WEBVTT - Novo Nordisk Gets US Approval for Wegovy Obesity Pill 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, we talked about how Nova Noordisk is one of

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the big movers today in early trading. The president and

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>CEO of the drug maker says the company is going

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>all in on weight loss drugs as his company is

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>the first to come out with a pill to be

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 2>sold in the US market.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>He spoke with our Katie Greifeld earlier today.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 4>This is really going to be super exciting for the

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 4>millions of patients that have been waiting to get their

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 4>hands on a gop one pill. And for the first time,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>we are having a pill that has an efficacy of

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>some seventeen percent if you take the pill regularly, and

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 4>one in three people are going to actually reduce up

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 4>to twenty percent weight loss. I think that data speaks

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 4>for itself, and we are super excited, of course to

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 4>be the first to the market and we're going to

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>give a go all in trying to make this a

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 4>huge success.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 5>Well, moving forward, I mean beyond just these first few

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 5>months after Eli Lilly does have their pill on the market,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 5>how do you plan to compete? What is your strategy

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 5>there given my understanding is that there's likely going to

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 5>be no restrictions when it comes to food, when it

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 5>comes to drinks around Lilly's version.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 4>So, as I mentioned, there are no other phase three

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 4>trials of oral gop one that has shown this level efficacy.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 4>This means that for the first time ever, people do

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 4>not have compromise between either taking an efficacious injection or

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 4>a convenient pill. For the first time ever, you have

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 4>the same efficacy of seventeen percent in injection or at pill.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 4>You can take it on a daily basis as a

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>pill or a weekly injection, and that I think is

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the key selling points.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 6>With WeGo v pill.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>We also have more than ten years of course experience

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 4>with regards to safety data and what have you. That's

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>why it's called the wegov pill, which means that this

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 4>pill is not only going to reduce your weight, it

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>also has protection for your cardiovascular systems. So this is

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>a phenomenal pill, second to none, I would say, and

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 4>we are very ready to compete with it.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about how you're going to sell it through.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 7>What channels?

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 5>Will you sell this way go v pill and will

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 5>all of those channels be available at launch?

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>The quick answer is yes, we're going all in. We're

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>of course going to sell this through our own websites,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 4>no WorkCare pharmacy, as well as all of our partners

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 4>be a Row, Live, MD, Costco, weight watchers, everyone that

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 4>you can imagine is going to start launching this at

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the same time on the day of the launch. Trum

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Our ex of course we'll be coming up soon as

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 4>well well as well as of course the traditional channels

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>that usually medicine is pro crud in us.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, that was the CEO of Novo Nordisk.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in John Tozzy now he's a Bloomberg Healthcare

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>reporter on this milestone for the Swiss drug maker.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Because Novo Nordisk was the first.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Mover here when it comes to the obesity treatments, but

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it quickly lost its lead to Eli Lilly.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Does this put it back in the lead again?

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean so for the Danish drug maker. I

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 8>believe it's Danish. Yeah, No, I think it is. Listen,

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 8>it is a milestone for sure. You know, patients have

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 8>been waiting for an oral version of these weight loss drugs.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 8>This is the first pill to get approval in the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 8>United States. Ili Lily is not far behind. They've said

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 8>they expect their pill to be a pill version of

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 8>their weight loss drug zep bound to be approved as

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 8>soon as March potentially in the US. So, you know,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 8>I think it's still quite a competitive space, but this

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 8>is still certainly a milestone for Novo Nordisk.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 9>So I would think that this would be kind of

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 9>a step function in demand for the industry to have

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 9>these error products available because I'm guessing there's just a

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 9>bunch of people out there that don't like to get

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 9>injections and that's a non starter for them. What's what's

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 9>the expectation what this could do for the marketplace when

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 9>we get more and more of these.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 8>Oral Yeah, I mean, Novae CEO certainly said that they

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 8>expect us to expand the market. I think will know

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 8>pretty soon, right whether you know. I mean, first of all,

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 8>the question of how many people currently using the injection

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 8>convert to the pill form and how many new people

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 8>start who have been reluctant for whatever reason. To take

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 8>the injection, you know, whether it changes things like adherents.

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 8>We know with these drugs that there have been you know,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 8>questions along how about how long people stay on the

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 8>medications and whether they go on and off because of

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 8>some side effects. So, you know, I think it is

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 8>you know, potentially likely to expand demand.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But we'll see, we'll see.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>And I remember Novo had a what they call the

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>next gen treatment, cagri Semi, which didn't do well, and

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>that tanked the stock. And it's partly why the stock

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>has fallen by about half this year. Is that kind

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>of an experiment that just went off the rails. And

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>this was always kind of in the offing.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean I think, uh, you know, companies have been

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 8>looking for an oral GLP one weight awes drug, you know,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 8>for uh, you know, for years. I think this has

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 8>been a goal of the of the market. I mean,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 8>there is an oral pill for the diabetes indication.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 10>Ye sorry, all right, that's good.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 9>I mean I think this will just it'd be big

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 9>for a lot of folks and hopefully the cost will

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 9>continue to come down and now I'll make it available

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 9>for more and more people.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 10>John Tazzi Healthcare Report Bloomberg News.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 9>Thanks so much for joining us here again, a good

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 9>day go for Novo Nordisk bloodmore coming up.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 10>This is Bloomberg.

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 9>All right, here's the story that kind of caught me

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 9>by surprise. I just wasn't on my radar screen. Sax

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 9>Mull's bankruptcy year after raising billions for a turnaround.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 10>When did that happen?

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I know they've been having problems with paying off their

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>debt and just kind of trying to restructure everything.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>But this has been like a slow moving train rad.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's a phenomenal brand.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 11>Here.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 10>Let's get to get the latest reporting on this.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 9>Basu joints us here Bloomberg News credit reporter so Reshman.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 10>What's going on with our friends at sas.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 7>Sax is running out of money and the over the

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 7>weekend we saw some lenders go into enter into confidential

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 7>discussions to discuss the company's new money needs.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And what are the options on the table. At this point, a.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 7>Chapter eleven is a possibility. Given the company is running

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 7>out of cash. It's been having issues with its suppliers,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 7>so right now everyone's kind of scrambling to figure out

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 7>how to salvage the company.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 9>So talk to us about what they've been doing over

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 9>the last several years and trying to stage this off

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 9>and maybe raise some other capital.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 10>What's what's been the recent pass life for this company?

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, Sex has always had some issues with its vendors,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 7>and in late twenty twenty four they decided to partner

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 7>up with Neiman Marcus in a two point seven billion deal,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 7>but the integration has not been growing great and the

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 7>company is still struggling with negative EBITA, dealing with late

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 7>payments to vendors. So it's just been having a lot

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 7>of issues, a lot of pressure points coming all together

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 7>once right before the holidays.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Who are the investors that have a lot at stake

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>in this debt situation for Sex.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a lot of you know, the Wall Street

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 7>lenders that are involved in this name, and they've just

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 7>seen you know, they're having a really tough time right

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>now with like brounds, et cetera. So they're seeing you know,

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 7>in Sacks, we're now seeing the debt trading in like

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 7>the single digits.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 10>How much debt do they have outstanding?

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 7>So they have more than two They did a two

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 7>point two billion deal and on top of that, they

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 7>did rescue financing back in August which added another like

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 7>six hundred million, So.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 10>There's this is real money for the banks are on

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 10>the hook for.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, this is a lot. This is a lot of

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 7>pain that's going to be going around.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 3>So how do you see this shaping up?

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>What will you be looking for in twenty twenty six

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 2>as this continues to be a story where SAX is

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>working with creditors trying to persuade them to you know,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 2>pitch in more or restructure their existing agreements.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 7>We'll be looking to see how the company and its

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 7>lenders are going to structure the new money raise, whether

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 7>or not that's going to take the form of a

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 7>bankruptcy loan or a dip. And we'll also be looking

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 7>to see who's ultimately going to take the keys, if

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 7>we're going to see a change of control, and if

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 7>lenders are going to assume control of the company. We're

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 7>looking to be seen whether or not we see SAX

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 7>and Nieman kind of separate from each other.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, boy, some of this is brutal here.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 9>So they have interest payment one hundred million dollars due

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 9>like December thirtieth, nine hundred and forty one million dollar

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 9>portion of sex second out notes. Not sure what a

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 9>second out note is. And I've been in that business

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 9>a long time. Trades for seven and a half cents

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 9>on the dollar.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's that is brital. That's just stress level.

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and about seven hundred and sixty two million of

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 9>more senior debt was quoted at forty eight cents.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 10>So yeah, market's telling you.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the market's saying that there's not a lot of

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 7>value here. Like Sacks and Neeman markets were kind of

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 7>known for their real estate value. But what we're seeing

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 7>is that's really maybe not the case. So that's something

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 7>that's going to be deliberated over the next coming weeks.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 7>How much is that real estate worth? How much are

0:09:58.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 7>is the company's name worth?

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Reshmie, let me ask you a question because I know

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of our listeners are AMEX Platinum card holders,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>which means they get a fifty dollars credit at Sacks

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>every six months and they'll be going into the stores

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to use that. Does this affect the operations on the ground,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Will customers see any difference when they go into Saxsmith Avenue?

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean right now, we're seeing a ton of

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 7>promotions taking place right now, and that's something that we've

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 7>seen in retail for years now, a very promotional environment.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 7>So there's going to be a lot of discounts out there.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 9>Are there other Sacks type stories out there that you're

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 9>monitoring the name that could be a real credit problem.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 7>Credit problem maybe Container Stores is the one that we

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 7>are kind of keeping an eye out. They filed for bankruptcy,

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 7>they exited, but there's you know, we're seeing a lot

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 7>of discounts taking place there as well.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 2>But this feels very different from you know, the problems

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>that First Brands or Tree Colore had, which kind of

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>came from out of nowhere. This feels, I was saying

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to Paul, like a slow moving train wreck. We've known

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>about these problems at Sacks and Cantake for a while

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's a matter of just the two sides working

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>it out right.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 7>Like Sachs and Niman, the integration has just gone so

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 7>wrong in so many ways and it's really not capturing

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 7>the synergies that maybe lenders had initially hoped for when

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 7>they did the deal.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 9>Is there a call maybe for just a new management

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 9>team that kind of come in there, if there is in.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 10>Fact a reorganization here or filing, I mean.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 7>We could definitely see lenders taking control of the company

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 7>and installing their own people.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 10>All right, Rushmi, thanks so much. Appreciate that that was

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 10>the story. I was not aware of.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Rashmi Basu. She's a credit reporter for Bloomberg News joining

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 9>Slacker in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. And you know,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 9>if you bring somebody in here and you say, oh

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 9>my gosh, is this a trend? And what do we

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 9>hear with first brands and clear no, it is idiosyncratic.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Right yes, and one off well, and that really shocked

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 2>people because it felt like it came from out of nowhere.

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 3>They didn't have a sense that this was happening.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, the integration with Neiman Marcus has been kind of troubling,

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 2>so people had a sense that this was not going

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 2>so well. And we know that the department stores as

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 2>a whole just don't have a business model that resonates

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>with younger consumers.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 10>Yep.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, And if you don't have a digital strategy down

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 9>then you're just in a world of hurt here and then.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 9>And it just I think being a former banker with

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 9>the screams to me is just the capitol structure isn't

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 9>appropriate for the business the way it is today. You

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 9>can't capital, you can't have that much debt on this

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 9>type of business. Maybe you could have a generation to go,

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 9>but given the economics of the department store business, as

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 9>you mentioned, it just doesn't feel like this story capital structure.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 9>So somebody's gonna have to pay, and it looks like

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 9>those junior note holders it's seven and a half cents

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 9>on the dollar they're going to pay, and even the

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 9>senior stuff they're going to pay as well. So stay

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 9>on top of that story for sure. SMP of fifteen,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 9>the Dow up a needing.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 10>This is Bloomberg. Good morning.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 9>I haven't seen the Bloomberg reporting all morning about how

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 9>many gajillions of people are gonna be flying this weekend.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's just crazy.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this schedule has changed a little bit

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of calendar has changed since COVID because people are able

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to leave it a little bit earlier work from home,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the few days before the holiday.

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, apparently like yesterday the day before where it was

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 9>the crazy day. So that just kind of brings you

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 9>to how are the airlines doing that there? And what's

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 9>the out look for twenty twenty six for the airlines?

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 9>Here George Ferguson, Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines anast from

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 10>It says he's on Zoom from the Jersey office. I'm

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 10>not buying it. I think it's a beach and you.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 9>Got a backdrop there that's CGI. But I look at him,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 9>he's in the Princeton office. I mean, all right, George,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 9>thanks for joining us here. I appreciate you putting the

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 9>effort there, sir, talk to us about the airline business.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 9>How healthy is it today and kind of what's the

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 9>outlook for tomorrow? Because every time I got on a plane,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 9>it's packed, dude.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 11>It is. But remember, you know, those revenue management officers.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 11>They don't like to let airplanes go down the runway

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 11>less than eighty plus percent full anymore. So you need

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 11>to tell me the price that everybody paid before I

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 11>get really excited about packed airplanes. Anyways, I'll get off

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 11>that soapbox right now. Look, I think you know, as

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 11>we get into twenty twenty six, we're looking at schedules,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing a lot of the growth coming from the

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 11>big full service carriers. United especially continues to sort of

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 11>pour on the gas here and put a lot of

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 11>capacity in the marketplace. Delta a bit less than them,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 11>America even a bit less than them. And as we

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 11>get into the new year, we're going to have Southwest

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 11>starting to sell premium seats, and everybody's got a plan

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 11>for bringing more premium seats to the marketplace. So you know,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 11>when we just look at the full service carriers, they're

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 11>going to grow higher than GDP levels. They are going

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 11>to be I mean, actually not the latest GDP number,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 11>which is a bit hot, but we're going to see

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 11>like three four percent seat growth in the first half

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 11>from those big full service carriers. I think that means

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 11>there's probably a risk premium seats are going to start

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 11>to feel some pressure on fares, and that's been you know,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 11>the really big driver of this business, especially for those

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 11>big full service carriers, has been driving their profitability on

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 11>the on the you know, economy end. We're seeing Spirit

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 11>airlines there sort of between this world and that world

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 11>a little bit. We're trying to figure out if they're

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 11>going to survive, might get bought by Frontier. They've dropped

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 11>a bunch of airplanes. We're seeing some of these carriers

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 11>cut capacity because of weakness in those seat prices. So

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 11>I think we'll start to see at least some you

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 11>know firming up of that of that basic economy as

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 11>the market tries to get that back in balance. So

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 11>I think that's what we're going to see in the

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 11>first half of the new year.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like there's going to be a surplus

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of those premium seats and then that leaves big empty

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 2>hole here for the frontiers and the spirits. Are they

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be forced to offer also some kind of

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>premium version of what they currently have an offer?

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think everybody's trying to figure out a

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 11>way to get more premium in their airplane. They're not

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 11>you know, they're not forced, but they want they want

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 11>that premium travel that's gonna just keep flying through, you know,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 11>through good and bad economic times and not have the

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 11>challenges of inflation on their budget and things like that.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 11>So I don't know if they're forced, but we're definitely

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 11>seeing all of them look at ways to increase the

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 11>price they can get the customer to pay for a seat,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 11>whether it's block a middle seat, you know, so it

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 11>might be three by three kind of airplane, they might

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 11>block the middle seat. Some of them are talking about putting,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 11>you know, more reclined and nicer seats in the front

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 11>of the airplane. So everybody, I think everybody as a

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 11>plan for how to get more premium in their airplane.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 11>And again that's gonna mean like everything in the airline

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 11>business will get off sides on premium before it's all done.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 11>I think it begins in the first half. I don't

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 11>think premium seat prices are going to create Unfortunately, we're

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 11>not gonna be able to go anywhere really super cheap

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 11>flying in front of the airplane in the first half

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 11>of the next year. But I don't think it'd be

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 11>as good as it was in twenty twenty five.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 9>Wages, that's a big cost component for these airlines. I

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 9>want my pilots happy and want them feeling like they're

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 9>well paid.

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 10>Talk to those about the wage the dynamic in the industry.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, look, you know, we still see you know,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 11>I don't know that I want to call it a shortage,

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 11>but you know, it's a it's a difficult balance between

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 11>the number of pilots out there and what's needed by

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 11>the airlines and the you know, the number of people

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 11>coming into the industry and getting air transport licenses and

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 11>things like that, and so the pilots are still decently paid.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 11>You know, they came off years decades ago. They just

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 11>had many, many bad years. There was a surplus of them.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 11>So they've been catching up and they got these twenty

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 11>percent increases in the last couple of contracts. And in

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 11>the last contract we saw a twenty percent increase and

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 11>then a four percent five percent, so actually it was

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 11>a couple it was a five and a couple of

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 11>fours before two percent salary gains increases. They're pretty nice

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 11>in this economy, and the airlines really can't afford that

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 11>kind of inflation. In their cost base. The pilots are

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 11>a big part of it, and so they keep rolling

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 11>out bigger airplanes. And that's another challenge in the marketplace.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 11>Right as you put a bigger airplane behind the pilot

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 11>so you could defray their costs over more seats, you

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 11>got to fly all those seats into these markets, and

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 11>sometimes you're discounting more to fill the airplane. So that's

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 11>a challenge and continues in the new year. We think

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 11>the airlines would be managing cost inflation there and maintenance

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 11>and gates everywhere.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 2>So wager is a big part of the airlines costs

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest part, but then fuel is the second biggest

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>or it can be and jet fuel has actually come

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>down in twenty twenty five. Is that going to continue

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to be a tailwind in twenty twenty six.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 11>So you know, we kind of we looked at it recently,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 11>put it out on the Bloomberg Terminal BI Space AI RLN.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 11>We did some scenario analysis on this look. I have

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 11>a hard time seeing fuel prices dip significantly lower than here.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 11>But I am no oil man. Right if I was,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 11>i'd own a football team, But I'm not oil man.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 11>I don't necessarily where those prices are going. All I

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 11>could tell you is that they stick around two dollars,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 11>the airlines will get The airlines had a nice tailwind

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 11>from fuel last year as fuel prices fell, it buffered

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 11>their margins. If they stick around two dollars, they probably

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 11>get a bit of a tailwind in the first quarter,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 11>but as they roll into the back part of the year,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 11>they're not going to get a lot of gains from fuel.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 11>That's not going to buffer their margins. But we'll see.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 11>I mean fuel has dip below two dollars, it could

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 11>stay below two dollars. I guess if you see slower

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 11>GDP growth, could be a bit of a buffer. But

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 11>we don't think as much as in twenty twenty five.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 9>Did the airlines hedge their fuel exposure, because boy, I

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 9>think I'd be hedging right here if I were CFO.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 11>Not anymore. I think every so often they surprise you

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 11>and so I hear what you're saying, Like, you know,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 11>you could see one of those crazy the cfo's out

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 11>there going, hey, we might as well edge here, could

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 11>be as good as we get. We saw Southwest do

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 11>that a number of times in their history and win

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 11>big but for the most part recently, what we've seen

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 11>is almost the entire field does not hedge fuel prices anymore.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 11>If you think about it, they kind of sell tickets

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 11>out six eight weeks, so they have sort of a

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 11>future commitment for fuel prices out that far. If fuel

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 11>prices rise dramatically, I think everybody in the marketplace adjusts

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 11>fares fairly quickly because they're not edged. And so I

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 11>think you know, when they look at the pack that

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 11>they're flying in maybe the airlines, they think no one

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 11>else hedging fuel. I'm not going to run the risk

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 11>to be wrong in a hedge, will stay on hedge,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 11>and that's what the US guys.

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Hard to stick your neck out.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I guess I don't know, unless you think you've

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 9>got to handle on the market.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 10>George Ferguson, thanks so much, appreciate it as always.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 9>George Ferguson, a senior aerospace, Defense and Airlines analles for

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 10>I think I figured out George. He's in the office today.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 12>But then I bet you a bunch of them are

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 12>going to noon bag out good to Tiger's tawn. But

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 12>he's sent his work for the Yeah, they're can go

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 12>to the Tiger's Tail and have a little holiday and

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 12>you wish you're there with you exactly.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 9>It's a great great spot there right around the Bloomberg

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 9>offices down there in Princeton.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 10>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay and

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's head over now to Washington, DC and check in

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 2>with Nathan Dean, he is Bloomberg Intelligence Senior policy Analyst,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to kind of wrap up the year that was in

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five and look ahead to twenty twenty six.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Because you can't overstate just how much of an influence

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>politics and policy had on the markets this year.

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 9>Clients actually demand access to Nathan Dean and the and

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 9>his notes get huge readership because politics definitely impacts investments.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you just look at the crypto space, for instance,

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>look at the fininancial space, a banking space.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Nathan, thank you so.

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Much for joining us today on the eve of Christmas,

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>eve which industry saw the biggest impact, for better or

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 2>for worse from policy.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 13>So obviously, I think the first thing to do is

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 13>look at President Trump's one big beautiful bill, and really

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 13>that's clean energy. You know, we saw a lot of

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 13>the tax credits curtailed in terms of just both solar

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 13>and wind, and both industries are really significantly being felt

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 13>in terms of you know, those actions. I would also

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 13>say is there's a lot of sentiment out there in

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 13>terms of crypto and financial services, like you just said,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 13>but twenty twenty six is going to bring even more

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 13>deregulation for those two sectors. And that's why we think

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 13>for twenty twenty six, crypto and financial services in particular

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 13>are going to see quite a benefit.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 6>Just in the banking space.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 13>For example, you know, back of the Napkin math, because

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 13>we haven't seen some proposals that haven't come out yet,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 13>we're estimating around seventy three to seventy five billion dollars

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 13>in capital that we returned to the big banks, So

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 13>think of Bank America, Chap Morgan, and City Group. And

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 13>then in the crypto space, obviously, you know, we had

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 13>some stable coin legislation passed that is now going to

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 13>be implemented in twenty twenty six. But also we see

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 13>Congress debating this crypto Market Structure Bill, which we think

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 13>is a seventy percent chance of success passing the first

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 13>half of next year, which would then bring regulatory clarity

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 13>for firms like coinbase and Robinhood.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 9>It's also an election year in twenty twenty six. How

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 9>does that impact how legislation gets passed or doesn't pass?

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 10>How's that work?

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so you know for twenty twenty six, every day

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 13>that all four and thirty five members of the House

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 13>and thirty three members of the Senate are here, it's

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 13>to day that their opponent is back home campaigning against them,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 13>and look, they don't want to be here. So we're

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 13>telling our clients is that legislation is going to be

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 13>very difficult to come by in twenty twenty six. Now

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 13>the Republicans want to have another bite of what's called

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 13>the reconciliation apple. This is essentially the one big beautiful

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 13>bill pathway again, so think of this is going to

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 13>be more healthcare related.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 6>We're somewhat barish on this just because.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 13>The margin of the margins of the House representative are

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 13>pretty thin right now and Look, if it was easy,

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 13>they would have already done it, the Republicans. But there

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 13>are some other bills out there, like I mentioned the

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 13>Crypto Bill. But twenty twenty six is a story about

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 13>deregulation because regulators live here, they don't go home, and

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 13>they're going to be working on these rules. And it's

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 13>also a story of tariffs, because we do anticipate the

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 13>Supreme Court in January is most likely going to say

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 13>that President Trump's eight the tariffs are unlawful, and then

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 13>the Trump administration is going to have to figure out

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 13>another way to implement these tariffs because just as off

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 13>this morning, President Trump said that these are really good

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 13>things for the nation.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's going to be something we're going to really

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>focus in on in twenty twenty six. If the Supreme

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Court does rule against the President, what does that mean

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>for the efforts by importers to claim a refund or to.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Try to get back some of that money.

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 13>So Bloomberg News had a call um a couple of

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 13>weeks ago and they use the term refund chaos.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 6>And I love that two word phrase because that's just.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 13>Going to show you how difficult it will be to

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 13>get refunds because to the best of our knowledge, it's

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 13>not like one company like Amazon could go to and

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 13>just say, look, give me a check for f one

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 13>hundred million dollars. You have to go down to the

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 13>line item, by each individual line item because each individual

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 13>line item has certain tariffs associated with it.

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 6>So it's going to be messy.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 13>And there's also no way to we can figure that

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 13>there would be an electronic version of this, wire would

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 13>have to be a paper check.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 6>So I think there's a lot of folks out there saying, look,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 6>if the refilms are coming, it's going to be quarters,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 6>if not years, And I would just say, is that.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 13>The other thing to keep in mind is that the

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 13>Trump adminstration most likely will launch these investigations. So if

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 13>you're in the press, you see section two thirty two

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 13>or section three oh one, think investigation. But those investigations

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 13>take time. And the biggest question that we have we

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 13>don't have this answer yet, is will President Trump reimpose

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 13>these tariffs three, four or five months before the elections

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 13>when they're extremely unpopular with the populace.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 9>Jeez, I mean, that's going to be crazy to see

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 9>how that plays out. What else here Nathan is the

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 9>expectation in Washington that the Democrats will win back the House.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 6>Perhaps, so it's certainly looking that way.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 13>I mean, just go historically, and the minority party has

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 13>always done extremely well. I mean, think of President Obama,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 13>the Tea Party comes in, think of President Trump, Nancy

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 13>Pelosi becomes Speaker of the House. So historically that which

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 13>suggests that the momentum goes back towards the Democrats. But

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 13>we've seen, you know, in Virginia, New Jersey, Miami, New

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 13>York City, that the Democrats are performing much better than

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 13>they would have even just within that historical norm. And

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 13>we've seen a lot of retirements from the Republican side

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 13>as we head.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 6>Into these midterms. Now, if you think of how.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 13>Do the midterms actually impact the investing side, I would

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 13>say is one, it takes away the opportunity for this

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 13>reconciliation method again. So they get twenty twenty seven, You're

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 13>not going to see a very large tax cut bill

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 13>or deficit inducing bill.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 6>It brings things back down to gridlock.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 13>I'm not saying nothing can get done, but it just

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 13>means that legislation is going to be less of an emphasis.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 13>And President Trump to implement policy is going to focus

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 13>more on executive orders and then the deregulatory method.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Is there any appetite Nathan in Washington to address AI

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 2>and to set up some more standard guidelines for companies

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to operate in. I mean, I think about Nvidia and

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 2>how it's the poster child of the AI revolution here

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>in the US, and Jensen Wang has pretty much gotten

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>everything he wanted.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So President Trump issued an executive order on artificial Intelligence,

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 13>essentially combating the state's abilities to create their.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:20.199
<v Speaker 6>Own rules on AI.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 13>Now, our legal analysts, Matt Shaddam has looked at it

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 13>and said, most likely this would not pass court muster,

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 13>so that AI executive order probably doesn't have much teeth

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 13>to it. But in that executive order, President Trump also

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 13>directed the Executive Branch to come up with a national standard.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 13>And so if we see the Executive Branch and the

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 13>various agencies come out and say, look, this is what

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 13>we think the national standards should look like, at least

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 13>it's an area for debate, a foundation, if you will,

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 13>for Congress to begin to start thinking about this, because

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 13>you know, right now it's very hands off industry in

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 13>terms of regulation. You know, I didn't talk about it

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 13>in twenty twenty five because it really isn't all that

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 13>much regulation for it. But if this foundation and this

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 13>debate continues, and you will see a lot of anti

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 13>data center messaging as we get into the twenty twenty

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 13>six midterms here in Northern Virginia. We saw it already

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 13>in our election. You know you are going to see

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 13>this coming to the political spectrum. So I do think

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 13>over twenty twenty six you'll see this debate. But again,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 13>I don't think you're going to see anything actually put

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 13>down on a piece of paper and say this is

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 13>what the national standard is.

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 10>All right, Nithan Deane, very good, appreciate it as always.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 9>Nathan Deane, Senior policy analyst for Bloomberg Intelligency is based

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 9>down there in Washington, DC.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal