1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,759 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Despite his claims 6 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:25,760 Speaker 1: that the Rushia investigation is a witch hunt, President Trump 7 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 1: has maintained that he would be willing to sit down 8 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: for an interview with Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Speaking about 9 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:34,080 Speaker 1: it earlier this year, I would love to speak. I 10 00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 1: would love to Nobody wants to speak more than me, 11 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:39,920 Speaker 1: in fact against my lawyers, because most lawyers they never 12 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: speak on editing. I would love to speak now. In 13 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 1: an interview with Associated Press, Trump's lead lawyer, Rudy Giuliani 14 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:50,760 Speaker 1: did say that Trump will not answer federal investigators questions 15 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:54,120 Speaker 1: in person or even in writing about whether he tried 16 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 1: to block the probe into Russian interference in the election, 17 00:00:58,520 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 1: But about a half an hour ago on Air Force One, 18 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 1: Trump against it. He's open to a Muller Q and 19 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 1: a under the right circumstances, joining me. As William Banks, 20 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:11,319 Speaker 1: Professor at Syracuse University Law School, So, Bill, unless you 21 00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: can follow the bouncing ball, you can't really keep track 22 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:18,399 Speaker 1: of what the what the president and his attorney are 23 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:21,560 Speaker 1: saying about this. But let's talk about written questions. That 24 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:25,920 Speaker 1: seems to be the easier of solutions, because Trump's lawyers 25 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:31,840 Speaker 1: would obviously draft any written answers. It is, and and 26 00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 1: I imagine that's certainly his lawyers are pushing hard in 27 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 1: that direction, both with the Muller team and in their 28 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: conversations with the President. We know the President, however, assist 29 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 1: inclined not only to disregard his lawyer's advice on many occasions, 30 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 1: but he likes to talk um. So I can imagine 31 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 1: an interview where he agrees to speak, and then it's 32 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:59,120 Speaker 1: a question of, you know, how carefully is and what 33 00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: his memory is like, uh, and whether he's entirely truthful. 34 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 1: So why would Giuliani be ruling out in his latest pronouncement, 35 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: be ruling out written questions and answers. Yeah, I think 36 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:16,520 Speaker 1: it's a matter of internal discussions among the lawyers in 37 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 1: the White House, and there's probably a debate about whether 38 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 1: they should try to just for forestall the effort to 39 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:28,919 Speaker 1: have an interview at all. Instead compromise, So oral or 40 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 1: written I think is part of the compromise situation. In 41 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 1: the end. I think, you know, if if Mueller continues 42 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,679 Speaker 1: to push hard for an interview with the president, he's 43 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: he's likely to get it. We know that he could 44 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 1: probably force it through through a grand jury. He could 45 00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 1: probably subpoena Trump uh and force him to appear. That's 46 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: why that's the way it started between ken Starrnville Clinton 47 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:57,880 Speaker 1: twenty years ago and then the Negotiati settlement, and the 48 00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: President did have an interview in the White House. It 49 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 1: wasn't particularly successful. It was it was more of a 50 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 1: of a media show than anything else, and it didn't 51 00:03:11,639 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: really impact the eventual proceedings of impeachment against Clinton. So Muller, 52 00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 1: what is Mueller's the advantage to Muller in allowing written 53 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 1: answers where he doesn't get to, you know, test the 54 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: president's memory and see his demeanor. Well, it's not as 55 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:35,760 Speaker 1: good as as an interview, that's for sure. But you know, 56 00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:38,360 Speaker 1: we have to remember that Mueller has many sources to 57 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 1: draw on here to issue his final report or to 58 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:46,000 Speaker 1: take whatever ever other additional steps you might want to take. 59 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,920 Speaker 1: He's got interviews of what two dozen or more other 60 00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 1: witnesses who were involved in the administration who had close 61 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: knowledge both of the Russia aspect and of the COMI firing, 62 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: and it's going to be the Comic firing and potential obstruction. 63 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,840 Speaker 1: I think that the lawyers are advising the president to 64 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:08,880 Speaker 1: a void. They don't want to get him in with 65 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 1: what Mr Giuliani is called the perjury trap. And you 66 00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: know that's that's good advice. So let's turn now to 67 00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:22,279 Speaker 1: the anonymous op ed. President Trump just said that he 68 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:26,560 Speaker 1: wants Attorney General Jeff's Sessions to investigate the author of 69 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: the anonymous op ed. He said, I think it's national security. 70 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 1: I would say Jeff should be investigating who the author 71 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,080 Speaker 1: of that pieces because I really believe it is national security. 72 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: So is an investigation by the Justice Department in order here? Well, 73 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 1: I don't think so. You know, this is one of 74 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:49,200 Speaker 1: those things that you know, the President is h he's 75 00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 1: a very smart man, and he's using miss again to obscure, 76 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: obscure the underlying difficulties that he's in because of the 77 00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:01,280 Speaker 1: Mueller investigation. You know, the op it was an extraordinary 78 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:08,160 Speaker 1: event for sure, or extraordinary that it exists. An extraordinary 79 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,560 Speaker 1: that was published anonymously by The New York Times. But 80 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,720 Speaker 1: it's not an action security issue. There's no you knows, 81 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:18,599 Speaker 1: as several people that have commented in the last couple 82 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:22,599 Speaker 1: of days. Uh, you know, there's dissent and discussion inside 83 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:28,080 Speaker 1: the administration all the time, not just the Trump administration. 84 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 1: Every administration government is making sausage and executive branch in 85 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:36,320 Speaker 1: the same way that that the Congress makes sausage and 86 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:42,160 Speaker 1: trying to draft legislation. So I think this will blow over, uh, 87 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: in the same way that so much has blown over 88 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 1: in the Trump administration. And again he's using it very cleverly, 89 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:53,039 Speaker 1: I think, to try to distract us from other issues 90 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:55,479 Speaker 1: before it blows over. Let me ask you another question 91 00:05:55,520 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 1: about it. He also said on Air Force one again 92 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 1: that he's administered ration is looking into taking legal action 93 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:06,600 Speaker 1: against The Times for publishing the article. Is there any 94 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 1: kind of legal action you could imagine against the Times 95 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:15,080 Speaker 1: for publishing an op ed? No, is the short answer. 96 00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: There's an absolute First Amendment right to publish. There's no 97 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:22,600 Speaker 1: such thing as a priory straint. There's you know, as 98 00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:27,360 Speaker 1: the President himself has admitted on various occasions, the libel 99 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 1: laws in this country, as he says, are are very 100 00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 1: uh favorable to the speaker or the writer, as they 101 00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 1: well should be. That's our whole tradition in our history 102 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:41,880 Speaker 1: in the United States, would be I think, the core 103 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 1: freedom that neither The New York Times or any of 104 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: us would be willing to give up. It's obvious that 105 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 1: not only the op ed, but the publication of the 106 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 1: book by Bob Woodward is weighing on the president and 107 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:01,640 Speaker 1: it hasn't even really come out yet. But he also 108 00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 1: said today that if Gary Cohen took those papers off 109 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 1: his desk, he'll never speak to him again. I mean, 110 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 1: I don't I don't know what to make of his 111 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:17,040 Speaker 1: reaction to the Woodword Book, because, as you said, things happen. 112 00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:19,559 Speaker 1: You know, there are people inside white houses that talk 113 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: all the time and say not nice things about presidents. 114 00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 1: That's right. And you know it's not Mr Trump who's 115 00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: special in this case. That's been true probably every president 116 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 1: in our history, for those who work for him and 117 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 1: try to shape policy that eventually gets made by the 118 00:07:36,760 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: executive branch. So I think, yes, the Woodword Book is 119 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:44,440 Speaker 1: uh is powerful because he's such a credible source and 120 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: such a highly regarded journalist with a long distinguished record. 121 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 1: So his sources, some of whom will identify themselves, and 122 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 1: others won't, I think, have a great deal more credibility, 123 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:00,960 Speaker 1: say than the book that was published last winner or 124 00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:05,320 Speaker 1: in the Winner of seventeam. So you know, again, the 125 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,560 Speaker 1: president has reason to be concerned about the releases, but 126 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:11,720 Speaker 1: there isn't anything he can do about them. All right, 127 00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Bill. As always, that's William Banks. He's 128 00:08:14,640 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 1: a professor at Syracuse University Law School. Today is the 129 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,160 Speaker 1: fourth and final day of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings 130 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court. In two 131 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 1: days of questioning, Kavanaugh refused to answer pointed questions on 132 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 1: a host of subjects ranging from abortion to presidential powers, 133 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,680 Speaker 1: always refusing to answer any questions pertaining to President Trump. 134 00:08:37,960 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 1: Here's Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal asking him about Justice Ruth 135 00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 1: Pader Ginsburg. This is not political, this is about Justice Ginsberg. 136 00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:52,880 Speaker 1: You believe that her quote mind is shot, end quote Sarah. Respectfully, 137 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 1: you're asking me to after having read those comments. You're 138 00:08:56,160 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: asking me to comment on something another person said, and 139 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:04,280 Speaker 1: I'm not going to do that. Joining me is Greg 140 00:09:04,320 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: store Bloomberg, new Supreme Court reporter who has been watching 141 00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:10,360 Speaker 1: just about every minute of these hearings, right, Greg, as 142 00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: much as I could. Okay, So I have to say 143 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,960 Speaker 1: that that exchange with Bloomenthal surprised me, even though I 144 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:21,160 Speaker 1: had heard, you know, much of what Judge Kavanaugh said. 145 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:24,920 Speaker 1: Why would a nominee refuse to say that an icon 146 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:29,400 Speaker 1: on the Court has not lost it? Well, Judge Kavanaugh 147 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:32,080 Speaker 1: clearly was trying to stay as far away as he 148 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:36,880 Speaker 1: could from political controversies. And even though that was about 149 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:40,960 Speaker 1: a future colleague, that was clearly a comment had he 150 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:44,920 Speaker 1: been critical of what President Trump said, That was a 151 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 1: comment that was going to be used for political purposes. Uh, 152 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 1: And he wanted to stay away from that. He didn't 153 00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:54,280 Speaker 1: need to. This was a hearing where, uh, you know, 154 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:57,480 Speaker 1: really his main goal was to avoid making mistakes, and 155 00:09:57,679 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: that was an area that potentially could have been mistake 156 00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:05,160 Speaker 1: for him. Now it seemed as if he went even 157 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: further than Neil Gorstch did in his nomination hearings in 158 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:13,960 Speaker 1: an attempt not to say anything. I mean, he refused 159 00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 1: to say, which gorste did, that it's not right to 160 00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 1: denigrade judges because of their ethnic background. He refused to 161 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 1: say he would refuse himself from certain cases, even though 162 00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:29,680 Speaker 1: other justices have agreed to that. Is there a fear 163 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 1: that Trump could rescind the nomination if he hears something 164 00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:36,000 Speaker 1: he doesn't like. Well, you know that that's an interesting question. 165 00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:40,240 Speaker 1: There were reports that uh, Donald Trump at least discussed 166 00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:45,400 Speaker 1: resending Gorsige's nomination after he made those comments about being 167 00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:50,960 Speaker 1: disheartened about about criticism of the judiciary or suggestions that 168 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 1: a judge might be influenced by his or her ethnic background. Uh. 169 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:59,680 Speaker 1: You know, I can't say what was motivating Brett Kavanaugh. Um, 170 00:10:59,720 --> 00:11:02,760 Speaker 1: you are right, he did. He was even more careful 171 00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 1: than than Neil Gorcer was and in trying to stay 172 00:11:06,120 --> 00:11:10,960 Speaker 1: out of those areas. Um. Uh, you know, did not 173 00:11:11,080 --> 00:11:13,880 Speaker 1: give the Democrats the kind of answers that they wanted. 174 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 1: But Democrats are powerless to to stop them. Giving the 175 00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:20,040 Speaker 1: Republican control of the Senate. No, there were some unusual 176 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:24,360 Speaker 1: exchanges with Senator Kamala Harris about whether he talked with 177 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:27,959 Speaker 1: anyone at a law firm Casuits about the Muller investigation. 178 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:32,199 Speaker 1: Did that end up going anywhere? Did Harris have any 179 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:35,080 Speaker 1: proof that he that he did talk to someone, because 180 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:36,920 Speaker 1: it was really a point that was pushed and pushed. 181 00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:40,120 Speaker 1: Yeah she had any proof, she didn't show it. Um. No, 182 00:11:40,240 --> 00:11:42,200 Speaker 1: it seemed like on on the first day of questioning, 183 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 1: she seemed like she knew something. She was asking him, 184 00:11:44,960 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 1: she had this idea in her head that, uh, it 185 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,720 Speaker 1: seemed that maybe he had had an inappropriate conversation, and 186 00:11:50,760 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 1: he was very worry about giving an answer. By day two, Uh, 187 00:11:54,880 --> 00:11:57,360 Speaker 1: he had identified one person in the firm that he 188 00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 1: that he knows pretty well and said no, I did 189 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 1: didn't have any conversations with him or or anybody else 190 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 1: at the firm about the Muller investigation. And then that 191 00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: was the end of it. Now. Senator Corey Booker ignited 192 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:13,200 Speaker 1: a little bit of a firestorm there when he, you know, 193 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:17,000 Speaker 1: said that he was trying to clarify where Kavanaugh stands 194 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:20,160 Speaker 1: on one of the one of his most controversial judicial 195 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:24,000 Speaker 1: decisions related to race. Where where do you see that 196 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:28,080 Speaker 1: he stands. Is it clear or it's ambiguous on the 197 00:12:28,120 --> 00:12:32,400 Speaker 1: subject of race. So so Senator Booker was looking at 198 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:36,360 Speaker 1: a couple memos, a couple of emails that Judge Kavanaugh wrote, 199 00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:39,080 Speaker 1: um or our series of emails that that he wrote 200 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,720 Speaker 1: back when he was working in the Bush administration. One 201 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:43,760 Speaker 1: of them had to do with the case involving minority 202 00:12:43,840 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 1: set asides and in federal contracting. Uh. And in that 203 00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 1: case uh, Mr Kavanaugh then Mr Kafanhaugh used language made 204 00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:56,959 Speaker 1: it pretty clear he was very skeptical about this program. 205 00:12:56,960 --> 00:13:00,200 Speaker 1: He called it a naked racial set aside um. On 206 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:02,760 Speaker 1: the other hand, the other document that the other series 207 00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:04,920 Speaker 1: that that that Booker was getting into had to do 208 00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 1: with racial profiling after nine eleven at airports, and they're 209 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:13,120 Speaker 1: what touch Kavanaugh Brett Kavanaugh seemed to say pretty clearly 210 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 1: said was that he was not on the side of 211 00:13:16,160 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 1: using racial profiling at airports, at least as a long 212 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:23,560 Speaker 1: term measure um. He would rather find a race neutral 213 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:26,640 Speaker 1: way to ensure that airports are safe. So it was 214 00:13:26,679 --> 00:13:29,400 Speaker 1: in some ways a mixed bag of stuff that that 215 00:13:29,520 --> 00:13:34,320 Speaker 1: emerged from those emails. Now most people are saying that 216 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 1: nothing really moved, No one moved in their positions on Kavanaugh. 217 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:43,120 Speaker 1: Does that include the two Republican female senators who are 218 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:48,640 Speaker 1: pointed at as possible votes for abortion. Yeah, they're They're 219 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:51,959 Speaker 1: both saying they don't have a final decision yet Uh. 220 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:57,079 Speaker 1: Nothing Uh that they said indicated that they are changing 221 00:13:57,120 --> 00:13:59,760 Speaker 1: from where where they've been, which is leaning towards voting 222 00:13:59,800 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 1: to confirm him. Uh. Senator Collins UH did suggest that 223 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:07,640 Speaker 1: she was not especially bothered by another email that came 224 00:14:07,640 --> 00:14:11,240 Speaker 1: out during this process, in which um Brett Kavanaugh, while 225 00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:15,280 Speaker 1: working at the White House, had uh suggested some some 226 00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: language be changed in a draft op ed where originally 227 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 1: it said that legal experts widely accept Rovie Wade as 228 00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:25,560 Speaker 1: as settled law. He suggested that, um, you know, that's 229 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 1: not quite accurate. There are a lot of legal experts 230 00:14:28,080 --> 00:14:31,360 Speaker 1: who feel otherwise. But Susan Collins said she you know 231 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:33,640 Speaker 1: what she'd heard about that she wasn't particularly bothered. So 232 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:37,000 Speaker 1: every reason to think that they are likely to vote 233 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:39,160 Speaker 1: to confirm him, and he will be confirmed, all right, 234 00:14:39,200 --> 00:14:41,520 Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Gregg. That's Gregg's store. He's the Bloomberg 235 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:45,320 Speaker 1: News Supreme Court reporter. And of course we know that 236 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:48,200 Speaker 1: it has been said by Mitch McConnell that he hopes 237 00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:52,200 Speaker 1: to have a vote on Kavanaugh before the new Supreme 238 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: Court term starts, and it's always the first Monday in Octour. 239 00:14:56,000 --> 00:14:58,960 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can 240 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 1: subscribe and listen into the show on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 241 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:06,720 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. 242 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:13,920 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg m