1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 2: Joining us for conversation live on Bloomberg TV. The seventeen 3 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 2: ninth Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Besson, Secretary Best and 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:16,360 Speaker 2: it's good to see you, sir, Jonath's good to see 5 00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,880 Speaker 2: a warm congratulations from all of us to you. Quite 6 00:00:19,880 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 2: an arrival from what was it, Little River, South Carolina. 7 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:27,360 Speaker 3: Yes, it's an American success story, orly in America. 8 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 2: To the office of Alexander Hamilinson with some unique experience. 9 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 2: How is that going to help you, sir, approach some 10 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:33,919 Speaker 2: of the challenges in this economy. 11 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:36,479 Speaker 3: Well, Jonathan, the way I look at it, for my career, 12 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:40,480 Speaker 3: for thirty five years, I've been sitting outside the room 13 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:42,920 Speaker 3: with my ear up against the door or trying to 14 00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:45,599 Speaker 3: look over the transum, trying to figure out what policy 15 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:47,880 Speaker 3: makers should do or going to do, and how that 16 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:51,160 Speaker 3: would affect the markets. Now I'm inside the room trying 17 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 3: to figure out what everybody outside the room expects us 18 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:57,600 Speaker 3: to do, how the market's going to react, and what 19 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 3: the economic and market implications are or short term, but 20 00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 3: more importantly medium term, and how that's going to affect 21 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:05,640 Speaker 3: the underlying economy. 22 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:07,400 Speaker 2: We've got a lot to discuss. So let's start with 23 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:10,319 Speaker 2: the debt market. What people expected you to do, maybe 24 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 2: was changed some of the issuance for treasury. Something that 25 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 2: you'd said back last summer about then Secretary Yellen was 26 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:21,759 Speaker 2: that Yellin had taken control of monetary policy through treasury issuance. 27 00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:25,320 Speaker 2: Then you're basically maintaining her plans. Can you help explain that, 28 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:27,360 Speaker 2: help us understand where you're coming from. 29 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:34,400 Speaker 3: Sure, So the previous administration shortened some of the duration, 30 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 3: and we haven't shortened it further. We've just kept the 31 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 3: policy in place. And I believe over the medium term 32 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 3: it's going to play out as it becomes clear that 33 00:01:48,760 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 3: everything that President Trump's administration is doing will be disinflationary. 34 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:58,040 Speaker 3: We're going to bring down energy costs, we're going to 35 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 3: bring down regulation, what DOSEE is doing in terms of 36 00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:06,960 Speaker 3: cost cutting, and I think once the tax cuts and 37 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 3: job aacks is made permanent, then you know we can 38 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:15,919 Speaker 3: have a revenue increase cost decrease. And as you said, 39 00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:18,120 Speaker 3: is the nation's top bond salesman, I got a pretty 40 00:02:18,120 --> 00:02:18,639 Speaker 3: good story. 41 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 2: So what's the medium term? Help me understand that. What 42 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 2: is the medium term? And then once you see all 43 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 2: those things. Let's say those ambitions become reality, then do 44 00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 2: you start to think about term again the debt. 45 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 3: Sure, but that's a long way off, and we're going 46 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:38,040 Speaker 3: to see what the market wants. As Lisa noted this 47 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:42,040 Speaker 3: morning that and it's fun to see someone who believes 48 00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 3: that Fed minutes are exciting that the Fed said that 49 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 3: they may stop their balance sheet runoff. So you know, 50 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:55,520 Speaker 3: easier for me to extend duration when I'm not competing 51 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 3: with another big seller. 52 00:02:57,200 --> 00:02:59,000 Speaker 4: So when do you think that time would be end 53 00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 4: of the year or further down into the administration's term. 54 00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:04,600 Speaker 3: It's going to be. It's going to be path dependent. 55 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:09,320 Speaker 3: We're still seeing sort of the residual Biden inflation that's 56 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 3: still coming through. Uh And I think as a the 57 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:20,760 Speaker 3: market starts to realize what we're doing and inflation starts 58 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,359 Speaker 3: to drop, then we will we will see. So it's 59 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:28,760 Speaker 3: going to be path dependent. That's the eventual goal. But 60 00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:30,760 Speaker 3: you know, I'm not going to signal it now. 61 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 4: When you mentioned the Fed minutes, participants indicated yesterday that 62 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:37,800 Speaker 4: one of the problems they had was they were waiting 63 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:40,080 Speaker 4: for Trump policies to come into place. 64 00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 5: Do you think that those policies. 65 00:03:42,720 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 4: When you think of tariffs, potentially deportations, immigration, this can 66 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:48,920 Speaker 4: be inflationary. Is it going to hold back the FED 67 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 4: from cutting rates? 68 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 3: Well, to the extent the team transitory at the FED 69 00:03:54,560 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 3: is still they has any credibility. I would say that tariffs, 70 00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:05,000 Speaker 3: if they have any price adjustments, are the most transitory 71 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 3: thing there are, So I don't think that should hold 72 00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 3: them back very long. And I would point out that, 73 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 3: depending on what number you want to use, ten twenty 74 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 3: million people who came across the border, we had the 75 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,440 Speaker 3: worst inflation of forty years when we added ten or 76 00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:20,760 Speaker 3: twenty million people. So I'm not sure why people are 77 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 3: saying that it's inflationary to tell them to go home. 78 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 4: So when you look at team transitory, do you think 79 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 4: the next move for them would be a cut emory? 80 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 3: I have said publicly that I will talk about what 81 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 3: the FED has done. When I was a market commentator 82 00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 3: and investor, I would talk about what they should do. 83 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:44,960 Speaker 3: Now I will leave it to them, and sure Powell 84 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 3: and I have a weekly breakfast. We saw each other 85 00:04:48,880 --> 00:04:51,560 Speaker 3: yesterday and I will convey my thoughts there. 86 00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:53,480 Speaker 2: Well, let's talk about what they have done. We can 87 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:55,640 Speaker 2: comment on that you said you're willing to They cut 88 00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:58,160 Speaker 2: rights one hundred basis points going into the end of 89 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:00,599 Speaker 2: last year, and I don't think happened yield to the 90 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 2: long end rows. 91 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 6: They didn't decline. 92 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:05,280 Speaker 2: Do you think Feller reserve easing contributed to high long 93 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 2: end yields? 94 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:07,960 Speaker 3: Well, Jonathan, I would just say the point of cutting 95 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:10,840 Speaker 3: rates is to cut rates. So if they cut rates 96 00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 3: and rates went up, then there probably was something there. 97 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 3: I thought that the rate cut in September, I said 98 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:23,800 Speaker 3: it maybe even on your show here, that it was oversized. 99 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 3: The market responded, But now we're seeing term premium come 100 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 3: back down, so we'll see what happens from here. 101 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,839 Speaker 1: Do you think the current rate right now is enough 102 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:37,040 Speaker 1: to bring down ten year yields over time just by 103 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: virtue of being restrictive? 104 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 3: Again, I'm not going to comment on current policies. 105 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 1: I am curious you talk about how you do look 106 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: at the ten year yield every single day. 107 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 5: I love that. 108 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 1: I love that you're the top bond salesman in the 109 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: United States, and I'm wondering, are you expecting it or 110 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,480 Speaker 1: hoping it to go down from here? Is that necessary 111 00:05:54,520 --> 00:05:57,040 Speaker 1: to reach to achieve your three percent growth target? 112 00:05:57,320 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 3: Well, what's necessary are they underlying conditions? So the underlying 113 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,719 Speaker 3: conditions that we need for yous to come down for 114 00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 3: growth to go back up. We've got this affordability crisis 115 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 3: in housing, We've got an affordability crisis in the auto payments. 116 00:06:13,839 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 3: So one thing that would be very stimuative. And as 117 00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 3: Jonathan mentioned earlier, the tenures come down. Our rates have 118 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 3: come down every week since Donald Trump's been president. So 119 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:26,920 Speaker 3: if we can continue that for fifty two weeks, that'd 120 00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 3: be great, and it'd be very it would be a 121 00:06:31,400 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 3: win for the American people, which at the end of 122 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 3: the day, that is our goal. So if we do 123 00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 3: what we say we're going to do, if we can 124 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:44,640 Speaker 3: rein in the budget deficit, if we have non inflationary growth, 125 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:49,440 Speaker 3: if we bring down energy prices, and I think now 126 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,159 Speaker 3: that I have the numbers on the inside, there was 127 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:58,280 Speaker 3: a big contributor to this massive inflation was a regulation. 128 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 3: I think you said earlier this morning that the what 129 00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 3: if these things cause inflation? You know some aszam Marie 130 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 3: just said, some of the policies, Well, what really happened 131 00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:14,800 Speaker 3: under the previous administration was you created a demand shock 132 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 3: with government spending, but it was met by supply constraints 133 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:23,080 Speaker 3: as there was more regulation and Trump one point zero 134 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:26,880 Speaker 3: we created demand shock with tax cuts and it was 135 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 3: met by a supply side response of less regulation. So 136 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 3: you know, the Biden administration created this inflation that a 137 00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 3: demand shock and constraining supply is the ultimate recipe for inflation. 138 00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 2: So and now you want to count spending the DOGE program, 139 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:44,640 Speaker 2: let's talk about it. You've called it one of the 140 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 2: most important audits to government ever. You remember the Clinton 141 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,240 Speaker 2: tried something similar, the National Partnership for Reinventing Government. How 142 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:53,760 Speaker 2: different will this be and what kind of cost savings 143 00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:54,880 Speaker 2: are even the team thinking about? 144 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, and John, I can go all the way back 145 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:00,440 Speaker 3: the given my tenure in the business, and go all 146 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:02,680 Speaker 3: the way back to the eighties to the Grace Commission, 147 00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 3: and they had some great the ideas, most of them 148 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 3: not implemented. I think that the Clinton Gore initiative, I 149 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 3: think a lot of that was academics. So this is 150 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:20,200 Speaker 3: people on the ground all areas of government, and it's 151 00:08:20,240 --> 00:08:23,680 Speaker 3: moving quickly. And I really do think it's unfortunate that 152 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 3: it's been lampooned and they attack the way it has. 153 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 3: But when it's being attacked like this. It tells me 154 00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:35,240 Speaker 3: that there are a lot of entrenched interest in terms. 155 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 3: When you're moving people's cheese, they don't like it, and 156 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:41,560 Speaker 3: it's not their cheese, it's the American people's cheese. 157 00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 4: Well, how about putting some of that cheese back into 158 00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:47,079 Speaker 4: American people's pockets. How inflationary would those five thousand dollars 159 00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:50,360 Speaker 4: potential DOGE checks be that the President spoke about yesterday. 160 00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:53,920 Speaker 3: Well, I think again that if we are bringing down 161 00:08:54,080 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 3: energy prices, if we are cutting the regulation and so 162 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:05,839 Speaker 3: I think that it's a to quote the Vice President 163 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 3: during the campaign, I think it's holistic, and I think 164 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:15,079 Speaker 3: that it's all kind of one mosaic. If you were 165 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:18,840 Speaker 3: to inject a lot of money into the economy, because Emery, 166 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:24,600 Speaker 3: think about this, that we are at this massive deficit 167 00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 3: to GDP six point seven almost seven percent, So what 168 00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 3: will be happening on one side, You'll be bringing down 169 00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 3: that spending in the economy. So very easy mental model 170 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 3: is every three hundred billion is about one percent of GDP. 171 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,760 Speaker 3: So every three hundred billion that DOGE is able to save, 172 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:49,479 Speaker 3: could you put that back in the economy into people's pockets. 173 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:52,400 Speaker 4: One thing potentially that could happen, and people are questioning 174 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 4: it is maybe remarking gold. Elon Musk, who's leading DOGE, 175 00:09:56,800 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 4: was talking about maybe going to Fort Knox make sure 176 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 4: those gold reserves are there. That comes under your purview. 177 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:04,760 Speaker 4: Do you have any plans to visit Kentucky? 178 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 3: I don't have any plans. I can tell you that 179 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,160 Speaker 3: we do an audit every year. I can tell the 180 00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 3: American people on camera right now that there was a 181 00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:20,400 Speaker 3: report September thirtieth, twenty twenty four. All the gold is there. 182 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 3: Any US senator who wants to come and visit it 183 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:25,720 Speaker 3: can arrange a visit through our office. 184 00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 4: Gold was your biggest holding when you were a hedge 185 00:10:28,120 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 4: fund manager before you divested to become the Treasury secretary. 186 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 4: So you know the value of where gold is right 187 00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:35,560 Speaker 4: now versus where it's marked on its balance sheet just 188 00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:38,760 Speaker 4: north of forty dollars an ounce it's close to three thousand. 189 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 4: Is it under consideration for this administration to revalue gold? 190 00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:45,719 Speaker 3: I think that somehow when we were telling about the 191 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 3: Sovereign Wealth Fund and I said monetize the balance sheet, 192 00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:51,679 Speaker 3: I can promise you that's not what I had in mind. 193 00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:53,840 Speaker 5: So it's not under consideration, not on the table. 194 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 3: That's not what I had of mine. 195 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:57,600 Speaker 1: When you look at the DOGE savings that you have 196 00:10:57,720 --> 00:10:59,560 Speaker 1: so far, how much is that going to go to 197 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:03,600 Speaker 1: offset some of the tax extensions that we see. What 198 00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: other savings are you looking at that potentially are crucial? 199 00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 3: Well, again, they're just getting started. And one of the 200 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 3: shocking things to me has been when we talk about waste, 201 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:20,640 Speaker 3: fraud and abuse, we all think of what comes out 202 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:23,080 Speaker 3: of d C. We think of some waste and fraud 203 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:26,199 Speaker 3: and friction costs. Because one way to think about this 204 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:29,720 Speaker 3: is twenty five percent of the US economy flows through 205 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:33,800 Speaker 3: Washington d C. So if we can cut the friction 206 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:39,000 Speaker 3: on that, that's a lot of savings. What we are 207 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 3: discovering now in waste fraud and abuse, there may be 208 00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:44,959 Speaker 3: much more fraud going on than we thought. And I 209 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 3: think you're going to be hearing about that over the 210 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 3: coming week. 211 00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:48,400 Speaker 6: Can we hear about it now? 212 00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:50,840 Speaker 3: I think you're gonna hear about it on the coming weeks. 213 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 2: What kind of fraud are you thinking about? What kind 214 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 2: of fraud have you identified? 215 00:11:55,120 --> 00:12:00,520 Speaker 3: Again, i'd refer you to so now out of you, 216 00:12:01,080 --> 00:12:03,959 Speaker 3: I'd refer you to some of the statements by Lee 217 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 3: Zelden at the EPA. 218 00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 2: Okay, well, we can build on that in the weeks 219 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:09,960 Speaker 2: to come. I can refer to you some comments from 220 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:12,040 Speaker 2: the Washington Post on defense cuts. 221 00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 6: They're reporting that Pt. 222 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:16,080 Speaker 2: Hexseth, the Defense Secretary or the senior leaders of the 223 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 2: Pentagon and throughout the US military to develop plans for 224 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:20,800 Speaker 2: cutting eight percent from the defense budget in each of 225 00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:21,760 Speaker 2: the next five years. 226 00:12:21,840 --> 00:12:22,680 Speaker 6: You're aware of that plan. 227 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 3: I'm in contact with Secretary Hegesits, and we're working very closely. 228 00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:32,559 Speaker 3: And again, I'm not going to jump the gun here 229 00:12:32,720 --> 00:12:37,719 Speaker 3: on TV, but I think everything's on the table and 230 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 3: can things work more efficiently. 231 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:42,439 Speaker 5: When it comes to the defense budget. 232 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:45,920 Speaker 4: We've spent more last year on our interest payments than defense. 233 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:48,840 Speaker 4: So are you hoping for twenty twenty five to spend 234 00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:51,840 Speaker 4: more on defense than the interest payments? 235 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 3: Well, it would depend how we got there too. That 236 00:12:56,400 --> 00:13:00,680 Speaker 3: does defense spending go down, does the interest go down? 237 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 3: We'll see what that calculus is. 238 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:05,280 Speaker 2: I've got to focus on tariffs too. Revenue raising is 239 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 2: part of that story. Reciprocity, national security. You want fair trade, 240 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:11,520 Speaker 2: but that we all want fair trade. The President has 241 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:14,880 Speaker 2: discussed reciprocal tariffs. He's mentioned the Europeans also offered to 242 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:17,640 Speaker 2: drop auto tariffs. Could we start there. Have the Europeans 243 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:19,840 Speaker 2: actually made that offer? Can you confirm that. 244 00:13:20,520 --> 00:13:26,520 Speaker 3: I haven't seen that, but possible. I think that good 245 00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 3: thing about President Trump's negotiating style is people put things 246 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 3: that were not on the table before on the table 247 00:13:34,360 --> 00:13:35,400 Speaker 3: very quickly. 248 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:39,320 Speaker 4: So that would be reciprocity and maybe negotiating. But to 249 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:42,679 Speaker 4: offset the tax cuts, where's the revenue raising. 250 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:48,280 Speaker 3: So there could be Not everyone is going to give 251 00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 3: on every point, right, So the Europeans seemingly put forward 252 00:13:55,480 --> 00:14:00,680 Speaker 3: very quickly auto terrorists, but not every country is going 253 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:04,439 Speaker 3: to do that. My view, as I've said before, China 254 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:07,199 Speaker 3: is the most imbalanced, unbalanced economy in the history of 255 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:10,680 Speaker 3: the world, and they are trying to export their way 256 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:15,720 Speaker 3: out of what is a very serious recession, and the 257 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:17,959 Speaker 3: rest of the world can't do that. They can't dump 258 00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 3: Chinese goods. They're going to have to rebalance their economy. 259 00:14:21,400 --> 00:14:25,880 Speaker 3: So tariffs on Chinese goods went up ten percent, and 260 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:30,560 Speaker 3: a lot of that again Mexico, Canada, China. That was 261 00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:32,600 Speaker 3: in response to the fentanyl crisis. 262 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:35,720 Speaker 4: China is the only one though that those terriffs have 263 00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 4: actually stayed in place. 264 00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:38,560 Speaker 5: Is that the opening salvo? 265 00:14:38,960 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 4: How high do you think Trump wants to go when 266 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:42,560 Speaker 4: it comes to Chinese terraffs Well, I'm. 267 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:44,600 Speaker 3: Not going to give away as negotiating hand on TV. 268 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:48,560 Speaker 3: I do have my first call with my Chinese counterpart 269 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,640 Speaker 3: tomorrow morning, so I look forward to a very productive discussion. 270 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:53,240 Speaker 5: What's the first point you want to bring up? 271 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:59,040 Speaker 3: That we want to work together? And as we said, 272 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:04,040 Speaker 3: a lot of the precursor ingredients from finanol originate in China, 273 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 3: so we really want to put a stop to that 274 00:15:06,880 --> 00:15:07,520 Speaker 3: very quickly. 275 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:10,560 Speaker 2: Historically, there's been some currency concerns with regards to China 276 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:13,120 Speaker 2: as well. In the conversations we had you before taking 277 00:15:13,160 --> 00:15:15,880 Speaker 2: up this post with you, you mentioned that some countries, 278 00:15:16,040 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 2: some currencies are undervalued. 279 00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:20,200 Speaker 6: Is China one of them? Is that something you'd like 280 00:15:20,240 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 6: to remedy? 281 00:15:21,280 --> 00:15:26,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, Jonathan, what I've said is, make no mistake, 282 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:29,360 Speaker 3: the US still has a strong dollar policy, but that 283 00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 3: does not mean that bilaterally other countries can weaken their 284 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 3: currencies versus the dollar or manipulate their currencies. But specifically 285 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:42,120 Speaker 3: on China, China is a very difficult currency to value 286 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 3: because I really think that when we think about the 287 00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:48,359 Speaker 3: value of the R and B, it's in three different equilibrium. 288 00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 3: On any academic model, say purchasing power parity, it's cheap. 289 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 3: On the other side, you have one point four billion 290 00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 3: people who are subject to capital can controls and they 291 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:02,520 Speaker 3: want to get some of their money out of the country. 292 00:16:02,920 --> 00:16:05,520 Speaker 3: And then you have what I would call the X factor. 293 00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:10,200 Speaker 3: If you put money into China today, what's your belief 294 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 3: that you will get it out in two, three, four years. 295 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:18,120 Speaker 3: So it's very difficult to come up with a point 296 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:19,640 Speaker 3: value of the currency. 297 00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:22,000 Speaker 1: You've talked about the desire to have a strong dollar 298 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,000 Speaker 1: policy for the United States, But is a strong dollar 299 00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:27,760 Speaker 1: at odds with the idea of bringing industrial production back 300 00:16:27,800 --> 00:16:29,920 Speaker 1: to the United States and sort of speaks to some 301 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:34,760 Speaker 1: of the concerns about other countries trying to devalue their currencies. 302 00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 3: Well, I think that we will necessarily have a strong 303 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:42,360 Speaker 3: dollar if we run good policies, and I think we're 304 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 3: going to run good policies if we if we cut 305 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 3: the trade deficits. When you think about the trade deficit 306 00:16:51,280 --> 00:16:55,480 Speaker 3: is a combination of terms of trade value, the dollar, 307 00:16:55,960 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 3: and our own budget deficits. So if we bring down 308 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:06,439 Speaker 3: the budget deficit, then I think everyone if we are deregulating, 309 00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:10,120 Speaker 3: if we make the tax cuts permanent, if we make 310 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 3: the US more bent business friendly, then everyone, all the 311 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 3: reserve managers in the world, all the private investors are 312 00:17:19,080 --> 00:17:21,480 Speaker 3: going to want a piece of that, and the dollar 313 00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:25,920 Speaker 3: will be strong. But we will be able to push 314 00:17:26,040 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 3: back on that through good policies, through productivity, the US productivity. 315 00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:36,080 Speaker 3: I think that I've been meeting with a lot of 316 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 3: the tech leaders lately, and I think we are very 317 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:43,760 Speaker 3: close to the cusp of this AI finally coming into 318 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 3: the productivity numbers. Do you think that a. 319 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 1: Strong dollar is necessary in order to offset some of 320 00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:52,600 Speaker 1: the costs that could be otherwise associated with the tariffs. 321 00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:58,480 Speaker 3: Traditional economic theory would tell you that the dollar strengthens 322 00:17:58,560 --> 00:18:02,520 Speaker 3: on the tariffs. Who knows what we've already seen since 323 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:07,280 Speaker 3: the dollar appreciation since November. Fit markets live in the future, 324 00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:10,960 Speaker 3: so have we already priced in some of that? And 325 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 3: on the other side, what we are trying to do 326 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:21,000 Speaker 3: is to get other economies to successfully rebalance. My conversation 327 00:18:21,280 --> 00:18:27,480 Speaker 3: tomorrow with my and this is really just an introductory conversation, 328 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:30,479 Speaker 3: but as we go down the road, the Chinese need 329 00:18:30,560 --> 00:18:34,680 Speaker 3: to rebalance their economy in favor of consumption, that they 330 00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:39,119 Speaker 3: are suppressing the consumer in favor of the business community. 331 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:44,440 Speaker 3: So as that happens, then they will increase their demand. 332 00:18:44,520 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 3: Same thing in Europe, you know Mario Drogy For any 333 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:50,119 Speaker 3: of your viewers who didn't see it, Mario Drogy had 334 00:18:50,119 --> 00:18:54,680 Speaker 3: a fantastic editorial this weekend in the Financial Times where 335 00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:58,480 Speaker 3: he said, look, we have put the equivalent of more 336 00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 3: terrorists on ourselves or terraces on ourselves then the US 337 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 3: could ever contemplate. So could you get a very strong 338 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:11,320 Speaker 3: euro Somehow they had an immaculate deregulation just quickly. 339 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:13,520 Speaker 4: You're having this call with your Chinese counterpart. Will you 340 00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 4: see him next week at the G twenty Finance Minister's meeting. 341 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:20,880 Speaker 3: I'm not going to Cape Town due to some domestic considerations. 342 00:19:21,440 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 3: I actually think that he's not attending either. 343 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 6: So is that what he's told you? 344 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,119 Speaker 3: This is the readout that we've gotten. 345 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 6: Okay? 346 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:38,440 Speaker 3: So and again I also believe several of my other 347 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 3: counterparts won't be there. I have been speaking in contact 348 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,840 Speaker 3: with them regularly, and then I will be seeing them 349 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 3: at the spring IMF World Bank meetings in DC. 350 00:19:50,040 --> 00:19:52,200 Speaker 2: I wanted to talk to you about national security as well, 351 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:54,120 Speaker 2: and the dollar has certainly got a role to plan 352 00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:56,960 Speaker 2: on that. From the sanctions policy of the United States 353 00:19:57,320 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 2: as we look back, do you think that's been misused? 354 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:06,320 Speaker 3: Excellent question, Jonathan that when I came into Treasury, if 355 00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:12,080 Speaker 3: you think about sort of treasury is five pieces. There's 356 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:14,639 Speaker 3: irs on one side, the men on the other. But 357 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:18,800 Speaker 3: the main focus of in the building at Treasury is 358 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:22,520 Speaker 3: domestic finance, international finance. That's what I've been doing for 359 00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:25,199 Speaker 3: my career for thirty five years. I was able to 360 00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 3: hit the ground running on that. The what we call 361 00:20:29,400 --> 00:20:34,159 Speaker 3: TFI terrorism finance is where my biggest learning curve is. 362 00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 3: So I'm spending a lot of time on that, and 363 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 3: I'm reviewing the sanctions policies. Why do we do what 364 00:20:39,760 --> 00:20:42,960 Speaker 3: we do? Have they been effective? Are we running a 365 00:20:43,119 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 3: twenty first century program as opposed to some outdated modalities? 366 00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:50,240 Speaker 4: Well, the current sanctions are in place, and places like 367 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:53,199 Speaker 4: Russia to try to get Puttin to negotiating table. You 368 00:20:53,320 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 4: are intricately involved in these in this deal. You were 369 00:20:56,400 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 4: just in Kiev. You met with President Zelenski. Trump yesterday 370 00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:02,720 Speaker 4: called zelen Is he a dictator without these elections and 371 00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:04,880 Speaker 4: said that he better move fast or he's not going 372 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:07,879 Speaker 4: to have a country left. Does this language make it 373 00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 4: harder for you to get that minerals deal over the 374 00:21:10,520 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 4: finish line? 375 00:21:11,359 --> 00:21:17,920 Speaker 3: Well, look, I think President Vilensky unfortunately escalated and has 376 00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:22,800 Speaker 3: put some daylight between the escalating that a lot of 377 00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:28,360 Speaker 3: his remarks in Munich I thought were inappropriate. President Zelenski, 378 00:21:28,400 --> 00:21:31,199 Speaker 3: when I met with him, assured me that he'd be 379 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:35,240 Speaker 3: the signing the minerals deal in Munich. He has not. 380 00:21:36,800 --> 00:21:40,160 Speaker 3: And look, the real purpose here, and I think it's 381 00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:45,439 Speaker 3: turned into this media circus that President Trump had a 382 00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:49,960 Speaker 3: very elegant plan, and it was bring the Ukrainians closer 383 00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 3: to the US. Let's do this economic deal. And the 384 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:57,520 Speaker 3: even Carl Rove in the Wall Street Journal this morning 385 00:21:57,560 --> 00:22:02,399 Speaker 3: approves of it that the US US with greater economic 386 00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:07,120 Speaker 3: interest in Ukraine, provides a security shield. So the sequencing 387 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:11,000 Speaker 3: of what was going to happen was bring the Ukrainians 388 00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:15,160 Speaker 3: closer to the US through economic ties, convince the American 389 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:18,800 Speaker 3: people and the American public, get them onside, and then 390 00:22:20,040 --> 00:22:24,160 Speaker 3: tell the Russians go to the negotiating table with a 391 00:22:24,359 --> 00:22:27,920 Speaker 3: very fulsome message that if we need to, we will 392 00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 3: take sanctions up. 393 00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:32,679 Speaker 4: Well, what about tapping the Russian frozen assets and three 394 00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:35,760 Speaker 4: hundred billion dollars? Would you force your European counterparts to 395 00:22:35,800 --> 00:22:38,840 Speaker 4: not just have them frozen, but actually tap them. Trump 396 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,159 Speaker 4: talks about repaying the American taxpayer. Shouldn't Russia be a 397 00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:42,560 Speaker 4: part of that. 398 00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:46,360 Speaker 3: Well, what's happening now is they are being tapped. So 399 00:22:46,720 --> 00:22:52,920 Speaker 3: the returns from interest, the returns from the freezed asset pile, 400 00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:56,439 Speaker 3: is going to pay the Europeans. You know, what's very 401 00:22:56,440 --> 00:22:59,960 Speaker 3: important to understand here is everything the US has done 402 00:23:00,200 --> 00:23:03,600 Speaker 3: to date that the American people, the American taxpayer is 403 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:08,040 Speaker 3: grant the Europeans. Roughly half of what they've done are loans, 404 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:13,400 Speaker 3: and the runoff from the frozen assets is being used 405 00:23:13,440 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 3: to repay European loans. 406 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:18,680 Speaker 2: Have you communicated that to the Europeans? The europe sent 407 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:19,359 Speaker 2: with them? 408 00:23:19,880 --> 00:23:20,240 Speaker 3: What's that? 409 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:22,800 Speaker 6: Have you communicated the Europeans the europe sent with them? 410 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:25,200 Speaker 3: I think vice president of Vans that are a pretty 411 00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 3: good job in Unich. 412 00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:28,680 Speaker 2: Do you think they understand that the United States is 413 00:23:28,720 --> 00:23:31,000 Speaker 2: running a deficit of north of six percent, close to 414 00:23:31,000 --> 00:23:34,440 Speaker 2: seven percent, and that the budget for defense is north 415 00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:36,240 Speaker 2: of eight hundred billion dollars do they think Do you 416 00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:38,520 Speaker 2: think they understand the gravity at the moment in the 417 00:23:38,640 --> 00:23:40,879 Speaker 2: United States the US perspective. 418 00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:46,520 Speaker 3: Look, I think that they understand that President Trump during 419 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:52,280 Speaker 3: his first term this term, Vice President Vance and the 420 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:56,600 Speaker 3: entire security apparatus had told them that many of the 421 00:23:56,600 --> 00:24:01,000 Speaker 3: countries are deficient in their NATO spending and they need 422 00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:04,760 Speaker 3: to come up. When I went to Ukraine, you're fly 423 00:24:04,840 --> 00:24:09,000 Speaker 3: into Poland. Poland is spending almost five percent of GDP 424 00:24:09,440 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 3: on defense. And look at Poland sitting next to Ukraine. 425 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:17,159 Speaker 3: Poland is one of the great economics success stories in 426 00:24:17,200 --> 00:24:20,920 Speaker 3: the past thirty years after China. They've had the fastest growth. 427 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:27,840 Speaker 3: So why couldn't Ukraine, with some US capital ingenuity know 428 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:31,040 Speaker 3: how and root out some of the corruption do as 429 00:24:31,040 --> 00:24:32,120 Speaker 3: well as their neighbors done. 430 00:24:32,160 --> 00:24:34,400 Speaker 2: If Europe spends more, will it allow Americans to come 431 00:24:34,480 --> 00:24:35,719 Speaker 2: back on defense spending? 432 00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:36,760 Speaker 6: Is that the automate goal? 433 00:24:37,760 --> 00:24:42,360 Speaker 3: The ultimate goal is for the Europeans to come up 434 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 3: to where they've said that they are going to and 435 00:24:47,560 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 3: to provide their share of the NATO spending. 436 00:24:51,320 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 4: You mentioned sanctions, So do you have both on the 437 00:24:54,320 --> 00:24:57,560 Speaker 4: table ready to go? A sanctions ramp up or wind 438 00:24:57,600 --> 00:24:59,879 Speaker 4: down on Russia, depending how these talks go. 439 00:25:00,640 --> 00:25:02,560 Speaker 3: I think that'd be a very good characterization. 440 00:25:03,480 --> 00:25:05,520 Speaker 4: When it comes to the talks, Trump still thinks he's 441 00:25:05,560 --> 00:25:07,760 Speaker 4: going to meet with Putin. He said probably by the 442 00:25:07,840 --> 00:25:09,040 Speaker 4: end of the month. The end of the month is 443 00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:11,359 Speaker 4: next week. Are you preparing for that. 444 00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:16,560 Speaker 3: I'm not going to give away the timetable, but the 445 00:25:17,760 --> 00:25:22,199 Speaker 3: president is committed to ending this conflict very quickly. And 446 00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:24,600 Speaker 3: I will tell you you're in Kiev, I went to 447 00:25:24,680 --> 00:25:27,840 Speaker 3: a children's hospital that had been bombed. And this was 448 00:25:27,880 --> 00:25:30,680 Speaker 3: not a children's hospital where you take your child if 449 00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:33,400 Speaker 3: he or she scrapes her like this. 450 00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:35,840 Speaker 4: So you can imagine I did that trip that you're 451 00:25:35,840 --> 00:25:37,760 Speaker 4: talking about just a few months ago. You can imagine 452 00:25:37,760 --> 00:25:39,879 Speaker 4: why they haven't had elections in right. They're living in 453 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 4: this martial. 454 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:52,440 Speaker 3: Law they are, and it's probably a necessary, probably necessary 455 00:25:52,680 --> 00:25:57,480 Speaker 3: to move forward with the democratic process. 456 00:25:57,880 --> 00:25:59,600 Speaker 2: We've covered a lot of topics. One name that has 457 00:25:59,600 --> 00:26:01,960 Speaker 2: not come up up very much is Elon Musk. Let's 458 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:05,280 Speaker 2: finish there. You've had some tremendous colleagues in your experience 459 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:08,359 Speaker 2: over your career, including the great investor Stanley Drunken, Miller. 460 00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:11,080 Speaker 2: You've worked alongside Donald Trump through the campaign. Can you 461 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:12,679 Speaker 2: just describe what it's like to work with someone like 462 00:26:12,680 --> 00:26:16,000 Speaker 2: Elon Musk, someone as successful an American business Just what's 463 00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:16,920 Speaker 2: that like day to day? 464 00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:22,040 Speaker 3: Yeah? Look, Elon Musk, like stand Druck and Miller, like 465 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:26,200 Speaker 3: I always compare the great business people to great athletes. 466 00:26:26,240 --> 00:26:30,840 Speaker 3: They keep their eye on the prize, whether that whether 467 00:26:30,880 --> 00:26:37,360 Speaker 3: he's the Messy or Michael the Messy or Michael Jordan. 468 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 3: He is focused and his energy levels unbelievable, and he's 469 00:26:44,080 --> 00:26:46,879 Speaker 3: gotten to where he has because everything's on the table. 470 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:50,479 Speaker 3: There's always this examination of why are we doing it 471 00:26:50,520 --> 00:26:52,840 Speaker 3: this way? Why are we doing what we're doing? And 472 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:56,600 Speaker 3: most of all, if something's not working, let's fix it. 473 00:26:56,680 --> 00:26:59,600 Speaker 4: You know, Sam Altman was on Bloomberg TV just two 474 00:26:59,640 --> 00:27:02,040 Speaker 4: weeks ago and called Elon Muss insecure. 475 00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:03,720 Speaker 5: Do you view him as much? 476 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:09,280 Speaker 3: I'm not going to get into the tech magnet the 477 00:27:11,200 --> 00:27:13,440 Speaker 3: kind of slap best. 478 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:14,840 Speaker 6: Secondly best, and I would say that's wise. 479 00:27:15,280 --> 00:27:18,040 Speaker 2: He is drawing criticism, though, when you and the administration 480 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 2: come out and pick out the various things where money 481 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:22,760 Speaker 2: is being wasted on, I think we can all agree 482 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:24,080 Speaker 2: that that's a waste of money. 483 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:25,400 Speaker 6: Well, there might be some concern. 484 00:27:25,480 --> 00:27:27,480 Speaker 2: Is the way that some people are being laid off 485 00:27:27,480 --> 00:27:29,200 Speaker 2: in Washington that lacks some dignity? 486 00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:30,720 Speaker 6: Could you comment on that today. 487 00:27:31,240 --> 00:27:36,879 Speaker 3: Look, I think that there are many fine public servants, 488 00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:44,080 Speaker 3: but I think that I've been in Washington's three or 489 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:48,359 Speaker 3: four weeks now, and there's a real bias towards the 490 00:27:48,400 --> 00:27:53,879 Speaker 3: status quo. And if you don't move quickly, then then 491 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:59,119 Speaker 3: the lobbyists get involved, the entrenched interest, and it's impossible 492 00:27:59,160 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 3: to get anything. So, you know, any anyone who has 493 00:28:03,400 --> 00:28:08,840 Speaker 3: experienced uh in financial hardship, the any kind of the 494 00:28:09,280 --> 00:28:12,720 Speaker 3: mental duress, uh, you know, I'm sorry for them, But 495 00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:17,359 Speaker 3: that's also what the average American experiences every day. Most 496 00:28:17,359 --> 00:28:19,280 Speaker 3: of us. You know, you all come to work, you 497 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:24,000 Speaker 3: want good ratings, the you know you uh you get 498 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:28,560 Speaker 3: a performance readout, you really push forward. And I can 499 00:28:28,600 --> 00:28:32,520 Speaker 3: tell you that in Treasury, I have been so impressed 500 00:28:32,560 --> 00:28:38,520 Speaker 3: with the quality of the permanent staff and I want 501 00:28:38,520 --> 00:28:41,040 Speaker 3: to get everybody back to the office and a lot 502 00:28:41,080 --> 00:28:42,440 Speaker 3: a lot of people are on board with that. 503 00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 4: When it comes to your prior life, you didn't have 504 00:28:46,480 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 4: a boss. You said it would be like atrophy if 505 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 4: you weren't trading financial markets every single day. What is 506 00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:55,160 Speaker 4: it like now to be in this position where you 507 00:28:55,240 --> 00:28:57,680 Speaker 4: make decisions that people can trade against what you're doing, 508 00:28:57,920 --> 00:29:00,440 Speaker 4: and you also have a boss that's pretty close to 509 00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:03,680 Speaker 4: you in terms of the Treasury Department in the West Wing. 510 00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:08,360 Speaker 3: Well, look, I only had my own firm for eight years, 511 00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:14,760 Speaker 3: so I worked with mister So with Stan Druckenmuller, and 512 00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:19,400 Speaker 3: it's a great feedback mechanism. And I think I had 513 00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:23,560 Speaker 3: the best position in DC. I'm on the White House 514 00:29:23,600 --> 00:29:27,320 Speaker 3: camp campus. We have a great staff in Treasury. I 515 00:29:27,360 --> 00:29:32,640 Speaker 3: can be in the Oval in four minutes and so 516 00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 3: there's proximity. And again, not like Elon Musk, President Trump 517 00:29:41,160 --> 00:29:44,120 Speaker 3: is committed to shaking up the status quo. He came 518 00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:47,680 Speaker 3: in with a mandate and he's moving on it very quickly. 519 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:50,719 Speaker 2: You're a total gentleman, and you've been very gracious with 520 00:29:50,760 --> 00:29:52,160 Speaker 2: your time. Thanks for being a good friend to this 521 00:29:52,200 --> 00:29:55,560 Speaker 2: program over the last year. Secretary best in there at 522 00:29:55,560 --> 00:29:57,200 Speaker 2: the Treasury secretly best and thank you, sir,