WEBVTT - Nvidia Gives Solid Forecast, Even as China Slump Mars Growth

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 3>I want to go to Nvidio though, because we are

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>going to see their numbers drop probably any moment now,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and we are seeing the stock up about eight tenths

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 3>of a percent here in the after market. Obviously a

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 3>big deal, biggest semiconductor company. What they have to say

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>about the AI trade, and it's not just the hyperscalers

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 3>but beyond as we heard from Kunjohn Sabania Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 3>So second tier companies are they also biding buying into

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>and video chips. So we'll have to see what they

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 3>have to say say. And Vidia is app folks, let's

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>get to it. First quarter just to DPS eighty one

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>cents a share.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 4>That's a miss. Street was looking.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>For ninety three cents, so twelve cents shy what the

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>street was expected expecting revenue is expected to be forty

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 3>five billion plus or minus two percent. First quarter revenue

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 3>forty four point one billion, that was a beat the

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>street expectations was forty three point twenty nine billion. First

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 3>quarter adjusted gross margin that was a miss sixty one

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>percent versus an estimate of seventy one percent. Company, though

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>saying that the second.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Quarter outlook reflects a loss in H twenty revenue of

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>about eight billion.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Keep in mind that when that ban came from the

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>administration and vide did do a write down of about

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>five and a half billion dollars, and Kunjan said it

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>was a little noisy because not all of the estimates

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 3>on the street had incorporated that full H twenty ban.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, shares bouncing around right now of about eight tenths

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 5>of one percent in the after hours. They were down earlier.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 5>The company said that global demand for AI infrastructure is

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>quote incredibly strong, also saying that Blackwell's NVL seventy two

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 5>AI supercomputer is in full scale production. The company also

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 5>said the second quarter outlook reflects a loss in H

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty revenue of about eight billion dollars. So I wonder

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 5>if that charge, Carol that they took was relatively conservative,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 5>The company also saying it was unable to ship and

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 5>add a two point five billion dollars of H twenty

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 5>revenue in the first quarter. The company also saying it

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 5>will pay a quarterly dividend of one cent per share

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 5>that will happen on July third. Shares right now in

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 5>the after hours are moving higher, up about two point

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 5>five percent.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, up about two yeah, exactly.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>The CEO, Jensen Wong, who we're going to hear from

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>our Ed Ludlow's going to talk with him at six

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty pm Wall Street time on Bloomberg TV and radio.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 3>The CEO saying the company stands at the center of transformation.

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Go back to what he said about global demand for

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure, incredibly strong adjectives, and so we're going to

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>want some more numbers around that. We're getting more on

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 3>the first quarter at comput revenue thirty four point sixteen billion,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>a little light. Street was looking for thirty five point

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>forty seven billion. First quarter networking revenue four point ninety

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>six billion. Street estimate was three point forty five billion,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's a bit of a big beat. But again,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>the key headlines seem to be what it says about

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>second quarter revenue forty five billion plus or minus two percent.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>The estimate on the street is forty five point five billion,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>So we could have some upside.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Tim from it, or we could see some downside from it.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing shares right now hire about about three point

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>two percent in the after hours. Want to bring in

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 5>Jay Goldberg, senior analyst Semiconductors and Electronics at Seaport Research Partners.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Jay joins us from San Francisco. Jay, I want to

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>get your reaction to earnings in just a minute. I

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 5>should note that you are the only analyst listed on

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the Bloomberg terminal with a cell rating for Nvidia. Does

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 5>today's result keep you at a cell rating?

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 6>So I have to go through numbers first, but I

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 6>would say yes.

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, my take is that in video, the most

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 7>scrutinized company in the planet, we all have a pretty

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 7>good sense of what their numbers should look like this year,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 7>what their capacity is working backwards from that, there's not

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 7>a lot of room.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Left for upside. Right.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 7>There's a few things here and there, but there's not

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 7>much upside possible. But on the downside, there's still a

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 7>lot of risks. There are a lot of things that

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 7>could go wrong. There's lots of problems with the supply chain,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 7>the fact that they keeper mentioning that Blackwell is ramping.

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 7>That was in doubt for a while. There's just a

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 7>lot of questions the companies. It's a good company, it's

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 7>well run, it's just gotten so big so quickly.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they can keep this.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 7>The level of expectations beating that they've had for the

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 7>last three years, that just can't keep going.

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 6>And I think the headwinds are continuing to mount.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>In the earning statement, in video, CEO Jensen Wong saying

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>global demand for Nvidia's AI infrastructure is incredibly strong. AI

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 3>inferenced token generation has surged tenfold in just one year,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>and as AI agents become mainstream demand for AI computing,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>we'll accelerate. Jay obviously sounds upbeat, but again, you know,

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 3>this is where we want to have some numbers around things.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>The CFO saying sales of their H twenty products four

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>point six billion for the first quarter of twenty twenty six.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 4>It continues to cross.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, is there anything that could kind of make

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>you say, well, wait a minute, maybe I need to

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 3>say it's not a sell maybe there is something interesting here.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 7>So I think the underlying question is what are we

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 7>going to do with AI? Like there's a lot of

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 7>excitement around AI, but it's still in very early stages,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 7>you know. I like to think of this as the

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Internet in the nineteen seventies. We knew it was something,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 7>but we didn't know what it would become. I think

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 7>that's where we are with AI now, and I think

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 7>it's going to take a few years for us to

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 7>really as an industry figure out what the actual consumer

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 7>use cases and applications are. And in that process there's

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 7>going to be some fits and starts, and don't I

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 7>just don't think we can keep this momentum going forever.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 7>I know demand is good now, but we start to

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 7>look in the next year. I think people are starting

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 7>to ask good questions about what is the ROI and

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 7>these massive GPU investments all the hyperscalers and the enterprises

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 7>have made, and I don't think we've seen those yet.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 7>I think what would sort of alter my belief is

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 7>if somebody invents some incredible consumer application for AI that

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 7>would radically accelerate things.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Hey, I just want to point out first quarter adjusted

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 3>EPs ninety six cents a share. That was three pennies

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>better than what the street was expecting. I think we

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>had a number that crossed earlier that was not accurate,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>So again they did be in terms of first quarter

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 3>adjusted EPs. The second quarter forecast, just to rehash, second

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>quarter revenue forty five billion plus or minus two percent.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>The estimate on the street is forty five point five billion.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Second quarter forecast also reflects eight billion dollars in loss

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 3>sales to China, and we know that that ban that

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>went into effect in April, and just continuing to check

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and Video shares right now up about two point nine

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>percent in the aftermarket.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 5>There's also another correction crossing right now in video. First

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 5>quarter adjusted gross margin coming in at seventy one point

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 5>three percent versus estimates of seventy one percent, so I

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 5>want to make sure that gets there. In Vidia says

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 5>the charge relates to H twenty excess inventory and by

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 5>obligations in first quarter auto revenues driven by self driving

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 5>platform sales. I want to get back to Jay Goldberg. Jay,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 5>you made an interesting comment that this is like you know,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>AI is like the Internet in the nineteen seventies. I

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>got to tell you playing around with chat GPT and

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 5>anthropics Claude, it blows my mind every single day getting

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 5>in a way MO blows my mind. I mean, I

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 5>mean to me, this feels like, certainly the new frontier.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 5>What's the vision that you have if we're in the

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 5>early stages, if we're in the early innings of this game,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 5>like what is the impact going to be? And where

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 5>will Nvidia be in that?

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 6>I think those are two separate questions, right.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 7>I think in terms of where in Vidio is going

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 7>to be ultimately will depend on what we end up

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 7>using AI for right, And I, like I said, chat

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 7>GPT is incredible technological achievement, but in terms of like

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 7>changing everybody's day to day life, it's it's not quite

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 7>there yet. It's very useful for some people. It's it's

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 7>very useful if you're if you're writing web content or

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 7>if you're coding, but for sort of average day to

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 7>day use. I think of my my my nine year

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 7>old father or my twenty five year old niece, they

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 7>don't they don't use chat GIPT.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 5>It's just not that useful for what Really the twenty

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 5>five year old is not using chat GPT. No, that's shocking.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 6>No, I'm basic. I'm using it.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm using it more than I not more than I

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 5>use Google. But like I'll go there first.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 3>I got to say my house, I think all of

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>a sudden has kind of amped up and you've got

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a range of ages and using it for different things

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and things like even grock and you know, yeah, it's happening.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 6>It's I think it is happening. I think we have

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 6>a long way to go though. Forward.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 7>The utility is really really clear, Like if you look

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 7>at if you look at search even it's not clear

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 7>how that's going to anetize.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Are we going to start adds there? What impact will

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>that have when we start seeing ads and jat GPT search.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm just making of that example.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 7>I have no idea they're actually going to do that,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 7>but that's going to I think that will have an impact.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 7>I actually think I'm a big optimist about it. I

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 7>think it can be much much more than what it

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 7>is today. And I don't think it's really exciting until

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 7>we get something along those lines.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, We are talking with Jay Goldberg, Senior analyst

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 3>of Semiconductors and Electronics Effort Support Research Partners from San

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Francisco and Video earnings. They have crossed, folks, and we

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>continue to see the stock up about two point nine

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>percent in the aftermarket. Ian King, with a write through

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Bloomberg terminal, and Video forecast revenue of about

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>forty five billion in the fiscal second quarter, despite losing

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 3>eight billion in revenue from China due to export controls

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 3>imposed by the Trump administration. The company is ramping up

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 3>production of its latest semiconductor design, Blackwell, and expect strong

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>demand for its AI infrastructure, which the company believes will

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 3>tran form the economy.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 4>And Video's growth is driven by its.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Dominance as you know, in the AI market or in

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the market for AI accelerator chips. Companies increasingly offering its

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>chips as part of whole computer systems to speed up

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 3>the deployment of complex technology.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 5>So Jay got a little bit of an update there

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 5>from Carol and from our OWNI and King about the

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 5>write through when it comes to Invidia results. Going back

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 5>to remind everybody, you're the only analyst listed on the

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg terminal with accelerating on in Video. What would you

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 5>need to see from the company today to have you

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 5>reverse course with that decision?

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 7>So I think one of the things sort of stands

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 7>out for me is a year ago there was a

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 7>line out the door for in video products. Everybody was

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 7>buying everything they could, right and if one company couldn't

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 7>take its allocation, there was somebody else who was more

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 7>than willing to step in. I think the same is

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 7>true of this eight twenty product. The company wrote it

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 7>down a couple months ago. I kind of wonder why

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 7>no one else bought that product. It's different, you know,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 7>there's all kinds of technical things there, but still it's

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 7>compute at the right price, it would have been attractive

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 7>to somebody.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Hey what and so yeah, Oh I'm sorry, please continue.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 7>So I'm just wondering how much more demand there is

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 7>right now. Again, I think AI long term is important.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 7>In the near term, though, I think we're sort of

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 7>running out of steam as people are taking a pause

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 7>to assess what they want to do with it.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>One thing I want to ask you, is it tough

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 3>to have a cell rating Considering the stock Nvidia has

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>rallied about twenty four percent since you initiated coverage on

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 3>April thirtieth.

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 7>Oh, it's fantastic having being the only celerated analyst on

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 7>a stock I like being the sober contrarian.

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>But even with the stock, you know, rallying as much

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 3>as it did, I understand it's a bounce from being

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>perhaps you know, taking quite a beating like many names did,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>courtesy of some of the news coming out of the administration.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 3>But I mean you still kind of conviction you're going

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to hold to it.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Oh, absolutely absolutely.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean I have a good sense of you know,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 7>Jensen is going to get on the call and it

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 7>can drive the stock price higher because he's a fabulous,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 7>fabulous marketer. He really knows how to sell this company,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 7>does a great job of that. But I think the

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 7>substance there is still I have lots of questions about it,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 7>and I'll I'll say in you know, in the two

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 7>three months i've had this celerating out there, I haven't

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 7>got a lot push back from the street.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 6>I haven't had investors and clients telling me that I'm crazy.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 6>I've had a few people say I'm too too soon.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 7>I've had a few people say I'm too late, but

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 7>nobody is sort of questioning my thesis.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 5>We're getting some additional details about challenges in China and

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 5>China restrictions are any in King writing on the live

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 5>blog that Nvidia missed out on two and a half

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars of sales in the fiscal first quarter and

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 5>will not getting projected eight billion dollars in the fiscal

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 5>second quarter. It's an amount per quarter roughly equal to

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 5>its nearest rival, AMD's total sales. You mentioned demand of

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 5>the H twenty specifically. Is that what you see as

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 5>the biggest risk? China and a lack of demand from China, Jay.

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 7>I think China is a big X factor, just because

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 7>the US government's China policy is, let's call it dynamic

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 7>and rapidly changing day to day.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that's the biggest risk. I think the

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 6>biggest question.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 7>I have about in Nvidia is long term demand for AI,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 7>where it's going, what it's going to be like in

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 7>the near term. I think when I speak to corporate CIOs,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 7>they've all tested AI pilots, they've all demoed it, and

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 7>what they're finding is that they get sort of ten

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent cost reductions around their AI deployments. It helps

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 7>them reduce call center costs, things like that, which is good,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 7>but it's not necessarily enough to justify the massive investments

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 7>needed to keep in video growing the way it has

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 7>been growing.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Jay, I want to go to a story I'm

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 5>just going through. I was exchanging some texts with some

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 5>friends earlier because it doesn't sound like I have a

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 5>group of friends and like some of them are very

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 5>concerned about AI and about impacts on jobs, and we're

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 5>watching this really closely. Dario Amidae, the CEO of Anthropic,

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 5>I've interviewed him before. Axios out this morning with a

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 5>story that he basically said that AI could wipe out

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 5>about half about all entry level white collar jobs I'm

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 5>reading from Axios right now, and spike unemployment to ten

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 5>to twenty percent in the next one to five years.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 5>He said this in an interview to Axio in San Francisco.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 5>Axios in San Francisco, do you disagree with that? It

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 5>sounds like you're not as bullish when it comes to

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the actual effect of AI on the workforce.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 7>I think that again, I'm a techno optimist, if anything,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 7>I think there will be absolutely there will be disruptions

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 7>to the labor force, but there will also be new

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 7>opportunities over the long term. So you know, I think

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 7>certain low level coding jobs, certain low level copy eating jobs,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Those will start to get pretty tough. Anyone who does

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 7>image creation, they're going to be challenged for a while

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 7>until we find new ways to make use of these tools.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 7>So absolutely, you know, in the nineteen hundreds, all the

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 7>buggy whip and you know carriage, you know, carriage makers

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 7>and horse trainers, they were very disrupted, and we're going

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 7>to see something similar. But the economy will still continue

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 7>to grow and hopefully we'll find ways to use those

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 7>people to do new things with the tools we get.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean hopefully, or else we're in for a real

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 5>reckoning when it comes to the labor force.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and again I think it's I think it's very

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 7>premature to talk about these sort of massive, big term

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 7>impacts of AI because the things.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 6>We actually use day to day aren't aren't quite there yet.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 7>You know, again, a few small categories where there is disruption,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 7>but in a broader sense, we haven't really grasped the

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 7>full potential for AI and what it's going to do.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 6>So then it's ways to.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Go if okay, So then it raises the question about

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 5>other companies than your view that could be beneficiaries of

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 5>the way that technology is moving. If in video in

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 5>your view has limited upside. Right now, where in your

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 5>view should investors be putting their money Broadcom?

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 7>I think today, anytime in video loses share, it's to

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 7>one of its big customers, the hyperscalers, Intel, micros off Google,

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 7>not Intel, So our Google, Microsoft, Amazon, those companies are

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 7>all in various stages of designing their own GPU alternatives,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 7>and Broadcom is going to make a lot of money

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 7>helping those those chips come to market.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 5>When do you think those chips will be able to

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 5>hold a candle to what Nvidia has developed.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 6>I think we're already there today.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 7>I think Google Google has the TPU, their tensor processing unit.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 7>They're on their fifth or sixth generation of those. Those

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 7>are incredibly performative. They work very well for Google and

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 7>what Google needs to do, and I think other Google's

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 7>peers are going to start to see the benefits of

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 7>that and move down that path as well.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 3>All Right, you are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Daily Carol Master along with Tim Stanevik live in our

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. We're talking to Jay Goldberg, Senior

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>analyst of Sevenconductors and Electronics over at Seaport Research Partners.

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 3>As we said, he's the only analyst listed on the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg with a cell rating on Nvidia, and yet here

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>in the after market, we are definitely not seeing investors

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>sell shares of Nvidia stock is up about three point

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 3>three percent.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 4>This as the company did come out and post.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Its latest quarterly update as well as outlook, and as

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 3>our ian King rights, the company it's the world's largest

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor company, giving an upbeat forecast even as China slowed

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>down Mars some of the growth slow down in China

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 3>weight on results, but sales will be about forty five

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in the fiscal second quarter that runs through July.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 4>That included the loss of roughly.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Eight billion dollars in revenue from China because of export

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 3>controls from the United States.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 4>The forecast was in line with the analyst estimates according

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 4>to our data.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 3>So what's interesting is that even with that loss we're

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 3>talking about, sales will be about forty five billion dollars.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>And as our ian King rights on our live blog,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 3>how many companies could frontload their earnings release with details

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>of what they're missing out on and still get a

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 3>positive reaction from investors.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 4>So the stock as we said, still.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Holding on to about a three and a half percent

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>gain here in the aftermarket.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Our colleague Carmen Ryanikey writing on our live blog that

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 5>it seems traders are acting to the company's revenue forecast,

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 5>which is still basically in line even with an expected

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 5>eight billion dollar loss. When it comes to H twenty revenue,

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 5>that signals in Vidia is making up for the loss elsewhere. Jay,

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 5>I want to bring you back in with the caveat

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 5>that you haven't necessarily had the time to comb through

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 5>these results. But in your view, where do you think

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 5>in Nvidia could be making up for the loss in

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 5>H twenty revenue.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 7>I think there's still a lot of demand from the hyperscalers.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 7>We have a bunch of massive data center buildouts taking place.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 7>We had, you know, big announcements in Salary, Rabia last week,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 7>Stargate earlier this year, UAE, ku Wait, lots of big

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 7>Gulf nations are building out data center capacity.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 6>The hyperscalers.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 7>You know have you know, building these plans these data

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 7>centers takes multiple years and so they've had commitments and

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 7>plans in place for a long time now. So those

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.239
<v Speaker 7>are going to continue, right I think the question is

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 7>next year, can the capex continue to be at these levels?

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 6>What happens there?

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 7>But a lot of what we're seeing today is stuff

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 7>that was planned on and committed to months ago.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 5>So I guess it also raises the question about demand

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 5>from these hyperscalers, which you said continues to remain strong.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 5>You also said that it does seem like, especially when

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 5>it comes to Google, that they could have some products that,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 5>in your view at this point, hold a candle to

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 5>in video in terms of where in Nvidia needs to

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 5>go next. Over the last few months, we've talked a

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 5>little bit about the way, and we're going to hear

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 5>from Jensen Wong six thirty Wall Street Time just in

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 5>a little under two hours. Ed Ludlow is going to

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 5>have an Nvidia Earning special six thirty pm Wall Street

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Time on Bloomberg TV and Radio. But Jay, I'm wondering

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 5>about where you think the area of growth is for

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 5>in Nvidia right now in terms of products. We've seen

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 5>Jensen Wong talk in recent months about humanoid robots, about

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 5>self driving cars as areas of potential growth. Where do

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 5>you see that the company needs to go.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 7>I think the two critical areas for them are in inference,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 7>compute and robots. Inference is the stage of AI computing

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 7>where it sort of goes into wide adoption when we

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 7>built the model and then we.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 6>Need to use it.

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 7>How that actually gets deployed I mentioned earlier, It depends

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot on what we're actually doing with it. Inference

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 7>is going to be the big battleground. I think in

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 7>Vidia has a lock on the training side of the

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 7>model building, but the inference question is is looming large.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 7>How we're actually going to deploy this. We as consumers

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 7>when we interact with with AI, where are those chips?

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 7>Are they in our phones? Is that where the AI

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 7>is being done or is it in the data center?

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 7>And I think that that's a big open question. Nobody

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 7>has a clear answer to that yet, and it's going

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 7>to matter a lot too, you know, I guarantee they're

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 7>going to talk about on the call. And the other

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 7>one is, like you mentioned, is robots. Jensen has talked

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 7>a lot about robots. It's a big theme of his

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 7>I think I think it's an area where there's there's

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, dozens of companies building humanoid robots that can

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 7>do all kinds of interesting things. And I'm just waiting

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 7>for a robot that can help me fold laundry.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and you and me both. Jay, Hey, Jay, appreciate

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 5>you joining us. Got to come back soon. Jake Goldberg,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Senior Analyst, semi Conductors and Electronics and Seaport Research Partners,

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 5>joining us from San Francisco.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 5>A lot's happening in the universe of Elon must on

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 5>the ground and up in the sky, Up in the sky.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Space Ex's starship suffering a midflight loss, its third consecutive setback,

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 5>and it raises questions about the company's progress on the

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 5>project Close to Earth.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 6>Though.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 5>In an interview to CBS News, Elon Musk expressed dissatisfaction

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 5>with President Trump's giant tax bill, saying it undercut his

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 5>effort to slash government spending.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 8>I was like disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly,

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 8>which increases the budge deps that does decrease it, and

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 8>that reminds the work that Podoche team is doing.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 6>I actually thought that when this big beautiful bill came along.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 9>I mean, like everything he don On does gets wiped

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 9>out in the first year.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 8>I think it both can be big, board can be beautiful.

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 5>So that's a portion of the CBS interview with Elon

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Musk gets set to air fully on CBS Sunday morning

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 5>this weekend. We should note that just the last couple

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 5>of hours, President Trump did dismiss criticism from Elon Musk

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 5>over the cost of his signature to AX bill. He

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 5>told reporters on Wednesday that compromises were made to secure

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 5>the necessary votes. We got Max Chafkin with us, the

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 5>co host of the podcast Everybody's Business and Elon Ink.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 5>He's also senior reporter for Business Week. He joins us

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 5>here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio, You've got a

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 5>new story out about Elon and whether or not he

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 5>actually is leaving politics.

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>I feel like.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Every time we start to say he looks like he's

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 9>leaving politics, there is again making news in politics, and

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, kind of here we go again, right. We

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 9>saw this at the end of last year when there.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Was talking the budget bill.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 9>A Republican Congressional Republicans reaching compromise to fund the government

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 9>must kind of came out unexpectedly against that. I think

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing something similar, right. He's attempting, I think, to

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 9>influence Congress here to at least shape this bill, if

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 9>not a torpedo at all together, which of course puts

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 9>him at odds in some sense with President Trump. Although,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 9>as you heard from Trump right, Trump is also negotiating

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 9>with Congress right now over the exact contents of the bill.

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 5>So you think he actually has a goal with comments

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 5>like this, He actually has a goal of shaping policy.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 6>And look clearly.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, like I don't know why else he

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 9>would be saying this. I mean, he seems to be

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 9>saying that this bill is insufficiently hawkish on the deficit.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 9>That's a point of view, you know, that's pretty consistent

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 9>with Elon Musk. Also, there's a pretty substantial contingent in

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 9>the Republican Party that agrees with him. I also think

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 9>it might be worth looking at some of the specific

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 9>aspects of this bill. You know, this bill has his

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 9>implications for the electric vehicle industry. It gets rid of

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 9>these tax credits that have been very important to Elon Musk.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 9>And other electric car companies. I don't know to what

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 9>extent those are still in play, but we don't know

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 9>what the final bill is going to look like. And

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 9>you could imagine getting Musk on side would be worth

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 9>something to support us this bill. So I suppose we'll see.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 3>As long as Elon Musk Max is a financial supporter

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of Donald Trump and Republicans, he's going to have a

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 3>direct line to the president.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that fair to make that assumption?

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it is fair, And I think even

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 9>in Trump's reaction here, you know, people, it's unclear to

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 9>me from that clip whether Elon Musk is intending to

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 9>criticize congressional Republicans or Donald Trump, although he did sort

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 9>of mock the name, you know, Trump's big beautiful bill formulation,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 9>Trump responding to it in a pretty accommodating way, like

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 9>he's he's not punching backs, He's taking it like a

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 9>criticism from a friend or something like that. Elon Musk

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 9>is going to be very is still very important to

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump and to Republicans as a potential funder in

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 9>the midterm elections and as also a very very visible supporter,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 9>right he you know, he's very polarizing now, but he's

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 9>still a successful business person, you know, an American industrialist.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, his support matters beyond money.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Carol made an interesting comment, I can't remember if it

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 5>was this week or last week, during one of our

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 5>editorial calls about the press that Elon Musk has been

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 5>doing lately.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like the Eras tour.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 5>I think it's notable for a couple of reasons. One,

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 5>when he bought X, it seemed like he was doing

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 5>everything directly to his followers and directly to the world

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 5>through X. He put his head down and worked a

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 5>lot with Doge. There were some Fox interviews over that

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 5>period of time. But as he's moved away from the

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 5>White House and over the last few weeks, we've we've

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 5>heard more and more from him, and especially through like

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 5>quote unquote traditional like legacy media.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 3>That's what kills me because you guys make fun of me,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 3>like my little Sunday morning shows that I watch.

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 4>But it's Sunday morning. It's a very mass wide audience.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 9>So I think what's going on is Musk is suffering

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 9>a lot of blowback from customers.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 9>He talks all the time about you know, the legacy

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 9>media and the Democrats and the and his various sort

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 9>of political adversaries. But what's happened when you look at

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 9>opinion polling is regular people, the people who buy musk stuff,

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 9>have turned on him. There was a really interesting poll

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 9>published the other day by Harris and Axios. They ask

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 9>people to rate how they basically how much they trust

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 9>well known companies. And you look at Tesla and SpaceX

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 9>over the last five years, and it is stunning. They

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 9>went from being some of the companies with the best

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 9>reputation to some of the companies in this universe of

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 9>one hundred companies with the worst reputation. And I think

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 9>what he's trying to do is get both investors and

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 9>consumers to focus on the other stuff, the non political stuff.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 9>So we had this rocket launch yesterday, which, as he said,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 9>Tim did not go very well for SpaceX, but there

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 9>was a big media role out. He did a bunch

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 9>of interviews with various outlets. I assume, although don't know

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 9>for sure, that this CBS interview was part of that,

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 9>essentially saying like, look at the space stuff, look at

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 9>the technology, which I think is smart from a messaging perspective,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 9>because SpaceX is just inherently going to be less political

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 9>than you know, attacking various parts of the federal government.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 9>On the other hand, Musk still needs this relationship with

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump, and SpaceX still needs this relationship with Donald Trump.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 9>So it's going to be a difficult dance. I think

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be very hard for him to undo

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 9>some of the damage that was caused with certain consumers,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 9>especially you know, left leaning consumers.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, I always think about money with everything we do,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 3>rightfully so, but there's a story on the Bloomberg about

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk's Neuralink raising six center million in a deal

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that values that company at nine billion. This is coming

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>from Semaphore siding unidentified people. So people, it sounds like

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 3>if this is true, like still committing money to his ventures.

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I wonder, Max, we live in a funny world.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Could it be six months, twelve months, eighteen months where

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, like everybody's kind.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Of back in on Eli because we have brain chips.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Because we have brainchips.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 8>Is that what?

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there is brain chips?

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know what I mean, Like, I don't know,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 3>does he do something I don't know.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 9>I think he's in a very difficult political position. I

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 9>think certainly that is what investors are hoping, you know, right.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 9>He made some comments on the earnings call about a

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 9>month ago, essentially saying, you know, maybe I'll spend one

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 9>to two days a week advising President Trump rather than

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, full time.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 5>And I was saying twenty four to seven, he's going

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 5>to be on company.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Sleeping somewhere on the floors.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 8>Who knows.

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, investors like this. The issue is

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 9>he is now closely tied to Donald Trump, and I

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 9>don't I don't think short of really like turning critic

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 9>and saying, okay, now I support a different political party,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 9>which could happen. I think it's going to be very

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 9>hard for him to walk that line because all you know,

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 9>politics is very polarized in this country, and it's going

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 9>to be hard to avoid, you know, winning back these

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 9>people he's alienated without in turn alienating you know, this

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of new cohort or conservatives who still very much

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 9>support Donald Trump.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Just twenty seconds left on the SpaceX launch that didn't

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 5>go exactly as planned? Can can they still spin it

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 5>as a win. That's what they're doing.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, all these launches are experiments. That's they're going

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 9>to say so, so you shouldn't really focus on the result.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 9>That said, a lot has to go right between now

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 9>and next year for them to hit the timeline. And

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 9>each time one of these launches does not go right,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 9>it gets harder.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Max Chafkin, the co host of the podcast Everybody's Business

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 5>and Elon Ink, also senior reporter for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. He's

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 5>joining us here in the Bloomberg Interactive at Brokers Studio.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Play and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 5>It is one of the most read stories on the

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg terminal right now. ETFs have a mass trillions of

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 5>dollars by offering investors greater tax efficiency, liquidity, and lower

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 5>costs than mutual funds. It's why we've seen inflows that

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 5>are so huge into ETFs and not into mutual funds. Now,

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 5>a regulatory shift is poised to bring ETFs and mutual

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 5>funds closer together, but it also threatens to complicate the

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 5>very features that fueled the ETF boom. Done Emi Grafeo

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 5>and Wildona Hire right about the dual share class structures

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 5>that could be approved as soon as the summer, and

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 5>the warnings about what could transpire if the market becomes stressed.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 5>They're both Bloomberg News Crossouts reporters and they join us

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 5>here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. Emily, I want

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 5>to start with what this looming shift is, this regulatory shift.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Explain what exactly it is and why it's happening.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so right now, when you're an investor and you

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:17.239
<v Speaker 10>buy a fund, you buy a mutual fund, or you

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 10>buy an ETF, and ETFs have one share class. It's

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 10>just an ETF, you get the ticker you buy. If

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 10>you buy a mutual fund, depending on what avenue you're

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 10>buying it through, you'll be in a different share class.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 10>You could be in the institutional one, the retail one,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 10>the advisor friendly one.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes their price differently.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was going to say, sometimes the share class

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 5>has a different expense ratio or I don't know, like

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 5>that's the difference, right, Yeah, yetifically exclusively through your private wealth.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Matter or something exactly.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 10>So maybe you get like a discount because you're using

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 10>it through like your employer or something, but ETFs don't

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 10>have that. Twenty over twenty years ago, actually Vanguard made

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 10>this patent where they could create a dual share class

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 10>fund where they have a mutual fund and an ETF

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 10>all in one, so you have multiple mutual fund share

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 10>classes and then one share class of that is exchange traded.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 10>The reason why they did this and they patented it

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 10>is because it makes the fund in total more tax efficient.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 10>Basically takes all the tax efficiency of the ETF and

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 10>puts it onto the mutual fund. So they figured this out.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 10>They were like, great idea, let's patent it, make sure

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 10>no one else does it, and they save their clients

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 10>billions on taxes over the years.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The patent expired two years.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Ago, so now everyone else on Wall Street is trying

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 10>to get in on it.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Can anybody and everybody do it? Goes on it? Well

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 4>not yet.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 11>So we have more than fifty firms that have applied

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 11>for the dual share class, but we are still waiting

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 11>from regulators to hear from regulators. We are expecting, you know,

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 11>the industries, expecting the SEC to greenlight this and to

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 11>actually allow it, maybe possibly as soon as this summer.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 11>But you know, right now we're just in in wait

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 11>and see mode to see if we can actually get

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 11>approval on this.

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Build on what's the concern here? If there is stress

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 5>to the market, if there are liquidity issues, like what

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 5>are the risks that some of your sources are sharing

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 5>with you.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, there's a couple of different concerns, but one of

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 11>the main ones is, you know, issues related to what

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 11>Emily was just talking about in terms of the tax efficiency.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 11>So if you have a mutual fund and ETF together

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 11>and you and the mutual fund has to pay out

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 11>capital gains distributions, then in that new structure, the ETF

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 11>investors could potentially also be hit. And there is some

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 11>historical precedent. There actually is a fund of anguart fund

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 11>that back in two thousand and nine had huge outflows

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 11>and so the ETF share class investor, you know, the

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 11>ETF investors were also hit with a fourteen percent distribution.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>So there is some.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 11>Precedent and so a lot of market watchers or you know,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 11>people who are maybe looking at this from a critical

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 11>angle or thinking ahead and saying that potentially this is

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 11>an issue that could come up.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm going to age myself.

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 3>But when I started this career about three decades in accounting,

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 3>one of my first things I did was like a

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 3>mutual fund show and it was just like it was

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of everybody was all of a sudden, you know,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 3>getting investment plans at their companies, and it was the

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 3>big thing. And I guess and then now we've kind

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 3>of seen the ETF rush over what the last decade

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 3>or so in counting?

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Do we need both?

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 9>Like?

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Is it just a case?

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Like as I saw this story, I'm like, Okay, here

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 3>it goes the mergeover to ETFs. Is this a first

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>step of eventually everything being converted? Or are there are

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 3>advantages to having one pure bread ETF versus one pure.

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 4>Bread mutual fund?

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah? I think when we started out writing this story,

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 10>we wanted to understand. There was this report from Seruly

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 10>and they posed this question of like, why would you

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 10>buy if you're an investor in an ETF, why would

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 10>you buy an ETF attached to.

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>A mutual fund if you could just buy a standalone one?

0:34:58.560 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Because the sec one of their.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 10>Concerns that they flagged, and issuers will say that they've

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 10>answered them. One of the concerns is is there going

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 10>to be this issue of like cross subsidization, one class

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 10>subsidized in the other. To answer your question, though, there

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 10>are some advantages to mutual funds. A lot of mutual

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 10>funds are already in tax exempt accounts, So a lot

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 10>of mutual funds in people's four to one k's. That's

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 10>probably the four to one k technology. It's not really

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 10>suited to hold ETFs. So most of our sources expect

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 10>that that that's a pretty big part of the market

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 10>that will.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Stay in mutual funds.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 10>This structure is more for maybe if you're an investor

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 10>that you've been sitting in a mutual.

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Fund in like your brokerage account for years and years,

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have all.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 10>Of these embedded capital gains that if you were to

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 10>sell you would pay a huge.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Capital gains tax on.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 10>You could tax free convert into the ETF with this

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 10>and maybe wash out at least some of the taxes.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the idea here.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 5>Build on our people or firms still launching mutual funds,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 5>are they going all in on atfs?

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we're atf reporters, so I'm gonna say they're

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 11>all going all in on the.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 10>Coperation vice.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 5>But it has seemed like even some of the huge

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 5>traditional mutual fund companies, like a Capitol Group for example,

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 5>I think you spoke to them at Milken Carol.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 11>MFS is one hundred and one years old and they

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 11>launched five ETFs.

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 5>Lash like that's that's a big deal.

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 11>I think all of them are watching where the money

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 11>is flowing, and mutual funds as a category are seeing outflows,

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 11>and ETFs are seeing record inflows every single year. And

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 11>obviously we're seeing like hundreds of new ETFs every single year,

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 11>and not all of them are you know, home runs,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 11>but you just need one. If you're a small etf

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 11>issuer and you have one hit, that's it.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Like that, you're you're set.

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 11>Like you know, if you have one strategy that that

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 11>you know, maybe a ton of retail investors are attracted to,

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 11>or something new, something that truly is innovative, it can.

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Work out really well for you.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 11>So a lot of people are looking at that and

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 11>thinking about.

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Well why not.

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 11>It's pretty cheap actually to file and a lot of

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 11>times to launch ETFs. It's a bit obviously, it's very

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 11>difficult to attract assets and attention and eyeballs, et cetera.

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 11>But if you can do it, you know, you can

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 11>get you can get a home run.

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is there something to learn by what Vanguard

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 3>did and kind of where this then maybe ultimately goes Yeah.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 10>I mean, well, one, using the structure, they were able

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 10>to save clients in mutual funds a lot on taxes.

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 10>Vanguard gets consistent inflows. So then this this concern about

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 10>the capital gains distributions like bleeding into the ETF, it's

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 10>really only concern concerning if the mutual fund gets a

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 10>ton of outflows and has to like sell shares to

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 10>meet a redemption. They've been really successful. But I mean, Carol,

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 10>they are Vanguard. That's why get huge flows. They have

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 10>a huge audience. I think everyone saw Vanguard's success. I

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 10>think most fund managers are realistic and that like, they

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 10>don't have the scale the Vanguard has. Fair but if

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 10>this is a way to maybe squeeze a little bit

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 10>out and get a couple more assets through now having

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 10>an ETF, might as well try.

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 11>But if I can add, yeah, you know, market watchers

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 11>critics people We've talked to analysts who are anticipating any

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 11>of the potential conflicts with this. They say it's not

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 11>a panacea for mutual fund managers to stench outflows like

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 11>mutual funds still are expected to.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 4>Keep seeing outflows.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 11>So even if you get this dual share class structure approved,

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 11>it doesn't mean that your outflows are going to You

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 11>know that you'll be all set terms of performance is

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 11>bad saying exactly, Bill.

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Donnie, you mentioned that if you have a successful ETF,

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 5>it can be game changing for a smaller term. What

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 5>about if it's Trump Media and Technology, for example, you

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 5>wrote about this company recently. It's majority owned by the

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 5>President of the United States, and you wrote that they're

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 5>laying the groundwork to come out with some ETFs.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>They are.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 11>It's actually an unusual move to pre announce that you

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 11>are planning to launch ETFs. Usually, issuers keep their ideas

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 11>close to their what's the saying, to their vest, to

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 11>their heart, and close to the vest, and so it's

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 11>very unusual to pre announce that you're going to be

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 11>doing something. But Trump Media did say that they are

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 11>planning on soon filing and launching ETFs, and separately Managed

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 11>accounts SMAs with three different themes, oil and gas, made

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 11>in America, and cryptocurrencies.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 4>The catch here is.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 11>Obviously all of that is tied to the president's various policies,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 11>whether they're terrifilated or cryptocurrency related. Obviously, oil and gas

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 11>was a big theme when he was running for re election, right,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 11>But more than sixty oil and gas ETFs already exist,

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 11>more than sixty focus. There's even a handful of made

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 11>in America ETFs already, and so what a lot of

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 11>ETF you know, analysts ETF.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The industry is looking.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 11>At this and thinking it's you know, you're adding to

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 11>the mix of an already saturated, oversaturated market. But it

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 11>does come with potentially the president being able to, you know,

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 11>maybe go out and say you can buy my phones

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 11>or something along those lines, and that that might you know,

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 11>hinder or hurt his competitors, the people who already have

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 11>these et al.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's a great story that you have on the terminal.

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna give you guys equal love because you guys

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 3>did a story together, that was your story, and well

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>you've got another ETF story. We've just got about forty

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 3>seconds left here about State Street looking to kind of

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 3>double down on it's a bit to bring private assets

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 3>to a broader spectrum of investors. So this is an ETF.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 3>This is an ets the private market world.

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is a private credit ETF. They have one

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 10>already and launched in February. The flows have been very lackluster,

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 10>especially for Stage Street. They're a big issuer. They've only

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 10>seen like five million inflows over a couple of months.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 10>But they are doubling down. This one's going to be

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 10>a short duration private acid ETF. The one they have

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 10>now it's a little bit longer duration.

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Markets are longer duration.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 10>Well they said, yeah, they said this one's one to

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 10>three years. It's still in the early stages.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you guys might you should do.

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 4>I know we have an ATF podcast, but you guys

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 4>should do an ETFO.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Show.

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 3>And La Grafe the Donna Hirich so appreciated both Bloomberg

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 3>News crocessset reporters.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Check them out on the Bloomberg and a Bloomberg dot com.

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple,

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoonunes from two to five pm Eastern, on Bloomberg

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 2>dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Business app. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal