WEBVTT - US Sues Google & Taylor Swift Ticket Fiasco

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brussel from Bloomberg Radio. Today,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice, joined by eight states, file a

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>civil antitrust lawsuit in the United States District Court for

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern District of Virginia against Google. Attorney General Merrick

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Garland announced on Tuesday that the Justice Department is suing

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Google for antitrust violations, accusing the search giant of using

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>its dominant position in the online ad industry to box

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>out competitors. Google has engaged an exclusionary conductor, severely weakened,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if not destroy competition in the ad tech industry. It's

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a high stakes attempt to break up Google's ad tech business,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the few times the government has called for

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the breakup of a major company. In response, Google said

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit attempts to pick winners and losers in the

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>highly competitive advertising technology sector. Joining me is Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Senior litigation analyst Jennifer ree Gent tell us a little

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>about the government's case against Google. So, the government's case

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually very much like an ongoing case that's already

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>been in litigation for a couple of years now, that

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was brought by a group of states led by Texas,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and both of these losses cover what they call the

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ad text stack, and the ad tex stack is a

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>series of products that are used basically by advertisers and

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>by publishers for placing advertisements online. When somebody opens up

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>a website, you know, we don't know what. We opened

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a website and we see all these advertisements, but there's

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this complex series of transactions that happen to place that

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ad there and to figure out what add to place

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on who the user is. And there are tools

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on the publishers side and their tools on the advertiser

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>side that they use, and then there's an exchange where

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they kind of come together to auction on the space

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and the ads that are available. And so the allegation

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>here is that Google has slowly bought in to each

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of these tools all the way across that chain and

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>at this point have dominance, you know, all the way

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>across from publisher to advertiser. And they did it by

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>buying products and then also by engaging an anti competitive

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>conduct that kind of blocked out the rivals that were

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>out there that we're able to compete, and they now

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have dominance across this whole chain of products the complaints says,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and this was from the words of one of Google's

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>own advertising executives. The analogy would be of Goldman or

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>City Bank owned the New York stock ege change. Right exactly,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a very big conflict of interest on

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>its face. You know, they have both ends. They can

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>control everything that occurs, and they have dominance in each

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>piece of it. Right, so they can affect where these

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>ads go. They can preference in themselves because they themselves

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have ad space and our advertisers, and then they can

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>also extract a lot of money out of advertisers and

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>publishers because they don't really have of competition. And if

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>these publishers and advertisers want to meet up and place

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>these ads in the best places, and the publishers want

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to sell their space, they have to use these Google tools.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Have no choice but to pay these high fees. Essentially,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so Google has argued different times that its ad business

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is not a monopoly because it has to compete with Meta, Amazon,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Comcast and others, and its share of the digital ad

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue market has dropped from thirty six point seven percent

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen to eight point eight percent last year, according

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to Insider intelligence. So does that show that there is

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>some competition? Well, that is Google sort of characterizing things

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>differently than the Department of Justices and the States are.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're looking generally and broadly at advertising on

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, but what the Department of Justice is looking

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at is something that's much more narrow you know, they're

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>looking specifically at each tool that's you by advertisers and

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>publishers to place advertisements on space on websites. And so

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to take out, let's say, a Facebook, because

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook operates its own wall system. So in other words,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's an ad exchange tool that auctions on ads

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook is not involved in, that Facebook isn't a

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>competitor there. Facebook is negotiating itself with advertisers for placement

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on its own website, et cetera. So it's not in there.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It may be a place where an advertiser can go

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>right online to advertise and it has space for those advertisements,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's not competing with the Google products that are

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at issue in the complaints. So, you know, while Google

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>may not be wrong about those assertions, they're just looking

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at the market differently than the Department of Justices. This

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>was mentioned that the press conference, the a G was asked,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>why are you duplicating this lawsuit by the Texas a

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Journey General and other states? So why are they duplicating

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens a lot, doesn't it. It does, yeah, And

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say there are a couple of different reasons

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>for it. I mean, the first reason is that they

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are an anti trust enforcer, and it doesn't mean they're

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>going to sit back and rely on some other plaintiff

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring their case when they think that there's been

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive conduct. They're going to bring their own case.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They have their own evidence, they've done a long investigation,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and they want to pursue that enforcement and not rely

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on somebody else. But I actually think there also might

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be another reason. The states, unlike the Department of Justice,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are subject to consolidation of lawsuits where there are other

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>similar lawsuits. And in the case of the the suit

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>that was brought by Texas, they were consolidated with other

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits over the exact same thing that are broad as

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer class actions, one by advertisers and one by publishers,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and they got consolidated and moved to a New York court,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and by virtue of that, they were slowed down immensely.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean even for litigation June. That litigation is going

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>at a glacial pace. It's complex, there are lot of

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>issues there, the judges taking it in tranches and in stages,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at a matter that probably I doubt

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>would get to trial any time before two thousand twenty five.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, the Department of Justice doesn't have

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to consolidate. It can stay where it brought it suit

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, and I suspect could probably get to trial

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on this before that other case gets to trial. This

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few times that the Justice Department

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>has called for the breakup of a major company since

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it dismantled Bell in the nine eighties. Why do you

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>think they're doing that here? Well, I think if they

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>view anti competitive conduct to start at anti competitive purchases.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, Google tried to compete and couldn't and

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>instead went out and started buying up competitors and sort

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of hoovering up all of the different products that were

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in the space in order to dominate it. That that

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in itself, that the acquisition activity in and of its

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>health is part of the anti competitive conduct here. And

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if that is the case, then the remedy to seek

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is to sell off some of these illegally acquired technologies.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would be different if if a company

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>was bought for pro competitive reasons, let's say, but once

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it was bought, the company developed into a monopoly which

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be illegal, but then behave badly and engaged in

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>an exclusionary tactics with that monopoly to then keep out rivals.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little bit different. But here they

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>say just buying Double Click, let's say, and add mobs

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other pieces of this puzzle that

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they bought. Those in itself were anti competitive, maybe should

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have been stopped by the agency at the time of

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition, but wererant, and now we need to seek

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to have them sold off. It's it's very much like

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the FTC's lawsuit against Facebook right now, where it's seeking

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the divestiture of either WhatsApp or Instagram or both. This

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>represents the Biden administration's first major case challenging one of

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the largest tech companies, and Attorney General Garland said, no

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>matter the industry, no matter the company, the Justice Department

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>will vigorously enforce our antitrust laws. How important is this

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit to the Justice Department. I think it's quite important.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say also that it's existing lawsuit against Alphabet

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>related to Google Search, which it brought a few years

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>ago and will go to trial in September of this year,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>at least it's set to at this moment. It's also

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>very important. I mean, they very much mirror the really

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>huge sort of seminal antitrust monopolization antitrust case against Microsoft,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which was generally successful. And I think they're very important

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>cases because since Microsoft, there has been very few big

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>monopolization suits brought either by the SEC or the Department

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of Justice. I think critics would say that they pretty

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>much just dropped that kind of enforcement. And we have

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem now because for the last ten years, the

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>FTC and d OJ have sat around and allowed these

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>big tech platforms just to buy up the industries that

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they're in, just buy up small competitors right and left,

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to rise to a position of dominance and now need

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it. And I think that's what

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do here now with this Google case

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and also the one that they're pursuing over Google Search,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're very important cases for them. Yeah,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they really tried to pump up this case

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at the press conference called it a landmark case, and

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>also Vanita Gupta, the Associated Tourney General, went through a

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>list of the different accomplishments in antitrust that the Justice

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Department has their you know, the Biden administrations, So right right, yeah,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's somewhat in response to a July

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess it was now in two thousand twenty one

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>executive order by President Biden that basically encouraged all of

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the agencies in the federal government to sort of ramp

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>up to try to in prease competition in the marketplace.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they're basically saying, look, that's what we've done.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We're responding to your executive order. We're working really hard.

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>We've accomplished a lot to try to you know, follow

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>our mission and ramp up competition in the marketplace, and

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a big piece of it. And I think

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an important case too, because it will be

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly difficult for them to actually win and achieve a

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>breakup order here. You know, they came close to it

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft, but that was overturned on appeal, and the

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice ultimately settled. Pieces of the liability portion

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>were overturned on appeal, and then the appellate court urged

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>them to rethink what the remedy was because the disrecord

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>did say the breakup was the appropriate remedy, and then

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice ended up settling with Microsoft. But

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>many think that the settlement was actually quite useful and

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>did increase competition in the marketplace, and so this is

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a big risk. They are taking a stab, they're trying again.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think their goal will be to try to force

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Google to type into some of these products. Do you

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think that this will actually go to trial or there'll

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>be a settlement? You know, it's so early to predict

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that because oftentimes settlements come about because of

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the direction that the litigation is going in, you know,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>reading the chord, reading some of the conferences, And we

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten anywhere near there yet with just a complaint.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>You know. My guess is that the Department of Justice

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is very interested in trying this case, and I think

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at least for now, unless they see they get a

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very hostile judge. For now, it would be hard to

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>see how they'd reach a settlement because I'm not sure

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that DJ would want any kind of a settlement that's

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>short of some divestment, and I really doubt Google would

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>agree to that. Jen. Let's turn now to another antitrust

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>issue that online ticket buyers shouldn't be able to relate to.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>That's such a fast Taylor Swift fans known as Swifties

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>rallied outside the US capital on Tuesday as the Senate

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee held a hearing about what went wrong during

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the pre sale for Swift tickets late less year. Millions

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of fans were left in virtual queues or denied tickets altogether,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and Ticketmaster had to shut down the pre sale. There

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>were complaints that the murder of Live Nation and events

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>company with Ticketmaster means that it controls event production as

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>well as ticket sales. Here's Jack Rotzinger, the CEO of

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>seat geek Arrival ticket platform. It is no mystery why

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>no other company has significantly penetrated the primary ticketing market.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Major venues in the US know that if they move

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>their primary ticketing business from Ticketmaster, they risk losing revenue

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>they earned from Live Nation concerts. But the president and

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>CFO of Live Nation, Joe Burke, told blamed bots who

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>buy up tickets in large quantities for the pre sale fiasco.

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We knew bots would attack that on sale and planned accordingly.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We were then hit with three times the amount of

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>bot traffic that we'd ever experienced, and for the first

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>time in four hundred verified fan on sales, they came

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>after our verified fan pass password servers as wealth Jen

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>give us the background here. You know, there have been

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>complaints about Live Nation for years, I mean essentially ever

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>since Live Nation acquired Ticketmaster, which vertically integrated the company.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a promoter and now was also a ticket

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>seller and across the board, there have been complaints about

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>abuse of that position. And at the time that Live

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Nation acquire Ticketmaster, it did enter into a consent order

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>basically promising to behave barely and not to discriminate against

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>other ticket sellers that are selling tickets for concerts and

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>events that it's promoting. Well, the Department of Justice loan

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Behold found a bit it wasn't abiding by those terms,

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and when after Live Nation just a couple of years ago,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>again saying hey, you violated these terms, and what they

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>did is they extended a consent order and they kind

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of beefed up some of the terms, and now people

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are saying, hey, they're still not abiding by these terms.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>And the problem at the core of it was you

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the determat of Justice allowed Live Nation to buy Ticketmaster,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's just a big conflict of interest and it's

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>really harms and forecloses other bival ticket sellers, and that's

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And there was this big snap who was

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>selling Taylor Swift tickets for her upcoming tour, and a

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, hey, that's because there's no competition

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>and the systems aren't good enough. Because Live Nation they

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have no incentive to innovate, they have no incentive to

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>try to keep thoughts out, they have no incentive to

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have the best quality technology here, so this process can

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>go smoothly. So this is just an example of why

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>their dominance is a bad thing. Is the Justice Department

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>doing anything about this? Now? We do understand from news

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that the d o J has still another investigation at

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this point of Live Nation ongoing, and that that had

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>started before the whole Taylor Swift fiasco. But you know,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Congress is upset about this too. So the Senate Judiciary

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Committee at hearing and brought in quite a few people

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to testify one from Live Nation, as the rest were

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all various people involved in the industry, promoters, actually somebody

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>from a band was there speaking about the troubles the

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they have in the small piece of the ticket price

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that they actually get, because I think they want to

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>draw attention to this. What can Congress do besides the

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>whole hearings? I mean, Congress can't really do very much,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>but at least what these hearings do is bring out

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>information that's useful for the Department of Justice and then

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also um validates what the Department of Justice is doing

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if they continue to pursue the investigation and then ultimately

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>decided to bring a lawsuit because June, I think at

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this point they have already failed to abide by the

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>consent order one. If it's found that they failed to

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>abide by those terms a second time, I don't think

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a third chance. The third chance

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>will be a lawsuit, and that lawsuit, given this Department

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, could be yet another one where they seek

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the breakup of a company. They could seek to force

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>them to sell ticket Master. I think anyone who's tried

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy tickets online and get stuck in one of

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those cues can relate to this absolutely. Thanks so much, Jen.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Bloomberg Intelligence seen you litigate Ation analyst Jennifer Ree

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>coming up next on the Bloomberg Law Show. The Supreme

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Court's first decision of the term is a blow to veterans.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm June Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg. Texas is

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>leading another lawsuit against the Biden administration over immigration policy.

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas and twenty other Republican led states are suing over

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.119
<v Speaker 1>change in immigration policy that would turn away more migrants

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but still allow three hundred sixty thousand people to legally

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>enter each year from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit accuses the Biden administration of arbitrarily creating recent changes

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and overstepping its authority. Joining me is immigration law expert

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight. Leon, We've

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about this parole program before, but why don't you

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>give us a little recap of what it is. So

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration decided recently that because the border has

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>become very very difficult command in that they would employ

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a new carrots and take approach to the border. The

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sixth part being that if you try to enter illegally

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in between the ports of entry, meaning you try to

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>cross the border illegally, what would happen to that person

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is they would immediately be subject to Title forty two

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>expulsion from the United States. But because that approach was

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>being draconian by a lot of the folks on the

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic side of the aisle, the idea is it would

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>be combined with carrots, which is this parole program, which

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was to say, look, we're going to allow about three

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand people per years, thirty thousand people per months to

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>come in legally from the basic four countries where we're

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of the traffic right now, Cuba, Nicaragua,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela and eighty and that way. It's times that we're

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>rejecting everybody, but we're asking them to come through this

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>legal manner that lessons the burden on our courts of entry.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So now the State of Texas and others are suing

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>over this program, and they say it's you know, the

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>administration has created a kind of visa program without approval

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from Congress, without legislation. Tell us more about the suit.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So the lawsuit is basically saying that the way the

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>parole authority works. And what parole is is it some

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>authority that Congress has conferred upon the President of the

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, whoever president at that time, to admit any

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign naginal if there is what's either called a compelling

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian interest or a significant public benefit for letting that

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>person in. So in the history of the United States,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this program had been used many times for programmatic purposes

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with Cubans, with Vietnam, Cambodia, during the Vietnam War. It

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>has been used many many times. But in the nighties,

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that program got substituted with what we now know as

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the refuge keep program. So the refugee program is the

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>program that Congress intends the president's use on an annual

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>plan basis to say, we're gonna take this many refugees

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>from this place, as many from this place, etcetera. And

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>what parole is is this a program that was changed

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so it would be just for one person at a time. So,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, somebody is having cancer treatment and the the

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>their mother has been denied visas for you know, because

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they think the mother is gonna immigrate to the United States,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so they can't get a visitor visa. But now they say, look,

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I need my mother in because I'm dying, and police

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>letter of visiting while hunting cancer treatment or something, and

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you would parole the mother into the United States in

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that situation. Things like that. And so the point that

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the States are making is you have to keep that

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>on a one on one basis that you can't create

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a memo that basically creates a criteria where people who

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>meet that criteria would be able to apply for a

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>parole program. They think that exceeds the bounds of what

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Congress created in this new parole framework in the center.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Does it sound like they're right, because it sounds like

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>something that Congress should be involved in. I think the

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>issue is going to be twofold. So number one, I

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>think ordinarily you would have a very close on this

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>because the argument that the Biden administration is going to

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>make is, well, this is a significant public benefit to

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do a program like this, because we have two million

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>people crossing our border and if we can end that

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by creating a legal flows to site and this off,

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a massive victory brawl of us. So

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna try to make that argument. The question is

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be how differential the court will be, and

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the court have not been very differential in the last

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>few years to the president. So that's gonna be one problem.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>But the second problem is this new and I'm sure

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you keep talking about it on your show, People keep

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. That made your questions doctrine that came

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out recently in the Supreme Court from the climate change cases,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>which is basically saying, look, whatever there's any major change

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that don't be an administrative action. Then the question is

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that Congress explicitly allow you to do that, And so

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be sort of another issue that may

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>come up here that may make it harder for the

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>administration to win long serve. I do think it will

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be enjoined very quickly at the district court level, because

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they filed it in a location that tends

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to lead towards that, and I do think the Fifth

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Circuit will probably keep the programming joined. And then the

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>question is will the Supreme Court allow this program to

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>actually get implemented. All indications are when it was used

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Ukrainians is that the program does help at

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the border. So is Texas suing you think just to

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sue or I mean, this is sort of the sixty

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>four thousand dollar question, which is looks there are certainly

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>some arguments that can be made on the inflammatory side

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about well, why did you sue when we did this

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>for Ukrainians? Are you suggesting something about that you were

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>okay with it with one psycho population and you're not

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>okay with it with another type of population. There's certainly

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>arguments that people will raise at regard and there's other

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>arguments about, hey, look, why are the States suing? Are

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they cutting up their nose despite their face, Because since

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we know these programs of a track record of success

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of channeling people toward legal immigration and getting them off

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the border, why would they sue? Those are fair questions

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and criticism. You know, I'm not here to launch them

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>or not launched them, just to introduce them to your

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>viewers and let them make their decisions. And so it's

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>unclear policy wise why this would be object stitutins they

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>would relieve pressure on the Texas border. But nevertheless they're

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>just trying to say perhaps that even if this is

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>relieving pressure, they just object to three hundred and sixty

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thou people being allowed legally into the United States that

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been allowed legally, you know a few months ago.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you about one allegation. They say it

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>unlawfully creates a de facto pathway to citizenship. Doesn't do that. Well,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens is it could in sort of a rude

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gold bird imagination for a few of the people in

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the program. And you might say, well, what do I

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>mean by this? Well, what happens is there's a lot

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of people who if they don't have an entry way

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>into the United States, then they can't get a green card.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you cross the border illegally, you can't get

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a green card, even if you marry a U S

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 1>c isen or you have some other citizen relative like

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a sibling or a parent that could petition for you.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But if there are people who need these circumstances, that

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>they have a relative that is able to petition for

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>them under a normal green card system, and the only

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>barrier to entry so far has been that they can't

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>get parolled into the United States, then this parole in

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that small subset of cases could lead to a past

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to citizenship. But it's not going to be all the

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty thousand people, but there will be

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>some number. I don't know what the percentage will be

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that would become Green card holders and eventually US citizens

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because of this program that wouldn't have otherwise had that.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So is that number gonna be one? I think it'll

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be more than one. Will it be all three hundred thousand?

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be much less than that, but it

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>will be some number in between. And the question is,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and people are going to talk about public

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>benefits and other things like that to try to get

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>standing in the court. Then the question is is that

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>all too speculative for the courts to take into a

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>count or can the court take into account this kind

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>of thing where there's a probability you can easily make

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the causal link, but you have no way to predict

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>how many people will be in this group. I want

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to turn to another immigration issue, and that's there are

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>these mass tech layoffs and it's leaving hundreds of workers

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>or maybe more that are living in the US on

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the H one B visas scrambling for jobs. Explain the

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>H one B visa. The H one B visa is

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the primary visa mechanism for skilled workers to enter the

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>United States to work if they copped visa. So there's

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>only sixty five thousand per year, plus additional twenty thousand

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>for people with master's degree. And so there's always a

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lottery there, you hear, because there's about five hundred thousand

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>people who want the visas and only about eighty five thousand,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as I said, get them in total. And so what

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>happens is that you win the off me and you

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>get sezzas. You have to work in a skilled occupation

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>for an employer who is giving you this kind of

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>skilled work. And they are visas that last or two

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>terms of three years. So the most you can be

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on H one B status is six years total and

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>then you either have to go home or an employer

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as the petition for you for a Green card, which

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then extend your say until that green card adjudication continue

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>or is decided. And so now one of the problems

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is that people are on the visas to work at

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>these tech companies, and even worse, if you're from India,

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem is you could be in a backlog waiting

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for a green card for up to thirty forty years.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the way our green card system works is that

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a first come, first served green card system.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>We divide it up for country, and so we say,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of all the green card plots, people from one country

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can only get seven person and of the plot. And

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so India, which has one point four billion people, is

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>limited to the same fourteen thousand green cards employment plots

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that Monaco is limited too. And so from that same point,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Indians have long, long line. And so if they

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get laid off anywhere in this forty year line, suddenly

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they lose their sadus, their spouse loses their sabbus, their kids,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>blues their status and it becomes this humanitarian nightmare. So

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they have only sixty days to find another job. Is

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that a firm? Sixty days? So here's what happens. When

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you are an eight one B visa and you lose

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>your job, another employer can position for you if you

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>meet the criteria to also have h one sabbus as

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bad employer. Now it has to get approved at the

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. In order for you to say so,

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to show that this is a legitimate employer

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>giving you legitimate skills, work at or on. And so

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if it gets approved, then you're fine. Then your problem

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>has been solved. If it does not get approved, then

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is, well, what is the administration gonna do.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to just allow people to remain here illegally?

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna get people some other status, like the

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>third action for them to remain here, and then perhaps

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if they can find an eighth one B job later

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>retroactively approve it's called nuke pro tunk approval, so that

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the approval goes back to where if it had been

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>approved prior to that, they could have kept their status.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>They have that discretion to do that, and so all

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of those decisions are being debated in the administration. But

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the issue. And then you know, people may decide,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is a totally different group than the group

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that comes without status, that they don't want to live

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States without status. But that's too scary,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>too uncertain. They don't want to drive it out a

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>driver's license, because that's not what the folk for doing,

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you folk for making hundreds of thousands of dollars. They

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>had drivers licenses, they had you know, bank accounts and

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>houses and things like this. And that group may not

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>want to live even one day undocumented in the United States.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And so what happened there is you could see a

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people selling their house or moving to Canada,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, doing something like that in that situation.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And so if this problem becomes a protracted problem where

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>people really can't change employers, you might start seeing some

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of that behavior. Just to take the personal element out

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of it for a moment. The reason for these visas

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are that it's supposed to be a program that fills

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>an area where there's a shortage of Americans to work

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>science technology. But now that there have been all these

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>layoffs and a lot of Americans are laid off, should

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this program be an effect at the numbers that it is. Well, so,

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a very interesting point about which VISA does want.

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So the ployment based green card has a test where

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to show an American worker is not available

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to get that green card. The H one

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dvs are actually doesn't have that test. The employer is

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not required to prove that American worker couldn't be found

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>before they hire a foreign worker. They just have to

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>prove that the foreign worker is getting all of the

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>same weight as a benefit that an American would be

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>paid for that job. The other interesting point is that

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>even though these layoffs are occurring, they're occurring within a

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of relatively low unemployment for skill docupations. And so

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, right now, at least

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>anecdotally from my world of clients, but also for the

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>people I talkt to a a lot of the layoffs

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that are occurring are this first much more toward the

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>group that's not really the eighth one beholding group. There

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are some people being laid off, but not in large number.

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But even to the those folks are being laid off

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, there are other places for them to

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>go because of the low unemployment rate in the skilled workforce.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>If this problem were to start to pick up where

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if actually we're seeing an inversion from what we have now.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now we have more job openings and unemployed people

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in these skill in sectors. But if it inverts where

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you start having more unemployment and less job opening and

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the skills suctors, then the kinds of concerns you're talking

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>about certainly can be raised. And look, that's why during

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration, he actually during the COVID period said

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this and put a travel ban on H one B

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>holders and said no more h want to be visa

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to be issued there in COVID because we ate COVID,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but be we're worried about the economic loss of jobs

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that now set the signs to let people in. Would

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>god Biden administration ever do this? Probably not, but it's

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly a tool that now President Trump has used. It

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>has raised the possibility that any president could use it

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this. And employers who want to

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>hire an H one B VISA holder it costs more

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>than hiring a US citizen for the job. Well, so

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the question. There's a lot of criticism on that end. Well,

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe employers are only hiring for IT workers to save wages,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but forgetting about what it costs right now. But right

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>now it costs in fees. It costs about five thousand

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars just in government to filing fees who hire an

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>H one B worker. And that's not even paying a

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyer yet, So you know, it could be between sixteen

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and twenty thousand dollars right now. U s c i

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>s is basically doubling that amount upcoming with their new

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fee rules. So if they end up big thirty thousand

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars to bring in an h one B worker into

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States. When this is all said and done,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, when this new fee schedule gets put in

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>very so and so the idea that you'd hire an

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ant to be to undercut an American starts to become

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>much more unsubstantiated at that kind of feed level. And

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what you really see happening is employers basically doing what

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the National Basketball Association or the National Hockey League is doing,

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>which is what they're just saying is, look, we don't

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>view this marketplace as America or global or anything else.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Just we want the best people. And if we've determined

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that X person is the best person, but they don't

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>happen to be a US citizen, we just want to

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>bring them in, period. And it's not really viewed by

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the way didsue. It's more viewed by them just deciding

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that they want to bring in X or Y person

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's the person they want on their feet. And

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these workers are making a hundred thousand, two

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars. There are some people making six hundred

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars on h mbps. It just depends what type

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of work they're doing and then what type of companies,

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of folks that were making even

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of money. That's not the average, but but

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I certainly know of some clients making that amount of money.

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And what it just comes down to is the marketplace

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and employers in a lot of these markets, they've become

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very talent sensitive, just like affortunately give. So you want

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that top level of talent because it could actually makes

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a product being more successful and less successful.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for being on the show. Leon. That's

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>immigration law expert Leon Fresco, a partner at Hollanden Knight.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember you can always get the latest legal news, honor

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast, slash Law,

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>week night at ten BM Wall Street Time. I'm June

0:34:55.440 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg One