WEBVTT - Broadcasting Live From Build America Mutual

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Coast to Coast. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Corey Johnson. We're here every day bringing the latest news

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world of business and finance and the most

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting stories in global technology from Silicon Valley and beyond,

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>powered by our more than twenty seven hundred journalists and

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>alice in more than one d twenty countries. You can

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>download Coast to Coast on iTunes, soundclud and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show weekdays at

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>two o'clock Eastern only from Bloomberg Radio with MUNI. Market

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty solid here with lots of issues in

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>all sorts. But what's going forward? We are broadcasting live

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Build America Mutual here in New York City.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Well what could be joined as CEO of Build American

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Mutual Sean McCarthy as well as the Chairman of Build

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>America Bob Cochran joining us right now and uh shan,

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>let me start with you. Um, where do we see

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>uh investors and muties and how is that changing from

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen maybe previous years. Well, you know, I

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>think the investors are still and been the same for

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a while, and that is a retail investor, UM,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and we see uh, the marriage between what municipal issuers

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Cities and towns are raising funds to build

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamental infrastructure, and those bonds are being bought by retail

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>mom and pop people in states New York, New Jersey, California, UM,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to support the construction of bridges, tunnels, roads

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and hospitals. I'm curious about the rate of activity that

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing, Bob, come on in on the conversation. I mean,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I am curious. I drive around the roads here in

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the New York metro area. Man, there's a lot of

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending that could be done, and we're starting to

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>see it on the on the airports. I am being nice, um,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but are we seeing more investment in infrastructure, UM, because

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing a ton coming out of the federal

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>government right. Well, there's a tremendous amount of investment going

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on in infrastructure around the country. It's just not as

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>much as we need, uh, the but it's growing. That's

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a year over year Association of Engineers have said we

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>need what two trillion, We're two trillion behind or need

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to raise another two trillion, and infrastructure funding over the

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>next ten years. We're doing about two hundred and fifty

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>billion of that a year, and new money financing in

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the US municipal market, I think most people involved in

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the market would say it's got a lot more capacity

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>than that. But the issue is really the ability to

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>afford the infrastructure that we need and that how do

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we do that, because it seems to be, um, whether

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Republicans Democrats, most most people agree that we need

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to do the spending, and yet when it comes to

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actually putting some kind of formal plan in place, we

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>never get the dollars that we really need. Well, you

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>make you make a good point, Um, I'll say that

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time, state and local governments

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have always, through sales tax and other local taxes, have

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>been raising money to build infrastructure for a long time.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just new money is the issue. It's

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>really also making sure you continue to repair the infrastructure

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that you've got, whether it's bridges or tunnels or roads maintenance.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>It's maintenance as much as anything else. And so I'm

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey, the state of Roads, so so you're

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>helping to pay keep those roads. So but the real issue,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it is what are you going

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to do to finance going forward? Now, the municipal market

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>has been able to finance long term infrastructure, whether it's

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>really really small transactions or enormous transactions like life in

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the Greater New York area. So it's a

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream that we need to look for, which is

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you either raise taxes or get support from

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else in order to finance these essential infrastructure projects.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>In December of nineteen eighty five, as a building we're

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in here, Better Park City was being completed, there was

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in musical bonds issue. It was the

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest month in the history of muni bonds that might

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be surpassed this month. That's correct. That's an amazing time

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for you guys. It was a previous tax bill, right

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk to me about the impact of this

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>tax bill. And so we see a lot of activity

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out of fear of what the tax will might have

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>right where they want to get these deals out now

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because they might not be around to do that in

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in four or five weeks there. Right. Well, there are

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>two major elements that are in doubt in the current

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>tax bill. One is current refundings of existing financings excuse

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>me m advance refundings of existing financings, and the second

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is private activity bonds. Perhaps so, the first advance refundings

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are an important source of efficiency and cost savings for municipalities.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But if those deals don't get refunded between now and

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, and that part of the

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>bill remains, they'll get refunded at some future point. Uh

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the uh if we lose private activity bonds, although that's

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not a part of the activity of BAM, it's not

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what we ensure, but nonetheless it's a very important part

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of the market. It's the equivalent of what people call

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>P three public private partnerships financed by tax exam bonds,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a shame to lose that when

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to go positively in the direction of more

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure finance. To lose an efficient element of the market

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>would be Unfortunately, why isn't why isn't infrastructure included more

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>aggressively in this tax bill? Well, you know, it's it's

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's a twofold issue one or or which projects

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are federal issues, in which projects are state and local issues?

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And you're going to speak to a number of other

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>people today that focus on the state and local part,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>which is where the vast majority of infrastructure, as you

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>know it other than gets done. So if you think

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about it at them, what we do is we ensure

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>municipal bonds to lower the cost of borrowing for these municipalities.

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But each local government decides which projects they want to do,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they put them on the ballot. The voters usually approve

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the revenue stream, whether it's an increase in taxes or

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>another revenue stream in order to pay that infrastructure project

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>off of our long period of time, that's a long

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>history of doing that and that works very well. The

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>issue right now is that major infrastructure has to be

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>done at the federal level. And you know when when

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the current administration got in, they identified a hundred big

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>projects that needed to be done. And let's hope they

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>get those projects a revenue stream so that they can

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>come to market and get financed. But that's the big issue.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not market access, it's a revenue stream in order

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for them. You know. The unfortunate thing is

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>that no one has figured out how to finance infrastructure

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for free. Yeah, well we are, we are going to

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for it, And the issue is whether

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>you impose taxes today to pay for it now or

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you well you can you can essentially build infrastructure

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and pay for it off, pay for it over the

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty year useful life of that infrastructure where

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it actually contributes to positively to the economy and to growth,

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and pay for it with user ease or identified revenue. Strange,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but it does have to be paid back. Finally, ask

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is there more of a piecemeal approach to the way

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because of the way that the borrowing is happening, that

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>master planning isn't happening in a big way. Communities aren't

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>being planned in a very large way, but small problems

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are being dealt with instead of big ones. Well, you know,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>everything starts at a small level. So if you think

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about certain projects that are done within a state, at

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the state level, they focus on some of the larger

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>projects and then they work their way down all the

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>way to schools. So what the issue is is making

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that the people in the community are focused on

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>which projects they feel they need to finance, which ones

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>do they need because essentially, so we don't have to

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to the days of Robert Moses and and

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>bulldozing whole cities because of one person thought it was

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. I don't think so. I don't think so.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, what we do is serve

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>building that really the sent projects that you live with

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>day to day. When you get into the subway that

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was funded with municipal bonds, when you go to the

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>US Tennis Center that was funded with municipal bonds, the

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>hospitals should go to their funded with municipal bonds, and

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>these are all essential municipal services that are fundamental to

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the way we live. And so at BAND what we

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do is two things. One, we're really focused on helping

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the small and medium sized issuers, cities and towns come

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to market and lower their cost of funding. And second,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we provide financial transparency. So if you come to our

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>website at build America dot com, we write a summary

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for every credit that we do, available for free. So

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if you are on a municipal bond investor and you say, boy,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at a bond and figure out

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>really what's going on in that city or town or

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that school district, we make that available for you. Interesting

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of transparency there to see you know exactly what

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you're investing into precisely. That's I love interesting instructure. I

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>wish we had more time. We've got to but hopefully

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we can continue this conversation another time. Thank you very

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>much for coming here. Thank you Sean McCarthy, chief executive

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>officer at Bild America Mutual BAM, and also Bob cochrane,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>chairman of BAM, and we are here at BAM headquarters

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. We do want to talk about

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the city's Keep in mind that the municipal bond market

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>preparing for a potential onslaught of bond deals. Corey talked

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about this earlier before the end of the year as

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a U S lawmakers consider pulling the tax break from

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tens of billions of dollars of debt issued each year.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some thoughts on that and why the muni

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>bottom market is crucial to US infrastructure investment. Kind of

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>continue that conversation we just started. Clarence Anthony is CEO

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>at the advocacy and lobby group National League of Cities,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>based in Washington, Right, Yes, that's correct, and the group

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>represents thousands of cities, towns, and villages. But he joins

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>us at BAM headquarters in New York City. Welcome blo

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>A Radio. Thank you very much for having me year today.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about who you guys represent

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and what you do. Yeah, we have a National League

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>of City. We are the voice for cities all over America. UM, Cities,

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>towns and villages, nineteen thousand of them, all kinds from

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City down to sop Choppi, Florida where I'm

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't grow up there, but I'm from Florida and Ulida. Yeah,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a city called Choppy Florida. UM. And and we

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the voice with the administration as well

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>as with Congress, we make sure they hear the voice

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of city leaders. UM. And it's a big job. Right now.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>What's going in Washington? Yeah, let's talk Washington right now.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And what does Washington want to hear from small communities

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and cities? Uh? You know, this administration has been unique

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in many forms, and I wonder what the reaction is

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to what small towns and and and big cities need.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that what we have been focused on, it's

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the attention on the infrastructure plan for cities,

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>um as Sean and Bob indicated. Um, you know where

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the rubber meets the road is in local governments where

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we control the road systems, the bridges, half a million bridges,

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, six airports. I mean, you can go on

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and on and on. And what we'd like to see

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is for Congress as well as the administration to focus

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>on an infrastructure plan and allow us UM will give

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>us a partner to deal with the cramble crumbling infrastructure

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in America. Clarence, I want to ask you something that

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I asked Um, Sean and Bob, and that is again,

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>most people will say infrastructure spending, it's a good thing.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a good thing for the country. It's probably a

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>good thing for our economy. Uh. And yet when it

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>comes down to it, we can't seem to get a

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>massive project, certainly with some federal direction, federal support underway.

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You the group is in Washington. What are you hearing

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, so we thought this was going to

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>be an easy thing out of out of the gate

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>when President Trump came in with his team, and yet

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>here we are. There's no question we thought that we

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would have a partner in in trying to get infrastructure

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>funded in America. UM. You know, UM, it's already been said.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have a D plus in America infrastructure.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that if if we really want to see

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our economy grow, we want to see communities grow and jobs,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about the infrastructure, UH that creates those opportunities. We've

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not been able to at this point get that focus

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure. Well, we're faxing fighting now with tax reform.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill is trying to save the tax exemption on immuni bonds.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to save the private activity bonds, or the

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>new markets tax credits. You can go on and on

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>those things that help local leaders invest and reinvest in

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>their communities. We just want a tool box of things,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>money and funds to be able to UH deal with

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this deficit that we have in UM infrastructure. So we're

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we're a willing partner. We don't want to focused on

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all those other things that are happening in Washington. We're

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on what is important to cities. Well, are the

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>needs of cities when it comes to lending right now

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>substantially different than UH smaller municipalities you mentioned villages and

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sub choppy and the like. Are the needs of big

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>cities very different or they're just bigger. They're just bigger.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I meant to you, you need a tool box that

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>would include muni bonds, private activity bonds, no matter the

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>size of your city, because I'm because so one of

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the things I travel around the few cities I travel around,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to be the same cities. But I

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time in San Francisco, has spent

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time in New York, has spent a

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of time in Los Angeles. Just got it back

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>from Chicago last week, and I see a problem of

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>homelessness that I haven't seen in my lifetime, including you know,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in this city in the eighties. Uh. And it seems

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to be universal across all those cities, and I don't

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>see it. You know, I was in Grand Rapids last week.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it. I've I've been an other smaller

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>places I haven't seen it. And and it seems like

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a unique problem. Yeah, it is one of the

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>issues that we're dealing with, and and it's very complex.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe because you're veteran. Veterans homelessness is something

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that is a priority for the national Legal Cities and

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten mayors all over America competing to make sure

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that they get rid of veterans homelessness in their communities.

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But we also have the opioid problem that is causing

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>many of the homeless issues that we're seeing, especially um,

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Corey in the rural communities of America, and

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and now that is becoming a major issue in the

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>urban communities as well. So um, you also look at

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just the affordability for the millennials and the and the

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>young folks that are coming out of college UH to

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford homes. So it's a very complex

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>issue it but it exists in every city. You may

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not have seen it, but that issue because of the

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but there's opioids, whether it's UH inability to afford homes,

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>affordability the captain originally course starts to play itself out

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with those people on the street in a major way.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll talking with Clarence Anthony CEO of National League of

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Cities at headquarters in downtown New York. So you mentioned

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the provisions, if you will, in the tax

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>overhaul legislation that's working its way through Congress. If indeed

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the benefits to the MUNI market are taken out.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that would mean for cities and

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending. Well, first of all, it's the cost of borrowing.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the first thing that would go up. And UM

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the cost of barring means that less investments and parks. Uh,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to look at their investment and

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>police and fire protection because you're going to have to

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pay more money to build the infrastructure that we don't

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have a partner with at the federal level. So that's

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the first piece that we would have. UM. The other

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that UM it does, if it's strips UM the

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>deduction or the pre empt from UNI bonds, what we're

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna have is um less investment in infrastructure periods, the

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>community centers, UM, the airports. I mean, you go on

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and on. We use all of that in the water

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>waste water systems in our cities. So UM just quickly

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just get twenty seconds. If if the economy grows faster, though,

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>then might we see the spending is some of that

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of part of the equation what we see with

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Yeah, I don't. I don't think the economy

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>will be able to make up for the difference that

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we will see for the cost in local governments to

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>provide those services. So, um, it's a it's a difficult

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>time now, but the National Legal Cities and Build American

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Mutual is partnering to make sure that we are getting

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the best solutions to leaders all over America. Let's hopefully

0:16:50.440 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>listen Clarence Anthony, Thank you, Carol, thank you. Court So

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>next case knows an awful lot about the sun. He's

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>got a state perspective on muni bonds and infrastructure. Ben

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Watkins is Director of Bond Finance at the State of

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Florida Sunshine State. It is indeed here at BAM headquarters

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in Lower Manhattan. Been good to have you here with us.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, good to be here. So what do you

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>spend most of your day doing? Oh, thinking about the

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>market and paying attention to themuni bonds and what does

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the market tell you right now and how it relates

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to Florida. Oh, so, interest rates are really great. They've

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>been great for a decade. I've been I've been wrong

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for ten years waiting for rates to go Well, all happen, yeah, okay,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>And so we've been taking advantage of that by doing

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>refundings to save save to lower our interest rate and

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>save money for our citizens and tax How significant are

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>those savings over the last ten years from my perspective, extraordinary.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.959
<v Speaker 1>So we've executed about twelve billion dollars worth of refinancing.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>So we've refinanced over half of the debt that we

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have outstanding the last state. So that's extraordinary. And UM

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so savings level three billion dollars and so three billion

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is significant. Um And so we've been able to take

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>advantage of historically low interest rates by refinancing all of

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>our debt. Uh, are you done? We wouldn't be but

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for congresses proposal to out of the business. Do you

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>want to squeeze stuff in before the end. You're going

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>to try to accelerate things. That's inconsistent with our normal discipline,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which is just take them as they come and take

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>them in bite sized pieces. But given the extraordinary circumstances,

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna move a little up. So and I'm sorry

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you were saying about the what Congress is trying to do?

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>What what's Congress is? What's the worst? Whats Congress is

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to do? Right now? So one of the proposals

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and tax reform that's both in the House and the

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Senate proposal is to eliminate our ability to do advance refundings.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean? That eliminates our ability to

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to refinance that a lower interest rates, and

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it impairs our ability to provide real economic savings to

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>our citizens and taxpayers. That's what it does to us.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So that three billion dollars, well, that's three billion dollars

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>less we have available for investment in infrastructure. Why do

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you think Congress is doing this? I mean that much

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you come from that. They're misguided, that's my best answer.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't understand and they don't necessarily want to understand.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So you stop and think about it. So you know,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the scoring thing, which is so think

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about this for a second. One point for trillion dollars,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that has so many zeros I can't even

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>count it. The impact of the amounts for funding. Yeah,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>well would you write that up on the board between

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>between all of his fingers and toes, we can get there. Yeah, okay,

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So seventeen billion dollars is what this cost over ten

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>years the federal government. That's what they say. That's how

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>j c T and CBO scored it. So the new

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Joint Many Taxation score just came out, like literally just

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>came out, and it says that the budget deficit that

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they've got the highest estimate for growth of any of

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the estimates out there, averaging point eight percent increase in GDP,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and still they think the deficit is going to increase

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>by more than a trillion dollars. Right, So here's my point, Charlie.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So all that is is a game, that's a scoring

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>game that's about the deficit. How big do we want

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the deficit to be? State and local governments. We're talking

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about true economic savings. We're talking about dollars that have

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to be charged our citizens and taxpayers to pay the

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>debt service on our bonds to build infrastructure, and they're

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>impairing our ability to do that. So this is real dollars.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>This is not just made up stuff inside the Beltway

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of gaming on scoring deficits. And that's how they're

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>impacting us. Well, you know, Queer and I spend a

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of time talking with various guests about trying to

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>understand why, you know, infrastructure spending hasn't really kind of

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten through, um Washington, especially when that was certainly a

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>big push by President Trump. That is a big push

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of his And yet this provision maybe in this GOP

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tax overhaul bill, how do we reconcile that if he's

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for infrastructure, and yet you're saying that by this provision

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>um in the tax bill, it's going to prevent maybe

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some infrastructure from happening, perhaps in Florida, cost you guys

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot more if you want to pursue this project, right,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So think about it like this. First off, I think

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they're irreconcilable. I think they're diametrically opposed. I think you

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can say one thing and saying one thing and doing

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>another thing to me is not being genuine and sincere

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about what you really what your priorities really find everybody,

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I would think. So, I think are you being heard

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in Washington? Absolutely with the with the proposal that we

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>have today that's on the table today, that's gonna impair

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>our ability to be able to lower our interest rate

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and save dollars. We have to balance our budget. This

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a game. It's dollars in equal dollars out.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not inside the belt Way. We can't play foot

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>seats under the table between the Federal Reserve and the

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and print money. And so if you if if

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>if the cost to me is higher, that means there's

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to be less of it. Um So, is

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 1>there a fixed me? What are you doing to try

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to fix this problem? So I've written my congress lay

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>all of this out right, um So, Senator Rubio and

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Senator Nelson and in an array of people at the

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>congressional level, to explain this in a very simple way.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Because people say, oh, wellmmunities are complicated. This is not complicated.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to explain it to Chairman Brady and

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Hatch. I mean, you guys, I get him on

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone. I mean, so I sent this. I told him, Hey,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>we say, three billion dollars. This makes no sense at

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>any level. It's inconsistent with your policy. It's going to

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>result in less investment in infrastrates. And do we know

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that for a fact that it will? It will result

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in less investment in infrastructure by definition, Yes, it will.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the reality because you have less money.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>If you have less money, you're going to do less

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>of it. What if the economy is coming along, doesn't

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>help you, doesn't matter, doesn't matter why because certainly will

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>help can afford it better. If so, you can do

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>more pago right, But this eliminates our ability to finance infrastructure.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's really what we're talking about. And so

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, at the local government level,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we have dedicated revenue streams for specific things, for specific projects,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>water systems, sewer systems, electric utilities, schools, um roads. That's

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about in terms of financing infrastructure. The

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>debt associated with it has an interest rate associated with it.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>We have to pay for that before we turn the life.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So what will happen if this provision is included in

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the final um tax overhaul provision? There will be a

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>higher there'll be a higher cost basis that has to

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be passed onto the citizens and tax or projects don't

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get done or projects don't get done. Uh, this is dramatic.

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised. I'm a little bit surprised given that your

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>point about Republican governor to your position that, uh, you

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of problems with republic and tax bill. Well, so,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>uh completely agree. But I call it like I see it,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's dear, it's our I'm magnostic about it. But

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so back to my point about you know, I I

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>communicated this in a very simple, very straight forward, very

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>understandable way to our congressional delegation and Senate offices. You

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>know what I got back, crickets, not even the courtesy

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of a response. Right, So what do you do with that?

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're living in their own world and they don't

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really understand that the infrastructure in this country is financed

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>by is paid for with step by state and local governments.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't come out of Washington, d C. It's not

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>money raining out of the sky. It's something we do

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and UM and the and the tool that we use

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to do this, of course is tax exempt bonds, tax

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage bonds, which makes it less costly to provide for

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure for America. So the impairing our ability to

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>be able to reduce our cost is inconsistent with his

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>bad policy. Um usurps local control and it disrespects the

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>partnership we have with the federal government on how infrastructure

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is built in this country. Then we've got a run.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I like this conversation. I wish you could do finance

0:24:52.720 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>for state of Florida. So a Rista says, when it

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to US, infrastructure funding is the problem, not capital.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Hamill is head of Municipal Finance at RBC Capital Markets,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us here at BAM headquarters in downtown New York City.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here, a pleasure, So explain away. Well,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of the proposals that you hear

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about addressing infrastructure um developed more borrowing programs, and really

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the challenge for state and local government is not where

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to borrow, but how to pay it back. And so

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>any meaningful solution going forward has to address the issue

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>of where additional funding as opposed to financing, is going

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to come from. Does that mean we've exhausted the vast

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>reservoirs of creativity for investment bankers. No, It just means

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that at the end of the day, any form of capital,

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be at municipal bonds which is my own expertise, or

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity or other forms of debt, have to be

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>paid back. And so that the strain for state and

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>local government to do more is to develop other sources

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of revenue by which they could uh finance their infrastructure.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So great for the people who live in those areas,

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they're getting tough. But no, Chris, when

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you when you talk to folks around the country, what

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>do they see as new areas of revenue sources to

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>pay all this back? Well, I think the first obligation

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>of government is to do more with existing resources. And

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of us smarter, be more efficient with

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they've got correct. And you see in the State of

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, Governor Cuomo advancing a concept called design Build,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>which is really not about financing, but how to build

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure at a lower cost. My firm commissioned to study

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Tapanzee Bridge, which is nearing completion and because

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>because of Design build procurement, that was built for twenty

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>less cost than a norm procurement method, and the New

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>York State legislature has not yet given the City of

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>New York the ability to use that procurement method. Wait,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>how does it work? Well, what it does is it is.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>What it does is combine the design aspects of building

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a project with the construction. And I don't know if

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you've ever remodeled your house, if you've hired an architect

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and then turned the plans over to the contractor, lots

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of times it doesn't work. And What it does is

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>combine those two steps into a single um, a single

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>party that performs both. So you design costs everything, and

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you say, the builder might say, actually, there's a there's

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of concrete you can use in this,

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>or there's a new light bulb you could use there

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Cisely, it integrates the two functions more efficiently,

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and it brings do you do that? Well? You know

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>everything about seven or years ago in San Francisco and

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the building in the architect we spent a lot of

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>time all of sitting together at early stages of the house,

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but also throughout the construction of the house. Right that is,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that is what it takes, and that's what this procurement

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>method permits. And so about forty states have it, but

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>New York is one of the states that only applies

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that in a limited capacity. And I think Governor Cuomo

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>has used it for five seven projects at the state level,

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have it yet at the city level,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because I have to say, I come from New Jersey

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and grew up you know, and really works smoothly, but

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there's just but there's so much waste. You can see it,

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through bureaucracy so that the money isn't spent

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on the things, whether it's schools, whether it's bridges, whether

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's roads. Sure, and and I genuinely believe beyond this,

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to need more tax revenue. But I think

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you build the political tax out as I can be

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and getting ready for a lot more taxes because of

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>tax overhaul. And and so if you convince voters taxpayers

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're using existing dollars efficiently, um, they might be

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>more open minded about pony and appetitional funds to build

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>more projects. I don't mind smart spending precisely. And I

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a bipartisan belief. Yeah, well, I mean smart,

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course it is. I mean it's easy.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like the differesting major and minor surgery, minor surgeries

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.479
<v Speaker 1>on me on you major surgeries that they start cutting me.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, and I think that's true of

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of programs and two. But uh, is there a sense

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>though that you know that there's One of the arguments

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans have put forth with this tax bill is

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that if in fact that it would of state local

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>tax deductions, for example, and other deductions, it will force

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>municipalities and cities or governments, state governments in particular to

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>lower tech, to spend less, do less, and cut taxes. Um.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a pushing on a string. The kind

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't agree with you more. I I think for stay

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in local government. Um, particularly the House bill is very

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.239
<v Speaker 1>much headed in the wrong direction. That it's it's going

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to put more strain overall on their budgets, and that

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to hinder what I think everyone believes that

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the country needs to be doing more on infrastructure, and

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the House build really is a non starter for any

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>meaningful infrastructure policy discussion next year. You know, I'm assuming

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you spent some time in Washington. We just talk with

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Watkins. Um, I'll just stay to Florida. He's a

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>really smart guy. He's a lot of fun. I have

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. We've got a bunch of viewer responses too,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are like, Amen, what do you have to say, especially

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>about the frustration and getting caffeine after two Um, but

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>frustration with people in Washington hearing what really needs to

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>be done on the ground. What are you here from, folks? Well,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we just got about very quickly what what the federal

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>government needs to do is broaden the options available to

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>state and local government with with remembering that you know,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy of the infrastructure spend every year comes from state

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and local government. Infrastructure is really a state and local function.

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And what the federal government needs to do is create

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>policies that allowed them to do more, not try to

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>federalize those projects. And and Ben is one of those

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>really smart guys who know how to run an infrastructure program. Yeah, fascinating.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I was telling him. I was down when Port of

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Miami when they were building the tunnel and watching the

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>crane's come in from China and out in the water,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty fascinated. That was a public private

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 1>partnership and interesting to see it get done. We had

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to run. Thank you so much. Thank you. Chris Hammill,

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>head of municipal Finance at RBC Capital Markets here at

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the headquarters in New York City. This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It's talk about municipill finance problems. Puerto Rico. It's got

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to come to the top of the list when you

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>look across all the parts of the United States that

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>are having issues. But perfect person talked about that and

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>more about what we're learning about the issues as it

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>relates to municipal finance and the infrastructure built up can

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hide charge on this right now. He was the director

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the U. S. Treasury Department's Office of State and

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Local Finance, exactly the guy in the government who should

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>know how to make these things work. Now he's with

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Ernston Young uh and and so glad to have you

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>here with us. UM, let's talk about Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We've we've done a lot of stories about Puerto Rico debt.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>We've had Kate Long on the show talking about that.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Who's who's so uh laugh, you know Kate, and she's

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>she knows this stuff so well. Has been so helpful

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to us to understand it. But after Maria, uh, it

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like the problems of Puerto Ricos has had have

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>They've been blamed for those port problems going into it.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We're not able to get around them to solve these

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>problems that are coming up after since the hurricane. Listen,

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we had a wonderful lunch today at the Municipal Forum

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>where Ben Watkins described how are as a country we

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>respond to disasters and it's a bottoms up approach. Um,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's local and state government's working together. They're on the

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>front line and the federal government is their partner from

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a funding point of view, and it takes that capacity

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to respond when you have a government that's under the

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>stress like Puerto Rico is. UM a storm of this magnitude,

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst in ninety years. UM. It really unveils um

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the lack of capabilities in this kind of area. Running

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a government every day is hard, but running it with

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the situation that they're in now is extremely difficult. And

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>so I think we're in uncharted waters in terms of

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the role of state and local government in Puerto Rico

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>versus federal government and and who has which responsibility and

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how to allocate that properly. So do we need to

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can kind of rethink the relationship and responsibilities between the

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>federal government of the United States and Puerto Rico. Well,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we did that and Congress did that UM in June

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and sixteen, and it's called Promisa, which

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was an unprecedented piece of legislation. Other than Washington d C.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The federal government has never come in and imposed a

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>financial oversight board over our government. UM. And in return

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for having access to debt restructuring authorities. So that was

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pre hurricane. UM, now we have a situation where um,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the federal government will have to respond with billions, if

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not tens of billions of dollars UM going in to

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>rebuild Puerto Rico. It's now truly a humanitarian crisis. We

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>saw some numbers today about death just people dying in

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the in the country, and that the compared to the

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>statistical average in recent months. We've seen over a thousand

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>people die in the last month in hurricane who might

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not have otherwise because the conditions there. Uh. I have

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not been to Puerto Rico since the hurricane, but many

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of my friends have, and UH, it's extremely extremely disturbing.

0:34:58.320 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>But I guess what I would say is, I think

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>what Washington is talking about now is how are we

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>going to respond in terms of this aid and is

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>there going to be a plan and who is going

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to have input and ultimately who is going to um

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have final say on what that plan will be. And

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, there is no question given the dollars

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that Washington has to spend in looking at a number

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like right now, well that's the that's the governor's number. Uh.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>There are still technical damage assessments underway. It will be

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>some time before we know the exact number, but it's

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a big number. I mean Bernie Sanders said, it's what

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>should be the future of Puerto Rico. Well, uh, once

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we get past God forbid, you know, God hoping we

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get through this much more soon, the crisis that's there.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But what should be the future of Puerto Rico. Well,

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the future of Puerto Rico has to be a fiscally

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>well managed territory with an economic future. How do you

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>get there? And second thirdly, there has to be ultimately,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in my view, a resolution on status promessa. Specifically because

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the politics of the situation, we said, let's put

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>status aside until we can fix the fiscal situation and

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>get the economy growing. Um. But the real question is

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>what is the economic rationale uh for Puerto Rico? And

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how many people on the island uh support that economic rationale?

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think there was the people Portico getting a

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>vote in Congress. Well, no, that's the issue of status

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, I think you know, the country is

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>responsible for allowing, um, the situation in Puerto Rico to

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>be in this um no man's land for decades. Um. Yes, Ultimately,

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to make a decision about how we're going

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to treat our territories as US citizens in the country. Uh,

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and and and just finally here, um, it sounds like

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>also this tension between the governor of Puerto Rico and

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and and the and watch you to as part of

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem deciding who's going to be responsible. Yes, I

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>mean there are many players and and there's the administration,

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's probably not a uniform voice in the administration

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on the issue, whether it's FEMA or HUT or Treasury

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>O m B. And there's Congress and so uh, there's

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be an opportunity in the coming weeks with

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a supplemental appropriations bill UM that will affect both Florida, Texas,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico in California to address this issue. What is

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money that should be spent and how

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>should it be spent and who should make those decisions.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>We have to run, but I hope we could talk

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Kenichi, He's strategic advisor and Earnson Young's

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Transaction Advisory Services team here at BAMA headquarters move around

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>most gray promotion up the later moved on can you

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>move like they do? I've never seen anyone move that

0:37:53.320 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>fast hard people. Let's move to get a purpose is

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>called movers and shakers. They cost a little more. That

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>name cracked me up. Bloomberg Markets Movers and Shakers with

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Corey Johnson on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everybody,

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>time for your movers and shakers on this Thursday afternoon.

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser along with Corey Johnson, we are live in

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>downtown New York at BAMA Headquarters. We'll get more on

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the MENI market infrastructure spending in just a moment. First up, though,

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>SNP five hundred, three hundred seventy seven names in the

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>index higher today. We had quite a rally on Wall Street. Uh,

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we have hundred and twenty seven names lower, one unchanged.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me talk about Kroger, the second biggest gainer in

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the SNP five hundred shares of Kroger up more than

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>six percent, up a buck forty eight to t eighties

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>six is share that stock though still down seventeen Well, Kroger,

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 1>which was up as much as fourteen percent, almost fourteen percent,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's highs today's yeah, I mean ended up up

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>six percent, so it pulled off substantially, but U Kroger,

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>even as we see competition heating up UH in the

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>grocery industry. UM this company which has been battered for

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>months by pessimism after Amazon UM bought Whole Foods, and

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been pushing right fiercely into this industry. It jumped

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the most in almost twenty five years after the company

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 1>posted corey same store sales that beat estimates. Kroger also

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sees sales growth continuing in the fourth quarter, so some

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>upbeat news and that stock just shooting up. Roger shares

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are up the first of October, so about the time

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that you could walk into a store. UH, the Whole

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Foods owned by Amazon, Kroger shares started rallying and they've

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>been rallying ever since. I was just trying to look

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at the gross margins for Kroger because it was such

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>an interesting part of this story. H gross margins were

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>covering to positive numbers one percent after the first positive

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers in in in three quarters. Michael's stores Michael's stock

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>up there all the time. Well, I do a lot

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of scrap booking, as everyone knows. I spent a lot

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of time with the scrap books and putting into books.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>That's what scrapbooking is, right, Just take junk and his

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>stick in books. Well, it's helping. It's helping Michael's third

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter earnings, a very strong same storece sales have one

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of squanderial improvement, a transluctor to continue into the holidays,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.919
<v Speaker 1>or such as the guidance after the call higher priced

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seasonal items. Of course, good for them. Uh, and you

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>know it's really good for Michael's. Is your daughter into

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>this slime? Has this slime thing is driving sales at

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Michael Yes, you can buy stock and slime. And look

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at Michael's stores. Michael Stores stock rallying on this tremendous

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sales of slime in the quarter and all the slime

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff stock up eleven point six percent, closing because of slime.

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.919
<v Speaker 1>How come I didn't get on that. This It's another one, right, Stair,

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I me in the face. You missed bitcoin too. I

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>did a bitcoin interview for your San Francisco's missed what?

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I got a text message from a friend of mine

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>who said he opened up a coin based account and

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>forgot to put the five thousand dollars into it that

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>he meant two years ago. He knew he didn't, but

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like I was gonna put five thousand. It's what

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he usually do with a new investment. Would have been

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>worth five thou dollars today. Oops. Yeah, note to self,

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't do that again. I'm sure he did. CBS fourth

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest gainer in the SMP five hundred shares of CVS

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Health at four point four percent, more than three bucks

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at seventy six sixty a share in today's session, still

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>down about three percent this year. His health nearing an

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>agreement to buy Health Insured ETNA for more than sixty

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars, according to a person familiar with the negotiations,

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Did I miss that that deal actually got done up?

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking to see if I missed a headline

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so said to me. Near to buy Health Insurre ETNA

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for more than sixty According to a person familiar with

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations, it's a deal that could reshape the pharmacy

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and health insurance industries, and an announcement could come as

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>soon as this coming Monday. But we'll have to see.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>CBS likely to agree to pay at least two a

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>year for ATNA, with more than paid with for are

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>paid for with cash I should say talks could though

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>still fall apart. All right, let's get to the volatility index.

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>It was exciting for the volatility index. Are typing the

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>VIX into my Bloomberg terminal. I go to the VIX index,

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 1>get out up six point four percent, so a rise

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>of six point even at the final closes at six

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>point six percent, but close to eleven forty one. And

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>by contextually, we are the VIXED trading a below ten

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for uh, you know, four of the last six days,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but today up to eleven forty one, six point four

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>percent right now after six point seven percent yesterday. So

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had four games in the VIX and the VIX

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>across on tunday moving average as well. This is Bloomberg. Alright,

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave here, my name is Dave. Just what do you

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're doing today? We're going for Dave. We're talking

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to Dave. Dave Wilson are stocked with his stock of

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the day that would be at home group. It's what

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you get when you put together furniture and home furnishing. No,

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely not pro absolutely not. We're talking about a company

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>describes itself as a home de course settler. I just

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>love that this company exists. Given what at Home was

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble, Well there go. I mean the

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>company that we now know as at Home operates more

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>than a five stores, each one offering more than fifty

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand items for sale. At Home has been around since

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine and went public in August of last year.

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.240
<v Speaker 1>The ticker, as you might expect, his Home. The initial

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>public offering was made of fifteen dollars a sheriff. Two

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>months of struggling to stay above that price, the stock

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>began rising this past April. Today, at Home climbed to

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a record after fiscal third quarter results were well received.

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Report came out late yesterday. Revenue beat the average analyst

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>estimate in Bloomberg survey by the widest margin since the

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I p O. Sales growth that stores open more than

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a year accelerated for a third straight quarter. Earning surpassed

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>estimates as well. Now that trifecta sent at Home surging

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen percent. That was the second biggest game ever for

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the stock. The largest followed the release of first quarter

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>results in June. Put it all together, and today's advance

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>brought these stocks games since the I p O to

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>eight four all right, Dave Wilson. Thank you so much,

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg SACS commas Dave Wilson with his stock of the day.

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Coast to Coast. You can subscribe

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show weekdays two

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>o'clock Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio and follow us on Twitter.

0:44:54.280 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>She's at Carol Masser, I'm at Corey TV. No't