WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2019: Pete Alonso's a Stud, Zac Gallen Called Up | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 449

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for me. You're

0:00:29.880 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. T Yeah, welcome

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>baby yours by Bay from Man five died from Saint

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Francis Pranknet. Stand ball ladies and tell me in your

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ps and with that we will give you a Tide

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty for this is the BFF status. Frank Stample,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I am Gregg Susman. Pleasure to have you showed us

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>today on a Wednesday day before the NBA Draft. Major

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>major hews breaking as we go in the air with

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Conley being traded to Utah jazz Is. I think

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us expected. I thought the Jazzuary natural

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>fit for him, and I think that could change some

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>things for the Indiana Pacers. We'll get to that probably

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow um on our show. Or on the Twitch show

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot. But Frankie, what's going on? Many? What's happening

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to man? Happy hump day to you. We also had

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>some breaking baseball news regarding a prospect we've been talking

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>about for a long while, so I'm sure we'll get

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>into that. Right at the top of the show, Zach

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Gallant expected to be called up tomorrow and start for

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Marlins. But before that, gready, how did you sleep, Bud?

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I step great. Last night's so great. We went a

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bit a little bit late. Um funny story. Actually, oh,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>if I'm may so, we're we're going over wedding stuff

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and you need mom calls are like eleven thirty eleven

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight, what's going on here? Jet to go over stuff?

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And he just starts yelling, what are you? What are

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you yell yelling about? What's going on? There's I have

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so much going on with your wedding, Judy's sisters moving on,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>paying bills and I missed my program? What do you

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you miss program? What do you mean you just

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I paid forty five dollars to go to an event.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting at the head table and I was

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>so busy. I forgot, and now I'm sitting in sweatpants

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the couch and I'm like, okay, wait, wait, what

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>does this have to do with me or the wedding?

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I missed my program. I'm sitting there crying of laughter,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank crying. I'm so busy and Judy, I can't contain yourself.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>She are you laughing at me? Are you wocking me?

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>And I can't stop. I just can't. I think I'm

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a negative influence on you. Greg. It was so funny.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, it seems a little over the top, but

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm not out of line and saying that.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, it was amazing. It was amazing. It

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was one of those things like scaring me about the

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>wedding press. It was one of those things. Did everyone

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>get that crazy with the wedding? She wasn't doing anything

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>for the wedding at all. She's just blaming us for

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>her not seeing something on the calendar. Didn't do anything

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for the wedding yesterday at all. I've got nothing. Oh

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but basically she it was hilarious. So she was stressed

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>out about that. So after that, I laughed myself to

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>sleep and I slept. Great sounds like something the Joker

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>would do. Laugh myself to sleep. There you go. It

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was awesome, dude, it was awesome. So I feel good tonight,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and really it's a big night for me. Frank, I'm

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>praying the rain holds out. I don't know what that

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>will is it? Oh? Yeah? Opening day, opening day, Opening day,

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>opening day in the kickball League, Raining defending Champions, Raining

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>defending undisputed champions. That's right. I've recently joined a dodgeball

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>league as well, which will be starting up next Thursday.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Spin speeds of the dodgeball league, is he Yeah, I'm

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to talk to him get some tips. Dodge, duck, dip, diving, dodge.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I gotta watch dodgeball this weekend to get myself. Yes,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is King of playing as well. That's awesome as Uh. Similarly,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>her brother and his fiance's also wanted. That's fantastic. Yes,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we got a little for watrouh. You guys just joined

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a random team. Yeah that's awesome. Yeah, I think you

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>like said they're like, you tell them how many people

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you want on your team together, and like add a

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>couple more people to it. Yeah, it's awesome. I'm looking

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>forward to that's great, man. I wish your best looking

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>dodgeball I kickball gets it in tonight. I'm feeling good, um,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling really good. Like bets were pretty good last night.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Went two for three, so I feel good about that. Obviously,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>things can't go as great for you. That's okay. I

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>went two for three yesterday. Both of my major underdogs hit.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I love Detroit, I love the Marlins. Obviously Mary Kelly

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>blew it at home against Colorado. But that's okay, two

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>out of three eight now, I'll take that every day

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of the week absolutely, And I'm over two on the week,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so we'll try and write the ship. And I'm a

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two for three on the week because I did never

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>picked on Monday. I didn't work out. All right, We'll

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>give your best bets forever later on in the program.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I know Christie Intern desperately needs them because you know

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>he went against us yesterday. It's a mistake for him.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>But on the show today there's a lot of maneuvering.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the trade uh in the NBA was also

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a major movement in the MLB. As a guy that

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you've been waiting to get called up, Frank, he's on

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>his way up. And that is Zach Gallan, the Marlins

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>prospect acquired in the deal for more Solo z. You know,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>along with Sandy Alcantara. He's being called up as Pablo

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Lopez is going to hit the I L What should

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we know about Zach Gallant and how desperate should we

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 1>be to pick him up? He should be owned right now.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I am very excited about Zack Gallan. Uh and and

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for a good reason. You look at what he's done

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the miners this year in the PCL, where all

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you hear about is how everyone in the miners is mashing.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>This year. Power is up, isolated, power is up, batting

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>averages up. Everyone is completely destroying the PCL and specifically

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Triple A as well. Zach Gallan in fourteen starts at

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>one point seven seven e r A with a zero

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>point seven one whip, a one fifty three batting average

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>against one and twelve strikeouts in nine one and the

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>third innings pitched. The reason why he wasn't on the

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>forty man roster initially for the Miami Marlins heading into

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this season was he wasn't expected to developed this quickly. Frankly,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and his fastball has seen a velocity uptick. This year,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting in the mid nineties. He touches nineties seven

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with it. Normally he was in the load nineties with that. Uh.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>He mixes in a curveball and a changeup as well.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Also has a cutter that he's using. He's just been

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely phenomenal. I mean to put it in perspective, how

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>good he's been hit. He leads the PCL with the

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>one point seven seven e r A. The next closest

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is Hector Nosse. Yes that Hector Nosc with a two

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>point eight seven e r A is twelve strikeouts are

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>first in the PCL. Second Hector Nossey with eight eight.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That's how good Zach Gallan has been. So I'm very excited.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Seems like he's gonna get to start tomorrow going up

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>against the St. Louis Cardinals. I don't want to just

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>completely skip over the fact that Pablo Lopez is kind

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of like a casualty of this. I don't want to

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>call him casualty. I think it's they're trying to limit

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>his endings his workload as well. So I love to

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>see if anything else comes out of this news regarding

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez. But Zack Gallant is getting the call, and

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>if he's available in your league, you should pick him

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up right now. Absolutely. And it's funny because I want

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to start with the Marlins. That funny, but Zack Gallant

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has this prospect pedigree, Frank telling you to go run

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>pick this dude up immediately. But he's not the only

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Marlin's young pitcher that's had some successes here. We've talked

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to Pablo Lopez and Caleb Smith and this Marlin's rotation

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in general, and yesterday that led us not to today's

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>oriole starter, Jimmy Yakobonus, but instead it led us to

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Yamamoto. As Yallomoto has faced St. Louis twice now

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Major leagues, and twice he has shut them out.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Seven shoutout innings last night, two runs, two walks, he

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>struck out seven pitches. He has been fantastic. It is

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>two major league starts. The Marlins defeat the Cardinals six

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. Is Jack Flawery went seven inks, three run ball,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>four hits, eight strikeouts while allowing shoe home runs. Jimmy Yamamoto,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for real, he certainly looks like it looks like it's

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so far. I was tweeting about Jimmy Yamamoto last night,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people were responding to me saying that

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals are really bad, and it's true. In the

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>month of June, the Cardinals have something like a six

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty o p s and they're like twenty seven and

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>baseball so they haven't been hitting. We get into that

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>as well right after this Greggy regarding Paul Goldschmidt and

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Carpenter. But for Yamamoto, I mean, his start last

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>night was eerily similar to his debut. His debut seven

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>innings pitched, three hits, zero earned runs, two walks, five strikeouts.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>That was last week, eight swinging strikes, fourteen first pitch

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>strikes to twenty four batters. Last night, seven innings pitched

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>two hits, so one less hit, zero earned runs, two walks,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts to two more strikeouts, ten swinging strikes and

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>again fourteen first pitch strikes to twenty four batters. So

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>his second start later on in the week is expected

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to come against the Philadelphia Phillies in Philadelphia, so a

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a tougher task there. Let's see how

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he responds to that. If you do play in a

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>daily transaction league. I might mention him for that, just

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>because I worried a little bit about pitching instituen his

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bank against that lineup. He did get the good fortune

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>of facing the Cardinals, who have not been able to

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball well this month. But Jimmy Yamamoto not

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to the same level of Zack Gallant, I think should

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be owned. I'm I'm not gonna drop anyone of value

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for him. Greg Well, well, to me, it's hard to

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>say that. I know he faces the Phillies obviously later

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. It's his banking park. But what morgana dude

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>due to get on your radar. I mean he's on

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the radar, But are you gonna drop that one of

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of shut out? Are you gonna drop anyone of serious value?

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that? What does that mean? Pado Lopez? Would

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you drop pabol Loopez? Who's who's been If I'm on

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the I l that doesn't work again, Um, trying to

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think of like a starting pitcher who's been struggling, Chris

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Archer for him, that's fair, I'm a right with that.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>There's some value that, Yeah, I mean I'd rather drop

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I would personally put gallant ahead of Yamamoto, even though

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Yamamoto do it for two starts for fine,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's like, if we're ranking the two, I

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>would rather have Gown than I would rather have Yamamoto.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do like him. He's pitched well, and you know,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>he does it with an interesting pitch mix. He doesn't

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>overpower people. He doesn't have like a mid nineties fastball.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He throws maybe two, and he has you know, four

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>other off speed pitches that he uses. He has a

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>curveball changeup. He he has a cutter as well that

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he uses. So he's kind of a crafty pitcher and

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's worked out so far. So I want to see

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can keep it up against Philadelphie Phillies. Let

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>me ask you about another name he also pitched last night,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's Jay Hap have won five inutes, allowed two runs,

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>three strikers. Didn't want anybody seven hits the ear ay

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>goes down to four point five nine or eighty seven

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>pitches in his five innings of work. He proved the

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>seven in three. Like like, Jav has not been good,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>but by any means, he doesn't go deep into games anymore. Uh,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got like two quality stars or three quality starts

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on this season. It's been a really real struggle for him.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a lot of home runs at a record clip.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, yesterday was the first time in six starts

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that he did not allow a home run. What do

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>you make of Jay hat going forward? What do you

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think of his performance last night? And is that someone

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you consider dripping for a Zach Gallon or Jimmy Yama Moto.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I it's tough to say, because he is going to

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be in position to get a lot of wins. He

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>has seven wins on the year despite a four point

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>five nine e r A. And just to put that

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, I was gonna mention this later on, but

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Stroman is four and nine with a three point

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to three EARRA. So it just shows you how flukey

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>winds can be in baseball. He's gonna be in position

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot of wins. But happ has not pissed. Well,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Greg, he's given up a lot of home

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>runs this year. He's not getting as many swings and

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mrs we kind of thought that might be the case.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>The strikeouts are down this year. Uh, the hard hit

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>rate is up against him four point five nine e

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>r A. The underlying numbers for Jay Happ are not

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>good either. The problem I have for dropping him for

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>someone like Yamamoto or Zach Gallen is that we don't

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>know how long those guys are going to be up.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I would probably make the move for Gallen if Jay

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Happ was the worst player on my team, if he

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>was the worst pitcher on my team. But I do

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>have concerns for both of those guys. You know, how

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>long are they going to stick around? You know, once

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith is back. We'll get an update from Inside

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Injuries tomorrow regarding Caleb Smith. But one Smith is back,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:18.359
<v Speaker 1>does that mean one of Gallen or Yamamoto goes back down? Potentially?

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, if this isn't a long term injury for

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez, if it even is also out too, He's out.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And you're saying like this with your quotations. But what

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing on Pablo Lopez, I say, shoulder injury. I

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is just mean. I mean, it

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense why they would make up an injury for

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>him if they're trying to limit his endings. Pissed Greg,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand his long term future. I mean we see

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that with Chris Paddock, he got sent down. I mean

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you could have sent Paulo Lopez down. Yeah, I don't know.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe he is actually dealing with something. I

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>would lean towards this probably, LIKEA just said, I hope

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>they were just shutting down Paublo Lopez for breathing. But

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it sounds worse than that, all right, So we'll see

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens there. So yeah, I mean I guess I

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would drop HAB for either one of them. I still

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think like Caleb Smith is gonna be back soon, and

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like again, does that mean Gallon or Yamamoto is going down?

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You actually hear him on the Fantasy Sports rad your network,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But doing to do it now because we're on But

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Baboo is back in Miami for more tests on his shoulder. Again,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I am unclear on the severity of the issue. Oh great, Bob,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>would you drop HAB for both of them? I would

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do it for Gallon, probably do it for Gallan, but

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like how I know he just gave us the rundown

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on Gallon and why he's been good this year. I

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>mean he is the best. He is the best pitcher

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in the miners right now, really in terms of his

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>stats this year, like maybe not like long term projection,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but he is pitching like the best player in the

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>minors so far this season, at least in Triple A.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I haven't. I mean, I haven't like double

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty good last man um. I mean he's by far

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the best picture in a difference. Okay, okay, I mean

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be the miners. I mean the fact that

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he's doing what he's doing in the PCL is super,

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>super impressive, very much. So he's in the PCO. He's

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in the PCO. The PCL. Really that makes sense. They

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are in the I am looking at the Pacific Coast

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>League leaderboard. Where where they where do they play? Where?

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Believe it's New Orleans? Is not Pacific New Orleans, Baby Cakes,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>New York, New Oran Zeipher's right, I mean, I'm looking.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making it up. It's just say it's his PCL.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know why would Minor league at mill

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com lie to me Greg anyway, it's not relevant.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We're dropping Jay Hat for Zach Gallen. And if you

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think that Yamamoto is gonna stick around like once Caleb

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith is back, I don't know. I just have concerns.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I would do it for Gallant. I'm not sure I

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>would do it for Yamamoto, but I do like Yamamoto. Okay,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. Sorry, you seem like you're on the fence.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I am on the fence. I am on the fence.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to find out why they're not in their

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>international leagues. It doesn't make sense to me, but that's

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Pacificosely doesn't make sense. A lot of

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>traveling a minute, one Jesus is the segment is flying by.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god? All right? Um for the Yankees, Karen,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a homer for the fourth consecutive day, and when

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a Carnascion Frank twenty second homer of the year, first

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as a Yankee. It was a celebrasion for Incarnacion. Nope, Nope,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I could expect it. Swung on and drove the date

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>right center. That bathers high. That is far. That is

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>god Eddie and Carnacion's first home run as a Yankee.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you want us so a brascion for Edwin and

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Carnac whoa, there was bracion for a Carnacio. That was fun.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Yankees going over the sweep today table Carl Stanton not

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in the line He looked great last night too. I don't,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't, Yeah, why would he not be in the lineup?

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Hammond Maybe creator signed don Carlo Staton. Let's not do this.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's not do this. Take a break. We've back after this.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roado dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Roado dot Com optimize her in minutes, build an optimized

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>line up for cash games and tourneys. Learned from the

0:17:53.680 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players joined Daily Roado dot com the

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>morning after. Katie might not even be a Warrior. Clay

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Thompson might not play next year, Bookie Cousins. They played

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for five milligain. Seriously, is gonna be Quinn cook and

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff curR And you guys gonna be charging like five

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>times the prices that you are in Oakland now in

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Man, the NBA has really been turned upside down, man,

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and on its head. And even as I sit here

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in a kawhi Lander raptor Jersey thirst old damn guarantee

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that Kawhi Leonard is going to be a raptor in

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from now. No guarantees, Sweet Days not Ammy.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Starting on F and T s Y Radio and on

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers, Money Now one hundred is not

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a lender, broker or agent of any lender or financial advisor.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We do not make loans or credit decisions. He must

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>be eighteen years or older and the US resident to qualified.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not an offer or solicitation to lend. I

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>want the money Now one hundred dot com and got

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the five thousand dollars I needed deposited in my account

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the next business day. If you need money for any reason,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>help is here. Go to money Now one hundred dot

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>com and get the money you need. Need to pay

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>off credit card debt, go to money Now one hundred

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Need your car repair, need home and provement

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>money visit money now one hundred dot com. If you

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>need fast cash for any reason, go to money Now

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dot com. Good, bad, or no credit at all.

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Go to money Now one hundred dot com. You could

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get up to five thousand dollars as soon as the

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>next business day. Go to money now one hundred dot

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>com on your phone, tablet or computer. Type in the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 1>address bar money now one hundred dot com. That's money

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>now the number one hundred dot com. Zach Gallant officially

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>coming up starting at the Cardinals tomorrow, Frank, Reggie the stats.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's been an amazing, amazing season over kid and

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>walk ratio is just stupid. One twelve to night. Yeah

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the p C O in the PCL. Amazing. I

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>still can't believe they're playing the PCL. They're just not

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 1>on the Pacific coast anyway. Yeah, you're not wrong. It

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense to me. Okay, I tell you all right, Um,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>what else happened last night? Well a lot, because you

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, Frank, and if it doesn't matter to you,

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and we'll do it very quickly, I promise it was

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a Brett Anderson night. Yeah, I don't see that on

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the run down grade. Seven innings of two run ball

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>only one were earned, shuck out too only runs the

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Allower and Johnny v R Homer and then in this

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>uh later uh error by Marcus Simeon run of the

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>other run. Great start from Brett Anderson. Yeah, I really

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>really love the two strikeouts, Greig tell us, tell us

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>more about it, freak. It's a quality starting to win,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>feeling good. A lot of home runs by the by

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the eight. Yeah, Chris Davis needs a few more hits

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to get is batting average forty seven, and that's what

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I noticed last Ramo Loriano awesome as usual. Only been

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>telling you about it for a month now. Average the

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>best fantasy analysts ever. I'm always right. Average sixty five,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, sixty five. Very good stuff. Okay, um,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>let's actually talk about Merrill Kelly. Though, for real, I

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if that's on the run down. I'm

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just doing it's not on the run down, Greg, I

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to probably pull up the run I don't want

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to pull up the run down. It's like, these are

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>things that I wanted to talk about. Greg should have

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>added them to the I make a lot of notes

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>before the show, Greg, and all of them are based

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on things that are on the rundown. I don't have

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>any notes for Merrill Kelly. I could talk about Merrill Kelly.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about whatever you want to talk about. Greg.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I take notes based on what I put on the

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>rundown because I think it's relevant, all right, So should

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I fother run down? Then Max Scherzer broke your nose.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what That's what I wrote you notes on that.

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, I don't when I when I wrote that

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>last night, I was actually very angry because I didn't

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think he was gonna start, So I wrote, you broke

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>your nose, you idiot. And then also Aaron Judge homered

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in rehab triple A back as soon as Friday. Aaron Judge,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your last note here is that John Peterson playing first

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>They might play first base for the Doctors, so that

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>allows them to uh potentially keep Alex Verdugo in the

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>outfield once A. J. Pollock returns to So I thought

0:21:58.480 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that was relevant as well, Gregg, what do you think?

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very relevant and it's more eligibility, although

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I still doubt he will play against left handers. That's

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>probably correct. They can put what do they normally put

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>there against lefties like David Fees. Can he play for space?

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes he can? All right, so then yeah that's probably

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the case. Yeah, um, okay, I'm gonna go into Merrill Kelly. Now.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Merrill Kelly last night against Colorado's six innings, six runs allowed.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>He did not have it at home. Frankie, you know

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>who did. Antonio sends to tell, oh, a six and

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>seven hits, one run walked for, he struck out five.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He was really good Ronado. Um, you know, homer off

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of Merrill Kelly in that first in the A ten

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>homer for Ernado was actually struggled in the month of June.

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a really nice day for Colorado all around. Yeah,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Antonio sends to tell has a five point zero nine

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>e r A on the season. He's got a five

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>point zero eight xfit. I don't know what else you

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say about. Antonio sends a telegrag I'm not

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about. What do you want to say about Merrill Kelly?

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>What happened? Man? He's been so good. He still has

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a three point nine. Actually, I don't know if they

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>factored in the last night, but anyway, this has pretty

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>much been the It's been the case for Merlo Kelly

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>all season long. He goes on these stretches where he

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's can pitch pretty well. We thought he's

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot here two starts at home. That

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>was not the case. He should be able to bounce

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>back against the San Francisco Giants later on in the week.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Modica really really liked Meryll Kelly. He wasn't really

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the top guy for me. There are a few others

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>that I liked more than him. Spoke about Tyler Skaggs,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>who pitched well last night as well. But yeah, Merrill Kelly, Look,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't have good enough stuff. He has changed

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up his arsenal, using his cutter more, his fastball is

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>getting hit hart earlier in the season, but it just

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have good enough stuff to miss batts, and

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he's prone to blow ups because of that. So Merrill Kelly,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>outside of a you know, fifteen team mix and the

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>only league, I don't think he should be rostered in

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>anything shallower than that twelve team leagues. He should not

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be owned. A y the Clock that struck midnight Corey

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to Frank example true another game I was watching last

0:23:58.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>night because I told you I was starting Brett and

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Sin this week, but I was also storing Marcus Stroman

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and I made I made the move to switch from

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer to Marcus Stroman. So I watched a lot

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of this Angels Blue Jay's game and Stroman was pitching really,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really well until he got caught um in the fifth inning.

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Back to back homer's from cool Calhoun and I'm back

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to that home works. But in the same Mann Colca

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>hu and Brian Goodwin h both got him. He didn't

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>pitching into the eighth inning. Stroman was in control. Was

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>so much on the night. I know it didn't strike

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>many Peo people out, but he only a lot of

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>four hits, three runs, three k's with that one walk.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>He dropped to four nine when another quality start earray

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sits at three point to three. It was a really

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>good night for Stroman, but also a really good night

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on the other side for Tyler Skaggs, who went seven

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the third three hits, one run, struck at six,

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't walk anybody. Both of these offenses a bit off balance.

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Um throughout the night. Lords Gurriel also went deep. They

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>went deep with the Blue Jays the eighth time this season.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Stroman, I know it hasn't exactly been pretty in

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts aren't necessarily there, but both of you guys

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>pitched well last night. Frank, Yeah, Marcus Stroman, what we've

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>always said about him is that he walks too many

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bad ers, and he doesn't get enough strikeouts to mitigate

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>those walks. Now, he does get a lot of groundballs,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if he had a good defense behind

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>him there all right, probably closer to bad. But if

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he has a really good defense behind him, then I

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think he can he can make it work because he

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>gets as many groundballs as he does fifty groundball right

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. So he puts a lot of runners on

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>base via the walk, doesn't get a lot of strikeouts,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pitches more to contact, and then you have worried you

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you have worries about guys like that. Florio talked about

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that with Dallas Kaiko last year. Is that when you

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>put guys on base and you don't get enough strikeouts,

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you're you're prone to you know, giving up like hits here,

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>hits there, and the next thing you know, you give

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up like three four runs, and um, it sucks. It sucks.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But Mark Stroman so far thist year has pitched well

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>three point two three e r A. He's got the

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers are not as good four point one six

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>x fit four point four six Sierra. I still do

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like him, and maybe a change of scenery will help

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>him out, but overall it's been a really good bounce

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>back season. Four Marcus Stroman and then Tyler Skaggs. It

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as good of a season for him, and

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he really needed this bounce back performance and that's exactly

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what he got here. Seven and the third Ding's pits,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>three hits, only one earned run that was the home

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>run to lord as Geriel, who remains red hot. I

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>love the zero walks here for him. Six strikeouts as well.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this on Monday with Matt Moodique as well.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>We like streaming pictures against the Toronto Blue Jays. We

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>had concerns with Scaggs because he had struggled overall recently

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and he had struggled on the road this season, so

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we weren't necessarily on Tyler Scaggs for his double start.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But if he puts together two good starts this week

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>then and you picked him up, or if he's out there,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>then I could give you confidence moving forward when it

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to Tyler Skaggs. Yeah, absolutely Scaggs if he continue

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to build on this momentum he gained last night. Scaggs

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is talented enough to go on a bit of a run.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Skaggs and as you mentioned, Marcus Stromans which

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>really really well this year, but even giving him a

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of trade value which no doubt the Blue Jays

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>will probably take up on look. And Allen made his

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>debut last night for the San Diego Padres. For more

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>top prospect Logan Allan, I think he's actually still inside

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the top one um. Alan makes his debut and he

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of height given his uh connection with

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>John Cena. The story goes that he met John Cena

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at a restaurant in Tampa years ago and they made

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a one dollar bet that Logan Allen would never make

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it to the majors, and last night he did. Sina

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was in attendance tonight or he will be attendance once

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>again to give Alan the one dollar that he earned

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>by making the majors. How into Logan Allen should we be?

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And it has not been. I know it has not

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>been a good season of the miners for him. But

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he does have pedigree, Yeah, he does. He's the sixth

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>rank prospect in the Padres organization according to MLB dot

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>com and he saw that plus change up on display

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>last night. That's a sixty grade changeup out of eight

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>according to MLB dot com. Once again, you you saw

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it on display, he looked pretty good, and you know

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Greg and the miners. This year and Triple

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>A he had a five point one five e r A,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but every other year, like last year, combined between double

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>A and Triple A, he had a two point i

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>four e r A eighteen at two point nine five

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>e r A s at three point four seventy yar

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>A And he's got four hundred forty one strikeouts in

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and eighteen ennings pitched in the minor leagues,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so well over a strikeout er ending. He was struggling

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, but every other year he was really good.

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So in deeper leagues he's not to the level of

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Zac Gallen, probably not even a Yamamoto, but in deeper leagues, yeah,

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I do have interest in Logan. I like him. All

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>these young pictures coming up there, they're making progress, and

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing because you talk about Logan Allen and you

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get to a guy like Zach Polisack, right, that did

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not exactly have major pedigree by any sense other than

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the last name, but he was a prospect that we

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't wait and see approach on almost like look Logan

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Allen and all police Stack has done since coming up.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Has performed every chance he's gotten, including last night against

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas doing seven ings of one room ball only that's

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>two hits. Now he walked five, which isn't very good,

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's still struck out six over dred pitches another good.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Know if Alani might Zach Pleisac, Yeah, he's been really

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>good so far in the Majors. He's allowed to earn

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>runs or less in four of his five starts. And

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he actually did his job. When I chose the Indians

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and Rangers under yesterday and Adrian Sampson, you did not,

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>so shame on you. But Zach Pleisac has pitched very well.

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He's gone seven innings pitched exactly seven ennings pitched in

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>three of his last four starts. The strikeouts have been solid,

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts last night, He's had at least six strikeouts.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's had at least five strikeouts in four straight games.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I really do not like the five walks. The underlying

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers for Zach Pleisac are worrisome. He's got a two

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>five six e r A. He's got a four seven

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>three x fit right. This is one of those scenarios

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>where I'm gonna continue to ride until the wheels fall

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>off here for Zach Plisack because it seems like sooner

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than later that is going to happen. But as

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>long as he is pitching well, I'll keep him in

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>my lineup. How do you rank rank Zach Pleisack with

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the other guys I mentioned? I know Zach Gallen's first, like,

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you love Zach Gallan talking about months, but what about

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the other players yelling the Alan and now Police, Like,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>how would you rank them in the order that you

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>want them based on the underlying numbers here? I would

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>put Police s ac last. I know he's pitched well,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not really sure how long Logan Allen is

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>going to remain in the rotation, But the Padres have

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of been throwing not great starting pitchers out there

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, and if Logan Allen can help

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>them win games, I think he'll remain in the rotation again.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm really intrigued by what he's done in the minors

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>every season before this year, and he looked pretty good

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>last night too. I mean to go seven innings against

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a really good Milwaukee Brewer's lineup. I have interest there

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in Logan Allen, so I would rank police Ack last.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I would probably go Logan Allen third, and then the

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>two Marlins guys ahead of him, Yallamoto second, and then

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Zac Gallan first, just because we've seen Yallamoto do it

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for for two starts in a row. Now it does

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sound like you're almost now higher on Yellow Motor than

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you were like ten minutes ago. No. I

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>liked him. I wrote about him last week on my Patreon. Uh,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was raving about him last week when

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he made his debut. I was watching that start. I

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think there's lots of like there again, Like he's he's

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a crafty pitcher because he doesn't overpower anyone, but he

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>uses you know, three or four off speed breaking pitches

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and he mixes them in well. So I think it's

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a good job by the pitching coach there, good job

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>by the catcher as well, putting Yamamoto in position to succeed.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And I like what I've seen from him. So and

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that was, you know, dating back to last week, it

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of a head scratcher for me because

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he got the call before Gallon. But now the Gallant

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>here we could all just be happy in one big,

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>happy family, absolutely happy, full of gallons, gallons and gallons

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of milk. Yes, I saw shout out to Andy Singleton

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. He said, Happy Gallantine's Day. You don't like

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that one, Greg, God, God, we're just trying too hard now.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't make it up. I gave credit

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to the person who did make it up. I think

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the end of the line for Adrian Sampson. Three innings,

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.239
<v Speaker 1>six hits, five runs, two walks, four strikeout, a lot

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of home run in his three innings of work. Not

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so good. Drew Smiley even worse though. Yeah, we tried

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to make something out of nothing here. I think when

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it came to push James, he did go on a

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>streak where he pitched well and you know, forced us

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to put him on the map. But there's now two

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>starts in a row where he has not pitched well.

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>He was pitching well at home this year. That's why

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I liked him as a two star pitcher. But you know,

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Indians, got blown up here and his last

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>start out against the Red Sox. It's just not looking

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>good for Adrian Sampson. Greg It is looking good for

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Willy Calhoun, who we believe it was in the ninth

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>inning yesterday hit a two run bomb, wasn't really a

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 1>bomb and kind of barely got over the wall. But

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it counts nonetheless to run. Homer for Willy Calhoun, first hit,

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>first hit since coming off the i El Coople of

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>days ago. Calhoun's third home run over the season. Good

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to see him go deep. Good to see Jose Ramirez

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>go deep as well, Frank for his fifth homer of

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the year. Are we still talking about this guy? I

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>was adding average now back over too. I feel like

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there have been players who have hit five home runs

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in a game already, this year's teams. That way, It's

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's June nineteenth and Josian Maris has five home runs.

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's June tenth. Five. Yeah, next player, Greg, next

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>playing Um, we don't want, don't want to get you

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know what? You know what we'll get to. You were

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>talking abouture performances. Let's talking about Jacob Degram because Jacob

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Degram last night against the Atlanta Braves do what Jacob

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Degram does. By the way, they are the hottest team baseball,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob Degram well he was absolutely dominant through almost

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nine innings of work. He shrugged out ten allowed two

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>runs in the ninth inning, uh five hits and those

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>runs home runs by Josh Donaldson and Freddie Freeman. But

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he was amazing in the Mets ten to two victory.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And after the game, Freddie Freeman is this is what

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we expect. It's Jacob Degram. He's one of, if not

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the best pitchers in baseball, and he showed it. And

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>don't look now, you look at with de Graam has

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>done recently. I mean, he's been amazing. He's allowed two

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>runs or less in every start since May twenty seconds,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's about a month before that. He got bombed

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in Miami, oddly enough, But other than that start in Miami,

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you go all the way that to April twenty six

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for the last time he allowed more than two runs

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>in a start. He's been fantastic. Maybe not as good

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as last year, Frank, Jacob de Gram certainly has figured

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>things out. Yeah, he's had three random blow up games

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>this year where he's allowed six and runs against the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Twins five and runs against the Milwaukee Brewers. You can

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of give him a pass for both of those. Teams,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing what we know now about both of their offenses.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>We knew the Brewers were gonna be good, and I

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Twins, but I don't think anyone foresaw them

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>being this good. And then that random start against the Marlins.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Every other start he's been really, really good. He's been

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Degram good. I think last year obviously a historic

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>season at one point seven oh e r A, it

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>seems like that might be the outlier for his career.

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the three point to six

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>e r A, right in line with all of his

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>underlying e r A indicators, it's right in line with

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing two years ago against seen when

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he had a three point five three e r A

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and all the underlying numbers. They were really good. Swinging strikes,

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still awesome, getting opponents to chase. It's just that the

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate is up against him, like it is

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>against every pitcher this year, because hitting is just up

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>in baseball, and he's giving up more home runs last

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>year zero point four one home runs per nine, which

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is just nearly unsustainable. And that's why we're talking about

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in last season as a as an historic year, and

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>then this year back up to one point one nine

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>home runs per nine, so that seems a little bit

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>more realistic with what's going on in baseball nowadays. But

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>still one of the top five, maybe top three starting

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pitchers in baseball. I'm not worried at all. A couple

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of days ago, Frank you was you got a question

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and you had said the question was Blake

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Snell versus Jacob deGrom and of the lead you would

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>florial both said Snell. I said to Grom, you would

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you like to change your answer? I actually thought about

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that as well after Blake Snell's most recent blow up Greg.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>But the underlying numbers for Snell they're very similar to

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground They're actually better though the strikeouts are better

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>for Blake Snell as well. The walks are a little

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bit down this year. I just think at this point

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>it might be crazy to say, but Blake s Now

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think might have better stuff than Jacob Degram. Greg,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't want to take anything away

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>from the ground. They're both really really good pictures. But

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell's swinging strike ERDs eighteen point seven percent this season.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the best in baseball. I'm not gonna retract it.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with it. I'm gonna stick with Blake

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Snell over Jacob Degram. But you're I mean, you're splitting

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hairs here. They're both really really good pictures. I mean,

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if you play in a points league, you might get

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more linked out of de Gram. He

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>might go deeper into games. Uh, you don't really worry

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about anythings as much with him. I don't really have

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that concern with Blake Snell, but again, works putting hairs.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the talent is just a little

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 1>bit higher for one Blake Snell. But again they're both

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in my top five. I'll remain with my answer Snell

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>over de Gram. I will also remain with my answer

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Degram over Blake Snell. Uh. Who the Mets hitting?

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I might go four to win at the fourteen time

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, Jeff McNeil the fourth time this year, and

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter Alonzo the twenty fourth home run of the season.

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Alonzo to seventy four average three o b P power

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>is very much real, obviously for Pete Alonzo, who has

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>simply been outstanding for the New York Matts this season.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the bets I did get right. Yesterday was

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers over the Pirates. As Mitch Keller's name, I

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring up to you, Frank five inutings, four runs,

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>two walks, six strikeouts on the day for Keller. Forget

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what Daniel Norris did. We've talked enough about him. He's useless.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller people are very, very excited about. He has

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>yet to really put together a good start. You drop

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller for some of the names we've talked about today.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a fair question. I think it's a

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>good question. I think when everything is once he starts

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to get everything going right for him, I do think

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that he might have higher upside than some of these

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>other pictures. And I realized it's only been one start

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for Logan Allen. Zach Allen hasn't even made a start yet.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I would still I would take I would probably take

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Gallon ahead of him, and then fumbling with those other two,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I would I would take Yamamoto just because he's pitched

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>well so far in his first two starts, and he

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>pitches his home starts in Marlins Park. I would still

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>take Mitch Keller ahead of Logan Allen. Um because you

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>saw it yesterday what his upside can be. I know

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>he gave up four runs technically, but it was only

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two earned runs, so some questionable defense behind him. He

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 1>still had six strike as he had fifteen swinging strikes

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>yesterday against the Detroit Tigers, which is what he's supposed

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. I know Mike has actually talked about this

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Mike Florio that the Pittsburgh Pirates their way

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of thinking when it comes there pitching philosophy with their

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers is outdated. They have these guys throwing a

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of fastballs, and you saw that last night for

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller, sixty two fastballs out of ninety three pitches,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little bit outdated. You know. I would

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like to see must grow view his use his breaking

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pitches more or it seems like that's kind of what's

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>gotten him in trouble so far this season. I would

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like to see Mitch Keller use some of his breaking

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pitches more as well. But the fact that he did

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have the six strikeouts in five innings and the fifteen

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes, I think he reminded some of us of

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what his upside can be. So I still do like

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller a decent amount. Greg, I would rank him

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much in the middle of these guys that we're

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the Marlins guys, but ahead of Logan

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on okay, and then he's also ahead of Zack police

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Stack as well. Correct. Okay, cool um, that's what miss

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelly did last night. Shane Green twenty first save of

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the season. Joehanennez still pitching that eighth inning. So you're

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Shane Green owner, you may want to bite the bullet.

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Now get a roster spot for Himenez before Shane Green

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>gets traded. The Lessia didn't trade him, So Frank, let's

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we cross our fingers. I hope you're right. I

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right for I think everyone hopes you're right, Greg,

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Because while there's a chance that a closer on one

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>team could be traded to another team in and remain

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.439
<v Speaker 1>a closer for the for the new team that they're

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>acquired by, I don't know if it would be the

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>case for Shane Green. He is having a breakout year

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's been all He's got a zero point

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>nine three e R at twenty one saves. But if

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>he's traded to I know the Red Sox well, maybe

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if you went into the Red Sox, he would be

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>there closer. But I just assume that if he he

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to another team like you went back to Yankees.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's say after he went to the Astros or another

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>team like that, he wouldn't be their closer. So we're

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping Shane Green doesn't get traded for fantasy purposes. But

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 1>keep in the back of your mind, if he is traded,

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Joe him and is the next man up. Absolutely,

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we have just a couple of minutes left before we

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 1>have to sign off of the YouTube. Frank, any more

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>highlights from yesterday. You want to make sure we hit

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean outside of Pete Alonzo, I put I put

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>out a poll before the show about like what his

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>upside can be future, just like if the season ended today,

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where was you draft him stay in the second round?

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think that speaks volumes to what he's doing

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>as a rookie this year. He's on pace for like

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>over fifty home runs. He's really he really is having

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>an Aaron Judge esque season or the New York Mets.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>So shout out to Pete Alonso tweeting about Freddy Freeman

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>last night. It seems like it's just flying under the radar.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>How good of a season he's having. I think he's

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>had no one of, if not the best years in

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the of the second round draft picks so far this

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of hitters, he's been awesome. I wanted

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to the struggles of Paul Goldschmidt and matc Carpetster,

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>but we could do that either tomorrow or Friday. Last

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that There's just two more quick things I wanted

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention. One was Elohimenez has just been on fire

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as of late in June three forty batting average, six

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>home runs, fourteen rbs. Yeah, it's funny because in my

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you had j Will Studios called out the guy that

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>had they kept Eloi last year after last year in

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>playoff season, He's like, and now he's doing this and

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a month later, he's been incredible in that month of June,

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and you tweeted about it last night as well, Will Drink.

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But he also made a note of it here, and

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's Michael Lorenzen. In this Reds bullpen back to back

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>days he gets to save and this is usually the

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>point part where I point out not to make anything

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of it, because Ricel Glacier has pitched the eighth and

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that was against too hard of the order. Lawrenz came

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>in for the seven, eight, nine hitters in the order

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>last night, but he's back to back days with the

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Glaziers in the eighth Lorenzi in the night. Now that

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>matters for us in fantasy, because, yeah, they're using their

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>best picture to face the best hitters, which has been

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the eighth inning the last two days. But if

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Lorenzen is now in the mix for saves and you're

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna use Iglasia's Morning Josh hitter type of role, fantasy

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 1>owners have to note that. Frank, Yeah, it's definitely worth noting.

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Pay attention to what's going on here with the Reds bullpen.

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're playing a deeper league, I would

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>add Michael Lorenzen. Now, if you own Rightily Glaciers, I

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 1>would probably try to get Michael Lorenzen on my team

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. I don't know if I really buy into

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the whole middle of the order thing, like I guess

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in theory, he faced the middle of the lineup, but

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he came in for the last two outs of the

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>eighth inning. That was against Yuli Gurriel, who has like

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>he has a sub sevens, Like, are we really that

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>worried about Julie Gariel? He faced Robinson Serenos. He did

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>strike out both of those batters, and they allowed um

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>an o Lex Bregman home run earlier on in the ending, Like,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>if they really wanted him to face the top of

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, why didn't rice Ley Glaciers to start the

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>eighth inning and face Miles Straw, Alex Bregman, Michael Brandley,

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>yard On Elvarez, I Mere Garrett came in, and then

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>once they gave up another run with one out left

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the eighth, they brought in Iglesias to face Julie

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Guriel and Robinson Chernos. And after the game, a Beat

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>reporter spoke with David Bell and he said, yeah, we

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that was the game was on the line.

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We needed Ricelly Glaciers to face Julie Gurriel because we

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were that worried about him. I'm not sure that I

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>necessarily buy it, because I'm like, Julie Guriel hasn't had

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that great of a season. But I guess in theory,

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you're right that it was the middle of the order.

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Although it's not like the normal astro's middle of the order,

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which hopefully will change soon as George Finger expected to

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>going to rehab Assignmentail to day exactly is back today

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Houston astor Justin Berlin or on a whole

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of home runs. Last night, by the way, that

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>three homers and it's back to back starts. He allowed

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 1>three home runs, was flying out he didnt. Justin Berlin

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is all the one you gonna do. I mean, he

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is someone that typically pitches more soda flyballs, but um

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in years past he's been able to get by because

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been walking anybody. So if he's giving up

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>solo shots, you can get away with that. But last

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>night he did give up four earned runs, which was unfortunate.

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried he's still again. He's in that same

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>stratosphere as Blake's now and Jacob mcgraham, probably better than

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>those two guys, to be honest, without we're gonna say

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>goodbye on YouTube today. We apologize for all the technical difficulties,

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 1>but we can't let you know that. Up next is

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Sean Gaston Nokia and at the window Shawn cover of

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Draft and take a look at some NFL

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff alongside of Chris Bensher as well. We appreciate time,

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see tomorrow here on YouTube. Frank, we got

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes left on the podcast, which means

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it's time for our best bets forever. I am two

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for three this week. You were over two with your bets.

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn that around. It's gonna winner today. I know

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's Dimmerman is on the noun and he's your boy.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you going with him? I am not going with Jordan'simmerman,

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge underdog going up against the pirates. He's plus

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>one seventies six. You know, I tried to change it

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>up yesterday because I've been choosing a lot of sides

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>recently in and I tried to go with a total

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>last night, and the Indians were just bombing the Rangers

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>around all night long, and I knew, yeah, this isn't

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna work out because it's like the fourth ending and

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they had like eight runs scored already, and it didn't. Overall,

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it didn't. So I like the under yesterday and the

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Rangers and Indians didn't come to fruition. I'm going with

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>an underdog today as my best bet. I realized it's risky.

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I talk about the Tigers and Orioles and why it's

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>risky taking bad teams to win games. But I'm gonna

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>go with the White Sox money line today plus one

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>underdog Lucas gie Ledo going up against John Lester and

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Cubs the Battle of Chicago. I'm taking Gee

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Leedo to outperform John Lester. Here's the difference between those two.

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's the difference of what you're alluding to and what

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you picked right, Because to me, Gee Leader and the

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>White Sox are the obvious pick today, like incredibly obvious.

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>John Lester has struggled, Lucas Gileto has been fantastic. Is

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>this the sucker bet? Greg so? The White Sox aren't

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a bad team. That's where you were wrong. The White

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Sox are only one game under five hundred better than

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers are almost twenty games under five hundred. The

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Marlins are or twenty games under five hundred. Like, that's

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a totally totally different conversation than the Orioles and that's

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Tigers in the Marlins. The White Sox are a solid

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>baseball team. Lucas Gilto is an ace. He has pitched

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>better than John Lester. I know it's away, but the

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>White Sox players something their own beds. I love the

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>bet of Lucas Gilto tonight in Chicago to take on

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs. That's a no rinter, Frank. I think it's

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic, fantastic bet. Go for it, man, I will

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>go for it made. I made the pick, and of

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>course it's probably not gonna come true, but if you

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>made it, it would be awesome. I can actually, like

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>see the disappointment in your eyes. What are you talking about,

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like I pick, like feeling bad about your pick? Like

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just take the White. It's just it's like a culmination

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of things at this point, Greig. I'm sorry, Frank. It's

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not your fault. I almost feel obligated. It's nobody's faults.

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I almost feel obligated, giving my love for him, that

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I have to take Jimmy yacabonus like he's starting today

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Orils. I can't believe it. It's an opener role.

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It's plus two fifty, but it's Chris Bassett. I'm not

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do it. I'm not even saying that I

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.439
<v Speaker 1>like it. That's like your long long shot. No, no,

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I think you gotta take it. I'm not.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not doing it. I really fix your guns.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not my guns. Man. I don't like it, but

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I will take the over. In the Brewers and the Padres,

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's strong versus Davies. It's eight and a half. It's

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough runs for match strama. Zach Davies give me

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the over. When it comes to the Brewers and the Padres,

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he just brings stamp. I am Gregg Sauceman. We apologize

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for all the technical difficulties we've had throughout the day.

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for everybody fixing those out the window. What was

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your way next? I have a great day. We joined

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by Dr A tomorrow. I have a great night and

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you then. Couldn't you catch the live show?

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Make sure the download our podcast at the n T

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>S Y Sports Network Audio Boom Channel oh