WEBVTT - NFL Wild Card Predictions: Bills-Jaguars, 49ers-Eagles, Packers-Bears, Chargers-Pats | Nick Wright

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Right with the Great episode four to eleven,

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a combo episode. We are going to be doing our

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>pick show and our full wild Card weekend preview show. Uh,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>those are kind of one and the same. You're gonna

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>get an idea of where I'm leaning on picks when

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we do the wild Card weekend preview and also something

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of a playoff preview and also demands perfect U outfit

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for you out. It's a weird term wardrobe maybe given

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is our first show, first sports show. I

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.319
<v Speaker 1>hope people checked out Thursday show, which was a far

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>different type.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Of show.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Since John Harbaugh got fired, and we're gonna get to that.

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if you're wearing that signal to

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, like you know you're available.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>For I'm riding with them through everything. You know, I

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>trust and believe they were on way up. I love

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>it. It's a good listen.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good franchise that we're gonna get to

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens piece. Shortly the we I did Tuesday show

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and I kept saying like, by the time you listen

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>to this, I wonder if John Harball will have been

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>fired And for a lot of people. I bet by

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the time they listened to it, John Harbaugh had been fired,

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get to that in a bit first. As always,

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this shows this episode what's right is presented to you

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>by our great friends at boost Mobile, and straight to

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the voicemails brought to you by our great friends at

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile. The Wizard's trade tray Young and it's not

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>even gonna be a topic because he got traded for

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>c J McCollum and Corey Kispert. And it is a

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>real reminder Demond's of in this apron world where the

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>empty calories, good stats, bad teams, guys what they're real

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the worst value is I mean no, and I listen,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I know CJ. I like CJ, but

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously in a different you know, he's an older

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>player at this point. Yeah, the salary was the important part.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is really Trey Young for Corey Kispert. That's

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what that trade is. I ain't and again that's that's

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a little dismissive of c J McCollum. But something else.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jones says he's going to retire with the most

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl rings. He has three. The most is six.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>This is a ridiculous, silly thing from an old man,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and my college football playoff semi final prediction. I think

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we are getting Indiana Miami. I would like Ole Miss

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to win, but I just because I really would like

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it to really stick it to Lane Kiffin, But I

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>think we're getting Indiana Miami. Reminder, everybody like rates of

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>pbscribe review to the show and we are on the oh.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just you know what's funny, people

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are hearing this Friday, so they'll know who won Miami

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ole Miss. That will have already happened. We'll see if

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm right. This could be just dated already. But it's

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>wild Guard weekend, my second favorite football weekend of the year.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>My favorite football weekend of the year's Divisional round weekend.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Wild Guard weekends my second favorite. Let's get right into

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a pal.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>So the playoffs are officially here, Wildcard weekend coming up.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the big dogs are missing out of

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. So with that being said, in the teams

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>that you see, what are some of the big storylines

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that you'll be following in this postseason?

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So top five storylines in order. I think I reserve

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the right to revise it. And I listen. I saw

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>my friend Mina Chimes and Dominique Foxworth mocking this idea,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but respectfully, they're wrong. The most interesting story about these

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>these NFL playoffs are is this the year Josh Allen

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>breaks through. I understand they're the sixth seed. I understand

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they are a flawed team with a bad run defense,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>but this is not Josh Allen on the Washington Generals.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They have the rushing champ, they have an excellent pass defense,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a great offensive line that there it would be.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to take greatness from Josh Allen to make

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it through on the road this playoff field, but it's doable.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder I for Bills fans, forget for Josh.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Would Bills fans rather have a better team, the best

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Bills team, whatever year you think that is, but have

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and Burrow in the field, or a flawed team

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but have no Mahomes in Burrow. I think Bill's fans

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would say, give me the flawed team on the road

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:21.119
<v Speaker 1>without the bugeyman plus Joe Burrow sitting in the bracket,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Bills can do it now. I

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>also think the Jags are a very dangerous team. I

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>said this on TV. I don't know if I said

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it on here, and you'll find you'll find out who

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking in this game later in the show. But

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe the winner of this game is going to

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>win the AFC. I believe in both of these teams

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more than I believe in the top two seeds, the

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and the Broncos. So that is to me. Storyline

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>number one is Can and Josh Allen breakthrough. That's the

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>most interesting storyline. Storyline number two is will any of

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>these year two quarterbacks go on a run? You have Caleb,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you have Drake, you have bo Drake has the most

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>well rounded team. Well, I don't know. The Broncos might

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>be a more well rounded team than the Patriot. The

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Broncos let me, I take that back, because I actually

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason that I think the Patriots are

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>better than the Broncos is because I think Drake is

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so much better than bow Knicks. But if you were to,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if you take the quarterbacks off of it and evaluate

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the rosters, it's probably Broncos number one. The Bears are

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one because the offense is so good, but

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the defense of those three teams is the shakiest. But

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>here's what I'm getting at, Demanse and listen, you know,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe in bo Knicks, but it's the number

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one seed, and if he goes on a playoff run,

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'm gonna say. Yeah, we live

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in a world where Mahomes missed the playoffs and just

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>tore his Aco Lamar missed the playoffs as coach, just

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>got fired. Joe Burrow missed the playoffs for the third

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>straight year. Okay, if one of these second year quarterbacks

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>goes on a real run, wins multiple playoff games, shows

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>up in the super Bowl, whomever it is, assuming again,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even really want to include bon Nicks

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in this, but I have to be fair, assuming that

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not the two thousand Ravens way to the super Bowl,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that the offense more than carries its weight, which obviously

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to happen with the Patriots or the Bears. Right,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>does that top of the NFL, not the very top,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but the top ish of the NFL quarterback pyramid have

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to start to include one of these kids?

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know what I mean?

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Like the if Drake May and the Patriots make the

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. I already think Drake May is probably a

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>top five quarterback. Then it becomes undeniable if Caleb puts

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it all together. God forbid, if bow Knicks wins two

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>playoff games and makes like, so, which of these young

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are any of them gonna go on a run?

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And are any of these young quarterbacks bo at least

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>has been to the playoffs going to have you know,

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>those first playoff game jitters or first real expectations in

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, you know, stumble That to me is the

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>second biggest storyline. Go ahead. It seem like you want

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>to say.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Something No, I mean, but bo Nicks can there. I

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like you'd attribute it. You would attribute that to

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the defense carrying. I think it also depends on how

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>they how they do on the run.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, you gotta see how the game plays out. I

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think the third biggest storyline is and again I know

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm quarterback centric in this, but because the storylines

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are typically third biggest storyline is what if Aaron Rodgers

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>goes on a run? I don't I don't think it's likely,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but after that game against Baltimore, I don't think it's.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Impossible that where another super Bowl.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the guy's got four MVPs. The guy

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>as regular season wise, he's a top three quarterback of

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all time, and so I obviously winning a super Bowl

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>puts him in a the It's a totally different world

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in a super Bowl. But I don't even if he

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just they break the the Steelers break their decade long

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>playoff win drought, pull off some upsets, they show up

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in a conference championship game be unbelievable and so I

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and the Browns game was an abomination. But aside from that,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>he's been really good for the last five weeks. And

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>he gets dk Metcalf.

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Back, So no DK insane.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I know the and not having DK almost costs him

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the their season. I think the fourth biggest storyline is,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this should have been bigger, is what if

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles repeat? Yeah, nobody under the radar. They've kind

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of been flying under the radar as a defending Super

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Bowl champion, and I think it's because they have seen

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>flawed so flawed all year. But if they go back, like,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>if they go back to back, what that means for

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved on that team all of a sudden, Jalen

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Hurts is a no doubt Hall of Famer, the you know,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Howie Roseman and the Eagles. Maybe they got an

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>argument that they, not the Chiefs, are the the prestige franchise. Well,

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I listen the Chiefs. The Chiefs have been to five

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls in seven years now and one three. The

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagles would have been to three and four years one two.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And then if we extend it back to Foles, it's

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to call that like part of this. It's a

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>different coach, it's a different quarterback, but it would have

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>been they've been. If they win this year that in

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>nine years, Demons, they went to four super Bowls, won three.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty unbelievable.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard to imagine them repeating give and other season.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing I just don't. It doesn't seem possible.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But maybe. But they're big favorites, relatively big favorites against

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Niners in round one. No one would be shocked

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>if they went on the road and beat Chicago in

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>round two. And if Chicago loses in round one, then

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Philly would be home for round two, like there's a

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>path there. And then number five is which of the

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>two NFC West Juggernaut teams is able to in the

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>playoffs look the way they did most of the regular season,

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>which is like the best team in football for either

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of them, the Rams and the Seahawks. The Rams path

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is harder, but their quarterback is so much better. The

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks being at home, being rested, being healthy, with that

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>defense in that crowd. Dude, I am not dismissing at

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>all the very real possibility of the Seattle Seahawks winning

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. I think that's Sam Darnold. The Seahawks

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can win the Super Bowl. I can't believe it. I

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think right now my pick would be Matt Stafford in

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, but I think Seahawks can do it. So

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>those are my five biggest storylines. We'll get to hardballs

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>firing in just a moment. I can spend a ton

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of time on it, but we haven't done it with

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Demons and on this show yet. But first, today's show

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by O representing sponsor hard Rock, Bet,

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Floridas Sportsman, the official sportsbook partner your favorite Florida teams

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Jags, Buccaneers, Heat, Magic, and Panthers. Playoffs kickoff

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. If you've got the script, on how It's

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Gonna play out, build a same game parlay on hard

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet and turn game day into payday. Or if

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're more into hardwood than the grid iron, you can

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>put up shots on the NBA and every night on

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet, your home for hoops action all season long.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You can even combine your football and basketball bets. If

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you got a playoff parlay, add an NBA bet or

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>player prop to it and turn up the payout. And

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if you miss the start of the game, don't worry.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Bet has live in game betting, so you're

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>never too late to bet any football or hoops all season.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Find a winner, grab player prop that you had circled,

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and bet live in just a few easy taps. Stelvin

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>tried your first bet on hard Rock Bet. There's time.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You get to get one hundred three dollars in bonus

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bets if you win. Just place a five dollar bet

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and if it hits, you get not only your winnings,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but also an extra one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>The hard Rock Bet sportsbook GAP is the only legal

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sports book for whenever you're in Florida, and it's also

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan. Coming soon to more states too. Plus. Hard

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet offers new promos every single day, so whenever

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, just open the app and check out what

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got any day of the week. Download the hard

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet app and make your first deposit payable and

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>bonus bets not a cash offer offered by the Seminole

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Digital LLC and all other states, must be twenty one

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>three to three play wise. In Indiana. If you or

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>someone you know as a gambling problem wants help, call

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem, Call

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred Gambler Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, demanse, let's get to harball before we get

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to some of the other games.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, So, sadly, after eighteen seasons twelve postseason ofppearances

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl Ring, the Ravens are a partner

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>ways with John Harball. You everything would call this on Tuesday,

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>But now that it's official, where are the Ravens going?

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's really interesting interviewing Brian Flores found that out today.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I I would be really interested in Mike McDaniel just

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>got fired and a lot of people are connecting Harball

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Dolphins.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't see him coaching.

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't see who coaching was.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't see Harrorball coaching in Miami.

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there's like a weird Steve I think

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I should know this. I think there's some Michigan connections

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ross, but it doesn't matter. Like the I think

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it'd be hard to go from Lamar Jackson to.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But they're not even gonna have TUA, Like, what are

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they gonna do?

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Miami's in a tough spot. What's funny not funny. But

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is I thought Mike McDaniel as the Ravens

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator was an awesome idea, Like Matt running game

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that he developed, except you have Lamar and Derrick Henry,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like that would be you know, Mike McDaniel as it

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was like Matt Nagy's leaving the Chiefs. I know it's

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>different systems and everything, but man, oh man, Mike McDaniel's

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs offensive coordinator is something I'm super intrigued by,

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>even though I think it's very unlikely. Now, maybe McDaniel

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's gonna step into a head coaching job. That

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>would surprise me. I don't think he's gonna go right,

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but maybe he will. His record wasn't terrible. The team

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't quit at the end, and some people might be like,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>look at what he did with Tua. As far as

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens decision on firing Harball, I there was no decision, guys,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the and I've done enough victory lapping on Twitter, so

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to. And it's not victory lapping about

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>someone losing their job, to be clear, victory lapping on

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I told you guys all year there was a problem

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>between Lamar and Harba, and you guys thought I was

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just I spun a wheel. People thought like, oh, Nick

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>just decided today he's going to create this out of

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 1>thin air as opposed to a paying close attention to

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the incredibly odd objective fact that they didn't communicate about

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>how hurt he was and also having a little behind

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the scenes insights. So their ability to ensure Lamar was

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a raven for life and was a raven next year

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>was going to be kneecapped had they kept Harba. So

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't, So they move on. And even though tell

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>me if this makes sense to you, to Monsey, the

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>odds are the next coach of the Ravens is not

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>nearly as good of a coach as John Harball, but

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that coach won't be the one to

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>get him over the hump. He might be a worse coach.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But also like that they just need something new or

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>better luck or whatever it is, and that it felt

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like you couldn't just run it back again with Harball,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so I felt like the move needed to be made,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>even though I think Harball is an excellent coach that

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>tracked to you.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely don't think the next coach that we

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 2>would get will be better or as good as John Harball.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be pretty hard to find. Belichick

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 2>wanted them.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it sounds contradictory. There is the Belichick thing

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so interesting had he not had this embarrassment of a

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>year in his co Jimmy, Yes, I really think so.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And you wouldn't care that that he's old, that it's

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not long term, because it's like, no, we just need

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to get over the hum lamar For Harball, obviously, I

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think he could have his pick of jobs. If I'm

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>John Harbaugh, I don't know that I want any of

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>these jobs. I certainly because it was reported yesterday that

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to wait a week before he starts taking interviews.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's smart because I'd be awful interested.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 2>In if.

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles, Bill's or Packers losing Round one to any

0:20:54.720 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of those teams, ownership decide we're gonna fire our coach

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to hire Harball. Now, on that note, I think Cincinnati

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>should reach out to Harball's agent today and be like,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>if this job was open, would he take it? And

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if the answers yes, I'd fire Zach Taylor. Now that's

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>not really Cincinnati's style. For Philadelphia, it might sound harsh,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Sirianni is literally the defending Super Bowl champion, But Howie

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Roseman and Jeffrey Lourie have never cared about being harsh.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They drafted Carson Wentz number two overall, gave him a

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>huge contract, moved on from him. Doug Peterson won a

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl with Nick Foles, then won a playoff game

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the next year with Nick Foles. They moved on from him.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They moved like they will if they think they can

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>get better, they will move on from somebody. And I

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>think Harbaugh, who came like started coaching in Philly, I

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's really interesting there. Buffalo less interesting and he,

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Danny explained, I didn't quite follow it. He has some

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>real like green Bay ties about like his who his

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>agent is and green Bay. I don't totally follow. It

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, but it seemed like Lafloor. Midway through the

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>season there was a little scuttle but about Lafleur not

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>being quite as safe as people thought and how he

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't gotten an extension. So if I'm horrible, I just

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>want to wait and see do what does a job

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>come open where the quarterback is set Josh Allen, Jalen Hurts,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love or am I gonna have to roll the

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Dart Dice or Atlanta with Michael Pennix. Like, so

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what I think.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Is those places if you went over there would be

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>more likely to move off the quarterback though, right, Like

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 2>it's like, Oh, he's obvious, it's not the coach that's

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the problem. It's the quarterback more likely. Oh, you have

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more control over who's coming in.

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean I think John Hart all get

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever he wants because there's also not another great head

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>coaching option out there. It's not like there's also Sean

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Payton and Jim Arbaugh waiting in the wings or Ben Johnson.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that guy doesn't seem to exist this cycle. Now,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>let me say this about what this means. Pardon me,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>guess what this means for Lamar.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Come come with it next year, dude.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>They have changed defensive coordinators multiple times since he's been there. Again,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>no culpability on his end for that, just stating effect.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>They've changed offensive coordinators multiple times and they're about to

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do it again. They've now changed head coaches. They brought

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in Derrick Henry, who has been nothing but dominant since

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he became a Raven. We can argue about how good

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>these picks were, but since Lamar has been there, they

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have spent three first round picks on wide receivers. They

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>perennially lead the league or near the top of the

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>league in Pro bowlers on the roster. And now I believe,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>with reason to believe, he got what he wanted and

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>he's getting a new head coach. Got to go be

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>awesome now. And more than being awesome, you gotta be available.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You want to know a shocking fact, Demons, In the

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>last five years, Lamar Jackson and always injured brittle Joe

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Burrow have played the exact same amount of games. No,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I'm not making that up.

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>That is an insane stuy.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>In the last five years, Lamar Jackson has played seventy

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>regular season games and four playoff games and Joe Burrow's

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>played sixty seven regular season games and seven playoff games.

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>To the tune of them both playing in the last

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>five years seventy four games in the last five years,

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they both have played in the playoffs two years and

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>either missed or not been healthy for the playoffs the

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>other three years. For context on that, in the last

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>five years, Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes have also played

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact same number of games ninety three, So nineteen

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>games more more than a full season and a playoff

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>run of more availability. And the Lamar stat is stunning,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Because we look at Burrow as injury always,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought, right, and with Joe we also like and

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there very what do you call it, like significant injuries?

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like Joe Burrow, like, oh,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he's out months with a turf toe. Oh, he's out

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season with the UCL Lamar. I

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't when I didn't know that. When I was looking

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it up, I was just like, I'm curious.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, you feel like with Lamar they are less crucial

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>injuries than well.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not. It hasn't been like needed surgery like Joe

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>needed on both the right, but the it's stunning seventy

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>four games each. So he's got to be available. He

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>turned twenty nine yesterday. He's going to get the biggest

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>contract in NFL history this offseason. It's got to go perform.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sitting here saying can't do it. But yeah,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty big off season, Pretty big off season. All right,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some of the playoff games before we

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get to.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Ours, so after your Chiefs got eliminated, you would need it.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Immediately jumped onto the Buffalo bandwagon and said that they

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 2>should win the super Bowl. But the problem is they

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>play your Jags. They obviously have the prince that was

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 2>promised on there, so you're in a little bit of debacle.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 2>You said that the winner of this game would go

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to the super Bowl. Do you care to explain that more?

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, listen, I just I I know that people think

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fastcile analysis. Just be like, Josh Allaen's best quarterback

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the bracket, so I'm picking him.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But in the.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>NFL playoffs, if you have a superhero, this is my

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>old Jared Goff thing that people got mad at. Do

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you remember that the superhero and the civilian that I

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>called Jared Goff a civilian, Yes, a civilian when they're

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>superheroes and bo Nicks, C J. Stroud, Aaron Rodgers at

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this point in his career, why oh are civilians? Doesn't

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>mean they're not good, but it does mean I can't

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>imagine those guys are just going to put the team

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on their back a sin to a higher plane. Justin Herbert,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>who I do not believe it has the traits of

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy who could do that. He is. He's never

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>done it, he's never shown it to us. But if

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it were to happen, it wouldn't come out of nowhere,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>right Drake May, by the way, saying with Trevor, let

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>me say that about Trevor now. Trevor at least has

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>won a playoff game and played well in the playoffs.

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But Trevor, he has the traits of a guy who

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>could be a superhero. Was a projected superhero coming out

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of school, hasn't quite hit yet. Drake May looks like

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a young superhero. It's like, oh, Drake May checks all

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the boxes, but it's his first time ever in the playoffs.

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is a legit superhero hero in the prime

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of his career, has played great in the playoffs. The

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>other guys who are his caliber of guaranteed future first

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ballot Hall of Famers in their prime are not in

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Hard to pick against that team, however, and

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so I guess when I so if they win, I

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Jags are excellent, excellent, And if the Bills

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can go to Jacksonville and win, then they go to

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>New England and win. They've already done it. Go to

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Denver and win, like they can beat all those teams. Jacksonville,

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, has been the best team in

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, certainly the best team in the AFC for

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two months. And if they beat Buffalo, Do I think

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they can go to New England? Of course? Do I

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think in the AFC Championship game they could go to Denver?

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They just went to New England and dog, I'm to

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver and crushed them. Do I think that in round

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>two if it happened to be this matchup, they could

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>beat Pittsburgh or Houston. In Jacksonville, they already beat Houston

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I I just think those are I think

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are the scariest team because of Alan, and

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think right now the Jags are the best team.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's a brutal spot where I got to pick

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>one of these two.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was about to say who who do you

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 2>actually want to win? Though? Like what? Jack? Okay?

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want Trevor. Do you realize it would seem

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>unfair if we went from since like first things first,

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and this podcast has been a thing, if the Super

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Bowls went from if it went Mahomes Mahomes missus a year,

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the borough year Mahomes Mahomes Mahomes AFC wise and in

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the year he's out. It's the guy that I'm the

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>only national supporter of in Trevor Lawrence. Yea like that.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It would it would just seem yeah, and so I

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would love it to be Trevor. NFL history tells us

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it should be Josh that this is this is his

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>time now. But I will say this and the Ravens,

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they didn't do it because of this stat

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but the stat that I was telling you

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>guys before the year, and hear what I'm saying here,

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's an interesting one. Every coach and quarterback combo

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that has ever won a Super Bowl together won their

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>first super Bowl together within the first five years of

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>being together. So like demons, do you follow what I'm

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>saying there? You as an avatar for the audience like

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there is There has never been a coach quarterback combo

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that got over the hump and won a Super Bowl

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>together that didn't get over the hump in their first

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>five years. Now you might have won, you know, like

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Belichick also won one in year eighteen together,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but you win. That was relevant this year for two

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>combos Lamar and John har who've been together eight years,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Allen and McDermott, who have been together eight years.

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I do not think McDermott's on the hot seat. However,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>losing in round one, even though they're the sixth seed

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're on the road, I think could put them

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>on the hot seat. I also though, oh you think

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for sure?

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I think how you feel, how the world feels.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>This is supposed to be their year. Everybody's gone, and

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 2>then you lose in round one, not even getting there.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And here's the other thing. You're losing round one to

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a team that, even though they're thirteen and four and

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have been bludgeting people, nobody respects. Yeah, like I respect

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the Jags, but nobody it had somehow they like, let's

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>say they drew the Patriots and lost in round one.

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I canna be like many Drake may vrabel this team.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>They were better all year. The Jags are a tough

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one certainly, and so I don't know, I don't know.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I find it so fascinating. I cannot wait for That

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>is the game of the weekend to me.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're the easily All.

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Right, let's be actually hold on, are you thinking about

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>upgrading to the all new iPhone seventeen Pro, designing the

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>most powerful iPhone ever, but you're also thinking about all

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>your traffic, all the traffic on your way to the store,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>transferring all your data. Good news. When you order a

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>new phone online with boost Mobile, they'll send an expert

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to your home or work to deliver your brand new

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>iPhone seventeen Pro and get you all set up on

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile within minutes, no hassle. Visit boostmobile dot com

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to get started. Delivery available for select devices. Purchase at

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>boostmobile dot com. Terms do apply. All right, let's talk

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Philly for a minute before we get to our picks.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are hosting the Niners this Sunday, and you know

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>what everybody's going to be looking at. Can Philly's offense

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 2>look normal? Can they play a decent game? Do you

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 2>think that they'll be able to return to their Super

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Bowl self? As you said, it like a switch in

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the Niners game.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I think is interesting. I think people

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>forget what the Eagles offense looked like last postseason because

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it did not get rolling until the Conference championship game,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and then it went into hyper drive. Conference Championship game,

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they scored fifty five points. The Super Bowl they scored forty.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Round one against Green Bay Phillies scored twenty two points.

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Jalen threw for one hundred and thirty yards. Round two

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams, Jalen threw for one hundred and twenty

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>eight yards. They scored eight points, which is really good.

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you remember that game is sixteen to fifteen

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>entering the fourth quarter, and that the Eagles were settling

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for field goals, settling for field goal and then Saquon

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>rips off the eighty yard or where he's slapping his helmet,

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but the passing game was not working, and then they

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>had the really weird sequence at the end where the

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Rams almost ended up stealing it. And then come the

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Conference Championship game and Super Bowl. I mean they scored

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety five points of those two weeks, but even those

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, Jalen didn't throw for two point fifty in

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>either of those games. Last year, the Eagles offense, when

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they we say it, got rolling. Jalen was very efficient.

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>He took care of the ball. He had an unbelievable

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown run in the RAM game. He you know, he

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>crushed Washington with the tush pushes. That's when the member

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of the refs were like, we're gonna award a touchdown

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if you keep this shit up to Washington. But last

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>year's Eagles playoff offense was Saquon being unreal. Jalen threw

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>four in four games, seven hundred yard, seven hundred and

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty six yards. So it wasn't that all of a

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>sudden the offense, the passing game started rolling. They were

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a dominant and they listen, they kicked the Chiefs assen

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the super I'm not taking anything away from them at all.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The point I'm making is it wasn't okay, you know

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>now we've got this playoff mode offense. It was the

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>offense they've been all year. Saguon Barkley was freaking awesome.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts took care of the ball. That's the offense

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they were all year. That's the offense they were in

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. If that trend of being the offense they

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>were all year, there'll be that offense in the playoffs continues.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They're in huge trouble because the offense they've been all

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>year this year is terrible. Now they are drawing a

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bad defense. But I am I will admit I am

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous about the Eagles going on a run

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just because their fans are so obnoxious to me. But

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do you The Eagles have not scored more than twenty

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>points against a playoff team since the Week three win

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams where they the blocked field goal returned

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown. Since then, this is what they've scored

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>against playoff teams. Seventeen against Denver, ten against the Packers,

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen against the Bears, whose defense is not good, nineteen

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>against the Chargers, twelve against the Bills. So I they're healthier,

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>they have Lane Johnson back. I don't think that. I

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>think that Eagles offense has been broken all year, and

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe Demonse it's going to all of a sudden.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they can flip the switch. I also

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>am curious in that game, and we'll get to it

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and picks in just a moment. Can the Niners offense

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be as prolific as they're gonna need to be against

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a defense that dominant? But it is time now for

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>knicks picks, So Demanse, Oh, there it is, there's our

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>friends bed. I was waiting for it. So in order

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to keep the five hundred or better streak alive, I

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think four of the five years on this pod, we've

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 1>been five hundred or better. We needed to go three

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and two or better the final weekend. Let's go through it.

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Because we laid two and a half with Tampa. They

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>won by two, so now we gotta go three and

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>one down the stretch. Seattle minus one felt great the

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>whole way. Raiders plus five and a half. I told

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys, my god, that Chiefs offense is just so bad.

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So now we just need one win in the late windows.

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Miami plus twelve felt dead pretty early. So it all

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>came down to Pittsburgh against Baltimore, and you have I

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was rooting for Pittsburgh to win. Out right. That's great

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>because I picked them. I know it makes you said,

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but I picked them, and I and I just the

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so I was rooting for it despite that. You should

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have seen how I reacted to Boswell's missed extra point.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Because Boswell's miss missed extra point, I'm like, oh my god,

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half is home. Like now, now

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no overtime there's no funny business. Now it's either

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a Raven's two point win or Pittsburgh. I'm sorry,

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a Raven's one point win or a Pittsburgh two point win.

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So we got it forty four, forty four and two.

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Nothing to write home about. You would have lost money

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on it because of the big but still going five

0:41:52.480 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred picking games is I'll call it difficult. I would

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>like to do better. The only the only piece of

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>our gambling show that was dominant. We'll get to it

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>more in a moment was Demonse's teasers, which I am

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>considering next year to Monsey putting real funds behind. Like

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I am, I'm I'm considering having a huge portion of

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>my twenty twenty six football gambling portfolio b Demonse's teasers.

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I preciate you are. I mean, you really you can

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a great job that well, you did a great job.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 1>You It was just impressive. Yeah, we'll get We'll get

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to that in a moment. But now all lines are

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of course from hard Rock bet. But I'm told something

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that there's a twist this year.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, so we're gonna you're gonna be picking on

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>all the games. But I'm gonna be going ahead to

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 2>head with you in picking picking games as well. Where

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you you stepped over to the teaser landscape, I'm gonna

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>step over to the pigs landscape.

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, love it. And so I don't know where we

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree, So why don't you. So you set

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up the you say the game, I'll say my pick,

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you say where you stand on it.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So first we got the Rams minus ten and

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 2>a half at Carolina. You're taking the Rams there.

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Listen, this is a I believe a square play. The

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>home favorite. Home dogs, big home dogs in the playoffs

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:36.919
<v Speaker 1>are always cover. The producers tell me there have only

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>been nine home dogs in the playoffs since nineteen seventy

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 1>of greater than four points, and they're one and eight.

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The road favorite is one and eight against the spread.

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, and ten and a half is a

0:43:54.520 --> 0:44:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of points. I just believe Carolina is not only

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the worst team that made the playoffs. I don't think

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>they're a good team. I think that there were five

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>or six teams that missed the playoffs that right now

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this week I think are better than Carolina. Yea, And

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Rams played them and lost to them.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Will give the Rams just enough appropriate fear to know.

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter that we're double digit favorites. We have

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to take care of business. I will swallow this huge

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>number and lay the ten and a half with the Rams.

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts done, I'm taking I'm taking Carolina there. I

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>knew you would. I'm yeah, no, I'm I trust Carolina.

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's It's a lot of points.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, Yeah, I was gonna say, you just like the points.

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It's totally fine. It's a lot of points.

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's why I am there. I mean, all right,

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 2>next one, the next one, you got Chicago plus one

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:01.919
<v Speaker 2>versus Green Bay.

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Listen, Chicago's at home, and I think they're better than

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, and they have played the Packers twice. Both

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>games came down to the final moments. But the Packers

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>are the are not the same team from an injury

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>perspective as they were right, Jordan Love hasn't played the

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Packers obviously, don't have Mica, don't have Tucker Kraft, don't

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of key guys. They when they played

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the Bears the first time, Caleb had to pass into

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the end zone to potentially you know, tie the game.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I think they probably would have gone for two. He

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:46.919
<v Speaker 1>threw the pick, and when they played him the second time,

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he had the pass in overtime to win the game.

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bears are better. The Bears are at home,

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bears are healthier. I did not like how the

0:45:56.000 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Bears played this weekend. I still think the Packers won

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.720
<v Speaker 1>nine games because they were about the quality. Once everybody

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.240
<v Speaker 1>got hurt of a nine win team, I'll take Chicago

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>plus one.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>The Bears might have the better coach. Oh you know

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 2>these days. Uh, but yeah, I took Chicago there too.

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you said.

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That the Okay, so we're on the same page there.

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, name page there? Jacksonville plus one versus Buffalo.

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'm taking the Jags plus the points. And

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you might say, what points?

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:28.240
<v Speaker 2>It's point.

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be honest with my dear friends at hard Rock. Bet.

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm disappointed that I can't that this isn't one and

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a half, and I really want that half point because

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think let's so let me explain my pick here, Okay.

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I I think Jacksonville is the more well rounded team

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and the team that currently is playing better. I also

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think Buffalo's tendency to play poor early and then rally

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>late could be a problem for them in this game

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>if Jacksonville's able to shorten the game by efficient passing

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and running the ball with ETN. I also the reason

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I said I want that half point is for some

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>reason or another deep down kind of think Buffalo is

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna win this game by one, and so like that

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four to twenty three Bills win. And so

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I know this is the definition of kind of having

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it both ways. I get that I don't have a

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>super strong conviction. I really liked when I thought I

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be getting I thought when this game, I

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it was gonna be Bill's minus two and a half,

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was Bill's minus one and a half. And

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>now it's Bill's minus one. But I will take Jacksonville

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>plus one. And to be clear, because I see what

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the producers wrote said number one storyline was Josh breaking through.

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>To me, those storylines were not all predictions. It was

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>what the biggest storyline is, will Josh break through? And

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 1>this bet? Can you know Bill's the Bills win by one?

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>There is no way to win this pick in either direction.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It would mean, the line's exactly right. I just think

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jags, they're a thirteen win team that's

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>at home, that's healthy, that's playing great. They shouldn't be

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 1>home dogs. So I just I'm obligated to. I don't

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>love it. You never love. You never love picking against

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the team that you think is more likely to win

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>because you're getting the points, but the points you're getting

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are one one. You don't love that. Well, you really

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>don't love that, but it is Jacksonville plus one.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I took Buffalo minus the point just because if Josh

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Allen does not go out there and win, it's gonna

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 2>be really bad for him. It's gonna be really bad

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 2>for Buffalo. I think if they don't go out and

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.240
<v Speaker 2>get this win. So I took with minus the points.

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:27.720
<v Speaker 2>But San Francisco plus four and a half at Philly, Yeah.

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Niners plus the points. I just I

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 1>think that I think this should be Philly minus three,

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's Philly minus four and a half, and I

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think San Francisco can win. I certainly just I don't

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>trust Philadelphia to look impressive offensively again against teams that

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>had a pulse down the stretch. Beat the Bills by one,

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Chargers by three in overtime, lost to

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bears by nine, beat the Lions, who had a

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>pulse at that point in time, by nine, but uh

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>beat the Packers by three. Lost to the Broncos by four,

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like they just even early in the year, beat the

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys by four, beat the Chiefs by three. That Rams game,

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll that, you'll oh, they beat the Rams by seven.

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Not really, they were beating the Rams by one. The

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Rams were attempting a game winning field goal and then

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it got blocked and returned for a touchdown. They beat

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks by six, like their wins by real margin

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this year. They're how more than one score wins the Giants,

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, the Commanders. And I understand, it's not like

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting seven and a half, I'm getting four and

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a half, But I do. I thought the Niners defense

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>played its best game in forever again in Seattle, and

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that if they it now Trent Williams not

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>practicing Wednesday, I don't love. I've got to imagine he

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>will play in this game Sunday. I like that this

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>game is Sunday instead of Saturday. For that purpose. I

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think San Francisco can win. I'm getting more than a

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>field goal against a team whose offense is broken. I'll

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>take San Francisco plus four and a half.

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm right with you there, Yeah, okay, all right, Chargers

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 2>plus four at New England.

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the Pats win, but I think the Pats

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>win by three. I'll take the four points. I'm underdog heavy,

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 1>but I just I can't. This is This would be traumatic.

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And I understand his offensive linees brutal, I get it.

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This would be traumatic for Herbert if he lays another egg.

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:06.720
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have to win. Like, I'm not gonna that.

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>They aren't as good as New England. They're on the road.

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna if he, you know, plays a normal

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Herbert game and they just lose. Now, he's not gonna

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 1>get like bonus credit. But I'm not gonna kill him

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:23.839
<v Speaker 1>for it. Uh. But he can't lay another egg. I

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>don't imagine he will. He's been carrying this team on

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball throughout the year. The defense,

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but the real the real reason that I like grabbing

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the pointsier to Monsey Ish Drake May has not faced

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a defense as good as the Chargers defense. I don't

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>know if he's done it all year. Like I'm trying

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to think who's the best defense the Patriots faced. I

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't find a good one. And the Steelers, I

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:05.320
<v Speaker 1>guess you could argue they turn the ball over five times.

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers like early in the year, I don't know,

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Bills. The Bills pass defense has been really

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>good all year. Drake May threw zero touchdowns against him

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in two games. Now, Listen, this isn't me. I'm I

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think the Pats are gonna win. But I get four

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 1>points and what I think will be a low scoring,

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>cold game at night, and I just don't think it's

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a prolific passing attack. I also think Vrabel

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:40.439
<v Speaker 1>can shorten the game if he needs to. I'll take

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the four points with the Chargers taking the four. Okay,

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>So right now, our only difference is you've got Carolina

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>plus ten and a half and you've got the Bills

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 1>minus one. Other than that, we're on the same page,

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Last one last year Pittsburgh plus three versus Houston.

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Steelers are gonna win, and I understand Tomlin

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>hasn't won a playoff game in a decade.

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They get DJ Metcalf back, They're coming off that type

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of victory. Houston's offense never got fixed. It got a pulse,

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but it never got fixed. There is this weird stat

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that only I care about, which is that Mike Tomlin's

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the greatest Monday night football coach ever. He's twenty two

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to three in his career on Monday nights and twelve

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and oh at home. He's been the head coach for

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. He's never lost a home Monday night game.

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:43.919
<v Speaker 1>This is a home Monday night game, and I think

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that Rogers is going to be for the first time

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>all year, Demonse willing to stand in the pocket and

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 1>get hit if he needs to be because they're in

0:54:55.320 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. And again, just like a kind of auto

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.439
<v Speaker 1>gambling rule. I know it has not been a good

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>rule in the playoffs the last decade, but Mike Tomlin

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at home getting points, I just gotta I gotta be

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>on that side of it. So I'll take Pittsburgh plus

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the three.

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Rogers might get mangled, though he might be a yeah,

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on I'm with you on that too.

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh plus three great.

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So we only have two differences. Yeah, but my my

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>picks are the Rams minus ten and a half and

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>then all the underdogs Chicago plus one, Jacksonville plus one,

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Niners plus four and a half, the Chargers plus four,

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh plus three, and de Mon's even if you don't win,

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so proud of the fact that you are you

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 1>just you just love getting points. You tease underdogs up

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of favorites down to the NFL playoffs. You're like,

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 1>just give me the points. Just love you love getting points.

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:11.479
<v Speaker 1>It makes me so happy. A such a good Uh yeah,

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, they're giving you the points. Just take it

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>all right. Speaking of good gambling fundamentals, Demon's crushed his

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>teasers this year eleven and seven, including a four lager

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago. This week, I don't even think

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it was close on any of them. Carolina plus ten

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half they lost by two, Pittsburgh plus eleven

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half they won out right, Buffalo plus a half.

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:45.719
<v Speaker 1>They annihilated the Jets, even with Mitch Trubisky playing what

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are you doing this week?

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 2>This week we got a three team eight point teaser

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 2>at plus one hundred, and we're gonna be teasing Chicago

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 2>up to plus nine. I want to tease Buffalo up

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 2>to a touch to plus seven, and then I want

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to tease the Chargers up to US twelve. You know,

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I can only go with the games they give me what. Yeah,

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 2>we had this week, so.

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot. I also like the fact that

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you resisted the urge to tease. If you like the

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Panthers plus ten and a half, you might be like, well,

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like them plus eighteen.

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And a half.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think deep down you felt like, yeah, they

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:25.520
<v Speaker 1>might get both.

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 2>They could, They could lose by three scores, and you're

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 2>not getting quite the key numbers.

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>You're the Chargers ones a little awkward going from four

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to twelve. It's not as much value. But I also

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna get blown out. Come on,

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's gotta be able to you know, if Chicago gets

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>blown out at home, it's a disaster. And listen, the

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Jags have been kicking the shit out of people, but

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the bills and the playoffs. You get all.

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll look past your teas and through the zero because

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you obviously get it up to seven, which is such

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a key. So I've lost I believe it's patronizing at

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this point for me to grade the teasers. I'm not

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 1>grading him anymore. You're just the you have taught me

0:58:17.440 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how to do it.

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Grad all right, you've.

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Graduated from it. I do have a touchdown, Genie this week?

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Who are we going with.

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence? Guy loves that quarterback snake?

0:58:31.320 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Trevor Lawrence.

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Trevor Lawrence plus one seventy anytime touchdown is my touchdown?

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Genie? This week? Solid? All right? That was was a

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 2>bold one. I expect that.

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So that is so what's the offer? I know what

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the offer is, but go.

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Ahead, So you skip the offer last week? This week

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 2>we were riding with your boy, Trevor Lawrence along with TD. Genie.

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 2>He's thrown for three touchdowns with zero interceptions in three

0:58:56.640 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of his last four games. Do you think he can

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 2>do it again? Trevor? Three plus touchdowns and zero interceptions

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 2>at plus six hundred.

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So this doesn't count, right, Like if he runs for one,

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it has to be three passing touchdowns. Then I sadly

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have to turn this down. While I appreciate it, I

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 1>just think that this is gonna be a running game

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Jags. Bill's run defense is bad. Pass defense

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is good. So even at six to one, I sadly

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have to reject it demands. Can't wait for the weekend.

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be facetiing you a bunch during these games.

0:59:29.920 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Wild Card weekend should be excellent. Your Raven's not in it,

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 1>my chiefs not in it. Get to be nice and relaxed,

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:40.720
<v Speaker 1>y kid ourselves, chill out. Thank you to everybody like

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:42.919
<v Speaker 1>great subscriber review to the show in a shout out

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to our wonderful sponsors, hard Rock, bet Boost and Zen.

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to all, even Blue Duck. Enjoy a great

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>football weekend. Talk to you guys Tuesday. What's right