WEBVTT - 8am-9am ET: Wraith & Behravesh

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveillance. We're in trouble with these super

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>low rates. We are causing financial instability, We're causing risk taking.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>The world has a golden opportunity at the moment to

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>achieve what I call a deflationary rebalancing, the proper recession.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet and remember not all profit recessance proceed cats or recession.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance, You're link to the world of economics, finance,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and investment on Bloomberg Radio. Good morning everyone, Bloomberg Surveyna's

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee and Tom Keane. We are in New York.

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We welcome all of you worldwide, all of you worldwide

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course across this a great nation. Bloomer FM

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, Good morning, Bloomberg trough hunted Boston, Bloomberg elevens

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Rio in a wonderful really spring like a lot of

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>rain yesterday, but gorgeous New York today. And actually how

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the flowers are gonna be with all the rain. Yeah,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a drenching, not not a wrenching like flooding and

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>all that, but it was it was a lot of rain.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloombird nine sixty the Bay. Every Good morning out in

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco right here. The weather has been spectacular recently.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This morning. Bloomberg Surveillance is always in the eight o'clock hour.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by cone Resnick Accounting, Tax Advisory Trust cone

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Resnick for the strategy, the insight your business needs to

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>move forward. Find out what cone Resnick thinks. Sign up

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for insights at cone Resnick dot com. C O h

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>N R e z n I c kN dot com.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We have spoken him far too much recently and somehow

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike to June he is gonna be like our best friend.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>He is head of Brexit rate strategy at U b S.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding. John Raith has had a UK rate strategy UBS,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>which means he is as much as anybody I know,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>knee deep and thinking about where Brexit goes. Generate once again,

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good morning. Will will Brexit be the only topic of

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the meeting? I mean, is it the backstory at the

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>G twenty meeting? Nobody wants to talk about UM. I'm

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sure it will. It will come up. I think for

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the countries there it will be a major preoccupation.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>For others perhaps a little less so. We've heard some

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>comments today from UM from from Bullard for example, a

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>FED officials saying that he doesn't think Brexit, even if

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it does happen, will have a major impact on the

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>outlook for the US, but clearly closer to Europe and

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the Eurozone, and obviously in the UK itself it's it's

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a very major event. Is uh have you been able

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to has anybody been able to quantify the impact, say

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>GDP basis a national accounts basis or is it too complicated? Yeah?

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the issue we have really, of course,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is there's no precedent for this. I think, um, you know,

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>I should stress our view is that ultimately the UK

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>will stay in EU, and any dip in activity that

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we see in the next few months running up to

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the vote on the sort of uncertainty and nervousness will

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.839
<v Speaker 1>probably bounce back in the second half of the year.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But if the UK were to vote to leave, then

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole range of scenarios as to how the

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>situation would unfold, and we've sort of categorized them as

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a softer Brexit, where there's a sort of fairly friendly

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and rapid re establishment of trading agreements and so on,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>um and and all the way to sort of hard Brexit,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>where some tough negotiating and the establishment of trade barriers

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>means that the hits of GDP will be larger. How

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>did Sterling rebound yesterday? You know, when you talk to

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the experts at u b S about how a bid

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>comes in, what's the why that the big came in.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Was it just the street set enough and they looked

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for a quick scalp or is there an underlying story

0:03:54.840 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to that? What we saw is today up to well,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I suppose you have to see it in

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the broader context that we were up at sort of

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one fifty four not very long ago, that the decline

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is dramatic and there will be temporary corrections. And that said,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know at the moment that which is somewhat ironic

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in this debate, the economic data in the UK continues

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to print pretty favorably. So there are some sort of

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fundamental reasons for temporary periods of Sterling strength, but in

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>our view, sure to be overwhelmed by this background risk

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way through to June generates review for American

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>audience the flows of capital and current account within United Kingdom.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a real idea of the flip

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in current account balances in Japan. Tell me about the

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>current account surplus deficit flows in the United Kingdom. Yeah,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's that you've hit on something important

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in this debate. There's a large, persistent current account deficit

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, exacerbated over recent years by the fact

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that the UK economy has been growing so much faster

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>than most of those in the Eurozone. Um and often

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 1>when you see a sliding the currency on the scale

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen recently in Sterling, attention turns to the current

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>account situation, and when there is a large deficit, it

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>exacerbates the risks of a sort of more out of

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>control decline in the currency because of the fact that

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>external investors are having to fund the current account. The

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>odd solution Michael was to send Aubrey and matter and

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Aubrey looks like ROSSI crawl. Send him down to take

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>over Barbados again. There used to be uh, the pound

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is so widely used in such a deep currency is

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>are we Is there a chance we see a really big,

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>disorderly decline. There is a chance, I think you know,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.679
<v Speaker 1>we would compare this really to the to the financial

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis when in the year running up to it. As

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the financial system deteriorated, we saw Sterling weakened steadily, as

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I would argue it has been recently, and then when

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>things went really wrong in in late two thousand and eight,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it was sterling that suffered the most because of the

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>UK's exposure to the financial sector being that much larger

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>than anyone else's. I think when the same situation again,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>this sort of gradual weakening of sterling slightly to continue,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and if on the twenty June the UK has taken

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the decision to leave the EU, then you could see

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a much more significant fall in the following months, although

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, that's not our central view. We

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>still think the UK will be a member of the

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>EU beyond the referendum. Well, at this point the currency

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>reflecting uncertainty. Is it x Brexit vote? Is it fairly

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>vald or are we seeing where you know, moves that

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>should be made given the current account? Um, well, I

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>think you know that was all factored in before as

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>far as currency markets were concerned. I think the only

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>new information in the last few months that's coincided with

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this fall in sterling is is the referendum suddenly coming

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>into focus. The date being fixed. Um, it's becoming imminent

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in in terms of markets, attention span, UM and having

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and having a big impact. Another said before, you know

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that the data in the UK just doesn't merit this.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look, just as one example, at

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the UM that the p m I industries, they're stronger

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in the UK than than any of the other major

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>global economies. Unemployment slow, retailselves are strong. You know, there's

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>no reason for Sterling to be undermined, like well said,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but does that imply an expectation of a slowing United

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom real GDP? Yeah? Possibly, But when you look at

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the extent of that implied slowing compared to where we

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are in other economies already, and in the context of

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the scale of the fallen Sterling, I think it goes

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>way beyond what what most forecasts are. I mean, you know,

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>ours is that the recovery continues at a similar pace

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to the past few years. And I mean I think

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much the consensus unless we do get a

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>vote to lea the EU, at which point I'm sure

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>there would be a lot of downward revisions to GDP

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and and every chance that the recovery stalls at least

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for the balance of this year. Okay, but if we

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get you know, clearly the elite outcome, which is no Brexit,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know everything's do you have a level that

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sterling rebounds to. Well, I mean over the over the

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming months after that. It will take a while,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and it will depend on any sort of significant dent

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to activity in the interim. But you know, we still

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>see a possibility of of sterling ending this year um

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>significantly stronger than its current level. But as I say,

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it will depend on activity indicators beyond the referendum, which

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>will tell us how much damage has been done and

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>how persistent or temporary it may turn out to be. Well,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>let me ask about that. The the O E C

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>D among others have been talking apparently a new NOE

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>doubt from your competitors. It's DID group. I've been talking

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about much much slower growth around the world. How does

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that affect the UK um again exprexit. Yeah, I mean

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it clearly, if it is a global slowing, it will

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it will affect all to a degree. I mean, I

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>think you know, as recent years have shown us, the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>UK has proved quite resilient um to the slower growth

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and the woes of the Aurozone in particular. And I

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think a large part of the reason for that is

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it has been long a service based economy, which is

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more able to perform domestically and more insulated from global

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>slowdowns in terms of dropping demand for manufactured goods and

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so on then certain other economies are. So, you know,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the recovery is somewhat mature, and I'm sure that if

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>growth starts it's slow, it might see you know, slowing

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or even an end to the decline in the unemployment rate.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, if there is a sort of genuine slowing

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of growing demand, I don't think the UK is at

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>most risk from that by any means. Race with Us

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>will continue this discussion. He was with UBS Michael McKie

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England Museum with an important tweet today.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen twenty three, Sir Christopher Wren died. I've been

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>doing a cycle of his churches in when I'm in London.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really something. Most of them were destroyed in World

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>War Two and with a lot of courage they were rebuilt.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It was very, very uh cool. Mr Murdock's father was

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>instrumental in helping rebuild Brides and Fleet Street, and it's

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>really I really urge people to go see Christopher Wren's magic.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Outside of our new headquarters in London is his jewel

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>right next to Mansion House. Sir Christopher Wren on this

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>day died in seventeen twenty three. Futures exactly flat. Let's

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in John Taker now with the latest news from

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world. John Houston is gonna be the site

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the night's Republican presidential debate, with Donald Trump rivals

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>getting one more chance to try and derail the GOP

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>front runner. Uh Santa emergency in Virginia. That's where four

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>people were killed after tornadoes damage homes left thousands without

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>power across the state. It's official. The natural gas flowing

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>out of America's shale formations is now available to the world.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>The liquefied natural gas tanker Asia Vision. It left the

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Shaneer Energy Sabing Pass Export Terminal in Louisiana yesterday with

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the first cargo of US shield gas. The tanker bound

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for Brazil and score one for humans. Mercedes ben says,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with a growing array of options on its cars, robots

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can't keep up. They were relying more and more in

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>human workers on the assembly line reclaiming space there to

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>put in those options. Interesting, did the natural gas thing? Yeah,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>look Rod, Mike, look at net gas one point seven

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>three five gazillion British thermal units. We'll have to talk

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>near with David Wilson, will do that in the next

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hour Bloomberg Surveillance. This news update was brought to you

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>by the all new BMW Springfield. Find amazing pricing at

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>every certified pre owned BMW vis at BMW Springfield and

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>JA dot Com. Financing and Leasing available BMW Financial Services.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Global Business News twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the Radio plus Mobile Act and on your radio.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm Cameron Moscow.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>US Dock index futures are little change this morning. Let's

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>go to the First Word Breaking news desk for today's

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>morning call, and here's Bill Maloney. Good morning Bill, Good

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>morning Karen. That's right. US futures are now trading little

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>changed as crewe fixtures fade from the highs down. Futures

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hied by eight points, recipes are unchanged and as a

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>futures are lower by two Shanghai plunge six point four

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>percent overnight as money market rates surged, while upm markets

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>are trading higher by two percent gains in France, UK,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Italy and Spain. On the US economic front. At eight

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen FEDS, Lockhart speaks in Atlanta at a thirty initial

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Jobs claims and Durable goods orders at ten thirty natural

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gas storage change, and at eleven o'clock Kansas City fed

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>after Divelos Nights Salesforce boosted your views, trans Ocean beat

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and Restoration Hardware Q four prelimery at just EPs missed estimates,

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>shares her down twenty pre market regard airings this morning,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Domino's Pizza and Visti on beat, Colz EPs beat revenues,

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>war in line and best Buy Q four EPs beat,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>although comps sales missed estimates, finding some yearly Welsh upgrades

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and downgrades. Advisory board race, the Bibles sold over at

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank, Cooper Tire raised to neutral versus Celicalman, Sachs

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Charter raised, ovoid A, JP Morgan, and finally, Restoration Hardware

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>cuts a sector way to Key Bank and cut to

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 1>neutral over at Robert Baird Live from the First Breaking

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>News Desk on Bill Maloney Karen. Alright, thanks Availa to

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hear live breaking news of your Bloomberg type squawk and

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>go on your terminal. Let's ask you a w K

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>go and that's a Bloomberg business flash. Tom and Mike Karen,

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much Bloomberg surveillance this morning, as always bunched

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>by invest Goo. Factor based strategies can help investors focus

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>on a high quality, low volatility and more. Learn more

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and investco dot com slash high conviction, giving us perspective

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the United Kingdom economy. All of the uproar over

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Brexit is John Wraith of UBS. John, if you were

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a one on one with the Chancellor of

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Exchequer or the Prime Minister or other elites of

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>England trying to keep the nation within Europe, what do

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you think you would hear? What's the number one sales

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pitch from elites to do no harm? Um? Well, I

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>mean you know that the the argument has raged in

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one sense or another for many years in the UK

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about the relationships with the You I mean, I think

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that the British people generally want convincing that

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>staying in is going to be better economically. Um. In

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the medium and long term, and that's something which is

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an argument that not hasn't always been been clear. And obviously,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as we've been talking about already today, over recent years

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>at least, the UK has been growing much more dynamically

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and rapidly than the rest of the EU and certainly

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Eurozone, so that that argument is a difficult one

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to make, which I think explains why opinion balls have

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been have been pointing to such a close outcome. One

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of those things like trying to convince people trade is

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a good idea because it's easy to find a picture

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of a guy who's out of work and much harder

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to the dispersion of benefits. Yeah, and you know, again,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as as with everything to do with this reference, and

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>there's two sides to every argument. And there are a

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of voters in the UK who feel threatened by

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>um the open access to the UK labor markets for

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>other EU citizens. But but equally there are some who

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>see the of efficient labor that they bring with them

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and the wider economic benefits that arguably are delivered. So

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, these things we'll keep raging. And that's one

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>reason why we and most people think that the debate

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to remain up in the air until the

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>day of the vote itself, which will will probably continue

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to undermine sterling among other things over the coming months.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We always talk about our currency being weak or strong,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>as if strong was good and weak was bad. What's

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be the impact on GDP in the UK

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from a weaker sterling? How long is the j curve effect? Yeah, well,

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's one of the ironies in this

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is that as long as the fall in the pound

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is reasonably stable and orderly, it's actually got a lot

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of benefits to bring to the UK. We're in a

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>situation where global demand, as we discussed before, is potentially slowing,

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and therefore, you know, for for for trading markets, having

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a more competitive currency might help tap into that lesser

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>overall demand. The UK also, in common with a lot

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of other countries, has inflation well below the central banks

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>target and and a and a weaker currency should raise

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>imported inflation, so that there are certainly some benefits to

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the lower level of sterling, But it does smack of

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a loss of investor confidence and some overseas investors taking

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or slowing their investments into the UK because they're worried

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about the outcome. So you as long as it doesn't

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>become a protracted and rapid for starting to call into

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>account into question the current account situation, then you know

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly it's certainly not all bad to see Sterling weaker.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>For sure, this um going to change the calculation for

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England at all. Well, they're very careful

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>at the moment not to sound to opinionated one way

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or the other. They obviously can't comment on such political

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>event as a referendum, other than to say they're aware

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, and they did say that they think it's

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons behind the weakness of sterling. But

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>they will wait for the outcome and they will react accordingly.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And if, as in our view, the UK stays in

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the EU recovery continues, lost momentum returns, then we think

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll very quickly tell the market that it's got too

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dovish and too concerned about the outlook. Fifteen seconds, what's

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>your calling Europe when you're just a dovetail that was sterling? Um, Well,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we're more upbe on the outlook for the for the

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Eurozone than than the consensus. We think growth fair is

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be a bit quicker um as far as

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the sort of euro sterling exchange rates concerned, we see it,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially ending this year not far from current levels,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but being fairly volatile in the interim. January is exceptionally valuable.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. What a primer and all that

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>is going on, you know, the Kingdom. And only to

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>give a shout out to Francine Laqui, who was way

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>out front of this, Michael. She told me in Dava's

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>before Davas to this is gonna be a huge deal.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You Americans don't get it. She was totally right, come on,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Not sure Americans didn't get people, excuse me,

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. But then I didn't get red socks. I mean,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a time of year where I have to

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 1>try to gauge am I done with the red Sox

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in late April or early day. I'd give them till May.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>They maybe have fixed gotten the team better. That's the

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>pound euro cross euro sterling. We'll quote that some more.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm so I've been remiss not to quote that. What

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I can quote flat euros yields are infractutionally one seventy three.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call it a quiet tape. Oil Churrance, you're

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty two on American oil Brent curteen right now downy

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>seven uh since Michael mentions euro sterling uh point seven

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>eight nine four pence. It's like Michael Pence and Nobel

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Laureate they had one twelve fifty three. Stay with us.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>We're pun friendly. On Thursday. Bloomberg Surveillance coming up there

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 1>with all due respect highlight brought you by Landrover. If

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's in your nature to cast off the every day

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and seek adventure, the Discovery Sport was built to help

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your search. Visit Landrover chie state dot com for special

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>offers during the only Adventure Sales event. Lander Over Above

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and Beyond broadcasting live to New York, Bloomberg eleventh to Washington,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>d C, Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg twelve hundreds to San Francisco,

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg n to the Country Series Exam Channel one, and

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>around the globe. The Bloomberg Radio Plus happened Bloomberg dot Com.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Surveillance. Welcome back Michael McKee along with

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane. Economic Indicators and we've got a lot this morning.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Commonwealth Financial Network. When it's time

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to change the conversation, talk with a broker dealer r

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I A that's ready to listen Call eight six six

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>two three or visit Commonwealth dot com to learn more.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's Vinnie Dell Judas at the First Word Desk, Michael,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a bit of a respite for Manufacturing Commerce Department

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>telling us durable goods orders up four point nine percent

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in January, the most and almost a year topping forecast.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Departments decline not as sharp as previously reported, excluding transportation

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>up one point eight percent, a measure of business investment

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>up three point nine percent. We also have figures on

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 1>initial jobless claims up by ten thousand to two hundred

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>seventy two thousand last week, roughly in line with forecasts. Again,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>durable goods orders up by the most and almost a year,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims creeping a bit higher. At the Blue our

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>First Word Desk on Videl Judas, Let's go back to

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>New York. This is really interesting to be looking at

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the durable goods breakdown and there were no categories that

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>decline during the month. Let me explain what I do

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on this. I'm not going to put the chart out

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>because people will drive off the road. It's too complex.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I take, Michael, and this is off of the good

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>work of Janatzi, Goldman, Sachs, inventories, durable goods, whatever. I

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>take a three month, a six month, a twelve month

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>moving average, so I smooth it all out, and then

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at the slope the derivative of those three

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>moving averages. All you need to know is all three

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>moving averages are moving in an up direction. That's the

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>massive headline. I'm eyeballing here, Michael. When the last time

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that occurred? I'm back to May of two thousand fourteen

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and then somewhere in the vicinity of November of two

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen. It is rare and distinctive. Neverman Varavish is

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>chief economist at the consulting firm I h S. And

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>he is joining us now to talk about rare and

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>distinctive movements in the US economy. Um, what are we

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to make of this? Is this uh a turning point

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>in the economy? Are we out of the slow patch?

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying we're gonna go gangbusters? But um, are

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>we looking in the rear view mirror at the fourth quarter? No,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Tom's right, and looking at these longer term trends, uh,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and and I think one way to look at what's

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>having manufacturing and especially durable goods and you know, capital

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>spending in a more general sense, is that I've been

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hit by three things. Um. The first is an inventory

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>cycle that's gonna end this year, and it's already ended,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, and I think that's what some of

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these numbers today suggest. The second is that huge plunge

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in energy sector capital spending. Also uh, less of a

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>drag now on on growth because oil prices are leveled

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>off and that recount is beginning to sort of bottom out,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>uh in terms of drilling and in terms of investment

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>in in the energy sector. Uh. The third drag is

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the dollar that's going to stay with us for a while.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>But but to Tom's point and to your point, Mike,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the two two of the negatives are pretty

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much behind us, and so I'm not surprised to see

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>these trends beginning to look much more positive now than

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they were before. So to fancy a question growth this year,

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>we think maybe two and a half percent, moving up

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to maybe you know, closer to three percent by next year. Well,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not terrible. It is not it's running faster than

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>what is your view of potential? Well, it's it's you know,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we can go back and forth on this a little bit.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Potential is probably just around two and a half, maybe

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less than that. UM, So we're close

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to potential right now. We'll probably go above that for

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a year, maybe even two, So which means the unemployment

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna drift down towards four and a half

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>over the next year or two, slowly, but but nevertheless

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>down towards four and a half. Is there a connection

0:24:54.760 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>between the durable goods numbers and hiring in manufacturing? Um,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly there is. I mean, obviously, demands tends to lead employment. Employment,

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, is a lagging indicator. So as

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>this turns around, we'll start to see better numbers out

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturing. As you know, almost all of the growth

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and employment has been in the service sectors. UM. Manufacturing

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>has been a bit of a problem until recently. Actually

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the last number was was reasonably upbeats. But I think

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to see some better numbers in manufacturing. And

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>there when somebody asked me, the young kid here at

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg said, why is this guy on? And I was

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bragging about the back of your research reports where you

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>classically and uniquely set up three scenarios. You were the

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>our buyer of gloom and optimism. Which way does i

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>HS tilt right now within your three scenarios? Which way

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is the Vish vector tilt? UM? Well, I mean clearly

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that the highest probabilities are base case UM, so that

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>sets around UM. We're giving about a chance to recession,

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but only fifteen to an upside. That's a slight tilt

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>towards the negative. I think, mostly because the risks outside

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the US not so much risk within the US UM.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But that may change over the year. We may we

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>may come out with a more balanced view in terms

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the risk as the year proceeds. Now, it's gonna

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>ask how often you adjust that given the frequency data. Well,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there are times we adjusted every month, sometimes even weekly,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>depending obviously you know two thousand, two thousand and eight.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>But but often it's it's more like once a quarter.

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We we really look at it carefully and say, okay,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what do we really think here? So mostly once a quarter,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but but sometimes it's much more frequently than that. No,

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't in many ways to go here. Uh, Nerman

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bearish with us. We're going to continue this discussion with him.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh And like as you mentioned there, you featured that

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of tours three percent. Given the gloom, the gloom flow,

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the global gloom flow, we forget remodeling. Is it morning

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in America? No, it's not. Let's all get over it.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But some would say, what would Michael Faroli say? Is

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this above potential? I mean that's something we can talk

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>with Nerman Barrish about here. Pretty good economic growth. Mr

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Bullard commenting this morning on the freight train to higher

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>interest ry at the freight train to hire interest, I

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like a Glenn Miller song coming on chat St.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Louis six five thousand, something like that. They yield in

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two basis points one point seven features up A glorious,

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a glorious one point. This hour of Chavals brought you

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>by Mazda White Plains. Visit Masda and White Plains dot com.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's John Tucker with news headlines and Michael and Tod

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>were Republican presidential CAMPAD has told their final debate ahead

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of the March first slate of primers and caucuses and

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>more than a dozen states and territories. The debating hosted

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>by the University of Houston. Senate Republicans have pledged a

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.959
<v Speaker 1>block President Obama's nominee for the next Supreme Court justice.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But now a twist, the President said to be considering

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Devada Governor Bryant Sandiville, a Republican, a state of emergency

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, wherefore people were killed after tornadoes damaged homes,

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>also left thousands of people without power across that state.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I guess this is a public service. February

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine to anybody who visits a Pizza Hut restaurant

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>shows a photo ID to prove they were born on

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Leap Day, we'll receive a free one topic personal pan pizza.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>As good a reason as any to get a fake idea.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, okay day February all right, well that's Monday,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be here. Do we have Leap Day this year?

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>We do? We do have Leap plan. Whatever I was

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at still come back and talk about that in

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just a month. First we gotta get dash because it's

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>time for the Katina Auto Group Bloomberg NBC Sports Up Day.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>We get an extra day in John on Monday too,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's yeah, leap day, Yeah be here. Carmelo Anthony

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>might get expressed his frustration with the Knick struggles, but

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>he was the one struggling last night in Indiana's had

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>five for twenty, only fourteen points and air ball on

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a three pointer at the end that would have tied

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. Carmelo outplayed by Pacers star Paul Georgia at

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five second half points. Indiana won one oh eight

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to one oh five with Melo office game, kristophs Porzingi

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>scored twenty two, Jose Calderano surprising twenty points, made all

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>four of his three pointers. Kyle O'Quinn off the bench

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for nineteen in sixteen minutes, but now thirteen losses the

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen games. New coach Kurt Rambis is one and four,

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they do a good job. The Pacers

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do a clog in the lane, they get people in

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the paints. It south slot of penetration, and we turned

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball over and unfortunately some of them you know,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>heard us significantly and they got on runs. But if

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we if we could have taken care of the ball,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 1>just write everything else that happened in the ball game,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we would have given ourselves a much better chance to win.

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick so Stoor Lando tomorrow. Nets are in Phoenix tonight

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>another one for Golden State won eighteen one twelve and

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>my ammy Steph Curry forty two points. The Warriors are

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and five local hockey teams were all off

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or all on the road tonight. College basketball, the Big

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Game is in the Big East, battle of teams ranked

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the top five. Xavier beat number one Villanova eight three.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Jets coach Todd Bowles was revealed he had surgery to

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>remove a be nine mass that bowl says was the

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>size of a golf ball from his throat. Bowls actually

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>had it during the season. Was told he could postpone

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the surgery, said he's now fine. With the Bloomberg NBC

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports update, I'm John stash Aller, John, thank you so much.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee frentic across our studio looking at the statistics here,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>um Neil Payne over at dot com points out it

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>has been twenty three years since the Canadian team won

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Stanley Cup. Do you think that will change this year?

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how many teams if the season ended today,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how many Canadian teams would be in the playoffs Vancouver,

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they even close zero. This is we're on track for

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>something that's only happened once before nine seventy where there

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>were no Canadian teams are global audience. This is a

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>source of national Don Cherry's apoplectic about this. I mean Toronto.

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Some people are calling him an h L team and

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Montreal has got to be the implosion of modern history.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>They start off so well. More hockey talk on Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The Sports Apart was brought to you by Ricottina Autogroup.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Everyone deserves to drive a Mercedes Been from Katina. Make

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it happen at Katina Motorcar in Edison, Racotina of Union

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the new Racotina of Freehold, or go to Recotina

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Global business news twenty four hours a day

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, the Radio plus mobile app and

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on your radio. This is a Bloomberg Business Flash and

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm terin Moscown. There's updates. Brought to you by Sector

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Spider e t F. So I buy a single stock

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>when you can invest in the entire sector is its

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Sector spdr s dot com are called six sector et

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>F orders free US capital goods rebounding in January by

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Moon's June fourteen, bookings for non military equipment excluding

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>commercial aircraft jump three point nine per cent. That was

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>more than forecast, and it follows a three point seven

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>percent decrease in December that was smaller than previously reported.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>The number of Americans filing applications for unemployment benefits rose

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>last week from a three month low and part reflecting

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the typical swings during holiday periods. US Dock Index future

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is meanwhile little change after equities staged a late day

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rebound yesterday as investors assess a sell off in China

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>overnight in a rally and European markets. You check the

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>markets every fifteen minutes throughout the trading day. On Bloomberg SNP,

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>EMNI futures up half a point, Dowie Mini futures up

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>four and Nasdachi mini features down one. DAX in Germany's

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up one point seven percent ten, Your treasury up five

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, the yield one point seven two percent. NIMEX

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>screwed oil down one point four percent, or forty five

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>cents to thirty one sixty nine a barrel COMEXS gold

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is down to tens percent or two dollars seventy cents

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to twelve thirty six, the euro a dollar ten twenty

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the end one twelve point five too. And that's a

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Flash, Tom and Mike Churn, thanks so much.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It is on Wall Street. The following is from Bloomberg

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>View Opinions in comment Jerry from Bloomberg Columnists. I'm Jonathan Bernstein,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a columnist for Bloomberg View. Maybe things are moving perfectly

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump. He has three victories now, and he's

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>leading in polls in many states and leading big in

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>national polls. A contrasting view, Marco Rubio is still set

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up nicely. That's the case if Trump is unlikely to

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>increase his support. If he can't, then outside of his

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>strongest states and Nevada, where he won big on Tuesday

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was one, Trump is only barely competitive in a three

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>candidate race and couldn't win a two man showdown. Trump

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>may not have a ceiling, but he may already have

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>won all the voters who were likely to back him.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Adding new support may prove increasingly difficult. Of course, in

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a three candidate race, Trump may only need a small

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage of new voters to prevail, but in the limited

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>polling we have in the Super Tuesday races, he's in

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the low thirties or worse in most states. He's going

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to pick up some new voters to win

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>those states, and he hasn't shown he can do it

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so far. I'm Jonathan Bernstein. For more of you, please

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go to Bloomberg View dot com or view go on

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal. This has been Bloomberg View and Bloombergview

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Commentary cam here hourly weekdays. I'm Bloomberg Radio, Michael. Just

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a turn to the screen, red green, red green, red

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>green red. Yeah. Oddly, UM features turn a little bit south,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but we shoe oil prices turn a little bit south

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to which maybe the reason behind. Anyways, good day to

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>talk economics, Good day to talk economics. A good person

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk economics with is Nearaman Baravis, who was the

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>chief economist at I h. S. Tom brings up a

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>very good point and you mentioned this when we started

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about durable goods UM the idea that we may

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>be seeing a flattening out of the decline of the

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>decline in spending on UM durables for energy production. UH

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>has this surprised you that energy has been such a

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>drag on the economy when everybody said, following all prices,

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be a big benefit. Well we've got

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Here is a timing issue, Mike, Um in the sense

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the pain came early and it was

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>very intense. Basically, capital spending in the energy sector is

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 1>at half what it was two years ago. It's a

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>big plunge. It's only two percent of the economy, but nonetheless,

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when you get that kind of plunge, even in two

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of economy, it drags down overall growth. Um. So

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it came early, came fast, it was painful. The benefits

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are are much more spread out. The way I like

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to describe it as Okay, So, because of lower gasoline prices,

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the typical US household gets a tax cut in quotes

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of a thousand dollars a year. But you don't get

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it all at once. You get in dribs and drabs.

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You get it every time you go to the gas station.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Five dollars here, ten dollars there. What do you do

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with it? You buy snacks, you buy cigarettes, if you smoke,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way it's showing up. It is showing

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>up and it's helping consumer spending, which is growing do

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we think at a rate of around which is quite respectable.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>So you know, everybody sort of saying, well, you know,

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more negative than positive. Yeah, it's early on, yes,

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but as things move on and as a negatives start

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to abate, we'll start to see a lot of the

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>positive show up. What should a policymaker do if this

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>were to be a trail? What you just sit back

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy the benefits? Now? Well, yeah, I think so,

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think what what? What? What could we

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>do at this point? Is you know, it's it's pretty

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're gonna do anything, you would have

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>done it a year and a half ago. Now it's

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's almost too late. But but it's it's there's no

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>need to do anything. Okay, there's no need to do anything.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's the attitude. I got a Davos nearman.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you wandered around the August halls of Davos.

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. It's one massive interest rate illusion of low

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>nominal and low real rates within the micro study that

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you've done it. I h s is that artifice shoull

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rate illusion affecting behavior and investment decisions in this nation. Uh. Yeah, Tom,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly it is. I mean I'm not going to debate

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that one. I mean, we we all agree that, uh,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they sustain low interest rates creates um, you know, lower

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>risk if you will, and increase uh you know, people

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>making risky bets, especially in terms of financial assets. So

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a fair amount of that going on. And

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that some of the rise in the

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>stock markets until last summer had to do with that.

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, fair enough. But on the other hand, I'm

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 1>not sure what choice central bankers have. They're the only

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>game in town. So it's like they really can't do

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>anything but keep pumping money into the economy and the

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>hopes of things turn around. Good news is it's worked

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for the US, partly because it's been coupled with serious

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>banking fixes. The US banking systems in much better shape.

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't worked in Europe because their banks are still

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. They haven't done what the US banks it.

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's it's important to kind of

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>distinguish the US experience, to say, from the European or

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>even the Japanese experience, we are not I guess you

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>would say in a liquidity trap. Then not in the U.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>S We're not. We might be in Europe, we might

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be in Japan, but I don't see it in the US.

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So does the FED need to keep its foot on

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the pedal at all at this point? Or is it?

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Would it be better for the various reasons people say

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for them to back off again? I think that the

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>FETE is probably in a good position to begin to

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, but very very very gradually. I mean, let's say,

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say they raise rates two more times this year,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and for example, they will have gone from ultra loose

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy to extremely lose monetary policy. By the way,

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>here I'm quoting stand Fisher, vice chair at the Federal

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Reserve UM. But but the point is that monetary policy,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>even after these very modest increases will still be pretty

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>accommodative in the US. So I think it's appropriate. US

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing fairly well. You know, we we have the

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 1>ability we could afford to start raising rates. Europe Japan can't.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the impact of the FED on the economy right now, Well,

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's very small. I mean, a quarter

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of the basis point. I mean started a quarter yeah,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>quota points a quarter of a percent uh an increase

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates which they put in place in December,

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>basically zero impact. Um. You know, let's say they do

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>two more hikes. Okay, maybe just the flight tightening, but

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>even there, that's It's the FED is not going to

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>get in the way of this recovery, certainly not this year.

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I look near men at the complexities

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you cover each day, whittle down for our audience,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not the pros and cons gloom optimism, but if we

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all understand the artificialities, the great distortions that we're living in,

0:39:55.600 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what is a simple message within all that complexity. The

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>simple message is that we have been through a very

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>bad situation, a you know, serving a financial crisis what's

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>referred to sometimes as a balance sheet recession, which is

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>an asset bubble that bursts. And in the in the

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>wake of that, um, we are struggling to come up

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>with the appropriate policies. I think, an appropriate policy mix.

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the US again has had slightly better success

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>than most, with growing faster than most. I would say,

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, follow the example of the US, I mean,

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>other countries don't like to hear it as much. But

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but to me, it's not just monetary policy, but monetary

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>policy coupled with fixing the banks, and I think we

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>went a long way forward. There's still issues in the

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>banking system, but we went a long way forward and

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>fixing our banks. Are we going to see the economy,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as it continues to motor along this year, get better

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:54.479
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that the angry voters will notice it? Well,

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>often there's a political lag. There's a lag between political

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>perceptions or to our perceptions, and the economy. If you

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>remember that happened in two to George H. W. Bush,

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy started to recover, but voters are very angry

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>about the economy. I think the same thing is gonna

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>happen this time. Voters are very angry, and that anger

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna go away, I would say for another

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>year or two. Nerman, thank you so much. Nerman, Barrifish

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>with us as we look it just it's a I

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>urge you. We again we protect the copyright of our guests,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but I urge you to get your hands on HS

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>material is always more than interesting. Michael, I. I think

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the way they do it with three scenarios is interesting.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised more people don't do that very much like

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve with the team presented his staff presents

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED with FED officials with different scenarios, three different scenarios.

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Got a lovely note yesterday from someone an email thanking

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>us for trying to not be hysterical. We try to

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>not say plunge or collapse surge that can sort of

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>go with but these big words. I mean today it

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>works because nothing's except for China stocks fits the mold.

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But we're trying to bring in economics, finance, investment, international relations,

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>some politics up to Super Tuesday with what we hope

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is a more measured conversation, give a framework to think

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>about it. That's what we're so you can make your decisions.

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And looking at the data screen, uh yeah, showing some

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>weakness here. Two days in a row from a one

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven handle at the West Texas seven down twenty seven cents,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Bran crew thirty four gold down five dollars announced a

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more measured hour another hour of Bloomberg surveillance