1 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Loots Podcast. 2 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:19,319 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe. Wasn't so Joe? You know, 3 00:00:19,360 --> 00:00:23,200 Speaker 1: I just came back from Beijing, yes, and uh, we 4 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:25,440 Speaker 1: haven't even talked about it yet, but I saw all 5 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 1: of your pictures and I'm extremely jealous. Yeah, the food 6 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:33,280 Speaker 1: was very good, and you should be jealous because you 7 00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:35,519 Speaker 1: missed out on quite a lot. But you know, I 8 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 1: thought you had some lamb thing, like a big, like 9 00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:41,239 Speaker 1: gigantic barbecued lamb that just looked like the best thing 10 00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:44,080 Speaker 1: I've ever seen? Is that? Right? It was so good, 11 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: it was amazing. It was like a Mongolian barbecued leg 12 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,720 Speaker 1: of lamb that you grill at your own little table 13 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: and then you dip it into crushed peanuts and salt, 14 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:57,800 Speaker 1: and it was good. I'm allergic to peanuts, but what 15 00:00:57,880 --> 00:01:02,000 Speaker 1: everything else sounded amazing? All right, Well, next time you come, 16 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:04,920 Speaker 1: we will have that without the peanuts. But you know, 17 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 1: I hadn't been back to Beijing for like thirteen or 18 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: fourteen years, and there were so many changes to the city, 19 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 1: like really big ones. Whole areas of it are just 20 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 1: unrecognizable to what they look like in two thousand five, 21 00:01:18,920 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 1: two thousand and six. I feel like we should do 22 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: a whole episode at some point, just like you comparing 23 00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: Beijing over thirteen years. I bet people would be interested 24 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,680 Speaker 1: in that. I don't think I was as um financially 25 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 1: minded back in two thousand five and two thousand six, 26 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: but I was going to say, one of the biggest 27 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:41,120 Speaker 1: changes in that time period has of course been to 28 00:01:41,480 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 1: China's capital markets. So thirteen years ago, China didn't really 29 00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 1: have much of a corporate bond market, and now it 30 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:52,120 Speaker 1: has a pretty big one, both domestically and dollar denominated 31 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:56,480 Speaker 1: off to our bonds as well. But most importantly, China's 32 00:01:56,520 --> 00:02:00,160 Speaker 1: corporate bond market has had a number of defaults in 33 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 1: recent years, and that's a really big change because historically, 34 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 1: you know, it was kind of uncertain that the authorities 35 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,840 Speaker 1: in China would allow companies to default. So you can imagine, Joe, 36 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:15,480 Speaker 1: that makes for an interesting bond market, given that bonds 37 00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:20,560 Speaker 1: are of course supposed to reflect investors perception of default risk. Yeah. 38 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 1: I remember, like, I guess what was at or the 39 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:29,120 Speaker 1: first ever Chinese bond default, And I remember thinking like, 40 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 1: how is this possible? Like how could you have the 41 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,600 Speaker 1: first ever bond default. And I almost like thought I 42 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 1: was misreading the article, is this idea that there had 43 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:41,080 Speaker 1: never been a defaulted bond before? But obviously, you know, 44 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 1: we sort of take for granted the maturity of the 45 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,839 Speaker 1: US bond market, the US corporate bond market, and then 46 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,919 Speaker 1: defaults even in good times, you know, they happened from 47 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 1: time to time with low rated companies. We sorry take 48 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 1: for granted that not all markets are as a mature 49 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 1: and sort of market regulated the way the US one is. Yeah, totally. 50 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:04,760 Speaker 1: And I mean I remember in two thousand and fifteen, 51 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 1: analysts over at Bank of America Marylanch they published a 52 00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:12,560 Speaker 1: note that was basically a history of Chinese corporate bond defaults, 53 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 1: and there were like two things on there. It was. 54 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 1: It was a pretty short note, as you might imagine, 55 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 1: but it raises all these interesting questions about how do 56 00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:25,480 Speaker 1: you actually develop a corporate bond market almost from scratch, 57 00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 1: and what sort of distortions or unique characteristics are introduced 58 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 1: when you have a big question mark over whether or 59 00:03:34,760 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 1: not defaults will be allowed. And I should just say 60 00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 1: one of the defining features of China's sort of business 61 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: system as a whole is the division between private companies 62 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:50,920 Speaker 1: and state owned enterprises. So s O es uh, these 63 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 1: big state run conglomerates that are often thought to be 64 00:03:55,040 --> 00:04:00,400 Speaker 1: government backed or even government guaranteed. Right, Well, I'm interested 65 00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: in learning more about this topic alright. So we actually 66 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:06,400 Speaker 1: have the perfect guest to talk about all of this. 67 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:09,600 Speaker 1: It's someone who's done a lot of academic work on 68 00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:12,600 Speaker 1: exactly this topic, as well as a lot of other stuff. 69 00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:16,360 Speaker 1: It's Juin Pan. She is a professor at the Shanghai 70 00:04:16,440 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 1: Advanced Institute of Finance at Shanghai Jiaotong University. So, June, 71 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,080 Speaker 1: thank you so much for coming on. Well, thank you 72 00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: so much for the invitation. It's exciting to hear what 73 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:31,280 Speaker 1: what do you and Joe just talked about it. It's 74 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 1: really an interesting topic for me at the moment. Right. So, 75 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 1: you actually just published a paper where you were looking 76 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 1: at this exact topic, and specifically you were looking at 77 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:46,960 Speaker 1: whether or not spreads or risk premiums on China's corporate 78 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 1: bonds actually reflect the health the financial health of its companies. 79 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 1: But before we dive into that, um, I wanted to 80 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 1: sort of ask you a broader question about how China's 81 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 1: financial mark as are currently structured, So corporate bonds are 82 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 1: supposed to be market based versus the sort of traditional 83 00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:12,760 Speaker 1: bank based system of lending in China. And what I 84 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 1: mean by market based is investors are setting or influencing 85 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: funding costs by demanding a certain level of compensation for 86 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 1: perceived risk. So how big of a leap was it 87 00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:26,880 Speaker 1: or is it for China to move from that bank 88 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,680 Speaker 1: based system of lending to something that incorporates more market 89 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:34,599 Speaker 1: based types of lending. I would say it's a it's 90 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 1: a big leap for people like myself who works in 91 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 1: a in a financial research area, in a financial market. 92 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 1: This is a very encouraging development to see that China's 93 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:51,479 Speaker 1: credit market overall, the credit market to be improving. Actually, 94 00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:56,479 Speaker 1: the speed of the market development was pretty impressive over 95 00:05:56,520 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 1: the past ten years. It grew into a roughly a 96 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 1: street trailing US dollar market, So it has been a 97 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:08,960 Speaker 1: pretty impressive development just to the credit market alone. So 98 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:13,120 Speaker 1: sorry break it down. What is the split between how 99 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:17,600 Speaker 1: much private credit is funded via something we'd recognize as 100 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 1: the bond market versus traditional bank lending. So if you 101 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 1: think about the ratio for non financial firms in China, 102 00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:28,919 Speaker 1: so we have a ratio of for market based debt, 103 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:34,600 Speaker 1: so including copper bounds and also other type of basically 104 00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:39,599 Speaker 1: market traded versus bank loans. In two thousand eight it 105 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:43,800 Speaker 1: was about four point six percent, so only a tiny 106 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:48,080 Speaker 1: fraction as a racial too to the bank loads. You know, 107 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 1: China's financial system is still a bank dominated uh system, 108 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 1: not not like in the US. So that number grew 109 00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:01,039 Speaker 1: from four point six in two thousand and eight a 110 00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 1: little bit under to be more precise, in two thousand eighteen, 111 00:07:06,920 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: and much of that improvement is driven by the corporate 112 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:17,960 Speaker 1: the credit market. So walk us through your most recent paper. 113 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:22,200 Speaker 1: So you're you're taking a deep dive into Chinese corporate 114 00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 1: bonds and you're trying to ascertain whether or not the 115 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 1: actual spreads, the risk premiums reflect something fundamental about the 116 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:36,280 Speaker 1: financial health of Chinese companies, as they sort of are 117 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: meant to do in more developed markets. So you know, 118 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 1: if a company is perceived to be at a higher 119 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 1: risk of defaults, it'll have a higher spread because investors 120 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 1: want to be compensated for that risk. Why did you 121 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:52,559 Speaker 1: decide to look into this particular topic in the US 122 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:57,000 Speaker 1: pocket this this question has been well researched, So you 123 00:07:57,080 --> 00:08:01,880 Speaker 1: look at companies of different let's the different fundamental risk 124 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 1: in terms of the faults. In academic we have standard 125 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,920 Speaker 1: models named after the professional button as we called the 126 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,640 Speaker 1: murder models. So in a mortor model, we take the 127 00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 1: firm's baton sheeting information including its leverage, and also we 128 00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:22,360 Speaker 1: take the firms if the firm is traded with public 129 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:26,440 Speaker 1: playlisted equity, we take the equity market information and one 130 00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:30,680 Speaker 1: of the key information will be the equity volatility. So 131 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:34,760 Speaker 1: the murder model will take those fundamental plus equity market 132 00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: information as input and give you an assessment of what's 133 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:43,040 Speaker 1: the probability of the fault for the bond issued by 134 00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:47,200 Speaker 1: this company. And you can get a sense that there 135 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 1: will be a connection between model predicted the faults and 136 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:58,840 Speaker 1: the market observed credit spreads. So in the US, if 137 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: you take an approach of that, you will see that 138 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:08,640 Speaker 1: about of the variation in credit spread can be explained 139 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:12,839 Speaker 1: by fundamental So we take this as a starting point 140 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 1: and we want to see whether in China we see 141 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:21,880 Speaker 1: a smiller direction in terms of fundamental house of the 142 00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 1: firm and the credit market pricing of the issuer. And 143 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,880 Speaker 1: and this is our studying point before we get to 144 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 1: how well, the model works with the Chinese. Uh, with 145 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: the Chinese bond market. I'm curious in the US, maybe 146 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 1: just talk a little bit about you know, the US 147 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:46,439 Speaker 1: is probably close to the sort of ideal free market 148 00:09:46,960 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 1: or free bond market. Is the Merten model robust enough 149 00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 1: such that one can use it to identify miss pricings 150 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:59,720 Speaker 1: or identify arbitrage opportunities between the price of a bond 151 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,839 Speaker 1: and the price of an equity. Because you said so, 152 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 1: I'm sort of curious whether it's something that's mostly useful 153 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,280 Speaker 1: from just a pure theoretical perspective, or whether it can 154 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 1: sort of form the basis for at least initially attempting 155 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 1: to identify overvalued or undervalued bonds. Well, this is a 156 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:21,720 Speaker 1: good question. I mean, our financial models are always approxi 157 00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:26,640 Speaker 1: mentions of the much much richer reality. But this model 158 00:10:26,679 --> 00:10:30,920 Speaker 1: actually has been used by practitioners. There is uh you 159 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 1: probably have heard of. It's called km V. Yeah, so 160 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 1: km V was a it was a company that they 161 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:43,560 Speaker 1: exactly the mode model and see the model with the 162 00:10:43,559 --> 00:10:46,920 Speaker 1: real data and the outcome is the problem. The km 163 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:50,679 Speaker 1: these distance to default measure, which is similar to the 164 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:54,439 Speaker 1: probability of default measure. I think for those listening who 165 00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: have terminals at home, we have a very good function 166 00:10:57,559 --> 00:11:02,600 Speaker 1: on the terminal where you can and see your company's KMB. Yeah, 167 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 1: I thought I had to uplug the terminal here, but 168 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 1: you can. Actually it has the Merton model and you 169 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 1: can change some of the assumptions and so it's very fun. 170 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 1: You can sort of measure uh, you know, the gaps 171 00:11:12,520 --> 00:11:15,080 Speaker 1: between the price of the CDs and distance to default. 172 00:11:15,080 --> 00:11:16,600 Speaker 1: You can play around with that. It's very fun. And 173 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 1: I didn't mean to interrupt your apologize for that. I 174 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 1: would say this model it's not perfect. It's even the 175 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:25,559 Speaker 1: Black Show's option pricing for the lives a lot of 176 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:29,840 Speaker 1: you know, limitations, but it's a good starting point, a 177 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 1: good reference point was to start with, and it's encouraging it. 178 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:38,000 Speaker 1: There is a link between the fundamental of the firm 179 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:42,360 Speaker 1: and how it's a bonus priced. And as you move 180 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:45,320 Speaker 1: on from the US market to the to the Chinese market, 181 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 1: you know will be surprised or maybe not surprised to 182 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:52,680 Speaker 1: see that this meant actually should not be taken for granted, 183 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:57,599 Speaker 1: as we see in a in a data so imperfections 184 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:01,720 Speaker 1: in the Merton model aside, What did your research actually 185 00:12:01,800 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 1: show for the Chinese credit market. Did spreads on China's 186 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 1: corporate bonds actually show some sort of link to the 187 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:14,000 Speaker 1: fundamental health of companies or issuers? I mean, I guess 188 00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 1: another way of asking that question is is the market 189 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 1: based system actually working in China? So this question has 190 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: a know and then a yes. So the note is 191 00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 1: that the four two zousand fourteen, as as you and 192 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 1: the Georges discussed, the four Tusan and fourteen bonds were 193 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:36,559 Speaker 1: not allowed to default, so they were zero deforet the 194 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:39,520 Speaker 1: prior two thousand and fourteen, so our data was from 195 00:12:39,920 --> 00:12:42,520 Speaker 1: two thousand ten to two thousand fourteen, would call this 196 00:12:42,679 --> 00:12:46,719 Speaker 1: the phase one period. During that period, there is no 197 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:51,080 Speaker 1: link fundamental and the credit spread. There is no link 198 00:12:51,600 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 1: between those two. Why wasn't there this idea that they 199 00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 1: go there were like there was questions about whether default 200 00:12:58,320 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: would ever be allowed to happen. What was the fear 201 00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 1: of there and what was sort of then driving the market? 202 00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:07,200 Speaker 1: If there was this perception that defaults just weren't going 203 00:13:07,240 --> 00:13:10,320 Speaker 1: to be a thing. Well, first, let me actually rephrase 204 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 1: my previous statement. I should say conditioning on information in ratings, 205 00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:19,200 Speaker 1: because China doesn't have rating agencies, so they do rate 206 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: these different bonds, so conditioning on the ratings from fundamentals 207 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:28,640 Speaker 1: that have no uh, additional information, so there is no link. 208 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:34,000 Speaker 1: Is I do want to qualify my previous statement um 209 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 1: in terms of why defaults was not allowed to happen. 210 00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:41,480 Speaker 1: I guess this is not something it's difficult for me 211 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:47,239 Speaker 1: to speculate on the regulation regulators, right, But the observation 212 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:52,840 Speaker 1: from the market up participants is that these bonds never deflored. 213 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,319 Speaker 1: So there is the Chanese saying of bound market pricing 214 00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:02,920 Speaker 1: face based do you down to this phase that bonds 215 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:07,439 Speaker 1: don't defer, So it doesn't really matter about risk compensation 216 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:10,320 Speaker 1: because the death's going to get bailed out anyway if 217 00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:13,319 Speaker 1: it ever ran into trouble, and hence there's actually no 218 00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:19,080 Speaker 1: differentiation shown in the risk premiums that is actually connected 219 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:22,120 Speaker 1: to the fundamental health of the company. But you said 220 00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:27,320 Speaker 1: that was phase one, So what happened in phase two? Okay? 221 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: So we start our phase two from from two thousand 222 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 1: fourteen after the first default the front phase two to 223 00:14:37,360 --> 00:14:40,880 Speaker 1: the first quarter of two thousand eighteen. So over that 224 00:14:41,040 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 1: period you started to see a connection between the film 225 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 1: fundamentals and equity marketing information and the what do you 226 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:54,880 Speaker 1: call the risk premium of the bonds all credit spreads 227 00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 1: of this spot the start to develop a link. The 228 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:00,360 Speaker 1: link is much weaker than what we've see in the 229 00:15:00,520 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 1: US market, but this is from our aunt. It looks 230 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:07,480 Speaker 1: like a very promising beginning for the Chinese cap credit 231 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:29,000 Speaker 1: market in your recent paper, and Tracy mentioned this in 232 00:15:29,080 --> 00:15:32,520 Speaker 1: the very beginning in the intro. Of course, the Chinese 233 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:36,720 Speaker 1: private sector, of the Chinese corporate market is still segmented 234 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:42,720 Speaker 1: massively between regular enterprises and state owned enterprises which are 235 00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 1: state controlled and state back to varying degrees. You also 236 00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:50,240 Speaker 1: look at what the bond market says about the state 237 00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:53,360 Speaker 1: owned s o E sector. What do you see are 238 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:56,440 Speaker 1: the differences in terms of how the bond market works 239 00:15:56,520 --> 00:16:00,640 Speaker 1: for those s O s SO doing place one which 240 00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: is prior to the default. There is not too much 241 00:16:03,920 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 1: differentiation between these two groups. Overall. We do see that 242 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 1: a s A HE this government sponsored enterprise, the s 243 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:18,480 Speaker 1: as our states on the enterprise, you know, depending on 244 00:16:18,560 --> 00:16:21,520 Speaker 1: how you call them, let's just call them as as SO. 245 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:24,920 Speaker 1: During phase one as HE does have a little bit 246 00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 1: of a premium, meaning that their credit spreads a narrower 247 00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:33,720 Speaker 1: compared to the non ass aly counterparts. Was similar ratings 248 00:16:34,360 --> 00:16:37,520 Speaker 1: during phase two. If you remember face towards the time 249 00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 1: from two southern fourteen to eighteen where we started to 250 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 1: see the faults, but the defaults happened during that time 251 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,800 Speaker 1: was mostly too to the non listed firms. So if 252 00:16:49,880 --> 00:16:54,480 Speaker 1: you focus on the listed firms, meaning that these firms 253 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:58,280 Speaker 1: usually are larger firms in the economy, then the difference 254 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,960 Speaker 1: between s and now as so as do a pretty 255 00:17:02,680 --> 00:17:05,960 Speaker 1: mild mild in the sense that during phase three later 256 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:10,000 Speaker 1: on they become explosive, but during phase two there was 257 00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: two about twenty basis point in terms of difference in 258 00:17:14,119 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 1: the credit spread. Let me repherence the the s AY 259 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:25,000 Speaker 1: issues enjoy about a twenty basis point narrower credit spread 260 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:30,639 Speaker 1: compared to that they are not necessarily counterpart. So the 261 00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:35,240 Speaker 1: implicit guarantee seems uh to be very much alive for 262 00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 1: these state owned enterprises, and so they have these lower 263 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:42,639 Speaker 1: risk premiums, which means they can attract financing at a 264 00:17:42,760 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 1: lower cost than private companies. I'm wondering do you have 265 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:53,680 Speaker 1: any thoughts or insights into how the Chinese authorities might 266 00:17:53,760 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 1: be viewing that discrepancy or that segmentation in the market, Like, 267 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:02,680 Speaker 1: is there a desire to put private companies on a 268 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:08,040 Speaker 1: more even funding footing? So to speak with s O 269 00:18:08,119 --> 00:18:12,000 Speaker 1: E S is that something that China wants? If it 270 00:18:12,119 --> 00:18:15,679 Speaker 1: may I complete the whole picture before I talk about 271 00:18:15,840 --> 00:18:21,480 Speaker 1: what UH policies implications. So prior to two thousand eighteen, 272 00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:24,600 Speaker 1: So so so far we have two phases. One is 273 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,640 Speaker 1: pretty fault, one is posted fought. But up to two 274 00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 1: thousand and eighteen, if you look at the data, the 275 00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:34,879 Speaker 1: difference between SZE and ANE is mild. It's about twenty 276 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 1: basis point of a premium for the s E. But 277 00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:43,959 Speaker 1: going into two thousand eighteen, this is when the credit 278 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:48,640 Speaker 1: market went crazy. This is so there are different regulations. 279 00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:52,920 Speaker 1: Even prior to to thousand eighteen. There was a de 280 00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:57,639 Speaker 1: leveraging campaign that started in two thousand and seventeen. So 281 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:03,639 Speaker 1: gradually the credit market is was affected by by the regulations. 282 00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 1: Especially in two thousand and eighteen, there was a what 283 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:11,840 Speaker 1: they called the st management New regulations are as a 284 00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:17,160 Speaker 1: management which kind of cut the funding or the from 285 00:19:17,200 --> 00:19:22,120 Speaker 1: the st manager site cut their holdings of the credits bounds. 286 00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 1: UH put it another way and makes them more discriminating 287 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 1: against the USA. That makes them more aware of the 288 00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:35,440 Speaker 1: credit rest even more so than before. So this is 289 00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 1: the time when the segmentation becomes very severe. So the 290 00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:45,760 Speaker 1: Twente basis point premium enjoyed by the stories exploded to 291 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:50,160 Speaker 1: about hundred basis points. Prior, the segmentation between these two 292 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:54,600 Speaker 1: markets were was not so severe. Then post two thousand 293 00:19:54,600 --> 00:19:58,480 Speaker 1: and eighteen it became a really big deal. And along 294 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 1: the same time do you see starting to see a 295 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:05,680 Speaker 1: lot more efforts for the bias or eu frons. So 296 00:20:05,920 --> 00:20:08,760 Speaker 1: it sounds like just listening to you so far as 297 00:20:08,840 --> 00:20:12,920 Speaker 1: you identify these three phases. So there was the pre 298 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:18,360 Speaker 1: default phase going up to everyone enjoyed pretty tight spreads. 299 00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:22,040 Speaker 1: The bond market didn't tell you very much. Post fourteen 300 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:26,080 Speaker 1: you start to get slightly more wider spreads for the 301 00:20:26,359 --> 00:20:31,119 Speaker 1: private non s O companies and more information from the 302 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:35,399 Speaker 1: UM bond market period. They the prices start being more informative. 303 00:20:35,880 --> 00:20:40,399 Speaker 1: Post eighteen, the spreads get even wider. And in this 304 00:20:40,640 --> 00:20:45,359 Speaker 1: phase this is due to asset managers being forced to 305 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: be more cognizant about credit risk. It sounds like a 306 00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:53,639 Speaker 1: sort of just an ongoing maturation process. There was a story, 307 00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 1: and Tracy alerted it to me this morning that actually 308 00:20:57,960 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 1: there is there is an s OE now that it's 309 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:04,560 Speaker 1: very close, if not near in default or some sort 310 00:21:04,600 --> 00:21:07,000 Speaker 1: of bond holders are going to have to take a haircut. 311 00:21:07,359 --> 00:21:11,040 Speaker 1: Are we on the verge of a new stage four 312 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 1: or phase four whereby the bond market will start to 313 00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:18,920 Speaker 1: be more meaningful for also the s O sector, the 314 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 1: private sees you see them, you actually see private listed. 315 00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:28,399 Speaker 1: When I say private, I mean s O E issuers 316 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 1: who do not have a publicly listed So for this group, 317 00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:38,119 Speaker 1: we we actually have sent the faults amount this group. 318 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:42,679 Speaker 1: I want to go back to uh my, my earlier question, 319 00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:46,240 Speaker 1: which was about whether or not it's desirable for the 320 00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:51,159 Speaker 1: private companies to be on a similar funding um playing 321 00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:55,440 Speaker 1: field as the s O s because of course, in 322 00:21:55,680 --> 00:21:58,040 Speaker 1: order for that to happen, I guess you you do 323 00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:02,639 Speaker 1: need to introduce some sort of default risk into the 324 00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:06,240 Speaker 1: state owned enterprise sector or you have to eliminate it 325 00:22:06,359 --> 00:22:09,880 Speaker 1: in the private market, which doesn't seem to be um 326 00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:14,040 Speaker 1: what China wants at the moment. So is leveling the 327 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:17,639 Speaker 1: playing field between those two sectors when it comes to financing, 328 00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:20,040 Speaker 1: when it comes to moral hazard, in the bond market. 329 00:22:20,440 --> 00:22:27,920 Speaker 1: Is that something that's desirable for China. It's it's something desirable, 330 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 1: But I just don't see how that would work in 331 00:22:30,520 --> 00:22:34,040 Speaker 1: this uh corporate bond market. If you put them together, 332 00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:40,080 Speaker 1: the ally has explicit or implicit government guarantee, while the 333 00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:47,840 Speaker 1: Nassois have duly compuri Its investors are not discriminating against 334 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:53,600 Speaker 1: the Nassois. But studying at phase three, when you see 335 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:57,320 Speaker 1: massive defaults, not massive, but you see increasing amount of 336 00:22:57,440 --> 00:23:02,919 Speaker 1: defaults happening in the market, the investors are nervous. When 337 00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:08,360 Speaker 1: they are nervous, they shown away from the nias we issuers. 338 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:16,200 Speaker 1: Most of them take only bob and they just block 339 00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:19,840 Speaker 1: up block that nice wee bots out. But they don't 340 00:23:19,920 --> 00:23:24,520 Speaker 1: even look at nicely bound. That's the that's the problem, 341 00:23:24,600 --> 00:23:28,560 Speaker 1: and I just don't At the policy level, it would 342 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 1: be difficult to find a way to level the plane 343 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:38,640 Speaker 1: field for for these two groups, especially during crisis. Speaking 344 00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:41,280 Speaker 1: at the policy level, I want to sort of ask 345 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,800 Speaker 1: a big picture question. So you mentioned that for for 346 00:23:44,960 --> 00:23:49,679 Speaker 1: most of history up until very recently, the Chinese economy, 347 00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:53,400 Speaker 1: most credit was bank credit, and it wasn't There wasn't 348 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:56,399 Speaker 1: even really much of a bond market. Uh, if you 349 00:23:56,480 --> 00:23:59,720 Speaker 1: go back a little bit over a decade, how much 350 00:23:59,800 --> 00:24:04,160 Speaker 1: of that bank led market is especially by design, whereby 351 00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:07,520 Speaker 1: authorities who have sort of priorities in terms of investment 352 00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:13,360 Speaker 1: can more easily u direct bank lending. And I'm curious 353 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:17,399 Speaker 1: if the ongoing growth of the credit market as a 354 00:24:17,560 --> 00:24:21,639 Speaker 1: meat is a vehicle for financing changes at all the 355 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:26,639 Speaker 1: ability of decision makers of political leaders to direct money 356 00:24:26,800 --> 00:24:31,080 Speaker 1: towards key favored industries, or whether that hasn't really changed much, 357 00:24:31,160 --> 00:24:34,000 Speaker 1: whether they can still do it except just through a 358 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:39,040 Speaker 1: different avenue. I think having the market based bound uh 359 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 1: poper bound market is very important to direct especially direct 360 00:24:45,480 --> 00:24:51,639 Speaker 1: funding financing sources for the disse because prior to that 361 00:24:51,920 --> 00:24:58,800 Speaker 1: bank funding was mostly directed at banks leading to firms. 362 00:24:59,119 --> 00:25:02,200 Speaker 1: So for the NIA slow he's this credit market is 363 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:08,400 Speaker 1: actually very important. And up to two thousand eighteen they enjoyed, 364 00:25:08,800 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 1: uh increased the issuance, they enjoyed the financing. But posted 365 00:25:14,320 --> 00:25:17,840 Speaker 1: to eighteen, as the market was going through a very 366 00:25:17,920 --> 00:25:23,520 Speaker 1: stressful period, they have something process actually dried I shouldn't 367 00:25:23,520 --> 00:25:27,640 Speaker 1: say dried up, but they were increasing steadily. But new 368 00:25:27,720 --> 00:25:31,520 Speaker 1: issuances by nyas yes, as a fraction of the overall 369 00:25:31,560 --> 00:25:36,399 Speaker 1: market decreased the first quarter of two thousand eighteen. So 370 00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:40,000 Speaker 1: we've talked a lot about I guess the sort of 371 00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 1: uniqueness of China's corporate bond market at at this current 372 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:48,600 Speaker 1: moment in time, and in many ways, it's still developing 373 00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:51,800 Speaker 1: and maybe it'll get to a similar level to where 374 00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:53,680 Speaker 1: the US is at the moment, but it's not quite 375 00:25:53,760 --> 00:25:58,680 Speaker 1: there yet. What do you think this means for international investors? 376 00:25:58,800 --> 00:26:03,240 Speaker 1: Because of course, China's corporate bonds are becoming more integrated 377 00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:10,840 Speaker 1: into international investors portfolios via inclusion in benchmark indusicries, including 378 00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:14,160 Speaker 1: some that are owned by Bloomberg LP. I should just mention, 379 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:18,560 Speaker 1: So what does all of this mean for international investors? 380 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:21,719 Speaker 1: How should they be viewing China's corporate ball market At 381 00:26:21,760 --> 00:26:26,439 Speaker 1: the moment, China's fixed incour market overall is being opening up. 382 00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 1: You see a lot of relaxing of restrictions that very 383 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:36,159 Speaker 1: much welcome the international investors. Copper body in particular, I 384 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:41,200 Speaker 1: think most of the foreign investment right now is focused 385 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:45,199 Speaker 1: on the on the yield space, not the spread space, 386 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:50,440 Speaker 1: meaning that it's focusing most of the government bomb. But 387 00:26:50,560 --> 00:26:54,080 Speaker 1: the you always say, the default free bonds, not the 388 00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:59,880 Speaker 1: credit bouk. Overall, I think this market would would benefit 389 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:04,520 Speaker 1: from more international investors, or conversely, maybe there will be 390 00:27:04,600 --> 00:27:10,720 Speaker 1: opportunities for international investors to pick the right bond to 391 00:27:10,840 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 1: put a different play. I think if for international investors 392 00:27:14,800 --> 00:27:19,800 Speaker 1: these companies that issue couple of bonds, these are especially 393 00:27:19,840 --> 00:27:22,600 Speaker 1: for the sample we started, these are large companies with 394 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:26,080 Speaker 1: listed equities, but this could be another way for them 395 00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:29,640 Speaker 1: to be exposed to the real China in a sense 396 00:27:29,760 --> 00:27:35,760 Speaker 1: that these are companies doing business in China. John, that 397 00:27:35,960 --> 00:27:39,240 Speaker 1: was a fascinating conversation and a really good time to 398 00:27:39,440 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 1: have that conversation given what we've just seen in China's 399 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:45,720 Speaker 1: credit markets. So thank you so much for coming on. 400 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:48,760 Speaker 1: We really appreciate it. Thank you. That was great, sure, 401 00:27:49,040 --> 00:28:03,320 Speaker 1: thank you. So. I found that conversation so so interesting. 402 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:06,560 Speaker 1: And one of the things I always like about, you know, 403 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:11,080 Speaker 1: markets and financial regulation and the development of capital markets 404 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:14,760 Speaker 1: is the idea that there can be all these unintended consequences. 405 00:28:15,119 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 1: So I'm really fascinated by the idea that by introducing 406 00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:22,479 Speaker 1: the possibility of default into the private market, China has 407 00:28:22,560 --> 00:28:28,480 Speaker 1: basically inadvertently created this big funding cost segmentation, but also 408 00:28:28,680 --> 00:28:33,879 Speaker 1: kind of created a potential financial stress point, like the 409 00:28:34,080 --> 00:28:36,960 Speaker 1: notion that when things get really bad, everyone flees the 410 00:28:37,040 --> 00:28:40,560 Speaker 1: private companies and heads into the s OE sector. I 411 00:28:40,640 --> 00:28:44,600 Speaker 1: find that really interesting, right, I mean, I guess the 412 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:47,720 Speaker 1: thing is, it's at some level there's going to be 413 00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:52,040 Speaker 1: it's hard to imagine the existence of s O s 414 00:28:52,320 --> 00:28:56,960 Speaker 1: and they're not being a major, uh slanted playing field 415 00:28:57,080 --> 00:28:59,760 Speaker 1: or tilted playing field on some level, like whether there's 416 00:28:59,760 --> 00:29:01,840 Speaker 1: a on market or a stock market or whatever. The 417 00:29:01,880 --> 00:29:04,120 Speaker 1: fact that a bunch of companies are a state backed 418 00:29:04,160 --> 00:29:07,000 Speaker 1: that a bunch of aren't. You had imagined that that's 419 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,360 Speaker 1: going to create an advantage for the state backed ones. 420 00:29:09,640 --> 00:29:12,400 Speaker 1: But to see how that sort of manifests itself, and 421 00:29:12,680 --> 00:29:15,320 Speaker 1: even like sort of wrap one's head around the idea 422 00:29:15,560 --> 00:29:19,680 Speaker 1: of market based pricing of state owned enterprises, it's just 423 00:29:19,840 --> 00:29:23,280 Speaker 1: extremely strange. It'll be interesting to see how that developed, 424 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:26,600 Speaker 1: because if it stayed backed, why would they let it 425 00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:29,080 Speaker 1: default at all? And it's very it's kind of hard 426 00:29:29,160 --> 00:29:31,440 Speaker 1: to wrap one's head around from a sort of US 427 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:35,480 Speaker 1: centric perspective, right, So you definitely have questions around this 428 00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:39,480 Speaker 1: and that company that you mentioned, the state owned enterprise, 429 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:44,440 Speaker 1: it's called ta WU and UH it's potentially sort of 430 00:29:44,680 --> 00:29:48,160 Speaker 1: defaulting on its dollar bonds. UM. This is a big 431 00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 1: s o E that's based in Tianjin, which is in 432 00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: the Northern province and has been um experiencing a few 433 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 1: economic problems. So this is going to be a really 434 00:29:58,280 --> 00:30:00,920 Speaker 1: interesting one to watch, like whether not this becomes a 435 00:30:01,000 --> 00:30:04,280 Speaker 1: watershed moment for s o E s. And again, the 436 00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:09,320 Speaker 1: policy implications are absolutely fascinating. Is this something that China 437 00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:13,080 Speaker 1: is actively trying to encourage in order to introduce more 438 00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:16,920 Speaker 1: differentiation between its s o E s Or is this 439 00:30:17,120 --> 00:30:20,760 Speaker 1: something that it doesn't actually want to happen, but it's 440 00:30:20,920 --> 00:30:23,960 Speaker 1: starting to have to countenance the idea of haircuts or 441 00:30:24,080 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 1: defaults because of its massive debtload and fiscal position. That's 442 00:30:29,440 --> 00:30:33,680 Speaker 1: sort of the question that we are in. Yeah, and 443 00:30:33,800 --> 00:30:37,200 Speaker 1: just more generally, I really like the way she broke 444 00:30:37,280 --> 00:30:40,760 Speaker 1: it down through the different phases because again, I mean, 445 00:30:40,840 --> 00:30:44,200 Speaker 1: this is obviously just such an incredibly immature market. It's 446 00:30:44,400 --> 00:30:48,560 Speaker 1: basically existed for a little over a decade, so I'm 447 00:30:48,600 --> 00:30:51,160 Speaker 1: sure there will be more phases to come, but so far, 448 00:30:51,360 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 1: what we've seen looks like what you would expect, uh 449 00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:58,920 Speaker 1: from a sort of maturing, growing industry or part of 450 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:01,719 Speaker 1: the capital markets and in the and if you think 451 00:31:01,760 --> 00:31:03,960 Speaker 1: about how young it is, it kind of makes sense 452 00:31:04,040 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 1: that they never had defaults in the beginning because you 453 00:31:06,280 --> 00:31:07,560 Speaker 1: sort of, you know, you want to build up an 454 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:10,480 Speaker 1: investor base, you want to have people have confidence in 455 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:13,400 Speaker 1: the market overall, so you sort of get the impression 456 00:31:13,480 --> 00:31:16,200 Speaker 1: the sort of liberalization of the market. It's slow, but 457 00:31:16,320 --> 00:31:19,920 Speaker 1: it's also kind of logical, right. I mean, there's definitely 458 00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:22,800 Speaker 1: teething problems that you would see in any new capital market, 459 00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:26,480 Speaker 1: but I do think the picture is complicated by the 460 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:29,280 Speaker 1: structure of the Chinese economy and the existence of the 461 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 1: s O s and it's sort of, um, it's sort 462 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:38,160 Speaker 1: of capital markets with Chinese characteristics, right, well put, thank 463 00:31:38,240 --> 00:31:42,480 Speaker 1: you all right, Well, this has been another episode of 464 00:31:42,640 --> 00:31:45,920 Speaker 1: the Odd Thoughts podcast. You can follow me on Twitter 465 00:31:46,440 --> 00:31:48,960 Speaker 1: at Tracy Alloway. And I'd like to just give a 466 00:31:49,000 --> 00:31:53,000 Speaker 1: shout out to uh Steve Hoe who's on Twitter and 467 00:31:53,120 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 1: he actually suggested John for an All Thoughts guest. So 468 00:31:56,560 --> 00:32:00,560 Speaker 1: you can follow Steve at Steve ho that's h o 469 00:32:01,080 --> 00:32:05,400 Speaker 1: U and then F Steve co F and I'm Joe 470 00:32:05,480 --> 00:32:08,760 Speaker 1: wisn't thal. You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, 471 00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:12,600 Speaker 1: and be sure to follow our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson. 472 00:32:12,920 --> 00:32:16,400 Speaker 1: She's at Laura M Carlson. And follow all of our 473 00:32:16,480 --> 00:32:20,480 Speaker 1: podcasts at Bloomberg at the handle at podcasts. Thanks for 474 00:32:20,600 --> 00:32:20,880 Speaker 1: listening