WEBVTT - School of Golf Architecture: Routing with Jeff Mingay, Part 1

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Garrett. Before you get started on today's episode

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of the School of Golf Architecture, I wanted to tell

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you a little about the Friday Egg Newsletter. We send

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it out three days a week Monday, Wednesday and Friday,

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and it'll keep you up to date on all the

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>most important happenings in the golf world. I think Will Knights,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>who writes it, does a really good job, not only

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>telling you what you need to know in a concise way,

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>but also offering a smart perspective on the events and

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>usually a dumb joker too. To subscribe to the Frida

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Egg Newsletter, go to the Friday Egg dot com, scroll

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>down a bit to find the yellow banner and enter

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>your email address. All right on with the episode.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>The Frida Egg requires a different technique. What you need

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to do is actually square the face so it'll dig

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>down underneath that bad lie and propel that ball right

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>out onto the green.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Playing out of a buried lion a bunker is completely

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>different than playing out of a night clean line of

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>green side bunker.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 3>You'd need to be aggressive on any show weather it's

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>sitting clean. Frid Egg.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've all faced it to the dreaded fried egg

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not to be cleared, though it's actually a pretty easy

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>shot to hit. Welcome back to the Frida Egg Podcast

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and to the fifth edition of the School of Golf Architecture.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Garrett Morrison. A few months ago, the PGA Tour

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>player Roberto Castro tweeted out something that got me thinking.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>He said, I'm no student of golf architecture, but even still,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I've never once thought about the routing of a golf course.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>What am I supposed to be comparing it to the

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>infinite other routings an architect could have chosen. I don't

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>get it. This is a fairly common frustration. I think

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>most golf architects will tell you that routing is their

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>most important task. At the same time, it's often the

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>most difficult aspect of a golf course for a player

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to perceive. So my hope is with this installment of

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the School of Golf Architecture, we can clear up some

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of that confusion. The term routing in golf course design

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>refers to how an architect lays out holes on a

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>piece of land, or, as Tom Doak puts it, routing

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is choosing the position of teas and greens for every

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>golf hole on the course. Sounds pretty simple, but it's

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely not here at the Frida Egg. We've already done

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a number of podcasts and articles on routing, and I've

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>listed several of those in a post on our website.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But this time I'd like to come at the topic

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>from a different direction. Typically we've asked how architects go

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>about the routing process, but today I'd like to ask

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>how we as golfers, can understand a routing when we're

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>playing it. This isn't all that easy because routing is

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a kind of invisible art. I mean, we can see

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the architect's craft and how bunkers are shaped, or how

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>greens are contoured, or how hazards are arranged to present

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>us with strategic dilemmas. Those elements are visible and legible.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But a routing is different because once the course is built,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to see how it could have been routed otherwise.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The alternatives are hidden under the finish work, and so

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>who can say whether the existing routing is good or not?

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>As Roberto Castro said, what are you supposed to compare

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it to? So to learn more about how a golfer

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>might read a routing. I called up Jeff Mingay. Jeff

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most thoughtful golf architects in the

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>game today. For almost a decade, he worked with Rod Whitman,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>helping on courses like black Hawk outside of Edmonton and

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Cabot Links on Nova Scotia. In two thousand and nine,

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeff started his own firm, and he's done several excellent

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>renovations of courses designed by Vernon McCann in the Pacific Northwest.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>These include the stunning Victoria Golf Club, as well as Inglewood,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Broadmoor and fur Crest in the Seattle area. Jeff joined

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>me from his office in Toronto, and our conversation ended

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>up being so rich that I decided to split it

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>into two parts. In this first episode, we talk about

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the elements of a good golf course, routing elements that

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>any player and notice to say. You're just a regular golfer.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You're playing a new course of course that you haven't

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>played before, and as you're playing it, you want to

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether you think it's routed well or not.

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the things, just off the top

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of your head that you think this golfer should think about.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the big things for me, and of

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>course it's it's very very much dependent on what type

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of property you know, an architect is working with, But

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I think connectivity is very very important the walk between holes,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>from one green to the next tee. I feel like

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>you're just comfortable when you when you leave a green

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know where the next tea is, you know,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>something as simple as that. I've been to so many

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 3>golf courses unfortunately, where you leave a green and if

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>you hadn't been there previously, you're think where do I

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>go next? That's an uncomfortable feeling to uh. You know,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm a bit of a traditionalist, but even even outside

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>being a traditionalist, it's nice to have the next tee

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>in the next hole will be the obvious place to go,

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.119
<v Speaker 3>so you get a very nice connectivity and a nice

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>flow through a property.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>The simplistic take on this would be that the green

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to tea transitions need to be short, but it's not

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily about that, right, So what are what is the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what are the criteria for connectivity between greens and teas?

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, ideally you do want a short connection

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 3>between the previous hole and the next tea. But again

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 3>terrain is going to affect that as well. But you

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>can still as an architect lay something out so that

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>even if there's a distance that you need to that

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>you need to traverse to get to the next hole,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>it still makes sense. If that makes sense where that connected.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're not only thinking about the golf holes,

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>but you're actually thinking of the flow between those holes.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, in one of the one of the great

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>golf courses in the world, for that is Highland's Links,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Stanley Thompson's golf course out and Kate Bretton, you know,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>built in late thirties, early forties. He takes sean what

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 3>I think is a thirteen kilometer journey through this property,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 3>which is part of a national park, and there's there's

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>a number of significant walks between holes. The gap between

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the the twelfth and the thirteenth, I believe it is

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>is something like five hundred yards. But Thompson created a

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 3>beautiful path along the Clybourne River. It's obvious when you

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 3>walk off the back of that green that the trail's

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>there and you walk from the twelfth onto the thirteenth,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>that your companions nice opportunity to chat The difference between

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>that particular golf hole and say a lot of golf

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>courses routed through residential community is that again, when you

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>walk off the back of the twelve screen, it's obvious

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>where you're going, even though it's a couple hundred yards

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>walk or three hundred whatever it might be, it's obvious.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>So the flow and the connectivity between holes is still

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>is still well done, even though there's quite a distance

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>between the two holes.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Right that having those transitions well thought out by the

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>architect is really important. And one place where I see

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that done really well is at Bandon Trails, where the

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>name of the course is focusing in fact on those

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>transitions between the holes, and those transitions are beautiful. The

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>paths are well tended, and the walks are well thought out.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, when you have one of these long walks

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>between a green and a tea, I think it's really great.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Not only when there's something cool to look at, not

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>only when you're traversing cool terrain and there's a view

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>or something like that to reward you for the walk

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>or give you a reason to do the walk, but

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>also like it when it feels like you're going somewhere

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 1>new where you're not just going back through the same

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>old territory, you know what I mean, I do.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 3>And Highland's Links is a very very good example of that,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>because much like bandoned trails are, much like Cyprus Point,

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Thompson does a really excellent job of celebrating three or

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>four very very distinct environments on that single property that

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>was dedicated to the golf course. In that walk between

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>twelve and thirteen is one of the exact best examples

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.479
<v Speaker 3>of the world because again he's given you this opportunity

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 3>to enjoy the Clybourne River. You're actually leaving the Wooded

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>River Valley en route back to the ocean, so you're right,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 3>he's sort of even though there's this cases where you're

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>walking through a residential community, you know, you're kind of

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>why do I have to walk two or three hundred

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>yards between these two holes? This is silly. At Highland's Links,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>you can't wait to do it because again he's putting,

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of the most beautiful environments in the

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>world on display as part of the round of golf.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, and another one I'd like to shout out here

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is Pacific Grove. I don't know if you've been to

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Grove, it's not exactly near where you are. Have

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you been to Pacific Grove? Oh great, Well, you know

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the back nine there, it's in the dunes. And one

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite green to tea transitions in the world

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is from eleven green to twelve tee there. So the

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>eleventh hole plays down off of the top of the

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>hill and the green is benched into the biggest family

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of dunes on the property, right and this is a

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>big gathering point in the routing of that back nine,

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that tall grouping of dunes. The eleventh green is benched

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>into there, and the transition to the next tee to

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth tee is through the back of that green.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You take a path that goes through these beautiful dunes,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and then halfway through the walk, the ocean is revealed

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to you. The Pacific go is revealed to you, and

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you walk out onto this tee and suddenly the final

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>reveal is the hole, the twelfth hole, a par five

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>running over amazing terrain along the road next to the ocean,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is an incredibly dramatic walk. It's its own reward,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and you really do feel like you're going somewhere new

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and to me, it's a long walk. You know, it

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>takes a minute to get from the eleventh green to

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth tee. But it is a feature of the

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>golf course. It is not a flaw in the routing.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the routing.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 3>Anyone who's experienced Thailand's Links as well speaks of that

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 3>walk between twelve and thirteen. It's legitimately one of the

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>among a bunch of great holes in a bunch of

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 3>great and diverse environments. It is one of the highlights

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>in the round. As a matter of fact, there was

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>no golf carts at Highland's Links until the mid nineties,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 3>I think, and one of the things people who are

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>familiar with the golf course complain quite a bit about

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 3>was that the new cart path didn't run along the

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Cliburne River between twelve and thirteen, so you actually miss

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 3>the experience of walking for five hundred yards between those holes.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 3>And once the carts got introduced to the experience, it

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 3>really became clear that that particular walk was an imp

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 3>important part of the journey around that course.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's one good thing for golfers to notice. You know,

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the walks like between greens and tees. Are

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they their own reward or are the greens and tees

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>close to each other? Does it make sense where you're going. Yeah,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really important. Obviously, it gives the round

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense that it's not a segmented round, it's a

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>whole experience. Let's talk about some other things that make

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for a good routing. You know, I think you and

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about the use of natural features on

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a property. How is that something that a golfer can

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>notice in the course of the round. What would you

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>look for when you're thinking about how a routing uses

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>or maximizes the best natural features of a certain piece

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of property.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, essentially what a golf course architect is trying

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to do is get the best out sort of the

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 3>best out of the natural assets you're provided on every property. Right,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 3>you want to take a look at this piece of

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 3>ground and use use the existing terrain, the existing vegetation,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>existing views, all those existing things the best way that

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you possibly can. For a couple of reasons. You know,

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 3>obviously that's going to minimize construction costs. If you can

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 3>find holes that are just laying on the ground, you know,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:40.599
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to push a lot of dirt er

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>eye you have to build too much. That's going to

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>be to the benefit of the developer an eventual owner

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>in terms of you know, from a business perspective. But

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the other reason to use natural features to the best

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of your ability is that you're going to inevitably arrive

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 3>at creating unique holes. You know, our minds can't be

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>as creative as nature, but we can be creative in

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 3>terms of how we use terrain to create unique golf

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>holes and more importantly, a variety of holes among the eighteen.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>So not all golf course sites have amazing natural features. Obviously.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's say that there's a course that's just on a

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>plain hillside that doesn't necessarily have any humps or bumps

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's just a slope, it's a hillside you're

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>building a course on there. What is a way in

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>which a routing can maximize that kind of site.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you know, as long as it's not

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 3>a mountain side, a hillside can actually be quite interesting

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and the routing is probably Wow. The routing is always

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the most important thing in golf course architecture. But the

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>routing on a hillside can really take advantage of a

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 3>number of things. You can create downhill holes, uphill holes,

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>side hill holes. So if we can put that puzzle

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>together and utilize that slope in that fashion, we're constantly

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>changing direction where one hole we're playing uphill, next all

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>we're playing down hill, next all we're playing side hill.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, Augusta National jumps in my mind immediately along

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 3>with Stanley Thompson's Capillanam. You know, those are two of

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the great routings on steep sites, you know that are

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 3>steep on a single plane, and they just did a

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>wonderful job by by doing exactly what I just described,

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, getting those holes to move different directions, to

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>change elevation in different ways. You know. So a hillside

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>like that, even though it's featureless, can actually end up

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>being something special with a smart routing.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and one of the keys is variety in which

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in the ways in which the holes use the land.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they're just going back and forth across

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the hillside, you're going to have a boring golf course.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But if they're going up and down, if they're turning

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>different ways on the hillside, if each hole uses it differently.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got you've got some variety. You're you're maximizing

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that natural feature exactly.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 3>And in the hillside example is interesting too because it

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 3>brings to mind prevailing wind, which is always a huge

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>consideration in routing a golf course. So if you take

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 3>that hillside on that single plane and you find those

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>holes that change direction, that change elevation in different ways,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you're creating a variety of holes. But then you're actually

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 3>attacking the wind angle in different ways. So now you've

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you've again it elevated that that that sense of variety

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>among the holes by not only using the terrain in

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in a variety of ways, but also factoring prevailing wind

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 3>and making sure that golfers aren't consistently playing into the wind,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>or consistently playing downwind, or consistently playing sidewind crosswayd I

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>should say sorry, you know, which brings Saint Andrews to mind.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, we talk about what a great golf course

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Saint Andrews is and how much it provides us in

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>terms of learning about architecture and taking inspiration, but it's

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>a bizarre routing because you know, you basically play as

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows out for nine holes in for nine holes,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I've been fortunate to play the old

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 3>course a number of times, and when the wind's India

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>on the outgoing nine, I mean you almost want to

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>stop after six or seven holes. Then you get out

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 3>to the end and you turn around and you know

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>you're going to hit some of the most exciting drives

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>of your life downwind. But it's really not a great

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>routing because if the wind is a huge factor on

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 3>any given day, it's pretty much a slog out and

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a weird, long hitting chip shot course on the way in.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, going back to the notion of using the

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>natural features of the property or maximizing using them as

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>much as possible. One of the things that really has

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of changed the way that I look at golf

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>courses when I walk aside and look at how the

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>holes are on the land, is that I try to

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>identify what the most prominent natural thing features are, or

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what the most interesting natural features are, whether it's a

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big bump or or some kind of

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>slope or you know, some kind of vegetation or whatever

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. You know, whether it's a view right a vista,

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I try to see what those prominent features are, and

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>then I look at how many holes use it and

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how they use it, whether there are greens there, whether

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there are tea's there, whether you return to that feature

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the round, not just in one

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the round, but say early in the round

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and laid in the round. Do you see that as

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as an important part of the experience of a golf course,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of a routing, that there's a beautiful or cool natural

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>feature and the and the holes return to it several

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>different times.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean, and you know, most of the great

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>routings you know across the globe feature those congregation points

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about, and they are really cool from a

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 3>playing perspective, from a spectating perspective especially, I mean you

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 3>see it in Augusta. You know where two green comes

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 3>down into that congregation, three leaves, seven comes back, eight

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 3>goes off. I mean for spectating, you know it's it's

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 3>it's an amazing way to route a golf course. And

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure Alistair mackenzie had that in mind actually when

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>when they were routing Augusta. Another great congregation routing is

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Oakland Hills. You know where the eleventh comes comes into

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that beautiful hill that's sort of in the center of

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 3>the property. The twelfth goes off it. On the other side,

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the eighth comes into the hill parallel to twelve, and

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 3>then the beautiful part three ninth off the hill with

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 3>the clubhouse in the background. Utilizing a single hill like

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>that for as many as four or five different holes

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 3>is yeah, it's a it's a real special way to

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 3>route a golf course. And again you see it so

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 3>many places, from Augusta to Oakland Hills, Romel or you

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 3>know one project that I worked on, Blackhawk Golf Club

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>at Edmonton, Alberta. The front nine, you know, the second

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 3>hole plays into a big dooney hill, Third goes off

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 3>of it, fifth comes back, six goes off of it,

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and seven drives over it. You know when Rod Whitman

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 3>routed that golf course, you know, I was there from

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 3>early on and I kept thinking about that congregation and

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of a as we talked about in terms

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 3>of like just flow. It also feels nice that you

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 3>come up with the hill, you go off the hill,

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 3>you leave, you come back. It's just as that nice

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 3>indescribable feel about it that you're you feel like you're

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 3>playing you know, I've always said I think whether or

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>not they actually realize it. I mean, golfers most enjoy

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>playing the game in a natural setting, and I think

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 3>when you feel like you're actually playing over terrain that's

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 3>always been there, a natural golf course and playing into

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 3>natural features. You know, coming up the hill on nine

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 3>at Cyprus with that big dune behind the green, I mean,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, nobody built that. It's a beautiful natural feature.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 3>So utilizing those features both for golf features, for backgrounds,

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 3>and again that whole congregational idea. You'll see that a

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 3>lot at the best courses in the world.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So one last subject that I'm interested in for good

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>routings or things that golfers can notice when they're trying

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to assess a routing of a golf course. And this

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is one that I've had a really hard time describing.

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious about how you would describe it. Do

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the best routings have a kind of sense of narrative

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or a sense of drama or a sense of music

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about them from beginning to end? And how would you

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>describe that? And what do you think is like the

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>best metal I just gave three metaphors there, right, story, drama,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and music. Do you have any favorite metaphors for describing

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>how a routing can kind of like take you on

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a journey like that?

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Huh. That's interesting, I mean, because you know, if you're

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 3>on a golf course that's basically in the middle of

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 3>a city, and you know, you're not visiting different environments

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>like you do abandoned trails or highlands, lakes or Cyprus point,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 3>to find those different pieces of the symphony, so to speak,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 3>is tougher. But when you get on those properties where

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>there are again more diverse sections to it, I think,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously those environments can create that kind of feeling.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 3>You know. The other thing, too, is that Marion's an

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 3>interesting deal where you know the way that it flows.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 3>Front nine, you know, you play a couple couple of

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 3>stout holes, come out of the gate up to number four,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, or sorry five, the long part four a

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 3>quite a pedal to the metal. Start at Marion. Then

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 3>you go through this middle section where it's hard to

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>believe that there could be so many three hundred and

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty yard holes in a row that are so cool,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, and then you cross the road. After twelve

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>you play the little thirteenth and then you better put

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>your seatbelt on again from fourteen through eighteen. Like I

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>said about the old course, I mean, I don't think

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 3>anyone would tell you that that's a great example of

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a quote unquote ideal routing, but anyone would love to

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>take credit for routing those holes at Marion. So I

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 3>guess we're lucky in the sense that all the great

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 3>courses are like different albums or different books or different songs.

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, thank goodness, you know, they all kind of

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>have their first tee to home green story. But I

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>guess the fact that we can't really sum it up

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 3>into one little tight box is a good thing because

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>it's it's hard to explain it's so personal to each

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 3>site in each golf course.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Marion is an interesting example. Obviously, it's it's famously

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a tight property. But but somehow or another, the routing

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>makes it feel like it's it's not constrained in any way.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's a sense of freedom, and I

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think there is also a sense of drama because you

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>reach a crescendo at the quarry right you you visit

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the most stunning kind of natural feature on that property

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>as the round gets to its apex, and so there

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is to me a kind of sense of drama. That's

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>where it really ramps up. And and those closing holes

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are quite dramatic and have created a lot of drama

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and the tournaments that have been played there they are.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 3>And that's another good point too, is a routing like

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Marion getting you to that that finale that you know

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is there. I mean, there's another great example of taking,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, a relatively small feature of the site, the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>old quarry at Marion, and utilizing it so perfectly for

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the final three holes. Incredible. Frankly, Pete Died did the

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>same thing at Sawgrass, you know, to dig a couple

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of lakes there and then come up with sixteen seventeen

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 3>eighteen as your finishing piece is great. But you know,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>and he would he would probably be the first to

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 3>admit it, mister Die, that you know he learned that

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 3>lesson from places like Marion, from places like Pebble Beach,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 3>from places like Cyprus Point, where you know, those those

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>cliff sides were so well utilized. And again the quarry

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>at Marion bringing you to that kind of conclusion is

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>another consistent I think among many of the great golf

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 3>courses in the world where the architects did a really,

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 3>really wonderful job with bringing you to that most exciting

0:24:58.000 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>place right at the end.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So, just to sum it up, Jeff and I touched

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on three basic things you can keep track of when

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the routing of a golf course. One

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the link between a green and the next tee? Is

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it clear where you need to go? And if the

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>walk is longer, is there something cool about it? In

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>other words, do the tee to green transitions give the

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>course a sense of coherence and flow? Two the use

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the property's features. What are the best assets of

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the landscape and do the holes maximize those assets by

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>using them frequently and with variety. Three And admittedly this

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is more of a hobby horse of mine than it

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is Jeff's. But does the routing have a narrative to it?

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Does it take you through a kind of story that

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>reaches a climax near the end. In the rest of

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>our conversation, Jeff and I dug into a few examples

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of famous golf course routings and how they embody or

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes don't embody, those principles. That's next on the school

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a golf architecture m hm

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Hm