WEBVTT - Batteries and Fast Recharging

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and I end nearly

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>every episode of tech Stuff asking y'all if there are

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>any topics you'd like to hear me explain on the show.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And recently a lot of you have been sending in requests,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome, and I'm getting to those now that

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>those tech glossary episodes are all done. And first up

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is a message from Brian Perez, who wants to know

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about fast charging technology, which is a great and legitimately

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>confusing suggestion because there are a lot of different technologies

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>out there. So today we're gonna talk about how batteries work,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's important for us to understand this technology. Then

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk more about how rechargeable batteries work, because

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly that's going to be important. And then we'll talk

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>about what makes fast charging possible and some of the

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>different technologies that are out on the market and why

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's such a mess. Uh So let's do that, and

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with the basics of electricity and that lovely

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>equation that tells us that wattage that that's a measurement

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of power, is equal to current in ampiers times voltage

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.279
<v Speaker 1>or volts, And it's good to remember the difference between

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>current and volts. Current refers to the amount of electric

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>current moving across a circuit, and voltage is the force

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that drives that current. So frequently folks like me use

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the analogy of water pressure to describe voltage and the

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of water actually flowing through a system to describe current.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, voltage is sort of the umph at which

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>current gets pushed. We'll come back to the watch discussion

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of this episode, because that's really at

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the heart of fast charging technology. So let's talk about

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>how batteries work in general and the evolution of the battery. Now,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing we have to keep in mind is that

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>batteries don't create energy. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Batteries store energy in the form of chemical energy. They

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>release energy in the form of electricity. So we're really

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about converting one type of energy into another. That

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is possible, right. We can't create or destroy energy, but

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>we can change it from one form to another. So

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the heart of what batteries do. Batteries go through

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>an electro chemical reaction and through that process they release

0:02:55.480 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>electrons i eat. Electricity. The reaction takes play, and electrons

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>are a byproduct. They are released as part of this

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>chemical reaction. Even when a battery isn't being used, this

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>reaction can still occur, though typically at a very much

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>slower rate. Right otherwise, batteries would be dead before you

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ever got a chance to use them, but it does happen.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>This is called self discharge. This is one of the

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>factors that determines the shelf life of a battery. So

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you ever look at just a long list of

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all the different types of batteries, you'll typically see the

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>listed you know, average shelf life of them, and if

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a shorter shelf life, that tells you that there's

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a higher rate of of self discharge. Generally speaking, that's

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>actually being a little too reductive because it also depends

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on the capacity of the battery, like how how much

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>volume does the battery have, But we're not going to

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>dive too deep into all of that. So batteries that

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>are in hot environ ments also tend to self discharge

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at a faster rate than batteries that are in a

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>colder environment, So you don't want your batteries to be

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in someplace that's going to be really hot. However, this

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>also leads some people to make a decision that is

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not very wise. It is not a good idea to shove,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, unused batteries in the freezer so that you

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>can make them last longer. The lower temperatures that the

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>batteries experience. That means that it will impede the chemical

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>reaction when you plug it into something. So this means

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that a cold battery will not perform as well as

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a normal battery until it gets up to temperature. And

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>when I say that the battery will eventually go dead

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>through self discharge, often we are talking about a factor

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about years, right, So self discharge doesn't happen overnight. There's

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>no reason to put batteries into the fridge or the

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>freezer or anything like that, because you're likely going to

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>use them before they would have self discharged anyway. Setting

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>aside stories about you know, ancient Babylonian containers that might

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have been used as some sort of proto battery, possibly

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of electro plating materials. The ancestor of

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the modern battery really took shape in sevent with Alessandro Volta,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and his name gives us the word volt. More importantly,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>our history starts with a disagreement between two scientific thinkers,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and those thinkers were Volta and Luigi Galvani. Now, Galvani

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>had observed in the seventeen eighties that if he were

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to take a frog that was really most sincerely dead

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and expose said dead froggy's leg muscles by you know,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>cutting away the skin and then touching that muscle with

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>an arc made from iron and brass, it would cause

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the muscle to twitch. Now, Galvani had already run experiments

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>using things like an electrostatic generator, so a device that

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>generates an electrostatic charge, and he knew that there was

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some connection between muscular movement and electricity because of this.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But this was different, right because he was using what

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be an inert pair of metals. It was

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>an iron embrass, and there was no electro static machine

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>generating a charge. He wasn't even doing this during a thunderstorm.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He had observed that thunderstorms could also produce electrostatic charges

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that could then influence experiments like these, But this was

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a case where neither of those things were components. So

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, the electricity must reside within the muscle itself.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>If it's not in the iron embrass, it's gotta be

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the muscle, and Volta thought that his buddy Galvani

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was totally on the wrong track. Volta's assertion was that

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the cause of the twitching was due to the use

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of two different metals that were connecting to one another

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>through the medium of a moist conductive UH substance, that

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>being the froggy's leg muscle. So Volta decided to experiment

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the field of electrochemical reactions to see if perhaps

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he was right and if Galvanni was wrong. So Galvanni,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was totally right in that muscle movements

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are the result of electrochemical processes, but in this case

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Volta was saying, yeah, but that's not what's happening here.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're you're making the right hypothesis. So

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Volta created a stack of material He alternated layers of

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>zinc UH. He then put in some cardboard that had

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>been soaked in brine, and then he would put on

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>layers of silver. So he kind of alternated with these,

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was able to create a kind of proto

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>battery that we refer to with the charming name of

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>voltaic pile. There were some pretty big limitations to this, however.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>The strength of this battery depended in part on the

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>number of layers that he could build up. However, he

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make it too tall, because the layers on top

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>would start to press down so hard on the layers

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>below that the brine in that cardboard would get squeezed out,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and then it would suddenly be less effective. Also, the

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>metal would corrode fairly quickly due to the electrochemical reactions,

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the the byproduct would build up on those plates,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>and eventually they would impede the reaction from continuing, and

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd see a decrease in electrical output because of it. Now,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>just a few decades after Volta's work, there was an

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>English chemist named John Frederick Danielle who made an or Daniel.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it doesn't have an E at the end,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'll say daniel it's d A N I E

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>L l uh. He made an early battery using a

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>plate of copper, a plate of zinc, and some gnarly chemicals.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if I can paint a mental picture. So

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he took a big glass jar and at the bottom

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>of the inside of this jar he put the copper plate,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so the copper plates at the bottom. On top of

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the copper plate, he poured in a solution of copper sulfate.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, these days, copper sulfate is used in

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like herbicides because it kills plants pretty darn effectively. Also,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about batteries, were often talking about chemicals

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that are acidic. That is pretty common. You've probably heard

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about battery acid and it's one of the many reasons

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>why you don't want to mess around, you know, cutting

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>open batteries and stuff. There are a lot of reasons

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for that, specifically when you get the things like lithium

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries and um that's one of the many ones.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So then he then on top of this copper sulfate solution,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>he poured in a zinc sulfate solution. Now, copper sulfate

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has a greater density than zinc sulfate, so the copper

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>sulfate settled down at the bottom of the jar, and

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the zinc sulfate floated to the top. You've probably seen

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>like mixtures of oil and water that do this kind

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Daniel then suspended a zinc plate within these

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>zinc sulfate half of the jar. So imagine like a

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hook that hooks over the side of the jar, and

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hanging from that hook is a plate of zinc held

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>horizontal above the copper sulfate level. Right, So you've got

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>two separate levels here, and two separate sulfates uh to

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>each plate. He attached a conductive wire. And now we

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>need a bit of an anatomy lesson for batteries. So

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>let's consider your typical battery. Let's say that you just

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to have a battery nearby, you can

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>even look at one and and kind of get the

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>lay of the land. So you've got two terminals with

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>your battery, Like if it's a double a battery, it's

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on either end of the battery. Right. These are the

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>points of the batteries that connect to a circuit or

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>or a load. This is the pathway that electrons will

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>take where at some point along the way they will

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>presumably do some sort of work. So you've got a

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>positive terminal and you've got a negative terminal. You could

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>connect these two terminals directly to each other with conductive wire,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's not a great idea. That would lead to

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the battery discharging very rapidly, and for some tymes of batteries,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that could be dangerous as the battery will heat up

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>from the rapid electrochemical reaction, potentially leading to combustion or explosion.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So not a good idea to do this. Attached to

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the positive terminal inside the battery is the cathode. Connected

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to the negative terminal inside the battery is the annode. Together,

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>these are the electrodes of the battery. There's a separator

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that keeps those two electrodes from touching. Otherwise we would

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>have a very similar situation to what I was talking

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about before, where you connect the two terminals with a

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>conductive wire, only in this case it would be internal

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>inside the battery as opposed to connect did through an

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>external wire. The separator does allow an electric charge to

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>flow between the two electrodes. Uh. There's also a medium

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>called the electrolyte that facilitates the flow of electric charge.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So during discharge, The anode reacts with the electrolyte and

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>experiences and oxidation reaction. Ions that is, atoms or molecules

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that carry an electric charge from the electrolyte will react

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>with the anode and that produces a new compound between

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the two and in this process also releases electrons. So

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>now we've got our supply of electrons popping over onto

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the cathode side. The cathode goes through a reduction reaction

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in which ions, electrons, and the cathode begin to form compounds.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>This process takes in electrons while the process that the

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 1>anode generates electrons, but the separator keeps the electrons from

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>just rushing over from one side to the other. Right,

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think, all right, if we've gotten excess of

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>electrons and like charge repels like, then the electrons don't

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>want to be next to each other, right, they'd rather

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get to the other side, especially as that side grows

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>more positive because the electrons are negative and opposite charges attract.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But the separator prevents the electrons from doing this. They

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>can't get to that side unless you open a pathway

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for them. That pathway is the circuit. So when you

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>open up a circuit. You create a circuit that goes

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>connects between these two electrodes. Now the electrons have a

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>way to get away from the negatively charged side of

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the battery and head to the positive charged side of

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the battery, and they will do that even if it

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>means they have to do some work along the way.

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Thus we have batteries. So with Daniels battery, which we

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>call the Daniel cell, the wire connected to the zinc

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>plate served as the negative terminal. The wire attached to

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the copper plate at the bottom of the jar was

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the positive terminal. And the cell worked really well. But

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because we're talking about liquid components here, it couldn't really

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be used in any sort of application that the thing

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>would be moved around because it would just be slashing everywhere, right,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So it had to be stationary, and that really limited

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what you could do with this kind of battery. A

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>few decades later brings us up to the eighteen sixties.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>That's when George Leshan switched things up by making a

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>battery out of a porous pot. He took some crushed

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>manganese dioxide with a little bit of carbon in it,

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and he used that as the cathode. He packed that

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>onto the inside of the porous pot. The annode was

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a zinc rod that was actually kept separate from the pot.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So you had a pot on the inside of which

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was this mixture of manganese dioxide and carbon, and then

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you have this zinc rod. Then he leant put both

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the pot and the zinc rod into another container filled

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with ammonium chloride that acted as the electrolyte. Now, this

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>solution of amonium chloride seeped through the porous pot to

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>make contact with the cathode and that allowed the electrochemical

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>process to begin and the carbon rod that would also

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be inserted into this Uh, this pot acted as a

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>collector for the electrons. So that's what you would use

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, direct the electrons outward to whatever circuit.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>This type of battery saw widespread use in telegraph stations,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but still relied on a liquid electrolyte, and UH that

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really made it unsuitable for stuff what moved around a lot,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so still not ideal. We would see all that change

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the work of inventor Carl Gossner from Germany.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I originally put in my notes that he was a

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>German inventor, But now that I read that, it sounds

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like he invented Germans, and I'm pretty sure they were

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>around before him. Anyway, Gassner made several improvements to batteries,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that they would be practical in many

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of our applications. For one thing, Gastner had the bright

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>idea to use zinc as the container material for the

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>battery itself. So the body of the battery was made

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>out of zinc and it also served as the negative electrode,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>so it was doing double duty. It was the container

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and the negative electrode, so the actual body of the

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>battery served as one of the two electrodes the anode.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>In case you're trying to keep these things straight. Inside

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the battery, he put in a folded paper sack which

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>served as the separator, which kept the interior of the

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>zinc case separate from the electrolyte. For the cathode, he

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>used a mixture of manganese ox side and in the

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of this he suspended a carbon rod, which again

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>acted as the electron collector. And later he would add

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>zinc chloride to the electrolyte because it reduced the rate

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at which the electro light would corrode the zinc uh

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the case. It would It would then extend the

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>batteries useful life by slowing down that that process. But

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the most important part of this invention was that Gasner's

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>battery is what we call a dry cell battery. It

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was not full of sloshy liquid. Even though the electrolyte

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a jelly liquid e kind of thing,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it was all dry. I meant that

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to worry about the battery components slash

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>galt all over the place, admit that you could invert

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>it and it would still work. It opened up a

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of applications for batteries. In the eighteen nineties, the

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>National Carbon Company, a US based organization, developed the Columbia

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>dry cell battery, which was another improvement. They first started

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>making La Sanche batteries in the eighteen nineties, but again

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>those were wet cell batteries. An engineer at the company

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>named E. M. Jewitt created a one point five volt

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>dry cell battery and got the blessing from the company

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a commercial version that they could actually sell.

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So in eighteen nine six NCC began selling a one

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half volt six inch long dry cell battery. Interestingly,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the National Car been Company would buy a fifty steak

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in another company called the American Electrical Novelty and Manufacturing Company.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The battery making part of that company joined in CC

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and together they became known as ever Ready, and much

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>later that company would change its name to Energizer, So

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that one dates all the way back to the early

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundreds. All the batteries I mentioned so far are

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what we call primary batteries. So a primary battery is

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a one use battery. That means once the battery goes dead,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really most sincerely dead. It's not coming back because

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a different chemical component reacting with another

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>chemical component to produce electricity, and then you get by

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>products as well, and you eventually run low enough on

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>those initial chemical components that you're not getting enough juice

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way to reverse that process. Right once

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it turns into the byproducts, the battery has become a nert.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Now a few things that can that can happen to

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>make a battery less effective. One is that, as I mentioned,

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you could have your chemical agents depleted in the battery,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So what you've got now is essentially a container just

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>filled with useless goop as a result of all these

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>electrochemical reactions taking place. Another is that whatever you're using

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as an electron collector might get covered in deposits, and

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that blocks the collector's ability to collect electrons. And so

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you might still have some viable juice in the battery,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but because of this corrosion coding elements inside the battery,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not able to have that that process go effectively.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Corrosion is also an issue as well for the electrodes.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever had an old battery and something and

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you've just seen this gross kind of build up on it,

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that's often the corrosion I'm talking about. And all of

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>these things lead to a batteries and ability to produce current.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>With primary batteries, there's really no way to reverse this process.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>The electrochemical reactions will stop, and then you've got to

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>toss the battery. Primary batteries tend to be relatively inexpensive.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>They also tend to have a fairly long shelf life,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're also wasteful. When we come back, we'll talk

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about secondary batteries, also known as rechargeable batteries. But first,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. When I was talking earlier

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>about the development of the battery, the last inventor I

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned was Carl Gassner, who invented the dry cell battery,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>which was in but the rechargeable battery actually predates the

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>dry cell battery, and the person who generally gets the

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>credit for inventing them is Gaston Plante. No one invents

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like Gaston or imprints like guests. Okay, I'll never mind.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen fifty nine, he created a lead acid battery

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that you could actually recharge his batteries and ode was

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>made of a sheet of lead, and he used a

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sheet of lead dioxide for the cathode, and he placed

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a linen cloth between those two sheets. Then he rolled

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this into a cone shaped spiral. He immersed this cone

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in a solution of sulfuric acid, which is pretty dangerous stuff,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and the chemical reaction that resulted released electrons and boom,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you get yourself a battery. Gaston discovered that if he

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>applied a charge to this battery so that current flowed

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>into the battery, it would actually reverse the electrochemical reaction

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that produced the electrons. This battery then had a way

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to discharge and then recharge. In eighteen sixty he presented

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a nine cell battery to the French Academy of Sciences,

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and his peer Camille Alphonse for continued to work on

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the invention and saw it actually become a commercial product.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Camille would later make improvements to this battery, including a

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>process that would increase the battery's capacity for storing electricity.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And we still use lead acid batteries today. It's the

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>type of battery you find in your typical internal combustion

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>engine vehicle. So your typical car that has an internal

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine also has a lead acid battery. Now, I

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Gaston created a nine cell battery, and that

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that we should chat about for just a moment.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Some batteries, like car batteries, consist of multiple cells that

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>connect to one another within the battery itself. So a

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>typical car battery would have six cells connected in series.

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>If you connect batteries in series, you increase the voltage

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that those batteries produce. Now, remember, voltage is kind of

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like pressure. That's how much umph is behind an electrical current,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a measure of the amount of current itself.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're not increasing the current by adding batteries or

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>mattery cells in series. You're increasing the voltage. If you

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>add them in parallel, it's different. But we're talking about

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in series one after the other. So your typical lead

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>acid battery has cells that individually have a voltage of

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>two volts, but because they are connected in series, the

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>battery overall has a voltage of twelve volts. Right, you've

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>got six cells each two volts. You've got them in series,

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so it multiplies the voltage to twelve. Most of your

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>typical household batteries, like double as, triple AS, C and

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>D batteries, those typically come in at one and a

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>half volts. But again, if you connect them in series,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you get more voltage. So a flashlight that has two

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>batteries connected in series is actually relying on three volts

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>for the voltage. Another thing we should touch on is

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that because batteries convert chemical energy into electrical energy, there's

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental limit as to how much juice a battery

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can hold. That doesn't mean all batteries are equal. Depending

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on the materials used to create that electrochemical reaction, you

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can get more efficient and energy dense batteries. For example,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>lead acid batteries don't really have great energy density, which

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you typically measure either by comparing how much energy the

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>battery can store compared to that batteries mass, or how

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>much energy it can store compared to that batteries volume.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>There are two different ways of looking at it. Alkaline batteries,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>which make up a lot of the typical batteries we

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>use today, the non rechargeable primary batteries that we use today,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>those are better from an energy density metric, meaning, based

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on that batteries mass or volume, it can hold more

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>energy than a lead acid battery. But we also have

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind that these are much smaller than

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lead acid batteries. The batteries power density and energy density

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>depend on the mass and volume of the battery and

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the type of chemical components that make up the anode,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the cathode, and the electrolyte. So we're ultimately talking about

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a chemical physical process that relies on a limited amount

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of source material, like a limited amount of fuel, if

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you will. So this means that it's very hard to

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>make longer lasting batteries based on what we have today,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>unless you're making literally just larger batteries. You can't really

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>squeeze more out of physics. It's just you're you're hitting

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental limits of what is possible in a chemical reaction. Now,

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in tech, we've got Moore's law, which we generally interpret

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>as meaning that every two years or so, the processing

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>power or processing speed of computers tends to double. That's

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the very you know, dumbed down version of Moore's law,

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of how we interpret it today. But

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we do not see batteries on a similar trajectory, right.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't see batteries increase in capacity at the same

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>rate as we're seeing processing speed or processing power. This

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is because the laws of physics don't really care if

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we need better batteries, which puts pressure on electronics manufacturers

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>too really create ways to limit how much electricity gadgets

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>actually require as they operate. Not just electronics manufacturers, but

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>also you know, the companies that design things like operating systems.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>In order to make batteries last longer. You can't just

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>build better batteries. That's that's that's a much slower process.

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It means that you have to be smarter with how

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>much energy you try to access so barring some miraculous

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>alien technology, we're not likely to see astronomical improvements to

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>battery life, though there are people who are working on it.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just we're not likely to see giant leaps there.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So that means we just have to be smarter about

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how our gadgets access power. Often when we're talking about

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>rechargeable batteries, we are thinking about bowl devices like smartphones, tablets,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>laptops and handheld gaming systems and that kind of thing.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>These devices almost exclusively today rely on lithium ion batteries. Now,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>if you were able to look inside a battery, and

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I urge you to never ever ever do this because

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>there is dangerous stuff in those batteries, but you would

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>see that the battery consists of layers of carbon graphite

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and lithium on the anode side. This is on the

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>negative terminal side of the battery, and we refer to

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the arrangement of lithium that's kind of nestled between lattices

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of carbon graphite as intercalation. So they're intercalated between these layers.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You can think of like the carbon graphite as being

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>almost like a net and the little lithium atoms are

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>nestled inside between layers of this net. Lithium has three electrons,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and you might remember from basic science class that electrons

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>orbit the nucleus of an atom within certain energy shells,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and that only a specific number of electrons can inhabit

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>each shell. For for the shell that's closest to the nucleus,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you can only have two electrons. So that means that

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>each lithium atom has two electrons in that first energy shell,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a single lonely electron that's orbiting the nucleus

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>in the next energy shell out from the nucleus. That

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>also means it's pretty easy for lithium to give up

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that electron. It's not holding onto its super hard. That

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>means the lithium atom, when it lets go of this electron,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes an ion. It's a charged atom of lithium, a

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>positively charged one in this case, because it's given up

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>an electron which carries a negative charge, but it's held

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>onto all of its protons, which have positive charges. So

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>when a lithium ion battery connects to a circuit and

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that circuit becomes complete, the outermost electrons in the lithium

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>atoms go through the pathway of the circuit and leave

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the lithium atoms now ions behind and head towards the

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>positively charged cathode side of the battery. That's because the

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>electrons carry that negative charge and negative is attracted to positive,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and the lithium ions left behind they do have that

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>positive charge to them. That will become important in a second. Now,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the cathode is positively charged because there is cobalt there

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that has given up electrons to oxygen. So that means

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that you have cobalt ions in a lattice like structure

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on the cathode side. So that's the positive side of

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>your battery. Ah. But I hear you say. If electrons

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are ditching lithium and they're heading over to the cobalt

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>side and joining cobalt ions, they are leaving behind lithium ions,

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that ultimately become unsustainable because of the electric charges involved,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Because if electrons are joining positively charged cobalt ions, they're

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eventually balancing out that charge. Right the electrons joined the

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>cobalt ion, they can't allout that positive charge. Meanwhile, you've

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>got lithium ions back behind on the anode side and

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a positive charge wouldn't that just mean that

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually the electrons would stop and feel less of a

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>pull towards the cobalt side and be pulled back towards

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the lithium side. Well, that would happen, except the electrolyte

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in between the anode and the cathode allows the lithium ions,

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the possibly charged lithium ions, to cross over from the

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>anode side to the cathode side, and essentially the lithium

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>ions settle in between the layers of cobalt very much

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that they had done when they

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>were lithium atoms over on the carbon side. The electrolyte

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>also prevents electrons from passing through it, Otherwise, again, batteries

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>would be useless because we would never convince those little

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>electron suckers to go through a circuit and do work

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for us. In addition to the electrolyte, there's a non

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>conductive separator between the anode and the cathode because again,

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't want them to come into contact with one another.

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, there is a real good reason for this,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And just as a spoiler alert, I'll just say, boom

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on the carbon side of the battery. You know, the

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the anode side, you have a sheet of copper that

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>acts as a collector. On the cobalt side, you have

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a sheet of aluminum to serve as the collector. The

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>positively charged lithium ions don't regain electrons in this process

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when they come over to the cobalt side, so they

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>remain positively charged and they stay over there nestled in

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the cobalt nets. But by moving the positive charge from

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the annode to the cathode, the poll for the electrons

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>remains steady and the electron flow or electricity can continue

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for as long as there are a sufficient number of

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lithium atoms left on the anode side to give up electrons.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But once that amount gets depleted enough, then the battery

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>no longer has enough charge to allow electricity to flow.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>During the recharging process, the source of electricity, whether it's

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from a charging cable or docking station or wireless recharge

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, it applies a voltage that's high enough to

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>reverse the flow of electrons so that now they will

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>move from the cathode side back over to the anode side.

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The recharging process strips the electrons away from the cobalt,

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so once again you have cobalt ions left behind. Sends

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the electrons back over to the anode side, and the

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>positively charged lithium ions escape their intercalation with the cobalt

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>sheets they move back through the electrolyte over to the

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>anode side. This happens because the positively charged cobalt ions

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and the positively charged lithium ions repel each other, but

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the cobalts locked into place right, It's like a lattice,

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so it can't really it can't move through the electrolyte.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The lithium ions are free to move across to the

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>other side, so they make the journey through the electrolyte

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>back over to the anode and they are reunite with

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the electrons, and the lithium ions become lithium atoms, you know,

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>neutral charge. They rejoined with the electrons through the charging process.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Eventually you get to a point where you're back to

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where you started, with an anode side filled with lithium

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>atoms and a cathode side filled with positively charged cobalt ions,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you can use the battery all over again. Now,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the layers I just described are not in a flat

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>plane in your typical lithium ion battery like it doesn't

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>look like a flat sandwich with a cobalt layer on

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one side and a carbon layer on the other side

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and electro light in the middle. No, Instead, these are

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>layers that then get folded over and over and over

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>again many times to maximize the energy density of the battery.

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you could see through a battery case, you

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.479
<v Speaker 1>would see what looks like tons of layers, it's actually

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just really a very long series of layers that's just

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>been folded over itself many times. Now, if the anode

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and cathode could touch one another, the chemical reaction would

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>accelerate rapidly and it would generate a lot of heat

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the process. This is what can lead to a

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fire or an explosion, and it's why we have strict

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>rules about bringing lithium ion batteries on board planes. So

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you might remember a few years ago when Samsung released

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Note seven smartphone, there were a few incidents of

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>batteries catching fire or even exploding, and it was a

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>big enough problem that Samsung recalled the Note seven on

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>two separate occasions, attempting to address the issue. According to Samsung,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there were two flaws in battery design that led to

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this issue. The first battery, which came out from one manufacturer,

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>had two electrodes that were somewhat weak and prone to bending,

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and that meant that if they bent in a certain way,

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they might actually be in close proximity, in fact, close

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>enough to come in contact with one another, which created

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a short circuit, which means the alli trunks could flow

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>through this shortcut rather than through and you know whatever

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>circuit they were supposed to go through, this being the

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Note seven, and they would do so really quickly, and

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that would heat the battery up beyond the failed point,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and you would have a fire or explosion. Now, the

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>second problem came after Samsung first recalled the Note seven

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and replaced the batteries with a new one from a

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>totally different manufacturer. But this battery also had a design flaw,

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a different one. Apparently, the welding on the new batteries

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was defective and allowed for a similar short circuit issue

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the replacement batteries, So the Note seven handsets that

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>were supposedly fixed could still have a similar issue with

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>catching on fire or even exploding. These defects gave Samsung

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a black eye. And it really spelled

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>doom for the Notes seven hand set. Those Samsung stressed

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that the phone design itself was not at fault, it

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>was just really super bad luck with two different battery manufacturers.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we come back, I'm going to dive

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>into how fast charging works. But before I do that,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. You know, one thing I

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't cover before the break with lithium ion batteries is

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that attached to the battery is special circuitry that can

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>control how much electricity flows into the battery during recharging. Uh.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's sort as safety measure really and and this is

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>important that you can prevent a battery from overcharging, which

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 1>could damage the battery that could lead to one of

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>those short circuit scenarios and talked about. So you want

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>everything to be really controlled when you're recharging, to make

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that the battery remains intact and you don't create

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous situation or you know, just cause damage to

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the battery which reduces its useful lifespan. So let's talk

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a moment about USB cables only a little bit, because

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just one of the ways that we can use

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to charge a lot of electronics and it's one of

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the ways that's compatible with some of the fast charging technologies.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to my recent tech glossary episodes, you

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>know that USB stands for Universal Serial Bus and it's

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a type of connector and cable system, you know, ports

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and connectors and cables that replaces a lot of other

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ports and connectors and cables that we used to have

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to rely on all the time to connect anything from

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>keyboards or computer amounts to computers or printers, all these

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of things that we need to have all these

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>different proprietary cables for. It effectively helped replace those and

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of course we find USB ports on all sorts of

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gadgets beyond computers and smartphones. I've got a little shower

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 1>radio that recharges via USB, so it's on all sorts

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, and the USB standard allows for the transmission

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>both of data and of power. But how much power

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the USB cable can carry depend upon the type of

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>USB port and the type of cable itself, So you're

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>going to find that the amount of wattage or power

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that a USB connection can carry is going to depend

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on those ports and the cable being used. Essentially, you're

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>limited to whichever is capable of carrying the lowest amount

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of power. So, while USB cables are largely backwards compatible

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and USB ports are largely backwards compatible with cables, if

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you're using an older cable connected to a later port,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be limited to what that older cable can do,

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>even if the port is capable of greater things. That's

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to get at here. So let's say

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you're using a USB two point oh cable to connect

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>your phone to a charging block. Uh, the two point

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>oh standard has a maximum power output of two and

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a half watts. That's five milliamps of current and five

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>volts of voltage, and you multiply those together you get

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>two point five watts. Fast charging technologs can recharge batteries

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>faster by allowing for greater wattage to flow into the battery. So,

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.959
<v Speaker 1>for example, USB three point oh keeps the same five

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>volts as USB two point oh. All right, so the

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>voltage is the same from USB three point oh to

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>USB two point oh. However, USB three point oh can

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>carry a current of up to point nine apps. That

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>means you get a max power output of four and

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a half watt's with USB three point oh. This tends

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of the default wattage that gets delivered

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>via charging by USB USB three point one and three

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>point two. They include us B p D. P D

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>stands for power delivery that can support up to forty

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>eight volts, so a much higher voltage and up to

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>five amps, So that means you can have a maximum

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>power delivery of two forty watts. That's a huge leap

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>from four and a half what's obviously four and a

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>half to two forty UM USB four which is right

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>around the corner now, it will similarly support up to

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>two d forty watts of max power, but most devices

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>do not take advantage of this um, especially fast chargers, don't. Uh.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>The max you see with fast charging right now tends

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to be right around one hundred what's so not all

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way up to two forty What's like It's kind

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of like anything where you think about about pressure, uh

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and output, you get to a point where the pressure

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and output will be too much to benefit from. It

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would only be overwhelming or dangerous. So we don't see

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>fast charging really hitting that two forty what maximum at

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>least I'm not aware of one the ones I'm aware

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fastest ones top out at one hundred watts.

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So the USB C cables those are the ones that

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have the well shaped reversible plug at the end, which

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>removes that annoying trade of having to figure out which

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>way is the right way up for your USB cable. Uh,

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>those are great if you happen to have stuff that

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>has USB ports on them, USB C ports on them,

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and they have us B p D built into them.

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So by default, most USB three point o ports just

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>push out that four and a half. What's so, even

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>if you do have a USB C cable the uh

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, technically capable of delivering more power to

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a device than four and a half. What's that's all

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the juice you're gonna get if you have that cable

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>plugged into a standard USB three point o ports. So

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>again you're limited by the lowest output of whatever component

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you're using as part of your setup. Now, if you're

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>curious about what kind of ports your computer has or

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what kind of USB cables you have, you can always

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the color inside the ports or inside the

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>connectors of those cables. If it's why eight, Well, you've

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>got yourself a relic that supports the old USB one

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>point oh standard. If it's black, it's USB two point oh.

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>A blue port is USB three point oh superspeed, and

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's teal, that means you've got a USB three

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>point one superspeed or superspeed plush. And so that's true

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with both cables and ports. If you've got both the

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>same color, then you know, all right, well, this is

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at the highest that these two can support. Complicating matters

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is that there are numerous fast charging technologies on the market,

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and each of them has a different maximum power delivery rating.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple's fast charging tech is built on USB p D

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and has a one what maximum power delivery So typically

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to buy a fast charging cable and

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>charger because Apple does not usually include these in the

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 1>box with its products. Similarly, if you want to connect

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 1>via a lightning cable, you would need to make sure

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that you had a lightning to USBC cable and that

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it had USB p D compatibility built into it in

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>order to enjoy that fast charging capability. Apple's circuitry in

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>their devices like iPhones it monitors battery charge, so the

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>fast charging ability kicks in as long as the battery

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>capacity is measured at being below eight. Once the battery

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reaches an eight charge, fast charging switches off and the

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.959
<v Speaker 1>device will charge at the slower standard rate to avoid overcharging.

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So this means if you run your iPhone until the

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>battery dies and then you use a fast charger, you

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>won't have to wait too long before you're at but

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>beyond that you'll see that charging has slowed down significantly.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Google also uses USB p D for its fast charging solution,

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but Google's max power is significantly lower than Apples. The

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Google fast charging tech maxes out at just a teen

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what's compared to Apple's one hundred, so it delivers electricity

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to devices with two amps of current at nine volts

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of voltage. Like Apple, Google also limits fast charging two

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>devices that are below battery capacity. So if you have

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a Google phone and an iPhone and they have comparable

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>battery capacities and you've both run them down to like power,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you plug your Apple phone into a fast charging Apple

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>station and your Google phone into a fast charging Google one,

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see the iPhone recharge way faster, way earlier. Uh.

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And so that's just how that works. Qualcom Quick Charge

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is another popular fast charging standard and it has several

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>generations of that standard. So there's you know, quick Charge

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one point oh, two point oh, three point oh, all

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the way up to five point oh. If you were

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>recharging a device with first generation quick Charge, that being

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>quick Charge one point oh, you would be limited to

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a maximum of ten watts of power. Quick Charge five

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>point oh, by contrast, can deliver one watts or more. However,

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>newer versions of quick charger really only found on a

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 1>few devices. Uh so it's you again. You're limited by

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever the slowest component is. If that component is your

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>actual device, it doesn't matter how good a charger you

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have or what cable you're using, You're going to be

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 1>limited by the max that device allows for. And in

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this case, there just aren't that many devices out there

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>with quick Charge five point oh built into them. Quick

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>charge really does up the voltage. So, in other words,

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this approach is all about increasing the pressure in the

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>system to charge batteries faster. Quick Charge five can allegedly

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>charge most phones from zero to capacity in just five minutes. Now,

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a device that uses quick charge or

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the charging accessories I would need to do this,

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so I can't test it. Myself, but that's what I've read.

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>If you go back to quick Charge three point oh

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or earlier, you run into incompatibilities with us B p D.

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>But since quick Charge four point oh, quick charge accessories

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>work with USB p D accessories, so you can mix

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and match cables and chargers from that point forward. Quick

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Charge also includes circuitry that monitors the batteries temperature, and

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>it has automatic thermal balancing. Essentially, that means it's going

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to use whichever charging method is going to keep the

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 1>coolest pathway to the battery to avoid overheating. Next, we've

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>got Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging. The latest version of this

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>supports max power of up to forty five watts in theory,

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>though in practice it appears that Samsung nerves this a

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It tends to be a little under whatever

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the max would be. Their version is also compatible with

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>us B p D, but limited again to forty five watts.

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This fast charging tech is exclusive to Galaxy devices. Then

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got mo roll a turbo Power. The most recent

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>turbo Power thirty product achieves a max power of twenty

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. What's that's built on top of

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Quick Charge three point oh so you can kind of

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think of this as a forked variation of quick charge technology.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got one plus warp charge, which is the

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>most recent version, supporting a max power of fifty what's

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and the list goes on, and really all of these

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>different name brands and numbers gets confusing, and the fact

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are so many different competing technologies for fast

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>charging means it's really hard to compare apples to apples,

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean technology that's coming from Apple in

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this case. If you want to get really really basic,

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that systems that supply a higher wattage

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to batteries recharge those batteries more quickly. But that is

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>being a bit reductive because you have to consider all

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the elements at play here. What are the limitations of

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the accessories? What is the battery capable of accepting? Batteries

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that have special circuitry in them to prevent them from

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>being damaged due to overcharging or voltage spikes? Are not

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:12.359
<v Speaker 1>going to just allow unfettered recharging, So it's not like

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you can just consistently up the wattage and decrease charging times.

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you could Jerry rig A you know

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 1>five hundred what delivery system, and you recharge your phone

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in a minute and a half, that would just most

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>likely lead to overcharging a battery and destroying it, or

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the phone would just shut it down and limit how

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>much wattage could actually go to the battery in the

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>first place. So the process really has to be controlled

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.800
<v Speaker 1>where else things get really dangerous really quickly. That being said,

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are so many different fast charging solutions,

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that each of these continues to evolve separately,

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>means that it's really tricky to talk about fast charging

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>at all. If your phone is a couple of years old,

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>like mine is, it might be that you're maxed out

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and an older version of whatever fast charge in tech

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>applies to your gadget, and that means that you would

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have to upgrade to a newer device if you wanted

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>something that charged more quickly. And one other thing I

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>should mention. As your technology ages, you might notice that

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems to drain battery life faster, that the battery

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't last as long as it used to. There

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are actually a few different reasons for this, some of

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which play into the concept of planned obsolescence. That's a

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy that companies use to create a planned life cycle

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for products, partly in an effort to get you to

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:34.359
<v Speaker 1>buy the next one of those things. But there are

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>some other things that play beyond just corporate strategy, and

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>one is that when you buy, say a smartphone, you're

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>locked into that hardware. You know, unless you are a

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>real d I Y tech head, your phone is pretty

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>much gonna stay exactly how it was when you bought it.

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And yet the companies that created the operating systems, you know,

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like Apple and Google, they're gonna keep evolving those systems

0:49:57.360 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and releasing updates to the operating system them that allow

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 1>for more sophisticated and complicated apps. And these updates might

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>place a greater demand on older hardware, hardware that you know,

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't optimized for these newer versions of the operating system,

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and as such, older handsets will see battery life suffer

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're not optimized to handle that. In some cases,

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>companies will actually throttle processor speeds in an effort to

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>offset battery drain. The users tend to hate that too.

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Write there's nothing like finding out the reason your phone

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.879
<v Speaker 1>seems to be slower now is because the company that

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>makes your phone made it slower on purpose, Even if

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that purpose was to give you more hours of battery life,

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>people hate that. Another reason battery performance declines over time

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is that in the discharge and recharge cycles, there's typically

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 1>some build up of what's called solid electro light interphase.

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>This happens as lithium electrons and the electrolyte as well

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as some organic so events react during the recharging phase

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and it creates little build up deposits on the anode

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>side of the battery, which effectively locks down some of

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the lithium in the battery. And because that lithium is

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:16.959
<v Speaker 1>locked down, it means there's less lithium atoms to release electrons,

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so it means your batteries max charge has diminished because

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't have as much of the active ingredients if

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you will. In addition, if you fully discharge a lithium

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>ion battery, some of that lithium will end up on

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the cobalt side and form lithium oxide. Some of the

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>cobalt will form cobalt oxide, and effectively that removes the

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>lithium from the process and it locks it in at

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that point, so you have reduced capacity because of that

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, So you don't want to drain a lithium

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ion battery all the way down to zero if you

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can help it. Older rechargeable batteries had a similar issue

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>called the memory effect. This was prevalent back in the

0:51:55.239 --> 0:51:59.280
<v Speaker 1>nickel cadmium battery days. While it's generally a good idea

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to recharge lithium ion batteries before they drop below say charge,

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to avoid those lithium oxide build ups at

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the cathode side, if it's a nickel cadmium battery, it

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was a good idea to actually use them until they

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.760
<v Speaker 1>were fully discharged. So of course that's led to some confusion,

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>right Some people are saying, well, should I wait until

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>my batteries all the way to zero before I recharge it?

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Or do I wait until it's like at thirty and

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>recharge it. Well, with lithium ion, it's better to do

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it and around thirty, but with nickel cadmium you wanted

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to use that battery as much as possible because if

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the batteries were not fully discharged before recharging, you could

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>see your battery capacity decrease. This is easier to understand

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with an example So let's say I have an old

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>nickel cadmium battery and it's charged up to and I

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>run my electric podcast pruner until the battery gets down

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to and then I recharged the battery back up to one. Well,

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that my nickel cadmium battery will behave

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as if that charge was actually zero percent, and now

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it will remember is really zero. So instead of having

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a charge, I effectively have a seventy charge because it

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>will never go all the way down to zero again,

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and it will get down to twenty five and then

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the battery goes dead as if there were no charge

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.800
<v Speaker 1>left in it. That was a problem with nickel cadmium batteries,

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:30.439
<v Speaker 1>and it meant that you know, your battery charge would

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 1>severely decrease after a relatively short amount of time. Now,

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>as I said, that's not really the case with lithium

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries, which tendency capacity reduce if you do run

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the battery until it dies and then recharge. But even

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if you use best practices, there will come a point

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>where a rechargeable battery will just outlive its usefulness. It

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>might take thousands and thousands of charge cycles before that happens,

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>but it will eventually happen. It's just a good idea

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to practice good behaviors because that helps extend the useful

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>life of batteries as much as possible, which is a

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>good thing, just to avoid being wasteful. All right, that

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>wraps up this episode about batteries and fast recharging. I

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>know it's a big mess. I didn't get into too

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 1>much technical detail because really, when you boil it down,

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it does get down to how much wattage do these

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 1>different methods apply to batteries and how fast can batteries

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>accept that? And at what point do these systems cut

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>off fast recharging to avoid overcharging a battery. That's really

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what it it gets down to when you really dig down.

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions, like Perez did, thank you

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>again for your suggestion, you can send them to me

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. The handle for the show is text Stuff

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:51.479
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.360
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:55:03.480 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>H