Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team bucket
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com if he may read it on the show.
Speaker 1: It was inevitable that at some point people would figure
Speaker 1: out that the border is a total mess and the
Speaker 1: people in the media are lying to you about it.
Speaker 1: That was just going to happen. It was a question
Speaker 1: of how long it would take. I mean, I know
Speaker 1: that there are those Democrats who are actually open borders
Speaker 1: ideologically and so they don't really care what a mess
Speaker 1: things have turned into down there. But there are some others,
Speaker 1: I think, who really believe the propaganda from the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: that they really think that they're being told the truth.
Speaker 1: And now we're seeing Hold on a second. You mean
Speaker 1: they might actually start building wall, They might act this
Speaker 1: is the Biden administration. They might start going after sanctuary cities.
Speaker 1: They might start prosecuting illegals who cross more than once
Speaker 1: or have other additional criminality. This is what's being said. Now.
Speaker 1: You're not really hearing a lot about it, though, are you.
Speaker 1: It's because the politics of this turning against the Democrats,
Speaker 1: and the media, as you know, doesn't want you to
Speaker 1: know what's really happening. They're always engaged in propaganda, and
Speaker 1: that includes social media companies. As I'm sure you're aware,
Speaker 1: there's an effort underway from social media giants to suppress
Speaker 1: speech and also to punish people who step out of
Speaker 1: line with their political opinions. And that's why I really
Speaker 1: urge you right now, you've got to get Express VPN.
Speaker 1: That's what I have because everything you search for, a click,
Speaker 1: or watch online can be tracked, is tracked by the
Speaker 1: big tech companies and then they match your activity to
Speaker 1: your identity using your device's IP address. Well, when I
Speaker 1: turn on my Express VPN, this is on my computer
Speaker 1: or my iPhone, you name it, my IP address is
Speaker 1: masked by a secure VPN server. It makes it a
Speaker 1: lot harder for websites to identify me. The Express VPN app,
Speaker 1: which is so easy, just downloaded to your phone. It
Speaker 1: takes a minute, encrypts your network's data to protect sensitive
Speaker 1: information from being compromise. Plus you can use it on
Speaker 1: up a five devices simultaneously. Stop handing over your data
Speaker 1: to big tech companies. Okay, go with the VPN that
Speaker 1: I trust for online protection right now, trust me, Go
Speaker 1: to Express vpn dot com slash buck to get three
Speaker 1: months free on a one year package. That's express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck to get three extra months free
Speaker 1: express vpn dot com slash buck. The border is a mess.
Speaker 1: You know that, it's very clear based on all the
Speaker 1: news stories that you can see on this and if
Speaker 1: you just read the basic facts and figures, or if
Speaker 1: you really just understand the Democrats view on the border.
Speaker 1: I mean, they they tell you things that are not
Speaker 1: what they really think and believe for public consumption, so
Speaker 1: they can fool enough of the country that they can
Speaker 1: get away with this stuff for a little while. But
Speaker 1: that's starting to slip. They got problems you have right
Speaker 1: now at the US Mexico border. The highest number of
Speaker 1: illegal crossings in twenty years. That's right, in twenty years, friends,
Speaker 1: And if you go back to the late nineties, and
Speaker 1: if you go back to the periods where you had
Speaker 1: border crossings along these similar lines, there were just single
Speaker 1: males who were crossing the border. Wasn't family units, wasn't
Speaker 1: unaccompanied children, and they were doing it in such large
Speaker 1: numbers and with such ease that they would go back
Speaker 1: and forth illegally across the border. You've talked to border patrol,
Speaker 1: you can hear the stories about this. Sometimes they would
Speaker 1: just line up a hundred guys right at the Tijuana
Speaker 1: San Diego border and they would just all do essentially
Speaker 1: a jailbreak run where they just go across and act
Speaker 1: like you know, or wait to see if anyone could
Speaker 1: actually tackle them from border patrol. That's how easy it
Speaker 1: was then. It's easier now in a sense because you
Speaker 1: don't even have to run. You just if you want
Speaker 1: to cross into the country illegally, wave them down and
Speaker 1: say you want asylum. It's all. It's all you have
Speaker 1: to do. And this, as I've said all along, is
Speaker 1: because of the incentives in place right now. The people
Speaker 1: who are at the southern border and trying to control
Speaker 1: this border patrol, immigrations and customs enforcement, they don't have
Speaker 1: the political backing or the resources necessary to do the
Speaker 1: job that they want to do that they're entrusted to
Speaker 1: do on behalf of the American people. And they will
Speaker 1: tell you, and they have been telling people that I
Speaker 1: am in contact with who are down there. And also,
Speaker 1: as I said, I'll be going down to the border
Speaker 1: myself in a couple of weeks to speak with all
Speaker 1: of them. They'll tell you that it's obvious why this
Speaker 1: is happening. People understand the Biden administration is not going
Speaker 1: to deport them and is welcoming to illegal crossings. That's it.
Speaker 1: It's very straightforward. But it's so straightforward at this point
Speaker 1: given the numbers and the fact that you have an
Speaker 1: increasing public opinion turning on Joe Biden on this issue,
Speaker 1: because the more you see this and the more it
Speaker 1: keeps happening, you say, hold on a second, how exactly
Speaker 1: are they planning on stopping this. I've been telling you
Speaker 1: all along, this is just going to get worse. Why
Speaker 1: wouldn't it just get worse? What's the downside if you
Speaker 1: want to come to America illegally and stay here forever,
Speaker 1: because it's a rich country with a big welfare state
Speaker 1: and a whole lot of economic opportunity. And as I've
Speaker 1: always said, I have no animosity, I have no ill
Speaker 1: will toward people who are crossing into the United States illegally.
Speaker 1: I understand why they're doing this, but I also understand
Speaker 1: why we have to have a border and law and
Speaker 1: order and sovereignty, or else the country starts to just evaporate.
Speaker 1: Over time. But what is a country without borders? These
Speaker 1: are fundamental questions that used to be agreed upon by
Speaker 1: the American people, but now it's changed dramatically. As you know,
Speaker 1: can't have a welfare state and open borders. You can
Speaker 1: go back to Milton Friedman. It's quite obvious why that's
Speaker 1: the case. And given the amount of money that we're
Speaker 1: spending now, the trillions of dollars were throwing around, you
Speaker 1: start to see that the whole system this feeling a
Speaker 1: bit wobbly, and certainly our immigration system is coming apart,
Speaker 1: so much so that the Biden administration is now and
Speaker 1: this is the great part of it, considering what would
Speaker 1: you call it a Trumpian border policies, or at least
Speaker 1: a move toward them. What do I mean specifically, Well, DHS,
Speaker 1: according to a virtual town hall with the chief of
Speaker 1: DHS Mayorcus, may start to prosecute some illegal crossers, especially
Speaker 1: those who are crossing for a second time. As I've
Speaker 1: told you, even if you did get turned back, there's
Speaker 1: no downside to trying it again. You might have to
Speaker 1: pay off the smugglers a second time, but that's it.
Speaker 1: There's no reason not to try again because they're not
Speaker 1: punishing people. Turns, that's actually a felony. It's a misdemeaned
Speaker 1: across in the United States the first time illegally. Second
Speaker 1: time you do it, it's a felony. You think they're
Speaker 1: prosecuting people under that. Well, they might have to, because
Speaker 1: if you don't guess what people keep coming, you don't
Speaker 1: just support them once, you have to support them a
Speaker 1: second time, maybe a third time. And they're seeing this
Speaker 1: now another one and this is classic. They may fill
Speaker 1: in gaps in the border wall. The Biden administration may
Speaker 1: fill in some of the gaps in the border wall. Now.
Speaker 1: Part of this is because the funding has already been allocated,
Speaker 1: and they're saying there are these legal reasons for why
Speaker 1: the funding must be used. But they're also admitting, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: in some places, it's actually probably a good thing to
Speaker 1: have a finished fenci finished wall. I've been to different
Speaker 1: sections of border wall, spoken to the Border patrol about
Speaker 1: this at length. Walls work. I mean, of all the
Speaker 1: stupid things that Democrats said during the Trump administration that
Speaker 1: walls don't work, maybe even more blatantly idiotic than Trump
Speaker 1: worked with Putin and Russia to steal the election through
Speaker 1: collusion that somehow there was no evidence of, and as
Speaker 1: we know from the very extensive investigations about it was
Speaker 1: all a fabrication. It's even dumber to say that the
Speaker 1: walls don't work. That's like saying water is not wet, right,
Speaker 1: That's like saying so up up is not up? Down
Speaker 1: is up? Up is down. It's meant to exhaust you
Speaker 1: intellectually and to confuse you. The way the Biden administration
Speaker 1: approaches so many things. You're seeing this now with infrastructure,
Speaker 1: you'll you'll see them say that everything is infrastructure now.
Speaker 1: I saw Kirsten Gillibrand on Twitter, the Democrats senator from
Speaker 1: New York, saying childcare is infrastructure, healthcare is infrastructure. No, actually,
Speaker 1: childcare is childcare. It's not infrastructure. But they're gonna say
Speaker 1: that everything is infrastructure now because it's propaganda. We're not idiots.
Speaker 1: We know that what they're saying isn't true, but they don't,
Speaker 1: and they can fool the simple for the benefit of
Speaker 1: the powerful. That's the plan. That's exactly what they're doing
Speaker 1: right now, which brings me to what's actually happening at
Speaker 1: the border. DHS Secretary of ma Orcus is saying that
Speaker 1: they will maybe fill in some gaps, you know, just
Speaker 1: just fill in some gaps in that wall. Why would
Speaker 1: you do that? I mean, walls don't work, they told us.
Speaker 1: It turns out that was a big lie and a
Speaker 1: really dumb one too. You know, we all understand walls
Speaker 1: don't work. The people that tell you masks work so
Speaker 1: well also tell you walls don't work. But there are
Speaker 1: walls all over the place seem to work pretty well.
Speaker 1: Illegal crossings may be prosecuted under certain circumstances. Now, there
Speaker 1: was a whole movement and it still is among Democrats,
Speaker 1: like AOC to make illegal crossing no longer a crime. Which,
Speaker 1: how are you ever going to stop border surges? Then?
Speaker 1: And they also we're saying the Biden administration is saying
Speaker 1: through this Mayorcas town hall for DHS, they'll take on
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities that won't assist federal law enforcement. Wait, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, I need to make sure that I'm oh, no,
Speaker 1: I'm double checking my work here. Yeah, that is what
Speaker 1: they are claiming. That is what they are saying that
Speaker 1: they are going to This is the headline from Daily Mail.
Speaker 1: No more instant A nice guy Biden's Homeland Security secretary
Speaker 1: now says he wants to prosecute more illegal immigrants and
Speaker 1: will crack down on Democrats sanctuary cities that refuse to
Speaker 1: work with ICE. Cracking down on sanctuary cities. Really, what
Speaker 1: are we now? Three four months into the Biden administration
Speaker 1: and they're already realizing obvious reality, which is that the
Speaker 1: status quo at the border, which is open borders, is
Speaker 1: unsustainable even for crazy Democrats. Now they don't mind the
Speaker 1: outcome of this in terms of the population in flow
Speaker 1: of the United States of illegals. That's not their problem.
Speaker 1: The problem is the American people are starting to see this.
Speaker 1: As much as the media is trying to cover up
Speaker 1: and soft pedal it and make it seem like it's
Speaker 1: not that bad and trying to downplay all this, the
Speaker 1: American people are saying this and saying, what the heck
Speaker 1: is going on down there? And it's being reflected in
Speaker 1: the polling numbers, it's being reflected in public perception. So
Speaker 1: now they at least have to start to pay lip
Speaker 1: service to what would be termed in a normal world
Speaker 1: border security, which they do not have right now. Didn't
Speaker 1: take very long, did I remember kids in cages, how
Speaker 1: awful Trump was, and everything else. Maybe they just were
Speaker 1: trying to do the best they could under difficult circumstances
Speaker 1: to actually secure the border, not to kick it wide
Speaker 1: open and then say, oh, we don't know how this happened. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's crazy, it's crazy. Where are we live in gus
Speaker 1: can't do anything about it? You know, maybe Biden will
Speaker 1: give another speech where he's sort of squintson muttersome stuff
Speaker 1: to the American people, where he's you know, you know guys, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm your leader. He got things to say.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable this guy as the president, but he is,
Speaker 1: Thanks Democrats, what a joke. Oh, and then there's Kamala
Speaker 1: The borders are Kamala Harris put in charge of this.
Speaker 1: You know, it's fascinating about Kamala Harris. She has the
Speaker 1: fanciest taxpayer funded transportation system possible. Right, Air Force two
Speaker 1: or whatnot or whatever. The Vice President's plane, I forget
Speaker 1: what is it? Whatever? I mean, there's Marine one, there's
Speaker 1: Air Force two. I guess whatever it is. She's on
Speaker 1: a fancy plane paid for by the taxpayer. She can
Speaker 1: go anywhere she wants pretty much on a moment's notice.
Speaker 1: She's been all over the place, been on the West coast,
Speaker 1: the East coast, She's she's stopped all over the country
Speaker 1: and flowing all across the country. She's in Brentwood, California.
Speaker 1: She's flying all over the place and hasn't been to
Speaker 1: the border. So she's a border tzar who's in charge
Speaker 1: of this but doesn't seem to want to actually go
Speaker 1: see the crisis herself. Isn't that just so strange? Well,
Speaker 1: because any photo ops might backfire. You can't have her
Speaker 1: standing at these grossly overcrowded facilities where there's no social
Speaker 1: distancing and people are spreading COVID all over the place,
Speaker 1: and kids are in really nasty circumstances there, as well
Speaker 1: as other people that are being held in detention of
Speaker 1: the border. You can't go to these overflowing facilities and
Speaker 1: put on a big smile and say, look at what
Speaker 1: a great job we're doing. So she's avoiding it that
Speaker 1: Kamala is not going to the border. That she laughs
Speaker 1: when she's asked about going to the border, and she's
Speaker 1: in charge of this as the vice president for this administration,
Speaker 1: is a metaphor for the whole situation. They're just trying
Speaker 1: to cover up their eyes and just say, ah, we
Speaker 1: don't really know. Maybe there's a problem, maybe there's not,
Speaker 1: but let's not focus too much on it. Oh no,
Speaker 1: there's a big problem, and they can't solve it unless
Speaker 1: they're willing to do the one thing they really don't
Speaker 1: want to do, which is approached the border in a
Speaker 1: way more similar to the Trump administration. The virus is
Speaker 1: sprinting because we have too many people who've seen the
Speaker 1: end in sight think we're at the finish line already.
Speaker 1: Let me be deadly earnest with you. We aren't the
Speaker 1: finish line. We still have a lot of work to do.
Speaker 1: We're still in a life and death race against this virus.
Speaker 1: Until we get more people vaccinated. We need everyone to
Speaker 1: wash their hands, socially distance and mask up and a
Speaker 1: recommended mask from the CDC. Think about it this way.
Speaker 1: Times are ahead. Think about it this way. Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: a moron, and I doesn't know anything, and she's the
Speaker 1: same crap all the time, and it's not actually helping.
Speaker 1: He doesn't know why there's been a surge in five
Speaker 1: states basically that I've accounted for a whole lot of
Speaker 1: the spread, including New York, New Jersey, Michigan. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: the case is recently. They're also not separating out cases
Speaker 1: from hospitalizations and fatalities because younger people getting this is
Speaker 1: not a problem. Older people getting this is the problem.
Speaker 1: So as long as seniors are vaccinated and not part
Speaker 1: of the wave that's going on right now, the surge,
Speaker 1: we really have anything to be working to be worried about.
Speaker 1: But that would be a rational, reasonable way to approach this.
Speaker 1: I just had COVID. I remember when I when I
Speaker 1: called my doc said I got COVID. He's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you'll be fine. Do this, do that, drink some fluids.
Speaker 1: You're you're in the low risk category. A problem comes up,
Speaker 1: you call me. Okay. That was it, and then I
Speaker 1: stayed home for a while. Right now, I'm lucky because
Speaker 1: I'm at a relatively low risk from COVID based on
Speaker 1: my age and characteristics, comorbidities, etc. But there are a
Speaker 1: lot of other people out there who are in the
Speaker 1: same position. I was going into an office every day,
Speaker 1: I was going about my life, and sure enough I
Speaker 1: got it. I did all the things they told me
Speaker 1: I had to do, which, as you know, I'm highly
Speaker 1: skeptical of and think are mostly worthless. But I did
Speaker 1: those things, still got sick. But you know what, fine,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't change a darned thing. I mean, I would
Speaker 1: have rather not gotten it if I could have chosen.
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying I would have lived my life
Speaker 1: differently over the last year. In fact, if anything, I
Speaker 1: would have said, well, why am I doing all this crap?
Speaker 1: I'm likely to get it over the course of the
Speaker 1: year anyway. I'm not going to be first in line
Speaker 1: for the vaccine by a long shot, so and maybe
Speaker 1: I should just be able to live my life all
Speaker 1: But it's always the risk to other people. They say, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's pretty pretty amazing. I mean, I was with my
Speaker 1: girlfriend the day that I basically came down with symptoms
Speaker 1: with it, the whole day in close contact. She's fine,
Speaker 1: she never got sick. There's so much about this virus
Speaker 1: that we don't understand. Still when it comes to transmission,
Speaker 1: they won't tell you that, but it's true. We understand
Speaker 1: the basics. Yes, it's aerosolized virus and it gains in
Speaker 1: your system, and but human patterns of behavior and how
Speaker 1: little anyway, you all know how I feel about this,
Speaker 1: but the mashkop We're not the end. We're not the end.
Speaker 1: I mean, just wait until they realize that they there
Speaker 1: will always be coronavirus out there, and there will be
Speaker 1: mutations of coronavirus in the future, and they're gonna want
Speaker 1: to have this ability to just sort of shut down
Speaker 1: or close down parts of society. Remember, we never went
Speaker 1: into a true lockdown, never, not in this country. I
Speaker 1: mean maybe for the first two weeks something that was
Speaker 1: kind of close to one. But we always had was
Speaker 1: this pick and choose arbitrary. Some businesses shut down, others
Speaker 1: open some you know, some employers keep people coming in,
Speaker 1: others don't. It was all it was all absurd the
Speaker 1: whole time, an arbitrary and didn't work. But now Biden's
Speaker 1: got the answers, raskers. People shoe the end of No,
Speaker 1: that's not he doesn't know that. Are they seeing the
Speaker 1: end in Texas and that's why bad things are happening? Oh? No,
Speaker 1: Texas is getting better somehow, Fauci noticed. Fauci can't even
Speaker 1: give you an answer. At least he's admitst that. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like, wow, it could be this, it could be
Speaker 1: that a little bit of this, a little bit of that,
Speaker 1: you know, mitigation, plateau, mask up the whole thing. And
Speaker 1: yet Biden, who I wouldn't trust to teach a fifth
Speaker 1: grade social studies class, he's out there. It'll mask up.
Speaker 1: Wash your hands, yeah, wash your hands. Just repeat that
Speaker 1: a million times a day. I'm sure that's really going
Speaker 1: to save a lot of folks. Sure, remember when they
Speaker 1: were telling us the beginning it was all about hand washing,
Speaker 1: you know, they slowed down on that because no, it's
Speaker 1: really about aerosolized virus, which means virus particles that are
Speaker 1: free floating in the air. That's how people get this.
Speaker 1: But they still do the whole Oh yo, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: give out purell bottles to everybody on the airline. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's great, so we all smell like rubbing alcohol. Yet
Speaker 1: they know that the politics of this are getting more
Speaker 1: complicated for them. They're not going to have vaccine passports,
Speaker 1: they say from the federal government in place six, the
Speaker 1: White House is ruling out any involvement in vaccine passports.
Speaker 1: What does that mean and why so? What the White
Speaker 1: House has said in an administration has emphasized is that
Speaker 1: the government will not be requiring or issuing vaccine credentials,
Speaker 1: and that's important to know. Now. The private sector has
Speaker 1: certainly launched a number of initiatives who try to develop
Speaker 1: some sort of credential system whereby people can attest and
Speaker 1: confirm that they were vaccinated. And what the government and
Speaker 1: the administration really believes is that if the private sector
Speaker 1: is going to do that, they need to be strict
Speaker 1: standards to ensure that people are protected at their privacy
Speaker 1: is protected, and also to ensure that these are accessible
Speaker 1: to everyone and not only available to those who have
Speaker 1: economic needs. What the Biden administration is going to do
Speaker 1: is push the private That's what they're already doing. Push
Speaker 1: the private sector, encourage the private sector to set up
Speaker 1: vaccine passports, and then once that's happening in places, then
Speaker 1: there'll be a move for the federal government to just
Speaker 1: regulate what the private sector is already doing. Backdoor vaccine
Speaker 1: passport tyranny, folks, that's the plan. Wokeness really is a
Speaker 1: cancer on the mind of the American people. It's just
Speaker 1: a destructive, awful force. And the only way that we
Speaker 1: really get passed that, I think, is if we fight
Speaker 1: against it. You know, there was this. There was this
Speaker 1: mentality before that I think a lot of people had that, oh,
Speaker 1: it'll pass. You know, this is a fashion, it's a fad,
Speaker 1: and while I hope it's temporary, it's not going to
Speaker 1: be temporary in my opinion, unless people start taking action,
Speaker 1: unless people start doing things that are meant to show
Speaker 1: that there will be consequences for companies that go woke,
Speaker 1: go woke, go broke. It's got to be very very
Speaker 1: well known that that's the way this happens. And then also,
Speaker 1: you know, individuals need to find ways to reach out
Speaker 1: to each other, to communicate, and to do so so
Speaker 1: that we can organize. Remember the Tea Party movement of
Speaker 1: twenty ten, it was people at the local level coming
Speaker 1: together to create a national movement that delivered a devastating
Speaker 1: loss in the twenty ten mid terms to the Obama
Speaker 1: socialist agenda right with the Democrat Party. So that's really important.
Speaker 1: But you know, if you've tried to share your political
Speaker 1: opinions on social media lately, you know that it's just
Speaker 1: fraught with peril. You could get kicked off. You have
Speaker 1: these big tech giants that will shut you down, or
Speaker 1: even Horse still shadow band you. So you think you're
Speaker 1: reaching people, but you're actually not. That happens to me
Speaker 1: all the time. That's why I really want you to
Speaker 1: check out Caucus Room dot com. Caucusroom dot com. Listen
Speaker 1: to this. It's a social media network exclusively for conservatives.
Speaker 1: Caucus Room is an online community for conservatives to gather
Speaker 1: and engage locally. It's only real people who are verified
Speaker 1: conservatives who can become Caucus Room members, and Caucus Room
Speaker 1: will never share your information with anyone ever. It's a
Speaker 1: great way to get engaged on issues where you can
Speaker 1: make the biggest difference locally. Okay. At Caucusroom, you can
Speaker 1: participate in live virtual meetings. They're so secure that Caucus
Speaker 1: Room play to host over a dozen virtual Republican Party
Speaker 1: conventions in the past year. All right, this is made
Speaker 1: by conservatives for conservatives to get organized and make a difference.
Speaker 1: Become a part of it today. Join the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Listeners Group. That's right, we have our own team buck
Speaker 1: Listeners group, the buck Sexton Listeners Group on Caucusroom dot com.
Speaker 1: That c Aucus Room dot com, Caucus Room dot com.
Speaker 1: Join It's free. You can interact with other listeners just
Speaker 1: like you find other their team buck other conservatives in
Speaker 1: your area at caucus room dot com. I think that's
Speaker 1: up to the masters. So look, you know, it is
Speaker 1: reassuring to see that for profit operations and businesses are
Speaker 1: speaking up about how these new Jim Crow laws are
Speaker 1: just anathetical to who we are. There's another side to
Speaker 1: it too. The other side to it too is one
Speaker 1: day in fact, move out of Georgia. The people who
Speaker 1: need to help the most. People are making hourly wages
Speaker 1: sometimes get hurt the most. I think it's a very
Speaker 1: tough decision for a corporation to make or group to make,
Speaker 1: but I respect them when they make that judgment, and
Speaker 1: I support whatever judgment they make. But it's the best
Speaker 1: way to deal with this is for Georgia and other
Speaker 1: states to smarten up. Stop it, stop it, stop it,
Speaker 1: stop it. You know smart enough, you know, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm Joe Joe Biden. I'm just you know, just kind
Speaker 1: of whispering. I'm like America's grandpa. Really, I'm just here
Speaker 1: to fool you so the socialists can take over and
Speaker 1: destroy everything and give your twelve year old puberty blocking
Speaker 1: drug because if you won't do that, you're a bad person.
Speaker 1: But you know, I'm just good old Joe amtrack Joe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable. Yeah, first of all, to call and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to budge on this. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: let this go. To call the Georgia Voting Law SP
Speaker 1: two O two, the Voter Integrity Act. Jim Crow is
Speaker 1: a shameless, reckless, unsupportable, unfair, nasty, divisive, grotesque thing to say.
Speaker 1: And the President of the United States is saying it.
Speaker 1: This is the unit president, right, so it's gonna be
Speaker 1: so much better than we are Trump. Trump was always
Speaker 1: dividing as Biden will unite us. Anyone who believed that
Speaker 1: was not very smart. It's just true. It's just it's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: I mean, they can say that these uniting Democrats. He's
Speaker 1: not uniting any Republicans with the other side on anything.
Speaker 1: Biden unites us on nothing. And he says things like
Speaker 1: it's Jim Crow laws, which if you just do a
Speaker 1: quick Google search and familiarize yourself with what Jim Crow
Speaker 1: laws really were, Let's say, how could Joe Biden be
Speaker 1: so scummy? How could he be so disingenuous? And oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, that's who Joe Biden is. That's who he
Speaker 1: has been all along, and now he'll just see the foe.
Speaker 1: You you got smart enough, you gotta you know, you
Speaker 1: don't know. Yeah, I mean the whole thing. It's absurd, Okay,
Speaker 1: But so then he did say something here that was
Speaker 1: interesting to me because I've been pointing out now for days,
Speaker 1: you know, who really gets harmed by this decision by
Speaker 1: Major League Baseball to move the game from Atlanta. As
Speaker 1: we mentioned to Denver, and we love our Denver audience,
Speaker 1: we love our folks into the state of Colorado. Team
Speaker 1: Buck and good for them to get the All Star Game.
Speaker 1: Although I think an All Star Baseball game sounds like
Speaker 1: the most pooring thing I've ever heard, But anyway, people
Speaker 1: do go to see it, and there is money that's
Speaker 1: generated from this. You're hurting stadium employees, guys selling hot
Speaker 1: dogs in the stands, local restaurant and pub and bar owners,
Speaker 1: people that have hotels or even airb and b's near
Speaker 1: the site of the game. And if that's who you're
Speaker 1: hurting me, I can't believe they said one hundred million
Speaker 1: dollars or revenue was the estimate. That's astonishing to me,
Speaker 1: but that's what I'm told. I mean, I also think
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable that baseball players can make millions of dollars
Speaker 1: for a sport that seems like very few people watch,
Speaker 1: and that's slowly dying. And anyway, people like it, so
Speaker 1: good for them. I mean, that's fine. I don't care.
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm focused on the politics here, folks. I
Speaker 1: stay in my lane. But it is true that you
Speaker 1: punish people who don't deserve to be punished at all.
Speaker 1: But the problem with the Democrat approach to so many
Speaker 1: things is that they are collectivists, and they believe in
Speaker 1: the emotions of the mob dictating action, and that's always
Speaker 1: going to result in people who are innocent who did
Speaker 1: nothing wrong suffering. Right. They want to show everybody how
Speaker 1: angry they are about something, show everybody how woke they
Speaker 1: are on a certain topic, and they take action, and
Speaker 1: those actions than harm people who have nothing to do
Speaker 1: with the actual topic at hand, really, but they got
Speaker 1: to sacrifice some folks. Where else do you see this
Speaker 1: not just with wokeness in Major League Baseball. You see
Speaker 1: it with the BLM movement and the destruction of businesses,
Speaker 1: and you know, the Antifa lunatics burning down buildings and
Speaker 1: trying to burn down police station. So they did burn
Speaker 1: down a police station in Minneapolis, as you know, that
Speaker 1: was BLM. But this is what ends up happening. And
Speaker 1: then they justify this because, well, we're angry, we're upset
Speaker 1: about something, so that means someone has to suffer. It's
Speaker 1: exactly the same mentality you see at work in Georgia.
Speaker 1: Georgia just voted for two as a state, two Democrats senators,
Speaker 1: both of whom are preposterous. But they won two Democrats
Speaker 1: senators and voted for Joe Biden in the presidential election.
Speaker 1: George is now thought of as a flipped blue state.
Speaker 1: But because they're they're passing at the state level an
Speaker 1: Election Integrity Act, they're going to treat it like it's
Speaker 1: the new home of Jim Crowlos. I mean, that's what
Speaker 1: they're saying. That's what Biden, the President of the United States,
Speaker 1: is saying. So they punished the whole state. Think of
Speaker 1: how stupid this is and how utterly pointless. But that's
Speaker 1: why Joe Biden. Remember, it's pointless if you're a rational,
Speaker 1: reasonable person. But it's not about justice. It's not about
Speaker 1: punishing the guilty or doing something that is truly righteous
Speaker 1: and moral. It's about that feeling. It's about the mobilization
Speaker 1: of the left and that virtue signaling feeling that people
Speaker 1: have of oh, yeah, that's right, we're stopping Jim Crow
Speaker 1: laws in Georgia. Yeah. Go major League Baseball. Yeah. That's
Speaker 1: that's the power of this left wing movement. That's where
Speaker 1: it derives all of its momentum, just that the people
Speaker 1: can say, yeah, I feel better about myself. There's an
Speaker 1: emotional impulse, there's an emotional need that has met here.
Speaker 1: They don't have to do anything, They risk nothing, they
Speaker 1: take no action, they go through no struggle. They just
Speaker 1: support this, and then they get to post it on
Speaker 1: their Facebook page. They could tell their friends, yeah that's right,
Speaker 1: and all the journals right about this. We're standing up.
Speaker 1: It's a new civil rights movement. No, you're not. Actually,
Speaker 1: you're hurting people and it's stupid and you're wrong. But
Speaker 1: Governor Abbot of the Stage of Texas has pointed out
Speaker 1: that Georgia's election laws not only do we do a
Speaker 1: little comparison to the laws in Colorado, but also Georgia's
Speaker 1: election laws are in comparison to some other places a
Speaker 1: whole lot more accommodating and likely to increase turnout and
Speaker 1: make things easy for people. Play clip one. The MLB
Speaker 1: was basically boycotting the state of Georgia that has laws
Speaker 1: that are more lenient for voters than the state of
Speaker 1: New York than the state of Delaware, where President Biden
Speaker 1: hails from himself, and not knowing what the laws provide,
Speaker 1: not knowing that the laws actually did not crack down
Speaker 1: but instead expanded the ability to vote. It is ridiculous
Speaker 1: that we have some of these organizations that know nothing
Speaker 1: whatsoever about what the law provides, but they're getting and
Speaker 1: injecting themselves into politics in ways that are just flat
Speaker 1: out wrong. Doesn't matter that they're wrong though, right that's
Speaker 1: the way they view it. They got what they wanted,
Speaker 1: which was to stick their thumb in the eye of
Speaker 1: the other side of those bad Republicans. That it was
Speaker 1: all based in a lie, it doesn't matter. This is
Speaker 1: another central idea to the modern Democrat Party. If we
Speaker 1: get to slap our opponents in the face, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if it was based on a lie. It's not
Speaker 1: a problem for us if we were wrong to do it,
Speaker 1: because we want to slap them anyway. Case in point.
Speaker 1: After the Boulder, the terrible mass shooting and Boulder happened,
Speaker 1: you meet people all over the internet, including Kamala Harris's
Speaker 1: niece and you know other other people who were saying
Speaker 1: things about how it's always a white male, it's always
Speaker 1: a white guy, and turned out it was an Islamist
Speaker 1: from Islamist immigrant from Syria named Alisa, as we know.
Speaker 1: And they have since stopped talking about this shooting entirely,
Speaker 1: kind of like the shooting that just happened in Maryland,
Speaker 1: which we'll discuss, because that isn't getting any attention. An
Speaker 1: active shooter situation, shot a couple of people on an
Speaker 1: army base in Maryland. You'd think that there would be
Speaker 1: a little more attention paid to this, but but no, no,
Speaker 1: why is that? Oh? I think we all know. But
Speaker 1: as I was telling everybody at the time, there was
Speaker 1: no shame or shock from the people that were saying
Speaker 1: it's always white male Trump supporters who are doing the
Speaker 1: mass shootings, which it is. It's not true, so that's
Speaker 1: the big that's just not reality. That's not what the
Speaker 1: statistics show at all. But they don't care because it
Speaker 1: felt good to say it. It felt good to basically
Speaker 1: say blank, you Trump supporters, and to use a lie
Speaker 1: to do it. They don't care. They want that that
Speaker 1: emotional need to be met. They want that. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: hate them, anything that gives them an excuse for that,
Speaker 1: that's sufficient, that's entirely that's entirely justification, and that that
Speaker 1: is their approach. So that's why while we look at
Speaker 1: this Georgia thing, we say, so it makes no sense
Speaker 1: what Major League Baseball decided here and Rember. Major League
Speaker 1: Baseball is just the most visible because it moved the
Speaker 1: All Star Game. But there are all these woke companies,
Speaker 1: I mean, so many of them have signed the letter
Speaker 1: of solidary thing. It's like a one hundred major companies
Speaker 1: have signed public letters of solidarity with this. And there
Speaker 1: are smart people who work at these companies, but they're
Speaker 1: politicized and so they don't care that what they're saying
Speaker 1: is bullcrap. But the other part of it is you
Speaker 1: think maybe they're trying to focus attention away from the border.
Speaker 1: I mean, look look around today, you'll see not that
Speaker 1: many news organizations are really spending time on what's happening
Speaker 1: at the porter, and certainly not in the change in
Speaker 1: policy that I've talked to you about how they're doing
Speaker 1: trumpier and trumpier things at the border. You don't You
Speaker 1: don't pick up that, do you. What's that all about?
Speaker 1: Why is that the situation? Why is that the circumstance
Speaker 1: in which we find ourselves? Hmm, Almost like they don't
Speaker 1: want people to know what's really happen and Georgia just
Speaker 1: is a distraction. It's a mobilization. And like I said
Speaker 1: to you, if you are hoping that proving the wrongness,
Speaker 1: the intellectual and moral wrongness of their case here against
Speaker 1: Georgia is going to stop them or change their minds,
Speaker 1: you are mistaken, Which is why I'm telling you what
Speaker 1: really motivates them. They want to feel righteous and tall
Speaker 1: and strong and good and slap you in the face.
Speaker 1: That's it. The truth does not matter to the left
Speaker 1: in that regard. I think it's important to remember the
Speaker 1: context here. The Georgia legislation is built on a lie.
Speaker 1: It's there was no widespread fraud in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Georgia's top Republican election officials IF acknowledged that repeatedly in interviews,
Speaker 1: and what there was, however, was record sitting turnout, especially
Speaker 1: by voters of color. So instead, what we're seeing here
Speaker 1: isn't for politicians who didn't like the outcome. They're not
Speaker 1: changing their policies to win more votes. They're changing the
Speaker 1: rules to exclude more voters. And we certainly see the
Speaker 1: circumstances as different. It's just not true. I mean, she's
Speaker 1: lying to you. If we had an honest press, they'd say,
Speaker 1: what are you talking about. They're actually adding They're adding
Speaker 1: Saturday early voting days. They're codifying things that were changes
Speaker 1: in the pandemic year that in some case, like the
Speaker 1: drop boxes in some cases, are now going to be
Speaker 1: permanent and just make it all easier. They're adding some
Speaker 1: security measures. That's it. It's all very standard. There's nothing
Speaker 1: about this it's discriminatory or racist. Certainly not Jim Crowe,
Speaker 1: but the Democrats have their narrative and they're going to
Speaker 1: run with it. Governor Kemp is sticking to his guns
Speaker 1: on this one, thankfully. Here's what he says about what's
Speaker 1: going on. Play eleven. Do you believe Major League Baseball
Speaker 1: will live to regret this decision? Yeah? I think they will.
Speaker 1: I Mean, it's almost comical, just all of these hits
Speaker 1: that keep falling moving the All Star Game from a
Speaker 1: city that's you know, or a metro area that's fifty
Speaker 1: one percent African American to a metro area that's ten
Speaker 1: percent African American, that has less early voting days than
Speaker 1: Georgia has. They have fifteen, we have seventeen. They have
Speaker 1: a photo ID requirement for in person voting, as we
Speaker 1: do the voter ID here. I mean, it's insane. I mean,
Speaker 1: you compare where Major League Baseball is headquartered in New York,
Speaker 1: and we've you know, I've talked to that issue to
Speaker 1: nauseam really about the discrepancies and how they're boycotting and
Speaker 1: pulling games out of a state like ours, yet they're
Speaker 1: headquartered in a state that's more restricting than we are.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just doesn't add up. And I will
Speaker 1: tell you the people here and all over the country
Speaker 1: have figured this out. They are outraged, and they are
Speaker 1: sick and tired of the cancel culture. The truth does
Speaker 1: not matter to the left on this though, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Has I been telling you, You've got
Speaker 1: to remember You've got to remember that that's central to
Speaker 1: all of this. And if you're wondering, you know why
Speaker 1: are they doing this? Why pick this issue? What's this
Speaker 1: Biden administration? It's so left wing, it's so woke, embraces
Speaker 1: so openly the cancel culture though. You know, Biden was
Speaker 1: asked about the PGA Professional Golf Association and playing the
Speaker 1: Masters in Augusta, Georgia, and Biden said, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: we leave it up to them or something like that. Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, the Masters, I think it is already happening,
Speaker 1: so it's too late for that to be canceled and beat.
Speaker 1: But beyond that, you know, you start to say, Okay,
Speaker 1: what state Now everyone's figured out this game, what state
Speaker 1: are're gonna move it to? That's gonna be so much better.
Speaker 1: You want to make sure those voting laws are far
Speaker 1: more permissive than what you got in Georgia. Good luck
Speaker 1: with that, so that that causes problems for them. But
Speaker 1: who's really pulling the st rings, who's really calling the
Speaker 1: shots in this Biden administration? You know, Amtrak Joe is
Speaker 1: a mediocrity. We're all very aware of that. He's not
Speaker 1: very bright, he doesn't really stand for anything. He's just
Speaker 1: been around forever and does whatever he needs to do.
Speaker 1: He's just the slimy politician. A guy has no particular
Speaker 1: moral or ethical backbone. He's a Catholic who's for abortion
Speaker 1: all nine months of her pregnancy and then talks about
Speaker 1: how his faith guides him and all, I mean, the
Speaker 1: guy's a joke, But who's really calling the shots. You
Speaker 1: got to ask yourself that, and you got to listen
Speaker 1: to this playclip ten. One other question about phone calls.
Speaker 1: His President Biden spoken to President Obama about how to
Speaker 1: pass the infrastructure bill, and his President Obama given him
Speaker 1: any advice on how to pass that bills. They speak regularly.
Speaker 1: They of course we're president and vice president, but they
Speaker 1: are also friends and they share a bond of serving
Speaker 1: through eight years of the Obama Biden administration, but also
Speaker 1: a personal friendship and kinship, and he speaks with him regularly.
Speaker 1: But we're not going to read out those calls. No
Speaker 1: surprise there. Yeah, we're not going to read out those calls.
Speaker 1: This is where you have to understand. The media is
Speaker 1: never going to tell you this openly or honestly, and
Speaker 1: they're going to shout you down for even saying this.
Speaker 1: You might as well have Obama as president. Still. Now
Speaker 1: I know Biden is actually the president and he's in
Speaker 1: the oval office, that he lives in the White House
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. But every major decision and every
Speaker 1: important call that the presidency is gonna make for the
Speaker 1: next four years at least, is really going to be
Speaker 1: decided by Barack husaining Obama. That's they see. Now It's
Speaker 1: all starting to make sense, is it now? It's all
Speaker 1: coming together? Because he wondered, how could the left of
Speaker 1: the Democrats Biden such a loser? But he won? But
Speaker 1: how did that happen? Well, because the Democrat establishment knew
Speaker 1: that he's the perfect guy to be there. Because that
Speaker 1: will mean that Obama's effectively the president from a far
Speaker 1: I mean, he's actually going to be calling the shots. Oh,
Speaker 1: it all makes sense. What Republicans will actually stand up
Speaker 1: against this woke left wing Biden administration madness? Who's really
Speaker 1: willing and able to have this fight and to stay
Speaker 1: in it. Not a lot these days, not a lot
Speaker 1: of people that you see who have a real national
Speaker 1: profile and it seemed like they're to be trusted on
Speaker 1: these policy matters. You know, I'm I'm seeing more and
Speaker 1: more of the of the fallout of what was an
Speaker 1: interview last night on Tucker Carlson's Show, which as you know,
Speaker 1: as the number one cable news show across all all
Speaker 1: channels on cable news by Farm and Tucker Show is
Speaker 1: completely you know, head and shoulders and audience numbers above
Speaker 1: the other shows on Fox and on CNN, m NBC,
Speaker 1: and you start to see why. I mean, it's become
Speaker 1: the place for cable news commentary, Cable news commentary on
Speaker 1: the right, one of the few places where you'll see
Speaker 1: interviews of people on our own side, where they'll be
Speaker 1: asked the questions that need to be asked without without pandering,
Speaker 1: without oh well, you know, you gave us this interview,
Speaker 1: so you know, if if we have to go a
Speaker 1: little soft on you, go a little easy on you,
Speaker 1: you know, we're willing to do that. No, that's not
Speaker 1: what they do over there. We saw Governor Nome go
Speaker 1: on Tucker Carlson Show and try to defend with just gibberish.
Speaker 1: I mean, what she was saying was absurd. It was
Speaker 1: you know, no, it's a trial lawyer's dream and we
Speaker 1: just want to change to a few things here and
Speaker 1: they'll send up. But no, she vetoed it, folks. She
Speaker 1: was she was trying to pull a fast one. She
Speaker 1: got caught. She's a big phony. Sorry, South Dakota corporate interests.
Speaker 1: She wants to be liked by them. She wants those
Speaker 1: board seats, you know, when she's no longer governor. Presidencies
Speaker 1: four years away, that's a big thing to try to
Speaker 1: get involved with, Gonna get a lot of hate. Doesn't
Speaker 1: want to deal with it. Sorry, I know we want.
Speaker 1: I know, we want a Republican female president. And and
Speaker 1: you see somebody who seems well spoken and it's telegenic,
Speaker 1: and you figure, okay, well maybe this is this is it.
Speaker 1: You know, we had Sarah Palin in that in that position,
Speaker 1: generally speaking, didn't work out. Now we Christy Nome. I
Speaker 1: think she's at the national level. I think she's done.
Speaker 1: And I know people have given her a lot of
Speaker 1: credit because South Dakotas stayed pretty open. But I mean
Speaker 1: it's as I've said, it's South Dakota, and South Dakota
Speaker 1: actually has the I think it's the six or seventh
Speaker 1: highest mortality per capita in the country. So South Dakota
Speaker 1: did not actually do very well. If we're really gonna
Speaker 1: if we're really gonna speak truth, which what we do
Speaker 1: on this show didn't do very well against COVID comparative
Speaker 1: compared to other states. You know, Florida, huge state, very dense,
Speaker 1: middle of the per capita mortality nationwide, actually on the
Speaker 1: better half of the fifty states. South Dakota is like
Speaker 1: number I don't know, I haven't checked the numbers in
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks, but it was number five or six,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe number seven last time I checked. That's not
Speaker 1: good for a state that doesn't even have a single
Speaker 1: major city. So yeah, Christine Noam went on air, and
Speaker 1: she tried to she tried to get cute, she tried
Speaker 1: to pull a fast one. She got a little smarmie
Speaker 1: with Tucker, and we saw who she really was and
Speaker 1: I'm not going to forget it. So there's that. And
Speaker 1: then you had this guy, Asa Hutchinson, the governor, another governor.
Speaker 1: I remember, Republicans we like people that are in charge,
Speaker 1: make calls as politicians and elevate them. So we want
Speaker 1: to have governors, usually as president or even an outsider
Speaker 1: JUSI with Trump. Democrats like to have senators. They like
Speaker 1: to have people that are you know, consensus institutionalists and
Speaker 1: elevate them. To look at Joe Biden elevate them to
Speaker 1: the presidential role. I know he was vice president coming
Speaker 1: Oh it's Joe Biden. It's really tough. You had Asa
Speaker 1: Hutchinson on last night and he went into Tucker's thunderdome
Speaker 1: and did not come out well at all. It was
Speaker 1: political nuclear meltdown, and you can watch it. It's about
Speaker 1: nine minutes long. It's all over the internet now you
Speaker 1: watch the clip. And Hutchison really just went in there
Speaker 1: with such a weak argument. I don't know. Maybe he
Speaker 1: hasn't been subjected because he's in Arkansas and it's a
Speaker 1: red state, and maybe he hasn't been subjected to having
Speaker 1: to really debate at a high level in that regard.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I was shocked and how inept the
Speaker 1: guy looked. But this is once again on the issue
Speaker 1: of trans the same thing that got Christy Nomall jammed
Speaker 1: up transgender rights, the new transgender civil rights movement, and
Speaker 1: anybody who's looking at the actual data and numbers would say,
Speaker 1: hold on that, we've had a two thousand percent increase
Speaker 1: in in teen and adolescent gender dysphoria and child gender
Speaker 1: just for it, two thousand percent increase of the last
Speaker 1: ten years hmm. I mean, you know, this is what
Speaker 1: you start to say, is there's something in in in
Speaker 1: our drinking water, or are we in the in the
Speaker 1: midst of a moral a moral fashion that has turned
Speaker 1: into a moral panic. And that's why there's all this
Speaker 1: pressure on kids. Social contagion among kids. They see other
Speaker 1: kids get a lot of attention for this, or they
Speaker 1: have strange emotions or feelings at that age, I don't
Speaker 1: how to process it. No, not only not allowed to
Speaker 1: talk about it. Remember there are some things. All you
Speaker 1: have to know is when when they won't let you
Speaker 1: have a conversation about something that matters, then you really
Speaker 1: need to have the conversation. And this is yet another
Speaker 1: instance of that. This is another another moment, another period
Speaker 1: where you'd say oh okay. And that then brings me
Speaker 1: to what happened with Asa Hutchinson, governor of Arkansas. So
Speaker 1: he vetoed and was overridden by his own state legislatures.
Speaker 1: So they were able to override the veto of the
Speaker 1: governor on this one. So Republicans, the state of Arkansas
Speaker 1: and the state legislature, they're saying no, no, no, we're
Speaker 1: actually supporting this, which means you say, well, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, how could Asa Hutchinson get this thing so wrong?
Speaker 1: What's really his argument about this? Well, here's just a
Speaker 1: piece of what was about a nine minute long interview.
Speaker 1: Play three issues that you have to address the legislature,
Speaker 1: you make judgment calls on it. But we also try
Speaker 1: to restrain ourselves as conservatives, is that we don't have
Speaker 1: to be involved in every issue. And if you want
Speaker 1: to broaden the party, if you want to get back
Speaker 1: to the principles, then let's at least think through in
Speaker 1: a reasoned way as to whether this is the right
Speaker 1: bill to interfere with parents and doctor's decisions on a
Speaker 1: healthcare matter, as you pointed out, as does not have
Speaker 1: thorough research in every area, and so I yield to
Speaker 1: that whatever you look at this bill, if I yield
Speaker 1: to the lack of research, really quick. Ten years ago,
Speaker 1: if somebody had said, hey, As Hutchinson, you're gonna be
Speaker 1: governor of Arkansas and you're going to veto a bill
Speaker 1: that would have protected children from chemical castration, what do
Speaker 1: you think you would have said, Well, just like I
Speaker 1: said today, if you're talking about a reassignment surgery, I
Speaker 1: would have signed that bill in a minute. But whenever
Speaker 1: you're talking about maybe less than two hundred kids in
Speaker 1: Arkansas that's currently on hormone treatment and they are immediately
Speaker 1: cut off without having a grandfather clause in this legislation.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's treating those kids, or their parents,
Speaker 1: or their healthcare providers fairly or equally. So here's a
Speaker 1: Republican governor of a very Republican state who is videoing
Speaker 1: legislation from fellow Republican legislature legislators because he wants to
Speaker 1: make sure that the small, relatively small number of children
Speaker 1: who are on drugs that are given to people, given
Speaker 1: to adults to chemically castrate them. These are hormone blocking
Speaker 1: drugs with enormous emotional and physical implications. They're giving this
Speaker 1: to kids, and he won't say we won't. We can't
Speaker 1: do this in our state anymore. As Tucker pointed out
Speaker 1: in the interview, you can't give a fifteen year old,
Speaker 1: you know, a glass of Johnny Walker, doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you think they're really mature or whatever. Nope, you're not
Speaker 1: not allowed to give kids that. You can't let twelve
Speaker 1: year olds get married, you know, there are rules out
Speaker 1: there for children. Doesn't matter what the parents and the
Speaker 1: doctors thing. But no, no, we won't take a stand
Speaker 1: on this issue because we want to we want to
Speaker 1: make room for them. When I say we, I'm talking
Speaker 1: about this is the argument Asa Hutchinson's making. He wants
Speaker 1: to make sure there's room for radical transgender ideology to affect,
Speaker 1: to really sacrifice our children on the altar of that
Speaker 1: radical transgender ideologology. And this is an ideological thing. This
Speaker 1: is why when a peer reviewed paper on contagion among
Speaker 1: children with transgender contagion, where when one kid comes out
Speaker 1: as transgender, all of a sudden, there's all these other
Speaker 1: kids in the class that are much much more likely
Speaker 1: to come out as transgender. When when that paper came
Speaker 1: out of Brown University, they had to shut it down
Speaker 1: a race it from the internet right away because normal
Speaker 1: people would see that and say, hmm, is this a
Speaker 1: meaning transgenderism for children? Is this a social construct being
Speaker 1: imposed on children by adults, or is this really a
Speaker 1: critical human rights issue of basic identity? You know, I'm
Speaker 1: I'm wondering, you know, at what point? I mean, the
Speaker 1: medical profession has lost a lot of credibility over the
Speaker 1: course of the pandemic from doctors and I'm going to
Speaker 1: be specific here from doctors who one minute or telling
Speaker 1: you don't leave your house, don't go outside. It's reckless
Speaker 1: and you're putting lives at risk. You know, that was
Speaker 1: last April as May, a year ago. But then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, you know, Black Lives Matter protesters are
Speaker 1: out there in the streets, and the same mds are saying, well,
Speaker 1: this is actually saving lives, so sure, go out gather
Speaker 1: in big groups. It's fine. Now we've seen that doctors scientists,
Speaker 1: just like any other profession are subject to politicization, are
Speaker 1: subject to biases and personal prejudices that comes into their work.
Speaker 1: But people try to cover over that. They try to
Speaker 1: cover it up. They want to elevate this priesthood of
Speaker 1: the scientists in order to control all of us. And
Speaker 1: I mean, I can tell you that Marxism as an
Speaker 1: ideology is built upon pseudo scientific language. They try to
Speaker 1: create mechanized structures for language and thinking to make it
Speaker 1: seem like this is reasonable, rational, makes sense, be good,
Speaker 1: And they use a lot of big serious They use
Speaker 1: a lot of fancy, big words for what amounts to
Speaker 1: a complete ignorance of actual human nature history and what
Speaker 1: will create a good society, but they create a pseudoscientific
Speaker 1: jargon around Marxism in order to make it seem more credible.
Speaker 1: What does that? Who does that remind you of? As
Speaker 1: we sit here talking about intersectionality. Wait, when people who
Speaker 1: are woke speak, do they use words that are either
Speaker 1: new constructs, things like cis gender and I mentioned intersectionality,
Speaker 1: you know, transgender, human rights, human rights causes. You look
Speaker 1: at the way they speak about that issue and things
Speaker 1: that are said, and there's always this evolution of language
Speaker 1: meant to gender dysphory as opposed to gender identity disorder.
Speaker 1: They change the language in order to make it seem
Speaker 1: like there's a scientific and rational basis behind this, when
Speaker 1: really it's just about control and shutting down argument, shutting
Speaker 1: down debate, and ignoring what is true, what is reasonable,
Speaker 1: and what is right. Asa Hutchinson is either not very
Speaker 1: smart or a coward or both. And he was exposed
Speaker 1: on Tucker Carlson's show in a way that I think
Speaker 1: anybody who's anybody who's thinking about running for president and
Speaker 1: the Republican ticket should have to go on TV and
Speaker 1: explain important decisions like this and get real questions asked
Speaker 1: one of my big concerns, one of my big problems
Speaker 1: with what's happened in media in general is we do
Speaker 1: not debate anymore. There are people will not risk their brands.
Speaker 1: You will not have any nobody these days who has
Speaker 1: a lot of followers and is making you a lot
Speaker 1: of money in media or making a really good living
Speaker 1: in media. No one will put themselves in a position
Speaker 1: where they have to, on a level playing field, with
Speaker 1: equal time, really throw down with somebody over what they're saying,
Speaker 1: what they believe. And it's one of the things when
Speaker 1: I first got into this business, I always was saying,
Speaker 1: I want to get out there. I want to be
Speaker 1: in debates. I don't want to debate you know, emotionally
Speaker 1: fragile nineteen year olds from some third tier state university somewhere.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know, conservatives all like that stuff. That's no.
Speaker 1: I actually want to go up in debate. You know,
Speaker 1: I'll debate Joe Scarborough or Rachel Maddower And I know
Speaker 1: that's oh, we're too big and important to debate that guy.
Speaker 1: Although you know, really, but you know, pick somebody, Pick
Speaker 1: somebody who's legitimate, Pick somebody who really represents the left,
Speaker 1: who wants to have a debate on these issues. There
Speaker 1: is no form, there's no place going on CNN as
Speaker 1: a conservative to get shouted over and smeared for three
Speaker 1: minutes before they go to commercial breaks. You can see
Speaker 1: your new Toyota. I mean, that doesn't count going on
Speaker 1: the Bill Bar Show where you have four crazy libs
Speaker 1: including the host, all shouting over you and cursing and
Speaker 1: everything else. That doesn't count. We do not have debates anymore,
Speaker 1: and it is lower it's lowering the level of our
Speaker 1: intellectual discourse. And it's also it also means I mean, look,
Speaker 1: there there are some Republican voices. I mentioned Asa Hutchinson,
Speaker 1: but there are Republican politicians and media stars who are
Speaker 1: just not very smart, not very good, don't know the ideology,
Speaker 1: don't know what they're saying. They just see whatever the
Speaker 1: hashtag is that's trending, and they shot. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: a real thing that exists in the party, and yet
Speaker 1: we and in our discourse in general. But I don't
Speaker 1: know how. I don't know how we change it. You know,
Speaker 1: I feel like everyone now is we're all in our
Speaker 1: own corners, listening to our own propaganda machines, echo chamber
Speaker 1: effect all the time. I wish we could have, you know,
Speaker 1: live debates, televised debates, gather in real places, have people
Speaker 1: that have followings and people that believe in them. You
Speaker 1: know you're gonna win some, you're gonna lose some too,
Speaker 1: And I know that no, not every issue. As a conservative,
Speaker 1: you're gonna be in a place where you make the
Speaker 1: case and you know fifty one percent of that audience
Speaker 1: gonna agree with you. That's but otherwise we get Asa
Speaker 1: Hutchinson saying well or else not conservative to do the Yeah,
Speaker 1: the guy was a joke. If George Floyd's murderer is
Speaker 1: not sentenced, just know that all hell is going to
Speaker 1: break loose. Don't be surprised when buildings are on fire.
Speaker 1: That is a prominent Black Lives Matter activist named Maya
Speaker 1: Eccles on TikTok, and I have to wonder I should
Speaker 1: check and see if that was allowed to stay on
Speaker 1: the TikTok platform. I'm sure if you are a woke
Speaker 1: leftist you can basically threaten bloody revolution in America. But
Speaker 1: as long as your politics are left wing, social media
Speaker 1: platforms will will give you whatever whatever leeway they can.
Speaker 1: They they'll let you stay on the platforms. You know,
Speaker 1: the same reasons that you have for Trump being banned
Speaker 1: from Twitter forever, for example. But the Mullahs of Tehran,
Speaker 1: their mouthpieces are still on Twitter. They're still online right there.
Speaker 1: There are true dictatorships, authoritarian regimes, they are able to
Speaker 1: stay on the Twitter platform and say all kinds of
Speaker 1: lies and terrible things. But no, no, they only it's
Speaker 1: only Americans silencing Americans on these platforms. Conservatives, of course,
Speaker 1: that's what ends up happening. But not if you're left wing.
Speaker 1: You say whatever you want. I just I want to know.
Speaker 1: I know we did a bit of a deep dive
Speaker 1: into where we are with this trial yesterday. But here's
Speaker 1: what I'll say in the meantime, based on the transcripts.
Speaker 1: I'm not watching it live. I don't have the time
Speaker 1: to watch it live. I'm reading transcripts and reading analysis
Speaker 1: of reading court transcripts and analysis of what's happened every day.
Speaker 1: And there is certainly reasonable doubt about officers chauvin In
Speaker 1: murdering somebody. Okay, there's reasonable doubt. That's not the same
Speaker 1: thing as me saying I approve of what he did
Speaker 1: or I think he handled it the right way, or no,
Speaker 1: that's not the same thing. There is definitely reasonable when
Speaker 1: when you can't even be one hundred percent certain about
Speaker 1: the actual cause of death in a situation like this,
Speaker 1: that that alone would rise to reasonable doubt. But but
Speaker 1: I want to be very clear. The media is reporting
Speaker 1: on this like it's a slam dunk. The corporate media
Speaker 1: is acting like this will be the gravest injustice imaginable
Speaker 1: based upon what's actually being presented as evidence, and they're avoiding,
Speaker 1: they're editing out, they're they're skipping past the places in
Speaker 1: all of this where there's a real defense being made
Speaker 1: here of Chauvin. I mean, his defense attorney's actually doing
Speaker 1: a pretty solid job. And all it takes is one
Speaker 1: person on that jury to believe that reasonable doubt is
Speaker 1: actually the standard, and you might have at least a
Speaker 1: hung jury. And we know if that happened. They're already
Speaker 1: telling us, the left is already telling us there will
Speaker 1: be massive riots. What a sad and disgraceful thing for
Speaker 1: this country where there are threats of riots openly because
Speaker 1: of one criminal case that may not go the way
Speaker 1: the left wants. The fact that there is increasingly obvious
Speaker 1: desire from the Democrat party to control everything about your life.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is why the pandemic, I think, has
Speaker 1: been such a moment of clarity for those of us
Speaker 1: who see what's really going on here. Where Democrats have
Speaker 1: no problem telling you how you are able to breathe,
Speaker 1: Democrats have no problem telling you where you can go,
Speaker 1: who you can see, your own family. There is nothing
Speaker 1: that the statest authoritarian mentality thinks is beyond their control,
Speaker 1: beyond what should be able to be dictated by them.
Speaker 1: And this is what's so troubling for me. They don't
Speaker 1: shy away from this at all. In fact, I think
Speaker 1: they're drunk with power. I think they really like it.
Speaker 1: And now we're seeing that communication corporations, so many different
Speaker 1: areas of American life are controlled by people who are
Speaker 1: who are absurd. I mean, their arguments are just simply obtuse,
Speaker 1: but they really are devoted to this stuff. There's a
Speaker 1: mass moral panic going on that the Left is always pushing,
Speaker 1: and there's a mob mentality at the heart of all
Speaker 1: of this. And it's time that we understand what we
Speaker 1: really face. And one of the issues that I keep
Speaker 1: coming back to is about big tech and how you
Speaker 1: need to protect your privacy from big tech because you
Speaker 1: don't even know how down the line they're really going
Speaker 1: to come after you. And you can anonymize all your
Speaker 1: activity online. You can actually hide your IP address, and
Speaker 1: you can encrypt all of your online all of your
Speaker 1: online activity and data possible with express VPN because Express
Speaker 1: VPN make sure that companies can't see my IP address.
Speaker 1: I've got this all my devices. It's so easy to
Speaker 1: set up and so straightforward, and then my identity is anonymized,
Speaker 1: so you're not under this constant monitoring and censorship from
Speaker 1: the left. The same way, stop handing over your data
Speaker 1: to big tech companies in the government. Defend your rights
Speaker 1: with the VPN I trust for online protection. Visit express
Speaker 1: vpn dot com slash buck that's Express vpn dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. To get three extra months free, just go
Speaker 1: to express vpn dot com slash buck. You get three
Speaker 1: extra months free on a one year package. You know,
Speaker 1: Republicans shrank Colcola two and we fly and we like baseball.
Speaker 1: Taking a position on a highly incendiary issue like that
Speaker 1: and punishing a community or a state because you don't
Speaker 1: like a particular law that count I just think it's stupid.
Speaker 1: I like where Mitch McConnell's trying to go with this,
Speaker 1: but so far he's wrong. So far what he's saying
Speaker 1: isn't actually the truth, and we need to come to
Speaker 1: grips with this. When there's an issue like this that
Speaker 1: comes up, there's always this moment where conservatives will say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, we're outraged about it, and we're going to
Speaker 1: do something about it. And I'm just gonna tell you,
Speaker 1: we really don't do anything about it. Historically, we don't
Speaker 1: do very much. We keep flying on these airlines. We
Speaker 1: don't cut you know, cut off our subscription to whatever
Speaker 1: the company is. We don't take an action here, and
Speaker 1: that's why they keep getting away with it. In fact,
Speaker 1: I always tell you about looking at the incentives, look
Speaker 1: at the incentive structure. And when you understand the incentives
Speaker 1: for these corporations, the people at the very top have
Speaker 1: a social incentive. Now that's not just the folks at
Speaker 1: the country club for the Delta air Lines or Coca
Speaker 1: Cola or MLB CEO or commissioner or whatever who are
Speaker 1: going to be nice to them. Remember that these the
Speaker 1: people who run these companies their subject to what the
Speaker 1: board says. They're subject with. The board of directors votes
Speaker 1: on it and decides, and that's something that is socially influenced, right,
Speaker 1: they can be removed at the people on that board think, oh,
Speaker 1: you're not woke enough. And so the elites in our
Speaker 1: society now have adopted because they're non As you know,
Speaker 1: our elites tend to be non religious. They are a
Speaker 1: lot of a lot of atheists, whether they're open about
Speaker 1: it or not running major companies. Does anyone really think,
Speaker 1: like Jeff Bezos is a religious guy. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: you look at these people. They're non religious, but beyond that,
Speaker 1: their religion has actually become this woke, civic minded, left wing,
Speaker 1: politically correct garbage. That's what they've replaced it with, end
Speaker 1: climate change and these causes. They've replaced the existential or
Speaker 1: the existential void that exists in human beings that can
Speaker 1: be filled with the relationship with God and the everlasting
Speaker 1: They've replaced it with these corporate identity politics shibboleths. And
Speaker 1: so it's very important for the CEO's very important for
Speaker 1: the chairman of the board and when they're thinking about
Speaker 1: these issues to try to make sure that the people
Speaker 1: that can make decisions about their future view them favorably
Speaker 1: through that lens, and then beyond that. And this is
Speaker 1: the part that I think is even harder for people
Speaker 1: to understand. Sometimes wokeness has been shown to be beneficial
Speaker 1: to the bottom line of these companies because we don't
Speaker 1: act on our politics, because that's not how we think
Speaker 1: we think of I want to buy the best milk
Speaker 1: I can buy when I go to the store. I
Speaker 1: don't care about whatever you know, PSA, my Dairy Farmers
Speaker 1: Association or something, but I just want the best milk. Okay,
Speaker 1: I wanted a good price. I'm with the best milk. Democrats,
Speaker 1: they they have tied in their identity to their politics
Speaker 1: and expect everyone they're interacting with to do the same
Speaker 1: and to share their politics. That's the only acceptable way.
Speaker 1: So they do care about whatever you know, soy milk
Speaker 1: they're drinking that, the soy farmers are putting out the right,
Speaker 1: you know, collective statement on this stuff. It does matter
Speaker 1: to them and they will buy from woke companies. Nike.
Speaker 1: Remember during the Colin Kaepernick thing, this is a perfect example.
Speaker 1: Nike took the position that they were gonna be They're
Speaker 1: gonna make Colin Kaepernick a supers that this guy was
Speaker 1: like a mediocre quarterback during his time, had a couple
Speaker 1: of good years, then he got old, he wasn't as good,
Speaker 1: and now he's become this civil rights hero or something
Speaker 1: in the sports world. The guy's preposterous, but he's more
Speaker 1: wealthy and powerful than he's ever been. Because of this,
Speaker 1: Nike actually did better, at least in the early sales.
Speaker 1: Nike wasn't boycott because of Kaepernick. That never happened, and
Speaker 1: a lot of young leftists figured that this was now.
Speaker 1: It was now cool. It wasn't just a question if
Speaker 1: you want good Nike sneakers. It was now cool to
Speaker 1: support this Colin kaeperna cause. So what I'm telling you
Speaker 1: is that we need to face reality here. Woke ink
Speaker 1: makes more money sometimes from what they do. We have
Speaker 1: to stop that. That shouldn't be the case, but sometimes
Speaker 1: it is the case. And you have to understand these
Speaker 1: incentive structures. There's the social incentives and then there's the
Speaker 1: bottom line financial incentive structures in place. This is why
Speaker 1: I keep telling you, and yes it is absolutely in
Speaker 1: my immediate interest to tell you this. The sponsors we
Speaker 1: advertise on this show are all to every single one
Speaker 1: of them are standing with free speech, standing with the
Speaker 1: rights of people in America to hold conservative views. If
Speaker 1: they didn't, they would not be advertising with me. If
Speaker 1: they didn't believe in the First Amendment. I didn't believe
Speaker 1: in the free free expression of ideas, and they weren't
Speaker 1: believers in what I do here, which is speak the
Speaker 1: truth as I can, as I know it and hold
Speaker 1: myself to real standards of decency and integrity and what
Speaker 1: I do. They're supporting me by sponsoring this show in
Speaker 1: different ways. You can support what we do here by
Speaker 1: actually buying those products in any area where you actually
Speaker 1: have some kind of a need. And I'm not going
Speaker 1: to go here and start listing all of our sponsors,
Speaker 1: but I'm being serious when I tell you that is
Speaker 1: a way you are voting for what you're listening to.
Speaker 1: To stay on the here. That is the way you
Speaker 1: are voting through the market, through your actions, you know,
Speaker 1: and whatever the products may be. Or you can just
Speaker 1: keep on buying from Woke Inc. Keep buying from Woking
Speaker 1: and see what happens. See see how how many you know,
Speaker 1: good media options you'll have out there? Right This This
Speaker 1: is the world we're living in. Out we have to
Speaker 1: understand we are defending ending on our own ten yard line.
Speaker 1: The Left has pushed us way into the corner in
Speaker 1: the media and in corporate America. You know, the diversity
Speaker 1: stuff is completely The diversity mantra has overtaken all corporate
Speaker 1: hiring practice. United Airlines just put out today some statement
Speaker 1: about how in the next ten years, fifty percent of
Speaker 1: their pilots are going to be either minorities or women.
Speaker 1: And I sit here and this is a very it
Speaker 1: seems like a relatively oh, you know, just another statement
Speaker 1: from some will corporation. But no, think about this for
Speaker 1: a moment. What do you care about when it comes
Speaker 1: to a pilot? What matters to you when you're on
Speaker 1: a plane about that pilot? Do you even see? I mean,
Speaker 1: I think ninety percent of the time I'm on an airplane,
Speaker 1: I never even see what the pilot looks like. I
Speaker 1: have no idea what the pilot looks like, who the
Speaker 1: pilot is, or anything else. But what matters do you?
Speaker 1: I think we could all agree, all reasonable rational people
Speaker 1: can agree. All that matters is that this person, whoever
Speaker 1: it is, male or female or whatever, this person is
Speaker 1: highly competent and skilled at their job and has a
Speaker 1: work history of being responsible, being efficient, being on it.
Speaker 1: All I care is that I have the best pilot
Speaker 1: I could reasonably have in charge of my life and
Speaker 1: the lives of the other you know, one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty people or whatever on that jet, that's all I
Speaker 1: care about. I care about their color or gender, zero
Speaker 1: percent makes absolutely no difference to me whatsoever. And I
Speaker 1: really mean that to the point where if we only had,
Speaker 1: you know, female Filipino pilots on the United Airlines who
Speaker 1: just happen to be the best at it. For whatever reading,
Speaker 1: I'm just making making up a scenario here, I'd say, great,
Speaker 1: they're the best pilots. That's what I want. I only
Speaker 1: want those people to be the pilots. If they're the best,
Speaker 1: I don't care, it doesn't matter to me. And it's
Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, we're all look
Speaker 1: at this saying, it really matters to you that you
Speaker 1: not be involved in a crash and possibly die in
Speaker 1: a fiery wreck, And that actually should matter to people
Speaker 1: a whole heck of a lot more than that that little,
Speaker 1: that little hit of serotonin you get of the self,
Speaker 1: that moment of self congratulation. You have to go, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm woke, Yeah, I'm all about diversity. Yeah that's great. Okay,
Speaker 1: well do you want the plane to land or not.
Speaker 1: But this is a perfect example of the way that
Speaker 1: they're they're subverting truth and objective fact in reality here,
Speaker 1: because if they're hiring the best based on the objective
Speaker 1: metrics and standards they have at United Airlines, they don't
Speaker 1: need to put out some statement like this because we
Speaker 1: just know they're hiring the best. But what it turns
Speaker 1: into is affirmative action, which is when they change standards,
Speaker 1: they say, we're not changing standards, and then they say
Speaker 1: when people point out that they are lying and they
Speaker 1: have changed standards, it's sexist or racist or whatever happens
Speaker 1: time and time again. We all see this, we are
Speaker 1: aware of this. But remember there is a war on
Speaker 1: observation in our society, a war on observing what is
Speaker 1: right in front of your face. You are not allowed
Speaker 1: to observe, you are told to obey. And so when
Speaker 1: United Airlines puts this out and people say, well, hold on,
Speaker 1: why are fifty percent. First of all, it's kind of
Speaker 1: an arbitrary number, but why are fifty percent going to
Speaker 1: be women and minorities over the next ten years. If
Speaker 1: you're just training the best people you can possibly get,
Speaker 1: you have no idea where those numbers will look like
Speaker 1: Demogo graphically over the next day. You have no idea
Speaker 1: United airlines. So why make that projection? Well, because they
Speaker 1: make that projection, and then to fit their numbers into
Speaker 1: that projection, they will change standards. We've gone through this
Speaker 1: with the military now so many times too. On the
Speaker 1: gender issue. They say, oh no, no, women in frontline
Speaker 1: combat roles, they'll meet all the same standards of readiness
Speaker 1: as you know marines deployed on the front line, and
Speaker 1: the infantry, they'll meet all the same standards. And then
Speaker 1: we actually play this experiment out and women are injured
Speaker 1: at a huge rate. Women can't meet the standards, so
Speaker 1: they change the standards. And then when the people that
Speaker 1: said you're going to change the standards are right, they
Speaker 1: say why are you so sexist? Not why were you right? Wow,
Speaker 1: we should listen to you. But this is yet yet
Speaker 1: another example, yet another instance of where the truth does
Speaker 1: not matter to the left. It's about the narrative. They
Speaker 1: are telling stories in society that make them feel good
Speaker 1: and that increase their power, and you either go along
Speaker 1: with that or you get attacked. You're either on board
Speaker 1: for this or you're the problem. The thing that showed
Speaker 1: that their narrative was a piece of horse maneure, and
Speaker 1: it shows you how dishonest these are smear merchants. That's
Speaker 1: why nobody trusts corporate media. They are a disaster in
Speaker 1: what they're doing. They knew what they were doing was
Speaker 1: a lie. I knew what they were doing was a lie.
Speaker 1: Everybody here knows what they were doing is a lie.
Speaker 1: They know that we know they're lying, and yet they
Speaker 1: continue to lie, and they lied, and they lied and
Speaker 1: they lied. We've offered them the information and they declined
Speaker 1: to interview the key people because they didn't want to
Speaker 1: let go the narrative. Well guess what, There's gonna be
Speaker 1: consequences for that. How we're not I know, corporate media
Speaker 1: thinks that they can just run over people. He ain't
Speaker 1: running over this governor. I'm punching back. It's great, isn't it.
Speaker 1: Desantist knows the game, knows what they're trying to do,
Speaker 1: and is going to fight back. Look this, my friends,
Speaker 1: this guy, this guy could be president. He's formidable, he's committed,
Speaker 1: he gets it, he's good at his job. And it's
Speaker 1: so funny. I know, are folks down in w IOD
Speaker 1: in w FLA as they hear this, are probably like, no, no,
Speaker 1: don't take our governor. And I get it. I understand.
Speaker 1: You have as a governor of the state of Florida
Speaker 1: the best Republican politician right now in terms of leadership
Speaker 1: and results and putting points on the board. The best
Speaker 1: Republican governor, the best Republican politician really in the country.
Speaker 1: And you know the guy, he's he's young, he's got
Speaker 1: some vitality, he knows how to handle the media. He's
Speaker 1: in a key state. There's a lot here, folks, there's
Speaker 1: a lot here. And it's it's early days, I know,
Speaker 1: but here it's perfect, don't you see. You have the
Speaker 1: Trump infrastrure. Infrastructure is in Florida now largely Trump's at Marlago.
Speaker 1: All that has to happen is Desantists becomes Trump's guy
Speaker 1: in this and we have that merger and Trump becomes
Speaker 1: that kingmaker with Desantists going forward, with his record of
Speaker 1: the pandemic, his record the state of Florida, I mean
Speaker 1: Florida is booming, right, this is a Florida's booming. You know,
Speaker 1: Newsome and Cuomo are are fighting, you know, fighting massive
Speaker 1: disasters on their watch all the time of their own
Speaker 1: making largely, and and yet you know, Florida is absolutely booming.
Speaker 1: Everyone's leaving California New York and moving to Florida. And
Speaker 1: it's such an important, important situation that's unfolding before the
Speaker 1: oasy American people. And yet oh, here's here's uh speaking
Speaker 1: of Governor Gavin Newsom. He's opening up in June, they're saying,
Speaker 1: And all of a sudden, everyone's going, wait a second,
Speaker 1: does that have anything to do with the fact that
Speaker 1: you're really having a tough time here keeping your job?
Speaker 1: Play seven. California has been slower than other states in
Speaker 1: the nation to reopen schools and reopen businesses. What do
Speaker 1: you say to parents and business owners who feel like
Speaker 1: you'll let them down. Well, nine thousand of eleven thousand
Speaker 1: schools have either reopened for in person instruction or a
Speaker 1: set of date to reopen for in person instruction. But
Speaker 1: they've been out of school for more than a year
Speaker 1: now at this point. Other states have been back for months. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So We put out a blueprint in December six point
Speaker 1: six billion dollars to dress learning loss, and we are
Speaker 1: looking to extend the school year. It looks like you're
Speaker 1: going to face a recall election in a few months.
Speaker 1: I met some business owners who are supporting the recall
Speaker 1: effort against you because they feel like the decisions you
Speaker 1: made destroyed their livelihoods. Now, we put two point five
Speaker 1: billion dollars in small business grants. Californi is the first
Speaker 1: state to do a state at home order. We have
Speaker 1: him on the lowest death rates of the major states
Speaker 1: in the country. We think we're better position than most
Speaker 1: other states to come roaring back, and we're providing record
Speaker 1: amount of relief and support for small businesses. Has the
Speaker 1: recall effort influenced your decisions in pandemic response. Absolutely not.
Speaker 1: In fact, quite the contrary. We're just focused on the
Speaker 1: data's disease prevalenced. I'm focused on what's actually happening on
Speaker 1: the ground. He is such a smooth talker, isn't he
Speaker 1: that Gavin Newsom. It's all bullcrap. Of course, this guy
Speaker 1: knows he's in trouble. He's going to face a recall
Speaker 1: and they should recall him, because it was when it
Speaker 1: was what the left wanted, when it was what the
Speaker 1: corporate media was pushing. He was all about, all about
Speaker 1: telling everybody to mask up and lock down everything else.
Speaker 1: And then we saw what a fraud he was. While
Speaker 1: he was making restaurants shutdown, he was doing indoor dining
Speaker 1: in French laundry. And so I realized, he better get
Speaker 1: things open up. He better improved the situation in California quickly,
Speaker 1: and sure enough. May not be it may not be enough, actually,
Speaker 1: but you've got the different governors because the state's really
Speaker 1: mattered during this pandemic. Your state leadership made a whole
Speaker 1: heck of a lot of difference to your life, in
Speaker 1: your livelihood in the past year. And Governor Newsom and
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo, Governor Murphy, Governor Whitmer absolutely awful. Governor Abbott
Speaker 1: maybe b minus. My man Ron de Santis a plus.
Speaker 1: Our friend Ned Ryan is in the mix. He is
Speaker 1: the founder of American Majority, and he knows the political
Speaker 1: seeing backwards and forwards. My man, Ned, great to have
Speaker 1: you back. Could be back with you, Buck. Yeah, interesting,
Speaker 1: very interesting times. We live in as usual, and I
Speaker 1: would hate to be bored but some of this stuff
Speaker 1: is getting ridiculous, specially on woke corporation front us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I want to ask you about this because here, here's
Speaker 1: here's where I think we are. People now realize that
Speaker 1: the biggest wealthiest corporations in America are by a pretty
Speaker 1: wide margin left wing controlled, leftist in terms of their
Speaker 1: politics and their wokeness. But here's the thing. We talk
Speaker 1: about this as conservatives, ned, but I feel like we
Speaker 1: don't really do anything. I feel like, you know, people
Speaker 1: still they still you know, they still buy the same
Speaker 1: products from the same places. They don't actually take collective action,
Speaker 1: they don't actually come together, and we don't boycott. Do
Speaker 1: you see it that way? And and do you think
Speaker 1: regardless of whether we do this or not, there's there's
Speaker 1: space for us to actually start to impose costs on
Speaker 1: companies that do not share our beliefs. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think there's a couple of different angles. But because I've
Speaker 1: been thinking about this, you know, as watching the whole
Speaker 1: situation in Georgia with the new election laws, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, you know, and impress movement, but not exactly
Speaker 1: a model that we want to follow across the board.
Speaker 1: But hey, okay, step in the right direction, but you
Speaker 1: would think it's the apocalypse, the end of the world,
Speaker 1: you know. Delta steps into it and Georgia legislators are like, fine,
Speaker 1: we're going to remove your tax credits, your tax breaks
Speaker 1: here in Georgia. Fantastic. I'm you know, meat buck, I'm like,
Speaker 1: if they're gonna if they want to play these political games,
Speaker 1: these corporations, they've been given a lot of benefits, tax breaks,
Speaker 1: all these things, why don't we start taking them away?
Speaker 1: So there's that one thing where Republican legislators need to
Speaker 1: really take a hard look at are these actually allies?
Speaker 1: Are they are friends anymore? And I think that's something
Speaker 1: else I want to explore here in a little bit.
Speaker 1: So that's the one thing, go at them where it
Speaker 1: really hurts on tax credits. But yeah, I think conservatives
Speaker 1: I've come to the point we don't buy Nike products
Speaker 1: anymore in this house. And it's one of those things
Speaker 1: where obviously, over the last couple years has become very
Speaker 1: apparent that this the woke Nike corporation that wants to
Speaker 1: lecture us on a whole variety that issues, is actually
Speaker 1: having a lot of its products made by weaker slave
Speaker 1: labor in China for a lot less than it would
Speaker 1: be made here on shore. So please don't try to
Speaker 1: election me. You work corporations as though you have some
Speaker 1: moral high grounds, and I think that's the thing. I
Speaker 1: think that's the approach a lot of us need to
Speaker 1: take effects. I've got buddies who have taken the same approach.
Speaker 1: We're not going to buy Nike products anymore. In fact,
Speaker 1: they've gone and taken it a step further. They're not
Speaker 1: going to buy products that are made in China. So
Speaker 1: I think we have to start using the power of
Speaker 1: the purse and say we're not going to put up
Speaker 1: with this anymore. You guys are actually trying to compel
Speaker 1: us on a whole host of fronts politically and also
Speaker 1: on the speech front and behavioral front. We don't have
Speaker 1: to take this from you anymore. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I really think a lot of these woke corporations, even
Speaker 1: the Chamber of Commerce. I mean, it's come to the
Speaker 1: point where they've gotten so many benefits from the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: They kind of Benedict Arnold the Republican Party, especially in
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty elections. We're speaking of Ned Ryan, founder
Speaker 1: of American majority. Ned, how is it that we have
Speaker 1: gotten to this point in in what we're talking about here,
Speaker 1: where there's so many more corporations that are left wing
Speaker 1: and that are running. Mean, whether it's you know, it's Uber,
Speaker 1: it's Google, it's Delta, it's American Express, it's Nike, it's
Speaker 1: United Airlines, it's it's it's Apple, it's Amazon. I mean
Speaker 1: you just go, You're like, oh my gosh. And these
Speaker 1: are the these are the companies that in recent years
Speaker 1: have really been you know, the big cause a lot
Speaker 1: of the the the upswing and the stock market. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are really powerful companies, and yet they're so clearly
Speaker 1: backing the Democrats. The dollars that are going to candidates
Speaker 1: show this. And yet we still have this idea out there.
Speaker 1: There's still this narrative that Republicans are the chrony capitalists
Speaker 1: controlled by the big corporations. I mean, how do we
Speaker 1: turn that around? But also, I mean, is that a
Speaker 1: part of it? Just that there are a lot of
Speaker 1: Republicans that want the scraps from the Chamber of Commerce
Speaker 1: table so speak. No, no, totally, I mean, just so
Speaker 1: there's a there's a couple of things on package your buck.
Speaker 1: First of all, has been a wrong way of thinking
Speaker 1: in Republican and conservative circles for years, and I think
Speaker 1: it's really boiled down to this. We've mistaken corporatism for capitalism. Right,
Speaker 1: so these chrony capitalists, we've say, oh, no, you know,
Speaker 1: they're private corporations, it's an industry, it's free enterprise as
Speaker 1: entrepreneurs have. No, they're chrony capitalist monopolies, especially when you
Speaker 1: describe the big tech companies, and it's not capitalism. I
Speaker 1: make this argument to a lot of libertarians. Know, these
Speaker 1: private corporations have become monopolies. You cannot have a free
Speaker 1: market dynamic when monopolies are dominating the marketplace. So you know,
Speaker 1: specifically with big tech companies. I think Republicans that better
Speaker 1: get righteous on this and understand it's a tradition for
Speaker 1: Republicans to break monopolies and be antitrust. Dido Roosevelt, Ronald
Speaker 1: Reagan take a strong stance on this. But you know
Speaker 1: what the problem is, book, A lot of these guys
Speaker 1: are taking Google cash and Facebook cash. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you start to break it down, how some of these
Speaker 1: conservative organizations, but even our elected officials. I wrote a
Speaker 1: piece that there's a couple of pieces Ago to American
Speaker 1: greatness spelling out I love Jim Jordan to death. I
Speaker 1: think Jim Jordan is a rock star in a variety
Speaker 1: of France. You can't be taking ten thousand dollars of
Speaker 1: Google money in the twenty twenty election expect me to
Speaker 1: actually think you're going to be correct on some of
Speaker 1: the tech issues. So I think we've got to completely
Speaker 1: re examine our approach on as a corporatism or capitalism
Speaker 1: and in what world do we decide book that we
Speaker 1: were just going to concede to these tech companies or
Speaker 1: these corporations, who gets to decide what free speeches, the
Speaker 1: flow of information? But also some of this behavioral stuff,
Speaker 1: like you're going to try and dictate some of our
Speaker 1: behavior and our society and our culture. I mean, even
Speaker 1: with this whole situation in Georgia in what the corporations
Speaker 1: are trying to step in and do and say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, your electoral process when we consider racist and
Speaker 1: bigoted and Jim Crowish, I mean, this is this is
Speaker 1: a one point where I think Republicans have to step
Speaker 1: back and go, hey, who are true friends here? What's
Speaker 1: the point of political power? Who are allies and how
Speaker 1: can we have the correct way of thinking about what
Speaker 1: true free market cap is amid because I think we're
Speaker 1: way off track on how we view this issue for decades.
Speaker 1: We're speaking of Ned Ryan, founder of American Majority Ned.
Speaker 1: I know that it might seem to some like, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, we're talking about the midterms. We just it
Speaker 1: feels like we just caught our breath from the last election.
Speaker 1: But here we are. It's it's April. We're gonna We're
Speaker 1: gonna be in the midst of the summer here, and
Speaker 1: people are gonna start gearing up for the fall, and
Speaker 1: candidates are going to come forward, and you know, we're
Speaker 1: gonna be there before we know it. The narrative that
Speaker 1: we have to the counter narrative, if you will, kind
Speaker 1: of like the counter revolution of the Soviet era. The
Speaker 1: counter narrative that Republicans have to come up with is critical.
Speaker 1: And I know you're somebody that's involved in that process
Speaker 1: of making sure that we are adhering to conservative populist
Speaker 1: values while pushing forward candidates who can actually win on
Speaker 1: the national stage, win at the state level. What is it?
Speaker 1: What are we offering now? You know, what does the
Speaker 1: Republican Party. I mean, I know I'm putting a lot
Speaker 1: on you here, but what is the Republican Party in
Speaker 1: April of twenty twenty one stand for? What should it
Speaker 1: stand for? What it should stand for is America? First
Speaker 1: and last? What are we doing to actually advance the
Speaker 1: American people's interests protect their interests on a whole variety
Speaker 1: of fronts, whether it's trade issues, whether it's immigration issues, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, I think probably most people have noticed,
Speaker 1: you know, now the Biden administration is saying, yeah, we
Speaker 1: might actually have to keep building the border wall for
Speaker 1: southern border security. Shocker. I think the message is it's Americanism, right,
Speaker 1: What are we actually doing to advance and protect the
Speaker 1: interests of the American people, which is the basic premise
Speaker 1: of our constitution republic right, all power flows from the
Speaker 1: American people. They give all this the power to the
Speaker 1: elected officials who are supposed to be stewards of the power,
Speaker 1: and money is given to them. It's the whole concept
Speaker 1: of self governance. It would be nice if Republicans actually
Speaker 1: started talking that way of like, hey, where's you to
Speaker 1: actually represent you the American people, not corporations, not big donors.
Speaker 1: So I think that's something that has to change. That's
Speaker 1: going to be a process of evolution, because quite frankly, Buck,
Speaker 1: those are very powerful forces still inside of the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: But I've told Trump this, but I keep on reading
Speaker 1: this is a chance in the twenty twenty two primaries
Speaker 1: to really take a chance, to take that moment to
Speaker 1: really imprint America First on the Republican Party. Because again
Speaker 1: I say this all the time, people, a party is
Speaker 1: what people say it is, and the people who say
Speaker 1: what it is are those that run and win primaries,
Speaker 1: show up at conventions and run for precinct chair And
Speaker 1: so the America First folks have to identify and coalesce
Speaker 1: behind the right candidates in the primaries, which is going
Speaker 1: to be a bit of a process, get them to win,
Speaker 1: and as they win, we start to change the essence
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party. The other thing I'll say, though,
Speaker 1: is this that people should have some hope going into
Speaker 1: the midterms. Book is this, don't forget redistricting is happening
Speaker 1: right in the way that it's going to happen. We're
Speaker 1: gonna know April thirtieth. I believe how some of the
Speaker 1: redistricting is going to work. What states are losing seats,
Speaker 1: which states are gaining seats. I think off redistricting alone,
Speaker 1: Republicans are going to be in a very very good
Speaker 1: position to actually take the majority back in the House.
Speaker 1: But we've got to make sure that we focus, as
Speaker 1: America First conservatives on the primaries to make sure in
Speaker 1: these I think it's three new districts in Texas and
Speaker 1: two in Florida, that we take those opportunities to make
Speaker 1: sure that we've got the right champions in those ruby
Speaker 1: red districts that are going to be created, so that
Speaker 1: we have more voices like that in the House. And
Speaker 1: then you know, in the Senate, we've got some opportunities.
Speaker 1: I think we've got a chance to take back the
Speaker 1: Arizona seats from Kelly. I think we've got a chance
Speaker 1: to take back the Georgia seat from Warnock. We've got
Speaker 1: an opportunity to replace really kind of establishment figures in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania and Ohio with more America First type units in
Speaker 1: the Senate races. So I would encourage people start thinking
Speaker 1: about it right now, who's saying the right things, who
Speaker 1: is actually promoting the right ideas? And the last thing
Speaker 1: I'll say is this book. What I would like to
Speaker 1: see is every Republican governor and every prominent Senate candidate
Speaker 1: go on Tucker Carlson because he would be an amazing
Speaker 1: vetting process. Based off as Asa Hudgison interview last night,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's amazing, isn't it. I mean you had Gnome,
Speaker 1: who is really being talked about run alongside De Santis
Speaker 1: as a likely presidential candidate, and you also had Hutchinson,
Speaker 1: as as you mentioned. I mean, there was like two
Speaker 1: cases of political self immolation on National TV. Do you
Speaker 1: think that speaking of corporate interests, do you think that
Speaker 1: both of them had bowed to corporate interests and essentially
Speaker 1: got called with their hands in the in the corporate
Speaker 1: cookie jar yea percent. No, I think there's a I
Speaker 1: know with nom there's a massive chamber of commerce influence.
Speaker 1: I would suspect the same with Hutchinson. And it was
Speaker 1: one of those beautiful things. I even, you know, texted
Speaker 1: Tucker afterwards and said, listen, I think the best thing
Speaker 1: you could do for the movement is somehow get the
Speaker 1: other twenty four Republican governors on over the course of
Speaker 1: this year, quite frankly, I would bring on any prominent
Speaker 1: Senate candidates. Let's have them go on with Tucker for seven, eight,
Speaker 1: nine minutes, and at that point after that, they're either
Speaker 1: going to be exposed for frauds as Norman Hutchinson have
Speaker 1: been exposed as, or they're going to come through like
Speaker 1: de Sciantists and go dang. I gotta tell you, Bluck,
Speaker 1: I had my question marks about Ron de Sciantists beginning
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. I'm becoming a big fan of Ron
Speaker 1: de Santists. He's making all the right moves on every front,
Speaker 1: whether it's tech issue, whether it's coronavirus, whether it's election integrity.
Speaker 1: I mean this whole sixteen minutes specially he went right
Speaker 1: back at him and just I mean literally obliterated sixty minutes.
Speaker 1: I'm like, this is fantastic. I really like this guy.
Speaker 1: We need more like this. We're speaking of Ned Ryan,
Speaker 1: founder of American Majority In Ned, I'm totally with you
Speaker 1: on Ron De Santists. I mean, I try not to
Speaker 1: be you know, I never want to be a cheerleader
Speaker 1: for any political candidates. I always want to be more
Speaker 1: like a like a coach, you know, encouraging and getting
Speaker 1: the game do the good things, and sometimes gotta tell
Speaker 1: him you're not doing the good things. But I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, I see a real future for him. I
Speaker 1: know a lot of people do. That's a that's a
Speaker 1: statement of the obvious right affortoon following politics, where does
Speaker 1: MAGA fit into all of this? I mean, Trump is
Speaker 1: putting out these I know you and the Trump family
Speaker 1: and drump himself are close. He's putting out these statements
Speaker 1: from down in Palm Beach. You know. It gets in
Speaker 1: the news cycle for about twelve hours, and then we
Speaker 1: kind of move on other things. I keep hearing there's
Speaker 1: stuff being planned. Do you have any sense of what's
Speaker 1: actually happening? Yeah, yeah, no, I mean Politico broke a story.
Speaker 1: I obviously had known him what was going on, but
Speaker 1: they broke a story that Susie Wiles, who ran Florida
Speaker 1: for Trump in twenty sixteen, in twenty twenty, and I
Speaker 1: went to the match to get her back to run
Speaker 1: Florida in twenty twenty, she's been asked to come in
Speaker 1: and reorganize the same American the Superpack, the Leadership Pack,
Speaker 1: the C four, you know, and so she's in there
Speaker 1: organizing everything. She's very good at what she does. I
Speaker 1: trust her implicitly, as does Trump. So she's reorganizing everything,
Speaker 1: and I think one of the things that they're trying
Speaker 1: to do is get everything squared away on the superpackfront
Speaker 1: packsron C Forefront. And I know there's obviously planned for
Speaker 1: him to have some social media platform, so he's obviously
Speaker 1: he's putting the pieces in place to have that impact
Speaker 1: on the mid terms. And again I talked to him,
Speaker 1: you know, into February, and I think he's he's planning
Speaker 1: on playing a role at very significant role in a
Speaker 1: lot of these primaries. Obviously the House races where they
Speaker 1: voted to impeach him, you can be guaranteed he's gonna
Speaker 1: target those and some of these Senate races. So no,
Speaker 1: Susie's coming in, she's reorganizing, she's getting everything on the
Speaker 1: right trajectory, and based off everything I've heard over the
Speaker 1: last week or two, I'm pretty encouraged because with Susie
Speaker 1: Wiles at the Helm, you know that those outfits will
Speaker 1: be run like they're supposed to be run and be effective.
Speaker 1: What about ned Ryan for you know, set it in
Speaker 1: the state of Virginia, Buddy, Oh gosh, I have to
Speaker 1: tell you this book one of the things that you
Speaker 1: have to do in Virginia. And I'm gonna beat the
Speaker 1: drum on this for however many years and I've ever
Speaker 1: decided to run. Hopefully this will have been done. We
Speaker 1: need to do voter registration in Virginia and other battleground states.
Speaker 1: And I'll just share a quick story with you. In
Speaker 1: two thousand and four, George W. Bush won the state
Speaker 1: of Virginia with one point seven million votes. One point
Speaker 1: seven and change two thousand and four, two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: twenty twelve, twenty twenty, twenty sixteen, twenty twenty. Guess what.
Speaker 1: Republicans have basically peaked out at one point seven million
Speaker 1: votes in the presidential Democrats were at one point four
Speaker 1: million in two thousand and four. They're not about one
Speaker 1: point nine million. They've been holding steady at that for
Speaker 1: the last couple presidentials. If Republicans don't actually start to
Speaker 1: do some of these fundamentals like the Democrats have been doing,
Speaker 1: and actually investing the time, money, effort into voter registration
Speaker 1: to build out the base, oh, it's going to be
Speaker 1: tough to win places like Virginia. So I will say this,
Speaker 1: I might explore that in the future book if some
Speaker 1: of the fundamentals are much better and the right work
Speaker 1: is being done over the next day, two or three
Speaker 1: election cycles. How's that all right? We'll take it for now,
Speaker 1: Ned Ryan found of American Majority. Ned always great to
Speaker 1: have you, buddy. Thanks Buck. We believe that President Biden
Speaker 1: is he legally has the authority to cancel up to
Speaker 1: fifty thousand in student debt through executive action a flick
Speaker 1: of a pen. That means, Sabrina and Darryl and Kendrick Intinnia,
Speaker 1: you don't have to go through Congress, you don't have
Speaker 1: to worry about all that. He's done. Some good things
Speaker 1: the president has, but we'd like him to go further.
Speaker 1: And we know, particularly now with COVID nineteen ravaging the economy,
Speaker 1: so many people out of war, to so many people
Speaker 1: having even more difficulty to pay their debt, that we
Speaker 1: ought to go do this right now. It's pretty straightforward.
Speaker 1: Why should student loan debt be privileged over other forms
Speaker 1: of debt that people have? Why should the government just
Speaker 1: pick winners and losers in such a such an overt way,
Speaker 1: And what does that actually mean for our higher education system?
Speaker 1: You know, you look at this and you say, hold
Speaker 1: on a second. Forty five million borrowers collectively oh about
Speaker 1: one point seven trillion dollars in student loan debt. But
Speaker 1: forty five million is less than twenty percent of the
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty million adults in the US. The
Speaker 1: vast majority of the adult population no longer has or
Speaker 1: never had student loans. Okay, so if we're really talking
Speaker 1: about the COVID nineteen pandemic, I mean, people are behind
Speaker 1: on rent, people are behind that they owe credit. I'm
Speaker 1: sure people listening to this right now. Your business has
Speaker 1: been shut down. You might have maxed out your credit
Speaker 1: cards to try to keep things going. You might be
Speaker 1: behind on a couple of mortgage payments. But people that's
Speaker 1: you know, people that read up fifty thousand dollars a
Speaker 1: student loan debt, I mean, are they financially able to
Speaker 1: carry that debt and pay it for now? Are we
Speaker 1: even looking into that or is it just we're going
Speaker 1: to pick a what seems like a for democrats politically
Speaker 1: advantageous debt category and just wipe it away. When a
Speaker 1: lot of working class folks who you know went to
Speaker 1: community college or maybe he went to no college, or
Speaker 1: you did a year or two at state school or
Speaker 1: went to trade school. They're gonna say, hold on a second.
Speaker 1: Other people will get fifty thousand dollars a debt just
Speaker 1: wiped away by the government. Why why? You know? And
Speaker 1: this is where you start to say, you know, how
Speaker 1: far are we from the concept of a jubilee, a
Speaker 1: wiping away of all debt? You know, this actually comes
Speaker 1: from the Bible. You go back, how far are we
Speaker 1: from that? Being the pitch? Maybe I'll dive into this
Speaker 1: a little bit more in the future, but you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's very important. I think that we understand that
Speaker 1: politicians picking winners and losers in this way is just
Speaker 1: the beginning. So yeah, he'll wipe away fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: of student loan debt, perhaps with an executive order. But
Speaker 1: do you think this is this is it? Do you
Speaker 1: think this is the only they're gonna do like this?
Speaker 1: Oh no, friends, Oh no, some radical stuff is going
Speaker 1: to be coming down the pike. Rock and roll, fellow patriots,
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call. Wow wow wow wow brown
Speaker 1: wow wow blown. Who Who am a plow? You know,
Speaker 1: I'm pretty smart. We don't even need are cool groovy tunes.
Speaker 1: I could just do. Yes, we do. I'm just saying
Speaker 1: I could do it myself. I'm very talented that way.
Speaker 1: Did you ever watch the Police Academy movies? No? I
Speaker 1: don't think so. Wait really well, they were great at
Speaker 1: their classics from the eighties, but there was a guy
Speaker 1: who could do. His whole thing was he was one
Speaker 1: of the Police Academy officers and he would do all
Speaker 1: these different like sound effects with his mouth. I guess
Speaker 1: you don't know what I'm talking about. Police kind of
Speaker 1: movies were big for a little while. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: like slapstick comedy stuff. I've definitely heard of them. I
Speaker 1: just don't think i've seen them. I mean it might
Speaker 1: be might be worth you know, are you checking out?
Speaker 1: Which can I ask what you've been watching recently? Because
Speaker 1: you know you never take my suggestions, so I don't
Speaker 1: even ask anymore. But what have you been watching? I mean,
Speaker 1: there have been two things on Disney Plus I've been watching,
Speaker 1: and I don't know how I feel about Disney Plus
Speaker 1: doing this, but they're doing the weekly rollout of the
Speaker 1: series rather than like the old Netflix style where you
Speaker 1: put the whole season out and you can binge it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but I've been watching Falcon in the Winter Soldier and
Speaker 1: of the Revival of the Mighty Ducks, which is what
Speaker 1: Mighty Ducks revival. Yeah, they're doing a new series on
Speaker 1: Disney Plus about a new crop of ducks, and Emilio
Speaker 1: estevez In is in it. It's basically the only problem
Speaker 1: I have with it is that they've made the Ducks
Speaker 1: the enemy. Oh yeah, bad ducks. Wow, please never make
Speaker 1: that noise again. But you don't have the Mighty Ducks
Speaker 1: in the original movies. They were the heroes, obviously nothing
Speaker 1: and became this big program. Well now apparently they're like
Speaker 1: the enemy. They're the big, you know, bully program of
Speaker 1: Minnesota high school or youth hockey. And this one player
Speaker 1: gets cut and he makes his own team trying. It's
Speaker 1: like Mighty Ducks the series Go Duck Yourself basically. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's definitely for kids, but I only like it for
Speaker 1: the nostalgia. You're still one day gonna be like stuck,
Speaker 1: you know, home with like a stubbed toe or something,
Speaker 1: and you're gonna say, oh my gosh, I gotta watch
Speaker 1: the Boys on Amazon Prime. Because Buck's been telling me
Speaker 1: for like three years now to watch it. I promise
Speaker 1: I will, but you know, well, you know I have
Speaker 1: a lot of sports to watch, and my wife isn't
Speaker 1: gonna watch that. So yeah, I hear you. No, look
Speaker 1: you hey, happy happy wife or my case, happy girlfriend,
Speaker 1: happy life. I know how it goes. But do you
Speaker 1: want to tell everybody you've got it kind of exciting?
Speaker 1: It is tomorrow more exciting day than your birthday. Let's
Speaker 1: just let's just get right to it. Oh yeah, for sure,
Speaker 1: tell everybody what's going on. Well, I don't think a
Speaker 1: lot of people in this audience are gonna like this,
Speaker 1: but as America, as America was built on your own choice.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to the home opener for the New
Speaker 1: York Mets. Tomorrow's the first time I've gone as a fan.
Speaker 1: I have gone as a media member before, but never
Speaker 1: gotten to enjoy it as a fan. So I'm very excited.
Speaker 1: Nice what you're gonna be? Obviously it's outdoors. We know
Speaker 1: nice weather tomorrow. I haven't checked. It'll be in the sixties.
Speaker 1: A city field is always extremely cold. You better get
Speaker 1: out the like the layers you need the layer. Yes,
Speaker 1: I'll be layering. I've got my big heavy Mets coat
Speaker 1: that I'll be bringing. Yeah, I'm prepared, I've done it. Well,
Speaker 1: you're the guy. You're the guy who goes to the
Speaker 1: sports event with the gear of the team. I mean,
Speaker 1: where am I gonna go and Apolo and khakis? Like,
Speaker 1: of course I'm gonna wear you know, Met stuff. Normally
Speaker 1: i'd wear a jersey, but you know I will wear one,
Speaker 1: but it'll be under a bunch of layers. Well, we're all,
Speaker 1: we're all excited for you. We know you're a Met
Speaker 1: super fan. And uh, just just real quick? Who are they?
Speaker 1: Who are they playing? Is it? Is it a game
Speaker 1: that's of interest or just because it's opening Day? Oh
Speaker 1: it's the Marlins, which any team in their division this
Speaker 1: year are actually pretty good, so it'll be a fine game. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And because the billionaire owner Steve Cohen out, is it
Speaker 1: like do they have people sort of showing up and
Speaker 1: spooning little bits of caviar in your mouth? Now? I
Speaker 1: mean is that things kind of not that I'm aware of,
Speaker 1: but I will proport back running show. Yeah, I will
Speaker 1: say that is one thing that is not often talked
Speaker 1: about because so I grew up I mean my dad
Speaker 1: and and my uncle were both guys who were there
Speaker 1: were Wall Street guys, and they liked the Knicks. And
Speaker 1: my dad's really good friend who's passed away years ago,
Speaker 1: used to be a season ticket holder, and so he
Speaker 1: was a season ticket holder. But we would sometimes, you know,
Speaker 1: take we'd buy some of the tickets from take him
Speaker 1: off his hands. We couldn't go to games, so I
Speaker 1: went to. I mean I would. I wouldn't say as many,
Speaker 1: like my dad went to more than I probably went
Speaker 1: to a dozen Knicks games growing up, which for me
Speaker 1: was a lot of professional sports games. Over a course
Speaker 1: of i'd say maybe ten, ten or fifteen years, I
Speaker 1: probably went to a dozen Knicks games, so at least
Speaker 1: a game or two a year, let's say. And I
Speaker 1: remember the food even when I was a kid. The
Speaker 1: food was awful at Madison Square Garden. No Mark, this
Speaker 1: is a long time. It's like before you were born, basically,
Speaker 1: but the food it was like they had, you know,
Speaker 1: just like hot dogs with all the mustard all over him.
Speaker 1: And I'm not that that's that bad, but I mean
Speaker 1: it was. It would. Now I've got back to Madison
Speaker 1: Square Garden mostly for PBR, for professional bull riding. My
Speaker 1: whole family likes to go every year. We have a
Speaker 1: great We didn't go this year, but usually because of COVID,
Speaker 1: but we go. But well, I use sometime if you want.
Speaker 1: It's actually a lot of fun because you can get
Speaker 1: really close to the actual arena floor. And it's not expensive.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, Nick's tickets are outrageous. It's not
Speaker 1: expensive at all to go anyway. The food is amazing
Speaker 1: in these stadiums, yeah, because you can get like a
Speaker 1: gourmet You can get a gourmet brisket at Mets Stadium. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that you can get. My favorite thing is the pat
Speaker 1: La Frida filet mignon sandwich. Oh my god, is legitimately delicious.
Speaker 1: I think some sort of cheese, I don't remember the
Speaker 1: exact side of cheese. Guru grilled du onions and the
Speaker 1: filet mignon. Obviously, it's a start. It's amazing, And as
Speaker 1: everybody knows, this is the part of the show where
Speaker 1: both you and I start to get a little hungry.
Speaker 1: So somehow the conversation often transitions to food. I'm like, prucer, Mark,
Speaker 1: what are you going to be eating? I really hope
Speaker 1: they have all the concessions open tomorrow, so I can
Speaker 1: properly do what I want, any thing I want. Oh man,
Speaker 1: yeah you should go for We're all very happy for you,
Speaker 1: and so don't worry. Everybody's show will beyond tomorrow. As
Speaker 1: it is with the game. Producer Mark is we're gonna
Speaker 1: get promised the listener will not know the difference. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: they it'll It'll all be fine for us. But Producer
Speaker 1: Mark going to Open Day, I would love to go
Speaker 1: go check out some sports sports events. What what do you?
Speaker 1: What is it? What does it cost? Right now? If
Speaker 1: I wanted to get if I want to get the
Speaker 1: couple of Mets tickets, um, you know which, I can't
Speaker 1: even pretend like I care about the Yankees, although by bye,
Speaker 1: my my dad is a Yankees fan. He's the only
Speaker 1: one who cares a little bit about fresional sports on
Speaker 1: the baseball side, and probably not even really anymore. But
Speaker 1: what what are we talking for? For? Like mid range
Speaker 1: Mets tickets in May or June? See right now, it's
Speaker 1: hard to say because they're only twenty percent capacity, so
Speaker 1: I don't actually you can't even get them because you
Speaker 1: gotta get that, you gotta get the ticket. The only
Speaker 1: reason I'm going is is a friend has season tickets
Speaker 1: right right, right, Yeah, that's that's the way, because no, dude,
Speaker 1: I I do think that we're going to reach this
Speaker 1: point because I feel this way, and this is true.
Speaker 1: I think for a lot of people across the country
Speaker 1: where we just want to experience life, like I want
Speaker 1: to get out out there and do if you were
Speaker 1: ever thinking about doing something before going somewhere, you know,
Speaker 1: enjoying some kind of an event, maybe a little bit
Speaker 1: of a splurge. I think this pandemic has made a
Speaker 1: lot of us feel like the time is now, like
Speaker 1: as soon as we can get what I mean now,
Speaker 1: maybe not like today. But you know, don't wait on
Speaker 1: these things because who even knows. You know. I went
Speaker 1: to PBR with my family before the pandemic. I went
Speaker 1: to a Knicks game before the pandemic. I went to
Speaker 1: you know, I did a bunch of things, not even thinking.
Speaker 1: I took the Snow Princess. Believe I'm not presser. I
Speaker 1: took the Snow Princess at her request to New York
Speaker 1: City Ballet. It was very civilized. You must have been
Speaker 1: bored out of your mind. Well, you know, I am
Speaker 1: a classically trained musician, which is something I don't often
Speaker 1: talk about on the show, but I was as a
Speaker 1: kid and I played in orchestras for years and stuff.
Speaker 1: So whole other conversation for another time. But yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I've got ballet. Although I will say, and just in
Speaker 1: case the snow Princess is listening, you have to put
Speaker 1: this very the the the lady dancers are very athletic
Speaker 1: at the ballet. So there is that. Um that's about
Speaker 1: all I could say about that, though I don't really
Speaker 1: understand the dancing part of it very much. I love you.
Speaker 1: What was that from Governor? Governor Cuomo andread son of
Speaker 1: a gun? Considering the recent allegations, I thought it fit. Well, Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's let's get into it here. Let's get into the
Speaker 1: roll call. We got producer marketing good moves. He's gonna
Speaker 1: have a fun day to Marle. Let's get into roll call.
Speaker 1: We got Kenny here, buck Hope all as well. I'm
Speaker 1: a lifelong Republican and Oregon done vote by mail my
Speaker 1: entire life. I try to find the logic and understand
Speaker 1: the arguments of the left, to understand the person and
Speaker 1: not wall off my mind. But I'm left scratching my
Speaker 1: head Georgia adopts the same system of proof of identity
Speaker 1: we have in Oregon. But here locally, even my Democrats
Speaker 1: parents are calling George's law Jim Crow. The logic of
Speaker 1: it is making my head hurt a little bit. Honestly,
Speaker 1: What's worse, they don't see the congruity between the two
Speaker 1: sets of laws. My head hurts. I need an aspir
Speaker 1: and shield side. Well, Ken, great to have you listening
Speaker 1: in Oregon. And if you listen on a station out there,
Speaker 1: because I know we've got a great Portland station, please
Speaker 1: please do tell us. We always love to hear what
Speaker 1: our affiliate stations are that people are reaching out from.
Speaker 1: And as for as for your yeah, I mean this
Speaker 1: is it's the mob mentality here, and it's propaganda. It's
Speaker 1: just propaganda. People say what they think they're supposed to say,
Speaker 1: and they benefit from saying it, and that's it. You know,
Speaker 1: they don't really think through it beyond that. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's kind of where it is. And actually, here
Speaker 1: we've got you're not the only one that feels like
Speaker 1: their head hurts on this thing. Pretty smart could overthrow
Speaker 1: a clip in here into roll call for seconds. I
Speaker 1: wanted to get to this one before. On the Georgia
Speaker 1: voting law, play play fifteen. Would you know the President
Speaker 1: has blatantly lied repeatedly and now his paid mouthpieces are
Speaker 1: repeating his lives. Good for Peter Doocey for pressing her
Speaker 1: on that point. They should press the President and his
Speaker 1: paid mouthpieces on whether he's going to condemn his own
Speaker 1: state of Delaware since they had many fewer drop boxes
Speaker 1: than does Georgia, that they don't have any early voting
Speaker 1: as well. Again, the Georgia law is designed to avoid
Speaker 1: the problems they had in their elections last year, not
Speaker 1: just on November third, in their primaries last summer when
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wasn't even a contested race, people had to
Speaker 1: wait hours in line. This bill is designed to give
Speaker 1: Georgian's convenient access to vote while also making their elections safe, secure,
Speaker 1: and efficient. And it's time that Joe Biden apologized for
Speaker 1: slandering Brian Kemp, the Georgia Legislature and the State of Georgia.
Speaker 1: Well there you go, all right, that's well said by
Speaker 1: Cotton slandering Georgia, slandering the legislature. Ken Centerton agrees. You
Speaker 1: got to see your role called got a clip played
Speaker 1: there you go, thanks for listening out in Portland. And
Speaker 1: I wonder whether that's what it's like out in Portland
Speaker 1: these days. Everything I always see, it's always, oh, you're
Speaker 1: in Oregon, Oregon. He's not in Portland. Okay, there we
Speaker 1: I just insert of that in my own head. Um.
Speaker 1: But he could be, because I know the like a
Speaker 1: lot of states, there's the coastal side of Oregon where
Speaker 1: the Looney left reigned supreme. And then you get more
Speaker 1: Inland and it actually gets pretty red. People enjoy gun
Speaker 1: rights and you know, like the Constitution, and you get
Speaker 1: you get Inland. Although I will say, uh, Canon, Cannon
Speaker 1: Beach is beautiful. I really do like it. I know
Speaker 1: the Libs, well, guys, why do we let the Libs
Speaker 1: take all the coasts? Can we have? I okay, no,
Speaker 1: that's not true. That's not true. Western coast of Florida,
Speaker 1: we got some stuff there, Gulf Coast, we got some
Speaker 1: of that coast. But on the ocean coasts, why do
Speaker 1: we seed all the ocean coast to the Libs? I mean,
Speaker 1: you go, you go, you start in Washington down to
Speaker 1: San Diego, Maine, down to Miami, and it's pretty much
Speaker 1: blue the whole way. I mean, you may get a
Speaker 1: little bit of red in some of the Carolinas along
Speaker 1: the coast, but not really, you know, not really in Delaware,
Speaker 1: Jersey Libs LIBS, Long Island on the coast Libs interior Conservative. Anyway,
Speaker 1: It's it's really pretty amazing you think about how consistent
Speaker 1: that trend is. You get blue coastal Libs all along,
Speaker 1: except except the Gulf Coast, which I gotta go down.
Speaker 1: I've never been. I want to go to the Gulf
Speaker 1: Coast Alabama, Mississippi. I want to check it out, all right.
Speaker 1: Mark a producer Mark, great name obviously, and Buck. I
Speaker 1: love when you guys put producer Mark first, by the way,
Speaker 1: just to like, just so I'd like, you know, they'll
Speaker 1: get too big for my bridges over here. We I
Speaker 1: know who you guys love producer Mark. I think if
Speaker 1: they know who reads the emails, see we have a
Speaker 1: very savvy audience, they do. I guess my Georgia got
Speaker 1: on the news again. Our governor is not quite run
Speaker 1: de Santis, but he's grown quite a bit since getting
Speaker 1: into office. Our generation in Georgia was all mostly conservative Democrat.
Speaker 1: It's almost a one party state. So it took a
Speaker 1: bit for him to realize that today's left will lie,
Speaker 1: cheat and steal to get their way. That is not
Speaker 1: the classic way. But as Kemp has learned, he stood
Speaker 1: firm and spoken back. Even Atlanta's own coke, invented by
Speaker 1: a wounded Confederate colonel, is no longer welcome in the
Speaker 1: Georgia GOP. This will be a key battleground. Population is shifting,
Speaker 1: with a growing African American community drawn here from around
Speaker 1: the country and a large Hispanic community since the Olympic
Speaker 1: construction boom, and the thriving business community has now gone
Speaker 1: full leftist. Georgia's business friendly conservative policies have nurtured a
Speaker 1: conservative hating viper in its metro Atlanta boosom. Well Mark,
Speaker 1: thank you for the the eloquent roll call and yeah,
Speaker 1: Georgia man, great state, Great state. I I hate to
Speaker 1: see it go woke, because it's gonna go broke, all right.
Speaker 1: Next up in roll Call, we've got our friend Dave.
Speaker 1: Remember if you want to be a part of roll Call,
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton or Team buck email
Speaker 1: us at Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com and check out
Speaker 1: buck Sexton dot com. You can listen to the podcast
Speaker 1: there and I'll have an editorial up tomorrow on this
Speaker 1: immigration madness at our southern border. Check it out buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. Always always always worth worth your time, Dave, Hey,
Speaker 1: Buck Glady here, you had Glenny Junkin on the show today. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: Virginia is lost and we'll be blue for the foreseeable future. Mark,
Speaker 1: I think we gotta get a like uh. Then the
Speaker 1: price is right, the bump, you know, but the the
Speaker 1: unhappy sound when you get it wrong. You know I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. Yes, I understand, be the buzzer mom, bromppm. Yeah, exactly, yeah,
Speaker 1: exactly when somebody says the wrong anyway, that's what we
Speaker 1: need for that. The Republican Party has been running disastrous
Speaker 1: candidates the last decade. The local media torpedoed Bob McDonald
Speaker 1: and Ken Cuccinelli over a bunch of lies. It's awful, Buck.
Speaker 1: We have people fleeing the Northeast Corridor and moving to
Speaker 1: Northern Virginia. They get twice the house for half the
Speaker 1: price and much lower cost of living. Unfortunately, they bring
Speaker 1: their liberal votes with them. We joke now about Nova,
Speaker 1: Northern Virginia and Rova rest of Virginia. They're turning the
Speaker 1: commonwealth blue, and I don't see it changing. It would
Speaker 1: be able to concede everywhere north of Fredericksburg to Maryland.
Speaker 1: Is strengthen our votes that are informed and really matter.
Speaker 1: Keep up the great work with producer Mark Well. We will,
Speaker 1: we will certainly try. Thank you so much. And yeah,
Speaker 1: you see, my experience of Virginia is Northern Virginia mostly,
Speaker 1: although I have family and show. I've got an uncle
Speaker 1: in Charlottesville. I've got an uncle there who is, you know, conservative, patriot,
Speaker 1: constitutionalist and so, and my grandmother used to live in Charlotte. Well,
Speaker 1: so I have family in Virginia, so it always has
Speaker 1: kind of a place, you know, in my heart. But
Speaker 1: Northern Virginia is just it's just DC expanded. It's just Washington,
Speaker 1: d C now expanded. I mean, it's unrecognizable in culture
Speaker 1: and demography to the rest of the state. Very very different.
Speaker 1: So there's that there. We gomp wramp all right, everybody,
Speaker 1: that's the show for today. Back tomorrow. She'll tie