1 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:06,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. 2 00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: After the bell, in Vidia forecast revenue for the current 3 00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:14,120 Speaker 1: quarter below the most lofty expectations. Fiscal fourth quarter sales 4 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:16,759 Speaker 1: will be about thirty seven and a half billion dollars. 5 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:19,960 Speaker 1: Here's the thing. The range of analyst estimates was as 6 00:00:20,040 --> 00:00:24,639 Speaker 1: high as forty one billion. Let's take a closer look 7 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: now at the Nvidia story with Angelo Zeno. He is 8 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:32,640 Speaker 1: vice president of equity research at CFR. Angelo, what did 9 00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:34,560 Speaker 1: you make of what you heard today from in video? 10 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:36,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, so thanks for having me. 11 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 3: I think overall the results were pretty good and you know, 12 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:44,440 Speaker 3: nothing that I'm concerned about here. To your point, they 13 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 3: provide guidance that I think was you know, it's about 14 00:00:46,880 --> 00:00:49,280 Speaker 3: a billion and a half or so below maybe where 15 00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:53,360 Speaker 3: the whisper numbers were looking for, but definitely above our expectations. 16 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 3: We were actually looking for about thirty seven billion in 17 00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:00,080 Speaker 3: the January quarter, and I think all us equal and 18 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:01,400 Speaker 3: you kind of look at the beat that they had 19 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,360 Speaker 3: in the October quarter, which was about two billion out there, 20 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 3: definitely shows that their demand remains very strong for their offerings. 21 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:11,479 Speaker 3: I mean in the October quarter was largely driven by 22 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 3: their hopper architecture. 23 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 2: As we kind of look. 24 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:16,920 Speaker 3: Ahead here in the January quarter, it was all about 25 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 3: the cadence and trajectory of the Blackwell ramp here. And 26 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:25,319 Speaker 3: at least, you know, from the initial kind of view here, 27 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 3: it seems like in video is being somewhat conservative in 28 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:30,959 Speaker 3: terms of that initial ramp with kind of a stronger 29 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 3: ramp kind of going into the April and July quarters. 30 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:36,399 Speaker 1: Are you concerned at all that maybe maybe just a 31 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:39,720 Speaker 1: bit the excitement that we have seen over artificial intelligence 32 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 1: maybe getting a little ahead of reality. 33 00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 3: Well, I guess what I would say is, you know, 34 00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:47,680 Speaker 3: at some point in time, investors you know, almost kind 35 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 3: of become numb to the stuff. And you know, from 36 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 3: that perspective, we could potentially be you know, entering a 37 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:56,800 Speaker 3: point in time here where investors might kind of be 38 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 3: willing to look elsewhere, at least over kind of the 39 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 3: next six to nine month period, especially with kind of 40 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 3: a new Trump administration entering, and that kind of you know, 41 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 3: typically kind of helping well, maybe some of the higher data, 42 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 3: more cyclical type names that maybe have underperformed, So maybe 43 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,120 Speaker 3: from a sentiment perspective, we can kind of see a 44 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,760 Speaker 3: period where some of these AI oriented. 45 00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:20,799 Speaker 2: Names take a step back. 46 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:23,480 Speaker 3: But that said, when we start looking at the fundamentals 47 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:27,240 Speaker 3: the major drivers for these AI semi stocks as well 48 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:29,480 Speaker 3: as mag seven names here over the next three to 49 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 3: five years, we still remain extremely optimistic about the fundamentals 50 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:36,360 Speaker 3: of these companies and believe that they will continue to 51 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 3: be primary drivers of growth for the broader markets here 52 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:41,080 Speaker 3: in the coming years. 53 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 1: So, as we both know, Nvidia is restrained by the 54 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 1: policies of the Biden administration from allowing China to have 55 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:53,720 Speaker 1: some of these most advanced and sophisticated graphics processors. You 56 00:02:53,800 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 1: mentioned the Trump administration and perhaps a little bit of 57 00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:00,600 Speaker 1: change in economic policy. Do you think that Trump administration 58 00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:04,519 Speaker 1: will continue of the Biden administration's hardline on chips where 59 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: China is concerned. 60 00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 2: Well, I think that's a great question. 61 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:09,440 Speaker 3: I think we have to wait and see, But I 62 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:12,840 Speaker 3: will say this, we do think kind of inn Vidia 63 00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:16,359 Speaker 3: may be more of a beneficiary under kind of what 64 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:19,880 Speaker 3: we would call a transactional based approach under a Trump administration. 65 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 3: So when you kind of think about the Biden Harris approach, 66 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 3: it really has been a kind of limit China to 67 00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 3: certain advanced chips and equipment like GPUs. EUVS is another 68 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:33,080 Speaker 3: great example made by the likes of ASML. But according 69 00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 3: to our Washington Analysis team, Trump we think might be 70 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 3: willing to offer more advanced AI chips to other nations, 71 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,480 Speaker 3: even China, if the price is right, while kind of 72 00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 3: maintaining a certain technology lead. So China is held maybe 73 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:49,240 Speaker 3: a generation or two behind. So this could drive we 74 00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 3: think higher related and video revenue in regions like China 75 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 3: where the company could potentially be able to sell let's 76 00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 3: say it's a one hundred. 77 00:03:57,320 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 2: Versus more, maybe more of a performance laid in h two. 78 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 3: So we see the potential for Nvidia to potentially actually 79 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 3: be better positioned under a Trump administration relative to a 80 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:09,120 Speaker 3: Biden Harris administration. 81 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:12,000 Speaker 1: I think we can agree that the centerpiece of the 82 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 1: Trump policy with respect to China on the economic side tariffs. 83 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:19,279 Speaker 1: What do you think the fallout will be as the 84 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 1: result of tariffs that may approach at least sixty percent 85 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: and maybe even more than that. 86 00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:27,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, listen, on the surface, if they were 87 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:28,840 Speaker 3: to go through the way they. 88 00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:31,440 Speaker 2: Are intended to come through. 89 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 3: If we're looking at sixty percent tariffs in China or 90 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:35,719 Speaker 3: in north of twenty percent. 91 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:36,280 Speaker 2: Let's say in. 92 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 3: Mexico for instance, you know clearly would have a negative 93 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:41,640 Speaker 3: impact i'd say in a broader tech sector. And a 94 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 3: big reason for that if you think about about a 95 00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 3: third of all electronic goods within the tech industry is 96 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 3: actually manufactured out in China, and when you think about 97 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:52,480 Speaker 3: how important Mexico is for. 98 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:53,800 Speaker 2: Industries like. 99 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 3: The automotive space, the number of industrial markets out there, 100 00:04:58,839 --> 00:05:02,160 Speaker 3: were a lot of semiconductors goods are kind of important 101 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:03,920 Speaker 3: from there, not to mention you know, the number of 102 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 3: PC vendors like the Dells of the world. So there, 103 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:10,080 Speaker 3: you know, definitely kind of implications. It will have a 104 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 3: negative impact and inflationary pressures, i'd say, to the overall 105 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 3: tech space as well as broader markets. So it's not 106 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:19,279 Speaker 3: necessarily something we want to see. But in the same respect, 107 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:22,160 Speaker 3: we think the Trump administration will kind of be a 108 00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:22,960 Speaker 3: little bit more. 109 00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:24,159 Speaker 2: Tactical out there. 110 00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:26,880 Speaker 3: So all in all, it's probably going to be messy 111 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 3: here for a little while, and I think investors just 112 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:30,680 Speaker 3: have to be kind of willing to kind of go 113 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 3: for the roller coaster ride. 114 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:32,640 Speaker 2: Angelo. 115 00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:35,280 Speaker 1: I'm not hearing a lot of concern from your perspective 116 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:39,560 Speaker 1: about further decoupling of the trade relationship between the US 117 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:40,400 Speaker 1: and China. 118 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:43,280 Speaker 3: Is that the case again, I mean, listen, I think 119 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:45,600 Speaker 3: it's it's something that we have to, you know, just 120 00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:47,799 Speaker 3: kind of wait and see how this all plays out. 121 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:51,600 Speaker 3: I think kind of initially, the way we would kind 122 00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:54,240 Speaker 3: of look at it is I don't know if there 123 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 3: would necessarily be kind of more of a decoupling to 124 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:00,599 Speaker 3: kind of be seen. But again, it's something that we 125 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 3: kind of have to wait and see. 126 00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:04,720 Speaker 1: A lot of what we've been focused on are the 127 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:08,599 Speaker 1: nominees for various cabinet positions. We still don't have a 128 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,920 Speaker 1: nominee for Treasury Secretary. We do know that Howard Lutnik 129 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: will be at Commerce and part of his portfolio will 130 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:18,920 Speaker 1: include the Office of US Trade rep. Generally speaking, when 131 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:22,479 Speaker 1: you assess the appointments that have been named so far, 132 00:06:23,160 --> 00:06:25,200 Speaker 1: what is the takeaway from your point of view on 133 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 1: how the Trump administration will proceed with governing. 134 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 3: No, I mean, that's listen, that's a good question. I mean, 135 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 3: when we kind of think about, at least initially, what 136 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:36,440 Speaker 3: you know, what. 137 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 2: The impact is going to be to the broader tech space. 138 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:41,040 Speaker 2: You know, I'd say right now. 139 00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:44,960 Speaker 3: It's one where you know, hopefully we kind of see 140 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,720 Speaker 3: the ability for greater M and A potential within the 141 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:50,839 Speaker 3: tech space, and I would say that would kind of 142 00:06:51,640 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 3: cause us to lean a little bit more in favor 143 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:57,080 Speaker 3: of the software space relative to the semiconductor industry. I 144 00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,599 Speaker 3: think there are a lot more uncertainties as far as 145 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,040 Speaker 3: this semiconductor industry is concerned, whether it's to your point 146 00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:07,159 Speaker 3: about tariffs, whether it be the unknowns about Taiwan, but 147 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 3: also as far as the M and A environment is concerned, 148 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 3: semiconductor names still do a lot of business overseas and 149 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 3: need to get approval in areas like China, which would 150 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 3: be would still be hard pressed to see, whereas kind 151 00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:23,920 Speaker 3: of in the software spectrum, you're in a much better 152 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 3: position out there. 153 00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 2: M and A probably is. 154 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 3: More kind of fluid, and we think regulatory approval would 155 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,840 Speaker 3: kind of be met more willingly under this new administration. 156 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,360 Speaker 3: So I think there are different ways to kind of 157 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 3: play the tech space. Under this new administration. 158 00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 1: You don't see regulatory risk and the possibility that some 159 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:45,520 Speaker 1: companies like let's say alphabet would be confronted with the 160 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:49,720 Speaker 1: possibility of having to maybe divest I certain assets I'm 161 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:51,640 Speaker 1: thinking of the story that we had the other day 162 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 1: about maybe Google being forced to sell off the Chrome browser. 163 00:07:56,560 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 3: So possibilities absolutely, But you know that said, you know, 164 00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 3: with the same respect, I think there's also a possibility 165 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:06,320 Speaker 3: for a company like Alpha Bit to be able to 166 00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:10,120 Speaker 3: kind of go back into the deal making spectrum under 167 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 3: an administration, a Trump administration. So think about rumors earlier 168 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 3: this year of them potentially looking at a company like 169 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 3: a Hubstop or even on the cybersecurity side of. 170 00:08:20,360 --> 00:08:22,000 Speaker 2: Things with a company like Whiz. 171 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,640 Speaker 3: I think all of that stuff now become possibilities for 172 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 3: a company like Alpha Bit, which is actually flushed with 173 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:32,559 Speaker 3: a ton of cash and you know, potentially could further diversify, 174 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:34,439 Speaker 3: let's say, their business away from search. 175 00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 1: Angelo, I'm curious as to whether or not when you 176 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:40,320 Speaker 1: are having conversations with your clients that there is one 177 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 1: issue that they are expressing a little bit of concern over. 178 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:45,960 Speaker 3: You know, I think as far as you know where 179 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 3: clients are at right now, I mean, I would say 180 00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 3: kind of the top of the list right now for 181 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 3: our clients we guest asked a lot about from a 182 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 3: concerned perspective, is on the valuation side of things, We've 183 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:58,200 Speaker 3: had a hell of a run when it comes to 184 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:01,680 Speaker 3: the markets here of last two years, especially on the 185 00:09:01,720 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 3: tech side of things. When you start looking at some 186 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,040 Speaker 3: of the multiple expansion we've seen, I think there is 187 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,360 Speaker 3: definitely fear out there from some investors that you know, 188 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,960 Speaker 3: maybe some of those gains that have been pulled in 189 00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 3: quite a bit kind of going into twenty twenty five. 190 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:18,840 Speaker 3: And typically as you kind of go into year three 191 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:20,760 Speaker 3: of a bull market, if you kind of view the 192 00:09:20,760 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 3: October twenty twenty two lows as kind of the lows, 193 00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:28,199 Speaker 3: then you know, the year three kind of period typically 194 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:32,800 Speaker 3: tends to be one where you see lower gains relative 195 00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 3: to those first two years, and especially kind of you know, 196 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 3: any environment where policy will kind of be a you know, 197 00:09:40,840 --> 00:09:45,559 Speaker 3: take kind of center stage here, there's definitely more risk 198 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:48,439 Speaker 3: out there than what we've seen we think over the 199 00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:50,000 Speaker 3: last kind of twelve to eighteen months. 200 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,640 Speaker 1: Angelo will leave it there. Thanks for making time to 201 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,160 Speaker 1: chat with us. Angelo Zeno is the vice president of 202 00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:59,080 Speaker 1: Equity Research at CFRA, joining us here from New York 203 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: City on the Daybreak podcast. Welcome back to the Bloomberg 204 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:12,520 Speaker 1: Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. As we continue to 205 00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 1: unpack the results from Nvidia. We also want to take 206 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 1: a broader look at what's happening in the Asia Pacific 207 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 1: and joining us for that is Stephanie holtza Jen. She 208 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 1: is the CIO for the APEC at Deutsche Bank Private Bank, 209 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 1: joining from our studios in Singapore. I know you're not 210 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:30,240 Speaker 1: allowed to talk about specific stocks, but I have to 211 00:10:30,280 --> 00:10:33,520 Speaker 1: ask you about the Nvidia story. When you listen to 212 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:37,440 Speaker 1: the narrative that the market's received from the company, what 213 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 1: conclusion do you come to. 214 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,000 Speaker 4: The conclusion has to be that right now we're in 215 00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:48,000 Speaker 4: a setup in regards to companies related to artificial intelligence 216 00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:51,320 Speaker 4: theme that there has very lofty expectations out there. It's 217 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:54,080 Speaker 4: also coming at a time where we had quite a 218 00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 4: good market rally, where lots of investors are kind of 219 00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 4: asking the right question, is that here to stay? And 220 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:02,960 Speaker 4: of course you know these type of results are getting 221 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 4: scrutinized under the magnifying class and if there's any reason 222 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 4: to look for short term correction, then you know this 223 00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 4: is being taken as such. However, it does not derail 224 00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 4: I think the long term, medium term investment theme that 225 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:24,280 Speaker 4: we've been going with on the back of the technological 226 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:28,240 Speaker 4: advance you see with the help of companies like Invidia, 227 00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:31,400 Speaker 4: So you know, these are opportunities to get in at 228 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:34,880 Speaker 4: better levels, but it doesn't derail the investment thesis. 229 00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:38,840 Speaker 1: So when you imagine the applications of artificial intelligence, is 230 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 1: there an industry that you would think really could benefit 231 00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:45,000 Speaker 1: most under these circumstances. 232 00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:49,840 Speaker 4: Well, we look at everything upstream, downstream around the technology 233 00:11:50,040 --> 00:11:53,959 Speaker 4: and the broader IT sector, and we have these as 234 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:56,439 Speaker 4: our sector pigs for a long time already. 235 00:11:57,160 --> 00:11:59,320 Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about the leadership change that 236 00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:02,400 Speaker 1: we've been dealing with in Washington. I think for a 237 00:12:02,440 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 1: lot of people it means a new global paradigm where 238 00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:09,719 Speaker 1: trade is concerned. President Electroump has said that he loves tariffs. 239 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:12,199 Speaker 1: He also loves to make deals too, And let's talk 240 00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 1: a little bit about the dynamic that's playing out between 241 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 1: Washington and Beijing or will after the inauguration in January. 242 00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:21,439 Speaker 1: Do you think that the US and China can reach 243 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:25,400 Speaker 1: some sort of grand bargain when it comes to trade 244 00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:28,960 Speaker 1: and avoid the application of a lot of these tariffs. 245 00:12:29,520 --> 00:12:32,320 Speaker 4: Well, I think there's a lot of speculation around and 246 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 4: I will not join the bandwagon of those because we're 247 00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:38,640 Speaker 4: not yet there. We can only look at what the 248 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 4: history is giving us to try to imply in the future. 249 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 4: I think more importantly is what is it that the 250 00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:47,719 Speaker 4: market is really concerned with at the moment. And there 251 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:51,319 Speaker 4: is next to trade and tariffs which could have an 252 00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 4: inflationary outcome. There's also the understanding that there will be 253 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 4: no austerity, that there's a fiscal imbalance and what's been 254 00:12:59,679 --> 00:13:02,520 Speaker 4: proposed and how it will be financed. Tariffs can only 255 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:06,280 Speaker 4: make up for some part of the spend that's been proposed. 256 00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:09,640 Speaker 4: So you've seen the market has been reprising to that narrative, 257 00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 4: looking at potentially less of a FED Central Bank reaction 258 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:19,600 Speaker 4: function to that new environment being you know, looking at 259 00:13:19,679 --> 00:13:22,199 Speaker 4: less cuts as we do as well. We see street 260 00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:25,600 Speaker 4: cuts from the Fed coming towards us until the end 261 00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:28,520 Speaker 4: of next year only. So I think that is that 262 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 4: is the biggest topic right now, and that is also 263 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:35,720 Speaker 4: informing how you structure portfolios. 264 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 1: I'm very curious about the way that you're viewing China 265 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,520 Speaker 1: right now, in light of the lot of stimulus that 266 00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:45,480 Speaker 1: we have seen unleashed on the part of authorities in Beijing. 267 00:13:46,360 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 1: Does that leave you to be optimistic that there is 268 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 1: some sort of recovery happening in China right now, or 269 00:13:52,600 --> 00:13:56,079 Speaker 1: maybe what has been proposed will will fail to stimulate 270 00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 1: in the way in which markets have been promised. 271 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm in the camp that I believe that the 272 00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 4: probability for this stimulus to succeed has definitely picked up 273 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:10,600 Speaker 4: and risen quite remarkably. And let me just quickly go 274 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:14,120 Speaker 4: back and put this in context, because when we talk stimulus, 275 00:14:14,320 --> 00:14:17,320 Speaker 4: lots of people only remember the fiscal stimulus one and 276 00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:20,080 Speaker 4: a half weeks ago. I would want to put it 277 00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 4: in context of the three different arrows. Let's let's let's 278 00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 4: lose the analogy of ebinomics, the three arrows of genomics 279 00:14:27,520 --> 00:14:30,480 Speaker 4: that have been launched. We started out the structural reform 280 00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 4: package during the third Planum in July. It was followed 281 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:39,200 Speaker 4: up in September with the monetary policy stimulus package, which 282 00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:42,960 Speaker 4: came at the heels of the big, the big fat 283 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:45,160 Speaker 4: cut that we saw. So I would I would put 284 00:14:45,280 --> 00:14:47,400 Speaker 4: the picture out that was when the wind was blowing 285 00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:51,000 Speaker 4: in China sales, so that was a very timely measure. 286 00:14:51,280 --> 00:14:53,920 Speaker 4: It was also very large and it had very important 287 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:57,800 Speaker 4: components like stock stabilization program. Now the third arrow to 288 00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 4: this is the fiscal stimulus which everybody been waiting for, 289 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 4: which has been finally launched in its first step, focusing 290 00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:10,800 Speaker 4: really on the local government, you know, re capitalization, recapitalization 291 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 4: exactly so right now if you look at it in 292 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:18,160 Speaker 4: its entirety and the way it's been delivered timely, and 293 00:15:18,200 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 4: the two elements we hadn't in the past, which is 294 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:23,240 Speaker 4: forward guidance that there can be more if there is 295 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:25,560 Speaker 4: need be. And also I think there's quite a good 296 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:28,360 Speaker 4: communication with the market at this moment in time, so 297 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 4: there's definitely listening to what the market is expecting and 298 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 4: trying not to underdeliver. Again, it leads me to conclude 299 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:37,920 Speaker 4: that the probabilities have gone up that China has been 300 00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 4: able to create its own kind of revival story without 301 00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 4: having to necessarily react to you know, the concerns that 302 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 4: you mentioned earlier that come their way, and that are 303 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:49,360 Speaker 4: of course concerns around tariffs. 304 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:53,520 Speaker 1: So you talk about three arrows very similar to ebonomics. Obviously, 305 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 1: Japan had to fight deflation for three decades. China seems 306 00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 1: to be struggling with that still, even though we've seen 307 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:03,120 Speaker 1: evidence that retail sales are picking up, industrial production is 308 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 1: picking up. We just talked about how local governments may 309 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:09,400 Speaker 1: be able to respond to the property market, but is 310 00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:14,160 Speaker 1: China's still confronted with a major deflationary problem that may 311 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 1: be persistent for a while. 312 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:18,440 Speaker 4: At this moment, it still is. So I just came 313 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 4: back from Shanghai as well confirming this. So I do 314 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 4: not want to paint a different picture. But I think 315 00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,440 Speaker 4: it's also a little early to use activity data from 316 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 4: today or that are backward looking that are being released 317 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 4: in the market as we speak to kind of draw 318 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:37,440 Speaker 4: a conclusion on whether these three errors have been successful 319 00:16:37,520 --> 00:16:42,080 Speaker 4: or art. So you look at a realistic pathway to 320 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:46,280 Speaker 4: find out. The jury is out obviously whether all of 321 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:49,720 Speaker 4: this works. I think we have to look into next year. 322 00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:51,880 Speaker 4: Most probably the first and the second quarter will be 323 00:16:51,880 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 4: there to stabilize the market, and then the third quarter 324 00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 4: I will also see a pickup an activity data that 325 00:16:57,360 --> 00:17:02,320 Speaker 4: most probably will help to convince the last naser to 326 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:07,440 Speaker 4: join the bandwagon also start broadening out investments into China again. 327 00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:10,960 Speaker 1: So how does everything that you're describing kind of inform 328 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:14,080 Speaker 1: an investment strategy? What does it translate into. 329 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 4: It translates into not a negative view on China so 330 00:17:19,080 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 4: we are out there highlighting the medium and long term opportunity. Still, 331 00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:25,880 Speaker 4: you have heard me saying that before. We have now 332 00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 4: seen that China is able to make a you to 333 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 4: date results that are resembling others in the region. So 334 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 4: as we're building a base, these are opportunities to build out. Well, 335 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:39,840 Speaker 4: it's not just China. We also like Japan's middle and 336 00:17:39,880 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 4: long term story. Then of course this will be a 337 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:47,080 Speaker 4: sideways market that also likewise gives opportunities to invest. But 338 00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:51,119 Speaker 4: having said that, we still prefer the US and equities 339 00:17:51,160 --> 00:17:55,080 Speaker 4: as to express our views that are fairly constructive. 340 00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:57,640 Speaker 1: Are there themes that you like right now? I'm sorry 341 00:17:57,680 --> 00:17:59,639 Speaker 1: to interrupt, but I'm curious about the themes that you 342 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:03,119 Speaker 1: may be pursuing. And I know that when we were 343 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:06,760 Speaker 1: talking earlier about artificial intelligence, there is a certain herd 344 00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:10,000 Speaker 1: mentality when it comes to technology. Maybe you can tell 345 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:14,000 Speaker 1: me some of the contrary positions that you're taking kind 346 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,359 Speaker 1: of avoiding. You know, what the mainstream is is trying 347 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 1: to accomplish. 348 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 4: Well, but you look at the playbook that we have 349 00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:27,679 Speaker 4: going into the elections, there is according to the different agendas, 350 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:31,919 Speaker 4: some of the sectors were definitely experiencing tailwinds, and of 351 00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:34,560 Speaker 4: course we have been also riding these. You know, you 352 00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 4: look at the energy sector, you look at financials that 353 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:40,679 Speaker 4: will be benefiting from a more of a deregulatory angle. 354 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 4: So it's not necessarily necessary to go against the market 355 00:18:45,320 --> 00:18:49,040 Speaker 4: when these themes are playing out. Right now, you're looking 356 00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:51,720 Speaker 4: at long term investment themes as well that look also 357 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:54,719 Speaker 4: like short term investment. Seems like the artificial intelligence. I 358 00:18:54,720 --> 00:19:00,199 Speaker 4: think you can also be joined joined in some of 359 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 4: these themes that then become long I think there's health 360 00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:06,359 Speaker 4: tech that is interesting, there's agritech that is interesting that 361 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:10,000 Speaker 4: we keep on highlighting industrials. But the main drivers right now, 362 00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:13,040 Speaker 4: as we've seen and most probably will continue to see, 363 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:19,920 Speaker 4: is writing on the current themes of deregulation benefiting financials, etc. 364 00:19:20,680 --> 00:19:23,080 Speaker 1: We were talking at the beginning of the conversation about 365 00:19:23,119 --> 00:19:27,160 Speaker 1: the inflationary impact of a tariff policy. Do you believe 366 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 1: there's opportunities still in fixed income right now? I hear 367 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:32,480 Speaker 1: a lot of what you're describing more on the equity side, 368 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:34,080 Speaker 1: but I'm wondering whether or not you want to be 369 00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:37,439 Speaker 1: maybe balanced in a way that would allow you to 370 00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: place a bed in the fixed income markets. 371 00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:43,159 Speaker 4: Absolutely, and a balanced portfolio is also shown to be 372 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 4: working better again in signs of stress. So fixed income 373 00:19:46,359 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 4: is a very important part to our portfolios. And as 374 00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:52,800 Speaker 4: I said, we have never been in the camp of 375 00:19:53,480 --> 00:19:56,240 Speaker 4: looking for too many cuts from the FED down, never 376 00:19:56,359 --> 00:19:59,040 Speaker 4: joined the bandwagon when the market was going gung ho 377 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:02,600 Speaker 4: and nine, so we didn't have to completely change our 378 00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 4: views with the new administration coming in. So this higher 379 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 4: for longer relatively or relative attractiveness of US assets it's 380 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:12,760 Speaker 4: been with us before. So you look at it from 381 00:20:12,760 --> 00:20:17,080 Speaker 4: a bond perspective, it still argues to have a large 382 00:20:17,280 --> 00:20:22,120 Speaker 4: fixed income allocations. We still prefer investment grade to express 383 00:20:22,160 --> 00:20:25,880 Speaker 4: that view, just to be on the higher quality side 384 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:29,880 Speaker 4: of the spectrum. And yeah, most probably will also see 385 00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,880 Speaker 4: a lot of this in the short term, given that 386 00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:35,800 Speaker 4: we will see the Fed not being able to react 387 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:41,200 Speaker 4: as swiftly and as pronounced as most probably the market 388 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:42,560 Speaker 4: had been pricing in before. 389 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:44,679 Speaker 1: We'll leave it there. Stephanie, thank you so much for 390 00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:48,159 Speaker 1: joining us. Stephanie holtze Jen, she is the CIO for 391 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:51,439 Speaker 1: the APAC at Deutsche Bank Private Bank, joining from our 392 00:20:51,480 --> 00:20:58,600 Speaker 1: studios in Singapore. Thanks for listening to today's episode of 393 00:20:58,640 --> 00:21:02,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition. Each weekday, we look at stories 394 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:06,399 Speaker 1: shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You 395 00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:09,600 Speaker 1: can find us on Apple, Spotify, and the Bloomberg Podcast 396 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 1: YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. Join us again 397 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:15,919 Speaker 1: tomorrow for insight on market moves from Hong Kong to 398 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:19,600 Speaker 1: Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Prisoner and this is Bloomberg