WEBVTT - The Diversity Commissars Strike Again

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.977
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.977 --> 0:00:18.017
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:18.017 --> 0:00:22.577
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Team. Welcome to the Freedom

0:00:22.617 --> 0:00:27.377
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, May twelfth edition of the program. I'm heading

0:00:27.417 --> 0:00:31.057
<v Speaker 1>to Chicago, so I'll be out tomorrow and it'll be

0:00:31.097 --> 0:00:33.097
<v Speaker 1>the first time I've ever been in Chicago, so I'm

0:00:33.257 --> 0:00:36.817
<v Speaker 1>kind of excited and looking forward to a weekend there.

0:00:36.857 --> 0:00:41.737
<v Speaker 1>But we'll talk about the situation of crime and Black

0:00:41.777 --> 0:00:46.537
<v Speaker 1>Lives Matter and why this is on my mind right now,

0:00:47.257 --> 0:00:51.777
<v Speaker 1>the Black Lives Matter movement, the aftermath of it, and

0:00:51.897 --> 0:00:55.177
<v Speaker 1>the data, the statistics about crime in Chicago, how all

0:00:55.177 --> 0:00:59.777
<v Speaker 1>of this is related. And there's actually a fascinating sub

0:00:59.817 --> 0:01:04.217
<v Speaker 1>stack from Barry Weiss where a guest writer deals with

0:01:04.257 --> 0:01:07.297
<v Speaker 1>this exact issue of why we're in the crime situation

0:01:07.337 --> 0:01:10.297
<v Speaker 1>room right now, and I will address that with you

0:01:10.377 --> 0:01:13.417
<v Speaker 1>here in just a moment. But I gotta tell you,

0:01:13.457 --> 0:01:17.457
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever considered becoming a real estate investor, go

0:01:17.617 --> 0:01:19.497
<v Speaker 1>check out my friends that done for your real estate.

0:01:19.537 --> 0:01:22.777
<v Speaker 1>They take you through every step of the process from

0:01:22.857 --> 0:01:25.777
<v Speaker 1>beginning to end, from figuring out what city you want

0:01:25.777 --> 0:01:29.097
<v Speaker 1>to invest in, what property, getting a loan, getting a

0:01:29.137 --> 0:01:32.177
<v Speaker 1>management company, tenant in place, and then free cash will

0:01:32.177 --> 0:01:34.097
<v Speaker 1>come to you every month as you build up equity

0:01:34.137 --> 0:01:36.897
<v Speaker 1>in that house over time, and if you pick the

0:01:36.977 --> 0:01:39.777
<v Speaker 1>right market the right house, you could see you dramatic

0:01:39.977 --> 0:01:42.857
<v Speaker 1>gains over a period of time. This is slow and steady.

0:01:42.897 --> 0:01:46.177
<v Speaker 1>This is not fast, fly by night stuff. This is

0:01:46.257 --> 0:01:49.657
<v Speaker 1>preparing for the long term making smart real estate decisions.

0:01:49.697 --> 0:01:51.657
<v Speaker 1>That's what Done for Your Real Estate teaches you to do.

0:01:52.057 --> 0:01:54.537
<v Speaker 1>Go to Done for You Buck dot com to see

0:01:54.577 --> 0:01:58.297
<v Speaker 1>how this works. That's done for You Buck dot com.

0:01:58.817 --> 0:02:02.377
<v Speaker 1>I have bought multiple properties with them personally, and I'm

0:02:02.377 --> 0:02:05.417
<v Speaker 1>going to be buying more properties with the advice of

0:02:05.497 --> 0:02:07.177
<v Speaker 1>Done for Your real Estate could have Done for you

0:02:07.897 --> 0:02:11.697
<v Speaker 1>Buck dot com. So I'm heading a chego and people

0:02:11.737 --> 0:02:14.897
<v Speaker 1>are asking me why. I say, well, it's because I

0:02:14.977 --> 0:02:18.377
<v Speaker 1>have never been and I'm forty years old and I've

0:02:18.417 --> 0:02:23.377
<v Speaker 1>been to Baghdad and Cobble and all over Europe and

0:02:23.417 --> 0:02:27.697
<v Speaker 1>into South and Central America and over to Southeast Asia,

0:02:27.817 --> 0:02:30.377
<v Speaker 1>and I've never been to Chicago. So I just kind

0:02:30.377 --> 0:02:32.377
<v Speaker 1>of felt like, you know what, I want to go

0:02:32.457 --> 0:02:34.257
<v Speaker 1>check this place out. I want to have my first

0:02:34.257 --> 0:02:37.457
<v Speaker 1>experience there. And one of the fun things about being

0:02:37.457 --> 0:02:39.657
<v Speaker 1>able to reach so many folks on social media is

0:02:39.697 --> 0:02:42.697
<v Speaker 1>that when you have a new experience you're going to

0:02:42.777 --> 0:02:44.657
<v Speaker 1>have in a city, in a place, you say, hey,

0:02:44.697 --> 0:02:48.297
<v Speaker 1>tell me about tell me about what I should do

0:02:48.337 --> 0:02:50.497
<v Speaker 1>when I'm there. You know, what do you recommend? What

0:02:50.537 --> 0:02:54.257
<v Speaker 1>do you think is a good first weekend in Chicago?

0:02:54.297 --> 0:02:56.417
<v Speaker 1>I tinderate people are talking about going to the river

0:02:56.897 --> 0:02:59.617
<v Speaker 1>and being on one of those boats. A lot of

0:02:59.697 --> 0:03:03.537
<v Speaker 1>pizza suggestions. I mean, I have Celiac disease, so that's

0:03:03.577 --> 0:03:05.857
<v Speaker 1>not really gonna help me very much, but it's a

0:03:05.937 --> 0:03:09.497
<v Speaker 1>nice idea. I appreciate it. And some steakhouses that's definitely

0:03:09.577 --> 0:03:12.617
<v Speaker 1>my jams. Stuff like that, right. I can't tell you, though,

0:03:12.617 --> 0:03:15.737
<v Speaker 1>how many people would I ask for advice on what

0:03:15.777 --> 0:03:19.977
<v Speaker 1>to do in Chicago? Make some comment, have some comment

0:03:20.057 --> 0:03:23.897
<v Speaker 1>about how keep your head down, were a bulletproof vest,

0:03:24.097 --> 0:03:26.617
<v Speaker 1>you better be armed. You know. There's a lot of

0:03:26.657 --> 0:03:29.897
<v Speaker 1>that going on, and I gotta tell you it's sad

0:03:29.937 --> 0:03:31.977
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it. I mean, as just as

0:03:31.977 --> 0:03:34.977
<v Speaker 1>an American, I've never even been there, but the fact

0:03:34.977 --> 0:03:36.737
<v Speaker 1>that this is what and a lot of them are

0:03:36.817 --> 0:03:41.777
<v Speaker 1>Chicago residents, and this is the third largest city in America.

0:03:42.337 --> 0:03:44.377
<v Speaker 1>What is it about two and a half million people,

0:03:45.337 --> 0:03:49.857
<v Speaker 1>and the commentary about the city isn't Oh, it's amazing.

0:03:49.857 --> 0:03:53.657
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you ask a Frenchman, particularly a Parisian,

0:03:54.337 --> 0:03:56.257
<v Speaker 1>about Paris, they're going to tell you that it's the

0:03:56.297 --> 0:03:58.937
<v Speaker 1>greatest city in the world. You ask a Londoner about London,

0:03:58.977 --> 0:04:00.537
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna tell you that it's the greatest city in

0:04:00.537 --> 0:04:03.577
<v Speaker 1>the world. I've asked some Chicago in now. Granted a

0:04:03.617 --> 0:04:05.417
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are not from Chicago. The people are

0:04:05.417 --> 0:04:08.137
<v Speaker 1>all across the US, but a lot of them are

0:04:08.257 --> 0:04:13.097
<v Speaker 1>Chicago natives. I've asked them and they're making they're making

0:04:13.137 --> 0:04:17.017
<v Speaker 1>comments about the shootings and about the violence that's going

0:04:17.017 --> 0:04:20.457
<v Speaker 1>on in that city, and you say, well, that's not

0:04:20.497 --> 0:04:22.537
<v Speaker 1>the way it's supposed to be nine one hundred and

0:04:22.537 --> 0:04:25.057
<v Speaker 1>one people through the eighth of May, so it's over

0:04:25.217 --> 0:04:28.297
<v Speaker 1>over nine hundred and one people right now have been shot,

0:04:28.737 --> 0:04:31.657
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy three of them fatally. So we're

0:04:31.737 --> 0:04:34.057
<v Speaker 1>not even halfway through the year and there have been

0:04:34.137 --> 0:04:39.937
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred people shot in the city of Chicago. That's appalling.

0:04:40.417 --> 0:04:43.377
<v Speaker 1>How do we get to this place? Why are there

0:04:43.417 --> 0:04:46.897
<v Speaker 1>so many shootings in the city of Chicago, you can see,

0:04:46.897 --> 0:04:49.777
<v Speaker 1>I mean how many you know, by the way, this

0:04:49.817 --> 0:04:51.297
<v Speaker 1>is true all across the country. It's not just a

0:04:51.657 --> 0:04:54.777
<v Speaker 1>Chicago thing. As we know, there's crime rising, particularly violent

0:04:54.817 --> 0:04:56.977
<v Speaker 1>crime and shootings has been rising in major US cities.

0:04:57.497 --> 0:05:00.777
<v Speaker 1>Why is this going on? What is the circumstance, what's

0:05:00.777 --> 0:05:07.217
<v Speaker 1>the situation that brings me to the Black Lives Matter movement?

0:05:07.737 --> 0:05:10.577
<v Speaker 1>And what happened in twenty twenty. And I'll tell you

0:05:10.617 --> 0:05:16.177
<v Speaker 1>this story through the prism of a fellow named Zach Kriegman,

0:05:16.217 --> 0:05:19.257
<v Speaker 1>who I'd never heard of before. And Barry Weiss on

0:05:19.337 --> 0:05:23.337
<v Speaker 1>her substack has a piece buy Zach Kriegman. She allows

0:05:23.417 --> 0:05:27.377
<v Speaker 1>people she remember she was the New York Times editorial

0:05:27.617 --> 0:05:33.577
<v Speaker 1>page person who was supposed to bring in alternate voices

0:05:33.697 --> 0:05:38.497
<v Speaker 1>from the lib orthodoxy, and she was harassed so much

0:05:38.497 --> 0:05:42.617
<v Speaker 1>by her colleagues that she resigned. Because it's such a

0:05:42.697 --> 0:05:48.257
<v Speaker 1>it's an atrocious joke. I mean, it's an intellectually fetid,

0:05:48.577 --> 0:05:51.697
<v Speaker 1>rotten place at the New York Times now, because you

0:05:51.777 --> 0:05:57.177
<v Speaker 1>either believe these left wing orthodoxes or they harass you,

0:05:57.177 --> 0:05:58.937
<v Speaker 1>they try to destroy you, they want to ruin you.

0:05:58.977 --> 0:06:01.177
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff. Well, you know that's true at the

0:06:01.177 --> 0:06:04.737
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. It's also true at Thompson Reuters. Right,

0:06:04.817 --> 0:06:09.057
<v Speaker 1>it's also true at Reuters. And you say to yourself, well,

0:06:09.097 --> 0:06:11.257
<v Speaker 1>this is this is supposed to be one of the

0:06:11.337 --> 0:06:16.417
<v Speaker 1>more a mainstream isn't the word that I should use here?

0:06:16.457 --> 0:06:22.257
<v Speaker 1>But less political I mean Reuters associated press. That's supposed

0:06:22.337 --> 0:06:26.577
<v Speaker 1>to be the most straight down the middle journalism you

0:06:26.617 --> 0:06:28.897
<v Speaker 1>can get. Right, that's at least what the brand is

0:06:28.897 --> 0:06:31.337
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. That's not true at all. We're about

0:06:31.337 --> 0:06:35.897
<v Speaker 1>to discuss how not true that is. There's certainly something

0:06:36.937 --> 0:06:41.617
<v Speaker 1>something about these media entities that represents themselves as oh,

0:06:41.697 --> 0:06:44.577
<v Speaker 1>we're just doing the reporting. We're just the reporters doing

0:06:44.577 --> 0:06:49.057
<v Speaker 1>the reporting. Well, this individual who worked at Thompson Reuters,

0:06:49.097 --> 0:06:56.457
<v Speaker 1>he was their chief data scientist. He was fed to

0:06:56.537 --> 0:07:01.257
<v Speaker 1>the diversity and inclusion machinery. Right, they lowered him in

0:07:01.417 --> 0:07:05.177
<v Speaker 1>feet first into the grinding gears of the diversity and

0:07:05.217 --> 0:07:09.177
<v Speaker 1>inclusion and human resources office. Which I'm going to tell

0:07:09.217 --> 0:07:12.377
<v Speaker 1>you this in these companies is they're very similar to

0:07:12.737 --> 0:07:20.137
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet political commissars who were deployed in factories and

0:07:20.537 --> 0:07:23.577
<v Speaker 1>businesses stayed owned, but businesses all over the Soviet Union,

0:07:24.177 --> 0:07:27.897
<v Speaker 1>there were people who were assigned by the state to

0:07:28.177 --> 0:07:30.817
<v Speaker 1>monitor the people that were doing labor in the state

0:07:30.857 --> 0:07:34.937
<v Speaker 1>owned enterprises, to make sure they never criticized anything, to

0:07:35.057 --> 0:07:40.217
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they praised the plan, they praised the

0:07:40.257 --> 0:07:45.297
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party and the revolution. How different is that really

0:07:46.097 --> 0:07:48.217
<v Speaker 1>from what you have going on with all of these

0:07:48.257 --> 0:07:54.377
<v Speaker 1>diversity and inclusion offices that just traffic in this identity politics,

0:07:54.897 --> 0:08:01.137
<v Speaker 1>race obsession, CRT narrative which has been become a dominant ideology,

0:08:01.217 --> 0:08:04.057
<v Speaker 1>the dominant ideology of the left and the Democrat Party,

0:08:04.937 --> 0:08:08.097
<v Speaker 1>And all they do is police people for thought crimes.

0:08:08.817 --> 0:08:12.257
<v Speaker 1>That is their existence, that is what goes on. So

0:08:12.337 --> 0:08:16.257
<v Speaker 1>here you have this data scientist writing for the very

0:08:16.297 --> 0:08:20.497
<v Speaker 1>white substag and he just looked at the numbers. And

0:08:21.217 --> 0:08:24.057
<v Speaker 1>this is very interesting for a conservative like me, because

0:08:24.497 --> 0:08:27.617
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy's clearly not a conservative, He's probably

0:08:27.657 --> 0:08:32.497
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat voting lib. But he understands numbers and this

0:08:32.657 --> 0:08:35.017
<v Speaker 1>whole story that the BLM movement is built on, that

0:08:35.457 --> 0:08:38.097
<v Speaker 1>unarmed black men are constantly being shot. It's a national

0:08:38.137 --> 0:08:41.417
<v Speaker 1>crisis by police by police. There is a national crisis

0:08:41.417 --> 0:08:45.417
<v Speaker 1>of black men being shot. It is not by police,

0:08:45.417 --> 0:08:48.577
<v Speaker 1>though it is overwhelmingly by other young black men. That's

0:08:48.577 --> 0:08:51.937
<v Speaker 1>actually what the data shows. That is what is statistically

0:08:51.977 --> 0:08:55.537
<v Speaker 1>obvious and clear. That is a national crisis. That is

0:08:55.577 --> 0:08:58.537
<v Speaker 1>a national emergency. But police shooting on armed black men

0:08:58.737 --> 0:09:02.377
<v Speaker 1>is not a national crisis. It is not something that

0:09:02.417 --> 0:09:06.857
<v Speaker 1>happens frequently at all. And he knows this because he

0:09:06.897 --> 0:09:08.617
<v Speaker 1>looked at all the numbers and he became kind of

0:09:08.617 --> 0:09:12.457
<v Speaker 1>obsessed when he was at router with looking at the numbers.

0:09:13.617 --> 0:09:16.257
<v Speaker 1>This is from the piece quote. Statistics from the most

0:09:16.297 --> 0:09:21.417
<v Speaker 1>complete database indicate that over the last five years, police

0:09:21.457 --> 0:09:25.617
<v Speaker 1>have fatally shot thirty nine percent more unarmed whites than blacks.

0:09:25.657 --> 0:09:28.017
<v Speaker 1>Because there are roughly six times as many white Americans

0:09:28.017 --> 0:09:30.057
<v Speaker 1>as Black Americans, that figure should be closer to six

0:09:30.177 --> 0:09:33.497
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. BLM activists insist the fact that it's not

0:09:33.577 --> 0:09:37.657
<v Speaker 1>that there's a gap, is, they say, evidence of the

0:09:37.697 --> 0:09:41.137
<v Speaker 1>bias of police departments when you actually look further the data. Though,

0:09:41.137 --> 0:09:45.017
<v Speaker 1>according to calculations which is published by the Deputy District

0:09:45.057 --> 0:09:49.177
<v Speaker 1>Attorney for Los Angeles based on FBI data, black Americans

0:09:49.177 --> 0:09:51.777
<v Speaker 1>account for thirty seven percent of those who murder police

0:09:51.817 --> 0:09:55.137
<v Speaker 1>officers and thirty four percent of the unarmed suspects killed

0:09:55.137 --> 0:09:58.137
<v Speaker 1>by police. Whites make up forty two percent of cop

0:09:58.177 --> 0:10:01.497
<v Speaker 1>killers and forty two percent of the unarmed suspects shot

0:10:01.537 --> 0:10:04.457
<v Speaker 1>by police, meaning whites are killed by police at a

0:10:04.537 --> 0:10:08.497
<v Speaker 1>seven percent higher rate than blacks. Because what he's doing

0:10:08.617 --> 0:10:11.697
<v Speaker 1>is trying to buy the numbers control for use of

0:10:11.777 --> 0:10:16.017
<v Speaker 1>force situations. That's what really matters. If you're looking at

0:10:16.057 --> 0:10:20.097
<v Speaker 1>our police disproportionately using lethal force, you have to look

0:10:20.097 --> 0:10:24.417
<v Speaker 1>at lethal force situations, not just the general population. Because

0:10:24.417 --> 0:10:29.977
<v Speaker 1>what this gets to is that Black Americans are disproportionately

0:10:30.097 --> 0:10:34.777
<v Speaker 1>involved in use of four situations against police that result

0:10:34.897 --> 0:10:39.697
<v Speaker 1>in use of force by police. And so this guy

0:10:39.777 --> 0:10:42.057
<v Speaker 1>points this out, this is just all by the numbers,

0:10:43.217 --> 0:10:45.537
<v Speaker 1>and he says, quote, if you broaden the analysis to

0:10:45.577 --> 0:10:50.017
<v Speaker 1>include armed suspects, whites are shot at a seventy percent

0:10:50.097 --> 0:10:53.937
<v Speaker 1>higher rate than blacks. Other experts in the field concur

0:10:54.017 --> 0:10:56.057
<v Speaker 1>that in relation to the number of police officers murdered,

0:10:56.057 --> 0:11:00.257
<v Speaker 1>whites are shot disproportionately. So what this is saying is

0:11:00.297 --> 0:11:04.017
<v Speaker 1>in a dangerous use of force situation where police officer's

0:11:04.097 --> 0:11:05.737
<v Speaker 1>life is in jeopardy, which is when you can use

0:11:05.817 --> 0:11:09.577
<v Speaker 1>lethal force, cops are more likely to use lethal force

0:11:09.577 --> 0:11:12.377
<v Speaker 1>against a white assailant than a black assailant. This is

0:11:12.617 --> 0:11:17.217
<v Speaker 1>by the numbers comepied by the FBI, the Washington Post

0:11:17.217 --> 0:11:20.057
<v Speaker 1>and others. This is what the actual data says. This

0:11:20.137 --> 0:11:23.497
<v Speaker 1>is the chief data scientist at Reuter's telling you this.

0:11:25.017 --> 0:11:27.937
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, not allowed to talk about this, No sir,

0:11:29.177 --> 0:11:32.577
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, not allowed to say it. Not allowed

0:11:32.577 --> 0:11:38.097
<v Speaker 1>to say it. And here we are. Now we see

0:11:38.137 --> 0:11:40.737
<v Speaker 1>what happens. He gets fed into the diversity and inclusion

0:11:41.497 --> 0:11:46.297
<v Speaker 1>machinery right all of a sudden, the HR and Diversity

0:11:46.337 --> 0:11:50.497
<v Speaker 1>office wants to talk to him. And it's because Oh also,

0:11:50.577 --> 0:11:53.017
<v Speaker 1>before I get to that, he says that there are

0:11:53.017 --> 0:11:56.817
<v Speaker 1>just countless stories at Reuter's where they were just lying.

0:11:57.577 --> 0:12:00.057
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were just leaving out critical data. They

0:12:00.057 --> 0:12:03.177
<v Speaker 1>were just misleading the public, he writes. In one story,

0:12:03.217 --> 0:12:05.897
<v Speaker 1>Reuters reported on police and Kenosha shooting a black man,

0:12:06.017 --> 0:12:09.377
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Blake, in the back, but failed to mention that

0:12:09.417 --> 0:12:12.177
<v Speaker 1>they did so only after he grabbed a knife and

0:12:12.297 --> 0:12:16.217
<v Speaker 1>looked likely to lunge at them on video. In another story,

0:12:16.897 --> 0:12:19.817
<v Speaker 1>Reuters referred to a wave of killings of African Americans

0:12:19.817 --> 0:12:24.377
<v Speaker 1>by police using unjustified lethal force, despite a lack of

0:12:24.377 --> 0:12:27.777
<v Speaker 1>statistical evidence that such a wave of police killings had

0:12:27.817 --> 0:12:32.137
<v Speaker 1>taken place in twenty twenty eighteen. We are a country

0:12:32.137 --> 0:12:36.337
<v Speaker 1>of three hundred and thirty million people. Eighteen unarmed black

0:12:36.377 --> 0:12:38.777
<v Speaker 1>Americans were killed by police. According to the Washington Post,

0:12:39.857 --> 0:12:42.617
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seven thousand people died of drug overdoses

0:12:42.697 --> 0:12:46.537
<v Speaker 1>last year. Just to put the numbers into context, how

0:12:46.617 --> 0:12:49.737
<v Speaker 1>much time does the Democrat corporate media spend on that

0:12:50.217 --> 0:12:53.457
<v Speaker 1>versus eighteen unarmed black men killed by police? By the way,

0:12:53.537 --> 0:12:55.337
<v Speaker 1>unarmed does not mean not a threat, does not mean

0:12:55.337 --> 0:12:57.577
<v Speaker 1>that they were not. That does not mean in and

0:12:57.577 --> 0:13:01.657
<v Speaker 1>of itself that those shooting incidents were not justified legally

0:13:01.977 --> 0:13:05.417
<v Speaker 1>and morally justified. I'm sure if you look at them,

0:13:06.177 --> 0:13:08.257
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them, maybe a majority of them were

0:13:09.017 --> 0:13:12.417
<v Speaker 1>legally and more justify, and maybe there were a couple

0:13:12.457 --> 0:13:15.937
<v Speaker 1>that weren't, and those officers should be prosecuted to the

0:13:15.937 --> 0:13:19.897
<v Speaker 1>fullest extent of the law. That's it. We have the system,

0:13:20.097 --> 0:13:22.657
<v Speaker 1>we have it in place, and it actually works pretty

0:13:23.097 --> 0:13:28.417
<v Speaker 1>darn well. But the only the only really serious story

0:13:28.457 --> 0:13:31.177
<v Speaker 1>to look a serious study to look at police shootings

0:13:31.897 --> 0:13:35.057
<v Speaker 1>on black versus white suspects was done by a professor

0:13:35.097 --> 0:13:38.497
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard a named Professor Friar and his study found

0:13:38.617 --> 0:13:41.457
<v Speaker 1>you wait for it, cops are more likely under similar

0:13:41.457 --> 0:13:44.457
<v Speaker 1>circumstances to shoot a white suspect than a black suspect.

0:13:44.697 --> 0:13:46.337
<v Speaker 1>We all know why this is. It's not it's not

0:13:46.377 --> 0:13:50.137
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand. If you shoot a white guy, the

0:13:50.217 --> 0:13:52.537
<v Speaker 1>media is not going to say, oh my gosh, it's racist.

0:13:53.617 --> 0:13:57.177
<v Speaker 1>But if there are questionable in any in any capacity,

0:13:57.697 --> 0:14:00.097
<v Speaker 1>if there's any sort of a judgment call situation with

0:14:00.217 --> 0:14:03.097
<v Speaker 1>a police officer, particularly a white police officer, shooting a

0:14:03.177 --> 0:14:08.337
<v Speaker 1>black suspect, the rush to its racist. The cops are murderer,

0:14:08.577 --> 0:14:11.897
<v Speaker 1>the protest, the answer, prosecution happens right away, and the

0:14:11.897 --> 0:14:16.497
<v Speaker 1>cops life is ruined. We all know this, okay, it's

0:14:16.537 --> 0:14:21.137
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the data, in the numbers. Libs just don't

0:14:21.137 --> 0:14:23.777
<v Speaker 1>want to hear it. And that then brings me into

0:14:23.777 --> 0:14:29.657
<v Speaker 1>what happened with this individual, This individual Kriegman who got

0:14:29.697 --> 0:14:34.817
<v Speaker 1>fired fired from Reuter's. You know that's coming because he

0:14:34.937 --> 0:14:40.017
<v Speaker 1>posted on the internal chat board for Reuters, meant for

0:14:40.217 --> 0:14:45.457
<v Speaker 1>discussion of controversial issues. He posted the data and his

0:14:45.577 --> 0:14:49.657
<v Speaker 1>findings to essentially say, hey, guys, this Reuter's narrative that

0:14:49.737 --> 0:14:53.297
<v Speaker 1>we're going for here, that unarmed black men are being

0:14:53.377 --> 0:15:00.457
<v Speaker 1>murdered by racist police as a continuous problem, as a

0:15:00.497 --> 0:15:04.297
<v Speaker 1>systematic problem, is a lie, and it results in the

0:15:04.297 --> 0:15:08.057
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson effect, which is cops undermined, defunded, less able to

0:15:08.097 --> 0:15:10.657
<v Speaker 1>do their jobs. And that then was alts and more

0:15:10.697 --> 0:15:16.297
<v Speaker 1>unarmed black men being killed predominantly disproportionately by other black

0:15:16.377 --> 0:15:19.177
<v Speaker 1>men in America. That is what actually happens. This is

0:15:19.177 --> 0:15:22.657
<v Speaker 1>what he said on the internal chat. What do you

0:15:22.697 --> 0:15:25.937
<v Speaker 1>think happened? Then they took it down right away, took

0:15:25.937 --> 0:15:29.697
<v Speaker 1>it down. Not allowed to say that, why it's data.

0:15:29.977 --> 0:15:33.897
<v Speaker 1>Not allowed to say the data. It's provocative and harmful,

0:15:33.937 --> 0:15:38.857
<v Speaker 1>they said. And then it got worse. Of course, he writes,

0:15:38.897 --> 0:15:40.537
<v Speaker 1>over the next two weeks, I kept checking back to

0:15:40.577 --> 0:15:43.057
<v Speaker 1>see whether they would reinstate it. After a good bit

0:15:43.097 --> 0:15:45.497
<v Speaker 1>of waiting and wondering, I was told by HR a

0:15:45.497 --> 0:15:48.857
<v Speaker 1>team of human resources and communications professionals was reviewing it.

0:15:49.697 --> 0:15:52.377
<v Speaker 1>I asked if I'd be allowed to discuss the moderator's concerns.

0:15:52.417 --> 0:15:54.857
<v Speaker 1>I was told no. Finally, they told me the post

0:15:54.937 --> 0:15:57.937
<v Speaker 1>would not be reinstated because it was antagonistic and provocative.

0:15:59.057 --> 0:16:01.897
<v Speaker 1>When I asked what exactly was provocative or antagonistic? She

0:16:01.977 --> 0:16:05.297
<v Speaker 1>suggests that I speak with the head of Diversity and inclusion, Oh,

0:16:05.377 --> 0:16:12.297
<v Speaker 1>Chief Commissar. So I scheduled the meeting and I was

0:16:12.377 --> 0:16:15.577
<v Speaker 1>told that I had what I had, it could hurt

0:16:15.577 --> 0:16:17.417
<v Speaker 1>me at the company. It could put the kaibosh on

0:16:17.457 --> 0:16:22.337
<v Speaker 1>any future promotions. Then the comments started rolling in from colleagues.

0:16:22.817 --> 0:16:25.697
<v Speaker 1>They called my review of the academic literature white splaining,

0:16:26.417 --> 0:16:28.337
<v Speaker 1>failing to note that many of the academics I cited

0:16:28.337 --> 0:16:31.257
<v Speaker 1>were black, That it was laughable what I wrote, not

0:16:31.377 --> 0:16:35.377
<v Speaker 1>worth engaging in. One even said, my unwillingness to engage

0:16:35.417 --> 0:16:38.177
<v Speaker 1>doesn't signal the strength of your argument. If someone says

0:16:38.217 --> 0:16:40.697
<v Speaker 1>that KKK did lots of good things for the community,

0:16:40.737 --> 0:16:44.217
<v Speaker 1>prove me wrong. I'm not obligated to do so. I

0:16:44.257 --> 0:16:45.897
<v Speaker 1>mean the person who wrote that as a moron and

0:16:45.977 --> 0:16:47.857
<v Speaker 1>a psychopath. I don't know who it is with in Reuters,

0:16:47.937 --> 0:16:52.337
<v Speaker 1>but that person is a complete, blanking idiot, total moron

0:16:53.097 --> 0:16:55.257
<v Speaker 1>paid by Reuters though. But you see, this is what happens.

0:16:55.697 --> 0:16:58.177
<v Speaker 1>People create these comfortable little narratives from themselves were they

0:16:58.177 --> 0:17:04.457
<v Speaker 1>don't have to engage or debate. And then Kriegman sent

0:17:04.617 --> 0:17:09.297
<v Speaker 1>a letter to company leadership saying, hey, what's going on here?

0:17:10.377 --> 0:17:12.697
<v Speaker 1>You know they did. After that, I brought him into

0:17:12.737 --> 0:17:15.937
<v Speaker 1>an office HR they fired him, terminated him after six years.

0:17:15.977 --> 0:17:20.217
<v Speaker 1>Chief data scientist Reuters, one of the biggest news gathering

0:17:20.337 --> 0:17:25.377
<v Speaker 1>organizations in the world, fired its chief data scientist for

0:17:25.537 --> 0:17:29.817
<v Speaker 1>sharing data that showed that the BLM narrative is bullcrap

0:17:31.177 --> 0:17:34.937
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't want to hear it, so they fired him.

0:17:35.057 --> 0:17:38.977
<v Speaker 1>This is at Reuters. This is also, though in essence,

0:17:39.297 --> 0:17:41.337
<v Speaker 1>at The New York Times, at the Washington Post, at

0:17:41.457 --> 0:17:44.817
<v Speaker 1>name a major corporation these days, at Uber, at Apple,

0:17:45.377 --> 0:17:47.617
<v Speaker 1>at all these places, you can't share this, and now

0:17:47.937 --> 0:17:50.137
<v Speaker 1>this is about news and news gathering, so he should

0:17:50.137 --> 0:17:52.457
<v Speaker 1>have even more right. I mean, you can make the argument, well,

0:17:52.457 --> 0:17:54.097
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be arguing we shouldn't be talking to this

0:17:54.097 --> 0:17:56.097
<v Speaker 1>at all of those companies. Okay, well, of course they do.

0:17:56.257 --> 0:17:59.977
<v Speaker 1>They indoctrinate with the BLM rhetoric at these places. But

0:18:00.297 --> 0:18:03.497
<v Speaker 1>at a news organization, you can't share data that contradicts

0:18:03.497 --> 0:18:07.937
<v Speaker 1>the newsroom narrative, clearly contradicts it. No, you cannot, Now

0:18:07.977 --> 0:18:10.977
<v Speaker 1>you cannot. It's a good time to tell you about

0:18:10.977 --> 0:18:14.057
<v Speaker 1>the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, which is defending many

0:18:14.137 --> 0:18:17.617
<v Speaker 1>officers who have been wrongfully accused charged or fired just

0:18:17.657 --> 0:18:20.217
<v Speaker 1>for doing their jobs. These officers and their families are

0:18:20.217 --> 0:18:22.177
<v Speaker 1>counting on you to support them in their time of need.

0:18:22.217 --> 0:18:24.537
<v Speaker 1>Your donation will help them stay out of prison and

0:18:24.577 --> 0:18:28.457
<v Speaker 1>avoid being financially bankrupted by bogus accusations and pressure from

0:18:28.497 --> 0:18:30.737
<v Speaker 1>the far left to charge the police for just doing

0:18:30.737 --> 0:18:33.537
<v Speaker 1>their job of protecting all of us. Take a moment now,

0:18:33.697 --> 0:18:36.057
<v Speaker 1>don't just let this be something we talk about. Take action.

0:18:36.497 --> 0:18:39.097
<v Speaker 1>Go to police defense dot org. Not only are they

0:18:39.177 --> 0:18:41.697
<v Speaker 1>raising funds necessary to get officers charged the best legal

0:18:41.737 --> 0:18:44.977
<v Speaker 1>defense possible, they're helping those officers and their families keep

0:18:44.977 --> 0:18:46.737
<v Speaker 1>the lights on, keep food on the table, keep a

0:18:46.817 --> 0:18:51.657
<v Speaker 1>roof over their heads. Fundraising is crucial for officers wrongfully

0:18:51.657 --> 0:18:55.137
<v Speaker 1>accused in these woke times. Please go to police defense

0:18:55.217 --> 0:18:58.697
<v Speaker 1>dot org. Consider contributing just fifteen dollars or more to

0:18:58.737 --> 0:19:00.617
<v Speaker 1>the Police Defense Fund to help these officers in their

0:19:00.617 --> 0:19:04.497
<v Speaker 1>time of need. That's police Defense dot org. Police Defense

0:19:05.017 --> 0:19:08.057
<v Speaker 1>dot org. I will let you all know how my

0:19:08.177 --> 0:19:10.937
<v Speaker 1>first trip to Chicago. I think it'll be a lot

0:19:10.937 --> 0:19:13.857
<v Speaker 1>of fun and I don't anticipate that there will be

0:19:13.897 --> 0:19:17.377
<v Speaker 1>any issues. Even though everyone saying there will be issues,

0:19:17.577 --> 0:19:18.977
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there will be I think I'll have

0:19:18.977 --> 0:19:21.617
<v Speaker 1>a lovely time. I'll give you my full report on

0:19:21.697 --> 0:19:23.817
<v Speaker 1>all this when I see you on Monday. Talk to

0:19:23.897 --> 0:19:26.057
<v Speaker 1>him Monday rather shields high