thought of them doing more of that. I

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think the most important part thing you said right there

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was that it forces that linebacker off the field. With

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Witton on the field, you could put a linebacker round.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You cannot do that and run a two hundred and

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty pound running back right at your face. Right, let's go,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to spread them out. That's a

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>great way to spread them out and force them to

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>still be able to respect and make a decision between

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>whether they're going to respect all those wide receivers or

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>respect the fact you still got a beast in the backfield.

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's your best way to do it, as

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to eleven personnel with Enfield. I would be a

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>big fan of that, but they don't ask for my opinions,

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not yet. Amber, did you have an opinion on that?

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just shocked. I think it took everyone

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>by surprise, the whole Witten retirement thing, very much so.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I'm gonna be happy with whatever

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>decision he makes. Honestly, I thought his time was coming up.

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I am expected to be this year, but we all

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>knew that his time was coming up. He's starting to

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>slow down. He's still an amazing player, better than most

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>out there, even with him slowing down. So it's gonna

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be a big drop off. And I'm curious to see

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what's up with Rico Gathers. I don't I still don't

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know the story behind him. Yeah, get in line, Nick.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>During the draft, there were some I guess the better

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>tight ends in the draft, which I don't know how

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>great you put him on the scale, but there were

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>some better tight end options in the first and second round.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the Cowboys missed an opportunity to not

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>either draft one of those guys or even in the

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>second round trade up if they needed to in order

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to secure the services of one of those top two

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I think that, you know, I don't think

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>they were interested in taking Goddard at fifth. I mean,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so that was another and if Philadelphia really needed the

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>guy that, you know, that's good for them. Um, you know,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the Eagles as an organization, did not

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have a great Friday Night and trying to trump the Cowboys,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and so if that was their attempt, and I don't

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.959
<v Speaker 1>think it really mattered. Now if they thought it matched up,

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought they needed it, they lost it to backup

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end. So but based off of what we saw there,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think that. I mean, they obviously

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>were making an attempt, and they they tried to jump

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas because they thought Dallas needed a tight end. I

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was both. I think they needed a tight

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>end and they knew Dallas has ever traded up for

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a player that it needs, right, I'm just I just saying,

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.959
<v Speaker 1>but they obviously thought that Dallas needed them, and if

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that would have been to be honest with you, if

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that would have been Oakland sitting in that spot and

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they knew Oakland needed a tight end, they would have

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>jumped Oakland to get that tight end. I don't think

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>teams are trying to make any statements as much as

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to get the players that are best

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for their teams. Only got a few picks, not trying

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a statement, but the narrative was pretty evident.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Bratt and and and I mean the Cowboys did homework

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on tight ends on Friday, they called around, they talked.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think the Cowboys would have drafted Dallas

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>s Gooddard had he been there. And that's the important point.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people missed that that it

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty clear and some of the things that we've heard,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I know we've heard it that that that wasn't even

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a part of the conversation. There were other players that

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>were being considered, and really Connor Williams was their target.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Phillies move makes like I don't think they did it

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to rub Buddy's face in it, right, But they were like,

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>well this is a team that of course, yeah, of

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>course that was I'm talking about the moves. The biggest

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fail of all time. I mean, seriously, you bring you

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bring a puberty kicker to the stage who didn't win

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a ring. That was Did you see Tyrone Crawford's tweet

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>where he just kind of ended it with some basing

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>your voice and he was like a kicker said that. No.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've watched enough wrestling in my day that

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy walks out there with the belt like that's it.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So walk out with the trophy and then just make

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the pick. That's all you have to do. In the

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>last three hundred and sixty five days, what has happened.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You won a championship, which is great, good job for them,

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>but that's all you have to say. You come up

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with something better than that, and let's bring David Akers.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>They should have been sent Dawkins would have been from

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a better guy and as many

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rings as you. Yeah, but still I still probably a

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>better guy. I get it. But in my I think

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Dawkins is technically part of their organization right now, Like

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he I think so, yeah, but don't. Well,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so we sent I would have sen up there. He

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>works for What's what I'm saying, But I'm no. My

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>point I think he does, does he not? Haven't seen

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>him in a while. My point is that I think

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen him either. Andre's still here. I don't

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know about Miles. Uh. I think Dawkins technically got a ring,

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to say. With Philly. He works

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>because he works for them. Last year, Yes, I got you.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a while to get It's fine, It's fine.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I would Yeah, they could have done a way better job.

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 1>We could have too. All right, let's take our final break.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna come back. I do want to talk a

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about jah Jihad Ward, another player the Cowboys

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>picked up on Saturday. We'll talk about that when we

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fans know that the second best of anything simply

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>won't cut it, and your skincare should be no different.

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>A long time locker room favorite of the players and

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>based Jack Black is the number one best selling men's

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>skincare brand in the country because we make products that

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>help guys look, smell, and feel better. Visit get Jack

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys to get ten dollars off

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 1>your first order of fifty dollars or more. Jack Black

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Look Good, Smell good, Feel good official men's skincare brand

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys. Star Sports Tours is the only

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 1>official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo ops

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with current players, alumni, and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk x's and os with Senior Director

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian broad Us. You can trust the official

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. Before there was a draft.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You get sized up a cowboy by three simple factors.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The crease in his hat, the bend of his brim,

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and his unbending attitude a man. Stetson didn't just protect

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>him from what life throw at him, It projected a rugged,

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American made with pride.

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Right here in Texas, there's still the unofficial crowd of

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to be

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Find a retailer nearest

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to you at Stetson dot com slash Cowboys. What does

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It means

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got the passion and the heart to do your

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why when

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the game's on the line, you're on your feet, whether

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're more

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.959
<v Speaker 1>than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and so is ATNT doing their part to keep you

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>connecting to America's team all season. Law AT and T

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back to the Break,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Back. It's the final segment of The Break, live

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. At the staff, we're

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>talking draft Cowboys, make nine picks, trade for two guys,

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>come away with a lot of players, and we're actually

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see some of those players here coming up.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The rookies will be here next weekend for the Rookie

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Mini Camp and then I think it's the week after

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that or maybe two weeks after that, the Cowboys Cowboys

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>will start their official on the field activities and we'll

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be bringing you all the coverage from those then heading

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>up to training camp in July. All right, So let's

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about one of those other players that the

0:37:55.600 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys traded for this last weekend to hod Ward, who

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>was a defensive tackle they traded with Oakland. That was

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the trade where they sent off Ryan Switzer and picked

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>up jehad Ward. Talk to me about jehad Ward and

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what kind of player he is he where he possibly fits, Well,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>he's um probably a three technique that can play him

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one and get up the field. Then they started liking

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>him at the Senior Bowl when they covered when they

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>coached there a couple of years ago, and he just

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was a good scheme fit for

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>what Oakland was trying to do, especially now with with

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>with the new staff that they have in there. So

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just just an opportunity the Pits, I mean, Oakland

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>needed a guy, you know, and obviously Bess Switzer and

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get him, and you know, they're just kind

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of looking at the roster, like, well, who would you

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>part ways with? Yeah, well, you know, we could use this,

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think it just kind of works and let's see. Yeah,

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's disappointing that we never really got to look at

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what Switzer could bring to the offense. But it's the

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect trade, like both teams got something they needed.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Both teams had to part ways with something to do it.

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I just found out with in the last two weeks.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's famously you know, the Cowboys wanted Donelle Pumphrey and

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles took him one or two picks before Besacci

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>is the reason Switzer was here. Bosacci was like, all right,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Pumphrey's gone, this is the guy we need to get,

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and so they did it. And so it makes perfect

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sense that as soon as as soon as they added

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Tavon Austin, well, Psacci probably told Grudener Reggie mackenzie like,

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>get on the phone, let's get this guy. And Keith

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>O'Quinn is one of the reasons that Tavon Austin is here.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he sat down right next to Jerry when

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about it and said, you know, does

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy make us better? And he was just like,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are you gidding me, like one hundred percent better tomorrow

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he makes us better. And literally he you know when

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he said tomorrow he was. I mean, we saw the

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>video we put out there. I mean, he shows up

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>yesterday already here, you're ready to go. And I think

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of those cases where a fresh start's

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>really gonna help him. But that's where it starts with

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>punt return a little bit of the offense. I think

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>if Switzer really would have been a able to contribute,

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we would have seen maybe more than than

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>than four catches. I mean, I know he didn't get

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity, but I think he you know, if

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he had a whole lot there to give, I think

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we would have seen a little bit more there. Maybe,

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>And I'm easily he's right in his way. Maybe there's

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just no I'm not when you got Witten on the team,

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm not trying to say the dude. Maybe

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to say he's welker, but I think

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Beasley and Witten both being there probably hindered his opportunities.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But again, I mean, if he goes on to have

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a Hall of Fame career, no offense to Ryan I

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't bank on that, So I think

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys, but I think you could go on to

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>be a productive receiver. Absolutely. I think I think it

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was about opportunities for him lat year. He didn't get

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. Yeah, he really didn't. But again

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>then especially post if you had Tavon Austin, you didn't.

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Again we talk about safety. They didn't draft a d

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tackle either, so they got one that they had a

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>good grade on two years ago. He's still early on

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in his career. It addresses a need. It's basically like

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>drafting a guy. I think you guys need to be

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>cautious about saying that the offense can look so much

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>better and different with out Witton because you kind of

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know what he is there linebacker on the field, because

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Witten does give you versatility to run the football and

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>catch the ball. Now, he doesn't spread you out as much,

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, you don't know exactly what they're doing

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>when he's out there. And I think that's what's made

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>him so great is that they can play big boy

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>football with him out there. They can also spread it

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit too, so the next tight end

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that they get, I mean it's true he did have

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>some complete package to him. Yeah, I think I think,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's great. I think that's a great

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it. But I do the one

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I will say is I think there are ways

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that. I think we've seen

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>them at times take an additional offensive lineman and put

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>them on the field. I think there's ways that you

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>can do that. But I also think that on the

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>flip side of that, what he what you forced them

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to do, As I was saying earlier, you forced them

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to change their personnel. If you've got ten personnel on

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the field verses eleven personnel, you forced them to add

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>an additional secondary guy. And now they're too If you

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>let's assume for a second you've got you could put

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Herns in the slot. Hearns plays a slot. Let's assume

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that you got Herns in the slot, and let's assume

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you've got on the other side, you got Cold in

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the slot. Now you're forcing that other team to have

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>two good enough slot corners. Now you're four deep on

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>their corners. You're forcing both of those to be good

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to be able to cover in man. And I

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's where you can create some real mismatches for

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself that maybe you can't create, because a linebacker can

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>cover Jason Witten and man coverage at this point in

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of instances, I don't agree with that. You

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I do not think a linebacker can just

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>shut him down. And that's not what I said, That's

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>not what I said. What I said I said, in

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of instances, a linebacker can. There are a

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of very, very athletic linebackers in today's NFL. I

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>think that there are a lot of those linebackers that

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can cover Jason Witten man to man. Well, I mean

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>my point is is stop making the Pro Bowl and

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>then we'll see if he's really wind it down. He's

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 1>not the same as he was, but he's still making

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl. He's still doing his thing. Get all that.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he's not. I'm not saying he's not.

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying but they'll just look at the production too.

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it wasn't like it wasn't like there were

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of opportunities last year that that they

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had to get the ball to Jason. And you know

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, It just it's not showing up in

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the in the game. So so something he's changed something.

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Example year, something happen. Maybe it's that guy or that's

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>throwing it. Okay, and that's fine. But I'm just saying,

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>whatever's happening, it's not working. So you have to start

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>throwing different things at it if you're going to get

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it to work. Right, I'm sorry that they dedicated a

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>whole wall to people that make the Pro Bowl. I

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:36.919
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if it's not working if you're still

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>making the public alternate, yes, but how many six tight

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>ends better than him last year. I'm just saying he's

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>still he's still producing. He's still producing. It's hard to

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>say that it's not working when he's still producing it.

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's his decision. I think he's pondering

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to do because I don't think he

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to get in a situation where he is a liability.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think he was last year. I don't

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know if he was. I know, I'm not saying liability.

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying I still think he can play at

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a pretty high level. My thing is I think that

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 1>there is some diversity that they can get in this

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>offense that right now, Let's be honest, the problem is

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>right now when Jason's on the team, Jason ain't coming

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>on to understand that. But I think there's some diversity

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that can happen if you could have both Jason and

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>be able to go to ten personnel. I think you're

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>probably that doesn't happen right now. Jason's not coming off

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the field. You know, I agree with what you just said,

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but also I want to see that to believe it

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>before I get all excited about it. This coaching staff

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>is stubborn. I don't I gotta see it. I mean,

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just do the same stuff with different players.

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which. Another thing I was gonna say

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>now that I'm trying to sunshine pump, I mean, well,

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what can a fourth round pick possibly be expected to

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>contribute to a team in his rookie year. I'm being

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>sarcastic because Dak was a fourth round pick, but uh,

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, this time of year, I love to do

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like informal poll anytime might see somebody from football ops,

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, who's your favorite pick? And I just,

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, just out of curiosity. A lot of people

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people talking about Dalton Schultz as that guy, I mean,

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>coming from Stanford, he knows how to do exactly the

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>type of stuff they want to tight end when it

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was a third round pick, like, it's not unheard of

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:12.479
<v Speaker 1>to get a good tight end. And if you listen

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to some of the things that people that were around

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when Jason got here say, like Jason didn't come in

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the door being as well rounded as he became. It

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of hard work and really Parcels, like

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember Parcels talking about how important it was to

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>beat a well rounded tight end, not just to be

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a pass catcher or not just the blocking guy, but

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:30.479
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna be great, if you're gonna be among

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the great tight ends, to be well rounded. And so

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if they can do the same thing with Schultz, maybe

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>he has enough of that to to kind of develop

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>him into Witten light right, the secrets in the dirt,

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what Whitten says. Let's get some questions. We've kind

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of we hit on the same they're drawing plays. Yeah, okay,

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we talked about safety, and there seems to be a

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of confusion or questions in regards to why do

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys knee a safety. So I would like to

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for you guys to please expand on this or explain

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 1>why are the Cowboys not okay with just Jeff Heath

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Caven Frasier. The Cowboys are okay with that. We don't

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think they should be okay with okay. Yeah, technically they

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>are okay. Yeah, you've got bodies there, they can do

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the job. Why do we see that as a need

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because they're moving Byron Jones, which a lot of you know,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about fan questions, fans hate that guy

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>more than he deserves. They're moving him to corner. They

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>literally don't have I mean, Xavier Woods has four starts

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to his name, none of which came at free safety.

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Cavan Frasier has never started a game, and you have

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heath, who I think is a solid player and

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind him starting, but you need somebody to

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>partner him with. I mean, so it's basically a projection

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that Xavier Woods, who they felt great about. I'm not

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to say he can't handle it, but they're bail

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>like right now, they're saying, we hope he's up to it.

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what their super positions can wreck your game,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like wreck a game if they if they are playing poorly.

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to me, it's left tackle and safety because

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're safety is not where he needs to be.

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's all I mean, you're you're the last

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>guy out through a cornerback in their two corner. You

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>can but if I mean, if you have a great

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>free safety, you can also kind of clean cornerbacks have

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>some bad games that ended up wrecking a game, I

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>get it, but I guarantee you that that a lot

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of it was probably bad scheme too, like give him

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>some help if he's that bad, or get him off

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the field. But safety, he needs to kind of be

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback of you know, of the defense. And I

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think that they just need to get better there. I

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>mean they Byron Jones was getting benched last year halfway

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>through the year for for Cavan Frasier in a game

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that they don't really love. For Cavan either and Xavier Woods.

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll see he makes plays, but I mean, I think

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to see more of it. But you have

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance to get a guy that you know, a

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>veteran out there that they can play, I think you

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta go for it. And I think they will. I

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>want to take exception to something he said earlier about

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know that I agree that the

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are okay with their safety position, all right, let

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>me let me alter it. Then, based on everything they've

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>done so far, I have no choice but to conclude that, well,

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I have not done anything. But I think that part

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of that is you can't address I don't think you

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>can address everything in one draft, not as many holes

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and needs as they had. I don't think you can.

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And so no safeties on the free agent market right right,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But but I think there are well, but I think

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that maybe those guys don't fit in their opinion. But however,

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all I'm saying, all I'm saying is that I don't

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 1>know that it's necessarily that they don't see. I think

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they see that that's something they got to address. And

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 1>you guys already said it. You think that by by

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>this summer they're gonna put something, bring somebody else in.

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So if that's the case, you know that they feel

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:49.240
<v Speaker 1>like they need to address it. I just don't think

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>it fell to them in the way that these other

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>positions did well. And I'm not killing them for not

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>drafting and safety alreadies. I mean, you know, I think

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Connor Williams is a better pick than Justin Reid. I

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think Layton vander esh is a better pick for what

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they need than Derwin James. I don't know if he's

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as good as a player, but it so it's not

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that I get that. And then once you get past

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the third or fourth round, you're not talking about safeties

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>who fit what they want anyway, You're just I mean,

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about what you already have, you know what

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean. And so that doesn't bother me. What will

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bother me? Now that they drafted Connor Williams. I feel

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.919
<v Speaker 1>confident that Lyle Collins isn't going to move now. I'm

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bothered by the thought of moving Cheeto Woodsier to safety

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or making Byron Jones flop back again after he already

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>flopped once, which I think they will have to. They

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are that little faith in Xavier Woods. They said that.

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I first of all, Xavier Woods isn't going to get

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance to showcase anything in the next month or

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>two anyway at OTA's I mean, that's not football, So

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So, I mean, I hate that thought.

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I And that's they said on Saturday. They can address

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it from within the team because they've got some guys

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with flex. I hate that I thought Cheeto looked great

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the month that he was playing corner last year.

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't mess with a good thing at an important position.

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You might have some really good corners here for the future.

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That's Jordan, Like, I really like what I'm seeing so far,

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and and it frustrates me because I mean, for the

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.919
<v Speaker 1>millionth time I've heard that Kenny, Vacaro and Trade they're

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not scheme fits whatever. They're experienced pro safeties who have

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 1>started games, and they probably wouldn't be expensive to bring in,

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's the harm. But let me ask you this,

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna if you're gonna go there like we

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do know, I mean last year with specifically with Vaccaro,

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't playing very much in in New Orleans like

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they had basically, Yeah, but I'm saying though they were

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 1>already not very happy with his play. So my point is,

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for whatever it was, they didn't feel like he was

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>living up to They also talking about the fact he said,

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is that why you laughing? No, I'm just talking about

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I guarantee they would have liked him

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy at safety and when Stefan Diggs

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was making a play, well, I mean maybe it's hard.

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Not it's harsh because Martin, they drafted Marcus Williams in

0:50:57.840 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the top fifty. He had a damn good year. I

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mean they did, they had options if we had it

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.319
<v Speaker 1>so good, that's the point they feel like they needed

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade the position. So that's my question is what

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 1>can they really expect from from the car if they

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:14.439
<v Speaker 1>were to bring him in Nothing right now? They better

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:17.439
<v Speaker 1>do it like now, Like, don't wait a while. I mean,

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what you need is a veteran guy that can come

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in here and help these younger players. Don't do it

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in June. The guy's already there. He doesn't know where

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>where the bathroom is. I mean, let him come in

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.319
<v Speaker 1>here and be a part of this program. I thought

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>what Tavon Austin did was was really important from the

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:35.800
<v Speaker 1>timing standpoint. I mean, yeah, he can go work out anywhere,

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but be here and be a part of the team.

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Be a part of the group. That's what they need

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to get this better. If they're gonna do it, do

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it now, because because you're right, Zavier Woods came on

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Razor not gonna make any plays on the ball. They're

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>not gonna separate anybody from you know, a pass and

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>knock at anyone on their ass. I mean, they need

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a guy that can do it right now,

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 1>come in here and play. He's not more of what

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>they are well, and they're gonna tell you, and they

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 1>might be right, but they're he's well, he's another like

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>box guy. We already have that, but he's different from

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>what they already have in the sense that he has

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>started and played well and had an NFL career. I

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>mean he I know, Okay, last year he got hurt,

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't a big part of it, but he has

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>started for them and played well. I don't know if

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he's ever been to a Pro Bowl, but he has

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 1>been in Pro Bowl consideration. He's been part of a

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Saints team that made a playoff push like or even

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean Trey Boston too. It doesn't have to be

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Kenny of a Car. I just they don't have a

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who has started what you want to experience, Yes,

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I want. I mean, and again for the million time,

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm worried people think that I hate

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods and don't think he can play. That's not

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the case. I just hope is not a strategy. It's

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not it's a I just think that's a bad idea

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>going into it. Jerry was asked if Eric Reid was

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>an option, and he did not answer it either way.

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>He didn't say that he's not or he just said,

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd just rather not talk about any veterans that are

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out there free agents or whatever. And Eric Reid, obviously

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, he's really good player and a former

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 1>first round pick and a player that was that kneeled

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>every game right for the anthem. Yeah, I was a

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:10.720
<v Speaker 1>big part of it. So yeah, that's those are the facts.

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't mean, Jerry's not gonna say

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>one way or another, but just those are the facts.

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Whether I mean, I don't know. I mean, and again,

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I hope Xavier Woods does. I hope he is the

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>safety of the future because they got a great deal

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on him, and again they thought very highly of him,

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and he fell all the way to the sixth rounds.

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to be the safety of the future. He

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>has a has a unique skill set of being a

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>slot corner type safety. I mean, there's a spot for him.

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't necessarily mean that he has to be back

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there starting. I think, well, I think Jordan Lewis could

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be a hell of a slot cornerback, and so if

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods can play safety, that's where I would prefer

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for him to be. But I mean, you talk about

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>look at all the things they've done to foster competition

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at receiver and all these other spots, like nobody like

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the Xavier Woods has gotten the greatest vote of confidence ever.

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They're literally just like the job's yours to lose like

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you can. But I guess that's my point is I

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're doing I think what they're doing right

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>now is he just haven't found the right opportunity yet.

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And we all agree by summer they're gonna find somebody

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to put in that spot. I don't think they're going

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to camp with just those guys. I would be shocked

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if they haven't added somebody July. I still think it's

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be Earl And maybe it is. All I'm

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>saying is I don't think. I don't think they go

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to camp with that with just what they got. How

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you just trade you go into next year unless and

0:54:23.040 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't trade next year's one, but you can trade unless

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he stages a holdout? What is Seattle's motive for? Kind

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with you on that? Why do you want to you?

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Why would you give up one of your best players

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for a pick that you can't use for eight months

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and if you let him leave in free agency next year,

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>then you get a comp pick for him. Anyway, that's

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be a three out of guess as good

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a player as he is depends on the size of

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 1>the deal. Kids, it's gonna be significant, right, I just

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when do you want to make this pick

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to yours or or next year? I'd rather have a no,

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. I mean, your scenario is you

0:54:57.719 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you keep him for a year and then you get

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a pick a year later. What would you change? What

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would you rather have for the twenty eighteen season as

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks who have already dumped a bunch of players

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>when they got a secondary Now you Pro Bowl caliber

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>player or a pick that you can't use until the

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>season's over. I just maybe I'm wrong. I don't know.

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think it's as easy to get

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this done now that the draft, So I don't know.

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:22.759
<v Speaker 1>All I know is that the reason why the Cowboys

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and other teams wait until the last second to turn

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>into the card is to see if someone's going to

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>offer you next year's one. Well, yeah, that's that's what

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they always say. Next year's one changes everything. Well, I

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mean next year's two is still probably valuable. Sure it is. No,

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it is. And I think I agree with both of

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys, and I think both can kind of exist.

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're kind of the dual things that are

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 1>probably why Gil hasn't been done is because you're kind

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of going back and forth between the two. Yeah, they

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 1>would probably love to get a two from the Cowboys.

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side, as Dave said, they got

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a young secondary and they're probably looking at like, well,

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna get him for one more year and

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>let him kind of be the veteran in this secondary

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with these young guys, and then even if he walks away,

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:04.359
<v Speaker 1>we thought we'll be compensated with a pick. So either

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 1>way it would probably pretty good. So it has to

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be a pick that we're getting from a team that

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just knocks our socks off for us to actually move us,

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually make us say, yeah, we gotta do it.

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Now and struggle with next year having an extremely young

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>so and that's why, I mean, that's why stuff like

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that happens on draft weekend, because it's like you pick

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.439
<v Speaker 1>up the phone and you're like, you can have pick

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.319
<v Speaker 1>eighty one in fifteen minutes, So just add that to

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're already about to do, like you have that

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:31.720
<v Speaker 1>instant chance to upgrade your team, Whereas now it's like, well,

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna lose one of our best players for these

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.399
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games that matter so much, and we don't get

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to do anything about it until next April. And I'm

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's impossible. I just think it's way it's

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>even more unlikely than it already. Lets them go get

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the car, oh hey, and that probably that would be

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be happy, right, That would be upsetting for me.

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Is like the Cowboys are like, he's not a scheme fit,

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>he's not as scheme fit, we don't want him. And

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 1>then somehow the Cowboys get Earl Thomas and the Seahawks

0:56:57.840 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>go sign him to do what the Cowboys said he

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>could do, which that's probably well. The other thing about

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks to remember is their strong safety. They don't

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen with him? He still has not

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>come back from that injury. Yeah, so if they're gonna

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>lose him too, now you have a completely different secondary

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>from what you had the beginning of last season, and

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>are you willing to let the guy who is the

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of the centerpiece of that in Earl Thomas call.

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I still think this is happening or

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some veteran is that they had ten

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>picks to start the draft and they had to sign

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen more free agents, so they had to bring in

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight players. I think it's ended up being twenty

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seven because of the trade. But I mean they brought

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eight players and there's one safety who's an

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>undrafted player from Oregon. That just tells me that there's

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>still nobody's come in here and change their mind about anything.

0:57:45.320 --> 0:57:47.479
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's even worse because you got twenty seven

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>players that have come through and you haven't added anyone,

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's even more of a need. Yeah. I mean

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Rolando McClain, the year he was good. He joined this

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>team on like July tenth, you know, so I don't

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>think this is done. I just would be surprised. If

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's et all right, guys, appreciate you joining us. We

0:58:05.200 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>are back next Wednesday. We'll give you, guys a little

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more. We'll talk a little bit more about this

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>team and where they stand right now at each position,

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>after the draft and after free agency until then, for

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Even, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I'm Derek Eagleson. This

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:20.640
<v Speaker 1>has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:58:22.800 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.