WEBVTT - Episode 10: Critical Race Theory with Vivek Ramaswamy

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Up next, The Truth with Lisa both part of the

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>game critical race theory. We've been hearing a lot about

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the term these days, but what exactly is it? What

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>does it mean? And why should you be worried that

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this poison is infecting American institutions from our education system

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the workplace. Today, I get you all the answers.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>This is The Truth with Lisa Booth. Yea welcome back

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Truth with Lisa Booth. I've got a really

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting show for you guys this week. My guest

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is vivek Rama Swamy. He's an incredibly successful entrepreneur. He's

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>founded multibillion dollar enterprises, led a biotech company CEO, became

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund partner in his twenties, trained as a

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>scientist at Harvard and a lawyer at Yale. Needless to say,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not a dumb guy. The Vega is also the

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>author of the forthcoming book Woke, Inc. Which takes us

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>inside corporate America's social justice scam. It comes out this August,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and after talking to him, I can't wait to read it.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be really interesting. The Vega has

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>lived the American dream. His parents came here from India

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>as immigrants, and he has built something for himself. He

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>knows how unique and amazing America is, and that's why

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he is so concerned about critical race theory infecting America's institutions. Also,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>as an entrepreneur, he knows a thing or two about

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in corporate America today. The Vegue and I

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>discussed critical race theory, this cancer, cancer that is infecting

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>our country. Right now, we're going to discuss the dangers

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of wokeness, his career in business, and so much more.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And with that, I want to welcome the Vague Ramaswami

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to the show The Vegue. Thanks for coming on The

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Truth with Lisa Booth. Thanks for having me. So your

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>parents immigrated from India. How did that shape your childhood

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>growing up? Look? Actually, I was in second grade in

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine three when I actually watched Martin Luther King's

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I Have a Dream speech for the first time. And

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in a certain sense, when I watched that speech, it

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>actually made me think about my parents. That that was

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the one where he said he wanted his kids to

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>grow up in a country where they'd be judged not

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>on the color of their skin, but on the content

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of their character, and as I thought about it in

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the years since then, that was that was really the

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>dream that allowed my own parents to succeed in the

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>way that they had. Right my dad came halfway across

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the world in the late nineties seventies with a thickening accent,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>no dollars in his pocket, and built a career as

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>an engineer at GE in Cincinnati over the course of

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>forty years. My mom was a geriatric psychiatrist who created

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>patients with Alzheimer's disease for her entire career, despite being

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a forg medical graduate. And to me, it was something

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that I took inspiration from and that I definitely couldn't

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do that today. What they did, pack my bags and

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go halfway around the world, go to a different country

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with a different culture, a different surrounding. And by the way,

0:02:58.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in an era where we didn't have an internet, they

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>had to have a loose phone connection. I wouldn't be

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. So in a certain sense, I

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of inspiration from the courage that my

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>parents had in voting with their feet to come to

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a place where they wanted to build a new life.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was also a reminder of what the place

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they came to America was all about, was a place

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>where they could live that dream that I learned about

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>even when I was a young kid, that no matter

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who you are or what the color of your skin is,

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>we now live in a country where you'd be judged

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the content of your character and the content of

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>your accomplishments rather than the color of your skin or

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>where you were born. And and to me, that's part

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of why I was always been partial to the American

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>dream is that it wasn't just something I studied in school.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It was something that my family and I had the

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>privilege of living. But at what point do you think

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this focus at what point do you think that came

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>into focus? I mean, at what point was there a

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>shift or or or when do you think this happened

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the country in terms of just this intense identity

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>politics focus. Yeah. Look, I think that the one of

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful things about the American dream is something that

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we aspire to, right, It's not a

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>destination that we reach. It is a vision that we

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>aspire to, which means we're always gonna fall forward. And

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think for as long as we've overcome the

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>civil rights the civil rights the civil rights movement overcame

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of historical injustices. You know, we were never

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>fully all the way there. And so in the nineties

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>began the birth of critical race theory, the idea that

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>there were these invisible power structures that governed the social universe,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Karl Mark said it in the he

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>thought there were these economic power relationships. There was the

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>emergence of this new academic movement in the nineties, critical

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>race theory and related woke ism that said that actually, no,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not just economic disempowerment's racial disempowerment and bigotry and

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>misogyny and racism that govern our social forces. And this

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is a fringe theory in the academy, and it added

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>something to the marketplace of ideas. It wasn't something that

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I personally subscribed to, but there's always something about a

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>person who wants to challenge the system that I respect,

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not I agree with them. When this really changed,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>actually was an untold story that begins with the two

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>eight financial crisis, when this went from being about challenging

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the system, when wokism actually became the new system itself,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and it was a tricky It was a tricky trade

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>underlying how that happened. But the way it worked was

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>after two corporations were the bad guys. Wall Street was

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the enemy. Corporate power was the target for the old Left,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and what they wanted to do was take money from

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>wealthy corporations and redistributed to poor people. Agree or disagree,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what the old left wanted to do. And something

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>new happened in the post two thousand eight period where

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there was this new left, this new woke left that

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>actually said that now it wasn't really about economic injustice

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or poverty, No, it was about racial injustice and misogyny

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and bigotry. And that actually presented the opportunity of a

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>generation for the most powerful companies in the United States,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>presented an opportunity of generation for Wall Street. Because ocupy

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wall Street's a tough pill to swallow, but this woke

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff was actually pretty easy. And so basically Wall Street

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>jumped on the woke bandwagon, agreed to lend it not

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>only it's money, but it's legitimacy to this new racial

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>identity based movement, and together you've got a bunch of

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>big banks that got together with a bunch of woke

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>millennials together their birth woke capitalism, and then they put

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wall Street up for adoption, and that actually proved

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a really convenient trade that took this nascent

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of wokenness from the halls of the academy and

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>supercharged it with the potency of capitalism. And then once

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wokeness got got in bed with capitalism, that's actually when

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it became unstoppable. And so Silicon Valle did the same thing,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a backroom bargain where they say they're gonna censor content

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>online that the woke movement doesn't want to hear, and

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in return, the woke movement agrees to work with the

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party to leave their monopoly power intact. The rest

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of corporate America started following the same pattern. That's really

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when wokeness became unstoppable, as when it merged with capitalism.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And capitalism is a powerful tool, usually to organize the

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>society's products, services, and economic affairs, but now it's being

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>used to organize society's social affairs to under this guise

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of wokeness. So long story there, but but if you

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted the redux version. That's kind of how it goes. No, I,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's incredibly interesting. And so you've sort of

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>existed though in a lot of these structures where you know,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>wokeisum is so prevalent. Right, So you graduated underground at Harvard,

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you went to Yale law school, you're an entrepreneur, you've

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>existed in the biotech industry. I mean, how much indoctrination

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.679
<v Speaker 1>did you find going on when you went to school

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard and Yale. Well, I actually think it's changed

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot over the last decade. So to be clear,

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and Yale were definitely left leaning places at the

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>point at the point in time where I was there.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you this, Lisas, I actually benefited from it, right.

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I got a better education than most of

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>my peers because I didn't necessarily subscribe to liberal dogma.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And that means you get your views challenge, and I

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>mean sometimes you change your view, and sometimes it means

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that you've come out with your same view, but with

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding of why it is you believe what

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you do, rather than just knowing what it is that

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you believe. So I was actually grateful for it and

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>when I went to Harvard I graduate two seven, I

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>still found it to be a place that was about

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual meritocracy, in the marketplace of ideas, where the

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>best ideas and the best arguments when on their own terms,

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of the background or the color of the skin

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of the person who's making that argument. It was it

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was definitely tilted in one direction. But I actually do

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that is tilted in my favor in that by being

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the intellectual minority, actually got a better education out

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think things changed dramatically over the decade.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Over the last decade, I do not think that's the

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>intellectual environment at Harvard today. It is definitely not the

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>intellectual environment at Yale today. And now what you say

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is merged with your identity that somebody can't evaluate your

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas without also evaluating the other inherited attributes that you

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>were born with, your race, your gender, your sexual orientation.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was this bizarre move intellectual move over the

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>worse of the last few years, where race actually meant

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>something that went even beyond the color of your skin.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Ianna Pressley, remember the Squad, summed it up actually pretty

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>well last year when she said we don't want any

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>more black faces that don't want to be black voices.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't want any more brown faces that don't want

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to be brown voices. The side note, I definitely don't

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>fit her description of what counts as a brown voice,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that I have brown skin. But to

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be being brown or being black was always about a

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>skin color, not about a voice. And so now that

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>created the opportunity to say that actually, there's such a

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>thing as a black voice and a brown voice. And

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>now it's just one step further to say that if

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you then disagree with any of those claims, that actually

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>means you're racist, not in the conventional sense that we

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think of racism is discriminating on a basis skin color,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but now racism as disagreeing with a dogma, even in

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>good faith, in the spirit of open debate. And that's

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>really what chilled open debate in this country and set

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>set in this new era, righted in this new era

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of fear that has supplanted our original culture of free

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>speech and open debate. And the irony and all of

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this is that in the name of diversity, we've then

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sacrificed true diversity of thought, including at our leading universities.

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it firsthand. In the name of democracy, democracy

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is not just about casting some valid every November. In

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the name of democracy, we've actually sacrificed our most important

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>democratic ideals of free speech and open debate. And in

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the name of inclusion, including in our educational institutions, we've

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>created this new exclusionary culture or certain points of view

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>just aren't welcome. And so you know, for me, I'm

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>writing this book I told you about, I'm not doing

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it as a journalist that's reporting on my findings. I

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>consider myself actually to be something more of a whistleblower.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Having been in elite I releague institutions, having been in

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>elite hedge funds, and then started a Company's a number

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of companies that have en venture backed and successful in

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the worlds of New York finance to Silicon Valley to biotech.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had firsthand experiences that made me compel to say

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that somebody needs to speak up, not from the outside

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>looking in, but from the inside looking out to really

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>reveal the heart of what's going on, because we're gonna

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>need a better way forward. But in order to for

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you better way forward, we're gonna first need to understand

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the essence of the problem that has really taken a

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>chokehold of all of our major institutions in the private sector,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>not just corporate America, but nonprofits, museums, philanthropies, universities, educational institutions,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and then of course the government itself well. And as

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you just laid out, and as I laid out in

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>the intro of the show, and as our listeners, no,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you've accomplished. I was telling you earlier

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and we were talking. I was telling you about some

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of the things I was working on. I feel lazy

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in comparison. You've accomplished so much at your age. But

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you've mentioned, you're a hedge fund partner

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in your twenties, founded multibillion dollar enterprises. Let you lead

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a biotech company. You're on Forbes America's Riches Entrepreneurs Under

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>forty list. I've not made the list. I'm thirty six,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>so maybe I have a couple of years. But you've

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>accomplished a lot, and lately, you know, you've been vocal

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>about this topic. You're writing a book, Woking, which is

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>out auguste Why what what compelled you? Why did you

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>feel because obviously there's a level of risk. There's always

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a level of risk in speaking out for you know,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly uh for you and you know, with companies and

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with your work. Why why did you speak out? Yeah, Look,

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I felt some sense of obligation to do it. I

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>actually consider this my form of public service, at least

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in the near term, because I told you about it

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning. It's near and near to my heart,

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the American dream, because I've lived it right. I've gone

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in a single generation from being the kid of immigrant

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>who came to this country with literally no money forty

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago to becoming the founder of multibillion dollar companies,

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>including one that's going public this year for over seven

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in a single generation. That was the dream

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to live. And you know, as

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I let a company a CEO for seven years, I

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>developed medicines for a number of diseases, probably the one

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm most proud of as a drug for the treatment

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of prostate cancer. But at the end of the day,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a new cancer that even the best of

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>science wasn't going to address. It was a cultural cancer,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not a biological cancer, and it was a cancer that

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>threatened to kill that dream that I really cared about,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was, of course the cancer that I that

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we all call woke culture. And I basically think the

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>essence of woke culture is that it's about waking us

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>up from the American dream. And that's what happened over

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last decade. We woke up. And

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem when you wake up from a dream is

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it pretty soon you forget what it was doing about.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You might remember how it felt to be in it,

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and let enough time pass, you forget how how it

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>felt to be in the dream too, And that's the

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>phase that I think we're in. I don't think it's

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>irreversible quite yet. I think that if the tens were

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about celebrating our diversity and our differences, at nauseum, in

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, ought to be about reviving our shared sense

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about who we are as a people. But like I said,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you only get a little bit of time once you've

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>woken up from a dream to go back to remembering

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what it was all about. And I think that's the

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>period that we're in. So I felt some sense of

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>urgency to be able to speak out actually to make

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough decision earlier this year, when I stepped

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>down as CEO of my company to do it. I

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do think that when a lot of left leaning ceo

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is like Mark Benioff or whoever write books about their

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>own politics, it tends to help their businesses. But the

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>reality of the world we live in is that that

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>standard isn't applied evenly. And it was really important for

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>me to practice what I preached by the way I

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>think business and politics should be kept apart. I definitely

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>uh endeavored to never use the business to foist my

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>political views on anyone. I was always only speaking up

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>as a citizen, But as I really entered the public

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>sphere with the book and a lot of other initiatives

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on, I wanted to practice what I preached,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in order to really protect the company's

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>voice as separate from my own, I stepped down as

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from my role as CEO, so I could really speak

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not as a CEO but as a citizen. But the

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>flip side of that is I'm going to speak with

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>candor in an unvarnished way, and I really lay out

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the book that's probably gonna take a

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people by surprise that is going to leave

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>me with fewer friends at elite ski conferences and fancy

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>ski towns that I might have otherwise had. But I

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do think that that's the kind of sacrifice that people

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in my position are gonna have to be willing to

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>make if we're going to turn this cultural tide. So

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it was the least that I could do. Can you

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>give us a highlight from that? I mean, now you

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>piqued my interest? Yeah, well, um, well, look it's it's

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the final stages of being touched up in a

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>books available for pre order now. It comes out mid August.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, look I talked a little bit about

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some of my experiences in in you know, seeing this firsthand,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and I guess, having been the CEO of a company,

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>actually am and really actually pretty sympathetic to the younger

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>generation of workers who want to join a company who

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>does more than just print a buck by making products

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that matter. In fact, that was part of our pitch

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as a biotech company, is that you don't want to

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be part of a generation that's just looking at turning

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of cash into a bigger wad

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of cash by going to All Street. And I, by

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, I've done that or tonangement for a while,

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Or you don't really want to be programming an app

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to click one millisecond faster on some

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>guy with a mustache, on an app that disappears via

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>text message. Whatever it is. You want to be applying

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>your talents to something that matters. Come do it at

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a place that allows you to make medicines or patients

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>who need them by fixing a broken industry. So that

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was actually one of the pitches for recruiting employees early

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the early days of when I even started my

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>company back. So I think that it's a good thing

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>when capitalism works by making products that matter for people

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>who really need them. Where I think it goes awry

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of these businesses espouse social values that have

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with their businesses as a way of

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>signaling their virtue, but in ways that actually serve as

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a distraction from the essence of what those businesses ought

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be about, not just for themselves, but a distraction

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for our democracy. And I guess one of the things

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about in the book is some of

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>my experiences in dealing with the next generation of talent.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Right if from a millennial, you know, the gen Z

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>talent pool, looking to enter the workforce. One of the

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>things I've learned is they're actually really hungry for a cause,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>hungry for a sense of purpose, if I may say it,

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>hungry for identity. And I think we live in a

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>moment where we have to recognize that, you know, religion

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>has nearly disappeared, Patriotism is on the decline, and human beings,

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>especially young human beings, are hungry for a cause. And

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that black hole, that vacuum for purpose and identity and meaning,

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's actually the void that wokeness is filling. It's become

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of the modern opioid for the masses. And

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that that has our work cut out for

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>us in fighting this, not to not to just go superficially,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as many on the right seemed prone to do and

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>countering wokenness, but rather to do the harder work of

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding a shared vision of not only what it means

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a conservative, but what it means to be

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>an American, which we lack a good answer to that

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>question today. I think rebuilding that answer and revising a

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>new brand of Americanism as that same sense of shared

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>purpose could actually be the cultural cure that we need.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I talked about in the

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>book and some of my first stand experience is the

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>first becoming really frustrated and sort of wringing my hands

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the air with what exactly happened over the last

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years that allowed our private sector to become as

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>defeat as it has with respect to the pursuit of

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these flimsy social causes and values, to really reflecting more

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>deeply on the fact that actually a lot of these people,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and I probably grew more sympathetic to it because many

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of them have worked for me over time, are really

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>well motivated, talented if they're given the right mission, even

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hard working people, but who need to have their hunger

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for purpose and hunger for change, and hunger for identity

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and hunger for a cause satisfied with the cause. That's

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>far more meaningful than the skin deep attributes that corporations

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and elite institutions are selling them today. I think the

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of Virginia Slims advertising the insecure teenagers back in

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the that's effectively what war corporations are doing today to

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of Americans. But what impact does it

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>have on companies in the sense, you know, one of

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest things I hear from a lot of people

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in corporate America is there's just this intense, intense desire.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's all about diversity. Diversity, you know, skin color, meeting quotas, etcetera.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>What impact does it have on a company when that's

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the focus versus just a meritocracy who's best for the

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>job regardless of their skin color? And and also that's

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of belittling to think that someone can't the job

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>based off of you know, meritocracy and just based off

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, skill sets, and it has to be

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>focused purely on race. I agree with you. I mean,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at United Airlines in the last month,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, said that the pilots in the cockpit had

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to be women or persons of color by the way,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>an expression that I detest, taking a hundred fifty cultures

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and lumping them into one new culture, which we call

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of color. But anyway, so they said women are people

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of color in the cockpit, had even if that meant

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>throwing out the tests that they used to use to

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>test for the competence of their pilots, and that reveals

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the essence of what's going on is today, in the

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>name of diversity, we have actually sacrificed excellence itself, the

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of excellence. And you know, make no mistake, I

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>think diversity is a good thing. Diversity of thought is

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what it's supposed to be about. And I think diversity

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of thought is a means to the end of achieving excellence.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>But now, in the name of diversity, we have sacrificed

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>both diversity of thought as well as our pursuit of excellence.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's how it impacts our companies.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's how it impacts are our educational institutions.

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's a separate impact to which is in

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the other direction, which I think is maybe even more important.

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Is not just the way in which these new political

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>values infect private enterprises to operate less efficiently than they

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would, which is a real problem, but Milton Friedman

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>could have told you about that fifty years ago when

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>he wrote his first critique of stakehold capitalism. In No,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the problem today is actually perhaps even greater in the

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>other direction, the way in which woke businesses are actually

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>infecting American democracy. And that's actually what makes me even

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>more worried, not as a CEO or a leader of

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>former CEO, or a leader of a business, but as

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>an American citizen worried about corporate overreach where we're actually

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>creating a modern version of old world Europe, where a

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>small group of institutional elites get in the back room

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>deal determining what the common ideals for society ought to be,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>when in fact, America was supposed to be a rejection

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of corporatism, a rejection of corporate ocracy, to create a

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>world in which, on our most important moral questions we

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>decided on the basis of a one vote, one person,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one vote system rather than a one dollar, one vote system.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's actually the more most dangerous trend

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of all, where corporations become the new moral arbiters. We

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>then effectively live in a one dollar, one vote system

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>where corporations use their market power to actually influence the

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>marketplace of ideas. And that's something that really concerns me

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>this year when you see you know, Major League Baseball

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>leaving Atlanta in protests over a new voting law in Georgia.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>These used to be the a political institutions that brought

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>us together, irrespective of whether we were democratic republican, and

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of whether we were black or white, we could

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>still get together in an a political space like a

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball stadium and come together. And the foundation for democracy

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on actually certain common spaces where we could all

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>come together that are a political And I'm worried that

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we're actually, in the name of protecting democracy in the

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>case of Georgia voting law, we're actually eroting the true

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>foundation for democracy itself in terms of the real free

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>speech and open debate, where every citizen's always actually counts equally,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than some corporation having a special say. How do

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you reign that in? Though? Yeah, So I talked about

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>some legal solutions in the book that I think, in

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the short term are pretty important. Um, how technical do you?

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>How technical are you open to getting? Least because I

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>could I could lay a couple No, I mean, I'm

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a nerd. So I like it. Okay, so so,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna go on, and you're gonna have to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>stop me. But but let me, let me, let me

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>give you a Let me give you a couple simple

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>legal solutions, all right. The simplest one is that I

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think we need to add political belief as a protected

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>class right up next to race, sex, sexual orientation post

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Bostock last year, the Supreme Court ruling in that case

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in religion in the Title seven of the Civil Rights Act,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no good reason why a corporation should be able

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to fire someone for their political belief when they can't

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>fire them for their religious belief, for their race, or

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>their sex. And my own view is that the last

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>thing we would want to do in general is to

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>apply another constraint to what private businesses can can't do.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the libertarian side of my brain says, that's what

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I would have told you ten years ago. But my

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>general view today is in the legal code, you can't

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>have it both ways. Where we say we don't trust

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the market to police certain forms of discrimination, but we

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>unquestioningly trust the market to police other forms of discrimination.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>And the punchline is, if you can't fire somebody from

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>their job just because they're black or Muslim or gay,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or you can't d platform somebody because they're brown or Muslim,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are gay or whatever, then you shouldn't be able to

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>fire them or de platform them just because they're an

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>outspoken conservative either, and that's not a theoretical issue anymore.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>If it can happen to the forty president of the

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>United States, it can happen to anybody. So so those

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of some of the kinds of solutions

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I talked about in the book, generally of the of

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the mold that you can't have it both ways. Political

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>belief as a as a protected class alongside the other

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>protected classes Section to thirty Reform by the way, which

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>says that actually normal private companies ought to be a

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to determine what shows up on their websites and what doesn't.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, But the private companies today that

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are doing it in Silicon Valley are effectively acting as

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>instruments of the state. Because if you notice, this has

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>actually gone up a lot over the course of the

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>last year after Democrats took control of not only the House,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but then the Senate and then the White House, and

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they call these companies up to testify every few months,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and they say, hey, if you don't take down hate speech,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and you don't take down misinformation, and you don't take

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>down content that we, by the way, disagree with, as

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in Washington, d C. Then we're gonna come after you.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna regulate you, we're gonna break you up, we're

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it swift, we're gonna make it punitive. And

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so these guys get back on their private jets, fly

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the other coast and do exactly what their

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>government overlords told them to do. But the problem with

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that is it's just a reverse form of chrony capitalism,

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>where government agents today are doing indirectly through the back door,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>using private companies to accomplish what they directly can't do

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>under the Constitution, namely under the First Amendment. And so

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>my view is, if you find yourself in a situation

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>today when private companies are being used as pawns, especially

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>by this new administration, to do indirectly what government could

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not directly do through the front door, then those private companies,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're engaging in those narrow sets of activities, should

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be bound by the same constraints as the federal government itself.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, in the case of big Tech and

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and all internet companies, by the way, there's Section to

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty immunity to give them live freedom from state liability

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>when they go out and do exactly that. So my

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>own view is that again, you can't have it both ways.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Either you're a private company that behaves as a private

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>company does, or if you're operating a behest of liberals

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>in control as the party in power, and by the way,

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you're immunized by section to immunity to do it. Then

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you can opt into getting that federal immunity, but if

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you do, you're bound by the same constraints as the

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>federal government itself, namely the U. S Constitution and the

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment. So those are some of the bigger picture ideas.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I can also get into some granular ideas relating to

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the business Judgment rule relating to rollbacks unlimited less shareholder

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>liability for a lot of these woke capitalists or woke

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>investors that are using corporations as pawns to advance their

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>social agendas, that in my opinion, is actually an abuse

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the corporate form and abuse of limited liability that

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we ought to police. On the flip side, I think

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>when their CEOs who are gone rogue and are are

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ultimately using shareholder resources to advance social goals, there's right

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now are legal doctrine that protects them called the Business

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Judgment rule which says that executives can't be sued for

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>making good business judgments. That should only apply in so

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>far as they're actually making business judgments, not social judgments.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>And shareholders should be able to ultimately bring suit against

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>executives who have gone rogue in using their seats of

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>power and a corporation to be able to push their

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>own personal values. So those are the kind of solutions

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I talk about in the book that get uh severally

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>more and more technical, but I go from you know,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all the ways in the big picture ideas down to

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some regular ideas that can I think, stop woke capitalism

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as we know it in its tracks. But at least

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, I will be the

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>first person to say that still these legal solutions are

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>really just a form of symptomatic therapy. As I said earlier,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what we really need is a cultural cure, a new

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>vision of what it actually the means to be an

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>American irrespective of the color of your skin, or your race,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or your gender, your sexual orientation, in a way that

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a way that really dilutes woke ism

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to irrelevance. And that's actually gonna be even harder work

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>than implementing some of these legal solutions. But in the

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>short term, I do think we're in a bit of

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>an emergency here. We do need some legal solutions to

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at least serve as that symptomatic therapy the vehic. Let's

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>hold it right there. We got to take a quick break.

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's say I get fired for being conservative? What can

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I do now about it? From a legal perspective? So so, actually,

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you bring up a really good point. My ideal fix

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in most of these cases would be a statutory fix

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>amending Title seven a Civil Rights Act, amending section two thirds.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That would also take Yeah, I guess what I'm trying

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to get at is what is available now under the

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>law for recourse. Actually, you bring up a really good point.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think people can bring legal action now in federal court.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the big text censorship example first, and then

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to the woke employee firings, uh, the world

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>corporations firing right wing employees in a second. So let's

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the big text censorship. Actually, there is good

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court case law today which actually says the obvious

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what you would expect it to say, that the government

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>cannot deputize private actors to do indirectly what the government

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is prohibited from doing under the Constitution. There's a great case,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it's called Bantam Books from from the nineties sixties, I believe,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>where there was a bookstore owner that wanted to sell

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of books and there was a local prosecutor

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that didn't want him. They didn't like one of the

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 1>books that he was selling, and so he came to

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the bookstore owner and he said, you know what, if

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't stop selling these books, I'm gonna come after

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you and I'm gonna prosecute you so for some other

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>unrelated crime. So the books are owner, of course, came

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to the pressure and stopped selling the book. Well, somebody

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>else wanted to buy the book, and they brought the

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>case and they said, hey, I know, you're a bookstore

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>owner and normally you can choose what book you sell

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and what book you don't. But this wasn't a bookstore

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>owner making that decision as a proprietor. It was actually

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>state act in the guard of private enterprise. And you

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, they won that case which said that actually,

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>if the bookstorer was just responding to a threat from

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor, who's really a public figure. Then actually the

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that we have is state action that ought to

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>be governed by the First Amendment, and so that's actually

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just one example among many, But there's good Supreme Court

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doctrine on this. I actually made an argument to this

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>effect in the Wall Street Journal in January of this year,

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm proud to say that that argument was referenced

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by Clarence Thomas in a recent opinion that he wrote.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's actually thrown the gauntlet inviting the right

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>plaintiff to bring that case personally. I think one of

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>those planets could be President Donald Trump himself bringing potentially

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the iconic case of our time, saying that actually what

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter did in the platforming him was actually

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a version of political censorship that might be allowed if

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>these were operating as normal private companies. But if they're

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it as instruments of the state of the party

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in power, responsive to their threats, and by the way,

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>immunized by the federal government in the former Section to

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty to do it, then that's actually just a federal

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>carrot and stick that makes this state like action in

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the mantle of private enterprise, which still means that the

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment applies, and so I personally think at President

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump could bring that case and take it all the

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>way to the real Supreme Court, not the fake sham

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook corporate Supreme Court thing that we heard about last week,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but the real US Supreme Court and have a pretty

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>good legal grounds to be able to win. And I

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think Clarence Thomas has already you know, played his cards

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about where he's coming out on that

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>set of issues. I'd be interesting seeing where the rest

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of the justices come out as well. But I think

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be the iconic defining case of our time

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's on big tech answorship. Think he hasn't well look,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't. I don't know him, uh, and

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't really speak to that, but I think that

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>if I were in his shoes, I would be bringing

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that case absolutely, and I wouldn't be doing it for myself.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>He could presumably start a media network of his own,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>he has access to be able to get his opinions

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out to the American people if he wants to. I

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would do it on behalf of the people that don't

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoy that position of authority that he might enjoy that

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 1>position of accessing the American people through other means. This

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is happening every day where people who are being d

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>platformed aren't the people who actually have alternative networks that

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they could go on. There are people whose voice has

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>literally been suppressed because they are forced to choose between

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendment and the American Dream, between speaking up

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and saying what they actually believe and keeping their job

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and putting food on the dinner table. And to me,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>America is not a place that makes you to choose

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>between the First Amendment and American Dream. You get to

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have both. And so if I were President Trump, I

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think that one of the most impactful things that he

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>could do is to bring that case in. If I

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>were him, I would say, you know what, once I

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.239
<v Speaker 1>get my account restored, which should be the damages here,

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to make any money off this. I'm

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna leave the network voluntarily. But I'm doing this

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of people who don't have the privilege and

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>position that I do to be able to reach people

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in a different way because this is actually a defining

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.239
<v Speaker 1>issue of free speech in our time. So whether it's

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>him or whether it's somebody else, has beend platform for

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the wrong reason. I think that this theory of combining

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>state action with the actions of private companies is a

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.239
<v Speaker 1>winning legal theory in my opinion that could go all

0:31:58.280 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the way to the Supreme Court. So that's on big

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>text sworship. I can give you a separate one, Lisa,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>where I think employees who are fired for their political

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>beliefs also have a legal theory that they could bring

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>under current existing legal doctorates too, which is again using

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court jurisprudence about religion. So, according to Title seven

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Civil Rights Act, you can't discriminate on the

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>basis of religious beliefs. And usually people think about that

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as meaning, correctly, you can't discriminate against an employee for

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>their religion, you can't fire an employee for belonging to

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain religion. But often forgotten is that it equally

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>means that an employer can't enforce their religion and force

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it down the throats of their employees. They can't force

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>them to bow down to a cross, they can't force

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>them to pray to the pray on behalf of the

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Koran or whatever. And guess what. That then raises the

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>question of whether wokeness today meets the legal standard for

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a religion, and I think if you look at the

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>core tenets of wokeness today in the United States, it

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>meets the Supreme Courts test in space. Supreme Courts actually

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>even said that's secular humanism counts as a religion. It

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>said that well in in a funny case a number

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, a religion called Creativity, in my opinion,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a rather goofy religion which says that white supremacy is

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>its guiding principle, where what is good for white people

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately what achieves you salvation, and what is bad

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for white people is ultimately a form of sin. It's

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not a religion I subscribe to, but it's definitely a

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>religion in the case of the Supreme Court, in a

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>case called Peterson that the Supreme Court heard, which said

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that this religion, professing white supremacy is its coretenant, counted

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as a religion for the purpose of Title seven. If

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy counts as a religion, then anti white supremacy,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which is welcomes today, counts as a religion too. And

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>employers can't, like Disney for example, just see what we

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>saw last week, can't force that religion down the throats

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of their employees any more than they could force any

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>other religion down the throats of their employees as well.

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I too think that is a well grounded,

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>legally well founded case that any employee who's fired for

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>their political beliefs can really take all the way to

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. And I think the Supreme Court would

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>likely saw with this on the side of the correct plane,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>if that the facts were correct, and that could be

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>done even without Republicans doing what I think Republicans ought

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to do, which is step up and amend the Civil

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act nineteen four by adding political belief as a

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>protected class. If they fall short of doing that, as

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>as I think Republicans are prone to do, you know,

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still legal action available in the courts. But I

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guess my concern is if conservatives are awake enough because

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I look at, you know, as you're talking about with

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some of this critical race theory and what's happening in

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>corporations and the rest of America that you know, time

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is of the essence. You look at the past few

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>months with COVID lockdowns and the authoritarian nature of the

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>left just shutting down businesses, denying people the opportunity to

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>go to church to worship, deciding who gets to exercise

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>their First Amendment rights and who doesn't. It's fine to

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>go out in protest among thousands, but you can't go

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to church, or there's limitations on how many people can go. Uh.

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, on on top of it, you

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>look at some of these things that the left wants

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with, you know, HR one, etcetera. Uh, And

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>then you look at what happened to President Trump, as

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, getting kicked off of social media, certain

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>banks not doing business with him, etcetera. But I guess

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel to me that people are awake enough

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at collectively all these different things I've mentioned, or

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>even looking the muted reaction to President Trump getting kicked

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>off Twitter, like, it doesn't seem like conservatives are as

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>weak as they need to for the fight that's ahead

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of us. Well, I think the Republican Party is not

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>awake to it that much. I can say for sure

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in that we are we I say we. I don't

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I have self identified now as conservative. I don't even

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>really identify as a Republican. I don't know what I

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>always have. But you know, more But but I think

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans appeared to be not really well cut to that

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>task today because they're shackled by the dogmas of nineteen

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty where Ronald Reagan, by the way, one of my heroes,

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>identified the real threat to liberty and prosperity in his era,

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>which was big government, and he came in and slashed regulations,

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>cut taxes, did what he needed to do to protect

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>American liberty and prosperity from the biggest threat of his

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>day in nineteen eighty. But as Dorothy might have said

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to Tote in the Wizard of Us, we're not in

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>night anymore. And actually another great to quote another great

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Republican from a hundred six years ago, if I may

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Abraham Lincoln, the dogmas of a quiet past, he's that

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>at the time are inadequate to the stormy present. I

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think the dogmas of eight are inadequate to meet the

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>challenges of one. And the free market that we idealize

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as conservatives, we have to recognized that that does not

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>exist today. The new market that exists is actually a

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>figment of other actors who are manipulating that market to

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>meet their own goals, including big government itself. In ways

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that I described earlier, and so the solutions that we

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>need in the twenty one century in the year are

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>different than just reciting some slogan that we memorized in

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty. We need actual solutions that meet the moment

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>of where we are today now. I don't think that

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>everyday conservatives are blind to that. I do think that

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they're disempowered right now to be able to fight back

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>against this movement. Because the legal system is stacked certain

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>protect certain classes are protected. You can't discriminate the basis

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of a whole range of criteria, but you can discriminate

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of your political belief and today that

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>means if you're a conservative, you have to send your

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.479
<v Speaker 1>kids to the public schools and accept a certain dogma

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's where they got to be educated. But public

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>schools have been completely overrun by this new infectious religion.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a secular religion, but religion nonetheless that's been established

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>as the religion that's ultimately being indoctrinated. Think that our

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>kids are being indoctrinated by so I think that they're

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>disempowered to be able to address it. I think it

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is the job of a leading political party in our

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>country to at least be at the forefront of that debate.

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:32.919
<v Speaker 1>But I think the problem with the current Republican Party

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is it doesn't really understand the issues, or if it

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>understands the issues, is dormant in dealing with them. And

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>what we really need is a new north star for

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the conservative movement that recognizes that the real enemy to

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>liberty and prosperity today is not just big government that

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is half the equation, but it is this new hybrid

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>of big government in big business. It's what I call

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Wolke industrial complex. That is the new leviathan that

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>is far more powerful than what Thomas Hobbs and vision

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>four centuries and it is far more powerful than what

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>either big government or big business could do alone. They've

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>entered into a marriage. It's an unholy alliance. It is

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not a marriage of love, by the way, it's a

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>marriage of convenience. It is more like mutual prostitution. But

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they have together birth this new, uniquely twenty one century

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>monster that's far more powerful than anything we've seen in

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the course of American history. And it is up to

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the conservative movement to step up and recognize that. And

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Republican Party has proven itself up

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to that task. But I do think that that our

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>work is cut out for us in the next couple

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of years, because I do think we're in an era,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as I said in the very beginning, where if we

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>don't take action pretty soon, the damage is going to

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>become irreversible. Well, and the arty is the stupidity of

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the direction or country is heading in. And we're a

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these quote unquote anti racists are the racists themselves.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the idea is blatantly just disgusting, the concept

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that somehow minority kids can't do math, so somehow you

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have to dumb it down for them. That's inherently racist.

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Or you've got companies like or you've got companies like Disney,

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>uh telling employees to recognize their white privilege. That's inherently racist.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 1>And so the irony of where we've arrived is all

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>these people who are you know, quote unquote putting them

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in the anti racist bucket, are actually just a bunch

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of racists. Well, I think anti racism, LISA is the

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>single greatest form of institutionalized systemic racism now in the

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>United States has taken hold of every major institution as

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>we know it, and it starts as this form of

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>anti white racism. You put your finger on it where

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're white, you're inherently stained with the guilt,

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 1>white guilt and white privilege at the point of your birth,

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of who you are, what your attitudes are. But

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't stop there, because once you engage in that

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>form of anti white racism, that actually triggers a new

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>wave of anti black racism in response, and then that

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>actually breaks us into tribes and ultimately sets us on

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a spiral all the way to the bottom. And so

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the name of anti racism, we're actually becoming a

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>more racist country in a way that makes me makes

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>me sad. Actually, as I watched this every day pollute

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the minds of our next generation. We say math is

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>racist because there's somehow racially unequal outcomes. Math isn't racist.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you what might be is failing to

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:05.919
<v Speaker 1>open the schools for poor kids in the inner city

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who may not be able to learn math in schools.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about whether that's racist, and that actually

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>reveals the heart of what's going on, which is using

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this mantle of wokeness as a way to deflect accountability

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for failed policies that were supposedly helping the very they

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to help, the very people that they're failing today. Now,

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta you brought up Disney, and I would be

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I didn't comment on this too, because I

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that that a lot of us have missed,

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which is that there's another actor on the scene in

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>recent years that took this unholy alliance right between big

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>business and big government, and if I may say, it

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>turned into a threesome. And that new actor is the

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party of China. Right. They understand this game far

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>more deeply than any of us do. There's a there's

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an even a Chinese word now for woke white people

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. It's called bite school literally refers

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to woke white people in the United States, and they

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>use it to laugh at us. And more than laughing

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at us, they're now using wokeism as a geopolitical tool

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to erode our moral standing on the global stage. And

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>if you have any doubt about that, I encourage you

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to just look at what they are saying at every

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic meeting over the last year. Last year, the EU

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 1>presses Jin Ping on the weaker human rights crisis, where

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we're talking about a million weakers in

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>concentration camps, who, by the way, Apple uses a slave

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>labor to make their iPhones, and they don't tell you

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's a separate point. The first thing that Jan

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Think says in response is that black lives matter, so

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that the United States is no better. And then you

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>look at his deputy, Yang jh their top diplomat, comes

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to the Alaska summit last month and lectures us in

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this opening statements of fifteen minutes on how the United

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>States is his word, slaughtering black Americans and that China

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>hey help with the China hopes that the United States

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>does better on human rights and that would be laughable.

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:51.959
<v Speaker 1>But you ask yourself how they're able to get away

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with this, and it comes back to companies like Disney. Actually, no,

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you how. Where Disney criticizes white privilege in

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>its training for him ways this month two years ago,

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it says it can't film in the state of Georgia

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if Georgia passes the equivalent of a heartbeat bill in

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>new anti abortion law. And yet last year, it films

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Mulan in the Shanjang Province of China without saying a peep.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>That is ground zero, the epicenter of the weaker human

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rights crisis until the very end they decided to speak

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up after they filmed it, when they said, we thank

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you the CCP and the local authorities in shan Jang

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for allowing us the privilege of filming here. And you know,

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the NBA is even worse so when these corporations become

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the new multinational moral arbiters, but apply their moral arbitration unevenly.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>The guys who are known for criticizing injustice here in

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States stay silent in China. That actually creates

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a false moral equivalence between Chinese nihilism and American idealism,

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>between China and the United States. And in my view,

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that's actually the real Chinese virus that we need to fight.

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It is not a biological virus. It is a cultural

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:57.959
<v Speaker 1>virus whose consequences could be far reaching, far beyond this year.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think few people on both sides of the

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>political aisle have actually put their finger on this pulse

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the way in which woke ism is now not

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just infecting capitalism, it's infecting geopolitics in a way that

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>actually might erode our standing visa EA China and even

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in more limited ways visa be Russia. You saw Navalny

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>being accused by Russia of being a racist, and that's

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>why he actually had to be silenced. They're catching onto

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>these new tools and playing it back against US China.

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're playing us like a Chinese mandolin, if

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm to say it, by using those woke values as

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a way of advancing their own agenda at our expense.

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So that thought quick break back on the other side.

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>My favorite line from if you remember the monologue that

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Gervais did. I think it was a Golden Globes

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, if Isis started a streaming service,

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you would call your agents, which is really underscores what

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>hypocrites all these people are. As you just laid out

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with corporate America, we saw with the NBA. You know,

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the list goes on, movies, etcetera. You know, they're all

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of hypocrites. But but I think you know,

0:43:58.080 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and having this conversation with you, and I have every

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 1>only had conversations with Maximo Alvera is a Cuban exile,

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to all come down to communism. And

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you look at critical race theory, it's a Marxist idea

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and it really all comes down to communism. And one

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know, he was talking about is how

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, communist government. What they wanted to do

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was to put you know, farmers against you know, people

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that live in the city pitt the city city dwellers

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>against the farmers, rich first, poor poor verse, Uh, you know,

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>rich right first, but you know, I mean, the list

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>goes on, and it's all about creating these divisions in America.

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>It seems that's where we are right now. I think

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's truth in what you say. If it's

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>even worse, I think this is worse than communism. And

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason is communism was based in the intellectual heritage

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of Marxism, where agree with it or not and I

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>don't but agree with it or not. At least it

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was based on the foundation of economic injustice that you

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if you were economically disempowered, that was the real injustice.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't so much about the color of your skin.

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You could bring people together across different nationalities, across different

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>skin colors. If you remember the proletariat, you were oppressed

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by the bourgeoisie, and it was a divide and conquered strategy.

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>To be sure, it was one that was based on

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a lie of invisible social power structures that didn't really exist.

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But we're used by communist dictators to be able to

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.720
<v Speaker 1>use those so called invisible power structures to their own advantage.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot wrong with it, but we don't need

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to relitigate that that was done in ninety eighty. I

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think that and and ultimately culminating in the fallow, the fallow,

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the wall in the early nineties. But this is worse

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because now it's not really about even economic injustice, but

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's about this new conception of alleged racial injustice, which

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>says that irrespective of the amount of money you have,

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of your upbringing, if you're black, you're inherently disadmanaged,

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and irrespective of your upbringing, whether you were poor or not,

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're white, you're inherently privileged. And to me, there's

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>something even more toxic about that philosophy, which says that

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it is what you were born with. It it's a

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>combination of it's a mutant hybrid between communism and the

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>task syst which says that actually your economics, your long

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>run plight as an agent in the world, is determined

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not even by your economics standings, but by your genetics,

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>by who you were on the date that you were born.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You are a per prisoner of the color of your skin.

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>That's really at the heart of modern critical race theory

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and woke ism, which I think bears a lot of

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>similarities to Marxism, but I think it's even worse because

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it combines it with this notion of inborn caste, where

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at least in the Marxist world view, somebody who was

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>poor could go on to become a member of the

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>rich bourgeoisie class, and there was some notion of mobility,

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>even if it was divisive. Here, this says that no

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>matter how rich you are, you could be a black billionaire,

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you're still ultimately you're ultimately stained with disadvantage versus poor

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 1>white working class in the opioid rust belt in Ohio.

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't matter irrespective of economics. It's race that ultimately

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>governs whether you enjoy advantage or privilege. Well, I think

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I probably misrepresented at Maximus point was that this is

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same vein of what the communist did in

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Cuba in terms of dividing people, but now it's along

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>racial lines in Americas, as you just laid out so eloquently.

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And what's frustrating to me is a lot of these

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are driving this divide, you know, on the left, primarily,

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not providing solutions for people that would make individuals

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lives better. You know, for instance, zip code determines a

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>child's future far too often in the sense of, obviously,

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have better educational opportunities if you live in a wealthier neighborhood,

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a better school system, even a

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>better public school system. Or you see a lot of

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people on the left being against school choice, or even

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>someone like Senator Corey Booker actually used to be for

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>school choice until he started speaking up you know, a

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>higher a national profile, and then he turned on it.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And he actually used to work with Betsy Divas and

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>then gave a scathing speech against her confirmation. But all

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>these people who purport to care about this issue actively

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:53.399
<v Speaker 1>work against things that could help minorities or could help

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>children achieve better success in the future. And that's what

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>infuriates me. Yeah. Absolutely, This is really just a way

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of of achieving greater power for the people who use

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the terms right. This isn't about I mean, and that's

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the one of the things that left is actually mastered,

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the use of terminology to pack in behind that terminology

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and agenda that has nothing to do with the term itself.

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Just take Black Lives Matter. It is a Marxist organization

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that calls for the decimation of the nuclear family structure,

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and yet I don't know what that has to do

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with actual protection of black lives and professors to care

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about black lives. In fact, it's about some completely orthogonal agenda.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what we sort of see the Left having mastered,

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is you come up with the right label, but you

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pack a lot of a power driven agenda behind it

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that's actually about empowering and often even enriching the very

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are pushing that philosophy and allows them to

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>evade accountability by creating this new woke smoke screen that

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.359
<v Speaker 1>ultimately distracts everyone by the things they say rather than

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that they actually do. And I think that

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that ought to be part of the calling card for

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the new conservative movement, too, is to actually counterintuitively recognize

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the very injustices that the left has monopolized as their

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>causes of concern, economic disparities and access to capital, formation,

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>access to education. We actually care about these solutions, makes

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you care about these problems in a way that actually

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>makes us want to deliver actual solutions that address the problem,

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>rather than one that just thrives on a new narrative

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of victimhood. And I think that victim the left US

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>turned victimhood into this new cultural currency in the United States,

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and I personally think that that actually hurts the very

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>people that it was supposed to help. Like all bubbles,

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think victimhood as a currency is now in

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a bubble of its own. When it bursts, it actually

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>hurts the very people that was supposed to help. Well,

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I see the same thing with respect of the victimhood

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of culture that ultimately evades accountability for solving the actual

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>problems that people might face in their in their everyday hardship.

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your vision for America? Well, look, I think that

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think my vision for America is the vision for

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>America that we began with two hundred fifty years ago,

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that America isn't even a place, It's just

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a vision of what a place can be. It is

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a set of ideas that brought an otherwise divided, polyglot

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.760
<v Speaker 1>group of people together. And more so than any nation

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in human history, America wasn't based on a single monarch,

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 1>or a single religion, or a single ethnicity or a

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>single language. No, it was based on a set of ideas.

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that today I don't even have a

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>good answer. We don't have a good answer to the

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>question of what does it mean to be an American

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in the year one? And I think that absence of

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>an answer to that question is actually the black hole

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at the center of our nation's soul. And so I

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think that we need to revive the basic ideals that

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>brought us together in the first place. Idea like the

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>American Dream eat pluribus from many one. And I think

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that these are the ideals that one the American Revolution.

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They're the ideals that reunited us after the Civil War.

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.439
<v Speaker 1>There the ideals that one World War one and World

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>War two and the Cold War, And I personally think

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still the ideals that give hope to the free

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>world as we know it. And if we can revive

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.320
<v Speaker 1>our sense of America as an idea deal, then I

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody, not a nation, not a corporation, not

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a virus, is going to defeat us. But that is

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the hard work that we're going to have to do,

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is to look to our history to identify not perfection,

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>because America has never been a perfect country, never will

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be a perfect country. Perfection doesn't exist. But more so

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>than any nation in human history, America is the pursuit

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of perfection. We've said it since the day one, the

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of happiness, the pursuit of liberty, equality and justice

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for all. It's called the American dream for a reason.

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a destination we reach. It's a vision that

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we aspire to. But reviving those basic ideas, the ideas

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that no matter who you are, who your parents who are,

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>where you came from, you could achieve anything you want

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in this country with hard work, ingenuity in your own dedication.

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Reviving those ideas. That's part of my vision for America

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is taking the American idea to mean something more than

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just being a bunch of higher mammals occupying a common

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>space doing what our iPhones tell us to do on

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a given day that is not America. America is the

0:51:58.200 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>set of ideas that brought us together in the first ways,

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it begins with civic education. I

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>think that we're overdue for a not for a conversation

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about civic service that we implement in the next generation

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of kids, to satisfy their hunger for a cause, their

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.240
<v Speaker 1>hunger for what it means to be an American, starting

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 1>at a young age, starting to reconstruct our history rather

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>than just criticize it and deconstructed, as we're doing in

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>our schools today. So I think civic education plays a

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>big role in that. I think there's a revival. A

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>civic revival across all of our institutions is really important.

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there are some legal solutions that

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we need in the near term to hold the tide

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately hold back the woke epidemic that's infecting all

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of our institutions, But that's really just the first step.

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The longer run vision is is a civic revival in

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this country that reminds us of who we are as

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Americans in a way that brings us together across all

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of these divisive identity politic lines. What are you running

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for political office? You know, I was. I was in

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody encouraged me to a couple of people I respect,

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>encouraged me to do that. Uh, you know at the

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>start of this year. Actually, well, I thankue. So that

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>means a lot to me. I love listening to you,

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>so that that means a lot to me. I So

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I I needed to do something first, and that was

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>actually writing this book that I was working on. The

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>reason that was important is that, I think in the

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 1>moment we live in today, As I said earlier, big

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>government is a problem, but it's only part of the problem.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the real cultural problem in America today spreads

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond big government to every institution in the private sector,

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 1>from our museums to our schools, to our universities, to

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the companies where we work, to the community centers where

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>we gather. That is really where the everyday threat to

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>liberty and prosperities playing itself. That that is where the

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 1>battle line is ultimately being forged, and one side is

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>expanding that battle line further and further as it continues

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to win in this culture of fear. And so I've

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>been a successful entrepreneur, right, I had been educated in

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the same elite institutions. I understand how to speak that language.

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I influent in that language. I have lived in that

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>world and seen it firsthand for myself, and actually felt

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a sense of obligation to see through the project that

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I started over the last year and a half, which

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was exposing that for what it was, because I think

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's important that every American see that game for what

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>it is, so that we can use that as a

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>first step to forging a better path forward. And so,

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, I mean, there was a lot of

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.439
<v Speaker 1>people were encouraging you to run for the Senate seat

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that opened up in Ohio. With Rob Portman announcing that

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he was going to step down. A lot of people

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 1>have stepped in to do that. You know. I thought

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about it for for a hot second, but at the

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:31.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I thought it was really more

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>important to focus on this new national movement outside of government,

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in our culture, in our private sector first, and to

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>really re energize our interest in answering the question of

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be American, even outside of government,

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in our place of work and in our communities. And

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm focused on with the rollout of the

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>book is building that new that new American movement, and

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll see where that goes. I do think that public

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>service is important. It involves a lot of sacrifice, and

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's something that I'm open to in my future. But

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to really turn to the until after

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this book is out, after I've really seen to starting

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:05.879
<v Speaker 1>this new movement in the private sector, which I think

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more important than a movement in government today

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and everyone go out and get woke. Inc it's out auguste,

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>which is this August obviously and uh wise words incredibly accomplished,

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:21.919
<v Speaker 1>man the Vigue. I really appreciate what you said today.

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a fascinating conversation. You're obviously welcome on anytime.

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope the book is a massive success, and I am.

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm looking forward to reading it thankfully. So

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it, and really and with with respect of

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the book, this isn't a commercial venture for me really

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>any if there's any net profit that comes out of

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it for me personally, I'm just putting it right back

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>into the underlying agenda and what I really care about

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is starting that new American movement this fall. So thanks

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for having me and we'll keep the conversation going awesome.

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Take care, Thanks so much. I want to thank the

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:56.240
<v Speaker 1>vig Ramaswamy again for such a smart and interesting interview,

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and I want to thank all of you at home

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as well for listening. If you're joined today's podcast, please

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 1>leave us a review and leave us a five star

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>rating on Apple Podcast. You can also find me on

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Instagram and at LESA Rebooth special thanks to

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>our team producer John Cassio, writer Aaron Kleigman, researcher Margaret Smith,

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and executive producers Debbie Myers and speaker new Gingridge, who

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are all part of the network and team