WEBVTT - Intel Approaches Apple About Investment

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>live from Coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>York and Eva low In sentrancs go.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Bloomberg reports that Intel

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>approached Apple about a possible investment and talks on the

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>two working together more closely.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 3>We have the latest plus.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 4>A quantum breakthrough.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 5>HSBC said it achieved a world first and deploying the

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 5>next frontier computing in financial markets using IBM's Heron processor.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>And Disney gears up for a legal fight with President

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump over the reinstatement of Jimmy Kimmel's show.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 5>At first, we check in on these markets, which if

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 5>you're looking at as that one hundred and we are

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 5>down for a third straight day, but only just We're

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 5>still questioning the.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Overall picture of valuations.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 5>We're still questioning what the inflation print on front and

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 5>they will tell us, and we're still questioning more broadly

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 5>how far we've run up in terms of this seismic

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 5>moves on the S and P five frond in the

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 5>NAST one hundred is still close to record highs. I'm

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 5>looking though at crypto that's actually pulling down yet again.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 5>We've got a key exploration of options tomorrow. We're seeing

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 5>some of those bullish bets coming out of Bitcoin and

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 5>certainly of Eve were down another three point six percent.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 4>But what are looking at under the hood.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's go to our top story.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Intel markedly higher for most of the session,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the only name on the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index in the green.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple also higher. Bloomberg reporting Intel has approached Apple about

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone maker investing in it and held early talks

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 2>on how the US tech firms could work more closely together.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>That's according to sources. Intel, which is now ten percent

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>owned by the US government, is looking to make a

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>comeback and has already secured investment from Nvidia in soft Bank.

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to go out to.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloombo's Ryan Gull, who broke that story with the deal's team.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the very specific details that we had from sources.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>These are early talks.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>What was the structure of what they discussed and what

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>do we know about the status of those talks.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, these are early talks. I would say there are

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 6>still a few unknowns. There's no sense at this point

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 6>what that investment could look like. There's definitely been some

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 6>commentary this morning as people are sort of digesting this news,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 6>and you can see Intel shares are up some twelve

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 6>percent or so over since yesterday and today as they

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 6>think about what this could mean for both companies. I

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 6>think if your Intel, you're looking at what it means

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 6>to right size a balance sheet and your foundry effort.

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Could this mean Apple comes in and thinks about, you know,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 6>sending foundry chipwards to the two Intel's foundry potentially? Could

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 6>this be something more on the product side. Could this

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 6>be packaging for of some of Apple's advanced chips. Maybe,

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 6>But these are early talks, and I think this just

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 6>goes to show that Intel is being quite proactive, especially

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 6>since the United States government took a stake of ten

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 6>percent in an unprecedented move a few weeks ago. But

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, at this point, I think people

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 6>are looking at the this is a potentially positive move

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 6>for Intel, maybe a little more of a middling slash,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, a known move for Apple.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that's reflected in the stock move there. We've

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 5>got seventeen billion added in market oup to Intel.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Less so for.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Apple because well Apple at the moment designs its own chips,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 5>but looks towards TSMC for that. How much do we think,

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 5>though the Apple's dialing in on the fact that they

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 5>committed to six hundred billion dollars of investment in the

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 5>United States.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 6>Listen, I think if you're Tim Cook and you're at

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 6>the White House in front of Donald Trump a few

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago, saying that you're going to invest six hundred

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars over the course of a four year period.

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 6>They already announced a two point five billion dollar investment

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 6>package with Corning, which makes Apple's glass for most of

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 6>its iPhones. You know, six hundred billion dollars is a

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 6>lot of money, and you know if you think about

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 6>how that could be deployed in the United States, as

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 6>far as Apple's made in the United States pledge goes,

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 6>this is about onshoring as much as it is about

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 6>anything else. This is about satisfying the White House's plan

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 6>to have American ships made in the United State dates

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 6>and to sort of satisfy some risk as to concentration

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 6>in Taiwan, where Apple in particular manufacturers most of its chips.

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 6>A TSMC.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>For what it's worth, an Intel spokesperson declined to comment

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 2>on our reporting, and Apple didn't respond to our request

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>for comment.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 3>There's a history lesson that's important here.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Apple, mostly in max but also in phones until twenty

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>nineteen had a lot of Intel silicon in it.

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>That relationships changed.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Explain that same with Nvidia, you know, in video and

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Intel had a rivalry history history that's now changed.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that is a really important point to underscore.

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>About five years ago, Apple decided that it was going

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 6>to transition away from Intel, mostly because it felt that

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 6>Intel's technology, the actual its actual processes to make some

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 6>of these advanced chips wasn't satisfactory enough. So that was

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of a painful breakup for those two companies of

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 6>relationsh ship that started as far beck as two thousand

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 6>and five, when then CEO Steve Jobs transitioned away from

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 6>power PC chips toward Intel. I mean, that was kind

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 6>of a rough breakup as far as Intel's chip making

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 6>ambitions in the United States went.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 5>Ron Gold, it's a great scoop. We thank you for

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 5>breaking it.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Down for us.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's get an investor perspective here.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>Joanne Poeni's portfolio manager of Advisor's Capital Management.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 4>You've had a.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 5>Long history of studying semiconductors as well. At what point

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 5>does Intel become interesting as an investment opportunity when the

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 5>government seems to be backing.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 7>It so hard.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, clearly the government is changing the game for Intel,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 8>but their challenges remain, and their challenges are on the

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 8>innovation side. Their design plus manufacturing has run into trouble

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 8>over the past few years, so much so that they've

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 8>lost a lot of market share to A and B,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 8>and they failed to become a player in the AI

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 8>advanced chips. No amount of government investment is going to

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 8>make their engineer smarter or necessarily speed up innovation. Not

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 8>throwing money at innovation means they can hire better people,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 8>so there might be some room to believe that their

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 8>piece of innovation could improve from here, but they seem

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 8>to have a long way to go. Having potential customers

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 8>on the sidelines, whether that's a Nvidia or an Apple

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 8>or others, will certainly encourage investors to take a harder look.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 8>But right now, an awful lot of assumed outcomes are

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 8>built into the price of the stock, So it's not

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 8>something more enthusiastic about.

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Joanne, You know this industry, you have deep history of

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>covering semiconductors. You also know the names and the players

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes. Right when this story broke. What was

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>your interpretation, This is Intel going out there and shopping

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 2>itself to try and save itself, or this is some

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 2>kind of savvy and smart strategic play by lit bou

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>tan Well.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 8>I think Intel has for a while been trying to

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 8>find customers for its foundry plant, and we saw Pat

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 8>Gelsinger do that earlier, and he was trying to build

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 8>the fabs ahead of having customers. Libutan obviously is taking

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 8>a more cost as approach, which I think investors welcome.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 8>The government money will help them maybe bridge the gap

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 8>between getting those fabs up and running and having customers.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 7>I think it's smart.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 8>They should be talking to everybody that wants to diversify

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 8>away from TSMC. For a long time, the geopolitical situation

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 8>was fairly stable. I think now there are greater risks

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 8>to that political situation and relying just on TSMC, even

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 8>if it does have some manufacturing here in the United States.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Leb Bhutan's real words were I'm not gonna build it

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 5>and then wait for them to come. They've got to come,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 5>and then I'm going to build it, So there is,

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 5>and then the White House jumped in. It is so

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 5>much the national security focus, not only because of course

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 5>one of the key plants that Intel was originally going

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 5>to be focusing in on was in Ohio, and you

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 5>know who's really rather focused on Ohio to the VP

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 5>all of this though, do you think US can become

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 5>a domestic chip making champion without TSMC without some sum.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, Caroline, that's yet to be determined. Intel was

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 8>a US manufacturing champion until they sort of went off

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 8>the rails with some poor decisions on which direction to

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 8>focus for chip manufacturing recipe development. They went down one path,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 8>TSMC went down another. TSMC was right, Intel was wrong,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 8>and now they're trying to make up.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>For that, and it's going to take time.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 8>And I think it's appropriate for potential customers to take

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 8>a look at Intel, even if it's not this year

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 8>or next year that they can be used, but even

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 8>if it's five years from now. In chip design, you

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 8>have to work with your manufacturer because the design details

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 8>depend on the manufacturing recipe.

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 7>So they need to start.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 8>Working together now, even if it's for manufacturing five years

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 8>from now. So there's hope for Intel, but it's a

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 8>little early, I think to be assuming that they're going

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 8>to be.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 7>Successful in this.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Joanne, I think I want to talk a little bit

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>about the Apple side of this situation.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Correct me if I'm wrong.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Advisors Capital has like, let's say, a million

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>shares of Apple across its different funds, right, and the

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>reporting was really clear. This is Intel going to Apple,

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>who bought the modem business from Intel in twenty nineteen anyway,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 2>and saying to them like you want to invest, like

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 2>help us out. But Apple does so much of its

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 2>own work in silicon Like do you see a rational

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>for Apple to be like, yeah, you know what, let's

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>do this.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we have on Apple for a long time for

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 8>our clients across various strategies. Some conservatives are more aggressive,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 8>but Apple is doing the smart thing here. And first

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 8>of all, we don't know if this is these talks

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 8>are actually happening.

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 7>We don't know if they're going for advance.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 8>But you know, from Apple's perspective, it's no longer about

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 8>the design of components for its iPhones and its max

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 8>I would expect that this to be more about manufacturing.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 8>This potentially is a move for Apple to become diversified

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 8>away from entire reliance on Taiwan semiconductor and to have

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 8>a second manufacturer.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 7>They love to have second suppliers.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 8>They haven't been able to because Intel has been so

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 8>far behind. If the belief now is that with government

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 8>subsidies and government investments that Intel will have the time

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 8>it takes to modify their manufacturing recipe and be able

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 8>to roll out at capacity, you know, product for Apple

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 8>n video you know who knows it?

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 7>Who else? That would be very appealing, I would think

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 7>to add Apple.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Intel was founded in the sixties, right, and we're in

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a very different situation today. In nineteen ninety seven, Microsoft

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>bailed out Apple. Funny things happen in technology in your career,

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>This in video announcement with Intel, and now the reporting

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, these things that you see coming.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, we already saw that Intel had received

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 8>a massive subsidy under the previous administration's Chip Act, so

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 8>we knew Intel was getting this money.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 7>What's different now.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 8>Is the this administration has decided to turn the subsidy

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 8>into an ownership stake, you know, which brings some returns

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 8>back to the taxpayer. But also I think the second

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 8>shoe to draw potentially our incentive's four potential customers of

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 8>Intel to help Intel get to that point where they

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 8>have manufacturing that's competitive with Taiwan's semiconductor. That's what's really

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 8>changed today is the incentives circling around the whole industry

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 8>to try to build up that domestic manufacturing.

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 7>And that's a big change.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 5>I have to say as an investor, you look at

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 5>what happened with Lithium America's yesterday, US reported to be

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 5>looking at a stake in that company.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>The shares rocket ninety percent.

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 5>The fact that they take a ten percent stake in

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Intel and suddenly the shares just go up into the right,

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Does it have to become part of your fundamental research

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 5>that when the US government gets involved, it's very hard

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 5>to bet against that stock or not be involved in it.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 8>Fortunately, calling we're able to pick and choose stocks. We own,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, forty to fifty equity positions in the different strategies,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 8>so we can choose not to be involved in companies

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 8>for which you know, we think there's significant risk of

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 8>government involvement because you just don't know which way it's

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 8>going to go, and you know, some of these announcements

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 8>have been pretty unpredictable. So fortunately there are plenty of

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 8>places to invest where you don't have to be directly

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 8>exposed to government risk. You know, we've owned Broadcom for

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 8>a long time, you know, since since I joined the

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 8>firm back in twenty fifteen, and they're doing just fine

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 8>without any government involvement, and they are playing a bigger

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 8>and bigger role in.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 7>The AI rollout.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 5>And let's just talk therefore about the context of the

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 5>AI circularity that people have been worrying about, or just

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 5>more broadly, the valuations.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>However, we are seeing bigger and bigger numbers.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 5>Yesterday was Ali Baba saying we think it's gonna be

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 5>four trillion by twenty thirteen thirty. That goes into the

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 5>need for AI compute.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 4>We do see a space where.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia can win, maybe even md can win. Where we

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 5>see custom asis win as well. Do you put your

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 5>bets into all of these so do you have to

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 5>focus in on the key win that thus far has

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 5>been a video?

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, I think carollin the way to play

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 8>this is to recognize that this is a pie that's

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 8>growing and that there'll be more and more players that

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 8>take little slices here and there, and there may be

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 8>some market share change. Right in, Nvidia is bound to

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 8>lose some market share, not bound to grow less quickly necessarily,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 8>but bound to lose some market share. We know A

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 8>and B has some good processors out there for AI workloads.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 8>We know that Broadcom is co developing with the likes

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 8>of Google other ASK based processors. So I think there's

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 8>room for a lot of players to participate. I think

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 8>the wise investor will be a bit diversified. Don't just

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 8>pick one, you know, pick a handful. There are startup

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 8>companies that aren't available to us as public equity investors,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 8>but those are worth watching because they could become competition

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 8>along the line.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 7>That wows, yeah, exactly.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 8>I think we have some years to go while this

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 8>pie continues to expand. At least that's the information we

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.479
<v Speaker 8>have now, you know. Unfortunately, we don't have great information

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 8>on how well the applications are turning out, how much

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 8>money is being made, and that ultimately could sustain data

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 8>center development in the future. But in the meantime, we

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 8>also have sovereign wealth funds investing in building out data centers.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 7>So there's a lot for global growth here, Joanne.

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>There are hundreds of billions of dollars committed to build

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>data centers, and we know where the chips are coming from,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and we know who's going to lease the capacity, but

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>there are still so many missing pieces. Electricity the main one.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I just don't understand if this is like people writing

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>checks they can't cash, you know, in the future, because

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>all the other pieces won't be there.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 8>No, that's a really good point. And you know they're

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 8>writing checks that nobody will take because there isn't the

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 8>energy potentially to power the data centers.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 7>And that's why I like so much.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 8>The global spread of this, of this buildout. You know, Yes,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 8>in the US, right, we need we need to build

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 8>more facilities for powering these and we're seeing the companies

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 8>themselves get involved and that might very well be the

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 8>solution in the US, but we're going.

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 7>To get an awful lot more investment.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 8>And that's, by the way, why the AI so called

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 8>investment team has spread beyond technology, it's into utilities, it's into.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 7>Even pipeline companies.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 8>Right, where is the demand spreading in addition to the

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 8>applications and the global footprint will I think be fungible

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 8>enough to allow the data centers to go where the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 8>power and the land is available. And so that's a

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 8>way also to avoid those bottlenecks too.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And Feeniev Advisors Capital Management robust, deep conversation. We appreciate

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 2>it very much. Okay, we're going to get out. So

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>conversation now with former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo on

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the state of New York City's mayor or race, and

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>he is speaking to Bloomberg's David.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 9>Gura him up twenty five points to you. Of course,

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>it's a four candidate race. How do you see the

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 9>path forward here given the polling and where things stand.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 9>I should note that the polling hasn't changed a tremendous

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 9>amount in recent weeks.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it will change dramatically. What you see in the

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 10>polls is Mam Dami is always about forty percent.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 11>That leaves sixty percent.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 10>As you accurately pointed out, you have a multi candidate field,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 10>so four people or three people who are breaking up

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 10>that sixty percent. I don't think you're going to wind

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 10>up ultimately with that larger field.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 11>I think the field is going to collapse.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to come down to me versus

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 10>mister Mammdanni. And as I said, Mamdanni has forty percent

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 10>his very radical ideas which are exciting to one group

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 10>of the population, especially young people, but are polarizing to

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 10>many other people. And I think it's going to come

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 10>down to a one on one and then it is

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 10>a totally different race.

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Curtisly with the Republican candidate says he's not dropping out.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 9>The incumbent mayor Eric Adam says he's not dropping out.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 9>We've passed the ballot deadline. If we were to have

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 9>a race where it's you against or Mandani, poles still

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 9>show him leading you by a substantial amount. What do

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 9>you see in the electorate that the data aren't shown

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to that particular configuration.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, polls are historically wrong, especially this year, especially

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 10>in New York. On your first point, you can stay

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 10>in the race. First of all, technically nobody can get

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 10>off the ballot, right. The question is are you viable

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 10>in the race, And you kind of people who are

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 10>in the race, but the voters just think they're not

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 10>really competitive, they can't win. I'm not going to waste

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 10>my vote, and I think that's what happens here. I

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 10>think it comes down to me and Mamdani. I think

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 10>when people understand what Mamdani stands for, besides what he

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 10>has said on TikTok, you know he's anti police. This

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 10>band the police legalized prostitution, didn't legalize the drug trade,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 10>abolish jails.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 11>You know, this would be anarchy in New York.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 10>Socialism does not work in New York City.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 11>It's antithetical.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 10>We're the business capital, right, We're pro business. Business is

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 10>the engine that drives the train. So none of that

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 10>has been communicated yet, and when it does, I can

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 10>tell you the minds will change.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 9>Is there an effort by you and your campaign to

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 9>try to convince Eric Adams or Curtiously would a drop

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 9>out of this race, or their conversations that are happening

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 9>behind the scenes to make what I imagine you see

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 9>as a compelling case for them to step aside to

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 9>make this more of a one on one race.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 10>No, I'm sure they're making their own decisions. I've been

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 10>in elections that where I have dropped out because I

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 10>thought it was the right thing to do. They have

0:18:55.880 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 10>a decision to make. There is no apparent path to

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 10>victory for them, They in essence would act as a spoiler.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 10>And that's a decision they have to make. They have

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 10>to make it personally, and that's their business. But again,

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to come down to a two

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 10>person rais no matter what, because that's what the polls

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 10>are going to say, and that is the choice. I

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 10>am a Democrat, my father was a Democrat. I worked

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 10>for Bill Clinton. Zoran is a socialist they call them

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 10>to democratic socialists, right, didn't support Democrats, that Barack Obama

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 10>was a liar and evil, and didn't support Kamala Harris

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 10>against Trump. Right, So this is a very different This

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 10>is apples and oranges between the two of us.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 9>I want to ask you about some comments that Curtis

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 9>Lee we made yesterday. I'm sure you heard them. He

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 9>was campaigning and suggested that your affiliates of your campaign

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 9>had reached out to him and offered him money to

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 9>the tune of ten million dollars to drop out of

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 9>this race. And I'm going to quote from what he

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 9>said during that campaign event. He called these classic Andrew

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 9>Cuomo tactics. Why don't you strap up Cuomo to a

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 9>lie detection machine and ask him and we'll all be

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 9>blown to Kingdom.

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 11>Come because he's behind it.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 9>I don't have a polygraphic machine with me here, But

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 9>how do you respond to what he's alleging in those comments?

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 10>Look, you can't. You have to take sliver with a

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 10>grain of salt. Right. He is a known con man.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 10>He's lied about being victims of crime before.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 11>But it's very simple, David.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 10>When he said that someone should have said who who

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 10>or offered you the money? Let him answer the question

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 10>because it would happen to be a crime, right, who

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 10>or offered you money? He never said who, which sort

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 10>of tells you right that it's all malarkey.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 11>There was no person who did it. I want to

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 11>ask you.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 9>Last we've talked about the state of the race, where

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 9>you hope that it's headed, and if we can, I'd

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 9>like to look back to nineteen seventy seven. So ways

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 9>you were nineteen, You were a student at Fordham University.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 9>Your dad was making a run for mayor and you

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 9>were helping out on the campaign. He didn't win the

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 9>Democratic primary and decided to run on an independent line

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 9>for mayor. He ended up losing that race by nine points.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 9>They say that history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 9>and I know that you don't want history to repeat

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 9>itself here. You'd like to win this race in the

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 9>way that he wasn't able to back then fifty years ago.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm not the first to point out this historical parallel,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 9>but I imagine you've thought about it, and I wonder how

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 9>that experience has informed your outlook on this race. There

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 9>was introspection after the primaries. You didn't do as well

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 9>as you wanted to do. You decided to make this run.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 9>What can you learn about that race that your dad

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 9>waged and how does that inform the way that you're

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 9>running this.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, my father was an extraordinary individual on many levels,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 10>highly principled, frankly a typical for a politician, and he

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 10>did quote unquote the right thing, whatever he thought the

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 10>right thing was for me. I believe in the Democratic Party.

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 10>I believe in what my father stood for, what John F.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 10>Kennedy stood for, and Robert F. Kennedy stood for, and

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 10>Bill Clinton and what Mandami represents. And this Democratic Socialists

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 10>of America DSA socialists call them whatever you want, is

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 10>repugnant to the Democratic Party, I know, And that's what's

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 10>really going on here. This is a civil war within

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 10>the Democratic Party right where the extreme left is pulling

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 10>the Democratic Party and the moderates are afraid of the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 10>extreme left.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 11>It's the inverse of.

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 10>The Republican Party when they had the Tea Party and

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 10>the Tea Party was pulling the Republican moderates too far

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 10>to the right because they were afraid of them in

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 10>a primary. That's what's happening here. It's a battle for

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 10>the soul of the Democratic Party.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 11>And the Democratic.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 10>Party is not anti business, it's not anti police.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 11>That's not who we are.

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 10>We're not about redistributing income as a policy. Right, you

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 10>tax to provide a service. You don't tax to take

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 10>money from the rich to give it to the poor.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 11>That's why Donald Trump cos him a communist.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 10>So this is not the Democratic Party that I believe

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 10>I represent and traditionally has served this nation well. He

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 10>is zero experience in the position, never managed anything five employees,

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 10>never had a real job. And when you when you're

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 10>willing to consider chief executive New York City, no management experience,

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 10>run five people. Now, who's going to run three hundred

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 10>thousand employees one hundred and fifteen billion dollar budget.

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 11>You wake up any morning.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 10>You could have a terrorist attack, you could have another COVID.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 10>It just the means government and the means public service

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 10>in a way that I just find important, and I'm

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 10>going to do everything I can to stop it.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 12>Got a quota.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 11>Thank you very much, appreciate it. Thank you. I'll send

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 11>it back to you.

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 5>Oh thanks to Bloomberg's David Gera. There and a reminder

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 5>that Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 5>News parent Bloombag LP, has endorsed Cuomo in the primary

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 5>and contributed to his pack ed.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we have some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg Amazon

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>has agreed to pay two point five billion dollars in

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>penalties and refunds and to change its pro sess for

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>how you cancel Prime subscription subscriptions. This is in the

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 2>FTC case against it, So the split is that the

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 2>company will pay one billion dollar in civil penalties and

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 2>refund one point five billion dollars to customers. The accusation

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that the FTC had made was that Amazon was misleading

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>millions of customers into signing up for Prime, but then

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>making it intentionally difficult to cancel. They will now change

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that process overall. When the news broke, there was a

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>brief spike into positive territory, but was still down two

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 2>tens of one percent. The extraordinary thing, Carrow is, remember

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 2>that the trial in this case with jury selection was

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>only three days ago, and they've reached a settlement two

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 2>point five billion dollars in just three days.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to another story out.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Of the UK AI data center to developer n Scale has

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 2>just raised one point one billion dollars just one week

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>after announcing its partnership with Nvidia and open Ai in

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the UK.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more from Bloomberg's Mark Bergen.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 2>A lot of focus at the moment on the Neo cloud,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 2>and n Scale kind of fits into that. What are

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the details from this story?

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 13>We know a lot more than what you said. This

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 13>is one point one billion. They've described it as one

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 13>of the largest. Actually they said it's the largest Series

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 13>B round in Europe. You know, it's really fascinating to

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 13>see the scale though we have some in our story

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 13>in the Bloomberg today, but this might be just the

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 13>amount of money they need to purchase just one of

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 13>their data centers they have had planned to build in

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 13>the UK, and I think you know, they are claiming

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 13>to go out and purchase deploy three hundred thousand in

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 13>Nvidia GPUs, so they're going to need a lot more money.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 13>We're not sure if this is just equity or equity

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 13>in debt, but they're likely to be raising probably both

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 13>of more and very soon.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 5>And your investigations before showing the n scale very briefly,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Mark has never built a data center before.

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, what do you need experience?

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 13>To be fair that they spun out of a crypto

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 13>mining operation similar to what Core Reeve did. They have

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 13>hired senior executives that have a lot of experience, but

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 13>the company itself hasn't.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Matt bag and short and sweet and we so

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 5>appreciate it, Thank you very much. Coming up, the wave

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 5>of AI data center announcements keeps on going. We talk

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 5>to Berkley's next. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I quick

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 5>check are some key names that move this market today. Look,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 5>we are just questioning some of the valuations within the

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 5>S and P five hundred, within the NASTAG. We're on

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 5>paus ahead of those big inflation numbers tomorrow. But I

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 5>dig into individual names that continue to push higher core

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 5>we've turned around or it was training lower and then

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 5>it goes into the grain by one point five percent.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Why they've got yet further commitments coming from open Ai

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 5>to continue to build out their data center needs. They'relping

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 5>it by another six and a half billion dollars to

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 5>more than twenty two billion in commitments. That's important because

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 5>we'd worried about perhaps the focus on Microsoft.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 4>As a key client for coreweave.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Now the neocloud really pushing in to other areas of growth.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 5>We're also looking at in video up seven tens and percent.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 5>This is we just digest there's a phenomenal scale of

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 5>investment coming from this company, whether it's backing Intel last

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 5>week to five billion, whether it's one hundred billion dollars

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 5>in terms of equity going into open Ai. No matter what,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 5>when they commit to increase their AI spend, the market

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 5>rewards them. Ed and interesting notes coming out in this

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 5>company today as well.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think in Vidia's worth lingering on. Barkley is

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>out with a new note raising its price target from

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 2>two hundred dollars to two hundred and forty dollars, maintaining

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 2>an overweight status on the stock Barklay's research analyst Tomamalley

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>joins us, the author of that note, you are in

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the camp of people that listen to Gentsen one when

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>he said this is going to be a one trillion

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 2>dollar opportunity or industry, and then very recently said actually

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a three or four trillion dollar opportunity.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>And now you, like many, say it's a bit more

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>believable to us.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Just explain your thesis.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 12>Perfect and thanks for having me on the show.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 14>I think in a prior segment you had Joanna on

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 14>talking about how the pie keeps on growing. If you

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 14>look at compute announcements since December of twenty twenty four

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 14>through date, we're looking at over two trillion of announced

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 14>dollars of compute in over forty gigwatts. If you look

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 14>at what Jensen said historically, about sixty five to seventy

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 14>percent of.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 12>That is related to compute.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 14>So if you look at what it could mean for

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 14>in Vidia, it's about one point five trillion dollars really

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 14>coming into the pipeline over a very recent period of time.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Tom, you saw the announcement between open AI and Video

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>right from the end of from earlier this week. Yes, okay,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>so on the internet, the analogy or metaphor that people

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>are using with that, it's like an extension cable that

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>in Vidia is the extension cable. They're unplugging from the

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 2>wall and just plugging back into the cable. Do you

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>see what I'm asking about? In Vidia puts one hundred

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>billion into open ai in order for open ai to

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 2>take one hundred billion dollars worth of Nvidia gear.

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, how do we interpret that?

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 14>I mean, there's two big concerns with the deployments of

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 14>AI right now. It's one power and then to the

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 14>circular reference issue that you see brought up again and again,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 14>I would say you can flip this argument on its head. Obviously,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 14>it's early days here and there is reason to be

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 14>careful about circular issues in terms of investment. But I

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 14>would ask where should Nvidia investor money. I think buying

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 14>backstock now would be one option. But Jensen's in founder

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 14>mode here. He's looking to create an ecosystem where you're

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 14>having more and more players actually drive AI further on.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 12>And I guess the other point would be, this is

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 12>not just Jensen.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 14>You're seeing investments from AMD and Broadcom, and this is

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 14>going to be something that's driven forward by a group

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 14>of companies, but clearly a concern that many investors bring

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 14>to light. But I do think that there in Video

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 14>is in a unique position where they're taking the capital

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 14>that they've made and they're reinvesting it in their space.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 12>So can look at that argument both ways.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 5>I look, they've just deployed in Europe with n scale,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 5>They've been deployed in neo clouds and care Wey for example.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Tom.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 5>What's so interesting is where the house of cards could fall,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 5>what would limit this up and to the right perspective

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 5>about AI compute needs and that feeding into in Vidia

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and in all of the semiconductors that currently have a

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 5>stake in providing AI accelerators.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 14>As you mentioned earlier in the show, it's the return

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 14>on investment first and foremost, and I think that what

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 14>we do in the note that we had out today

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 14>is try to show what the investment from a chip

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 14>perspective is looking like versus what the ROI is and

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 14>we do that by looking at hyperscaler RPO. So you

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 14>look at AWS, Azure, GPC, Oracle and over the past

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 14>several years that's been growing out a thirty percent take

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 14>or so essentially hyperscaler backlog that's exploded to over eighty percent,

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 14>and if you look right now, the backlogs at over

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 14>one point one trillion dollars. So what you're seeing first

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 14>and foremost is that you're getting some ROI, you're getting

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 14>some business that's stepping up. That's an area of the

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 14>world that we can do a little more work.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 12>On.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 14>The other side, which is less in the semiconductor ecosystem

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 14>is the power side, where if you look at what

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 14>forty gigawatts means, you're talking multi major cities in terms

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 14>of the deployment. So that's really where the investment needs

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 14>to focus on from this point forward, because if you

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 14>don't have a utility bill for someone living in city

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 14>and that's being sucked to another data center, that's a

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 14>serious problem.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.239
<v Speaker 5>Tom It's interesting that I think Ali Baba chimed in

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 5>the CEO saying four trillion is his number two by

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty thirty. But I cast my mind back to March

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 5>when there was a wabble in the market, when we

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 5>did start to question some of the valuations. That was

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 5>because the chairman of Ali Baba had said there was

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 5>a bubble in terms of AI infrastructure investment, particularly in

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 5>the US. So how much of this what alarm bell

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 5>rings for you when we start to get into a

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 5>valuation that screams bubble because you see in video can

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 5>go up another thirty.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Percent or so.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think there's two things to look at.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 14>The first sort of reset in evaluations this year came

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 14>around deep Seek and that was a change in where

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 14>we saw the AI revenue coming from. We've transitioned to

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 14>what was scaling laws in training, so all these guys

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 14>making money on training, and now we're moving more today

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 14>era of inference, which is people actually using these models,

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 14>seeing agents out there actually serving individuals, and so you've

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 14>seen a shift in where compute spend has actually gone.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 14>So the ROI is helpful and it makes me feel

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 14>a bit better as we go along here, and we'll

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 14>continue to look at open AI and thropic and you'll

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 14>see more fundamentals come out as time goes along. But

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 14>the concern is always these are very large numbers. Where

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 14>did these dollars come from? First step is look at hyperscalers.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 14>If you look at today the cap X as a

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 14>percent of OP income, it's still around fifty percent. I

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 14>wouldn't start to get worded until you're above one hundred

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 14>percent and getting to a position where you're obviously taking

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 14>on debt to do this. And then secondly, I would

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 14>look at the sovereigns where globally you're starting to see

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 14>countries invest in this, and that's additional dollars that is

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 14>outside of that original pie. And that was always the

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 14>proxy for when are we run out here? When do

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 14>we get to the limit of hyperscaler capex.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Tom You did not reference Intel in the note you

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 2>published overnight, but you do cover Intel. I just wanted

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 2>to ask for your reaction to the Nvidia equity investment

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>in Intel, but actually for me more the partnership on

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>X eighty six and also in the piece domain, like

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>how do you interpret that?

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think just first and foremost, from a very

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 14>thirty thousand foot view, it's good that Intel is getting

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 14>dollars to bridge the gap here.

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 12>There's obviously been some capital.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 14>Concerns when it comes to how it moves the technology

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 14>profile forward. We've seen a government investment, we've seen some

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 14>other investors Brookfield and Apollo over the past several years,

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 14>and you haven't seen a big change in the technology profile.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 14>What I would argue is that this is very favorable

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 14>for in video. You potentially have Intel focusing an AI

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 14>product for x eighty six CPUs in the data center

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 14>that will help with the thirty six and seventy two

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 14>systems that Nvidia has out there today. On the PC side,

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 14>gaming PCs already have a discre GPU and video is

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 14>already there. Maybe you could see some collaboration that helps

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 14>drive forward Intel's push on the AIPC side, but largely

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 14>this seems like a more favorable agreement for Nvidia, and

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 14>funny how times change within video stepping in to rescue

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 14>Intel here.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Tom, let's end here. So there's consensus that in

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>AI and dat cent at least this will be a

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 2>four trillion dollar industry over varying timeframes or addressable opportunity.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Have you and your colleagues and peers calculated how much

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 2>of that you expect in video to take and have

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you factored in competition from AMD, GROCK in other CUSTOMASIC

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 2>solutions that are coming out.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so I don't think we've done a full analysis.

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 14>When we get to that Fortrillian boy, that would be

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 14>great if we do, but I would say that right now,

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 14>general purpose silicon still represents greater than ninety percent of

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 14>the market, and that's.

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 12>In video and AMD.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 14>Broadcom with their announcement, particularly with open AI, is starting

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 14>to take more share if you look at the longer

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 14>term horizon, I still think general purpose silicon makes up

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 14>a majority of the market, say sixty forty, but you

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 14>do see from where we are today, general purpose silicon

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 14>is a much larger piece of the pie. So again,

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 14>as Joanne was saying before, it's smart to be invested

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 14>across these names. If you look at Broadcom, they're just

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 14>growing at a much faster rate than where they are today,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 14>which makes that story very interesting as well. So I

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 14>guess in summary, just four dollars to Vidia over the

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 14>long term as I look at the market, but a

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 14>faster growth rate from the customs silking guys.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Tom O Marley from Barge's I think the first time

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Tech and we've really enjoyed it.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, carry what you got.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 4>And it is time now for talking tech.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 5>And first up, Elon Musk's XAI and the US government

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 5>assign a deal that allows federal agencies to use rock

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Ai chatbot now. The dealer is part of a push

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 5>to speed up adoption of new technologies like oftificial intelligence,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 5>and in just forty two cents per agency, it's the

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 5>cheapest contract yet and the government's new initiative. Plus, the

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration has launched investigations into imports of robotics, industrial.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Machinery, and medical devices.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 5>The probes set the stage for tariffs, which the President

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 5>is allowed to place on good steamed critical to national security,

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 5>and Apple.

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Is calling on the EU to scrap the Digital Markets

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Act Now.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 15>The US tech giant argues that the consumer protection law

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 15>worsens user experience, increases privacy risks, and threatens to undermine innovation,

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 15>though the company says it is complyingying with the law

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 15>while it's in the place.

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Ed okay coming up.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Alexa Moon Tobo of Inspired Capital joins us she'll explain why.

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 2>She says physical ai is reaching an inflection point and

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the impact of quantum on financial services, which today is

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a top story.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 3>This has been big tech.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 5>HSBC has achieved a breakthrough in deploying quantum computing in

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 5>financial markets now. Using IBM's Hero and Quantum processor, the

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 5>bank was able to improve bond price predictions. Let's talk

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 5>about the opportunity to invest in this next frontier of computing.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 5>And Alexa Montovo, founder and managing partner of Inspired Capital,

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 5>previously the founder of fintech style up learn Vest. She's

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 5>sold to Northwestern Mutual back in twenty fifteen. And what

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 5>interests me so much is within your podcast, you've just

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 5>been speaking to a founder, you've backed logical all about

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 5>the future of quantum.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 4>Ye've been deep diving on this.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 5>So when you see these sorts of iterations and breakthroughs,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 5>what do you make of it? Where is the opportunity

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 5>for you in the seed in the series?

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 16>A first of all, great question. As you know, I

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 16>am a long term early stage investor and I like

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 16>to look for companies that could be worth ten twenty

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 16>thirty billion dollars. There's very few of those in the world,

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 16>and I think that led me to quantum now almost

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 16>a year and a half ago, thinking it's sort of

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 16>the next wave of innovation after AI, and the potential

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 16>is profound once and if we build these quantum computers

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 16>and mind you, it's a category where the people have

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 16>been toiling away for thirty years without much success. But

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 16>the best experts in the world believe that in the

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 16>next decade we will begin to see real advancements towards

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 16>building the first scaled quantum computer, and what comes out

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 16>of that is huge advancements in financial services and pharmaceuticals

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 16>and all these other categories that are going to change

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 16>the world in a profound way.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 5>You think about IBM's role here, and they've come on

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 5>the show and said, by twenty twenty nine, are quantum

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 5>computer is going to be in there in the world

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 5>and achieving real things. Then from the early stage founder,

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 5>how are you seeking them out?

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Where can they add to the quantum process?

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 7>Sure?

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 4>So, I think the big goal.

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 16>Right now is people are trying to get to ten

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 16>thousand cubets so many different hardware types six or seven

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 16>based on how you've cut it, and I think your

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 16>most important researchers and PhDs in the world are trying

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 16>to get to ten thousand, one hundred thousand skilled cubets.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 16>That is the march that everyone is working towards, and

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 16>we're rooting for them.

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Alex I'm really interested in like the business model, which

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 2>I know is a bit of a dry way of

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 2>looking at it, but when we think about compute for

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>data centers in the AI context, people lease that capacity, right.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I think about the work that Google is doing in quantum.

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 2>It uses it's quantum machines in house for research. So

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with what HSBC did with IBM, and when you're looking

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to invest in the early stages of this field, how

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 2>do quantum computing companies give their services to a financial

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 2>institution like an HSBC.

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 3>What's the model for that?

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 16>That's a great question. So I think we're going to

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 16>see a few things. First of all, right now people

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 16>will rent out their quantum computers. You're seeing prices from

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 16>ten thousand to in different cases fifty thousand dollars per

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 16>per hour, et cetera. So people will rent them out.

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 16>I actually think it could be a profound business model shift,

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 16>which is whatever is created with that quantum computer, whatever IP,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 16>whatever technology that comes out of using those advancements in compute,

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 16>that you could take a revenue stream forever. So that

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 16>is sort of an interesting shift. Somebody once said to

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 16>me that whoever builds the first quantum computer almost overnight

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 16>could become Pfizer because the compute of what's possible for

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 16>pharmaceuticals could be that profound, So it gives you a

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 16>sense of the shift, which is you could potentially take

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 16>a stream of the IP that comes out of quantum

0:40:57.719 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 16>computers as a new business model.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 2>Entirely Alexi, you are one of many I would say

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 2>that is arguing that physical AI is having a chatch

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 2>GPT moment. Physical AI is now a pretty broad category.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 2>So which vertical within that would you say that is

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 2>most true?

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 16>Of great question? So what I get excited about as

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 16>everyone was running at digital AI, as you've seen the

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.439
<v Speaker 16>dollars pour into the category and inspired our venture fund.

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 16>Early stage venture fund is very thesis driven. So for us,

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 16>what physical AI means is taking big foundational models that

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 16>now exist credibly that can interact with things like sensors

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 16>and robotics and create smart devices everywhere in our physical world.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 16>If you think about just our infrastructure.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 4>We all live because.

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 16>Of our infrastructure, our water, our pipeline, our electricity, our roads,

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 16>and we're getting to the point where we can no

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 16>longer be reactive, which is what we are. Almost like

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 16>the Roman times, something breaks, you go and fix it

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 16>to becoming predictive about our ecosystem around us, our world

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 16>and infrastructure around us. And that is what we mean

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 16>by physical AI it inspired. We're really looking for the

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 16>intersection of observability and predictability in the environment around us.

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 5>And looking at your poor photio companies, you've already made

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 5>some key bets. Yes, we're thinking about bright Ai TC Labs.

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 5>What is it that these companies that we see on

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 5>our screen now have offered you from the seed in

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 5>series a area that you feel hasn't been adopted already by

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 5>big industry, by big companies already listed.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 16>Sure, I'll start with bright Ai. Bright Ai. Alex the

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 16>CEO is an absolute technical genius, the godfather of IoT,

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 16>and he invented a sticker. There's now two hundred and

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 16>fifty thousand already deployed of these stickers, and they can

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 16>go on anything from a utility pole to a water pipeline.

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 16>And here's what it does. It then sends an observability

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 16>layer back to whichever company has bought these stickers and

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.959
<v Speaker 16>can say, now, proactively, the utility pole is twenty five

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 16>degrees slanted, let's go fix it before it falls on

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 16>an electrical wire and takes power grids out. Literally, men

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 16>and women walk up and down utility poles, right now

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 16>and observe them physically and then fix things versus being

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 16>predictive and fixing it. In the water world, will literally

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 16>find inside pipelines the leaks and right now today we

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 16>lose six billion gallons of treated water, which is fifteen

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 16>million homes of water. Think about that every single day

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 16>because of leaks and verse and bright AI is the

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 16>sensors that we'll get ahead of that. SE's BRIGHTAI. A

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 16>company we're really rooting for. Another company, as we said,

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 16>was TC Labs, which is an incredible team out of Google.

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 16>They're trying to save one gigaton of carbon each year

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 16>and what they do is go take the energy we

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 16>already have. So think about this. Because of AI, we

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 16>need wild amounts of energy. There's not enough energy is

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 16>the headline, and so they are going to the infrastructure

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.839
<v Speaker 16>we already have oil refineries and not only helping make

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 16>them be more EFFICI using AI so that they can

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 16>produce more energy, but also more carbon friendly. So that's

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 16>TC Labs. And then finally True Swift is the data

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 16>set of sensors for our forest. The forest are the

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 16>lungs of the planet, and they are measuring them so

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 16>that we can get ahead of forest fires in major

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 16>storms that then take power out. So as you see

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 16>your very forwarde banking and physical AI.

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Alexavon Tobo, co founder managing partner of Inspired Capital, thank

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>you very much. South Korea says investment projects in the

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 2>US will remain in limbo until visa issues are resolved.

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 2>In the wake of the Trump administration's immigration raid at

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 2>a Hyundai LG Energy battery plant in Georgia, South Korean

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Kim Minsouk sat down with Bloomberg's scherry On

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 2>in Seoul for an exclusive interview.

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 17>Realistically, without a solution, it's difficult to invest in the

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:59.240
<v Speaker 17>United States and carry out the various joint projects currently

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 17>planned between South Korea and the US. We absolutely must

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.240
<v Speaker 17>find a solution. Several projects are underway between South Korea

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 17>and the US. Without resolving the visa issue, meaningful progress

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 17>remains virtually impossible.

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, Disney ready for a legal battle with President

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 5>Trump over Jimmy Kimmel's late night return.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 4>We're on that. Next. This is Broomback Tech