WEBVTT - Kathleen McCarthy on Real Estate Investments

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is mesters in business with very results on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Scrap yourself in for this one. It's absolutely fascinating. Kathleen

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy is the global co head of real Estate for

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>private equity giant Blackstone. She and her team manages over

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and sixty five billion dollars in real estate assets.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you are all interested in commercial real estate,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate, logistics, warehouse, laboratory and medical facilities, multi

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>family and apartments, offices, on and on in the US,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>in Western Europe, in Asia, India, Japan. UH, this is

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just a tour to force education on how to invest

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in global real estate. UH. Blackstone has been in this

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>space for over thirty years. According to their ten K filings,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.279
<v Speaker 1>their opportunistic fund is up sixteen percent a year over

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>those thirty year periods. That that's really an astonishing return.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen has been with Blackstone since and I just can't

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>say enough as to how absolutely fascinating, um and knowledgeable

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and intriguing this conversation is. That you won't hear the

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>gaps between her answers and my questions because we edit

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that out. But she answers a question. I'm just sitting

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there dumbfounded by how She's just like, oh my god,

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just an absolutely comprehensive explanation about something I had

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>no idea about. And now I feel like I really know.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know where to begin other than saying,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>strap yourself in. This is a Monster podcast. My conversation

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with Kathleen McCarthy, Global head of real Estate for Blackstone.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen McCarthy, Welcome to Bloomberg. I am so excited to

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>be here. Mary, So I'm excited to have you here

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because Wow, what perfect timing to talk about real estate.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Just at the towards the end of the year. Rates

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>are going higher, real estate prices are getting a little wobbly,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and I have a million questions about all of that.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to that, let's talk a little

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bit about you and your background. You started your career

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>doing M and A at Goldman Sachs. Tell us a

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that experience. What was that Like, I

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>back back up actually a little bit further and thinking

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about how did I get there, because I don't think

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it was very obvious actually that I would come out

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of Yale with an Ethics, Politics and Economics degree perfect

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and end up in M and A on Wall Street.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But so much, of course for all of us probably

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>comes back to those formative years with our families. And

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in my house, I was the oldest of three girls.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>My mom was a high school science teacher in our

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>public high school, and my dad worked for a cosmetics company,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Avon products, you know, like the Al Ladies. And so

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for most of my life, I mean really for all

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>my life that I remember his company, and if I

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>would go to visit, they have things on the wall

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that says the company for women. He routinely had women

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>who were his managers, his bosses, and there was a

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>female CEO for a really long period of time. And

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so as people were thinking about, Okay, what do you

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do after college? I was thinking any number of things,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and mostly that I didn't really know what I wanted

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to be when I grew up. But I was not

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of at all informed by gender norms that people

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>ask me a lot about now, in particular, how you

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>know a woman? How did you think about ending up

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in this page? So how did that color what you

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on at college and how you molded your career? Well?

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought about when when I thought about college and

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what I did there and why I selected going to Yale.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It was largely, I think the start of me recognizing

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm a person who loves to learn and loves

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to just keep expanding skills. And so I in college

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of reading and writing and thinking, it's

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what you do, I guess, with a liberal arts degree.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And then when I was going to Goldman, there were

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of objectives. I guess. One was wanting to

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to pay for my life in New York

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and pay off student loans exactly, and then also build

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a set of skills that could be used anywhere. And

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't at that point sure if I would end

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>up in a corporate role or I would end up

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>in the Peace Corps or something like that. And so

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what investment banking I thought offered, and I'd say ultimately

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really delivered, was an experience where you could learn a

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ton of different analytical skills, writing skills for business contexts,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>persuasion skills, you know, the opportunity to be in a

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>boardroom watching senior professionals, whether it was the chairman of

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the board or the CEO of the company, or the

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>investment bank, or leading your deal, getting to ideas and

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>outcomes that were influenced based on information. And so I

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>felt that my experience do doing you know, M and

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>A Goldman gave me this whole stable of skills that

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>set me up for really just about anything. And how

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>did you shift into real estate principal investment at at

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Coleman Sex. That seems like a big leap from traditional

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>M and A. Well, I would say that probably the

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of folks who were in my analysts classic Goldman,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the merger group, when they were looking for

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>their next thing to do, we're looking more towards private equity,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>more traditional private equity, kind of like what my colleagues

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in there are BCP team do, which is investing in companies.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Some people maybe we're going to hedge funds as well,

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'd say overall folks are more kind of corporate oriented,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, investing in companies, and for me that was interesting.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I definitely wanted to gain investing skills. I found one

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that was a little unsatisfying as a

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>merger bankers. You'd you'd work on a transaction, you'd help

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a company buy something or sell something, or merge with

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>another business, but then you really never knew whether your

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>model was at all close to accurate, how did it

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>work out? Ultimately? All of the things you thought were

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, did it ultimately happen? And so I

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be part of that kind of follow through.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why moving to the investment side was interesting

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I would say when it when it

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>came to kind of what part of investing, I think

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>being a merger banker did inform what I wanted to

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do next, because when you're doing that every day, you're

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>interacting with different clients and different industries and having to

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>learn a whole new set of vocabulary, whole new business.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, you know, if I want to start

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a great investor, and and in particular I

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this term at the time, but you know,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Schwartzman were first to as pattern recognition, great investors

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are really great at pattern recognition. You want to start

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>building that building expertise. I felt I wanted to move

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 1>into something that was still large and wasn't gonna piehole

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>me or pigeonholed me at a very young age in

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>my career um but where I could be working in

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and out of a common vovocabulary that could apply across

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of geographies and asset classes, and real estate

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>offered that um. I'd also say, you know, interestingly, when

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I was going to interviews at different private equity firms

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>or different real estate firms, it was noticeable that in

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the real estate brochures of those companies, there was a

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of diversity in the kinds of people that

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>worked at these firms. And it was all sorts of

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of diversity, including kind of the nature of people's degrees.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You had people who never had a college degree, folks

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>who are architects, folks who are lawyers, folks who had

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a more traditional M b A. And And what I

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 1>found was these were all people who were really interested

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in participating in in a people business ultimately, which is

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>where do people live and work and shop, and how

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>great cities come together and things like that. And I

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to be attached to those kinds of those people.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're passionate about what they were doing, So so

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>let me engage in a little bit of pattern recognition

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>M and A. The success of a of a deal

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>depends on that structure. The price paid how it is

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>structured in terms of upfront costs, ongoing courts, what you getting,

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and real estate in many ways, especially commercial real estate,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of parallels that thing. What are you paying, what's

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the structure of the deal, how is it financed? Am

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I oversimplifying or is that a fair comparison? Now? I

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>mean again, there's so many things that carry over from

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing to another. Um and interestingly and happy to

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>come back to these things I learned in helping companies

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>through murders, particularly around things like communications and shareholder relations

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and and employee engagement that have now served me really

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>well a couple of decades later in my career. But

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say those are all similar things, whether you're talking

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about companies that make something or companies that own real

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>estate or real estate assets. And I'd say, when when

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think about Blackstone and how we work on our

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>transactions and what has served us so well over time,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it certainly has to do with buying great quality real

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>estate and the price we pay for it. A big

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>part of it, also, though, is the capital structure you

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>set up and is it able to withstand anything that

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can come your way, including tough environments that you might

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not control. So I'm glad you mentioned that, because before

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we get to two thousand and ten and you moved

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to Blackstone, let's talk about a tough environment. You were

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman Sachs in the real estate division in the

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>middle of two thousand and eight two tho nine, right

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>through the worst of the financial crisis, so I have

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask, what the hell was that like, Well, it

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a difficult time. Um, I'm not laughing out

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>of joy, but out of you know, kind of. It's

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>always still a stunner. All of us who were in markets,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in real estate and derivatives and trading in anything, who

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>survived that baptism of fire. People have told me stories

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that they came through that, and that affects you the

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of your career. That colors It leaves a mark

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and colors you forever. Well, I would say, I feel

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like in the first decade of my career I actually

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>had to somewhat similar experiences in that way, because I

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>remember I came out of college three months after the

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com rubble burst. So I was sitting at graduation

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and classmates were getting emails saying their offers were rescinded

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because their company was going out of business, and I

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>went from again this merger group at Goldman, which was

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>focused only on the biggest possible deals, to working on

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>what were relatively small transactions but for important clients. Uh.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, for me again with a learning agenda,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there's learning and all of that, but environments change quickly,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's the investment you make or you personally,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it's your ability to kind of keep putting one foot

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in front of the other and move through that. Two

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and ten was a particularly tough and very formative experience,

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would say there are so many important lessons

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>learned for me. One is an investor, the importance of

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>buying super high quality assets, putting resilient capital structures in place,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>having access to reserves so that in a moment where

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you need to invest more capital in your transaction or

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>where you need to or you have an opportunity I

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>should say, to buy back debt at a discount, being

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>able to capitalize on those kinds of opportunities is so important.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, we didn't have all those opportunities, and we

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>hadn't set ourselves up as well. I really Blackstone meanwhile,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to that had, and that's a big

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>part of how Blackstone has been set up for so

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>much success in the decades that followed. But let me

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>let me interrupt you one second. So everything you described

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>are the sorts of things that you would imagine everybody

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>should be prepared for. It does, and I'm kind of

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear that one of the largest and savvayest

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>shops on the street kind of wasn't prepared for it.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that the sort of thing that the lesson we

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>learned from it is that the takeaway Obviously, Goldman has

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so many different moving parts, and the derivatives group on

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that side might be working at cross purposes with long

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>term real estate investment on this side. So so hold

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that aside. But is the takeaway from the financial crisis

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that you have to be resilient. You have to reserves,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You have to purchase assets that are robust enough that

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they could withstand a beating, and you have to have

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>enough dry powder that when these opportunities come along to

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>buy high quality assets at the stress prices, you have

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be ready to jump. I think you pretty much

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have it, Barry. I mean, I think about for example,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Blackstones track record. We've been investing in real estate for

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>over thirty years and in our opportunistic funds. So these

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>are the funds where we're trying to generate higher returns

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for customers in a relatively shorthold period for the assets

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we buy for them. We've had sixteen percent net returns

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on all of the capital we've invested over thirty years

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>net net of feedes. Are we gonna get a red

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>flag from a compliance or is that an official It's

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in our public statements. So it's our opportunistic real estate strategy.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Six per a net of fees thirty years. That's an

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>amazing it's an amazing return. And when you look across

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that and what you what I always think about is

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of different kinds of environments. We

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>were investing in things that felt great, things that felt

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>really terrible, things that felt good when we bought real

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>estate and didn't feel so good a couple of years

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>later perhaps. But what you just touched on is what

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is most important. You can't control the environment

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you're in, but you can control the decisions you make

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>leading up to that and through it, and the things

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that I think really distinguished what we were able to

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>do at Blackstone and what got us to the other

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>side of the financial crisis in a way most real

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>estate investors did not. Were these things good assets, resilient

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>capital structures, access to reserves, access to new capital to

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>go on the offensive and and take advantage of moments

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>where there's there's distress pricing. So Gullman and you're looking

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>around at the end of the financial crisis and you're

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>aware of, hey, we missed opportunities here. This could have

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>been a little tighter, this could have been and you

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>run into Blackstone and it's like, Wow, these guys, I

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>wish we had that way we were. How do I

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get involved with that? It's it's interesting, it was it

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was a little they came out I think a little

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>differently than that. What I would say is I had

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an amazing experience at Goldman, including i'd say the learnings

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that I had an opportunity to access through the financial crisis,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>um particularly getting those up learnings that are relatively early

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>part of my career. I think it is so important.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>What really got me thinking about doing something different was

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was just you was I continuing to learn? Was there

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a will to keep investing in real estate? Having had

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those traumatic experiences as a firm, and I

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>felt like I wanted to make sure I was in

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a place where I personally was not treading water and

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I had an opportunity to keep learning. And I knew

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to continue to be in real estate.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I was not sure exactly in what aspect. And I

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually quite surprised when Blackstone reached out to me

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about a role to work with institutional clients do capital

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>raising and investor engagement. And I was surprised mostly because

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I had no experience with that at all. I had

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>come at Goldman almost all of our capital had come

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>from high net worth clients. Also, I had done acquisitions.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have investor experience really, UM and what Blackstone

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of I think looking at it a

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>little differently and saying, if there's a person who understands

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate and can understand markets, but also can can

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>help our clients understand better, what are we doing with

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>their capital? Or if they're not yet a client, why

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but we're offering compelling um there could be an interesting

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>match there. And I think just generally a feeling like

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>wet Blackstone. Our performance was strong through the financial crisis.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We were able to open doors and keep open doors

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with clients, but it was all about stewarding those relationships

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and how do we do that better? And so what

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what got me ultimately really excited about the Blackstone opportunity

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was not so much that I had any confidence that

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to do investor relations or that you know,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that was going to be my my long term career destiny.

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Was that I wanted to work with these people who

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were really focused on doing a great job, not only

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>through the investments they made, but through the interactions they

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>created with their clients. And I felt like that move

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>would allow me to continue to learn and grow and

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>frankly diversify my skill sets, so I'd be better set

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>up to be a leader in in a bunch of

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>different capacities in the future. So let me ask you

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a very obvious question. You shift from high net worth individuals,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and no matter how high net worth they are, their individuals,

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they react to markets. They can be emotional. The So

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I have a vivid recollection. In the midst

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of the financial crisis, the news flow was just re

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and we were on the right side of it, but

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it was so relentlessly negative even people making money in

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the downturn were unhappy. Um. And then you shift to

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>institutions that have a much longer time horizon and a

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>very different headspace. Even though there are individuals at those

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>various endowments, institutions, what have you. How does the energy

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and the vibe and the conversations change. Is it's still

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>people or people and they're freaking out, or hey, we

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>have a perpetual lifespan and so we don't care about

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>next quarter, we care about the next century. Am I

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>exaggerating or well? I would say I think for all

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>investors of any type, whether it's size or whether you're

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>an individual investor or institutional investor, really what matters most

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is performance in the end especially we as a manager,

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if we can show up and say we continue to

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>generate great performance on your investments. It could be any

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of client on the other side of the table

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that is the most important, That the most important. I

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think that from my perspective, the biggest difference and this

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>may evolve over time, but the biggest difference between an

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>institutional client, so that state pension plan or charitable foundation

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>or university and down in versus an individual investor. I think,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, institutional investors have decided that they

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>want a knee real estate to be a core position

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolio in and out of cycles. And that's

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because real estate in strong economies can generate basically very

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>strong alpha. In weaker times or in an inflationary environment

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we're in right now, for example, as a real asset

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a hard asset, it preserves value as cost to replace

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>those assets go up. It's a cash flowing asset where

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you can remark your rents to market in a in

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a rising cost environment, and so um I think those

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors are really committed to real estate. Individual investors,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, have not yet determined that real

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>estate is something they want and need to leave as

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>core to their portfolio in and out of cycles. I

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think that is changing, and I think in particular, when

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you look back to environments similar to what we're in now,

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>where you see rising interest rates persistent inflation, you think

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about how well real estate has performed in those moments.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think individual investors are starting to appreciate how attractive

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this is as a part of their portfolio. But that

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is a different kind of approach to portfolio construction and

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>for individual investors. I always run into the when we

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>discuss real estate. I find I have to say, stop

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>focusing on individual homes. That's just one tiny aspect of

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>real estate. You have to think in broader, longer terms

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and commercial sides, not your neighbor's household for thirty less

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>than the expected. Let's talk about warehouses, Let's talk about farmland.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about things that it doesn't matter necessarily what

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the economy is doing. People got to eat, goods are

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>still being moved around the country. I mean, I think

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>separating the for sale residential market from for rent commercial

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate, including rental apartments, is so important. These are

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>different things, and I think you can't just mark what's

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going on in the single family for sale housing environment

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with what might be happening in warehouses or rental apartment

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>complexes or office buildings. Quite quite fascinating. So let's talk

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your team that you run. How

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>large is the real estate team in Blackstone? The real

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>estate team at black Stones about nine people globally. That's

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a big chunk of the phone. It's a big chunk

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of the firm. And I think what what actually that

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>under states is the impact we have through all the

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies we we own in our funds, So we

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>own fifty five portfolio companies, and that really forms a

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>huge extension of what we're able to do and then

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>also see in terms of people on the ground across

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the world operating in specific real estate sectors and then

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sending back the information they're working with every day. So

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>when you say portfolio companies, I immediately think of like

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Bornado or are you talking about specific privately held companies

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>who themselves own lots of various commercial real estates. So

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>these are specific privately held companies by our funds. So

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and these are companies that for the most part, we

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>own and control a hundred percent of the company. And

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we buy companies and then continue to help grow

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>them by new asset acquisitions or just growth in their

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>cash flows. In other circumstances, we will build up companies

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>through a series of smaller acquisitions. So an example would

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>be in the US, were one of the largest owners

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of warehouse properties. We have a company called link Logistics.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It owns about four hundred million square feet of warehouses.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>That is a company that we have built through a

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>series of acquisitions. We identified a world class management team,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and we said we want to build a great company,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>but we're not doing it through just one acquisition of

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one company. We're going to build it up through a

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>series of transactions and the ideas. As the things grow,

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>there's massive economies of scale and expertise, and what might

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have been a reasonable investment at one X, when it

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes a hundred X, it becomes a very very different experience.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say yes, And I think one of the

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>things that's so important about the scale of these businesses

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and the scale of our business together across all of

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these companies and our funds, is that we have a

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>huge information advantage. We get data, real time, proprietary to

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>us constantly coming off these businesses, and it really helps

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us make better decisions and you otherwise would be able

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to do if you didn't have access to this. And

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so rather than wait for a research report to tell

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>us what's really happening in apartment rent growth or in

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>new leases for warehouses in Northern Europe, we're getting those

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>data points real time and that can help us inform

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>on whether we're going to buy more of something I

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>want to sell something, pivot, how we're managing assets and

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>those are all just important decision making tools for us.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, so much of what our work is is

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>not just buying the real estate, but it's all about

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the value we can create? How can we

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>grow cash flows? That's that's most most of the time,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>how you make money in real estate is growing the

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and those those data points coming from all

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>across the world, and what's really happening in these assets,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>how our tenants making decisions help inform those strategies. I

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have heard from a variety of different companies that they're

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in internal data creation and analytics is just a huge thing.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Used to take like a year or two. You get

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>reports out back from the field, what's selling, what's not selling,

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what's rising. Now it's almost real time, it's almost instant. Yeah,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>we we definitely benefit from that, and I think we

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>have the good fortune that there's there's been a heritage

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of from day one of using insights that we

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>uniquely have access to, and the technology infrastructure around that

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>has definitely improved. It's needed to improve at our scale

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for us to really be able to use all that information.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think even just twelve or so years ago

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>when I joined the firm, you'd have senior professionals with

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>legal pads taking notes and meeting sal who what what

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>did we what do we what do we just learn

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>from that sale? Or how many people are in our process?

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>What do they want to pay? You know? And and

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.719
<v Speaker 1>using those notes to kind of inform the thinking around

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>next investment choices. Not exactly cutting edge, not exactly cutting edge,

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is one of the things that

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is so special about not just the real safe business

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of Black So, but really about our whole firm is

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the way we not only use data provided to us

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>through tools, but also we're in constant conversation. I mean,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we are a meeting heavy culture. We are a conversation

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>heavy culture, and so much of that is about harnessing

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>information and insights people have that can help make those decisions.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>And it's how we've built our investment committee process one

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>global investment committee, or you're drawing in insights and expertise

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>from around the world. It's just trying to say, Okay,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we have access to advantages through information that others may not,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and let's use that rather than kind of risk that

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that just stays on the sideline. That's really interesting. So

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>SO let's talk about market timing. You're a fantastic market

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>time and what I mean by that is you joined

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone right at the tail end of the financial crisis

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when real estate was the worst that's been in decades,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and from there you've had the wind at you're back

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for a dozen years. I have to ask a silly question,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>how much of what's happened the past twelve years has

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>just been spectacular timing and how much of it is

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just recognizing, Hey, things are very cheap, financing isn't expensive.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Now is the time to get aggressive? Well, I would

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>say timing can matter, and we're definitely in a moment

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>where we think dislocation in the market is going to

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>create interesting buying opportunities at values that are going to

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>feel like very attractive basis. But in the future or

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are we there yet? We're not there yet. We're getting there,

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but not quite there yet. I'd say, seventh inning, I

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'm really bad. I want you to tell

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>me Tuesday at the truck If I knew that, I

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>would turn that with you, Barry Um. But you know,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say, on the on the general idea of

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like market timing, it can be helpful, of course, to

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pick a really interesting moment to enter a market by

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a company by bineid. I would say, though, if you

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>look at the history of Blacks on real estate, some

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of our best investments were made at the worst post,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of course. I mean Hilton Hotels is always the example

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we give. You could argue buying that in two thousand

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>seven was the worst possible time. But going back to

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about earlier, we bought a great company. No, no,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we would, we took we took the company private. It

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was definitely not a distressed company. But what we were

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>excited about was the ability to grow the company and

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>really capitalize on its ability to to grow in a

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>capital light way, and by bringing in an incredible management

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>team led by Christmas Setta, we were able to help

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>propel the growth and we were excited about that from

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>day one. Probably the time. Well, we then hit the

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis and there were a lot of really dark

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>days and I think if we we did probably an

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>article search right now, you have found a lot of

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>prognosticators in two thousand eight nine in ten saying this

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was this was going to be a you know, a

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible black spot for us, and goes back to exactly

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>what you said by robust properties and a good structure

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that can tolerate and if it survived that hurricane, right

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and if in the most profitable private equity investment ever made.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why again buying in in more distressed

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>environments definitely helpful, but it's not really the only way

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to find success, I think, in anything. And to your

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>question about when I joined Blackstone and what's what's been happening,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the way I think about the last twelve years for

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>me and for our business, it's really that story of

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>what happened coming out of the financial crisis and the

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that during that period of time, most real estate

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>companies struggled to return capital to their investors, let alone

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>generate a profit, and black Stones funds to that period

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>generated substantial profits because we had made those good choices

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not just about the investments, but the capital structures, about

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the reserves, about having dry powder. And when we got

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the financial crisis, our clients

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really trusted us to start doing more for them than

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>just those opportunistic funds I was talking about, and that

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>has given us an opportunity to serve more clients and

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with more products that acts as more parts of the

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate market it than just those opportunistic strategies I

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about. I have used the phrase financial crisis PTSD

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and in no way being disrespectful to people who actually

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>suffer PTSD in combat or whatever. But everybody who came

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>through that felt felt the use the phrase trauma. But

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you're now saying something even more interesting, which is when

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you come through that intact and demonstrating an ability to

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 1>navigate that environment for your clients. At that point, hey,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we want to go pedal to the metal. They open

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>up the floodgates and say, if you survive that craziness

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in a normal economy, whatever you say, go with it.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>How does the trust that's built up over that time

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get get put to use following a crisis like the GFC. Well,

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, um, you're really in two ways. One is

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that our clients have given us more capital. And I

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>think many clients came through the GFC deciding rather than

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle their investments around with a lot of managers, they

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>want to do more with their more successful managers, and

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we've definitely been a beneficiary of that. I think that

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>trust has also allowed us, like I said, to expand

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>into different types of real estates. So really, so much

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of our focus today is on growing and expanding our

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>core plus business. This is real estate that has a

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very stable cash flow profile where we're able to generate

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>compounding returns over time by adding value in assets that

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to own for a long periods of time

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and structures that allow us to do that. And we've

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>done that more and more for institutional clients. We've expanded

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to doing that also for individual clients. And it's really

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that trust from the good performance in tougher environments and

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>really any environment that allows us to do that. So

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to put a little context around the five

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty five billion in commercial real estate assets that you

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>guys own globally. What is the real estate market? Some

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>thing like it's like three times at It's like yeah.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's because where I was leading to is, hey,

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>at what point does this get too big? At what

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>points are you picking b deals or sea deals? Three

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred trillion versus half a trillion, I'm assuming that means

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a ton of head room to just keep

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>growing this. That's how we feel about it. I mean,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market is so widely held, it's in

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>so many places, there's so many different opportunities and interestingly,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we should come back to this, but the opportunities change,

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>right and based on kind of how people are using assets,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we feel like there are plenty of opportunities

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can create. And I'd say again, our capital

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>also is structured in a way that we're never under

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure to deploy capital and then sit in cash and

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody complains. And this is this is part of the trust,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>right is the is the structure the investors give you

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the flexibility of when you draw their

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>capital to deploy into opportunities and what those look like.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of flexibility in our capital to

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>move across sectors, to move across geographies, to wait to

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>deploy the capital that they've committed until we find great opportunities.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's all a relationship built on trust. But it

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>also means that we can be patient. So do you do, Hey,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>someone says I'm gonna give you a billion dollars, here's

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million, and you do a capital core and

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the balance as deals come up, or do they shovel

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>all the money to you and you have to find

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a home for it until the correct opportunity comes along.

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say the vast majority of our capital, it's

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the former where use a capital calls a capital call

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as needed exactly, and that's got to help our o I.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's got to make numbers look really good because you're

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not forced to make a decision because you don't want

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to sit there earning half a percent, absolutely and more

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>than anything, you don't want to be ever in a

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're either a force buyer or a force seller.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And we set up all of our structures to make

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that we're we're able to generate continued great performance

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>by deploying capital too great opportunities when we find them,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and then also selling when we think the opportunities right now,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're forced to do so. What's the great war

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on Buffett quote? The difference between baseball and investing is

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there no cold strikes? You could just sit there with

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the bat on your shoulder and wait for the pitch

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you like, and there's no there's no they're calling strikes

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on you. You can really be patient, and it has

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a huge difference. Patience matters a lot to say,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>To say, the least. I'm very re helts. You're listening

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Kathleen McCarthy. She is the global co

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>head of real Estate at black Stone. They manage over

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and sixty five billion dollars in real estate

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>investments around the world. So let's talk a little bit

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on today. There's a quote of yours that

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I found really fascinating. We are entering this tougher economic

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>moment with capital and with cranes more in check than

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been in prior cycles, and I think that

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>positions are real estate assets to do quite well. So

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of capital and cranes and check.

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a great phrase. You're referring to people waiting to

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>invest and people waiting to build well. I think where

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that quoe came from. It's just the concept that most

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>real estate down cycle, so periods of time where real

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>estate is under more pressure from a performance perspective, come

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>about because there's been a lot of new capital, often

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>lent to people who then go build speculative real estate

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning and speculative meaning that they're building and office building

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>without a tenant in mind um and oftentimes what what

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you've seen in prior cycles is that the market gets

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really nice and healthy, people are really happy with performance,

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Lenders get more comfortable, they lend folks provide equity to

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>new projects. You end up with a lot of construction,

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and something happens, either there's been too much construction or

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the economy softens, and then real estate is in real

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>estate is that under pressure because there's been too much

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>capital and too many cranes. And I think what feels

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>very different about this moment is that we really never

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>got back to those more heady levels of lending and

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>more significant amounts of new construction prior to for example,

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED responding to inflation and interest rates, and so

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we're heading into whatever we're heading into with record low

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>levels of vacancy relatively, i'd say disciplined capital structures. That's

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not to say people won't be under pressure from either

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>debt service coverage challenges or loan to value challenges. But

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the combination of as you talked about, some

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the learnings from the global financial crisis, some of

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions on banks. I think also we can't underestimate

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>how COVID did create an interruption to what was a

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>very healthy market and probably change things in terms of

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not every project that was ready to go was put

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>into production in the summer of for example. And so

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing on the ground now is that fundamentals

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when particularly in our preferred sectors, which are our biggest

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sectors are warehouses. That's our portfolio globally rental housing. UM

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea logistics and warehouse yeah. They We

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are high conviction investors and we pick themes that we

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think are really benefiting from the way people are living

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and working and shopping and just mega trends. And so

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>starting actually in two thousand and ten, we started buying warehouses,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>not I think at first even recognizing what was happening

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with the e commerce, but like I mentioned, we pay

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really careful attention to what's happening in our portfolio, and

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we started to realize what e commerce was doing to

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>drive demand for warehouse space and how there was a

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift that started happening. Historically, warehouse performance just tracked

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>GDP performance. It was basically a one to one correlation,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and the house performance tracks g and then what you

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>saw is with e commerce demand and the shift moving

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>off goods online. It just changed. It just it just

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>totally changed, you know, I don't I don't know, but

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely more than one to one. And I would

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>say again, like going back to the point of cranes

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the news, there has been new supply, but it really

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>has not kept up with the explosive growth in demand

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for a warehouse space, particularly in urban areas, so what

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we call sometimes last mile logistics, so where the warehouses

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>closest to the densest population centers. Those assets are in

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>demand because of e commerce retailers wanting to get things

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to people in the same day or within a few hours.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Even we're also seeing really the impact of restoring and

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>realignment of supply chains, and that is ongoing, and that

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is both of these phenomenal are global. One of the

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>most interesting things is that these are often global stories.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>These these themes um the mega trends are rarely isolated

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to just one economy and so U when when you

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>think about the performance of our warehouse portfolio in this year,

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in you it's been some of the strongest fundamentals that

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we've we've seen and and you know, things are softening

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in certain pockets, but it's it's still really benefiting from

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that that lower new supply environment. You mentioned the pandemic

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>first Blackstone and you guys hybrid Are you in the

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>office at what what is your We're fully in We're

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in really in five days. So that's really interesting because

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask the question Bloomberg. This is a

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>big building, it's hybrid, but they're encouraging people to be

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in more often. My my own office, we're kind of

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>always been virtual and we tell people we do a

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning meeting which you can call in on, but

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we asked people come in the office one of two

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>days a week. I'm hearing more and more offices are

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>moving to a hybrid with an anchor day. So all

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of this back and forth is really what will cities

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>look like post pandemic. Is there going to be a

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>huge piece of the commercial office space that's going to

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>suffer from some form of a hybrid workforce? Because it

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like we're ever going back to every office

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in every city five days a week. That you guys

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>are an exception. Most companies are not full five. It's

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.320
<v Speaker 1>three and two or four and one or two and three,

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like five days a week is kind of a rarity.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I know Jamie Diamond wants everybody back in Chase five

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>days a week, but it ain't happening. We come at it,

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I think as part of a mission orientation, which is

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we have this incredible responsibility from our investors to do

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the absolute best job we possibly can with their capital.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>That's such a smart thing to say, can I tell you?

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Because as much as the younger generation loves the hybrid workforce, hey,

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we're stewards of capital, and our clients expect to expect

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>us to be here every day. Yes do it? I mean,

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and and so many of our customers as well, I

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, our frontline workers and emergency workers and teachers

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and firefighters. And so I feel like, how can we say, Okay,

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you you all need to be at work every day.

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>You're protecting us, teaching our children. But we're gonna We're

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hybrid and not necessarily delivered the best we

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>possibly Nobody wants their money manager and their pajamas with

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>their in their fuzzy slippers when they're responsible for billions

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a huge responsibility. And I would say I

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>also personally think we have a huge responsibility to our

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>own team to training and learning. I mean, I'm learning

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and training all the time, and I think about it

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Like all the research on children in school, right,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the learning loss from children not in school, It's the

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing in a workplace where all they're learning and

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>then doing better. And so I think being together is

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so important now, as you know, I would love to

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>convince everyone in the world that you know, being back

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in five days is really, you know, the right thing

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to do for for the whole ecosystem, the economy around

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where you work, and your own professional development and your

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>customers experience. I firmly believe it. But I would say,

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as we think about what is happening in the broader

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>world and how that's impacting office demand, I think we're

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in an era of experimentation. We believe that the office,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>in some format and for some periods of time in

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a week, will continue to be a really critically important

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>part of culture for for organizations and corporations. And what

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing happening is really actually, i'd say, an acceleration

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of a trend that was started pre pandemic. I mean,

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's so interesting. COVID really did accelerate so many trends

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways remote work cloud that It's funny

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>because when we launched a firm, we had a national footprint,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>but we were New York based, So all the things

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that we've been doing during COVID, we started in and

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked in like people discovered FaceTime. It's like,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that this technology is came out in two

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight. This is not a but it was a

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>massive I feels like the pandemic brought forward a decade.

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think in many ways and in different different sectors.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>For real state, it feels like whether it's like three

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>years of an acceleration or ten, it's definitely that that

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>pull forward. And what I'd say for office buildings, if

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we had met in two thousand sixteen, let's say, one

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things I would have probably called to your

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>attention is the fact that so many office buildings, particularly

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>whether you think at the lobbies or them the amenity

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>floors for tenants, it started to feel more like a hotel.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at this beautiful Bloomberg building with the food.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It's first all, it's a beautiful building, and then you

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>have your food and amenities, and I don't know if

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a fitness center, but so many buildings now

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>do all of these up on the roof. It's unbelievable,

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>all these things to really attract people into the office

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and to create a sense of community while they're here.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Cultural community, cultry and collaboration. That's really the fascinating thing

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about this building is kind of designed the way the

0:41:56.120 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>original Pixar building was designed and ultimately the Apple space ship,

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>which is everybody comes in the elevators through the sixth floor,

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>no matter where you work, because it just creates these

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>random interactions and you'd be amazed how often things spiral

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>from that. That collaborative force, collaboration. It's really a very

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>impressive thing when when as it works, it's super important.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And again that goes that feeds our theory that the

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>office and is definitely going to continue to be a

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>part of culture and building culture and creating more from

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the team you have. So wait, let me interrupt you again.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>So the consensus seems to be, Hey, I want to

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 1>invest in real estate, but not offices. They're distressed. Offices

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are going away. Put me into hospitality or farmland, but

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>no office space. You guys aren't buying into that. Well,

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say for office specifically, or what is known

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as traditional office, we're seeing a real bifurcation in demand

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>between with really the greatest man going to the highest quality, newest,

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>best amenetize, most sustainable office buildings. And New York is

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a is a you know, a perfect example. I think

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of what is happening. The office stock in New York

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is very old compared to the giant I don't know,

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I was New York Times, a Wall Street Journal article.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Times about all of this

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>real estate along Park Avenue that we're built in the fifties, sixties,

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>seventies and have none of the amenities that my modern

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>clients want today. And I think it's it goes beyond amenities.

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's also the ability to create flexible space and create

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>open spaces that you can move and change as your

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>company's needs change, gathering places, and so I think that

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>is real, real challenge for older office buildings in New York.

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The average age of an office building is sixty seven

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so and only about seven percent of the office stock

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>in New York is less than ten years old. And listen,

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there's you don't have to be less than ten years

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>old to get the demand. But I would say we're

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing those assets attract much more to and at higher prices,

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and so, uh, we think those are going to come

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>out as more winners in this kind of this. So

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you want little to do with the older spaces. At

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what point do you take a sixty or seventy year

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>old building and say knock it down put up a

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>new one. Well, I would say these traditional office assets

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a relatively small part of our portfolio for

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a while because going back to our thematic investing, our

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolio is eighty percent concentrated in warehouses, rental housing, lab

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>office space, and hospitality assets. So we'll get to biomedical

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 1>research happening. Is that substantial enough that it's an asset

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>class in your because I would imagine there's a lab here,

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>there's lab there. You're saying this is much more substantial,

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>much more substantial. And actually, was I think is super

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that there are a few critical nodes in

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. There's basically our whole portfolio is concentrated really

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in five Cambridge, US, Cambridge, UK, South San Francisco, Seattle,

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>San Diego, and actually now Boulder, Colorado is emerging but

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>these are like we sometimes describe as kind of the

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 1>pulsing heart of research, and there is not enough space

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>actually for all of the demand from biomedical tenants in

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>these places, and going like, how how did we even

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>come upon this theory and why this versus traditional office

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>going I mentioned two thousand six fifteen, going back to

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that period of time when we started recognizing, wow, tastes

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and trends are changing a lot for more traditional office assets,

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and we were quite concerned actually to your question about

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have an older office building, it could be

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>quite expensive to try to repurpose it, reconfigure it to

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>really attract tenants that are are great, the best tenants

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And so we started thinking, Okay, if

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if office is going to be under pressure, are there

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>segments or sub segments of the office market that we

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think will do better. And what we started to realize

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is that there was all of this capital and and

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and really a changing tide in terms of the research

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>demand and dollars being funded into it. Everything from immunotherapies,

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>which of course now we all know a lot about

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>things in the pandemic, genomics, big data intersecting with personalized medicine,

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and and UH and a change also and how and

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>where this research was being done. Like if you think

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>about when I was growing up, all of the big

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical companies had these corporate campuses that were highly securitized

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 1>deep in suburbs. And what started happening is all of

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>those researchers and we want to be in cities adjacent

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to some of the best research institutions in the world,

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and and companies needed to be where they're their talent

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be. And so we UH in two thousand

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen took private a nearly nine billion dollar company called

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>BioMed and really concentrated the business in those best markets

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and then helped it grow. One of the great things

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>about having the capital we have access to is that

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>we were able to help continue to grow their footprint

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in those different cities and then therefore serve the tenants

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that we think are the most attractive in that space.

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And so that is an example of why you can't

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.879
<v Speaker 1>just pay the whole office market with a broadbrush. Lab

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>office was was never a darling of real estate investors

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>until the world changed and and the nature of the

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>research happening, the volume of it and where it was

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>getting done changed, and we I think we're at the

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>forefront of really participating in that for our investors because

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we were looking for, okay, what does a megatrend and

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>what's changing in the world. That's totally fascinating. The lab

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff is really I had no idea it was that huge.

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You can see obviously labs are large and important. I

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 1>just didn't know it was large enough to be a

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>substantial asset class. The other area you have been very

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic about is hospitality sector. You guys are super bullish

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on that. We have been long believers in hospitality, and

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>part of this is just a very long term growing

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>demand trend for hospitality, for experiences, for travel and tourism.

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>If you look at just about any graph of demand

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for air travel, demand for hotel room nights, whether it

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>be leisure or business, you've seen a long term trend

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>up into the right and pretty much only interrupted in

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful way by COVID and the great news I

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think if you're a hospitality owner is that you've seen

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.439
<v Speaker 1>a very strong balance back uh. In fact, I think

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>demand for our hospitality assets is well exceeding what we

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>saw in so we we remain very enthusiastic about it. Now,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Hospitality assets are, you know, a more operational asset class.

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>When you think about if you have a warehouse or

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>rental apartment, you have very limited exposure to labor costs,

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>very limited exposure to capital costs, and so in uh

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 1>inflationary environment, your cash flow growth is can be more

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>robust in those asset classes because you can really you

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>see top line rent growth pushing through to the bottom

0:48:57.040 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>line cash flow. In a hospitality asset, it can be

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>more challenge lenged. But I think the good news is

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that is something that we have a lot of experience

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.760
<v Speaker 1>with and and we have the opportunity as a private

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>investor to to work into our underwriting as we're thinking

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>about buying assets, recognizing the environment you're in, recognizing higher costs,

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we we remain really attracted to attaching ourselves

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the growth in demand for that asset class. So

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the structure for hospitality,

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because I suspect a lot of people may not understand

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 1>when they look at a hotel, any of the big

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>brands with Hilton, whatever, very often individual hotels are owned

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>by separate people, but the management company comes in and

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's of the same management company, but every hotel might

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be distinctly owned by a separate investment group, individual owner,

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:51.959
<v Speaker 1>family owner. How does that challenge your investment process? We were,

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, very accustomed to operating in a world

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 1>where we may own, like we did with Hilton, both

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the real estate and the brand on it. We've actually

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of opportunities in something like that to

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>basically grow the brand and those franchises even onto real

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>estate that the company may not own. Um And then

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's other circumstances where we just own the asset and

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we work in partnership with a brand to help us

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 1>operate in branded and I would say there's great power

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in great brands in real estate, like you know, just

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like any other segment of the economy. One of our

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.919
<v Speaker 1>our hotel companies that we own today is something called

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Great Wolf Lodges. Many of your listeners may have been there.

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's water parks with hotels, and these assets are

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>located within a couple hours driving distance of something like

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of the U S population, and it's a very affordable,

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>attractive drive to destination vacation for families. And so that's

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an example where we've invested in a company that has

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a brand, and we're really trying to propel both the

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate strategy and the brand strategy to help it

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be a growing and faster growing company. As we're speaking

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on looking up the name of the tell in the

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Grand Caymans that I remember collapsing early in the financial

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>crisis because because the underlying owner just kept leveraging and

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>leveraging and leveraging, and somebody very smart in private equity

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>went out and brought up the debt for pennies on

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, and the next time they went to refindance,

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they said, nope, pay, Oh you can't pay. Thanks, we'll

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 1>take that billion dollar hotel. That story is just fascinating.

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>How often do you see sort of unusual crazy investment

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>themes blowing up like that? Well, or is that just

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>leverage and don't Yeah, I would think too much that

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that. I think, you know it sounds I I'm

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit familiar with that story. I'm definitely familiar

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.359
<v Speaker 1>with that hotel. I think it's a U. It's just

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>an example of a capital structure that didn't work and

0:51:55.680 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't prepared to withstand capital structure, and and and that's

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 1>something in the hospitality space. Certainly, you can have cash

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>flows that dip in a in a tougher environment UM

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or if you're not managing it well and you need

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a capital structure really built to withstand it. You mentioned

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that earlier, But every time I think about um a

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hotel that changes hands sort of in a very rapid

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>period of time, it always feels like somebody took on

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>too much, that bad capital structure, not building enough resiliency

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to withstand any sort of change in conditions. Yeah, definitely,

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean in a positive way, and an inflationary environment,

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>hotel has the ultimate short duration least. So so we

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked ab Yeah, average rely sturation one night in

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the hospitality world. And you know, if you're managing it well,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want a great outset, if you have a

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>great capital structure, that can be a really good thing.

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:54.479
<v Speaker 1>And when rates are rising, um. But certainly if if

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not operating it well or if those rates come

0:52:56.480 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>under pressure, it can be really tough of you. So

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about a related hospit fatality issue casinos. The

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court decision said, sorry, Nevada, you don't get to

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be the only state that has gambling. How has this

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>changed the landscape for investing? Is this a growth area

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>or are we pretty well casino up in the United

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>States or or around the world. Well, our focus in

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hotels that have casinos as part of their offering is

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>really trying to find world class destination resorts that have

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>demand drivers beyond just what's going on in that casino.

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>And and actually our most profitable single asset investment ever

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Cosmopolitan Hotel in Las Vegas, which was an

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>investment that we purchased from a bank that had had

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to foreclose in complete construction on the project. And we

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>saw it not just as an opportunity to kind of

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>reset and reset operations versus how a bank was handling it,

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but we tried, we thought really creatively about how could

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we turn this whole opportunity on its head make it

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the coolest place as a destination in Las Vegas. And

0:53:57.200 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we renovated every into the property five million dollars of

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 1>capital invested to not only offer better guest rooms, but

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>also you know, an amazing set of food choices and

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 1>shows and entertainment. And when we sold it also we

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 1>had a very creative exit that that found the right

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>capital for the property itself and a right and the

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>right capital for the operations. And what I think is,

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's just emblematic of buying an asset

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that is somebody might have just said, oh, that's a

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>casino or casino hotel. We saw this as an entertainment

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>destination and a strategy that we can then apply in

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 1>other places as well. We recently took private company in

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Australia called Crown Resorts and it's really taking that same

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:39.359
<v Speaker 1>playbook of how do we how do we transform these

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 1>assets operations in that case as well, you know, really

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>help support a very carefully constructed compliance and legal structure

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>around it as well. Um, but I think you know

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's for us beyond just a casino. It's

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about that whole entertainment and tourism experience we can deliver.

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's look a little bit about multifamily and apartments.

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:03.479
<v Speaker 1>It feels like the financial crisis we have wildly unto

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 1>builds single family homes, multi family homes, large apartment buildings.

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the demand for rentals is a key

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>driver of inflation because they're just ain't enough apartments. What

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 1>does that space look like, yeah, I think you you

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. We as a country, we have not built

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 1>enough housing of all forms since the financial crisis. Depending

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 1>on how you're calculating, it's something like we're short forward

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to six million units. Unbelievable, and it's really like a

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>growth opportunity, really really tough to dig out. And I

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 1>would say the environment we're in is actually making that

0:55:36.239 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>affordability question more challenging because you've seen homebuilders pull back

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>from new construction. It's harder for people to afford to

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>buy a home today. The monthly cost of owning a

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>home is I think something like nationwide one and a

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>half times the rent monthly cost to rent a home,

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and so that is driving demand for rental housing, and

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so that is a big part of why we've continued

0:55:57.880 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>to see rental housing be so resilient and and it's

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>already I would say if you look back to prior

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tough periods, two thousand two ten is not an exception either.

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd say rental housing tends to perform quite well in

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in tougher economic environments. It does really well in inflationary

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>environments as well. I mentioned the shorter duration lease at

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the average lease of a rental house rental apartments about

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a year um. And so these are assets that are

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in great demand today and I think you're poised to

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:28.240
<v Speaker 1>perform well in the environment ahead as well. Lest anybody

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>accused me of suffering from home country bias, which it

0:56:31.200 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly sounds like I have been, let's talk about around

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. Where else does Blackstone see real estate opportunities

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:41.799
<v Speaker 1>outside of the United States. So in our business we

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>invest not only US Canada, but also Western Europe and

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>then across both developed and developing markets. In Asia, it's

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 1>developed meaning Japan, Korea, Australia, and then more developing would

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be India is one of our our biggest markets globally

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and in particular in Asia as well and uh so.

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of what we what we like outside

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the U S, there's a lot of consistency in

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the themes I would say, in terms of logistics, rental housing, hospitality, assets,

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>lab office, every ex Yeah, there's of course nuances in

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:20.360
<v Speaker 1>different markets and and in particular rental housing is not

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>something that exists in the same way and a lot

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of markets around the world, So for example, Australia has

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hardly any official rental housing market the way we would

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have it here. It's just just beginning. There's lots of

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people that own a condo and rented out. There's not

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of owners who own a couple of hundred

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>units and professionally managed it and rent it out and

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and so. But that's just beginning. But that's you know,

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that's an example of where things are a little different

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in different parts of the world. But I do think

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for us, one of the advantages we have of being

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so connected globally is this, as we talked about kind

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the powdern recognition of saying, okay, we had a

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>theme in warehouses that was working really well in the US.

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Where else in the world do we see that and

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe other people don't, And for us that was the

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 1>UK and Western Europe because the UK is having a

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>real hard time. The UK is having a hard time,

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but I would say we um the UK though. For

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the assets where we focus on, which our main focus

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is in the UK, have been warehouses, also really affordable housing,

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>providing an affordable housing capital um that those have been

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest parts of our investment activity in the

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>performance has continued to be very strong there. Let me

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ask you a challenging question. So you talk about Steve

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Schwartzman says, is a pattern recognition. One of the things

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we preach to investors all the time is don't fool

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself with pattern recognition, meaning don't think that every setup

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is the same and oh, this is a great opportunity

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where really only looks a little bit like a previous

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:52.480
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity. How do you protect yourself against being fooled

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>by what looks like, oh I see this pattern when

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not really what what we all think it is.

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think one of the really I mean, I

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say challenging but really fun things about

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:06.959
<v Speaker 1>investing is that the environment does change constantly. So something

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that worked yesterday or transaction you were able to create usterday,

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't create again today, or you shouldn't maybe. And

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the ways we protect ourselves

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>goes back to this process where it is highly collaborative

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>process and we're bringing together insights from all around our business.

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And I would say we we force a lot of

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>connectivity and collaboration between our investment team and our asset

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>management team, who is with our portfolio companies every day

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>creating value. And so What that allows us to do

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is I think spot as early as we probably possibly

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can where things might be changing, where those conditions are changing,

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always that something has turned negative, it

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just maybe less positive. So an example of this would

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be just to keep drawing back to the warehouse example.

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The e commerce revolution and reassoring and supply chain realignment

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>has really propelled demand for all types of warehouse space,

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:05.959
<v Speaker 1>but where it has driven the most rent and cash

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>flow growth is in these more urban areas that are

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more supply constrained almost by nature, less land available, and

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>more demand because tenants really need to be there both

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to access their customers and to reduce the cost of

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>transportation and labor to move goods around. And so we

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>pivoted our portfolio to focus on those markets and assets

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in those markets, away from other elements of the markets

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that are again doing well, doing fine, but just not

1:00:31.200 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>growing as quickly. Our job, we feel, is to end

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>up in the assets with the best possible performance, and

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that leads to shifts that might feel, you know,

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a little nuanced or a little minor at the time,

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately lead to much better outcomes. I feel like

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I am getting on real estate education like no other.

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>If we're talking about real estate of all sorts and

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>capital structure, we obviously have to talk about the cost

1:00:56.480 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of capital and interest rates. Where you, guys, the Federal

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Reserve is obviously really important, Jerome Palace, in the midst

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of a unprecedented rate hiking regime, how do you look

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at what's going on with the Fed? Well, I would

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>say this is an environment that we feel like we've

1:01:15.120 --> 1:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>been preparing for for a long time. For forty years,

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen anything like this since eighty one. Yeah,

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And I would say going back seven or eight years,

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little more, we were spending a lot of

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>time thinking about, Okay, how do we get in ourselves

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>invested in assets that are going to perform well? Should

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we be in a higher inflation, higher interest rate environment.

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The last interest rate spike we saw was mid two

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands leading up to the financial crisis, but that was

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing like one and twenty two. No, and again, it

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that we called this environment. It was more just

1:01:49.440 --> 1:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a recognition that we had been in a very persistently,

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>very low interest rate, very low inflation environment, and we

1:01:57.040 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>started talking with our investors and amongst ourselves a about Okay,

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what happens in the world with higher rates,

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation, maybe sustained geopolitical uncertainty, feels like a lot

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>more gaming difference, just different scenarios. And when you think

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about at the at the most simplistic level, the way

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you value real estate, the way you make money in

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate is it's a combination of your cash flow

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and the multiple you can put on that cash flow.

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>In real estate parlance, it's the inverse of a multiple

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>cap rate to yield. People think about in yields. By

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, when I switched from M and A to

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate, I spent basically eighteen months in my mind

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just converting yields into multiples, because you know, learning relearning

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the lingos of valuation. It's the same thing, you're just

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from different different perspective, just just flip

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it around. And so, you know, what we think about

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is that if you have an environment like the one

1:02:47.800 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in where there's upward pressure on interest rates, therefore

1:02:51.080 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>upward pressure on cap rates or said like another way,

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>downward pressure on multiples. The way to mitigate that is

1:02:58.400 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>through cash flow growth. So you want to be in

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>assets where you can grow cash flows both because as

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a matter of what's happening in the economy, the wind

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>might be at your back, and also because of what

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we can do with our interventions for value creation. And

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a big part of how we ended up

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>with this very concentrated portfolio and warehouses and rental housing

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and lab office and hotels where you have short duration leases,

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so as rents are going up, you can capture that

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>higher rent like short duration bonds, like short duration bonds exactly. Also,

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of those assets, as I mentioned, have

1:03:28.360 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively low input costs, so you're not as exposed to

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>higher input cost pressure in an inflationary environment. And again

1:03:36.400 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you may have headwinds in terms of what's happening with

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>rates or what's then happening with cap rates, but you

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>can still perform well because of the cash flow growth

1:03:44.360 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we're able to generate. And and and there's you know, we're

1:03:46.720 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not just it's making this up. There's precedent for it

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at if you look back to too,

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's nine eighty two, the last time we

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>were in a you know, a significant rate hiking cycle.

1:03:56.640 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You saw that rental growth in apartments opped up with

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation even though actually interestingly, supply was two x what

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it is right now. This this is part of why

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we have confidence. Yes, you could also look in the

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in UK because I think it was between nineteen seventy

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen eighty. UM real estate returns something like sixteen

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>percent in an environment with you very very substantial inflation,

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and so we know again we we wanted to position

1:04:22.320 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios for this environment. And so you know what

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we see happening now is the FED is hard at

1:04:28.760 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>work trying to cool the economy in a way that

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>ideally doesn't you have a tough landing, but you know

1:04:37.280 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that certainly you're seeing some of that comes through to

1:04:40.160 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>our market in the form of more uncertainty. Transaction activity

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>slows down because people are unsure of your what how

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>should I value it? How where can I borrow? Borrowing

1:04:49.760 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>costs have gone up, and and that seems like kind

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of a natural outcome of of what's happening in this environment.

1:04:56.480 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you, um the opposite question of

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>investing during a rising rate environment, how would you respond

1:05:04.880 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to the criticism that some people have floated. Well, of course,

1:05:09.360 --> 1:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>black Stone real estate has done great over the past

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, rates have done nothing but go lower. Their

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>cap structure has been super friendly. You're I'm assuming your

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pushback is doing well in a rising rate environment. Also,

1:05:23.040 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the cost of capital. Yeah, I would say, um,

1:05:27.440 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always something that people who you know seem to

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to say, is like, you know why it's now

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to work anymore for us? Um And there's

1:05:36.080 --> 1:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I've I've heard a lot of different versions of things,

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And I would say we have done this for thirty

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>years in a lot of different parts of the world.

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not in every circumstance have we had ultra low

1:05:46.160 --> 1:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. And I would say we've continued to generate

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>great performance in all of those different types of environments

1:05:52.400 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and all of those different places. And I think it

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is by sticking to this thematic approach, a really discipline

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>approach in terms of what we buy, and then how

1:06:01.320 --> 1:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we capitalize it? And and then importantly how

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do we create value as we own it? I mean, interestingly,

1:06:08.320 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's one of my favorite examples is Japan. So your

1:06:11.840 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Japan should have all the hallmarks of a tough place

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to make money in real estate. You have a shrinking population,

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you have very low cap rates, persistently very low borrowing costs,

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and very low growth, and yet it's been one of

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>our most successful markets ever. And that's partly because of

1:06:29.680 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the transactions we buy. We can buy more,

1:06:33.040 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>do more complicated investments that others maybe can't tackle, larger

1:06:36.600 --> 1:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>situations where we buy portfolios of real estate, not single assets,

1:06:39.680 --> 1:06:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and then we manage the heck out of it. We

1:06:41.560 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do every last thing we can do to create value

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>enhance those cash flows, and that's how we do well.

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And so again, all different kinds of environments can come

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>our way, but I think the process is built to

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>perform in any one of them. Quite fascinating. I know

1:06:57.200 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I only have you for a limited amount of time.

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Four I get to my favorite questions. I have to

1:07:04.040 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ask you about a curve bawl question. Coach Ella, you're

1:07:08.960 --> 1:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you're like a regular Coachella like you don't like By

1:07:13.560 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, when I think of coach Ella, I think

1:07:15.800 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of burning Man and mud pitts Um Coachell is not

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>quite that crazy. But how how often you go to

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.439
<v Speaker 1>this and what what is that experience? Like? Well, I've

1:07:26.440 --> 1:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>been fourteen times. Get out. Well, you're not old enough

1:07:31.640 --> 1:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen times. So you started going when you were twelve.

1:07:34.160 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You're very kind to say that. No. I started going

1:07:37.280 --> 1:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>because my then boyfriend now husband was at business school

1:07:40.880 --> 1:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>at U c. L A. He's super into music, and

1:07:43.480 --> 1:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he drove down there in two thousand six, Um two

1:07:50.080 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>five or six and he um and you went with him.

1:07:53.640 --> 1:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I was not with him at the time, but at

1:07:55.880 --> 1:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that festival and it was so different then you could

1:07:57.720 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>buy single day tickets. It wasn't this whole thing it

1:07:59.880 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is out uh And I remember him calling me and saying,

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to come out next year for this. It's

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so amazing. And even at that first hotel, there were

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so many bands he got exposed to that have become

1:08:11.240 --> 1:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some of our favorites and really just opened us up

1:08:13.280 --> 1:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to listening to a lot of different kinds of music. Um.

1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You the proverbial undercard. If you go all day, you

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot of new and music is a

1:08:21.840 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of alt or Yeah, it's it hasn't. I'd say

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it grew up. I think it's a more alternative rock festival.

1:08:28.320 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And it is really branch now. There's a lot of

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>wrap and dance and E d M. We're still there

1:08:32.800 --> 1:08:36.599
<v Speaker 1>mostly for the rock music, which is a diminishing part

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. I'd say I'm probably, um, you've sort

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of identified it the dorky ist and maybe now getting

1:08:44.120 --> 1:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to the oldest person with the most sun block on

1:08:47.160 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>at the whole festival. My wife and I every time

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>we go into a show, we have a fun little

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>thing we do, which is what's the demographic of the

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>crowd and are we at the bottom of the top

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of that age bread and right now? And then like

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>well walk, So we sort of show. The other day

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a great band called the Fab Fox that the

1:09:06.479 --> 1:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Beatles covers. It's all It's it's letterman, Um, Jimmy Fallon.

1:09:12.680 --> 1:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Their band does this, and we were amazed that they

1:09:15.800 --> 1:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>were like teenagers and twenty somethings singing along, knowing every word.

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, some of the stuff is generational. But

1:09:22.760 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking boomeer rock or classic rock. You're talking um,

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.639
<v Speaker 1>something much more. Give us a few bands that you've

1:09:30.680 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>seen that have stayed with you. What sort of alt

1:09:33.400 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>music U do you like at Coachella? Well, um, probably

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the favorite you know, Coachella experience ever would

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be actually Roger Waters, who played Dark Side of the

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Moon in its entirety, and I was not a Roger

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Waters or Pink Floyd fan before seeing this, and I

1:09:52.920 --> 1:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, including the pig flying and dropping the leaflets,

1:09:56.640 --> 1:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>was so amazing. Uh, it was just it was so

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>memorable in part. And this is not the only example

1:10:02.680 --> 1:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>of this, but it was a band or a performer

1:10:05.880 --> 1:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>where I was kind of like, do I really want

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to stay up laid? My body's jet legged, I've been tired.

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>My Matt makes me go at noon and see all

1:10:12.520 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the early bands and like do I really? One did

1:10:14.280 --> 1:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was so interesting and amazing. Um. There was

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>a similar experience also seeing The Cure for the first time.

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I had always loved the Cure, but it never got

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to show. Oh my gosh, they played so long that

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they were they basically pulled the plug on them and

1:10:29.040 --> 1:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they kept playing off their amps. But you know, Chris,

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the city of Coachella will find them for this, and

1:10:34.360 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>they just kept going. They finally had to, like, you know,

1:10:36.439 --> 1:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>move Robert Smith on the stage. But it was so amazing.

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And I've now seen The Cure many times, but I've

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>never seen The Cure and I was a fan. I

1:10:44.320 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend so I'm gonna out myself. Here's how old

1:10:47.120 --> 1:10:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I am. Freshman year in college, me and my buddy

1:10:51.880 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe go to Nashville Coliseum where we scalp a pair

1:10:56.439 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of tickets for a hundred and seventeen dollars for the

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:04.759
<v Speaker 1>pair for one of the seven original Pink Floyd the Wall.

1:11:05.520 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>My gosh, they did three or four shows in Nassa

1:11:08.479 --> 1:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Calosseum and three or four shows in the l A.

1:11:11.800 --> 1:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the Forum of the Colosseum. And

1:11:14.120 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the only reason we paid that little for the tickets

1:11:16.840 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is the cops had come out on high stepping horses

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're clearing everybody out, and I remember saying to

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>the guy, you got about thirty seconds before you're holding

1:11:24.640 --> 1:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>two worthless pieces of paper and we had cash. He

1:11:27.560 --> 1:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>literally snatched the cash from our hands, gave us tickets.

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>The cops come to us and we're like, we got tickets,

1:11:33.080 --> 1:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and we went running. Missed the first I don't know,

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>three minutes of the show. Astounding, right, that's how old

1:11:39.920 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I am. Well, I would say one of the one,

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of mentioned it. It has been you

1:11:45.560 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 1>find it interesting to see live music not only come

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>back to post pandemic. But I think people take real

1:11:51.000 --> 1:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>interest in this. And Matt, my husband, I talked about

1:11:53.160 --> 1:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. He tells it maybe a similar

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>story where he I forget what year it was, but

1:11:57.760 --> 1:12:01.639
<v Speaker 1>he saw Radiohead at Radio City Music Hall and he

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was offended that he had he scalped a ticket for

1:12:04.040 --> 1:12:06.519
<v Speaker 1>like thirty five dollars or something like this. We don't

1:12:06.520 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>really understand how, you know, how does like a Pearl

1:12:08.880 --> 1:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Jam concert and MSG work where the whole thing sells

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>out at a certain price. Why isn't put Why isn't

1:12:14.920 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Pearl Jam just selling the tickets for a lot more.

1:12:16.680 --> 1:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of an interesting question, But there's a monopoly

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and be all the secondary sellers have the firepower to that.

1:12:24.200 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like in the markets, Hey, do you want to

1:12:26.320 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>go up against Goldman Sachs trading desk as a day trader?

1:12:29.520 --> 1:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're stupid, you do. But ordinary people can't compete,

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and ordinary people can't buy tickets because all the bots

1:12:36.240 --> 1:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing their things. I could. I could whine about

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:41.639
<v Speaker 1>this for hours. Sounds like we need another podcast, Yeah

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I won't. Instead, I'm going to jump to our favorite questions.

1:12:45.080 --> 1:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So normally I would ask what are you streaming? But

1:12:47.880 --> 1:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're past streaming. Let's talk about what are

1:12:50.320 --> 1:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you listening to today? So I have Phoebe Bridgers on repeat,

1:12:54.600 --> 1:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>listening to her constantly. I will check that out. Tell

1:12:57.520 --> 1:12:59.479
<v Speaker 1>us about some of your mentors who helped to shape

1:12:59.520 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>your career. I think mentorship is like a constellation of

1:13:03.080 --> 1:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>people that, in my case, so many different people at

1:13:06.800 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>any different times. Sorry, um, you know two of my

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:14.519
<v Speaker 1>incredible mentors actually themselves are friends. So I worked when

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I was like Goldman, very closely with Bram Kramer, who

1:13:17.520 --> 1:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>taught me a lot about, you know, just not only

1:13:20.120 --> 1:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>being a great investor, but i'd say also a great

1:13:22.080 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>manager of people. And I think interestingly, maybe not surprisingly,

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it turns out he's close friends with John Gray, who

1:13:28.120 --> 1:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>has been an incredible mentor and sponsor to me and

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>every single day challenges me to be better and work

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:39.639
<v Speaker 1>harder and think more carefully at black Stone. Um, let's

1:13:39.640 --> 1:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about books. What are some of your favorites and

1:13:41.400 --> 1:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you reading right now? I love to read.

1:13:44.200 --> 1:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I would break what I'm reading into two categories, what

1:13:46.640 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading to my children and then what I'm reading myself.

1:13:49.160 --> 1:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So what I reading my children is. Um, we've been

1:13:51.680 --> 1:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>working our way to the kids love it. No, we've

1:13:56.560 --> 1:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>been reading the Royal Doll books, which somehow, even though

1:13:59.720 --> 1:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I grew in a family of reading, which I never

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>read this yeah, oh yeah, and I somehow missed those

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>as a child. So I really enjoyed reading Charlie Chocolate Factory,

1:14:06.920 --> 1:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and Matilda and the Witches and all of those fun things.

1:14:11.800 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a seven year old and a ten year old.

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of Harry Potter happening in our

1:14:17.280 --> 1:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>house too. I'm actually movies books um I read when

1:14:22.160 --> 1:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the kids were growing up. You can watch the movies,

1:14:25.160 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but only after you read the books. So all the

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kids had to read the book and then go watch

1:14:29.479 --> 1:14:31.519
<v Speaker 1>My Tenerald I think has read all the Harry Potter's

1:14:31.520 --> 1:14:33.559
<v Speaker 1>like four times at this point, I'm listening to them

1:14:33.560 --> 1:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on audiobook now their endless. It seems like there's a

1:14:37.600 --> 1:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>different one every other year. So they they they're so

1:14:41.560 --> 1:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>versed in all of it that I was not able

1:14:43.200 --> 1:14:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with dinner table conversations. So now listening

1:14:45.439 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to them again because otherwise I'm not gonna be able

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to keep up. And then for myself, it's funny. I

1:14:49.520 --> 1:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>love reading novels. But I really enjoyed in the past

1:14:53.439 --> 1:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years reading Patrick read and Keith's books. He

1:14:56.760 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called Say Nothing, which was about the

1:14:59.120 --> 1:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>troubles in Northern Ireland. UM. And now I'm reading something

1:15:03.240 --> 1:15:06.959
<v Speaker 1>called Empire Pain, which is about, um, basically the opioid

1:15:06.960 --> 1:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>crisis and how that came about. And it can be

1:15:09.400 --> 1:15:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a little heavy, but it's so interesting. But it's written

1:15:11.960 --> 1:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>really well in such a compelling way. The one they

1:15:15.160 --> 1:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up making the film about. It's possible. I am

1:15:20.000 --> 1:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so behind on movies and TV shows. Well, my husband

1:15:24.320 --> 1:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tells me that during the pandemic, when everyone else was

1:15:26.640 --> 1:15:29.479
<v Speaker 1>making their way through the full Netflix catalog, I didn't

1:15:29.479 --> 1:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>watch a single show, So I gotta come on, you

1:15:32.120 --> 1:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't watch The Crown. I did. I had post like

1:15:35.360 --> 1:15:37.679
<v Speaker 1>post deep pandemic. I And now that I've been gotten

1:15:37.720 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>back to traveling, I binge watched The Crown. Um, I've

1:15:41.600 --> 1:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>watched Marvelous Mrs Maysl. I love that so so good. Ye,

1:15:44.680 --> 1:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so you you caught the Highlight so I know somebody

1:15:48.600 --> 1:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>who is involved and no spoilers. UM, but one of

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the things I'm like halfway through the most recent season

1:15:57.080 --> 1:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh, so, I guess she's gonna die soon,

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, no, no, that's next season. We have

1:16:02.640 --> 1:16:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the last season. She's still around a lot of material. Yeah,

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>they have endless material. Although there's some complaints this season

1:16:08.560 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is inaccurate, I don't care. It's just the most gorgeous,

1:16:12.520 --> 1:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>beautifully told stories, and even if you're not an anglophile,

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just fascinating. So digression side, let's get to our

1:16:22.160 --> 1:16:25.519
<v Speaker 1>last two questions. What sort of advice would you give

1:16:25.560 --> 1:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to a recent college grad who was interested in a

1:16:27.920 --> 1:16:31.479
<v Speaker 1>career neither real estate investing or finance or m and

1:16:31.520 --> 1:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>A or any of the things that you have done

1:16:34.240 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so successfully. I would say to have a long and

1:16:39.720 --> 1:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>great career focus on your writing skills, and that sometimes

1:16:44.160 --> 1:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think is a counterintuitive for a job that's more

1:16:46.880 --> 1:16:50.479
<v Speaker 1>considered matthew and analytical, And of course those are basic

1:16:50.560 --> 1:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental skills you absolutely need to have. But I think

1:16:53.240 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when I when I think about my career or what

1:16:56.160 --> 1:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has created the best opportunities for me, it often comes

1:16:58.439 --> 1:17:01.479
<v Speaker 1>about because it's we need to come communicate something either

1:17:01.520 --> 1:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to our investment committee or to our investors, or increasingly

1:17:05.120 --> 1:17:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to a much broader group of stakeholders that include elected

1:17:07.560 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>officials and tenants and community members and activists, all of

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>whom you are are touching our business in some way.

1:17:13.840 --> 1:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that ability to take ideas that can

1:17:16.080 --> 1:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>be rather complicated or sometimes seem a bit foreign to

1:17:19.760 --> 1:17:22.519
<v Speaker 1>others and really put them into terms that are clear

1:17:22.600 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and compelling and understandable is super important. That that's really interesting.

1:17:27.120 --> 1:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Final question, what do you know about the world of

1:17:29.800 --> 1:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>investing today that you wish you knew twenty plus years

1:17:33.720 --> 1:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>or so ago when you were first getting started. I

1:17:36.240 --> 1:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think at the time, I wish I knew

1:17:38.479 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 1>just how interesting this work would stay for so long

1:17:43.600 --> 1:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and how many amazing people I would get to work with,

1:17:47.800 --> 1:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly a blackstone. But when I think about the people

1:17:49.840 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>who lead our companies or folks in the industry, I

1:17:53.479 --> 1:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>now know opportunities like this to talk to you like they.

1:17:57.479 --> 1:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I spent a lot of the early days

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of my career worrying about how long will I do this?

1:18:02.160 --> 1:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Or should I be doing this a lot longer? And

1:18:05.439 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>if I had just kind of thrown myself into like, wow,

1:18:07.520 --> 1:18:09.799
<v Speaker 1>let's just enjoy every moment with all of these people

1:18:09.840 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>who are intellectually curious and smart and hard working, and

1:18:14.200 --> 1:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I've had the good fortune of always being with teams

1:18:16.840 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that were super collaborative and supportive. I wish I had

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>known that, because I think I would have had a

1:18:22.640 --> 1:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>lot more confidence of just every day enjoying the moment

1:18:25.840 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 1>that was really fascinating. Thank you, Kathleen for being so

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:33.519
<v Speaker 1>generous with your time. We have been speaking with Kathleen McCarthy.

1:18:33.560 --> 1:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>She is the global co head of real estate Investing

1:18:37.280 --> 1:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for Blackstone, running it's nearly uh six hundred billion dollars

1:18:43.040 --> 1:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in real estate investments. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:18:47.439 --> 1:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>please check out any of the previous four hundred and

1:18:50.360 --> 1:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty interviews we've done over the past uh eight years.

1:18:55.360 --> 1:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you

1:19:00.040 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>find your favorite podcasts. UH. Follow me on Twitter at

1:19:03.880 --> 1:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>rid Halts. Check out all of the Bloomberg podcasts at

1:19:07.600 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast uh. You can sign up for my daily reading

1:19:12.040 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>list at Rid Halts dot com. I would be remiss

1:19:15.400 --> 1:19:17.559
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank the cract team who helps

1:19:17.640 --> 1:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>put these conversations together each week. Justin Milner is my

1:19:23.160 --> 1:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>audio engineer. Uh Atico val Bron is our project manager.

1:19:27.600 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Sean Russo is my head of research. Paris Wold is

1:19:31.040 --> 1:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>my producer. I'm Barry Dhults. You have been listening to

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio.