WEBVTT - Marathon Asset Management Chairman & CEO Bruce Richards Talks Treasuries, Fed, Software Stocks

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now Bruce Richards, founder and CEO of Marathon

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Asset Management. His firm specializes in public and private credit markets,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>with over twenty three billion dollars in assets. It's interesting,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Matt reminds me. In the morning, I will look at

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the ten year It's the first thing I do every morning.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>We're only at around four point four percent. The market

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>has been digesting this. We don't need to be in

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>any state of alarm or anything like that, but a

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are really bell ringing about the deficit.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>How do you feel about the long term.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a state of alarm either. The long bond

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is of concern. But start with there's three things guaranteed

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in this country, death, taxes, and deficits. And the deficits

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are becoming front of mind for everybody. And when you

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have a big, beautiful bill which will probably add to

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>deficit pro growth and so you know best. And the

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>theory is that will grow out of this. Dimon even

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>said it just a minute ago. That will grow out

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. The truth of the matter is we're running

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of GDP in terms of deficits and seven

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>percent equals about two trillion that we're adding to debt

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>each year. And when you have a tariff policy that

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>leads to a week er dollar and maybe some some

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>indigestion by foreigners and owning our treasuries, and they own

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of the treasuries, it becomes that much more

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>alarming because there's ten trillion of treasuries at the current

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>pace of what we need to roll off and refinance,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as the new debt that we add. Given

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the deficits trillion of treasuries in the next year to sell.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And so while there's a big bid for the front

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>end treasuries, when you get out longer along the curve,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year treasuries, it becomes a little more difficult

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to digest because it has some pretty big price risk.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>The duration for the thirty year treasury is eighteen which

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>means eighteen years, which means that if you raise rates

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>base points, the price falls eighteen percent, So it's a

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty big price decline. So you have these macro funds,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds that are starting to short the long end,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>knowing that the Fed's not buying treasuries and knowing that

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>foreigners will be more reluctant to buy long end treasuries,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and yet you have so many treasuries for sale, and

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so I can't tell you. I think rates are a

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>really tough thing to call, and we try not to

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>make a rate call. But you know, earlier this century,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>pre you know GFC, you know, long bonds were up

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>around six percent. Could we go to six percent? Yes?

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And when we do, it becomes much more difficult to

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fund our government because of the higher interest charges. Right.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>We had a great story I think yesterday that Double

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Line and TCW and PIMCO, they're all they're in a

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>buyer strike. So even American companies are not buying our

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 3>long dated treasuries. Some of them are even shorting long

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.839
<v Speaker 3>dated treasuries. Obviously, the foreigners right now feel a little

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>bit offended by what's going on in trade, so they

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 3>could stay out as well well. And as a result,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe Treasury moves issuance to the front end of the curve.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Does that solve things?

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know it does, but we'll just put

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the front end. And the bottom line is

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation's really well behaved at two point one percent. You

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>think treasures should be doing better on that basis, But

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED knows that later this year, when terris really

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>start to kick in, that we might see a higher inflation.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the five or seven percent doomsdayers are kind of,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, off the reservation and making those calls. We

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>think more like two point one percent PC number becomes

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a two point eight to three point two range, and

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that's reasonable. A one percent increase from here kind of tops.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And with that the FED will want to see how

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation you know, factors through and before making a move.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So the Fed's got hold for an extended period of time.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Despite what the ECB is doing and the Bank of

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>England's doing, and the Bank of Cannon is doing, which

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is the ease rates, the FED will keep rates where

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they are now. The real issue, I think is the

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>knock on effect when you have higher rates, whether it's

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the front end or the longer and when you have

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>higher rates, there's a crowding out. And so whether it's

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>municipalities that have to pay a higher rate, whether it's

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that have to pay a high rate, whether it's

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>homeowners that have to pay a higher rate and get

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>crowded out because they can't afford to buy that home,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>or the real estate markets, commercial real estate that is

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with higher cap rates, this crowding out effect that

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>impacts markets and impacts the consumer.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to double down on those risks because I

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>want to be very clear about this when we talk

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to big credit funds, private credit funds, the higher for

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>longer environment has also meant higher yields. Hence that goals

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and opportunity. We get it, but I want to talk

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>about the cracks because to your point, if we do

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>see long end rates remain higher, what cracks where exactly

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>will that pain be? Because we're also equally hearing about

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>people starting to want to dive into rescue financings. Are

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>they worth it?

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So it is a great time to invest, and as

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a lender, we're making returns that equity markets would wish

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they were making, and we're making these really high re

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>rates return with really low level volatility. So we're equity markets,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the public equity markets that have sixteen vol in the

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>private credit markets that can speak for us at Marathon,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>our volatility and our private credit lending books are like

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>four to six percent. It's really low relative to the

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>rate of return that we're making. So the risky ward

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is phenomenal to your point that you're making. There are

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>some cracks. The number one crack is the consumer. And

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so the consumer. If you look at the high your market,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at every sector across the high you walk

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and hio walk is doing well. It's yielding seven and

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, you know, a nice bread of three

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty off. It's it's doing great. But there's

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>one sector that's underperforming and negative on the year, and

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, consumer discretionary type, you know, retailers and

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort and and so we've been avoiding that because

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we've understood that the consumer would be weak in this

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>type of marketplace and consuming less because of the higher

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation that we've traditionally seen and now higher rates. So

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's one sector that's really causing me to take a

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of pause. And software that's interesting.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>We talked to garget Shaw Jory from Blackrock earlier and

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>she loves software right especially because of the AI.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You have to love software because of AI, and when

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you have AI first software companies, and that's what Google's becoming,

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that's what Microsoft is today, that's where salesforce is moving towards.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>In Snowflake and Adobe and these big incombing companies that

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>will see enterprise value even sore further from here, given AI,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it's hugely positive. Do you know, Matt, that there are

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>five thousand companies owned by private equity, five thousand that

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>are software companies.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Thousand software software.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Companies owned by private equity, and not all those companies

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>will make the AI adjustment, and there will be creative

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at destruction that comes their way, which will make them

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>much more valuable because they'll make that adjustment. And so

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>when you look in their data room of how they've performed,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the pe sponsors, how their software firms have performed, you'll

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>see companies which have much higher multiples because of AI.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The exact point that she was making that you were making, right,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But then you'll have a bigger cohort of companies that'll

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have that blockbuster moment video. Think about Mark and Treason,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark Intreason making this common fifteen years ago that AI

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>will eat the world. And AI has done a lot

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for the economy, done a lot for the equity markets

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and wealth creation. Now his new saying is AI will

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>eat software, and so what software companies will make it through? Now?

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Think about being a lender, Sonario.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, this will credit blockbuster moment.

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So because because our loans are capped at par, we

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have the upside of equity, but we have the

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>downside if there's a default. Marathon manages to never have

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>need to fall, let alone a loss, and so we're

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>avoiding software companies. I think private credit has somewhere between

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty percent of their book in software related companies.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that when you make a private investment

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that you have no real exit and it's a five

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to seven year loan. You can't sit here today and

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me that this company it's a software company. A

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional software company can make that we switch to be

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a AI software first company. And so I think they

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>have all the downside with none of the upside other

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>than getting your coup on your cash flow and par.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think those spreads need to be a couple

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred bases points wider. I think that the decade email

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ratios that they're lending at, which has been very very high,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because the arr because the reoccurring revenue needs to be

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>considerably lower. In fact, we're taking a much greater degree

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of position as it relates to these software companies in

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the private credit markets by saying time out, We're going

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see for a period of time how

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it settles in and which companies can make the transition

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and which companies can But I think the default rate

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>will go from one third of the marketplace that you

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>see in software relative to the market to three times

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the default rates of the traditional marketplace. So I think

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a great place to invest as private equity and

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as equity, but it's not such an intelligent place to

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>invest if you're private credit cap a par on these

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>software companies