WEBVTT - The Creep

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna be talking about creeps. Yes, about creeps, creepiness,

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the nature of creepiness, and what makes creeps creepy. And

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the end we will find a way to

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>love the creep too, because there's a little bit of

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>a creep in all of us. Yes, this will give

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone the chance to connect with their inner creep. And

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think also like rethink their creep analysis. They're creep

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>judgments that they've passed uh uh in in previous times. Okay, so, Robert,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to test our intuitions a little bit about

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>creepiness by running a few scenarios by you. Because creep

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>creep is a word we apply intuitively, creepy is a

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>word we imply intuitively. But sometimes it's hard to make

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a distinction, like what is creeping us? What is a

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>creep and how is it different than like a scary

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>guy or a terrifying situation? Yeah, a creep a creeper

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>if you will creeping uh is it's sometimes referred. Okay,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>let me know what you think about this. You're standing

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in line at the bank and a man with a

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>hunting rifle runs in the door, aims the rifle straight

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at your face and shouts at everybody in the room freeze,

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hands up. Is that creepy? Not creepy? That's terrifying, scary, traumatic,

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but not creepy. I totally agree, not creepy at all. Okay,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>here's another one. You go out for a walk with

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your dog and when you get back home, somebody has

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>taped a handwritten note to your front door that says

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>why do you take such long walks? That I could

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>see that being? That is bull's eye creepy to me.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It's but I wonder if that goes beyond creepy and

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like outright scary because under under what scenario is

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that a valid act by somebody? Is that under under

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for what reason would that be possibly be okay for

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>someone to leave that note on your door? Well, I mean,

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>creepy things aren't necessarily okay. I mean we're just testing

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>our intuitions. Come on, surely your gut says that's creepy?

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Mine does? I've I think that would be like hard creepy.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>This would be this would be creepy bordering on frightening,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because I'm gonna immediately be concerned about my surroundings. I'm

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be I'm gonna start looking for dead rabbits and

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and so forth. Okay, I got another one. Your

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>company has been downsizing recently. You arrive at work one

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>day to receive an email from your boss that just says,

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>please come see me in my office first thing this morning.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that creepy? It's not creepy. Certainly anxiety producing, but

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not not creepy, right story even, but not creepy. Obviously,

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something that can be a strong indicator of anxiety.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It can even be kind of ambiguous in a way,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's not creepy. Okay. So how about you're at

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a funeral for a close friends recently dead relative, and

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>as you approach the open casket to pay your risk specs,

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the person in the casket opens her eyes and starts screaming.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Not creepy, No, No, that's outright terrifying and I'm probably

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>losing my mind, right, Okay, one more. You're on a

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>train or a bus, uh, and a man comes and

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sits down next to you. He begins rummaging around in

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>his backpack, and out of the backpack he produces a

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>doll and then sits there in his seat brushing the

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>doll's hair. Is that creepy? I think it depends entirely

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>how into the brushing he is. Like, because I've been

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>having written The Train quite a bit, you do see

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some strange behaviors now and then, but sometimes it's just

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the the attitude of the person can sell you on it.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So I can easily imagine a dude who's just kind

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of like tired, and he like pulls a doll out

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's combing its hair. And if the vibe is

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this is just something this guy does every day. He

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do it. I don't know why. Maybe his

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>for his job, he has to have this this doll

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>properly groomed. Right, Maybe he's a professional doll groomer. Yeah,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so if it If that's the case, I would say

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not creepy. However, if he's getting it out and like

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lovingly stroking its hair and whispering to it while he

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>u while he grooms it, then yes, that would be creepy. Yeah.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>What if he's just singing a little bit. Yeah, singing

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>does that enhance the creepiness if it's like a lullaby?

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess? Yeah? What if he's singing bon Jovi? Less creepy?

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess. This is the thing. It gets difficult and

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you start you're you're trying to find the figure out

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the why behind a scenario. What's up with this individual?

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Why are they doing the thing that they're doing, and

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>why are they behaving like this? Why do they dressed

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like this? And your mind's just just crunching it, processing

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and as fast as as as it can, and then

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to decide creepy or not creepy? Right, Okay,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so all these things that they're gonna get some kind

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of fear response like we talked about, but they're not

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>all creepy. And likewise, the creep as a person is

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a particular figure, but different than a monster, or maybe

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>different than a dangerous person or a scary guy or

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a predator. Even though we very strongly have this idea

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of what a creep is, though it may be very

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous to us. In the big hazy thing, right, and

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the creep, especially in fiction, the creep may turn out

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be monster. The creep may turn out to be hero.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And example that instantly comes to mind Boo Radley from

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>To Kill a Mockingbird. Oh, perfect creepy character. But he

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ends up it ends up not being the threat and

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ends up saving the day. So you think he's a creep,

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but then he turns out to be a good guy.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he still a creep after you know he's a

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>good guy? No, because there, for the most part not,

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I would guess, because the threat analysis has been fully computated.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He's proven himself to be a non creep. Okay, well,

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the literary history of the creep a

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit. First of all, I was wondering how long

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>has the word creepy been in English. It it seems

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot more mileage than it ever has before,

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but from what I could tell, it dates back at

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>least to Charles Dickens, who some sources have alleged coined

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the term, and it appears in David Copperfield. Did you

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>ever read the copper Field? I never have? Yeah, So

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty nine, Dickens writes of a character named Mrs Gummage,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a great creepy name. Dickens as great at

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those quote. She was constantly complaining of the cold and

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of its occasioning a visitation in her back, which she

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>called the creeps. Okay, so it's not it. It's a

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit removed from our current usage of the word.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. So uh, this means like a physical sensation,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's mostly unrelated to the way we use it now.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to make a side note that Dickens,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is full of great creeps, like of

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>any author in English, there's creeps everywhere and they're great.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's the child catcher in Oliver Oliver? In Oliver Twist,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember childcatcher? Yeah, or I keep there are

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of I remember in Uh. In Oliver Twist,

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it describes describes Noah Claypool as eel like I think

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he's a creep. Man, I'm blanking on the name of

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this character. I'm sure someone will remind Yeah. But by now,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, the creeps, creepiness and of course the person

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>who is a creep has come to mean something very different,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>right And from my experience, the concept of creepiness is

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>utterly pervasive and everyday conversation, we we talk about it

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time. The creep is a standard type of

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>person we encounter and under the wrong circumstances or with

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit of bad luck or awkward behavior, we are

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all ourselves sometimes the creep. Yeah. I think this is

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an important thing to drive home. No matter how handsome

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or suave you happen to think you are, no matter

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>how harmless you think your appearance or demeanor happens to be,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter how chill you are, you have come off

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>as a creep at some point in the past. Absolutely,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you have acted weird. We've all acted weird. Sometimes it's creepy,

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but we definitely do live in the age of creepiness.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>This is something that a couple of writers were going

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about today have alluded to. But I decided

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to do a Google Ingram search for creepy, you know

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ingram viewer where it'll it'll chart the usage of

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a word about printed literature across a long period of time.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I looked at the word creepy from the

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>r eighteen hundred until two thousand eight, and it's interesting

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of a rising and falling bell curve of

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>creepy usage from about nineteen hundred to nineteen forty and

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>then creepy goes dormant through the fifties and sixties. I

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>wonder why that is. But then around nineteen seventy nineteen

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty it begins to rise again. And then there is

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this dramatic, precipitous spike way above the norm coming up

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>to the two thousand's. So for some reason, the millennium

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is the millennium of creepiness. Well that sounds about right.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we can get a better idea of what

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the creep is, who the creep is if we just

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>look at some great examples of creeps for for context. Sure, um,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>while start off by mentioning that the name of the

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>character from Oliver Twist came to mind, and that's Fagan. Fagan. Oh,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of course Fagan a creep. Though I don't know if

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Fagan's a creep. Noah Claypools are creep, but Fagan, I remember, see.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember being in a musical, like a community theater

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>musical version of Oliver and our our drama teacher played

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Fagan and I felt like he did a very creepy

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>take on Fagan. So that's the one that's that's stuck

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. He was great at it. Wait, I

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>guess when you think about the details of it, it

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is truly creepy. He's this guy who collects an army

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of little children who he Yeah, yeah, he's kind of

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a creep. But but certainly there are some more iconic

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>creeps that instantly come to mind. So have you seen

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lonely Island video for Do the Creep? Yes? Was

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it snl or uh It's well, they sort of came

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>out of snl okay and then they did this album

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with all these videos. Yeah. Yeah, it's got uh Andy

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Sandberg and Nicki Minaj and Nicki Minaj that's a guest

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff spot in it as a female creep, which we

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can come back to. But then also John Waters introduces

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it and they're kind of dressed like young John Waters

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in this video as they're they're doing the creek, they're

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they're taking on these anerisms of a very creepy male individual,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's got a pencil mustache and invades your

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>personal space. Yeah, it will come back to John Waters

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in a in a bit too. But I feel like

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he's an individual who has embraced his creepiness and thus

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>transcended it. Yes, like he's adorable now. Yeah, so it's

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of an interesting area there. In a way, it's

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like the more you know a creep either either it's

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>going to firmly establish their creepiness or it's going to

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>dissolve them a bit and dissolve the creepiness. Right, nobody

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ever remains the same amount of creepy they seemed at first.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It either gets better or gets worse. That's that's some

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sound sound advice there. Um for me. There's a well,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there's an actor by the name of Lucky Yates who

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the anyone who listens or rather watches Archer

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe familiar with with him because he does one of

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the voices on that show. Does Dr Creeker does a

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor of character. But he he also has a character,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that he does this character anymore,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but he did for a while here in the Atlanta area.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>He did this character of the Fiend and the theme

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>would would host various events such as a late night

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>horror creepy show, puppet show, and various puppet slams in

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the area. And uh and this was kind of a

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>like imagine like a little bit of Vincent Price, a

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of little Richard all sort of dashed together

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and that was the fiend. This does not sound like

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a creep to me. This sounds like a like a

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a suave dude, suave but a little threatening like kind

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of that's the thing. You're not really sure if he's threatening,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but he certainly came off as uh is a little

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bit creepy, kind of a pencil than mustache going on,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, and also kind of a a pan

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sexual aura. Um. Other characters, well, first of all, most characters.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that Peter Lori play Peter Lori, who what

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a great creep he was in Casablanca as he creep? Yeah,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of a creep. Yeah, I have a hard

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>time remembering him not but I guess in like Twenty

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Leagues under the Sea wasn't a creep and uh, and

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess in some movies he plays more of an

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>outright monster type character. This is true of some actors.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>There are people who get type cast as creeps. And

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have to introduce the name of a guy

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>who I greatly love and respect as an actor, but

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>he's always a creep. Tom Noonan God bless him. Oh yes,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>tom noonon Is is always I can't think of a

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>non creepy tom Noon and Roll, and I wonder what

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be tom Noon. I mean, I don't

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know anything about him personally. I'm sure he is just

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a wonderfully sweet, great guy, you know. I I can't

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine that he's actually a creep in real life. But

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what's it like to be that guy who's always cast

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as a creep because he's perfect for it? Right? Because

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>he was the bad guy in RoboCop two, the drug

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>dealer who ends up inside the machine. He was the

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>great Red Dragon in Man Hunter? Yes, who else was?

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He's in an episode of The X Files where he

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>plays like a child murderer. He was a creepy priest

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on an episode of Louis Yeah, and he's also in

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>House of the Devil, playing a world endingly creepy role. Well.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>One thing is I guess interesting to point out about

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>character actors is character actors often have kind of a

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>unique look, maybe even a slightly grotesque look. And then

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that is that is blown evermore out of a proportion

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>by either acting opposite perfect looking starring humanoid individuals, or

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, having increasingly creepy settings makeup etcetera. So

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got a creep for us. Yeah. Uh. One of

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the writers that we were reading in preparation for this episode,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>a cultural critic named Adam Kotsko, wrote this piece called

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>nice to Meet You in New Inquiry, and he expanded

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it into a book about creepiness. But he calls attention

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Burger King King. Oh yes, right, the advertising

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon beginning in like the mid two thousands of the

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Creepy King, which is Burger King's lurking mascot. I don't know, Robert,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I put some links in the in our notes to

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>these videos. Did you go back and watch these? Yeah,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we watched at least one of them. I remember them

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>making the rounds back back in the day, and everyone

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>embraced this creep factor exactly, so they got great word

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of mouth. It was sort of a viral marketing sensation,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>except I don't think it made anybody want to eat

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Burger King. But the most common version of this type

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of commercial is somebody gets freaked out because they discover

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the Burger King. Who's this guy in a king outfit

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with a unmoving, smiling king mask. The mask itself is

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminiscent of the the anonymous v for Vendetta

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>mask sort of, except it's got this big grin. Um, yeah, yeah,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty awful. But they discovered somebody in the

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>commercial discovers the King is like watching them or leaning

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>over their bed or staring at them from somewhere, and

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>they get creeped out rightly because the King is creepy.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But then they're anxiety is calmed because the King offers

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>them some disgusting Burger King products. Uh, well, tell me this.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I know we're both fans of of this particular film,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or at least treatments of this film. But Torgo from

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Manos the Hands of Faith, Torgo is the ultimate creep.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>If there is one creep to list, it is Torgo.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen this movie, it was a it

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was a great hit on Mystery Science Theater three thousand.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But it was a film produced in El Paso, Texas

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties, and it has this character in

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it who's kind of I mean, what can you You

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about him in the movie. He's just

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a guy with very large knees who kind of talks

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like this. That's a good Torgo, like apparently he was

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a satyr. I think so, but it's

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not really. The sader effects are not great. So he

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>just looks like he has enormous weird legs and he

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>shuffles about and he's helpful sometimes, you know, but very

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>very very cree be. Yeah, never tally inappropriate behavior, right,

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and but never completely feels like a threat. Oh no,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>later in the but early on, like I'm thinking, when

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like the Famili's first encounters him, he's he's just carrying luggage, yes,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and just eating up lots of lots of screen time. Okay,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we we can't do too manymore, but at one I

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>gotta mention you ever seen Crinkles, the clown from the

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties post sugar rice Crinkles commercial. I have not,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I knows you put the now I noticed you

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>put the link in the notes and I didn't click

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. Well, that that's worth a look. It's this

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>clown who's eating cereal. And I think part of what's

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>creepy about it is the production of the commercial. So

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not even all the clown clowns get a bad rap.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about clowns, but I have to admit

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he is kind of creepy looking, but it's the production

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of the commercial that does not have like rapid editing

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like commercials do now. So there are scenes of this

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>clown just eating cereal and taking a long time to

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>say anything after he has a bite, and it's quite creepy.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the silence makes it creepier. Okay, well, I

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>will definitely have to watch that and creep myself out. Um.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>One that comes to my mind instantly too is riff Raff,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>played by Richard O'Brien in Rocky HRR Picture Show. And

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess really most characters that Richard O'Brien plays fall

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>into that creepy role because he's see another Tom Noonan type. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>he has this natural Will you remember Dark City he

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>played the what Mr Hand as one of the strangers. Yeah,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so he's he definitely pops up in my mind. Is

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>both a riff Raff is a creepy character, but then

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Richard O'Brien himself is kind of I think I think

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be fair to say he is a proud

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>creep as well. And uh you know, I also from

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a personal note, I have to think back to the

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>monster science videos that have done here for how stuff

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>works where I play the character Dr Anton Jessup. Um, wait,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>that was you that. I know it was such a

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>performance it's hard, too hard to believe. But yes, that

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually made Joe, and uh, you know, and it's

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a very two dimensional character. I didn't when really that's

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing about a creep. A creep is two dimensional.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Once they become three dimensional, there's something infinitely worse or

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>something infinitely more human. But but we did try to

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>implement greasy hair, overly enthusiastic nature, poor posture, excessive gesticulation,

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>excessive smiling, lack of boundaries, pale skin, obsessiveness. Yeah, and

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and as I say these things, I also have to realize,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these are they're not They're not

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>too far removed, probably from how I am in real life.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have to come back to what we said

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier about no matter you know, how you think you

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>carry yourself in in our world, you've probably come off

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>as a creeper. So whatever I'm trying to achieve with

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Dr Anton Jessup, people have probably seen me in public

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and thought exactly the same thing with me. So in

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>many cases, it may be the difference between normal person

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and a creep is just a difference in some mannerisms

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and grooming. Yeah, and I think the who is observing

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you and you know what moment have they caught you in? Okay?

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>So one thing you might have noticed with us talking

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about all these examples so far is that I think

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them we mentioned is male. Yes,

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>so is creepiness inherently a male property? Is there such

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>a thing as a lady creep? Or culturally do we

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just tend to assume if you're talking about a creep,

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that creep is a man, And if you're talking about

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody being creepy, you're probably referring to a person who

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is male. This is a certainly a topic that it's

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's explored in some of the literature we've looked at,

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and it it does seem to be this double standard

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that exposes a lot of our a lot of the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sexual politics and our culture. That Yeah, I mean, I

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to to elaborate on it too much,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but you are I found that you you are kind

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of It pains to come up with good examples of

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>even a fictional creepy female. Um, the best that I

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>can come up with is clearly going to be Jerry

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Blank from Strangers with Candy. Now, I've never seen Stranger,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so you got to explain Jerry Blank to me. Okay.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So this was a character played by Amy Sadaris and

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the show also featured Stephen Colbert. It's one of the teachers,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was like an after school special on the show.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is um an older x con whose returned to

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual high school and it's taking high school classes

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>alongside more or less real teenagers. Quite plausible. Yeah, but

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>she's acting like a teenager as well, So there's a

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of grotesque body humor. Uh you know,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's this older lady. Sadaris wore a fat suit to

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>play the role. She's always making these these funny twisted faces.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But she's also pans sexually aggressive, I guess you'd say,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And she's generally and generally inappropriate ways. She's also a

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit racist, and that comes out in in what

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>she's talking about. Most of the time, she makes terrible choices.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>But yet even in this comedy, we find ourselves caring

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>about her, like we know in a way they achieve

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>something special with Jerry because we care about Jerry we

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know enough about Jerry and granted it's a comic character,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>it's an unreal character, but she is still kind of

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a grotesque character, and she's still a creepy character. I

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>think how much of that do you think is the

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>character and how much is just what Amy Sadaris brings

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to it. Oh, I mean, it's hard to separate the

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>two because it's yeah, it's so much of it is

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>just Amy Sadaris is wonderful, twitchy performance. It's really one

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the great comedic performances of all time. You know,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Amy Sadaris actually plays a kind of creepy character in

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Kimmy Schmidt as well. Oh yeah, she's like the Lackey character, right, yeah, yeah,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's interesting. We'll come back to another lackey in

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So you mentioned Rocky Horror Picture Show riff

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Raff Richard O'Brien, but there are some lady creeps in

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that as well. There are and those were some other

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>examples that came to mind, So particularly Colombia and Magenta

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>from Rocky Are Picture Show, who are kind of who

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of lackeys of riff Raff and uh uh and

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>uh and Frank and further and and I bring them

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up because they're both definitely female fictional characters that come

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>off as creepy intentionally, so and we'll ignore the fact

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're both technical I think they're one of them

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is technically an alien. But but I always found that

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the key with the characters both creepy and attractive. So,

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>if anything, their otherness, their creepiness is eroticized, I think,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so that the sense of danger that you get from

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>them is not based on physical deformity, but like they're

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of countercultural aspects there. Yeah, I guess you could

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>say goffinus to a certain extent. And also their their

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>sexual freedom, especially when when they're juxtaposed to Brad and Janet,

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>who are like the ultimate straight people. Like that's that's

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like everything that works or doesn't work in

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Hard depending on your your your viewpoint, UH stems

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>from an encounter between squares between norms and UH and

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>complete fringe individuals. Oh yeah, well, I mean in Rocky Horror,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the creepiness is liberating. It's a liberated sort of heroic

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>creepiness that is contrasted to this horrible norminus. All right, well,

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know we've rolled through some examples here, so I

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think we should probably take a quick break and when

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we come back we will get into the science of creepiness.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into what the what study, what studies one

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>study in particular, have to say about our criteria for creepiness.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>With the holidays almost here, you don't have time to

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>go to the post office traffic parking. It's gonna be

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>packed and everyone's gonna be mailing off gifts and packages.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So you need to do what we did, need to

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>go to stamps dot com. Instead. Go with stamps dot com.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You can avoid all the hassle of going to the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>post office during the busy holiday season. Everything you can

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>do with the post office you can do right from

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>your desk. Instead, buy in print official US postage using

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your own printer and computer print postage for any letter

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>or package the instant you need it, and then the

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>mail person just picks it up and you're good to go.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It's easy and it's convenient. Here at how stuff Works

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, we use stamps dot com and we need

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to send out the odd bit of merchandise or correspondence,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and we want you to try it out as well.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So right now, go to stamps dot com. And use

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our promo code stuff that's stuff. For this special offer,

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a four week trial plus a hundred and

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>ten dollar bonus OFFWATH that includes postage and a digital scale.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So don't wait. Go to stamps dot com right now

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>before you do anything else. Click on the microphone at

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of the homepage and type in stuff that

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>stamps dot com inter stuff and start mailing things. So

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about how one of the problems here is

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of uh, ambiguity and subjectivity and

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>how we define the idea of the creep Lots of

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>people will probably agree on what's a creepy situation, what

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>which person is a creep? But what what what are

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the actual criteria? Yeah, I mean it's so subjective. One

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of the articles I was looking at was the Age

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Age of Creepiness by Nathan Heller, published in

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The New Yorker and uh he and he brings up

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of fictional characters as thought experiments. Here, for instance,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he says, is John Travolta creepy as a disco predator

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>in Saturday Night Fever? Hard to say? Is he creepy

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>as a weathered black clad gentleman who leers at women

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>while fondling their chins. Yes, very much and now forever more?

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>What change? He's of course referring to Uh, classic John

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Travolta versus modern John Travolta. And does modern John Travolta

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>affect the way you feel about classic John Travolta? Yeah?

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, like men at the time, did

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>anyone would anyone dare say? Is John Travolta creepy and

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>satura Saturday night to fever? Or is that merely us

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at current John travol To and then looking backwards

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>through time? And it brings up the question of like,

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how does the suaveness of the dude inform whether or

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>not you think he's creepy? Yeah. Like another example that

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Heller brings up is Don Draper from Madman. Don Draper

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is a suave character. Uh. John Ham is a very

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>handsome actor, and we get to know a lot about

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>his complexities and his dark side, and you know what's

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 1>good in him, But he's he's definitely a creeper. Uh

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the time, maybe a lot of the time.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But how do you how do you actually categorize it?

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>When is he a creep and when is he uh endearing?

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>In that book we mentioned Creepiness by Adam Cootsko. He

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>also argues that creepy types are haunting due to their

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>quote peculiar power of attraction. So our eyes are drawn

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to the creep. You know, how can you how can

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you not look at the creep You can't let them

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just disappear into the background because they're capturing your attention. Yeah,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you you have to process who and what they are.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Though he's primarily focused on fictional characters right like on TV.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's time to look at a study

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that will actually quantify what makes a creep uh. And

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>so this study is called on the Nature of Creepiness

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's published in New Ideas in Psychology this year,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and the researchers, Frank McAndrew and Sarah Kinkey tried for

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time that we know of in the history

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of science, to take an empirical and quantified look at

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the experience of creepiness and how it relates to usage

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the word. And I think this is really interesting

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because lots of scientists have studied fear, anxiety and all

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that and creepiness as we've been talking about. Is this

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>seemingly universal and utterly conversationally pervasive topic, but until now

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really been studied on its own to look

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>at what makes it unique. Yeah, it's been it's been

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the twilight, everyone's setting the light in the dark. That's

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a that's a very nice way of putting it. But anyway,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So I want to quote their mission statements sort of

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>what what they set out to do. Quote. It is

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the goal of this paper to introduce a theoretical perspective

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on the common psychological experience of feeling creeped out and

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to uncover the cues that we use to label other

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>people as creepy. So two main questions, what does it

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>mean to be creeped out? And who's creepy? Okay, So

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>McAndrew and ken Ki they're uh, they're they're sort of working.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Assumption is that we have this internal creepiness detector that

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is a defense system warning us against some kind of threat.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And they based this on research indicating things like that

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>creepy interactions literally make us feel the chills, uh, and

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that other psychological research has associated feelings of literal coldness

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with other types of threats, such as the social threat

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>triggered by the experience of social exclusion. Um. But it's

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not just a warning against a threat because simply observing

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>common usage. As we talked about at the very beginning

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of this episode, you would not describe an overtly terrify

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>terrifying encounter as creepy. If a friend tells you, uh,

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he was chased down the street by a maniac with

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a chainsaw, that is not creepy. Creepy is what if

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a guy standing across the street staring at you,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that's probably creepy, right. Yeah. It's kind of like if

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're walking down the street and you're trying to decide

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>whether to remain on this side of the street or

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to cross over and continue on the other side. Is

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the individual on this side of the street are they

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like karate punching the air and like beating trash cans

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with something that would be more overtly threatening, And you

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>would say, I choose not to walk on that side

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the street. If it's just somebody out there like

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>feeding pigeons or reading a newspaper, You're like, no problem,

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I walked by people doing that all the time. Not

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a threat. It's that person who's kind of shifty that

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>person who you you can't quite get a read on.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>What if it's a guy just sitting on the sidewalk

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>revving a wood chipper but not putting anything in it.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>M hmmm, depends how much woods around. I guess that's

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>again it's I'm gonna have to look for more contextual quotes,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>will come back to it. Okay, So the authors they

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>offer a hypothesis explaining the nature of creepiness, which is that, um,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the distinct feature that makes something creepy is ambiguity, meaning

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a lack of certainty about whether someone or something is threatening,

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or a lack of certainty about the nature of the threat. Um.

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So already I can hear that. Okay, that that's making

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. Creepiness involves some kind of uh feeling

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of not being sure how to react to something. But

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>then they've got an additional hypothesis. Creepiness may be related

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to the concept of in evolutionary psychology of agency detection.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we've talked about agency detection on the show before. Um,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of having an overactive or hyperactive agency detection means

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that if you're walking down the road and you hear

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>some leaves wrestling, you say who's there instead of just assuming, well,

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just the wind. I don't even need to look, right,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And why would this be favored evolutionarily, Well, false false

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>positives don't cost you much checking to see who's there

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>when nobody's there. That's not a big risk to take.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But false negatives can get you killed if it wrestles

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and you don't look. You know, one in a million times,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that might be the maniac with the chainsaw. Yeah, it's

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a type one errorsus a type two error. And nature

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to select for freaking out a little bit

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>too much over things that are not a threat. Right,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So they say that our tendency is to sort of

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over value cautiousness in potentially threatening situations, which could lead

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to the experience of creepiness. You know, this guy here,

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done anything overtly dangerous or threatening. You're just

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>getting some cues that's set off that over sensitive threat alarm,

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps you on guard. And that feeling of

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>creepiness is the biological sensation of being kept on guard.

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>All right. Now, They've got four explicit hypotheses in the

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>paper that they want to test through their their experiment,

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be in the form of a

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of a big survey to get people's attitudes on creepiness.

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So the first hypothesis is, h if creepiness communicates a threat,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>males are going to be more likely to be perceived

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as creepy than females simply since males are more violent

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and physically threatening to more people. Makes sense. Uh. Second hypothesis, UH,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>females are going to be more likely than males to

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>perceive some sort of sexual threat from a creepy person. Okay, okay,

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand that too. Third hypothesis, there are certainly they're

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be certain occupations that will be perceived as more

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>creepy than other ones, like occupations that signal a fascination

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>with what they call threatening stimuli like death or non

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>normative sex, unacceptable types of sex. And and that that

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>one that particular description I don't doubt at all. But

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it also it really underlines the problematic, contextual, and and

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>individual aspects of UH of that the threat analysis that's

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>going on, like what is normal sex exactly to to

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to any given individual right, it's going to be based

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on the you know, it's gonna very person to person

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it is your is the character here walking you know,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 1>through an Amish town or they're walking down the streets

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen seventies New York and a Scorsese film. You know, Yeah,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>some bad lieutenants are creepier than others. And then their

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>last hypothesis, since they hypothesize that creepiness is about uncertainty, Uh,

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna say that non normative nonverbal behavior, so weird

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>mannerisms and behaviors and actions or characteristics associated with unpredictability

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>will be positively associated with perceptions of creepiness. So that's

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of to say that acting weird and acting unusual,

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>acting unpredictable is going to be associated with creepiness. Okay, yeah,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because because there is like shiftiness is creepiness for the

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>most part. Right, Yeah, So what are their methods? How

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are they going to test this? Well, they admit that

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this first research, since you know, creepiness hasn't

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>really been studied this way before. This is mostly exploratory,

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>so they're just trying to get some places to start

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>test the waters, figure out the depths, and then it's uh,

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it's future studies and meta analysis that will give us

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some real understanding exactly. So in this study, it

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was one thousand, three d forty one individuals heavily weighted

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>towards females. There were a thousand, twenty nine females and

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and twelve males, ranging an age from eighteen

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to seventy seven, the main age of about twenty nine,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were all recruited online to respond to a

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>survey for quote, a study about creepiness. I wonder if

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>people who are interested in answering questions about creepiness have

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a non standard view of creepiness. That's always a concern

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with research, right exactly, And they admit that in their study.

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>They talk about the some of the limitations of their

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>methods at the end of the paper, and you can

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>mention those in a bit. Uh one. One other problem

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that they mentioned is that they wish that they had

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten data on the participants country of origin. They do

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>not have that. They believe the sample is primarily American

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but contained a significant portion of international participants. But we

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, so we shouldn't really consider that um at

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>least for the purpose of this study. Exactly. As we'll

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>get into a bit. I I have some some strong

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>feelings about the Nate the role of this absolutely Yeah,

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>well I think creepiness is going to be highly culturally determined.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So yes. Um, So, here's the first part of the study.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You get in there, imagine you're participating in this study.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>The first thing is a forced choice question, is a

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>creepy person more likely to be male or female? Well,

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>male is going to be the the answer they're going

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to give. Survey says you are absolutely correct. The result

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was point three percent of respondents thought that creepy people

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>were much more likely to be males than females. Unquote.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So also, males and females were in almost perfectly well

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>agreement that males were more likely to be creepy. So yes.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>When we asked earlier, is creepin as a male issue,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it really seems like it is. Men and women agree

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that men are generally the creeps. Then they get to

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the next section. The next session is a scenario that

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they're prompted to imagine. So it goes like this quote,

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine a close friend of yours whose judgment you trust, Robert,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>have you got the close friend in mind? Okay, a

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>close friend of mine. Now imagine that this friend tells

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you that she or he just met someone for the

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>first time and tells you that the person was creepy. Okay.

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>After reading the prompt, these participants, they're given a list

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of forty four behaviors and physical traits. Just a couple

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of examples had lots of tattoos or never looked your

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>friend in the eye, and they're asked to rate the

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>likelihood on a scale of one to five, one being

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not likely at all, five being very likely that the

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>creep from the friends creep encounter exhibited these traits. And

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as you can expect, some traits were considered much creepier

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>than others. So they say, and the results that that

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some things highly correlated to creepiness that people

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>gave the answer for here. One of them was this

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>big composite variable that they put together out of these

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>appearance and nonverbal behaviors traits that people rated as creepy,

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>such as the person stood too close to your friend,

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the person had greasy hair, the person had a peculiar smile,

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the person had bulging eyes, and things like that. Though

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like bulging eyes, but anyway, and then

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they go on to say also other things that were

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>rated as creepy in this section where being of the

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite sex as the friend, though they think this is

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>probably due to the predominantly female sample in the study

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>being extremely thin. That's strange. I don't usually think of

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that as a creepy trait, but well, I guess it

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>comes into what's extremely thin? Yeah, so extremely I guess. So. Yeah.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>But even it, like we're getting into judgment hall is

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>based on someone's physical appearance, right, But I mean that's

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>how the mind works. Oh yeah, yeah, I mean I

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>think this explicitly calls out a lot of unfair, prejudicial attitudes, right,

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these things. I mean, there's nothing wrong

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with having greasy hair, right, No, I mean that's not

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>threatening in itself. I mean it it depending on the

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>context and the culture. Like greased back, slicked back hair

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>could be the height of fashion like that, it shows

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that you were exceedingly well groomed. In other scenarios you

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>can afford the special pomade. Yeah, you're you're you're slicked back,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you're dapper dan man, you know. But other times it

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just means that your hair is greasy and you haven't

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>taken care of yourself. So it it varies. It depends

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what the fashion is, what the uh, what the individual's

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>expectations are, right, But of course they're testing people's attitudes,

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and people's attitudes aren't necessarily always so enlightened. But anyway,

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So going on from that, another thing that's uh that's

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cited as not looking the interaction partner in the eye.

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>If somebody's like, you know, not just not make an

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>eye contact, staring at the floor, maybe asking to take

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a picture of the interaction partner. I can see that

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>watching people before interacting with them. This, I think this

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very significant. Asking about details of

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one's personal life, having a mental illness, there's another prejudicial attitude,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, uh, talking about his or her own personal life,

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>displaying too much or too little emotion, being older, and

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>steering the conversation towards sex. On the other hand, I

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was just wondering, what are the least creepy descriptors, Like,

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>what did they rate the lowest? Uh? These include was

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a child. Okay, that's funny because I can think of

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of creepy children, but they're usually in movies and stuff. Yeah,

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're doing something that's out of context and unchildlike

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and then also was fashionably dressed, talked a lot about clothes.

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>These are these are interesting, like the fashionably s like,

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, like how much of it is the weight

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the scenario that the individual is is bringing to mind,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>like they're imagining like a bar setting perhaps, and then

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>they would the impeccably dressed kind of I'm guessing to

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>go back to Saturday Night Live. I'm thinking that the

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Roxbury guys, right, are they fashionably dressed? Um? But they

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>are creeps. They are creeps and they they are they

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>are Yeah, we should have mentioned them earlier because they

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>are invading personal space there there. They seem to have

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>put way too much thought into their fashion, whether or

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>not their fashion actually lines up with what is uh

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>currently culturally the norm. Okay, next part of the thing.

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>They also looked at occupations, right, same thing, rate rate

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and occupation on the scale of one to five. How

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>creepy is it? This was really this is really interesting.

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>This is one of my favorite parts of the study

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because we end up seeing, like the their scale of

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the professions that came up creepy, the less the least creepy.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The creepiest is the clown of course, the poor clown

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>right up there with like undertakers and the individuals we

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier people engaged in uh some sort of sexual business.

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The four that were significantly higher than the mean were

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the clown, the taxidermists, the sex shop owner, and the

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>funeral directory. But one of these is not like the other.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's wrong with clowns other than the fact

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that you don't like the way they look? Yeah? Well,

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the taxidermist one, too, is one where it

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.479
<v Speaker 1>totally depends on your setting. Like if you're talking about

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>rural Tennessee. Uh, but the taxidermists, they're just doing their thing.

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They're just stuffing those deer heads and those fish and all.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>That's just a part of your life. Taxidermist in the

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>big city slightly different vibe going on. But they the

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>clown is ever problematic, and it's is kind of a

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>unique intry here. We should do a whole episode sometime

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>on the maligned clown. Yeah, I would love to, because

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much of the mind that this we've kind

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of convinced ourselves that clowns are creepy. Yes, there are

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>clown examples that are avertly creepy. But we've kind of

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>been telling ourselves the same creepy clown joke over and

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>over again until we can't see anything else. But I digress. No,

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you're exactly right. I think a lot of

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>clown fear is performative. Though at the same time I

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge sometimes clowns can be creepy. But why why is

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this a recently emergent phenomenon. You don't hear people talking

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about clowns being creepy hundred years ago. Yeah, clowns were great.

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Clowns were the the entertainment of choice for young and

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 1>old alike. Uh. And here's the thing. People often say, Oh, well,

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the clown is creepy because the clown is like a

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>false face and you don't really know what's behind it.

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And yet the least creepy profession on this scale was

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the meteorologist. And and I get the same vibe off

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of like most meteorologists like he you know, kind of

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the standard newscaster type of person. Here is someone who

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I really can't get a read on because they're putting

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out this demeanor. You know. The funny thing is I

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I know of some specific creep be meteorologists like we're

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>involved in crimes. But funny side note. Also there's a

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>weather dot com article gloating over the fact that meteorologists

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>got rated the least creepy of all professions. Um, and

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think, I think just we've got to remember

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>now to put somebody at ease, always be a fashionably

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dressed child meteorologist who can't stop talking about clothes. Yeah.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Now you people are probably wondering where do I rank? Well,

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you can certainly look up this, uh this article and

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 1>find yourself. We find out fund to find ourselves as

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>writers kind of in the middle of the scale though.

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It so our mean is two point fourteen, and that

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>means we're below the mean of the scale, right, if

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the mean is three, it's one to five scales. So

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we're generally considered less than the medium creepiness. Most professions

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on here got less than medium creepiness. That I can't

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't get over the fact though that according to

0:43:56.160 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this we are more creepy than actors. I'm maybe I

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>just know some creepy actors, but well we're not much

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's almost the same. Almost. Yeah, I guess we're we

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>were kind of equivalent. Over that that tiny slice of

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a percentage point. It's true actors should be at the

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the list. Do I think one could make

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>an argument for that, but hey, we're no, at least

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>when we're not the taxidermist, clown, sex shop owner, who

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>would be like right there at the top. Okay, so

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we did, we did occupations. But also they wanted to

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 1>see about hobbies. And in this next section they didn't

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have a list of hobbies. Instead that this was a

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>different format. They were just asked to list, in a

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 1>free prompt, a couple of hobbies that the subjects would

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>consider creepy. Yes, the creepy. The creepy hobbies here. Um

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so collecting things, especially dolls, insects, and body parts with

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>collecting body parts. Again, one of these things is not

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>like the other. I think it calls to mind like

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>questions of like where did that come from? How did

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you get it? Yeah? The body Yeah, the body part

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>one is is far creepier than collecting insects and and

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and dolls. Like my sister collects dolls, shouldn't collect body parts.

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I would be concerned if it was body parts. Um

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>what does she just collect doll parts? Full full dolls?

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But that at any rate. Yeah, there's kind of I

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like maybe there's an unfair stigma with that too,

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with the collecting of dolls, this is my arms room.

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>There's They also pointed out hobbies that entail a great

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 1>deal of watching, either in the form of photographing people, uh,

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>bird watching and uh. And also they pointed out taxidermy

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and having quote a fascination with pornography or exotic sexual activity.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But yet again, this is going to be one of

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>those things where we we do wish we had had

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>country data on this, right, because this is probably gonna

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be highly culturally variable. Yeah, I mean exotic sexual activity

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>like that, it depends entirely and you choose to define that, Like,

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of individuals out there who might define uh,

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, homosexual activity as that. And therefore any um,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, gay or lesbian or bisexual individual is then

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a de facto creep based on this scale. Oh, I

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think that is like, if you go back fifty years

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is a like an American culture

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago, you will see a strong association between,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, a gay man and the concept of creepiness. Yeah. Now,

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess hopefully we seem to be losing that. I

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>don't really get a sense of that today, but now

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's certainly like the homophobic attitude towards uh gay's

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>gay men in particular, is that is that yes they

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are there's something threatening, there's something creepy about them that

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like the the idea that this individual is gay and

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they want to have sex with me, like for the

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like gay in or out there, uh you know, cruising

0:46:55.520 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>around for for straight bottled up uh square to to

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>warp or something you know, Oh no, oh no, yeah, yeah,

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they're coming for you. They're not coming for you, trust me.

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Um uh but but yeah, that's I think undoubtedly a

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>part of this. Okay, we're getting towards the end of

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the study, but there's there's another section. In this next section,

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>subjects are asked to rate, on a scale of one

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to five their level of agreement with fifteen statements about

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>creepy people. That would start with a prompt like when

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I meet someone that seems creepy dot dot dot, and

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 1>then you'd have a statement to complete, do you agree

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with this or not? For example, I think this person

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has sexual interest in me, or people are creepier online

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>than when I meet them. Face to face, and so

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>they did some analysis on that and the results. Analyzing

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the results from the section, the authors sort of conclude

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that the following statements are the most commonly believed to

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be true about creepy people. So they make us feel

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>feel fearful or anxious. Uh. They believe that the creepiness

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 1>resides in the individual more than in his or her behavior.

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that's unfortunate. I think people probably

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>do feel that way like that. It's it's really that

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a person is a creep and always a creep, rather

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>than that what they're doing right now is creepy. I

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>feel more the opposite. Yeah, but it does come into

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea that we just dismiss someone as a creep.

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>We write them off as a creep until additional information, uh,

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know tells us otherwise. But if we're just dismissing them,

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that information may never come because it's not like we're

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to gonna know the creep unless we have

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to write. Right. Okay, So more creepy behaviors. We think

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they may have a sexual interest in us. That seems key,

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it represents a sexual threat. Um. Uh, they're

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>creepy when they exhibit multiple symptoms of creepiness rather than

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just one. And I think that makes sense because I

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>would sort of call this creep clustering similar to the

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>crank clustering. Like if you meet somebody who believes in

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>one crank theory, they probably believe in a lot of

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 1>crank theories. If you meet somebody who's into time cube,

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're probably also I don't know, flat earther, Actually

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they probably wouldn't be both of those, as they're incompatible.

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 1>But but you know what I mean about that. Yeah, yeah, So,

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like the kind of person who might encounter

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>like nine or era or even modern era Glynn Danzig, Like,

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if they're the kind of person who thinks, you know,

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>some other things they're into, well, okay, I guess the

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>thing is if they're the type of person that's going

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to think tattoos or long black hair happens to be creepy,

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they're also going to think that having like sharpened fingernails

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be creepy. They're gonna think that that

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>other aspects of his persona are also creepy. How can

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sharpened fingernails be creepy? I know, it's it's it's beautiful. Okay,

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so a few more so, Uh, the expected intimacy and

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>frequency of the interaction with the person moderates perceptions of creepiness.

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So uh, just sort of like expectations are going to

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>change the way you receive the conversation. That obviously makes sense. Uh.

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Something that is done by somebody who's close to you

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is not physically but you know, a close friend of

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>yours is might not be creepy, but if a stranger

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>did it, it it would be creepy. That's kind of obvious.

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Next thing that people believe that creepy people are unable

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to change, but they do not necessarily have bad intentions.

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and then finally, people who follow social rules

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of behavior are not perceived as creepy. So basically, if

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you if you mind your manners and you follow all

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the rules of normal social interaction, as often kind of

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous and unstated as they are, you can avoid being

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>considered creepy. So the serial murderer who completely buries uh

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>their true identity is not creepy. Dexter is not creepy,

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Dexter came up in some of the literature

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, either I think they made the argument

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>that Dexter does become creepy later on because there's some

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of a an incest angle or something. Maybe. I mean,

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I never really I only watched a little bit of Dexter.

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's not um, he's he doesn't come off as

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>creepy to people who know him, right just because he's

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He basically minds his manners and doesn't

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>act too weird in public. Yeah, and and I didn't

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>watch a lot of the show, but you also, I

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.760
<v Speaker 1>did not get the strong impression that he really enjoyed

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing all that much, like he just

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of did it because he had to. I think

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:27.359
<v Speaker 1>he did. Yeah. I mean again, we're sitting here talking

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about a show we haven't really seen. It's true, okay,

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but that is the creepy judgment. Saying someone is creepy

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:36.839
<v Speaker 1>is judging a show you haven't really seen. Okay. So

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more about their their analysis. They did say

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that from the results, they think the hypothesis that creepiness

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is linked to unpredictability is somewhat supported. Uh. They say

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that subjects more often agreed that the statement quote I

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>am uncomfortable because I cannot predict how he or she

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>will behave was descriptive of their reaction to a creepy person,

0:51:57.320 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and people were close to neutral on the statement quote,

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>even though someone maybe creepy, I usually think that I

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>understand his or her intentions. So it seems like there's

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 1>some support for creepiness being unpredictability. They also found support

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for the hypothesis that women are more likely to perceive

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a creepy person as a sexual threat. Uh. And then

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 1>in the final section that the last thing that was

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on the study was a single yes no question do

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>most creepy people know that they are creepy? The responses

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:31.479
<v Speaker 1>were a hundred and fifteen yes. That was like eight

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>point six percent, seven hundred nine seven No, that was

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like six and uh four hundred and twenty nine unsure,

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.959
<v Speaker 1>which was like thirty two. So generally people don't think

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that creepy people know that they're creepy, or they can't

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>tell whether they know or not, and then other straight

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>stray observations. I thought this was kind of interesting. The

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 1>authors point out that older participants seem to be a

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit less concerned about creepy people and less likely

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to perceive sex fual threat or an intent to harm,

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting. I don't know if I would have

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>predicted that that older people are less creeped out. Huh,

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that is interesting, Like to what maybe do you know,

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>basically like they just don't see themselves as being threatened

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that much by the creeps in their midst or does

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that mean there maybe even more open to their own

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>creepiness and the creepiness of others. It could be or

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't know, maybe over time. I mean, as

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed discussed, you encounter a lot of creeps in

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. Creepiness is a common everyday experience. And the

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 1>more you experience creepiness and it does no harm to you,

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>maybably become desensitized to it. Or Yeah, one or two

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>things is going to happen, right, Either you're gonna you're

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be desensitized to it or you are gonna just

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:48.120
<v Speaker 1>really go down the well of fearing the creep all

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 1>around you. Right. Yeah, so uh, we we should move

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on from this study. But one thing I do want

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to mention at the end is the authors acknowledge some

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 1>limitations of their study. Like we talked about, this is

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is an online survey. So this is

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>very preliminary. It's more sort of like establishing uh leads

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for other research in the future. Because with an online

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 1>survey like this, one possibility that you have is a

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>problem with self selection bias of the participants. Right, So,

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>since it's an online volunteer survey, we're not necessarily hearing

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>from a truly random sample of people, but from the

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of people who would click on a Facebook link

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to fill out an online psychological psychological survey about creepiness.

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That that is presumably a type of person indeed, um

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and they might be giving different types of answers than

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a truly random sampling of the population would. Also we

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>already pointed out, for example, the lack of data and

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>country of origin. This would be very interesting to look into,

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably, you know, if somebody's going to study this.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Moving ahead from this point, I think this would be

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the most interesting things to look at. What

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in what ways are these creepy behaviors culturally variable and

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>which ones are more universal? One thing I would say,

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>it's well known, for example, that some cultures have very

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:06.359
<v Speaker 1>different feelings about things like eye contact yes than other

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cultures do, like sometimes making prolonged eye contact with somebody.

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:12.839
<v Speaker 1>In one place that might be totally normal and nice

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:15.439
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, and in other places it might be

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>considered very creepy, right, or staring in general, like is

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it okay to stare at somebody who stands out a

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit? Yeah? Yeah, it's going to vary from culture

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to culture. All right, let's take a quick break and

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we come back. We'll look at a few more aspects

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of creepiness. Hi, I'm Lauren Vogelbaum, a host of the

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>new House to works Now podcast. Every week, I'll be

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing you three stories from our team about the weird

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and wondrous developments we've seen in science, technology, and culture.

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Fresh episodes will be out every Monday on iTunes, Spotify,

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Google Play Music, and everywhere else that find podcasts are found.

0:55:54.400 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the big takeaways from this study we

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.359
<v Speaker 1>looked at and from some of the discussion we've had

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 1>so far, is the idea of the threat ambiguity right

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in creepiness. That creepiness is different from scariness because when

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you are scared, you're scared of something that is overt

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or that being scared might be a part of creepiness,

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's okay to openly display fear and revulsion from

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>something that is overtly threatening. Like we said, guy running

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at you with a chainsaw, it's okay to scream and

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>run away from that. If there's a guy who's just

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:26.879
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit creepy and you scream and run

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 1>away from him, we sort of have this conflict, right,

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like we're feeling, Am I just being rude? Right? If

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I do that? Um and the one of the authors

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the study of Frank McAndrew. In another essay, he

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:44.240
<v Speaker 1>terms this the conflict between self preservation and self presentation,

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a good way of putting it. Yeah,

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we're all walking this web of social expectations and societal norms,

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's an individual up ahead. It's kind of shaking

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the web a little bit, and we don't want to

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 1>plumb it off the web with them. Don't want something

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 1>bad to happen. But we also don't want to shake

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the web ourselves exactly so, So in that sense, creepiness

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.479
<v Speaker 1>is uncomfortable, not just because it entails anxiety, but also

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's inherently awkward. It's uncertain, you don't know what

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the best thing to do, is, so you're stuck in

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this state of I'm not comfortable, I don't know what

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to do, and that itself is a source of distress.

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>One more thing I want to mention real quickly is

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that mc andrew of the Creepiness Study is also interested

0:57:29.000 --> 0:57:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in the creepiness of places. Were primarily focused on creepy

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people today, but he has an essay at the Conversation

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you can check out about the evolutionary psychology of haunted houses. Interested. So,

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know what a number of you are

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>probably thinking out there. Well, this is all great, but

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what did Freud have to say about it? Right? He's

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the final authority today? Well, uh, Sigmund Freud did not

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>discuss the creep specifically, but in nineteen nineteens the uncanny

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he did have this to say, and you know is

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it will discuss This involves translation of the terms, but

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, the subject of the uncanny is a province

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of this kind. It undoubtedly belongs to all that is terrible,

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to all that arouses dread and creeping horror. It is

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>equally certain, too, that the word is not always used

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in a clearly definable sense, so that it tends to

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>coincide with whatever excites dread. Yet we may expect that

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it implies some intrinsic quality which justifies the use of

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a special name. One is curious to know what this

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>peculiar quality is, which allows us to distinguish as uncanny

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>certain things within the boundaries of what is fearful. So

0:58:40.600 --> 0:58:42.919
<v Speaker 1>he's start of playing the same game that we've been doing,

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a distinction. He's got this term uncanny

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 1>literally in the German, I think it's das unheimlich, right,

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>das unheimlich translated as the uncanny, this sort of creepiness feeling.

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's an important distinction to make between

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>what we mean when we say creepiness and what Freud

0:59:00.920 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 1>meant by the uncanny or dassunheimlich and um. But but

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he's playing the same kind of tight rope walk of Okay,

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly just fear, right, it's something else. And

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Freud quotes Ernst Ginch to find a He's trying to

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>find a perfect example of what encapsulates his idea of

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the uncanny experience. He writes, quote doubts whether and apparently

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>inanimate being is really alive or conversely whether a lifeless

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>object might not be in fact animate. Okay, so I

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>guess I can can see that like that can be creepy.

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>People often refer to things in the uncanny valleys creepy, right,

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>something that's a little close to being similar to human

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>but not close enough that it's real, and so it

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 1>gives you the willie's uh. And they give the example

0:59:50.800 --> 0:59:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of waxwork figures, artificial dolls or automatons. Freud gives that, yeah,

0:59:57.000 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I would agree that, yet wax models of individuals life

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>wax models are are uncanny and are perhaps a little creepy.

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever been to a wax museum? I have,

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while, but yeah, I've I've been to

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a really have been to, like a small one that

1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>had a few different exhibits. They should be illegal. But

1:00:13.880 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but a writer we talked about earlier, Kotsko, he talks

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about Freud's concepts, right, yeah, and he he makes the

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>argument essentially that that that the uncannying is here, the

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Lunheimlich essentially boils down, to quote, the inherent creepiness of

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>human desire. Okay, well, if it's Freud, obviously desires coming

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>in right, and and Yeah, I think human desires maybe

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>inherently creepy if you look at it in the right light. Uh. Now.

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>He also points out there on Freud's list of suggested

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>translations for unheimlich um, there is uncomfortable, uneasy, gloomy, dismal, uncanny,

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ghastly haunted in reference to a house, and of a

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in reference to a man, quote a repulsive fellow. Uh.

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of those get it better than others. I mean,

1:01:00.880 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>creepiness is inherently uncomfortable and uneasy. I think those are good.

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Ghastly gloomy. Nah, that's not really right. And you know,

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually I end up kind of waffling on this

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of of all this when Freud says the following

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the same work, dismembered limbs, a severed head, a

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hand cut off at the wrist, feet which danced by themselves.

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>All these have something peculiarly uncanny about them, especially when,

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as in the last instance, they prove able to move

1:01:31.720 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of themselves. In addition, what, yeah, I would say, that

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is not creepy like that is that is the realm

1:01:37.960 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of like straight up maddening terror. Yeah, that's the person

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in the casket opens her eyes and starts screaming yeah,

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't compare a weird character played by Steve V.

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Simmy in a film to two disembodied parts like flopping

1:01:52.720 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>around or a or a or or or a human

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>head rolling around and moaning or totally yeah, yeah, I

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>completely agree. I think Freud's and Heimlich is something different

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>from creepiness. Uh. The the overlap is kind of interesting

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because it seems in some senses to kind of capture creepiness.

1:02:10.680 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that Freud goes on to talk

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>about is this idea of you know, of course, the

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>familiarity aspect, like Heimlich is a word in German that

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>so it has a lot of range of meaning. It

1:02:21.840 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of means hidden or private sort of, but it

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>also encapsulates the idea of something feeling at home like homeie,

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>homely or familiar um, and so it can take on

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all these different kinds of meanings, bringing lots of connotations.

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's that's where a lot of this

1:02:39.640 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity comes from. It's this huge, loaded, big word in German,

1:02:45.440 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and creepiness is not the same way in English. Creepiness

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in English, I think is a much more uh specific word.

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>If that makes any sense. Yeah, and it's certainly. Certainly

1:02:55.920 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if any listeners out there have have other ex amples

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of linguistic models for creepiness, other translations of it that

1:03:04.640 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have that carry slightly different weight within a given culture,

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear about that. What one quote

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that I do think might be a little bit useful

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is that Freud quotes Shelling in his essay on on

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Uncanny and says that Shelling defined the uncanny is

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>everything that ought to have remained hidden and secret and

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>yet comes to light. Okay, that now sounds like they're

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's talking about creepiness again. Sort of, Yeah, because

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of see that like something some a

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>person who's behaving creepy, there's there is like a pressure

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>building in them. Often, you know, there's like something that

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is a behavior that you are worried they may express

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're not yet expressing or something like that. Alright,

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So we've we've pretty much we've pretty much covered what

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we currently know about creepiness, and we've discussed some examples

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of creepiness, uh and and try to to you know,

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>dismantle uh, the notion itself. One thing this is I

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up something that I kept thinking about

1:04:09.240 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as as we're discussing these these various creepy factors on

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the creepy checklists, the various creepy characters that come to mind,

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is, you know, to to what extent is

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>uh is the perception of a creep like inherently racist?

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Like like how much ethnic fear and ethnic anxiety is

1:04:33.480 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is wound up in our perception of the creep. You know,

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I can honestly say that when you said this, I

1:04:39.080 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>hadn't encountered anything to make me think this, because there's

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously plenty of you know, racism and bias in the

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>way people assess potentially threatening or negative characteristics of other people.

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we all have implicit biases, um, and

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and we make judgments about people that are unfair based

1:04:57.800 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on you know, superficial external character sticks. But as I've

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>always interpreted interpreted it to me, creep is a fairly

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like a race or ethno neutral concept. When when I

1:05:09.080 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think of a creep, I I certainly don't think of

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a person of a of a different race or different culture, right, um.

1:05:15.960 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But I can see how it certainly could be interpreted

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that way because as we've talked about the creep in

1:05:22.400 --> 1:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>many ways, is in the eye of the beholder. Yeah,

1:05:24.960 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are some activities that are probably going

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty universally considered creepy. But then there are

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>other things that are just basically reflecting the prejudices of

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the of the creepy. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, we're definitely

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>not at the point where if you call someone or creep,

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna come back and call you a racist for it.

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm pondering here, I guess is that there's

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot in the stereotypical creep that lines up

1:05:49.640 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not only with character ambiguity, but also racial ambiguity. So

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the other the you know, one whose physical characteristics diverge

1:05:56.920 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from the norm, whose fashion sense diverges from the norm,

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who's social graces, grasp of language, and perhaps even expectations

1:06:04.160 --> 1:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of relationship interactions is different or is believed to differ

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from the status quo. Uh And so, as as I

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>looked at some of the stereotypical mainstream examples, I kept

1:06:14.280 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>asking myself, Wait, is this person considered creepy because of

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at least implicit racism or xenophobia? Uh? So I have

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>an example here all right, So, and I present this

1:06:28.120 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as an open question. I'm not pretending to have this

1:06:30.040 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>all figured out. But The Big Lebowski one of my

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite movies, and I am I am not in any

1:06:36.080 --> 1:06:40.439
<v Speaker 1>way of uh, you know, criticizing the film or or

1:06:40.480 --> 1:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, criticizing the Cohen Brothers. But it's probably freshen

1:06:43.360 --> 1:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>my mind because I saw it last week. So we

1:06:46.440 --> 1:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>have a number of fabulous creepy characters played by very

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>talented actors. H And they're creepy for multiple reasons. So

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>let's first of all, this Jesus and Jesus Jesus and

1:06:57.800 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>overtly we can say Jesus is cre because he's an

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>alleged sex offender. It's loud, he invokes threats of sexual violence. Yeah.

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a Lulie nukel n uncle. Yes, the nihilist

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Peter Stormaer. Yes, fabulous, fabulous actor plays a great creep

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>especially in this. So he's a nihilist, he's a pornographic actor,

1:07:21.040 --> 1:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a musician and a criminal. It's plenty to be

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to find creepy there or so, I don't know if

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I find really creepy really maybe, well, I don't know. Again,

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>perspective plays a key here, but he's at least soft creepy, okay.

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh Knox Harrington, the video artist, pencil thin mustache, he's

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of an observer in the background. He has a

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>strange laugh. It's David Fuellis, yea, who plays him. It's

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a very bit part. But he's also he's the guy

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>who plays the werewolf in the Harry Potter movies. Right,

1:07:53.640 --> 1:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, he was also in uh, the the

1:07:57.000 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Island of Dr Moreau movie that we've discussed here before.

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>He is creepy. Knox Harrington is creepy. Yeah. And then

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and then of course there's Jackie Treehorn, the pornographer Loan Shark.

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He's fascinated with the erotic. He comes off very suave

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. But you can certainly make a case

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>based on the criteria we're discussing earlier that he's a

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>creepy dude and he does drug the dude. So, yeah,

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>that's true. For some reason, the main two I would

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think of as creepy or the Jesus and Knox Harrington.

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So but also whoa, whoa, whoa, there are other creeps

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in The Big Lebowski. Uh. Philip Seymour Hoffman's brand is

1:08:34.240 --> 1:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely creepy. He is definitely creepy. And I think he's

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a good example that yes, there's a there, here's a

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>very white creep character because he's just such a lackey

1:08:43.640 --> 1:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to to the Big Lebowski Jeffrey Lebowski. So we have

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all these reasons to find these individuals creepy, but for

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the first four that I mentioned, on top of these

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>create these these these avert reasons. It's also worth noting

1:08:57.560 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that the characters are respectively Sto Rican, German, English, and

1:09:03.320 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>possibly Italian American. The actors are respectively Italian American, Swedish English,

1:09:08.360 --> 1:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and Italian Americans. So there's there is a certain ethnic

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>otherness in all of these characters. And so I have

1:09:14.800 --> 1:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that to to wonder, like to what extent is that

1:09:17.320 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>weighing it? Like, yeah, it could be like certainly the

1:09:22.080 --> 1:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Jesus would be creepy if he were white. I'm not

1:09:24.840 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>saying he wouldn't be. But do we do we end

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>up pulling in certain uh fears of the ethnic other

1:09:31.400 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into these creepy stereotypes. Huh, Well, I'm not sure that

1:09:36.040 --> 1:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>happens in the Big Lebowski, but I can definitely see

1:09:38.560 --> 1:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>how that would happen. Um and m M. I guess though.

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is probably one of the most innocuous

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's englishness. Knox Harrington's englishness, his English accent is

1:09:51.840 --> 1:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of the creepiest things about him. Yeah, he

1:09:54.479 --> 1:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>comes off Yeah indeed, Um, he's also got that mustache.

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly we can think of various movies, whether

1:10:04.840 --> 1:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like an ethnic heavy shows up, like the the

1:10:08.000 --> 1:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Odd Job situation, where you know, or out of nowhere,

1:10:11.280 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>there's this uh this this Asian uh thug character who's

1:10:15.479 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>working for the supervillain and uh yeah, and there's a

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>certain ethnic otherness that's that's wrapped up in their persona. Yeah,

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely there. In James Bond, I mean

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there we get back into times when it was I

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think more okay to just overtly make your creeps somebody

1:10:31.080 --> 1:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, vaguely foreign. Um. And And it's there

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of times in in James Bond, you'll

1:10:37.400 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>have a creep who is some kind of vaguely foreign

1:10:40.400 --> 1:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>or overtly foreign creep who also just watches the watching.

1:10:44.800 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, he doesn't talk much like Odd Job he

1:10:46.960 --> 1:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>just stares at you. He doesn't say anything. That that

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is I think pretty standard creepy behavior watching without talking.

1:10:54.160 --> 1:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But it can also it's equally can be described as

1:10:57.200 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who simply does not speak your language and and

1:11:00.040 --> 1:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that a loss to interact. Yeah, there you go. Um,

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are plenty of other I think characters

1:11:04.680 --> 1:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>that come to mind of like creepy foreigner stereotypes. Um,

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>there's Ortega. Remember Ortega from one of the ms T

1:11:11.360 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>s Oh Yeah, from the Incredibly Strange Creatures who stopped

1:11:14.000 --> 1:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>living and became mixed up zombies. Yeah, there was kind

1:11:16.320 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of this weird uh like racist Latin American kind of concoction. Uh.

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Peppy Lapew the that the French skunk from the cartoons. No,

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Peppy Lapew goes definitely beyond any ambiguity of threat, Like

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Peppy Lapeuw is a rapist. Yeah, yeah, yeah he is.

1:11:34.760 --> 1:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>He's he is actively chasing down the Was it a

1:11:38.000 --> 1:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>dog or her cat? It's a cat? Yeah. I think

1:11:40.920 --> 1:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Bruno and Burrat are both strong examples of this. You

1:11:44.439 --> 1:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>can make a case for Hannibal Lector as we see

1:11:47.479 --> 1:11:50.879
<v Speaker 1>him in the TV show, is having certain ethnic otherness

1:11:50.960 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to him. M Hmmm, I don't know. Is Hannibal creepy?

1:11:55.680 --> 1:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Is Hannibal Lecture creepy? He should be? Should he's in

1:11:58.600 --> 1:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that don dre promote exactly. I think where we we

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of waffle back and forth between finding him just

1:12:04.520 --> 1:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>endlessly um, almost seductive. You know, he's like a vampire,

1:12:08.960 --> 1:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but then he you know, he's also creepy. There's almost

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of confidence in one's behavior that pre empts, uh,

1:12:17.000 --> 1:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some amount of creepy characterization. Like one of the things

1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we were reading about, and you mentioned earlier that New

1:12:24.120 --> 1:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yorker article which talks about the inherent self consciousness of creepiness,

1:12:29.080 --> 1:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which is again in opposition to one of the things

1:12:31.760 --> 1:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that was found in the study we talked about, you know,

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 1>where people don't think that creeps No, they're creepy. But

1:12:37.560 --> 1:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in that New Yorker article, uh, there was a section

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about how, you know, the constant self consciousness we have

1:12:44.360 --> 1:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is is itself kind of creepy? Like being very self

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>conscious about your behavior can lead to creepiness. Yeah. I

1:12:52.080 --> 1:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>mean to bring it back to Hannibal. Hannibal Lecter is

1:12:55.000 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 1>less creepy than than Buffalo Bill, right, because Buffalo Bill

1:12:59.560 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>acts less sure of himself and less in control of

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:08.759
<v Speaker 1>his his his persona. Yeah, though I guess hannibals probably

1:13:08.760 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>creepy once he well, no, I was gonna say he's

1:13:11.320 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>creepy once he starts eating you, but then he's just

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>outright terrifying. Yeah, yeah, there's so maybe there's less less

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 1>twilight there. Yeah. Well, there you have it, some some

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:24.479
<v Speaker 1>food for thought there at the end, uh cannibalistic or

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>otherwise about the creep, about how we perceived the creep,

1:13:27.840 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>why we perceived the creep, and what the creep means.

1:13:30.439 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We gotta come back sometime and actually do an episode

1:13:32.920 --> 1:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about clowns. Yes, yeah, I would totally be game for that.

1:13:36.120 --> 1:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's some good resources out there, and

1:13:39.320 --> 1:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I have I have a lot of personal thoughts on

1:13:40.960 --> 1:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the meatic. We're gonna shut down your creepy clown names

1:13:44.880 --> 1:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. In the meantime, head on over to stuff

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to bow your mind dot com. That's where you will

1:13:48.439 --> 1:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>find all the podcast episodes. You'll find videos, you'll find

1:13:51.560 --> 1:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>blog posts, and you will find links out to our

1:13:53.439 --> 1:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>various social media accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, tumbler.

1:13:57.840 --> 1:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh you named and if you want to get into

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for this directly. As always, you can email us and

1:14:02.680 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>blow the mind. How stuff works dock for more on

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff

1:14:17.320 --> 1:14:25.519
<v Speaker 1>works dot com? Remember remember the