WEBVTT - HFE's Weinberg Sees BOE Disappointing on July Rate Cut (Audio)

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com the radio plus Globo lact and on your radio.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Katherine Cowdery. A third day of gains on Wall Street.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Markets are showing further signs of stabilizing after wide swings

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of Britain's decision to leave the European Union.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Consumer staple shares are leading the way, as Hershey rallies

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>her She's been up as much as twenty one percent

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>after report that Mondale International made a takeover bid for

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the chocolate maker. Trading and its shares has been halted

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pending an announcement. The SMP Utilities Index is traded at

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a record high today. We took the markets every fifteen

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>minutes throughout the trading day. DAL Industrial Average is up

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>two hundred sixteen points one percent at seventeen thousand, nine

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred ten. SMP five Funded up twenty five points one

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>point two percent at two thousand ninety five. The NAZDAC

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is up forty nine points, a gain of one percent.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's trading at eight. West Texas Intermedia Crude oil down

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight cents of barrel one toe sparckled down five

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars announced at and the tenure treasury is up ten

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds with the yield of one point for eight percent.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's a Bloomberg business flash. You're listening to taking

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Stock with Kathleen Hayes and Pim Fox on Bloomberg Radio.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Political uncertainty, a recession perhaps baked in the cake. Now,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that's all that's going on in the UK, and more

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>since the vote last week to leave the European Union

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us now to look at what's next for that economy,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what it means for the British pound. Is Carl Weinberg,

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>chief economist managing director at High Frequency Economics. So Carl,

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's get right into Mark Kearney's speech today.

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>He suggested very clearly that the Bank of England is

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ready to cut its key rate this summer. UH some

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are already saying they'll be two rate cuts, one of

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one in July one in August. And he also said, well,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the rate part. In my view, and

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not pre judging the views of other independent members

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of the NPC, the economic outlook has deteriorated and some

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy easing will likely be required over the summer. Carl,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you what do you make

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of this? Was this a surprise? Well, um, yes and no.

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And first of all, any time Mark Arney talks about

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>cutting rates is a surprise because if you look at

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>his career, both in Canada and the UK, it's always

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>been you know, rates have been too low for too long,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they have to go higher, And of course with that

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to the caveat that he's never actually hiped rates

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on those threats, so that when he talks about easing,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a deep breath and you know,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder how much of this is you know, conditioning us

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for expectations rather than actually prepared to do something. I think,

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the mechanics the way it works, he

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>laid out in his speech pretty clearly a plan, which

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is they're going to talk about it in July, but

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>they've got to come up with new forecasts and new

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>options for August. So I think that maybe they made

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>disappoint markets in July, but probably will ease in August.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>One thing to keep in mind about all of this

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is that in order to justify a cut in interest rates,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they have to have some forecast that tells them that

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the inflation target is going to be violated, and to

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>make that forecast they need some idea about a policy setting,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and policy, as we all know, is extremely up in

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the air right now without even a prime minister to

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>make it, let alone a Parliament to approve it. So

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that waiting until August will give them a

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>chance to come up with some plausible scenarios and some

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>crude expectations for policies so they can justify a change

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in rates. I think it's going to be August. Carl

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>explained to us why this um this certainty or you know,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>some amount of data suggesting that the inflation target will

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be violated. Presumably then to the downside is necessary because

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>again in the latest Bloomberg survey done by a Bloomberg

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence team in London, of the economist survey to see

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a recession over the next couple of years, they're evenly

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>divided between this year and next. Only twenty nine percent

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>are saying a recession at off. There's a recession on

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. Isn't that enough justification for a re cut? Well,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England, like the FED, has a mandate

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and its mandates are to support the unemployment objectives of

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the government, and primary UH mandate is to hit the

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>inflation target, which is two percent year over year increase

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in CPI. So UH most importantly he has to be

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>focused on the inflation number, and by saying he's going

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to ease, he's saying he has a premonition that we're

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>going to see the inflation rate actually drop substantially further

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>than it has already. Headline CPI is around zero. Core

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>CPI is around one in a fraction percent in the UK,

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>so that have to be a substantial flowdown and substantial

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>increase in splack. That's all good, is a back of

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an envelope calculation, but to be the basis for justifying

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and easing of monetary conditions, he's going to have to

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>show that in a forecast in the Bank's inflation report.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a very well established process that they don't

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>work on the basis and back of the envelope, and

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I think kinds of statements they act on the basis

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of model based forecasts and other kinds of formal forecasting techniques.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to have to run this through their

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>model and make their models show them that there's going

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to be an inflation undershoot, or at least a good

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>likelihood thereof, and they need more input from the policy.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So I had to be able to do that. What

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for the pounds sterling down against the

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar after Mark Kearney suggested that rate cuts are a

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.679
<v Speaker 1>very strong possibility anyway, And of course this pound sterlings

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>tumbled since Paul's closed. Yeah. Well, what he's done is

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he's indicated what we used to call instead days. And

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I know you remember this, Kathleen, a bias towards easings.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a statement of his personal buyo

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is at least to it easy. And the market has

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>taken that as a promise of lower rates to come,

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and they are doing what they've been told to do,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>which is discounting that bias as being a premonition of

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. I'm not saying that he can't

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>do this. I suspect he probably will, but he's just

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to do it between now

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and the MPC meeting in July. UM. As far as

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the markets, though, the market is always right and the

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>market believes that there's a rate high coming soon, and

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>whether as soon as July or August, it's changes the spread,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it lowers the attractiveness of the UK assets even more

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>to foreign investors, and that's going to mean the cheaper pound.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. Markets also deferred this morning on selling off

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>after the current account numbers came out. But the current

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>account numbers have been just appalling. And we've been warning

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>readers of high frequency Economics for a long time that

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a Sterling crisis is a potential outcome of running a

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>current account deficit as big as seven percent of GDP,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and the numbers we saw this morning were that order

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude and not getting any better. So I think

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of reasons for Stirling to cheapen,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and that Carney's statement today probably catalyzed some of that thinking,

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit firmer on the side of all right,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Carl Weinberg, thank you so very much for so eloquently

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>summing up the uh the forces that are facing Mark Harney.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He's head of the Bank of England. As he looks

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at the possibility his own bank forecast a deep recession

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if this Brexit vote goes through. So Carl putting out though,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's a couple of hurdles to cross, and one

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of them, of course, is inflation. Where that is looking

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>when the bank offing gets to July. I'm Kathleen Hayes.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>This is taking Stock. My co host Pim Fox on

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>vacation this week, and this is Bloomberg. A week from tomorrow,

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States Labor Department will re releasing its jobs report.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, we're gonna look at some of the

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>big indicators of the labor market as the Fed considers

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>its next rate move coming up. This is Bloomberg.