WEBVTT - Trump's Tariff Turmoil

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to a little special edition of the Chuck Podcast,

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically for my YouTube subscribers. And so this is what

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to deal with this morning, on this Friday morning,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>which is a question I've already been getting over the

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>last forty twenty four hours, which is simply what do

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>all these tariffs mean for us politically? So look, here's

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>what we do know at the moment. This is not

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>going to go This does not look like it's going

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to go very well. You have this kind of economic

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>shock to the system, this kind of you know, record

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>breaking balls in the stock market. It's the type of

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>story that everybody pays attention to. This is not the

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>type of stories that it's just people that are invested

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market, or just wealthy people invested in

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. This is a global story. This is

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>arguably the lead story in every major news organization around

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the world because these tariffs have impacted everybody. So look,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a few things here that we both overestimated

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>with Trump and underestimated with Trump. And it has to

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>do with the idea that he's a transactional guy. And

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the assumption was and frankly, this is what many in

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the business community because Donald Trump campaigned on this, he

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>said he was going to do this. He is believed

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in tariffs. It goes back to nineteen eighty seven. Back

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty seven, when Roger Stone was trying to

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>help create Donald Trump the politician, Donald Trump bought a

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>full page ad in the New York Times. I believe

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>it was in New York Times, maybe been the Post

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Times in journal actually, but it was definitely a full

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>page ad that talked about how Japan was ripping off

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>America and that Japan our trade deficit, and you know,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we had idiot negotiators. If you recall nineteen eighty seven,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan was president, so he in some ways, Donald Trump,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't have much of an ideology, right he was

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>one time pro jo and now he's pro life and

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>all these things. If there's one issue has been consistent on,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's this belief that the American economy should and should

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all be sort of within the borders of America. So

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he does I think this is one of his actual

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>core beliefs, that this is the way the system should work,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that there should be more manufacturing in the country, that

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have that that and he sees everything through

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this binary way, there's winners and losers, and America is

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the winner, so therefore they shouldn't have trade deficits with anybody.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>People should have trade deficits with America, but it shouldn't

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be the other way around. So he's somebody that doesn't

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>really you know. If I were, if I were a critic,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd say he doesn't understand the global economy. But he

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't. I would say he doesn't really, he doesn't

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>buy in to this idea that the global economy has

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>been a success. I for the life of me, I

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>don't see how people don't look why most people don't

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>understand that if you essentially look from post World War

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>two to now, America has written the rules for the

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>global economy and it has benefited America immensely. Still the

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>wealthiest nation still, you know, and I say little things.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to any other country and ask yourself if you'd

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>rather live there or hear when it comes to simple

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things like the mail service or the quality of toilet paper,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>never mind the availability of goods and services, the availability

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we do have a lot more cheap

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>goods available to us. Why do I grew up in Miami,

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>people used to fly in from other countries in order

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to simply go shopping in the United States. Okay, is

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this has been what the global economy has done for America.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So I know it's not cool to be for the

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>status quo these days. Right, everybody wants to disrupt and

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>change and disrupt and change. But this is one disruption

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make a lot of sense because one could

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>argue that since America has essentially decided that the cause

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of World War two was that we didn't have enough

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the economic ties with each other, and the more economic

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ties you have, that less likely you're going to fight

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>each other. And so guess what. The last time we

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>went through this tariff business, it was followed by World

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>War Two, and there's plenty of evidence that it was

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty direct link. The nineteen twenty nine stock market

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>crash essentially was the beginning of the collapse of the

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>German economy was already fragile. It sort of accelerated the

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>collapse of the German economy, which of course accelerated the

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>rise of Adolf Hitler. And I don't think I need

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what happened after he took over Germany.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So The point is is that this the American leadership

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>post World War Two concluded we can't have this type.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So what was born all of these multi national multilateral organizations,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's NATO, the IMF, all of these things, and

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it has been a success. We went nearly eighty years

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>without a war in Europe essentially, or almost eighty years.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>There was the Balkan War. We can't ignore that, and

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously we have the war now with Ukraine. But the

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 1>fact of the matter has been relative peace on Europe,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the longest arguably period of peace in Europe if for

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a thousand years, if you want a nitpick on this.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is a radical change and it isn't going

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to get better overnight. So what does this mean politically?

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's already pretty clear to me that most elected Republicans,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if they could vote without fear of Donald Trump, would

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 1>take back tariff authority tomorrow. You're already seeing some Senate

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Republicans Chuck Grassley is introduced to bill with Maria Cantwell

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think we'll have majority support, probably not yet

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty votes, but trust me, it'll get there. But let's

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>talk realistically. What do I how should you watch the

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>next eighteen months, essentially between now and the midterms, because

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>if there is a change in control of either house

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in Congress the midterms, I do think these teriffs will

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>go away almost immediately. So if let's make this, I

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>believe right now, if there were a Democratic House and

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a Republican Senate that they would collectively grab the tariff

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>keys away from Donald Trump. And so the likelihood of

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a Democratic House and a Republican senate's pretty high come

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>January of twenty twenty seven. But between now and then,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the question is would there be a majority in the

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>House and a majority in the Senate to do this

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Republicans in charge of the House. In the

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>answer to that, that is likely. No. There is a

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>big distinction between House Republicans and Senate Republicans. House Republicans

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are more reliant on the base of Donald Trump's party.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>They're more reliant on Donald Trump, and they're frankly, you know,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>their political careers would be dead if Donald Trump decided

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to kill their careers. I'm not saying Senate Republicans aren't

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>fragile to potential threats from the Donald Trump base, but

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a bit more inoculated and many of them

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to run in twenty six. Not all of

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>them have to be on the ballot in twenty six,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a little bit In fact, many of them

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>won't be on the ballot ever again with Donald Trump

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>or with Donald Trump as president, So there's a little

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more security that they have in their minds to

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>try to separate themselves from Trump. And frankly, even if

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you are on the ballot in twenty six, senators are

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a general election electorate. Okay, so a guy

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Tillis may be vulnerable to a Trump primary.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Challenge of the matter is he only wins a reelection

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>if he can figure out how to win the middle

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and on this tariff business, which really hurts a state

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like North Carolina. To he's going to have to sit

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>here and walk a line. He doesn't want to antagonize

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump because I think he would struggle in a primary

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina. And at the same time, you know,

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if somebody to is right beat him in a primary,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that person can win a general election

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in these midterms of North Carolina. So that's just one example.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But the point is this is what I would watch

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for over the next sort of three to six months.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the don't assume that Donald Trump is negotiating

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with countries. Do I think some countries will get some

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>negotiated reprieve. Yes, I think the UK will not much.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Anybody else in Europe, anybody aligned with the EU know,

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think the UK, because of Brexit, he will

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>be more inclined to do a deal there. I think

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he's likely to do a one on one deal with

0:08:54.600 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Japan because the Japanese have basically been courting him very carefully.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They've been obsessed with courting him multiple leaders, certainly this

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>ruling party has, and I think he is likely to

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>reward them with some sort of side deal. But for

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the most part, I think he believes this in his bones,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't think there's going to be a

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of reprieve. So what does that mean? The markets

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are still going to be volatile, People are not going

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to be happy. Remember who's watching the stock market the

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>most these days, it's retirees. What's one other thing about

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>retirees that people forget about. They vote, right, the person

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>most likely to vote in a special or election or

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a midterm election is somebody over the age of fifty

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they are the most likely voter, so and right now

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones most sensitive to a loss in value.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Baby Boomers, people in their thirties and forties, you know,

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you can even look at this moment, Oh, maybe there's

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a buying opportunity. You know, you're still invested for the

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>long term ten years, fifteen years, touch in your retirement,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you might have more patience for this. But if you're

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in your fifties, sixties, or seventies, aka the people who

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are the most likely voter and the people the most

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to show up, you're going to be very sensitive

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to these market disruptions. So I think you're going to

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to see that this is sort of I would.

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be what the Afghanistan

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal was to Joe Biden, is what this tariff bomb

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump set off earlier this week is going

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to be for him. That Afghanistan withdrawal for Joe Biden

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>dropped his approval rating anywhere below forty five somewhere between.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes could get as low as thirty eight.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>He never got above forty five again for the rest

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of his presence. At this point, I don't expect Donald

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump to get above forty four or forty five for

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of his presidency because of this tariff stuff.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So this is likely to make him less popular, doesn't

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mean he's going to be less popular among the MAGA base.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you see, you know, he's got his propaganda

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>machine going his media. The sort of the supportive folks

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of his in the media are sort of putting their

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>blinders on and pretending that this is you know, he's

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>got some brilliant plan here, but it's it's it's going

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to become toxic. You're going to have I think a

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>few things to watch for include House Republicans who decide

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not to seek reelection. Some of them may decide I'm

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>going to run for governor, I'm going to run for

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, but I'm not going to run for the House,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>because I think a House Republican is going to be

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more vulnerable in this environment than a Senate Republican.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republican might be able to inoculate themselves some you've

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>already seen a few of them break away when you

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>had ran Paul Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins vote

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrats on that, on the on the Canadian tariffs,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think you will have some some that do that.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>If you start seeing the Republican retirements get into the

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>double digits, it almost will be handing the Democrats control

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of the House. And I think that will be something

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch for because I think you look, we already

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>saw in these Monday elections that the Republican base is

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not that engaged. At least Donald Trump's base is not

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>engaged enough to win these elections, certainly not in Wisconsin.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>We saw a place like a Scanbia County in Florida

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>vote for a Democrat for Congress. For the first time

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and six has a Scambia County supported

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat either for Congress, do you a Senate or

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the presidency. Why is that significant? Well, it's Scambia County

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is home to Pensacola, a naval base. It's got probably

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the largest cohort of federal government workers or federal government

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>adjacent workers in the state of Florida because of all

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the adjacent aspects that come with a major naval base

0:12:55.559 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like the one in Pensacola. Already see the vulnerability and

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just a reaction to all of the all of

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the cuts that have been taking place due to DOGE,

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and certainly some of this comfort onto that now you

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have this economy that's going to hit people right in

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the pocketbooks. I mean, the dollar store is going to

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>turn into the ten dollar store. You know, they're not

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to find things that cost a dollar.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That's going to hit a lot of Trump voters. That's

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>going to hit a lot of red districts. So I

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's going to back down. I think the

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that what we all thought about Donald Trump, that

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>he was transactional, that the markets would be a guardrail.

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we now need to realize that this third

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>term stuff is such bs. He's more Thelma Louise here.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got nothing to lose in his mind. He actually

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this might be the one thing he has conviction about,

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and he I think has a higher pain tolerance for

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the market chile rations, a higher pain tolerance for maybe

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>rich people calling him to complain than the average politician.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The average politician, Republican or Democrat, has their largest donor

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on speed dial on their cell phone. So I think

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress are going to be hearing, not just

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>from their constituents with fault and gray phone calls into

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the congressional offices, but the members of Congress themselves are

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>going to hear from their biggest supporters, who are all

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>going to look at their stock portfolios and panic. So

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it is hard to see how this gets better for

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans before now and the midterms. And I know we

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>consider and say this is a long way to go,

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but this is something, this severing of ties with so

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>many allies. I got to read you this one quote

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>here from the Canadian Prime Minister, which is just an

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>astonishing quote, but it's pretty important. This is the current

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, and he said the following

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the eighty year period when the United States embraced the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Mannal of global economic leadership, when it forged alliances rooted

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in trust, in mutual respect, and champion the free and

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>open exchange of goods and services is over. While this

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is a tragedy, it is also the new reality. And

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's why I don't think I think Trump had the

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>miscon conception that somehow America was essentially an essential economy

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and that there's just no way that countries wouldn't essentially

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>change their economic behavior to appease the United States. This

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is providing a huge opening for China. We now have

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>two of our closest Asian economic allies, Japan and South Korea,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>who are coordinating with the Chinese on how to respond

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to the US tariffs. We have the Canadians figuring out

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with the EU how to coordinate. We have now thrown

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>people countries that we thought were allies of the United

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>States into the arms of China, which seems to be

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>an absolute you know, the unintended consequence that nobody should

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>want left or right. I mean, if we lose our

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>alliances to our chief economic and frankly cultural rival for

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>global supremacy, what have we done? You know, we're not

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>going to like that. So that's why, you know I

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>always say to people who don't want America to be

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the beat cop, I said, Okay, if America is not

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the world's policeman, somebody will be. And you're not going

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to like any other country being the world's cop. You're

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot happier for the world's cop.

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And we're just seating this turf we are giving China

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and opening all around the world with countries that were

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>so aligned with US, I never thought those bonds would

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be shaken. So look, I think this is a Republican

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Party that's quoting disaster. I'm going to quote Ran Paul,

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>who made a various stute point a couple nights ago.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Ran Paul one of the few Republican senators who's been

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>publicly pushing back against these tariffs. This is his sort

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of core libertarianism in him. A libertarian doesn't want any

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>time gariffs on anything. But he pointed out a very

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>important fact. The Republican Party pre World War Two was

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>very similar to the current Republican Party of today, a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bit isolationist. It was the party of business, and back

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>then in the nineteen tens, twenties, and thirties, America's businesses

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were afraid of foreign competition, and so they did want

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tariffs because it protected their businesses, it protected their wealth.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not how the economy works anymore. This is

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of Donald Trump trying to somehow manufacture the

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ice block industry again. You know, there was the ice

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>block industry used to be a big deal in Europe

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>until we figured out refrigeration and we didn't need blocks

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of ice to cool our food. And this is the

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of trying to turn back the clock to an

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>era that doesn't exist. You know, we put those tariffs

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>in when we were we weren't using airplanes for cargo.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Then we were using ships and certainly in this country trade.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So it is there's no part of this that makes sense.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And trying to look back and say this was some

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>golden age, it wasn't a golden age. We had extreme

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>poverty back in the late nineteenth century, early twentieth century,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we had child labor issues, we had terrible work conditions.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure what part of that era of business,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what part of that era of the economy, is actually

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>something to wish we had again. So you know, this

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is and you know what happened after that. The Republican

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Party wasn't trusted with control of the legislative branch for

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>nearly sixty years. Sixty years. You know, they had a

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>brief period where they controlled the House the two elections

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in the fifties thanks to the popularity of Dwight Eisenhower,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but that went away quickly and they went forty straight

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>years with control of the House. This all goes back

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Republican Party and their trade issue and being

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially punished for essentially wrecking the economy in the twenties

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that led to the Great Depression, and many economists have

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>concluded it was the bad tariff regime, among other things,

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that put us in that situation. So I can't see

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a positive outlook politically here for the Republicans. And the

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>question is how when do how many congressional Republicans break

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>for him? And when do they break for him? I

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>explained earlier, I highly doubt the House Republicans will crack

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>because they got there because of Trump. So in some ways,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in for a diamond for a dollar, the Senate Republicans

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>want to break, Maybe they'll wait till after they passed

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the tax cut because they're going to need a lot

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of help from Trump on that. By the way, you

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about stupidity with this legislative agenda by

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this White House. If he knew he always wanted to

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>do this teriff for all these tariffs, he should have

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>waited six months, gotten his tax cut, then done this. Instead,

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>he's now the tax I think he's put his tax

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>cuts in jeopardy here, because I think this economy is

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just going to be in terrible shape. Come the end

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of the summer into the fall, we're going to see

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of horrible warning signs. You're going to see

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a rise of unemployment rate. We've already seen that the

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>parent company of Chrysler and Cheep has already announced TERFF

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>related layouts. And so the tax cut's going to come.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Donald Trump's going to try desperately to come

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>up with some sort of rebate check of some sort

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to try to and call it like sort of hey,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give the first, you know, the first

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 1>chunk of tariff money that comes in the country. I'm

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>going to give it back to my farmers. I'm going

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to give it back. And it really isn't you know.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>All it is is our own money that we paid

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that essentially is covering the tariff costs then being sent

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>back perhaps in check form. But I'm not sure Congress

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be comfortable going along with that because

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it'll even come as as believable. But I think

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he will try something to mitigate this, but I don't

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be getting rid of the tariffs.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And even if he gets rid of him, it's not

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going to solve the larger problem he has already severed.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>He's already severed all of these economic and potentially national

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>security ties with so many key allies that putting these

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>partnerships back together is going to take decades. It's going

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to take decades, and it's going to take because the

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>concern this is now twice that America's elected him, and

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this disruptive ideology. So our European our traditional European partners,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are traditional Asian partners. They're not going to quickly get

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>back into bed with us, even if the next term

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of somebody who is a non a president

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>who isn't in favor of trump Ism. But it's going

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a long seventeen months, so I think people

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>will have to prepare accordingly. I think you will see

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a pullback and spend and that will be just all

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of that will be a domino effect. But I do

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>expect Congress will finally find its spine and take its

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>tariff power back from the presidency. But it may not

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>happen until you have at least one chamber in Democratic hands.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think of at the House, if the Democrats

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>pick up the House and Republicans, even if it's you know,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Republicans don't lose a single senency. I promise you there's

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a large majority that if they know it, can they

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>know they have the votes in the House to do it,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>they will take the tariff keys away from the mad

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>King here. And I think that likelihood is quite high

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is This is potentially one of the greatest

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>political disasters. This is I'm trying to come up look

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for other equivalents. Maybe this could be as bad as

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened to Democrats in ninety four with the assault

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>weapons ban, with healthcare. Perhaps this is as bad as

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Tea Party for the Republicans for the Democrats in

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten. Perhaps it's Watergate nineteen seventy four. But I

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.479
<v Speaker 1>think this is not going to be a small ripple.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a gigantic crack here. And

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>who knows it. Perhaps perhaps this leads to a new

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fight inside the Republican party. Maybe there are primaries. I'm

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. I think as long as Donald is

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>king of his party, you're not going to see successful

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>primary challenges. But I do think if this does lead

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to what happened the last time the Republicans played with

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>terror fire and it leads to huge successes for the Democrats.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You will see the Republican Party have a real fight

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>over the direction post Trump. But for now, prepare for

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a very tumultuous and likely This is You know, Donald

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump's life just got so much harder to politically conduct

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this presidency. Good luck everybody. M