WEBVTT - The Prosecution

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Before we begin, please be aware this episode contains discussions

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>around infant deaths and other difficult topics. Please take care

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>while listening.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>They told me that's stirring a lot more destinate.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 3>I think, did you have any concerns that the glass.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Arise in Mortality Day?

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>So tell me about what concerns did you.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 4>I think we don't just.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Notice till the teenagers and start there discours and last

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>competive previous years.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching a short clip from Lucy Leppy's police interrogation.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not long, but it's hard to watch. What strikes

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>me immediately is how small she seems in the room.

0:00:54.520 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>She sits quietly, her shoulders rounded, her voice low. She

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>answers questions carefully, not defensively, not forcefully, but with a

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of deference, as if she's already accepted that the

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>people across the table control what happens next. I hesitate

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>even to say that out loud, because I know how

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>dangerous interpretation can be. And I also know that plenty

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of others convinced of Lucy let Bee's guilt have watched

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this video and seen a wolf in sheep's clothing. I

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was called that too, and I can still remember when

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>my own body took on that posture, that sense of

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>being trapped inside a process you don't fully understand, where

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>every word feels like it can make things worse. Yeah,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, watching interrogation videos is not fun for me.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Here you were asking why am I was dressed? I

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 5>was scared. It was after long hourity vening, middle of

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 5>the night. I were the innocent. They were telling me

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 5>that I was feel.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>My own interrogation began much the way Lucy's did. At first,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I responded the same way, carefully, dutifully trying to cooperate,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>believing if I was calm, honest, if I just explained

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>myself clearly enough, the situation would resolve itself. And then

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as the pressure built, something shifted. They accused me of

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>lying repeatedly. I became desperate to be believed, but all

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I could do was repeat the truth, and that never

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed to satisfy them. I'm telling you what I know.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you believe me? I thought maybe it was

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>my bad Italian, that it was my fault. They were

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>getting so angry as they get me into doubting my

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>own memories, as they threatened me with thirty years in prison.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>As they slapped me, I didn't know what was true

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or not anymore.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 3>A part of me even began to doubt myself.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where my mind goes when I watch this video

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of Lucy, that feeling that the people asking me questions

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't looking for the truth, but for confirmation of a

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>guilt they've already assumed. I spoke about Lucy's police interview

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>with journalist Rachel Levive, who covered the let Be case

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for The New Yorker. Rachel had spent several weeks reading

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the full transcript, and I wanted to know what she

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>made of them.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 6>I could see sort of the disorientation of being accused

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 6>of something that felt like a very alien concept, and

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 6>just like not knowing how to talk about it. It

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 6>was like an incongruous thing in her life that she

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 6>had no language for even sort of comprehending how she

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 6>had got there. And I think you could see her

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 6>when she was in the police interview, just like not

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 6>quite getting it and sort of answering but not really

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 6>defending herself, just sort of trying to be a good student,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 6>trying to be like an obedient nurse in a way,

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 6>and also kind of giving the authorities the benefit of

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 6>the doubt, Like she seemed like someone who really did

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 6>trust authority, And it was almost as if she was saying, like,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 6>if they think I did something wrong, maybe I really did.

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I deeply empathize with that.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 6>That seemed to be the state that she was in

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 6>a lot for the police interviews at least, and even

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 6>for the trial, sort of like just a sense of

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 6>grief that she was finding herself in that position.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The interrogation room and the courtroom are very different spaces,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but they are connected. The assumptions formed in one quietly

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>set the terms of the other, and it was within

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>those terms that the prosecution presented its case. So when

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Lucy let Bee finally took the stand, she wasn't starting

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>from zero. She was stepping into a story that had

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>already been written about her, and every pause, every careful answer,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>every attempt to explain herself was now filtered through that story,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not in the interrogation room, but in front of twelve jurors.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>This episode is about how that story was told. I'm

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Knox and from Vespucci and iHeart Podcasts. This is

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Doubt The Case of Lucy let Be Episode four the prosecution.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's October tenth, twenty twenty two. Rain drizzles over Manchester

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Crown Court. Inside the air is heavy. For the first time,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Lucy letb steps into the court. After three and a

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>half years of investigation, thousands of interviews and mountains of evidence,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>police handed their case to the Crown Prosecution Service. Manchester

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Crown Court sits right in the city center, a working

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>courthouse built for volume. It's not grand or ceremonial. It's practical, busy,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the kind of place where life changing things happen in

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>rooms that look almost ordinary.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 7>Manchester Crown Court is a relatively modern building. It is

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 7>slightly decaying, I have to say, long corridors not particularly

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 7>public friendly.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That's kim pelling again. The journalist who was in the

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>court at the time.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 7>It's probably fifteen courtrooms in the building. I was in

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 7>Court seven. From my perspective as a reporter, gave you

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 7>a very good front, real seat. The stage was all

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 7>set in front of you.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The public gallery is small, seats are scarce. Everyone is

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>packed into a room waiting for a trial that comes.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Nearly seven years after the first alarms were raised.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 7>The public galleries was divided into two sides as you

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 7>walked through the entrance. The left hand side where I sat,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 7>maybe I have fifteen or to push. So there was

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 7>three four seats available to the press and that was it.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 7>Let Bemum and Dad, John and Sue were on the

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 7>right hand side, and then on the other side were

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 7>the families of the victims and we were sat in

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 7>front of them on the front row of the public gallery,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 7>nearest to the dock. In the well of the court

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 7>was the judge, Mister Justice Goss, and then in front

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 7>of us were the various lawyers, including the League Council

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 7>for the prosecution, Nick Johnson, King's Council and Ben Meyers

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 7>for the defense Ben Meyers, King's Council. And then behind

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 7>them we had the Charity of twelve.

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the defendant, a face most people there knew

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>only through photographs printed after her arrest, frozen beneath headlines

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>describing the charges she now faced.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 7>There was great anticipation ahead of let be coming into

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 7>the stock you were going to see in person, and

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 7>of course there's a great curiosity is to her appearance

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 7>and how she conveys.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Herself for the first time.

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>The jury of four men and eight women were able

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to assess this so called monster for themselves. But for

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Kim at least, what he saw was.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 7>Nothing that stood out, So she wasn't particularly expressive. She

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 7>looked tired and strained. It was hard to get a

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 7>handle on her from the start. Really, she didn't fit

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 7>the characterization of some of the accused of such monstrous crimes, unfortunately,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 7>rather banal realities that they had looked often just like anybody,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 7>any normal person that you just passed the street without thinking.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>The clerk asks her name. Lucy let Be confirms, and

0:09:52.880 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then the charges seven counts of murder, fifteen counts of

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>attempted murder. Twenty two times they're read out, and twenty

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>two times she replies not guilty. The judge rules all

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty two charges are to be tried together. That would

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>mean after both opening statements, there would be twenty five

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks of prosecution evidence before the defense could even counter.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>For us listeners, you may be interested to know that

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in British courts there are highly experienced senior lawyers who

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are given the title King's Counsel or often shortened to KC,

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with English prosecuting lawyers being part of the Crown prosecution service,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because theoretically, right at the top of the criminal judicial

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>system in Britain is the King. So in every case

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>it's always the monarch versus the defendant, and in this

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>case it was Rex, you know, like King versus Lucy

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>let Be.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 8>As I have already told you, a large quantity of

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 8>paperwork from the hospital was recovered.

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>What you are hearing now is an actor reading sections

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>from the court transcript of Nick Johnson, k C, the

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor in the case, giving his opening statement. Prosecutors don't

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just present facts, They organize them. They decide what comes first,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>what follows, and how quickly the picture takes shape. Evidence

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is paced, arranged and built over time. So in that

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>room the prosecution aren't just presenting evidence, they are telling

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a story.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 8>In addition to the paperwork relating to some of the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 8>children I have told you about and other children, they

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 8>also found some other interesting items.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Nick Johnson's opening ran for ninety four pages, three days

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in court, three days of evidence previewed, themes introduced, and

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a narrative laid carefully into place, and the image Johnson

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>chose to end on the one he left ringing in

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom wasn't medical charts or expert testimony. It was

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a post it note found in Lucy Letbe's home.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 8>There were some post it notes, you know what I mean,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 8>those little yellow tabula notes with closely written words on them,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 8>some of which included the names of her colleagues. On

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 8>some of the notes were phrases like why, how has

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 8>this happened? What process has led to this current situation?

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 8>What allegations have been made? And by whom do they

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 8>have retch evidence to support their comments. In her writings,

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 8>she expressed frustration at the fact that she wasn't being

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 8>allowed back onto the neonatal unit, and she wrote, I

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 8>haven't done anything wrong and they have no evidence, so

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 8>why have I had to hide away? And her notes

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 8>also expressed concern for the long term effects of what

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 8>she feared was being alleged against her. There are also

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 8>many protestations of innocence, but I want to show you

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 8>one note in particular. There's all sorts of material on

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 8>this document, but just where that gross is now, just

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 8>to the right of that, it says I don't deserve

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 8>to live. I killed them on purpose because I'm not

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 8>good enough to take care of them. I am a horrible,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 8>evil person. At the bottom, I am evil. I did this. Well,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 8>ladies and gentlemen, that, in a nutshell is your task

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 8>in this case. You have to decide on the evidence

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 8>whether she did do these things or any of them.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 8>It is important to remember that the prosecution brings this

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 8>case and therefore we, the prosecution, must prove it. And

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 8>in order to prove it, we must make you sure.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, my lord.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's kim pelling again.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 7>The posit notes were, yeah, I'd said, they were a

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 7>key moment in that. I think it was purposefully done

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 7>to sort of say, I'm finally to the jury. We've

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 7>given you all this information as to how we think

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 7>she's the killer on the unit. And it is a

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 7>little bit more so, that's a very striking visual piece

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 7>of evidence for the jury. So we got that very

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 7>early on, and of course you look at that and

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 7>you think, ah, well, this could be game over already. Here.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, this person's literally confessed to what she done.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>By the time the prosecution finished its opening, the tone

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the trial had already been set before the jury

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>heard a single doctor, before a single scan or blood

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>result was put on screen. The question of what that

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>note meant, a confession or a fragment of despair twisted

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>into evidence would be argued later, but for now, this

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was the frame through which the jury would begin to

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>hear months of dense medical evidence, timelines, collapses, charts, and

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>expert opinion, not in a vacuum, but under the shadow

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of words already hanging in the room. I am evil.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I did this.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Along with the handwritten notes recovered from Lucy Leppy's home,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution would go on to present a wide range

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of other evidence. They placed text messages and social media

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>activity alongside events on the neonatal unit, time stamped exchanges

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes read like real time commentary and were used

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to suggest how Lucy reassured her colleagues that sudden collapses

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>were simply natural deteriorations. In an attempt to deflect suspicion.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>One of these text messages, Lucy wrote, it was the

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>hardest thing I've ever had to do. Just a big

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>shock for us, all hard coming in tonight and seeing

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the parents XX. An exchange between one colleague read we

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lost baby D, to which her colleague replies, what, but

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>she was improving? What happened? Wanta chat? I can't believe

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you were on again. You're having such a tough time.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>In another exchange, a colleague wonders, what's happening on the unit.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>There's something odd about that night and the other three

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that went so suddenly. Lucy replies, well, baby C was tiny,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously compromised in utero, BABYD septic.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 3>It's baby A. I can't get my head around.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>The jury was also shown a chart that the Crown

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>said revealed that let Be was the one constant presence

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>across the deaths and collapses, including a shift from incidents

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>happening overnight to happening during the day once Lucy's own

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>shift patterns changed. But central to the case were the

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>medical records themselves. These medical records were used to establish

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the baby's conditions before and after each collapse, to argue

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that some recoveries were two it was sudden to be natural,

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and to allege that notes and timings had been altered

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to distance Lucy let Be from critical moments. The prosecution

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>then laid out the different mechanisms by which they alleged

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>harm had been done.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>There was so many different ways that they said that

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>let Bey had killed or harmed these babies, which in

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>itself was strange to begin with.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Napton, science editor for the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was following the trial closely.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 2>But they said she had, over a period of over

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, had been purposely inflicting harmon

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>babies in various ways. In some cases, they said she

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>had injected air into their bloodstream, which caused a blockage

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>en anati stable item and they went into cardiako restident

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 2>some of them died. In other cases, they said she

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>injected air into the stomach, which that has the effect

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of making the stomach in large, and then that pushes

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 2>up into the diaphragm, which is controlling the lungs coming

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 2>in and out. So if the diaphragms constricted and can't

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>sutly pumped the lungs, then the baby can't get a

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>toxic generic and it collapses. In other cases, they said

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>she'd put insulin into feedbacks so that the babies had

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>too much insulin. There was another case where they said

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 2>she dislodged the tube of a baby, another case where

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 2>she'd injected milk into the baby's stomach to cause it

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>to vomit and destabilize. There was another incident when they

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 2>said she smothered the baby.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>In most serial murder trials, the prosecution points to a

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>single consistent method orm O. Here they were asking the

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>jury to accept seven different mechanisms of harm, from insulin

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>poisoning in two babies, air injected into the bloodstream of others,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>physical interference with breathing, and in so cases, a method

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they said had never before been described, forcing air into

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>baby's stomachs until they could no longer breathe.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>It was a.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Theory that had no clear precedent in the medical literature,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and one that some doctors unconnected to the case said

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that they had never encountered. But the Crown's expert witnesses

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>told the jury it was possible and that it had happened.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Here the jury would hear from dozens of witnesses, not

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>just experts, but also nurses, doctors, and parents, But one

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>voice would become the spine of the medical case, and

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he was the first expert witness called. Here are actors

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>reading court transcripts, Could.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 8>You please state your full name.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Dr Evans, Dr Dewwie Richard Fans.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 8>Thank you. You are I understand a consultant pediatrician. I

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 8>am Could you please inform the jury when you first

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 8>qualified medically.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 9>I qualified from the Welsh National School of Medicine in

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 9>nineteen seventy one and carried out my first pediatric post

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 9>eighteen months later.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, as you may recall from earlier episodes, doctor Evans

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>or the Welsh Wizard, had never treated any of the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>babies in this case. He had never worked at the

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Countess of Chester Hospital. He was actually retired and had

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>reached out to police to volunteer himself as an expert

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>witness in this case. But his role was different. Doctor

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Evans was there to look backward, to read the medical notes,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>reconstruct collapses and tell the jury what those records meant, What,

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in his opinion, could explain what had happened to these

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>babies and what could not.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 8>Having passed through the various stages of training, could you

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 8>confirm that you later became a National Health Service clinical

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 8>consultant pediatrician.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I was appointed consultant pediatrician in Swansea in nineteen.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Eighty Before any individual child was discussed, Before any allegation

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was examined, the court spent hours establishing who he was,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>his decades in neonatology, his role building intensive care services,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>his long experience as an expert witness in criminal and

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>family courts. This mattered because from this point on, much

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of what the jury would hear about how these babies died,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>whether their collapses were natural, accidental, or deliberate, would be

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>filtered through doctor Evans's conclusions. He wasn't just another witness,

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He was the lens, and as the prosecution made clear,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they were asking the jury to trust that lens, case

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>by case, baby by baby as the medical foundation of

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>everything that would follow. The prosecution began with Baby A,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a premature infant who collapsed and died shortly after birth.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>The allegation was air embolism, air entering the bloodstream.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 2>So essentially, an air embolism is where a pocket of

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>air and air bubble is injected into a vane on

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the body and things need to run freely so that

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>oxygen the blood can run to the heart and the

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>lungs and everything gets oxygen into that and then gets

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the brain. If you have an air bubble in that system,

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>as you can imagine, it's basically forming a little buckage,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>and that can cause no problem with the brain. It

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>can cause problem with the heart.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's actors again, reading court transcripts of doctor Evans's testimony

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>about Baby A's possible cause of death.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 8>Yes, finally, on baby A, please, doctor Evans. The means

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 8>by which air could have been inserted into a baby's

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 8>circulation from what you know of the way in which

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 8>Baby A was being treated, What are the possibilities?

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, there are only two really, sorry, there's only one. Really.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 9>The air would have gone through an intravenous line, and

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 9>that can only occur in two ways, accidentally or on purpose,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 9>and that's it. Some time ago I obtained a copy

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 9>of all the intravenous bits and pieces of equipment used

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 9>at the Chester hospital, which we're all familiar with. We're

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 9>all familiar with these lines from visiting people in hospital,

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 9>an intravenous bag line. I won't go through the whole bit,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 9>but doctors, nurses, we're so obsessive about ensuring that air

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 9>does not get into the system. You know, we're absolutely

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 9>obsessive about it and always have been. And it's much

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 9>better now than so. Having rigged up the system that

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 9>was used in Chester, and it's in a room in

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 9>this court, in this building, so we could demonstrate it

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 9>if necessary, I rigged it all up. There's no way

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 9>air could have got into baby A by accident. You know,

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 9>the fail safe systems, the monitoring, the alarm setups which

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 9>have been present for you know, a couple of decades.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 9>I suppose ensures that this is not something that can

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 9>occur accidentally.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, no ambiguity, no alternative explanation offered. The problem

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with air embolism is that it leaves no DNA. It's

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to prove. But here doctor Evans was pointing to

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a red flag all over the baby's skin.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Dr Dowie Evans based his confusion of air embolism on

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a skin rush, largely so in many of the babies.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>There was a splitting pink rush that is recorded in

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 2>some cases and the doctors talk about it in other

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>cases which had its mottled appearance, and it came and

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 2>went and they said it was evidence of our embolism. Now,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the papers, or pretty much the only paper

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 2>they based that on, was a paper by a very

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 2>very eminent ponetologist and Canada called doctor shoe Lee's.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Now remember the name doctor shoe Lee because his paper

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and what he has to say about it will later

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>become vitally important. But for Now, doctor Evans was very

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>keen on emphasizing the importance of this study to the jury.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Evans argue is that the paper supports what the

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor is at the hospital suspected that these types of

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>rashes are indicative of an air embolism.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 9>So therefore what we've got here is bright pink vessels

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 9>against the generalely cyanosed cutaneous, you know, relating to the skin.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 9>So the fact that it's bright pink, now that is remarkable.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 9>It's very unusual. It shouldn't be pink, you know. Or

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 9>if it's pink, why has the baby collapsed? It doesn't

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 9>make sense. Their interpretation is absolutely correct.

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Then there was baby E. Baby E had died of

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gastro intestinal bleeding. Doctor Evans was not asked to name

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a precise cause. He was asked something narrower, whether there

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was any evidence this could have happened naturally.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 9>There is no evidence at all that this was a

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 9>natural phenomenon. It is not something I have ever seen

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 9>in my decades of neonatology and hands on clinical practice.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Again, certainty, not unlikely, not rare, not unexplained. In doctor

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Evans's view, impossible to attribute to nature. This was the

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pattern the prosecution established case by case, sudden collapse, no

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>natural explanation, expert opinion that deliberate harm was the only answer.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Over the months that followed, doctor Evans was recalled repeatedly,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>each time addressing a different baby and a different cause

0:28:54.680 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of death. If the medical evidence alone wasn't enough to

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>convince the jury, it didn't.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Stand on its own.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Alongside the expert testimony came stories from doctors, nurses, hospital managers,

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and parents. Accounts of moments that felt wrong, of sudden collapses,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of patterns noticed only in hindsight, of suspicions that grew

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>quietly then hardened. One of the most striking came from

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>doctor Robb Jayram.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 3>He told the.

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Jury about the early hours of February seventeenth, twenty sixteen,

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>when he went to check on baby k. He said

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that when he entered the nursery, he saw Lucy letb

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>quote standing by the incubator and the ventilator. Doctor Jayram

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>testified that the infant's blood oxygen levels were in the

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>eighties and falling, and that mislet Be was doing nothing

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to respond. It was a moment the prosecution returned to

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>again and again. A still image frozen in time, a

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor's interpretation of inaction presented as intent. But arguably the

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>most emotionally powerful testimony came from the parents. The mother

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of baby D told Manchester Crown Court about being pushed

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>into the neonatal unit and noticing a nurse nearby.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Quote.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I was pushed into the neonatal unit. She was sort

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of hovering around my baby but not doing much. She

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>had a clipboard to take notes and she was sort

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of looking at a machine, but I didn't understand what

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>she was doing. When she asked if everything was okay

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>she said, The response was calm, stating I asked if

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>everything was okay, and she said yes, she's I would

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have expected her to leave us, but she just stuck

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>around and was sort of just watching, looking over us.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to tell her to go away, to give

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>us some privacy. That idea of hovering of watching was

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seized on by the prosecution.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 3>These moments mattered.

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They didn't prove how the babies died, They didn't explain

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms or causes, but they did something else. They gave

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution's case human weight. They turned timelines and charts

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>into lived experience, and for the jury. Grief did what

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence alone sometimes can't. It made the story feel real.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>In essence, what the jury heard was a web of

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>circumstantial evidence, professional judgment layered on professional judgment, each account

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>reinforcing the last, and all of it arrived in a

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>courtroom where the jury went home every night. In the UK,

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>juries are not sequestered. They're instructed not to read coverage,

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>not to search the case, but they're still living inside

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the same media environment as everyone else. Headlines had been written,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>narratives had been established. By the time this trial began,

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Lucy Letby was already known to the public as the

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>nurse accused of murdering babies. The prosecution didn't need to

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>introduce that context.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>It was already there.

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And yet, for all of this, the testimony, the timelines,

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the suspicions, there was still a conspicuous absence at the

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>center of the case. No one ever testified to seeing

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Lucy let Be harm a baby, no eyewitnesses, no moment

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>where someone could say I saw her do this. What

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>remained then was the authority of expertise. Because here's the thing.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution didn't rely on one expert. They called seven

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seven medical experts brought in to interpret collapses, rashes, blood results, patterns,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and to tell the jury why those things were important.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And the defense they didn't call a single medical expert,

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not one. The only external person who testified on Lucy

0:33:55.040 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>let Bey's behalf was a hospital plumber. That's it, in

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a trial that lasted ten months. We will look into

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>why this might have been in future episodes, but for now,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>what's important to note is that imbalance. It mattered, not

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>just legally but psychologically, because when science is complex and

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>explanations are hard to follow, numbers can begin to stand

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in for certainty.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 4>So there was layer upon layer of gosh, how can

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 4>she possibly be innocent? Amongst all this, seven experts appeared

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 4>for the prosecution, none appeared for the defense, and seven

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 4>doctors who worked at the hospital stood up and said,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 4>we think she's guilty. So there were fourteen medical experts

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 4>who said she was guilty, so purely on the numbers,

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, as sometimes in a jury 're baffled by

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 4>all the science, and it was complicated. But if you

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 4>think this is fourteen zero, you got fourteen experts up

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 4>here think she's guilty zero speaking up for it.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Next time, I'm on Doubt the Case of Lucy Letbie.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 8>No direct evidence of Lucy doing anything wrong. In fact,

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 8>the opposite.

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 4>The thing that was a big red flag for me

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 4>as a doctor about delwy Evans, who's the lead prosecution expert,

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 4>is his certainty.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 10>He's not a lawyer. He shouldn't be about winning and Lucy.

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 10>He's about giving his expert opinion. But he's never lost

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 10>a case, so he's a hired gun really for the prosecution.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Doubt The Case of Lucy Letbe is brought to you

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>by Vespucci, iHeart Podcasts and Knox Robinson Productions. I've been

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>your host Amanda Knox. This episode was written and produced

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>by Natalia Rodriguez. The co producer was Lucy Ditchmont. The

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>assistant producer was Amy Gill. The sound designer is Tom Biddle.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The theme music was written by Tom Biddle. Voice acting

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>by Paul Leaming and David Charles, story editing by Kathleen Goldheard.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Legal advice was provided by Jack Browning. The producers at

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Podcasts are Chandler Mays and Katrina Norville.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 3>The executive producers.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Were Joe Meek, Amanda Knox, Christopher Robinson, Daniel Turkin. And

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Galvin, thank you for listening.