WEBVTT - The Early Days of AMD

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with How Stuff Works and I heart radio and I

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>love all things tech and tech Stuff. Listener Stephen asked

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>me a long time ago if I could do an

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>episode or two about the company A m D. And

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long time, Stephen, but now I'm getting

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to that episode. So today we're going to learn about

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a m D, where it came from, and its role

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in the tech industry in general, because it's a pretty

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>interesting story and I knew bits and pieces of it,

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but like any subject for tech Stuff, as I dive

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>into the research, I learned way more than I had

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>ever learned before, and I end up going down lots

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of rabbit holes. And of course, to understand the history

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of a m D, WILL need to talk about a

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of other companies first, as they would lay the

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ground for a m D and a couple of other

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>really big organizations in the microchip industry. And at the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>center of this prehistory for a m D was William Shockley.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I've talked about Shockley a few times in past

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff. He was, without a doubt a

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>brilliant engineer, though in other ways he was also a

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>deeply flawed human being who harbored some truly horrible traits.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And you might think that such a comment isn't really

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>germane to the discussion of technology, But as it turns out,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Shockley's personality plays just as important a role in the

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>emergence of a m D as his experimental work did. Now,

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Shockley worked at Bell Labs, specifically in their solid state

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>physics research department, and he would play an important part

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in the development of the transistor, which was an alternative

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to the vacuum tube technolology that had come before and

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>had proved to be a limitation on technology in general

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and electronics in particular. So, hey, what the heck do

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>vacuum tubes do? And what do transistors do? Was the

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>big deal with them? Well, vacuum tubes are also known

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as thermionic tubes, and they look a lot like light bulbs.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>They are glass with a filament inside of them, and

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they work on the principle that if you add energy

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to a metal, as in, if you heat up that metal,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the energy will cause the metal to eject electrons. And

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you probably remember this from science classes. Electrons inhabit an

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>energy level orbit around the nucleus of an atom, and

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if you pour energy into that atom, it will boost

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the electron to higher energy level orbits. And if you

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>pour in enough energy, you'll cause the electron to leave

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>its atom entirely. John Ambrose Fleming would build the first

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>vacuum tube like device, which he called an oscilla. Should

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>valve way back in four His device had two electrodes,

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and that would be our good old buddies, the cathode

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and the anode. The cathode is the negatively charged electrode

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and is thus the source for electrons flowing through a system.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>The anode is the positively charged electrode, and it accepts electrons.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Though we also need to remember that current direction is

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>traditionally thought of as the direction of the flow of

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>positive charge, So in other words, the flow of current

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually in the opposite direction of the electron movement.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's really been Franklin's fault. Will just skip it

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for now. Fleming demonstrated that by heating the cathode, which

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is at one end of an enclosed glass tube inside

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of which Fleming had induced a vacuum, So there was

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum inside the tube. When you heat it up

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the cathode, it would give off electrons and those electrons

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>could flow across the gap inside the tube between the

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>cathode and the anode. They could leap through that vacuum.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This type of component is called a diode because it

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>only allows electrons to travel in one direction, and it's

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>useful if you want to create a more complex device

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that works based on where electrons can and cannot go. Now,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>another smarty Pants named lead to Forest would add a

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>third electrode to this system, and it's called a control grid.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And the control grid can serve as both a control

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>switch for how many electrons can travel from cathode to

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>anode as well as an amplifier. And you can influence

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>the current flowing through the vacuum tube by controlling the

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of voltage going into the control grid itself. So

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with a tiny change of voltage to the control grid,

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have a larger change manifest itself through the

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>overall circuit. This was a triode and other variants would follow,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>making complex electronics possible. But while they were useful. Vacuum

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>tubes are also really large, and they give up a

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of heat too. By the nineteen forties, physicists were

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at an interesting category of materials that might serve

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>as a substitute for these large, bulky hot vacuum tubes,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and that material category is called semiconductor material and semiconductors

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are why we have the electronics of today in the

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>form that they are in. That being said, vacuum tubes

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>still are useful. They are still used in electronics today,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly in things like music amps. But that's a discussion

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>for a different episode. So what about a semiconductor, because

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the bread and butter of companies like a

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>M D well. A conductor, at least for the purposes

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of this episode, is a material that allows for the

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>passage of electrons through that material. It conducts electricity. The

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>opposite type of material is called an insulator. That's material

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that resists the flow of electrons through it. Semiconductors have

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>conductivity that lies between a conductor and an insulator. In addition,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the conductivity of a metal decreases as the metal's temperature increases,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or another way to put it is that a metal's

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>resistance to electricity increases as the temperature also increases. Semiconductors

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are actually the opposite. Their conductivity increases as temperature increases.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>There's one part of this picture that I need to

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>really cover, and it's called doping. Now. Doping is when

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>you take an otherwise pure substance and you add small

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>amounts of some other material to it, so it becomes

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>impure because you no longer have one type of atom

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in that substance. With semiconductors, we typically talk about silicon,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>although that would actually come a little later in the

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>development of the transistor. But pure silicon is an insulator.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a bunch of silicon atoms, they

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>form silicon crystals, and the crystals all bind perfectly with

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>each other. They have perfect covalent bonds between the atoms,

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so means there's no free electrons available to move around.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you hit this stuff with a free electron,

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that free electron can't shake anything else loose. It's all

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of locked in, so it insulates electricity. But by

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>adding small amounts of other materials like arsenic, you can

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>add in some free electrons. See arsenic has some extra

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>electron or an extra electron compared to silicon. So if

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>arsenic is binding with silicon atoms, then you end up

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with this extra electron that's not bound to anything, and

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it will allow for some level of conductivity, all dependent

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>upon how much arsenic per silicon you have in that mix.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>This would be called in type doping because you're adding

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:50.119
<v Speaker 1>electrons to the actual material and electrons have a negative charge,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>thus in type doping, or you could dope the silicon

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with something else like boron or gallium, which would mean

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the crystal would actually have a few free spaces for

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>electrons or holes. So instead of having these perfect covalent

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds that are tight all the way across the entire material,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you would have these little holes that could accept an

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>incoming electron. This is called P type doping. By putting

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in type and P type silicon together, you can create

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a diode, and by adding a third layer so that

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you either have N P N or a P N

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>P sandwich of doped silicon, which honestly sounds pretty gross,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you would get a transistor. And that's what Bell Labs

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was trying to create back in the late nineteen forties. Now,

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Shockley's research group was able to develop a transistor that

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>could perform the same tasks in electronics as a vacuum tube.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>The first ones were very large and bulky and more

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>like a proof of concept, but it quickly became apparent

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that this was going to be the future of electronics,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and it was what would pave the way for many tourization,

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately leading to a new era in electronics. And I

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>should also point out that there were other team members

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>besides Shockley who were working on this, like John Bardeen

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and Walter Brittaine and Gerald Pearson. They all made equally

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>important contributions to make the transistor possible, but Shockley was

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>frequently sourced as the the head or the the prime contributor,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>which is not entirely fair. Now, Shockley left Bell Labs

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and he went on to found his own company called

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory, and he hired many brilliant people to

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>work for him. But his personality and his leadership style

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>was so confrontational it was demoralizing. He was described as

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>being autocratic and paranoid, and he had a reputation for

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>insulting his employees, building them way up early on and

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>then gradually undercutting them as the relationship would continue in

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>as you might imagine, this led to a pretty unhappy

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>work environment. On a side note, Shockley would later espouse

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some truly terrible racist beliefs. And I feel it's important

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to note this because I don't believe in giving a

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>free pass to someone simply because they made truly monumental

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>contributions to the advancement of technology. We can't deny those contributions.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>They were absolutely important and they transformed our world. At

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we shouldn't ignore the negative aspects of

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>someone's contributions either. We should take in the full picture. Okay,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So Shockley was in the running for world's Worst boss,

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and it all came to a head in nineteen fifty seven,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more than a year after Shockley had created

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the company in the first place, eight employees, all engineers

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with PhDs, confronted a board member of Shockley Semiconductor named

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Beckman. And I'll have to do a full episode

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on Beckman at some point. He's another fascinating person. But

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they voiced their concerns to him, and Beckman heard them out,

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and he tried to kind of work out a compromise,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was really too little too late. So the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>eight decided to leave the company, and Shockley would dub

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>them the Traitorous Eight, very dramatic, and they included Julius Blank,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Victor Greenwich, Jean Harney, Gene Kleiner, Jay Last, Sheldon Roberts,

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and a certain Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce. These eight

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>individuals approached a company called the fair Child Camera and

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Instrument Corporation, and that company was actually looking to diversify

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>into the burgeoning semiconductor business at the time. Robert Noyce

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and Gordon Moore were sort of leaders of this charge,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>and after coming to terms with fair Child, including each

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the engineers sinking five dollars of their own money

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>into the uh the whole endeavor as an initial investment,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they created a new division called fair Child Semiconductor. Now

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I've covered fair Child in episodes, but granted those episodes

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>aired way back in two thousand thirteen. The company did

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really big things in technology, including bringing

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the integrated circuit to market. Though I should mention that

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the engineers over at Texas Instruments had also independently created

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>an integrated circuit. Fair Child was just really fast at

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>getting that to consumers um and by consumers, I really

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>mean other businesses. This is sort of a business to

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>business kind of enterprise. But fair Child was also known

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for giving birth to other companies, and we sometimes call

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these other companies the fair Children. In nineteen sixty eight,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>after working at fair Child for about a decade, Robert

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Noyce and Gordon Moore decided they were going to leave

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>fair Child and they were going to start their own company,

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and they called it Intel. Intel will pop in and

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>out of our story of a m D as it

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was not just a m d's chief rival and still is,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>but so has a strangely collaborative relationship with a m D.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's both competition and collaboration between the two companies.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain more later. Now, in the wake of noise

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and more departing fair Child, fair Child Semiconductor reached out

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to a physicist over at Motorola named see Lester Hogan,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>yet another person I'll have to do a full episode

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on in the future, and fair Child offered Hogan. I

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>will modestly call it a pretty darn sweet deal. That's

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>underselling how crazy good this deal was for Hogan. But

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not an episode about fair Child, so they

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted Hogan to come over to fair Child to manage

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor team. So Hogan brought seven Motorola executives with

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>him and they were collectively known as Hogan's heroes. So

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got the Traitorous Eight and we have Hogan's Heroes,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and this makes the early days of Silicon Valley sound

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of Tarantino movie. Hogan the Way had

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>previously worked under Shockley over at Bell Labs, so he

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>had that in common with the trader Is Eight, though

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't join Shockley's semiconductor company when Shockley left Bell Labs,

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and Hogan's team had a very conservative management style, something

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that clashed with another fair Child Semiconductor employee, a guy

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:25.359
<v Speaker 1>named Walter Jeremiah Sanders the Third or just Jerry Sanders.

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And Jerry Sanders will play a very important role in

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our story. I'll explain more in just a second, but

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. Jerry Sanders grew up

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen forties. He was raised by his grandparents

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>after his parents essentially abandoned him. He grew up on

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the South Side of Chicago, fairly rough part of Chicago

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and according to an article in sf

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Gate and a few other sources, when he was eighteen

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>years old, he rushed to help a friend of his

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>who was being attacked by a gang, and he himself

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was also beaten up, and he was being up so

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>badly that he went into a coma for a few days,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and a priest actually administered last rites. But he recovered

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from that and he was able to succeed despite his

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>tough past. He enrolled in the University of Illinois and

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>graduated with a degree in engineering, and he got hired

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>by Fairchild to be a sales engineer and also a

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>marketing manager, and he became known for being particularly successful

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. But then Nois and more left and

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Hogan and his heroes swooped in and they changed things

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and they effectively pushed Sanders aside. They essentially they called

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it a promotion, but it really was a d motion.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He went from a director of marketing to being sort

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of a vice president of marketing, and it was really

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>seen as as more of a let's get this guy

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. Sanders was thirty three years old

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Now Sanders and seven other fair Child

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>employees would end up leaving fair Child Semiconductor to go

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and found a new organization. Now, according to most accounts,

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if you go and you start searching for history of

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a m D on the net, you're gonna find a

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>very similar story told over and over again. And the

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>story goes that the Jerry Sanders effectively led this charge

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and he got the team together to form this new company. So,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>according to the history of semi conductor engineering, Jack Gifford,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>who had become the head of computer marketing at Fairchild

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in early nineteen nine, saw the writing on the wall

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when Hogan's heroes swept into the company. He had already

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>been considering the possibility of starting his own analog circuit company,

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but he was young. He was just twenty eight years

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>old at the time, and when he decided to take

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that leap, he found he couldn't get any financial backing

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for his business. His buddy, Bruce Waterfall, told him that

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem was the financiers thought Gifford was too young

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and inexperienced, and therefore he posed an investment risk. So

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Waterfall reportedly told Gifford that he needed to find someone

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>older and more experienced whom the bankers would find more reassuring,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and Jack then thought of Jerry Sanders, who, according to

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the book, had just left Fairchild himself after being pushed

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>aside by Hogan. Sanders was apparently considering a new career,

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>going into the recording business in Hollywood, and initially he

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't interested in Gifford's pitch to start a new analog

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>circuit company. Sanders response was effectively, I'll do it on

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>two conditions. One, I have to be the president of

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the company, and too, it's not going to be an

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>analog circuit company, but a digital circuit company. Gifford found

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>himself without any real leverage, and he agreed. Getting the

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>money also proved to be a little tricky. One of

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the investment groups they approached was called the Capital Group,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and there was a guy there named Jim Martin who

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>was working there, and that might have already spelled doom

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for the new company before things could even get started,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>because it turned out Jim Martin had previously worked for

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>fair Child, but he had been fired. In fact, he

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>had been fired by a certain Jerry Sanders. This has

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>me imagining a scene in which Sanders, looking for investment

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>capital for Gifford's company idea walks into the office of

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy he had once fired at his old company

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past. But Jim Martin was also good friends

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with Jack Gifford, and so he worked with his colleagues

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Capitol Group to provide an initial investment in

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the new company. And this new company's name would be

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Advanced micro Devices or a m D, and it incorporated

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on May one, nine nine. So from Chockley's semiconductor lab,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we can trace a path not just a fair Child,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>but also Intel and a m D. And while a

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>m D would become known as a competitor with Intel,

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>things would start off a little bit differently. A m

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>D was originally in Santa Clara, California, but quickly moved

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to Sunny Vale just a few months after the founders

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>formed the company. Their new DIGS had fifteen thousand square

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>feet of space and was valued at half a million

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars at the time. While the engineers at Intel we're

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>working on creating new microchips, a m d s first

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>order of business was taking products from Fairchild and then

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>redesigning them, essentially optimizing them and tweaking them. This would

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be something that a m D would get really good

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>at not necessarily building its own products from the ground up,

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but taking other products and then optimizing them. These were

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly in the form of integrated circuits, and while a

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>m D started in the business of building logic chips,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they weren't yet creating CPUs themselves. Uh, the CPU is

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the primary logic chip in a computer. Now. To be fair,

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a m d s founding was right around the time

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>when the concept of a CPU on a single chip

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was just starting to coalesce, because this was still the

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>very early days of computers. Earlier, the logic center of

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a computer consisted of several different logic chips, all wired together,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and each logic chip itself was an integrated circuit that

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>would fit into the larger circuit of the central processing unit,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which would, as I mentioned, consists of several chips. But

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>many people, independently or depending upon whom you believe, not

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so independently, proposed that with the right architecture, you could

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>build all the necessary logic components onto a single chip

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in an integrated circuit and create what was effectively a

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>computer on a chip. Now, I said, depending upon whom

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you believe, because there are disputes regarding who first came

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>up with the notion of a computer on a chip.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's some arguments about who it was that first proposed this,

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's the past ability that people responsible for building

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what would become the first true single chip CPU may

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>have learned about the possibility from another person who had

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>already proposed it and had worked for them in a

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>previous company. But the unfolding all of that would require

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>an episode all by itself. The episode about how the

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>CPU on a chip came to be would be a

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty dramatic story that I don't have time to tell today.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So single chip CPUs were not yet realized when a

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>m D first started, and it makes sense that they

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>began with basic logic chips what we would consider components

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of an overall central processing unit today. They were chips

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like an arithmetic logic unit and a control unit. So

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>these are all elements that are now integrated into the

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>CPUs we have today, but in the old days, they

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>were all discrete components that you would have to, you know,

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>put together in your circuit. Their first really successful component

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>came out a year after the founding of the company,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>so in nineteen seventy, and it was called the a

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>M to five O one logic counter. It was the

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>industry's first binary slash hexadecimal up down counter. So what

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the heck does that mean? I could just say that

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and move on, but I feel like without describing what

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>binary hexadecimal counters do, it's meaningless. Right, I could have

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>said any gobbledygook and it would have been just as fine.

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>So binary, of course, refers to the two state basic

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>unit of logic in computers, and we represent binary as

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>being either a zero or a one. So you can

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think of it like a light switch, right, it's either

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>off or it's on. It can't be both, it can't.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It has to be one or the other. And if

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you use strings of binary digits series of zeros and ones,

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can represent all sorts of stuff, from other numbers

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to letters, to pictures of cats and so on. But

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes a lot of binary numbers to represent the stuff.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And as you work with larger digital systems, you start

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to discover that working with binary becomes unwieldy. It's very

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>hard to read or write blocks of binary code, and

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's super hard to do so without introducing errors in

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the process. So one way to deal with This is

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to group sets of four bits together. A bit is

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that basic unit of information, a zero or a one,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So you can group these four bits together into another

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>type of numbering system called hexadecimal numbers. Now hexa decimal

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>numbers is a base sixteen numbering system. We use a

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>base ten numbering system. We go from zero to nine,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and when we get past nine, you have ten, which

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is again you start back at zero, and then you

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have a one in the tens column for that number.

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But you go all the way back up to nineteen,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and then you start over again, and now you have

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a two in that ten's column. Well, hexadecimal is base sixteen,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and that presents a challenge, right because if you're talking

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>about base sixteen, you would normally start with zero. Then

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you'd work up to fifteen. But how could you tell

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a ten apart from the two digits of one and

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>zero that are side by side. Right, If you can

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have a zero and a one in your numbering system,

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can have a ten in your numbering system

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's base sixteen, you can't tell the difference between

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a ten and a one zero. So anything ten or

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>higher ten to fifteen would be confusing, and so for

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that reason, the digits ten, eleven, twelve, fourteen, and fifteen

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are in hexadecimal, represented by letters A, B, C, D, E,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and F. So hexadecimal digits include zero through nine and

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>A through f to represent binary or decimal numbers. Now,

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>remember hexadecimal numbers represent groups of four bits. A zero

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in hexadecimal represents a binary string of four zeros in

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a row, and F and hexadecimal represents the four bit

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>string of one one one one, Because that actually represents

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the decimal number of fifteen um you have. You essentially

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>say one plus two plus four plus eight. That's how

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>those different digit spots represent numbers. So to convert binary

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>into hexadecimal, you would first take your big block of

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>binary code and you divide it into four bit strings.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Then you would convert each four bit string into the

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hexadecimal digit that represents that four bit string, and you

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have a slightly simpler way of representing all the information.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So a m d S first successful logic counter could

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>do this task and it became an important early component

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in mini computer systems of the early nineteen seventies. At

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the time of the A M to five zero one release.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 1>A m D had fifty three employees. The company had

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>established a wafer fabrication lab that could make two inch

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>silicon wafers and then a m D would then use

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that as a platform for integrated circuits, and the company

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was able to build circuits with elements on the seven

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>micrometer scale, or if you're old school, the seven micron scale.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>A micrometer is one millionth of a meter, and today

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>microprocessors are built on the nanometer scale that's one billionth

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of a meter, But in nineteen seventy the micrometer scale

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was pretty darn impressive. In an a m D engineer

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>named Sven Simonson led a group that designed another successful

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>A m D product, and it was a chip that

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>handled multiplication. It was called the A M two five

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>oh five and it was at the time the industry's

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>fastest multiplier chip. So the company was making a name

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for itself building out these components that were outperforming other

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers that we're working in the same industry. One was

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>also the year that a m D began to produce

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>random access memory or RAM chips, and anyone who has

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>gone shopping for computers has seen stuff about RAM, and

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think most people realize it has something to do

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with computer performance, but they might not know what it

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>actually is all about. Well, first you know it's it

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is memory, and memories purpose is to keep a record

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of information, and there are different types of memory. This

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is true for people and it's true for computers. So

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in computers, you have read only memory or ROM, you

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>have random access memory or RAM, and then you have

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>auxiliary memory, which we usually refer to as storage. So

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>auxiliary memory is where information lives when you've saved it.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's in a way sort of analogous to our long

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>term memory as human beings. But retrieving information from auxiliary

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>memory takes a little bit of time. A computer has

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to go through the directory, find the information, retrieve it,

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and pull it up into the current moment. So if

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a computer had to refer to its auxiliary memory every

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>time you want to run any sort of process related

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to that data, it would feel like it was really

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>taking forever. Random access memory is more sort of like

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>our our short term memory. It's used to temporarily store

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>information for the purposes of working with that info and

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>making it faster. So rather than having to pull up

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the data from storage every time the computer can store

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it temporarily in RAM. So the more RAM you have,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the more information you can hold in this working memory.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why people tend to talk about having more

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>RAM with your computer makes your computer faster. What's really

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>doing is it's cutting down on how frequently your machine

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>needs to consult it's auxiliary memory. So if it can

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>load more data into RAM, then it doesn't need to

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>pop back into the library as frequently. RAM is often

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>referred to as volatile memory, and it will only hold

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>information as long as the computer is powered on. Upon

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>losing power, traditional RAM relinquishes all that information. Read only memory,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, or ROM has pre programmed information that's

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>hard coded onto the memory itself and generally is used

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to hold stuff like basic sets of instructions that the

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>computer has to follow in order to boot up and

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get the system ready for use. All right, so that's

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>RAM in a nutshell. I'll have to do a full

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>episode about later on to talk about the nitty gritty stuff,

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back, I'll talk more about the

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>early days of a m D. But first let's take

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. In two, a m D made the

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>move to become a publicly traded company and held a

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>night po Chairs of a m D were valued at

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars each. The following year, it would open its

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>first overseas manufacturing facility in Malaysia. So the company was

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>expanding early on, and the company continued to manufacture components

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and grow, And that's pretty much what the company did

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for its first few years, building logic chips, growing the company.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's not really much to say about those years

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>apart from the fact that Sanders established himself as a

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a flamboyant leader. He had already been seen

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as similar in uh fair Child, and I read in

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:37.239
<v Speaker 1>an Ours Technica article that Francis fran Barton, who was

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the chief financial officer at a m D in the

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, described Sanders as being part Indiana Jones, part

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>don Keyxote. So that's pretty darn flamboyant. Now, Uh. I

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do want to say that if I were to cover

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>every single thing they ever put out, this would sound

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like a technical manual and all the names are a

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>M and then a bunch of numbers that would become

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>unmanageable right away. So I'm going to be skipping around

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So by the spring of nineteen seventy four,

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>five years after the company had started, it had grown

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to just under fift employees. A m D also reinvested

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in its manufacturing facilities, which is a necessary and critical

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the semiconductor business. Gordon Moore, you know, that

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who used to work at Fairchild and then became

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a co founder of Intel, had famously made an observation

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen sixty five that market demands would create

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the incentive for semiconductor companies to cram about twice as

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>many components onto a square inch silicon chip every two

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>years or so. To meet that demand, companies like Intel

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and A m D had to frequently overhaul not just

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the design of the chips, but the manufacturing process itself

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to create ever smaller transistors and pathways in order to

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>stay true to that observation. Today we call that observation

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law, though these days we tend to think of

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of computing power, and how computing power

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tends to double and strength every eighteen to twenty four months,

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as if it were magically doing that on its own.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The Gordon Moore's point was that there was going to

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>be a continuing demand from the marketplace for ever smaller

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>components on microchips, which in turn also means that the

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>microchips are able to do a lot more stuff because

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you've crammed more components onto it than the previous generations microchips,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and that as long as that market demand is there,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then it would create the incentive to continue investing in that.

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So his was a market driven vision. We tend to

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>think of it as some sort of innovation law, but

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that means that's sort of like getting it backwards anyway.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Even in those days, a m D and Intel were competing.

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>While Intel had started to develop computers on a chip

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteen seventies, releasing the Intel four zero

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>zero four micro processor back in nineteen seventy one, it

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was also still the business of building logic chips, and

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a m D sales for certain products we're starting to

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>catch up to and in some cases exceed Intel sales,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So things were looking good for a m D. Jerry

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Sanders initiated a special program called Run for the Sun

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy five. This was a sales target for

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a m D. The sales target was to make ninety

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars in sales that year, So why ninety

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars, Well, that would be one dollar for

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>every mile between the Earth and the Sun, and Sanders

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>again had a certain flair for the dramatic. By the way,

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>A m D would very nearly make that goal. They

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>came up less than a million dollars short of that figure.

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Really impressive considering where they were. But I guess that

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>means they didn't burn up on the surface of the Sun,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's good. Also, in nine, A m D did

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>something pretty clever. Engineers took a very close look at

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a photograph of the die that Intel was using to

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>build the company's A D eight eight bit microprocessor. So

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the microprocessor was called the eight and it was an

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>eight bit microprocessor. Am D looks at this their engineers.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They start to set out to reverse engineer Intel's work

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and make their own version of Intel's chip, So a

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>m D S version would ultimately be called the a

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>M nine D e D. Now you might imagine that

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Intel was pretty head up about the fact that A

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>m D had managed to figure out their secret sauce

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and then reverse engineer it to create their own variation

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>of Intel's chip. But what actually unfolded was one of

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the more unusual business deals in tech history, in Intel

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and A m D entered into a cross licensing agreement

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>between the two companies. This initial agreement had to do

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with microcode, which is the code on top of a

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>CPU that allows it to interact with the computer's other systems,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and it gets pretty complicated both logically and legally. But

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing to point out is that A m

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>D and Intel, without while they were still being fiercely

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>competitive against each other and even engaging in lengthy and

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>acrimonious legal battles over their history, would continue to renew

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>patent licensing agreements every decade because they were set to

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>expire after ten years. While in nineteen seventy seven, A

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>m D and the German company Siemens entered and do

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a joint venture to develop micro computers. Those are the

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>type of computers we think of as desktop personal computers

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, Now together the companies formed a third

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>entity called Advanced micro Computers, and they established it both

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and in Germany. The main focus

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was to create computers that had a dialog Z eight

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand micro processor as the CPU. A m D was

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>actually a second source for those type of chips. Now,

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that means that a m D had acquired a license

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>from Zilog to produce Xilogs chips using Zalogs designs. So

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's as if you, let's say that you make

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a soft drink like Coca Cola, and then Pepsi comes

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up to you and says, hey, we can't meet our demand.

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>We have way more demand for our product than we

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>can personally manufacture, so we are willing to strike a

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with you where you can make our stuff and

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>sell it because the demand is there, and you'll pay

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>us a little licensing fee so that we get some

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>money out of this. But that way we meet our

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>customer demands and you make money and I make money.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of the idea that a m D

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>had with Zilog, where they were allowed to produce Zilog

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>chips in return for this licensing fee. Now, before long

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that Siemens and a m D had

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>very different visions of where advanced micro computers should go.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And in nineteen seventy nine, just two years after entering

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.919
<v Speaker 1>into the joint venture, a m D would buy out

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Siemens stake in that company, and A m D would

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to operate advanced micro computers for a short while,

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>but would choose to shut it down in N one

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>because of another big opportunity. Then, opportunity came straight from

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>their old nemesis, Intel. In the nineteen seventies, Intel had

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>developed the eight six microprocessor and by extension, what has

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>become known as the X eight six instruction set architecture.

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>This was a significant advancement over Intel's eight bit processor,

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the D eight that was the one that A m

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>D had managed to reverse engineer and effectively clone a

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of years earlier. The eight six microprocessor was a

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>top candidate when another tech giant, IBM, was looking at

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>microprocessors that might power its upcoming IBM PC. But Big

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Blue had a concern. IBM was worried that the demand

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>for the IBM PC would quickly exceed Intel's manufacturing capacity,

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and that would result in shortages and delays in the

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, which in turn would make IBMS customers unhappy. Plus,

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>if something should happen to Intel, then IBM would be

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>up the creek as far as its computers were concerned.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>They'd have no supplier for their microprocessors. So IBM essentially

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 1>told Intel, hey, we can make a deal, and it's

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big one, you know, make you

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of money, but you have to figure out how

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to license your technology to another manufacturer so that we

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>can get the number of chips we need to meet

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>our demand. Intel, not wanting to lose this valuable contract,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>agreed to IBMS terms and then turned to a m D.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Thus Intel an a m D entered into an agreement.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Intel would supply a m D with the proprietary information

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>about how the eight six and by extension, the x

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>A D six instruction set architecture worked, and a m

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>D would start producing some of Intel's chips, and the

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>two competitors joined forces to meet IBMS expectations. Now, in

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>another episode, I talked about how IBM's decision to rely

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>heavily on off the shelf components would lead to its

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>eventual departure from the personal computer market because other companies

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>would replicate IBM computers by getting hold of those same

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>basic components and putting them together themselves. And part of

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that had to do with Intel and a m D

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not having to sign any sort of exclusive deal with IBM,

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So not only did these companies make a killing off IBM,

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they also benefited from all the IBM compatible manufacturers that

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>grew out of that era, and both Intel and A

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>M D were raking in the cash. Intel would continue

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to supply A M D with database tapes for the

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>design of the six, the six, and the A D

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>two eighty six, which gave A D the ability to

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>make clones of those chips, plus the variants like the

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and thee Those were variations on the x A

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>D six architecture. Now A and D did not put

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>all its eggs in the Intel second source basket. It

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was also developing chips for RISK computers. RISK or r

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I s C stands for reduced instruction set computer. It

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>relies on a processor design that follows a simplified set

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of instructions, and it's an alternative to complex instruction set

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>computing or c I s C. The idea of r

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I s C computers is that they do fewer things,

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>but the things they do they can do much more

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>quickly and efficiently. The power PC microprocessor architecture, which was

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>a joint venture between Apple, IBM, and Motorola, relied on

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>risk chips. The A M D line was known as

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the A M twenty nine thousand series. So in nine three,

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>A M D ruffled the feathers over at Intel a

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit. The company produced it's a M two eighty

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>six licensed clone of Intel's eight two eighties six, And

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>typically we just refer to these as two eighty six

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>microchips or two eighty six computers. It's really saying that

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the computer, which was an IBM compatible computer had inside

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of it an A D two eighty six microchip or

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a M D S version. So the fact that A

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>M D was making this chip totally fine. That was

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>completely covered under this licensing agreement between the two companies.

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That was not the problem. A M D was doing

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it was supposed to be doing. It was

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>taking Intel's chips, and it was making them and making

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 1>them available to these UH manufacturers that are making the

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>actual computers. The two chips were identical from an architectural perspective,

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but a M D S version had a higher clock speed.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Intel's clock speed for the two eighty six topped out

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at twelve point five Mega hurts, and a M D

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>S could go up as high as twenty mega hurts.

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So that raises the question what are clock speeds? So

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>let me answer that very quickly. With a processor, the

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>clock tells us essentially how many internal operations the microprocessor

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>can perform each second, and we describe this in cycles

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>per second, and a HURTS is one cycle per second.

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 1>So Intel's two eight six microprocessor could complete twelve and

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>a half million cycles every second, but a m D

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>S could do twenty million cycles every second. So a

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>m D S chip was able to process information at

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a faster rate than Intel's which led the industry to

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 1>say that a m D was effectively producing better Intel

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>chips than Intel could, and as you can imagine, that

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't go over so well at Intel. Intel did not

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>want to see companies going with their competitors version of

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>their own chip instead of them. But things were going

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>great at a m D. The company was named one

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Fortune five hundred companies in nineteen eighty five.

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Tony Holbrook would become the president of the company in

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six, and Jerry Sanders would turn into the CEO,

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not turn into he was just that was his role.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Didn't have a magic fairy come down and Grant him

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the wish of becoming CEO those some days. I think

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how business works. Also, in nineteen eighty six, Intel

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>terminated their contract with a m D, which was problematic

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>as the second source deal between the two companies that

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that had started back in nineteen eighty two, and it

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.879
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to last ten years. But if I'm doing

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>my math correctly, two plus ten does not equal nineteen

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>eight six. So I guess Intel wasn't too happy with

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>getting a reputation for making the second best Intel microchip

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, and the company was gearing up with

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>its three eight six update. So Intel said no dice

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to a m D, and a m D sued, alleging

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that Intel had breached the contract. But these legal battles

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>take time. This particular legal battle would take almost ten years,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and in the meantime am D had to figure out

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>what else it had to do. That what else would

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>end up being up two pronged attack. One would be

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to develop their own CPUs, actually designing their own microchip

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>architecture from the ground up based on the x A

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:37.439
<v Speaker 1>D six instruction set. The other prong of this two

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pronged attack was to look at what Intel was doing

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and reverse engineer it again and maybe even do it

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>better than Intel could again. So in our next episode

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about this two pronged attack and what a

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.839
<v Speaker 1>m D did and how it continued to evolve and

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with the company today. But this is

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>time to wrap up this particular episode, So thank you

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>so much for the suggestion. Greatly appreciate it. If any

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of you have any suggestions for future episodes of tech

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Stuff episodes, you can write me the addresses tech Stuff

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. You can drop on

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>by the website that's tech stuff podcast dot com. You're

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna find an archive of all of our shows there,

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>plus links to the social uh presence of tech Stuff

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and to our online store, where every purchase you make

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>goes to help the show. We greatly appreciate it, and

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I will talk to you again about a m D

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tex Stuff is a production of I Heart

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.