1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:13,079 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a 2 00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: live from Coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New 3 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 1: York and Eva low In sentrancs go. 4 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,200 Speaker 2: This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Bloomberg reports that Intel 5 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 2: approached Apple about a possible investment and talks on the 6 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:31,640 Speaker 2: two working together more closely. 7 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 3: We have the latest plus. 8 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:34,400 Speaker 4: A quantum breakthrough. 9 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 5: HSBC said it achieved a world first and deploying the 10 00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:42,559 Speaker 5: next frontier computing in financial markets using IBM's Heron processor. 11 00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 2: And Disney gears up for a legal fight with President 12 00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:48,760 Speaker 2: Trump over the reinstatement of Jimmy Kimmel's show. 13 00:00:49,200 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 5: At first, we check in on these markets, which if 14 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 5: you're looking at as that one hundred and we are 15 00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 5: down for a third straight day, but only just We're 16 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:56,639 Speaker 5: still questioning the. 17 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:58,040 Speaker 4: Overall picture of valuations. 18 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,040 Speaker 5: We're still questioning what the inflation print on front and 19 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 5: they will tell us, and we're still questioning more broadly 20 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 5: how far we've run up in terms of this seismic 21 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 5: moves on the S and P five frond in the 22 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 5: NAST one hundred is still close to record highs. I'm 23 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:11,959 Speaker 5: looking though at crypto that's actually pulling down yet again. 24 00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 5: We've got a key exploration of options tomorrow. We're seeing 25 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 5: some of those bullish bets coming out of Bitcoin and 26 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 5: certainly of Eve were down another three point six percent. 27 00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:21,399 Speaker 4: But what are looking at under the hood. 28 00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's go to our top story. 29 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:26,440 Speaker 2: Shares of Intel markedly higher for most of the session, 30 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 2: the only name on the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index in the green. 31 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:35,320 Speaker 2: Apple also higher. Bloomberg reporting Intel has approached Apple about 32 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:38,639 Speaker 2: the iPhone maker investing in it and held early talks 33 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 2: on how the US tech firms could work more closely together. 34 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 2: That's according to sources. Intel, which is now ten percent 35 00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:46,520 Speaker 2: owned by the US government, is looking to make a 36 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:49,800 Speaker 2: comeback and has already secured investment from Nvidia in soft Bank. 37 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 3: I want to go out to. 38 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 2: Bloombo's Ryan Gull, who broke that story with the deal's team. 39 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 2: Let's get the very specific details that we had from sources. 40 00:01:57,920 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 3: These are early talks. 41 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:02,480 Speaker 2: What was the structure of what they discussed and what 42 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 2: do we know about the status of those talks. 43 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 6: Yeah, these are early talks. I would say there are 44 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,480 Speaker 6: still a few unknowns. There's no sense at this point 45 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:13,800 Speaker 6: what that investment could look like. There's definitely been some 46 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,679 Speaker 6: commentary this morning as people are sort of digesting this news, 47 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 6: and you can see Intel shares are up some twelve 48 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 6: percent or so over since yesterday and today as they 49 00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 6: think about what this could mean for both companies. I 50 00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:28,560 Speaker 6: think if your Intel, you're looking at what it means 51 00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 6: to right size a balance sheet and your foundry effort. 52 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:34,440 Speaker 6: Could this mean Apple comes in and thinks about, you know, 53 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 6: sending foundry chipwards to the two Intel's foundry potentially? Could 54 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:41,760 Speaker 6: this be something more on the product side. Could this 55 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:45,519 Speaker 6: be packaging for of some of Apple's advanced chips. Maybe, 56 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 6: But these are early talks, and I think this just 57 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:51,280 Speaker 6: goes to show that Intel is being quite proactive, especially 58 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 6: since the United States government took a stake of ten 59 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:57,160 Speaker 6: percent in an unprecedented move a few weeks ago. But 60 00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 6: I think, you know, at this point, I think people 61 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:01,359 Speaker 6: are looking at the this is a potentially positive move 62 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 6: for Intel, maybe a little more of a middling slash, 63 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:07,600 Speaker 6: you know, a known move for Apple. 64 00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 5: Yeah, and that's reflected in the stock move there. We've 65 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:12,120 Speaker 5: got seventeen billion added in market oup to Intel. 66 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 4: Less so for. 67 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:15,520 Speaker 5: Apple because well Apple at the moment designs its own chips, 68 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:18,679 Speaker 5: but looks towards TSMC for that. How much do we think, 69 00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:20,520 Speaker 5: though the Apple's dialing in on the fact that they 70 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 5: committed to six hundred billion dollars of investment in the 71 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 5: United States. 72 00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:26,120 Speaker 6: Listen, I think if you're Tim Cook and you're at 73 00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 6: the White House in front of Donald Trump a few 74 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:29,520 Speaker 6: weeks ago, saying that you're going to invest six hundred 75 00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,160 Speaker 6: billion dollars over the course of a four year period. 76 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,600 Speaker 6: They already announced a two point five billion dollar investment 77 00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 6: package with Corning, which makes Apple's glass for most of 78 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:42,280 Speaker 6: its iPhones. You know, six hundred billion dollars is a 79 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:44,400 Speaker 6: lot of money, and you know if you think about 80 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 6: how that could be deployed in the United States, as 81 00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 6: far as Apple's made in the United States pledge goes, 82 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 6: this is about onshoring as much as it is about 83 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,840 Speaker 6: anything else. This is about satisfying the White House's plan 84 00:03:57,000 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 6: to have American ships made in the United State dates 85 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:05,119 Speaker 6: and to sort of satisfy some risk as to concentration 86 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:09,440 Speaker 6: in Taiwan, where Apple in particular manufacturers most of its chips. 87 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:10,000 Speaker 6: A TSMC. 88 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 2: For what it's worth, an Intel spokesperson declined to comment 89 00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:18,719 Speaker 2: on our reporting, and Apple didn't respond to our request 90 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:19,200 Speaker 2: for comment. 91 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 3: There's a history lesson that's important here. 92 00:04:22,240 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 2: Apple, mostly in max but also in phones until twenty 93 00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 2: nineteen had a lot of Intel silicon in it. 94 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:31,440 Speaker 3: That relationships changed. 95 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:35,240 Speaker 2: Explain that same with Nvidia, you know, in video and 96 00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:38,320 Speaker 2: Intel had a rivalry history history that's now changed. 97 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 6: Yeah, I think that is a really important point to underscore. 98 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:45,680 Speaker 6: About five years ago, Apple decided that it was going 99 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 6: to transition away from Intel, mostly because it felt that 100 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:52,839 Speaker 6: Intel's technology, the actual its actual processes to make some 101 00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 6: of these advanced chips wasn't satisfactory enough. So that was 102 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,600 Speaker 6: kind of a painful breakup for those two companies of 103 00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:01,919 Speaker 6: relationsh ship that started as far beck as two thousand 104 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:06,280 Speaker 6: and five, when then CEO Steve Jobs transitioned away from 105 00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:08,920 Speaker 6: power PC chips toward Intel. I mean, that was kind 106 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 6: of a rough breakup as far as Intel's chip making 107 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 6: ambitions in the United States went. 108 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:17,839 Speaker 5: Ron Gold, it's a great scoop. We thank you for 109 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:18,360 Speaker 5: breaking it. 110 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:18,800 Speaker 7: Down for us. 111 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 4: Let's get an investor perspective here. 112 00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 5: Joanne Poeni's portfolio manager of Advisor's Capital Management. 113 00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:23,720 Speaker 4: You've had a. 114 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:26,839 Speaker 5: Long history of studying semiconductors as well. At what point 115 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,479 Speaker 5: does Intel become interesting as an investment opportunity when the 116 00:05:30,520 --> 00:05:32,040 Speaker 5: government seems to be backing. 117 00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 7: It so hard. 118 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:35,080 Speaker 8: Well, clearly the government is changing the game for Intel, 119 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 8: but their challenges remain, and their challenges are on the 120 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:42,919 Speaker 8: innovation side. Their design plus manufacturing has run into trouble 121 00:05:42,920 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 8: over the past few years, so much so that they've 122 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:46,560 Speaker 8: lost a lot of market share to A and B, 123 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 8: and they failed to become a player in the AI 124 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 8: advanced chips. No amount of government investment is going to 125 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:57,040 Speaker 8: make their engineer smarter or necessarily speed up innovation. Not 126 00:05:57,120 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 8: throwing money at innovation means they can hire better people, 127 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,800 Speaker 8: so there might be some room to believe that their 128 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,880 Speaker 8: piece of innovation could improve from here, but they seem 129 00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:09,600 Speaker 8: to have a long way to go. Having potential customers 130 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:12,640 Speaker 8: on the sidelines, whether that's a Nvidia or an Apple 131 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:17,599 Speaker 8: or others, will certainly encourage investors to take a harder look. 132 00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 8: But right now, an awful lot of assumed outcomes are 133 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 8: built into the price of the stock, So it's not 134 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:25,520 Speaker 8: something more enthusiastic about. 135 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:29,719 Speaker 2: Joanne, You know this industry, you have deep history of 136 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 2: covering semiconductors. You also know the names and the players 137 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,359 Speaker 2: behind the scenes. Right when this story broke. What was 138 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 2: your interpretation, This is Intel going out there and shopping 139 00:06:40,440 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 2: itself to try and save itself, or this is some 140 00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:47,599 Speaker 2: kind of savvy and smart strategic play by lit bou 141 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 2: tan Well. 142 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 8: I think Intel has for a while been trying to 143 00:06:51,640 --> 00:06:55,520 Speaker 8: find customers for its foundry plant, and we saw Pat 144 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 8: Gelsinger do that earlier, and he was trying to build 145 00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:03,359 Speaker 8: the fabs ahead of having customers. Libutan obviously is taking 146 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 8: a more cost as approach, which I think investors welcome. 147 00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 8: The government money will help them maybe bridge the gap 148 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 8: between getting those fabs up and running and having customers. 149 00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 7: I think it's smart. 150 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:16,880 Speaker 8: They should be talking to everybody that wants to diversify 151 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 8: away from TSMC. For a long time, the geopolitical situation 152 00:07:20,440 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 8: was fairly stable. I think now there are greater risks 153 00:07:23,200 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 8: to that political situation and relying just on TSMC, even 154 00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,480 Speaker 8: if it does have some manufacturing here in the United States. 155 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 5: Leb Bhutan's real words were I'm not gonna build it 156 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:36,320 Speaker 5: and then wait for them to come. They've got to come, 157 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 5: and then I'm going to build it, So there is, 158 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 5: and then the White House jumped in. It is so 159 00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 5: much the national security focus, not only because of course 160 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:48,320 Speaker 5: one of the key plants that Intel was originally going 161 00:07:48,360 --> 00:07:50,400 Speaker 5: to be focusing in on was in Ohio, and you 162 00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 5: know who's really rather focused on Ohio to the VP 163 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,240 Speaker 5: all of this though, do you think US can become 164 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:02,240 Speaker 5: a domestic chip making champion without TSMC without some sum. 165 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:06,400 Speaker 8: You know, Caroline, that's yet to be determined. Intel was 166 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,040 Speaker 8: a US manufacturing champion until they sort of went off 167 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 8: the rails with some poor decisions on which direction to 168 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 8: focus for chip manufacturing recipe development. They went down one path, 169 00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:23,480 Speaker 8: TSMC went down another. TSMC was right, Intel was wrong, 170 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 8: and now they're trying to make up. 171 00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 7: For that, and it's going to take time. 172 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 8: And I think it's appropriate for potential customers to take 173 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 8: a look at Intel, even if it's not this year 174 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 8: or next year that they can be used, but even 175 00:08:35,720 --> 00:08:38,400 Speaker 8: if it's five years from now. In chip design, you 176 00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:41,920 Speaker 8: have to work with your manufacturer because the design details 177 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:44,199 Speaker 8: depend on the manufacturing recipe. 178 00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 7: So they need to start. 179 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:48,120 Speaker 8: Working together now, even if it's for manufacturing five years 180 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 8: from now. So there's hope for Intel, but it's a 181 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 8: little early, I think to be assuming that they're going 182 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:53,839 Speaker 8: to be. 183 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 7: Successful in this. 184 00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 2: Joanne, I think I want to talk a little bit 185 00:08:57,080 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 2: about the Apple side of this situation. 186 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:01,560 Speaker 3: Correct me if I'm wrong. 187 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 2: I think Advisors Capital has like, let's say, a million 188 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 2: shares of Apple across its different funds, right, and the 189 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:11,600 Speaker 2: reporting was really clear. This is Intel going to Apple, 190 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 2: who bought the modem business from Intel in twenty nineteen anyway, 191 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:17,200 Speaker 2: and saying to them like you want to invest, like 192 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:19,560 Speaker 2: help us out. But Apple does so much of its 193 00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:22,320 Speaker 2: own work in silicon Like do you see a rational 194 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 2: for Apple to be like, yeah, you know what, let's 195 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:24,120 Speaker 2: do this. 196 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:25,439 Speaker 7: Yeah. 197 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 8: Yeah, we have on Apple for a long time for 198 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 8: our clients across various strategies. Some conservatives are more aggressive, 199 00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 8: but Apple is doing the smart thing here. And first 200 00:09:34,520 --> 00:09:36,480 Speaker 8: of all, we don't know if this is these talks 201 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 8: are actually happening. 202 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:38,560 Speaker 7: We don't know if they're going for advance. 203 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 8: But you know, from Apple's perspective, it's no longer about 204 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,559 Speaker 8: the design of components for its iPhones and its max 205 00:09:46,480 --> 00:09:49,160 Speaker 8: I would expect that this to be more about manufacturing. 206 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:52,760 Speaker 8: This potentially is a move for Apple to become diversified 207 00:09:53,200 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 8: away from entire reliance on Taiwan semiconductor and to have 208 00:09:57,600 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 8: a second manufacturer. 209 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 7: They love to have second suppliers. 210 00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:02,839 Speaker 8: They haven't been able to because Intel has been so 211 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:06,439 Speaker 8: far behind. If the belief now is that with government 212 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:09,960 Speaker 8: subsidies and government investments that Intel will have the time 213 00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:14,520 Speaker 8: it takes to modify their manufacturing recipe and be able 214 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:18,640 Speaker 8: to roll out at capacity, you know, product for Apple 215 00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:20,360 Speaker 8: n video you know who knows it? 216 00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:23,199 Speaker 7: Who else? That would be very appealing, I would think 217 00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 7: to add Apple. 218 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:29,200 Speaker 2: Intel was founded in the sixties, right, and we're in 219 00:10:29,200 --> 00:10:33,200 Speaker 2: a very different situation today. In nineteen ninety seven, Microsoft 220 00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:38,040 Speaker 2: bailed out Apple. Funny things happen in technology in your career, 221 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:41,120 Speaker 2: This in video announcement with Intel, and now the reporting 222 00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 2: on Apple, these things that you see coming. 223 00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:50,079 Speaker 8: Well, you know, we already saw that Intel had received 224 00:10:50,080 --> 00:10:55,120 Speaker 8: a massive subsidy under the previous administration's Chip Act, so 225 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 8: we knew Intel was getting this money. 226 00:10:57,600 --> 00:10:59,000 Speaker 7: What's different now. 227 00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:02,360 Speaker 8: Is the this administration has decided to turn the subsidy 228 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 8: into an ownership stake, you know, which brings some returns 229 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 8: back to the taxpayer. But also I think the second 230 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:13,080 Speaker 8: shoe to draw potentially our incentive's four potential customers of 231 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 8: Intel to help Intel get to that point where they 232 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:21,199 Speaker 8: have manufacturing that's competitive with Taiwan's semiconductor. That's what's really 233 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 8: changed today is the incentives circling around the whole industry 234 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:28,160 Speaker 8: to try to build up that domestic manufacturing. 235 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:30,440 Speaker 7: And that's a big change. 236 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,360 Speaker 5: I have to say as an investor, you look at 237 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:36,920 Speaker 5: what happened with Lithium America's yesterday, US reported to be 238 00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 5: looking at a stake in that company. 239 00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 4: The shares rocket ninety percent. 240 00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:42,160 Speaker 5: The fact that they take a ten percent stake in 241 00:11:42,160 --> 00:11:44,680 Speaker 5: Intel and suddenly the shares just go up into the right, 242 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 5: Does it have to become part of your fundamental research 243 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:50,680 Speaker 5: that when the US government gets involved, it's very hard 244 00:11:50,760 --> 00:11:53,240 Speaker 5: to bet against that stock or not be involved in it. 245 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:54,200 Speaker 7: Yeah. 246 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 8: Fortunately, calling we're able to pick and choose stocks. We own, 247 00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:01,880 Speaker 8: you know, forty to fifty equity positions in the different strategies, 248 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 8: so we can choose not to be involved in companies 249 00:12:05,360 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 8: for which you know, we think there's significant risk of 250 00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 8: government involvement because you just don't know which way it's 251 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:13,080 Speaker 8: going to go, and you know, some of these announcements 252 00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:17,160 Speaker 8: have been pretty unpredictable. So fortunately there are plenty of 253 00:12:17,240 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 8: places to invest where you don't have to be directly 254 00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:23,280 Speaker 8: exposed to government risk. You know, we've owned Broadcom for 255 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:25,960 Speaker 8: a long time, you know, since since I joined the 256 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 8: firm back in twenty fifteen, and they're doing just fine 257 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 8: without any government involvement, and they are playing a bigger 258 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 8: and bigger role in. 259 00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 7: The AI rollout. 260 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 5: And let's just talk therefore about the context of the 261 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 5: AI circularity that people have been worrying about, or just 262 00:12:40,960 --> 00:12:42,400 Speaker 5: more broadly, the valuations. 263 00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 4: However, we are seeing bigger and bigger numbers. 264 00:12:44,760 --> 00:12:46,599 Speaker 5: Yesterday was Ali Baba saying we think it's gonna be 265 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:50,680 Speaker 5: four trillion by twenty thirteen thirty. That goes into the 266 00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 5: need for AI compute. 267 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:53,680 Speaker 4: We do see a space where. 268 00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:56,120 Speaker 5: Nvidia can win, maybe even md can win. Where we 269 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:58,840 Speaker 5: see custom asis win as well. Do you put your 270 00:12:58,840 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 5: bets into all of these so do you have to 271 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 5: focus in on the key win that thus far has 272 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 5: been a video? 273 00:13:03,520 --> 00:13:05,320 Speaker 8: Yeah, you know, I think carollin the way to play 274 00:13:05,320 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 8: this is to recognize that this is a pie that's 275 00:13:07,520 --> 00:13:10,200 Speaker 8: growing and that there'll be more and more players that 276 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,320 Speaker 8: take little slices here and there, and there may be 277 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 8: some market share change. Right in, Nvidia is bound to 278 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:20,120 Speaker 8: lose some market share, not bound to grow less quickly necessarily, 279 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:22,360 Speaker 8: but bound to lose some market share. We know A 280 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:25,880 Speaker 8: and B has some good processors out there for AI workloads. 281 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 8: We know that Broadcom is co developing with the likes 282 00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 8: of Google other ASK based processors. So I think there's 283 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:35,720 Speaker 8: room for a lot of players to participate. I think 284 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:39,040 Speaker 8: the wise investor will be a bit diversified. Don't just 285 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,079 Speaker 8: pick one, you know, pick a handful. There are startup 286 00:13:42,120 --> 00:13:45,240 Speaker 8: companies that aren't available to us as public equity investors, 287 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:49,400 Speaker 8: but those are worth watching because they could become competition 288 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:50,600 Speaker 8: along the line. 289 00:13:50,679 --> 00:13:52,880 Speaker 7: That wows, yeah, exactly. 290 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:54,800 Speaker 8: I think we have some years to go while this 291 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:57,920 Speaker 8: pie continues to expand. At least that's the information we 292 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:01,479 Speaker 8: have now, you know. Unfortunately, we don't have great information 293 00:14:01,600 --> 00:14:04,319 Speaker 8: on how well the applications are turning out, how much 294 00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:07,480 Speaker 8: money is being made, and that ultimately could sustain data 295 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:09,720 Speaker 8: center development in the future. But in the meantime, we 296 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:13,840 Speaker 8: also have sovereign wealth funds investing in building out data centers. 297 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 7: So there's a lot for global growth here, Joanne. 298 00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 2: There are hundreds of billions of dollars committed to build 299 00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:24,000 Speaker 2: data centers, and we know where the chips are coming from, 300 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 2: and we know who's going to lease the capacity, but 301 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:31,280 Speaker 2: there are still so many missing pieces. Electricity the main one. 302 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:36,640 Speaker 2: I just don't understand if this is like people writing 303 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:39,400 Speaker 2: checks they can't cash, you know, in the future, because 304 00:14:39,440 --> 00:14:41,000 Speaker 2: all the other pieces won't be there. 305 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:42,080 Speaker 3: Yeah. 306 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:44,840 Speaker 8: No, that's a really good point. And you know they're 307 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 8: writing checks that nobody will take because there isn't the 308 00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 8: energy potentially to power the data centers. 309 00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 7: And that's why I like so much. 310 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:58,160 Speaker 8: The global spread of this, of this buildout. You know, Yes, 311 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 8: in the US, right, we need we need to build 312 00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 8: more facilities for powering these and we're seeing the companies 313 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 8: themselves get involved and that might very well be the 314 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:09,160 Speaker 8: solution in the US, but we're going. 315 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:10,360 Speaker 7: To get an awful lot more investment. 316 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 8: And that's, by the way, why the AI so called 317 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 8: investment team has spread beyond technology, it's into utilities, it's into. 318 00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:19,600 Speaker 7: Even pipeline companies. 319 00:15:19,880 --> 00:15:22,480 Speaker 8: Right, where is the demand spreading in addition to the 320 00:15:22,520 --> 00:15:26,400 Speaker 8: applications and the global footprint will I think be fungible 321 00:15:26,520 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 8: enough to allow the data centers to go where the 322 00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:32,680 Speaker 8: power and the land is available. And so that's a 323 00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 8: way also to avoid those bottlenecks too. 324 00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:40,720 Speaker 2: And Feeniev Advisors Capital Management robust, deep conversation. We appreciate 325 00:15:40,760 --> 00:15:42,880 Speaker 2: it very much. Okay, we're going to get out. So 326 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:47,120 Speaker 2: conversation now with former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo on 327 00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 2: the state of New York City's mayor or race, and 328 00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:52,520 Speaker 2: he is speaking to Bloomberg's David. 329 00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 9: Gura him up twenty five points to you. Of course, 330 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 9: it's a four candidate race. How do you see the 331 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 9: path forward here given the polling and where things stand. 332 00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 9: I should note that the polling hasn't changed a tremendous 333 00:16:03,040 --> 00:16:03,920 Speaker 9: amount in recent weeks. 334 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 10: Yeah, it will change dramatically. What you see in the 335 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:13,080 Speaker 10: polls is Mam Dami is always about forty percent. 336 00:16:13,800 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 11: That leaves sixty percent. 337 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:18,960 Speaker 10: As you accurately pointed out, you have a multi candidate field, 338 00:16:19,040 --> 00:16:22,200 Speaker 10: so four people or three people who are breaking up 339 00:16:22,200 --> 00:16:25,160 Speaker 10: that sixty percent. I don't think you're going to wind 340 00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:28,240 Speaker 10: up ultimately with that larger field. 341 00:16:28,320 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 11: I think the field is going to collapse. 342 00:16:30,480 --> 00:16:32,840 Speaker 10: I think it's going to come down to me versus 343 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:37,560 Speaker 10: mister Mammdanni. And as I said, Mamdanni has forty percent 344 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:43,160 Speaker 10: his very radical ideas which are exciting to one group 345 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:47,480 Speaker 10: of the population, especially young people, but are polarizing to 346 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 10: many other people. And I think it's going to come 347 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:52,760 Speaker 10: down to a one on one and then it is 348 00:16:52,800 --> 00:16:54,720 Speaker 10: a totally different race. 349 00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:58,040 Speaker 9: Curtisly with the Republican candidate says he's not dropping out. 350 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 9: The incumbent mayor Eric Adam says he's not dropping out. 351 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:04,320 Speaker 9: We've passed the ballot deadline. If we were to have 352 00:17:04,359 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 9: a race where it's you against or Mandani, poles still 353 00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:09,960 Speaker 9: show him leading you by a substantial amount. What do 354 00:17:10,000 --> 00:17:12,440 Speaker 9: you see in the electorate that the data aren't shown 355 00:17:12,440 --> 00:17:14,200 Speaker 9: when it comes to that particular configuration. 356 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:19,320 Speaker 10: Yeah, well, polls are historically wrong, especially this year, especially 357 00:17:19,359 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 10: in New York. On your first point, you can stay 358 00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:26,680 Speaker 10: in the race. First of all, technically nobody can get 359 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 10: off the ballot, right. The question is are you viable 360 00:17:31,200 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 10: in the race, And you kind of people who are 361 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 10: in the race, but the voters just think they're not 362 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:41,520 Speaker 10: really competitive, they can't win. I'm not going to waste 363 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:44,080 Speaker 10: my vote, and I think that's what happens here. I 364 00:17:44,080 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 10: think it comes down to me and Mamdani. I think 365 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:53,639 Speaker 10: when people understand what Mamdani stands for, besides what he 366 00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:59,000 Speaker 10: has said on TikTok, you know he's anti police. This 367 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:03,199 Speaker 10: band the police legalized prostitution, didn't legalize the drug trade, 368 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:04,600 Speaker 10: abolish jails. 369 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 11: You know, this would be anarchy in New York. 370 00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:11,760 Speaker 10: Socialism does not work in New York City. 371 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:12,640 Speaker 11: It's antithetical. 372 00:18:12,680 --> 00:18:18,679 Speaker 10: We're the business capital, right, We're pro business. Business is 373 00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:22,520 Speaker 10: the engine that drives the train. So none of that 374 00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:26,440 Speaker 10: has been communicated yet, and when it does, I can 375 00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:30,040 Speaker 10: tell you the minds will change. 376 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 9: Is there an effort by you and your campaign to 377 00:18:32,880 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 9: try to convince Eric Adams or Curtiously would a drop 378 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:37,600 Speaker 9: out of this race, or their conversations that are happening 379 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:39,760 Speaker 9: behind the scenes to make what I imagine you see 380 00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:41,720 Speaker 9: as a compelling case for them to step aside to 381 00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:43,280 Speaker 9: make this more of a one on one race. 382 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:46,399 Speaker 10: No, I'm sure they're making their own decisions. I've been 383 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:51,080 Speaker 10: in elections that where I have dropped out because I 384 00:18:51,240 --> 00:18:55,760 Speaker 10: thought it was the right thing to do. They have 385 00:18:55,880 --> 00:19:00,399 Speaker 10: a decision to make. There is no apparent path to 386 00:19:00,640 --> 00:19:05,240 Speaker 10: victory for them, They in essence would act as a spoiler. 387 00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,679 Speaker 10: And that's a decision they have to make. They have 388 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:12,720 Speaker 10: to make it personally, and that's their business. But again, 389 00:19:13,320 --> 00:19:14,639 Speaker 10: I think it's going to come down to a two 390 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:18,679 Speaker 10: person rais no matter what, because that's what the polls 391 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 10: are going to say, and that is the choice. I 392 00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 10: am a Democrat, my father was a Democrat. I worked 393 00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 10: for Bill Clinton. Zoran is a socialist they call them 394 00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:35,720 Speaker 10: to democratic socialists, right, didn't support Democrats, that Barack Obama 395 00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:40,080 Speaker 10: was a liar and evil, and didn't support Kamala Harris 396 00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 10: against Trump. Right, So this is a very different This 397 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:49,960 Speaker 10: is apples and oranges between the two of us. 398 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:51,680 Speaker 9: I want to ask you about some comments that Curtis 399 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 9: Lee we made yesterday. I'm sure you heard them. He 400 00:19:54,080 --> 00:19:57,360 Speaker 9: was campaigning and suggested that your affiliates of your campaign 401 00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:00,919 Speaker 9: had reached out to him and offered him money to 402 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:03,240 Speaker 9: the tune of ten million dollars to drop out of 403 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 9: this race. And I'm going to quote from what he 404 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:07,480 Speaker 9: said during that campaign event. He called these classic Andrew 405 00:20:07,520 --> 00:20:10,240 Speaker 9: Cuomo tactics. Why don't you strap up Cuomo to a 406 00:20:10,280 --> 00:20:12,439 Speaker 9: lie detection machine and ask him and we'll all be 407 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:13,360 Speaker 9: blown to Kingdom. 408 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:15,400 Speaker 11: Come because he's behind it. 409 00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:18,080 Speaker 9: I don't have a polygraphic machine with me here, But 410 00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 9: how do you respond to what he's alleging in those comments? 411 00:20:20,680 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 10: Look, you can't. You have to take sliver with a 412 00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:28,840 Speaker 10: grain of salt. Right. He is a known con man. 413 00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:33,000 Speaker 10: He's lied about being victims of crime before. 414 00:20:34,520 --> 00:20:35,680 Speaker 11: But it's very simple, David. 415 00:20:36,160 --> 00:20:40,920 Speaker 10: When he said that someone should have said who who 416 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:44,400 Speaker 10: or offered you the money? Let him answer the question 417 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:49,040 Speaker 10: because it would happen to be a crime, right, who 418 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:53,840 Speaker 10: or offered you money? He never said who, which sort 419 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:58,159 Speaker 10: of tells you right that it's all malarkey. 420 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:02,680 Speaker 11: There was no person who did it. I want to 421 00:21:02,680 --> 00:21:02,919 Speaker 11: ask you. 422 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:04,520 Speaker 9: Last we've talked about the state of the race, where 423 00:21:04,520 --> 00:21:06,400 Speaker 9: you hope that it's headed, and if we can, I'd 424 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 9: like to look back to nineteen seventy seven. So ways 425 00:21:09,520 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 9: you were nineteen, You were a student at Fordham University. 426 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 9: Your dad was making a run for mayor and you 427 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:17,040 Speaker 9: were helping out on the campaign. He didn't win the 428 00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,040 Speaker 9: Democratic primary and decided to run on an independent line 429 00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 9: for mayor. He ended up losing that race by nine points. 430 00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:27,000 Speaker 9: They say that history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes, 431 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:28,520 Speaker 9: and I know that you don't want history to repeat 432 00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:30,480 Speaker 9: itself here. You'd like to win this race in the 433 00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:33,520 Speaker 9: way that he wasn't able to back then fifty years ago. 434 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:36,040 Speaker 9: I'm not the first to point out this historical parallel, 435 00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 9: but I imagine you've thought about it, and I wonder how 436 00:21:38,800 --> 00:21:41,960 Speaker 9: that experience has informed your outlook on this race. There 437 00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:44,200 Speaker 9: was introspection after the primaries. You didn't do as well 438 00:21:44,200 --> 00:21:47,240 Speaker 9: as you wanted to do. You decided to make this run. 439 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:49,800 Speaker 9: What can you learn about that race that your dad 440 00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:51,399 Speaker 9: waged and how does that inform the way that you're 441 00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:51,920 Speaker 9: running this. 442 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:56,520 Speaker 10: Yeah, my father was an extraordinary individual on many levels, 443 00:21:57,600 --> 00:22:03,439 Speaker 10: highly principled, frankly a typical for a politician, and he 444 00:22:03,520 --> 00:22:05,960 Speaker 10: did quote unquote the right thing, whatever he thought the 445 00:22:06,040 --> 00:22:12,119 Speaker 10: right thing was for me. I believe in the Democratic Party. 446 00:22:12,680 --> 00:22:15,960 Speaker 10: I believe in what my father stood for, what John F. 447 00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:19,200 Speaker 10: Kennedy stood for, and Robert F. Kennedy stood for, and 448 00:22:19,720 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 10: Bill Clinton and what Mandami represents. And this Democratic Socialists 449 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:30,919 Speaker 10: of America DSA socialists call them whatever you want, is 450 00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:36,440 Speaker 10: repugnant to the Democratic Party, I know, And that's what's 451 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:40,120 Speaker 10: really going on here. This is a civil war within 452 00:22:40,320 --> 00:22:45,359 Speaker 10: the Democratic Party right where the extreme left is pulling 453 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 10: the Democratic Party and the moderates are afraid of the 454 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:50,480 Speaker 10: extreme left. 455 00:22:51,000 --> 00:22:52,480 Speaker 11: It's the inverse of. 456 00:22:52,480 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 10: The Republican Party when they had the Tea Party and 457 00:22:55,119 --> 00:22:57,840 Speaker 10: the Tea Party was pulling the Republican moderates too far 458 00:22:57,880 --> 00:22:59,440 Speaker 10: to the right because they were afraid of them in 459 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:02,280 Speaker 10: a primary. That's what's happening here. It's a battle for 460 00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:04,439 Speaker 10: the soul of the Democratic Party. 461 00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:06,960 Speaker 11: And the Democratic. 462 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:11,720 Speaker 10: Party is not anti business, it's not anti police. 463 00:23:12,520 --> 00:23:14,000 Speaker 11: That's not who we are. 464 00:23:15,320 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 10: We're not about redistributing income as a policy. Right, you 465 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 10: tax to provide a service. You don't tax to take 466 00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:30,800 Speaker 10: money from the rich to give it to the poor. 467 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:31,360 Speaker 12: Right. 468 00:23:32,119 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 11: That's why Donald Trump cos him a communist. 469 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 10: So this is not the Democratic Party that I believe 470 00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:48,840 Speaker 10: I represent and traditionally has served this nation well. He 471 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:55,560 Speaker 10: is zero experience in the position, never managed anything five employees, 472 00:23:55,920 --> 00:24:01,639 Speaker 10: never had a real job. And when you when you're 473 00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:07,320 Speaker 10: willing to consider chief executive New York City, no management experience, 474 00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:11,199 Speaker 10: run five people. Now, who's going to run three hundred 475 00:24:11,240 --> 00:24:14,520 Speaker 10: thousand employees one hundred and fifteen billion dollar budget. 476 00:24:14,560 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 11: You wake up any morning. 477 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:18,440 Speaker 10: You could have a terrorist attack, you could have another COVID. 478 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:25,960 Speaker 10: It just the means government and the means public service 479 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:31,200 Speaker 10: in a way that I just find important, and I'm 480 00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 10: going to do everything I can to stop it. 481 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:35,680 Speaker 12: Got a quota. 482 00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:37,640 Speaker 11: Thank you very much, appreciate it. Thank you. I'll send 483 00:24:37,680 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 11: it back to you. 484 00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:41,959 Speaker 5: Oh thanks to Bloomberg's David Gera. There and a reminder 485 00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:44,400 Speaker 5: that Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg 486 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,679 Speaker 5: News parent Bloombag LP, has endorsed Cuomo in the primary 487 00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:49,680 Speaker 5: and contributed to his pack ed. 488 00:24:51,119 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 2: Okay, we have some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg Amazon 489 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:56,399 Speaker 2: has agreed to pay two point five billion dollars in 490 00:24:56,480 --> 00:25:00,760 Speaker 2: penalties and refunds and to change its pro sess for 491 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:04,760 Speaker 2: how you cancel Prime subscription subscriptions. This is in the 492 00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:07,639 Speaker 2: FTC case against it, So the split is that the 493 00:25:07,680 --> 00:25:10,399 Speaker 2: company will pay one billion dollar in civil penalties and 494 00:25:10,480 --> 00:25:13,520 Speaker 2: refund one point five billion dollars to customers. The accusation 495 00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:17,000 Speaker 2: that the FTC had made was that Amazon was misleading 496 00:25:17,080 --> 00:25:19,760 Speaker 2: millions of customers into signing up for Prime, but then 497 00:25:19,840 --> 00:25:23,600 Speaker 2: making it intentionally difficult to cancel. They will now change 498 00:25:23,640 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 2: that process overall. When the news broke, there was a 499 00:25:26,119 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 2: brief spike into positive territory, but was still down two 500 00:25:29,160 --> 00:25:32,359 Speaker 2: tens of one percent. The extraordinary thing, Carrow is, remember 501 00:25:32,400 --> 00:25:36,359 Speaker 2: that the trial in this case with jury selection was 502 00:25:36,400 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 2: only three days ago, and they've reached a settlement two 503 00:25:39,080 --> 00:25:41,399 Speaker 2: point five billion dollars in just three days. 504 00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:42,840 Speaker 3: Let's get to another story out. 505 00:25:42,680 --> 00:25:45,920 Speaker 2: Of the UK AI data center to developer n Scale has 506 00:25:45,960 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 2: just raised one point one billion dollars just one week 507 00:25:48,560 --> 00:25:51,800 Speaker 2: after announcing its partnership with Nvidia and open Ai in 508 00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 2: the UK. 509 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:54,440 Speaker 3: Let's get more from Bloomberg's Mark Bergen. 510 00:25:55,119 --> 00:25:57,439 Speaker 2: A lot of focus at the moment on the Neo cloud, 511 00:25:57,560 --> 00:25:59,399 Speaker 2: and n Scale kind of fits into that. What are 512 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:01,040 Speaker 2: the details from this story? 513 00:26:02,359 --> 00:26:03,960 Speaker 13: We know a lot more than what you said. This 514 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:06,720 Speaker 13: is one point one billion. They've described it as one 515 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:09,159 Speaker 13: of the largest. Actually they said it's the largest Series 516 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:13,280 Speaker 13: B round in Europe. You know, it's really fascinating to 517 00:26:13,280 --> 00:26:15,880 Speaker 13: see the scale though we have some in our story 518 00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:18,119 Speaker 13: in the Bloomberg today, but this might be just the 519 00:26:18,119 --> 00:26:20,480 Speaker 13: amount of money they need to purchase just one of 520 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:22,480 Speaker 13: their data centers they have had planned to build in 521 00:26:22,520 --> 00:26:25,000 Speaker 13: the UK, and I think you know, they are claiming 522 00:26:25,040 --> 00:26:27,960 Speaker 13: to go out and purchase deploy three hundred thousand in 523 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:30,680 Speaker 13: Nvidia GPUs, so they're going to need a lot more money. 524 00:26:31,119 --> 00:26:33,480 Speaker 13: We're not sure if this is just equity or equity 525 00:26:33,520 --> 00:26:36,560 Speaker 13: in debt, but they're likely to be raising probably both 526 00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:37,840 Speaker 13: of more and very soon. 527 00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:41,520 Speaker 5: And your investigations before showing the n scale very briefly, 528 00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:43,320 Speaker 5: Mark has never built a data center before. 529 00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:46,560 Speaker 12: Yeah, I mean, what do you need experience? 530 00:26:46,960 --> 00:26:49,159 Speaker 13: To be fair that they spun out of a crypto 531 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:52,359 Speaker 13: mining operation similar to what Core Reeve did. They have 532 00:26:52,480 --> 00:26:54,800 Speaker 13: hired senior executives that have a lot of experience, but 533 00:26:54,840 --> 00:26:55,800 Speaker 13: the company itself hasn't. 534 00:26:56,280 --> 00:26:58,600 Speaker 5: Bloomberg's Matt bag and short and sweet and we so 535 00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:01,160 Speaker 5: appreciate it, Thank you very much. Coming up, the wave 536 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:04,000 Speaker 5: of AI data center announcements keeps on going. We talk 537 00:27:04,040 --> 00:27:13,920 Speaker 5: to Berkley's next. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I quick 538 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:17,000 Speaker 5: check are some key names that move this market today. Look, 539 00:27:17,040 --> 00:27:19,199 Speaker 5: we are just questioning some of the valuations within the 540 00:27:19,280 --> 00:27:21,119 Speaker 5: S and P five hundred, within the NASTAG. We're on 541 00:27:21,160 --> 00:27:24,080 Speaker 5: paus ahead of those big inflation numbers tomorrow. But I 542 00:27:24,119 --> 00:27:27,160 Speaker 5: dig into individual names that continue to push higher core 543 00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:28,919 Speaker 5: we've turned around or it was training lower and then 544 00:27:28,960 --> 00:27:30,840 Speaker 5: it goes into the grain by one point five percent. 545 00:27:30,920 --> 00:27:33,600 Speaker 5: Why they've got yet further commitments coming from open Ai 546 00:27:33,840 --> 00:27:36,480 Speaker 5: to continue to build out their data center needs. They'relping 547 00:27:36,560 --> 00:27:38,320 Speaker 5: it by another six and a half billion dollars to 548 00:27:38,320 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 5: more than twenty two billion in commitments. That's important because 549 00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:44,160 Speaker 5: we'd worried about perhaps the focus on Microsoft. 550 00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:45,040 Speaker 4: As a key client for coreweave. 551 00:27:45,080 --> 00:27:48,000 Speaker 5: Now the neocloud really pushing in to other areas of growth. 552 00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:50,399 Speaker 5: We're also looking at in video up seven tens and percent. 553 00:27:50,720 --> 00:27:53,639 Speaker 5: This is we just digest there's a phenomenal scale of 554 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:56,600 Speaker 5: investment coming from this company, whether it's backing Intel last 555 00:27:56,600 --> 00:27:58,920 Speaker 5: week to five billion, whether it's one hundred billion dollars 556 00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:01,840 Speaker 5: in terms of equity going into open Ai. No matter what, 557 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:05,560 Speaker 5: when they commit to increase their AI spend, the market 558 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:08,159 Speaker 5: rewards them. Ed and interesting notes coming out in this 559 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:09,320 Speaker 5: company today as well. 560 00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:12,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think in Vidia's worth lingering on. Barkley is 561 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:14,320 Speaker 2: out with a new note raising its price target from 562 00:28:14,320 --> 00:28:17,119 Speaker 2: two hundred dollars to two hundred and forty dollars, maintaining 563 00:28:17,119 --> 00:28:20,520 Speaker 2: an overweight status on the stock Barklay's research analyst Tomamalley 564 00:28:20,600 --> 00:28:23,960 Speaker 2: joins us, the author of that note, you are in 565 00:28:24,040 --> 00:28:27,520 Speaker 2: the camp of people that listen to Gentsen one when 566 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:29,560 Speaker 2: he said this is going to be a one trillion 567 00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:33,880 Speaker 2: dollar opportunity or industry, and then very recently said actually 568 00:28:33,920 --> 00:28:36,440 Speaker 2: it's going to be a three or four trillion dollar opportunity. 569 00:28:36,960 --> 00:28:40,520 Speaker 2: And now you, like many, say it's a bit more 570 00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:41,440 Speaker 2: believable to us. 571 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:43,280 Speaker 3: Just explain your thesis. 572 00:28:43,880 --> 00:28:45,360 Speaker 12: Perfect and thanks for having me on the show. 573 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:47,440 Speaker 14: I think in a prior segment you had Joanna on 574 00:28:47,520 --> 00:28:50,520 Speaker 14: talking about how the pie keeps on growing. If you 575 00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 14: look at compute announcements since December of twenty twenty four 576 00:28:54,080 --> 00:28:57,240 Speaker 14: through date, we're looking at over two trillion of announced 577 00:28:57,240 --> 00:29:01,200 Speaker 14: dollars of compute in over forty gigwatts. If you look 578 00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:03,960 Speaker 14: at what Jensen said historically, about sixty five to seventy 579 00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:04,480 Speaker 14: percent of. 580 00:29:04,440 --> 00:29:05,840 Speaker 12: That is related to compute. 581 00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:08,040 Speaker 14: So if you look at what it could mean for 582 00:29:08,120 --> 00:29:11,920 Speaker 14: in Vidia, it's about one point five trillion dollars really 583 00:29:11,920 --> 00:29:15,080 Speaker 14: coming into the pipeline over a very recent period of time. 584 00:29:15,440 --> 00:29:19,280 Speaker 2: Tom, you saw the announcement between open AI and Video 585 00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:24,280 Speaker 2: right from the end of from earlier this week. Yes, okay, 586 00:29:24,360 --> 00:29:29,000 Speaker 2: so on the internet, the analogy or metaphor that people 587 00:29:29,040 --> 00:29:32,080 Speaker 2: are using with that, it's like an extension cable that 588 00:29:32,280 --> 00:29:35,320 Speaker 2: in Vidia is the extension cable. They're unplugging from the 589 00:29:35,360 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 2: wall and just plugging back into the cable. Do you 590 00:29:38,360 --> 00:29:40,880 Speaker 2: see what I'm asking about? In Vidia puts one hundred 591 00:29:40,920 --> 00:29:43,720 Speaker 2: billion into open ai in order for open ai to 592 00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:46,640 Speaker 2: take one hundred billion dollars worth of Nvidia gear. 593 00:29:47,880 --> 00:29:49,400 Speaker 3: Absolutely, how do we interpret that? 594 00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:52,120 Speaker 14: I mean, there's two big concerns with the deployments of 595 00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:55,040 Speaker 14: AI right now. It's one power and then to the 596 00:29:55,080 --> 00:29:58,040 Speaker 14: circular reference issue that you see brought up again and again, 597 00:29:58,160 --> 00:30:01,120 Speaker 14: I would say you can flip this argument on its head. Obviously, 598 00:30:01,120 --> 00:30:04,000 Speaker 14: it's early days here and there is reason to be 599 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:07,960 Speaker 14: careful about circular issues in terms of investment. But I 600 00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:10,600 Speaker 14: would ask where should Nvidia investor money. I think buying 601 00:30:10,640 --> 00:30:14,080 Speaker 14: backstock now would be one option. But Jensen's in founder 602 00:30:14,160 --> 00:30:17,480 Speaker 14: mode here. He's looking to create an ecosystem where you're 603 00:30:17,520 --> 00:30:20,880 Speaker 14: having more and more players actually drive AI further on. 604 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:22,640 Speaker 12: And I guess the other point would be, this is 605 00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:23,360 Speaker 12: not just Jensen. 606 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:26,640 Speaker 14: You're seeing investments from AMD and Broadcom, and this is 607 00:30:26,640 --> 00:30:28,360 Speaker 14: going to be something that's driven forward by a group 608 00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:31,800 Speaker 14: of companies, but clearly a concern that many investors bring 609 00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:34,280 Speaker 14: to light. But I do think that there in Video 610 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:36,719 Speaker 14: is in a unique position where they're taking the capital 611 00:30:36,760 --> 00:30:39,280 Speaker 14: that they've made and they're reinvesting it in their space. 612 00:30:39,400 --> 00:30:41,160 Speaker 12: So can look at that argument both ways. 613 00:30:41,360 --> 00:30:43,840 Speaker 5: I look, they've just deployed in Europe with n scale, 614 00:30:44,040 --> 00:30:47,400 Speaker 5: They've been deployed in neo clouds and care Wey for example. 615 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:47,720 Speaker 4: Tom. 616 00:30:48,080 --> 00:30:51,760 Speaker 5: What's so interesting is where the house of cards could fall, 617 00:30:52,280 --> 00:30:56,400 Speaker 5: what would limit this up and to the right perspective 618 00:30:56,520 --> 00:30:59,600 Speaker 5: about AI compute needs and that feeding into in Vidia 619 00:30:59,680 --> 00:31:03,000 Speaker 5: and in all of the semiconductors that currently have a 620 00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:05,000 Speaker 5: stake in providing AI accelerators. 621 00:31:05,920 --> 00:31:08,000 Speaker 14: As you mentioned earlier in the show, it's the return 622 00:31:08,040 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 14: on investment first and foremost, and I think that what 623 00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:11,800 Speaker 14: we do in the note that we had out today 624 00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:14,920 Speaker 14: is try to show what the investment from a chip 625 00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:17,680 Speaker 14: perspective is looking like versus what the ROI is and 626 00:31:17,960 --> 00:31:20,520 Speaker 14: we do that by looking at hyperscaler RPO. So you 627 00:31:20,520 --> 00:31:25,040 Speaker 14: look at AWS, Azure, GPC, Oracle and over the past 628 00:31:25,080 --> 00:31:27,000 Speaker 14: several years that's been growing out a thirty percent take 629 00:31:27,040 --> 00:31:31,440 Speaker 14: or so essentially hyperscaler backlog that's exploded to over eighty percent, 630 00:31:31,560 --> 00:31:33,880 Speaker 14: and if you look right now, the backlogs at over 631 00:31:33,960 --> 00:31:36,960 Speaker 14: one point one trillion dollars. So what you're seeing first 632 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:39,640 Speaker 14: and foremost is that you're getting some ROI, you're getting 633 00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:41,800 Speaker 14: some business that's stepping up. That's an area of the 634 00:31:41,800 --> 00:31:43,080 Speaker 14: world that we can do a little more work. 635 00:31:43,120 --> 00:31:43,200 Speaker 12: On. 636 00:31:43,240 --> 00:31:46,600 Speaker 14: The other side, which is less in the semiconductor ecosystem 637 00:31:46,640 --> 00:31:48,600 Speaker 14: is the power side, where if you look at what 638 00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:52,720 Speaker 14: forty gigawatts means, you're talking multi major cities in terms 639 00:31:52,760 --> 00:31:55,400 Speaker 14: of the deployment. So that's really where the investment needs 640 00:31:55,440 --> 00:31:57,520 Speaker 14: to focus on from this point forward, because if you 641 00:31:57,520 --> 00:32:00,320 Speaker 14: don't have a utility bill for someone living in city 642 00:32:00,320 --> 00:32:02,200 Speaker 14: and that's being sucked to another data center, that's a 643 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:03,000 Speaker 14: serious problem. 644 00:32:03,280 --> 00:32:06,239 Speaker 5: Tom It's interesting that I think Ali Baba chimed in 645 00:32:06,360 --> 00:32:09,800 Speaker 5: the CEO saying four trillion is his number two by 646 00:32:09,840 --> 00:32:12,360 Speaker 5: twenty thirty. But I cast my mind back to March 647 00:32:12,400 --> 00:32:14,560 Speaker 5: when there was a wabble in the market, when we 648 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:17,280 Speaker 5: did start to question some of the valuations. That was 649 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:19,360 Speaker 5: because the chairman of Ali Baba had said there was 650 00:32:19,360 --> 00:32:22,760 Speaker 5: a bubble in terms of AI infrastructure investment, particularly in 651 00:32:22,800 --> 00:32:27,120 Speaker 5: the US. So how much of this what alarm bell 652 00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:29,440 Speaker 5: rings for you when we start to get into a 653 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 5: valuation that screams bubble because you see in video can 654 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:32,960 Speaker 5: go up another thirty. 655 00:32:32,760 --> 00:32:33,240 Speaker 4: Percent or so. 656 00:32:34,520 --> 00:32:36,360 Speaker 12: Yeah, I think there's two things to look at. 657 00:32:36,360 --> 00:32:39,239 Speaker 14: The first sort of reset in evaluations this year came 658 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:41,440 Speaker 14: around deep Seek and that was a change in where 659 00:32:41,480 --> 00:32:44,800 Speaker 14: we saw the AI revenue coming from. We've transitioned to 660 00:32:44,840 --> 00:32:47,800 Speaker 14: what was scaling laws in training, so all these guys 661 00:32:47,840 --> 00:32:50,360 Speaker 14: making money on training, and now we're moving more today 662 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:53,240 Speaker 14: era of inference, which is people actually using these models, 663 00:32:53,440 --> 00:32:56,640 Speaker 14: seeing agents out there actually serving individuals, and so you've 664 00:32:56,640 --> 00:32:59,800 Speaker 14: seen a shift in where compute spend has actually gone. 665 00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:03,040 Speaker 14: So the ROI is helpful and it makes me feel 666 00:33:03,080 --> 00:33:04,920 Speaker 14: a bit better as we go along here, and we'll 667 00:33:04,960 --> 00:33:08,040 Speaker 14: continue to look at open AI and thropic and you'll 668 00:33:08,040 --> 00:33:10,120 Speaker 14: see more fundamentals come out as time goes along. But 669 00:33:10,560 --> 00:33:13,640 Speaker 14: the concern is always these are very large numbers. Where 670 00:33:13,640 --> 00:33:16,600 Speaker 14: did these dollars come from? First step is look at hyperscalers. 671 00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:19,800 Speaker 14: If you look at today the cap X as a 672 00:33:19,840 --> 00:33:22,400 Speaker 14: percent of OP income, it's still around fifty percent. I 673 00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:24,480 Speaker 14: wouldn't start to get worded until you're above one hundred 674 00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:27,200 Speaker 14: percent and getting to a position where you're obviously taking 675 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:29,560 Speaker 14: on debt to do this. And then secondly, I would 676 00:33:29,560 --> 00:33:32,240 Speaker 14: look at the sovereigns where globally you're starting to see 677 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:35,080 Speaker 14: countries invest in this, and that's additional dollars that is 678 00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:37,480 Speaker 14: outside of that original pie. And that was always the 679 00:33:37,520 --> 00:33:39,440 Speaker 14: proxy for when are we run out here? When do 680 00:33:39,480 --> 00:33:41,920 Speaker 14: we get to the limit of hyperscaler capex. 681 00:33:42,440 --> 00:33:45,120 Speaker 2: Tom You did not reference Intel in the note you 682 00:33:45,120 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 2: published overnight, but you do cover Intel. I just wanted 683 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:52,360 Speaker 2: to ask for your reaction to the Nvidia equity investment 684 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:56,120 Speaker 2: in Intel, but actually for me more the partnership on 685 00:33:56,960 --> 00:34:00,760 Speaker 2: X eighty six and also in the piece domain, like 686 00:34:01,080 --> 00:34:02,840 Speaker 2: how do you interpret that? 687 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:03,280 Speaker 3: Please? 688 00:34:04,160 --> 00:34:06,560 Speaker 14: Yeah, I think just first and foremost, from a very 689 00:34:06,760 --> 00:34:09,200 Speaker 14: thirty thousand foot view, it's good that Intel is getting 690 00:34:09,239 --> 00:34:10,480 Speaker 14: dollars to bridge the gap here. 691 00:34:10,480 --> 00:34:12,280 Speaker 12: There's obviously been some capital. 692 00:34:11,920 --> 00:34:15,279 Speaker 14: Concerns when it comes to how it moves the technology 693 00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:18,200 Speaker 14: profile forward. We've seen a government investment, we've seen some 694 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:21,400 Speaker 14: other investors Brookfield and Apollo over the past several years, 695 00:34:21,520 --> 00:34:24,440 Speaker 14: and you haven't seen a big change in the technology profile. 696 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:26,840 Speaker 14: What I would argue is that this is very favorable 697 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:30,240 Speaker 14: for in video. You potentially have Intel focusing an AI 698 00:34:30,360 --> 00:34:34,120 Speaker 14: product for x eighty six CPUs in the data center 699 00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:36,160 Speaker 14: that will help with the thirty six and seventy two 700 00:34:36,239 --> 00:34:40,000 Speaker 14: systems that Nvidia has out there today. On the PC side, 701 00:34:40,040 --> 00:34:42,279 Speaker 14: gaming PCs already have a discre GPU and video is 702 00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:45,000 Speaker 14: already there. Maybe you could see some collaboration that helps 703 00:34:45,080 --> 00:34:48,640 Speaker 14: drive forward Intel's push on the AIPC side, but largely 704 00:34:48,680 --> 00:34:51,759 Speaker 14: this seems like a more favorable agreement for Nvidia, and 705 00:34:51,800 --> 00:34:54,200 Speaker 14: funny how times change within video stepping in to rescue 706 00:34:54,239 --> 00:34:54,719 Speaker 14: Intel here. 707 00:34:55,400 --> 00:34:59,040 Speaker 2: Okay, Tom, let's end here. So there's consensus that in 708 00:34:59,120 --> 00:35:00,799 Speaker 2: AI and dat cent at least this will be a 709 00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:05,600 Speaker 2: four trillion dollar industry over varying timeframes or addressable opportunity. 710 00:35:06,040 --> 00:35:10,319 Speaker 2: Have you and your colleagues and peers calculated how much 711 00:35:10,320 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 2: of that you expect in video to take and have 712 00:35:13,040 --> 00:35:17,439 Speaker 2: you factored in competition from AMD, GROCK in other CUSTOMASIC 713 00:35:17,520 --> 00:35:18,839 Speaker 2: solutions that are coming out. 714 00:35:20,160 --> 00:35:22,240 Speaker 14: Yeah, so I don't think we've done a full analysis. 715 00:35:22,239 --> 00:35:24,080 Speaker 14: When we get to that Fortrillian boy, that would be 716 00:35:24,080 --> 00:35:27,120 Speaker 14: great if we do, but I would say that right now, 717 00:35:27,239 --> 00:35:30,400 Speaker 14: general purpose silicon still represents greater than ninety percent of 718 00:35:30,480 --> 00:35:31,760 Speaker 14: the market, and that's. 719 00:35:32,120 --> 00:35:33,040 Speaker 12: In video and AMD. 720 00:35:33,239 --> 00:35:37,080 Speaker 14: Broadcom with their announcement, particularly with open AI, is starting 721 00:35:37,120 --> 00:35:38,960 Speaker 14: to take more share if you look at the longer 722 00:35:39,040 --> 00:35:42,360 Speaker 14: term horizon, I still think general purpose silicon makes up 723 00:35:42,400 --> 00:35:45,040 Speaker 14: a majority of the market, say sixty forty, but you 724 00:35:45,120 --> 00:35:48,200 Speaker 14: do see from where we are today, general purpose silicon 725 00:35:48,520 --> 00:35:50,720 Speaker 14: is a much larger piece of the pie. So again, 726 00:35:50,760 --> 00:35:53,640 Speaker 14: as Joanne was saying before, it's smart to be invested 727 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:56,360 Speaker 14: across these names. If you look at Broadcom, they're just 728 00:35:56,480 --> 00:35:59,200 Speaker 14: growing at a much faster rate than where they are today, 729 00:35:59,560 --> 00:36:01,440 Speaker 14: which makes that story very interesting as well. So I 730 00:36:01,440 --> 00:36:04,799 Speaker 14: guess in summary, just four dollars to Vidia over the 731 00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:06,440 Speaker 14: long term as I look at the market, but a 732 00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:08,759 Speaker 14: faster growth rate from the customs silking guys. 733 00:36:09,239 --> 00:36:11,560 Speaker 2: Tom O Marley from Barge's I think the first time 734 00:36:11,560 --> 00:36:13,560 Speaker 2: on Bloomberg Tech and we've really enjoyed it. 735 00:36:13,600 --> 00:36:15,440 Speaker 3: Thank you very much, carry what you got. 736 00:36:15,280 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 4: And it is time now for talking tech. 737 00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:20,160 Speaker 5: And first up, Elon Musk's XAI and the US government 738 00:36:20,360 --> 00:36:23,319 Speaker 5: assign a deal that allows federal agencies to use rock 739 00:36:23,400 --> 00:36:25,560 Speaker 5: Ai chatbot now. The dealer is part of a push 740 00:36:25,600 --> 00:36:28,560 Speaker 5: to speed up adoption of new technologies like oftificial intelligence, 741 00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:31,040 Speaker 5: and in just forty two cents per agency, it's the 742 00:36:31,160 --> 00:36:34,480 Speaker 5: cheapest contract yet and the government's new initiative. Plus, the 743 00:36:34,480 --> 00:36:38,440 Speaker 5: Trump administration has launched investigations into imports of robotics, industrial. 744 00:36:38,080 --> 00:36:39,600 Speaker 4: Machinery, and medical devices. 745 00:36:39,800 --> 00:36:42,760 Speaker 5: The probes set the stage for tariffs, which the President 746 00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:45,800 Speaker 5: is allowed to place on good steamed critical to national security, 747 00:36:46,360 --> 00:36:47,319 Speaker 5: and Apple. 748 00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:49,960 Speaker 4: Is calling on the EU to scrap the Digital Markets 749 00:36:50,000 --> 00:36:50,480 Speaker 4: Act Now. 750 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:53,200 Speaker 15: The US tech giant argues that the consumer protection law 751 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:58,240 Speaker 15: worsens user experience, increases privacy risks, and threatens to undermine innovation, 752 00:36:58,480 --> 00:37:00,759 Speaker 15: though the company says it is complyingying with the law 753 00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:01,880 Speaker 15: while it's in the place. 754 00:37:02,239 --> 00:37:04,520 Speaker 3: Ed okay coming up. 755 00:37:04,719 --> 00:37:08,920 Speaker 2: Alexa Moon Tobo of Inspired Capital joins us she'll explain why. 756 00:37:09,000 --> 00:37:12,480 Speaker 2: She says physical ai is reaching an inflection point and 757 00:37:12,520 --> 00:37:15,680 Speaker 2: the impact of quantum on financial services, which today is 758 00:37:15,680 --> 00:37:16,400 Speaker 2: a top story. 759 00:37:16,800 --> 00:37:17,680 Speaker 3: This has been big tech. 760 00:37:32,960 --> 00:37:37,000 Speaker 5: HSBC has achieved a breakthrough in deploying quantum computing in 761 00:37:37,080 --> 00:37:40,440 Speaker 5: financial markets now. Using IBM's Hero and Quantum processor, the 762 00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:43,759 Speaker 5: bank was able to improve bond price predictions. Let's talk 763 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:47,160 Speaker 5: about the opportunity to invest in this next frontier of computing. 764 00:37:47,360 --> 00:37:50,440 Speaker 5: And Alexa Montovo, founder and managing partner of Inspired Capital, 765 00:37:50,440 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 5: previously the founder of fintech style up learn Vest. She's 766 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:56,319 Speaker 5: sold to Northwestern Mutual back in twenty fifteen. And what 767 00:37:56,480 --> 00:37:59,520 Speaker 5: interests me so much is within your podcast, you've just 768 00:37:59,560 --> 00:38:02,200 Speaker 5: been speaking to a founder, you've backed logical all about 769 00:38:02,239 --> 00:38:03,040 Speaker 5: the future of quantum. 770 00:38:03,120 --> 00:38:04,839 Speaker 4: Ye've been deep diving on this. 771 00:38:05,600 --> 00:38:08,759 Speaker 5: So when you see these sorts of iterations and breakthroughs, 772 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:11,040 Speaker 5: what do you make of it? Where is the opportunity 773 00:38:11,040 --> 00:38:12,360 Speaker 5: for you in the seed in the series? 774 00:38:12,360 --> 00:38:15,520 Speaker 16: A first of all, great question. As you know, I 775 00:38:15,560 --> 00:38:18,160 Speaker 16: am a long term early stage investor and I like 776 00:38:18,200 --> 00:38:20,240 Speaker 16: to look for companies that could be worth ten twenty 777 00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:23,440 Speaker 16: thirty billion dollars. There's very few of those in the world, 778 00:38:23,480 --> 00:38:25,840 Speaker 16: and I think that led me to quantum now almost 779 00:38:25,840 --> 00:38:28,640 Speaker 16: a year and a half ago, thinking it's sort of 780 00:38:28,640 --> 00:38:34,000 Speaker 16: the next wave of innovation after AI, and the potential 781 00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:37,239 Speaker 16: is profound once and if we build these quantum computers 782 00:38:37,280 --> 00:38:39,520 Speaker 16: and mind you, it's a category where the people have 783 00:38:39,560 --> 00:38:43,480 Speaker 16: been toiling away for thirty years without much success. But 784 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:45,600 Speaker 16: the best experts in the world believe that in the 785 00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:49,080 Speaker 16: next decade we will begin to see real advancements towards 786 00:38:49,080 --> 00:38:52,239 Speaker 16: building the first scaled quantum computer, and what comes out 787 00:38:52,280 --> 00:38:56,160 Speaker 16: of that is huge advancements in financial services and pharmaceuticals 788 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:58,040 Speaker 16: and all these other categories that are going to change 789 00:38:58,080 --> 00:38:59,600 Speaker 16: the world in a profound way. 790 00:39:00,080 --> 00:39:02,120 Speaker 5: You think about IBM's role here, and they've come on 791 00:39:02,160 --> 00:39:04,720 Speaker 5: the show and said, by twenty twenty nine, are quantum 792 00:39:04,719 --> 00:39:06,000 Speaker 5: computer is going to be in there in the world 793 00:39:06,080 --> 00:39:09,920 Speaker 5: and achieving real things. Then from the early stage founder, 794 00:39:10,440 --> 00:39:11,560 Speaker 5: how are you seeking them out? 795 00:39:11,680 --> 00:39:13,880 Speaker 4: Where can they add to the quantum process? 796 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:14,239 Speaker 7: Sure? 797 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:16,200 Speaker 4: So, I think the big goal. 798 00:39:16,040 --> 00:39:17,920 Speaker 16: Right now is people are trying to get to ten 799 00:39:17,960 --> 00:39:21,680 Speaker 16: thousand cubets so many different hardware types six or seven 800 00:39:21,760 --> 00:39:23,680 Speaker 16: based on how you've cut it, and I think your 801 00:39:23,840 --> 00:39:26,720 Speaker 16: most important researchers and PhDs in the world are trying 802 00:39:26,760 --> 00:39:29,720 Speaker 16: to get to ten thousand, one hundred thousand skilled cubets. 803 00:39:29,960 --> 00:39:33,120 Speaker 16: That is the march that everyone is working towards, and 804 00:39:33,160 --> 00:39:35,319 Speaker 16: we're rooting for them. 805 00:39:35,760 --> 00:39:38,439 Speaker 2: Alex I'm really interested in like the business model, which 806 00:39:38,480 --> 00:39:39,799 Speaker 2: I know is a bit of a dry way of 807 00:39:39,800 --> 00:39:42,759 Speaker 2: looking at it, but when we think about compute for 808 00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:47,080 Speaker 2: data centers in the AI context, people lease that capacity, right. 809 00:39:47,280 --> 00:39:49,800 Speaker 2: I think about the work that Google is doing in quantum. 810 00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:54,560 Speaker 2: It uses it's quantum machines in house for research. So 811 00:39:55,080 --> 00:39:58,000 Speaker 2: with what HSBC did with IBM, and when you're looking 812 00:39:58,080 --> 00:40:02,520 Speaker 2: to invest in the early stages of this field, how 813 00:40:02,560 --> 00:40:06,840 Speaker 2: do quantum computing companies give their services to a financial 814 00:40:06,840 --> 00:40:08,280 Speaker 2: institution like an HSBC. 815 00:40:08,480 --> 00:40:09,480 Speaker 3: What's the model for that? 816 00:40:09,480 --> 00:40:10,920 Speaker 16: That's a great question. So I think we're going to 817 00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:13,400 Speaker 16: see a few things. First of all, right now people 818 00:40:13,760 --> 00:40:17,279 Speaker 16: will rent out their quantum computers. You're seeing prices from 819 00:40:17,320 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 16: ten thousand to in different cases fifty thousand dollars per 820 00:40:21,400 --> 00:40:23,719 Speaker 16: per hour, et cetera. So people will rent them out. 821 00:40:24,200 --> 00:40:27,200 Speaker 16: I actually think it could be a profound business model shift, 822 00:40:27,239 --> 00:40:31,000 Speaker 16: which is whatever is created with that quantum computer, whatever IP, 823 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:38,640 Speaker 16: whatever technology that comes out of using those advancements in compute, 824 00:40:38,960 --> 00:40:41,239 Speaker 16: that you could take a revenue stream forever. So that 825 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:43,560 Speaker 16: is sort of an interesting shift. Somebody once said to 826 00:40:43,600 --> 00:40:46,160 Speaker 16: me that whoever builds the first quantum computer almost overnight 827 00:40:46,200 --> 00:40:49,200 Speaker 16: could become Pfizer because the compute of what's possible for 828 00:40:49,200 --> 00:40:51,680 Speaker 16: pharmaceuticals could be that profound, So it gives you a 829 00:40:51,760 --> 00:40:55,120 Speaker 16: sense of the shift, which is you could potentially take 830 00:40:55,640 --> 00:40:57,640 Speaker 16: a stream of the IP that comes out of quantum 831 00:40:57,719 --> 00:40:59,759 Speaker 16: computers as a new business model. 832 00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:04,239 Speaker 2: Entirely Alexi, you are one of many I would say 833 00:41:04,280 --> 00:41:07,359 Speaker 2: that is arguing that physical AI is having a chatch 834 00:41:07,400 --> 00:41:11,920 Speaker 2: GPT moment. Physical AI is now a pretty broad category. 835 00:41:12,040 --> 00:41:15,279 Speaker 2: So which vertical within that would you say that is 836 00:41:15,320 --> 00:41:15,920 Speaker 2: most true? 837 00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:19,520 Speaker 16: Of great question? So what I get excited about as 838 00:41:19,600 --> 00:41:23,480 Speaker 16: everyone was running at digital AI, as you've seen the 839 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,439 Speaker 16: dollars pour into the category and inspired our venture fund. 840 00:41:28,520 --> 00:41:31,160 Speaker 16: Early stage venture fund is very thesis driven. So for us, 841 00:41:31,200 --> 00:41:35,600 Speaker 16: what physical AI means is taking big foundational models that 842 00:41:35,719 --> 00:41:39,080 Speaker 16: now exist credibly that can interact with things like sensors 843 00:41:39,120 --> 00:41:43,720 Speaker 16: and robotics and create smart devices everywhere in our physical world. 844 00:41:44,280 --> 00:41:46,280 Speaker 16: If you think about just our infrastructure. 845 00:41:46,560 --> 00:41:48,919 Speaker 4: We all live because. 846 00:41:48,600 --> 00:41:52,480 Speaker 16: Of our infrastructure, our water, our pipeline, our electricity, our roads, 847 00:41:52,760 --> 00:41:54,360 Speaker 16: and we're getting to the point where we can no 848 00:41:54,440 --> 00:41:56,759 Speaker 16: longer be reactive, which is what we are. Almost like 849 00:41:56,800 --> 00:41:59,400 Speaker 16: the Roman times, something breaks, you go and fix it 850 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:03,080 Speaker 16: to becoming predictive about our ecosystem around us, our world 851 00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:05,839 Speaker 16: and infrastructure around us. And that is what we mean 852 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:09,319 Speaker 16: by physical AI it inspired. We're really looking for the 853 00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:13,680 Speaker 16: intersection of observability and predictability in the environment around us. 854 00:42:14,040 --> 00:42:16,040 Speaker 5: And looking at your poor photio companies, you've already made 855 00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:19,600 Speaker 5: some key bets. Yes, we're thinking about bright Ai TC Labs. 856 00:42:20,040 --> 00:42:21,799 Speaker 5: What is it that these companies that we see on 857 00:42:21,840 --> 00:42:25,320 Speaker 5: our screen now have offered you from the seed in 858 00:42:25,640 --> 00:42:29,080 Speaker 5: series a area that you feel hasn't been adopted already by 859 00:42:29,160 --> 00:42:31,280 Speaker 5: big industry, by big companies already listed. 860 00:42:31,360 --> 00:42:35,719 Speaker 16: Sure, I'll start with bright Ai. Bright Ai. Alex the 861 00:42:35,840 --> 00:42:40,360 Speaker 16: CEO is an absolute technical genius, the godfather of IoT, 862 00:42:40,880 --> 00:42:43,440 Speaker 16: and he invented a sticker. There's now two hundred and 863 00:42:43,480 --> 00:42:46,160 Speaker 16: fifty thousand already deployed of these stickers, and they can 864 00:42:46,200 --> 00:42:49,279 Speaker 16: go on anything from a utility pole to a water pipeline. 865 00:42:49,400 --> 00:42:52,280 Speaker 16: And here's what it does. It then sends an observability 866 00:42:52,360 --> 00:42:55,560 Speaker 16: layer back to whichever company has bought these stickers and 867 00:42:55,640 --> 00:42:58,959 Speaker 16: can say, now, proactively, the utility pole is twenty five 868 00:42:59,000 --> 00:43:02,480 Speaker 16: degrees slanted, let's go fix it before it falls on 869 00:43:03,000 --> 00:43:07,040 Speaker 16: an electrical wire and takes power grids out. Literally, men 870 00:43:07,080 --> 00:43:09,600 Speaker 16: and women walk up and down utility poles, right now 871 00:43:09,680 --> 00:43:12,680 Speaker 16: and observe them physically and then fix things versus being 872 00:43:12,680 --> 00:43:17,040 Speaker 16: predictive and fixing it. In the water world, will literally 873 00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:19,800 Speaker 16: find inside pipelines the leaks and right now today we 874 00:43:20,160 --> 00:43:24,400 Speaker 16: lose six billion gallons of treated water, which is fifteen 875 00:43:24,400 --> 00:43:27,040 Speaker 16: million homes of water. Think about that every single day 876 00:43:27,280 --> 00:43:30,080 Speaker 16: because of leaks and verse and bright AI is the 877 00:43:30,120 --> 00:43:32,960 Speaker 16: sensors that we'll get ahead of that. SE's BRIGHTAI. A 878 00:43:32,960 --> 00:43:36,279 Speaker 16: company we're really rooting for. Another company, as we said, 879 00:43:36,360 --> 00:43:39,360 Speaker 16: was TC Labs, which is an incredible team out of Google. 880 00:43:39,600 --> 00:43:43,759 Speaker 16: They're trying to save one gigaton of carbon each year 881 00:43:43,800 --> 00:43:45,719 Speaker 16: and what they do is go take the energy we 882 00:43:45,760 --> 00:43:48,319 Speaker 16: already have. So think about this. Because of AI, we 883 00:43:48,360 --> 00:43:52,920 Speaker 16: need wild amounts of energy. There's not enough energy is 884 00:43:52,960 --> 00:43:55,879 Speaker 16: the headline, and so they are going to the infrastructure 885 00:43:55,920 --> 00:43:58,839 Speaker 16: we already have oil refineries and not only helping make 886 00:43:58,880 --> 00:44:01,759 Speaker 16: them be more EFFICI using AI so that they can 887 00:44:01,800 --> 00:44:05,080 Speaker 16: produce more energy, but also more carbon friendly. So that's 888 00:44:05,160 --> 00:44:08,520 Speaker 16: TC Labs. And then finally True Swift is the data 889 00:44:08,560 --> 00:44:12,680 Speaker 16: set of sensors for our forest. The forest are the 890 00:44:12,760 --> 00:44:14,880 Speaker 16: lungs of the planet, and they are measuring them so 891 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:17,800 Speaker 16: that we can get ahead of forest fires in major 892 00:44:17,920 --> 00:44:21,439 Speaker 16: storms that then take power out. So as you see 893 00:44:21,760 --> 00:44:24,680 Speaker 16: your very forwarde banking and physical AI. 894 00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:29,520 Speaker 2: Alexavon Tobo, co founder managing partner of Inspired Capital, thank 895 00:44:29,560 --> 00:44:32,719 Speaker 2: you very much. South Korea says investment projects in the 896 00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:36,200 Speaker 2: US will remain in limbo until visa issues are resolved. 897 00:44:36,200 --> 00:44:39,839 Speaker 2: In the wake of the Trump administration's immigration raid at 898 00:44:39,840 --> 00:44:43,160 Speaker 2: a Hyundai LG Energy battery plant in Georgia, South Korean 899 00:44:43,160 --> 00:44:46,400 Speaker 2: Prime Minister Kim Minsouk sat down with Bloomberg's scherry On 900 00:44:46,600 --> 00:44:51,239 Speaker 2: in Seoul for an exclusive interview. 901 00:44:51,520 --> 00:44:55,319 Speaker 17: Realistically, without a solution, it's difficult to invest in the 902 00:44:55,440 --> 00:44:59,240 Speaker 17: United States and carry out the various joint projects currently 903 00:44:59,280 --> 00:45:04,240 Speaker 17: planned between South Korea and the US. We absolutely must 904 00:45:04,239 --> 00:45:08,240 Speaker 17: find a solution. Several projects are underway between South Korea 905 00:45:08,320 --> 00:45:12,360 Speaker 17: and the US. Without resolving the visa issue, meaningful progress 906 00:45:12,400 --> 00:45:14,440 Speaker 17: remains virtually impossible. 907 00:45:15,320 --> 00:45:18,280 Speaker 5: Coming up, Disney ready for a legal battle with President 908 00:45:18,320 --> 00:45:20,200 Speaker 5: Trump over Jimmy Kimmel's late night return. 909 00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:23,120 Speaker 4: We're on that. Next. This is Broomback Tech