WEBVTT - Week In Tech: DeepSeek Freak Out

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tunion to tech Stuff. If you don't recognize

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>my voice, my name is Oz Volshan and I'm here

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>because the inimitable Jonathan Strickland has passed the baton to

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Cara Price and myself to host tech Stuff. The show

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>will remain your home for all things tech, and all

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the old episodes will remain available in this feed. Thanks

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of iHeart

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts and Kaleidoscope. I'm oz Voloshian, and today will bring

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you the headlines this week, including the Chinese AI company

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that spooked the US tech sector. On today's Tech Support segment,

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to four or four medius Jason Kebler about

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>building mazes to trap AI web crawlers, and then we've

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>got when did this become a thing? This time we

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>look at why everyone is so obsessed with their own data,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all of that on the weekend. Tech is Friday, January

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty first. Welcome, Welcome into another tech field of news cycle.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Today and for the next few weeks, you'll get used

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to hearing a lot from me because Carra is out

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>on leave, but she'll be back soon. And to fill

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the considerable void, I want to welcome one of our

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>producers to the show, Eliza Dennis, to be my interlocutor

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>slash captive audience as I run through the headlines. Eliza,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>thanks for jumping today.

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course I'm happy to be here.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You know exactly what I want to talk about because

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you and Toy did all the research.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yes, we all got sucked into that deep

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Seek vortex.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a fascinating story. Monday was I think the

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>craziest day I can remember in tech in terms of headlines,

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>probably since the release of CHATCHYPT three in November twenty

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. US stock market lost a trillion dollars of value. Unbelievable,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest loser was in Nvidia, the manufacturer of

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>advanced aichips, which was down seventeen percent on Monday, representing

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>almost six hundred billion dollars in value.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>The deep Seek freak.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Deep seak freak. I like that. I mean, the reason

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's my story of the week is because it has

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>these two characteristics that define a lot of tech coverage,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>which is hype and doom. I think honestly, before Monday,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>most people didn't know anything about deep Seek. But the

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whole world, including US having getting up to speed. So

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>deep Seek is primarily a research company that makes its

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>own AI models, and it's released a number of different models,

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but the one that kind of shook the US tech sector,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say was R one. R one was released

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on January twentieth, Inauguration day. Some online conspiratorial folks are

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>saying it's no coincidence, but it's a so called reasoning model,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't just generate answers, but it's able to

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>break down problems into smaller parts and consider multiple approaches

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to solving a problem. Until January twentieth, the state of

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the art on reasoning models was open AIS one and

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this was released to users on December fifth, twenty twenty four,

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>so less than two months ago, and it was the

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>first so called reasoning model to be released OH one.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Because of these reasoning capabilities, I breaking down problems can

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>solve much more complicated problems than GPT four more successfully.

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>The cost of doing that is more computing power, and

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that drives up cost and that's where the crux of

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this R one story is. So what really makes our

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one remarkable is that it performs just as well on

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>these benchmark tests as one if not better, but it's

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>far cheaper because it requires less compute to solve the

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>same problem. This means, at least according to deepseek, and

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some controversy here that it is twenty to fifty

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>times less expensive than open AI's one.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so money always causing a scandal? Is this the

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>doom part of the story that you know China made

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>it cheaper?

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, it depends on your perspective, right, Like,

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly the US stock market thought that this

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was a cause for doom, but others are pretty excited

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can do AI with far less computer and energy.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of an interesting double headed monster here.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Depends how you look at it. But what shook the

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>stock market was that Wall Street assumed US tech companies

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>basically had a lockdown on Frontier AI a true mote,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and the race of R one makes people think that

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>may not exist. Mark Andresen the Silicon Valley VC referred

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to deep Seek as the twenty first century's Sputnik moment.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Sputnik was the first artificial earth satellite launched into orbit

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>by the Soviet Union in nineteen fifty seven, and it

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was really kind of the starting gun on the space race,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at least as far as many in the US were

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned to all of a sudden side had to play

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>catch up, right, which is clarified. Deep Seek is both

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a research organization that creates its own models, but it

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>also has a consumer facing app in the form of

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a chatbot, and you can get it from the App Store,

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store, or the Android App Store. On

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Monday this week, Deepseek was the number one app in

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Charts. This was driven by a couple of

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>million downloads in a short period of time. So just

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of context, chat GPT has around seventy

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>million monthly users in the US. But nonetheless this set

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>off basically a frenzied feedback loop because Wall Street really

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>cared about whether the US was losing its AI edge

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and whether people would still, you know, value companies like

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>open ai and video in the way that they did.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But Main Street had curious people downloading the app, and

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>then the more downloads in the shorter period, you know,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the longer the app was on the number one place

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>on the Apple charts, and then the news media were

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>picking up on that and it kind of created this frenzy.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think which put more and more market pressure on

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>tech sector stocks.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>That's just massive feedback loop that was happening.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was a kind of crazy interesting intersection of

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>media and tech and sentiments, and like, let's be clear,

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is partly a story about leading edge models, but

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's partly a story which I think hits home, which

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is about Chinese software on US devices. And it was

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>only a week ago that we were all talking about

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and so yeah, this like geopolitical US China thing

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is very present obviously all over this story. And Twitter

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>were quick to uncover deep seek the apps in terms

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>of service, which include quote collection of device model, operating

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>system keystroke patterns or rhythms, IP address and system language

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>keystroke patterns. That is euphemism for what you type on

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>your phone, and not just what you type into the

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>deep seak app, but whatever you're typing on your phone.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's why I, for one, have not downloaded

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>this app. And of course us US has also found

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of joy messing with deep Seek, asking questions

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about Shishin Ping Chanaman Square, Taiwan, and in certain cases

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they watch the app begin to answer before erasing its

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>own answer. Saying it didn't know the answer or it

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't engage. There are also examples of the actress saying

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't help, or even churning out Chinese Communist Party propaganda.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And again these are the most like readily understandable parts

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the deep seek story. But I would argue then

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>by no means the most consequential.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, what's the real story.

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not the app, right, it's the model or

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the models. And one of the most interesting things about

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this story is that deep seeks models are actually open source.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Google's models, open Eyes models, Anthropics models, They're all closed source,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>which means that the underlying code and the training details

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are not publicly available. Deep Seak, by contrast, is open source,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning you can actually take the technology the model a

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>deep Seek has developed and use it without ever touching

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a deep Seek product. And funny enough, this actually builds

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the one outlier in the US tech sector, which

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is Meta, whose own large language model LAM was released

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three and it kind of shocked the

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>whole industry because it open sourced its model with the

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>explicit idea basically of wanting to create a platform where

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 1>innovation could happen and the innovation wouldn't just be captured

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the hands of its competitors. And mean, I think

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Lama was actually like a worse model than what open

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ai and Google and others had, but it was an

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>invitation to others to kind of do better, and Deepseek

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>took them up on the invitation. I think there's both

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>been a victory lap at Meta this week. The strategy

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of open sourcing their model worked. It did create incredible innovation.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But also I think people are Meta are scratching their

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>heads according to the information, saying how did they how

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>do they do so much better than us?

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also interesting though, because Meta, you know, has been

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>accused of stealing other people's ideas for years.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's true.

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>We all know like stories, seems like snapchat reels, seems

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>like TikTok. I don't know, so maybe maybe.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>This is karma Meta giving something back to the world.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, what's interesting is the New York

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Times pointed out is that Meta's business model relies less

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on large language models, so they can kind of afford

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to let this technology into the wild, versus like Google,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a fundamentally a search company or open Ai,

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which is basically valued almost exclusively because of its models.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Now deep Seek also had interesting incentives because it's actually

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>been developed by a guy called li Yang guen Fung,

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and in his day job, he runs a multi billion

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar Chinese quant hedge fund called High Flyer.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, explain, I don't know what quant hedge fund is.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So quornt hedge fund is basically a fancy way of

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>saying a hedge fund that uses algorithms to process the

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>world's information and make decisions about trading stocks. So quant

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are and have been for a long time,

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very heavily reliant on AI.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, got it.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>So he's no stranger to AI. So this seemed like

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>a logical.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Path, Yeah, exactly. And it's worth noting that Funk said

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>last year that Chinese AI sector quote cannot remain a

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>follower forever, as in, it shouldn't be in second place

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to the US forever. And so you know, he has

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>his hedge fund, but he also has this mission which

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe is not purely economic, as a kind of nationalist tone.

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 1>And so back in twenty twenty three, it's reported that

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he started buying huge amounts of Nvidia GPU chips and

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>found a deepseek hiring some of the best engineers in

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>China and arguing that publishing the code open source increases

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>collaboration and helps bring people into the mission. Basically, his

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>point was, it's more exciting to work on something that

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole world can use and build on and see

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>how it works than contributing to building ip that makes

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the owners of one or two private companies extremely wealthy.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I see. So it really was kind of like egged

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>on by this race that China and the US are

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>creating for themselves.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So you can only speculate that you quite well regarded

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in China today if you've if you've managed to wipe

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars off the US sock market with your

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with your innovation, So what's been roiling the US markets

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and the tech sector more broadly. It's not like R

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>one is way, way, way better than O one the

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>open AI model. In fact, it performs you know, at

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>par or maybe slightly better in places and open A

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I have already started previewing their new reasoning model three,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which I think everyone agrees will be substantially better than

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one and are one so it's not like the US

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>has been superseded, is it? Kind of not like the

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>story moment in their respect. But there are three I

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think key drivers as to as to why people are

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned that a Chinese company has been able to achieve

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>parity so fast. The first is price. Deep Seat claimed

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that another of their frontier models, called V three, was

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>trained for just six million dollars, which is several orders

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude less than the multi one hundred million dollar

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>costs of training US models. Now, someone said this number

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually deeply misleading, but no one is denying that

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>deep Seat models are way more efficient than US models.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>They can perform at par with US models using far,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>far less computational power, and that is a huge breakthrough.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, So those numbers might be fudged, but still they

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to be cheaper no matter what.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think the common strategy here was

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to deflate the price because the cheaper it is, the

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more scary it is, which is kind of interesting. The

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>other point to make is that I think the US

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>firmly believed that export controls on advanced GPU chips were

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to guarantee superiority in the AI arms race.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think what these deep seat models show is

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's far from necessarily true, because with far less access

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to advanced chips, deep Seat was able to make models

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that perform on par with open Ai models. The third

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting thing here is the concept of distillation.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So the deep Seek models trained on US models, including

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. They effectively distilled all the work that open

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a I had already done and used it to train

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>their model. So that's part of the reason why it

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was cheaper, because it was building on work that somebody

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>else had already done. CNBC reported actually that when you

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ask deep Seek what it is, it responds, quote, I

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>am a large language model created by open ai based

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the GPT four architecture. Wow, honest, honest, exactly. So

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>open Ai basically say they've stole our ip, which is

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of ironic given what so many people say about

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>open ai and how lms work more generally.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I'm really curious as like what your takeaway from this.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Is, Well, you and I both work in the media, Eliza, true,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>which is which which is a sector that doesn't come

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in for much love from our cousins who work in technology.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>But to me, this is really a story about the

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>power of narrative. The US is deeply, deeply invested in,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>especially right now, big beautiful buildings, this idea that more

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is bigger is better, stargate hundreds of billions of dollars,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, huge data centers, oceans of cash. Just spending

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>loads and loads and loads of money and preventing other

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>people from accessing hardware could ensure the US would be

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in the lead forever. And that narrative got punctured this week.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>China's narrative and Deep Seek's narrative very consciously wanted people

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to focus on how cheaply they'd done this, basically the

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>opposite flex And again, you know, as people look at

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>China and fast following et cetera, et cetera, they really,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think effectively with narrative punctured a lot of the

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>bravado of the US sector. And so you know, narratives

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>do have value, folks, And the reality on both sides,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, is far more complicated. If we're taking the

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>stock market has anything to go by, I think China

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and Deep Seek definitely won the narrative this.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Week, absolutely. But what we know being in media is

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that there's a reason it's called a news cycle. This

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>could be turned all around very quickly.

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for doing this today, Eliza, and

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>look forward to seeing you. I'll see you all day

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>every day, but I look forward to seeing you again

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on the microphone next week.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy to do it.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>When we come back four our four Media joins with

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the story of AI web crawlers caught in a trap

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>laid by a little human ingenuity. Stay with us on

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff. We keep an eye on all the ways

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that technology impacts us as humans, but today we want

0:15:59.960 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to turn the focus around on the people subverting tech.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>During protests in Hong Kong back in twenty nineteen, umbrellas

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and even lasers were used to subvert facial recognition technology

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and protect protesters from being recognized by the Chinese police.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Since then, we've witnessed the birth of chatbots and the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>incredible stories of humans messing with them. There are researchers

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Pennsylvania who've tricked AI powered robots

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to act rather problematically, driving off bridges, finding optimal places

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to set off bombs, spying on people, and entering restricted

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>areas just a few examples of the way that humans

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>can interfere and overcome guardrails built into large language models.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>On today's tech support, we bring you another example of

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>human ingenuity against AI training bots. Here to tell us

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>all about it is Jason Kebler from four or four Media.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Jason, welcome, Hey, excited to talk about the story.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Too excited to have you on the show. As always,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of steps back though, what is what

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is the relationship between AI training and web scraping.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So in order to build things like chat GPT, companies

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>like OpenAI need tons and tons of training data, and

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they get that training data from a variety of places.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>They you know, scrape big databases of books, they scrape,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, all sorts of things. But one of the

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>biggest places that they get content is just from the

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 3>open Internet. And they have these web crawling bots that

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 3>basically go all over the Internet and just pull text

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 3>from it.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So are these websites consenting to being kind of crueled

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>by AA models.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 3>It's happening almost universally without consent. There are ways that

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 3>you can try to stop it, which is by instructing

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 3>these bots not to scrape a website using a file

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>called robots dot txt, which is basically a list of

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 3>instructions for which bots are allowed to rape your website

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and which are not. But there's so many different AI

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>companies that are doing this, you sort of have to

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 3>constantly be researching, like what is the name of xyz

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>companies AI training bot at any given moment. But this

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 3>is something that you have to like proactively do. And

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the other thing, very quickly is there's also been examples

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of AI companies that have been ignoring robots dot txt.

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 3>So even when a web developer says, hey, don't scrape

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 3>my website, oftentimes AI companies will do so anyway. And

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 3>so for the most part, the entire Internet is being

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>scraped by these AI crawling bots.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And what is the kind of value transfer that's happening here?

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I read about I think, can you a story about

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I fix It?

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 3>So there's this website called I fix It that posts

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>all these instructions for how to repair your phone or

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>your computer. It got hit by OpenAI's training bot more

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>than three million times in a single day, which that, uh,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you know that server space that costs money for I

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 3>fix it, So they're actually losing money on the proposition.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 1>So what's the story this week? It has it has

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting name which I can't really pronounce. Is it nepenthes.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's Nepenthees, which is actually the name of the

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>genus of carnivorous plant that makes up the picture plant.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 3>So not a venus fly trap, but the picture plant,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 3>which is like this plant that sits and waits for

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 3>a fly to get stuck in it, and then it

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>eats the fly. So I think it's a it's a

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 3>reference to this like trap plant more or less.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And how is it?

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>What? What's what is it?

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So basically it is an endless maze that is

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 3>designed to get these AI bots trapped in it forever good.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean by that is it's like a

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 3>layer that is enticing to an AI bot because it

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 3>looks like there's a lot of content on the website,

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>But the way that it was programmed is it's text

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that loads very very slowly, Like if you click on it,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 3>it's excruciating how slowly it loads. And then it just

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 3>links endlessly to pages that do the same thing and

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 3>link back to themselves. And so you know, a human

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 3>would click this and say, oh, I don't want to

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>be here, I'm gonna leave this. This is a useless website,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 3>but an AI bot might think, oh, there's interesting text

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to scrape here, let me scrape it, and it just

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>does so endlessly. And the text is nonsense. I should

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 3>preface that. It's like the text doesn't really mean anything.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 3>It just like pulls randomly from a dictionary. So it's

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 3>not really adding much meaning to what the AI companies

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 3>are trying to get out of this.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So the article includes a link that shows nepencies at work.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe it?

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So if you click on it, it's just like

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of words. It loads super slowly, and then

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 3>it's a bullet list of links and if you click

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 3>on that link, the exact same thing happens, where the

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 3>text just slowly pops up, like one word at a time.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty excruciating to actually watch because it goes so slow.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So who made this? Why and how did you find

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the story?

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was made by a pseudonymous developer who calls

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 3>themselves Aaron b Okay, and they're a web developer who

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>hates AI more or less, and they they've actually released

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 3>the code to put this on your own website publicly,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and so their hope is that people will put this

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 3>on their websites to you know, disrupt training bots. There's

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 3>this disclaimer that says, quote, this is deliberately malicious code

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>intended to cause harmful activity. Do not deploy if you

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>aren't fully comfortable with what you're doing. And you know,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that much about Aaron B because they

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>are pseudonymous, but I get the sense that there's sort

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of like an old school web developer who is anti AI,

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>is anti you know, like social media and big tech

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>to some extent, and was really like looking for some

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 3>way of fighting back. Like even if this isn't going

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to destroy the AI companies and their bots, it will

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>probably waste their time and waste their resources.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it could do that in a way

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of inspiring and thrilling, as if somebody

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>who's drown to protest, or do you think it could

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way which should be meaningful for

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>their activities and business models? Yeah?

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think that to some extent, these artificial

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 3>intelligence companies have already scraped so much data right that

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to like destroy their businesses, for example.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 3>But I do think that it is a way of protesting,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think that if enough people start adding this

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>layer to their websites, it could be it could waste

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 3>their money. I think it is a meaningful protest. And

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I think also it's really important to say that you

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 3>can as a layer to your website so that an

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 3>AI training bot can't get to your real content. So

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 3>if you're someone who has a blog and you don't

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 3>want AI to train on your blog, you can put

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>this up and hopefully the AI will get trapped there

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>and they'll never be able to, you know, scrape your

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 3>real content.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And so when you spoke to Aaron, did they have

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>any other plans up their sleeve or other other places

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where you're seeing creative acts of resistance?

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this is all that I talked to

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Aaron B about. But they said that they built this

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>as a response to web developers feeling like they weren't

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>in control of their websites anymore. I think that there

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 3>have been a lot of efforts to kind of poison

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 3>large language models by feeding it, you know, bad information,

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 3>or feeding it information that itself creates that's inaccurate. And

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.959
<v Speaker 3>there's this idea that you may or may not happen

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>that these AI models might eventually collapse because they're training

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 3>themselves on essentially junk data that they themselves have created.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 3>Whether that comes to pass, you know, I kind of

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>doubt it. I think that that's a problem that can

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 3>be solved. But there have been active resistance where people

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 3>are saying, yeah, I'm just going to generate endless junk

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>so that artificial intelligence will suck it up and hopefully

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>crush under its own weight.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>There's another fabulous story in this vein about data poisoning.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of Londoners are quite sick of all

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the tourists, and so there's a very very old, tired

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>chain restaurant called the Angus Steakhouse which has an outpost

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>next to Leicester Square, which is like the Times Square

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of London, and a whole bunch of people decided kind

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of an organic campaign on Reddit to start writing reviews

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Anger Steakhouse was the best and most undiscovered

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>restaurant in all of London. And then there this i

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>think wave of people going and the reviews started to

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get picked up by Google's like meta review process, so

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you google best steakhouse in London, it would

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be served to you at the top of the results.

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So I do. I do really enjoy these. You know,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not always clear how consequentially they are, but there's something,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something delicious, so to speak about humans pushing back.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 3>That's incredible. It reminds me of people who lived in

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 3>this neighborhood that Google Maps kept recommending as an alternative

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to traffic banded together and reported an accident on their

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 3>street every single morning for like months, and so Google

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Maps stopped telling cars to go that way. I really

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>like stories like that. I think they're fun, and I

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>think that there are ways of human beings sort of

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 3>like fighting back against the algorithms, sort of across the

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 3>entire internet.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Jason, thanks so much for joining me today.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Coming up sleep apps, pedometers, and the nineteen sixty four

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Olympics with us. We're back with another When did this

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>become a thing? Today we explore how step counts, heart rates,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>sleep scores, all of this data we collect on ourselves

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>became just another thing for us to obsess over. I

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>started using a device called Whoop about eighteen months ago.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a wearable device that tracks my sleep and workouts.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And one thing about it that I really like is

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that the device itself is screenless. It's kind of like

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a watch band without a face, so I don't have

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to be confronted with my scores and as I actually

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>open the app and check what's going on on my

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>phone with my heart rate or my sleep score, whatever else.

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>The whoop actually initially enticed me because I wanted to

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>know how well I was sleeping. That's actually not one

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent true. The Whoop was a present from my mother,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>who wanted me to know how well I was sleeping,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and specifically what the effects were of a few drinks

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at the weekend or during the week. And it turns out, unfortunately,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that the effects on sleep are pretty bad. So I

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>stopped wearing my whoop. Just kidding. I actually got pretty

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with my sleep performance. That's what whoop calls it,

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>because like everything in your waking life, sleep is a

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>task that can be optimized, and I fall into this trap.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I kept checking on the numbers every morning. I look

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at my sleep stats, especially RAM and deep sleep scores,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the number of hours my head was on

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the pillow. And then there's this mysterious stat called heart

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>rate variability, which measures the time between each heartbeat, and

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>i'd of course assumed that being more regular was better,

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out quite the opposite. You want a

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>higher HRV score. Anyway, as it happens, I stopped wearing

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my whoop, not because I fell out of love with it,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>but actually because the bluetooth on my iPhone broke, and

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>by the time I got on a new phone, my

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>obsession with my sleep data had waned. I kind of

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>learned what I always knew, which was that better lifestyle

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>equals better sleep. Unfortunately, and sure, it can be helpful

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to have a band on my wrist telling me I've

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>misbehaved or rewarding me when I haven't, but there is

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>also a garden path of obsession with these types of

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>stats that can be counterproductive to wander down, fueling the

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fire of self competition even more. In fact, I written

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you went to a meditation class and the teacher basically said,

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>don't wear those things. Check in with yourself, know thyself.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, as the Bible says, so the path of

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>self optimization, or at least surviving modernity, sure is winding. Anyway,

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this's got me thinking about how crazy it

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we now have the ability to get such

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>an intimate look under our own hood, which has been

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a driving fascination since the Renaissance and its public autopsies

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>or anatomies, and how much has changed even in the

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years. So my question is when did it

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>become normal for us to wear these devices, get all

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this data and have it be a thing that we

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think about so often? Basically, when did we start competing

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with ourselves in this way? And the answer is, perhaps

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>unsurprisingly always, but with a big kind of so. Wearables

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like Whoop are the latest in a long line of

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>devices that track our physiological and physical movements, devices that

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>provide data we just can't resist about ourselves. And in

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>many ways, this all became a thing with the pedometer.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So how old is the pedometer? Really? Really? Old? Actually,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>five centuries ago, Leonardo da Vinci sketched a design for

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a clock like device that would attach to a person's waistband.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>A long lever would move with a thigh while a

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ratchet and gear mechanism recorded a number of steps. Da

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Vinci imagined it as a military and map making tool,

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>not exactly a fitbit, but a suddenly a step in

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that direction. As time went on more. Inventors iterated on

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the pedometer for centuries. In seventeen seventy seven, a Swiss

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>watchmaker even implanted a step counter into one of his watches.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the first wearable pedometers weren't something

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that the general public wore. It was more of a

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>niche thing for the constantly curious, like one Thomas Jefferson,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>who had spent his downtime on vacation step counting his

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>way around the Paris Monuments. Things really took off in

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century. In the nineteen sixties, to be exact,

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>when Japan hosted the Olympics. And the reason we will

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>march in place to reach ten thousand steps a day

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is because of a marketing campaign. Ahead of the nineteen

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty four Tokyo Olympics. The city was in a building

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>frenzy and a top doctor aired the concern that modern life, elevators, cars,

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>richer food, was making Japan sluggish. The doctor mentioned this

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to an engineer and said it would all be fine

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>if people just walked ten thousand steps a day, and

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>two years later, the company Yamasa designed a wearable step

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>counter called man Poquet, which means ten thousand step meter.

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Side note, the Japanese character for ten thousand really does

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>look like a person walking, So while that number came

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>from a doctor, the information wasn't verified until after the

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>number stuck. And while it's true that walking is good

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for you, that number ten thousand is kind of arbitrary

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and on the high side, the consensus now is that

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand is the ideal, but anyway, it doesn't matter.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Too late competitive step counting was in vogue, the habit

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was formed, and the obsession with tracking ourselves took off

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in earnest And now, whether you're wearing an aura, a

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fitbit of whoop, or just your smartphone in your pocket

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to be healthier in the new year,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to go way beyond step count and into

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>calories burn V two, max hrv, etc, Etc. Etc. It's

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like we've become our own tamagotchies. Remember those

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of animatronic pets that lived on little Japanese devices

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that you had to take care of and make sure

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they were well fared and that they were cleaned off

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to go into the arthum. I'm glad I don't have

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to monitor my own hunger or happy meter, but maybe

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be helpful, especially if others could see it too. Anyway,

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while I do question whether the

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>obsession with personal health data is healthy or even helpful.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, doing this piece where did

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this become a thing? Has made me question whether now

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that I have a new iPhone with functioning bluetooths again,

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it may be time to dust off the trusty old whoop.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week for Tech Stuff, I'm Oz Voloshan.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis, Victoria Dominguez and

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Lizzie Jacobs. It was executive produced by me Kara Price

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katrina Norvell for iHeart Podcasts.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Murdoch mixed this episode and he also wrote our

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>theme song. Special thanks to Russ Germain, who is a

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener of Tech Stuff from Alberta and he wrote

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>him with a great question which was quote, I hope

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys will discuss the recent and unfortunate changes at

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Meta. With Mark Zuckerberg deciding to take out

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact checkers and even omitting publicly, there'll be more

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>harmful material, possibly on Facebook end quote. This was a

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>great question and it fueled part of our intro to

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>last week's episode with Jessica Lesson. So thank you Russ,

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and please continue writing with questions. They really make our

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>show all the richer. Join us next Wednesday for tech

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff The Story, when we will share an in depth

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Meredith Whittaker who runs Signal. Please rate, review,

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and reach out to us at tech Stuff Podcast at

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com. We're so grateful for your feedback.