WEBVTT - Takeaways from the 2025 U.S. Open with Trevor Immelman

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a brid egg

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida egg, Frida egg, Frida egg

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>brid Egg fridagg bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>run off the golf course.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Friday Egg Golf Podcast. I am

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>your host, Andy Johnson. Today I am joined by Trevor Immelman.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 2>We are going to break down the one hundred and

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifth US Open. It was held last week at Oakmont.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>It was very wet, It was quite a week. It

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of weather. Pure chaos broke down on

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the back now and I'm excited to chat with Trevor

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>about all the ins and outs and contenders. Also the

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>setup Oakmont overall is a course. Really fun chat with

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Trevor breaking down this major. I can't believe we're we

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 2>are three legs of the four through the major season.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>We've got Port Rush coming up in about a month

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>exactly from today, so really a lot of storylines. Obviously,

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>JJ spawn captured the title. Incredible finish for him to

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 2>win his first major and and win at Oakmont. What

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>a first major to get Oakmont? It's not usually a

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>first major golf course. Today's podcast is brought to you

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>by our friend at mob Jack.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>That's m O. B J A K.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Mob Jack. You may not have heard of this company.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>It is a newcomer on the belt scene. I was

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>wearing my mob Jack belt all last week, got a

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>number of implements about it. They are well versed in

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the belt space. I personally like I love a nice

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>pattern belt, and they have some really great pattern fabrics

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>that are fade resistant. It's a nice thing to brush

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 2>up like. I like wearing a belt that doesn't have

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>like logos on it. This this kind of fits.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>That for me.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>It is they are luxury lifestyle belts that are handcrafted

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>in the United States and small batches and using old

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>world artists and craftsmanship. Mobjack tells a story. Really it's

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a meticulous craftsmanship, uncompromised quality, and the belief that luxury

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 2>is defined by attention to detail. If you're into belts,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking for a good belt, they have a

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>like a brass buckle that's with that has like a

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>nice matt finish to go along with the patterns. This

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>is a really good looking belt. So if you're interested

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 2>in mobjack, go to mobjack dot com. That's mob jak

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>dot and use the promo code Frida egg to get

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent off.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>That's mobjack dot com.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Mob jak use the promo code Frida egg to get

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent off. Let's get to Trevor Immleman. All right,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Immelman, as always, was becoming a tradition, maybe not

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 2>unlike any other a tradition. Is you coming on to

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about our last major this weekend? We had the

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>US Open. It was It was quite the tournament.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of things to talk about about

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>this tournament. JJ Spawn captured the title. It became anybody's tournament.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>On the back nine just a you know, a ton

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of players had a chance. JJ Spawn though, makes four

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>birdies on the back nine the last two holes to

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>win by two shots over Robert McIntyre and capture his

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>first major championship, his second win of his career and

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 2>obviously a part of a breakout season for Spawn, who's

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>now top ten in the world.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the win goes with the.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Runner up playoff loss at the players one of the

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>other huge events on the PGA Tour calendar as well

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>as a second place at down in Palm Beach. So

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on JJ Spahn and and kind of the finish there.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, extremely impressive gulf from him. I mean, what

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a week it was, what a final round it was.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I posted a message on X earlier in the day

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that just always had a feel that there were going

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be some crazy twists and turns throughout the day.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>Every shot seemed on such a knife edge, particularly the

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>t shots. If you hit it into the rough, you

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just never knew what you were going to get. And

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>things were just changing dramatically, and then we got the

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>weather delay. But you know, you've got to give so

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>much credit to JJ for the way that he finished

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the tournament off, to go ahead and come back in

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. I'm just looking at the scorecard here. Four

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>birdies in his last seven holes. You know, birdies were

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to come by. We saw that throughout the week,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>even when conditions were better. And for him to go

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>ahead and make those four birdies down the stretch there,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and particularly the last two holes when everything was on

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the line, you got to tip your cap to him

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and congratulate him. He went out there and won that

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>with a moment that will be remembered for a long time.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>With that brilliant pot across the green at eighteen.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the pot was incredible.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I was standing right there behind and you know, like

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm a member of the media, I'm supposed to be impartial,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>And when that putt got about five feet away, I

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>like threw my hands up because I knew it was

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>one of those putts that was traffic. And I mean

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I let out an audible like oh, I you know,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 2>I cheered because it was just such a remarkable putt.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you just it's when I saw where he

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>hit it. When I got up to the green, I

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>was looking at him, like, God, this is that's a

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>hard put I wouldn't want to have to two put

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that to win.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>You know. That's that's about one of the worst putts

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 3>you could have on the green.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>The odds were far greater than he was going to

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>three put than what you know it was going to

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be if he made it, and just incredible really, and

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it went in at perfect speed like there was no

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a week where it felt like there

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>was quite a lot of luck at play with the

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lies and the rough and you know whether you're to

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to advance the ball twenty yards fifty yards

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>get it up onto the green. There was just felt

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like no luck involved in all that partt When in

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>perfect speed it was tracking the last eight or ten feet,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you just were like, man, I think this is going

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to go in brilliant moment there for him. I'm a

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>huge JJ spawn fan. He is a wonderful guy, a

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>great guy that's very popular on to a really good

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor. It doesn't take himself too seriously, and

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know he's put in the hard yards throughout his

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>career to make it to this point. And so fun

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to see good people get rewarded who've put the work

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in and battled through the adversity. That was quite something.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>That was really a cool moment. They're watching him make

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that putt and you see the reaction from all the

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>other competitors, whether it be Tyrrell or Bob or even

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Halan that he's playing with. I mean, these guys just

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at it going like yeah, fair play. I mean,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's something special right there.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I loved it, like just like kind of like putter

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>toss going in and It's almost like he didn't know

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>what to do, like just through It's.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Gaddy caddy was so close to him that I thought

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he might try to dive and catch him. It was.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It was quite funny to see the caddy right there

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>with him, probably trying to get a read on the

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pot if it went by the hole, and you know

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he's holding the umbrellas hammering down with rain again. Yeah,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've probably watched it fifteen times since, and

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you always spot something that brings a smile to your face.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, after the initial shock of the ball going in.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The more you watch it, the more other things you

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>start to notice really cool, I think.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously the first two majors of the year,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 2>we had Rory McElroy Scottie Shuffler, supreme talents, players that

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>from a young age were destined for, you know, stardom

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>on the PGA Tour. Obviously, Rory tons of expectations as

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a kid. Scotty wins the US Junior becomes the number

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 2>one player in the world. Jaduspahn a little bit different path,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 2>and one of the beautiful things about golf is is

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that you know you never know what age you're going

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to play your best golf, and here he is at

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty four, really rounding into his his his best self.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I loved the quote he talked about in his post round.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>He said, I grew up watching golf. I was a

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>young kid wanted to play golf. I loved golf. It

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 2>was a passion for me growing up. I always played

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>with my parents. Growing up, one thing led to another.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't really groomed to be a professional golfer. I

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't get put through academ academies. I didn't play a JGA.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I played local stuff. I did qualify or actually, my

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 2>first big USGA event was the US Junior. I did

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that two times when I was like sixteen and seventeen.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of when I realized my potential. I just

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>kept going like one foot in front of the other,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>junior golf, college golf, turning pro, and now here I

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 2>am with the USGA, a US Open trophy. Think about

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the career and it's like this just incremental rise. Where

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 2>he's not playing AJGA golf.

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>He's played.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>He plays at San Diego State, obviously a pretty strong program.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know his path to the tour. He started

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Canadian Tour. He got up through the Canadian

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>tour to the corn Ferry Tour. You know, it was

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the web dot com. I remember watching him at the

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 2>very beginning of the Frida Egg. I went to one

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>of my first trips to pro golf tournament was to

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the Columbus Nationwide event and I watched him there and

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, because a guy on web dot com tour

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know one guy you should watch hit

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 2>a golf balls, JJ Spawn. He can really hit it.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>And I watched him there and then it's just like

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>he kind of was just mired in in the middle

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 2>of the PGA tour for years and who knows where

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>he goes from here, but it's just, you know, to

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>get to the top ten in the world rankings, it's

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>just a very unexpected He's not someone you go and

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>watch and you're like, wow, like you know that guy,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether it's aesthetically, he doesn't look like he's like,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's not one of these like six foot

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>four Cam Davis, like gret you know, god like looking

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>golf swings when you're looking at the range. But that

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>swing is is really repeatable and we saw it under

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>pressure just you know, deliver two. I mean, two absolute

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>perfect drives on seventeen and eighteen.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in a lot of ways, it's it's like a

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a throwback, isn't it. You know when

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I when I turned pro, it was kind of accepted

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that you would go through years of like cutting your

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>tea and learning the ropes and getting to understand the

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>golf courses and learning from the other great players and

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>stumbling a bunch before being able to win, and then

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually you would reach your prime in your thirties. I

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>mean everyone used to think you'd reach your prime in

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>your thirties, and then I guess really started with Tiger

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was the first guy to jump on there and absolutely

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>dominate in his early twenties. But as the years of progressed,

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>guys have had more and more success early. But you know,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as you talk about that and read through some of

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>his accomplishments, I mean, it's it's kind of like a

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>throwback of he took his time, he lost his card,

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>He used to go through the mini tours a lot

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>of self doubt in moments, wondering whether it'd be good enough,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but he kept at it and had the right group

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of people around him to keep nudging him in the

0:12:55.360 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>right direction, and now he's major champion, and he's won

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the US Open at one of the toughest golf courses

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to play. He absolutely flushes the ball, there's no doubt

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about that. My son has done some travel with me

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this summer since he got back home, and he was

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>with me at the Charles Schwab at Colonial and I

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>always like to go down on the range on Saturdays

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and Sunday mornings and watch the leaders warm up and

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe have a chat with them, see what's

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>going on, see if I can notice any patterns with

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>their swing and their ballflight. And JJ was up near

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>around the lead that week as well, and we watched

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>him warm up and we left the range and my

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>son Jacob said to me, man, I didn't realize JJ

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball that pure. It was extremely impressive warm

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>up all the way through. The bag doesn't have a

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy amount of power to be able to overpower any

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of golf course, but there's for sure enough pop

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the bat. We're talking mid to high one seventies

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>penetrating ballflight. He moves the trajectory around, up and down

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot. For the most part, hits the fade

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but the ball comes out and it feels and sounds like, man,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing has been hit, and it's been hit rarely squarely.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Love is swinging, Lovey is right shoulder powers through the ball.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of face flipping and face rotation going

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on there. And I was like, yeah, I mean, this

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>guy flushes it and he's starting to get that self

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>belief now that he's had all of these close calls

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>after the initial win at Valero, but he's for sure

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>up this game in the last twelve months. And you know,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he leaned on all of those experiences coming

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch yesterday, and maybe, you know, it's one

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>thing getting it done at the end and making all

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>those brilliant birdies and hitting those two brilliant drives on

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and eighteen. But I'll tell you what. You know,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people would have packed it up after

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>five or six holes after the start that he had.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean that in necessarily even a quitting fashion.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it in getting down on yourself mentally and

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, this is clearly not my week. I've

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>just hit the flag stick on two after hitting a

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect wedge, and I'm off the green, he makes another

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>bogie there, he makes what does he make here? Five

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fives to start, and then he bogies the next hole

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the past three. So he's five over after six on Sunday,

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I'd love to know the self talk and

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the thought process he was going through at that moment.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But to be able to hang in there and keep

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>grinding it out is something that I think is super impressive.

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The rain delay probably helped him to be able to reset,

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe take a little squizze at the leaderboard and go okay.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that was maybe the worst possible start I

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>could have got off to, but the good news is

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually still in this and he was able to

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to reset. But yeah, man, it was cool.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It was cool to watch. And you know, in sports,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we love to see the favorites win, but every now

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it's fun to see somebody step up and

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>prove to themselves and the world that they can get

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it done too. And that's really what I take out

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of his performance. And who knows where this goes from here?

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, who knows? That's It's one of the beauties

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of sport where you have to watch, you have to

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>get in the game and you've got to complete all

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy two. Hold. I mean, this guy who knows he

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>could win more majors going down the road for sure.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I think with Oakmont's pedigree for winners, the the membership

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>certainly wishing him to win more. The uh, you know,

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I had in my notes, so I was going to

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>ask you this is is this the rain delay that

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that changed the course of the US Open? Because if

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 2>you look at Spawns quotes and from his press conference,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>he you know, he he talked to his coaches obviously

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 2>during the break, and I think it was Josh Gregory

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>who said.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 3>It was. He said they were just like, dude, just chill.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're if you were given four shots back going

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 2>into the back nine on Monday, you would have you

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 2>would take that. They just said, just let it come

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 2>to you. Be calm, stop trying hard. That's what I

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>was doing. I felt like I had a chance, a

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>really good chance to win the US Open. At the

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>start of the day. It was just unraveling very fast.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But that break was actually the key for me to

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>winning this tournament. You know, you just think about Yeah,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And it seemed like the break was also had a

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 2>detriment on other players, you know, and uh, one thing

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I was curious about and it seemed like we a

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of guys had a lot of trouble hitting hitting

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>approach shots from the from the wet fairways when they

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 2>came out. Is there something that spawns swing that you know,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>we both have talked about, like that consistent strike that

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 2>he asked. It's seemingly a heavy ball the hits when

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>he is there something about his swing that actually was

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you know that separated him on the on the soggy

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>fairways because that was giving people a lot of trouble.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's really tough to answer because all of these

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are are so good through the impact zone. You know,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to this level unless you are. You

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>just kind of wonder did he let that bother him

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>less than some of the others. The thing that makes

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>golf so elusive and winning and championship golf so elusive

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is it's just one little tiny piece of doubt can

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>cause havoc. And you know, maybe he just dealt with

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it mentally in a better way to where he was like, look,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put my swing on the on the shot

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens rather than being a little apprehensive

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>or being a little more defensive. Who knows, you just

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>need that one little shred of doubt to cause absolute havoc.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But it reminded me so much of other sports. You know,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen delays like that change outcomes in sports. You

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>see it in tennis sometimes players will go for a

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>bathroom break or the rain or.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Come my Cubs World Series.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Remember that Super Bowl in New Orleans when the it

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>went out and all of a sudden the game changed. Uh.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You see it in Formula one all the time. So

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of the beauties of sport. Nobody knows

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. You just got to keep rolling

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>with it. You've got to be you've got to be unflappable.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got to you've got to be in a situation

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to where you need to be able to expect anything

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and not allow any of it to bother

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you and to affect your psyche at all. Uh. And

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the main thing that I was impressed with

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>from JJ yesterday was the start, the the delay, the

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>change in conditions, the sloppy fair ways. He dealt with

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that so well. And uh came out on top.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is, you know, he putted extraordinary and

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.719
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that's been a soft spot throughout

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 2>his career has been the putter. He's always been really

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 2>tee to green Ace. The putter has been, you know,

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>not as reliable put it. I think like what impressed

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>me the most, and it impressed me at the players

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>was like his lag putting under the gun under pressure

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 2>where you might see that's where and all of a

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 2>sudden you get more you have more thoughts going through

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>your head. It gets harder to leave putts dead and uh,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>and the putts he hit coming in made it a

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>lot easier on him because you know, they just matching

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>perfect speed with the with the you know, in a

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>in a situation where finding the perfect speed was hard

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 2>because the speed of the Greens drastically changed after the

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>rain delay. I think like the the adaptability and for

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>him to just kind of go out and just really

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>in a situation where nobody was taking the ball, he

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>just grabbed it and ran with.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>It and and I think, you know, it'll be interesting.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Josh Gregory was talking afterwards, he and he and I

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>think this is like an important note of JJ spawn

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>as he was talking about how you know, he obviously

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>works with a ton of players, but he was like,

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, this guy is having a career year. He's

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 2>gotten into the top fifteen in the FedEx Cup, top

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty five in the World golf rankings, and it's really

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>easy when you get there to become complacent. And what

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 2>he said to me is, I'm ready to work. I'm

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>tired of coming up short. I want to be a lead.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>And you think that that type of mindset is kind

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of what can lead to people becoming world class at things,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 2>especially when he already has the traits of being a

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 2>really good ball striker. If he you know, he makes

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 2>some incremental gains on the short game and putting over

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>the next you know, eighteen months, you know this, it

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>might not be where we're surprised that he's a top

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>ten player.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, he's clearly put a lot of great work in.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we zero in on putting shucks. I

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>remember a couple of seasons ago. You know, he was

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>trying all sorts of different styles. He was trying arm block,

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>he was going conventional, different putter styles, all sorts of

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>different things. But you know, he's done well with this

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>putter change. He's found a stroke that looks rarely, rarely solid,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and he made a bunch of putts throughout the week

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that were absolutely clutch. I mean none more so than

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that bomb on eighteen. It's fascinating to me, you know, nowadays,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with the advent of social media and all the great coverage,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it be podcasts or pregame shows and all that

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. It was so much talk going into

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the week from the members at oakmand from the USGA,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>from players that had made scouting trips up there, like

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>these green these greens are going to be fifteen. They're

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>so fast, they're so undulating, and in a lot of

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that sort of starts to plant seeds in your mind.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, never mind being a fan, but how about

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a player and you're starting to hear all

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, read all that stuff, and then they have

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>all of the rain coming into the tournament. The players

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>get there on Monday, it's soaking wet. The greens aren't

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>quite as fast. Then Tuesday, Wednesday, everybody's like, oh, they

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>started to get fast again. And then the rain kept

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>coming in throughout the week and they never quite got

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to that point to where they were super scary, but

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>he found a way to keep adjusting. So well, really

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really cool stuff.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 2>This is a crazy It was a weird week, yeah,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>for a tournament, just with you know, kind of the

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>lead up the rain.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Then it was, you know, kind of hot.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of different like conditions within days, you

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 2>know more nothing more so than Sunday, where you know,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty idyllic in the morning, great scoring conditions, and

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>then the afternoon got you know, it was a little windier.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>The rain obviously threw a huge wrench in it and

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 2>became very difficult in the middle. And then you came

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 2>out to I think like what a number of players

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 2>that Adam Scott called it borderline whether they should have

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>been out there, and he was more this was more

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about what happened to Sam Burns, not himself.

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 3>I want to be clear with that.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 2>This is not him, like you know this this was

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>prodded and asking about Sam and he said, you know,

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the fairways were borderline. Justin Thomas was tweeting,

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look great out there, you know, like you had

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a tweet about whether they should be out there.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 2>This week was it's just gonna be one of those

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 2>tournaments where we go down to look back on and

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>be like, a lot of weird stuff happened that week,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 2>And I think it was a setup style that we

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen from the USGA in a long time. Obviously,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the Mike Davis era was centered around kind of the

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 2>graduated rough philosophy, where and what I mean by graduating

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 2>rough is where your penalty for hitting in the rough

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 2>progressively gets greater the further from the fairway you get.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>I think then John Bodenheimer came in and we've had

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>an era of like where he came in was after

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Shinnecock and there was a lot of negativity amongst the

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>players about the USGA and they're may be credentials for

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 2>hosting such a big tournament. And I think we got

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a number of years in the recent years where they've

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 2>been very cautious with setups, very you know, this is

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 2>the way it is. But it almost felt like Oakmont

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 2>gave them a veil because it's Oakmon, and the gravitas

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of Oakmon is similar to Augusta National, where players aren't

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 2>going to really say because this is the way Oakman

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>is it's it's punishing, it's unforgiving. Where they really put

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 2>their foot down on the setup. It was thick, uniform,

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>rough from the second you ventured off the fairway to

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the rope line. I would say that my biggest critique

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>would be if you're outside the rope line, you're in

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>a much better spot than if you're inside.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>The rope line.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 2>And then obviously the greens, and I think the new

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 2>whole locations that were created by the Green, the restoration

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 2>historical renovation that Gil Hans had really opened up some

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>new dimensions to to the golf course in terms of

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>whole locations that otherwise would have felt more like in

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the green. What was your what are

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on kind of the US Open? You obviously

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 2>played through a couple of different eras in the setups

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that they've they've had, and where this setup this week

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>stood for you.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot there to unpack. I would say

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that this US Open at Oakmont was how how I

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>remember it when I was playing, just got to hit

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it so straight, got to find a way to keep

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it in play, otherwise you're just hacking it out. Uh,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I kind of liked the idea of graduated rough.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there would be a way nowadays too, through

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the use of data, figure out what the the penalty

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>should be, how heavy the penalty should be depending on

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>how far you stray from the middle of the fairway

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or or the edge of the fairway, even if you

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do it that way. But yeah, gosh, when

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you have in a certain aspect, I wonder. Let's just

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>say there was no rain throughout the week and that

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>course got like super firm and fast, like we saw

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>guys putting it down the first fairway from one hundred

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and sixty yards out. Okay, thanks thanks to your great

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>idea there. Imagine if it just kept getting firmer throughout

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the week, with amount of slope and undulation you have

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of those fairways, how hard it would have

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>been to keep the ball on the short grass. It

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been galy. It would have been so hard

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep your t shot in play it.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Was away on Friday, Yeah, there would have been.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of eight and a half out of ten

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>te shots that then end up a foot off the

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>fairway and just in complete hack out rough. And to me,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of one of my concerns as I

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>enjoying watching. I didn't work at all this week. I

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was just a fan on the couch, you know, reading,

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching as much as I could. Was it

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>becomes a little a little bit of a fifty to

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty call on what sort of lie you're going to get,

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't punish you according to how poor the

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>shot was. And earlier in the week I also put

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>something out on social media where you know, I'm a

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of Oakmont. I played a US Open and

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was way too hard for me, but have a ton

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of respect for the golf course and how it has

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>stood the test of time. But I always felt like

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of the course is the greens and the

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>magnificent slopes that you have on these greens. You know,

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you think of some other courses like Augusta National or

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>many links courses over in the UK and Ireland, even

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a wing Foot where you get these giant ridges and

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>slopes and bowls and plateaus and so much interesting stuff.

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you have super thick rough around the greens,

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it becomes quite one dimensional. Rather than seeing players use

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>their imagination to use these ridges and slopes and funnels

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and see the ball get rejected down a hill like

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we were seeing at number two or we were seeing

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at number three. I would love to have seen a

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of that so we could have seen

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>some more variety. It just felt like it was it

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>hit your drive. You know, guys were fifty to fifty,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whether they were hitting the fairway or not, and you're

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>walking up there praying that you've got some sort of

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>lie that you can advance it or not. You can

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have two balls right next to each other and have

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>one guy going for the green, one guy hacking out sideways,

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was the same thing. Around the greens. We

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>saw this either a bunker shot, a pot from off

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the fairway or the chop with the love wedge to

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty feet. And I would just love to have seen

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>a little more variety there to see it mess with

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these players' minds to where they have to bump and

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>runs and flops and checkers and all sorts of different things.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting it's an interesting one. It'll be

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to see what the USGA learned from this, because you're,

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're always capturing the data, especially nowadays, and

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing how everything unfolded so Yeah, that's kind of my

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on that.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I I echo a lot of thoughts. I think

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the setup philosophy. I did a panel with Scott Langley

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesday, who's obviously very with the setup. Their their

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 2>goal with the setup was to create a black and

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 2>or a true or false test. He we kind of

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>talked about, you know, before we went on you know,

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, multiple choice tests, true false tests. He asked

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>me what type of test I like more and I said, well,

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I like short answer, which wasn't that's not even in

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the USGA wheelhouse.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 3>They don't to me, you know that what.

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So they wanted to set up a true false test,

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and to me, that's kind of like for me, my

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 2>personal taste. And I think, like what's very interesting is

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 2>like I think a lot of like regular uh you know,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>like your weekend golfer loves the true false test because

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 2>they like to see the best players in the world

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 2>struggle and feel that relatability to somebody hacking it out

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of the rough at.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Times, because they don't see the best golfers struggle very often. Yes,

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>This was so far from a typical PGA tour stop.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this was this was like Memorial setup ratcheted up,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 2>which is typically one of the hardest PGA Tour setups.

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say the one thing that the Memorial has

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 2>is they have like one of the things I think

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that course does really well is it scaled the appropriately

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 2>for the modern game. And what I mean by that

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 2>is that it does have thick rough and it is

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 2>very punishing when you get off the fairway. The fairways

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 2>are just forty yards wide where you have a little

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>bit more space to play in, and the test is achievable.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 3>It's what you said, you know.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I think like one of the things that I don't

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 2>like about really thick rough is the idea that okay,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 2>we want to test who's driving the driving it the best,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But isn't the way that golf course was set up,

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 2>particularly Thursday Friday. I thought it played a lot better

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend when the fairways got soft and they

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>played wider.

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but the way.

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 2>It was set up on Thursday and Friday was we

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know who's even close to passing the test because

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the test isn't passable. Yeah it, And what I mean

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 2>by that is, you know, I always thought in college,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I don't want to get into the academics.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 2>But like I always thought like the stupidest tests of

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the world were like, oh, the high score in the

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 2>class is thirty percent, you know, or high score in

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the class is fifty percent. To me, the way and

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 2>this is my personal setup, and I want to just

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is my personal and you can disagree.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 2>It's fine to disagree with this, but my personal belief

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>is that the way a golf course should test a

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 2>game should be like the first part. The first question

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>in the test is off the tee, do you can

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>you pass that test? And I should have a good

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 2>chance to pass that test. Then the next question is

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>approaching the greens, and all in all with that, there's

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 2>layers of gray. And this is what I think Augusta

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 2>National does so so well. And I'm not saying every

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>venue should be set up like Augusta, but when you

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 2>have great greens like Oakmont, what you have the ability

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to do is induce a lot of gray area. So

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the passing the test that Augusta is getting into a

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 2>small pocket in a rather wide fareaway. There is a

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 2>grade a place and you can still be in the

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 2>fairway and you could have gotten that question off the

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>team wrong and smart players know that they got it wrong.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Other players might might say, like I can take this on.

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm from the faraway, but you don't know you're playing

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 2>from the wrong area. But it allows you the opportunity

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to hit the great shot to recover. And I think

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>that's the biggest thing that we were missing from this

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 2>tournament was the excitement that recovery brings, recovery shots and

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 2>this and the actual like you know, we can say

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 2>we're testing skill. The one thing that the setup did

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 2>not allow for was the skill of recovery. Yeah, and

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>the skill of recovery to me, like you know, when

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>I was looking at I was trying to you know,

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Sam Burns hasn't played well in many major championships, and

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting into like I'm thinking about, like, why is

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Sam Burns playing well here? I was thinking about this

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>this morning when I was on my way to the airplane,

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, well he was. He's an example of

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 2>where the recovery here. It wasn't daring recovery shots, skillful

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>mid irons from judging a lie and the rough and

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 2>really like saying okay, like I can I can take

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>on this screen. It was more hack it out hacking.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 2>He what he was doing was hacking it forty yards

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 2>up and then wedging it close and putting. Which wedging

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and putting is his real Like, that's his bread and butter.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Agree, and that should be.

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Part of his recovery, but that shouldn't be the only

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>path to recovery in my opinion.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, we saw something similar at Wingfoot when

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Bryson won in twenty. When you dial it up to

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this point, all the answers are false. It's so hard

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>for anybody, even at this great level that these players are,

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just so hard for them to constantly be hitting

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>good shots. I mean, it's not possible. They're not machines,

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, never mind uneven lies and wind and rain

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and all that other kind of stuff. And like at Wingfoot,

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they got the fairways so narrow that all

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, even the most accurate drivers were missing

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a great amount of fairways. So then all of a sudden,

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the equation got put back onto distance. Okay, now, because

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's missing fairways because the fairways are so narrow, that

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>means that the longest hitters have a massive advantage because

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>if everybody's missing them, why wouldn't you just rather be

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>forty fifty yards further up there like Bryson was, to

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 1>where you've got a better chance of hacking it out

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>up onto or near the green and a better chance

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a part. And kind of had a little

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of that feel this week again. And the emphasis

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day for me, when I

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>look back at the last four rounds was it was

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it turned into you know, who's putting the best out here,

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Who's who's going to be able to to put from

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 1>long range? Who's going to be able to make those

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>eight ten foots to save pars after they've had to

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>chop it out of the rough? And JJ was the

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>guy that really rarely putted well this week.

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I want to be you know.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 2>The other thing about this is that when you think

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 2>about the ethos of the US Open, it goes to

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a new venue every year. Part of the ethos of

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 2>the US Open should be showcasing the the spirit and

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the the wide range of golf that we have in

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 2>America through these different venues in different locales. My question,

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 2>my question, you know, my bigger question, and if Oakmont

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 2>wants their identity to be this, I would say, that's great,

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 2>that's you have that identity. But like my my critique

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 2>would be, as you alluded to earlier, this is one

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest golf designs in the world.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 2>To me, the this style of setup kind of puts

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>restrict plates on on on what type of creativity, the

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 2>creativity and shot making that this golf course could bring

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 2>out if set up a little bit differently. And I think, like,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's what's wild to me is like why

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 2>people don't And I think this is like maybe more

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 2>of a Mike Davis thing, where like people just like

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>do not like Mike Davis. But I am I'm shocked

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 2>at like the negativity that people have towards the graduated

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>rough idea, because to me it makes a lot of sense.

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 2>And like the idea of if I'm three yards off

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the fairway, I hit a without a doubt better t

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 2>shot than someone that's fifteen yards off the fairway. Thus

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm penalized less for being three yards off the fairway

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 2>then somebody that's fifteen yards off the fairway, And then

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 2>what like my real issue becomes when somebody's twenty five

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 2>yards off the fairway and they're in they're in trampled

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 2>down spectator areas, and they get a clean lie and

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 2>they're they're better off than the person who missed the

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 2>faraway by two inches.

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I always love, love it when when a player

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>has to make a choice and you know, if you've

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>missed the fairway and you look down at your ball

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, gosh, I think I might be able

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to go for this. But there's absolutely that conflict of

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the smart play is because at the

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, you know what's playing well in

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the US Open is trying to keep the double bogies

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>off your card. I mean, it's impossible to go through

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a US Open without making your whole host of bogies,

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>But can you keep the big numbers off of your card?

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to really challenge the players and

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>bait them into going for it, especially when you've got

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>green complexes like this to where we could see some

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>really fun chips and pitches and putts and bunker shots

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with all these great undulations and stuff like that, I

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>would be in favor of the graduated rough to be

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>able to if you're three yards off the fairway, you're

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely in two minds of whether is this going to jump?

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to come out soft? I've got this

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 1>deep bunker in front. I don't want to be short

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sighted there, you know, And you're managing that reading of

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the lie all the time. I'm kind of in favor

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, I'm in favor of that when

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I was playing. I'm in favor of that now as

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>an announcer because there's so much more meat on the

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bone to talk about and to question and to listen

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to the player and caddy conversation and the caddy saying oh,

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can get there, and the player

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>going oh no, no, this lies good enough. I can get there,

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and then hitting the shot and going through that process

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and bearing in mind what just happened. Was it the

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>right decision, was it the wrong decision? I think that

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff is quite interesting. But you know, when

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you think back to the the the US opens at Oakmond,

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is is kind of what we've seen.

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's just it's a beast, it's a monster.

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it wears you down. I mean, we saw players

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>do so many crazy things this week. You know, guys

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really losing their cool early on in the week. You know,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Shane Lowry one is just like so funny to

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>me that he went and just picked his ball up.

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>He thought he had put his market down and he

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>picked it up. You know, for a player of that

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>caliber to be so scrambled in their mind in that

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>moment to make a mistake like that just shows how

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 1>how this course really was beating them up mentally and physically.

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just the test that you're going to

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>get here.

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I you know, being there on the ground, I

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 2>don't think I've ever seen just the like seemingly uniform

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 2>million mile stare from player after player as they walked

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 2>from green to tea. Just nobody was having a good

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 2>time out there. Nobody was having a good time. It

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 2>was pain and suffering and you know, it hurt a

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>couple of players wrists on the way out. It dispatched

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>some some physical pain. I think, like the final point

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll make about this whole the whole setup, is it

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 2>is necessitated that this this tournament. They were gung ho.

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 2>The president of the club got up at media day

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and said, we're going to have an over par winner.

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 2>That's what we've told the usj we're having an overpar winner.

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 2>One guy finished under par, one under, you know, and

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 2>if it was if.

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It was firm, it would have been way over par,

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like way over part.

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Way over par.

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 2>And and and they they did this through the rough.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's be clear, when people like those bunkers were fierce,

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 2>you saw a.

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Lot like I love.

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I love the penalty that bunkers, Fairway Bunkers gave out

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this week, where you saw guys just having to like

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>just flip it out.

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I love that.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>But where I like struggle is when the rough, the rough,

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 2>which is not of a hazard, the rough is doling

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:22.720
<v Speaker 2>out a greater penalty than the bunker.

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Almost.

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we've had that for many years though,

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't you.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's where we and this gets to the

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>greater point and why we've gotten here is because of

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the equipment and how far it goes and us trying

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to hold on to to the the relic of even par.

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And it particularly comes true at the US Open. Every

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 2>year comes ahead because nobody's happy, like I thought. You know,

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Pinehurst last year was one of the greatest championships I've

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 2>ever seen it, and it was you know, two of

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>the world's best players elevated and distancing themselves from a

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 2>field and having one of the great showdowns of our time. Yeah,

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and there was a whole contingent of people that were

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 2>upset because of what score?

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Where are they finished? And score it apart?

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I don't know what score they were. I enjoyed

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it so much.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I have no th at six hunder, you know, And

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I think like that's that's the push and pull of

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>this tournament, is that nobody's going to be happy, whether

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you you know, and and the whole kind of metamorphois

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 2>of this is that equipment's made it and it's been

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, you cannot get even par unless you have

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 2>rough like this.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do agree with that. This is this is

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a debate that may never end. It's been going on

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for decades. You know. Jack always tells the story of

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 1>him starting to talk about this in the seven these

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and you know, golf, golf, social media, you know,

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>people get fired up when you talk about about the

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>equipment and possibly rolling it back when you get to

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this level of player and these guys that have rarely

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dedicated their whole lives to getting good at the sport

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you give them this high level of equipment there,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there's all this is there's really no defense that you

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>can come up with other than the setup that we

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just saw.

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, and I think you've got to have three hundred.

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have, you got to have. You brought

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:49.479
<v Speaker 1>up the Memorial earlier. Uh Memorial has kind of similar rough,

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>wider fair ways, but there's four par fives where there's

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>only two at Oakmont, and you know, you've got to

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have three three hundred yard past threes. We had the

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>eighth hole yesterday. I had three hundred and one yards,

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken. And that's that's just due to

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, that's just due to having to stretch it

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>out so much in order for the players to have

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a similar shot value than what all the other great

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>champions through the years have had to endure. And yeah,

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way you're going to the only way

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to create some defense is make the penalty

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.760
<v Speaker 1>so severe from a rough standpoint.

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about some players that did not lift the the.

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but I first want to go through some of

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this here with JJ before we jump off of that.

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So driving distance, he was thirty sixth so he's right

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>at three hundred average, so that's in the top quarter there.

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Sixty three percent of fairways he hit, field average was

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty three percent, so he did drive the ball straight

0:50:11.040 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>than the majority of people. He was nineteenth and fairways

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>hit greens in regulation he was ninth. That's seventy one percent.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>That's also pretty stella. Field average fifty six percent, so

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:29.720
<v Speaker 1>he rarely gained a lot right there. And then twelfth

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and putting, so yeah, he was really rarely consistent throughout

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the bag. But strokes gain putting, he was twelfth a

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:45.399
<v Speaker 1>number of putts second in strokes gain putting, a lot

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of that probably due to a sixty five footer on

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the last hole there.

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 3>But did you see he didn't even know where he

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 3>was on the leaderboard?

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me?

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 3>He said, said he didn't want to be to be

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 3>play it safe. He didn't want to like.

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm too afraid to look at it, because you know,

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to remain in that same mindset, which I

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>totally get. You know, I used to do something similar,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to make sure that he wasn't distracted

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going on to that final green and that he could

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:24.919
<v Speaker 1>feel that he was in the lead and just rarely

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try his best to stay in the zone.

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And it was a great choice because he went ahead

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and made that putt. You know, another thing I'll just

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>say is I'm a huge fan of the USGA. I

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think they do so much great stuff. And if you

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, this Championship through the years, you know,

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was so excited leading into this week.

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, the US Open really gets me pumped up.

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at this venue, you look at

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Pinehurst last year, you look at the venues that they

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have upcoming, you know, it's like it's it's mouth watering stuff.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, I'm really excited to see what they

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>come up with going forward.

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I think, and I mean next year going to Shinnacock,

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a golf course that can kind of I think

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it might be the only golf course in the world

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>that can statiate the both parties that want to see

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 2>recovery shot, high level shop making mixed with even pars course.

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 3>That is to me.

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, Oakmant, It's Oakmant and Shinnacock are without a doubt,

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the two most challenging golf courses in America.

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say that's that's fair to say Shinnecock

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, you get the possibility of strong winds.

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And I played an open there way back, the US Open,

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's just so many holes where you you're not

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sure if you're going to be able to hit the green,

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just thinking about ten and eleven, like ten

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is a shortish part four and you got a somewhat

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of a blind t shirt and you steer one down

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>into the fairway and you've got a short club in

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and you just you're like, I don't know, this green

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is so firm. I don't think I can keep the

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sandwich on the green. And you get to eleven, the

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:27.879
<v Speaker 1>pass three up the hill, and it's the same thing.

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>You're just wondering, like, gole, this is I'm not good

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to do this. I mean, the golf course just

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>constantly asks you those questions of you know, I'm going

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to have to strike this perfectly from the fairway to

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>generate enough spin. I'm probably gonna have to hit it

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen feet higher than my standard flight to

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>try and get some elevation on it to stop it quicker.

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you're hoping it somehow catches a soft piece

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the green, because this thing could just bounce flag

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:03.399
<v Speaker 1>high straight over the back. And then if you throw

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the wind into it and your down wind and knocks

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it down into a front bunker that's you know, eight

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>or nine feet deep. You've got a whole host of

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>other issues. It's it's gonna be a fun one. Yeah,

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they they have, they have some incredible venues lined up.

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be awesome to watch.

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I think ten ten eleven or shen Cock

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is maybe the worst two starting holes because they obviously

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 2>split tea if you're a little nervous. Oh, I couldn't

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 2>think of two worst, two worst shots to have to

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:40.759
<v Speaker 2>hit than the approach shots of those two.

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean the whole the whole place. I mean

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>one is one SnO barg and either because you've got

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to try and drive it into a dog leg downhill

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if and the wind's blowing across and then that green

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>falls off on all sides. And then two is the

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>long part three, right, Yeah, you could be going in

0:54:57.920 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>there with lumber and yeah, it's uh.

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 2>The twenty twenty sixth preview here, All right, let's take

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a quick break. Today's podcast is brought to you by

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Club Champion. Oh come on, it's very penal.

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 2>When I played it, I was very tired. I was

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>coming off a long trip in Scotland. But one of

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the things that helped me out a lot was that

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 2>my distances were dialed in. And one of the ways

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I get my distances dialed in trajectories. I know what

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the ball is coming out, what windows coming out of,

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 2>and how far it's going. Thanks to our friends at

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Club Champion there, I get fit in their track Man

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and Sam Putt Labs. It helps me get a pure

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 2>role on the putter. I think a lot of people

0:55:55.760 --> 0:56:01.359
<v Speaker 2>miss doing the putter fitting. I'll say, like anecdotally, I

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 2>was using an off the wreck putter before this putter,

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and this this putter hugs the line a lot better.

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>So they have this new AI Fitter co Pilot in

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:16.240
<v Speaker 2>every store that helps fitters find the ideal club faster

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 2>by analyzing over four hundred forty million swings per month

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 2>and suggesting ideals and heads and chafts and nine accuracy.

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 2>So this makes sure that golfers aren't getting tired. I

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 2>think that's actually like an anecdotal thing. You go do

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a putter a club fitting. You get tired, so go

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.040
<v Speaker 2>check out Club Champion. They have they have studios all

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:43.719
<v Speaker 2>across the country and use the promo code FRIEDA Egg

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and you'll get a free driver fitting or iron fitting

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 2>with a club purchase. Go to club champion dot com

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 2>slash fried Egg use the promo code fried egg no

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 2>spaces to get a free driver or iron fitting with

0:56:55.160 --> 0:57:06.359
<v Speaker 2>a club purchase. Let's get back to Trevor Immelman. Let's

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 2>get to some guys that didn't win. JJ spond all

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:15.359
<v Speaker 2>around performance though obviously played really strong t De Green

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:20.280
<v Speaker 2>as he does often with that golf swing and then

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the great putting week on top of that.

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 3>You're close with Adam Scott.

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that this was kind of the story everybody wanted,

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 2>was the near forty five year old adding that second major.

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he was right there, had the lead at times

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. You know, what is it about him that

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 2>most impresses you as he continues to play high level

0:57:51.880 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 2>golf into his mid forties.

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>His motivation to still want to play well and his

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>motivation to win. You know, I've never ever heard the

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>guy talk about money or the amount of money that

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he's playing for. He's obviously been around so long that

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he's seen everything from a standpoint of prize funds and

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>through the Tiger boom and then now over the last

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>few years as things have really jumped up. But for him,

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just all about winning and building this legacy of

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>winning the best tournaments, the best championships, and now he's

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>still motivated and keen to put the work in. For me,

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've known each other forever. We competed in

0:58:45.560 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>junior golf together and came through all the different stages

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of amateur golf, young on Tour, European Tour, PGA Tour,

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>winning majors. You know, here I am, I'm six months

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 1>older than him, and I haven't played a professional tournament

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 1>since the end of twenty nineteen, and he's still up there.

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the last two majors, at the PGA Championship,

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he's tied for second with seven holes to play, and

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the next major, the US Open, he's what was he

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tied for the lead after the eleventh hole, maybe twelve,

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>tenth hole, maybe something like that, And that to me

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is just seriously impressive that he's still willing to make

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the sacrifices from a practice and travel standpoint, living in

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Europe and still got all the speed to be able

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that. That is impressive. I have not spoken

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to him today. Spoke to him a few times before

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the round yesterday and during the delay yesterday we were

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>texting back and forth. But yeah, he's going to be

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hurting for sure. You know. He felt really good all week.

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>He felt great going into the week. He loves Oakmont.

1:00:11.720 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He liked the way the course was set up, even

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>from he called me on a scouting trip. He went

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Monday after the Memorial and he called me from

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the golf course and was like this, I like this.

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like this. He had played a couple opens

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there before and so felt like he was comfortable with

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it mentally. It wasn't overwhelming like it normally does to

1:00:31.720 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>people when you go there for the first time. It's

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just so hard. It starts to make you anxious and

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>nervous about man, I might not break ninety at this place.

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And so he felt really good, had a good vibe,

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was fun to see him up there, you know,

1:00:49.440 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like you say, I'm really close with him, spend a

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of time with him, and it was fun. Afternoon

1:00:55.080 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on the couch rooting, rooting for him and seeing it

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all unfold. But for sure he's he's going to be

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hurting today. And it absolutely was was an opportunity that

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to feel like he let slip by.

1:01:12.960 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>It's funny as you as you were talking and I

1:01:14.920 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>just started scrolling through the leaderboard, you know, with him

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>calling you on the scouting saying, you know, I really

1:01:21.400 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like this place. I think it really sets up well

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for me. You know, there's a level of experience. Obviously,

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>he was one of the few players in the field.

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it was like him justin Rose and I'm

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 2>playing Phil who had played three plus US opens at Oakmont,

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, this was being their third. But you look

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 2>through you scroll through the leaderboard and something that's that's

1:01:45.760 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of void on the leaderboard is is that that

1:01:48.960 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 2>youth wave that has seemingly taken over pro golf When

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you kind of start to scroll through it. Sure there

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>all the guys that were on the board have been

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>around for a while, Ben Grit maybe you could say

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit inexperience in in majors and uh and

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>then like you get to like rasp miss andeerguard Patterson

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>or is kind of the next one. But you know,

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, this leader board was very, very seasoned. Yeah,

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>he drove the ball so well, and I think something

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>that people have been were just shocked by was seeing

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>some of the ball speed numbers. I also thought like

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the things he carried around at Oakmont that

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>was particularly useful was that mini driver. Yeah, where you

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>saw it on eleven where Sam Burns hit his three wood.

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't enough to cover the hill in that And

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday afternoon rolls down the hill, he goes up

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 2>there with that mini driver. Where has he been finding

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the speed? As as someone who's approaching forty where where

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>can I find the speed that he's finding?

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's it's quite incredible. I mean he cruises,

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely cruises, and in one eighties. I mean it's the

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>one eighty seven on eighteen on Saturday and the one

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight that they picked up on the fourth hole yesterday.

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a that's a little more than normal

1:03:11.280 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>probably probably you know, he's normally in that one eighty

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>four zone. So there's there's some adrenaline attached to that.

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't the fourth hole yesterday, Excuse me. It was

1:03:24.800 --> 1:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it was, Yeah, the part five, the part five A

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. You know, he's pretty big guy, always

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>been in great shape, always worked out a lot. He's

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>very in tune with his fitness and his body and

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>managing all of that. And he is one of the

1:03:46.720 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>most hyper mobile, flexible people that I have ever come across.

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his shoulders and arms and upper back, it's

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's like rubber bands. In fact, one of the

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>things that we talk about a lot with him is

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes he's so loose up top that his swing can

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit long and then he can get

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit out of sink and you know, but the

1:04:20.000 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>advantage to that is that he's able to really generate

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton of club hit speed on the way down.

1:04:26.000 --> 1:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got a near perfect swing, unbelievable leg

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>action to be able to send all that energy down

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>into the club. And he's not afraid to let it

1:04:38.600 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>rip either. You know, it's a club that he's very

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>very confident with, and so he steps up and just

1:04:45.400 --> 1:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>freewheels it. The money Driver's been in the bag for

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time, more than a year now. He absolutely

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>loves that club. Every now and then he'll throw in

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a three wood instead depending on the course set up.

1:04:57.960 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he loves that many driver. He calls it

1:05:01.280 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the weapon. He uses it a lot, likes it. Able

1:05:06.000 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to change the trajectory quite a bit with it and

1:05:09.320 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>get a low one out there if he wants to,

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if he needs a little extra run on it. So

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a club that he loves. But yeah, you know,

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he's just a guy that's like it's aspirational in many

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ways when you observe him, you watch him, you hang around.

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, even yesterday, they caught that moment where, I mean,

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy's just shot seventy nine, he's he's come back

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in forty one, he's one, two, three, four, he's five

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>over the last five holes yesterday to finish, and they

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>catch that that moment of him congratulating JJ spawn and

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it's so authentic and so real, and you can see

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that he feel feels good for JJ. He understands and

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciates what a mo mentus occasion that is for him

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and treats him accordingly. He's a true gentleman of the game.

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we spoke about we spoke about JJ being

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a throwback with having to wait later

1:06:20.080 --> 1:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in his career to become the finished product, if we

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>want to call it that. In many ways, Adam's a

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a throwback from that's standpoint of it being

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman's sport.

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It's funny you brought up that hyper flexible. You know,

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>back when I was working my first job out of college,

1:06:42.520 --> 1:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I was living in the city and I used to

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 2>watch Morning Drive every morning and they had a feature

1:06:49.200 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 2>with Adam Scott and I'll never forget it. They like

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>went through like his fitness regimen and they had I

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:57.280
<v Speaker 2>think they had the guy that was helping him at

1:06:57.320 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the time they were doing it, and they were like,

1:06:58.880 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Adam's biggest problem this we have to rein in his flexibility.

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>We're doing counter exercises to like make him like almost

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:11.919
<v Speaker 2>less flexible with like resistance going the other way, which

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and it makes sense to how he's how

1:07:14.920 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>that has parlayed into aging. So well, you know, on

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>top of you know, I'll just add this on top

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the congratulating JJ. You know, this guy

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>just had had you know, he was gutted, obviously, probably

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>had a Sunday that he did not want or expect

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>to have. He was he was as always completely open, honest,

1:07:39.080 --> 1:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>available and gracious with his time with with people that

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk to him. All the way out to

1:07:46.600 --> 1:07:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the parking lot, he was talking to Brendan Quinn, who

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>wrote a great piece in The Athletic about about him today.

1:07:53.960 --> 1:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>In that piece, he talked about about kind of where

1:07:57.160 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>he goes from here. He said, I I feel like

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I can keep this up for another eighteen months for sure.

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Then at that point I'll be forty six. I think

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I can push myself for the next year and a

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>half and then reassess. You know, that's a reasonable goal.

1:08:11.760 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not so long, but it's like, are you ever

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>going to do it? I need to give myself a

1:08:16.439 --> 1:08:18.519
<v Speaker 2>bit of a deadline, a bit of an or a

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:22.800
<v Speaker 2>bit of urgency, right, So you know that gives them

1:08:22.800 --> 1:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>a gives them a year and a half, that takes

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>them right through the President's Cup eighteen months.

1:08:29.800 --> 1:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does. You know, because he has the speed still,

1:08:36.479 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he could probably stretch that out a little longer. So

1:08:43.120 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll just have to see. You know, he still has

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the appetite, he still has the speed. It's gonna be

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fun to see what he does over the

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:55.479
<v Speaker 1>next eighteen months because he's still ride it. He's still

1:08:55.560 --> 1:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>right into it. And you know, something that a lot

1:08:58.720 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>of people don't talk about is, you know, the amount

1:09:03.600 --> 1:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of time that he's investing as well into being on

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the board of the PGA Tour and being a part

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of that. You know, there's a lot of things going on.

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>He's got a young family over in Europe, doesn't live

1:09:18.439 --> 1:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US. And you never see though, or at

1:09:24.800 --> 1:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>least he doesn't show the frustration in any way. He

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>always handles everything with the utmost class and I have

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a ton of respect for that. He's just just a

1:09:38.439 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful guy.

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that was one thing I was going

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to say, is like, you know, I can't imagine, you know,

1:09:47.560 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like probably the thing that is, you know,

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the golf swing and the skills it seemed to be

1:09:55.360 --> 1:09:58.519
<v Speaker 2>there are going to be there for probably the next

1:09:58.560 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>five years, the ability to do it at least for

1:10:02.920 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 2>five years, you know, in the vein of like Michelson

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>one of fifty one. Yeah, and a lot of that

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>is like similar to Adam Scott, like still has the

1:10:11.720 --> 1:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>speed and the movement capabilities.

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, and similar to Michelson too and completely different

1:10:18.920 --> 1:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to somebody like Tiger is just hasn't really ever had

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>any any crazy injuries, yes, or anything that would set

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>him back or surgeries to where he would need to

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:36.519
<v Speaker 1>take time out. So that's probably been one of the

1:10:36.520 --> 1:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>things that's aided him to be able to maintain all

1:10:38.760 --> 1:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of the speed and decent play into his mid forties

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe, yeah, maybe he can stretch it out the

1:10:44.840 --> 1:10:45.639
<v Speaker 1>way the way.

1:10:45.520 --> 1:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Filled in, Yeah, to be to be the biggest threat

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>is the family piece, Like that's that's got to be

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the hardest thing about chasing this is the idea I

1:10:57.120 --> 1:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>was reading a little bit about it yesterday, is like

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the two to three weeks off, you know, it is

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>as someone who occasionally leaves his family for ten ten

1:11:08.120 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>plus days, that that is the hardest part about, you know,

1:11:12.400 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>about any of this, And I imagine that is probably

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the thing that that would hold him back. And then

1:11:18.200 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, he's in a spot where he

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:23.519
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have exemptions forever, you know, and he has to

1:11:23.600 --> 1:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>keep his game at a certain level to play more

1:11:26.160 --> 1:11:26.919
<v Speaker 2>than the masters.

1:11:27.120 --> 1:11:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, that's something we all sign up for as athletes.

1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at any any athlete out there,

1:11:33.840 --> 1:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>or any entertainer or any high level businessman or woman.

1:11:39.080 --> 1:11:42.479
<v Speaker 1>When you when you get to that that one percent,

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna have to make sacrifices in your personal

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>life in order to keep that going. And it's something

1:11:51.560 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're all juggling at all times. I mean, like

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you say, if you're in a similar situation, constantly be

1:12:00.120 --> 1:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on the road, whether it be going to majors or

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>big tournaments, or doing podcasts or going to do you know,

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>course visits and stuff like that. You know, we're all

1:12:11.600 --> 1:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just trying to do the best we can. From that standpoint. It's, uh,

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough when you've got three, four, five balls

1:12:19.920 --> 1:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the air that you're trying to juggle. But to

1:12:26.000 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>some extent, every everybody is in that same situation.

1:12:29.840 --> 1:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, different way.

1:12:31.280 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's got circumstances, whether they're home every night or whether

1:12:35.680 --> 1:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>they're on the road one hundred nights, two hundred nights.

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:12:40.479 --> 1:12:44.519
<v Speaker 2>The Was there anybody else that really impressed you this

1:12:44.640 --> 1:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>week that maybe didn't that did not win?

1:12:48.400 --> 1:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Ah? Yeah, I thought. I thought Bob McIntyre showed a

1:12:55.720 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of toughness. We've seen it from him before. You know,

1:13:00.240 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got he's got something inside him that that that

1:13:07.240 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like that grittiness, which which I.

1:13:10.000 --> 1:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Like, Like you watch him and nothing jumps off like

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:18.040
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing. Nothing is like screams he's world class at

1:13:18.200 --> 1:13:23.519
<v Speaker 2>this or that. But he just shows up and is

1:13:23.520 --> 1:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>is around and and gets the ball in the hall.

1:13:27.120 --> 1:13:28.040
<v Speaker 3>See he's not afraid.

1:13:28.120 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't seem like he's afraid to have the ball.

1:13:32.240 --> 1:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not afraid of of a moment. We sought a

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit at the Ryder Cup. We saw it leading

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>into the Ryder Cup. We saw it a few times

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:45.599
<v Speaker 1>last year the Canadian Open, we saw it the Scottish Open.

1:13:46.400 --> 1:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And when he's coming down the stretch there, it's not

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to win at home when you've got everybody putting

1:13:52.120 --> 1:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a little extra heat on you, wanting you to win

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:58.479
<v Speaker 1>as the hometown guy. And then yesterday coming down the stretch,

1:13:58.479 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was tough. He was making brilliant putts

1:14:02.120 --> 1:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and hit wonderful t shots as well up the last

1:14:05.160 --> 1:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of holes. And yeah, he's got that little something

1:14:10.360 --> 1:14:14.519
<v Speaker 1>extra that's that's and I mean this in the most

1:14:14.600 --> 1:14:19.599
<v Speaker 1>respectful way possible. He's got that that something extra that's

1:14:20.080 --> 1:14:24.599
<v Speaker 1>it's annoying to have to play against because you know

1:14:24.720 --> 1:14:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that he's he's not going to give it to you.

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to do something like make a

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty five winter on the last hole like jj'sporn did

1:14:34.600 --> 1:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to beat him. So yeah, I was super

1:14:39.160 --> 1:14:44.919
<v Speaker 1>impressed with him. He just continues to take incremental steps

1:14:44.960 --> 1:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to getting better over the last few years. Great to

1:14:49.880 --> 1:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>see Hovlin back up there. Same thing with with pj's

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>guy Cameron Young. Some better play here over the last

1:14:56.880 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, of course, I think in a certain way,

1:14:59.800 --> 1:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's starts with qualifying for the US Open and that

1:15:02.280 --> 1:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>marathon day and getting through the playoffs. So good to

1:15:08.760 --> 1:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>see him.

1:15:09.280 --> 1:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>They need him, They need him for that Ryder Cup.

1:15:11.800 --> 1:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>They need some players with some pop in the bat for.

1:15:14.120 --> 1:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you, And a lot of that

1:15:17.400 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>stems from him starting to put much better in the

1:15:19.520 --> 1:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>last month or so.

1:15:21.439 --> 1:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:15:22.200 --> 1:15:24.759
<v Speaker 1>You know Hatton as well, he's got that little extra

1:15:24.880 --> 1:15:25.799
<v Speaker 1>chip on his shoulder.

1:15:27.400 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 2>I thought it would have been apropos for the man

1:15:29.720 --> 1:15:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that it always has great quotes. You know, whether you

1:15:33.000 --> 1:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>agree with him or not, you just love his quotes

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:37.400
<v Speaker 2>about golf courses. If he would have won in that

1:15:37.479 --> 1:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>torture chamber.

1:15:38.840 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's brilliant. It's sort of halfway through the week,

1:15:41.320 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it was before the week when he said

1:15:43.680 --> 1:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>people ask him about the mindset and he's like, well,

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I love us opens because everybody starts on the same page.

1:15:50.160 --> 1:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Is what I do every week of my career. They're

1:15:53.920 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>just angry and irritable and can't quite figure out, you know,

1:15:58.960 --> 1:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>all these different breaks that they're getting. And I thought

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he hit a lot of high quality shots.

1:16:06.320 --> 1:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought he kind of got jammed by by seventeen

1:16:10.400 --> 1:16:13.640
<v Speaker 2>with that rough going down into the bunker. That was

1:16:13.680 --> 1:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>like something that happened all week. Obviously that was there.

1:16:16.880 --> 1:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Everybody knew about it. But you know, it's like you

1:16:19.880 --> 1:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>basically got put into a spot where it's virtually impossible.

1:16:24.000 --> 1:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sixth inch of off on a forty five degree downhill,

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>lie hitting uphill to a fairly quick green. There was

1:16:34.200 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just nothing that he could He could really do that.

1:16:37.360 --> 1:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>And needing a three.

1:16:38.920 --> 1:16:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so there was there was a lot of good stuff,

1:16:42.520 --> 1:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ram and Scheffler kind of hung around. Seems

1:16:45.200 --> 1:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like Ram is starting to find his stride again and

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and really hit some high quality shots like we were

1:16:52.240 --> 1:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing a few years ago when he when

1:16:56.439 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>he won those two majors and shefflet they mayeazing thing

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>about Scheffler is he's he's so good. He's so good

1:17:06.640 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that he can have his D game and still have

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win with with nine holes to play,

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and and that that's that's quite special. That's quite something.

1:17:16.840 --> 1:17:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you look at you watched that Saturday round.

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:23.120
<v Speaker 2>If you watch it again, it's just like that guy

1:17:23.160 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>should have been right in it. And even on Sunday

1:17:26.360 --> 1:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>he's just a couple putts, you know, he had I

1:17:29.080 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>think he had seven three puts on the week.

1:17:31.360 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he made nothing, made nothing on Sunday and

1:17:36.880 --> 1:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>still with a few holes to go when everyone else

1:17:39.160 --> 1:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>started to leak oil, you were like, go Lee, is

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>he going to be able to get in there two

1:17:44.360 --> 1:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>over and have a chance to win this before JJ

1:17:47.600 --> 1:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>made those great birdies to finish. But yeah, he yah,

1:17:51.840 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he he's good man. He's that's obviously not groundbreaking analysis

1:17:57.439 --> 1:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>right there. But to be able to come to U

1:18:01.960 --> 1:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as tough of a tist is what this is, uh,

1:18:06.080 --> 1:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and and clearly not have his best stuff and still

1:18:09.920 --> 1:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have a shot at it is it's quite something.

1:18:13.960 --> 1:18:16.360
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the ones that I think if you

1:18:16.520 --> 1:18:20.519
<v Speaker 2>looked at if you looked at if it was a

1:18:20.600 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>graduated rough setup, that's probably someone that finishes maybe a

1:18:25.360 --> 1:18:27.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit higher on the board. And you know, I

1:18:27.720 --> 1:18:30.880
<v Speaker 2>just I don't think he really misses very much wide.

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, I agree with that.

1:18:33.840 --> 1:18:36.479
<v Speaker 2>I think he's probably the guy that is the most

1:18:36.520 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>penalized by the one yard you know what we talked

1:18:39.240 --> 1:18:41.960
<v Speaker 2>about with like one yard, two yard, three yards off

1:18:43.840 --> 1:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>type of setup. Uh so that was that would be

1:18:48.120 --> 1:18:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think like if you it'd be an interesting you

1:18:52.920 --> 1:18:56.719
<v Speaker 2>can't do this obviously, but if that that graduated rough setup,

1:18:56.960 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>it might have been a similar situation to DJ, where

1:19:01.000 --> 1:19:03.639
<v Speaker 2>you looked at the board at times on the weekend

1:19:03.680 --> 1:19:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, who are these guys? You know, a

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:08.679
<v Speaker 2>reminder of you know, at the time when DJ won,

1:19:09.080 --> 1:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Shane Lowry wasn't really who Shane Lowry is today. Andrew

1:19:12.720 --> 1:19:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Landry was on the board, Scott Piercy, you know, similar

1:19:17.560 --> 1:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>you know set up. It was just you know where

1:19:20.320 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>where Scotty might have lifted and separated the way DJ did.

1:19:23.400 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Obviously winning winning by two in the score books, but

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:29.679
<v Speaker 2>really four if you take away the silly penalty.

1:19:29.840 --> 1:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Now let's just talk from from a graduated rough standpoint

1:19:35.120 --> 1:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and an agronomy standpoint, this is your wheelhouse, you know.

1:19:41.720 --> 1:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The maintenance stuff obviously did an incredible job with pretty

1:19:47.120 --> 1:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>much everything going against them for everything but the weeks

1:19:51.600 --> 1:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>leading up and the week of the event. I mean

1:19:54.880 --> 1:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they did an incredible job, even during and off to

1:19:58.760 --> 1:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the delay, squeezing water all over the place.

1:20:01.920 --> 1:20:05.479
<v Speaker 2>I read I read an article real quick about with

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Mike McCormick, this great superintendent there that was from the

1:20:09.920 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>winter and it was a Pittsburgh article, a Pittsburgh newspaper,

1:20:14.479 --> 1:20:15.959
<v Speaker 2>whereas like, what would.

1:20:15.720 --> 1:20:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Be the dream lead in and he was like, ideally

1:20:18.800 --> 1:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>no rain for the monthly day?

1:20:20.320 --> 1:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Get and he got something.

1:20:25.400 --> 1:20:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Got the most rain ever recorded in Pittsburgh. Yeah, in

1:20:29.960 --> 1:20:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the time frame lead again, you.

1:20:31.720 --> 1:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Gotta tip your cap to just the man hours. I mean,

1:20:35.960 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>those people are not getting they're working so hard, they're

1:20:39.400 --> 1:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>not getting any sleep. They're just grinding it out, making

1:20:42.680 --> 1:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that that they keep the course the way they

1:20:46.840 --> 1:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>want it, in the way this championship deserves. But if

1:20:50.120 --> 1:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you had to do graduated rough from a maintenance standpoint,

1:20:57.439 --> 1:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and how how much extra work is that to be

1:21:02.200 --> 1:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain that?

1:21:04.400 --> 1:21:06.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's really I think it's the matter

1:21:06.640 --> 1:21:10.880
<v Speaker 2>of like changing the blades on. You know, like it's

1:21:10.920 --> 1:21:13.040
<v Speaker 2>like if you're mowing your lawn and you just change

1:21:13.120 --> 1:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the height of cut.

1:21:14.320 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, But what happens if you get a week like

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this and maybe this would have been a better first question,

1:21:19.680 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 1>where there's so much rain and they can't necessarily get

1:21:22.560 --> 1:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the mows in there, then then what happens?

1:21:25.560 --> 1:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Well then I think, like, I mean, I don't think

1:21:28.360 --> 1:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>they mowed much of this week obviously, then you you

1:21:31.680 --> 1:21:34.360
<v Speaker 2>would already have the base of the graduated rough and

1:21:34.400 --> 1:21:37.280
<v Speaker 2>it would just grow longer. Okay, But it's not like

1:21:37.439 --> 1:21:39.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, the shorter rough's going to all a sudden

1:21:39.800 --> 1:21:41.519
<v Speaker 2>be longer than the longer rough, right.

1:21:42.040 --> 1:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>No, I understand that. It seems like earlier in the

1:21:44.920 --> 1:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>week they were they were going with the hand mowers,

1:21:47.000 --> 1:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and then they had the blows and the rakes and

1:21:48.760 --> 1:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they had everything going trying to get it to stand up.

1:21:51.360 --> 1:21:53.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, I mean that's.

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I think, Like, I think the thing is like you

1:21:57.080 --> 1:22:02.120
<v Speaker 2>can agree or disagree on the setup in the philosophy,

1:22:02.920 --> 1:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>but they absolutely executed the setup they were going for.

1:22:06.120 --> 1:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh they nailed it. Yeah, they nailed it to a tea.

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Even with all of the rain and the bad weather.

1:22:13.240 --> 1:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Would you go, would you go, okay, so you've got

1:22:15.360 --> 1:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. You've got a yard of the of the

1:22:18.960 --> 1:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>semi right, would you go what two or three yards

1:22:23.080 --> 1:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of maybe two and a half inches and then jump

1:22:26.160 --> 1:22:28.519
<v Speaker 1>to the five or what would you do? Uh?

1:22:28.600 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I think like I might go like yeah, probably, like

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe I go to like three three and a

1:22:35.680 --> 1:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>half even I mean they were cutting in five and

1:22:40.040 --> 1:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>a half right, Yeah, we're not talking about just like

1:22:43.520 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>having no rough.

1:22:44.479 --> 1:22:46.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that's like the thing that people.

1:22:46.120 --> 1:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, no, no, But how area? How wide? Would you

1:22:49.680 --> 1:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>have that strip?

1:22:50.640 --> 1:22:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Just probably a couple of yards? Right you want to?

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:58.559
<v Speaker 2>I think like you could do it, even running in

1:22:58.680 --> 1:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and out of bunkers, right, like you see those bunkers

1:23:03.040 --> 1:23:05.880
<v Speaker 2>into the in the faariaway. Maybe that's the lean line

1:23:05.880 --> 1:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of demarcation is in and out of those bunkers. One

1:23:09.000 --> 1:23:10.639
<v Speaker 2>of the other things it would do is more balls

1:23:10.680 --> 1:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>would get into those ditches, which are like real penalties.

1:23:14.680 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I love the look at those. I love that long

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:19.599
<v Speaker 1>grass coming out that looked so good on TV.

1:23:20.560 --> 1:23:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you conceivably if the if the grass was shorter,

1:23:24.520 --> 1:23:29.640
<v Speaker 2>running into the bunkers, you would you'd probably deduce that

1:23:29.800 --> 1:23:32.880
<v Speaker 2>more balls would get up near the faces because more

1:23:32.920 --> 1:23:35.679
<v Speaker 2>balls would enter the bunker with more pace. And that's

1:23:35.720 --> 1:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the things I loved. I love the way

1:23:38.080 --> 1:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the balls rolled up to the faces. They didn't come

1:23:40.960 --> 1:23:43.839
<v Speaker 2>like one of my big big complaints about Quail Hollow

1:23:43.840 --> 1:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>would be, like all the balls end up at the

1:23:45.760 --> 1:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>bottom of the bunker, and at the bottom, yeah, and

1:23:50.000 --> 1:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom of the bunker, it really reduces the

1:23:53.479 --> 1:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>penalty that those bunkers are going to inflict, like what

1:23:55.840 --> 1:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>we saw why those bunkers worked, the faraway bunkers. And

1:23:59.000 --> 1:24:01.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, Sam Burns is like the quintessential the way

1:24:01.840 --> 1:24:04.479
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think like enough people are going to

1:24:04.520 --> 1:24:07.120
<v Speaker 2>give credit to Sam Burns. That Saturday round he played

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>was incredible. Ye to just like have to just shovel

1:24:10.360 --> 1:24:12.439
<v Speaker 2>a couple of balls out of the bunkers and save par

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:16.519
<v Speaker 2>over and over again was awesome without his best stuff

1:24:16.560 --> 1:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>off the tee, but the that like him having to

1:24:20.240 --> 1:24:22.960
<v Speaker 2>just chip out, I think like if you had for rough,

1:24:23.040 --> 1:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>then the ball comes in a little bit faster into

1:24:26.040 --> 1:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>those bunkers and gets up to near the face.

1:24:28.000 --> 1:24:29.200
<v Speaker 3>So the bunkers are them.

1:24:29.080 --> 1:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>More penal, But yeah, I don't think you have to

1:24:32.360 --> 1:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>do much right, Like I'm not talking, And I think

1:24:34.680 --> 1:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>this is where like people people were like, oh, he

1:24:36.680 --> 1:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>just wants fair away everywhere. It's like, no, like, give us,

1:24:41.200 --> 1:24:43.600
<v Speaker 2>give us the opportunity for flyers. I thought, like a

1:24:43.680 --> 1:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>perfect example of what you were talking about earlier about

1:24:47.000 --> 1:24:50.920
<v Speaker 2>like that chance was was how Sunday's eleventh hole played off.

1:24:51.000 --> 1:24:54.559
<v Speaker 2>That played out with Adam Scott and Sam Burns. Now

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:57.719
<v Speaker 2>this was because Sam Burns was in the in that divot.

1:24:58.040 --> 1:25:01.760
<v Speaker 2>He ends up short and all sorts of problems. He's

1:25:01.840 --> 1:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>trying a very tough shot, right, that was a very

1:25:04.240 --> 1:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>challenging shot from the divot uphill to that small green

1:25:07.880 --> 1:25:10.799
<v Speaker 2>on the eleven. Yeah, I'm Scott hits a bad approach,

1:25:10.880 --> 1:25:12.880
<v Speaker 2>but let's just say he caught a flyer from the

1:25:12.960 --> 1:25:15.360
<v Speaker 2>rough instead of just hitting a bad approach. He ends

1:25:15.439 --> 1:25:19.160
<v Speaker 2>up long and they both like then chaos ensues around

1:25:19.160 --> 1:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the green, right because they're in certifiably awful places around

1:25:24.400 --> 1:25:27.439
<v Speaker 2>the green. And I think that's what I I You know,

1:25:27.560 --> 1:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>like what you said, this great these great putting surfaces

1:25:33.240 --> 1:25:35.679
<v Speaker 2>that they have there. You know, you could you could

1:25:35.680 --> 1:25:38.439
<v Speaker 2>say to me, Oakemont's got the greatest set of greens

1:25:38.439 --> 1:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>in the world, and I don't think I could like,

1:25:40.240 --> 1:25:42.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to disagree with you. I might say

1:25:42.760 --> 1:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I like these maybe more, but they're like, you know,

1:25:46.080 --> 1:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>without a doubt in the question.

1:25:47.840 --> 1:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>The more shots that.

1:25:48.960 --> 1:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>We we encourage people to play into the greens, the

1:25:52.000 --> 1:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>more interesting they're going to get.

1:25:53.439 --> 1:25:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:25:54.920 --> 1:26:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, last one of my parting thoughts with Sam Burns.

1:26:01.920 --> 1:26:04.719
<v Speaker 2>I loved how he handled the situation. Maybe didn't handle

1:26:04.720 --> 1:26:07.839
<v Speaker 2>it well in the moment to play well. It seemed

1:26:07.880 --> 1:26:12.519
<v Speaker 2>like that lie affected him I'm fourteen, maybe mentally and

1:26:12.840 --> 1:26:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the end actually hitting it, but afterwards, like could have

1:26:17.439 --> 1:26:21.479
<v Speaker 2>been so easy to blame blame the rules officials just

1:26:21.600 --> 1:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of took ownership of it, and I thought that

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>was very classy of them.

1:26:26.080 --> 1:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I totally agree with you. Kind of the guy is.

1:26:30.280 --> 1:26:33.519
<v Speaker 1>That's how I know him. It's what I've witnessed and

1:26:33.560 --> 1:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>seen every time I've been around him. He's a great guy.

1:26:39.400 --> 1:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And even in the moment, I thought he handled it

1:26:41.840 --> 1:26:44.559
<v Speaker 1>quite well, Like, Okay, he asked for the second opinion,

1:26:44.640 --> 1:26:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that's perfectly acceptable. But when the second opinion came down

1:26:50.040 --> 1:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and that official said no, we don't think you should

1:26:53.360 --> 1:26:56.799
<v Speaker 1>get relief. He didn't really throw a tantrum or do anything.

1:26:56.840 --> 1:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>He said okay, and he went about hit the shot.

1:27:01.720 --> 1:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Shot very clearly had a ton of water come in

1:27:04.680 --> 1:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>between the ball and the grooves. I mean it just

1:27:07.280 --> 1:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>had a snap hook on it, which is a shot

1:27:10.120 --> 1:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't hit all that often, being a favor of

1:27:12.439 --> 1:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And then afterwards, yeah, you know, handled it,

1:27:18.000 --> 1:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>handled it like a pro, and you know, had had

1:27:23.120 --> 1:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a great shot at it really until that moment. It

1:27:26.800 --> 1:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>was at that point that I felt like the final

1:27:28.920 --> 1:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>pairing was out of it. He made the double there

1:27:32.920 --> 1:27:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and Adam three putted to make the bogie there, and

1:27:36.680 --> 1:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time JJ hit that brilliant drive on

1:27:40.200 --> 1:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen to within ten or fifteen feet and it was

1:27:43.720 --> 1:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh man, you know, I think this is over.

1:27:46.200 --> 1:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Because McIntire was in the clubhouse at one over and

1:27:52.360 --> 1:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last three holes, we're a bit of a

1:27:54.800 --> 1:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>struggle for that final pairing.

1:27:59.280 --> 1:28:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Last question, any any thoughts on the struggles of some

1:28:02.560 --> 1:28:04.160
<v Speaker 2>of the top players this week.

1:28:07.360 --> 1:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's that sort of golf course, you know,

1:28:09.840 --> 1:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are if you are just off your game,

1:28:14.320 --> 1:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gonna it's going to eat you up. Yeah.

1:28:17.320 --> 1:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember playing in the US Open. I missed the

1:28:21.880 --> 1:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>cut by a shot or two. I wanted to say

1:28:25.840 --> 1:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it was one shot, and I bogie the ninth hole,

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>which was my thirty sixth hole in O seven. You

1:28:35.560 --> 1:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>just got to be You've got to be on it

1:28:39.360 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>with your game, You've got to be in it mentally.

1:28:43.920 --> 1:28:47.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's a brutal test, you know, when you get

1:28:47.560 --> 1:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a course that is set up and playing this difficult.

1:28:53.880 --> 1:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Nobody nobody is immune. Man, nobody is immune. It can

1:28:58.120 --> 1:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's there's no there's no judging out there. You just

1:29:04.000 --> 1:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares about your reputation. Nobody cares how the course

1:29:08.000 --> 1:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care how many tournaments you've won. It's going to

1:29:10.720 --> 1:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>eat your lunch if you if you're not not on it.

1:29:13.800 --> 1:29:15.439
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that was what we saw.

1:29:16.120 --> 1:29:22.439
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the margin between being nine over on

1:29:21.760 --> 1:29:27.280
<v Speaker 2>on on Friday afternoon and and six over and you know,

1:29:27.439 --> 1:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>at six over having a legitimate shot at contending was

1:29:31.640 --> 1:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>so narrow, just because.

1:29:33.080 --> 1:29:35.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like a a.

1:29:35.160 --> 1:29:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Lie here, a couple of minutes of misputt here, And

1:29:39.320 --> 1:29:40.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's the amazing.

1:29:40.640 --> 1:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know.

1:29:40.880 --> 1:29:43.400
<v Speaker 2>The thing you sit back at the end of all

1:29:43.479 --> 1:29:46.559
<v Speaker 2>these golf tournaments and realize is how small the margin

1:29:46.680 --> 1:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is over the course of four days. I mean, it's

1:29:48.760 --> 1:29:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the amazing thing with with golf is like so many

1:29:51.880 --> 1:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>people focus in on what happens on Sunday, but you

1:29:54.880 --> 1:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>know often there's you know, just monumental moments and Thursday

1:30:00.080 --> 1:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and Friday that shape tournaments.

1:30:02.960 --> 1:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the cut was cut was seven over, right, Yeah,

1:30:06.520 --> 1:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you made the cut on the number and

1:30:09.960 --> 1:30:12.879
<v Speaker 1>then found a way to shoot even on the weekend,

1:30:13.640 --> 1:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you went from making it on the number to tie nineteenth. Yeah,

1:30:18.360 --> 1:30:21.559
<v Speaker 1>and just shows just how difficult it was.

1:30:22.560 --> 1:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, big shot Bob had the best weekend shooting

1:30:25.920 --> 1:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty nine, sixty eight, but he you know, he was

1:30:28.360 --> 1:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>he finished second after being four over, and he was

1:30:31.960 --> 1:30:36.320
<v Speaker 2>what he would have been nine shots back of Sam Burns.

1:30:36.040 --> 1:30:36.800
<v Speaker 3>At that point.

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. First round seventy, second round seventy four. So how

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:45.519
<v Speaker 1>on earth do you shooting back to back? How on

1:30:45.600 --> 1:30:47.519
<v Speaker 1>earth do you shoot back to back grounds in the

1:30:47.600 --> 1:30:51.479
<v Speaker 1>sixties on the weekend of a US Open at Oakhorn.

1:30:51.640 --> 1:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty pretty impressive stuff from Bob right there.

1:30:55.000 --> 1:30:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I Mean, there were so many guys in the mix

1:30:57.000 --> 1:30:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that he kind of snuck up on the on the

1:30:59.040 --> 1:31:02.439
<v Speaker 2>whole tournament telecast and everything, and he was out way

1:31:02.479 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>in front of the leaders.

1:31:04.600 --> 1:31:07.479
<v Speaker 3>You know where he in just the bogie.

1:31:07.640 --> 1:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the way he started with two bogeys in

1:31:09.800 --> 1:31:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the first three holes, like it threw the scent of

1:31:12.240 --> 1:31:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Bob McIntyre maybe winning off the mark. But then he al,

1:31:15.720 --> 1:31:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Sudi's just there.

1:31:17.160 --> 1:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Yeah. I mean the other thing in in

1:31:22.040 --> 1:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>defense of that is he started with two bogeys in

1:31:25.920 --> 1:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>his first three holes, so even further back, Yeah, but

1:31:32.080 --> 1:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to play his last twelve holes bogie free with three

1:31:36.800 --> 1:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>birdies in awful weather, So his last twelve holes he

1:31:44.680 --> 1:31:50.719
<v Speaker 1>made six threes. That is that is some proper stuff right.

1:31:50.600 --> 1:31:54.479
<v Speaker 2>There, I said, I tweeted about this, but I think

1:31:54.560 --> 1:31:57.080
<v Speaker 2>like in this, as you said, you know, bogie his

1:31:57.120 --> 1:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>first two holes, like he's immediately that five over and

1:32:00.640 --> 1:32:03.599
<v Speaker 2>the leaders are going off at three under when he's

1:32:03.680 --> 1:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>five over.

1:32:04.760 --> 1:32:07.000
<v Speaker 3>It makes sense why he wasn't on the telcast.

1:32:07.240 --> 1:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I had just dealt with for sure, and then all

1:32:09.360 --> 1:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden he just played some Brillian go I

1:32:11.760 --> 1:32:13.679
<v Speaker 1>mean sixth threes in the last twelve holes.

1:32:14.240 --> 1:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He could have won.

1:32:15.280 --> 1:32:17.479
<v Speaker 2>He could have won it, and they showed twenty shots

1:32:17.520 --> 1:32:20.559
<v Speaker 2>of him in regulation because of like just the nature

1:32:20.600 --> 1:32:22.719
<v Speaker 2>of this tournament. It was a wacky tournament.

1:32:22.880 --> 1:32:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it really was. And I saw a clip.

1:32:25.960 --> 1:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw a clip of him. He made a nice

1:32:27.840 --> 1:32:31.519
<v Speaker 1>little I don't know, maybe three foot on the eighteenth

1:32:31.520 --> 1:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>hole to say to save his part. And I mean,

1:32:35.840 --> 1:32:38.679
<v Speaker 1>there's no gimmes at Oakmont because the greens is so treacherous.

1:32:38.680 --> 1:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But this putt, it's got to put a break to it,

1:32:41.320 --> 1:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's made it, and he's given like a decent

1:32:44.439 --> 1:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sized fist pump because he's probably thinking to himself at

1:32:48.120 --> 1:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that point that that might have been the winning putt,

1:32:53.680 --> 1:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and then and then he's has to sit around and

1:32:57.160 --> 1:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>watch those guys finish. And it was only JJ's brilliant

1:33:02.439 --> 1:33:04.519
<v Speaker 1>stuff from seventeen and eighteen that stopped him.

1:33:05.240 --> 1:33:05.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:33:06.200 --> 1:33:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's incredible tournament. Thanks as always for coming on.

1:33:11.640 --> 1:33:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you back on the road your Travelers this week?

1:33:14.200 --> 1:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1:33:14.479 --> 1:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm home till Friday, and then we go up

1:33:17.680 --> 1:33:20.519
<v Speaker 1>to Travelers, which is the final signature of the end

1:33:20.560 --> 1:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season.

1:33:22.479 --> 1:33:24.440
<v Speaker 3>And then then you got Scotland.

1:33:24.840 --> 1:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got we got Scotland.

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you're gonna play any golf while you're over there.

1:33:32.000 --> 1:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I you know what I think I'm gonna do. Well.

1:33:34.360 --> 1:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I always love to play in North Berrick. It's one

1:33:36.320 --> 1:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite courses in the world. And I mean,

1:33:41.000 --> 1:33:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to take my clubs. I think I'm

1:33:42.640 --> 1:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna play play it with like a rental set or

1:33:45.200 --> 1:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that.

1:33:46.560 --> 1:33:47.439
<v Speaker 3>You know where you should go?

1:33:48.080 --> 1:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Where you should go to Boris's shop in Golin rent

1:33:52.840 --> 1:33:53.759
<v Speaker 2>a set of hickories.

1:33:54.760 --> 1:33:55.839
<v Speaker 1>That's not a bad idea.

1:33:56.800 --> 1:33:59.599
<v Speaker 2>He's got. He's got a little shop in downtown Gollan.

1:33:59.720 --> 1:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Get you yourself a little a set of hickories. He's

1:34:02.680 --> 1:34:06.759
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the most interesting human beings in golf

1:34:06.760 --> 1:34:11.679
<v Speaker 2>that I've ever met. Oh really yeah, very interesting guy.

1:34:12.200 --> 1:34:12.519
<v Speaker 3>Great.

1:34:12.840 --> 1:34:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't I wouldn't advise getting in a hickory match

1:34:15.960 --> 1:34:17.479
<v Speaker 2>with him though, No, I'm.

1:34:17.320 --> 1:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure he'll take me down and he hit probably fifty

1:34:21.200 --> 1:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>shots in my whole life with hickories.

1:34:24.720 --> 1:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>My biggest regret of my latest Scotland trip was that

1:34:27.960 --> 1:34:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I didn't bring old clubs because I had to play

1:34:30.320 --> 1:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Oakmont the Monday on my way back, and I was like,

1:34:33.680 --> 1:34:35.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm not playing hickories.

1:34:38.080 --> 1:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Imagine how tough that would be.

1:34:41.000 --> 1:34:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Be extraordinarily tough.

1:34:44.280 --> 1:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That would be. Yeah, So I'll be over there and

1:34:48.200 --> 1:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>then we come back and finish the regular season and

1:34:52.000 --> 1:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>uh then that'll be it for me for the for

1:34:54.120 --> 1:34:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the year.

1:34:55.240 --> 1:34:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, well we're we'll look forward to uh

1:34:59.000 --> 1:35:02.360
<v Speaker 2>look forward to those couple events and uh looking forward

1:35:02.400 --> 1:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to the last majors of the year.

1:35:04.640 --> 1:35:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And thanks. It's always for coming on.

1:35:06.840 --> 1:35:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, it's Uh, it's fun to join you.

1:35:09.760 --> 1:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's fun too. You know. Usually when I'm working

1:35:13.080 --> 1:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on TV, it's like a platform for me to be

1:35:16.000 --> 1:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>able to get my thoughts out, but this week I

1:35:19.360 --> 1:35:22.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that platform because I was sitting at home

1:35:22.479 --> 1:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>watching it and uh, you know, it's fun just to

1:35:26.040 --> 1:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to sit with somebody that loves the game

1:35:29.080 --> 1:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as you do and and talk about it.

1:35:32.040 --> 1:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And major championship golf is is the best. And uh,

1:35:37.400 --> 1:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kudu's kudos too to JJ on the great win.

1:35:41.400 --> 1:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He is gonna gonna remember that pot and lifting that

1:35:45.680 --> 1:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>trophy for the rest of his life and be celebrated

1:35:48.320 --> 1:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of his life. So that's awesome.

1:35:50.760 --> 1:35:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, epic moment too with his with his kids there

1:35:54.760 --> 1:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>like unforgettable memory, brilliant. You know, I won't ever forget

1:35:59.160 --> 1:36:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that visual. It's on Father's Day. Awesome, awesome win. So

1:36:04.120 --> 1:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>all right, thanks Trevor. We'll talk to you soon.

1:36:06.280 --> 1:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks and.

1:36:18.760 --> 1:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, thanks big thanks to Trevor for coming on.

1:36:22.160 --> 1:36:24.720
<v Speaker 2>These have been really fun. I hope you guys are

1:36:24.800 --> 1:36:28.080
<v Speaker 2>enjoying them as much as I am. Also, huge thanks

1:36:28.080 --> 1:36:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to PJ Clark. He was on the ground all last

1:36:30.360 --> 1:36:35.519
<v Speaker 2>week at Oakmont, was rumbling around put out some new

1:36:35.520 --> 1:36:38.040
<v Speaker 2>feature on the Shotgun Start called the Lunch with the

1:36:38.040 --> 1:36:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Boys on our social page. Him and Joseph kind of

1:36:41.640 --> 1:36:44.599
<v Speaker 2>dove in and we're doing a bunch of stuff on

1:36:44.640 --> 1:36:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the ground at Oakmont. That was a fun development. Big

1:36:48.240 --> 1:36:51.519
<v Speaker 2>thanks to PJ for putting that together and putting this

1:36:51.560 --> 1:36:54.599
<v Speaker 2>podcast together. We'll be back next week with a new

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:57.840
<v Speaker 2>edition of the podcast. And big thanks to everyone who

1:36:57.920 --> 1:37:00.559
<v Speaker 2>followed along for our open coverage. It was a lot

1:37:00.600 --> 1:37:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of fun to be there and and I wouldn't be

1:37:02.880 --> 1:37:04.519
<v Speaker 2>there without your support.

1:37:05.080 --> 1:37:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Thanks.