WEBVTT - Why Understanding Financial Fraud Is The Secret To Understanding Business

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy. Allowit, Tracy, I think

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you're really gonna like today's episode. Oh okay, what is it?

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean? I guess I would hope that you like

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all of the episodes. But I feel like this is

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a topic that, just from what I know about you

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>really animate too. But we are going to be talking

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>about fraud and financial fraud. Fraud. Wait. Should I take

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that as like a personal slight that you think I'm

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really interested in financial fraud? No, it's not a slight.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like that you have a mind that

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>likes to figure out frauds and leans towards fraud. Yeah, exactly,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and figures them out and understands how they happen and

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the conditions it allow frauds to take place, and how

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>people missed everything. I feel like that's a youth thing.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong? No, you're right. Uh, you actually nailed

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it on the head in um what you just said.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the fact that people miss these things when they're happening,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and then as they unfold, you kind of go back

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and you see all the warning signs and you think,

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>how could people not have seen this coming. That's what

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinates me the most. It's it's people missing out on

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 1>something that is quite clear in hindsight. Yeah, it's pretty

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>incredible when we have these stories about big financial frauds,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>how egregious they seem always in retrospect, and how they're

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>just always seemed to be numerous red flags that anyone

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with half a brain should have been able to pick

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up on. And yet somehow we have this suer delusion

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>where nobody sees it, or maybe people who saw it

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>decided that it wasn't worth pointing it out, and then

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to relearn human history and human behavior all

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>over again for the next time. Yeah, exactly. And there's

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>an example that springs immediately to mind, probably one of

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the most famous recent financial frauds, Bernie made Off and

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you remember, um, after he got arrested, people started circulating

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>charts that showed the historical performance of the fund that

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we're coming from, uh, the made Off funds marketing materials,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were just a straight, smooth line pointing upwards.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course, in hindsight, everyone thought that was deeply,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>deeply suspicious. But at the time, people some of them anyway,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>seemed more than happy to just accept that as fact. Yes,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's perfect example, because it's one of these things

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that in hindsight, as you say, it's like, oh, of

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>course that could never have been realistic. Where was everyone

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time saying how impossible it was. It's a

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of how something happens and the exact same

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>fact goes from being oh, this is very impressive to oh,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously a scamp. Yeah. How quickly things change. Yeah,

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we could avoid frauds in the future, or

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>spot them quicker if we really studied the patterns and

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>instituted some good practices about the weak spots in our

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>behavior and in organizational behavior that fraudsters like to exploit.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that would make a lot of sense. So

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll start on that road with our guest today.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>His name is Dan Davies, and he is the author

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of a new book called Lying for Money, How Legendary

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Frauds Reveal the Workings of our World. And it is

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating book, and it looks at lots of frauds

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and historical patterns and how they come about. And uh,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan joined us. Now, Dan, thank you very much for

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Thanks very much for having me Dan. Before

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we get into the frauds and the patterns of fraudsters

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and why we miss them and all this stuff that

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, let's just talk about your career. I

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of think of you as someone who just knows

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about everything, and you, uh, you can talk about political referendums,

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can talk about technical things, and tell us

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your career background and why you

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to write a book on this topic. Sure, well,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I was basically acquisi analyst for fifteen years. I started

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out at the Bank of England as a regulatory economist

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I used to be in the office next door

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to the guy who was the elite supervisor of Barings

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank at the time of the Nick Leason crisis, which

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>was kind of an interesting set of office traffics watch.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Then I was lucky enough, over the course of about

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years in equity analysis to have a succession of

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>busses who allow old me to mess around looking at

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>quirky things rather than doing something about the usually disgraceful

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>quality of my own ex forecasts. And so, you know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you pick up a little bit of everything because I

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was covering the financial sector, and financials are relevant to

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>more or less anything you want to get interested in,

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which was something that I took full advantage of. Then

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about four or five years ago, I kind of felt

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that I had had as much fun as it was

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>possible to have out of equity analysis, so I quit

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and well started writing articles for newspapers and websites and

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>eventually started writing this book. And you know, frauds. It's

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>just really interesting because it's like where the system breaks down.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can study the economics all the time,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but if you're only studying successful companies and economies, then

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like trying to learn about medicine by only studying

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy people. Where you really see how the structure works

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is in cases like bankruptcies and frauds and all these

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>nasty things that people don't like to think about, where

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole system breaks down and where key assumptions turn

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>out not to be true. I like that description. You're

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of probing the system for its weak spots. So

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to jump right into it because, as

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe has already said, this is a topic that is

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>dear to my heart. So what's your favorite example of

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>fraud that you chronicle in your book. Oh, it kind

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of changes every day, because the thing is that obviously

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>every day I'll come up with a new one that

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I wish i'd put in the book but didn't, or

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>someone asks whether they're favorites in there, and I'm just

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like to do half of my favorites aren't in there.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think the classic one is the Great salad

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>oil scam. It's just such a beauty. Yeah. I mean,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just basically oil floats on water. And because of

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this fact, it is surprisingly difficult to tell the difference

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>between a tank full of valuable soybean oil and a

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>tank that is basically full of seawater with a few

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gallons of soybean oil floating on top. And there was

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy called Tino de Angelis who was the salad

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>oil king and really knew more about soybean markets than

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone else in the world at that time. But he

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>was an absolute crook, and one of the ways that

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>he managed to extract fraugil in cash from his company,

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>American Crude Vegetable Oils, was to borrow money collateralized against

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the soybean oil in his tanks, but to have vastly

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more warehouse receipts, as the kind of short term ones

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>were called outstanding, than there was soybean oil cartalized against them.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He was a hell of a character. But what he

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>used to do was let the lenders come out take

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a dip sample into one of his tanks, and it

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>either had oil floating on water, or there was a

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>length of pipe welded into its full of soybean oil

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the tank was empty, or they

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>even had a plumbing system to pump it around so

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that the same soybean oil could appear in different tanks.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>In the end, he was claiming to have more in

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>his one tank form than the USA produced in an

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>entire year. Now, obviously there's a scientific lesson here that okay,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>oil floats on water, and just for various technical reasons,

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to verify that a big tanker is actually

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>filled with the soybean oil that the owner claims it is.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>What is the sort of human lesson though? So what

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>did he exploit with regards to human systems that allowed

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>him to perpetrate this highly profitable scam. Well, yeah, that's it.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It is all about the human systems. Because at the

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, if it hadn't been that, he'd

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>have thought of something else. That was just the kind

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of guy he was. At the time, American Express was

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>an independent financial institution rather than just a credit card brand,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and it had a brand new corporate lending business, and

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it had a set of targets whereby every one of

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>its divisions had to make at least a million dollars

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>worth of profit every quarter, back in the days when

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a lot of money. And so there were

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people out there looking to gain market share rapidly, and

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to gain market share rapidly, you tend

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to not be choosing off about the kind of customers

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that you take on. Now, everyone wanted to believe him

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he was a larger than life character. He actually used

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to allow rumors to circulate that, you know, D'Angelis was

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in the mafia because he felt like, you know, he wasn't,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but he felt like if people believed that, then they

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>would think that he had extra sources of cash flows

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and paid back his loans. And so, really, the thing

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>that I keep on coming back to in these things

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>is it's surprisingly difficult to challenge someone who's really determined

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a big time fraudster. If you've got someone

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who's really got into running a dishonest business, then actually

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to design their scam around all the controls

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that you have, and they're going to look like a

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really successful operator. And you know, as we know from

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the dot com era, from all sorts of examples from

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the very recent past, if something's a success story, it's

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>very psychologically, sociologically, and institutionally difficult to be the person

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>who stands up to that guy. You know, It's the

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>whole Emperor's New Clothes phenomenon. So I'm curious from the

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>fraudsters perspective. I mean, there's clearly a lot of intellectual

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ingenuity that goes into a scam like the one that

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you just described. Why do you think they sort of

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>channel their creative energies towards fraud and scamming people rather

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>than actually working within the system to create a legitimate business.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very weird, actually, Tracy. I mean, I'm not sure

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand why these people do this. I think the

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>classic model is what they call the fraud triangle, Like

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you have the murder triangle of means, motive and opportunity

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>for fraud. What it seems to be is that you

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity which is a deficient control or a

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>way around the existing control systems. You have a mead,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>which is just someone you know. As I say in

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the book, bankers in the end steal for the same

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>reason that heroin addicts do. They've been put in a

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>position where they have to get hold of more money

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>than they can get hold of immediately by honest means.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you have what Kressy called a rationalization, because

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about these fraudsters is in general, they

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't regard themselves as deviance individuals in the way that

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>other criminals basically do. Are read about two dozen autobiographies

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of people who had been convicted of famous frauds, and

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the absolute constant refrain through all of them is that

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really my fault. They always find some way

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of distancing themselves and putting a psychological barrier between their

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>self image as basically an honest and successful business person

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and the reality of what they're doing. So even to

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Angelus, who was clearly stealing money from

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>his company, kept on rationalizing it that all he was

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>doing was borrowing money in order to finance later transactions.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>There's usually some fantasy that there's going to be a

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>big score at the end of it which will allow

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>them to pay everything back and make everything right as

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if the fraud had never happened, and then we only

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>find out about them when they collapse. One thing that

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>interests me is how many nick Leason's there are out

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there who actually did happen to have a good day

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>on the market and managed to make cool of the

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting account's balance. Daniel said something that I thought was

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>very funny when you said that this character, you know, de'

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>angelis like to have the rumor out there that he

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was linked to the mafia even though he wasn't, because

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it put the idea in prospective business partners had that

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe had actually made him more credit worthy because he

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>had other sources of income coming in. It kind of

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of with made Off. Weren't there people who

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>suspected something was amiss, but that they thought it was

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>something else, so they thought, oh, maybe he's doing some

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of insider trading or doing something else that sort

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of scam me with the uh, you know, market maker

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>side of his company. And although you'd think that should

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>be a red flag to anyone that actually made them

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>more confident that he would have the money to keep

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>supporting his fund. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, quite a lot of

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>people thought exactly. Thus, also with some Israel that you

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>capital and some Israel actually wasn't inside its radiator as

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>well as a conci scheme operator. But yeah, people thoughts, well,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a crook, but he's not necessarily going to scam me,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which turns out usually to be quite about way to

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>run your relationships. So how can organizations, I mean, you've

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>identified a couple of obvious weaknesses or blind spots that

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>happened when organizations they set out a specific target for

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>making money or market share that causes them to drop

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>their guard. They think, well, I'm I'm okay getting into

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>business with the scammer because I'm not the one being

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>scammed here. What are some practices that companies can actually

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>implement to sort of guard against these sort of obvious

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>human failures. Well, I'm going to give two answers to that,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, directly answering the question. I think it comes

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the fraud triangle. You want to avoid creating

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a need so you don't want to create situations in

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>which you're setting unrealistic targets for your staff, because if

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you're setting on realistic targets, then you're putting them in

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a position where they can't do things legitimately, and that's

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting what they call criminergenic in sensuves so

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in sense of structurally making people more likely to commit crimes.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You can then look at the opportunity side of the triangle,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and an opportunity to commit fraud is just a weakness

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in controls. As we say in the book, every time

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you decide what you're going to check up on, you

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>are also deciding what you're not going to check up on.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's how the fraud gets into the system, because

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you simply can't check up on everything. And so, you know,

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for catching the bulk of frauds, it's really you know,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a like a return except it's say fraud return trade off,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>where you start beefing up the controls until you think

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that the marginal value of the frauds you're preventing is

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>equal to the marginal cost of doing so. Having said that,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a really difficult thing to investigate because the definition

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of a fraud is it's something that happens outside your

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>normal manufacturements information systems, so you can really badly get

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that optimization calculation wrong. In the classic example of that

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is Medicare, where in the end, credible people like non

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>politically say that in the nighties, between twenty and a

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>third of all payments made under the Medicare system were fraudulent,

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>which was probably hundreds of billions of dollars, probably the

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest fraud until the financial sector took the title back.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And what was going on there is that it was

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely assumed that the main cost problem in Medicare was

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>over treatments, and that the main driver of over treatment

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>was defensive medicine from doctors who are scared of getting sued,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and so they had systems that were meant to catch

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>unusual treatments but minimize otherwise the cost per claim processed.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And so what they built was a system that couldn't

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>detect four thousand identical hip replacements coming in from a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>clinic in Florida that just simply didn't exist because it

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>was a paper creation of some fraudsters. So you can

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>think about things like that. On the other hand, the

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>second answer I'd give is almost to turn around the

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>question and say, are you sure that minimizing your exposure

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to fraud risk is actually what you want to do,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the question is do you want to

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>make yourself bulletproof against fraud or do you want to

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get rich? And actually, it turns out, as far as

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I can sell, the optimum level of fraud is certainly

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>not zero, and it could be very high. We could

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>look in Silicon Valley and take a look at the

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Frans case and Elizabeth Holmes and say, well, this is

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy. You avoid a thranos by really checking out

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>all your tech demos and then not doing any business

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>at all with people who fake their demos, which is

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a great way of avoiding frauds. Unfortunately, it also means

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that you miss investing in Oracle because Larry Ellison totally

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>fake demos at crucial elite stages. It means you probably

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>miss investing in Apple around the time of the iPhone

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>because some of those demos there were definite differences between

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>what was happening on the big screen and what was

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>being sent from the device. In general, a system that's

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>set up to eliminate fraud risk is going to eliminate

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so much legit some business that I kind of find

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>myself wondering if what you should be looking for is

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>almost a rule of thumb to stop you trusting too

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>little rather than trusting too much. H Um. I want

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to press you on this point because it's a really

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. And you know, if you read another very

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>good book, Bad Blood, about the Sarin Nos case, one

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes out is that Elizabeth Holmes was sort

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of pursuing strategies that she thought had been pursued by

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Microsoft before, so sort of a fake it

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>till you make it approach. How many of the frauds

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that you look at actually start out as legitimate business activities,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe even promising business activities, and then encounter some trouble

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and then turn into actual frauds. I think it's about

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty between that sort of thing of being a

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimate business that drifts and something that was clearly set

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>up as a fraud from day one. I mean, the

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about the whole Soranus and the fake it's

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>or you make it model is that it's a history

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of that comes from mining fraud. Gold miners always thought

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that there was a great big load just a few

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>feet away for digging rock, and that all they needed

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit more investors cash in order to

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>achieve it. And that's how gold miners started getting into

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the habit of faking essay results, which is a tradition

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that goes way back to the first days of the

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Californian gold Rush. And you get these things which start

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>out as having an honest intention, but then when you

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that you can do that, there's some people who

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>realize that actually faking it until you make it is

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>one business model, but it's in many ways cheaper to

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>just start straight out by faking it. Dan, what is

0:20:55.560 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the oldest type of pride? The very earliest one I

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>found as public procurement fraud. There is a public procurement

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fraud in the Bible, and it's a case of skimming

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>profits of a maintenance contract in the Book of Kings

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who's counting. And that's really because governments developed

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the history of civilization than corporations did. And

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>what is actually quite interesting is that modern commercial fraud,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just generally stealing by lying, is surprisingly modern.

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't find that many of them before about eighteen hundred,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the reason for that is that you don't find

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that many recognizably capitalist enterprises before eighteen hundred. Actually, I

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>tell a lie because I've got my ancient history wrong.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>The ancient Greeks had a loss of shipping fraud, and

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that would presumably have predated the ev answer of the

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Book of Kings. Getting a ship, pretending to load it

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with a valuable cargo, scuppering it or hiding it, and

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>then telling your investors that they've lost their money. That's

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>probably the oldest form of fraud. Um. I have what

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>might be a strange question, but I'm going to ask

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it anyway. Do you think as the world grows more

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>complex and as we get more regulation, more supervisors, you know,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>big supervisory departments situated within companies, whether they're financial or

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>something else, do you think that makes the potential to

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have frauds more likely or less likely? So, for instance,

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have insurers is what allows us

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to have insurance frauds. Right, So do the opportunities expand

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>as we have more regulation and more supervision or do

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they shrink. I think it's an arms race basically, so

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>locally they could be growing or shrinking. Globally, I think

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they probably stay at a reasonably stable long term proportion

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. I'm writing some more at the moments

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's a U S edition of the book coming out,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and looking back through the book, I realized that it's

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>time after time that I'm talking about something that happened

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the a C. S or nineties and saying, of course,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't get away with this today because they changed

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the rules. And it makes me worry that I'm portraying

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>this view of an almost whig version of history of fraud,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that all these bad people did bad things in the past,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but we got wise to them and we've shot that

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>particular loophole, and so that couldn't happen anymore. And then

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you get something coming along like sub primal libel. So

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>what you get is technology and algorithms, I think are

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>very good at detecting the general run of fraud, and

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you might actually even see genuine structural declines in just

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>simple credit card skimming, check kiting and fairly straightforward small

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>time stuff like that. But the nature of the really

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>big frauds is that they're designed around the systems. They're

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>designed around the guy who sets the algorithms in place,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and you have the whole company controlled by a either

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>by a fraudster or by a system of incentives that's

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so bad that it might as well be a fraudster.

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is that the amount of loss and

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the amount of damage is just totally driven by the

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>very big frauds. If we consider something like payment protection

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>insurance in the UK, or libor or forex, every single

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>small time fraudster in the USA could work for five

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>years and not get to be the tenth part of

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what the size of one of the really big financial scandals.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone like you know, d'angelus, the salad oil king, if

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he were in his prime today, is he still alive?

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>He is still alive. Yes, he was arrested for another

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>fraud in the nine hasn't done anything since. That's if

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you were in his prime today. Coming up with the

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>skills that enabled him to identify the selled oil opportunity,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in your view, lend themselves to spotting opportunities for fraud today.

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, absolutely, because it's just picking. It's a combination

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of a very deep understanding of one industry and the

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>way that it goes about. Because in general, if you

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>were able to defraud something, then you have exactly the

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>same knowledge as someone who's really good at managing it.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>If Tina was around today, though he'd been doing initial

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>coin offerings. As far as I can see, with the

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that I c o s are capable

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of raising and the amounts of direct a site and

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>regulation that goes into them, anyone who's doing any other

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of securities fraud today is just a damn fall.

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>That brings me to the sort of obvious question. To

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>identify initial coin offerings is sort of a ripe opportunity

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for fraud. Are the rules or rules of thumb that

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you could set up for look again an economy, looking

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at a situation and saying, okay, this is the area

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a generalizable rules to be able to say this is

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the area where right now we're probably seeing a lot

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of fraud. I think the big rule is exponential growth,

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>because the absolute signature of a fraud is that firstly

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to grow as a compound rate because it's

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>based on a business units that's showing positive growth. And

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that, you've got a wedge reflecting

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the money removed by the fraudster, which also has to

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>show compound growth, but us you've got those two things

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>acting together. In general, a fraud has to grow unusually quickly,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which is why they always look like great, big success stories.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the book, I think the golden rule that

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>we suggest is if something's growing unusually quickly, then it

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be checked out. And then the second part

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the test is it needs to be checked out

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way that it hasn't been checked out before,

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because if it's a megafraud, then it's being designed around

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the usual qualifications. And probably something I'd add

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to that is if you try to check something out

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and the person in charge won't give you any of

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the information that you're looking for, then that ought to

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be really suspicious. Well, Dan, that was really fascinating, and

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I could keep asking you for more

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>examples of famous financial frauds, but then we'll be here

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for about four hours, so we're gonna leave it there,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to spoil the book. Yeah, and

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you have the U S edition coming out right, Well, yes,

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be coming out in Basically, we realized

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>with the US publisher Scritner, that in the book, I've

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>got value added tax payment, protection, insurance, Ronnie and Reggie Cray,

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>loads of kind of British things that despite the best

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>efforts of guy Richie, Americans don't care about. So I'm

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>rewriting that. Also, it turns out that Americans have slightly

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>stronger forearms, so they won't mind a book that's longer.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really excited about that working on that at

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the moment. All Right, Dan Davis, thank you very much

0:28:41.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thanks very much, well, Joe, you are

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct in your assessment. I did very much enjoy

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that conversation, and I think the thing that I found

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting is the concept of this idea that

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a really fine line between genius, you know,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>someone who sees an opening in the economy or in

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the system to make a bunch of money legitimately, and

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who pursues fraud and basically sees an opening in

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy or in the system and pursues it illegitimately. So,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dan gave that example of Apple and Steve

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Jobs and embellishing some of their reports early on in

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>their history, and of course you Jobs now is widely

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>lauded as a genius, but it could have turned out

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so very differently. Yeah, I think that idea that to

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>commit fraud within an industry requires a deep, granular knowledge

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the industry itself is a really sendating one. And

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone who just came to mind without regards

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to this is Martin Schrilly and the farmo bro who's

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>currently in prison. But the thing is, he really does

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>know a lot about pharma, Like, he is extremely knowledgeable

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about how the pharmaceutical industry works. And of course he's

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>argued that he was not a fraud stir and so on,

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but regardless, he's someone with an unusually high level of

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>just the actual mechanics of how the business works. Yeah,

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's plenty of dumb frauds out there, for sure,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but some of them are legitimately ingeniously crafted and you

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just think, Wow, this person is clearly smart, clearly knows

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the business, has clearly analyzed it, put the effort in

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to find the holes in the system. Why couldn't they

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have pursued, you know, a legitimate business absolutely and this, uh,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea to that, if you're going to

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>catch a fraud, you better come up with some test

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's never been devised before or never been applied to

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this company before, because if the fraud had gotten to

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>point X where you're thinking about it, it was almost

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly designed to to fool the standard tests. Yeah, and

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>there's one other interesting thing down said, which was do

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to aim to have no frauds ever in

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>your system? And you know, he pointed out to the

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that a lot of frauds either end up as

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>legitimate businesses or end up creating a lot of wealth

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for the people involved with them. And that kind of

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>goes back to some of the bubble episodes that we've had, Joe, Like,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly we all went insane when we thought beanie babies

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were worth thousands and thousands of dollars, but it did

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of people wealthy if they were able

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to pull out at exactly the right time. Well, and furthermore,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea that if you were to construct a set

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of behaviors is that to ensure that you never got

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>caught up in a fraud, you would have to also

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that you miss a lot of things that don't

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be frauds that turned out to be

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wildly profitable. So you really sort of want to calibrate

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your fraud detection level, your approach at a level that

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe is per is not too onerous. Yeah, there's so

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>much to unpack in this entire topic. It's such a

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>good topic, which gets back to Dan's point in the

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning that frauds are just a great entry point to

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding business or human systems. Yeah, and human nature. Um,

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but for the avoidance of doubt, this is the p

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>s a moment of odd lots. Don't do fraud, kids,

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. This isn't an endorsement, I have to say,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so that, uh, this seemed to leb blurbed Dan's book

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and his blurb is if you want to learn to

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>fend a fraud, read this, and if you want to

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>commit fraud, don't. But if you absolutely must, first read this,

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was a pretty great blurb. Okay, all right, well,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this has been another edition of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway, and I'm Joe wise in't all. You could

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, and you could

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>follow our guest Dan Davies on Twitter at d Square Digest,

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and you should follow our producer Topur foreheads on Twitter

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at for hiss T, as well as the Bloomberg head

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts, Francesca Levy at Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.