WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US Eco Preview, Iran Election, US-China Relations

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a look at GDP and PC data here in the

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>US what that could mean to federal reserve policy going forward.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. I'm Stephen Carol in London.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Who We're looking ahead to the presidential election in Iran

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and asking what shifts, if any, it could mean in

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the country's foreign policy.

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm Derek Prisner, looking at US China relations as presidential

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 4>candidates Biden and Trump prepared to debate.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 5>ey Loove, the three own, New York, Bloombergen ninety nine

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 5>to one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 5>XM one nineteen and around the world on Blue Bomberg

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Radio dot Com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>today's program with some key economic data here in the

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>US this week are reading on first quarter GDP that's

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>a third and final reading, and the Personal Consumption Price

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>Index for May. That's the inflation measure closely monitored by

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Fed. What could it mean for consumers and for

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Fed policy moving forward? Well, for more, we're joined by

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Stuart Paul, us economist with Bloomberg Economics. Well Stewart, we've

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>seen some encouraging data on inflation CPI PPI over the

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>past two months. What do you expect to see this week?

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We're expecting to see similarly encouraging signs when it comes

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to PCEE inflation. We estimate, based on the CPI and

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>PPI data that we've already seen, that headline PCEE inflation

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to decline to two point six percent in

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>May from about two point seven percent in April, and

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really facilitated by a swing in gasoline prices. Gasoline

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>prices decline during the month of May. Typically gasoline prices

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>rise during summer driving season, so you have both the

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>actual price of the pump and the seasonal adjustment factor

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>weighing on headline pce inflation for May. The core PCE

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>measure which matters quite a bit more for the Federal

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Reserve that's also going to show some encouraging signs by

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>slowing to two point six percent from about two point

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>eight percent prior. It's still the case that shelter is

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>undergirding core inflation measures, but we are seeing core goods

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>prices decline when we map CPI to PCE space, and

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>we also are seeing some softening services prices within the core.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>If we're looking outside of shelter, we see declining prices

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for airfares, for recreational services, for personal care services, some

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of those more discretionary spending categories, and we think that

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's related to consumers starting to tell in their belt

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We did see pretty discouraging signs in

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the retail sales report just last week.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>But we also saw import prices down. That's a reaction

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>possibly to people not spending as much. And it looks

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>like all that US energy production at a record high

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and a slight demand just really helping out, really changing things.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, It is helping to weigh on a headline inflation.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>The big question, of course, what could this mean to

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve. It's leftist benchmark lending rate unchanged seven

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>meetings in a row dating back to last September. Another

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 2>policy meeting at the end of next month, right the

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>thirtieth and thirty first of July, just five weeks away.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So any encouraging signs on the inflation front

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>bodes well for the interest rate outlook. The Fed in

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>its previous meeting changed its own outlook for interest rates.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It had previously expected to cut interest rates by seventy

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>five basis points this year, but in its most recent

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>update it's now showing just one twenty five basis point

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>cut this year. We think that the encouraging signs on

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the inflation side and consumers starting to tighten their belt

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>could result in maybe two interest rate cuts this year,

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in September and then one in December. It gets

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tricky around election season, but with inflation

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>coming in, with inflation slowing on a monthly basis and

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on an annual basis, with core inflation slowing, signs are

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to point to the Fed perhaps being able to

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>cut two times this year, but probably only starting in September.

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>If they were to decide to get two cuts off

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>And as always, the key to this is a pattern.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Yeah, that's right.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So we have seen two encouraging monthly inflation prints. The

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>first quarter was a little bit rough, but we're starting

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to see a bit more evidence that a trend is

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>building in that slowing inflation landscape.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, well, let's that would be encouraging. Let's talk

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 2>about first quarter GDP. This is a third and final reading.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>A prior reading reported a growth of one point three percent,

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>but we could see a little upside surprise to this.

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we could see some modest revisions coming in, so

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>perhaps an upward revision of Q one GDP to an

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>annualized pace of growth about one and a half percent

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from as you mentioned, one point three percent in the

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>second estimate. It's starting to get a little bit stale

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>for driving FED policy. So what's really going to matter

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Friday Personal Income and Outlays report. And although

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing more recent data showing personal income growth,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>there is something that's stopping consumers from taking that income

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and driving spending. There is something, perhaps more consumer caution,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that's going to lead to further slowing. Even if we

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>were to see an upward revision to Q one GDP,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as we look at the Q two data, we could

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>see some additional slowing as consumers become a little bit

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>more cautious.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Now that slight change in GDP. Is it the same

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 2>exact factors you know? Or is there something else what changed?

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the same factors, It's just a little bit of

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>additional precision as time goes on, when the Bureau of

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Labor Statistics in the Bureau of Economic Analysis has the

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>time to more precisely measure the factors that go into

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>gross domestic product and gross domestic income.

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so first quarter GDP that is out on Thursday,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>May Personal consumption Core Price Index out on Friday. A

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>lot to look forward to, and our thanks to Stuart paul,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Us economist with Bloomberg Economics. Moving to company earnings now,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 2>the world's largest express transportation company, FedEx, reports its latest

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>earnings on Tuesday. What will the results tell us about

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the health of US supply chains and business and consumer demand?

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And for more? We're joined by Lee Clascal, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Senior Transport Logistics and shipping analysts. Well, Lee, what do

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>you expect to see from FedEx in its Q four

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 2>earnings this week?

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 6>I think that the company is going to report a

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 6>number that's probably more or less in line with consensus.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 6>I don't think there's really any divergence from there. But

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, what we do expect to see and we

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 6>really hope to see, is continued improvement on their cost

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 6>cutting measurements that they've been trying to reduce costs for

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 6>some time. They have two programs in place called Drive

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 6>and Network two point zero, and that's supposed to generate

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 6>around six billion dollars in cost savings for the company.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 6>And you know, what the company is trying to do

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 6>is right size its network to kind of match the

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 6>realities of how its business has changed so much over

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 6>the years with more of a focus of B two

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 6>C business versus B to B business and B two

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 6>C business, which is, you know, shipments that go to

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 6>your house, whether you buy something online or otherwise. You know,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 6>it tends to carry lower margins, and so they're trying

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 6>to improve that lower margin business by taking costs out.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Well. I think it's been working because in margin this year,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>FedEx said it's worldwide headcount was down about twenty two

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand over the past year or the prior year. Just

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago, it's had of plants to slash another

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>two thousand jobs in Europe. So are these cuts still

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>going on? Is FedEx still cutting jobs?

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? I mean, they absolutely are, and they need to

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 6>write size. I mean, FedEx for a long time became

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 6>a little bloated, you know, over the years, and the

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 6>focus really wasn't so much on margin, shall I say?

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 6>It was probably about the air fleet and in other things.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 6>And I think that you know, as management changes happened

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 6>at the company, kind of priorities have shifted, and you know,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 6>the company has become a truly show me story. And

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 6>management has been producing some pretty good results over the

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 6>last couple of quarters, and we can we expect that

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 6>to continue. You know, a couple of months ago, it

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 6>announced that it was no longer doing the line Haull business,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 6>the airline hall business for the US Postal service. That

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 6>business was, you know, about a two billion dollar revenue business,

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 6>but extremely low margin. And you know what that capacity.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 6>They're able to free up that capacity, and not only

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 6>are they able to fill it with more profitable business

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 6>from small to mid sized car shippers, but they're also

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 6>able to say, hey, maybe we don't need ten planes

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 6>in a certain lane, maybe we can only you know,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 6>we only need to do six flights as opposed to ten.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 6>So they're able to kind of lower their own cost

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 6>structure by reducing their air network, which is which is

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 6>something that you know we expect to see and you

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 6>know that will definitely benefit its margins. And the company

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 6>is also going through a major transformation. For the longest time,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 6>it operated separate ground and air networks, and now it's

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 6>it's becoming more of a hybrid where some of it's

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, air freight business or vians I go through

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 6>its express network, are now going into trucking if it

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 6>makes sense, if it's not like you know, needs to

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 6>be there the next day, it might make sense pushed

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 6>into their trucking network, which carries significantly less costs and

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 6>so therefore, you know, better margins for the company. So

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 6>you know it, we're in early innings towards this shift.

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 6>They changed their reporting structure this month, so you know

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 6>we're going to see that going forward.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, those same cost cutting efforts, raining and spending, streamlining

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>operations as allowed fed X to announce plans to buy

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>back five billion dollars of its own share so at

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>least shareholders must be thrilled about this.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 6>They are, They are outperforming their peers. You Know, what

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I would say is investors are probably still remain a

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 6>little skeptical about FedEx and its ability to change its

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 6>cost structure. Again, that's why I mentioned it was a

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 6>show me story. They really need to prove and execute

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 6>on their plans to build positive sentiment sentiment amongst monks investors.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 6>So that's something you know that we're we're really watching.

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 6>And then you know, you're also kind of in a

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 6>time where demand isn't great. Their express business volumes are

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 6>expected to be down on one one percent in the quarter.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Ground volumes, you know, might be up about one and

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 6>a half two percent in the quarter, and they're less

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 6>than truckload business fed X freight, you know volumes are

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 6>expected to be up less than one percent. So you know,

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 6>we have kind of a tepid demand outlook. Obviously, a

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 6>stronger consumer would bode well for them, A positive ISM

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 6>number would bode well for them. You know, positive industrial

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 6>production numbers would bode well for them. So you really

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 6>need to see the economy begin to accelerate from here

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 6>for that volume picture to get better. The kind of

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 6>good news for them is that comps do definitely become

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 6>easier in the second half of the calendar year, and

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 6>so you could see an acceleration of volume growth and

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 6>even you know, volume inflecting positive and business later on

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 6>the year, albeit you know, a low single digits.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Well just about six months ago before the holidays. FedEx's

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>latest earnings out this Tuesday, and our thanks to Lee Klascow,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and shipping analyst. Coming up

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg day Break weekend to look ahead to the

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 2>presidential election in Iran and whether it could mean a

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>shift in the country's foreign policy. I'm Tom Busby and

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>later in our program a look at US China relations.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>As presidential candidates Joe Biden and Donald Trump prepare to

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>debate this week, but first Orian set to hold a

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>snap presidential election in the coming days that follows the

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>sudden death of former leader Ibraham Raisi in a helicopter

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>crash last month. But the vote comes at a time

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>of heightened tension between Iran and the West. For more,

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak europe

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>banker Stephen Carroll Tom Ibraham.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Raisi's death came at a sensitive time for Iran and

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>for the wider Middle East. Tehran came close to an

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>all out war with Israel in April when it launched

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a direct military strike on Israel after its consulate in

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Damascus was bombed. Now, the president's influence is limited in Iran,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>but we could see some subtle shifts in policy when

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the new president is elected. I've been discussing the context

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>for this election with Bloomberg's Golnarmotavali, who leads our coverage

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of Iran.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 8>TV debates are actually quite critical in Iranian elections because

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 8>what they do is that they give you an immediate

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 8>sense of how the candidates are and being received by

0:13:54.800 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 8>the public. It's the major exposure to the broader general public.

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 8>And I think last debate was kind of interesting because

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 8>it very much focused on the economy. So obviously there

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 8>was a lot of discussion about sanctions and inflation, which

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 8>is a massive problem in Iran and in Iraq's relationship

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 8>with the West and the broader global economy. This is

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 8>a very highly circumscribed process. So it's a ballot that's

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 8>very dominated by conservatives and hardliners, and we have only

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 8>one reformist candidate of the six that are running.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And who are the key names to be watching as

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>we move towards the polling.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 8>Day, So the big names, I mean think it's important

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 8>to point out that quite a few important, very high

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>profile conservatives were disqualified, were not barred from running, which

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 8>is interesting, including people like Ali Larry Jaranni, who's a

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 8>very influential conservative politician. It's the second time he's been barred.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 8>But the names that we need to keep deep and

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 8>said Jali Lee, who's a former nuclear negotiator under Ahmadi Needrard.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 8>He's a very very radical, hardline, deeply religious person, very

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 8>anti Western, very anti US, opposed to the nuclear deal.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 8>He very much is kind of in the mold of

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 8>let's keep our relationship with China and Russia as strong

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 8>as possible. We don't need the West, we don't need Europe.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>We're very capable of being self sufficient economically. He's very

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 8>much of that mold. The other names that we need

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 8>to look out for are Masud Pezeshkian, who's the one

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 8>token reformist. But he's quite an influential and important reformist

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 8>because he was health minister under Moham Maghatami in the

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 8>late nineties and early two thousands, and he can become

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 8>quite a serious I mean, the cynical view is that

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 8>he's there just to lend legitimacy to the vote, so

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 8>that Harmonae and the establishment that run the islam Republic

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 8>can say, look, we don't just have hardliners, We've got

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 8>a reformist choice there as well. But the fact that

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 8>he's actually quite a serious reformist name actually raises the

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 8>possibility that he might boost turnout, and a boost in

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 8>turnout is always going to work in favor of moderates

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 8>and reformists.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm interested to get your view on how engaged

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the public has been in Iran in this campaign. Is

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 3>it something that people feel as is sort of addressing

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the key issues in their lives.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't think so. I think for many years there's

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 8>been quite a strong sense of political disenfranchisement and disenchantment

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 8>in Iran. We've had some really violent uprisings and protests recently,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 8>most notably in twenty nineteen and obviously more recently in

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty two after the death in police custody of

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Maths Amini, who was arrested for allegedly violating these strict

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 8>Islamic dress codes that apply to women mostly. That caused

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 8>a huge convulsion across the country, and the establishment is rightly,

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 8>very very concerned about internal political dissent. I would say

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 8>that opposition to the whole system of the exact republic

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 8>it has been, and you know, has been an all

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 8>time high since the nineteen seventy nine revolution, for I

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 8>reckon for at least since twenty twenty two, and that's

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 8>something that individuals men like Harmony are worried about. Institutions

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 8>like the ILGC, the example revolution regard called, they're worried

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 8>about that, and they need to have as many people

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 8>participating in this election as they can again to give

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 8>that system and their own system a sense of legitimacy

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 8>and credibility. And that's why Pezeshkian's presence is so key

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 8>and important from a political point of view.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Can you just briefly explain the process here, just so

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 3>we can understand why we don't consider this to be

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 3>a free election.

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, I don't know whether i'd say it's not entirely

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 8>a free election. It's a highly circumscribed These elections tend

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 8>to be very heavily stage stage managed from the outset.

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 8>So you have a procedure whereby individuals who have to

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 8>meet a certain criteria can go to the Interior Ministry

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 8>and apply to become to register to become presidential candidates.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 8>The criteria some of it includes being between the age

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 8>of forty and seventy five or forty five and seventy

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 8>five I think I can't quite remember. You have to

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 8>have some experience in political office, and you have to

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 8>have no criminal records. And there are some things that

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 8>are less clear, like being a woman is something that's

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 8>it's up for debates whether the Uranian constitution prohibits women

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 8>from being presidents or not being a Sunday. You definitely

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 8>have to be a Muslim. There's never been a non

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 8>Shia Muslim president in Iran since nineteen seventy nine, since

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 8>we've had the presidency. So you have that process where

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 8>people who meet that criteria register and then once they've registered,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 8>we have this very powerful non elected body called the

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 8>Guardian Council. That's made up of twelve theologians who basically

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 8>decide which of those two hundred or so people who've

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 8>registered can actually run. They're the people that decide who

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 8>gets disqualified. And that means that there's this perception that

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 8>it's a very stage managed process.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk us through how we should be thinking about this

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>from an international point of view. Obviously Iran has a

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>very tasty relationship with the West, first of all, and

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 3>how should people sitting in London or in Washington be

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>looking at this and thinking about this election.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think they need to be looking at

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 8>not just who becomes president, but how how the entire

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 8>government administration is then managed afterwards. So what's critical, for instance,

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 8>is if hypothetically Pezeshkian, who's this token reformist, experienced candidate,

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 8>does win the majority of votes, if he becomes president,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 8>what then happens to the foreign policy file? Because one

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 8>of the issues I think when Raharni, who managed to

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of refashion himself as a moderate in twenty thirteen

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 8>when he ran for the election, he won that election

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 8>basically on a mandate of sanctions removal, better relations with

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 8>the West, and some kind of dayton with the US.

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 8>But the problem was that his foreign policy was constantly

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 8>being attacked by hardliners, and because he gave almost kind

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 8>of full reign to moderate politicians like Javad Zari, these

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 8>multi lingual, you know, very errudite, sort of articulate diplomats

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 8>to kind of schmooze in New York and go on

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 8>these promenade walks in Switzerland with men like John Kerry.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 8>Stuff like that doesn't go down well amongst the hard

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 8>line within the hardline establishment in Tehran. So, for instance,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 8>if someone like Peziskion does become president, you then have

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 8>to ask, well, if the foreign policy file is given

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 8>to hardliners and someone who de facto has the support

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 8>of the IRGC, maybe that will make for a less contentious,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 8>paradoxically more stable administration and you can so I think

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 8>that's what we need to look out for. It's not

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 8>just who wins the top job, it's who looks after

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 8>the strategic decisions that are going to decide the kind

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 8>of direction of traveling. Yeah, exactly.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I wonder also because because we're obviously very focused

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>on Iran's relationship with the region as well, and as

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 3>particularly you know, after the incidence with Israel in recent months.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 7>Two.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how much of an impact could this election

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>have on how Israel interacts with its neighbors.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 8>At the bottom line is that, you know, the Islamic

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 8>Republic is very much in terms of foreign policy, it's

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 8>almost defined by its support for Palestine, for Palestinians, and

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 8>it's also defined by the fact that it opposes the

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 8>very presence of the States of Israel, at least rhetorically.

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 8>That's the rhetoric that's not going to change.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 8>There are kind of agreements and sort of arrangements or

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 8>relationships that are managed so that they kind of can

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 8>tolerate whatever consensus exists in the region. So, for instance,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 8>they need a strong economic relationship with the UAE. They

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 8>have to Dubai has been referred to as Iran's economic lung,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 8>for instance, for decades. So if you have these accords,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 8>the so called Abraham Accords between the UAE and Israel,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 8>for instance, Iran can and does turn a blind eye

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 8>to that and just keep it on a separate track

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 8>to its economic trade relationship with the UAE. That's something

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 8>that won't change regardless of who who becomes president. What

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 8>can change is if someone like Jali Lee who's, like

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 8>I said, very very conservative fundamentalist. If he's president, he

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 8>is probably less likely to be bothered about pragmatic outcomes

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 8>that protect Iran's trade relationship with the Europeans, for instance,

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 8>or he might be less concerned about preventing an escalation

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 8>over Iran's nuclear program with the US. He's much more

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 8>in the vein of if you want a Western comparison,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 8>someone like John Bolton, he's more He's very focused on

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 8>this idea. It's almost a bit like I mean, Putin's

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 8>trip to North Korea made me think of Jali Lee

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 8>because that's something that I would think he almost would

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 8>aspire to that type of profile, a Putin type profile

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 8>where he goes on trips to countries like North Korea, Turkmenistan.

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 8>You know, he focuses on this non aligned, anti NATO,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 8>anti US axis. So you know, if someone like Pezeshkian

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 8>was president, that there may be more of an effort.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm just speculating here to find some kind of balance

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 8>or to kind of take a more proactive role within

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 8>Palestinian politics in terms of balance, the kind of balancing

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Iran's relationship with Hamas and not just Hesbonna, but also

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 8>Fatah as well right to take a more proactive, constructive.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Role thanks to Bloomberg's Gollnarmota Valley. I'm Stephen Carolyn London.

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You can catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Daybreak here at beginning at six am in London and

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 3>one am on Wall Streets.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom Well, thank you, Steven, and coming up on Bloomberg

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 2>day Break weekend to look at US China relations as

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>presidential candidates in the US prepare to debate. I'm Tom

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 2>Busby and this is Bloomberg. I'm Tom Busby in New

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>York with your global look ahead at the top stories

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>for investors in the coming week. The first US presidential

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump will take place

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>this coming Thursday, June twenty seventh, and the US relationship

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>with China is sure to get a lot of attention.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's get to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia co host

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Doug Krisner and Brian Curtis.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Tom this year's presidential election will shape the course of

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 4>relations between the US and China for the next four years.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 4>To be fair, there are differences between these candidates and

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 4>their approaches to China, and there are similarities. Both agree

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 4>China's industrial and trade policies are putting American companies at

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 4>a disadvantage, and the two agree on keeping national security

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 4>a priority. They differ when it comes to the notion

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 4>of isolation.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 9>And that means that China may be put in a

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 9>difficult position. It's likely US policies on trade will get

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 9>even tougher going forward, as both President Biden and former

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 9>President Trump want to reduce US reliance on Chinese goods.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 9>Among the products targeted by the new US levies are

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 9>electric vehicles, batteries, and semiconductors. And joining us now for

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 9>further discussion on this is Rebecca Chong Wilkins, Bloomberg Asia

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 9>Government and Politics correspondent and John Leu, Bloomberg Executive Editor

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 9>in Beijing. Rebecca, if I could go to you first,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 9>Former President Trump initially started the trade war with China

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 9>to bring manufacturing back home to the United States, but

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 9>now he's talking more about raising tariffs and using that

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 9>as a way to increase US revenues. So this is

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 9>pretty interesting how it complicates the picture. President Biden has

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 9>been somewhat more targeted. Could this go all the way

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 9>to China's most favorite nation status being stripped.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 10>I suppose when we think about Trump, the whole obvious

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 10>element is the unpredictability of where this will go. So

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 10>far bit from me to make a prediction on where

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 10>he'll direct his policy. But I think from Beijing's point

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 10>of view, it is precisely the unpredictability which is a

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 10>concern here. I spoke to an advisor to Beijing quite recently.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 10>He sits on China's sort of top broader political committee,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 10>and he said that, of course things haven't been easy

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 10>under Biden, but Biden has been somewhat constrained because he,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 10>for example, works harder to build consensus among his allies,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 10>and some other countries have sort of somewhat muted the position.

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 10>But when it comes to Trump, there is this element

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 10>of unpredictability which really makes it much more dangerous, potentially

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 10>makes them a much more dangerous character for Beijing to

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 10>deal with.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 4>John Back in the twenty twenty presidential campaign, when Biden

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 4>and Trump last faced one another, there was this view

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 4>among some of the geopolitical watching community that Biden would

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>develop a multilateral approach in dealing with China and Trump.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 4>The more isolationist approach. Now we've seen Biden kind of

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 4>marshal together some cooperation. I'm thinking of export controls on semiconductors. Japan,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 4>the Netherlands involved with the US on that front. Is

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Beijing prepared to deal with the Trump administration potentially that

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 4>would take more of an isolationist approach.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that Beijing's main concern with the Trump administration

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 7>is just as Rebecca outlined, the unpredictability. I think the

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 7>way that Trump goes about it, the style of that execution,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 7>it being less reliant on allies, less reliant on trying

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 7>to build consensus, that probably plays into Beijing's hand more

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 7>than it hurts Beijing. If you look at Europe, for example,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 7>if Trump were to simultaneously put in tariffs against China

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 7>and European goods, that would actually help China try and

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 7>strengthen its relationship with Europe and maybe to overcome some

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 7>of the trade challenges that exist there as well.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 9>Doug mentioned semiconductors. That's such a key industry. The US

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 9>had some pretty famous battles with Japan on semiconductors going

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 9>way way back. The US had the early lead, Japan

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 9>won that lead back in the eighties, and then the

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 9>US rested it back decades later. I think the big

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 9>difference though, is that Japan was an ally all through it.

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 9>China is not. So is that industry semiconductors where the

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 9>real stakes are and where the real battles will lie.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 7>I think it's become pretty clear that one of the key,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 7>if not the most important arena for the competition between

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 7>the United States and China is in technology. So be

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 7>it chips, be it the AI that is powered by

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 7>those chips, and so I think no matter who becomes president,

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 7>I would expect the United States to continue to squeeze

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 7>as much as possible, because I think the ultimate objective

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 7>here for the US is to make sure that China

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 7>does not become does not reach some sort of technological

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 7>parody and potentially some sort of military parody that that

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 7>technological prowess would bring about.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Rebecca, let's talk a little bit about geopolitics right now,

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 4>particularly where Taiwan is concerned. What would we expect from

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 4>another Trump administration that is different from the way in

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 4>which the Biden administration has been tackling Taiwan.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, the Biden administration more recently seems to have slightly moderated,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 10>and I will say there does seem to be a

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 10>faties of pragmatic view in Beijing when they have been

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 10>these sort of slip ups or certain comments around Taiwan.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 10>Beijing has been relatively muted of late. It does seem

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 10>to understand that China, the issue of Taiwan, is of

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 10>course going to come up and be a very hot

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 10>topic in this US election, and that of course the

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 10>Overton window in terms of what people are willing to say,

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 10>has shifted across the board, whether it's in the Democratic

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 10>Party or among Republicans. But again, sorry to harp on

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 10>on the same issue, but I think it is this

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 10>problem of unpredictability where it is hard to anticipate where

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 10>Trump might move. And of course part of that is

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 10>because the whole position, the US position, is about maintaining

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 10>the status quo and maintaining this ambiguity.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, speaking of unpredictability, I mean President she himself has

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 9>been unpredictable in some ways in dealings with you know,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 9>with the tech industry, with various sectors in China. And

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 9>I'm wondering if China wants to hit back at the

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 9>United Slate States, where is the United States most vulnerable

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 9>in a.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 10>Sense, Well, it certainly does have room to maneuver. And

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 10>I would just say it's not just the United States

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 10>that it can hit back on, but also the EU.

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 10>And so, for example, before we had that EU decision

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 10>on tariffs, we did see sort of Chinese state media

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 10>and experts sort of trailing the possibility of retaliating with

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 10>tariffs or investigations into food, wine, planes, transport.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 7>And so on.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 10>But certainly it can consider moves like restricting trade and

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 10>market access. It could also think about going further to

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 10>restrict certain exports, and you know, it does have sort

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 10>of tools in its toolbox.

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 4>John to Bryan's point, when you consider companies American firms

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>like Apple or Tesla, any sense of how their dealings

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 4>with Beijing may change under a Trump administration.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 7>I think there would be a lot of concern from

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 7>the likes of Apple and Tesla about potentially losing market

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 7>share in China because of something that Trump administration has undertaken.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 7>I think Beijing will take a relatively restrained approach when

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 7>it comes to these companies because, for one, Apple employees

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 7>so many people in China making iPhones and iPads, et cetera.

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 7>Same for Tesla. China's the world's largest car market electric

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 7>car market, and Tesla's a huge player. And Tesla not

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 7>only makes cars in China for China, but is also

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 7>exporting a lot of electric cars that are produced in

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 7>Chia to other parts of the world.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 9>I'm curious about the China bashing because it works pretty

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 9>well on both you know, President Biden and President Trump's

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 9>hustings when they're out talking to people. If we flip

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 9>that around in China, you live there in Beijing. Is

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 9>China pretty adept at US bashing? And how does that

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 9>play with the populace?

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 7>I think. I think the Chinese government is very adept

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.479
<v Speaker 7>and very proactive about making sure that there's a perception

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 7>that it is standing up for the interests of the

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 7>Chinese people. And that comes in play when we're talking

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 7>about things like Taiwan, like the South China Sea, especially

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 7>during the last Trump administration, where there were slights such

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 7>as you know, Trump calling COVID the China flu in.

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 7>This is like that China. The Chinese government is very

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 7>compelled in those instances to stand up and to show

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 7>that it is fighting for you know, China's pride, prestige,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 7>et cetera. And you know, as nationalism goes, I think

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 7>that is a tool for every government in every country

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 7>in the world. Patriotism, the love of one's country. That

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 7>is something the president, she and the government here will

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 7>play on to its advantage.

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 4>In May twenty twenty, I believe the Trump administration suspended

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 4>visas for Chinese graduate students with ties to universities affiliated

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 4>with the People's Liberation Army. Now President Biden upheld that

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 4>suspension students were still being denied visas as recently as

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three. Rebecca, how is this situation going to

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 4>change change under any new administration, whether it's a new

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Biden administration or a Trump administration.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think this issue of sort of people to

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 10>people exchanges, as it's formally put in diplomatic circles is

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 10>really a key one. And it's interesting because both President

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 10>student Ping and President Biden are trying to actually changes.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 10>Both have highlighted the need to get these exchanges back

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 10>on the road, including at their sit down on the

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 10>sidelines of APEC in San Francisco November. But really we

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 10>haven't seen much sort of substantive progress at all, and

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 10>I will say, you know, sources and folks that sort

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 10>of business folks that I speak to do raise this

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 10>concern about the safety, their personal safety of going to China.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 10>You know, whether or not that sort of substantiated, there

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 10>still is this sort of big perception issue over personal

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 10>safety when it comes to making these trips and when

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 10>it comes to sort of regularly resuming these ties. The

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 10>other big focus, particularly if Biden does win, we'll be

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 10>trying to get student exchanges back on the road.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 9>So we don't know who's going to win the presidential election,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 9>but we said in our introduction that we basically thought

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 9>that things would get tougher for China on the rhetoric

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 9>side in the US for sure going forward. And that's

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 9>up until the election. But what about afterwards, of course

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 9>it depends on who wins, Rebecca, But is there any

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 9>chance that things would settle down and relations could improve

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 9>after the election.

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, yeah, of course, I think it's important to highlight

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 10>that campaign promises are not necessarily real world policies here

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 10>in any way. But you know, we think about when

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 10>Biden came in, some were expecting him to take a

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 10>ease up just a little bit, and in fact we

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 10>saw the opposite, He doubled down on those tariffs. So

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 10>even if we just continue on a similar momentum when

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 10>it comes to introducing more restrictions and more cubs, that's

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 10>still quite a sort of intense pressure that is being

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 10>placed on Beijing. Even if it's more predictable, it's easier

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 10>for them to understand the context. The other concern, as

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 10>John mentioned too, is if it is Biden, in particular,

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 10>if he's able to continue bringing other countries along and

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 10>lock and step moving with the US. We see, for example,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 10>the EU probe into EVS and the EU which previously

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 10>had been somethink of a sort of striking trying to

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 10>strike a more middle path, let's say, something sort of

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 10>more moderate from the US, and keen to strike and

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 10>emphasize its difference from the US. We see the EU

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 10>and various European Union nations moving a little bit closer

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 10>to the US, So that is another concern too.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 9>Rebecca, John, thanks so much for joining us and sharing

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 9>your insights with us. We've been chatting with Rebecca Cheng Wilkins,

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg Asia Government and Politics correspondent in John Liu, Bloomberg

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 9>Executive Editor in Beijing, I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 9>along with Doug Krisner. You can catch us every weekday

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 9>here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at eight am in

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 9>Hong Kong and eight pm on Wall Street. Tom.

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Brian, and thank you Doug. And that does

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 2>it for this edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 2>again Monday morning at five Wall Street time for the

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>latest on markets overseas and the news you need to

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 2>start your day. I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us. Top

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 2>stories and global business headlines are coming up right now