WEBVTT - Bumpy Week for Nvidia and Tesla, The Billion Dollar Bet On a Space Station Startup

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Live from San Francisco. I'm Tim Stenebeck, and this is

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up on the program today, Elon tries

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>to alleviate Tesla concerns, telling staffers to hold onto their

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>stock after plunging fifty percent in three months, plus micron

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>under pressure, disappointing margins, overshadowing an otherwise impressive set of

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>quarterly results. And in video, that's on America announcing new

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>plans to invest billions of dollars on US manufacturing. All

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>that and more coming up over the next hour on

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>First Up.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Shares a Tesla over the last five days down about

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>three point five percent. Elon musk yesterday trying to reassure

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Tesla employees during what he referred to as quote a

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 2>little bit of stormy weather. Check out what he had

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to say. He urged employees to hang onto their stock.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>He called Arc invest Kathy Wood as an example of

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>someone's still believing in the stock. He said some people

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>like Kathy Wood at Ark invest do you see the future?

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm saying is, hang on to your stock.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit more about Tesla had things

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>over to Europe where we're joined by Bloomberg's Craig or Trudell. Craig,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>what did you make of what we heard from elon

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>late yesterday? What was the tone that he was trying

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to communicate to his employees.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 4>It was highly unusual, and you know, I know that

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 4>we've of course, you know, over the years, you know,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>heard from from Musk via you know, memos that he's

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 4>sent out to staff that you know, tend to leak,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, soon after. But this was, you know, in

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>the middle of a quarter, you know, not not a

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>product event or anything like that, a sort of spur

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 4>of the moment, all hands and to sort of stream

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 4>it publicly. It seemed to be a sort of you know,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>reassure the employees and in the in the course of

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 4>doing so, reassure the market that, you know, yes, Tesla's

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 4>in his words, are are on fire and they you know,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 4>that keeps getting shown on TV. But you know, essentially,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 4>don't worry. Everything's going to be fine, you know, the

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 4>future is going to be bright.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, speaking of the future, he did bring up

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the idea once again that self driving cars, autonomous driving

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 2>for Tesla on a wide scale is right around the corner.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>This is something he's been talking about for close to

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>ten years. How close is he though, this time, Craig.

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, that is the key question for Tesla,

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's it's stock. You know, this is something that

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Musk has been talking about since twenty sixteen, and he

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 4>himself has you know, referred to the idea that you know,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 4>he's he's sort of a boy who cried wolf at

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 4>this point. He's made this prediction that you know, at

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 4>some point they'll have a software update where your Tesla

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 4>will be able to drive itself and it'll be useful

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 4>even when you're not in it, and perhaps you know,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 4>go fetch people and it essentially work the way in

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Uber would. That has not happened, and I think there

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 4>are a lot of reasons to be skeptical that that

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, future will arrive. With the hardware set that

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 4>he's put in his vehicles, you can both you know,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>be impressed by the fact that his systems are quite

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 4>capable for assisting drivers, but they still need the human

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>in the loop. And until and unless that changes, I

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 4>think you're going to have this this you know, a

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 4>real reason to sort of second guess why this company

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 4>is valued as richly as it is.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>We Tesla Sharre is getting hit over the last three months.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Hired today by two percent, down on the week. Still

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>though Bloomberg's Preye Tree Jel joining us from London, could

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>just see you, Craig, have a good weekend. Well, let's

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about another company that has had a week, and

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that's in Vidia. Maydeep saying of Bloomberg Intelligence joins us.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Now Mandy, as we reflect on the week that was

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>in Video GtC, Why did this week fail to really

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>capture the attention and the excitement of investors like a

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>previous GtC events have.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, I think from a product roadmap perspective,

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.119
<v Speaker 3>they did everything they could have, you know, in terms

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 3>of showing the next three years what it would mean

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>for in video and even on the supply side, it seems,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 3>you know, it will remain inelastic around the accelerated computing chips.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 3>The demand side is where there are still question marks,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 3>because you know, he talked about infrincing using one hundred

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>times more compute than prior sort of infrincing. So reasoning

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>and the deep sea type approach is what's driving the

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>additional compute, but it remains to be seen whether it

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>can pull offset. You know, the plateauing of pre training,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 3>which everyone seems to agree on at this moment of time,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know there is always that lurking competition from

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 3>your hyperscalers developing data own a six even though he

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 3>downplayed the competition, and really for him, it's about the

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 3>next version, which is the black Belt and Rubin.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 5>And look, I.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Think if you're a customer of Nvidia, you're asking yourself,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>if Blackvel is forty times better, do I really appreciate

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>all the Hopper chips that I have right now within

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>two years? And I think that will come up at

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>some point in terms of the depreciation expenses.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>So it raises the question about the next catalyst here

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 2>a man deep. If this didn't excite investors, then what

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>are they looking toward to get more information about what

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>could move the stock higher.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think the single biggest thing right now is how

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 3>would Nvidia's gross margin look like in the second half,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 3>because there is that concern that you know, given Nvidia

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 3>is packaging two GPU chips now in their black Belt series,

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.239
<v Speaker 3>how does that impact the gross margin? And gross margins

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>have already been trending down with the Blackwell ramp that

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 3>they were with seventy five percent and now it's closer

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to seventy percent. So clearly that gross margin ramp is

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 3>critical in terms of the next series that in video

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 3>is going to produce, and that for me, is the

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>key determinant of where the stock is headed next.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Mandy Seeing of Bloomberg Intelligence, Mandy always get to see you.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us. Well, let's break down the week

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>in markets. Nancy Curtain is Alti Teadman, a global chief

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>investment officer, and she joins us. Now, Nancy, we're still

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>talking about a correction, especially when it comes to tech stocks.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>The NASTAC one hundred could close down for a fifth

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>week in a row, the longest losing streak going back

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 2>to May of twenty twenty two. Is this correction a

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>sign of more weakness to or do you think we're

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>at the bottom.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 6>Look.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 7>I think near term forecasting is pretty na on impossible.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 7>But one of the things to keep in mind is

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 7>we have a pretty big D day deadline ahead, which

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 7>is April second, and until we know what these tarts are,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 7>the magnitude, reciprocal, etc. I think markets are going to

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 7>be pretty volatile here. But look, we think this is

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>a correction and not the beginnings of a bear market,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 7>because we don't see a recession. And I think that's

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 7>an important thing to keep in mind. You were overdue

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 7>a correction. Corrections normally resolve themselves as the markets move higher.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Huge levels of pessimism, which I find very encouraging, but

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 7>we could have some volatility here, as you mentioned, for

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 7>at least another eleven days.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>What makes you so sure that we're not going to

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>see a recession? The consumer, we know powers this economy.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>We've gotten some mixed consumer data, especially in the early

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>part of last week when it comes to airlines. What

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>makes you so sure we're not headed twitter recession.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all, I think it's the dichotomy between

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 7>the heart and the soft data. So the soft data

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 7>has been weaker, consumer sentiment, inflation expectations one year have risen,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 7>and we do think that the economy is slow and

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 7>certainly going to be negative, probably in the first quarter.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Because we had all that buying of imports proactively by companies,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 7>which is meaning that net trade is going to be

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 7>a negative. So expect the first quarter to be lower.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 7>Expect GDP overall for twenty twenty five to be weaker

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 7>than expectations. But you know, let's get back to the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 7>hard data, jobs, personal incomes. The household balance sheet, which

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 7>was announced by the Fed two weeks ago, still remains

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 7>pretty strong, and you know, we haven't talked about the

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 7>fact it could well be that investment surprises. Look, you

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 7>saw in Nvidia committing to five hundred billion over the

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 7>next four years. That comes on top of Apple, that

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 7>comes on top of TSMC. Add those three companies together

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 7>and you're looking at close to one point four trillion

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 7>of expenditure over the next four years back into the

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 7>United States, not to manage, not to mention, you know,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 7>the funding bill making its way through Congress, which might

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 7>have some CAPEX goodies like you know, one hundred percent

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 7>expensing of R and D and depreciation, etc. So you know,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 7>there are some things here. Hard data is still solid,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 7>those slowing, and we think there are some things that

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 7>will come in what I call the goody side of

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 7>Trump that are still to come.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's zero in a little bit on tech specifically, the

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>MAG seven Meta Platforms is actually higher for the year

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>as of now, but for the first time this year,

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it did dip into negative territory for the year. Other

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>than that, six of the seven MAG seven are negative

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>on the year. Do you see a turnaround with the

0:09:58.760 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 2>MAG seven.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, we don't buy stocks, we buy managers. But you know,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 7>our managers have been underweight. Our active managers are underweight

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 7>the MAG seven. So that's been a good positioning for

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 7>us this year. Met has done a much better job

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 7>I think of communicating how they expect all this AI

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 7>spend to result in better metrics, advertising, metrics, engagement, et cetera.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 7>The other companies have been a little bit more vague,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 7>and that's why investors are concerned, at least for the

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 7>four horsemen that are spending what three hundred and twenty

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 7>billion plus, you know, on various forms of AI infrastructure,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 7>how that's going to result in returns our view, let's

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 7>go to the spending beneficiary. So we like digital infrastructure.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 7>We like infrastructure generally because that's where all the spending

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>is going. We like power, we like energy, we like

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 7>onshore in a production We think infrastructure is something that's

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 7>less correlated to equity markets, very very good counter parties,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 7>but also is part of what I call this huge

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 7>spending surge that's likely to continue. So MAG seven underweight.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 7>We think that's the right positioning, but we want to

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 7>be with the spending beneficiaries.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 2>What's your view on how Jenai adoption moves to other

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 2>parts of the market. So far, the beneficiaries have largely

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 2>been the hyperscalers, the chip manufacturers, the companies that we

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about each and every day. When does that move

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>beyond these companies?

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 7>So well, our theme has been a broadening in market participation,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 7>and by the way, we're seeing that this year. You know,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 7>it feels horrible, but you know, ninety seven percent of

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 7>the decline is coming from the MAG seven. There are

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 7>a bunch of sectors that are in positive territory, but

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, looking forward and of course European markets, the

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 7>Chinese markets in positive territory as well, So you know,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>as we look forward, we think that broadening theme will

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 7>be operative that we think Jenai is early innings, early innings, right,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 7>compute power is going to come down these large language

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 7>models are going to come down the cost of that,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 7>and of course that's Jevan's paradox that leads to greater adoption,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 7>and that's not been priced in. The profitability and productivity

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 7>enhancements across large sections of the global economy from jen

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 7>Ai is still to come and that's really not priced in.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 7>And so again that's not a tomorrow thing. But we

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 7>think that is positive yearly from the kind of a

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 7>medium term perspective, and again our clients are longer term,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, investors. We don't try to play the markets

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 7>with a day to day trading mentality.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Curtin of Aalti Teadman, thanks so much for joining us.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 8>Have a great weekend.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, coming up Micron, it disappoints investors of the week

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>margin Now look we're gonna have more on the chip

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 2>maker right after this. Shares down by eight percent.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 8>Right now, this is Bloomberg.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Micron are following today after the memory chip

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 2>maker said margins will miss analysts estimates this quarter. Look

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>at that shares down eight point two percent as we speak.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 2>It's ours investor sentiment despite posting a strong sales and

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>profit For more. Pierre farragu joins us New Street Research

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>head of Chech Infrastructure. Pierre, good to see you today.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering about this margin miss Why did analysts get

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>it so wrong and why did Micron miss there?

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 5>What happened, Well, you have to put that into the

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 5>context of the perspective of analysts, financial analysts and the

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 5>perspective of management. So if we get it from the

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 5>perspective of analysts, the stock had like a fantastic rome,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 5>like if you get old stocks exposed to AI. Really

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 5>Micron is the one who behaved the best in the

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 5>last few weeks and even in the last like you

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 5>have to date, and that kind of situation always calls for,

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 5>like you know, taking profits a bit of a pose

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 5>in the outperformance, and we do think Memory is going

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 5>to outperform AI is the AI world, because that's really

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 5>the part of the AI achieve the path as the

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 5>bill of material of the chief that's is growing the fastest,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 5>and so when you get more memory, margins should expand.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 5>And if you don't get that immediately, the stock running

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 5>to the numbers expecting that. So there is a profit taking.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean there is a change in trend? Something weird? Happening. No,

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 5>If you look at it from the perspective of management,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 5>the situation is interesting. As a CEO of Micron, you

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 5>don't want to warm up investors too much on margins

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 5>for tour reasons. The first one that you don't want

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 5>to set expectations too high to avoid situations like today,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 5>And the second one is your clients are listening to

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 5>the code as well, and you don't want to brag

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 5>too much that margin expanding towards because for your clients

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 5>it means you know you your pricing is going up.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's talk big picture a little bit. How

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>would you characterize Microns really stacking up to competition when

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>it comes to this high bandwidth memory.

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so hybend with memory is going to be the

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 5>largest segment of memory at the end of this year

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 5>and it barely existed three years ago. And at the moment,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 5>from a technological standpoint, Micron and Highnix are in the

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 5>lead position for hybend with memory. They are coming up

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 5>in the market the earliest with the latest generation of

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 5>these chips, and Samsung is like running a bit behind,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 5>like struggling a bit with their production. But I think

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 5>they will eventually catch up, and at the end of

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 5>the day, what you have to keep in mind that

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 5>this market is going to remain a treeopoly. Only the

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 5>three companies have the technology as the decades of experience

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 5>required to be able to manufacture these chips. And what

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 5>really matters is that if you look at the H

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 5>one hundred, the GPU that is largely deployed today from Nvidia,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 5>it has ninety six yeabytes of HBM. The Robin Ultra

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>that will roll out in twenty twenty seven is going

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 5>to have one terabytes of HBM, ten times more. That's

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 5>really what the opportunity is these guys are facing.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Pierre, what would you say when you look out across

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>this year and even in the next year, the cycle

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 2>looks like, the trend looks like when it comes to

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 2>pieces and smartphones, is there concern there still about weakness?

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a great question. I am actually very very cautious,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 5>very variation on pieces and smart phones. I think consumer

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 5>demand is not there, and I think AI is not

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 5>going to trigger a hardware with fresh cycle. So people

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 5>are not going to buy a new phone or buy

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 5>a new laptop to use AI. They are going to

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 5>start using AI first and then AI is going to

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 5>push up, you know, the specification requirements of your device

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 5>over time. So definitely not to bullish on that front.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 5>At the same time, we are at a point in

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 5>the cycle which is a low point. So when I

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 5>say I'm not bullish, it means I expect the recovery

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 5>from two day's level of demand to be very very sluggish,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 5>very slow, but it's still recover So the story for

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Micron is these businesses are to low they're going to

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 5>recover very very little. But the data center business is

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 5>really going through the roof.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Pierre, we only have just twenty seconds left for

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the answer, but a little bit of a peppert because

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 2>we're just learning that ten Cent has launched upgrades of

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>a Deep six style reasoning AI model. Twenty seconds on

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 2>your reaction to what China's doing when it comes to reasoning.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, AI is just joining the pack. Everybody is doing

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 5>the same. Every time you create a great model, you

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 5>have like a lot of innovation happening to try and

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 5>make the model more efficient, and like the US and

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 5>the West has been doing that for a decade, even

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 5>like a couple of decades, and China is joining the group.

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 5>And there is nothing really new in deepse You got

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 5>what ten cent ilt you bit about doing?

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 9>All right?

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Pierre Farrague of New Street Research, Pierre, good to see you.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us. Have a wonderful weekend. Well, we

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 2>do have some breaking news. Boeing has won a contract

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>to design and build the US's next generation fighter jet,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>beating out Lockheed Martin. The contract is part of the

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Next Generation Air Dominance Program. It aims to develop a

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.719
<v Speaker 2>new fighter jet that will operate with drones and replace

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the F twenty two Raptor. The new fighter jet is

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 2>expected enter service in the twenty thirties, and the Air

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Force plans to spend up to twenty billion dollars on

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 2>research and development through twenty twenty nine. You see shares

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of Lockheed Martin down, you see shares of Boeing. Uh Well,

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>billionaire who made his fortune and cryptocurrency is turning his

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>attention to space. Jed Michaeleb is the sole financial backer

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of vast Space. It's a startup aiming to build the

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>world's first commercial space station. Bloomberg's Kyle Porter has the

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 2>details of this story. Kyle, this is a very quickly

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 2>growing startup. They're hiring people every single day. This guy

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 2>has put pretty much half of his fortune behind this company.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Can he pull it off?

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's a really good open question. I was very

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 6>skeptical before I visited in December. I came away thinking,

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, they've got a decent shot of this. They

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 6>might revolutionize how you go about these type of projects.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 2>How are they doing it? How are they revolutionizing it?

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, most people in the space industry or any big

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 6>industrial company, tend to think of you build a product,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 6>you get investors, you grow. It happens over time, you

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 6>reach benchmarks, and a lot of these projects tend not

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 6>to reach the finish line because something goes wrong during

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 6>the process. An investor pulls out, You sell that what's

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 6>left of the company. Vast have decided time is money,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 6>but money is time. So why not spend five hundred

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 6>million dollars a year, get a product to market, and

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 6>then have your revenue come back.

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>In Kyle, As I was reading your story, and as

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I watched the Real Good Bloomberg Originals documentary that a

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Company is It, I was thinking to myself, talk about

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>putting all your eggs in one basket. If they do

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>not get this contract from NASA.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Is that it Well, they've sort of hinted there might

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 6>be a Middle Eastern investor that might take it if

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 6>they don't manage it, but they're very upfront the yeah,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 6>this is the big swing, and if it doesn't happen,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 6>it could be, you know, lights out for the company.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Who's the talent that they've brought in to help run

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the company.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 6>They bought a company called Launcher, which was headed by

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Max Hote a couple of years ago. Now, Max also

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 6>had never built a space station before, didn't have any

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 6>real experience in space until he started a Launcher, and

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 6>neither of his rockets I think preached all a bit.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 8>But now he's running the show for.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Them, all right, Bloomberg, Kyle Porter, thanks for joining us.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the big take. Check it out on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Also check out the documentary about it.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 8>Very very cool.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Jim Steneveek in San Francisco.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm also watching shares at Apple today down about three

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>tenths of one percent. The company is shaking up its

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>executive ranks to get its AI efforts back on track

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 2>after months of delays and stumbles. The changes aim to

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>rescue Siri, which has struggled to release new features, and

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Apple is betting on Rockwell's technical experience to solve the problems.

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>From all on the personnel moves, we're joined by Bloomberg's

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Dana Wollman. Dana, what's going on at Apple when it

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>comes to AI?

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 8>Why are they so far behind?

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 10>So Apple really over promised, promised a whole raft of

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 10>upgrades to Apple Intelligence at its Developer conference in June

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 10>of last year, and behind the scenes, the engineering team

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 10>has struggled to keep up with those promises and deliver

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 10>on pace. And so the company just took control of

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 10>Syria and took it away from the executive who had

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 10>been overseeing this ambitious upgrade and had moved it under

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 10>the person who brought us the Vision Pro, which itself

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 10>has not been a commercial hit, but if nothing else,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 10>has been well regarded for its technical innovations.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 2>So Apple, Yes, well, people, I mean I haven't actually

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>tried the Vision Pro yet. People who talk about it

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>just rave about it. But you know, you don't see

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the sales numbers for it, and you don't, by any

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>means see it being one of Apple's blockbuster devices by

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 2>any means, Dana, I think the question that I have

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is context here. It's really rare for Apple to make

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>a big personnel move such as this.

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 10>It is rare for Apple to make a personnel move

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 10>like this like this, as you said, and according to

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 10>our own reporting, it was in the works even before

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 10>some recent bombshells. Bloomberg reported that a different company executive

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 10>called the delays ugly and embarrassing. According to Bloomberg's reporting,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 10>this move had been in the works for a while,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 10>but as you said, it doesn't usually happen, and I

0:22:57.800 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 10>think a lot of industry observers were waiting for some

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 10>sort of shoot a drop, whether it was someone being fired,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 10>really heads rolling, or something of this nature, at least

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 10>the project being reassigned to somebody else.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dana, we are going to have to leave

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 2>things there. I do want to head now to the

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Oval Office and the White House, where we're hearing from

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 2>President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hagsath.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 9>It's going to be amazing. Should have been nine years ago.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 11>They've been talking about doing it for many years, but

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 11>nobody ever got it off. But we did, and there

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 11>was great excitement and great acceptance of it by almost everybody,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 11>including a lot of Democrats. Actually, I do want to

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 11>say that I've decided that the SBA, the Small Business Administration,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 11>headed by Kelly Loffler's a terrific person, will handle all

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 11>of the student portfolio.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 9>We have a portfolio that's very large, lots of.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 12>Loans, tens of thousands of loans, pretty complicated deal, and

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 12>that's coming out of the Department of Education immediately, and

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 12>it's going to be headed up by Kelly Laffler SBA

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 12>and the role set for it.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 11>They're waiting for it that it will be serviced much

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 11>better than it has in the past.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 9>It's been a mess.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 11>And also Bobby Kennedy, the Health and Human Services will

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 11>be handling special needs and all of the nutrition programs

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 11>and everything else rather complex, but that's going to be

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 11>headed by and handled by Health and Human Services, So

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 11>I think that will work out very well. Those two

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 11>elements will be taken out of the Department of Education,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 11>and then all we have to do is get the

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 11>students to get guidance from the people that love them

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 11>and cherish them, including their parents by the way, or

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 11>be totally involved in their education along with the boards

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 11>and the governors and the states, and it's going to

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 11>be a great it's going to be a great situation.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 11>I guarantee that in a few years from now, I

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 11>hope I'm going to be around.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 9>To see it, but I think we're going to see

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 9>a lot. I think that you're going to.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 11>Have tremendous results. You're going to have results like Norway, Sweden, Denmark,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the countries that do so well.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 9>I think you're going to have a lot of those results.

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 11>If you look at Iowa and Indiana and Idaho, so

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 11>many places that run so well, Florida, Texas, big ones,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 11>and you're going to have great education, much better than

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 11>it is now at half the cost. And we're not

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 11>even doing it as a cost item, although you will

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 11>say probably half, maybe more than that, and you're not

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 11>going to be at the bottom of the list. You're

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 11>going to be much higher, and maybe you'll be I

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 11>will guarantee some of the states will be at the

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 11>top of the list.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 9>They'll be comparable or better than these number.

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 11>One, two, three, four, five countries, the countries that are

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 11>in the top five positions. So to me, it's very

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 11>exciting and it's been received very well, So I just

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 11>want to tell you about the student loans and special needs.

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 11>But we're here for a reason today that is very

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 11>and I'm thrilled to announce that at my direction, the

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 11>United States Air Force is moving forward with the world's

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 11>first sixth generation fighter jet, number six six generation.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 9>Nothing in the world comes even.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 11>Close to it, and it'll be known as the F

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 11>forty seven. The General's picked a title, and it's a

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 11>beautiful number, F forty seven. It's something the likes of

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 11>which nobody has seen before.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 9>In terms of all of.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 11>The attributes of a fighter jet, there's never been anything

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 11>even close to it, from speed to maneuverability to what

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 11>it can have to payload.

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 9>And this has been in the works for a long

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 9>period of time.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 11>After a rigorous and thorough competition between some of America's

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 11>top aerospace companies, the Air Force is going to be

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 11>awarding the contract for the next generation air dominance platform

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 11>to Boeing.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 9>You know, was highly competed for.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 11>There was a lot of competition, generals, and it's been

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 11>going on for a long time, very very tough competition.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 11>But this plane is produced numbers that nobody's ever seen before.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 11>Their forty seven will be the most advanced, most capable,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 11>most lethal aircraft ever built. An experimental version of the

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 11>plane has secretly been flying for almost five years, and

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 11>we're confident that it massively overpowers the capabilities of any

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 11>other nation. There's no other nation. We know every other plane.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 11>I've seen every one of them, and it's not even

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 11>close as the next level. You know, level five is good.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 11>This is level six. They say their forty seven is

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 11>equipped with state of the arts stealth technology. It's virtually

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 11>unseeable and unprecedented power. It's got the most power of

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 11>any jet of its kind ever made. New verability, likewise

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 11>is the There's never been anything like it. Despite the

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 11>power and speed, its speed is top over two, which

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 11>is something that you don't hear very often. America's enemies

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 11>will never see it coming. Hopefully we won't have to

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 11>use it for that purpose, but you have to have it, and.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 9>If it ever happens, they won't know what the hell

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 9>hit them.

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 11>A new fleet of these magnificence and planes will be

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 11>built in the and in the air during my administration

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 11>for the next couple of years.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 9>It's ready to go.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 11>They've already built much of what has to be built

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 11>in terms of production, including the sheds. We'll ensure that

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 11>the USA continues to dominate the skies. Given an order

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 11>for a lot, we can't tell you the price because

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 11>it would give it would give way to some of

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 11>the technology and some of the size of the planet's

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 11>good sized plane. This contract also represents a historic investment

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 11>in our defense industrial base, helping to keep America at

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 11>the cutting edge of aerospace and technology. Our allies are

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 11>calling constantly. They want to buy them also, and will

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 11>certain allies We'll be selling them, perhaps toned down versions.

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 11>We like to tone them down about ten percent, which

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 11>probably makes sense because someday maybe.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 9>They're not our allies. Right.

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 11>But I would like to ask Secretary Hegseth, who's doing

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:33.719
<v Speaker 11>a fantastic job. He's really really been very inspiring in

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 11>so many ways, and I must say.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 9>That before he speaks.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 11>We have had record people wanting to join our military

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 11>in the last two and a half months, literally since

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 11>this I think probably since the election November fifth, but

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 11>especially since we came to office and since I announced Pete.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 9>He's young, he's smarty, strong, he loves it of him.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 9>But we've had.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 11>Record numbers of people wanting to join our military.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 9>Now, if you go.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 11>Back six months, it was the exact opposite. You had

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 11>record numbers of people not wanting to join the military.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 11>Now you have record numbers of people wanting to be

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 11>in our military. And that's a really that's a great honor.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 11>That shows you we're really on the right track. So

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 11>Pete maybe say if you were Chorts, well.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 9>Mister President, this is a big day.

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 8>This is a big day for our war.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 13>Fighters, this is a big day for our country, a

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 13>big day.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 9>In the world.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 13>The name of this program is the next Generation of

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 13>Air Dominance, and mister President, because of your leadership, your clarity,

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 13>we are going to America is going to have a

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 13>generations in the future of air dominance because of this

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 13>sixth generation fighter. We've had the F fifteen, we had

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 13>the F sixteen, the F eighteen, the F twenty two,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 13>the F thirty five. Now we have the F forty seven,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 13>which sends a very direct, clear message to our allies

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 13>that we're not going anywhere and to our enemies that

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 13>we will be able to project power around the globe

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 13>unimpeded for.

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 9>Generations to come.

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 13>Mister President, this is a gift to my kids and

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 13>your kids, to my grandkids and your grandkids. This is

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 13>a historic investment in the American military, in the American

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 13>industrial base, in American industry that will help revive the

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 13>warrior ethos inside our military, which we're doing rebuild our military,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 13>which the previous.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 9>Administration did not do. By the way, mister President, they paused.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 13>This program and were prepared to potentially scrap it. We

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 13>know this is cheaper, longer, rage and more stealthy. President

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 13>Trump said, we're reviving it, and we're doing it.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 9>And then we are also going to re establish de terrence.

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 9>Under the previous administration.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 8>We looked like fools.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 9>Not anymore.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 13>President Trump has re established American leadership. The F forty

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 13>seven is part of it. And mister President, thank you

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 13>for having the current to do it and leading away

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 13>for all.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 9>Of our fires. Thank you very much, Pete.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 11>One of the things I will say, but the general

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 11>generals are going to speak, and just a couple of seconds,

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 11>but this plane flies with drones. It flies with many,

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 11>many drones, as many as you want. And it's a

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 11>technology that's new. But it doesn't fly by itself. It

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 11>flies five with many drones as many as we want,

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 11>and that's something that no other plane can do.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 9>So I'd like to.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 11>Introduce, if I my Air Force Chief of Staff, General

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 11>David Olvin, and also General Dale White, to incredible people

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 11>that I've known over the years, but I got to

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 11>know really well.

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 9>Over the last few months. And would you say a

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 9>few words please, Jenneral.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 14>Thank you very much, mister President, Miss President, Miss Sectary,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 14>thank you so much for your unwavering committed to our military.

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 14>I will say this is a big day. This is

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 14>a big day for a United States Air Force as well.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 14>You know, air dominance is not a birth rate, but

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 14>it's become synonymous with American airpower. But air dominance needs

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 14>to be earned every single day. And since the earliest

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 14>days of area of warfare, brave American airmen have jumped

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 14>into their machines, taken to the air and they've cleared

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 14>the skies. And whether that be clearing the sky so

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 14>we can rain down destruction on our enemies from above,

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 14>or we can clear the path the ground forces below.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 14>That's been our commitment to the fight and that's really

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 14>been our promise to American and with this at forty seven,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 14>as the Crown Jewel in the next generation air dominance

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 14>family of systems. We're going to be able to keep

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 14>that promise well into the future. I also want to

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 14>thank everyone from industry and with the government, our engineers

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 14>who have put work tirelessly on this program.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 8>To bring it where we are right now today.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 14>This shows that American talent, American skill, and American determination

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 14>are second to none, because this platform is second to none.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 14>So we believe that this provides more lethality, It provides

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 14>more capability, more modernized capability in a way that is

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 14>built to adapt. This along with our collaborative combat aircraft

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 14>the President talked about with drones. This is allowing us

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 14>to look into the future and unlock the magic that

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 14>is human machine teaming. And as we do that, we're

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 14>going to write the next generation of modern aerial warfare

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 14>with this.

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 8>This enables us to do this.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 14>The manner in which we put this program together puts

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 14>more control in the hands of the government, so we

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 14>can update and adapt at the speed of relevance, at

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 14>the speed of technology, not at the speed of beer.

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 9>Honors.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 8>This is more air force, This is more options for

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 8>the President.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 14>We say, as our mission in the United States, Air

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 14>force is to fly, fight and win airpower anytime, anywhere.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 14>If you want to go anywhere, you have to have

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 14>a platform that gets you anywhere.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 8>This provides the options from.

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 14>The very one end, which is a quick response, and

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 14>then we can get right back into fight and stance

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 14>without having to deploy troops that are going to take

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 14>maybe months in cost more lives.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 8>We can move back and find stance and maybe we

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 8>restore that de.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 14>Terms all the way to decisive victory as part of

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 14>a joint force that is the most lethal and capable

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 14>military every own history. That's what we provide now, and

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 14>this provide allows us to relate.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 8>Into the future. It's more deterrence, more capability. It's what

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 8>piece to strength looks like in the future. Mis President.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 8>That's what we're very proud of that.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 14>And all we can say is on behalf of us,

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 14>and I says Air Force, let's deliver it.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 9>Thank you very much, Thank you, Jim, you like you

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 9>to say anything. I'll just don't want to chase that.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 9>This is what to do generally, had the mook.

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 8>A questions.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Thanks, Thank you very much. Great job.

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 11>We've worked together long and heart of it and this

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 11>was a big secret in fact, we don't show too

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 11>much of it.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, there we have it, President Trump, along with Secretary

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of Defense Pete hag Seth. Also we heard from David Alvin,

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 2>chief of Staff of the Air Force, getting quite a

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 2>few headlines on this story. The Army, or President Trump,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>i should say, has said that the F forty seven

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>will be built during his administration. The US Air Force

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>has proceeded with the F forty seven fighter jet. The

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 2>US Air Force will award that jet contract to Boeing.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 2>In response, we did see shares of Boeing higher on

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 2>the news. Shares of Lockheed Martin are falling. He did

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>also say that this experimental version of the F forty

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>seven has been flying for almost five years and that

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it will be built during his administration. This next generation

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>fighter jet, he did also say, will fly with drones,

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's already experiencing interest from our allies. From more,

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 2>we bring in Bloomberg News as Tyler Kendall, she joins

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 2>us this afternoon from Washington, DCO. This morning, I should say, Tyler, good.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 8>To see you.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about this F forty seven and

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the technology that allows it to fly with drones?

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 15>Well, Tim Bloomberg News reporting that the Air Force has

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 15>allocated at least twenty billion dollars around the research and

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 15>development for this effort. You said it, they're Boeing beating

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 15>out Lockey Martin for the contract that could be worth

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 15>multi billions of dollars, and this was a two year

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 15>bidding process for these companies to try to put forward

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 15>that full scale proposal for this new generation of fighter

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 15>jets that will work in tandem with drones. You heard

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 15>President Trump emphasizing there that that's how critically important that

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 15>is is they try to move to this next generation. Now,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 15>not a lot about this program is known. It's classified

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 15>or reporting indicating that it's meant to replace that Lockie

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 15>Martins F twenty two Raptor stealth jets that are currently

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 15>in the sky and flying. The goal is to have

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 15>this operational by twenty thirty. Now, you mentioned our allies there.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 15>That was something important that President Trump mentioned because we

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 15>know a lot of this is gearing up in our

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 15>competition with China. Like many of the proposals that we've

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 15>seen from the Trump administration, particularly in recent weeks, try

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 15>to bulk up, particularly when it comes militarily against China.

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 15>I also would like to flag one other headline that

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 15>we were seeing today. Elon Musk at the Pentagon are

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 15>reporting indicating that this program in particular, there might have

0:37:57.400 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 15>been some budget constraints there as Elon Musk looks full

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 15>forward to his DOGE cost cutting efforts. Just yesterday, Secretary

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 15>of Defense Pete Heigseth announced that five hundred and eighty

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 15>million dollars worth of programs will be cut at the

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 15>Department of Defense. Of course, that fails in comparison to

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 15>the numbers that we're talking about for this program here,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 15>but it does bring the DoD's cost cutting measures to

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 15>eight hundred million dollars. Since Pete Hegseth was sworn in

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 15>as Defense Secretary, Tyler.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You've done a lot of reporting on the weapons of

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the future. These companies Palanteer, SpaceX, Boeing is a traditional

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>old school defense contractor. Where does this fit in with

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the modernization of the armed forces?

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 15>Well, tim the defense industrial base has actually shrunk by

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 15>forty percent over the last decade. That's according to the

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 15>Department of Defense, which says that they want to try

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 15>to get in those smaller contractors who compete with the

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 15>big defense primes. They're referencing some reporting that I did

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 15>a few months ago where I had the chance to

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 15>sit down with the Chief of Staff of the Army,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 15>General Randy George. He's the highest ranking military official in

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 15>the Army, and he is trying to put forward this

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 15>path that would make the acquisition process easier. It would

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 15>instead look to these short term contracts instead of these

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 15>multi decade contracts in order to get these more nimble

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 15>companies in particularly when it comes to drone makes it

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 15>easier for them to do business because oftentimes he's told

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 15>me that they will put in these purchase orders, but

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 15>then at the end of the day, by the time

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 15>those weapons get on the battlefield, they end up being obsolete.

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 15>That appears to encounter with this. Of course, this is

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 15>going to be a decade long, multi billion dollar project

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 15>that the defense primes had been competing for.

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Bloomberg, Tyler Kendall joining us from Washington, d C. Tyler, thanks,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 2>do appreciate that well. Sticking with what's happening in Washington, DC.

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Earlier this week, President Trump fired too democratic members of

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the FTC. Questions had already been raised about how much

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 2>influenced the White House might expect or exert over the

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 2>agency and its actions toward big tech. Joining us now

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 2>is William Covese. He's professor at the George Washington School

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of Law. Bill, good to have you with us. How

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 2>did you look at these firings earlier this week? I

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>know it alarmed certain folks who watch this agency closely.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 16>As far as the FTC goes, there was an inevitability

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 16>that the Republicans were going to get control of the FTC.

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 16>There is a nominee pending, Daniel Metterer, who's likely to

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.399
<v Speaker 16>get a vote in the Congress relatively soon, so that

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 16>in a short time there would be a working majority

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 16>of three Republicans that would have the votes to do

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 16>what they wanted. The larger message, though, for the regulatory process,

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 16>is that the White House is determined to get more

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 16>control over how these agencies operate and to bend their

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 16>programs more in the direction that the President prefers. At

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 16>The agency leadership has said, we do want to press

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 16>a ad with the big tech cases that are running now.

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 16>We want to have an active program involving mergers. But

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 16>at the same time they've said, we do want to

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 16>create an environment that's going to be more favorable for

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 16>deal making because we're going to tolerate settlements. We're going

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 16>to establish a timeline that is more predictable and reliable.

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 16>So this is part of a larger effort across the

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 16>government for the White House to achieve greater control over

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 16>how the regulatory process operates, including for big tech and

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 16>any trust.

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, explain the nuance there, because what I heard is

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 2>two different things. One is that Okay, we're going to

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 2>continue with you know, for lack of a better term,

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 2>of crackdown on big tech. Are going hard on big tech.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess some observers would would point that out. Some

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 2>people might not agree with that statement. But the other

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 2>part is we want a friendly or regulatory environment, and

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 2>we want to communicate a friendly regulatory environment that opens

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 2>up more m and a How do those things co exist?

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, here's one way that you can reconcile them. The

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 16>Biden administration adopted the position on mergers that was very

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 16>skeptical about settlements is a way to resolve problems settlements

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 16>that would involve divestitures or conduct related solutions. The leadership

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 16>of the Federal Trade Commission and the incoming leadership of

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 16>the Department of Justice Anti Trust Division have said settlements

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 16>belong in the solution set that where the parties can

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 16>come forward with a divestiture package that we regard as acceptable.

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 16>When they offer us conduct related solutions to specific problems,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 16>we are going to be more willing to accept those.

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 16>That opens up a wider path for deal makers to

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 16>come forward with solutions to problems that might otherwise have

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 16>led the agencies to go directly into court. So there's

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 16>a commitment to bear down on any competitive mergers, but

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 16>a greater willingness to accept solutions that the previous administration

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 16>tried to slam the door on.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because we've heard in the past, even during

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 2>the election that Vice President jd Vance thought Lena Kahn

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 2>was actually doing a great job. It raises the question

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 2>of continuation of policy between her FTC and Andrew Ferguson's.

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So do you expect that the FTC and I guess

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 2>also the DOJ is going to continue to move forward

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 2>with the cases against Google, Apple, Meta, and Amazon.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 16>I expect it will continue. And it's been interesting to

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 16>watch how Andrew Ferguson, the FTC chair, especially, has emphasized

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 16>that many of these initiatives began at the end of

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.720
<v Speaker 16>the first Trump presidency. The case involving Google Search began

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 16>at the end of the President Trump's first term. The

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 16>FTC's case against Meta for monopolization began in twenty twenty.

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 16>The investigation of Apple began in twenty twenty. So one

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 16>message that's come from the leadership is that we're the

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 16>ones who started this, We're the ones who brought this

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 16>scrutiny to bear, and we're going to carry forward with

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 16>those In a way, it's an effort to claim credit

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.479
<v Speaker 16>for the development of the newer approach to competition law.

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 16>At the same time, CHERF Ferguson makes a point of

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 16>saying the Biden Harris antitrust era at the FTC is over,

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 16>the con chairmanship and policy is over.

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 8>I think what they.

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 16>Mean to be saying there is that we are going

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 16>to be more willing to consider solutions to mergers that

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 16>stop short of absolute prohibitions. We're going to provide more

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 16>clarity and certainty about the duration of the merger review process.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 16>We're not going to game the system of process to

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 16>stretch out the timeline to give companies more pause and

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 16>considering whether they want to go ahead.

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 9>So it is.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 16>It's a mixture of saying we're going to continue to

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 16>be tough with respect to tech in particular, but at

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 16>the same time saying that we aren't going to create

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 16>an environment that is so demanding as it was before.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 16>So there're going to be possibilities for for more mergers.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 16>And I think both of the leaders face something that

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 16>a Republican nominee to these agencies always face. A conventional

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 16>story in academics me are part of creating that right.

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 16>The eventual story is Republicans are going to open the gates.

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 16>They want to say things at the beginning to say

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 16>not so fast.

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 2>William Covisich GW law Professor Bill, good to see you.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for joining us. Do appreciate it.

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, do you want to bring in Bloomberg's Ryan Vistellica

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to wrap up this week in market? It's certainly a

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 2>big focus being news out of Nvidia's GtC event. Ryan,

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't look like this was the catalyst that Nvidia

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>investors wanted to see, and also that the greater tech

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 2>industry wanted to see. What is the consequence of that?

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 17>Hey, thanks for having me on.

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 7>So you're right.

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 17>I think if you talk to a lot of analysts

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.320
<v Speaker 17>and investors in Nvidia, there was a lot of optimism

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 17>about their product pipeline, their roadmap going forward, but it

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 17>wasn't really enough to avert some of the week. As

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 17>we've seen in the stock there continues to be a

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 17>lot of uncertainty about policies. There continues to be a

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 17>lot of uncertainty about tariffs, the outlook for the economy.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 17>All of this stuff has been weighing on tech in particular,

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 17>although losses have been pretty widespread. But a couple of

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 17>stats caught my attention earlier today. This is on track

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 17>d the fifth straight weekly drop for the Nastik one hundred.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.320
<v Speaker 17>That's its longest since May twenty twenty two. Microsoft is

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 17>on track for its eight straight weekly drop. That's its

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 17>longest since February two thousand and eight. So certainly a

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 17>kind of level of historic selling they're here that we're

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 17>seeing today. We've seen the mag seven index fall into

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 17>a correction, We've seen the Nastik one hundred fall into

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 17>a correction. There's been just a lot of broad based weakness. However,

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 17>I do think we might start to see some people

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 17>start buying the dip here. Valuations have really come off

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 17>with their minds and we might be building a sort

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 17>of face.

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's the question. Hey, Ryan, have a great weekend.

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 2>That's Bloomberg's Ryan Estealica. Thanks so much. That is going

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to do it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Do

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 2>not forget to check out our podcast. You can find

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it on the terminal as well as online at Apple, Spotify,

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart. This is Bloomberg Technology.